He'll be out of prison in under 5 years and go right back to do all the things that made him rich at the expense of other people... He's rich and white... and our justice system is baby soft on white collar criminals.
You are incorrect sir. Being against black box voting has been a liberal issue for as long as I can remember, something conservatives seem to support if I recall, and there's a difference between voter fraud and election hacking. I would have though someone as enlightened as yourself could have figured that one out.
Speaking of denying voting/voter fraud ever happened... how do you say that in Russian?
which, is set up on purpose, to reduce morality, and destroy the best fighting force in the world.
(I have thick skin/. types, fire away)
I think you've done it Sherlock! You've uncovered the conspiracy to destroy America with liberalism!!!!! Quick! Someone notify Breitbart and Infowars! (I'm sure you don't waste your time with that liberal Fox News!)
I'm personally glad you're not in the military, as it appears you could be outwitted by a ham sandwich.
I've lived in both Palo Alto and currently Seattle. I've yet to feel a single earthquake in my 10 years here, and Mt Ranier (if it erupted) is more of a threat to the southern suburbs than the city or it's northern suburbs where the tech sector is strongest.
And ^this^ is why American education systems are failing. Kids don't know shit about history, don't know what fascism is, don't know what what liberalism even means. Thank you for proving our point.
...and yet you talk about OTHERS indoctrinating... Why don't you be so kind as to indoctrinate... err... inform us... as to what fascism is and what liberalism means.
The GOP isn't called the party of hypocrites for nothing...
You also should acknowledge that an officer is far more likely to BEGIN the engagement with his gun drawn if the person is an armed black. if the person is white and open carrying, officers more often than not make appropriate inquiries to the situation. A white person in a car telling an officer UP FRONT that he has a firearm on him, then reaching for a wallet when asked to present identification would not be shot, while a black person clearly is.
A bidding war you say.. doesn't a bidding war usually involve more than one bidder? Now I may be mistaken as I haven't followed this very closely, and I am assuming that Amazon is the only player here. So under that assumption, Amazon is basically saying.. "if you try to negotiate, we'll walk"? or in layman's terms... take it or leave it, but that's just common business practice.
Listening to Rush makes me unreliable eh? LOL. Typical...
I said listening to Rush *increases* your bias (which everyone has) making you *less* reliable... if you want to interpret that as flat out unreliable, then those are your words.
Seriously, Rush is a commentator who tells jokes and I know it. I find him amusing for the most part, but not very informative, except to keep me current with what's being discussed.
You think Rush is telling jokes... are you legitimately saying Rush is supposed to be comedy? Jon Stuart was comedy... because people actually laughed at what he said and did. Did he have a liberal slant absolutely... Were the jokes obvious, yep.. Rush is a right wing ranter, nothing more... I've listened to Rush and there isn't a single aspect of his show which someone can consider "comedy".
Listening to Rush and claiming it's comedy is more akin to me saying I watch Maddow, but it doesn't affect me because I just watch her to keep current with what's being discussed. If someone watched Maddow as part of their viewing regimen, what would YOUR take be on that person.
But the hard "news" portion is still generally fair though obviously a bit slanted right.
Realizing that you already have a right wing bias and claiming that Fox is middle leaning right...pretty much validates what I'm saying...
Since you view Fox as "slightly to the right" of objective... and knowing Fox is pretty much a straight up mouthpiece for the right... that places you right about here:
"Ignore those who are NOT journalists when it comes to news (I listen to Rush, but he's NOT a reporter so I don't get my "news" from him)"
..but you're not ignoring Rush are you. You can CLAIM you don't get news from him, but if you're listening to him then that's kind of an oxymoron because you take the information he gives you and that alters the lens through which you interpret the news you consume. (and that's his job) You try to come off as objective when it's blindingly apparent that you are not.
I will agree with you however that, especially in this day and age it's about sources sources sources!!! Listen to one side and listen to the other. Sometimes the people you hate can offer fair points which I will add has affected me to a positive degree and decrease (but not eliminated) my own bias.
I find Fox and MSNBC to be opposite sides of the same coin. Coming from someone with a liberal bias I can easily see where they try to lead their viewers.
I too encourage people to not be lazy and watch testimony and read bills and listen to both sides and above all always follow the money!!!! Because money seems to be the biggest culprit these days to destroying the values we are supposed to hold dear.
Would you prefer a news organization begin with the pledge of allegiance, show some eagles firing lasers out of their eyes and a club mix version of the national anthem?
....and Russia is a FAKE STATE!
...and just how many women would trust a guy saying... "yeah.. I'm totally on the pill"
He'll be out of prison in under 5 years and go right back to do all the things that made him rich at the expense of other people... He's rich and white... and our justice system is baby soft on white collar criminals.
He may have helped to stop it, but it begs the question.. Did he have a hand in spreading it in the first place, or is this an unrelated charge?
human rights by nature is a liberal (the non-political meaning) issue
You are incorrect sir. Being against black box voting has been a liberal issue for as long as I can remember, something conservatives seem to support if I recall, and there's a difference between voter fraud and election hacking. I would have though someone as enlightened as yourself could have figured that one out.
Speaking of denying voting/voter fraud ever happened... how do you say that in Russian?
Where is the Putin/Trump cyber security task force when you need it!?!?!?!
which, is set up on purpose, to reduce morality, and destroy the best fighting force in the world. (I have thick skin /. types, fire away)
I think you've done it Sherlock! You've uncovered the conspiracy to destroy America with liberalism!!!!! Quick! Someone notify Breitbart and Infowars! (I'm sure you don't waste your time with that liberal Fox News!) I'm personally glad you're not in the military, as it appears you could be outwitted by a ham sandwich.
I've lived in both Palo Alto and currently Seattle. I've yet to feel a single earthquake in my 10 years here, and Mt Ranier (if it erupted) is more of a threat to the southern suburbs than the city or it's northern suburbs where the tech sector is strongest.
Looks like an ego cage match brewing.... which seems pretty common on Slashdot!
I'm guessing they will advertise these cars as running in the internet fast lane...
you claim your opinion is fact
hmm.. I can't find "my opinion is fact" anywhere in my posts. Perhaps you could quote me..... or just tell me what I should be thinking.
Well shit! I guess I better read your literature on how I'm brainwashed... and be sure to tell me what to think in the end!
Arguing with the willfully ignorant is a waste of time. So no.
Got it.. i need to be *willfully* indoctrinated... didn't quite catch that nuance at first.
And ^this^ is why American education systems are failing. Kids don't know shit about history, don't know what fascism is, don't know what what liberalism even means. Thank you for proving our point.
...and yet you talk about OTHERS indoctrinating... Why don't you be so kind as to indoctrinate... err... inform us... as to what fascism is and what liberalism means. The GOP isn't called the party of hypocrites for nothing...
May you be the first to off yourself for the greater good of the species...
Ladies and gentlemen, I present the Randian enviromentalist....
I can see you saying that every time Trump successfully takes a shit...
You also should acknowledge that an officer is far more likely to BEGIN the engagement with his gun drawn if the person is an armed black. if the person is white and open carrying, officers more often than not make appropriate inquiries to the situation. A white person in a car telling an officer UP FRONT that he has a firearm on him, then reaching for a wallet when asked to present identification would not be shot, while a black person clearly is.
A bidding war you say.. doesn't a bidding war usually involve more than one bidder? Now I may be mistaken as I haven't followed this very closely, and I am assuming that Amazon is the only player here. So under that assumption, Amazon is basically saying.. "if you try to negotiate, we'll walk"? or in layman's terms... take it or leave it, but that's just common business practice.
"libtard" - anything after that is pretty much invalidated.
Listening to Rush makes me unreliable eh? LOL. Typical...
I said listening to Rush *increases* your bias (which everyone has) making you *less* reliable... if you want to interpret that as flat out unreliable, then those are your words.
Seriously, Rush is a commentator who tells jokes and I know it. I find him amusing for the most part, but not very informative, except to keep me current with what's being discussed.
You think Rush is telling jokes... are you legitimately saying Rush is supposed to be comedy? Jon Stuart was comedy... because people actually laughed at what he said and did. Did he have a liberal slant absolutely... Were the jokes obvious, yep.. Rush is a right wing ranter, nothing more... I've listened to Rush and there isn't a single aspect of his show which someone can consider "comedy".
Listening to Rush and claiming it's comedy is more akin to me saying I watch Maddow, but it doesn't affect me because I just watch her to keep current with what's being discussed. If someone watched Maddow as part of their viewing regimen, what would YOUR take be on that person.
But the hard "news" portion is still generally fair though obviously a bit slanted right.
Realizing that you already have a right wing bias and claiming that Fox is middle leaning right...pretty much validates what I'm saying...
Since you view Fox as "slightly to the right" of objective... and knowing Fox is pretty much a straight up mouthpiece for the right... that places you right about here:
(right wing ideology)___x (you)____________________________ (unbiased objective)_____________________________________(left wing ideology)
That's a double edged sword.. it also means that that US would have to give information to foreign governments stored on US servers.
I mean.. we wouldn't want to be hypocrites now would we?
"Ignore those who are NOT journalists when it comes to news (I listen to Rush, but he's NOT a reporter so I don't get my "news" from him)"
..but you're not ignoring Rush are you. You can CLAIM you don't get news from him, but if you're listening to him then that's kind of an oxymoron because you take the information he gives you and that alters the lens through which you interpret the news you consume. (and that's his job) You try to come off as objective when it's blindingly apparent that you are not.
I will agree with you however that, especially in this day and age it's about sources sources sources!!! Listen to one side and listen to the other. Sometimes the people you hate can offer fair points which I will add has affected me to a positive degree and decrease (but not eliminated) my own bias.
I find Fox and MSNBC to be opposite sides of the same coin. Coming from someone with a liberal bias I can easily see where they try to lead their viewers.
I too encourage people to not be lazy and watch testimony and read bills and listen to both sides and above all always follow the money!!!! Because money seems to be the biggest culprit these days to destroying the values we are supposed to hold dear.
Would you prefer a news organization begin with the pledge of allegiance, show some eagles firing lasers out of their eyes and a club mix version of the national anthem?