Is building their own networks part of Congress' direction for this subsidy? Or is it just to provide aid to presumptively poor tribal people so they can have Internet access?
On the gripping hand, expansive interpretation of deliberately vague congressional authorization is something the supine, cowardly congress relies on, lest they be on the hook for something unsavory or, gasp, failed.
India and Chinese increases dwarf those reductions....
Congratulations.
Yes but they make much of the stuff the west shed making for itself, so we feel better even though they pollute more making the stuff, for us, we used to make for ourselves.
You can (and should) tax local pollution as well. Why should it be free to pollute?
1. Because one of the few true things for democracy to decide is how much pollution of common areas is acceptable as a tradeoff vs. progress.
2. Government, and the politicians riding to power handing things out, are voracious for more money. This additional tax won't reduce deficit spending one iota as said politiicans will treat it as more it can spend, and keep borrowing the same amount.
What he said probably isn't. The OP talks in terms of there being no credible threat nor against specific people or places. That's obviously informed by the current Supreme Court standard.
That doesn't mean the police's ears can't perk up and take a closer look, but it is not prosecutable by itself.
I don't think they can do this without your permission or a warrant. While it is true 3rd parties are under no 4th Amendment obligation, they cannot just be a crypto wrapper for government access.
Let's check page 2711 of the company's contract with you...
Ball-less, supine Congress, which devolves things onto the executive and judicial branches lest they be held accountable, should have done this all along.
This is independent of whether it is a good idea or not.
This. The design is that these frequencies penetrate walls so cell phones are actually useful. While sucking up such for energy is clever, if they have to coat walls and floors with it, so much so it interferes, that would be an issue. And, as regulator of use of fequencies...
Radio makers have to build little rf-opaque rooms to test micro broadcasts, but to prevent the escape of the signal more than block incoming.
Wait until apps that track you and pop up a harassment icon over your head in augmented reality appear, so people with opposing opinions can harass you.
All of this is nice but irrelevant. Congress specifically made rebroadcasting illegal so bars would have to pay to show broadcast TV games.
That's what tripped up the earlier company. It thought it could get around that by literally giving you your own antenna on their site and you paid them to transfer it through the Internet. But the same law requires cable companies to pay to carry it, too. The antenna being "yours" was not enough.
These guys are doing the same thing but are hoping that, by not charging, they can get around the law which may have something about how bars and cable companies get paid and so are showing for money.
Dragon Media's lawyer initially predicted that the lawsuit would backfire on the entertainment industry, but the Dragon Box maker must have decided it had little chance of winning at trial.
"Hmmmm," thought the lawyer. "If we sue, people will get mad at us, and pirate more, leading to a bigger settlement from Dragon Box."
Slashdot Mirror
By contract they are not supposed to run off unauthorized copies (often using inferior materials) on assembly lines the company installs.
While some things can be dangerous, it's also about cheating the system.
Your investment is usually in business, which needs to thrive or there are no jobs.
The US politicians really rage about business being evil while in Europe not so much; they get you on income and sales type taxes.
I just bought an AT&T Electric LTE car! It is 100% gas but is forward-looking.
Why is this downmodded? It has nothing to do with Trump. The Chinese dictatorship is piloting a similar system for the Venezuelan dictatorship.
Is building their own networks part of Congress' direction for this subsidy? Or is it just to provide aid to presumptively poor tribal people so they can have Internet access?
On the gripping hand, expansive interpretation of deliberately vague congressional authorization is something the supine, cowardly congress relies on, lest they be on the hook for something unsavory or, gasp, failed.
There are AI apps coming down the road that will float balloons over your head in augmented reality pooh poohing you for this or that...forever.
Oh no, you posted support for candidate x or issue x, nevermind anonymously.
The conversion of modern politics to religion in the 16th century is almost complete.
Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition! And by the time it appears, it will be too late.
India and Chinese increases dwarf those reductions....
Congratulations.
Yes but they make much of the stuff the west shed making for itself, so we feel better even though they pollute more making the stuff, for us, we used to make for ourselves.
You can (and should) tax local pollution as well. Why should it be free to pollute?
1. Because one of the few true things for democracy to decide is how much pollution of common areas is acceptable as a tradeoff vs. progress.
2. Government, and the politicians riding to power handing things out, are voracious for more money. This additional tax won't reduce deficit spending one iota as said politiicans will treat it as more it can spend, and keep borrowing the same amount.
Aside from that, though...
What he said probably isn't. The OP talks in terms of there being no credible threat nor against specific people or places. That's obviously informed by the current Supreme Court standard.
That doesn't mean the police's ears can't perk up and take a closer look, but it is not prosecutable by itself.
How's the cyber security of nob-capitalist systems? I suppose, with no freedom of speech and no Internet even in some cases, you'll never know.
People complained about capitalism and pollution, but everywhere else was far worse.
I don't think they can do this without your permission or a warrant. While it is true 3rd parties are under no 4th Amendment obligation, they cannot just be a crypto wrapper for government access.
Let's check page 2711 of the company's contract with you...
It also discounts your actual cost is 2 to 3x your salary. $100k is a $50k person for 1 year, keeping costs down.
Ball-less, supine Congress, which devolves things onto the executive and judicial branches lest they be held accountable, should have done this all along.
This is independent of whether it is a good idea or not.
If it continuously charges you will be running topped off most of the time.
But these amounts aren't enough to keep up with ambient battery loss while the phone is off.
What don't I understand here? How is 40uW out of 150uW 30 to 40% efficiency?
If you rounded it to the nearest 10%, 26.666%.
But 30-40 already suggests an error range.
This. The design is that these frequencies penetrate walls so cell phones are actually useful. While sucking up such for energy is clever, if they have to coat walls and floors with it, so much so it interferes, that would be an issue. And, as regulator of use of fequencies...
Radio makers have to build little rf-opaque rooms to test micro broadcasts, but to prevent the escape of the signal more than block incoming.
To correct the situation, tell them you will not be buying their product because they caved on a silly joke.
If it matters.
How dare anyone make fun of that! Grrrrrrr!
Wait until apps that track you and pop up a harassment icon over your head in augmented reality appear, so people with opposing opinions can harass you.
Governments will argue this can be used to detect criminal evidence. We need laws to stop this cold because it will be abused in dictatorships.
What's this nerd subject doing on this serious, political website! >:-(
All of this is nice but irrelevant. Congress specifically made rebroadcasting illegal so bars would have to pay to show broadcast TV games.
That's what tripped up the earlier company. It thought it could get around that by literally giving you your own antenna on their site and you paid them to transfer it through the Internet. But the same law requires cable companies to pay to carry it, too. The antenna being "yours" was not enough.
These guys are doing the same thing but are hoping that, by not charging, they can get around the law which may have something about how bars and cable companies get paid and so are showing for money.
Dragon Media's lawyer initially predicted that the lawsuit would backfire on the entertainment industry, but the Dragon Box maker must have decided it had little chance of winning at trial.
"Hmmmm," thought the lawyer. "If we sue, people will get mad at us, and pirate more, leading to a bigger settlement from Dragon Box."
Who at DB thought this strategy might work?
You cared enough to write back. I stick by what I said. Fake job. Are you a struggling youtuber? Is that your butthurt?
The world's youngest self-earned billionaire did it via social media.
So...yeah.
Ask Slashdot: What Could Go Wrong In Tech That Hasn't Already Gone Wrong?
Sexbots. Sexbots gone wrong. Sexbots out of control rampaging across the countryside having you whenever they want.