That's the theory. If only it had been tested. Oh wait, it has, in France, and it helped keep unemployment there high.
They kept the rule long after its economic claim was proven wrong, because people liked time off. See also forcing reduced work weeks of 37 1-2 or even 35 hour work weeks.
You are a memebaby.
Working longer hours for no pay may suck, but it benefits the economy by increasing productivity in a dollars per unit work completed. That is why more people get hired, the opposite of your theory.
When you are an oppressed society like this, or communist in general, it is in your interest, and the benefit of your family, to work hard to make Dear Leader's country look good on an international stage.
The Eastern Bloc countries and the Soviet Union used to let Olympic athletes keep goodies from the West, like radios and blue jeans. If they brought home gold, especially in premier events like women's figure skating or pairs, that meant massively upgraded family apartments assigned to you, or even a resort dachau, like the higher ups get.
Can you imagine the hellish pressure on such young people?
This was a perverse aping of capitalism, but without any real economcic freedom.
There is a lot more to freedom than freedom of speech, if concern for the general welfare is your shining ideal. Give up on command and control.
"The fish kept moving rapidly around, but the robots, undaunted and with infinite solar energy, kept effortlessly apace, following the fish. Sadly, within 2 days, every so-tracked fish died. Biologists are conducting autopsies, but it looks like exhaustion, cause unknown."
Is my understanding correct, that quantum computing is fast, but isn't the magic oracle to factor numbers? It neither exceeds a Turing machine while remaining finite, nor is infinite in that context?
Exactly. One of the benefits of a cash is anonymous transactions, one of the rights people reserve unto themselves.
Making everything electronic so government can track it is just another sad cog in the panopticon the government is building, a precursor to a 1984-like dictatorship.
Well, not really. I was looking to see what might be causing the government concern. I started at the top of my decision analysis tree with the first node, "Remember: Government just wants your money." If yes, done.
Barbie showed her drawing to Skipper. "Isn't that a pretty Christmas tree light pattern? The arrows show how it'll go!"
"Oooooih! That's pretty! I can't wait to see it!" squealed Skipper!
"Hmmmm," thought Barbie. "Now all I need is one of the boys to program it for me!" (3 pages skipped) "And programming...done! Switch it on! Oh, here, like this [switches it on]", said the boy.
"And our national winner of best Christmas tree programmer is Barbie Mattel!" The president grinned and shook her hand. "What an excellent programmer!"
"The Obama administration says requiring proof that a speaker intended to be threatening would undermine the law's protective purpose."
And Obama is supposedly a "constitutional law professor". Well, yes, Obama, that statement is technically true. And that has what to do with its constitutionality?
Oh, you were talking about its meme value as a political. populist narrative power vector.
Valls said taxation would have to orient citizens towards more ecological choices, notably the 2015 state budget measures to reduce the tax advantage of diesel fuel versus gas.
I'm gonna go out on a limb and guess they will be raising diesel tax slowly and not lowering gas tax at all.
"Google should be broken up," say politicians of the European Parliament, to whom Google has not learned to make "donations", unlike national European governments, or the government of the United States.
"Christ, Almighty!" said Google lawyers. "Doesn't this ever end?"
The difference is Amazon is offering this to me, the end user.
Comcast isn't extorting it from them by slowing them down unless Amazon kicks back a portion of my money to Comcast (which, by the way, is fraud as my contract with Comcast offers me certain speed rates.)
dot dot dot says the ac, typing from a phone or tablet or pc, over probably wireless to powerful internet backbones, all developed with literally trillions in private investment.
I "Canadian government scientists" developed it, then who dropped the ball?
Also, you giant government lovers, why did it take an outbreak to fast track production levels of experimental drug? The FDA, and Canadian equivalent, are the biggest mass murderers of the past century. Deaths due to cumulative tech lag vastly outweigh deaths due to drugs getting to market too fast. The math is trivial.
> I'm not sure medical science understands (well enough) the relationship between carbs/blood sugar/cholesterol and cardiovascular disease.
Unfortunately it seems to be a simple cause and effect assumption, as a first start. High fat, ergo cut back on it.
That niacin-like drug study that forced HDL (the good cholesterol) higher did exactly that -- and had no net benefit in hard outcomes (strokes, heart attacks, deaths.) Oh, thin people had lots of HDL, I guess that's it.
GOOD. When people fear the government, there is tyrrany. When government fears the people, there is freedom.
I would also like to add that, when there is little barrier to tracking the calls of mundane political opponents, or even listening in to their calls, than a check box on a piece of paper saying "You got a warrant, didn't you?", there is nothing to stop a G. Gordon Liddy type from listening in on the other presidential candidate's conversations, and their planners and donors and strategists.
This is the mechanism by which 1984 will happen -- sufficient important stuff done in the virual world that a government, with an easy-to-use virtual world panopticon, will indeed abuse it.
Because slow warming is a small problem, over centuries (when we have no idea what the tech landscape will be in 50 years much less 300.)
But overshooting on cooling could induce an ice age, which geologists have evidence can occur in as little as two years. Then you will kill many billions.
The problem is hyperventillating over GW. It's doubtful anything should be done that slows tech growth. But the opposite could become quickly murderous.
If I were a schill for corporations, as your memeplex no doubt is informing you, I would be gung ho for amelioration geoengineering (some plans are only a few billion, nothing to modern society.). I am not.
Don't blame Aero or the Supreme Court. Blame Congress who created the law.
It is logical someone could create a super-antenna + DVR system to distribute over-the-air content to you that you, by living there, have access to.
Cable companies were gonna do that. Congress stepped in and allowed the over-the-air local broadcasters to force cable to carry, no charge, or require a negotiation for money, broadcast company's choice.
You never know, they could win. Hey, oh my god, they won!
From the judge's ruling: "After careful review of the arguments and facts presented, and according to the relevant statutes, we find in favor of the precious snowflakes."
Slashdot Mirror
It's the one with 76 trombone players.
Oh, wait. That still doesn't narrow it down.
That's the theory. If only it had been tested. Oh wait, it has, in France, and it helped keep unemployment there high.
They kept the rule long after its economic claim was proven wrong, because people liked time off. See also forcing reduced work weeks of 37 1-2 or even 35 hour work weeks.
You are a memebaby.
Working longer hours for no pay may suck, but it benefits the economy by increasing productivity in a dollars per unit work completed. That is why more people get hired, the opposite of your theory.
When you are an oppressed society like this, or communist in general, it is in your interest, and the benefit of your family, to work hard to make Dear Leader's country look good on an international stage.
The Eastern Bloc countries and the Soviet Union used to let Olympic athletes keep goodies from the West, like radios and blue jeans. If they brought home gold, especially in premier events like women's figure skating or pairs, that meant massively upgraded family apartments assigned to you, or even a resort dachau, like the higher ups get.
Can you imagine the hellish pressure on such young people?
This was a perverse aping of capitalism, but without any real economcic freedom.
There is a lot more to freedom than freedom of speech, if concern for the general welfare is your shining ideal. Give up on command and control.
"The fish kept moving rapidly around, but the robots, undaunted and with infinite solar energy, kept effortlessly apace, following the fish. Sadly, within 2 days, every so-tracked fish died. Biologists are conducting autopsies, but it looks like exhaustion, cause unknown."
Keeping people from starving was 80% of the budget ago.
Is my understanding correct, that quantum computing is fast, but isn't the magic oracle to factor numbers? It neither exceeds a Turing machine while remaining finite, nor is infinite in that context?
Exactly. One of the benefits of a cash is anonymous transactions, one of the rights people reserve unto themselves.
Making everything electronic so government can track it is just another sad cog in the panopticon the government is building, a precursor to a 1984-like dictatorship.
Well, not really. I was looking to see what might be causing the government concern. I started at the top of my decision analysis tree with the first node, "Remember: Government just wants your money." If yes, done.
So, done.
Barbie showed her drawing to Skipper. "Isn't that a pretty Christmas tree light pattern? The arrows show how it'll go!"
"Oooooih! That's pretty! I can't wait to see it!" squealed Skipper!
"Hmmmm," thought Barbie. "Now all I need is one of the boys to program it for me!"
(3 pages skipped)
"And programming...done! Switch it on! Oh, here, like this [switches it on]", said the boy.
"And our national winner of best Christmas tree programmer is Barbie Mattel!" The president grinned and shook her hand. "What an excellent programmer!"
"I know!" exclamatederionoed Barbie!
There's very little the SC puts up with nowadays.
And Obama is supposedly a "constitutional law professor". Well, yes, Obama, that statement is technically true. And that has what to do with its constitutionality?
Oh, you were talking about its meme value as a political. populist narrative power vector.
He's talking needing energies that would make Doctor Who's Tardis, powered by an exploding supernova, gasp in disbelief.
I'm all for breakthroughs, but geeze.
Does it actually help people with, say, burning stinging diabetic feet?
I'm gonna go out on a limb and guess they will be raising diesel tax slowly and not lowering gas tax at all.
It's the only turbo that slows something down.
Or maybe they transcribed tai-bo lasers wrong.
> 2. A beach ball droid?
Yes. You can already buy the toy, I'm sure. The toy sales outdo the theater sales 10 to 1, the movies are a loss leader.
The Falcon whipping around like that, land and ship, I haven't felt a presence like that since...
Since 1977.
"Google should be broken up," say politicians of the European Parliament, to whom Google has not learned to make "donations", unlike national European governments, or the government of the United States.
"Christ, Almighty!" said Google lawyers. "Doesn't this ever end?"
The difference is Amazon is offering this to me, the end user.
Comcast isn't extorting it from them by slowing them down unless Amazon kicks back a portion of my money to Comcast (which, by the way, is fraud as my contract with Comcast offers me certain speed rates.)
dot dot dot says the ac, typing from a phone or tablet or pc, over probably wireless to powerful internet backbones, all developed with literally trillions in private investment.
I "Canadian government scientists" developed it, then who dropped the ball?
Also, you giant government lovers, why did it take an outbreak to fast track production levels of experimental drug? The FDA, and Canadian equivalent, are the biggest mass murderers of the past century. Deaths due to cumulative tech lag vastly outweigh deaths due to drugs getting to market too fast. The math is trivial.
We computer people get boners for things that can, at least in the theoretical model anyway, simulate a Turing machine.
We have a two-party system because all the little factions band together to seize the presidency, an enormous prize with veto.
That's the difference. To fix means altering the president's power, which will never happen.
> I'm not sure medical science understands (well enough) the relationship between carbs/blood sugar/cholesterol and cardiovascular disease.
Unfortunately it seems to be a simple cause and effect assumption, as a first start. High fat, ergo cut back on it.
That niacin-like drug study that forced HDL (the good cholesterol) higher did exactly that -- and had no net benefit in hard outcomes (strokes, heart attacks, deaths.) Oh, thin people had lots of HDL, I guess that's it.
GOOD. When people fear the government, there is tyrrany. When government fears the people, there is freedom.
I would also like to add that, when there is little barrier to tracking the calls of mundane political opponents, or even listening in to their calls, than a check box on a piece of paper saying "You got a warrant, didn't you?", there is nothing to stop a G. Gordon Liddy type from listening in on the other presidential candidate's conversations, and their planners and donors and strategists.
This is the mechanism by which 1984 will happen -- sufficient important stuff done in the virual world that a government, with an easy-to-use virtual world panopticon, will indeed abuse it.
All human history teaches this course.
Because slow warming is a small problem, over centuries (when we have no idea what the tech landscape will be in 50 years much less 300.)
But overshooting on cooling could induce an ice age, which geologists have evidence can occur in as little as two years. Then you will kill many billions.
The problem is hyperventillating over GW. It's doubtful anything should be done that slows tech growth. But the opposite could become quickly murderous.
If I were a schill for corporations, as your memeplex no doubt is informing you, I would be gung ho for amelioration geoengineering (some plans are only a few billion, nothing to modern society.). I am not.
DO NOT FORCE GLOBAL COOLING.
Don't blame Aero or the Supreme Court. Blame Congress who created the law.
It is logical someone could create a super-antenna + DVR system to distribute over-the-air content to you that you, by living there, have access to.
Cable companies were gonna do that. Congress stepped in and allowed the over-the-air local broadcasters to force cable to carry, no charge, or require a negotiation for money, broadcast company's choice.
You never know, they could win. Hey, oh my god, they won!
From the judge's ruling: "After careful review of the arguments and facts presented, and according to the relevant statutes, we find in favor of the precious snowflakes."