right, but the original intent has been fatally warped to have the opposite effect. now the guilds just sue everyone who tries to use "their" knowledge. the solution to the problem has been turned around to worsen the original problem
as to private police force protecting private property - that's the only police force that has any moral grounds to exist in the first place.
so if you're poor, the only rights you have is to be abused anyway a plutocrats wants you to be?
this is what freedom means to you?
nevermind that question, not that it seems you want freedom or human rights. the only thing you understand is "i have money, fuck you"
which is the status quo in plenty of poor countries with no functional government, with a few ultrarich who can do anything and a sea of poor who can do nothing
that's the utopia that you want
and you are never going to get
because we're just not as fucking stupid as you
now get back to sucking plutocrat cock, you ignorant sycophant
so you want people to live shorter more painful lives and the system to cost 10-100x more than countries that handle healthcare responsibly
the simple truth is healthcare and healthcare insurance is not voluntary. it's mandatory
because you can spout eloquently all you want about independence and freedom, but you don't understand the subject matter. when you break your arm, you're not shaking it off and going on with your life, you're going to the hospital
and we're not refusing you if you can't pay, because we're not sociopaths
and when you can't pay your bill you're shafting us
being an irresponsible freeloader is the actual real life effect of your uneducated "ideology", not real freedom
you and you fucking ignorant douchebags are nothing but useful fools for plutocrats interests in this country
the sum total of your ignorant beliefs is to put money in the pockets of a few already super rich rent seeking parasites at the expense of the rest of us
you free market fundamentalists are dangerous ignorant toxic pieces of shit
you believe ignorant, uneducated, obviously wrong crap like a creationist or an antivaxxer
and like an antivaxxer spreads disease
and a creationist hurts children's education
the sum total of your stupid low iq shit stained LIES is the damaging of our economy and the middle class
that's the same level of intellect i am dealing with with such an ignorant low iq comment
you can't deny basic fucking reality and still think you get respect. you're a DUMB PERSON, who believes DUMB THINGS
why aren't there hospitals on every street corner? why don't we all build our own gigawatt power plants in our backyards? why don't we all start our own private police forces?
i'm going to build my own bridge over the river!
because natural monopoly is a myth!
there is no such thing as *high cost barrier to entry with low chance of return on investment*!
it's a librul statist myth! just climate change!
free market fairy, peace be unto you. everything you touch works with magic, no fucking actual thought or intelligence or logic or reason required
seriously dealing with you knuckle dragging free market fundamentalist morons is just like dealing with a creationist or ufo cultist. ignorant unsupported faith and belief instead of actual intelligence and education on a topic
this is where you go "HURR DURR MONOPOLIES DON'T EXIST WITHOUT GOVERNMENT *DROOL SNORT*"
with weak government, their powers increase you mindless twat
study you're fucking history
you are stupid and uneducated person. really. that's not a baseless insult. that's objectively true, to believe the ignorant things you do. you're like a creaitonist or an antivaxxer, you're blind ignorant trust in the magic free market fairy to solve all problems, when it clearly does not
we're not your true antipodean doppleganger, that would be hamilton bermuda
but you're the closest thing to that for us
and if when they find Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 it turns out to be directly antipodal to the Statue of Liberty, i'm giving up on reason and becoming a conspiracy theorist
i do not respect you. do you respect antivaxxers? creationists? climate change deniers? 9/11 truthers?
we are talking about low iq, delusional, and mentally deficient people who believe these things. attacking your mental capacity if you believe in things like this, and things like free market fundamentalism, is not an ad hominem attack. it is actually an objective description of your mental capacity, as derived from the demonstrated use of your mental faculties, to arrive at horribly ignorant beliefs
a moron is a person of limited mental faculties. objectively correct. a moron believes in ignorant things easily demonstrated false. objectively correct. therefore, you are indeed, a moron, objectively speaking, not a baseless insult, if you are a free market fundamentalist (or antivaxxer or climate change denier etc.)
that certain politicians and plutocrats "respect you" and give your ignorance air time and exposure is simply these people noting the utility of "useful fools" to advance an agenda which only benefits them, at the expense of the rest of us
free market fundamentalism *does not work*. it is plutocrat propaganda. and since reagan you ignorants lap it up and believe it. because it is a simpleton's idea and you have a simplistic mind. again, not a baseless insult, an objectively correct statement as you have demonstrated by your own statements
Tea Party News Network Readers Are 'Unsophisticated Simpletons,' According to Resignation Letter
Most of the editorial staff of the Tea Party News Network resigned this afternoon following a Daily Beast exposé on the website’s desperate efforts to generate traffic. TPNN began in 2012 to give voice to the conservative grassroots and quickly grew a mass following among tea partiers, even scoring interviews with major figures in GOP. But shady business practices that blurred the line between the company’s non-profit political wing and its for-profit news wing—as well as increased reliance on fight porn—led to nearly the entire staff quitting Thursday. “The audience is regarded as unsophisticated simpletons," read the resignation letter to the site’s owner, Todd Cefaratti. "The activism that built all of the infrastructure is considered ‘a pain in the ass,’ not as an opportunity to save the country. As a group we can no longer tolerate being associated with these despicable practices.”
many news organization will engage in false balance
Other examples of false balance in reporting on science issues include the topics of man-made vs. natural climate change, the relation between Thiomersal and autism[5] and evolution vs. intelligent design.[6] For instance, although the scientific community attributes a component of climate change of the last 50–100 years, particularly global warming, to the effects of the industrial revolution,[7][8][9][10] there are a small number of scientists who dispute this conclusion.[11][12][13] Giving equal voice to scientists on both sides makes it seem like there is a debate within the scientific community, even though there is a scientific consensus.
False balance can sometimes originate from similar motives as sensationalism, where producers and editors may feel that a story portrayed as a contentious debate will be more commercially successful than a more accurate account of the issue. However, unlike most other media biases, false balance may actually stem from an attempt to avoid bias; producers and editors may confuse treating competing views fairly—i.e.,
My only problem is with those that would campaign for privatization when there is good evidence to suggest things will be worse as a consequence just because they are anti-government.
And within that one tiny sentence is encapsulated decades of economically ignorant hot air. Thank you.
There exists a class of loud, toxic morons in the USA that actually believes everything should be privatized, and they are either 1. stupid, they honestly can't see how this makes some services worse (roads, police, broadband, healthcare, etc.), or 2. evil, they do know it will make things worse, but they want to profit unfairly off of our misery as entrenched rent seeking parasites (while talking in dishonesty about "capitalism" when there is no competition and there can be none due to natural barriers to entry).
We conquer the Independence Day aliens by having a Macintosh laptop computer upload a software virus to the mothership (which happens to be one-fifth the mass of the Moon), thus disarming its protective force field. I don’t know about you, but back in 1996 I had trouble just uploading files to other computers within my own department, especially when the operating systems were different. There is only one solution: the entire defense system for the alien mothership must have been powered by the same release of Apple Computer’s system software as the laptop computer that delivered the virus.
yeah an x-y plot of inebriation vs/ addictiveness is a good shorthand way to think of drugs because people will say accurate but misleading things like "nicotine is more addictive than heroin!" (but it doesn't leave you unable to work/ have a relationship)
the one-two punch of being inebriated and addicted is what makes a few drugs radioactive. just inebriating you without addictiveness or addicting you without inebriation is not really a problem. because you can still work and have relationships. inebriating you and addicting you blots out the world, and that is how you lose your job and your loved ones. so that's the "sweet spot" that means a drug should be verboten, that the costs of prohibition are less than the costs of the drugs themselves
alcohol has such a profile that it can only be considered moderately addictive and inebriating. which does, indeed, as you say, make it more dangerous than a casual understanding of drugs makes it. certainly more dangerous than marijuana, lsd (which should require a babysitter though, if made legal), psilocybin, mdma, etc. but not meth, heroin, coke, etc. alcohol is the "gateway" drug in a new meaning here of being on the edge between less harmful and truly life destroying drugs
i think the most important thing is that people who want to talk about drugs in blanket therms: whether for legalizing everything or legalizing nothing besides caffeine, are completely wrong. every single drug is different, and every single drug needs it's own social/ medical/ legal approach. anyone who wants to legalize everything or legalizie nothing is someone who is demonstrating ignorance or ideological extremism
it amazes me to meet people who think they can sound intelligent when talking about drug policy and not even mention addiction
addicts don't just hurt themselves, they become zombies that we have to take care of
this is where you lecture me that all of the problems about drugs has to do with uptight prudes and dumb laws. not at all anything to do with, gee, i dunno, fucking addiction maybe?
or where you lecture me that we should just let people rot away in the street so they alone suffer for the consequences of their actions. because we're all sociopaths
I support the legalization of marijuana (and lsd/ psilocybin, with a MANDATORY babysitter) and insist meth/ heroin/ coke never become legal.
Usually I hear the "drug policy should be the same for all drugs" from the legalize-all-drugs morons.
It's refreshing, I guess, to hear such hamfisted purposeful ignorance from the drug control side.
The simple fact is that drug policy will never be a blanket concept: all drugs are not chemically the same, and so the law for each drug will be different.
The pertinent qualities are inebriation and ease of addictiveness (toxicity, delivery method, potency, fatal dosage threshold, etc.: some other qualities to consider).
If moderately addicting and inebriating, like alcohol: legal. If easily addicting but not inebriating, like nicotine: legal (you can still hold a job/ relationship). If inebriating but not easily addictive, like marijuana: legal (you can use the drug, then choose not to later).
Only when you combine addictiveness and inebriation, like meth, coke, heroin, do you have a problem. Because now your ability to maintain a job/ relationships is impacted: the drug takes over your life. Simply as a function of the chemistry of the drug (not societal attitudes as idiots who think drug policy can be formulated without addressing the obvious fucking topic of addictiveness think).
Even then: healthcare for addicts, not jail, like Portugal.
but what you are really criticizing is the mediocrity of the hiring process
hiring a good team is perhaps the most vital function of a company, and so many get it wrong, in terms of who and what kind of skills they should be looking for
they'll hire the guy who knows the buzzwords of the moment, and ignore the guy who doesn't know the buzzwords, but could learn them in half a day and, most importantly, apply them with the requisite scalability, maintainability, versioning, testing, etc. that means the difference between a world class site and a brittle piece of shit
Like "cloud computing" is a new buzzword for an old concept, that doesn't mean the concept loses value. In fact the old concept is quite reinvigorated, the buzzword is just along for the ride.
People have an aversion to trendy buzzwords for good reason, but it's interesting how this means a little bit of smarmy style can turn your mind off from analyzing the genuine substance here. "Big data" is being used to reinvigorate a powerful tactic. Oh you don't like that buzzword? Well, the tactic is still reinvigorated.
Why have you tuned out just because you don't like a word? It makes you and your analysis shallow. Just ignore the word and move onto the substance.
you can't respond to someone's argument by misunderstanding it
try again and maybe i'll reply to you. first, try to read what i am actually saying, and actually respond to that. rather than making bullshit up in your head that has nothing to do with what i am saying
the point is, terrorism, in the name of vile efforts, is real, and should be opposed, and is a separate concept than genuine reasons for revolution or independence
and no, whoever wins does not decide it's legitimacy, the *concept behind the effort* is what matters
just fighting society is not noble in and of itself, the question is: what exactly are you fucking fighting for?
and if your ideas suck (even if you mean well, your ideas may not be intended with malevolence, you just might be a fucking moron), and actually represent more injustice and suffering, like fundamentalist religion, or racist twattery, or whatever, then yeah: you're a fucking loser terrorist and fuck you
just fucking with society isn't noble. for many reasons it just means you're a pathetic socially retarded douchebag
the greatest enemy to freedom is cynicism like yours
vile evil people can do many things to remove your freedom. but it's quite hilarious that some people, like you, roll over in quivering fear and give it up on your own. because you perceive the enemies of freedom to be so potent. they aren't. they are in your cowardly mind. not reality
Mark Arthur Ciavarella, Jr. (born March 3, 1950) is a convicted felon (Federal Bureau of Prisons Inmate number 15008-067) and former President Judge of the Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas in Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania who was involved, along with fellow judge Michael Conahan, in the "Kids for cash" scandal in 2008.[4]
In August 2011, Ciavarella was sentenced to 28 years in federal prison for his involvement in the Kids for Cash scandal.[5]
if you think justice doesn't prevail, then whose side are you on in the end?
Slashdot Mirror
right, but the original intent has been fatally warped to have the opposite effect. now the guilds just sue everyone who tries to use "their" knowledge. the solution to the problem has been turned around to worsen the original problem
is supposed to be about rewarding innovators
IP law has been corrupted to reward entrenched economic interests
as such, IP law needs to be ignored and/ or actively sabotaged at every available opportunity
IP law is anticompetitive monopolistic nonsense
it is the largest point of corruption where oligarchs have warped the government to enforce their position rather than enforce fairness
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R...
we must do everything we can to make a mockery of IP law
so if you're poor, the only rights you have is to be abused anyway a plutocrats wants you to be?
this is what freedom means to you?
nevermind that question, not that it seems you want freedom or human rights. the only thing you understand is "i have money, fuck you"
which is the status quo in plenty of poor countries with no functional government, with a few ultrarich who can do anything and a sea of poor who can do nothing
that's the utopia that you want
and you are never going to get
because we're just not as fucking stupid as you
now get back to sucking plutocrat cock, you ignorant sycophant
so you want people to live shorter more painful lives and the system to cost 10-100x more than countries that handle healthcare responsibly
the simple truth is healthcare and healthcare insurance is not voluntary. it's mandatory
because you can spout eloquently all you want about independence and freedom, but you don't understand the subject matter. when you break your arm, you're not shaking it off and going on with your life, you're going to the hospital
and we're not refusing you if you can't pay, because we're not sociopaths
and when you can't pay your bill you're shafting us
being an irresponsible freeloader is the actual real life effect of your uneducated "ideology", not real freedom
I DON'T RESPECT YOU
you and you fucking ignorant douchebags are nothing but useful fools for plutocrats interests in this country
the sum total of your ignorant beliefs is to put money in the pockets of a few already super rich rent seeking parasites at the expense of the rest of us
you free market fundamentalists are dangerous ignorant toxic pieces of shit
you believe ignorant, uneducated, obviously wrong crap like a creationist or an antivaxxer
and like an antivaxxer spreads disease
and a creationist hurts children's education
the sum total of your stupid low iq shit stained LIES is the damaging of our economy and the middle class
seriously, just dealing with a creationist
"natural monopoly is a myth!" DROOL SNORT
all i can think of is this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C...
that's the same level of intellect i am dealing with with such an ignorant low iq comment
you can't deny basic fucking reality and still think you get respect. you're a DUMB PERSON, who believes DUMB THINGS
why aren't there hospitals on every street corner? why don't we all build our own gigawatt power plants in our backyards? why don't we all start our own private police forces?
i'm going to build my own bridge over the river!
because natural monopoly is a myth!
there is no such thing as *high cost barrier to entry with low chance of return on investment*!
it's a librul statist myth! just climate change!
free market fairy, peace be unto you. everything you touch works with magic, no fucking actual thought or intelligence or logic or reason required
seriously dealing with you knuckle dragging free market fundamentalist morons is just like dealing with a creationist or ufo cultist. ignorant unsupported faith and belief instead of actual intelligence and education on a topic
because oppression always comes from government and never from anything else
would you mind educating your ignorant shitstained mouth and then speak next time?
here's some intellectual charity you dumb fuck:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M...
this is where you go "HURR DURR MONOPOLIES DON'T EXIST WITHOUT GOVERNMENT *DROOL SNORT*"
with weak government, their powers increase you mindless twat
study you're fucking history
you are stupid and uneducated person. really. that's not a baseless insult. that's objectively true, to believe the ignorant things you do. you're like a creaitonist or an antivaxxer, you're blind ignorant trust in the magic free market fairy to solve all problems, when it clearly does not
you guys need a better PR team
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
seven hundred ten
seven hundred eleven
seven hundred twelve
hello perth australia from new york city
we're not your true antipodean doppleganger, that would be hamilton bermuda
but you're the closest thing to that for us
and if when they find Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 it turns out to be directly antipodal to the Statue of Liberty, i'm giving up on reason and becoming a conspiracy theorist
educate yourself:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/N...
then speak
i do not respect you. do you respect antivaxxers? creationists? climate change deniers? 9/11 truthers?
we are talking about low iq, delusional, and mentally deficient people who believe these things. attacking your mental capacity if you believe in things like this, and things like free market fundamentalism, is not an ad hominem attack. it is actually an objective description of your mental capacity, as derived from the demonstrated use of your mental faculties, to arrive at horribly ignorant beliefs
a moron is a person of limited mental faculties. objectively correct. a moron believes in ignorant things easily demonstrated false. objectively correct. therefore, you are indeed, a moron, objectively speaking, not a baseless insult, if you are a free market fundamentalist (or antivaxxer or climate change denier etc.)
that certain politicians and plutocrats "respect you" and give your ignorance air time and exposure is simply these people noting the utility of "useful fools" to advance an agenda which only benefits them, at the expense of the rest of us
free market fundamentalism *does not work*. it is plutocrat propaganda. and since reagan you ignorants lap it up and believe it. because it is a simpleton's idea and you have a simplistic mind. again, not a baseless insult, an objectively correct statement as you have demonstrated by your own statements
here's some proof from a few hours ago:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/...
many news organization will engage in false balance
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F...
My only problem is with those that would campaign for privatization when there is good evidence to suggest things will be worse as a consequence just because they are anti-government.
And within that one tiny sentence is encapsulated decades of economically ignorant hot air. Thank you.
There exists a class of loud, toxic morons in the USA that actually believes everything should be privatized, and they are either 1. stupid, they honestly can't see how this makes some services worse (roads, police, broadband, healthcare, etc.), or 2. evil, they do know it will make things worse, but they want to profit unfairly off of our misery as entrenched rent seeking parasites (while talking in dishonesty about "capitalism" when there is no competition and there can be none due to natural barriers to entry).
just write a virus on your apple powerbook and upload it to their mothership
problem solved
neil degrasse tyson understands:
http://www.goodreads.com/quote...
We conquer the Independence Day aliens by having a Macintosh laptop computer upload a software virus to the mothership (which happens to be one-fifth the mass of the Moon), thus disarming its protective force field. I don’t know about you, but back in 1996 I had trouble just uploading files to other computers within my own department, especially when the operating systems were different. There is only one solution: the entire defense system for the alien mothership must have been powered by the same release of Apple Computer’s system software as the laptop computer that delivered the virus.
duh! easy as pie
ahh! they already did repurpose the name, thanks for the info
How about Walkman?
And now I'm not joking... that device was as big a cultural shift as the smartphone.
Why not reuse the name? It's their IP.
It shows an introspective, penitent, and confident Sony looking into its past to claim its future.
The ad campaign could feature Blade Runner-esque and William Gibson style "jacking in" and all that great early 1980s cyberpunk culture.
yeah an x-y plot of inebriation vs/ addictiveness is a good shorthand way to think of drugs because people will say accurate but misleading things like "nicotine is more addictive than heroin!" (but it doesn't leave you unable to work/ have a relationship)
the one-two punch of being inebriated and addicted is what makes a few drugs radioactive. just inebriating you without addictiveness or addicting you without inebriation is not really a problem. because you can still work and have relationships. inebriating you and addicting you blots out the world, and that is how you lose your job and your loved ones. so that's the "sweet spot" that means a drug should be verboten, that the costs of prohibition are less than the costs of the drugs themselves
alcohol has such a profile that it can only be considered moderately addictive and inebriating. which does, indeed, as you say, make it more dangerous than a casual understanding of drugs makes it. certainly more dangerous than marijuana, lsd (which should require a babysitter though, if made legal), psilocybin, mdma, etc. but not meth, heroin, coke, etc. alcohol is the "gateway" drug in a new meaning here of being on the edge between less harmful and truly life destroying drugs
i think the most important thing is that people who want to talk about drugs in blanket therms: whether for legalizing everything or legalizing nothing besides caffeine, are completely wrong. every single drug is different, and every single drug needs it's own social/ medical/ legal approach. anyone who wants to legalize everything or legalizie nothing is someone who is demonstrating ignorance or ideological extremism
it amazes me to meet people who think they can sound intelligent when talking about drug policy and not even mention addiction
addicts don't just hurt themselves, they become zombies that we have to take care of
this is where you lecture me that all of the problems about drugs has to do with uptight prudes and dumb laws. not at all anything to do with, gee, i dunno, fucking addiction maybe?
or where you lecture me that we should just let people rot away in the street so they alone suffer for the consequences of their actions. because we're all sociopaths
I support the legalization of marijuana (and lsd/ psilocybin, with a MANDATORY babysitter) and insist meth/ heroin/ coke never become legal.
Usually I hear the "drug policy should be the same for all drugs" from the legalize-all-drugs morons.
It's refreshing, I guess, to hear such hamfisted purposeful ignorance from the drug control side.
The simple fact is that drug policy will never be a blanket concept: all drugs are not chemically the same, and so the law for each drug will be different.
The pertinent qualities are inebriation and ease of addictiveness (toxicity, delivery method, potency, fatal dosage threshold, etc.: some other qualities to consider).
If moderately addicting and inebriating, like alcohol: legal. If easily addicting but not inebriating, like nicotine: legal (you can still hold a job/ relationship). If inebriating but not easily addictive, like marijuana: legal (you can use the drug, then choose not to later).
Only when you combine addictiveness and inebriation, like meth, coke, heroin, do you have a problem. Because now your ability to maintain a job/ relationships is impacted: the drug takes over your life. Simply as a function of the chemistry of the drug (not societal attitudes as idiots who think drug policy can be formulated without addressing the obvious fucking topic of addictiveness think).
Even then: healthcare for addicts, not jail, like Portugal.
but what you are really criticizing is the mediocrity of the hiring process
hiring a good team is perhaps the most vital function of a company, and so many get it wrong, in terms of who and what kind of skills they should be looking for
they'll hire the guy who knows the buzzwords of the moment, and ignore the guy who doesn't know the buzzwords, but could learn them in half a day and, most importantly, apply them with the requisite scalability, maintainability, versioning, testing, etc. that means the difference between a world class site and a brittle piece of shit
how can a SJW silence you?
i don't like SJWs but i also dislike the douchebag blowback against them
all you assholes, SJWs, and people like you so so butthurt by SJWs, poor baby, you can all swallow a shotgun as far as i am concerned
your observation applies to "big data" too
but we can only sell one revelation per post, or the natives get restless
None.
Like "cloud computing" is a new buzzword for an old concept, that doesn't mean the concept loses value. In fact the old concept is quite reinvigorated, the buzzword is just along for the ride.
People have an aversion to trendy buzzwords for good reason, but it's interesting how this means a little bit of smarmy style can turn your mind off from analyzing the genuine substance here. "Big data" is being used to reinvigorate a powerful tactic. Oh you don't like that buzzword? Well, the tactic is still reinvigorated.
Why have you tuned out just because you don't like a word? It makes you and your analysis shallow. Just ignore the word and move onto the substance.
you can't respond to someone's argument by misunderstanding it
try again and maybe i'll reply to you. first, try to read what i am actually saying, and actually respond to that. rather than making bullshit up in your head that has nothing to do with what i am saying
the american revolution wasn't actually a revolution, it was a war of independence
independence movements always existed, and always will
many factors go into whether or not they succeed
the most important factor is the cohesive quality of the idea a group is fighting for
some may go nowhere
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L...
even with interesting backing
http://www.washingtontimes.com...
other movements may ignite convulsive earthquakes of power balances into orgies of death and destruction
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B...
http://www.history.com/topics/...
and there are many such ideas. they range from the noble ideas of the founding fathers, to degenerate violence loving "revolts"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M...
the point is, terrorism, in the name of vile efforts, is real, and should be opposed, and is a separate concept than genuine reasons for revolution or independence
and no, whoever wins does not decide it's legitimacy, the *concept behind the effort* is what matters
just fighting society is not noble in and of itself, the question is: what exactly are you fucking fighting for?
and if your ideas suck (even if you mean well, your ideas may not be intended with malevolence, you just might be a fucking moron), and actually represent more injustice and suffering, like fundamentalist religion, or racist twattery, or whatever, then yeah: you're a fucking loser terrorist and fuck you
just fucking with society isn't noble. for many reasons it just means you're a pathetic socially retarded douchebag
the greatest enemy to freedom is cynicism like yours
vile evil people can do many things to remove your freedom. but it's quite hilarious that some people, like you, roll over in quivering fear and give it up on your own. because you perceive the enemies of freedom to be so potent. they aren't. they are in your cowardly mind. not reality
reality:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M...
if you think justice doesn't prevail, then whose side are you on in the end?