DOE isn't dragging their feet, there is a regulatory agency in charge of the national power grid that rejected the idea as unsubstantiated. Actions like this have to be justified, the DOE order had NO justification for the action.
We're already at 400, getting to 380 would require eliminating all carbon use right now. The reason people concerned about climate change get so freaked out is the goal isn't even to hold it at 400, it's to stop growing at the rate we are, it's to hold the number to somewhere around 450ppm by gently slowing emissions to 1990 levels.
These people freak out because even holding the decrease down is considered to be too much by a large segment of the population even though the ability to do this is well within our capabilities without any impact on our lifestyle. But what it would require is to stop burning things like coal and the coal barrons aren't having that.
There is no such thing as a government granted local monopoly on telecom services. No local government can bar an over-builder from coming into an area regardless of what some illegal language in some other agreement says.
I really wish you people would stop trotting out this as some explanation. There aren't over-builders in your area because telecom services are a natural monopoly. If you local jurisdiction was stupid enough to sign agreement limiting access to the ROW to only those with a franchise agreement than they will get their ass handed to them in court if they ever try to enforce it. I haven't heard of a local government trying to enforce one of these agreements since the courts ruled them illegal many many years ago and I dare you try to find such a situation.
1) Eliminate unions and pensions for drivers/maintenance. These are often quite expensive.
Let ensure everyone working at the transit is an illegal alien who doesn't care about anything. Benefits are for losers, no one in a government job should make more than minimum wage without benefits to ensure all government employees are the absolute bottom of the barrel. We can save even MORE money using prisoners for drivers, I suggest we hire from the sex offenders.
2) Thin the layers of management. Quite a few of these people exist for the purposes of fattening up their own pensions.
Let make sure if an driver is sick they have to call and 800 number to call in sick and there is no one to replace them on the route. Cause management of any kind is highly overrated
Optimize routes to actual use. Day-long routes are still quite common even though most of the time the busses are empty when the commute is not happening.
So your idea is to only provide service during the commute and anyone that needs to use the bus when it's not commute time can just go fuck themselves.
4) Replace the least-used bus routes with subsidized route sharing. Better service for customers, less fuel/pollution.
Lets ensure least used areas now have a subsidy that will entice ride sharing services to game the system and increase costs for their own profit at tax payer expense. Lets just give big piles of cash to Uber and Lyft, I'm sure it won't be abused.
Do you have a subscription service for these ideas of yours? They are so good I'm sure they could win some sort of award.
then searching for that is the same as cops walking the beat looking for the same
It's not the same, the technology greatly changes this and it's ripe for potential abuse, and not just the kind you are choosing to talk about with regard to race. This is the prefect tool to "create" evidence where none exists. And by create I don't mean locate evidence, I mean create.
Technological tools like this are incredibly scary.
5.1 Seconds will beat a lot of vehicles already on the road including "sports" cars. Jaw dropping accelerations of 3 seconds like the Model S P100D can achieve beat even very high end gas sports cars and are simply beyond what almost anyone would want for your average commute. Yea it's cool and all, but that 3 second acceleration just isn't going to be a big feature for most people.
Orrin Hatch, one of the architects of striping both the FTC and FCC of their ability to regulate business is asking the FTC to investigate Google because they are mean to "conservatives".
The irony is palpable with a man who's spent his career defanging governments ability to go after monopolies asking government to investigate when they don't have the authority to do a damn thing and he knows it because he was instrumental in taking those abilities away.
But Hatch is a sycophant who finally proved he didn't have any morals and he proved it when he got down on his knees and serviced Trump. It's a good thing he's retiring because he shat all over his legacy the last 4 years.
I remember when Microsoft's CEO laughed at Chromebooks and asked "Who would want one of those". 2 Years later when they discovered Chromebooks were selling like hot cakes and had replaced Windows in most school computer labs they freaked out. Turns out people did want a simple computer that was secure by default and that scared MS to death. They actually started selling a few laptops heavily subsidized by Microsoft to try to compete.
Although technically you can transfer a homemade firearm you would have to prove your intent. There are people in jail for this because the Jury believed they intended to transfer the firearm they produced. Any legal position where you base your defense around your intent at the time is going to be VERY dangerous path. Maybe your willing to gamble a decade in prison for it, but I'm not. And you transfer that firearm to any person and they commit a crime with it and I can guarantee you will be arrested and more than likely convicted.
A 3D printed gun against tanks, aircraft, machine guns and a state willing to use them against their people is not going to be a win for the 3D printed gun group. They'll criminalize possession of the 3D printer, the ammunition, hell even the gun powder.
The whole stupid idea that a bunch of citizens with guns could stop a national army is stupid propaganda from the NRA. They can't and history is replete with examples even dating back to when the army had the same weapons as the lay person.
Ah the "routinely overturned" trope. 83% of all supreme court decisions overturn the lower or appellate court. The 9th circuit isn't even close to the most overturned.
This makes sense when you consider that the Supreme court generally doesn't take cases where they agree with the court ruling. If they agree with it why would they even hear the case? They get more than 10K applications every session and can hear about 80. That's a LOT of rejections.
If you manufacture a firearm and don't comply with the registration and numbering requirements and other federal laws such that it's a "ghost gun" and then transfer that firearm to any other person including a son you will have broken federal law and the person you transferred it to would have as well for taking it.
There is no debate on this, I suggest you read up because almost every firearm manufacturing website mentions this.
Not likely outside apple. Most other manufacturers will keep at least one A port because they aren't stupid enough to assume everyone has a wireless mouse and all mouse transmitters are USB-A. They might have a single Halo product that mimics Apple but the majority will include A ports.
You make the assumption that all psychotics are incapable of basic tasks. You're not correct, psychotics can be found running better than half the nations businesses or more. Being psychotic doesn't make you incapable of doing other things, it just means you are incapable of caring about anyone other than yourself. He's a textbook psychopath, his wife's divorce degree reads like the textbook marriage psychopaths generally have.
You just defined political speech as political speech. Good job on your non-definition.
Define political speech. What is it? Is the restriction content based? That's illegal under the 1st amendment BTW. So go ahead, define what political speech is. A meaning that has legal significance is the requirement, not some circular definition where you assume everyone knows what you mean.
We're in the peak of the economy right now. We'll be sliding into recession later this fall after the summer activities stop and people start paying attention to the earning announcements in October.
I predicted this for last year because I didn't think he'd hold off on his economy destroying trade proposals for a year and half. But make no mistake, trade wars are bad and they will turn the economy no matter how much he tries to soften the blow (he hasn't). On top of that the Trillion dollar tax cut he gave the 1% is going to trickle down to Trillion dollar deficits by the end of the year and the Republicans are going to start talking about slashing Social Security and Medicare to compensate. Basically giving the Rich your Social Security and Medicare money.
It's no wonder analysis of the last 40 years shows democrat presidents bring roaring economies and Republican presidents promptly stomp that economy into the dust bin. What Trump is bringing has a very good chance of being just as bad as the recession Bush Jr bought us.
What you actually mean is political speech, but I'd like to see you define political speech in way that would actually be constitutional and capable of being enforced. Good luck.
The funny part is he talks about offering opinions in "opposition to group think". This is usually code for "I said some hateful and racist or sexist shit".
Twitter and the other social media platforms have no requirement to provide the soapbox for you to spew hatred. Go do it in your town square where you can properly experience the consequences of your speech. Either that or setup and run your own website/social media platform. I'm sure it will be popular.
It might be part of YOUR net neutrality rules but it wasn't part of the rules that the FCC implemented with the Title II designation. The rules the FCC implemented included a blanket exception for wireless traffic.
Slashdot Mirror
Nuclear is viable only if you disregard cost as any kind of factor.
DOE isn't dragging their feet, there is a regulatory agency in charge of the national power grid that rejected the idea as unsubstantiated. Actions like this have to be justified, the DOE order had NO justification for the action.
We're already at 400, getting to 380 would require eliminating all carbon use right now. The reason people concerned about climate change get so freaked out is the goal isn't even to hold it at 400, it's to stop growing at the rate we are, it's to hold the number to somewhere around 450ppm by gently slowing emissions to 1990 levels.
These people freak out because even holding the decrease down is considered to be too much by a large segment of the population even though the ability to do this is well within our capabilities without any impact on our lifestyle. But what it would require is to stop burning things like coal and the coal barrons aren't having that.
There is no such thing as a government granted local monopoly on telecom services. No local government can bar an over-builder from coming into an area regardless of what some illegal language in some other agreement says.
I really wish you people would stop trotting out this as some explanation. There aren't over-builders in your area because telecom services are a natural monopoly. If you local jurisdiction was stupid enough to sign agreement limiting access to the ROW to only those with a franchise agreement than they will get their ass handed to them in court if they ever try to enforce it. I haven't heard of a local government trying to enforce one of these agreements since the courts ruled them illegal many many years ago and I dare you try to find such a situation.
Let ensure everyone working at the transit is an illegal alien who doesn't care about anything. Benefits are for losers, no one in a government job should make more than minimum wage without benefits to ensure all government employees are the absolute bottom of the barrel. We can save even MORE money using prisoners for drivers, I suggest we hire from the sex offenders.
Let make sure if an driver is sick they have to call and 800 number to call in sick and there is no one to replace them on the route. Cause management of any kind is highly overrated
So your idea is to only provide service during the commute and anyone that needs to use the bus when it's not commute time can just go fuck themselves.
Lets ensure least used areas now have a subsidy that will entice ride sharing services to game the system and increase costs for their own profit at tax payer expense. Lets just give big piles of cash to Uber and Lyft, I'm sure it won't be abused.
Do you have a subscription service for these ideas of yours? They are so good I'm sure they could win some sort of award.
It's not the same, the technology greatly changes this and it's ripe for potential abuse, and not just the kind you are choosing to talk about with regard to race. This is the prefect tool to "create" evidence where none exists. And by create I don't mean locate evidence, I mean create.
Technological tools like this are incredibly scary.
Only requires 2 lasers, highly radioactive turned into a gas and energized into a highly excited state.
I see no problems with any of those things in a commercial device.
5.1 Seconds will beat a lot of vehicles already on the road including "sports" cars. Jaw dropping accelerations of 3 seconds like the Model S P100D can achieve beat even very high end gas sports cars and are simply beyond what almost anyone would want for your average commute. Yea it's cool and all, but that 3 second acceleration just isn't going to be a big feature for most people.
Orrin Hatch, one of the architects of striping both the FTC and FCC of their ability to regulate business is asking the FTC to investigate Google because they are mean to "conservatives".
The irony is palpable with a man who's spent his career defanging governments ability to go after monopolies asking government to investigate when they don't have the authority to do a damn thing and he knows it because he was instrumental in taking those abilities away.
But Hatch is a sycophant who finally proved he didn't have any morals and he proved it when he got down on his knees and serviced Trump. It's a good thing he's retiring because he shat all over his legacy the last 4 years.
I remember when Microsoft's CEO laughed at Chromebooks and asked "Who would want one of those". 2 Years later when they discovered Chromebooks were selling like hot cakes and had replaced Windows in most school computer labs they freaked out. Turns out people did want a simple computer that was secure by default and that scared MS to death. They actually started selling a few laptops heavily subsidized by Microsoft to try to compete.
All the regulations apply the moment you transfer said gun to any other person.
Are you really so stupid you can't google this?
http://www.gunsholstersandgear... (not a legal source, a home gun maker site)
https://www.atf.gov/resource-c... (look at answer 11 and 10)
Although technically you can transfer a homemade firearm you would have to prove your intent. There are people in jail for this because the Jury believed they intended to transfer the firearm they produced. Any legal position where you base your defense around your intent at the time is going to be VERY dangerous path. Maybe your willing to gamble a decade in prison for it, but I'm not. And you transfer that firearm to any person and they commit a crime with it and I can guarantee you will be arrested and more than likely convicted.
A 3D printed gun against tanks, aircraft, machine guns and a state willing to use them against their people is not going to be a win for the 3D printed gun group. They'll criminalize possession of the 3D printer, the ammunition, hell even the gun powder.
The whole stupid idea that a bunch of citizens with guns could stop a national army is stupid propaganda from the NRA. They can't and history is replete with examples even dating back to when the army had the same weapons as the lay person.
Ah the "routinely overturned" trope. 83% of all supreme court decisions overturn the lower or appellate court. The 9th circuit isn't even close to the most overturned.
This makes sense when you consider that the Supreme court generally doesn't take cases where they agree with the court ruling. If they agree with it why would they even hear the case? They get more than 10K applications every session and can hear about 80. That's a LOT of rejections.
If you manufacture a firearm and don't comply with the registration and numbering requirements and other federal laws such that it's a "ghost gun" and then transfer that firearm to any other person including a son you will have broken federal law and the person you transferred it to would have as well for taking it.
There is no debate on this, I suggest you read up because almost every firearm manufacturing website mentions this.
Giving it to your son would constitute transfer and would make both you and your son criminals.
Not likely outside apple. Most other manufacturers will keep at least one A port because they aren't stupid enough to assume everyone has a wireless mouse and all mouse transmitters are USB-A. They might have a single Halo product that mimics Apple but the majority will include A ports.
Uh, no.
You make the assumption that all psychotics are incapable of basic tasks. You're not correct, psychotics can be found running better than half the nations businesses or more. Being psychotic doesn't make you incapable of doing other things, it just means you are incapable of caring about anyone other than yourself. He's a textbook psychopath, his wife's divorce degree reads like the textbook marriage psychopaths generally have.
You just defined political speech as political speech. Good job on your non-definition.
Define political speech. What is it? Is the restriction content based? That's illegal under the 1st amendment BTW. So go ahead, define what political speech is. A meaning that has legal significance is the requirement, not some circular definition where you assume everyone knows what you mean.
He claimed what he does is an act. His wife says he's in fact really like that. I'm inclined to believe the wife.
We're in the peak of the economy right now. We'll be sliding into recession later this fall after the summer activities stop and people start paying attention to the earning announcements in October.
I predicted this for last year because I didn't think he'd hold off on his economy destroying trade proposals for a year and half. But make no mistake, trade wars are bad and they will turn the economy no matter how much he tries to soften the blow (he hasn't). On top of that the Trillion dollar tax cut he gave the 1% is going to trickle down to Trillion dollar deficits by the end of the year and the Republicans are going to start talking about slashing Social Security and Medicare to compensate. Basically giving the Rich your Social Security and Medicare money.
It's no wonder analysis of the last 40 years shows democrat presidents bring roaring economies and Republican presidents promptly stomp that economy into the dust bin. What Trump is bringing has a very good chance of being just as bad as the recession Bush Jr bought us.
What you actually mean is political speech, but I'd like to see you define political speech in way that would actually be constitutional and capable of being enforced. Good luck.
The funny part is he talks about offering opinions in "opposition to group think". This is usually code for "I said some hateful and racist or sexist shit".
Twitter and the other social media platforms have no requirement to provide the soapbox for you to spew hatred. Go do it in your town square where you can properly experience the consequences of your speech. Either that or setup and run your own website/social media platform. I'm sure it will be popular.
As long as the searcher is part of Customs and/or Immigration. This doesn't apply to your local law enforcement.
It might be part of YOUR net neutrality rules but it wasn't part of the rules that the FCC implemented with the Title II designation. The rules the FCC implemented included a blanket exception for wireless traffic.