Slashdot Mirror


User: sysrammer

sysrammer's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
2,203
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 2,203

  1. Re:I've Had Just About Enough of You Two on The Secret Government Rulebook For Labeling You a Terrorist · · Score: 1

    Good pic.

  2. Re:Terrorist is an impossible label on The Secret Government Rulebook For Labeling You a Terrorist · · Score: 1

    I know USAF makes practice bombing runs on American cities. It has done so at least since the 50's. I imagine they did it earlier, too. It's called "training".

  3. Re:Finally! on World Health Organization Calls For Decriminalization of Drug Use · · Score: 1

    Sounds like a good idea. I've been wondering how we're going to get out of the for-profit prison business. I'm sure this would lead to its own problems, but, hey, that's what humans do. Fix a problem, create a problem.

  4. Re:Paper tracked barter on New Digital Currency Bases Value On Reputation · · Score: 1

    16 tons, what do you get?
    Another day older and deeper in debt.
    St. Peter don't you call me 'cause I can't go,
    I owe my soul to the company store!

    TEFord

  5. Re:Alternate use for this technology on DARPA Successfully Demonstrates Self-Guiding Bullets · · Score: 1

    And that one F14 would shoot down each and every one of them.

  6. Re:Thanks for the tip! on $500k "Energy-Harvesting" Kickstarter Scam Unfolding Right Now · · Score: 1

    Ah, a crystal set, then? I remember those. I was mildly amazed when I learned that you could have a "self-powered" radio.

  7. Re:Get rid of NASA on Getting the Most Out of the Space Station (Before It's Too Late) · · Score: 1

    USAF had decent flying shapes in the 50's. None could handle re-entry temps. Spam-in-a-can could. And it supported defense research (ICBMs).

    On the other hand, we had the USAF Man in Space Soonest program. The acronym proved prophetic, as we missed getting into space first.

  8. Re:The shuttle's failings were largely on Getting the Most Out of the Space Station (Before It's Too Late) · · Score: 1

    I largely agree with you. A caveat, though, is the fact that shuttle *needed* USAF funding to get off the ground. Whether or not it was a good thing that it got off the ground is a topic for another thread.

  9. Re:But I was hoping for Ginger! on Small Genetic Change Responsible For Blond Hair · · Score: 1

    Mary Ann!

  10. Re:Yes, reach the poor people! on Google To Spend $1 Billion On Fleet of Satellites · · Score: 1

    Good one.

  11. Re:Speculation on The Sudden Policy Change In Truecrypt Explained · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It must be sad living in a world of such heightened paranoia.

    ...sez the AC.

  12. Re:Monolith! on The Shrinking Giant Red Spot of Jupiter · · Score: 1

    ybmti

  13. Re:Yo Dawg! on HP Joins OpenDaylight Project · · Score: 1

    It's software, all the way down.

  14. Re:I DON'T CARE! on Malaysia Airlines Flight 370: Experts Unable To Replicate Inmarsat Analysis · · Score: 1

    Good answer. It's typically not a good idea to eat next years seed crop.

  15. "I apologize."

    Sorry, this is the internet. We can't have that, now, can we?

  16. Re:This is why the public stopped giving a fuck... on The Strange Death of Comet Ison · · Score: 1

    Leonids. November 2001. Never to be forgotten.

  17. Re:This is why the public stopped giving a fuck... on The Strange Death of Comet Ison · · Score: 2

    Oh lord, you realize you just started another conspiracy theory, right? I should start an email chain tonight, attributing this to some vague authority. I wonder how long it would take to propagate.

  18. Re:What is the halfway divide? on How To Find Nearby Dark Skies, No Matter Where You Are · · Score: 1

    Mississippi River watershed.

  19. Re:"Three years ago today" on The Guy Who Unknowingly 'Live-Blogged' the Bin Laden Raid · · Score: 1

    "This is the question no apologist can ever answer". The answers are all over these threads here. Read and learn, citizen.

  20. Re:"Three years ago today" on The Guy Who Unknowingly 'Live-Blogged' the Bin Laden Raid · · Score: 1

    Ok, I get it. You really don't like Pax Americana. Well, like all things, this too shall pass. You will rejoice in it, perhaps, if you're one of the lucky ones to live through it.

    After the war, we helped rebuild both antagonists of WWII. Today they are strong democracies and allies. We have our differences, but can work through them.

    Bewail the evilness of America all you want, but there's not much historical evidence of this kind of thing ever happening before.

  21. Re:Pretty Interesting on The Guy Who Unknowingly 'Live-Blogged' the Bin Laden Raid · · Score: 1

    Excellent idea. Good posting. Serves as a fine example of what intelligent intercourse is all about.

  22. Re:Pretty Interesting on The Guy Who Unknowingly 'Live-Blogged' the Bin Laden Raid · · Score: 1

    Hmm, that's kind of a neat story actually. Not sure what's with all the negative comments.

    Between the wingnuts on the right who will whine about anything BHO does, the wingnuts on the left who will whine that BHO isn't all love and unicorns, Russian trolls who have allowed cold war thinking to be revived, and Muslim trolls who are just pissed, yeah, there's going to be a lot of negatives. Oh, and let's not forget the Slashdot Hipsters who're "too cool to fool".

  23. Re:Slow News Day at Slashdot on The Guy Who Unknowingly 'Live-Blogged' the Bin Laden Raid · · Score: 1

    As old as mankind, child. There, there, back to sleep now.

  24. Re:Obama is Osama! on The Guy Who Unknowingly 'Live-Blogged' the Bin Laden Raid · · Score: 1

    Tonight on Fox! Osama bin Talkin'!

  25. Re:"Three years ago today" on The Guy Who Unknowingly 'Live-Blogged' the Bin Laden Raid · · Score: 1

    Excellent posting, gman. Thanks. Another factoid that escapes the revisionists is the fact that, previously to the a-bombs, we were fire-bombing cities. Tokyo lost over 100,000 people in a previous raid. It took 100's of bombers and 1000's of men, with very little loss on our side because we had air superiority. (ref. wikipedia; "The Operation Meetinghouse air raid of 9–10 March 1945 was later estimated to be the single most destructive bombing raid in history.[2]")

    The Japanese, with their warrior culture still in control of their living god, took these blows as any good warrior would.

    When the idea finally sunk in, after the second a-bomb, that maybe we could, instead of sending a hundred bombers to bomb one city in one night, send one bomber each to a hundred cities in one night and utterly destroy them, well, the smart ones were finally able to overcome the warriors.