Slashdot Mirror


User: buck_wild

buck_wild's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
1,139
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 1,139

  1. Re:Sound fine, but... on Hard Drives Instead of Tapes? · · Score: 1

    We use a service called IronMountain (formerly Arcus) to send our DR tapes offsite. They're essentially foam-padded metal containers. I'm sure they would also have containers for hard drives, though you'd have to supply your own static free stuff. The benefit of metal containers is the added fire and shock resistance.

  2. Re:Sound fine, but... on Hard Drives Instead of Tapes? · · Score: 1

    Nah. We're not talking about image quality here.

    A better comparison would be comparing a hard drive with a zip drive. If you restore from either, you still get the same data back.

  3. Re:Sound fine, but... on Hard Drives Instead of Tapes? · · Score: 1

    "Why do people in industries with strict uptime or reliability requirements always act holier-than-thou about the whole issue, as if their way is the only right way?"

    Because we have the experience and requisite expertise to know what we're talking about. We've tried all the other ways, in order to save costs, and found that our way is the best way...for us. I'm not saying that it's MY way or NO way, but I CAN tell you what works in my environment. Because it's my ass if I don't meet those Six Sigma numbers.

  4. Re:Sound fine, but... on Hard Drives Instead of Tapes? · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't that cost more than writing to tape? I mean, depending on how much data you're backing up, that's a hell of a lot of technology (and points of failure) to use to get rid of tape.

  5. Re:Compliance on Hard Drives Instead of Tapes? · · Score: 1

    The tapes we use are $54 a piece, and hold up to 100BG of data. IBM 3494 tape library, 3590 tapes.

  6. Re:Far more practical on Hard Drives Instead of Tapes? · · Score: 1

    You would still need to back up to another medium then, if you want that level of data recovery options.

  7. Re:Far more practical on Hard Drives Instead of Tapes? · · Score: 1

    One problem would come with government contracts. They require that backup data be stored a minimum of (if I recall correctly) 35 miles away.

    I hate using cron for important stuff, by the way. There's just no safe way to make SURE something happens. I've just been burned too many times...

  8. Re:Far more practical on Hard Drives Instead of Tapes? · · Score: 1

    So where (or what) do you back it up to now?

    My company is looking to cut down on Disastor Recovery costs by using IBM Sharks, with Flashcopy, coupled together in a dual-datacenter approach. The software used to couple them together (they'd reside miles apart) is VERY expensive, though, and perhaps not worth the added cost.

  9. Re:Far more practical on Hard Drives Instead of Tapes? · · Score: 1

    We also use Netbackup. Once we worked out all of the bugs, it works like a champ. We coupled ours with an IBM 3494 tape library.

  10. Re:Far more practical on Hard Drives Instead of Tapes? · · Score: 1

    You can, but that's not the point.

    With another hard drive comes another computer, and another network connection, possibly another switch (to avoid bandwidth issues), etc. Why would you want to introduce all the extra points of failure?

  11. Re:Far more practical on Hard Drives Instead of Tapes? · · Score: 1

    So you've basically introduced another potential layer of failure?

    I think you'd be better off setting up a private network (to relieve potential bandwidth issues) and backup straight to tape.

  12. Re:Eddy Marin on Spammers Sue Anti-Spam Groups · · Score: 1

    So post the correct information already.

  13. Re:Spamhaus slashdotted already on Spammers Sue Anti-Spam Groups · · Score: 1

    I'm sure you'll be notified if you sign up at www.emarketersamerica.org. :)

  14. Re:Jerks on Spammers Sue Anti-Spam Groups · · Score: 1

    Nah, I prefer those black and yellow cans that just say 'BEER' on them.

    *shudder*

    Ok, maybe not.

  15. Re:I can see it now... on 3G phones: Send Anywhere, But Not Anything · · Score: 1

    Yeah, but then it didn't ever come from Bob, and she just looks like a petty liar.

  16. Re:Only in a perfect world... on 3G phones: Send Anywhere, But Not Anything · · Score: 1

    I disagree, but only at work. If a VP sends something to his direct reports, who then forwards it to their managers (adding their own spin to enhance the message a tailor it to their staffs) and eventually it gets to me. And then I forward it on to the people actually involved with the project. If I just make my own message, it loses the sense that one of the 'gorillas from the mist' has spoken about their project.

  17. Re:phone features on 3G phones: Send Anywhere, But Not Anything · · Score: 1

    If I'm using minutes in my plan and I don't go over, then I'm never 'saving' money by spending a dime to send a text message.

  18. Re:Actually... on 3G phones: Send Anywhere, But Not Anything · · Score: 1

    Mod parent up "Funny", please

  19. Re:Her famous "Sex in Games" article on Genderplay in Videogames · · Score: 2, Funny

    "it might get you a bit how under the collar"

    Try typing with BOTH hands.

  20. Re:Guys in games. on Genderplay in Videogames · · Score: 2, Informative

    You've obviously never played 'LeisureSuit Larry' then.

  21. Re:Treo? on Nokia 3650 Released in US Market · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    "...even my boyfriend, who has one of those LG phones that you get for free with Verizon, gets jealous of me surfing around the Internet, playing games, and chatting when we're waiting in line for something."

    Shouldn't you be paying attention to each other, instead of 'chatting', etc.? I mean, talk about a breakup waiting to happen.

  22. Re:Overseas spammers? on AOL Sues Five Spam Companies · · Score: 1

    As long as you believe that, I have a bridge to sell you.

  23. Re:Ugh. on Games Workshop Tries to Crack Down on Internet Sales · · Score: 1

    Having been in sales, I can assure you that commissioned sales people can earn a very good living, provided they know what the hell they're talking about.

    I got out of sales because the market was dropping, and I needed a job with 'steady earnings' in order to buy a house. I still part-time it on the side when I can, and can sometimes double my paycheck by working only weekends.

    And no, I'm not talking about telemarketing, outside sales, or any other nefarious profession.

  24. Re:I've actually been looking at another option on Linux Media Jukebox on the Cheap · · Score: 1

    Tried this...and it interferred with my portable phones. Had to send it back.

  25. Re:Great!! on AOL Sues Five Spam Companies · · Score: 1

    Nice. So now they think that you're spamming them. Maybe they'll get you in the next round of lawsuits.