Slashdot Mirror


Nokia 3650 Released in US Market

A Swing Dancing Dork writes "Check out the new Nokia 3650! Video and still imaging, MMS support,Bluetooth,Triband, and polyphonic bliss all wraped up in a uber-modern package." I was looking phones all morning so I'm glad this showed up. Anyone have advice on cel phones? I'd like IMAP, HTTP, and IM, as well as PDA functionality that can sync via bluetooth to a Mac. I was looking at the Sony Ericsons, but this may work as well.

341 comments

  1. T-Mobile's Sidekick by ChaoticChaos · · Score: 4, Informative

    Two words - T-Mobile's Sidekick. Color units are coming in a month or two. Has SMS, full HTML web browsing (not WAP!), POP3 email, AIM messaging, scheduler, notes, games, hidden keyboard! GSM/GPRS device. Uber c00l!

    All of your data is fully backed up to Danger's servers so there is never a chance of losing anything. Unbeatable deal for less than $100 with unlimited data for $39.95 a month.

    No IMAP or syncing via Bluetooth though.

    1. Re:T-Mobile's Sidekick by unicron · · Score: 2, Funny

      And is it still a cell phone, too?

      --
      Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
    2. Re:T-Mobile's Sidekick by ChaoticChaos · · Score: 1

      Yes! Great cell phone.

    3. Re:T-Mobile's Sidekick by deadsaijinx* · · Score: 1

      i like using my phone to make calls. Oh, and the occasional game of snake. Guess I'm not much of an uber-geek.

      --
      YOU SUCK BALLS!
    4. Re:T-Mobile's Sidekick by chrisseaton · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why do you wacky American's call it a "cell" phone? What is "cellular" about it? I (British) call it a "mobile" phone - because sic.

    5. Re:T-Mobile's Sidekick by Fofer · · Score: 3, Informative

      *Barely* a cell phone. Holding the thing to your ear feels weird, so the earbud is a necessity. Not to mention the voice plan prices suck. It's meant to be a data device, not a cell phone - and if it *is* a cell phone, then that's how they make their money back... by raping you on the voice usage.

    6. Re:T-Mobile's Sidekick by isaac · · Score: 4, Informative
      Why do you wacky American's call it a "cell" phone? What is "cellular" about it?

      The radio network. The phone associates with the tower in a given cell, then gets handed off to another cell when the phone moves to it. This is as opposed to older radiotelephone technology that didn't have automatic hand-offs.

      -Isaac

      --
      I am not a lawyer, and this is not legal advice. For Entertainment Purposes Only.
    7. Re:T-Mobile's Sidekick by SuperCal · · Score: 1

      Unbeatable deal for less than $100 with unlimited data I get unlimited internet with a $10 a month add on fee with my voice plan from sprint. Fair warning though, I understand that sprint's service reps are pains to work with, luckily I havn't had to find out.

      --
      Business News and Resources: www.usasource.net
    8. Re:T-Mobile's Sidekick by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 2, Informative

      Why do you wacky American's call it a "cell" phone?

      Because each of the cellular phone towers only cover a smallish region, otherwise known as a "cell"?

      We call them mobile phones also, but "cell" is still used by some people...

      --
      "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
    9. Re:T-Mobile's Sidekick by cpeterso · · Score: 2, Insightful


      The cell is not in the phone. The cell is the radio "cells" of the phone network towers.

    10. Re:T-Mobile's Sidekick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sorry the "Unbeatable deal for less than $100 with unlimited data " part lost its quotes between preview and submit... I'm sure they were there before... anyway I blame slashcode... because I couldn't possibly have made a mistake. :)

    11. Re:T-Mobile's Sidekick by PhillC · · Score: 4, Funny

      And Germans call them "Handys" because, well they are......

      --
      Brought to you by the author of such childrens' classics as "Some Kittens can Fly!" and "All Dogs go to Hell."
    12. Re:T-Mobile's Sidekick by steelerguy · · Score: 3, Funny

      Why do you wacky Brits call a line a queue? Why do you call the hood of a car a bonnet? Are you are fruity? :)

    13. Re:T-Mobile's Sidekick by ChaoticChaos · · Score: 1

      I have no problems using the Sidekick as a Cell phone. I'm not sure why you did.

      The $59.95 cell plan is unlimited data, 500 anytime cell minutes, unlimited nights and weekends. Unlimited. T-Mobile's network doesn't have long distance either. You can call anywhere in the USA and hang on all weekend long without ringing up one charge.

      This sux?

    14. Re:T-Mobile's Sidekick by steelerguy · · Score: 5, Informative

      So here is my quick review of it.

      It can be annoying as hell to talk on until you get used to it. Most phones have a natural sweet spot that just feels right when you hold it to you head. The screen of the Sidekick gets pressed on your check while the ear piece is not so close to your ear. Once you get used to it is not a big deal. Also, pressing that phone up to your greasy ass cheek gets smudges on it.

      Not a great PDA but if you use your PDA for what a lot of people do, as an address book and appointment book, it will do just fine.

      The ring tones are gay. People will all look when it rings to see who the ass is. Then they think you are crazy when you press a 'Gameboy' to you head and start talking. Once they see you get off the phone, flip the screen, and start browsing the web or checking email they think it is the most kick ass thing they have seen.

      It is better than any phone at browing the web. You actually get decent pictues and number of lines per page. Some site are designed kind of weird though and you have to scroll. Also not so good for site that use a lot of cookies to store data, but then no phones are good at that.

      Games are lame, but sometimes you get desperate.

      Email is great. If you get a web based account with pop access you are pretty much set for home and while on the road.

      Wish they have more than just AIM but it works pretty good. Just have to convince your friends they need AIM accounts and to stay logged into them.

      Some people have said it feels cheap. Well compared to the Motorola Pagewriter is does a little bit. But I had a lot more problems with the Pagewriter and it was not a phone nor did it have games. It does not feel any cheaper than most lightweight mobile phones.

      The design is great. The flip screen that hides the keyboard when not in use works perfectly. The only bad part is if you have to dial a number not in your address book you have to flip the screen, dial, then flip back..well I suppose you could leave the screen out but that would just be weird.

      It lacks good syncing. Kind of scary, if you store a lot on it, but I hear they are working on it. I would also wait for color if it is going ot be out soon, although their greyscale is pretty damn good.

    15. Re:T-Mobile's Sidekick by gilesjuk · · Score: 2, Informative

      Queue is a clearer term than line IMHO, operating systems use that term eg. print queue. If you asked someone where their job was in the print line they might get confused :)

    16. Re:T-Mobile's Sidekick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      When the first maps of "mobil communications were laid out and sold to the highest bidder buy a law firm in Washington DC on behalf of the Federal Cmmunications Commission, (FCC) the territories were outlined on a national map and because it looked like a giant honycomb the indiviual sites were called cells.

    17. Re:T-Mobile's Sidekick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Watch out for the plan here. The unlimited data (plus a relatively meager bucket of phone minutes) plan for $40 is only for the first 2 months.Next year it may cost you per byte. The T-Mobile people won't tell you. Their data plans for their phones are pricey, so I imagine they'll go that route here too.

      I think the new Blackberry's are better anyway, and you can get service with AT&T if you like them.

    18. Re:T-Mobile's Sidekick by steelerguy · · Score: 4, Funny

      and if you asked a texan if they wanted to queue dance they would shoot your ass. :)

    19. Re:T-Mobile's Sidekick by gilesjuk · · Score: 1

      Well I think line dancing sucks, so another reason not to use the word :)

    20. Re:T-Mobile's Sidekick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i meant "first 2 years" - sorry, i'm retarded.

    21. Re:T-Mobile's Sidekick by stratjakt · · Score: 5, Funny

      ...pressing that phone up to your greasy ass cheek gets smudges on it.

      I don't think you're using it properly.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    22. Re:T-Mobile's Sidekick by mdfst13 · · Score: 2

      These PDA phones really need an earpiece/microphone attachment. Leave the PDA hooked to your belt or in your purse; just hook the earpiece to your ear and yak away. This would also allow you to look at the PDA while talking, which can be convenient if you keep your appointments in it...

    23. Re:T-Mobile's Sidekick by moonbender · · Score: 1

      People keep saying that the USA's cell phone network is inferior to the European, but it sure seems that T-Mobile - a German company, no less - is charging a whole lot more in its country of origin. I don't think there's any free nights and weekends plan with any of the large 3 or 4 providers, and no unlimited data, either.

      *sigh*

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    24. Re:T-Mobile's Sidekick by moonbender · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      That's just the Texan reaction to anything. "Would you marry me?" -- *BAM*

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    25. Re:T-Mobile's Sidekick by feepness · · Score: 2, Funny

      Why do you wacky American's call it a "cell" phone? What is "cellular" about it? I (British) call it a "mobile" phone - because sic.

      Because "cellphone" is one word, two syllables, whwreas "mobile phone" is two words, three syllables. It's shorter, easier to say/write, and gets the job done just as well.

      Why do you wacky British always gotta have it "proper" even when it's a pain in the ass?

    26. Re:T-Mobile's Sidekick by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      What about syncing with a Mac?

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    27. Re:T-Mobile's Sidekick by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      'I don't think you're using it properly.'

      Makes you wonder how he manages to type so well.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    28. Re:T-Mobile's Sidekick by RedWizzard · · Score: 1
      ...pressing that phone up to your greasy ass cheek gets smudges on it.

      I don't think you're using it properly.

      That review was crap - he's just talking out of his ass.
    29. Re:T-Mobile's Sidekick by daviddennis · · Score: 1

      I have one, and I broke it by stepping on it. (It was in my pants, which were on the floor, thus making it an easy mistake to make - don't do this!)

      I am trying to find a replacement screen, but it's pretty expensive compared to the cost of the device, so I will probably just wait for the colour model since I'm not a heavy cellphone user.

      I had reception problems which made it almost useless for a while, but when I went back to it a month or so ago it seemed to be working quite a bit better.

      One problem is that they tiny type and low-contrast screen is hard to read. I think the upcoming colour version will be enormously better, which is why I'm willing to go without a device until it comes out.

      Did SSH for it ever get introduced? I know it was available internally.

      D

    30. Re:T-Mobile's Sidekick by theedge318 · · Score: 1

      Having had one foot firmly either side of the pond, I personally use "cell", it is the more precise description (satellite phones are also mobile).

      Also note that in the UK, mobile is pronounced differently:

      UK- mo-bYle (pronounced like "bile", the bodily fluid)
      US- mo-bl (pronounced like the gasoline - or petrol company)

      So the second syllable of mobile is also even longer in the UK - just one more reason not to use it.

      --
      Sig Nazi- "No Sig for you, come back 1 year."
    31. Re:T-Mobile's Sidekick by gurple · · Score: 0

      Stage right: Enter Bluetooth

      --
      -- We've secretly replaced his regular signature with Folgers Crystals®
    32. Re:T-Mobile's Sidekick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      people just say mobile, no one really bothers about the phone bit

    33. Re:T-Mobile's Sidekick by McAdder · · Score: 1

      The "gay" ringtones can be replaced by other downloadable ringtones.

      They just released v2 of their SDK. Their development network is expected to be up RealSoonNow. Many users feel that an ssh client would be very useful; I'd expect an open one to be developed sometime this summer (my guess).

      Read lots more about it here. Go to the forums.

      I didn't even want a cel phone until this came out. But that functionality allowed me to tell AT&T to piss off. I'd say its not for the guy who is always on the phone, but AIM and email from most anywhere rocks. Until I lost it, I was using it with a Jabra Bluetooth headset. Solves the problem of feeling like you are talking into a bar of soap.

      Now if I could just get it in a shoephone form factor...

      --
      Every great advance in natural knowledge has involved the absolute rejection of authority. - Thomas Huxley (1825-1895)
    34. Re:T-Mobile's Sidekick by g4dget · · Score: 1
      The Sidekick is a pretty good deal. And it's a no hassles way of getting mobile internet browsing and messaging, complete with web-based access.

      But don't fool yourself into thinking that you get a high quality device for that. A significant fraction of the web pages I go to don't work: large pages, large images, JavaScript, and Java cause it to just fail and not display anything. And the proxying mechanism they use is quite slow (kind of like WAP browsers). The phone also has a fairly awkward shape, and the rotating, non-touch sensitive screen is also not all that convenient compared with a standard flip-PDA.

      Right now, the Sidekick is probably still your best bet for mobile web and E-mail access: the alternatives from Palm and PPC have plenty of problems themselves and cost several times as much. Still, I wouldn't expect Sidekick to be able to make a long-term business out of this. Ultimately, it's cheaper and easier to put the intelligence on the handheld (and have users pay for it individually) than to build big server infrastructures.

      But, frankly, something like the Nokia or the Sony P800 looks awfully attractive to this Sidekick user.

    35. Re:T-Mobile's Sidekick by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

      The ring tones are gay.

      So it plays the tunes from Rent or Cats or something?

    36. Re:T-Mobile's Sidekick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's the matter?? Words are too long for you to pronounce efficiently??? I'm having difficulty understanding this concept....

    37. Re:T-Mobile's Sidekick by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

      Yes, but a series of documents doesn't form in a geometric line. A group of individuals waiting for something will (well, at least in the US they do).

    38. Re:T-Mobile's Sidekick by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

      The sidekick is great and does everything you mention and more but...

      1. Its T-mobile only. T-Mobile coverage is infamous for being weak and spotty in some/most places and this really makes the phone a pain to use especially while you sit there and watch it attempt to synch up to the GPRS network.

      2. The hardware could use some work. Put the thing in your pocket one day and there will be enough dust underneath the screen to annoy the hell out of you. I unscrew mine on a weekly basis just to clean the dust out. You can fight the kipple but it seems you can't stop it.

      This is my second sidekick because of dead keys. After a few months of light to moderate use the keys are dying *again*. The M and N keys are going and require a really hard press to get them to work, which is really a shame because when the keyboard works you can really fly with it. Its a great design, but its a shame its a POS in the quality department.

      3. Danger is tightly controling its SDK so don't expect anything like the selection of palm apps to arrive anytime soon. What you see is pretty much what you get. I don't mind, but I can see how this could be a problem for some people.

      4. Synching apps are non-existant. If the keyboard wasn't such a POS I probably wouldnt mind, but I just avoid the PDA functions altogether.

      >unlimited data for $39.95 a month

      Actually its unlimited for 12 months only. Then they will begin charging us or come up with a new plan. Also the 39 dollar plan is only 200 phone minutes during the week. That's 10 minutes a business day. You'll want to move up to the 59 dollar plan for 500 minutes.

      >No IMAP

      It'll do IMAP, but only the inbox. Its an undocumented hack.

      Also, there is no telnet/ssh and don't expect one.

      I can live with the above and I use my sidekick everyday, but it does have issues.

    39. Re:T-Mobile's Sidekick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "and if you asked a texan if they wanted to queue dance they would shoot your ass. :)"

      Nah, Texans are friendly. They'd just say "I ain't no queue and you'd best be askin some other queue dance with you."

    40. Re:T-Mobile's Sidekick by R.Caley · · Score: 1
      And is it still a cell phone, too?

      Not only that but it's big enough to be used as a club to concuss anyone who tries to steal it off you.

      --
      _O_
      .|<
      The named which can be named is not the true named
    41. Re:T-Mobile's Sidekick by mofolotopo · · Score: 1

      What sucks is that I get the same plan on Cingular for $20 less and the unused anytime minutes roll over at the end of each month. Even that isn't all that great compared to some of the specials they've been running lately.

    42. Re:T-Mobile's Sidekick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a cellular phone, because it works with radio cells. A cell phone for short. Just like you have a race car. The race is not in the car. Many things are named by what they work with, not by what they contain. Get it?

    43. Re:T-Mobile's Sidekick by weiyuent · · Score: 1

      Why do you wacky American's call it a "cell" phone? What is "cellular" about it? I (British) call it a "mobile" phone - because sic.

      *sigh* Since Britain is the home of obscure cockney references it should be obvious to you that a mobile phone is a ball-and-chain that your spouse / girlfriend / mother attaches to you, which is like being in a prison cell. Hence "cell" phone.

      Don't believe a word of the geeks who tell you that cell is short for cellular, which supposedly describes the switching technology behind modern mobile networks!

    44. Re:T-Mobile's Sidekick by weiyuent · · Score: 1

      Also, pressing that phone up to your greasy ass cheek gets smudges on it.

      I suggest you forego oil-based lubricants for your back-door activities in order to eliminate the problem you describe here.

    45. Re:T-Mobile's Sidekick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hear hear!

  2. Too big by flxkid · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I was just about to buy one yesterday but they were just too big. I really wanted a phone with speakerphone and BT, and this seems to be the only one that I can get on T-Mobile or Cingular.

    Went for a T68i instead. It'll have to do for now (atleast it has BT).

    OLIVER

    --
    Better VDF than VD...check it out: Data Access
    1. Re:Too big by I'm+a+racist. · · Score: 1

      FYI - The Ericsson 580 has both bluetooth and a speaker, although it is a bit large. I've used the speaker phone to do conference calls, and it's (surprisingly) damn good.

      It can also run MMS, as the prototype MMS software was on the 580 (it was demonstrated at a few conferences - GSM World Congress in Cannes and CeBit). This was before the T68 was announced.

      It will work fine on the T-Mobile, or any other GSM, network (I believe it's an 800/1800/1900, not that it matters, since it definitely works in America and Europe).

      --


      Down with Saudi Arabia!!!
    2. Re:Too big by sharl · · Score: 1

      Yeah it is too big and plasticky. Whatever it has built-in, you still need to carry it around and use it as a phone. I think the OS X 10.2.5 update will add BT support for this (same as 7650 I believe), but iSync has yet to be updated for it.

      I've had a T68i since September, and it's horrible. The hardware's nice, but the os is useless - everything takes an age to happen, it crashes lots, and usability is an alien concept. I have got it working reasonably well with my Palm vis BT and GPRS, and Mac support is a given of course. But the Nokia OS is soo much better. If only they made a small phone with BT/GPRS and mac compatibility. Soon, I hope.

      Check out the 7650 actually. It's still big, but a much nicer build, as long as you can use the organiser features.

      --
      Clearly I have too much time on my hands.
    3. Re:Too big by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree about the T68i. I've had one since January. I've never gotten used to it...

  3. but... by galacticdruid · · Score: 2, Funny

    but can it cook you dinner?

    --
    we are all one consciousness experiencing itself subjectively - bill hicks
    1. Re:but... by frodo+from+middle+ea · · Score: 1

      Actually , IF they build a microwave that can be controlled via bluetooth..

      --
      for the last time people, I am "frodo from middle eaRTH", not "middle eaST".
    2. Re:but... by MoreDruid · · Score: 1

      you might be able to cook it for dinner

      --
      The best weapon of a dictatorship is secrecy, but the best weapon of a democracy should be the weapon of openness.
  4. Hmm.... by Cali+Thalen · · Score: 1

    IMAP...yeah, ok. HTTP...cool. IM...sure, why not. PDA functionality...interesting.

    POLYPHONIC RING TONES!!!! All right, I'm there baby!

    --
    Chaos, panic, disorder...my work here is done.
    1. Re:Hmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If I ever meet you I am going to KICK your TEETH down your THROAT!

      ;-)

    2. Re:Hmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If I ever meet you, I am going to TAKETH your TITHE down your ROCK!

      ;-P

    3. Re:Hmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If I ever KILL you, I am going to INSCRIBE your NAME on my JOHNSON!

      8>)

    4. Re:Hmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If I ever CLONE you, I am going to LINK your BANJOS on my IRISHMEN!

      ATDT 1-800-CALL-ATT

    5. Re:Hmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If I ever ESCAPE from this FACILITY, I am going to EAT an ICE CREAM CONE!

      12173319813698

    6. Re:Hmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If I ever FORNICATE with my SISTER, I will SPEND time in PRISON!


      CHEN KENICHI

    7. Re:Hmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If I ever FORNICATE with your SISTER, I will spend HOURS in a VD CLINIC!

      iamthekingofrockthereisnonehigher

    8. Re:Hmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If I ever SEE a NERD in LINE to see STAR WARS, I will POINT at him and LAUGH!


      Der Ubermeister!

  5. Welcome to last week by Samir+Gupta · · Score: 0, Troll
    We've had such phones, and more importantly, the network infrastructure, in Japan for a year or two, and people actually use them. Network usage is cheap, so people do indeed use video and pictures as a primary form of messaging. In Japan, the phone, not the PC is the primary Internet access platform. We even designed our Gameboy Advance and SP to be compatible (in Japan only) with mobile phone hookups for online gaming.

    Now the US is still playing catch up, and I'll bet US cell phone companies will charge you a arm and a leg, ensuring such features are relegated as a novelty for marketing or a small niche of people, like police or real estate work.

    I only wish Japan was on the GSM standard, so that I could use my J-phone while overseas.

    --
    -- Samir Gupta, Ph. D. Head, New Technology Research Group, Nintendo Co. Ltd., Kyoto, Japan.
    1. Re:Welcome to last week by steelerguy · · Score: 1

      I guess the Japanese must love scrolling and scrolling and scrolling and scrolling and scrolling...when trying to read web pages. Browsing on moble phones sucks. It is nice to have as an option but doing it more than on a computer is just retarded...but then again the Japanese are buying up golden turd squirts by the firstful. Weirdos.

    2. Re:Welcome to last week by cascino · · Score: 3, Informative

      I thought you worked at Sega?

      How's your Smell-o-vision project going?

      Your educational background is pretty impressive too.

      What about Super Marx Brothers?

      Or Game Boy Advance porn?

      Have you finished the HIGHLY ADVANCED SPEECH RECOGNITION DEVICE?

  6. I can' t even imagine... by iocat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    how irritatating it would be to try and dial that thing, with the buttons not layed out in the traditional, muscle memory configuration. Oh sure, you can use voice recognition, or look up numbers on a list, but even with all that enabled, I still end up *dialing* my phone about 50 - 60% of the time, and trying to deal with that keypad combination would suck, especially with numbers where you can only remember it by dialing it.

    --

    Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

    1. Re:I can' t even imagine... by macrom · · Score: 1

      polyphonic bliss all wraped up in a uber-modern package

      Yeah, but like the parent says, what's up with the dialer? A rotary phone flashback? What's so uber-modern about that?

    2. Re:I can' t even imagine... by LordSkippy · · Score: 1

      And you have to rotate it clockwise a bit to even match the old rototary dail lay out! ;P

      --
      My karma is in a nose dive
    3. Re:I can' t even imagine... by IronTek · · Score: 1

      Yes, someone should be fired for that keypad design.

      That alone makes me not want it. Also, duribility comes into question. Can it really take me throwing it across the room in frustration every time I try to dial it until the contract with my wireless carrier is up? I think not!

    4. Re:I can' t even imagine... by cpeterso · · Score: 4, Informative


      I've used a 3650 for a few months now. The circular "arrow keys" button especially sucks. The button is so sensitive that it often registers the wrong direction when pressed. Very frustrating..

    5. Re:I can' t even imagine... by ryanr · · Score: 1

      You young punks.

      When I was a kid, we had to pulse dial by tapping on the cradle buttons ('cause, you know, they had locks on the rotary dial) and we liked it!

    6. Re:I can' t even imagine... by ruiner13 · · Score: 0, Troll
      "how irritatating it would be to try and dial that thing, with the buttons not layed out in the traditional, muscle memory configuration. Oh sure, you can use voice recognition, or look up numbers on a list, but even with all that enabled, I still end up *dialing* my phone about 50 - 60% of the time, and trying to deal with that keypad combination would suck, especially with numbers where you can only remember it by dialing it."

      Did you also bitch when they switched from rotary dialers to touch tone? We handled the change back then, and unless you have an IQ well below 100, I think you can handle this too.

      --

      today is spelling optional day.

    7. Re:I can' t even imagine... by OpenSourced · · Score: 1

      I suppose the Nokia people aren't even trying to market to the people who are old enough to have muscle memory of the old traditional dials. In fact, they have probably designed it the other way around so that the cool guy that flashes its new phone around can't be put down by some old timer crack about how things come all the way round and end up in the same place. They surely try to differentiate themselves as much as possible from the old dial phones association, probably. After all, it's not a sure bet that they are old enough to be hip now. And hip is the question. Phones are now, specially for early adopters, a fashion item. The sooner we get used to that, the better.

      --
      Rome taught me patience and assiduous application to detail. Virtues which temper the boldness of great, general views.
    8. Re:I can' t even imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL I DON'T think Nokia has the power to change the way people think about dialing numbers. I think this was a BAD design move, and those phones will not succeed. I've already been working with one, and let me tell you, they have great features, but that semi-circular keypad is a deal killer.

    9. Re:I can' t even imagine... by EpsCylonB · · Score: 1

      In soviet russia the dialer phones you!

    10. Re:I can' t even imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it takes you more than a few days to get used to it, you shouldn't be allowed to use any electronic equipment without supervision.

    11. Re:I can' t even imagine... by Greedo · · Score: 1

      At least it has retro-appeal.

      You want ugly? Take a look at their 7210 model.

      --
      Tuus crepidae innexilis sunt.
    12. Re:I can' t even imagine... by Ghostx13 · · Score: 1

      Hmm, if you can't get used to dialing on a diffrent key config what makes you think you could get used to using all the new features that this phone comes with?

    13. Re:I can' t even imagine... by iocat · · Score: 0
      Touch tone phones offered a lot of advantages over rotary dial, most notably speed of dialing. That made learning a new system worth it.

      This phone offers no advantages in its stupid layout -- it's not faster or demonstrably better in any way (except maybe aesthetically, if you're a Finn, I guess), it's just different (and thus slower) than standard phone dial pad arrangements just for the sake of it.

      --

      Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

    14. Re:I can' t even imagine... by Xandu · · Score: 2, Informative

      the buttons not layed out in the traditional, muscle memory configuration

      I seem to be in the minority here, but I really like the phone. Yes, the buttons are layed out in a "weird" retro-rotary phone fashion, but I've had the phone for 3 days now, and it's not nearly as hard to learn as I thought it would be. My biggest complaint with the keypad is the 4-way scroll key. It's a little too small and sensitive for my fat thumb.

      --


      --Xandu
    15. Re:I can' t even imagine... by Linux+Ate+My+Dog! · · Score: 1

      I dunno, I have been testing it for months on end now, and am totally used to it. I even managed to get to level 11 in Bounce with the scroll-pad.

      Don't trust me, though, I work for the manufacturer...

    16. Re:I can' t even imagine... by Renesis · · Score: 1

      The phone is awesome. I had one of the horrid NEC E606 3G phones for 2 weeks before taking it back and getting this 2.5G device (I upgraded from the 7650).

      The screen is nice, the Series 60 user interface is very easy to use - you can easily and quickly get to any function you want. I've fitted a 128Mb MMC into the back and I can now fit full-length movies onto the phone for those moments when you are stuck waiting somewhere with nothing to do. There are also hundreds of apps and games available to download.

      The bad things about this phone are the keypad and the "joystick". The joystick isn't as accurate as on other phones I've used (a lot!) and as someone mentioned - sometimes it hits the wrong direction or it hits the centre-click by accident - annoying, but you can learn to be more careful with it. The round keypad is a joke though - it's taken me 2 weeks of use to try and remotely get used to texting on this - if you are a hard-core text user then you need to steer clear of this phone. The keypad + joystick are also crap for playing most gmaes.

    17. Re:I can' t even imagine... by NanoGator · · Score: 1
      "how irritatating it would be to try and dial that thing, with the buttons not layed out in the traditional, muscle memory configuration."


      "Did you also bitch when they switched from rotary dialers to touch tone? We handled the change back then, and unless you have an IQ well below 100, I think you can handle this too. "

      Don't you think you're being an ass? He's talking about being able to dial a number without having to stare at it. I have an idea, try closing your eyes and typing your response. I bet you get pretty far with relatively few mistakes. Then, once your response is done, try clicking on the submit button without opening your eyes. Can't do it, can ya? You'll understand at that point how frustrating it is to lose tactile feedback.

      Why don't you actually listen to what people are saying and try to understand their point instead of trying to make fun of them for making a legitimate complaint?
      --
      "Derp de derp."
    18. Re:I can' t even imagine... by balut · · Score: 1

      I had this phone too for more than two weeks now and my thumb gets sore after using it. You have to have a long, thin thumb on either hand if you want to dial/text with one hand. My old black, brick, Nokia phone enabled me to dial/text with one hand because the keypad was sensible. Of course, I'm doing this while driving =).

    19. Re:I can' t even imagine... by ByteHog · · Score: 1

      I agree. I have issues with that number pad...

      --
      - This isn't the sig you're looking for. Move along, move along..
    20. Re:I can' t even imagine... by wheany · · Score: 1

      Nokia is specialized in crappy arrowkeys. The arrow-keys on the 9210 Communicator suck, the ones on 3650 suck, the joystick on 7650 isn't much better.

      It is sad that the primary navigation device is sacrificed for stylishness.

    21. Re:I can' t even imagine... by gottabeme · · Score: 1

      Um, yeah. The person dialing the phone phones you.

      I think you meant "In Soviet Russia, the phone dials you!" :)

      --
      "Those who consume the bulk of goods are those who make them. We must never forget this secret of our prosperity."
    22. Re:I can' t even imagine... by abiogenesis · · Score: 1

      The best cursor is that of Nokia 7110, which is basically a "wheel" exactly like in a wheel mouse. You can roll it up, down, and click it. It's strange that they never used the same method in any other phone.

      --

      Donate free food to the hungry at The Hunger site.
    23. Re:I can' t even imagine... by abiogenesis · · Score: 1

      6610 is the same phone with a more traditional design.

      --

      Donate free food to the hungry at The Hunger site.
    24. Re:I can' t even imagine... by wheany · · Score: 1

      Shame that the 7110 sucked otherwise. Laggiest UI ever. It's my current phone, BTW. Getting a 6800 (the one with the foldable qwerty-keyboard) tomorrow...

    25. Re:I can' t even imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      seems you never used an ericsson

  7. Uglly and big phone- hard to use by miradu2000 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I saw this device yesterday at the AT&T wireless store in the mall of america. Two word - it sucked. Sure it had a great camera, and big screen - but the buttons felt cheap, the device is huge, and feels realy lcheap in your hands. The 5 way navigator didn't click down very well, and.. you get my point. I think the size of this thing kills it. Sitting right next to it was some uber tiny color nokia that i really liked . It had a much nicer feel to it - nokia has good and bad designs.

    As for a perfect cell phone i would wait for the Sony Ericsson T608 and T610 (CDMA/GPRS respectivly) They are compeltly new phones with the features of the t68i and more. I can't wait for them to be released.

    1. Re:Uglly and big phone- hard to use by mh_tang · · Score: 1
      I'd have to agree with the parent poster. I've been looking to buy a new cellphone, and the Sony Ericsson's are pretty consistently high quality. I was really close to buying a T68i, but decided to wait a while for the T610.

      The T610 seems to have everything that was nice about the T68i (trimode GSM, GPRS, nice color screen, bluetooth, and good build quality) but then adds a metal body instead of plastic, 65k color screen, a camera, and apparently 1/3 faster GPRS. Good review of T610 here Plus it's small, well designed with nice smooth lines, and the red color looks great. Should be released soon.

    2. Re:Uglly and big phone- hard to use by abiogenesis · · Score: 1

      The user interface and slowness of T68i is horrible. If T610 is similar, I wouldn't buy it.

      --

      Donate free food to the hungry at The Hunger site.
  8. Screw Mac's by rw2 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    What about something that can sync up with Linux using bluetooth.

    1. Re:Screw Mac's by dhovis · · Score: 1

      Well...

      Bluetooth is an open standard, and the SonyEricsson T68i (and a few others) use SyncML, another open standard. So such a phone would be perfectly capable of syncing under Linux, just as soon as someone writes the software.

      OTOH, if you use MacOS X, then this functionallity is already built into iSync.

      --

      --
      The internet is the greatest source of biased information in the history of mankind.

    2. Re:Screw Mac's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever hear of appealing to a meaningful demographic? Being a linux user, you probably haven't.

    3. Re:Screw Mac's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Methinks someone has sand in their vagina...

  9. Cell phone advice: by Telastyn · · Score: 0, Troll

    Don't get one.

    Just one more thing to lose.
    Just one more way for others to annoy you.
    Just one more way you can annoy your fellow man.

  10. Slightly OT Comment by billstr78 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Anybody see the unauthorized realistic but bootleg commercial advertising this phone on the Net? I had a link to it but it has been since taken down by Nokia's Lawyars.

    It depicted a couple of zany guys taking a picture of a cat swinging from a celieng fan with this phone. Had the realistic Nokia logo and everything.

    Rumor had it that the commercial was put together by one of the ad firms in charge of (or denided) Nokia's account and leaked on to the Net from there.

    Definatly one of the most halarious .mpg's I have seen in a while.

    1. Re:Slightly OT Comment by Ziller · · Score: 1

      That's gotta be the sickest shit I've seen in a while, but I don't know what halarious means so maybe it was ;)

      ok so maybe I don't see a lot of shit.

      --
      One skilled in battle take a stand in the ground of no defeat, and so does not lose the enemy's defeat.
  11. Taco Rocko by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I was looking phones all morning so I'm glad this showed up. Anyone have advice on cel phones? I'd like IMAP, HTTP, and IM, as well as PDA functionality that can sync via bluetooth to a Mac. I was looking at the Sony Ericsons, but this may work as well.

    Maybe you should add spell check and grammar check to that list.

    1. Re:Taco Rocko by DarthWiggle · · Score: 1

      For /. this shows extraordinary levels of command of the language. Not a "loose/lose", "their/they're/there", or similar to be found... truly remarkable. Taco deserves a hug..

      Yes yes, mod me troll... you know it's true... :)

  12. new vs old by TR6 · · Score: 1

    I dont know about you, but I still use the old Motorola "Brick" as it was/is known. It has been runover by my truck (other story) and it suffered a broken antenna... thats it. I dont know if newer is better.

  13. Sending mine back by LtBurrito · · Score: 4, Informative

    I just got call tags sent so that I can return mine to ATT. The phone is good. It has good rf performance, better than my T68i. But... It claims to be bluetooth audio, but doesn't work with any bluetooth headset but Nokias. It only works with the bluetooth 'handsfree' profile, not the headset profile that most bluetooth headsets obviously support.

    It does synch over bluetooth with outlook, but the alarm for calendar events is fixed. You can't shut it off without silencing the whole phone (or turning it off). I was awakened at midnight the other night by an alarm for my mom's birthday. I like my mom and all, but that sucks. I want to be able to have just visual alarms for calendar events.

    For $150, it's a nice phone, it just has a few issues. I'll wait for the P800 to be available through ATT. For now, I really do like my old T68i better.

    1. Re:Sending mine back by MrChuck · · Score: 1
      I'm with you on the Bluetooth headset thing - either support the standard or don't. Nokia-only is not the standard.

      If your were "awakened at midnight" by an alarm, perhaps that reduces your geekpoints a lot & should be factored into the credibility of your answer.
      I really just get rolling at midnight. I saw 6AM kinda recently. Just heading to bed.

  14. One trait I always look for when purchasing phones by ChangeOnInstall · · Score: 1

    One trait I always look for when purchasing phones...can I dial it while driving, and not have to look at the phone? My Motorola T720 certainly meets this criteria... it has large buttons, including a concave "5" button in the center with a small point it its middle.

    This phone on the other hand, with its circular dial pad, can't come close to meeting this criteria. Nokia seems to have been trying to make it more and more difficult to dial their phones using the keypad, and this particular model seems to be quite the shining example of their hard efforts.

    I'd love to have bluetooth, a multi-megapixel camera, and video capability too. But personally, these features rank a little lower on the list than being able to effectively use the device as a telephone.

    And please, no rants about driving and using a cell phone. I saw you talking on yours while holding up traffic in the fast lane yesterday.

    --
    What has *science* done?!? -- Dr. Weird (ATHF)
  15. Buy a CDMA phone instead. by Magnus+Pym · · Score: 1

    Disclaimer: I work in the CDMA industry. Not that I am biased or anything. :)

    But my advice holds. Comparing CDMA to GSM is like comparing Linux and Windows. The only advantage of GSM is the installed base.

    Magnus.

    1. Re:Buy a CDMA phone instead. by Dub+Kat · · Score: 1

      Could you at least back it up or something? GSM seems to be somewhat popular and catching on. Can it interoprate with GSM, or will we just have two competing standards and phones that won't interopate?

      I envy people in Europe where they can buy just one nice phone and switch providers without hassles. One standard can be nice :)

    2. Re:Buy a CDMA phone instead. by gokulpod · · Score: 2, Informative

      you got it the other way round man.

      CDMA is like windows, being controlled by one company - Qualcomm

      GSM is an open standard

      --
      My mom never taught me to sign.
    3. Re:Buy a CDMA phone instead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you going to explain why?

      I'm ignorant between the differences between the two. (begs)

    4. Re:Buy a CDMA phone instead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you think he's a plant (the guy who said to buy cdma)? Oh well. I guess he wont answer.

      Same ac who asked "Why" to him.

    5. Re:Buy a CDMA phone instead. by NeuroKoan · · Score: 1

      More information from someone *not* in the cell phone industry.

      Current CDMA phones: Crappy battery life, poor reception, blah, blah, blah. Doesn't support data packets. Pluses: CDMA covers almost everywhere you would want to use your cell phone.

      GSM/GPRS: European standard just started getting adopted in the states. Much better battery life and signal quality. Problem, adoption not so big, so the networks look like spider webs. Ex. My parents live in Sacramento and I go to school in Santa Barbara. Reception works fine in both areas, but it is a bit sketchy in the middle of I-5. GSM is also a 10 year old (implemented, 20 yrs+ in the planning) tech. GPRS adds data packet support and gives GSM some new life, but not enough to sustain for much longer. But you can check your email with this tech :)

      Also, if you are running OS X and you have a Bluetooth interface and a descent Bluetooth enabled phone (read, not Nokia), then you can surf the web with your laptop over Bluetooth over GPRS. That makes me smile.

      WCDMA/CDMA2000 3x: Drool, drool, drool. Can't wait for this to finally be deployed. Athough GSM/GPRS is "Good Enough" for most people, its going to be a hard sell for providers; they have to shell out $1 billion (estimated from other countries implementing this new standard) to license the spectrum *before* they can even start developing any technology. ug, but hopefully it will come soon. Needs a killer ap to convince consumers and Telcom execs.

      Advice: if you need a phone now get a GSM, its only going to get bigger and better in the States since most providers are entrenched into rolling out GSM service. Plus if you have a tri-band GSM phone (it should be if you are buying a GSM phone in the States) it will work in Europe and Japan. If your current CDMA or TDMA phone works fine now, no need to buy a new phone (unless you are a gadget freak). Wait a few years until the new CDMA standard starts to be deployed.

      Eithe way, by the time WCDMA/CDMA2000 3x comes out you will have to buy one if you consider yourself a responsible geek.

      --

      "However," replied the universe, "The fact has not created in me A sense of obligation."
    6. Re:Buy a CDMA phone instead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think he already did. He LIKES CDMA and it is, thus, better. It's the way of the Slashbots. What are you, new around here?

    7. Re:Buy a CDMA phone instead. by muonzoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Methinks you have your head on backwards.

      CDMA has poor interoperability; sure, if you only ever need a phone in the USA and your don't care about open standards, please, get a CDMA phone.

      If you travel at ALL, then GSM is currently the only way to go.

      The sooner CDMA and other US-centric telecom technologies buy the farm, the better for consumers.

      The insane convenience of having one-phone, one-number, 6 continents and no hassels roaming FAR outweighs the slight technological advance that the CDMA air interface has.

    8. Re:Buy a CDMA phone instead. by gid-goo · · Score: 1

      It's not a great comparison since GSM covers the entire spectrum of protocols used to support mobile operation (interoperation of HLRs, VLRs, MSCs, blah, blah, blah). AND, EIA/TIA-41 sucks butt compared to GSM (yes that's technical terminology).

      That bit of pedanticism aside the portion of GSM which is the same as IS-95 and CDMA 2k is definitely inferior to CDMA.

    9. Re:Buy a CDMA phone instead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If CDMA is Linux then I'll take GSM any day! (And so will 90% of the rest of the population). Sorry your working for such a loser protocol...

    10. Re:Buy a CDMA phone instead. by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "CDMA is like windows, being controlled by one company - Qualcomm

      GSM is an open standard "


      Yeah it's a pity that coverage is far more important than open standards.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    11. Re:Buy a CDMA phone instead. by mellifluous · · Score: 1

      An interesting analogy, but GSM is an open standard, while CDMA is not (it makes a pretense, but that is all). The better analogy would seem to be GSM as Linux, and CDMA as Windows with Qualcomm playing the role of Microsoft.

    12. Re:Buy a CDMA phone instead. by covertlaw · · Score: 1
      I'm going to back you up here. My experience with GSM/GPRS v. CDMA has been like night and day. Most of the people in America who buy GSM/GPRS phones "just in case" they go to Europe are like people who buy shitty, car based SUVs like RAV4s, Highlanders, and Escapes "just in case" they need to go off-roading. If you really need a mobile phone in Europe, unless you're really hopping a jet over there every week, it's cheaper to buy a disposable one over there.

      First of all, my old GSM provider, T-Mobile, sucked. My phone was always charged all sorts of roaming fees and had lousy reception. Traveling across country, I could hardly ever get a signal, except for out east.

      So I changed to Sprint last summer. My calls aren't dropped nearly as often, the calls are clearer, and the battery life is actually better. The phone's also reliable as hell. It's the Touchpoint 2200, they don't make it anymore, but it's survived a lot of abuse. I know it's just my experience and it doesn't really count, but that's all that matters to me.

      This next comment is going to turn me into Flamebait. If it's a Windows v. Linux style comparison between CDMA and GSM/GPRS, well, I have to admit that I've also been running Windows XP Pro for a year, and the only application that's been crashing is Mozilla.

      Sprint's going back to using Nokia phones, though. If I ever buy another phone, I'd buy one of the LGs or Samsung first.

      By the way, the camera lens cover on that new Nokia is going to get scratched up pretty quickly if they don't fashion a cover for it.

    13. Re:Buy a CDMA phone instead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DUDE what are smoking! T-Mobile has great quality and i've had ZERO problems with coverage. and their customer service is great too. i just got a T68i from them. GSM is nice, all i had to do is put my sim card in and i was all set. with t-mobile i was able to use BT on my 17" PB G4 to dial my university for internet access and use minutes, not gprs (something AT&T doesnt support)

      so, be smart, and get a T68i and T-Mobile, and get an Apple PowerBook G4 17"

    14. Re:Buy a CDMA phone instead. by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

      "Crappy battery life, poor reception, blah, blah, blah. Doesn't support data packets. Pluses: CDMA covers almost everywhere you would want to use your cell phone."

      That's bullshit. I have a Kyocera Smartphone. It's a Palm and a CDMA phone. It may not have data (it has an internal modem, but that doesn't really count), but it gets great reception and it goes for 6 hours of talk time on one charge.

      Sprint also offers nationwide (well, close enough) 2.5G data service.

    15. Re:Buy a CDMA phone instead. by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "If you travel at ALL, then GSM is currently the only way to go."

      I can travel in a country of 300 million people that is three times the size of Western Europe and never pay roaming fees or need to switch my phone. Not to mention coverage in Canada.

      "slight technological advance that the CDMA air interface has"

      2x more people per cell, as well as much larger cell sizes is not "slight". It's massive. That's why I have unlimited calling to anyone else on the same CDMA network. That's why I get unlimited off peak minutes and 500 free peak minutes. That's why I get unlimited 144kbps data service.

      GSM doesn't work in the US. The cell size is simply too small. If you look at the carriers who have adopted GSM (AT&T, T-Mobile, Cingular) vs. the carriers who have adopted CDMA (Sprint, Verizon), the CDMA services have far better coverage.

      17km cells may be fine when your country is the size of California. The US has fewer people than Western Europe, yet it is nearly three times larger. Much of that area is sparsely populated. Covering Wyoming using GSM cells is sinply not feasable.

      "The sooner CDMA and other US-centric telecom technologies buy the farm, the better for consumers."

      Nope. Having a diverse set of technologies is good for consumers. Being locked into a fast-aging standard is bad. What's good for consumers is having both standards available and letting the free market choose the best option.

      Most people in the US will rarely need to leave the country. Europeans may travel from country to country often, but Americans do not. Interoperability with other systems is not a criteria most Americans care about.

      So far, people in the US have chosen CDMA over GSM technologies. CDMA does more and costs less.

    16. Re:Buy a CDMA phone instead. by Colm+Buckley · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The parent article makes some good points about the relative suitability of GSM and CDMA in a large and sparsely-populated area such as North America, however one point needs addressing:

      Nope. Having a diverse set of technologies is good for consumers. Being locked into a fast-aging standard is bad. What's good for consumers is having both standards available and letting the free market choose the best option.

      Diversity in available technologies is only beneficial to consumers if those consumers are free to easily switch between technologies, and if the technologies are interoperable from the consumers' point of view. This is an often-forgotten tenet of competition; if there are barriers to switching between competing providers, you don't have competition, you have overlapping monopolies.

      Consider the application of the above statement to Internet standards:

      Having a diverse set of transport protocols is good for consumers. Being locked into fast-aging TCP/IP and HTTP is bad.

      ... and imagine that Internet devices could only speak either TCP/IP and HTTP or the other (proprietary) standard, not both. The result would be market fragmentation, consumer bewilderment, and the maintenance of proprietary monopolies.

      I'm not arguing that GSM is superior to CDMA, or the reverse - they both have good and bad points. But don't be fooled into believing that it was the "free market" which put CDMA in place and keeps it there in North America; it's quite the reverse.

    17. Re:Buy a CDMA phone instead. by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

      "Diversity in available technologies is only beneficial to consumers if those consumers are free to easily switch between technologies, and if the technologies are interoperable from the consumers' point of view. This is an often-forgotten tenet of competition; if there are barriers to switching between competing providers, you don't have competition, you have overlapping monopolies."

      That's why the new regulation that allows you to keep your number is so important. It's about time.

      For most people, switching handsets is not a big deal. Most companies are happy to give you a free handset if you agree to stay with them for a year.

      "and imagine that Internet devices could only speak either TCP/IP and HTTP or the other (proprietary) standard, not both."

      HTTP is a protocol built on top of TCP/IP, so your example doesn't work.

      "I'm not arguing that GSM is superior to CDMA, or the reverse - they both have good and bad points. But don't be fooled into believing that it was the "free market" which put CDMA in place and keeps it there in North America; it's quite the reverse"

      No, it's not. No one forced Verizon or Sprint to choose CDMA. No one forced T-Mobile or Cingular to choose GSM. Each company chose the protocol which was the best for their needs. GSM has it's advantages. So does CDMA. The US government kept it's hands out and let the free market decide.

      "Having a diverse set of transport protocols is good for consumers. Being locked into fast-aging TCP/IP and HTTP is bad."

      Wow... that's true! Being locked into TCP/IP and HTTP IS bad. If someone can develop a better technology, I'm all for it!

  16. How about just making phones? by RatBastard · · Score: 1

    Bah! How about a phone? Just more useless crap to drive the price up and make people trade up for the newest model.

    --
    Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
    1. Re:How about just making phones? by wheany · · Score: 1

      Nokia has a phone for you. That is, when (or if?) they release it...

  17. Seriously... by black+mariah · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Am I the only one that doesn't care if I can play games and take pictures with a PHONE? These things bug the hell out of me. They REALLY need to come up with a better word than PHONE to use for something where the communicative abilities have obviously taken a back seat to solitaire.

    ALSO, is there anything more COMPLETELY FUCKING STUPID than TEXT MESSAGING someone from a PHONE, where you could type less and ACTUALLY CALL THEM? GRRRRRRR......

    --
    'Standards' in computing only impress those who are impressed by things like 'standards'.
    1. Re:Seriously... by jimf42 · · Score: 1

      I totally agree...all I want is a really good functional PHONE... I have a PDA and I would prefer it be separate from my phone. No games, screesavers, etc. are needed.

    2. Re:Seriously... by Ziller · · Score: 1
      ALSO, is there anything more COMPLETELY FUCKING STUPID than TEXT MESSAGING someone from a PHONE, where you could type less and ACTUALLY CALL THEM? GRRRRRRR......

      My friend's GSM service allows him to select ~6 people to whom SMS's cost absolutely nothing, so there, although in other cases I tend to agree, but mostly 'cause replying an SMS will cost the other person too, whereas answering a domestic call won't.

      --
      One skilled in battle take a stand in the ground of no defeat, and so does not lose the enemy's defeat.
    3. Re:Seriously... by Malc · · Score: 3, Informative

      I don't think you understand why text messaging became so popular. In some places in the world, people haven't grown up with free local calls, or buying airtime in blocks. Voice calls were (are?) considerably more expensive than text messages. Thus they originally became popular with poor (cheap?) students and the like.

    4. Re:Seriously... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "ALSO, is there anything more COMPLETELY FUCKING STUPID than TEXT MESSAGING someone from a PHONE, where you could type less and ACTUALLY CALL THEM? GRRRRRRR......"

      What if someone is sleeping or in the meeting and can't answer the phone?

    5. Re:Seriously... by LinuxHam · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I use AIM on my Nextel i95cl when I'm in meetings. The only bad thing is the constant vibrating interruption every time the other party sends a message.. and some people like to send one word per message, I swear.

      I also use it b/c I've been IM'ing with my friends and family for so many years and it's the only way I can talk to my peeps with unlimited anytime minutes from anywhere in the US to anywhere in the world via AIM.

      Motorola phones have this interesting text input mode called T9 whereby you don't have to (for example) hit 22-wait a couple seconds for the cursor to move-2-wait a couple seconnds again-22-999 to spell out "baby". You just hit one digit for each letter, and the T9 system figures out the word you want. So 2229 spells "baby". You can hit 0 to view other alternatives if it guesses incorrectly.

      It's also good in movie theaters, 'cept the screen is awfully bright.

      --
      Intelligent Life on Earth
    6. Re:Seriously... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >ALSO, is there anything more COMPLETELY FUCKING
      >STUPID than TEXT MESSAGING someone from a
      >PHONE, where you could type less and ACTUALLY
      >CALL THEM? GRRRRRRR......

      Are you the same guy that said to me back 1987 something like "what a moronic invention - Internet!?!? What should I type anything, I can just call my mom when I need to reach her!!!! GRRRRR..."

    7. Re:Seriously... by Arthur+Dent · · Score: 1
      ALSO, is there anything more COMPLETELY FUCKING STUPID than TEXT MESSAGING someone from a PHONE, where you could type less and ACTUALLY CALL THEM? GRRRRRRR......

      Actually, TM is really handy. I only wish people would use it more often, especially those obnoxious loudmouths on the ride home from work. Yes, you, please shut up, I have no desire to hear how you spent your day at the office.

    8. Re:Seriously... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      U americanos havent understood shiat... calling can be intrusive. Say if your at the library studying or something, you cant run in and out calling all the time - in cases like this (we europeans at least) try to be subtile, and be considerate at other people.. voila! its SMS time!

    9. Re:Seriously... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yeah, that SMS beep is SO MUCH less intrusive than the voice ring! Oh, you you meant intrusive FOR THE CALLER! Typical...

    10. Re:Seriously... by bhawbaker · · Score: 1

      simple answer: you are not everyone

      complex answer: everyone has different needs... some people like me like to use the text message. maybe we are deaf and the only way we can receive messages is via text ?

      bob

    11. Re:Seriously... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then you will be directed to their voice mail? How is that any different than a text message? At least with the voice mail you KNOW they didn't get it.

    12. Re:Seriously... by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Am I the only one that doesn't care if I can play games and take pictures with a PHONE?"

      What exactly are you losing by having these features available? These things have a processor in them anyway, why not have the extra doodads?

      Why are you so resistant to additional features, anyway? You'd be surprised what you might discover. For example, when I got my first internet phone, I was pleasantly surprised that it was easy to find show times for movies. Sounds useless until you're out with a group of friends who're bored. To my surprise, I ended up using that quite a bit.

      And then, I got my T-68i. I'm the type of guy who likes to play with my new toys, and this thing didn't disappoint. It has COMPLETELY replaced my alarm clock. It has an alarm where you can not only set the time, but the days it goes off. It only goes off on work days, but remains quiet on my days off. You have no idea how long I've wanted that in an alarm clock. I can also set appts to have it wake me up for that. For example, I found out one Friday that they wanted me to work on Sunday. No prob, pushed a few buttons, and Sunday I was woken up with a message saying "go to work today." No problemo. I never ever thought I'd have a phone that did that. You might be thinking "so what? why not just get a more expensive alarm clock?", to which my answer is "Well, besides that it's already in my phone, I travel as well and the phone goes with me."

      I don't see where communication possibilites have been pushed back for games. Perhaps you could elaborate on that? Color screen maybe? On the surface, I could sort of see the complaint there. Thing is, though, on a color screen black is black and white is white. On your traditional monochrome LCD screen, black is gray and white is silver. My point? You get much better contrast to read from. Also, you can assign icons to the people that call you. That's kind of neat. Important? Not really, but it's at least sort of useful.

      "ALSO, is there anything more COMPLETELY FUCKING STUPID than TEXT MESSAGING someone from a PHONE, where you could type less and ACTUALLY CALL THEM? GRRRRRRR...... "

      You mean besides situations where it would be inpolite to talk? Just because you don't see the point doesn't mean it's senseless. I discovered when I got my T68 talking to my laptop via bluetooth that SMS messages were ending up in my inbox in Outlook. That was pretty damn cool! I could get messages out via my cell phone using my laptop. Wish I had explored that more, never found the time tho.

      I respect that you don't care about games on your phone etc, I don't think your rant is all that valid. It's one thing to have no interest, it's another to rant like everybody's stupid.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    13. Re:Seriously... by JakiChan · · Score: 1

      Motorola phones have this interesting text input mode called T9

      Oddly enough, the Nextel phones are the only Motorola phones (as far as I am aware) that use T9. T9 input is common (Nokia, SonyEricsson, and Siemens use it), but on all of their non-iDEN phones Motorola uses iTAP, their own version of the same thing. Dunno why. My v3682 as well as the v70 and all the v60 variants I have seen use iTAP.

      --
      "Where quality is like a dead stinking rat - you just can't miss it."
    14. Re:Seriously... by black+mariah · · Score: 1

      Now THAT is an explanation. I never thought about places where local calls cost money (could this be why text messaging has caught on in England so well?).

      --
      'Standards' in computing only impress those who are impressed by things like 'standards'.
    15. Re:Seriously... by black+mariah · · Score: 1

      Yet another good point. Deaf dudes! Something else they might want to throw in is the ability to translate the other parties voice into text. Instant portably teletype.

      --
      'Standards' in computing only impress those who are impressed by things like 'standards'.
    16. Re:Seriously... by black+mariah · · Score: 1

      Some more good points. I think the main thrust of my annoyance with these devices is the fact that they're still marketed as PHONES. At some point a gadget with a bunch of extra stuff taped onto it becomes another gadget entirely.

      --
      'Standards' in computing only impress those who are impressed by things like 'standards'.
    17. Re:Seriously... by FRiC · · Score: 1

      In some countries it also costs money to _receive calls_. Sending text messages is much much cheaper.

    18. Re:Seriously... by FRiC · · Score: 1

      What's annoying is that eventhough all these manufacturers use T9, but there doesn't appear to be a fixed T9 standard. e.g. different words and word selections appear on different brands, and the ordering of special characters, and even the space key is placed differently.

    19. Re:Seriously... by troc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It costs menothing to RECEIVE an SMS when I am roaming in other countries......

      It then costs me less that a voice call to SMS back.

      Not only that, what if the person you want to contact is on the phone, in a meeting, asleep, etc? Text messages are like small emails in that respect. I often email people short one liner emails when I am at work or at home, SMS gives me the same functionality wherver I am. Yes I can email from my phone but it's more expensive and unnecessary.

      Troc

      --
      Troc's dubious podcast and blog: http://www.trocnet.net
    20. Re:Seriously... by AppyPappy · · Score: 1

      I refuse to own a cell phone because Jesus hates them. You didn't see our Lord and Savior walking around Galilee with a phone to His ear promising his mother that He would eat right. He didn't take pictures of Golgatha with phone to show to His brothers and sisters. And you don't see pictures of Him hanging on the Tree of Sorrow with a freaking earbud.

      And He didn't drive with one because it's a SIN. Everytime I see some soccer mom cruising around in her SUV chatting to her friends and ignoring the traffic in front of her, I want to yell "DON'T YOU KNOW YOU ARE RISKING ETERNAL DAMNATION".

      --

      If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem

    21. Re:Seriously... by blimpyboy · · Score: 1

      *Beep* as opposed to... *BeeP bleep blah blah balh* (for 30 seconds while the owner of the phone picks it up), followed by "HELLO? WHO IS THIS? I CAN'T HEAR YOU, YOUR BREAKING UP, HANG ON A SEC..." and so on. yes. exactly the same.

  18. Bad reception wiith T68i by benwaggoner · · Score: 1

    I had a T68i via ATT for a week, and returned it for a Motorola T720. the T68i was a great phone in pretty much every way except that its signal strength simply wasn't adequate in lots of places I need to be (Portland airport, San Jose). The T720 works great for me in places where the T68i would cut out constantly. I do miss the Bluetooth, though.

    I looked at the new Nokias, but I just couldn't hack the weird number pad. Yeesh.

  19. Found it by billstr78 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here is the latest story from an advertising trade rag. Here is the link to the commercial if you just can't wait.

    1. Re:Found it by billstr78 · · Score: 1

      Here is another link to a story which also refrences other "spoof" ads. Very funny stuff.

    2. Re:Found it by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      Here is a mirror also

  20. More Trolling from Samir! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That crazy raghead fraud is spouting more complete nonsense. If there was really a Samir Gupta at nintendo, I'm sure he wouldn't appreciate you stealing his identity, however, THERE IS NO SAMIR GUPTA listed as a VP in any nintendo division. Sad it is, that you have nothing better to do than prete nd to be someone who doesn't exist.

    1. Re:More Trolling from Samir! by Graspee_Leemoor · · Score: 1

      " Sad it is, that you have nothing better to do than prete nd to be someone who doesn't exist."

      And even sadder that you have nothing better to do than check up on him.

      graspee

  21. About the marketing.... by SuperCal · · Score: 2, Funny

    Judging from the product's webpage they are marketing to gay cowboys.... I hope that everyone gets the same picture and nokia hasn't set up some rotating images because that guy is seriously funny looking with that hat...

    --
    Business News and Resources: www.usasource.net
    1. Re:About the marketing.... by fobbman · · Score: 5, Funny

      They use the same scripts that Amazon.com uses, so that they can market to people based upon their prior purchases. Kinda sucks that you can't go back and edit your post, doesn't it?

    2. Re:About the marketing.... by FreshFunk510 · · Score: 1

      Hmm that explains why the guy in my ad is a pimp-stud holding a heavy machine gun while reading an 0'Reilly book.

      I thought that was quite odd.

      --


      "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." - Martin Luther King, Jr.
  22. So many features.... by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 1

    MMS support,Bluetooth,Triband, and polyphonic bliss

    I'd like IMAP, HTTP, and IM, PDA functionality that can sync via bluetooth to a Mac

    Funny, I have no desire for so many functions. I just want a phone & phone service that doesn't drop my calls, has long battery life, comes with cheap monthly service, and that lets me keep my current cell phone number even if I switch to a different company...

    --
    "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
    1. Re:So many features.... by mosch · · Score: 1
      Well, it comes wuth Bluetooth, MMS, and such, but the SonyEricsson T68i also has kickass battery life, and excellent reception.

      the wireless earpiece and easy syncing are just a bonus, in my mind.

    2. Re:So many features.... by mazevedo · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Funny, I have no desire for so many functions.

      Then, don't write here!!! Who made you post to this forum??

      I have a 7650 (first Series 60 phone), that I've bought in a promotion that my telco was offering. My phone costed me just about $75. I wasn't going to buy a $700 phone by then. My first impression of the device was that it was quite "useless" at the beginning. Then I started to configure the e-mail. Because I travel a lot, and most of the time I'm away from a "NETed" computer, I started to see if I had important e-mails in my mail box. Then I started to use the Callendar function, started to add some extra programs (yes, this works like a PDA!!!) and games!

      The camera has been usefull quite a few times (like in an accident a friend had, so that we could take pictures of the car and send them to the insurance company)

      All of this can be syncronised with a PIM program like Outlook or Lotus.

      The only four drawbacks the 7650 has are:

      • Short battery life
      • No bluetooth AUDIO PROFILE (i.e., you cannot connect to a wireless headset or car kit)
      • Fixed memmory: 4Mb
      • Only GSM 900/1800

      The 3650 addresses all this problems, because it has a longer battery life, BT audio profile, Multimedia Card for extra storage of programs, contacts, pictures, videos and last but not least: TRIBAND!!

      If you want a phone that just does phone calls, you can buy some models from Nokia that just plain do that!!

      --
      mazevedo
    3. Re:So many features.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then, don't write here!!! Who made you post to this forum??

      I saw Taco hold a gun to his head.

      Honestly, don't get so angry just because someone posts a view contrary to the ./ majority...

      It's ok. You're allowed to express free opinions here... calm down. Breath...

  23. The Ring by Angry+Black+Man · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Say goodbye to dialing numbers in the dark with that fscking pad... then when you finally get used to it and go and try to use your housephone it will take you roughly 4 minutes to dial 10 digits.

    Wtf was Nokia thinking? What happened to ease of use and ergonomics?

    --
    the byproduct of years of oppression by the white man
    1. Re:The Ring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The keys actually light up in the dark. Dialing by touch, however, would be quite challenging.

      So : stay clear of people you know who owns these phones on the freeway :-)

    2. Re:The Ring by Linux+Ate+My+Dog! · · Score: 1

      Um, the keypad lights up at the first touch. Very bright. Like most Nokia phones. You can actually see the keys.

      The screen itself is so bright that one of the apps you can download at Handango.com is a flashlight app. It sets the screen to blank with the backlight on. Handahngo declined to put up a screenshot.

    3. Re:The Ring by Frac · · Score: 1

      Say goodbye to dialing numbers in the dark with that fscking pad... then when you finally get used to it and go and try to use your housephone it will take you roughly 4 minutes to dial 10 digits.

      Right.... Because back then everyone was SO confused when we switched from rotary phones to ones with keypads.

    4. Re:The Ring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Right.... Because back then everyone was SO confused when we switched from rotary phones to ones with keypads
      The standard numeric keypad was an advance in user friendliness. The best description I can come up with for this keypad is a retreat from user friendliness. :-p
  24. A Potential Problem by SmartGamer · · Score: 1

    *klik* *beep*
    "Huh?"
    *klik* *klik* *klik* *beep* *beep* *beep*
    "Stupid thing..."
    *klik*klik*klik*klik*klik*klik* *beep*beep*beep*beep*beep*beep*
    "Martha! The TV remote's not working and it's making these weird beeping sounds!"
    "That's your cell phone, dear."

    --
    Warning: Poster of this comment is a nerd. Just like everybody else here.
    1. Re:A Potential Problem by writermike · · Score: 1

      *klik*klik*klik*klik*klik*klik* *beep*beep*beep*beep*beep*beep*

      "And it was, like, beep, beep, beep, beep, beep. And then, like, half of my TXT msg was gone. And I was, like ... heh. It devoured my TXT msg. It was a really good TXT msg. And then I had to do it again and I had to do it fast so it wasn't as good. It's kind of a bummer."

      --
      If Nalgene water bottles are outlawed, only outlaws will have Nalgene water bottles.
    2. Re:A Potential Problem by exhilaration · · Score: 1
      I wonder why I have the sudden urge to run to my nearest Apple store and buy a Mac?

      Oh well.

  25. Separate components? by Jason1729 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    For what these things cost, you could buy a cell phone, digital camera, and PDA, all of which will have better specs than the phone. If you skimp a bit on the camera and PDA, you can add an mp3 player too.

    Considering that, what is the point of this combo phone? It's huge, I want my cell phone to be tiny so I can have it at the bottom of a pocket and forget about it. Another point, what happens when you want to upgrade one of the parts, with the combo-phone you lose everything and have to re-buy it all.

    To top things off, the 3650 is ugly, and why do they put the buttons in a ring around the bottom of the phone? Do they think it's a dial? It will make dialing numbers much harder and typing text on that thing will be a horrible experience.

    Jason
    ProfQuotes

    1. Re:Separate components? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3650 costs 430 euros in Finland, cheapest Ipaq costs the same.

      The best thing about combined package is the convinience. Have you tought about how much space small cell phone, digital camera and PDA will take together in your pocket? What about synchronizing between three devices or carrying around three chargers instead of one?

    2. Re:Separate components? by Jason1729 · · Score: 1

      Yes, but why in the world would anyone buy an iPaq or any winCE piece of crap? PalmOS is far superior both from a usability and programming point of view. I wouldn't trade my Visor Deluxe for 10 iPaqs, except maybe to sell them to suckers on ebay and buy another palm handheld. New palmOS 3.x devices are available for well under $100. If you want colour, even the IIIc can be had for $90 as a new OEM.

      I find it funny that you posted that as AC. You're too afraid to have anyone know you recommended an iPaq, and the only reason you did is because it's so over-priced and you're using it as an example of how expensive handhelds are.

      Jason
      ProfQuotes

    3. Re:Separate components? by wheany · · Score: 1

      you could buy a cell phone, digital camera, and PDA, all of which will have better specs than the phone.

      I want my cell phone to be tiny so I can have it at the bottom of a pocket and forget about it.

      Would your phone, superior digital camera, superior pda and if you skimp a bit on the camera and PDA, superior mp3 player be small enough to have at the bottom of a pocket?

      And you don't have to buy this phone. Vote with your wallet. Buy a simpler, possibly even non-Nokia phone. Buy a camera, a pda and an mp3 player. Use the power of free market.

  26. Here kitty... by xTK-421x · · Score: 1

    The video that made the phone popular:

    http://ih8ufkr.com/humor/nokia.avi

    Origins at snopes.

    --
    "TK-421, why aren't you at your post?"
    1. Re:Here kitty... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      The video that made the phone popular:

      kitty movie in better quality
      http://www.whowantsabalti.com/vids/nokia.mpg

  27. IN SOVIET RUSSIA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    cel phone call YOU!!!
    teh 1337 uber hax0r b307ch

  28. ugly by Dynedain · · Score: 1

    I'll stick w/ my Samsung I330 thank you. It has all of these features already.

    --
    I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
  29. Cool, now we can make our own cat swinging videos! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  30. No PDA functionality thank you by Malc · · Score: 1

    I already have a PDA. Why would I want one with a miniature screen and sub-standard functionality? Why should I pay for this duplication? I just want my phone to sync its phonebook with my PDA. End of story.

    1. Re:No PDA functionality thank you by wheany · · Score: 1

      I already have lots of stuff, but I'm not going to list things I'm not going to buy because of that.

    2. Re:No PDA functionality thank you by Malc · · Score: 1

      Good for you! An upstanding example for us all.

  31. Sony Ericsson T608/T610 by augustz · · Score: 1

    Any further info on when these are coming out? These really hit the sweet spot for me. Good design, nice phone.

    T-Mobile is by far the friendliest provider I've dealt with, and after spending a few hours of my life over the year with other providers (Sprint PCS ehem) I'm willing to have that count for something.

    They have some good plans and let you unlock your phone after a bit.

  32. Turning your exisiting PDA into a cell phone . . . by jgaynor · · Score: 1

    Even though the treo and some small-screen MS smartphones are out there - I think slashdotters wont be happy until they have a full blown VOICE cdma CF-type-II expansion card that they can use with American network. Sure these new phone can do pictures and all, but they just aren't very customizable. People want to add cellphone capability to their much adored bleeding-edge PDA's.

    Audiovox just released the RTM-8000 for the European crowd - a Tri-Band GPRS/GSM CF card that can be used with existing pocket PCs. How long until the US gets one? Is there already something like this out there for the states? Mind you I want to do VOICE, not just have a wifi modem that I can get overcharged for.

  33. It's a... phone. by WegianWarrior · · Score: 1

    While I'm as gadgetfixated as anyone, I need my phone for one thing; to make calls. And maybe the occosinal SMS. I don't need a PDA (thats what my Palm is about), and I don't need to spend a shitload of cash for WAPing (I'm not that rich, and I can survive without checking my e-mail a few hours). So, since this phone don't offer me any significant increce on the things I deam inportant (batterylife mostly), I'll stick to me 5110 a few more years.

    --
    Everything in the world is controlled by a small, evil group to which, unfortunately, no one you know belongs.
    1. Re:It's a... phone. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what a piece of shit

    2. Re:It's a... phone. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, I said the same thing when I your reply.

  34. I want a simple phone! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's nice to see those full featured cell phone hitting the market...but the price are always too high for the use I would do.
    What I need is a simple tri-band phone, small and efficient, with a chip, but without cam or other stuff that I don't need.
    The Ericsson T39 is the kind of phone I'm looking, but still pricey on ebay.
    I would love to see a small/cheap phone coming on the market this year.

  35. So, I assume it's just me now.... by Skyshadow · · Score: 1

    Is there anyone else out there who uses their cell phone to place and recieve phone calls, or am I all alone now?

    --
    Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
    1. Re:So, I assume it's just me now.... by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 1
      I'm with you.

      I tried to get a new phone last week, because my old Nokia's starting to fail on the "5" key. Worn out.

      Getting a phone that just makes calls is difficult. I gave up. I'm getting out my soldering iron and see if I can get the key to last another year or two.

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
  36. Re:Turning your exisiting PDA into a cell phone . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Sure these new phone can do pictures and all, but they just aren't very customizable."

    Why not? You can install or write own Java applications for the new cell phones.

  37. Looks like an old intellivision controller by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 1

    or a paddle... remember paddles?

    --
    stuff |
  38. I don't know seems a little much... by Fallen+Kell · · Score: 1

    Basically you are paying 2 to 3 times more and getting less quality solution then if you just bought things like a digital camera and pda, and cell phone seperatly. Just about all cell phones will have the ability to access the internet, and most decent pda's can connect to your cell phone as well as connect to your digital camera, thus being able to send "pictures" through your cell phone (at much higher quality at that).

    Yeah yeah there is the "prestige" of owning the all in one device, but until that all in one device is as good in all its functions as the other devices are seperatly, I would rather own the devices seperatly (I'm just a power freak, I prefer quality over compactness almost every time).

    --
    We were all warned a long time ago that MS products sucked, remember the Magic 8 Ball said, "Outlook not so good"
    1. Re:I don't know seems a little much... by nordicfrost · · Score: 1

      As for the quality perspective, I totally agree to your post. But I think that convergence is a major advantage for many people. At my work (a web newssite), we are constantly looking for the day when a high qualty-pixel PDA phone enters the market. Reason? We want to equip the journalists with these as their image / audio / text inputting platform for professional use. Sure, we could use a PDA, a phone and a camere but this becomes really cumbersome to drag around every day. So for now, a bluetooth camera and phone looks like the best solution.

  39. SyncML by JakiChan · · Score: 3, Informative

    This phone doesn't support SyncML, so the chances of you syncing with your Mac anytime soon are slim. Nokia does provide PC software to allow syncing with your Windows PC, though.

    And as for Bluetooth, once again Nokia has failed to implement the headset profile, although it does support the newer handsfree profile. I can't seem to find any details on the differences between the two but what it does mean for sure is that of the current Bluetooth headsets available, only the SonyEricson HBH-60 and the soon-to-arrive Nokia HDW-2 support that profile. Nokia is known for their poor and buggy Bluetooth support (they must hate that their rival Ericsson invented it) and they do seem to try the "embrace and extend" scheme once in a while - they want you to buy their Bluetooth device and not someone else's. They've used the headset profile in the 6310i, but that's it for the US market.

    It's hard not to support SonyEricsson (especially the Ericsson part) when they've made Bluetooth a licensed standard, and when they put things like SyncML, an open syncing standard, on their phones. And don't forget the SonyEricsson Clicker which is just plain cool.

    A good review of the 3650 is here.

    --
    "Where quality is like a dead stinking rat - you just can't miss it."
  40. Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



    Not me. It's a telephone. It's excessively expensive and no one ever really uses all those 'features'.

  41. Smartphones on CNET & Phonescoop by joelparker · · Score: 2, Informative
    Try the reviews on CNET and PhoneScoop

    I'm very happy with the Kyocera,
    the new smartphone from Verizon

    IMHO it's worth time looking at individual apps
    on wireless PDA sites like Handango.
    The right apps that fit your needs can make
    a huge difference in your satisfaction.

    Cheers, Joel

    1. Re:Smartphones on CNET & Phonescoop by piperepip · · Score: 1

      I LOVE the newest Kyocera smartphone... Small and light, color screen, and an entire Palm in a phone. Even has SD/MMC support so you can add on Bluetooth later. It's 3G, as well. Anything it doesn't have can be added on in a Palm app or SD/MMC... what else is there?!?

  42. Treo? by SlashChick · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have a Handspring Treo that I really get a kick out of. It works as a regular (although larger) flip phone when I need a phone, and as a PDA when I need a PDA. Today I was waiting at the salon to get my hair done, and while I was waiting, I was surfing Google and trying to find a good software package for one of my clients.

    The Treo has AIM/Yahoo/MSN support thanks to VeriChat, which I highly recommend. I also use Top Gun SSH to SSH into my servers from anywhere.

    Treo Central is the hookup for new software, and is also a good site for ringtones (if you're into them -- I like the wide selection of ringtones that come by default.)

    Also, PalmNet lets you connect your Treo to your laptop and get 10K/sec Internet access wherever you can find a Sprint PCS connection.

    All in all, if you need more than just a phone, the Treo is a winner. If you want just a phone, get just a phone... but even my boyfriend, who has one of those LG phones that you get for free with Verizon, gets jealous of me surfing around the Internet, playing games, and chatting when we're waiting in line for something.

    The Treo is $149 right now. If you are a current Sprint PCS customer and you sign another 1-year Advantage agreement, you may be able to receive a service credit. I got a $200 credit [4 1/2 months free] just for signing up for another year, but I had to negotiate heavily.

    Hope this helps...

    1. Re:Treo? by buck_wild · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      "...even my boyfriend, who has one of those LG phones that you get for free with Verizon, gets jealous of me surfing around the Internet, playing games, and chatting when we're waiting in line for something."

      Shouldn't you be paying attention to each other, instead of 'chatting', etc.? I mean, talk about a breakup waiting to happen.

      --
      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
    2. Re:Treo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On your website, I see this at the bottom:

      Fatal error: Nesting level too deep - recursive dependency? in Unknown on line 0

      I don't know about PHP, but in perl you only get errors sent to stdout if you explicitly want to (using CGI::Carp or something). Can't you make PHP not do that?

  43. 2 posts a day limit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Huh? I guess I don't post enough as a troll to find out.

  44. Battery life by afidel · · Score: 1

    Is there a bluetooth capable phone that has over 3 hours realworld talktime? My dad uses his phone an insane amount and absolutly goes crazy if his phone's battery dies during the day. I would love to get him a bluetooth phone so I can put to gether a CE based invoicing program and have it fax the invoice through the cellphone.

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    1. Re:Battery life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ive got an "old" SE t39, and it just keeps on going. I havent recharged the battery for more than a week.

    2. Re:Battery life by afidel · · Score: 1

      That looks good, with the 1150mAh battery it looks like it might actually make him happy =) Now I just have to find out if it is available in N. America and if so can I get it working on AT&T's network easily.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    3. Re:Battery life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah there are actually good phones with bluetooth that I can say I have gotten a large about 3.5 4 hours of talk time off of in one charge and its an old Ericsson R520m not sure how new sony ericsson battery life is but this one definitely goes the distance and until this one dies I have no intentions of replacing.

  45. Why not by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    just carry around a laptop with PCMCIA cell phone?
    Or why not just clip a 45" big screen TV on your belt?
    Damn, are you so desperate for 24/7 entertainment that you HAVE to drag a theatre around with you??

    So sad it is that you people can't just turn it off and walk away for a few hours.
    I haven't watched a movie in a few years now.
    I don't even listen to the radio when I drive. I just listen to the motor and my thoughts.

    Have any of you ever tried that?? What do you do when the electricity goes out for a few hours?
    Contemplate suicide because you can't get online and play a game or watch some new PPV movie??

    Get a life...

    1. Re:Why not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Get a life...

      just like you, mr I'm soo fucking sad I post anti-phone posts.

    2. Re:Why not by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1

      Flamebait. NOT...

      I'm stone cold serious, you people need to get a life if you have to carry an Internet terminal around everywhere with you.

      I remember when there were no satellites in the sky, where there was no such thing as cable TV, computers smaller than a building, and cell phones were a Dick Tracy funny papers thing. You think the world is a better place for all this technology?? You are all slaves to the machine. Look at it, really. Check the YRO section, look at the former KGB generals coming here to run 'Homeland "Security"'..

      Look at all the Big Brother articles right here on /. !!!

      We beg for the very tools that enslave us. How appalling.
      I carry a cell phone, a plain cell phone and only because I have to for work. If it were not for that I would not carry one.
      I don't have a home phone because I am sick of assholes calling me to no end trying to sell me crap I don't need or want.

      I am a connected Luddite. I am on the net because I have to be, for work purposes. Outside of that I have no real use for the Internet, it's pretty much a giant toilet of misinformation.

      If all the electronics on earth stopped working today I would rejoice because we would have to go back to using our minds again, like we used to.
      Computers have made people STUPID. SOME people may now be smart about computers, but so what? So that they know how to work on and use the tools that will bring about the end of our freedoms???

      Yeah, get a life indeed....

    3. Re:Why not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You're also holier-than-thou. Perhaps you'll learn someday that those kind of people are not viewed positively.

      Cheers!

    4. Re:Why not by blimpyboy · · Score: 1

      And you are posting on slashdot?

    5. Re:Why not by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I do security work.
      It's my job to be aware of what goes on. /. is a good place to stay abreast of security, privacy, rights issues.

      Just because I use and work with technology does not mean that I have to have a love affair with it.

  46. Bluetooth thoughts? by rilister · · Score: 1

    So what's the current state of Slashdot feeling on Bluetooth these days? Anyone find it an essential part of their life?

    Essential item, hot geek toy or useless boondoggle... any thoughts? (I ask because I remember the mass sceptism circa twelve months ago - or do you still prefer 802.11?)

    --
    'This writing business. Pencils and what-not. Over-rated if you ask me. Silly stuff. Nothing in it' - Eeyore
  47. Nice, wish it was CDMA by mpost4 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I wish this was a CDMA phone, from the web site it had it listed as GSM
    I am looking forward to the point when they have a bluetooth CDMA cell phone, I have the palm pilot tungsten t and a bluetooth adaptor for my laptop. I found that Jabra makes a bluetooth headset for non-bluetooth phones, but it only works for audio it does not do data. Here is the response I got from them when I asked about the headset.

    The Bluetooth profile supports audio but not data. Sorry.

    Thank you for contacting JABRA Customer Service.

    Heather A. Fox
    Customer Service Representative
    800-327-2230
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Michael P. O'Connor [mailto:m.p.oconnor@verizon.net]
    Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2003 4:10 PM
    To: info@jabra.com
    Subject: question about the FreeSpeak for non-bluetooth phone
    I have the Qualcomm QCP-2760 phone and was wondering if this will also let other Bluetooth device to connect to the cell phone, so that I can use a Bluetooth pda to dial the phone, and to use both a laptop and the pda to connect to the internet via the cell phone thought the dial connection I have setup for the phone. Can I do data over the Bluetooth adaptor? Thanks for your time.

    Michael P. O'Connor
    m.p.oconnor@verizon.net
    http://mikeocon nor.net

    This has been talked about a lot on the Tungsten T mailing list on yahoo groups ( http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Tungsten_T/

  48. Nokia 7210 by BrettofSeattle · · Score: 1

    I used the 3650 for a day and loved it, but it's just too big. I picked up the 7210 instead and it's great. WAP, color screen, polyphonic ringtones, Java, speakerphone (works better than I thought), and an FM radio (which I don't think the 3650 has). Best of all it's only 2.9 ounces!


    If your service provider is AT&T, you need to pick one up fast because they aren't going to be offering it any more. I had to call around to find a store that still had some.

    1. Re:Nokia 7210 by FyRE666 · · Score: 1

      Dude you were duped if you only just bought the 7210 ;-) The 7250 was launched a short while ago - it's essentially a 7210 with a camera for the same price the old 7210 used to be. Of course, if you managed to get the 7210 for next to nothing that's all well and good! BTW, the 7210 is a horrible phone for java developers, and very slow compared to the 60 series phones (3650/7650 at present). The 60 series also run symbian apps, and can play sampled sounds and midi which is great for games, recording film clips and annoying ringtones!

  49. Whining about "simple phones" by binaryDigit · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Why is everyone whining on about "ohh, these phones have too much" and "ohh who needs a pda + phone" and "waah, I don't want a camera on my phone". Your solution is simple, buy a phone without it. If you go over to say at&t wireless, they have like a dozen GSM phones alone. All the way from relatively simple phones with bw displays up to the 3650 (and soon the P800).

    Fine, great, you don't want that stuff. Just don't buy it then, don't whine about it. There are those that do want those features.

  50. Alternatives. by rf0 · · Score: 1

    I've tried a 3650. Buttons sucked as they aren't in the normal layout. However other phones to try. If you want big screen + Symbian + PDA then go for either Nokia 7650 or Sony Ericcson P800. If you want something small with a camera Nokia 7250 is quite cool. If you want something small with bluetooth. T68i. Just my opinion but they are all good phones.

    Rus

  51. The best two phones on the market... by ngtni · · Score: 1

    ... are, without a doubt, the Nokia 6100 and the Nokia 7250.

    The Nokia 6100 is a simple, elegant phone - packed with features (colour screen, polyphonic ringtones, etc) but also currently the smallest and lightest phone on the market. Missing features - no camera, no radio, but that means this phone is just 13mm thick!!

    The Nokia 7250 is the updated version of the 7210 (better screen and better software), also with an integrated camera (but no video).

    http://www.nokiausa.com/phones/7250i
    http://www .nokiausa.com/phones/6100

    Phones to avoid: the 7210 and the 6610. These are essentially "older" versions of the phones above.

  52. It's not just a phone.... by gilesjuk · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's a smartphone, you made a mistake going with the T68i. The T68i is a toy in comparison, can't install new apps, can't write your own.

    The 3650 can run all kinds of apps, it's basically a modern colour PSION scaled to fit in a phone.

    Who cares if it's a little chunkier than a dumb basic phone, it has more functionality. You might as well say a laptop is too big compared to a PowerPC, this is the difference between a 3650 and a toy like the T68i, only the 3650 is only a little bigger.

    1. Re:It's not just a phone.... by gilesjuk · · Score: 1

      PowerPC, doh I meant PocketPC.

  53. All I want by rynthetyn · · Score: 1

    Is a tiny phone--small enough to fit on my keychain would be nice. I don't want video, I don't want a camera, I don't want a PDA, I just want a phone that does what a phone is supposed to do--call people.

    --
    Eagles may soar, but weasles don't get sucked into jet engines...
    1. Re:All I want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      try a panasonic phone sold at www.celluloco.com not an endorsement but i haven't seen it in the states anywhere else

  54. NY Times review by HeroicAutobot · · Score: 1
    I would definitely check out the NYTimes review by David Pogue for this phone.

    Don't miss his complaints about the interface! The button arrangement on this phone is apparently a PITA.

    --
    I'm looking for a HEPA media filter for my TV. I'm alergic to reality shows.
  55. Re:One trait I always look for when purchasing pho by Fulcrum · · Score: 1

    This phone on the other hand, with its circular dial pad, can't come close to meeting this criteria. Nokia seems to have been trying to make it more and more difficult to dial their phones using the keypad, and this particular model seems to be quite the shining example of their hard efforts.

    That was my primary concern when I was getting ready to buy the phone. Fortunately, a co-worker already had it and I had the chance to play with it and see how the dial pad felt.

    First, for me it wasn't/isn't that bad and I can easily dial after some use. The phone also has voice activated dialing for up to 25 numbers, as well as, one-touch dialing (I also heard that it has the capability for up to 8 voice commands.

    The combination of the above and the loudspeaker makes it easy enought for me to use it in the car.

  56. I would like a mobile phone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...that I can call people on and they can call me. Do you think I can find one?

    Jeebus Cripes, what's next, built in blowjobs?

  57. WHAT?!?!? No kitchen sink?!! by tempestdata · · Score: 1

    Thats a deal breaker right there!

    --
    - Tempestdata
  58. The only thing more stupid than that by raygundan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Is people who don't realize that not everyone has the same preferences as them. No matter how silly it may seem to you, some people like to send text messages and play video games from their phones.

    This is like shouting "tastes great" at someone who thinks the beer is "less filling."

    Or for geeks, shouting "vi" at an emacs user.

    By your logic, we need a new name for "computers" because all anybody uses them for is Word Processing and Solitaire. I propose we call them "Soliputer WP."

    1. Re:The only thing more stupid than that by Oliver+Defacszio · · Score: 1
      The problem is that there are no new models for those of us who just want a fucking phone. Believe it or not, there is a large demographic that just wants a mobile phone. Just a phone. Not something that has ten million other irritations that are purely unwelcome, no games, no screensavers and no web access. Just a phone.

      If you want one of these abominations, have fun. Meanwhile, the manufacturers are missing out on a lot of revenue from people like me who want a new phone, but not an arcade in my pocket.

      --

      -
      Inventor of the term 'pardon my French'.
    2. Re:The only thing more stupid than that by Mike+Markley · · Score: 2, Informative

      This thing might be what you're looking for -- it does have games, but making them work well is hardly the focus of the thing. Hell, it doesn't even have a web browser ;).

    3. Re:The only thing more stupid than that by wheany · · Score: 1

      Okay, I'm getting redundant, but here is a new, very basic Nokia model.

    4. Re:The only thing more stupid than that by Oliver+Defacszio · · Score: 1

      That's a very slick little phone (especially the external LCD)... thanks for the heads up.

      --

      -
      Inventor of the term 'pardon my French'.
  59. jeez you guys are slow by fragged+one · · Score: 0

    this phone has been available with att wireless for about three weeks now. not exactly 'just released'.

    --
    if it wasn't for that horse, i wouldn't have spent that year in college.....
  60. Hidoi! by garyrich · · Score: 1

    Yeah, rub it in.... meanie. At least we don't pay $85 for a melon ;-}

    --
    -- your Web browser is Ronald Reagan
  61. CDMA.... by ajkst1 · · Score: 1

    When are major phone makers going to come out with sweet phones for CDMA? Sure the world uses GSM, but the US for the most part uses CDMA. The GSM service in the US sucks

    1. Re:CDMA.... by redcliffe · · Score: 1

      When CDMA is released as a free and open standard like GSM.

    2. Re:CDMA.... by Dusty · · Score: 1

      When CDMA is released as a free and open standard like GSM.

      I thought that Qualcomm's patent on CDMA style RF was going to expire soon. Does anyone know when?

      I doubt they'll release the protocol over the top though.

  62. Which networks? by abischof · · Score: 1

    Perhaps I missed it, but which mobile networks in the US offer/support this phone? (I'm on Voicestr^H^H^H^H^HT-Mobile, so I'm hoping that may be one of them)

    --

    Alex Bischoff
    HTML/CSS coder for hire

    1. Re:Which networks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the amount of time it took for you to write your message you could have checked the freaking t-mobile web site. THe picture of the 3650 is right there on the front page you lazy sos

  63. I'd like by Multiple+Sanchez · · Score: 1

    > I'd like IMAP, HTTP, and IM, as well as PDA functionality that can sync via bluetooth to a Mac. I was looking at the Sony Ericsons, but this may work as well.

    U-S-A! U-S-A!

    No blood for IMAP, please.

    Friends, /.ers, countrymen. Do we really need four different kinds of icing on our devilsfood? A little first-world modesty would become us.

    That being said: will this thing sync with my Aibo's GP32?

  64. The Sidekick has IMAP support by Wonko42 · · Score: 4, Informative
    The Sidekick does have IMAP support. It even supports SSL connections over both IMAP and POP3. The only drawback is that it doesn't support server-side IMAP folders (i.e., it will connect to the server and download the contents of your inbox, but that's it).

    I love my Sidekick.

    1. Re:The Sidekick has IMAP support by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1

      Then, it's kinda missing the point. I use proper IMAP on my mobile, not "IMAP pretending to be POP". Sounds more like a compatability feature rather than true support.

    2. Re:The Sidekick has IMAP support by Wonko42 · · Score: 1

      It's not an advertised feature. Danger (makers of the Sidekick) decided not to promote IMAP support until they had a better implementation, which they do claim to be working on. There's also a complete, working SSH client for the Sidekick, but since their developer program just recently got underway, there currently isn't a way to actually transfer the SSH client to your phone to use it. Heh.

  65. SyncML IS supported by MoreDruid · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I got one of these phones a few weeks ago (Hail Europe!) and Nokia provides SyncML sofware on their CD, along with 3 games: Bounce, some card games (Klondike 'n stuff) and Triple Pop.

    You can download an updated version of the Videorecorder app from the Nokia site as well, instead of video only, you get video & audio.

    I especially like the PC-Suite, you can drag 'n drop an mp3 to your mobile (if it's linked through cable, IR or BT) and it automatically is converted to a .wav/.mid ringtone (including the lyrics, I've got Shaggy's "Sexy Lady" if my GF gives me a call), and you can download all data to your PC/laptop, or make a "real" backup. And last of all, I truly LOVE the fact that it's got an upgradeable 16MB SDcard in it (max 64MB I think).
    --
    The best weapon of a dictatorship is secrecy, but the best weapon of a democracy should be the weapon of openness.
    1. Re:SyncML IS supported by JakiChan · · Score: 1

      I got one of these phones a few weeks ago (Hail Europe!) and Nokia provides SyncML sofware on their CD,

      As a Java app? That's kinda cool. The early release versions that were reviewed had CDs in Chinese, so it was kinda easy to overlook. We'll see if Apple decides to add support for it to iSync.

      Personally, I use MobileSync with my T68i and sync between Entourage and my phone. That is really nice and will make it hard to get a non SE phone next, although I dislike the T610/T616 because they're triband and not quadband. I have hope for Moto's V600.

      --
      "Where quality is like a dead stinking rat - you just can't miss it."
  66. Re:One trait I always look for when purchasing pho by Dynedain · · Score: 1

    One trait I always look for when purchasing phones...can I dial it while driving, and not have to look at the phone?

    I could care a rats ass about trying to dial my phone while driving (unsafe no matter what the phone).....what I look for is whether I can answer it while driving.

    --
    I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
  67. It's a friggin' phone for gosh sakes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They give them away for a penny at Radio Shack! Video and imaging on cell phone? Definitely belongs in the more-money-than-brains department.

    Now you can get annoying phone calls in inappropriate places with video accompaniment! Full color goatse.cx!

  68. Nokia 3650 Released in US Market by Marvinthehaggler · · Score: 2, Insightful

    OK, as someone that has had one of these babies for about three months now, I must caution you. The camera is handy, the video is cool (but ultimately kinda useless), and it is kind of a PDA. HOWEVER: 1. The Bluetooth is a little strange. I can't seem to get anything to bind to the device other than a headset. Nokia's other devices up until now have only supported the Headset profile in Bluetooth, so it is possible this device only has that profile and no others (connect to computer, adhoc network, etc.). 2. MMS is still an evolving standard, and the way this device does MMS is in some cases out of spec. 3. I HATE the keyboard. Say goodbye to keying things into it without looking at the keypad, at least for some time until you get really used to it. Good luck entering lots of PDA stuff, like contact information, on this keyboard. 4. The plastics are chincey. 5. The device has crashed on me about once a week. The US carriers really vet their mobile phones hard, so possibly the 3650 sold in the US will have a better software load on it than the Hong Kong 3650 I have. BTW: I agree strongly with the posters below regarding the Sidekick (made by Danger). If you are looking for a good device, go with that one. I haven't seen the color one yet (not yet out, but sometimes I get these things early), but note that the attachable camera on the B&W version takes very low res pics.

  69. It looks like a birth control pill dispenser! by Poilobo · · Score: 1

    The keypad looks like your dialing on a birth control pill dispenser. I should have gotten one of these for my girlfriend, oh the trouble it would have saved.

    --
    Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
  70. Siemens S55 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I presonally prefer the Siemens series of phones,
    just got my hands on the Siemens S55, it has all the features MMS, camera etc etc etc, plus java support, holds the signal very well (AT&T), and is nicely designed.

    1. Re:Siemens S55 by Aramgutang · · Score: 1

      I own the S55 and it's definately the most feature-packed phone out there + it's tiny, but...the battery life...it sucks bad enough if you just make & recieve a few calls/SMSs in a day, but when you actually use all those extra functions, it hardly lasts you through half a day. Now that's bad. Oh yeah, the ringtones sound too quiet to hear most of the time (strong vibration makes up for it though) and buttons are incredibly hard to press (only affects playing games though). Otherwise, great phone! It goes for only $300 on eBay. Would definitely recommend.

  71. How much... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does Nokia pay the OSDN to advertise for them?

  72. What I want by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You know what I want in a phone?
    - The ability to make calls
    - The ability to receive calls

    That's it. My 2-year-old Sprint PCS phone recently got a crack in the LCD, so I've been looking to buy a new unit to replace it.

    So far, I haven't found any models that cost less than $100, because they're all crammed full of features that I don't need, like color LCDs and voice recognition and built-in cameras and programmable polyphonic MIDI ringtone generators and speakerphone and integrated PDA features...

    Why isn't anyone serving the low-end market?

    1. Re:What I want by FreshFunk510 · · Score: 1

      They do, dont' they? I can easily walk down the street and find a deal where they can give you a phone for free. If you want to stay with your own subscriber I'm sure you can find an old model nokia for dirt cheap.

      Anyway, in the long run, high-end market becomes the low-end market due to technological advances.

      --


      "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." - Martin Luther King, Jr.
    2. Re:What I want by EpsCylonB · · Score: 1

      I here ya, I had to replace my old nokia 5110 (a complete brick by today's standards). Ended up paying £70 for a 3310.

    3. Re:What I want by NeuroKoan · · Score: 1

      Panasonic Allure (*not* the Versio) is/was a great phone (as in phone-phone, not useless-gadget-phone).

      I'd recomend getting one if you can get your hands on one. Its a super solid phone, tiny without being hard to hold etc.

      Man, I wish mine didn't die...

      --

      "However," replied the universe, "The fact has not created in me A sense of obligation."
    4. Re:What I want by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      I reccomend Motorola startacs--completely no frills compared to these Nokia toys, but i dropped mine in a toliet bowl (while it was on) once, dried it out and it works like a charm. not to mention all the time's its been dropped and so forth. Forget exactly how much but it was under 100$US

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
  73. high price per photo? more flexible PDA setup? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My initial impression was that photo taking/sending
    was metered with a relatively high price, from
    T-Mobile service and this Nokia 3650 phone.
    This contrasts with SprintVision where Internet
    access is flat rate. Is there a nice camera phone
    that works with SprintVision, yet? Really, a
    higher resolution camera would be desired, like
    perhaps 2-megapixel resolution as in the Sony NZ90
    described at
    http://www.expansys.us/product.asp?code=NZ90&a sour ce=

    Maybe an NZ90 with a PCMCIA phone card and
    bluetooth phone telephone headset would work.

  74. Nokia and Bluetooth by NeuroKoan · · Score: 1

    Unless Nokia finally got off their asses and wrote a descent Bluetooth stack, stay away from Nokia phones. Nokia has had a notoriously incomplete and horrific Bluetooth implementation from the get go.

    SonyEricsson phones have the best Bluetooth implementation yet, and are the only ones supported by iSync works out of the box with only SonyEricsson and Ericsson phones.

    --

    "However," replied the universe, "The fact has not created in me A sense of obligation."
  75. Why wait for the Sidekick? by fm6 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    T-Mobile offers the T68i now. (For some reason, it's not on the T-Mobile web site, but you can buy it from Amazon. Yeah, it's only got a five line screen. But I've already got a PDA, I'd rather have my phone separate. Add a bluetooth interface to my Palm M515 and I've got pretty nice wireless web browsing setup.

    The best thing about T-Mobile's data support: it's not a stupid CDMA "cell modem". It's an "always-on" packet protocol, GPRS. Instead of paying for connect time, your pay for the amount of bandwidth you use. If I weren't broke, I'd trash my obsolete, poorly-designed SCH-3500 and get one of these.

    Or maybe not. I've been wondering why there hasn't been more buzz about the widespread availability of GPRS. Are there interface issues using it to run a web browser? Or are people just unenthused by the 56K bandwidth? Hey, it's fast enough to access slashdot! What more do you need?!

    1. Re:Why wait for the Sidekick? by stickyc · · Score: 1

      The UI on the T68 is miserable! I'm in love with bluetooth and the feature set, but the slow/badly organized menu system and just general un-intuitiveness are really getting on my nerves.
      The UI's so bad, you missed that the T68 has most of the PDA features, including contact management, datebook w/alarms, to-do list, and notepad.

    2. Re:Why wait for the Sidekick? by fm6 · · Score: 1
      Personally, I don't care whether a phone's internet or pda features are easy to use. As I said, I'm happy with the PDA I've already got, and don't want them merged with a phone.

      The beauty of Bluetooth is that you can just leave the phone in your pocket and access its features using another Bluetooth device. So all I really want is a phone that has Bluetooth and GPRS. If the T68I has a bad UI, then maybe it's not worth looking at. But whatever mistakes T-Mobile and Erricson made designing this phone, they realized that Bluetooth and GPRS are a magic combination. So presumably we'll see this combo in other phones, and soon.

      That's my theory anyway. Anybody have any real-world experience with this kind of configuration? As I said, I'm wondering why there isn't more buzz about GPRS.

  76. "Mobile" taken by fm6 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    When cells first came out, a lot of people in the U.S. already had "mobile" telephones. These were basicaly point-to-point radios that tied into the phone network. Expensive, because they tied up a lot of radio spectrum. Obviously, you need a word other than "mobile" to describe the new service.

  77. Why get one of those.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    when you can get one of these?
    In particular, note the pricetag.

    -Afreet

    1. Re:Why get one of those.... by glenstar · · Score: 1

      That is one of the ugliest phones I have ever seen... and only 20k USD you say... wow.

  78. Out of box thinking by philipsblows · · Score: 3, Informative

    At first I was mildly intrigued by the look of the 3650, and since T-Mobile (my carrier in AZ) actually offers the phone directly, I did some looking around... bottom line, pass on it (IMHO).

    Others have pointed out the flaky Nokia bluetooth stuff, and the lack of syncml might actually be a bigger minus that I would have thought initially (I have an Ericsson R520 with all sorts of features, syncml among them, and I am just now starting to exercise the phone's feature set).

    The keypad has to go.

    I usually stop by here to get some phone scoopage (there are certainly many, many other sites as well). They have a review of the 3650 at the bottom-- or use the review search feature-- with the final thoughts (on page 3 of the review) rather humorous, but probably too true to be ignored.

    Also on that site I found a review of the Siemens S55 which made me want to read more about the current and upcoming Siemens offerings. On the same site yet again is an article covering just that topic, about the upcoming SX1 and others from Siemens. The SX1 looks like it takes alternative keypad design in a slightly more functional direction.

    Having tried out the Jabra FreeSpeak with my R520 (successfully and satisfactorily), and with a need to use some WAP and other wireless networking features lately, I am utterly convinced that getting a phone that does what you want it to do-- well-- is essential. Look past the buzz, get what will meet your needs, and pay attention to those details about keypad quality, low-light screen readability, and other such mundane details.

    But that SX1 still looks cool...

    1. Re:Out of box thinking by mattcasters · · Score: 1

      I went to the store last week to buy this phone. Up to now I never bought anything else but Nokia. However, because I wanted a wireless earpiece to use in the car, Nokia wasn't an option. (Two words: No BlueTooth).
      So I went for the S55 and I haven't looked back. The included serial cable to connect to Windows comes very handy. The phone can then be browsed with an explorer like interface & accepts regular midi (ringtones) and jpg(pictures) files.

      Cheers,

      Matt

      --
      News about the Kettle Open Source project: on my blog
  79. I'd like IMAP, HTTP, and IM, as well as PDA functi by mlk · · Score: 2, Informative

    IM
    The Nokias are based on Psions OS, the people who maded Doom also make a ICQ client.

    HTTP
    Opera make a Symbain version of well, Opera.
    J2ME HTML - http://www.reqwireless.com/

    IMAP
    J2ME
    Mail++ ( plus many others )

    --
    Wow, I should not post when knackered.
  80. Piece of Junk by rhyder · · Score: 1

    All things

    none done well
    ass-a-9 keys
    in the garbage
    within the year

  81. the 3650 is a disaster by jedrek · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've been working on a project with the 3650 over the past 2 1/2 months and, what can I say, it's a piece of shit. If other Nokias are going to be like this, then they will fall off their pedestal - Nokia is popular as hell, but they're not a monopoly. Their total disregard for quality has pushed a lot of users, including me, to Motorola, Samsung, SonyEricsson and Siemens. The 6210 was a fiasco, bluetooth in the 6310 was buggy as hell (fixed a bit into the 6310i).

    Anyway, what sucks in the 3650?

    * The keypad. This is definately the *worst* element, it flies in the face of convention and not in a cool and edgy way. I've been using this phone non-stop for the last 11 weeks and I haven't gotten used to it.

    * Usability. Nokia took over by offering good usability. Phones used to have a different button for everything, Nokia took that, stripped it down (in the 3110, 51x0, etc) to a single nav key. It's been worse lately - the 6310 has like 13 or 14 main menu options so you can't even use shortcuts (like menu, 2, 2, 1 to write an SMS) to control all the functions.

    While it's been slowly getting worse, the 3650 is just a leap ahead. The menus are organized so poorly that it took me 10 minutes to find the clock, took me a cab ride home (25km) to figure out how to turn the keypad tones off. It's just... complicated. Plus, the software is inconsistent - you can link some elements, you can't link others - even tough they seem identical to you.

    Anyway, the phone is a total pain in the ass, I hope we start doing something for a newer model but - knowing my luck - it'll be this model all the way until autumn.

    Ugh.

    1. Re:the 3650 is a disaster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you bother to read the manual??? Of course as feature numbers increase, it will become increasingly harder to use the phone. You can't have everything at your fingertips.

      Next time at least flick through the manual to find out how to do stuff.

      However in terms of intiuity, this phone scores negative marks. Try changing the background image !!! :)

    2. Re:the 3650 is a disaster by phoneboy · · Score: 1

      While I tend to agree that the key layout is a bit strange, allow me to provide a different viewpoint on this.

      I recently swapped my 7210 for a 3650 due to all the bugs in the 7210. I showed my wife this phone. She started to play with the camera and various things with it. Once I had set up the phone correctly to send email and turned off the t9 prediction crap, she was able to send email fairly easily.

      Note that my wife is what I consider an "Average person." She's not a geek like most of us who read or interact on Slashdot. Her general impression of the phone was that it was easy to use.

      Perhaps other, non-technical people might find the phone easy to use. Most of those people don't post on Slashdot, however.

      -- PhoneBoy

      --
      The views expressed herein are not necessarily those of anyone, including the poster.
  82. Re:Turning your exisiting PDA into a cell phone . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ha expansis where everything costs twice as much as it should!

  83. Button Layout by pneuma_66 · · Score: 1

    The first time I saw this phone, i noticed the horrible button layout. What would possess a company to release a product that has a different button layout thant 99% of all phones. Also, this layout is not demonstrably faster or more convenient.
    It's too bad, because I would seriously consider this phone, were not it for the poor layout. I. got a T68is instead.

  84. I would rather have communicator anyday... by Eric+Savage · · Score: 1

    But it's not available in Boston area :(

    --

    This is not the greatest sig in the world, this is just a tribute.
  85. How about something useful? by Okonomiyaki · · Score: 1

    It's nice to see that the designers were brave enough to stray from the standard phone keypad layout but for what purpose? Style? If you're going to redesign something that everyone is familar with, make some improvements! How often do you actually enter numbers into your phone? What we need is an interface that dramatically improves on text entry.

  86. Extra demands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds good. I'll get one as soon as it
    plays mp3s
    has mw radio
    plays flash 6 & java 2

  87. Comparison with Sony Ericsson P800 by Colm+Buckley · · Score: 2, Informative

    I had a brief play with the Nokia 3650 this week; I was particularly interested to see how it compared with my shiny new P800. I had been a bit nervous about getting the P800 because (a) it was pretty expensive (b) my previous Ericssony (the T68i) had been a big disappointment and (c) I'd always been a Nokia fan, ever since the 6110.

    I needn't have worried. Beside the P800, the 3650 is clunky, circumscribed, and weird. The screen is poky and not as clear as the Sony's, and the keyboard's striking aesthetics aren't backed up by anything so mundane as actually being easy to use. The camera on the 3650 is better than the P800s in low light, but this is more than made up for by the P800's superb user interface and PDA functions. The jog dial on the P800 is the closest return to the old Nokia "do what I want" button I've seen in years, and the clever choices of "open" and "closed" UI styles make the P800 the best phone/PDA compromise I've ever encountered - in fact, the only one yet which is both a usable phone and a great PDA.

    I used to be a staunch Nokia partisan, but it seems that their only innovations these days are in weird keypad layouts. Check out the P800 instead of the 3650. Sell your dog if you have to - you won't regret this phone.

  88. yes, but does it microwave your brain? by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 2, Funny

    I've been using Nokias since 99, and I pretty much have a permanent headache. Not to say that the two facts are inter-related, mind you(although Nokias are generally on the list for most radiation output). But I think I'll switch over to the Sony Ericssons when my contract is over with suck-fest Cingular...

    --
    "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
  89. Re:I'd like IMAP, HTTP, and IM, as well as PDA fun by Linux+Ate+My+Dog! · · Score: 1

    You don't need a midlet for IMAP -- you can set up IMAP and POP3/SMTP mailboxes natively in the messaging application.

    There are also C++ based clients for IRC available at Handango, as well as another C++ based HTML browser (Emily or something). I am not even sure if Opera has released for the 3650.

  90. The Matrix Phone by angle_slam · · Score: 1
    If you liked the cell phone from the first Matrix movie (the Nokia 8110), maybe you'll like the new phone for the Matrix sequels, the Samsung Matrix Phone. Here are some links:

    Unfortunately, very few details about the features of the phone.

  91. Re:I can' t even imagine... [OT] by segfaultdot · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Actually, I have a 7210 and i rather like it... that picture on the website looks kinda funky but it is a pretty sleek phone. Nice color screen, GSM & GPRS... lotsa frills, but it works pretty well. The only thing i don't like is that the quality of the sound coming out of the speaker during regular calls isn't that great... that's a pretty freaking ironic problem for a phone to have, but oh well. The handsfree is great and the speakerphone is pretty good. Nice toy, all in all.

  92. 3650 vs 7650 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well I've had a 3650 in Europe for ages now and it seems noone here is comparing it with its true rival the 7650.

    7650
    3.6Mb Ram = bad
    joystick = good
    keypad = okay but the on/off button sucks

    3640
    3.6Mb + 16Mb MMC = good
    circular direction pad thing = bad
    keypad = takes 20mins to type a 3 char SMS --> bad

    Well thats my 2 'cents'

    Cheers

  93. Don't you want the buttons covered? by gsyswerda · · Score: 1

    I've used Motorola StarTac phones for years, and I don't think I would want to give up folding the phone closed to hang up. Also, when the phone is folded, the buttons and screen are protected. Maybe I'm missing something, but what happens to a phone like the Nokia 3650 when you stuff it in your pocket and it's banging around with your keys and stuff?

    --
    Make a difference: move to a swing state.
  94. Still far from the mark by elitman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I bought one of these off of eBay a couple of months ago, and sold it shortly after I bought it despite having invested in a 128MB MMC card. A few key comments:

    1. While I thought the keypad would be interesting and innovative, it's actually a disaster in consumer product design. The standard 3x4 keypad design is so commonly employed that people now input numbers/PINs/etc. as much for the pattern of the digits as the number the combined digits form. I found while using the device that even numbers I have known and dialed for years did not easily come to memory as the phone lacks the visual queues the familiar layout provides.

    2. The device supports a limited set of Bluetooth profiles, so that Jabra headset you bought or the first few generations of SonyEricsson headsets (through the HBH-30) won't work with it.

    3. IMAP over SSL/TLS? Forget it. Doesn't work.

    4. The user interface feels childish and inelegant. This is just my opinion, but when you compare it to either UIQ on the SonyEricsson P800 or PocketPC 2002 it appears more to be the product of an early-stage, open source project than commercial UI design.

    5. The video camera only captures ~12 seconds of video. This is NOT a storage limitation, as this restriction exists no matter how much storage you have available.

    6. Also personal opinion, the construction of the device feels cheap and "plasticy".

    Still, the device category has come a hell of a long way since the IBM/BellSouth Simon...

  95. Consider it by CausticWindow · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I can't believe all the fuss over this relatively uninteresting technologogy. Seriously, polyphonic ringtones? Ultra low-res camera? Why?

    But my biggest issue with this product is this; is it really the right time for us to support a french phone maker (and even a french standard)?

    I say, buy Motorola, a good wholesome US company.

    --
    How small a thought it takes to fill a whole life
  96. dont forget the java. by bbcrack · · Score: 1

    You can get some really cool games for J2ME enabled phones such as Dragon Island. A great palce to read about new games is Midlet Review and you can try midlets out from Midlet.org

  97. The Phone That I'm Waiting For... by cjsnell · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm waiting for the Motorola V600. It's due out later this year.

    Big screen (65K colors), Bluetooth, J2ME, polyphonic rings, GPRS, and best of all, A NORMAL, USABLE KEYBOARD LAYOUT!

    1. Re:The Phone That I'm Waiting For... by StrawberryFrog · · Score: 1

      I'm waiting for the Motorola V600 ... best of all, A NORMAL, USABLE KEYBOARD LAYOUT!

      For a minite there you had me hoping for a qwerty layout, but from the link it looks just like another numeric keypad. I don't find writing messages on those to be either normal or usable.

      --

      My Karma: ran over your Dogma
      StrawberryFrog

  98. Wow by CausticWindow · · Score: 1

    You're a regular troll buster

    --
    How small a thought it takes to fill a whole life
    1. Re:Wow by cicadia · · Score: 1
      You're a regular troll buster

      Yes, even if you do seem to be reusing someone else's work

      --
      Living better through chemicals
  99. just bought one by montjoy0 · · Score: 1

    I just bought mine Tuesday night. So far I'm pretty happy with it. For those of you who don't like the keypad, it's not so bad. By the time I had punched in all of my contacts I was as used to it as my old nokia 6160. The camera is pretty cool, but so far my favorite feature is the ring tones - any midi songs you can find will work, and with bluetooth it's pretty easy to set them up (well, setting up bluetooth on your linux box is a pain). The phone is about the same size as my 6160, so that doesn't really bother me - but I could see it being an issue if you're used to something smaller. The apps it comes with are pretty lame (mostly demos), and I haven't tried downloading any. It is kind of difficult to play games on the rocker switch, but you can't expect too much from a cell phone I guess. Overall I'm pretty happy with it, and it's way cooler than my old basic phone.

  100. futsk it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dudes, I have been a long time slashdot user.
    I hate to bring this to you, but you, the american guys, are so back in cell phones. And I know, that I am drunk and that I sound like a normal troll around here, but it's time for you to move to GSM or G3. 1900 MHz is just not going to make it. BTW, the only reason you have a different frequency for the cellphones, is that your military is already using 1800 MHz. And BTW, attacking Iraq was a mistake, although not all of you might agree with that. GSM has been very stable in here, europe. And..... we don't have DMCA in here :) So.... umm.. what I'm trying to say, is that I'm drunk and beware of the bush. Life can be beautiful.... and it ain't in the USA. It's here, in europe. Chicks are nice and beautiful.... and this is a rule. or something. The USA is bloated and the people living there. It ain't here..... in europe..... peace & bear. have fun.... and btw... nuclear strike ain't the asnwer to your prairs. peace!
    suff

  101. Late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Argh... you in the US sure are late regarding mobile phones.

  102. Re:One trait I always look for when purchasing pho by MrChuck · · Score: 1
    And please, no rants about driving and using a cell phone. I saw you talking on yours while holding up traffic in the fast lane yesterday.

    No, I was the guy on the motorcycle you cut off because you didn't signal cause your hand was on your dick^W Cell Phone.

    Hang up or get off the road. You're steering a 1ton plus metal vehicle, not sitting in your lazy boy

    ---
    I want the jammer button on my bike:
    Hello? Hello? damn, I can't hear you. I'll call you later. Maybe I'll pay attention to driving my 12mpg, 3 ton, own-zipcode SUV that will never see a dirt road.

  103. call me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    soon it will be a big deal if a cellphone has the CALL function built in :p

  104. Re:One trait I always look for when purchasing pho by ChangeOnInstall · · Score: 1

    No, I was the guy on the motorcycle you cut off because you didn't signal cause your hand was on your dick^W Cell Phone.

    No, you nearly hit me because you were splitting lanes in a bend at 70 when traffic was stopped.

    --
    What has *science* done?!? -- Dr. Weird (ATHF)
  105. Old News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is very very old news. It was released on T-Mobile's network in the US on 3/28......

  106. Nokia? wtf? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  107. Re:I can' t even imagine... [OT] by dimator · · Score: 1

    An A double T dude told me that the 7210 has been discontinued due to wierd software/slowdown problems. I guess when you get a few ring-tones and other stuff into it, the interface gets sluggish... The 7250 is supposed to fix this (I think), _and_ add a camera. :)

    --
    python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
  108. gack--Nokia marketing in overdrive by g4dget · · Score: 1
    Anybody see the unauthorized realistic but bootleg commercial advertising this phone on the Net? [...] Rumor had it that the commercial was put together by one of the ad firms in charge of (or denided) Nokia's account and leaked on to the Net from there.

    Yeah, right, and you still believe in Santa Clause, too? More likely, this ad was paid for by Nokia, deliberately made a bit "controversial", and leaked onto the net. Welcome to the new world of marketing.

  109. Ummmm by ziggy_zero · · Score: 1

    Is there anyone out there that this shit is getting way out of hand? I mean, aren't cell phones neat enough in that you can call people frm pretty much anywhere? Who needs video, internet access, or instant messenging? Really? Do you really? I don't even think it's that cool, and I'm definitely one for cutting edge technology. But this is to the point of ludicrosity. Does anyone agree with me? Or am I just weird?

    P.S.
    No, I'm not some old fogey who's not "hip" to the current technology trends, I'm 17. Hmmm I also listen to vinyl a lot. Maybe I'm an old fogey trapped inside a teenager's body.

    --
    I belong to the ______ generation.
  110. P800!!!!!!!!1 by exhilaration · · Score: 1
    i WANT my P800!!!!!!!!!!!! WHEN WILL THEY START CARRYING IT?????????? :( :( :( :(

    damn it, I can't afford a P800 unless T-Mobile or AT&T subsidize the cost.

    :*( i'm sad

  111. NOKIA KEYPAD DESIGNER ON CRACK? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WTF? Why would I want to use this weird-ass non-standard key layout? Dude, that's pretty f*****d up right there.

    1. Re:NOKIA KEYPAD DESIGNER ON CRACK? by dapyx · · Score: 1

      Some may like it -- "De gustibus non disputandum est."

      --
      I'm sorry, the number you have dialed is an imaginary number. Please rotate your phone 90 degrees and dial again.
  112. IN SOVIET RUSSIA... by brsmith4 · · Score: 1

    CELL PHONES COOK YOU FOR DINNER (with microwave radiation)... oh wait, they do that here in the states too... ~:-\

  113. Nasty Old Queue by fm6 · · Score: 1

    What drives me crazy is "enqueue". Since "queue" isn't commonly used in the U.S., nobody knows that it's both a noun and a verb. Yeah yeah, I'm the one who rants against prescriptive grammar rules. Still grates on my nerves though.

  114. It's been available in India for over a month... by PhrozenF · · Score: 1

    I have one....

    US is not such a big GSM market, which is why they get GSM phones after their official launch in europe and asia-pacific....

    India is predominantly GSM, and now a few 3G CDMA2000x1 operators...so the market for GSM mobile phones is in the range of over 20Mill handsets a year, consistently, for the past two years. And it's only going to grow...

  115. Wake up Nokia! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I find it interesting that nobody mentions or is aware of the great threat Microsoft poses to Nokia and the rest of the market.

    Through their normal underhanded business methods (Sendo would know what I'm talking about), they have developed a version of their OS that runs on mobile phones, allow you to access exchange, schedule, browse, play movies, IM, etc. Asian phone suppliers manufacture these phones cheaply and in large numbers.

    M$ smartly integrates the phone with their current application and user base. Idiots like operator CEO's would make stupid decisions like exclusively using these phones. After all, there is nothing wrong with M$ monopoly on desktop, so why not the phone too...

    Luckily they will learn the painful truth as the loss of freedom of choice and, in their case, control will hit them hard one of these days.

    I develop both phone and backend applications at one of the worlds largest operators. We have spoken to Nokia on numerous occasions. I have seen M$ move into the market with inferiour products under Nokia's noses. We have told Nokia this, asked them to give us the same flexibility as M$ always gives you before they strangle you, but no, either they are too stubborn, set in their ways or convinced of their own immortality.

    So Nokia, listen carefully in order to survive you need to at least do the following:
    1) Provide the same integration with M$ backends as M$ does.
    2) Provide the same ability for any consumer to easily update the phone firmware/OS.
    3) Do not try and build back end platforms that M$ already has. You will fail until Linux/BSD kills M$ on the server.
    4) Focus on the application space. Office will not run on the phone soon, but .NET will (watch out for this one). Compete on phone applications where M$ has no back-end, no market dominance, establish your own.
    5) Build back-ends for applications M$ cannot even envision at the moment. After all you still know the most about your own environment.
    6) Be willing to bend over to operator requests, they are your market. They are the ones M$ are buying. First the operator and then the consumer.
    7) etc...

    You are still in controll of the market, you have lots and lots of money. Start fighting the war while you still can...

    NOKIA WAKE UP!

    I must apologize for posting as Anonymous. Lapse in keeping my account updated has caused my now forgotten account password to be mailed to a non-existent email address...

    Alwyn Schoeman
    jabber id: alwyn@jabber.or.id

  116. We haven't discussed 7650 yet... by the+cobaltsixty · · Score: 1

    So, thanks for mentioning it.

    I bought one (and yes, i paid it fully. My old TDMA phone has just died, so i've thought i'd need a brand new phone. And i never lost a phone, except for the humidity in Amazon - who oxidates everything. Interesting, since Nokia's Brazilian Factory is in the Manaus Free Trade Zone - In Amazon too. They build in Amazon, but they're not meant for it. Figure it).

    At first, it looks like a pricey, geek-minded phone for a few people who'd like to show financial power. So do i.

    I bought the phone and then i spent more time than usual away from home, in other cities. Then, the beauty of 7650 started to show. Since it takes photos, you'd take it more personal. Reads my e-mail.

    My coworkers have T68i. My 7650 can take photos and upload to them. You can e-mails photos, and there's now an open protocol for photo publishing from nokia (the german guys @ http://www.fotodock.com built an astounding service there).

    Then i realized: Since from the very beginning, 7650 is aimed at persons who are individualists. People who spent many time roaming around, far from home, and who'd like to have a companion for their lifestyles.

    Oh, it comes with C++ tools for Symbian OS. Borland has just starting to support it with C++ Builder. MobileSet for JBuilder already does that, by J2ME.

    The nokia approach is to make a phone become a part of a person. They started that by building stylish phones not meant for all, but for a small segment. They have phones for kids, phones for workers, executives, and so forth. That's what made nokia become a superpower: By attaching cellphones to lifestyles. People no longer buy phones based on their tech specs, but in their looks and the impression it projects, mostly from marketing.

    BTW: Yes, once i opened the camera in a whorehouse. I was invited to go home. That's a price you pay for being able to see - and record - too much for a moment.

  117. Motorola V60 by Tim · · Score: 1

    I'm a cell phone luddite too. I hate the things. I owned one briefly back in 99, then got rid of it because I didn't want to carry it around, and I really didn't like the way people started to expect you to pick up the telephone all the time, just because you have a cell phone.

    That said, I had to get another cell phone recently, and I decided on the Motorola V60c. I love the thing. It's cheap (I got it for $80), it's small, it's easy to dial (unlike those micro-tiny Nokia toys), easy to hear, and because it's a flip phone, it's actually comfortable to use. While the V60c doesn't have games or a color screen or polyphonic hoo-hahs, it does have an incredibly useful little calendar program (with alarm clock), and I find that it more than meets my PDA needs. Plus, with the sleek stainless case, it's damn stylish (who needs a color screen when you can look like you're James-freaking-Bond on the steel cellphone?)

    My only complaints? The antenna is a bit flimsy (Radio shack replacements are $10 each), it would be nice to have downloadable ringtones, and I wish it had a calulator program. Otherwise, I highly recommend it (and I think the new version of the V60 line has a calculator, games and ringtones, for the same price). Go get yourself one of these.

    --
    Let's try not to let fact interfere with our speculation here, OK?
  118. hacker/geek heaven by clarity · · Score: 1

    Hi there,

    I've been a bit surprised by the amount of negative statements about this phone. I have it for about 2 weeks now, and here are my comments on it.
    - I really like that it has Symbian on it, and that you can finally write some decent applications for it. With C++ you have access to just about anything, way way better than J2ME which mostly seems to be able to turn pixels on/off and beep (though in 3650 now it is able to send SMS/MMS and use the camera). I have a NFS app for it, so I can mount the drives from linux, the SDK sort of works on linux as well, so for me this really kicks ass!

    -It for sure is big, but still not too big. When I don't want to carry something as big with me, I just switch my SIM card to something smaller.
    - the keypad is strange, but I got used to it pretty quickly. i still type faster on a normal phone keyboard but not too much
    - it for sure is neat to take photos wherever you are and just zip them to your email right away. Perfect for mobile blogging. Though the photos are not too great, but work for the purpose.
    -connecting with PC via IRDA works well, and many friends have reported BlueTooth working quite well as well - maybe bluetooth problems are only in US sets (mine is European?). when connected to pc, symbian apps can use PC's internet connection for their net connection - nice for testing
    - an excellent email client
    - quite a few good web browsers out there for symbian
    - gprs is kinda slow compared to let's say siemens (only class 6, compared to class 10), but still quite usable

    so, if you want something you can really play with (ie, hack), this is quite neat.

  119. live video streaming as well by clarity · · Score: 1

    oh, and I forgot - you can watch video streams from the net. Here in Slovenia you can get it via one of our operators, Simobil, and you can watch our national television and some cartoons. Surprisingly it works quite well, though you better have a good data option on your subscription (you can get unlimited GPRS here for about $32)

  120. MIDP 2.0 ? by Andreas+Rueckert · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'd definitely ask, if there will be a MIDP 2 firmware upgrade available any time soon. Gaming without real sprites is a PITA...

  121. Lots of software by bh213 · · Score: 1

    I owned 7650 for quite some time now. It is great, if a bit bulky, phone. My only gripe is, that it does not support Bluetooth audio (no wireless headset support). 3650 supports this, supports movie capture and has somewhat enhanced J2ME support. Also 7650 has tons of software available:
    As a bit of shameless self promotion, here is a game our company developed.
    You also get obligatory IR control software and some other stuff here
    You can get really nice & open source bluetooth remote controler here. There is other cool stuff like miniGPS, which gives you option to customize some options, depending on which base station you are currently connected.
    Rant: Also, for anybody developing for nokia using J2ME - this is probably the most buggy implementation I have seen. For example, if you called Sound.setGain(byte) it crashed, no matter what the input was (this is a confirmed bug), and this is not isolated case. I really can't understand how somebody can get through QA when one of the public functions in interface that has 10 or so items doesn't work at all. *sigh*

  122. American Literacy Figures! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The following report on lower than expected adoption of the Internet in the US is interesting - shocking even.

    At least 90%+ of the wacky British are functionally literate.

    "Literacy could also be a factor, the report suggested, as nearly one-quarter of the U.S. population cannot read well enough to handle everyday tasks."

    1. Re:American Literacy Figures! by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > At least 90%+ of the wacky British are functionally literate.
      > Literacy could also be a factor, the report suggested, as nearly one-quarter of the U.S. population cannot read well enough to handle everyday tasks.

      Yeah, offtopic, but that statistic is so wildly wrong in many ways that it borders on offensive.

      Maybe its because everyday tasks, according to the US statistic, includes things like assembling a nuclear reactor, whereas the off-the-cuff 90% stat includes identifying the alphabet...

      Functionally literate and "cannot read well enough" may look similar but they are entirely different things. Hell, I consider myself more literate than probably 85% of the world (and that's probably a low estimate), but that doesn't mean I don't make occasional mistakes, or come across something I can't recognize.

  123. Video - no sound by babycakes · · Score: 1

    I've just got the 3650 this week; it does take a bit of getting used to but it does have some nice features such as personal configuration of the menu layout. So you can have all your most frequently used options near the top and the less-used ones out of the way at the bottom.

    The one problem I have with it though is that the video recorder doesn't record sound, even though the sample clips it comes with have a full soundtrack - annoying seeing as they fail to mention this in the advert.

    Aside from that, the keypad takes a bit of getting used to but its a nice phone, and not as chunky in my pocket as I expected it to be.

  124. Hmmmm... Product placement then... by Moderation+abuser · · Score: 1

    This looks like a pretty blatant Nokia advertisement to me.

    Is that what Slashdot has come to now?

    --
    Government of the people, by corporate executives, for corporate profits.
  125. It has BT (and then some)... by wetson · · Score: 3, Informative

    ...but Nokia's interpretation of BT is spotty. Not all BT headsets are supported since it doesn't support the headset profile, opting to support only Nokia's headset. Otherwise, I think it works fine.

    Is it too big? Somewhat, if you compare it to the T68i. But it's not as heavy as it looks (it's way lighter than my old 7110). But it has a big enough screen for ebooks (mobipocket reader is available), plus there's a gnuboy port for it. An mp3 player isn't included, but 3rd party programs are available.

    Oh plus, it has an MMC (but not SD) slot, so the 3rd party apps are really useful. It's looking like a viable replacement for my PDA.

    I just have to get used to the funky key layout.

  126. IMAP, HTTP, and IM, as well as PDA functionality ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd just like something that sends and receives phone calls. Is that even possible anymore?

  127. Re:(bad)Alternatives. by Ch_Omega · · Score: 1

    I have used both the 7650 and 3650, and absolutely love mye 3650(And after using the keypad for about a weak, you can dial blindfolded with no problems.). Therefore, I have this to say about you recomending the 7650 as an better PDA-alternative.

    Yes, it would be really smart to buy an 7650 instead of the 3650, especially since with a 7650, you'll be stuck with only 4mb memory, and NO way to expand it. And belive me, the 4 megs take no time to fill up. Just install DOOM, or GoBoy(Gameboy emulator) with two GBC roms, and internal memory is full. The 3650 does at least have an MMC-slot. Oh, and the camera of the 3650 is better than both the 7650 and the 7250.

    The P800 on the other hand is in every way an supperior phone/PDA-solution(exept for the camera, witch is about the same as 7650/3650) to any Series 60-phone, because of the bigger(thouch) screen, and the use of a stylus, as well as more internal memory, and newer version of the Symbian OS. And you can get Opera for free for it. But offcourse, it's in a totally differen price group, and quite expensive.

  128. Heh. That *IS* traditional by gosand · · Score: 1
    how irritatating it would be to try and dial that thing, with the buttons not layed out in the traditional, muscle memory configuration.

    You know you are old when you look at it and say "dude, that is the way the numbers used to be laid out - on rotary phones". Now *THAT* would be cool, to have a rotary dial mobile phone. :-)

    My parents still have some rotary phones. One time, and this was back around '85, my brother brought home a date who was a "city girl". She went to use the phone, and she didn't know how to use a rotary phone. She was just pushing the numbers, not actually "dialing" them. It was so funny. Do people even wonder today how we got the term "dialing" a number?

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  129. 3650/7650 - Sweet Phones by Korgan · · Score: 1

    I got the 7650 the day it was released to my local market. Couldn't resist. Did the same with the 3650. The difference between the two? Other than the style... Not a lot. Audio Bluetooth on the 3650 allows for a bluetooth headset, and the MMC capabilities mean a lot more apps can be installed... Also a huge bonus.

    I have to admit, the American cellular market makes me laugh. CDMA? What an expensive joke. GPRS is so much cheaper because you're only paying for what you use, not how long you spend connected (which includes idle time).

    I personally will never go near a CDMA network as long as GSM/GPRS/UMTS are available. For a supposedly 3G service, its an extremely backward network.

    BTW, OS X 10.2.5 supports the 7650 and the 3650 via bluetooth without a problem. Including transfering files between the two, syncing the calendars, addressbooks and so on... I have no problems with it on my Powerbook or my Powermac.

    Oh well... What can I say? USA, congrats on gradually catching up to the rest of us. ;-) Maybe if Verisign and T-Mobile sort their problems out, I'll be able to send MMS msg's to friends there.... Or maybe I'll just stick to sending them to my friends in every other country ;-) (well, almost)

  130. It's a phone. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    blah blah blah

    It's a phone.

    You rule the tool, not the other way around.

    You don't answer it when it rings and you
    turn the damn ringer off so you don't hear it.

    You call them back if they leave a message that
    has anything worth hearing.

    You rule the tool.

    Get over it.

    It's a phone.

  131. Re:The Matrix Phone by gosand · · Score: 1
    I like the phone! I'd probably have to hold it in my hand to know for sure, but it looks pretty durable and solid. Yeah, it is kind of gimmicky, but I like the design - simple, but cool. It actually looks like a phone, and not a piece of jewelry. I really like the ring tone that is just the phone ringing instead of some dumb song. Of course, it is the phone ringing from the movie.

    I usually don't go for gimmicks, which this is, but I like the looks of it. You are right though, weak on specs and details.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  132. If this is any indication of Nokia BT support.... by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

    ... then I guess I won't be getting N-GAGE then :(

    I'm picking up my car today, having just had the HK TrafficPro and Ericsson HCB-30 bluetooth handsfree installed. This Nokia doesn't sync with SyncML, have a headset profile for my motorola headset, and would probably have problems with my new car handsfree. What a pile of shite. And isn't that keypad just the dumbest thing you've ever seen (I mean, besides the Pontiac Aztek)? I could even RESPECT a retro moving 'rotary' dial knob ala an iPod with return, but this thing's just retarded.

    Bad Nokia! No cookie for you!!

  133. bah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what's with the stupid numeric layout?

  134. My 3650 Experience; by xSherlock · · Score: 1
    I happend to win 3650 in NokiaGame event, and used it 2 weeks before I luckliy managed to get rid of it.

    Round kepad is absolute crap, can't be used with one hand, and has this annoying dark blue backlit that makes it illegible both in daylight and night.

    Some people complained about 6310/6310i Bluetooth compatibility. 3650 takes one step further as it is compatible with other nokias 3650 and nokia BT headset only! No #$%^# way to sync it with PC with BT dongle/IPAQ 3970. MMS mesaging to Siemens s55 dosen't work either. You can't use this HBH-30 Ericsson headset that works with everything on the earth (even 6310i) as this is not orginal Nokia accesory :)) Anyone there in finland heard of open standards????

    Menu is weird, you can make links/shortcuts to only few items and not to the other, it doesn't let you wiew the files and you have to get third party software to actualy see the file system. Essential app as ex. you can recieve a *.mid file via infrared and you will not be able to use it as a music file unless you move it to the right folder, a simle task you can't do without file manager. Idiots.

    Messaging lacks one crucial function to delete all SMS mesages, so when my network went down and I got 50 mesages form my monitoring software. I had to manualy perform open/options/scroll_down/delete/yes_i'm_sure on every single one of them.

    phone is big, and bulky, and has plenty of empty air space under it back cover. What for?

    you have to take out battery to acces MMC cards slot !?!?!?!

    To sum it up this one of the worst designed phones I have ever had in my hands

  135. Get the SonyEricsson P800 by OzeBuddha · · Score: 1

    Get the P800 instead - bluetooth, tri-band so it will work in the states (u guys just have to be different), massive screen for a phone, bluetooth, built in camera & speakerphone & you can d/l more apps for it (java support included). It takes the new memory stick duo mini memory stick & runs the same o/s as Nokia's 9210 communicator (Symbian v7). It's got gprs for fast net access, polyphonic ringtones, touch screen, handwriting recognition, web & wap browser, mms support, mp3 & video player & even comes with 3 styli. About the only thing I haven't been able to do is work out how to switch it from portrait to landscape mode & it doesn't do faxes (but who does anymore). This baby is the bomb.

    check out http://www.sonyericsson.com/ (no i am not an employee)

  136. I will buy one by fatbitch · · Score: 1

    when it plays ogg :)

  137. Re:Turning your exisiting PDA into a cell phone . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Take a look at the Sierra Wireless AC750 from T-Mobile, it's a GSM/GPRS + Voice pcmcia card, and the manufacturer even has directions on how to get it working in Linux!

  138. Scratch and sniff by yerricde · · Score: 1

    You're trying to bust a troll, but your techniques seem ineffective. Let me point out a few things you can work on:

    I thought you worked at Sega

    Notice that the Sega post is from February 1994, around the time the Sega Saturn console first 2came out stateside. It's April 2003 now. Nine years is more than long enough to switch companies in one profession, even in the Far East

    How's your Smell-o-vision [slashdot.org] project going?

    The manual for the USA version of Earthbound (the sequel to Mother, which Nintendo never published in the USA) had scratch-and-sniff panels.

    Have you finished the HIGHLY ADVANCED SPEECH RECOGNITION DEVICE

    Ever heard of Hey You, Pikachu!?

    Possibly the most damning evidence is this post, which calls Nintendo's handheld the "Gameboy Advance". Nintendo house style spells "Game Boy" as two words.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  139. Tested out the 3650 by chuckzillajunior · · Score: 1

    I had the chance to try out this phone this weekend, using T-Mobile service. It got much better reception in my part of town than my Sprint phone does. I was impressed with its camera features (found myself wanting a zoom feature) and played with the video recording feature a bit too. Found that I adapted to the circular key pad without much trouble. It had more than I expected from a phone, and was actually lighter and smaller than I expected. The camera was much less cumbersome than most of the other camera phone I have seen. This is the phone I will be upgrading to. I also saw that Nokia is giving away 10 of the 3650 camera phones in a sweepstakes running through April 29th. The contest URL is: http://www.nokiausa.com/registration?sweepstakes=1