Slashdot Mirror


P4 2.80GHz Overclocked to 3.917GHz

vwbus writes "The guys at Muropaketti have taken a brand new Pentium 4 2.80GHz chip, bought a pint or so of liquid nitrogen and overclocked it to an astounding 3.917GHz. The Finns describe how they put together the system on their web page, and luckily there are a whole set of pictures which demonstrate exactly what they've done, so you don't need to understand Finnish to figure it out. The pictures show wisps of nitrogen evaporating from the jar sitting on top of the CPU, and they publish some SiSoft figures to demonstrate the kind of speeds they attained." The folks at Muropaketti have had a lot of practice with this cooling method.

376 comments

  1. Its soo cold in finland by Hougaard · · Score: 3, Funny

    Why not just keep the processor outside :-)

    1. Re:Its soo cold in finland by psavo · · Score: 4, Funny

      Why not just keep the processor outside :-)

      Cuz the bears would eat it ;) (or at least shit on it).

      --
      fucktard is a tenderhearted description
    2. Re:Its soo cold in finland by HacTar · · Score: 1

      Close the Window(tm). Penguins like that cool!

    3. Re:Its soo cold in finland by Camillo · · Score: 2, Informative
      Actually, one of the problems they had was that the processor got too cold:

      Prosessori ei kestänyt todella alhaisia lämpötiloja. Testit alkoivat rullaamaan huomattavasti paremmin, kun kulho ei ollutkaan aivan umpijäässä.

      "The processor didn't handle really low temperatures. The tests ran significantly better when the bowl wasn't completely frozen."

      So, now you know why we can't keep the processor outside - it would get too cold!

      NB. Daily temperature maximums for Helsinki the last few weeks have rarely dipped below 25 C. Not that you would care, though. :)

    4. Re:Its soo cold in finland by Hougaard · · Score: 2

      Daily temperature maximums for Helsinki the last few weeks have rarely dipped below 25 C. Not that you would care, though. :)


      Hehe.. Actually I live in Denmark so I know how good the weather has been here lately, but that would make a very good fp :-)

    5. Re:Its soo cold in finland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope you mean -25C, cause that's about 77F. I'd prefer to go with the -25C

    6. Re:Its soo cold in finland by richie2000 · · Score: 5, Funny
      Because it would mess up the local ecosystem.

      In university, we got an old huge VAX which we had to run with open windows, but after a while they told us to stop. Not because of the immense power drain, but because the palm trees were starting to push out the birch, fur and pine trees in the local forests and they were concerned that tigers were next. This was in northern Sweden, BTW. You Americans can probably relate to Minnesota, if it helps.

      --
      Money for nothing, pix for free
    7. Re:Its soo cold in finland by OpCode42 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Oh great, then intel would trademark Intel Outside as well...

    8. Re:Its soo cold in finland by Hougaard · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Hmmm... How about getting a better calculator:

      25C = 77F
      -25C = -13F

      Celsius is sooo easy.. 0C is freezing point and 100C is boiling point (For water)

    9. Re:Its soo cold in finland by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      fuck, for the LAST TWO WEEKS AND MORE it has been SUNNY ALL DAY LONG. in my apartment it's 31C 24H. and i see no clouds on the sky now either.. sigh...

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    10. Re:Its soo cold in finland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because of the climate or the population?

    11. Re:Its soo cold in finland by radish · · Score: 2


      (or at least shit on it).

      Only if it was in the woods ;-)

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    12. Re:Its soo cold in finland by Space+Coyote · · Score: 2

      And if it was prime.

      --
      ___
      Cogito cogito, ergo cogito sum.
    13. Re:Its soo cold in finland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in Minnesota, and we have fir trees here, but not fur trees.

      So maybe it's not as cold here as you think, if the trees you have there have to grow fur to stay warm.

      Maybe it's a global warming thing. Maybe our trees used to have fur.

      I'm all against global warming. It messes up the ambiance of Minnesota.

    14. Re:Its soo cold in finland by plaa · · Score: 2

      Why not just keep the processor outside :-)

      Quite ironic you should say that. While most of central Europe is battling floods, the first drops of rain to southern Finland for at least four weeks came yesterday. It's been around 25 degrees Celcius the whole month, probably a bit more inlands.

      --

      I doubt, therefore I may be.
    15. Re:Its soo cold in finland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cold? It has been 25 centigrades the whole month here in Finland. If next summer is going to be like this, I'll buy air conditioning to my home.

    16. Re:Its soo cold in finland by Hayzeus · · Score: 1
      You Americans can probably relate to Minnesota, if it helps

      Minnesota is also known here as "Western Sweden".

    17. Re:Its soo cold in finland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't you know that 'Open Windows' is illegal. I'm
      surprised the BSA didn't shut you down. Not to mention
      the fact that you are trying to run windows on a VAX.
      -
      -
      By the way, did you ever play adventure on emacs?
      I cannot be by that stupid beast after the VAX. I die
      every time.

    18. Re:Its soo cold in finland by checkyoulater · · Score: 1

      Celsius is sooo easy.. 0C is freezing point and 100C is boiling point (For water)

      Thanks professor. The rest of the world has know this since about grade 3. If you really want to help, tell the Americans and Brits to stop using Imperial measurements and switch to Metric.

      --
      Is that a real poncho? I mean, is that a Mexican poncho or is that a Sears poncho?
    19. Re:Its soo cold in finland by loply · · Score: 1
      Brits do use metric. Infact, its illegal to sell in imperial.

      Famous story about a grocer arrested because he refused to sell fruit in metric was all over the news a year or so ago.

    20. Re:Its soo cold in finland by Tower · · Score: 1

      So it is illegal to sell a pint of Guinness? Now *that* would be a crime.

      --
      "It's tough to be bilingual when you get hit in the head."
    21. Re:Its soo cold in finland by morie · · Score: 1

      yeah, the shit would be a hot 37 degrees C

      --
      Sig (appended to the end of comments I post, 54 chars)
    22. Re:Its soo cold in finland by skotte · · Score: 2

      in our defense, Celsius only works if you have some idea how hot 'boiling point' is in people terms.

      F works kinda nice because it gauges the standard human range of temperatures. 100 is much too hot, 0 is much too cold. 50 is a nice day out. 30 is damn cold. 70 is a tad warm.

      (actually here's where it shows its european roots: the scale is a bit chillier than americans like. so really 40 is much to cold, 60 is a nice day, and 80 warm. just bump it up 10 degrees to measure american whims.)

      but yeah. F is people terms, 0-100.

    23. Re:Its soo cold in finland by lorenlal · · Score: 1

      Yea,ordering a "half-liter" just isn't the same as saying "pint."

  2. Climate change by dr.Flake · · Score: 2, Funny

    Not for long!!!

    --
    Why are other peoples sig's always more witty ???
    1. Re:Climate change by hype7 · · Score: 1

      only because of the heat given out by this puppy!

      -- james

  3. just picked up a pint of liquid nitrogen by laymil · · Score: 0

    so yeah, where can I JUST PICK UP a pint of liquid nitrogen...

    i can't wait for LIQUID NITROGEN cooling in my laptop...although i have a feeling the thermal stresses would make it want to disintegrate.

    so much for the 3 GHZ barrier thats about to get broken...someone wake me up when we hit 100?

    1. Re:just picked up a pint of liquid nitrogen by prockcore · · Score: 4, Funny

      I don't know about liquid nitrogen, but you can pick up a pint of ben & jerry's anywhere... much tastier.

    2. Re:just picked up a pint of liquid nitrogen by forged · · Score: 4, Informative
      Just don't put fingers in it or they'll snap like glass !

      By the way, no one has made mention of the price of such a setup. OK they had 15 minutes of excitment for the price of a _really_ expensive CPU, custom motherboard, not to mention the nitrogen-cooling gear, the voltmeters and other lab equipment they use.

      For the moment I'll stick to that 1.5Ghz processor which barely produces any heat & is so damn quiet:)

    3. Re:just picked up a pint of liquid nitrogen by Fembot · · Score: 1

      actualy im fairly sure most students would have little difficulty in obtaining it provided it was for legitimate use not "i bet my friend i couldnt down a pint of it"

    4. Re:just picked up a pint of liquid nitrogen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just don't put fingers in it or they'll snap like glass !

      Well, severe frostbite will set in pretty quickly, requiring amputation of the fingers. But fingers are generally thick enough that if you want them to shatter outright, you'll need to leave them in there for a minute or two. The thing is, you need them to be cold all the way through.

      Also, they won't shatter nicely, like glass. More like a finger-shaped ice cube.

      Of course, if you have very small fingers, they will freeze through quicker and shatter more nicely.

    5. Re:just picked up a pint of liquid nitrogen by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      the cpu was free as i know, ln2 doesn't cost that much, the mobo and others they've had for some time probably.

      besides, they are a hardware(&overclocking) news site, and not even in english and they made it to slashdot with that article, don't think it's worth the exposure even?

      like, who would've want to just read another boring p4 2.8ghz review.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    6. Re:just picked up a pint of liquid nitrogen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This isn't strictly true. I've put my hand in liquid nitrogen a half dozen times. It's semi-protected by a bubbling layer of nitrogen gas. You absolutely do NOT want to touch the bottom of a container or be wearing a ring, if you try this. I froze the tip of my finger the last time I pulled that trick.

    7. Re:just picked up a pint of liquid nitrogen by Tim+C · · Score: 2

      When I was in University, in my first year, we had a lab experiment on superconductors. It involved (amongst other things) using liquid nitrogen to cool the conductor down to 77K, in order to make it superconducting.

      I never did it, but I saw others put their fingers in the container, and splash liquid nitrogen around on the desk, etc. As long as you're quick, it's perfectly safe.

      Also, as for the cost, back then I remember being told that liquid nitrogen, bought in sufficient quantity, is about the same price as milk, so I imagine that theirs didn't cost them that much; probably no more than most people would spend getting drunk. They wouldn't have cooled the nitrogen themselves, just bought a container of it precooled.

      Cheers,

      Tim

    8. Re:just picked up a pint of liquid nitrogen by Keith_Beef · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I knew of a chemistry teacher who took a pair of rubber gloves (the kind sold for household chores): he put one on his right hand and filled the other with sausage meat then dipped it into liquid nitrogen. He tucked his left hand up his sleeve and set the meat-filled glove on a wooden board so it looked like he was holding a nail with his left hand. In his right hand, he took a hammer...

      He waited, knowing that his pupils would be arriving for a lesson in a few seconds...

      The pupils arrived...

      "Sit yourselves down while I finish off what I'm doing"...

      CRUNCH! he brought the hammer down on the rubber glove, sending meat-filled glove across the bench.

  4. jury rigged by laymil · · Score: 1

    styrofoam and duct tape! looks like a hack at its finest...although i'd hate to have to keep refilling the liquid nitrogen.
    so much for long term cooling...but its interesting as a proof of concept.
    god damn COOL factor...but i guess thats what slashdot is.

    1. Re:jury rigged by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Jerry rigged", you mean? But yeah, it's way cool :-)

    2. Re:jury rigged by Captain+Pedantic · · Score: 1

      Curiously, he doesn't

      --

      None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free. Johann Wolfgang von Goethe.
    3. Re:jury rigged by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also note the "TurboPLL" mod, originally a Japanese invention: essentially change the crystal that pulses the clock generator on the motherboard (14.3 MHz -> 18.4 MHz) to get a higher FSB than BIOS settings allow. Also note the extra trimmer potentiometers to adjust CPU voltage and RAM voltage manually... Hacking in it's original physical sense, indeed :-)

    4. Re:jury rigged by Y+Ddraig+Goch · · Score: 1

      NOT! If you'll examine the photos again you will see that the styrofoam cup is used as a funnel and what appears to be duct tape is fiberglass insulation around a copper vessel.

      --
      Meddle thou not in the affairs of Dragons, for thou art crunchy and with most anything.
    5. Re:jury rigged by OrangeSpyderMan · · Score: 1

      I think this setup is the overclocking equivalent of bukkake... excites geeks , and they'd all love to, but it's the kind of thing the ain't ever gonna do at home :-D

      --
      Try NetBSD... safe,straightforward,useful.
    6. Re:jury rigged by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No such word. You must mean nigger rigged.

    7. Re:jury rigged by Hater's+Leaving,+The · · Score: 1

      Funny you should mention bukkake (is that how you spell it?) - because the _Japanese_ have already won this race. 4005MHz, on about 25th of the month. I knew the Finns wuoldn't be far behind, but to be honest, the Japanese have the crown currently.

      THL.

      --
      Keeping /. cynic density high since the fscking Kwhores/trolls arrived.
  5. Now, Kids... by OpenSourced · · Score: 5, Funny

    Don't try this at home. If you feel tempted, watch three times in a row "Terminator 2", and remember you are not made of liquid quicksilver, or whatever.

    --
    Rome taught me patience and assiduous application to detail. Virtues which temper the boldness of great, general views.
    1. Re:Now, Kids... by GreyWolf3000 · · Score: 1

      Message to moderators: I think this guy was going for "Funny", not "Informative." In fact that was abundantly clead, as the message references "liquid quicksilver" and "don't try this at home."

      --
      Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
    2. Re:Now, Kids... by OpenSourced · · Score: 2
      Yeah, as a matter of fact, that was the idea. But of course, if somebody thinks it's informative, then it's certainly informative for him, because he should definitely not try that at home :o)

      --
      Rome taught me patience and assiduous application to detail. Virtues which temper the boldness of great, general views.
    3. Re:Now, Kids... by GreyWolf3000 · · Score: 1

      But the idea isn't to be informative to one person, it's to be informative to the public. BTW my recent funny post got modded up then modded down 'cause I was accused of M$ bashing when I was really poking fun at it--I guess people don't really like funny posts then....

      --
      Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
    4. Re:Now, Kids... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess you`re spending too much time worrying about how your comments are modded. I think you should have a think and try and work out why. Perhaps you believe you are undervalued?

    5. Re:Now, Kids... by GreyWolf3000 · · Score: 1

      You're misunderstanding--I've been trying to post different various types of posts that I see get different scores. When I actually post, modding seldom matters to me (and I seldom get modded up or down) because when I want to actually discuss something I don't bother to format the post in a way that looks nice or anything.

      --
      Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
    6. Re:Now, Kids... by cwebster · · Score: 2

      Liquid Nitrogen is actually fun to play with. A friend any myself went to many industrial gas suppliers while in high school, and finally found one willing to fill a stainless steel thermos with it. Had fun shattering random objects, pouring it on top of normal bodies of water, etc.

    7. Re:Now, Kids... by Paul+Slocum · · Score: 1

      Believe it or not, you can actually gargle the stuff without killing yourself. My dad learned to do it from some physics professor in grad school, although I've never seen it. When he worked at TI he won some bets doing it. But he said some people would just pay him not to do it. Hehe. I sure as hell wouldn't try it!

      Must be similar to the physics that allow you to stick your hand in a pot of boiling lead without getting burned. In that case, I think it was that the moisture on your hand forms a thin shield that doesn't conduct heat well.

      -Paul

    8. Re:Now, Kids... by Paul+Slocum · · Score: 1

      Whoops, should have scrolled down a bit before I posted. -Paul

  6. 0v3rClox0red by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An 8086 to 6mhz
    An 8088 to 9mhz
    An 80286 to 25 mhz
    An 80386 to 60 mhz
    An 80486 to 100 mhz
    A Pentium 1 to 200 mhz
    A Pentium 2 to 700 mhz
    A Pentium 3 to 1800 mhz
    A Pentuim 4 to 3917 mhz
    A Itainum4 (with CBTIA and Paddilum .net 4.4 Sp 490 with DRM and Copy protection special edition) to 1 Thz (Terraherz)

    1. Re:0v3rClox0red by OpCode42 · · Score: 1, Redundant

      *bite*

      Ok, AMD released a 150mhz 486 and Pentiums went up to 200mhz .

      That is all.

    2. Re:0v3rClox0red by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Pentiums went to 233 MMX in Desktops and 300MHZ (MMX) in laptops:

      P5 233 66 32KB -16K I -16K D off chip .35 4.5 mil Socket 7 - 2.8 SPEC 8.4 / 5.7
      P5 300 66 32KB -16K I -16K D off chip .25 4.5 mil MMO

      MMX P5 had fabulous battery life.

      As far as the fastest 486, I believe the final 486 core was named 5x86 by AMD. It was available at 133MHz. It went into a socket 2 or socket 3. It typically was able to beat the Pentium 75.

      I have never seen a 486 (not 5x86) DX4 faster than AMD DX4-120. So I dont know where this 150 came from.

    3. Re:0v3rClox0red by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually, there were 233mhz pentiums

    4. Re:0v3rClox0red by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This misspelling bothers me so often, can't keep my keyboard shut this time.

      Terra, as in "the planet we live on", or tera as in "a one with many zeroes" ?

  7. WOW! by GreyWolf3000 · · Score: 1, Funny

    That's incredible--however they're using Windows, so I bet MS Office still takes hours to load ;)

    Oh give me a board, that I can afford
    That can OC a P4 no prob.
    Where liquid N 2, cools that hot CPU
    And keeps you from doing your job ;)

    Oh they took a 2-8, to almost 4-G that's great,
    Bun can this new speed get me laid?
    The answer of course, one that I don't endorse,
    is visit this link everyday!

    --
    Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
    1. Re:WOW! by JohnFluxx · · Score: 1, Informative

      On k5 I saw someone mention how you can tell the deterioation of a message board by how many goatse links there are.

      Here at /. we have gone one step further and started to mod them up to +2 :)

      We have entered a new realm, unexplored by other message boards...

      Just joking - please don't flame me

    2. Re:WOW! by yatest5 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      That's incredible--however they're using Windows, so I bet MS Office still takes hours to load ;)

      Yes. Ha-ha. Office apps take at least 3-4 seconds to load on my super-charged 600Mhz PC. Seriously, how did this tat get modded up?

      --
      • Mod parent up! [a] by Anonymous Coward (Score:5) Thurs, June 31, @13:37
    3. Re:WOW! by gazbo · · Score: 0

      Excuse me, not meaning to brag but credit where credit's due.

    4. Re:WOW! by GreyWolf3000 · · Score: 1

      It got modded up for the song--I spent 10 minutes thinking that thing up!! (The Office joke is poking fun at the typical Anti-M$ mod-me-up-cause-I-think-M$-sux-and-I-am-l33t, but I guess people see it so much around he they assume people are actually espousing that view).

      --
      Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
    5. Re:WOW! by Com2Kid · · Score: 1

      /. has so few goatse links these days, I raaarly see them, not like a few years ago when a reader had to carefully check each link they clicked on before going to it, and goatse redirects where popping up all around the net.

      Goatse is old any ways, I seriously doubt that it has offended anybody but the weakest minded individuals since it first came out. *yawn* Old troll, unoriginal troll, unoffensive troll, is it really a troll anymore or just a desperate cry for help?

  8. Money to burn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    person 1: "I just got this brand new P4 2.8GHz CPU. What should I do with it?"

    person 2: "Get a Radeon 9700 and get on top of the 3Dmark2001 benchmark list at Mad Onion?"

    person 1: "Radeon hasn't come in yet..."

    person 2: "Compile some software?"

    person 1: "Already did that."

    person 2: "Create a new anthropomorphic CGI character with a Jamaican accent?"

    person 1: "Tried it, but for some reason the CGI software refuses to let me. Something about digital rights management and George Lucas."

    person 2: "Rip some DVDs to DIVX?"

    person 1: "Already did that. I think it's what pissed off George Lucas."

    person 2: "Ah hell, lets just dump some liquid nitrogen on it and overclock it. It'll be like the Fast and The Furious if it blows up."

    person 1: "Duuuuude! Great idea!"

    1. Re:Money to burn by loply · · Score: 2, Funny
      It'll be like the Fast and The Furious if it blows up

      Liquid Nitrogen != Nitrous Oxide :)

      Although Id like to see what happens if you atomize and spray liquid nitrogen into your engine :)

    2. Re:Money to burn by biohazard99 · · Score: 1

      Should increase compression similar to a (super|turbo)charger, but without the added Oxygen provided by N20 or (super|turbo)charging, all you will actually do increase the amount of NOx leaving the tailpipe which is bad, for very little performace gain.

  9. Just the CPU, or.. by dr.Flake · · Score: 4, Interesting

    At this point they are only extreme cooling the CPU. Some of the "coolness" will also cool the MB a bit.

    At what point will it be "necessary" to dip the total package of MB, memory, GPU and CPU in the nitrogen?

    I mean, you would want to increase FSB and memory timings as well if you want to get half-decent Quake3 fps's scores.

    --
    Why are other peoples sig's always more witty ???
    1. Re:Just the CPU, or.. by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      most parts don't work in lower temps than ~-100c. actually the cpu in this particular test wouldn't boot too cold either.. that's why there's hairdryers on these boys tables.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    2. Re:Just the CPU, or.. by Sampsa · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Here is a picture of LN2-cooled GeForce 4 Ti4600 display adapter:

      GeForce 4 GPU running at 409MHz and Memory 777MHz

      :)
    3. Re:Just the CPU, or.. by gotih · · Score: 1, Troll

      i think the reason they didn't overclocking the ram is that AFAIK no motherboard has a clock multiplier for anything other than the processor. the only reason you can overclock a CPU is because the motherboard allows you to change the CPU clock speed (multiplier).

      --

      fear is the mind killer
    4. Re:Just the CPU, or.. by Phosphor3k · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You dont "dip the whole thing" in liquid nitro. Thats how you end up with a fried computer.

      A better idea would be to put the "entire thing"in a tub of 3M fluorinert(a completely non-electrically conductive liquid) which comes in different flavors ranging from low heat transfer with low flamability, to very high heat transfer with very high flamability, and run pipes full of liquid nitrogen through the fluorinert in order to cool the system.

    5. Re:Just the CPU, or.. by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      on non-engineering sample intels you can't change multiplier.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    6. Re:Just the CPU, or.. by dr.Flake · · Score: 1

      But to what temperature can you cool the 3M fluo-stuff? I bet -192C would cause the whole set to freeze up, and bye bye to your heat conduction.!!

      This cpu is so fast becauze its extremely cold. Not because it can get rid of the heat it produces!! that's a nice side-effect.

      --
      Why are other peoples sig's always more witty ???
    7. Re:Just the CPU, or.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These guys are using hairdryers to warm up
      condensators on the motherboard. The system wont
      boot if its too cold (>-100c).

    8. Re:Just the CPU, or.. by dirkdidit · · Score: 1

      Slashdot had a story about somebody using the 3M stuff and it did freeze up once they got it cold enough. I believe the story said that the 3M stuff turned to a jelly.

      I also believe they had liquid nitrogen going through cooling tubes to cool the 3M liquid.

    9. Re:Just the CPU, or.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually [tilde] [hyphen] 100c
      or "Approximately negative 100 deg. Centigrade"

    10. Re:Just the CPU, or.. by Callamon · · Score: 1

      Just overclock the FSB.. I don't have any special cooling in my system (just several variable-speed case fans), but run my 2.4GHz P4(b) at 2.53, with the RAM running at 1120MHz (1066 RDRAM).. The Gigabyte 8iHXP allows you to change the FSB base speed. Mine is running at 140.

  10. Rip off Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    This Slashdot article is a blatant rip off from The Inquirer

    1. Re:Rip off Slashdot by Fembot · · Score: 1

      I hate to point this out, but thats the point of slashdot, to collect interesting news from all the boring stuff....

    2. Re:Rip off Slashdot by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 1

      But you're supposed to use your own words...

      --
      "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
    3. Re:Rip off Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      people own words do they?

      whos to say "the inquirer" didnt get the story via another site, and that site via another site, its just a reporting tool.

      besides, who cares? i found it through slashdot, so good for slashdot, i enjoyed reading about it.

    4. Re:Rip off Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Basically, this whole thread is illegal :/

  11. Dude, you're getting... by tRoll+with+Butter · · Score: 1, Funny

    Frostbite!

    --

    ---
    Siggy, siggy, siggy, can't you see? Sometimes your puns just irritate me.
  12. Alchimists we are by HacTar · · Score: 2, Funny

    I want nitrogen evaporating from my pc too!
    It's too cool!

  13. Assembly 2002 showed 4G too by Chexsum · · Score: 0

    I seen overclocking for the first time through the live feed of Assembly TV. I think it was an XP processor or something but I am not into hardware enough to care. I had to ask why they were pouring Liquid Nitrogen into a cup as it was shown but quickly found out I was watching 'Liquid Nitrogen (DONT try this at home!!!) OverClocking'. Crazy Finns!

    --
    Pixels keep you awake!
    1. Re:Assembly 2002 showed 4G too by Chexsum · · Score: 0

      Blah... the main links dead (if i remembered it correctly anyway) so heres some more for windows users only;

      Day1, Day2 and Day3.

      Oh, it was Overclocking ASUS. ;)

      --
      Pixels keep you awake!
    2. Re:Assembly 2002 showed 4G too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ASMTV

      Assembly Slashback

      AsemblyTV Review

      Is some links about the event.

  14. Do I have to mention... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, imagine what a Beowolf cluster of these could do.

    --
    Random GeoCities Link: X

    1. Re:Do I have to mention... by Nameles · · Score: 1

      Melt the polar icecaps?

    2. Re:Do I have to mention... by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      burn your house down?

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
  15. What's next ??? by dr.Flake · · Score: 1, Interesting

    What would be the next step to more extreme cooling???

    Like putting a vaccuum cleaner over the nitrogen to lower the surface pressure.
    Any other gas around that's even cooler?

    (imagine a beowolf cluster of these. (it had to be said!))

    --
    Why are other peoples sig's always more witty ???
    1. Re:What's next ??? by Hittite+Creosote · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The coolest gas you could get normally would be liquid Helium, at about five degrees above absolute zero. Believe me, it's not easy to work with in the lab (and if you think waving a vacuum cleaner around is the way to reduce surface pressure, you shouldn't go anywhere near it).

    2. Re:What's next ??? by dr.Flake · · Score: 1

      i'm no lab technician, handling liquid CO2 is as extreme as i would get. ( i value my fingers alot, being in the medical business)

      but seriously. is liquid nitrogen the ultimate "cool"?
      Helium aparently is not an option.

      --
      Why are other peoples sig's always more witty ???
    3. Re:What's next ??? by gazbo · · Score: 0
      Yes, I never go further than handling liquid CO2. Yup, I'm always pouring liquid CO2. I find it enjoyable, almost sublime. BWAHAHA!

      Ah, my second (and therefore final) post of the day, but it was spent mocking someone. My mother would be proud. Assuming she's not being screwed by truckers.

    4. Re:What's next ??? by MotorMachineMercenar · · Score: 1

      Curiously, the nuts at Muropaketti (a pun for those who know Finnish) noted that the test setup became more stable after the LN2 warmed up a bit. If the picture is related to this, it would mean -192.9 Centigrade as opposed to -196 C.

      An indication of how cold it gets in Finland is that these guys are referring to the vat being 192.9 below zero as "not completely frozen." :-)

      --
      "We have an A-Bomb...what more do you want, mermaids?" --I.I. Rabi, speaking in defense of Robert Oppenheimer
    5. Re:What's next ??? by October_30th · · Score: 1
      test setup became more stable after the LN2 warmed up a bit

      What happens when you have LN2 at -196'C in a container at a room temperature? The same thing that happens if you have water in a container that's kept at 200'C. The liquid starts to vaporize, that is, gas bubbles form in it. Also, if you have LN2 in a thermal equilibrium and you insert an object at room temperature in it, it boils bleeding away the heat from the object.

      When left alone, the container (or the object) cools down and a thermal equilibrium develops between it, the gas phase and LN2. The liquid still boils, but less ferociously so. With less and smaller bubbles the thermal conductivity is improved and that's the reason for the improved system stability.

      --
      The owls are not what they seem
    6. Re:What's next ??? by Jan+Derk · · Score: 1

      My vote goes to superconductivity, bringing the CPU clock speed to infinite.

    7. Re:What's next ??? by dr.Flake · · Score: 1

      infinite clock speed would cause electrons to go back in time!!

      mmmm. i can see the posibilities:

      Windows 2050: this is the answer to a question you were about to ask.

      (that is, if windows is still around then. More likely: Debian 4.0-testing: this is the.....)

      --
      Why are other peoples sig's always more witty ???
    8. Re:What's next ??? by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      Debian 4:Now with Linux 2.4 and KDE 3.0?

      j/k.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    9. Re:What's next ??? by Tetsujin28 · · Score: 1

      Windows 2050: this is the answer to a question you were about to ask.



      Noooo! Not a pre-cog Clippy!

      "It looks like you're going to try to write a letter a week from next Tuesday. Would you like me to you?...."

      --
      - - - -
      The real Tetsujin 28 is a giant robot.
  16. Thermal Stresses by SkewlD00d · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    It looks cool. Yeah, that CPU will last about a day. Thermal stresses will destroy that cpu very shortly. Also, the P4's have huge #s of pipeline-stages that result in LOWER cycle efficiency that older models and comparable AMD chips. Wintel has the folks suckered into thinking higher GHz == faster. Nyet! Sun's chips exec instrs alot more efficiently that intel's; the exact numbers escape me, but i remember 250 MHz Ultrasparcs being hella fast.

    BTW, does this mean 1000 fps in Quake3?

    --
    The biggest trick the devil pulled was letting lawyers become politicians so they can write the laws.
    1. Re:Thermal Stresses by Bloodmoon1 · · Score: 1

      On the higher clockrate: This isn't necessarily a good thing. Anytime a jump is encountered in the code (i.e. GOTO), the processor, (and its lengthy pipe, something well over 20 stages last I checked, not sure about these newest Intel chips) is encounterd, all the instructions in the pipe need to be dumped and new code pulled, which = wasted clock cycles. I guess this means the processor can afford more wasted cycles. On the SPARC processors from the previous comment: Sun Micro's SPARC (Scalable Processor ARChitecture) is a 64 bit processor and in it's newest (that I'm aware) incarnation is 1.05 GHz with a 16 stage pipeline. The processor is scalable from 600 MHz to 1.5 GHz, which Sun anticipates expanding to at a later stage in development. Long and short, they're probably the best processor MHz for MHz. These things also rock for multi-processing. UltraSPARC III White paper.

      --

      Request: ECM unit, 1000 km fullerene cable, 1 tactical nuclear weapon. Reason: Birthday party for foreign dignitary.
    2. Re:Thermal Stresses by Sampsa · · Score: 5, Informative

      CPU still works fine and actually we are already planning for the next test with liquid nitrogen

      Earlier we tested Pentium 4 2,4GHz CPU with liquid nitrogen over 20 times and it's still kicking

      We dry the components very carefully after the test with compressor.

    3. Re:Thermal Stresses by Viol8 · · Score: 0

      No one cares. Why don't you get a life instead and go clock some women instead of CPUs?

    4. Re:Thermal Stresses by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      and suppose life is more like yours, since you have already posted 5 meaningless posts to this article.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    5. Re:Thermal Stresses by radish · · Score: 2


      *ahem* branch prediction?

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    6. Re:Thermal Stresses by Viol8 · · Score: 0

      I'm at something called "work". I get paid to sit in front of this beige box. You should try it something.

    7. Re:Thermal Stresses by Sampsa · · Score: 1

      This LN2 cooling and other testing is my daily job. I'm the webmaster of largest hardware-site in Finland and I get paid for what I'm doing.

      So what's your point?

    8. Re:Thermal Stresses by Sunda666 · · Score: 1

      Don't think so.

      Sparcs are not the best processor in any way. They have that odd register windows, 14-stage pipeline (too damn long for RISC!) and only one load/store unit...

      Id bet my $$ on POWER or MIPS archs as the best, but the hammer and itanium look quite promising too.

      Here is a good article about 64-bit cpus. Bookmarked the page they start talking about sparcs, but the complete article is worth a read.

      Cheers.

      --


      ``If a program can't rewrite its own code, what good is it?'' - Mel
    9. Re:Thermal Stresses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then why are you ripping off the company and spending your time making meaningless posts on /.?

    10. Re:Thermal Stresses by 1000StonedMonkeys · · Score: 1

      That longer pipeline is also why the P4 is the only chip that can even think about going 4GHz. Try doing that with an Athlon and no amount of liquid nitrogen would be able to keep the chip from catching fire (well, okay, it wouldn't catch fire, but it wouldn't work either).

    11. Re:Thermal Stresses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What an idiot... If somebodys job is to work for a hardware site, this could probably be considerd as pr?

      I guess some people are jealous that they have to do a boring 9-5 job instead of getting to play around like a little boy with big boys toys!

    12. Re:Thermal Stresses by Viol8 · · Score: 0

      Testing with liquid N2 is your daily job? Yeah right. I can just see your boss saying "hey , how can we speed up our computers , I know , lets rip them open and immerse them in liquid nitrogen". Pull the other one , its got bells on.

    13. Re:Thermal Stresses by Viol8 · · Score: 0

      Well they got your replying didn't they? And at least they were on topic which is more than your post is.

    14. Re:Thermal Stresses by Sampsa · · Score: 1

      Yes, testing processors with LN2 is a part of my job. I also do product reviews and other stuff related to http://www.muropaketti.com

    15. Re:Thermal Stresses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ignore viol8, he's an ignorant jack-ass.

      you're cool, and the overclock is quite impressive.

  17. Re:The article cuz its slashdotted. by Bakajin · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Congratulations! You are the first person to post the text of the article! Weclome to your free karma points! Good job also on disquising your whoreing with a witty comment.

    Oh wait... but by the way, I do believe that probably 95%+ of the slashdot crowd doesn't read Finnish and are going to just look at the pretty pictures, just like the posting suggested.

  18. I'm so cool... by CoderByBirth · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...I don't even need liquid nitrogen to overclock my CPU.
    I just give it The Fonzie and it runs like hellfire.

    1. Re:I'm so cool... by Myco · · Score: 3, Funny
      Just make sure you don't decide to "give it the Fonzie" after you've immersed it in liquid nitro.

      Jumped the shark indeed.

  19. I wonder... by balloonhead · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    ...what these guys could do with an old 386...

    --
    This idea was invented by Shampoo.
    1. Re:I wonder... by i7dude · · Score: 1

      "...what these guys could do with an old 386..."

      nothing.

      dude.

  20. What is the fascination with overclocking? by Viol8 · · Score: 0

    I mean , its not like boosting the horsepower of a car and having a blast burning up some guy at the lights. Yeah , so your computer runs faster, what you gonna do , get your mates around and give them a demo of how fast the linux kernel compiles now? Gimme a break. Overclockers are really sad dudes who need to get out more.

  21. Re:The article cuz its slashdotted. by dr.Flake · · Score: 1

    Yeh, sure..

    post the original finish article, that will help.

    --
    Why are other peoples sig's always more witty ???
  22. Re:1000fps in Quake by peterpi · · Score: 1
    Presumably that would require overclocking the GPU as well.

    What's up with that? Does anybody overclock graphics chips? I don't remember having seen anything on the subject.

  23. Faster than 3.917 by Raetsel · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Do my eyes deceive me? I doubt it. WCPUID is noting 3998.24 MHz in that picture! (It's most of the way down the page, if you want to see it in context.)

    Wow.

    --

    "...America's great minds of today, teaching America's great minds of tomorrow. Poor bastards." -- A Beautiful Min
    1. Re:Faster than 3.917 by ymgve · · Score: 2

      Do my eyes deceive me? [muropaketti.com] I doubt it. WCPUID is noting 3998.24 MHz in that picture! (It's most of the way down the page, if you want to see it in context.)

      If you read the english summary, it says that they managed to run the CPU at 3998 MHz, but had to knock it down a notch to keep it stable.

    2. Re:Faster than 3.917 by Sampsa · · Score: 2, Informative

      Hello, That's correct. I was able to run the last test with 3998MHz CPU clock Here is the original size screenshot: http://www.muropaketti.com/bench/nw2800/superpi_39 .gif

    3. Re:Faster than 3.917 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On slashdot, everything is possible.
      Probably some l33t h4ck0r guru figured that 1 GHz must be 1024 MHz.

    4. Re:Faster than 3.917 by Kibo · · Score: 1

      Have you guys tried or considered trying dry ice?

      --
      --Jimmy has fancy plans; and pants to match.
    5. Re:Faster than 3.917 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, finnish women are hot.

    6. Re:Faster than 3.917 by Keith_Beef · · Score: 1

      Looking at this image made me raise an eyebrow...

      Is that the same Aga that makes stoves?

  24. Correction by XNormal · · Score: 4, Informative

    The pictures show wisps of nitrogen evaporating from the jar sitting on top of the CPU

    You can't see the evaporating nitrogen. The wisps are droplets of water condensed from water vapor in the air by the low temperature.

    --
    Stop worrying about the risks of nuclear power and start worrying about the risks of not using nuclear power.
    1. Re:Correction by micromoog · · Score: 4, Funny

      And you can't really "see" water vapor. The resulting "vision" is actually photons reflecting from or refracting throught the water and stimulating retinal nerves.

    2. Re:Correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > And you can't really "see" water vapor. The
      > resulting "vision" is actually photons
      > reflecting from or refracting throught the
      > water and stimulating retinal nerves.

      Excuse me, wise guy, I think you should also share
      your 9th grade physics teacher's definition of
      "see" as well. Idiot.

    3. Re:Correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey dood - you`re being called an Idiot by an AC! You`re not just going to sit there and take it, are you?

    4. Re:Correction by p3d0 · · Score: 1, Redundant

      And you don't actually have any retinal "nerves". They're only cells that transmit signals from your eye to your brain.

      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
    5. Re:Correction by sporty · · Score: 2

      Ug, and you really don't have any humour, since trying to make fact funny doesn't always work. Wait a sec... damnit.

      --

      -
      ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

    6. Re:Correction by ean · · Score: 1

      that's what it means to 'see' something

    7. Re:Correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you don't really have any "brain" either, or you never would have made that post...

    8. Re:Correction by p3d0 · · Score: 1

      I don't get it.

      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
    9. Re: Correction by XNormal · · Score: 2

      Actually, you're right. You can't see water vapor either. Only the condensed droplets.

      Thanks.

      --
      Stop worrying about the risks of nuclear power and start worrying about the risks of not using nuclear power.
  25. What some guys do for the kick... by axllent · · Score: 3, Funny

    It really surprises me what some guys do... I mean what is the practical advantage of this? Just to proove what exactly?
    Now, if they were to use the same system to get instant cold beer.. now that's something we can all use, but to work with a freezer on your desk....

    1. Re:What some guys do for the kick... by Quixote · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you have to ask the question "why do these guys try to push the boundaries?", then you are in the wrong place. I can't speak for all techies, but all the ones I know are always interested in seeing how far you can push the envelope. Think of it like art.

    2. Re:What some guys do for the kick... by A+Rabid+Tibetan+Yak · · Score: 1

      Liquid nitrogen to cool beer? Blegh!

      Everyone knows that you use a jet engine to cool your beer :).

    3. Re:What some guys do for the kick... by Peyna · · Score: 2

      I think 2x2ghz processors would be cheaper and probably more effective than 1 4 Ghz processor. Much cheaper to get 2x2 than 1x4 with they way they've done it at least =]

      --
      What?
    4. Re:What some guys do for the kick... by Reziac · · Score: 2

      It proves that the 2.8GHz chip is probably a 3.9GHz chip under the hood. :)

      Did you see the recent article about how all those overclockable Celerons really ARE the max speed they'll clock to, but were remarked down to fill the market demand for cheaper chips .. this has been going on at least since the P75 era. (Most "P75" CPUs were really remarked P90 and P100 chips. In fact I've got one of 'em in my Closet. True P75 chips won't overclock.)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    5. Re:What some guys do for the kick... by adolf · · Score: 2

      Er.

      The P90 and P60 were completely different cores from the rest of the vanilla Pentium line, and always were rather rare, being the first generation.

      P75, 100, 120, 133, 150, 166, and 200 shared the same core.

    6. Re:What some guys do for the kick... by Reziac · · Score: 2

      There were two different P60 chips (I've got one of each -- and an old motherboard that will only speak to one of them!) And I've personally seen evidence of different grades of P75. Also, per info at the time, P90 was same core as P100, tho maybe there was a previous P90, I dunno.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    7. Re:What some guys do for the kick... by Alphtoo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, axllent, those same thoughts were crossing my pinpoint mind when it occured to me, Damn! The way to do this is to create a refrigeration system for the CPU and the MB and, hell, the whole case, that operated on nitrogen instead of freon. And build the computer in a large enough box to handle at least a twelve-pack, and keep 'em frosty! I like the idea! I think I'll build my next box along those lines. (Maybe even have some spare bays a little less cool in which to keep a couple of sandwiches or a chunk of cheese or something).

  26. Re:Yeah, yeah, yeah by SirDrinksAlot · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Go with the feeling, you're not the first post.

  27. Hmmm, 145MHz FSB, 21x Multilier = 4Ghz - eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Notices in the CupID screenshots that the Multiplier is 21x.

    Notices that in the Sandra screen shot the FSB is 4x145 Mhz (580).

    Does mental arithmetic - 145x21=3045MHz.

    Which is rather a lot less than they were claiming. I suspect a few of these picture may have had a close encounter with Photochop.

    1. Re:Hmmm, 145MHz FSB, 21x Multilier = 4Ghz - eh? by Sampsa · · Score: 5, Informative
      Hello,

      We have modified TurboPLL-module on Asus P4T533-C motherboard which allows us to use higher front side bus.

      Thanks to this module, when we set 145MHz from BIOS, the FSB is actually 186MHz.

      You can check out the pictures of modified motherboard here.

    2. Re:Hmmm, 145MHz FSB, 21x Multilier = 4Ghz - eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      karma whore.

      I've seen 4 responses from you to other members and all are 5:insightful.

      What keeps me from opening my own beer-cooling factory and proclaiming to the world that cold beer is g--o--o--d?

  28. The Risks of Using Technology Evolve... by perfects · · Score: 5, Funny


    1972: Typist's Elbow
    1982: Space Invaders Wrist
    1992: Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
    2002: Your entire hand shatters after being frozen in liquid nitrogen.

    1. Re:The Risks of Using Technology Evolve... by edmac3 · · Score: 1

      I've actually had liquid nitrogen poured on me[hand] before... but nothing happened because your body heat is enough to vaporize the nitrogen about an inch before it touches you.

    2. Re:The Risks of Using Technology Evolve... by cheese_wallet · · Score: 2

      " I've actually had liquid nitrogen poured on me[hand] before... but nothing happened because your body heat is enough to vaporize the nitrogen about an inch before it touches you."

      More like a millimeter, unless your body temp is 120 degrees.

    3. Re:The Risks of Using Technology Evolve... by Nameles · · Score: 1

      It can actually touch the skin, as it's a way to remove warts. They take a long Q-Tip and dip it in liquid nitrogen, and then press it on the wart. Usually dies down in a few weeks, but sometimes they do come back.

    4. Re:The Risks of Using Technology Evolve... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1996: Wankers Elbow (Online for first time)

    5. Re:The Risks of Using Technology Evolve... by Jonny+290 · · Score: 2

      Hey, you also left out:

      1994: alt.binaries.pictures.* Wrist Syndrome

      --
      Hey Taco! Looks like you're using the "infinite monkeys and typewriters" scheme to generate Ask Slashdots again...
  29. Liquid Nitrogen for External Use Only by stereoroid · · Score: 5, Interesting
    It is possible to hold some on your tongue and blow "smoke rings", but if you want to know what happens if you swallow it, you may end up in the running for a Darwin Award. This guy did it and failed to qualify (i.e. lived to tell the tale). It's in his own words, and he left out the goriest details, but it's still cringeworthy.

    If you've seen this article before: yes, I know. Some people haven't. This is for them. Thanks.

    --
    (this is not a .sig)
    1. Re:Liquid Nitrogen for External Use Only by stereoroid · · Score: 2

      Your assignment, should you choose to accept it, is to type the phrase "begging the question" into Google and read every hit returned.

      In other words: HUH?

      --
      (this is not a .sig)
    2. Re:Liquid Nitrogen for External Use Only by davecl · · Score: 2

      A friend of mine tried gargling with it (it can be done) and swallowed some. He belched for about a minute solid, but that was it. And he thermally shocked his teeth, knocking the dental cares off, which was perhaps a good thing...

    3. Re:Liquid Nitrogen for External Use Only by Mt._Honkey · · Score: 2

      I spent the better part of this tuesday playing with Liquid Nitrogen. It turns out that you can stick your entire hand in it, and it won't hardly get cold at all for a second or two, so you can splash it at people with your bare hands. Because your hands (mouth) are so far above the boiling point of N2, it boils instantly upon contact with your skin. That means that you end up with a layer of gas around your hand, sheilding you from the brunt of the cold. Just don't leave it in for more than a second or two, because the LN2 WILL break through and give you cryo burn. Cryoburn (frostbite) is much much worse than a heat burn, partly because there has been little evolutionary reason to build up defences against it. Maybe Inuits would be better off.

      --

      Don't Bogart the fish sticks
    4. Re:Liquid Nitrogen for External Use Only by dschuetz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You know, I was just thinking about this the other day, for some reason.

      I first read the story years ago on USENET (it might even have been when I was still in school, so late 80's early 90's). I remember that he even mentioned in his posting that "this is not an urban legend, so if it ever turns into one, you'll know it started with fact. Expect to see a journal article soon."

      It looked a lot like the story at the darwin awards, but for the lack of mention of urban legends (of course, if I really *did* read it 12 years ago, then I may be having a memory lapse).

      That said, the story looks more and more like a joke. I did a quick google USENET search, and didn't find the original article, but found plenty of reprints, mostly in joke groups. There's no mention of time (where and when did this happen?). And you'd certainly think that it would have made it to the journals by now.

      So, has anyone found any definitive research on this story? I'd believed it was true, when I first read it, then forgot about it for years. Now, I'm not so sure. And snopes doesn't have anything on it.

    5. Re:Liquid Nitrogen for External Use Only by Fnkmaster · · Score: 2
      Not an urban legend. Even though it has made it on to joke pages, the jokes are all based on a real event. The one sketchy thing about this telling is the part about "machines digesting for me" (there's no such thing I've ever seen, and I've seen several major gastrological surgeries).


      The guy's name is Michael Mazur and he was at WPI. Here was the original story from WPI. Also there are other similar incidents on record, so the injuries are accurately described.

    6. Re:Liquid Nitrogen for External Use Only by jw32767 · · Score: 1

      http://www.wpi.edu/News/Wire/Jan99/nitrogen.html

      I was at WPI when it happened. It was quite a running joke around the campus for a long while.

      --

      Josh Winslow
    7. Re:Liquid Nitrogen for External Use Only by Fnkmaster · · Score: 2

      Damn, my link to the press release didn't come out before.

    8. Re:Liquid Nitrogen for External Use Only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't comment on this article, but I saw something similar a few years ago, so it could be true. The one I saw was a case of some idiot thinking that "wait for the LN2 to evaporate, and then drink the LN2 slushie" actually meant "pour the LN2 into the cup and drink it before it has a chance to evaporate". He survived with no permanent injuries though...a pity.

    9. Re:Liquid Nitrogen for External Use Only by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Your "friend" eh?

      I once heard of an individual who tried this and burped for an extended period time, an involuntary response that rid his body of gas produced as the nitrogen changed phases. He was concerned that he might burp long enough to be harmed by the lack of oxygen. That sounds more plausible to me. But I can believe portions of the digestive system might be frozen by the liquid nitrogen."

      http://www.darwinawards.com/personal/personal200 0- 25.html

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    10. Re:Liquid Nitrogen for External Use Only by ahecht · · Score: 1

      I am now a freshman at WPI, and they told us this story at new student orientation. However, I had actutally first heard about it during the Summer of 2000 from a professor at the University of Arizona who knew Michael personally, and had recieved a copy of the email that is now on DarwinAwards.com. He read us the email while we were eating our LN2 ice cream.

    11. Re:Liquid Nitrogen for External Use Only by Ratfactor · · Score: 1

      You know, I had an 8th grade science teacher who once told us about an adventure he had with the stuff as a boy.

      Seems he and some friends liked putting it in their mouths and running around pretending to be steam engines.

      One friend laughed while doing it (can't imagine why...I'm always very serious about my steam engine follies) and swallowed the liquid nitrogen. Reflexively, my teacher stuffed a garden hose in the friend's mouth and made him drink as fast as he could. Seconds later, the friend's stomach visibly bulged and he let out a enormous belch.

      After that, he was fine. Makes sense to me. That teacher had a lot of good stories.

      (OT: On Topic)
      Anyway, I'm glad *somebody* is working on a system that will properly run Doom III in full res.

      (OT: Off Topic)
      Is it just me or is everybody else waiting 'til D3 comes out for their next major hardware upgrade?

  30. Apple, catch up. by ymgve · · Score: 1

    Now our processors are FOUR times the speed of yours!

    (Yeah, yeah. I know that MHz != performance, but still...)

    1. Re:Apple, catch up. by boaworm · · Score: 2

      Apple's latest CPU's run at 1.25 Ghz, which is more like 3 times slower than that P4. Still, 1.25 is without liquid nitrogen cooling.. so that's not really relevant either...

      And the most interesting part is that Mac users (like myself, love my Titanium Powerbook) are very happy we have sufficiently powerful non-wintel CPU's which consumes only a small amount of energy. Imagine putting one of those P4 2.8 in a laptop... ;-)

      --
      Probable impossibilities are to be preferred to improbable possibilities.
      Aristotele
    2. Re:Apple, catch up. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a pentium4 2.2 laptop, I can play Quake and lot of games. Does not consumes much more than yours.
      Don't see your point, didn't you know we can play quake with laptops now.

    3. Re:Apple, catch up. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed, the P4 2.2 Ghz "mobile" does consume more power. While the tech specs may not list it, when you play games like Quake on a wintel laptop, the battery life can be dropped in half.

      Where as playing Quake3 on a TiBook wont reduce battery life by nearly as much.

    4. Re:Apple, catch up. by be-fan · · Score: 2

      I have a P4 2.0 GHz laptop. The battery life is fine, but I can feel it through the 3/4" wood of my desk!

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    5. Re:Apple, catch up. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      EMM..Agree,
      performance,speed, != ALL :)

  31. Imagine a beowulf cluster of those! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Imagine a beowulf cluster of those!

    1. Re:Imagine a beowulf cluster of those! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ooooooooo. o8o
      `888 `Y88. `"'
      888 .d88' .ooooo. ooo. .oo. oooo .oooo.o
      888ooo88P' d88' `88b `888P"Y88b `888 d88( "8
      888 888ooo888 888 888 888 `"Y88b.
      888 888 .o 888 888 888 o. )88b
      o888o `Y8bod8P' o888o o888o o888o 8""888P'

  32. Even faster: 4029.78 MHz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If one looks at this picture at the same site you will see an even faster P4: 4029.78 MHz. However that one didn't run the piFast benchmark as fast.

  33. this pic shows 4339mhz!!!!! by dcstimm · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://www.muropaketti.com/artikkelit/cpu/nw2800/l n2_5.jpg

    1. Re:this pic shows 4339mhz!!!!! by WWWWolf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, the caption says that they checked what's the highest speed they can get to the POST... If it would have actually booted, that would have been interesting =)

  34. Poor lab techniqures! by psyconaut · · Score: 1

    Pouring liquid nitrogen from a cryocanister without gloves on into an open container without a funnel. Really, really smart! I'm guessing these boys wouldn't know an MSDS if it hit them over the head.

    Also, I'm curious as to why they thought they needed liquid nitrogen? It's probably a little over-the-top....anyone with college level organic chem can come up with a whole list of mixtures that reach precise, predictable temperatures....they could have worked out what level of thermal conductivity was required and then chosen a cooling agent.

    -psyco

    1. Re:Poor lab techniqures! by Isle · · Score: 1

      Because liquid nitrogen is cheap and abundant, and any physics research facility has loads of it lying about. At my institute we use it for freezing drinks for parties (yes, freezing the drinks not cooling them). Besides it is very safe to handle, you can even put it in your mouth.

    2. Re:Poor lab techniqures! by Winterblink · · Score: 1

      Not every uberdork wannabe is concerned with proper lab techniques and safety when trying to get a story on Slashdot. :) Example: those psychos blowing up CDs by spinning them at insanely high RPMs (although THAT was actually kinda cool).

      --
      "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
      -Hoban Washburn
    3. Re:Poor lab techniqures! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not that dangerous!?! have you ever seen what happens to a hotdog when it's stuck in liquid N? a drop or two isn't going to be that bad maybe a little frostbite, but a large spill!!! a pic of the dude's shattered finger on the floor would be more interesting than an overclocked p4.

  35. Lead (material) by C0deJunkie · · Score: 1

    Ok, I suppose i'll need a few onces of lead or other heavy and dense material to keep it on the ground. I wouldn't like to have my P4 blablah Hz flying around over my head without an adequate ballast.

  36. Go live in Siberia by r6144 · · Score: 1
    Build a small house, and use a beowulf cluster of these to provide the heating (about as efficient as an electric heater). Just make sure you have electricity and a phone line if you want to participate in some distributed computing projects (like seti). Of course, it is even better if you have some useful things to compute, or can sell your computing power.

    But... as soon as you feel reasonably warm, the P4's clocks will drop automatically.

  37. Re:1000fps in Quake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes. Most everybody, I thought...

    There are tweaker apps for that, e.g. RivaTuner for Nvidia chips (if you don't want to edit registry to enable the clock speed sliders in the driver interface, the "CoolBits" tweak), or PowerStrip for most all cards.

    I've seen pics of self-built watercooling systems for GeForce cards, one square waterblock for the GPU and one longish L-shaped for the memory chips. (Google it up if you're interested.)

  38. LOOK, A NIT!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sorry to be a picker of the nits, but they bought 10 liters of liquid nitrogen -- not a few pints. i think this is important since most slashdotters don't actually read the article....

  39. I don't think LHe is useful by r6144 · · Score: 1
    I doubt if CPUs will work well below -55C. There may also be some mechanical problems.

    If you want the CPU to work at a reasonably high temperature (like 0C or -20C), then LHe are no better than LN2. I guess LHe's heat capacity is quite low.

    1. Re:I don't think LHe is useful by Rich0 · · Score: 1
      If you want to actually cool the CPU down to 4K then LHe is your best bet. If you just want a refrigerant I'd stick with freon.

      I see no reason that a CPU shouldn't work at arbitrarily low temperature, but if you cool the CPU too far I bet the problem will switch from heat dissapation to having the electrons move too slowly. I can definitely see mechanical problems though - if the material used in different layers of the CPU has different moduli of expansion then it will shear apart when cooled.

      Also - LHe has very low heat capacity - it should be lower than LN2 since there is no bond vibration and consequently only degrees of freedom associated with motion. (Not to mention only van-der-Walls attraction in the liquid state.) It is also VERY expensive. Not that this doesn't stop some folks from using it under reduced pressure to further lower the boiling point (some commercials NMRs actually use this technique to squeze out a few more Tesla/MHz - just hope you don't have a power outage...).

  40. It can't be all that good... by The_Guv'na · · Score: 2, Funny

    I don't see any "AMD Approved" sticker.

    Ali

    [Apoligies, but someone was gonna say it sooner or later!]

    1. Re:It can't be all that good... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "AMD approved", does that mean the case is fireproof?

    2. Re:It can't be all that good... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This has to be a record.

      Well past the halfpoint mark of the article's comments before an AMD fanboy chimes in.

      And... *sob* you were being sarcastic.

      What is Slashdot becoming?

      We've gotta 'sock it to The Man!' Don't buy Intel.

    3. Re:It can't be all that good... by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      "AMD approved", does that mean the case is fireproof?


      Get with the times, troll; AMD has had thermal protection for months now.

      --
      It's been a long time.
  41. I Betcha by g00z · · Score: 1

    That you can check your email wicked fast with that baby!

    Seriously.. This whole speed thing is becoming quite the moot point now. How much power does a fella need? I'm still sitting behind a 600mhz machine and don't feel the need to upgrade at all. I would even go as far as calling myself a power user (Running intense applications such as Photoshop, doing video editing, etc). Sure, may have to wait a bit for super intense things, but the FEEL of the machine pretty much remains good enough.

    Giving it some thought though, it's just a "bigger dick" war. Like guys that get all up an arms over how much horsepower their camaro has or something.

    --
    "The Wright brothers were the first to fly with a heavier-than-air machine, but boy did they have a lousy plane"
    1. Re:I Betcha by watsondk · · Score: 1

      Agreed, I am runing a 3 years old P2 Xeon 450 box, which does all I need with the exception of video encodeing.

      It will be replaced when it dies.

    2. Re:I Betcha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How much power does a fella need?

      You finally got it. I already said the same many years ago, when I bought a 486/25MHz.

    3. Re:I Betcha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, I got a P166MMX out of a skip, put a 1.3GB laptop hard drive in it and installed Slackware 8.0 and used it for web browsing and remote working by VPN over the internet with an old modem.

    4. Re:I Betcha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No no no no no!!!
      Your argument does not hold AT ALL!!
      You may think that 600mhz is "adequate" whereas 2.8-4ghz is "over the top".
      Ah, excuse me, hellooooo! At one point ,a couple of decades ago, the fastest computer in the world wasnt as fast as your "merely" 600mhz chip. A little further back, ALL THE PROCESSING POWER IN THE WORLD DID NOT EQUAL YOUR CPU!!!

      Its ALL RELATIVE! One mans underpowered dung heap is another mans grotesque monstrosity.
      If you cant find an application worthy of/needing more than 600mhz doesnt mean other people wont.

    5. Re:I Betcha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow.. I am the speed demon with an Athlon 750. (Without a need to upgrade, except if Unreal2 is really cool then I might need to)

    6. Re:I Betcha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps you would feel a need to upgrade if you were sitting in _front_ of the machine.

    7. Re:I Betcha by be-fan · · Score: 2

      Seriously.. This whole speed thing is becoming quite the moot point now. How much power does a fella need? I'm still sitting behind a 600mhz machine and don't feel the need to upgrade at all.
      >>>>>>>>>>
      You're obviously not a real man. How long are you? 3"? Seriously, this is /., News for Nerds, not /., News for People who Do Nothing but Surf and E-Mail.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    8. Re:I Betcha by Sj0 · · Score: 2

      ...which is still perfectly alright for what many people do. Believe it or not. If you find the right software(in this case, I'd guess Windows 98 + 98lite + microGUI), even a 486 can fly.

      --
      It's been a long time.
  42. wow... by DarkHelmet · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's strange seeing a processor run at sub zero. I'm used to popping popcorn inside my Athlon's case whenever I wanna watch a movie.

    --
    /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
    1. Re:wow... by the+way,+what're+you · · Score: 1

      Get an Athlon for the popcorn, and a liquid nitrogen-cooled P4 for the beer!

      --
      example.org - powered by Linux!
    2. Re:wow... by Skal+Tura · · Score: 1

      not so, i have here 'some' cooling too:
      a freezer
      Pump
      nice water-block
      Glycol ;)

      Glycol freezes @ ~-17C i have problems with
      that only when this system has been unused
      for sometime, ie. ~2 hours or so, all the tubes
      inside freezer gets frozen and after that
      this whole room is a bit cold after i've got
      it to run again ^_^ at best i can get -12C to
      the block =) and of course, i didn't pay a penny
      for this system =) oh yeah, and the freezer
      goes as down as -37C at best ;)

      Also when i don't want to run OC'd system @ a very
      noisy pump my air cooling handles very nicely, also =) my cpu runs at 39C on full load (seti or distributed.net)

      i want to play around with ln2 also ;)

  43. You can dip your fingers in LN2 by October_30th · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually you can dip your fingers/hand in LN2 without hurting yourself. I used to do it every time to amuse/bemuse visitors who came to our laboratory. Just make sure you're not wearing a ring or other jewellery.

    --
    The owls are not what they seem
    1. Re:You can dip your fingers in LN2 by Elbereth · · Score: 2

      Actually you can dip your fingers/hand in LN2 without hurting yourself. I used to do it every time to amuse/bemuse visitors who came to our laboratory. Just make sure you're not wearing a ring or other jewellery.

      Yeah, I used to dip my hands in hydrochloric acid. It's perfectly safe, and it amused the people who came by my lab.
    2. Re:You can dip your fingers in LN2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget the "breathing smoke" trick!
      Take a sip of liquid N2 (quite safe, but keep
      it away from the teeth..)
      Now exhale over the liquid.. nice plume of water vapor "smoke"!

    3. Re:You can dip your fingers in LN2 by October_30th · · Score: 1
      Keep the exposure to LN2 less than a few seconds long and it is perfectly safe. The oil on your skin protects you from the cold but not from hydrochloric acid.

      Just don't try dipping your tongue or splashing LN2 in your eyes, though.

      --
      The owls are not what they seem
    4. Re:You can dip your fingers in LN2 by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      that'd be DILUTE HCL I would have thought

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    5. Re:You can dip your fingers in LN2 by slashuzer · · Score: 0
      Na-Nah....concenterated Nitric Acid. I amuse people by dipping my fingers in concenterated Nitric Acid.

      I still can't beleive those idiots were fooling with liquid nitrogen without gloves!!

    6. Re:You can dip your fingers in LN2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Huh?

      It's fun and harmless (unless you're an idiot).

    7. Re:You can dip your fingers in LN2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Actually wearing gloves can do you more harm than not wearing them.

      If you splash liquid nitrogen on your gloves, the glove will freeze and freeze your hand as well. On the other hand if you splash nitrogen on your skin, it evaporates doing no harm.

      I don't see what your problem is with people who don't wear gloves while handling liquid nitrogen. If anything, you should be complaining about people who don't wear goggles, because even a drop of liquid nitrogen will damage your eye.

  44. Over 4GHz? by r6144 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    If someone can make 4.3GHz mode stable, I suspect some software may break for storing the Hz number in a 32-bit number, and they may say "45,336,372 Hz processor detected".

    Thank god, in linux/arch/i386/time.c an unsigned long is used to measure KHz's.

    1. Re:Over 4GHz? by VAXman · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually there were problems in going above 2.2GHz since that is negative number (using 32 bit signed). See here for example.

    2. Re:Over 4GHz? by wumarkus420 · · Score: 1

      I actually had the same problem with an AMD K6-2 450Mhz. Had to use a similar patch for that one. I guess that's what we get for not upgrading our Windows versions fast enough.

    3. Re:Over 4GHz? by squidfood · · Score: 1

      Well that's ok, I'm doing historical simulations and it's better to have the clock run backwards.

    4. Re:Over 4GHz? by lubricated · · Score: 1

      an unsigned long on an x86 machine is still 32bits. You need an unsigned long long for 64bits on a 32bit machine.

      --
      It has been statistically shown that helmets increase the risk of head injury.
    5. Re:Over 4GHz? by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      Why the fuck would you use a signed integer for processor speed? Are you expecting to travel back in time and execute code backwards so it run forwards, to control the interaction? It doesn't work that way anyway.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:Over 4GHz? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, it doesn't work that way, now does it?

      http://www.ai.mit.edu/~cvieri/reversible.html

  45. liquid nitrogen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    where could one attain some liquid nitrogen?

    1. Re:liquid nitrogen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try stealing it from your local university. Try Physics or Chemistry buildings.

    2. Re:liquid nitrogen by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      chemical firms, duh. the places that sell welding gasses and stuff.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  46. Re:1000fps in Quake by gl4ss · · Score: 1

    quite the opposite, you can just up the internal clock speed of the gpu, but you can't (usually nowadays, if not having unlocked cpu) up the clock speed of x86 without upping anything else.

    actually it's even easier to oc gfx card than setting some jumpers, just get some 'tweaker' program, this has been done for ~7 years? (voodoo1 has a dos environment setting that you can use to change clock speed, and for my old s3 i found a similar program too)

    nowadays even more hardcore overclocking is happening on gfx cards with hacks to change gpu and memory voltages.

    r8500 ln2 cooled: http://www.kamu2.net/radeon.html

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  47. Remember Kids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do not eat the brown acid!

  48. Danger? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I would think that this is best done in a well ventilated area.

    A relatively small jar of liquid N2 evaporated and warmed up to room temperature in a short time can replace many liters of air by pure N2. Trying to breathe the stuff won't cause a drowning or suffocating feeling or even a smell, as the air we breathe normally contains 70% of it.
    The first symptoms of suffocation by lack of O2 in the air (rather than lack of air) are some kind of euphoric feeling and wooziness, so you wouldn't necessarily start thinking of finding a way to reduce the effect.

    I bet that euphoric feeling is just what they experienced when they saw it working ;-)

    1. Re:Danger? by zdzichu · · Score: 1

      The first symptoms of suffocation by lack of O2 in the air (rather than lack of air) are some kind of euphoric feeling and wooziness,

      How do you think - how that guys felt when they overclocked pIV to IV GHz? :)

      --
      :wq
  49. You can speed up a mac the exact same way by eclectro · · Score: 5, Funny


    See this this link for full instructions and pictures.

    --
    Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    1. Re:You can speed up a mac the exact same way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The best acceleration for a mac is 9.8 m/s/s out the window.

    2. Re:You can speed up a mac the exact same way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but this technique may allow some recent Mac buyers to bring their systems up to 1.3 GHz or higher in speed!

      Actually, I like (modern) Macs. I just wanted to piss off some Mac zealots with a "MHz myth" rip.

  50. slashdot effect by flonker · · Score: 2

    Their server seems to be withstanding the slashdot effect quite nicely...

    1. Re:slashdot effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Muropaketti is a part of SoneraPlaza which is a part of Sonera which is a big ISP in Finland. AFAIK server has four UltraSparcs and other goodies.

  51. That is nothing compared to... by A+Rabid+Tibetan+Yak · · Score: 1

    Project E.U.N.U.C.H - The "Extreme Use of Nearly Universal Cooling Hardware" ;).

  52. Talk about.... by pjdepasq · · Score: 2

    Wow. I'm impressed. Talk about your home brewed....

  53. Fingers by Pathwalker · · Score: 2

    Since nitrogen is such a good insulator, you can dunk your hand into a bucket of liquid nitrogen for a second or two, and as long as you make sure you don't touch the sides, you will be just fine.

    As it flash evaporates from the heat of your hand, it forms a protective layer that slows the heat loss quite a bit.

    I did it back when I was in high school, and visiting a collage physics lab. It feels strange, like a cold wind blasting your hand.

    1. Re:Fingers by hrieke · · Score: 3, Informative

      So, excuse me for yelling, but:
      YOU SHOULD NOT TREAT LIQUID NITROGEN AS A TOY. YOU CAN CAUSE SERIOUS HARM TO YOUR BODY.

      I'm speaking from the hindsight of a lawsuit from Johny can't count to 21 with out taking off his pants. (Check out my web site listed in the URL.)

      --
      III.IIVIVIXIIVIVIIIVVIIIIXVIIIXIIIIIIIIVIIIIVVIIIV IIVIIIIIIVIII...
    2. Re:Fingers by stevelinton · · Score: 2

      Someone once told me that LN2 is almost exactly as dangeous as boiling hot coffee -- a few drops won't hurt, but soak your sleeve in it and you in trouble, etc.

  54. BIOS Picture by DreddUK · · Score: 1
    Holy Cow! The BIOS picture reports Pentium 4 4339 mhz! Guess that didn't boot.

    --
    "If A equals success, then the formua is A=X+Y+Z. X is work. Y is play. Z is keep your mouth shut" - A Einstein.
  55. Once Upon A Chemistry Class... by Kibo · · Score: 4, Funny

    I had a professor who told us of a practical joke he'd do every few years. He was fond of explosions and other cool things liquid oxygen and nitrogen being no exception.

    Appearently he used to fill on of the fingers in a latex glove with hamburger, then put his hands in the glove. Careful to conceal his deception, he would stick stick his false finger into a some liquid nitrogen, while telling the class about how if one just left a finger in there it would shatter if struck. He then proceeded to demonstrate this by smashing the false and frozen finger with a hammer.

    The way he tells the story, he was forced to discontinue this irregular practice when a bit of frozen hamburger hit a girl in the front row, causing her to faint.

    And a styrofoam cup with a piece of what appears to be copper pipe, held together with duct tape and dreams, while it might be cool, doesn't rise to what I would consider "gear".

    --
    --Jimmy has fancy plans; and pants to match.
    1. Re:Once Upon A Chemistry Class... by forged · · Score: 2
      • ...he was forced to discontinue this irregular practice when a bit of frozen hamburger hit a girl in the front row, causing her to faint.

      This must have been funny as hell :) I can just about imagine the look on people's faces then!

    2. Re:Once Upon A Chemistry Class... by phorm · · Score: 1

      Heard about a shop teacher that did a similar trick with a bandsaw in shop class... glove filled with red dye and something that looked chunky.

      Until one day he really *wasn't* paying attention, and nipped off part of a real finger. I don't think he uses that trick anymore

  56. wasted time, but cool by f00zbll · · Score: 2, Insightful
    have to admit it's cool and all. But I can't help but think all this geek exploration isn't doing much good other than waste money, time and energy to prove something most every geek already knows. Now if Intel or AMD could come out with a 2 ghz chip that doesn't require a bad ass cooling fan, which uses a fraction of the power the P4 requires, i'll be impressed. Until then, all this is just a waste of time and leads to the growing power problems we see in CA.

    How many roving black-outs do we need to start thinking about energy conversation. It's great for your wallet by the way. Instead of eating up say 100 kilowatt hours a month, the system only used 5 kilowatt hours you'd save money. Businesses would save even more money when you take into consideration everything else it affects. Sure IBM is working on it, but it about time every CPU manufacturer start getting serious about reducing power consumption.

    1. Re:wasted time, but cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your a little ignorant ay? The energy shortages in CA were MANUFACTURED. Just like "shortages" of most any resource, be it food, electricity or whatever.

    2. Re:wasted time, but cool by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      The market does not demand such a thing, if it did, C3 would be flying off the shelves.

      Electricity to run the computer for 8 hours a day is negligible. Even if the faster chip only saves 10 minutes of employee time, for most reasonable salaries, it was worth it. Employees are too expensive and electricity is too cheap for people to be worried about 50 watts here and there.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    3. Re:wasted time, but cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your a little ignorant ay? The energy shortages in CA were MANUFACTURED. Just like "shortages" of most any resource, be it food, electricity or whatever. Uhh, that makes a lot of sense. Just because the roving black-outs were caused by energy companies cost cutting measures, that doesn't mean it's a bad idea. If everyone reduces the amount of electricity they use each day, that means it will be easier for energy companies to determine how much buffer they need for the summer months. That may result in lowering the cost of electricity, which results in less resources used to generate electricity. How does it being "Manufactured" make it not a problem? When you're house goes dark and you can use any appliance, tell me it's not a problem/inconvienance.

    4. Re:wasted time, but cool by Sj0 · · Score: 2

      If you Want a via, buy a via.

      The rest of us want fast computers.

      --
      It's been a long time.
  57. Great by AppyPappy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now it can wait on the hard drive faster.

    --

    If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem

    1. Re:Great by the+way,+what're+you · · Score: 1

      In the meantime, enjoy your faster internet!

      --
      example.org - powered by Linux!
    2. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By the way, your signature is not an Arthur C. Clarke quote - its Robert A. Heinlein.

  58. ooh! My turn this time. by DirkDaring · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Can you imagine a beowulf cluster of these?

  59. Underclocking, anyone? SpeedStep? by Florian · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Any chance to underclock this beast at, say, 1.4 GHz w/ passive cooling? (Would still fulfill my computing needs.)

    But really, what a waste of electricity, heat, and what a noise pollution. I'm waiting for desktop CPUs with SpeedStep which clock down to 100 MHz when you're doing vi editing and go up to 2.8 GHz, turning on all fans, when you compile software or transcode video streams.

    I hope there will be enough consumer demand for such CPUs, pushing AMD/Intel towards saner technology.

    --
    gopher://cramer.plaintext.cc http://cramer.plaintext.cc:70
    1. Re:Underclocking, anyone? SpeedStep? by dschuetz · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Any chance to underclock this beast at, say, 1.4 GHz w/ passive cooling?

      I've been thinking about that a lot lately, myself. I'm trying to rebuild my network at home (now that I have a cable modem, but don't start me on that! :( ). It's occurred to me that 350MHz is probably too much for a firewall (plus, I need a box for experimentation), so I set out to try and build a simple, low-profile, low-speed box for a firewall.

      Can't be done. Everywhere I look, I see 1GHz+ systems. I could find 500 MHz K6 CPUs, but that was about the lowest. And anything on eBay is both too fast and too big. I want something simple and small, that I can maybe put a four-port ethernet card into. Something like a 1U PIX, but running BSD.

      This becomes more of an issue as I think about set-top boxes -- I want to be able to do video/audio/games/web to the TV, but I don't want to have whirring hard drives or whiny fans in my bedroom. Once again, I need a decent speed, but not super kick-ass (especially if I can do MPEG decoding in hardware), but, again, I'm out of luck. Stuff that slow (and cool) just isn't easy to find.

      'course, I'm not looking *too* hard, either. And, no, I don't want to go the PC104 or SBC route -- if it comes to that, I'd just buy an Athlon 2600 and retire my Duron to firewall duty, for the same cost.

    2. Re:Underclocking, anyone? SpeedStep? by stud9920 · · Score: 1
      I'm waiting for desktop CPUs with SpeedStep which clock down to 100 MHz when you're doing vi editing
      Dude, you've clearly not tried Mandrake 8.2 ! You can't live without 400 MHz !
    3. Re:Underclocking, anyone? SpeedStep? by 0xA · · Score: 2

      I just bought a P133 and put 16mb RAM and an HD in it for $70

      Works really well with OpenBSD, if you want to try use Linux (or at least one of the piggy distros) you probably want something a little newer. Try your_city.forsale on usenet.

    4. Re:Underclocking, anyone? SpeedStep? by Jagasian · · Score: 2

      Buy a VIA's "Eden EPIA" instead. It is a tiny x86 motherboard with integrated ethernet, audio, video, and CPU. It costs $80. Just add ram, harddrive, and powersupply, and you have a tiny computer great for settop box projects. The entire setup doesn't need any fans, just a small heatsink on the CPU. It also consumes very little power. The CPU runs at 533mhz, and the built in video has TV-Outs.

    5. Re:Underclocking, anyone? SpeedStep? by O · · Score: 1

      Get a VIA EPIA mini-ITX system. They're cute and little and the slower one only needs passive cooling.

      --

      1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21 -- Mathematics is the Language of Nature.
    6. Re:Underclocking, anyone? SpeedStep? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? You can't find a 486 in a dumpster like everyone else?

      That's what I did. I built a nice 10Mbit firewall out of dumpster-recovered material.
      (486DX-66, 2 3Com 3c509 cards with TP, used an
      old hard drive.. works fine)

    7. Re:Underclocking, anyone? SpeedStep? by psych031337 · · Score: 2

      Look in the classifieds of your local newspaper, where the non-geeks hide. You will find quite some people there trying to get a buck out of their old typewriter type-of-computer. Lots of 486 und P75/100/133 boxes to get there. My firewall/router runs a 486/75 with 32megs on a linux fli4l minidist system and crunches seti in its spare time (ok, that IS 1 packet every 12 days, but what the fuck....)

      --
      +++ath0
    8. Re:Underclocking, anyone? SpeedStep? by Yokaze · · Score: 2

      >I could find 500 MHz K6 CPUs, but that was about the lowest.

      Well, no one forces you to run it at this speed.

      I have a K6 400MHz running at 166MHz without a fan.
      Front side bus reduced from 100MHz to 66MHz
      and a multiplier of 2.5.

      The CPU doesn't get very hot, since it is idleing most of it's time.

      IIRC, there is even a patch for the Linux kernel out there, which let's the CPU idle when it gets too hot.

      But maybe you'd prefer the VIA C3 processor.
      Passive cooled, up to 866MHz, combined with VIA Apollo CLE266 chipset with integrated graphics, hardware support for MPEG2 decoding, integrated networking and audio, it might do the trick for your set-top box.

      --
      "Between strong and weak, between rich and poor [...], it is freedom which oppresses and the law which sets free"
    9. Re:Underclocking, anyone? SpeedStep? by lanky_boy_2000 · · Score: 1

      Why not just use a mac?

      That wasn't very nice of me.

      --
      What's not to be worried about? Everything!
    10. Re:Underclocking, anyone? SpeedStep? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A Pentium 4 at 1.4GHz? Are you nuts? The performance would be absolute *shit*. If you are that into having passive cooling look into the Via C3 processor. Sure the performance isn't that great, but hey, you were thinking of a P4 at 1.4GHz, so you don't seem to be the type to be on the bleeding edge.

    11. Re:Underclocking, anyone? SpeedStep? by praxim · · Score: 1

      I'd recommend buying a SPARC on EBay if you can. They're not horribly cheap, but they're pretty quiet and very low profile.

    12. Re:Underclocking, anyone? SpeedStep? by GoRK · · Score: 2

      Try a Soekris Engineering Net4501. It's an AMD Elan 133MHz processor based SBC with a slot for a CompactFlash card (up to 1GB microdrive), 3 10/100 ethernet interfaces, a serial port (console), a MiniPCI slot, and a 3.3v PCI slot. Best of all, it's inexpensive.

      http://www.soekris.com/

      It works great as my router. I know you said you didn't want an SBC, but I think that you probably just don't know that you really do want one :)

      ~GoKR

    13. Re:Underclocking, anyone? SpeedStep? by Reziac · · Score: 2

      I have a stack of 386s I'd be happy to sell you :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    14. Re:Underclocking, anyone? SpeedStep? by TheSync · · Score: 2

      I want something simple and small, that I can maybe put a four-port ethernet card into.

      Boxer PC dual Ethernet, 11cm x 16.5cm x 22cm.

    15. Re:Underclocking, anyone? SpeedStep? by Kashif+Shaikh · · Score: 1

      I'm waiting for desktop CPUs with SpeedStep which clock down to 100 MHz when you're doing vi editing

      Arrgh....vi. I wish I could speedstep my processor down to 100 mhz with Emacs. Funny, with emacs I don't see any speedstepping....I wonder why...

    16. Re:Underclocking, anyone? SpeedStep? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check up on colleges and such. The p90 box I'm currently using as a router I picked up for $15 from the college "surplus" sale (all the old computer lab equipment) including a mid-90s svga monitor. The monitor is now on my test system, and I got a cheap router out of the deal.

    17. Re:Underclocking, anyone? SpeedStep? by skSlashDot · · Score: 1

      Via/Cyrix C3/800/133 in a cheap Socket 370 motherboard is what I run on my home file server. With carefully chosen components, it runs cool and is virtually silent, but fast enough for Samba and email. I've even done 3D rendering on it, at about 1/3 the speed of a P4/1.8.

    18. Re:Underclocking, anyone? SpeedStep? by TheAwfulTruth · · Score: 2

      True, but those low end 1 gig processors are DIRT cheap and you can of course underclock them in the BIOS yourself to whatever you want! If you truly don't need the CPU horesepower and want to save on Electricity/fan noise, clock that 1 gig whatever to 200 Mhz! Easy!

      --
      Contrary to popular belief, coding is not all free blow-jobs and beer. Those things cost MONEY!
    19. Re:Underclocking, anyone? SpeedStep? by dschuetz · · Score: 2

      Wow. This must be the most replies any of my posts got. 17 (at this time). I'm impressed.

      I have to admit, I never considered underclocking a 1GHz chip to, say, 200 MHz. That might be worth a try.

      Also, ARM chips have been something I've been wondering about, especially for multimedia set-top use (they seem to work okay for Rios and (I think) TiVo). The Via board's kinda cool, as is that little 3-port SBC (I forget what it was called), though I'd have to use a PCI card on it for wireless (I want to keep that on its own DMZ, not actually "in" the net).

      Thanks, all -- you took a one-off, "hey, anyone got any ideas" post that was actually vaguely offtopic, and saved me the trouble of putting together an AskSlashdot item. :)

      david.

    20. Re:Underclocking, anyone? SpeedStep? by adolf · · Score: 2

      To put this into context, I've got a P133 over in the corner for light web browsing and such. It runs seti@home, and has a very low-speed, low-noise PSU fan. The hard drive is an oddly quiet 6.5 gig Seagate.

      There is no CPU fan in this machine. It does have a fairly large heatsink, aligned properly to promote convection currents, and the appropriate amount of heatsink goop between it and the CPU.

      I found the big heatsink attached to a (dead) fan in another machine I was working on. Pulled the fan off, and things have been dandy.

      It gets warm. Not hot. When I first told people about this, they thought I'd kill the CPU instantly. But it's been running for years now, and I really don't miss hearing the bearings go bad on yet another CPU fan.

      For finding big heatsinks new, try looking at Alpha's product line - they ship their stuff from the factory fan-less, and their VARs generally put together kits with hideously noisy fans. Ask for one without, and you'll probably be able to buy one without difficulty.

      Also, ISTR old Packard Bell Pentium machines having a positively huge heatsink on the CPU, without a fan. These machines are very likely to be available for free, these days...

    21. Re:Underclocking, anyone? SpeedStep? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "since it is idleing most of it's time."

      drop the E, smart guy. Idling.

    22. Re:Underclocking, anyone? SpeedStep? by AyeRoxor! · · Score: 1

      "Can't be done. Everywhere I look, I see 1GHz+ systems. I could find 500 MHz K6 CPUs, but that was about the lowest"

      First place I would look is in a tupperware bin at the local mom-and-pop computer joint, next to the 30-pin simms.

  60. Not that dangerous by kghougaard · · Score: 1
    Relax i little now. It is not that dangerous to play with liquid nitrogen. It IS cold, but you can get by with just a minimum of commen sense (as with a lot of other stuff, hot water for instance). One good thing to know for example is: Dont drink it :-)

    Do you use a glove everytime you "play" with boiling water?

    We have some nice traditions here at the Technical Univeristy of Denmark. We have a yearly Christmas Lunch for all the students within my area, where some of the 1. year students make icecream as fast as possible. About 4 teams with 4 team members. One to mix incredients, one to hold the bowl (he has a glove, since it has to go fast), one to use the electric mixer, and one to pour the nitrogen. Its great fun. It takes about half a minute to make great vanilla icecream. It's the dessert of the lunch. Then the remains of the nitrogen is used to cool beer in plastic cups. Thats great fun also, and nobody has ever gotten (seriously) hurt, even though the average person might be a little drunk at the time.

    Anyway, it is not that dangerous. You can easily stick a finger in it, or have some in your hand. It is because of the Lighten-Frost effect (As I recall). Your skin evaporates some of the nitrogen, which then acts as an excellent insulater between you and the very cold stuff. This also works for very warm stuff. Liquid lead at 600 degrees (Celcius of course) for example.

    Kristian

    --
    He, who dies with the most toys, wins
    1. Re:Not that dangerous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pull something like that in the US and everyone would be shitting bricks. People are fucking uptight here.

    2. Re:Not that dangerous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here in Helsinki University of Technology we used to have parties where we used to pour a bit of liquid nitrogen into a glass of vodka. Why dilute the drink with ice cubes made of water when you can have ice cubes (well, blobs) made of the drink itself.

    3. Re:Not that dangerous by Cid+Highwind · · Score: 1

      This also works for very warm stuff. Liquid lead at 600 degrees (Celcius of course) for example.

      Yes, but with hot lead, it's the outer layers of your skin evaporating, not the lead! That sounds slightly more painful IMHO.

      --
      0 1 - just my two bits
  61. mikamikamika! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if you want to win, go with the finn

    1. Re:mikamikamika! by slashuzer · · Score: 0
      Mika ain't coming back. Retired for good :-)

      M. Schumacher drove him to retirement! Hee-hee!

  62. A pint or so... by Marton · · Score: 4, Funny

    is not ten liters. Ten liters is ~20 pints.

    You work for Nasa?

  63. SPARC is slow [O/T] by jpmorgan · · Score: 1

    There's a little thing called branch prediction, speculation, and in some architectures (like EPIC) taking multiple branches at once and throwing away the results you don't want.

    MHz per MHz, Itanium2 is the fastest processor out there (check the numbers for yourself at http://www.spec.org/). Sparc's are veeeery slow - most people don't buy sparcs for raw computational speed. And yes, I work with sun boxes every day.

  64. are they fooling themselfes ???? by dr.Flake · · Score: 1

    Maybe a dumb question.

    But is it posible the cristal generating the Mhz's is also getting very cold, and therefore getting slower.

    Maybe the BIOS thinks it is running at 4000 Mhz (simple multiplication), but in reality somewhat slower!!!

    Doesn't refute the fact the scores are quite good. But at what actual frequency ??

    --
    Why are other peoples sig's always more witty ???
  65. the only appropriate comment: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...Cool...

  66. Who cares? by smcavoy · · Score: 0, Troll

    Really, who does? It's not like games are going to increase in speed by 50%.

    (oh yes, this is obviosly a troll, because it goes against the article)

    1. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's troll because you say "Who cares?" It's troll because you're an asshole.

      Going against the article is fine. But being the bitch that says "I don't care about this so I have to make sure all of you know that I don't care" is annoying.

  67. overclocking story every month by peter303 · · Score: 2

    These stories are slashdot's equivalent of the "grow three inches" spam. Its done everytime a new chip is released.

  68. Re:Yeah, yeah, yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Fuck ravers!

    Fuck goths!

    Long live rock'n'roll!

  69. Re:The article cuz its slashdotted. by Bahamuto · · Score: 1

    Hey Mod him down if you want, but I think its hilarious. No one else thought to post the article in complete Finish. If he wanted to Karma whore he owuld have posted it translated or something. If I ever got mod point again, he'd get my vote for +1 Funny.

  70. Getting dizzy!!! by mustangdavis · · Score: 1

    We all know that the P4's have a reduced instruction set inorder to achieve the high clock rate (compared to an Athlon).... so does this mean that we now have processors that are over clocked to which spin in circles and do nothing at an even faster now??? w00t!!!

  71. Bah... by jsonmez · · Score: 1

    Bah... I overclocked mine to 7800 mhz yesterday with some dry ice and a paint can.

  72. Unbeleivable! by slashuzer · · Score: 0
    They're handling liquid nitrogen with bare hands!!!

    1. Re:Unbeleivable! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Have you ever handled LN2 yourself? What's so unbelievable about that?

      I do it every day. The styrofoam dewars don't get cold and small splashes of liquid nitrogen on your skin feel like a cold breeze. You have to pour quite a lot of LN2 on bare skin in order to get a frostbite. If you manage to pour it on your clothes, that's another matter.

  73. Linux-weenies foiled again! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As recent tech news reports have printed across the globe, an anonymous donor recently contributed $200,000 to "The Xbox Linux Project," a contest which challenges computer-savy programmers to port the Linux operating system to Microsoft's Xbox console. Drooling braindead Slashdot fans immediately adjusted their eyewear and began tinkering on the monumental task to do the unthinkable: install a rival operating system on Microsoft's own proprietary machine. However, most Linux users have experienced the same result in their Xbox project as they have with attempting to talk to any members of the opposite sex: utter and complete failure.

  74. Umm, handling liquid nitrogen without gloves? by MaxVolume · · Score: 1

    What a bunch of idiots....

    1. Re:Umm, handling liquid nitrogen without gloves? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please, for the love of God, mod parent -600 redundant, THIS HAS BEEN SAID AND EXPLAINED AT LEAST 4 TIMES ALREADY!

  75. Re:Anyone know... by Maran · · Score: 2

    "why the fuck Mozilla takes so long to start on my Windows ME box?"

    Maybe it's protesting because you haven't got a liquid nitrogen-cooled P4 in your machine.

    Maran

  76. how long will by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It take for CmmdrTaco to put up the same Posting??
    lol

  77. Re:The article cuz its slashdotted. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He posted it AC, you dumb cunt. Karma doesn't help AC. Fuck you're stupid. The fact that I have to explain the most base facets of slashdot is quite telling of your stupidity.

  78. laptops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    enough said

  79. WoooHooo! 3.2GHz X low IPC = effective 2GHz PC! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Until Intel fixes their cripled core, I ain't interested.

  80. Gloves?? Ever hear of them by Ozor · · Score: 1

    What a nut filling a cup with liquid nitrogen and not using gloves.

  81. Ok, if anyone ever starts a geek hall of fame by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 1

    this guy needs to be in it

  82. Goddamn you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    And more "oooh... liquid nitrogen... dangerous... gloves save us all" nuts are coming out of the woodworks.

    Where the hell did you all got an idea that handling liquid nitrogen is SOOO dangerous that you just have to wear gloves? Please tell me what kind of gloves will protect you when they're saturated with a -196'C liquid?

    1. Re:Goddamn you! by Big_Breaker · · Score: 1

      The issue with gloves isn't that they protect you from the absolute temperature. The issue is thermal conductivity... Ever notice how people can walk across 300C hot coals and not get burned.... that is because ash is a great insulator... ie low thermal conductivity but touching the side of a toaster (metal) will crisp your skin right away?

    2. Re:Goddamn you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As has been mentioned countelss times, liquid nitrogen generates it's own "insulating layer" and is no more dangerous than the coals are with their build in insulation.

  83. Server NOT slashdotted by timeOday · · Score: 4, Funny

    I guess P4s really DO make the Internet go faster!

  84. You Idiots!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Screw the liquid nitrogen....... you need NAWZ!!!

    Up the boost..... add a huge front mount intercooler, type R badging, oops.... wrong forum.

  85. Not a bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's like the funniest hardware article I ever read at: http://totl.net/Eunuch/

    Project EUNUCH stands for the Extreme Use of Nearly Universal Cooling Hardware -- check out this page!

  86. DANGER!!! That is NOT nitrogen vapor, it's water! by MarvinMouse · · Score: 3, Informative

    I know where you can get Liquid Nitrogen, it's incredibly easy to do. But a word of note to those who may want to keep their electronic systems working longer then the test time.

    Unless you live in the sahara desert or another place that has incredibly low humidity. This is incredibly dangerous to the motherboard. Those whisps that you see coming from the Liquid Nitrogen is not Nitrogen vapor. It is water!! Nitrogen vapor is not visible. The fact of the matter is, that the air around us has a lot of water in it, and when you start to cool it suddenly to -160 and below, you create a lot of water vapor. Now doing this with a computer will likely leave a nice little pool of water on the motherboard when you are finished. So unless you are willing to take that risk. I do not recommend doing this.

    There is even a pic there where it should the frozen water buildup on the outside of the containing device they built. Can you imagine what the motherboard would've looked like after a while of this?

    Having working with Liquid Nitrogen, and knowing how dangerous it can be even without electronics. I don't recommend this as a friendly try with buddies experiment.

    --
    ~ kjrose
  87. Newsflash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Americans are the only ones still using such a backwards system such as Farenheit. Britian switched to Celsius in the 60's and 70's.

  88. Does this make it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Work like an Athlon?

  89. Isn't that near the temp for superconductors? by gelfling · · Score: 2

    Minus 160 is near the functional limits for 'high temperature' superconductors so it would seem that if you have a stable technology for maintaining that level of cool you could use a completely different compute technology altogether and not worry about slow hot silly old silicon at all.

    1. Re:Isn't that near the temp for superconductors? by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 2

      Well, making semiconductors and integrated circuits is far more than just the temperature properties of the material. High Tcrit ceramics may not be suitable for ICs and photolithography.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  90. ....all that speed....and not even that fast! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...its quite amusing that this highly overclocked
    and cooled PIV is only twice as fast as a 1.5GHz
    AMD Athlon processor 8-)

    1. Re:....all that speed....and not even that fast! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, it's still faster... WAY faster!

  91. Re:DANGER!!! That is NOT nitrogen vapor, it's wate by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 2

    One thing I noticed was that they weren't working with gloves. From my experience working with LN in the lab is that getting even tiny drops on your hands is like getting splattered with hot cooking oil and to get a good splash from it I'd expect would create a flash frostbite burn.

    As for the condensation issue I wonder if it would be worthwhile to make a dewer vessel chassis for the motherboard with the ports/power supply connector the only (sealed) connections to the outside. Put the board in, connect the ports, bolt it shut (with a low temp gasket seal), then fill it with LN. Problem here would be having to constantly vent the gas boiled off by the heat of the board and having to always add more. Sudden thermal contraction might also crack circuit board traces or even ICs.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  92. Obligatory DOOM3 comment by Provocateur · · Score: 1

    WHat EXACTLY did the DOOM3 README say about minimum hardware requirements?!

    1. a working knowledge of Finnish
    2. jar of liquid nitrogen
    3. house located somewhere in frozen European continent or Alaskan tundra
    4. ???

    --
    WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
  93. Where am I? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought I typed slashdot.org into my browser, not hardocp.com.

  94. You forgot... by pollock · · Score: 1

    1985: Nintendo Thumb

  95. Clearly, this is prelude to Martian invasion... by TechnoInfidel · · Score: 1
    ...because as everyone who's see Mars Attacks knows, Martians breathe nitrogen. The side effect of this little demonstration is to release nitrogen vapour into the atmosphere, which is in effect assisting their efforts to terraform (err, marsaform) Earth in preparation for landing. This story alone might not have been enough to reveal their diabolical plan, but when you read the other story on Slashdot which tells of their bombardment of the English countryside with a so-called "meteorite", it becomes only too clear that their plans are more fully realized then I had feared.

    Geeks of the world unite! It may already be too late to stop our enslavement, but it will fall to us to overthrow our Martian overlords in the due course of history.

    Legumes, must plant more legumes...

  96. liquid nitrogen vs. boiling water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's exactly right - I worked with liquid nitrogen all the time freezing cell lines when I was a graduate student in immunology. It stings if you get a drop on your skin, but it would take much longer contact with a significant quantity to cause significant injury.

  97. No such thing as liquid CO2 (at normal pressure) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CO2 goes directly from solid phase ("dry ice") to gas at atmospheric pressures. The other AC post makes a crack at this as a "sublime" experience, because the process is called sublimation.

  98. No it isn't.... by Slashamatic · · Score: 2
    It isn't that cold. I tried the hole in the ice in February (at a balmy -20), no worries!!!!!!! Perhaps that could be a new use for an overclocked Pentium, making that ice hole!!!!!

    If you want really cold you need to find that place in Siberia where they have down to -57C.

  99. This story is WAY old by Kripes · · Score: 1

    This was posted months and months ago on HardOcp and several other sites. This isn't News at all. Oh well flame me if you will.

  100. Use an ARM chip instead? by horza · · Score: 2

    Use an ARM chip, I think the StrongARM 208MHz runs at something like 30mW, as opposed to the several W a lower power Intel runs at. Pick up an old RiscPC and install ARM Linux on it. Not only is it lighteningly quick but it runs cool so doesn't need a fan (saving even more electricity, and the no noise an extra bonus).

    Phillip.

  101. Translation of Muropaketti article by Novus · · Score: 4, Informative

    I did a quick translation from Finnish of the Muropaketti article:

    There are probably more than enough articles about the Intel Pentium 4 2.8 GHz, so standing out from the crowd with some LN2 overclocking tests is a good thing.

    For the tests, we ordered 10 litres of liquid nitrogen from Porin Hitsauslaite Oy and Messer (well known for [his|its] good service) supplied a 20 litre tank at the same price.

    As a test bed, an Asus P4T533-C with an i850E chipset (which had been found to be satisfactory) was used. Samsung PC800 RDRAM modules were used for memory. The motherboard had TurboPLL, Vcore and Vmem modifications, which are better documented here.

    This was the first LN2 test with this processor, so we started off by trying to get a feel for how the CPU behaves at low temperatures and what sort of results to expect in the future. For this reason a PNY GeForce 4 MX 440 display adapter was used, which has been found to tolerate very high bus speeds. Later, we'll do some ATI Radeon 9700 Pro tests and try for a new 3DMark2001 record.

    Below a series of pictures describing the events and some general pictures of the [assembly|system].

    [lots of pictures]

    The tests didn't start easy, even though the system did agree to start Windows XP at 3913MHz. The Pifast test didn't complete at all. After testing for a hour we started to get a grip on the situation. The CPU didn't tolerate really low temperatures. The tests started running noticeably better, when the bowl wasn't frozen solid.

    [more pictures]

    At the end of the first day of testing, I managed to run the Pifast test at 3917 MHz and reach a new record of 24.17 seconds.

    Finally, I managed to complete the Superpi test at 3998 MHz at 39 seconds, which is the current record on the Superpi ranking list maintained by [the|some] Japanese.

    I also ran the SiSoft Sandra CPU and Memory benchmark tests at 3920MHz (21 x 186MHz). The results speak for themselves.

    Sandra's CPU tests says the bus speed is 145 MHz, because a TurboPLL coupling was used on the motherboard. A 18.43 MHz crystal was used, from which the correct bus speed can be derived:

    (18,43MHz / 14,3MHz) * 145MHz = 186,55MHz

    Finally, we checked how high we could go and still get the CPU to wake up.

    [POST picture]

    The system managed to POST at 4339 MHz with a bus speed of 206 MHz. Let's hope we break the magical 4 GHz boundary in our next test. In other words, there's more to come...

  102. Liquid Propane for Overclocking by vossman77 · · Score: 1

    I work in cryo-related science and as we all no liquid nitrogen creates a gas layer between its source and the liquid nitrogen as it boils off. This phenomena can be exploited for need tricks such as quickly putting your hand in liquid nitrogen and pulling it out as well as placing it in your mouth and breathing smoke.

    Liquid propane on the other creates no gaseous layer when cooling i.e. if you dip your hand in liquid propane its gone. I wonder if this would allow for even greater limits.

    1. Re:Liquid Propane for Overclocking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's gone? The liquid propane or your hand? .anonymouscoward.

    2. Re:Liquid Propane for Overclocking by TheAwfulTruth · · Score: 2

      Your hand, and that "in your mouth" story reminds me of that Darwin Award wannabe that actually SWALLOWED liquid nitrogen based on remembering wrong about the "in your mouth" trick. He wrote up a great article about all the damage and surgery required to fix that little mistake :)

      --
      Contrary to popular belief, coding is not all free blow-jobs and beer. Those things cost MONEY!
    3. Re:Liquid Propane for Overclocking by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      ....but nitrogen has the wonderful property of being inert and not detonating from microscopic sparks. Liquid propane in an open bottle on my CPU? or worse, a homebrew recirculating system with compressor? *shudder*

  103. New Topic for Overclocking needed by ICA · · Score: 1

    Is there some way we can get a new topic for overclocking, case mods, and all the other shit that I just plain don't care about anymore?

    I'm not looking to troll here, and I must admit that back in the day of 486, AMD-K6 and the like, I was very much interested in overclocking.

    Now, I would prefer to buy my absurdly cheap processor, and just let it run.

    I would just block the hardware category, but cool new hardware tends to be one of my favorite things to read about. We just need some additional segmentation.

    1. Re:New Topic for Overclocking needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      simple, admins, create a "case boyzzzzzz", section, for the picture, get a trackball mouse, with internal light (blue), and a huge oversized see through trackball glowing an eery blue, with Rtype stickers on the side (or Alpha type).

  104. Re:DANGER!!! That is NOT nitrogen vapor, it's wate by TheSync · · Score: 2

    From my experience working with LN in the lab is that getting even tiny drops on your hands is like getting splattered with hot cooking oil and to get a good splash from it I'd expect would create a flash frostbite burn.

    Oh, let's not get wimpy! You can pour (a bit) of LN2 into your palm, quickly turn it over, and not get frostbite. Tiny drops are no big deal, just shake them off quick. You are to some extent insulated by the gaseous N2.

    Safety goggles OTOH are probably a really good idea. Aprons are good too (I once had a bit of LN2 go down my pants into my crotch - it gets ya jumping!)

  105. wondering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how much longer before a double posting gets on...any bets?

  106. Nope, only to about a THz (this is Tera HZ) by PaulBu · · Score: 1

    Nope, only about couple hundred GHz. You are limited by the gap voltage of superconductors, at too high frequency electron pairs which carry supercurrent break down. Nb goes to about 700 GHz for simplest digital divide-by-two operations.

    Even tougher limit is speed of light in your wires.

    Believe me, I do this fdor fun and paycheck too! :)

    Paul B.

  107. iMac mobo will do the trick by X_Caffeine · · Score: 1

    OK, before you laugh: you can get a 400mhz iMac "logicboard" with a built-in G3 processor, all the built-in ports (including Ethernet) for under $150. It's plenty fast, passively cooled, and without the CRT that typically comes with computers, will consume about as much power as your clock radio. All you have to figure out is a chassis. And as we all know, it runs "Darwin" BSD quite well...

    --
    // I will show you fear in a handful of jellybeans.
  108. Transmeta by X_Caffeine · · Score: 1
    I was on a similar project a while ago, and figured that a Transmeta Crusoe would be perfect for my purposes. It turns out that non-laptop motherboards even exist, used primarily in rack-mount devices. But guess what? A basic Crusoe mobo & processor cost about 3 times what that Athlon 2600+ w/ motherboard will!

    I think this might be part of Transmeta's woes... they've never released products that the "enthusiasts" can get into. Look what the overclockers did for AMD!

    --
    // I will show you fear in a handful of jellybeans.
  109. Chemistry Teacher Throught Liquid Nitrogen at us by Nazmun · · Score: 2, Informative

    And nothing really happend... he was throwing it everywhere and for the most part it just evaporated before it could really do anything. A human won't even feel a few drops of liquid nitrogen if it were to start falling on him.

    Liquid Nitrogen is very cold but it cannot survive in the extreme heat of room temperature. When the Liquid nitrogen was on the surface of our lab tables it acted like water on a top of a 600 degrees frying pan. It danced wildly then evaporated. A cup of nitrogen should be no problem unless one of these guys dipped their hands in it.

    --
    Hmmm... Pie...
  110. Awwww! by Cheesewhiz · · Score: 1
    Awww, how cute...3.9 GHz accomplished through extreme methods of cooling that last for maybe a minute or three before utterly destroying the hardware, and it's *almost* pushing 5 gigaflops.

    Kind of sad that my out-of-the-box Dual-GHz G4 pulls 6.7 gigaflops on a bad day, huh? (/gloat)

    No, really it feels good to troll every now and a lifetime ;-)

    --

    -----
    "Cogito Eggo Sum: I think, therefore, waffle."
  111. right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    do you remember when someone cracked slashdot and embedded a javascript pop-up of the goatse man in each slashdot story? Every story you read, with javascript enabled, was plagued by the goatse man dancing his ass all over the screen. I couldn't reach the close-button and couldn't reach the netscape menu panel to disable javascript while the goatse man was on-screen. I feel redeemed that those crax0rs used the goatse man instead of hillary clinton or princess diana. w000!

  112. Yes, Jesus *was* real; a man and nothing more. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am an atheist and don't believe in the existance of ihova, jesus, holy spirit, muhammed, budha, and think aliens are not real. I think of pictures and websites as this to be the creations of Christians, Islamics, Budhists, and Catholics in their attempt to invent evil and drive ignorant people to religion(slavery under an authority of religion). I think there is no such thing as a higher power that watches over me. I see so much pain, devastation, starvation, and disease in this world and I think the supreme being is not worthy of my worship and respect because the supreme being has done nothing to deliver me from these hurtful moments. I am an atheist and kindly ask for people to join me on my cause in censoring religions' invented evils because it is a scam to force people into slavery. Every individual on planet earth should have a serial number on his forehead or wrist so he can be tracked and prevented from spreading the lies inherent within the many worldly religions. People use religion as a crutch because they are weak and cannot speak out of self-education without belief in a God. I am educated through many atheist colleges and anyone who operates on these dastardly principles called Capitalism should be shot. Humans belong in groups just to survive and shouldn't be left alone because of their for-profit desires and lies. I await another asteroid to end this world for another 10 million years and then we evolve from the sewage we once were and back into primitive life forms to once again live upto evolution by natural selection.

    -Be well.

  113. VIA EPIA Mini ITX Mainboard/CPU Combo $100 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    VIA EPIA Mini ITX Mainboard with embedded VIA C3 chip
    http://www.viavpsd.com/product/epia_mini_itx _spec. jsp?motherboardId=21
    http://www.viatech.com/en/VI nternet/mini_itx.jsp

    benfits:
    Mini-ITX form facter:
    - 170mm x 170mm
    - Micro ATX Chassis Compliant

    VIA C3 chip:
    -No fan needed (even at 800Mhz)
    -Very low power requirments

    Mini-ITX case's can be fould here:
    http://www.viavpsd.com/product/epia_compati ble%20c hassis.jsp

  114. Re:Anyone know... by Sj0 · · Score: 1

    Because Windows ME is the worst operating system created by human minds.

    --
    It's been a long time.
  115. Re:DANGER!!! That is NOT nitrogen vapor, it's wate by Sj0 · · Score: 2

    Water is an insulator on it's own. it won't short out a clean motherboard when we're talking about time periods of a few minutes to a couple hours. After that though, you should worry about the liquid water causing corrosion or absorbing enough conducting materians to gain the properties of a conductor.

    Actually, I've used water in the past to clean low-voltage electronics, such as keyboards. As long as you ensure there is no liquid remaining when you put it back together, and ensure that actual components aren't saturated, the keyboard will run like new for another few years(before someone spills beer on it again. :( )

    --
    It's been a long time.
  116. This is how REAL men do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is how REAL 100% heterosexual men do it! You apple homosexuals - take a look at this you fucking ladies!

  117. Undervolting / Underclocking site by Guppy · · Score: 2

    There's an article on SilentPC Review where they reduce a 1 GHz Athlon at 1.79V to 600 MHz at 1.17V, dropping the power consumption from 49to 13.8 watts. Link..

    They also have plenty of information about quite power supplies, hard drives, heatsinks, etc.

  118. Gloves by droyad · · Score: 1

    Anyone notice the lack of gloves in the photo. These people must be insane.. or just geniuses if they are pouring liquid Nitrogen with bare hands...

  119. !:) agree. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Haha,agree,-->if these guys need the '386's cpu'

    I can give it to them.

    Hey!Guys there r a gift to u!

    a '386SX 25 Cpu,do u like it?

  120. Re:DANGER!!! That is NOT nitrogen vapor, it's wate by LadyLucky · · Score: 2

    What's wrong with water? It doesn't conduct electricity.

    --
    dominionrd.blogspot.com - Restaurants on
  121. Re:Win98?! by turgid · · Score: 1

    I beg your pardon? Windows 98 on a 486/25? Try Slackware with a 2.2 kernel. Slack 7 will do just fine.

  122. Re:Win98?! by Sj0 · · Score: 2

    Slackware?! No offense, but I'd much rather be using my Operating system than trying to haggle with it to get applications installed. If I were to choose an alternative to Wndows on a 486, it would be OS/2 Warp(after MS got kicked out of the project and all the MS code was rewritten). It would be a good OS to run on(Fast? Fast!), but I'm not sure if there would be a browser as slim as K-Meleon or Galeon for it.

    --
    It's been a long time.
  123. Re:Win98?! by turgid · · Score: 1

    Well, I have an old 486/25sx in the cupboard (Compaq Presario) with 20MB RAM and 100MB hard drive. I was going to turn it into an X Terminal but alas my g.f. has moved in and there is no room to have it up just now. I have booted slack on it OK but not set up a proper system. I'll do that over NFS from my main machine, when we get a bigger house...

  124. Re:DANGER!!! That is NOT nitrogen vapor, it's wate by toriver · · Score: 2

    It can dissolve salts/"dirt" from whatever surface it condenses onto, and thus get enough free ions to start conducting, though...

  125. dammit it's true by Firehawk · · Score: 1

    Just confirmed the report on medline (search of medical journal articles).

    Couldn't find the article itself but I found a letter discussing this child who drank a mixture of orange juice and liquid nitrogen (who subsequently required major abdominal surgery) which quoted this other case ...

    "The only similar case was that of a chemical engineering student who drank a beaker of liquid nitrogen and developed immediate pain and collapsed. He was found to have free air under the diaphragms and pneumomediastinum but no perforations. Full recovery followed supportive care (Cynthia Aaron, personal communication, 1998)."

    hmmm.....