Yes, but that was before the data being sold was connected to the Trump campaign. Facebook can conduct experiments on manipulating user's moods, but the line has to be drawn here.
It was perhaps out of Zuckerberg's greed did he fail to realize that not sufficiently acting as a team player would cost him, unlike Eric Schmidt who clearly demonstrated his loyalty.
I did notice one of those kids who got on a national stage to declare "give us an inch we'll take a mile." That modicum of honesty was actually refreshing. Obviously they're young, and their handlers need to give them more coaching.
In the age of "punching nazis" and "orange hitler" and the amount of ad hom labeling that goes on, it's rich to be told that the noise to signal ratio is too high. So much distrust and lack of intellectual honesty; one could spend hours pondering all the reasons why.
You do have a point though. In any attempt to reform 2nd amendment rights, intelligent and informed criticism will fall on deaf ears. It's better that it never reaches that point.
Maybe it depends on the kind of game. The difference between something engineering in nature, such as Factorio or Kerbal Space Program compared to something idiotic like Farmville.
Enjoying games that require a steep learning curve demonstrates a willingness to learn new skills and do problem solving. You're right that actually writing code is the most important, but it is possible too that other factors could help lead to the out-of-the-box thinking that would benefit a good security analyst.
Because kids being exploited for their special victimhood status and then used as human shields to deflect criticism is such a productive means to establish dialog, too.
Don't even try to pretend that "gun control advocates" are interested in honest, reasonable discussion for an acceptable compromise, when they can't even acknowledge what "regulated" actually meant in the context of which it was written.
What I do know is that we need more the discussion about why we celebrate guns so much while ignoring the real harm they can and do cause.
Because only if there was no guns, there could never be a worse consequence than the current gun violence in the U.S.? Real peace in our time? Is that what the discussion needs to be?
Then it becomes a matter of perspective. "boot stamping on the human face forever" vrs. the occcasional 24hr news cycle frenzy. There are always uncertainties among individuals whereas absolute power corrupts absolutely.
Over a billion human beings recently became subject to a dictator for life, and mass surveillance will be used for a social credit system that rates people on what they say and who they associate with in order to determine their level of participation in society.
Meanwhile, you're looking for revulsion from gun owners.
Why don't you take a moment to reconsider just exactly what it is you think you know.
Or maybe it is better to understand that sacrificing freedoms and liberties for what seems to be good intentions can have horrible unintended consequences in the long term, and should always be avoided.
Probably trolling. Then again, Cayenne8 may actually be Lance Thomas, the L.A. watch maker that learned to be a gun slinger in order to defend his store.
It is probably enough to appreciate that people are wired differently, and human sexuality is as varied and unique as individual facial features. There are things about it I'll never be able to understand, and thankfully, I don't need to.
This idea is interesting but as a form of trust verification it still relies heavily on the user, and would instill a sense of false security that could only lead to more not adhering to safe sex practices. It seems to be more of a Rube Goldberg method of sharing lab report printouts.
Technology that could provide a test quickly and accurately on demand would go much further in helping to limit the spread of infection.
Sure, because people can always be relied upon to be honest about providing that kind of information. They'd never lie to get what they are biologically driven towards.
Yes, there's no way that heuristic algorithms could have flagged files or executables with no previously recorded hash and uploaded them as samples for detailed analysis.
In other words, A/V serving its intended function could only be the result of a Russian plot.
This is meme control, and controlling the pathways in which they can become viral.
It must be very annoying for the powers that be when the politics they've scripted goes off the rails. Mass media is failing to do its job, so there is a demonstrated need to pull levers within social media as well.
hate propaganda aimed at minorities is conservative news
I suspect that reporting the facts of capital crimes committed by multiple-time deported criminal aliens would fall under this category. As would crime statistics pertaining to particular demographics and geographical areas that are impacted.
Factual reality is indifferent to your adherence to political correctness dogma. Failing to accurately report on issues directly related to matters of race or religion means that liberal news cannot be relied on to properly inform the public either.
That the U.S. president is considered to be a racist monster to the level of those that actually committed racial genocide, also speaks volumes to the problem of weaponized propaganda that you abhorre.
That's right, the parties are funded by billionaires and corporations, and right now Facebook is being sent a very strong message to get with the program. Do a better job supporting approved candidates and undermine all others, or else.
By 2020, everyone in China will be enrolled in a vast national database that compiles fiscal and government information, including minor traffic violations, and distils it into a single number ranking each citizen.
Chinese are already loving Big Ching.
It's amazing and terrifying to consider over a billion humans living under this dictatorship driven, Orwellian nightmare of total surveillance and control.
Well it'd be really embarrassing for Mueller if he couldn't claim at least a few scalps, given the level of corruption that is the standard in politics and the level of manpower and unlimited resources at his disposal.
Ants put under a magnifying lens get burned. When you're working backwards from the conclusion, the more little ants you burn the better, since the pile that results can be pointed at by professional liars and be claimed to amount to something substantial.
If we're going to go that far to create wetware interfaces, then general AI would also be a natural byproduct of understanding the processes of how the mind and human biology works.
We wouldn't even necessarily have to understand how general AI works exactly or why, only the processes used to create it. At first it won't be a threat, but eventually it would be weaponized or handled carelessly. The potential is just that great, and our capacity for hubris also is unlimited.
I think you're correct that our competitive nature will lead to cyborgs in order to obtain an advantage over the competition. This may be exactly the weakness that an AI would need to exploit in order to achieve dominance.
An example could be captive fish that learn to recognize the source of their food and become excited in anticipation just prior to feeding. Non vertebrates like the Portia spider display complex behavior too, like learning from trial and error, but I hesitate to call that any kind of 'mind'.
Slashdot Mirror
Yes and now they are being told to care. Now it suddenly matters to the people who curate 'trending' articles and make the talking points.
Someplace, somewhere, there was a meeting and a point was brought up that Facebook was selling data to the enemy as well. Then it became problematic.
Yes, but that was before the data being sold was connected to the Trump campaign. Facebook can conduct experiments on manipulating user's moods, but the line has to be drawn here.
It was perhaps out of Zuckerberg's greed did he fail to realize that not sufficiently acting as a team player would cost him, unlike Eric Schmidt who clearly demonstrated his loyalty.
I did notice one of those kids who got on a national stage to declare "give us an inch we'll take a mile." That modicum of honesty was actually refreshing. Obviously they're young, and their handlers need to give them more coaching.
In the age of "punching nazis" and "orange hitler" and the amount of ad hom labeling that goes on, it's rich to be told that the noise to signal ratio is too high. So much distrust and lack of intellectual honesty; one could spend hours pondering all the reasons why.
You do have a point though. In any attempt to reform 2nd amendment rights, intelligent and informed criticism will fall on deaf ears. It's better that it never reaches that point.
Maybe it depends on the kind of game. The difference between something engineering in nature, such as Factorio or Kerbal Space Program compared to something idiotic like Farmville.
Enjoying games that require a steep learning curve demonstrates a willingness to learn new skills and do problem solving. You're right that actually writing code is the most important, but it is possible too that other factors could help lead to the out-of-the-box thinking that would benefit a good security analyst.
Because kids being exploited for their special victimhood status and then used as human shields to deflect criticism is such a productive means to establish dialog, too.
Don't even try to pretend that "gun control advocates" are interested in honest, reasonable discussion for an acceptable compromise, when they can't even acknowledge what "regulated" actually meant in the context of which it was written.
What I do know is that we need more the discussion about why we celebrate guns so much while ignoring the real harm they can and do cause.
Because only if there was no guns, there could never be a worse consequence than the current gun violence in the U.S.? Real peace in our time? Is that what the discussion needs to be?
Then it becomes a matter of perspective. "boot stamping on the human face forever" vrs. the occcasional 24hr news cycle frenzy. There are always uncertainties among individuals whereas absolute power corrupts absolutely.
Over a billion human beings recently became subject to a dictator for life, and mass surveillance will be used for a social credit system that rates people on what they say and who they associate with in order to determine their level of participation in society.
Meanwhile, you're looking for revulsion from gun owners.
Why don't you take a moment to reconsider just exactly what it is you think you know.
Never question, just accept the narrative exactly as it is laid out for you, else you are human garbage. I see you've been taught well.
Or maybe it is better to understand that sacrificing freedoms and liberties for what seems to be good intentions can have horrible unintended consequences in the long term, and should always be avoided.
Probably trolling. Then again, Cayenne8 may actually be Lance Thomas, the L.A. watch maker that learned to be a gun slinger in order to defend his store.
Because having a fantasy that has been reinforced over a lifetime be undermined by simple, factual reasoning, usually provokes an emotional response.
It is probably enough to appreciate that people are wired differently, and human sexuality is as varied and unique as individual facial features. There are things about it I'll never be able to understand, and thankfully, I don't need to.
This idea is interesting but as a form of trust verification it still relies heavily on the user, and would instill a sense of false security that could only lead to more not adhering to safe sex practices. It seems to be more of a Rube Goldberg method of sharing lab report printouts.
Technology that could provide a test quickly and accurately on demand would go much further in helping to limit the spread of infection.
Sure, because people can always be relied upon to be honest about providing that kind of information. They'd never lie to get what they are biologically driven towards.
16 pci-e lanes ought to be enough for everyone.
Yes, there's no way that heuristic algorithms could have flagged files or executables with no previously recorded hash and uploaded them as samples for detailed analysis.
In other words, A/V serving its intended function could only be the result of a Russian plot.
The truth has a well-known liberal bias, you know.
That bias exists up to the point where someone's feelings might get hurt. Then science denial is not just tolerated, but expected.
This is meme control, and controlling the pathways in which they can become viral.
It must be very annoying for the powers that be when the politics they've scripted goes off the rails. Mass media is failing to do its job, so there is a demonstrated need to pull levers within social media as well.
hate propaganda aimed at minorities is conservative news
I suspect that reporting the facts of capital crimes committed by multiple-time deported criminal aliens would fall under this category. As would crime statistics pertaining to particular demographics and geographical areas that are impacted.
Factual reality is indifferent to your adherence to political correctness dogma. Failing to accurately report on issues directly related to matters of race or religion means that liberal news cannot be relied on to properly inform the public either.
That the U.S. president is considered to be a racist monster to the level of those that actually committed racial genocide, also speaks volumes to the problem of weaponized propaganda that you abhorre.
The first rule for dealing with whistleblowers is to attack the messenger. They are just doing their job.
That's right, the parties are funded by billionaires and corporations, and right now Facebook is being sent a very strong message to get with the program. Do a better job supporting approved candidates and undermine all others, or else.
China's social credit system:
By 2020, everyone in China will be enrolled in a vast national database that compiles fiscal and government information, including minor traffic violations, and distils it into a single number ranking each citizen.
Chinese are already loving Big Ching.
It's amazing and terrifying to consider over a billion humans living under this dictatorship driven, Orwellian nightmare of total surveillance and control.
Well it'd be really embarrassing for Mueller if he couldn't claim at least a few scalps, given the level of corruption that is the standard in politics and the level of manpower and unlimited resources at his disposal.
Ants put under a magnifying lens get burned. When you're working backwards from the conclusion, the more little ants you burn the better, since the pile that results can be pointed at by professional liars and be claimed to amount to something substantial.
It doesn't matter what you can prove or disprove with a telescope, if observing the lunar cycles with Mark I eyeballs alone isn't sufficient.
That people even go to such lengths to try to argue with flat earth theory suggests that they enjoy swatting down a strawman.
If we're going to go that far to create wetware interfaces, then general AI would also be a natural byproduct of understanding the processes of how the mind and human biology works.
We wouldn't even necessarily have to understand how general AI works exactly or why, only the processes used to create it. At first it won't be a threat, but eventually it would be weaponized or handled carelessly. The potential is just that great, and our capacity for hubris also is unlimited.
I think you're correct that our competitive nature will lead to cyborgs in order to obtain an advantage over the competition. This may be exactly the weakness that an AI would need to exploit in order to achieve dominance.
An example could be captive fish that learn to recognize the source of their food and become excited in anticipation just prior to feeding. Non vertebrates like the Portia spider display complex behavior too, like learning from trial and error, but I hesitate to call that any kind of 'mind'.