You're missing the point. Google doesn't care if DRM is bullet proof, or if it actually works at all. It only has to be good enough to make the content providers happy.
Do you really need to consult the military to recognize the absurdity of those laws? I'm not a gun expert nor even a gun fan, but it seems pretty obvious to me still how pointless those laws are.
I think you're confused. The app store is where you go to get apps for your phone. A crap store on the other hand is where you can purchase things like that joke.
Two months ago Snowden was living in Hawai'i with an attractive girlfriend and a decent salary. How is that more dysfunctional than living in a Russian airport on the run from the US government?
How can you blame them for ending support for something you say was never really supported to begin with? The product may have been useful to enterprises, but without at least the option of a support agreement in writing you can not consider it enterprise software.
There are reasons why people trust their data with Google more than other companies. The fact that they have projects like dataliberation.org makes me less concerned about the possibility of being locked in to any of their products. People bitch about Google shutting down Reader, but Google makes it easy to export your subscriptions so you can use them in a new product. Also, Google does collect a lot of our data, but they are transparent about it and are pretty good about allowing people to opt out.
Face unlock and slide to unlock are only intended to be moderately secure anyway. It's a trade off, because strong security is inconvenient. That said, photos of people's faces are generally much easier to come by than videos of people staring straight into a camera and blinking.
I have the most recent version of Gmail app on two Nexus devices. The priority and important folders are most certainly there when you select "Show all labels". And I do have them hidden in the web interface, but that doesn't remove them. I use the hidden labels for lower priority stuff.
No I'm not wrong on either count. I have both of those settings as you say already. In the app, the Priority Inbox option is only for making it default or not, the mailbox is still there either way. In the web page, I've always used Classic and I still have the Important label.
Obviously the officer shouldn't have shot John Williams, but how is this an example of an officer strategically moving off camera? He was already off camera when he first tried telling the guy to put the knife down because that's where the guy was. There's nothing unusual about him being off camera in this case.
Yes, exactly like that. The priority mail box used to be something you could disable in the Gmail app, now you can't get rid of it. Also, in the web interface there is the "Important" mailbox which I can't get rid of.
Making the wireless network private doesn't do anything about the interference in the room on every available frequency which is actually causing the problem.
As I already said, "whether they exist or not is irrelevant. Either way, we still can't have them." That may change within the decade, but it's true for now.
As far as I'm aware, negative energy is still purely hypothetical. There is currently no reason to believe such a thing actually exists or is even allowed by physics.
Slashdot Mirror
You're missing the point. Google doesn't care if DRM is bullet proof, or if it actually works at all. It only has to be good enough to make the content providers happy.
Do you really need to consult the military to recognize the absurdity of those laws? I'm not a gun expert nor even a gun fan, but it seems pretty obvious to me still how pointless those laws are.
Humans are selfish and self-serving like no other species can be.
Sure... if by "like no other species can be" you mean "exactly like every other species is".
We know what kind of people are at gitmo, even horrible people are entitled to a trial.
How is it nonsense? Occulation is a type of eclipse, so all occultations are also eclipses..
I think you're confused. The app store is where you go to get apps for your phone. A crap store on the other hand is where you can purchase things like that joke.
Two months ago Snowden was living in Hawai'i with an attractive girlfriend and a decent salary. How is that more dysfunctional than living in a Russian airport on the run from the US government?
What are you more likely to have handy, a hill or a massive abandoned salt mine?
There are partisan hacks on MSNBC, but not everyone. Rachael Maddow has been critical of the administration the past few times I've seen her.
None of them come unlocked. The OP said Nexus devices are easily unlockable, as yours was.
On T-mobile. No problems using it just for VM here.
How can you blame them for ending support for something you say was never really supported to begin with? The product may have been useful to enterprises, but without at least the option of a support agreement in writing you can not consider it enterprise software.
There are reasons why people trust their data with Google more than other companies. The fact that they have projects like dataliberation.org makes me less concerned about the possibility of being locked in to any of their products. People bitch about Google shutting down Reader, but Google makes it easy to export your subscriptions so you can use them in a new product. Also, Google does collect a lot of our data, but they are transparent about it and are pretty good about allowing people to opt out.
2.3; yes its old but whatever happened to the 'its a nexus, it will always get upgrades' bullshit?
No one ever, ever said that. The N1 was severely limited by the space available on the device.
Face unlock and slide to unlock are only intended to be moderately secure anyway. It's a trade off, because strong security is inconvenient. That said, photos of people's faces are generally much easier to come by than videos of people staring straight into a camera and blinking.
There's already an option to require a blink during authentication so that photo's won't work. Your wife should probably enable that.
I have the most recent version of Gmail app on two Nexus devices. The priority and important folders are most certainly there when you select "Show all labels". And I do have them hidden in the web interface, but that doesn't remove them. I use the hidden labels for lower priority stuff.
No I'm not wrong on either count. I have both of those settings as you say already. In the app, the Priority Inbox option is only for making it default or not, the mailbox is still there either way. In the web page, I've always used Classic and I still have the Important label.
Obviously the officer shouldn't have shot John Williams, but how is this an example of an officer strategically moving off camera? He was already off camera when he first tried telling the guy to put the knife down because that's where the guy was. There's nothing unusual about him being off camera in this case.
Yes, exactly like that. The priority mail box used to be something you could disable in the Gmail app, now you can't get rid of it. Also, in the web interface there is the "Important" mailbox which I can't get rid of.
Making the wireless network private doesn't do anything about the interference in the room on every available frequency which is actually causing the problem.
Umm, I did an FSB once. I passed and the officer sent me on my way.
As I already said, "whether they exist or not is irrelevant. Either way, we still can't have them." That may change within the decade, but it's true for now.
As far as I'm aware, negative energy is still purely hypothetical. There is currently no reason to believe such a thing actually exists or is even allowed by physics.
Nope, currently a driver is still required to be in the car. In fact in Nevada two people are required in the car during this trial period.