Slashdot Mirror


Bolivian President's Plane 'Rerouted Over Snowden Suspicions'

niftydude writes with the latest news on the Edward Snowden saga. It appears that the Bolivian President's plane was denied access to French and Spanish airspace due to suspicions that Snowden was on board. Quoting a few pieces from the Guardian: "In an extraordinary move, France and Portugal revoked flight clearances for the Bolivian President's plane on Tuesday after representations were reportedly made by the U.S. State Department. Mr Morales was flying home from an energy conference in Moscow and his aircraft was hastily rerouted to Vienna, Austria. Bolivian Foreign Minister David Choquehuanca angrily denied that Mr Snowden was on the President's aircraft, a fact later confirmed by Austrian authorities, and said France and Portugal would have to explain why they abruptly canceled authorization for the flight. AP reports that Venezuela's foreign minister Elias Jaua has condemned the decision by France and Portugal to block the plane from its airspace. He claimed that changing a flight's route without checking on how much fuel was left in the plane, put Morales' life at risk." Spain claims they only agreed to allow the plane to refuel there if it were subject to search, and France did end up authorizing use of their air space today. In related news, Julian Assange and the general secretary of Reporters Without Borders Christophe Deloire published an Op-Ed today why Europe must protect Snowden. And: dryriver sends news that Ecuador discovered that their embassy in London was bugged, describing the incident as "another instance of a loss of ethics at the international level in relations between governments."

621 comments

  1. God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by TWiTfan · · Score: 5, Funny

    My country's dick is so fucking big that we can have entire continents close off their airspace! Jesus, I want to snort a mountain of coke and fuck my wife's sister!!!

    --
    The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
    1. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want to snort a mountain of coke and fuck my wife's sister!!!

      Just do it bro; no-one's going to stop you!

    2. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by dyingtolive · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Home of the brave, land of calling for the assassination of anyone who pulls back the veneer hiding the relentless authoritarianism" just didn't have the same ring, I guess.

      --
      Support the EFF and Creative Commons. The war is coming, and they're supporting you...
    3. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      America: Fuck Yeah!

    4. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was this sarcastic or a manifestation of the most brainless form of american hubris ? Bad things inevitably happen when you go that route.

    5. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know, right? Remember back when Bush was president and this shit was so uncool? THANK GOD THAT'S OVER!

    6. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by FriendlyLurker · · Score: 5, Informative
      Worth pointing out that some of those same EU countries trying to impede and/or deny Snowdens asylum requests ("a centuries-old right in international law") are also responsible for allowing CIA extraordinary rendition of unknown prisoners via their air space without any due process, airplane checks (yes Spain, that includes you).

      As usual, US officials and their acolytes who invoke "the law" to demand severe punishment for powerless individuals (Edward Snowden, Bradley Manning) instantly exploit the same concept to protect US political officials, their owners and their allies from the worst crimes: torture, warrantless eavesdropping, rendition, systemic financial fraud, deceiving Congress and the US public about their surveillance behavior. If you're spending your time calling for Ed Snowden's head but not James Clapper's, or if you're obsessed with Snowden's fabricated personality attributes (narcissist!) but apathetic about rampant, out-of-control NSA surveillance, it's probably worth spending a few moments thinking about what this priority scheme reveals.

    7. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      What you gonna do when we bug you!

      NSA?! - Fuck Yeah!!
      Weapons of Mass Destruction?! - Fuck Yeah!!
      Obama's Drones?! - Fuck Yeah!!
      Mission Accomplished?! - Fuck Yeah!!
      Fox News?! - Fuck Yeah!!
      Hollywood?! Fuck Yeah!!
      Stuxnet?! - Fuck Yeah!!

    8. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 5, Insightful

      land of the free, home of the "shit, that guy must be snuffed out, he told the world how dirty we really are. an example must be made so that others think twice about being a whistleblower".

      happy fourth of july, fellow americans ;( can't say I'm very proud to be american right now. in fact, I'm ashamed of what my country is looking like, to the rest of the world.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    9. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by auric_dude · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Team America to police the World but who will police America?

    10. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by i+kan+reed · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It'll be fun when we slaughter a political dissenter who was forced to flee to a south American country on July 4. So much freedom!

      Maybe we should use an axe to kill him. That won't, in any way, draw parallels to anything else that happened in history.

    11. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I like this quote: "Index on Censorship said to EU states this morning: "Members of the EU have a duty to protect freedom of expression and should not interfere in an individual's attempts to seek asylum. Edward Snowden is a whistleblower whose free speech rights should be protected not criminalised.""

    12. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Actually, it was brave, patriotic and glorious when Bush was president. Now everyone is screaming about it. Why is that?

    13. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Answer: Nobody. We are the mightiest, richest, most powerful nation on the planet. He who has the gold make the rules. There is nobody to constrain our might and power. So just continue to take it from us and enjoy it.

      USA, USA!

    14. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 5, Insightful

      lets also blame our fellow geeks who have ENABLED this spying via their tech efforts.

      do you work for a networking company and have you worked on any sniffer or DPI code or hardware? you are to blame - you are part of the problem!

      do you work for anything having to do with calea? you are to blame!

      do you look the other way when you go into work each day? how do you justify the harm you are doing? oh right, you're helping to 'catch bad guys'. yeah, keep telling yourselves that.

      fellow geeks who enable the evil governments that spy are FULLY TO BLAME just as much as the politicians and folks in power who ordered the equipment and software to do this.

      seriously - if we, as a group, said NO to such jobs, they would not get done. but we are whores and will work for spying companies and not even think twice about it.

      its fucked up beyond belief. and we are part of the problem.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    15. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really, you can't tell?

    16. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      One nation Under God.
      If you don't believe in God, then that means One Nation under No One.

      It is a humble way to say the United States won't be anyone's bitch.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    17. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This is the THIRD story today, where commenting with the following quote appears both appropriate and relevant to topic:

      "The two aims of the Party are to conquer the whole surface of the earth
      and to extinguish once and for all the possibility of independent thought"

      -- George Orwell, 1984

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    18. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Russ1642 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I think the movie Cube was about this. You don't know you're part of the problem because you're working on just a tiny piece of it.

    19. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chuck Norris?

    20. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by evil_aaronm · · Score: 1

      Exactly. For the most part, Obama is doing the same thing, maybe even moreso, than Bush, and yet, "real Americans" who loved Bush hate him. Why is that?

    21. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 5, Informative

      A'int no "home of the free". The US has more people incarcerated - per capita and in raw number - than any nation on Earth, or even in all of human history!

      While accounting for a mere 5% of the global population, the US has an aggregated 25% of the world's prisoners, and is growing this at a consistent, exponential rate.

      You have states, like Louisiana, where one out of every 55 people in the state is a prisoner for the duration of a year or more.

      We make China look like amateur hour. Stalin? a blip.

      Now. How can anyone argue that there's no such thing as "brainwashing", or that it only works on stupid or ignorant people?

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    22. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Too bad it ain't yo' country no mo'.

      Seriously, I am a EU citizen, but it's clear that I have as much influence on USA politics as any of you yankees here.

      <sidenote>
      I don't feel any inclination to snort coke or fornicate any relation of my SO. Might be a US thing.
      </sidenote>

    23. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by DexterIsADog · · Score: 1

      Actually, "moreso" over the top. I voted for him twice, but I'm dismayed at how far overboard he's gone with the "pragmatic" view that killing U.S. citizens without judicial review and continuing the indiscriminate spying is necessary for the national interest. Better than Willard, but it's still creepy.

      As to the reason there's more fuss, it's more complicated than the racism and/or hatred of Reps for Dems you imply. It's also that it's gone on for too long, and he's doing things even Bush didn't do.

    24. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It must be nice to be the Index on Censorship and not really have to give a shit about your own foreign relations. Or about the fact that the rest of Europe does the exact same shit as the US, only they just haven't been ratted out yet.

      Why do you think that they are helping the US? They want to show their own prospective leakers that they had better not get any ideas.

      Europe's current "moral high ground" is based solely on the fact that they currently have two fewer leakers than we do, and their governments are painfully aware of this.

    25. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1, Flamebait
      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    26. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by arth1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually, "moreso" over the top. I voted for him twice, but I'm dismayed at how far overboard he's gone with the "pragmatic" view that killing U.S. citizens without judicial review and continuing the indiscriminate spying is necessary for the national interest. Better than Willard, but it's still creepy.

      Why did you write "killing U.S. citizens"? Why not "killing humans"?

      If you believe that US citizens are worth more than any other human beings and should have rights others shouldn't have because of the circumstance of their birth, you're part of the problem.

    27. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> if we, as a group, said NO to such jobs, they would not get done. but we are whores and will work for spying companies and not even think twice about it.

      Most Americans are whores and are only in it for the money and/or fame.

    28. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

      Son, have you ever considered a career in Intelligence?

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    29. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by CanHasDIY · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Uh, for the record, there were and are a large number of us who bitched about Bush's criminal behavior just as much as we bitch about Obama's. Problem is, the shills and sheeple bray so fucking loudly with their partisan nonsense, we end up being drowned out.

      Well, plus the partisan nonsense itself - when I complained that Bush was fucking us all over and defiling the Constitution, the 'liberals' cheered while the 'conservatives' called me a traitor. Now that it's a Democrat pulling the exact same shit, when I complain the 'conservatives' are right there with me, while the 'liberals' claim the only reason I don't agree with Obama is because he's (half) black. WTF?

      the 2-party system, combined with the general and willful ignorance of the population at large, are the reason we appear to be fucked.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    30. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But I can't decide if this "you are to blame, geeks!" post is worse than the movie or not.

      fellow shoe makers who make sneakers... none of these asshats could get to work without shoes... you are to blame!

      people who use the internet, they would have nothing to track if you didn't use it, YOU ARE TO BLAME!

      *wooshy hand motions*

      YOU ARE TO BLAAAAAMMMMMEEEEE!!!!

    31. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want to blame something, blame the money system.

    32. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by thomasw_lrd · · Score: 3, Informative

      I agree that we in the US have long ago since stopped being the land of the free, but I don't think Stalin is a good comparison. I doubt we really know how many people disappeared in the night, how many were actually incarcerated, how many were sent to Siberia, how many were just killed outright.

    33. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      You may be right.

      That said, we have about as much control over your airspace as you do, so it equals out.

    34. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      One nation, indivisible.

      You can take your commie-scare bullshit revisionist pledge of allegiance and shove it up your ass.

    35. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by radiumsoup · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Stalin? Really?

      So we've sent 4 million political dissidents to their deaths and left another 8-10 million to starve to death, then?

      Idiot.

    36. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      From Wikipedia: (emphasis mine)

      On 20 August 1940, Trotsky was attacked in his home in Mexico with an ice axe by undercover NKVD agent Ramón Mercader.[108] The blow to Trotsky's head was poorly delivered and failed to kill Trotsky instantly, as Mercader had intended. Witnesses stated that Trotsky spat on Mercader and began struggling fiercely with him. Hearing the commotion, Trotsky's bodyguards burst into the room and nearly killed Mercader, but Trotsky stopped them, laboriously stating that the assassin should be made to answer questions.[109] Trotsky was taken to a hospital, operated on, and survived for more than a day, dying at the age of 60 on 21 August 1940 as a result of blood loss and shock.[110][111]

    37. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How's it going?

      I'm a military contractor. The stuff I work on is designed to kill people. Well, mostly communication systems and power distribution, but a few of the systems, and the whole giant thing, is there to provide weaponry, humanitarian aid, and search/rescue operations.

      Life's about choices, and if you've made the kind of choices where the navy is firing at you, it's probably not a big loss to humanity if we have to kick you off the planet. Right now, there are people who will throw acid on girls for going to school or kill their sisters for dancing in the rain. These are not people who will sit down at the breakfast table and discuss their problems calmly over a croissant. They're going to kill people for what we consider no reason at all, and the only thing they can understand is force. If you can figure out a way to get them to the table, fuck man, I'll buy the bagels with my last paycheque.

      Now, as for this warrantless wiretapping, or the use of military force without judicial permission and gratuitious amounts of oversight? That's something for which someone should be facing jail time -- because WE ARE the kinds of people who will sit down and discuss our problems over a croissant.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    38. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      seriously - if we, as a group, said NO to such jobs, they would be done by someone else.

      Fixed. That's one hell of a typo.

    39. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One Nation Under Gard

      FTFY

    40. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have to agree with you here. These exaggerations just serve to detract from the very real problems occurring at higher levels in the government. Nobody believes for a second this is anything like what happened in communist Russia and making claims just makes us look like paranoid idiots.

    41. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > do you work for a networking company and have you worked
      > on any sniffer or DPI code or hardware? you are to blame -
      > you are part of the problem!

      > do you work for anything having to do with calea?
      > you are to blame!

      And where does this witch hunt stop in your black and white world? Network monitoring devices used for dubious surveillance work are probably also used for legitimate network security purposes, as well as capacity planning, outage detection and response, testing new equipment is working properly....

      In the end technology is neutral. Equipment and knowledge have no inherent good or evil nature. Our understanding of nuclear physics could end all life on earth or it could solve the energy crisis. A car could kill a child who ran into the road or it could take an expecting mother to hospital to give birth. You have to look at who is using the tools and how they use them. Don't blame the tools - or those who built them - for the actions of some people who use them in ways you don't like.

      > fellow geeks who enable the evil governments that spy are
      > FULLY TO BLAME just as much as the politicians and folks
      > in power who ordered the equipment and software to do this.

      No, they aren't. Please grow up.

    42. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, for instance some people cease to comprehend the most basic sarcastic writings on public forums. Really fucked up stuff.

    43. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by starless · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I agree that we in the US have long ago since stopped being the land of the free,.

      Just wondering when the US was supposed to be the "land of the free"?
      Even after the era of forcefully removing the previous population from their land coming to an end, and slavery ending, there has still been apartheid
      (including anti-miscegenation laws) and anti-communist drives until rather recently.
      Despite the multitude of current problems, it may well be that the US is the most free it has ever been.

    44. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by MaWeiTao · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I think you were living in a different country than I was. When Bush was president people were taking to the streets over every little perceived offense. Remember all the demonstrations over the war, the Patriot Act, the G8 and UN summits? Remember how vocal MoveOn.org and others were?

      Go on to MoveOn.org today and there isn't a peep about Snowden or the NSA's domestic spy program. I thought these guys were supposed to be defenders of democracy. I guess they only care when a Republican is president.

      A while back Al Jazeera ran a story about supporters going to absurd lengths to defend Obama even when it violates their supposed principles. It was almost comical to see the people they interviewed criticize something like drone strikes only to do a full 180 and defend the program when they learned that Obama was behind it.

    45. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by adokink · · Score: 0

      Remember Mr. Falciani and the list of tx evaders in Switzerland: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herv%C3%A9_Falciani Sometimes, leaks are protected if you have something to win. Others, not.

    46. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dammit, Sam! I can see you from the orbit!

    47. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The qualifier "US Citizens" is used because the governing officials in question are accountable to, and usually swore oaths to protect, "US Citizens."

      It isn't so much that US Citizens are better or more deserving than any other people. It is that the people being named and shamed can't fall back on "I was doing this to uphold my duty to protect US Citizens" as an excuse, when it is precisely those citizens they are harming.

    48. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by mordejai · · Score: 2

      I want to snort a mountain of coke and fuck my wife's sister!!!

      Yeah, well, you won't be getting any more coke until you apologize to the President of Bolivia. You should have thought that through.

    49. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Assassination? Like they have assassinated Julian Assange? Or Bradley Manning?

      Anwar al-Awlaki, al-Awlaki's 16-year-old son (in a separate targeted attack)

      Realistically if US can get their hands on someone there is no need to assassinate, as they can rot the rest of days in Guantamo, no trial needed

    50. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by clarkkent09 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      US government, just like any other, is primarily responsible to its citizens who elected it to look after their interests. It is not a matter of whose life is more important. If you don't like it, move to a planet where there are no countries.

      --
      Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
    51. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by SirGarlon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why did you write "killing U.S. citizens"? Why not "killing humans"?

      Perhaps simply because it's an easier case to make, when arguing with other Americans. There are a scary number of my countrymen who are willing to agree with statements like "[anyone accused as] a terrorist doesn't have any rights." Even the most ignorant American is aware that US citizens have certain, specific rights. Persuading him that those rights need to be respected is, in my opinion, a prerequisite to subsequently selling him on the idea of natural and universal human rights.

      So I think framing the discussion as "killing US citizens" does reflect a certain chauvinism, but not as bad as it probably appears to a foreigner. :-(

      --
      [Sir Garlon] is the marvellest knight that is now living, for he destroyeth many good knights, for he goeth invisible.
    52. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes, an assassination is unlikely.... now. Snowden played it smart, got a lot of media involved, and got his face and his story spread all over the world. That is the only thing that has kept him alive.

    53. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Nobody believes for a second? Maybe this will change your mind. As a former citizen of Soviet Russia I can attest that there are many many parallels happening in US lately.

    54. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by RivenAleem · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's time ... *puts on glasses*... to bury the hatchet.

    55. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's talking about prisoners.

      Idiot.

    56. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by dkleinsc · · Score: 4, Insightful

      For the record, there are a significant percentage of liberals who complain about Obama's behavior as much as we did Bush's.

      I in fact see that as a quick test of which political figures and organizations have principles: If their opinions remain consistent (e.g. ACLU and Glenn Greenwald and the EFF), they're legit. If their opinions change based on who's committing the crime (e.g. MSNBC and Fox News), they're partisan hacks.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    57. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by ImprovOmega · · Score: 1

      Why did you write "killing U.S. citizens"? Why not "killing humans"?

      If you believe that US citizens are worth more than any other human beings and should have rights others shouldn't have because of the circumstance of their birth, you're part of the problem.

      It's not that U.S. citizens are worth more, and it is indeed troubling when there's non-military action, extrajudicial killing of any human being, but somehow it feels even more egregious when a government is doing that to it's own people. Not from a value perspective, but from a "hey you're supposed to be on our side" angle.

    58. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there's still time!

    59. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by ArhcAngel · · Score: 2

      If you created a GUI so the NSA would be able to check the box to track US mobile phones, YOU ARE TO BLAME!

      This would never have happened in a command line only country.

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    60. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Except that is a political hot potato. No what they really realized is that its better to assasinate them than put them in gitmo, because gitmo is a festering problem for years to come...the flak from an assasination comes and then just gets forgotten.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    61. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Mercader went on to study cartography and since has created a popular projection of the globe onto a 2-d map famous for it's ability to make countries south of the United States appear small in comparison.

    62. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. Blind partisanship and political hypocrasy are largely in the domain of liberals. The majority of them crow on about tolerance and being open minded, but in reality what they mean is they want it for their viewpoint and no one elses. They have their utopian ideals, and firmly believe that the only way to "save" the world is by embracing their view. That they could be wrong never even enters their imagination.

    63. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by TheCarp · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Hair splitting. So instead of sending them to their deaths, they get sent to their prison rapes. Sure they don't die per se, but they don't often get a trial either. May not be political dissidents, but most of them never actually hurt anyone either, they just happened to be brown people who chose to smoke a joint like the white kids do.

      So yah, these distinctions are not really that important to me. I definitely put them in the same general category of evil.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    64. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by 1s44c · · Score: 1

      Obama is that you? Or Bush? I can't tell anymore, you both sound the same.

    65. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by 1s44c · · Score: 1

      "Home of the brave, land of the relentlessly monitored"

    66. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by melikamp · · Score: 2

      They are totally comparable. Stalin's government was more authoritarian and ruthless, but if we start adding up all of the political injustice, Obama's administration may just take the cake. In 2011, more than quarter million prisoners in US were doing time for drug offenses. Most of them -- pot, all of them political. In many cases, the actual crime was having brown skin, which makes them even more political. Give this machine 30 years of Stalin's term, and you arrive at similar numbers. This time, though, the turkeys are killed humanely :)

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helen_Keller!_The_Musical

    67. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Seumas · · Score: 5, Funny

      People like you make me fucking sick. Go to the grocery store. Tell me, how many different types and brands of sodas are on the shelf. Now, try telling me we don't got freedom, you fucking godless commie.

    68. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by timmyf2371 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Apologies if you were trying to be ironic, but that sounds like a perfect comparison.

      How many people disappeared in the night, only to be rendered to random countries around the world to be tortured?
      How many were sent to Guantanamo?
      How many were just killed by extra-judicial drone attacks?

      --

      Backup not found: (A)bort (R)etry (P)anic
    69. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Seumas · · Score: 1

      Yeah, there haven't been any suspicious planes crashing into the sides of mountains, people dying of heart attacks in hot tubs, or sudden strokes of anyone of any significants in the last twenty years or anything.... oh wait... :D

    70. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now, as for this warrantless wiretapping, or the use of military force without judicial permission and gratuitious amounts of oversight? That's something for which someone should be facing jail time -- because WE ARE the kinds of people who will sit down and discuss our problems over a croissant.

      By your post it seems we're the kinds of people who will design things to kill people, then rationalize it by saying that other people are worse. You are the problem.

    71. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Cigarra · · Score: 3, Insightful

      ... if you've made the kind of choices where the navy is firing at you, it's probably not a big loss to humanity if we have to kick you off the planet.

      It's funny that you mention that, on the 25th anniversary of yet another senseless massacre by your beloved US Navy:

      "On 3 July 1988 (...) the aircraft serving the [Iran Air 655] flight, an Airbus A300B2-203, was shot down by U.S. missiles fired by the United States Navy guided missile cruiser USS Vincennes as it flew over the Strait of Hormuz. The aircraft, which had been flying in Iranian airspace over Iran's territorial waters in the Persian Gulf on its usual flight path, was destroyed. All 290 onboard, including 66 children and 16 crew, perished".

      I hope it's not too late for you to reconsider the choices you've made in life. Otherwise, I'll settle for you dying a horrible, slow death.

      --
      I don't have a sig.
    72. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm gluten intolerant, you insensitive clod!

    73. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Hatta · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Right now, there are people who will throw acid on girls for going to school or kill their sisters for dancing in the rain

      There are also people who will fabricate grounds for a war that kills half a million people (iraq). Those who will overthrow democratically elected regimes in favor of friendly dictators (iran). Those who will ally with the worst of the wahabists (saudi arabia) while overthrowing a much more progressive secular government.

      These are not people who will sit down at the breakfast table and discuss their problems calmly over a croissant. They're going to kill people for what we consider no reason at all, and the only thing they can understand is force

      You could say the same about the hawks in the US government.

      WE ARE the kinds of people who will sit down and discuss our problems over a croissant.

      Apparently we're not. It's been, what, 50 years now and Kissinger has never as much been indicted for war crimes? Can we expect Bush to be?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    74. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by dkleinsc · · Score: 3, Informative

      Life's about choices, and if you've made the kind of choices where the navy is firing at you, it's probably not a big loss to humanity if we have to kick you off the planet.

      What about the people who just happen to be nearby the people the Navy is aiming at? Do they deserve to be killed too? How many of the approximately 500,000 people in Iraq who were killed qualify as the bad guys that aren't a big loss to humanity?

      These are not people who will sit down at the breakfast table and discuss their problems calmly over a croissant.

      Really? How many have you asked? I'm reminded of the point where we were planning to attack Iraq, and Dan Rather went over to Iraq and sat down with Saddam Hussein for a perfectly calm interview, which suggests that they might in fact be willing to talk. For what it's worth, the people of Iran just elected a guy who was pushing for just that approach to dealing with the US (assuming the croissant is halal).

      They're going to kill people for what we consider no reason at all, and the only thing they can understand is force.

      I strongly suspect that those who engage in terrorism think the same about us. For example, we have 86 Yemenis locked up in Gitmo right now that we have determined have committed no crime against us. We have killed more than a few Yemenis with drone strikes, despite no (publicly known) terrorist attacks from Yemen on the United States and an alliance with the Yemeni government.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    75. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Seumas · · Score: 2

      And just think about all those baristas who are culpable for our current surveillance state, because they made sweet expensive coffee-based drinks for people in the government and tech geeks during their commute to these jobs! The horror!

    76. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      Why did you write "killing U.S. citizens"? Why not "killing humans"?

      Because everyone expects the POTUS to [sanction] kill[ing] humans, but killing citizens without due process is a violation of his oath to uphold the constitution. Remember, the constitution does not recognize a right to life, but it does recognize a right to due process. And unfortunately most people consider the rights guaranteed in the constitution to be both exhaustively enumerative and to be for citizens only. This is odd, because our government occasionally declares them to be human rights. For example, freedom of speech (obviously not all speech, but good old traditional political dissidence is what I'm talking about right now) is a human right in the USA, when it's a citizen's right in the UK. You can't (allegedly) try a citizen of the UK for seditious speech in the UK, but you can try a visitor for the same.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    77. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by austinhook · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wow! According to radiumsoup we only have to stay better than Stalin before we start to worry about our freedoms eroding. I have heard about setting an impossibly high bar to surmount. Only due to lack of imagination have I never dreamed that setting an almost impossibly low bar to crawl under could be just as difficult.

    78. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      We stopped being "home of the free" when people started feeling okay about telling other people how to live via legislature and court cases, all in the name of the "greater good". Both (R) and (D) are equally culpable in this progressive slide towards totalitarianism. Very few are standing for liberty, and are typically branded by unflattering terms like "Anarchists" designed to illicit emotional responses.

      Take a long look at Obama, and those that support(ed) him. Take a long look at GWB, and those that supported him. You're talking 97% of the US population who have supported the Patriot Act / ObamaCare nanny state.

      "Please enslave me, just as long as you pretend to care about me"

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    79. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Seumas · · Score: 1

      This is Slashdot. None of us even have an armchair affiliation with intelligence!

    80. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by 1s44c · · Score: 1

      Why did you write "killing U.S. citizens"? Why not "killing humans"?

      If you believe that US citizens are worth more than any other human beings and should have rights others shouldn't have because of the circumstance of their birth, you're part of the problem.

      That is a core belief of the US government and to a slightly lesser extent the American people. It's been obvious since, and possibly before, the war of independence.

    81. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by DexterIsADog · · Score: 1

      Other people have responded with the correct answer, but I will too - armies engaged with enemies on foreign soil do not require judicial review to kill them. This is true for every country in the world which has engaged in conflicts.

      Targeting U.S. citizens abroad for death without a constitutional review is a separate and particularly egregious thing for the president to do. I wasn't making an exhaustive list, so I threw a couple of the things I didn't like about what Obama has done into the post, but if it makes you feel better, I don't like the indiscriminate killing of other nationals abroad either.

      Your last line is an assumption of my beliefs not in evidence from my post. But since we're on the subject, have you done anything, anything at all about killing of those other human beings, aside from a snarky post at me? Thought not.

    82. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by anagama · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You should add a <sarcasm> tags.

      There's a large portion of the American population who would mod you "insightful" thinking you actually believe what you wrote.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    83. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      My recent conversations with certain political types, they believed the Obama is the Messiah hype. So, one nation, under Obama? And Obama is sure acting like that, by violating the law* that colloquially bears his name to extend deadlines by a year, and conveniently pushed back beyond the next election.

      Color me not surprised.

      *A law so desperately needed that we had to vote for it to see what was needed, because it couldn't wait another second.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    84. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by WoOS · · Score: 1

      >>> the "pragmatic" view that killing U.S. citizens without judicial review [....] is necessary for the national interest
      > US government [....] is primarily responsible to its citizens who elected it

      I hear that on certain cemeteries on the east coast one can hear ongoing groaning from the ground:

      We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

    85. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by arth1 · · Score: 1, Informative

      Remember, the constitution does not recognize a right to life, but it does recognize a right to due process.

      Funny, last I looked the constitution started thus (emphasis mine):

      IN CONGRESS, July 4, 1776.

      The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America,

      When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

      We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

    86. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right... character assassination and physical assassination are totally the same thing.

      land of relentless hyperbole indeed.

    87. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Stormwatch · · Score: 2

      Funny that this doesn't mean what people think it means.

      The words were taken from the Gettysburg Address, where Lincoln asked his listeners to resolve that "this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom." Except that in the Gettysburg Address, "under God" didn't modify "this nation" but the following phrase, "have a new birth of freedom." In Lincoln's time, "under God" was a common idiom that meant "with God's help" or "the Lord willing." -- NPR

      So yeah, it means: "One nation, hopefully." See how stupid the whole thing is?

    88. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why do you think that they are helping the US? They want to show their own prospective leakers that they had better not get any ideas.

      They might think they are intimidating prospective leakers, but what they are really doing is encouraging them. Snowden saw what the US did to people like Bradley Manning and the NSA leakers who came before him and he STILL decided to go ahead.

      It was apparent from the first mention of his name that he was motivated by patriotism and idealogy - all this bootlicking by EU members is only going to push their own leakers that much closer to a similar breaking point as Obama's 180 on warrantless wiretaps pushed Snowden.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    89. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by arth1 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Other people have responded with the correct answer, but I will too - armies engaged with enemies on foreign soil do not require judicial review to kill them. This is true for every country in the world which has engaged in conflicts.

      According to US laws, it does require a declaration of war.
      And according to the UN charter, the Chapter VII only allows that for self defence or as a UN sanctioned intervention.

      So no, you cannot kill foreign nationals anywhere without judicial review, lest you commit a war crime.

    90. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by DexterIsADog · · Score: 1

      I didn't "frame the discussion as 'killing U.S. citizens'", it was one of a couple of the many actions I mentioned that I dislike from this president. Keep some perspective - the ease with which you call me a chauvinist reflects some in you.

    91. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I worked on comms systems that allow governments to track mobile communications. Logs of everyone on a shortlist; who they contacted or contacted them including numbers, locations, times, duration of calls, content of any messages etc. Authorities get direct access and have their own frontend to the system, they can add anyone to it and get detailed stats on anyone they like. Only select admins and high level guys at the companies can see it otherwise.

      That was only one part of the system, and a small part at that. It is currently in use in at least one country where people are being killed, and another that has a poor track record on human rights violations and political suppression. It's likely used in more but I don't work with them anymore so that's all I know of for sure.

      When designing and building it I just didn't think of the worst case scenario, you think it will be put to good use by law enforcement in respectable countries. You expect it to be used with proper oversight. I guess in hindsight it was incredibly naive, and I do feel terribly guilty for having anything to do with it when I see places on the news where I know it is operational.

      I get quite angry when discussing politics now, particularly discussing things like the recent events surrounding the US and some other western countries. I guess part of that is due to feeling guilty over my small part in it, and wanting to put it right in someway. I can't put it right, and I can't really discuss openly why I get so heated in discussion so people just assume you are a conspiracy nut or something for throwing out an opinion without really being able to justify it to them.

      I agree with you, we are a big part of the problem. I can try to justify it by saying that if I wasn't involved it would still be the exact same anyway. That is true, it wouldn't have made a difference if I wasn't involved but I was, and so I share the blame.

      You don't have to be a bad person or have any bad motives whatsoever to end up doing things that end up having terrible consequences.

    92. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by P-niiice · · Score: 1

      Um, yeah - conservatives didn't say a word about the Patriot act back then, and NOW they're outraged when Obama is continuing what Bush did (and is actually restricting the use of the data)? They're all about "government overreach" but actively work against abortion and preventing marriages between consenting adults? They are all for deficit reduction and against government spending when its the democrats who have to clean up their overspending and financial messes and get the economy working? Yeah, you must be kidding here.

    93. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by phantomfive · · Score: 3, Funny

      If you don't like it, move to a planet where there are no countries.

      Where do I sign up?

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    94. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by dyingtolive · · Score: 1

      Are you saying that those people have not had public figures call for their execution?

      Mind you. I said "calling for assassination", not "assassination". Reading comprehension will get you far in life, unfortunately, it makes you less of a fan of Fox News.

      --
      Support the EFF and Creative Commons. The war is coming, and they're supporting you...
    95. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Nyder · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I agree that we in the US have long ago since stopped being the land of the free, but I don't think Stalin is a good comparison. I doubt we really know how many people disappeared in the night, how many were actually incarcerated, how many were sent to Siberia, how many were just killed outright.

      At the rate the United States Government is going, I expect people that speak out to start disappearing...

      --
      Be seeing you...
    96. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 5, Interesting

      And when you send the brown folks to jail, they don't vote.

      Then - by making 1 in 10 of them ineligible at anytime and demoralize the others - you eliminate the threat of a progressive force in the electorate, which appeared on the threshold of revolution, 35 years ago.

      The illusion of a representative republic is maintained by such soft suppression.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    97. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Mattcelt · · Score: 1

      I thought it was an ice pick?

      "A mountain climber's axe! It's a mountain climber's axe! Can't I get that through your skull??"

    98. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Wormsign · · Score: 1

      No, the turkeys aren't killed at all. It's not comparable. Try again. Don't get me wrong, I despise our prison-industrial complex and want it to change, but comparisons to mass murderers are not helpful. They cloud the discourse.

    99. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by meta-monkey · · Score: 5, Insightful

      To be honest, I'm kind of shocked at how far they've let that veil fly open, and for how long. If there's one thing politicians are good at, it's PR and vague, meaningless statements. But they're being really specific. "These programs are legal! Full oversight! Bipartisan support! That dude's a traitor!"

      It's incredibly (or intentionally?) botched PR. Why is the NSA still in the spotlight (or at least light) instead of slipping back into the shadows?

      Usually, it would go something like:

      1) Whistlerblower: "They doin' the snoops!"
      2) Republicans: "Saint Bush never intended this! It must be a secret Muslim plot by Obama to install Sharia law!"
      3) Dems: "No way, it was the Cincinnati branch of the NSA!"
      4) Senate hearings: "Mr. Snowden, thank you for your service to your country."
      5) Snowden: "No prob. I'll go rot in obscurity now."
      6) NSA: "Ow. My wrist. From the slapping." (Goes right back to biz as usual)

      Instead we've got international relations breakdowns, furious Internet rage that might actually result in demonstrations (for what that's worth).

      What the hell is going on?

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    100. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by amRadioHed · · Score: 2

      There are partisan hacks on MSNBC, but not everyone. Rachael Maddow has been critical of the administration the past few times I've seen her.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    101. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Wormsign · · Score: 1

      I'd mod you up if I could.

    102. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But they are guilty. Who needs to bother with a trial when you know they're guilty?

      Apply sarcasm tags as necessary.

    103. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Wormsign · · Score: 1

      You might as well just blame capitalism. People need jobs and money. When times are tough, people will bend their moral fiber to feed their family.

    104. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      It actually starts "We the people". And I'm not even an American. (But I have watched Star Trek)

    105. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by neo-mkrey · · Score: 1

      LOL!!

      And I will be celebrating by lighting a bunch of explosives made in China!

    106. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Better than Stalin, perhaps, but not better than Kruschev, I think.

      And this is no better than this.

    107. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Life's about choices, and if you've made the kind of choices where the navy is firing at you, it's probably not a big loss to humanity if we have to kick you off the planet."

      It must be nice knowing that whoever Navy happens to kill is an evil-doer.I am sure it helps you sleep at night too. Obviously Navy does not make mistakes about life it kicks off the planet as you eloquently put.

      Now, before we get into the politics and boring reality of what is currently happening, the people that you already write off as those who would not want to eat a bagel with you, typically don't want to eat a bagel with you because you either stole or shat on their entire breakfast at one point or another. It is a little hard to get over social faux pas of such magnitude.

      But there I go being pro-terrorist, right?

    108. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      Many did. It's the ones who didn't then and the ones who aren't know who are all part of the problem. If all you can do is point at Bush and say "he did it too", you're part of the problem also.

    109. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by clarkkent09 · · Score: 1

      I don't think you would like it. Competition between countries, just like competition between business, and individuals, is where good things come from. Centralized power leads to stagnation.

      --
      Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
    110. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by SirGarlon · · Score: 4, Informative

      I remember that incident you are referring to. If you remember it as well, or if you read the Wikipedia article, you'll see that the Vincennes attempted to identify the Iranian airliner, failed, and in the tense environment, overlooked a series of cues that could have distinguished it from a hostile fighter. So when the airliner did not respond to radio contact, the captain ordered a missile fired at it.

      Consensus is that it was a horrible mistake.

      So consider this. When and where the US Navy deploys is up to politicians. There are *way* too many hawks in the US government right now, but that's not the Navy's fault. Future tragedies can be averted by giving the Navy better technology. Consider for example better radar that can tell the operator clearly whether the aircraft is ascending or descending, or better communications so the cruiser can get a video feed from a friendly aircraft or drone to visually identify the target before they decide to shoot. This would make the Navy deadlier toward people the Navy is trying to kill, but potentially a lot less deadly toward people it is *not* trying to kill.

      If you want to prevent the next Iran Air 655, there are two approaches. You can stop the US sending its military all over the world (good luck!). Or you can provide them with the best sensors and information systems money can buy so when they have to decide whether to pull the trigger, they make that decision with the best possible information.

      And yes, I've done Navy work myself. You may wish me a slow, horrible death, too, but I would prefer to discuss your objections over a croissant.

      --
      [Sir Garlon] is the marvellest knight that is now living, for he destroyeth many good knights, for he goeth invisible.
    111. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This has little to do with the power of the US vs that of the ROW. This is a struggle between the citizens and the inter-governmental system.

      In Finland, the Protective Police (the "Finnish NSA") took the opportunity yesterday to propose tighter information exchange between the Protective Police and the US NSA.

      The NSA is bigger than Obama. It's bigger than the precidency itself. In fact, I doubt Congress would ever dare challenge the NSA even if they wanted. It's all part of the managed democracy: having elections, debates, political parties and scandals. In the meantime, the thinly veiled Establishment is running the show.

      These recent revelations would not have been a scandal in any other country (China, Russia, France, Finland). The populace takes it for granted that the security establishment does whatever it pleases without any serious oversight. The US is special: it has let its citizenry believe it's somehow different.

    112. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by MrDoh! · · Score: 1

      That's it exactly. I don't get it, they're normally sneakier than this. The current events are making them look mind numbingly incompetent. wait. unless that's Obama's plan all along... so he HAS to, under not so strong protests, gets rid of them? Cunning as a sackful of hamsters.

      --
      Waiting for an amusing sig.
    113. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Znork · · Score: 2

      I assume there's no taxation without representation, so at least they don't have to pay any more taxes then, right?

      Right?

    114. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by dyingtolive · · Score: 1

      You could not get modded high enough here. You're right, it is breaking the formula.

      --
      Support the EFF and Creative Commons. The war is coming, and they're supporting you...
    115. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just wondering when the US was supposed to be the "land of the free"?
      Even after the era of forcefully removing the previous population from their land coming to an end, and slavery ending, there has still been apartheid
      (including anti-miscegenation laws) and anti-communist drives until rather recently.
      Despite the multitude of current problems, it may well be that the US is the most free it has ever been.

      Yes, but we didn't care about those people. The government has started spying on me now.

      There's a quote about that, somewhere. First they came for...

    116. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by 0111+1110 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well it was really only ever truly free for people who were not of African descent. If your ancestors were from Africa (in the recent past) then the US had no freedom at all. But since I am of European descent, if I had been born in say 1805 I wouuld have lived in what may have been the freest society that human beings have ever known. It wasn't really until the early 20th century that the US really stopped being free for white people. That's when the US really started to develop a taste for tyranny.

      If you are trying to figure out why such an unfree country is full of people who like to talk about freedom that is why. It's because we have a very unusual history. The only other country I know of that had a similar experiment in freedom is France, but their experiment died a lot faster.

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    117. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Life's about choices, and if you've made the kind of choices where the navy is firing at you, it's probably not a big loss to humanity if we have to kick you off the planet.

      The kind of choice like living in a coastal country that we decide to invade? Do you have any idea how many actual innocents have died during the last couple of armed actions by our respective countries?!

      I'm a military contractor. The stuff I work on is designed to kill people. ...

        I'll buy the bagels with my last paycheque.

      Talk about no fucking sense of irony - how about you make the first move; stop building weapons of pure destruction for personal profit so that innocent people can be bombed during their breakfasts (no they can't afford fancy French pastry, but they still break their fasts) for your leaders personal profits! Then maybe their survivors might have something left to live for other than revenge?

    118. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by dinfinity · · Score: 1

      If you don't like it, move to a planet where there are no countries.

      Considering moving to another planet is not a fucking option, it's probably best to point out nationalism (or 'patriotism' as some people like to call it) and recognize that it does far more harm than good in well-developed civilized countries as it flies straight in the face of international cooperation.

      Cases in point:
      - the irrational unfettered hatred of US citizens towards the UN, the WTO and pretty much every institution that operates in a more than bilateral way, although one could argue that 'well-developed' and 'civilized' don't really apply to the US (anymore).
      - the almost equally ridiculous hatred of EU citizens towards the institutions of the EU.

      International cooperation is hard and won't become easier if everybody thinks they're on the best patch of grass and the way to go is to dig a big fucking moat around their patch.

      The above does assume caring about international cooperation. If you're an imperialist, then nationalism is the best thing since sliced bread.

    119. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by melikamp · · Score: 3

      People get killed in prisons. People get killed outside, because prisons force them to become a part of the criminal world (talk about rehabilitation). People die by ODing on street drugs (a problem created solely by enforcement). People can't ever hope to get a good job, and so die from health issues. They commit suicides. These deaths may be hard to quantify, but they are a direct consequence of the political incarceration. But you seem to be too taken with "humanely".

      You are also quick to dismiss the comparison only because of death rate, as if killing is the worst thing you can do to a person. Dooming them to a life of unpaid slave labor in prison, wage slavery outside, and taking away political rights is just as damaging as killing, as long as you do it to enough people and with enough prejudice.

    120. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Stalin? Really?

      So we've sent 4 million political dissidents to their deaths and left another 8-10 million to starve to death, then?

      Idiot.

      The USA has killed that many civilians and dropped bombs on a quarter of the world's countries, since the end of WWII.

      Perhaps you need to remove the blinkers and learn a little about you own country's history?

    121. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by 0111+1110 · · Score: 1

      That doesn't make violating the human rights of non-citizens okay. I did not vote for anyone to violate the rights of human beings anywhere in the world. Our government was founded on the basis of natural rights, not on majority rule or tyranny of the majority over the minority. Even if the majority of Americans thinks it is okay to say murder a million people that doesn't make it right. You've at least heard of this whole "right vs wrong" thing, right? If something is wrong to do to Americans then it is also wrong to do to non-Americans. Well, unless of course we are members of a super-race or something and are beyond good and evil or whatever.

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    122. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by steelfood · · Score: 1

      There are no longer competent people working in the government anymore, even in their PR department.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    123. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by steelfood · · Score: 1

      I see it this way: if American geeks don't do the work, they'll just offshore it. And then there'll be nobody to blow the whistle.

      Or, to put it another way, there has been a lot of whistleblowing over the past 13 years by these very same geeks (because there's been a lot of wrongdoing). Do you think there'd be anywhere near as much information on our government's wrongdoings if it had been Indian or Chinese or even Russian contractors doing the work? I think not.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    124. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by 0111+1110 · · Score: 1

      Remember, the constitution does not recognize a right to life,

      http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/ninth_amendment

      The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

      The only reason they didn't mention that all human beings have a right not to be murdered is because they considered it to be offensively obvious. And like the other amendments in the bill of rights might lend more credence to the modern and incorrect interpretation of the purpose of the constitution. The constitution's purpose was to enumerate everything that the government could do. Everything it was allowed to do. Anything not listed was supposed to be verboten. The constitution was never intended to list every single human right that the Founders believed in. The Declaration of Independence made it quite clear that they believe in every human being's right to exist, to be alive. And not only American lives.

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    125. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Well, yes, but that's only the preamble to the "constitution" part.

      The full constitution consists of the declaration of independence (without which the rest would lack legality), the constitution, and the bill of rights.

      But it's certainly worth noting that it says We, the people and not "We, the citizens". Throughout the constitution, the founders appears to have taken great care to establish that except when explicitly stated, the rights and protections are meant for everyone, not just citizens. (Of course, back then, only a small subset of white male landowners would have full citizen rights, so it wasn't all altruistic, but probably out of necessity.)

    126. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A number of conservatives did say a word about the Patriot act. The limited government movement hadn't really taken off in the Republican party like it has now. By the by, conservatives against abortion are generally the same as liberals against the death penalty. Innocent life is sacred for our narrow view of life and our narrow view of innocent. What you see as a liberty issue, they see as a life issue. There is no real place for compromise on the issue.

    127. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by TheNastyInThePasty · · Score: 1

      Why haven't there been demonstrations yet?

      --
      The best thing about UDP jokes is I don't care if you get them or not
    128. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      land of the free, home of the "shit, that guy must be snuffed out, he told the world how dirty we really are. an example must be made so that others think twice about being a whistleblower".

      happy fourth of july, fellow americans ;( can't say I'm very proud to be american right now. in fact, I'm ashamed of what my country is looking like, to the rest of the world.

      I don't know, but I do find it very curious that even our enemies won't offer the guy asylum.

      Maybe, just maybe, he's not the poster boy you want him to be. Maybe, just maybe, we're not the bad guys you want us to be.

    129. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by perceptual.cyclotron · · Score: 1

      No, no - you've got it all backwards.

      Free land and resources – Just kill whoever lives there now!
      Free labour – Just kill them if they don't work!
      Freedom from accountability – Just keep those filthy bastards whose lives you destroyed away from you so you don't have to look in their eyes!
      Freedom from conflicting ideologies – Witch hunts for everyone!

      And nothing much has changed on any of those fronts, realistically.
      The US has always been the land of the free. There just happen to be a whole lot more *other* people living there too...

    130. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by clarkkent09 · · Score: 1

      First of all, the US created the UN and other international institutions against the will of Europeans and most other nations, who, prior to Willsonian idea of collective security, did not understand or attempt any form of international relations not based on balance of power. Not disagreeing that there are many of us in the US (myself included) who think this is dumb on our part, but it is just a little bit unfair to single out the country that contributed the most to international cooperation as being against it.

      Btw, international cooperation today is greatest it has ever been due to capitalism and globalization so you should be happy. Just about every person in the world is involved in voluntary and productive cooperation as well as competition with people all over the world within the global market. Lookup Milton Friedman's example of a pencil: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R5Gppi-O3a8 for a beautiful illustration.

      Governments are not the place to look for any kind of cooperation that sacrifices the interests of their country for others, even a little bit. It is not only very difficult and unnatural for such a thing to happen in any democracy as such gov. will not last very long, but it is morally suspect as well. Try running for election in any country on a platform of say reducing welfare benefits or increasing taxes for citizens of that country in order to help the starving in other countries in the name of eliminating nationalism and patriotism and see how far that gets you,

      --
      Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
    131. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by steelfood · · Score: 1

      We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

      Everyone has these unalienable rights, not just the citizens of the U.S. (and green card holders). The U.S. government has no obligation to protect the rights of non-citizens, but by the Declaration, Governments also must recognize that they exist for all. That means to be constitutionally sound, the U.S. government has to acknowledge that even non-citizens have the same inalienable rights.

      And yes, the Declaration of Independence is not the Constitution. The Constitution limits the powers of the government. The Declaration embodies the spirit of the country and its people.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    132. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      one out of every 55 people in the state is a prisoner for the duration of a year or more

      That's an interesting way of looking at such statistics.

      I wonder what the average time spent in prison is for an american (including those who are never in prison) over their lifetime? Given our rate of 0.743% and our average life span of ~78 years, I'll just say it's 212 days, since nothing brings out a correct answer on Slashdot faster than incorrect assumptions based on math.

    133. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree that we in the US have long ago since stopped being the land of the free, but I don't think Stalin is a good comparison.

      At the height of the Gulag system (Russian prisons where political prisoners and criminals were interned), which was about at end of Stalin's life (1962), the prison population was lower than in prisons and jails in the land of the free.

      There you go, a comparison to the worst police state and yet, still less people in jail. It was at the time where your neighbor could say "hey, that guy said something bad about Stalin" and police would arrest you.

      So I'm sorry, but there is something fucked up with US justice system (or society?) where the largest prison population and somehow above average crime rates. China, as a comparison, has lower crime rates and lower prison population and 3x larger population.

    134. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember, the constitution does not recognize a right to life, but it does recognize a right to due process.

      Funny, last I looked the constitution started thus (emphasis mine):

      IN CONGRESS, July 4, 1776.

      The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America,

      You're confusing the Declaration of Independence with the Constitution. If you were a foreigner applying for citizenship, you would fail. The Declaration, though a nice statement of ideals, doesn't have any legal binding on the United States, which was (arguably) created by the Articles of Confederation a year later or by the current Constitution ten years after that. The Congress they're talking about in 1776 wasn't a governing body, but the original meaning of congress, "a formal meeting of representatives for discussion of some common interest." To wit: the oppressive policies of the actual government of the day.

    135. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      For the record, there are a significant percentage of liberals who complain about Obama's behavior as much as we did Bush's.

      We in the middle appreciate your contributions, but could we ask a favor of you (this goes for reasonable people who identify as conservatives as well): could you please, please get the loud and crazy members of your social grouping to shut the fuck up with all the partisan attack shit? I get sooo tired of every lib (and con) I disagree with on some random topic condemning my entire platform because I don't march in lock-step with them.

      Much obliged.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    136. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is nothing in refusing to make things that can be used to kill people that magically makes people elsewhere do the same. By and large people who work on defense systems want nothing more than for them never to be used. But they will gladly have them used to kill one intent on murdering a million than let a million die to avoid the blood of the one on their own hands.

    137. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by copponex · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, if you want to get into raw numbers, the United States is responsible for at least a few million deaths worldwide since the end of WWII. If you count our proxy wars and the wars we helped arrange, such as the Iran-Iraq War, the Soviet-Afghan conflict, various central American death squads, etc, then it is upwards of 20-30 million dead in the last sixty years or so.

      (Here's a weak source, but discussing our empire isn't exactly acceptable conversation in regular media outlets. The basic facts are undeniable, even if you'd like to discount our role in arranging, funding, and supplying arms for war that are in our own interest.)

      We're not above watching people die of starvation either:

      As many as 576,000 Iraqi children may have died since the end of the Persian Gulf war because of economic sanctions imposed by the Security Council. ...
      The sanctions were imposed by the Security Council after Iraq invaded Kuwait in August 1990. Led by the United States, the Council has rejected many Iraqi appeals to lift the restrictions, which have crippled the economy, until Iraq accounts for all its weapons of mass destruction and United Nations inspectors can certify that they have been destroyed in accordance with several Council resolutions.

      I think we all remember how many WMDs were found after we spilled the blood of our own and hundreds of thousands of Iraqis, along with emptying our treasury of five trillion dollars.

      In any case, what is undeniable is that the United States of today and the Stalinist era of the USSR both share one common feature: the respective governments of both nations are hiding their decisions to have people killed and imprisoned from a transparent judicial process. Our government has now openly declared that the political elite are above the law.

      But instead of talking about those hard realities, you have backpedaled to the position that we are not as bad as Stalin.

      Well, that's a load off my mind! I hope Obama spends the 4th helping military doctors force feed hunger striking prisoners at Guantanamo while they celebrate spending the rest of their lives without the right to a trial. I even have an idea of what we can write on the cake:

      "NOT AS BAD AS STALIN!"
      "USA! USA! USA!"

    138. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by 0111+1110 · · Score: 1

      That is a core belief of the US government and to a slightly lesser extent the American people. It's been obvious since, and possibly before, the war of independence.

      http://www.ushistory.org/declaration/document/

      We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

      Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin, John Adams, Roger Sherman, and John Livingston. June 28, 1776

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    139. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Geez, don't you understand anythin'? God gave us capitalism, and the private prison system needs prisoners, so we can milk the government for tax dollars to increase the profit line and our quarterly dividends for our shareholders. I.e. more prisoners equals more profits, etc.

    140. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by SirGarlon · · Score: 1

      I apologize for expressing myself so poorly that you found it insulting. I was actually trying to defend you. I'll shut up now.

      --
      [Sir Garlon] is the marvellest knight that is now living, for he destroyeth many good knights, for he goeth invisible.
    141. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      Nope, I can't do that: I'm a firm believer that anyone has the right to say anything they want, no matter how stupid it is. Also known as the First Amendment to the US Constitution. In return, I reserve the right to call them stupid.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    142. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by 0111+1110 · · Score: 1

      The Constitution limits the powers of the government.

      The constitution was mainly intended as an exhaustive enumeration of the powers of their new government. The first eight amendments were very controversial precisely because they were worried that they would encourage people to believe that any human right that wasn't listed could be violated by their new government. They didn't want that. They foolishly were relyiing on people not to simply ignore the ninth amendment which made their desires and concerns pretty clear that the first eight did not represent an exhaustive list of things the government was not allowed to do.

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    143. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      discuss our problems over a croissant.

      Surely you mean freedom bread?

    144. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Pino+Grigio · · Score: 1

      We make China look like amateur hour. Stalin? a blip.

      I think that this kind of hyperbole just diminishes any argument you were trying to make. In fact, it's pretty much destroyed it.

    145. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by jahudabudy · · Score: 1

      That's the Declaration of Independence. Nothing to do with the Constitution.

      --
      ...sometimes, in order to hurt someone very badly, you have to tell that person terrible lies. - PA
    146. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by 0111+1110 · · Score: 1

      Life's about choices, and if you've made the kind of choices where the navy is firing at you, it's probably not a big loss to humanity if we have to kick you off the planet. Right now, there are people who will throw acid on girls for going to school or kill their sisters for dancing in the rain. These are not people who will sit down at the breakfast table and discuss their problems calmly over a croissant. They're going to kill people for what we consider no reason at all, and the only thing they can understand is force. If you can figure out a way to get them to the table, fuck man, I'll buy the bagels with my last paycheque.

      Pot, kettle. So your solution to someone killing a girl for dancing is to bomb their whole village? Just kill everyone and let God sort out the details? Because it sounds like that is what your precous weapon systems are designed to do. They are devices used to murder people and you have not the slightest control over who uses them and for what end. You may want to believe that only good people will wield your devices, but that is almost certainly not the case. In fact I'm betting that bad people have killed children with your devices. Just like the school girls in your example but on a much more massive scale.

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    147. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Agent0013 · · Score: 1

      In the heat of the moment the data that shows you it is a civilian airline is ignored and filtered out by your mind to fulfill the threat assessment you feel is the true occurrence. Read the Wikipedia article and you can see it talk about this very subject as a possible cause for the mistake. There was lots of evidence that it was not a fighter jet. But that gets overlooked when you believe it is time to act fast and shoot the weapons. Later you have time to look at the situation and see you were wrong, but shooting first and questioning later is probably the wrong way to go about it.

      --

      -- ssoorrrryy,, dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh oonn.. -Quote found on actual fortune cookie.
    148. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 1

      It's been, what, 50 years now and Kissinger has never as much been indicted for war crimes?

      "Political satire became obsolete when Henry Kissinger was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize." - Tom Lehrer.

      Political satire has been beaten, bloodied, bludgeoned into unconsciousness, and dumped unceremoniously in an unmarked grave by the antics of almost every US administration since Nixon. The amount of ammunition provided by them for satirists is stupendous; the failure of anyone notable to use it satirically is shameful.

      --
      Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    149. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by 0111+1110 · · Score: 1

      But they will gladly have them used to kill one intent on murdering a million than let a million die to avoid the blood of the one on their own hands.

      And if they are instead used to murder a million people? What do you do then. Take the weapons back? I don't think there is anything wrong with making weapons that are designed to kill people, but knowingly selling them to a government which you know will use them to do bad things is another story. I would never sell any sort of weapon to the US government. Never. I don't trust them to do good things. I expect them instead to do evil things with them.

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    150. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

      There is nothing in refusing to make things that can be used to kill people that magically makes people elsewhere do the same. By and large people who work on defense systems want nothing more than for them never to be used.

      Yeah, pretty much. My job is to make sure that some time in the next 20 years, if someone in the navy presses the button it'll work and the ship will protect the sailors onboard. I'd prefer that it never gets pressed but that's not how earth works.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    151. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember, the constitution does not recognize a right to life, but it does recognize a right to due process.

      Funny, last I looked the constitution started thus (emphasis mine):

      IN CONGRESS, July 4, 1776.

      The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America,

      When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

      We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

      You should probably look at the Constitution more frequently to refresh your recollection insofar as your quote is actually taken from the preamble to the Declaration of Independence, not the Constitution.

      The Constitution starts thus (emphasis mine):

      We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

    152. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Nope, I can't do that: I'm a firm believer that anyone has the right to say anything they want, no matter how stupid it is. Also known as the First Amendment to the US Constitution. In return, I reserve the right to call them stupid.

      That works for me; maybe if they hear it from "one of their own," they'll actually take the suggestion seriously and tone down the rhetoric.

      The problem, of course, is that some people express their opinions so loudly they effectively drown the rest of us out, essentially denying us our right to free expression

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    153. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by 0111+1110 · · Score: 1

      Consensus is that it was a horrible mistake.

      Oops! I just killed 290 innocent people including children. It was just an innocent mistake! Was he imprisoned on charges of manslaughter at least? I'm guessing the answer is no and that the man responsible for a senseless massacre went unpunished.

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    154. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

      America is not the only country with a Navy.

      Just out of curiousity, what's the cutoff age when it's worse to kill someone? 12? 16? 18? 21? You mention children explicitly as though they're more innocent than the... let's say baker sitting next to them. What did that baker do that was worse than what the kids did, and after which birthday cake did he become a statistic rather than a senseless death?

      I do plan on dying a slow and horrible death. That's why I exercise regularly, watch my diet, and drink moderately.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    155. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

      There's gluten free bagels and vegan cream cheese available.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    156. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

      Life's about choices, and if you've made the kind of choices where the navy is firing at you, it's probably not a big loss to humanity if we have to kick you off the planet.

      What about the people who just happen to be nearby the people the Navy is aiming at? Do they deserve to be killed too? How many of the approximately 500,000 people in Iraq who were killed qualify as the bad guys that aren't a big loss to humanity?

      Probably none of them. Dave was a jerk though.

      There was no reason for the US to attack Iraq other than to provide for a distraction in the hunt for bin Laden.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    157. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

      But there I go being pro-terrorist, right?

      Questioning what the government is doing is not pro-terrorist.

      Building bombs and putting them in public places is pro-terrorist.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    158. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Hatta · · Score: 1

      There was no reason for the US to attack Iraq other than to provide for a distraction in the hunt for bin Laden.

      And yet you support the US, not just in words but with your life's work. How do you figure using hundreds of thousands of innocent lives as a distraction makes us any better than the jihadists?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    159. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

      I am aware of every incident that has used the systems I've worked on in my life. So far I'm up several thousand saved lives and not one system has killed anyone. Someone had to shoot a tiger once, but that wasn't 100% my fault and the tiger is still alive.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    160. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by isorox · · Score: 1

      Instead we've got international relations breakdowns, furious Internet rage that might actually result in demonstrations (for what that's worth).

      Those demonstrations last until the next episode of American Idol.

      In countries where the demonstrations resume, you get Syria. Or at best Egypt.

      49% of America will be glad to see the army depose Obama. 49% would have been glad to see the army depose Bush.

    161. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by meta-monkey · · Score: 2, Funny

      I may not like the caffeinated beverage you drink, sir, but I will defend to the death your right to do the Dew.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    162. Re: God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Possible, but I will need more evidence that a single speaker on NPR with no sources or evidence to bolster his claim, especially when the obvious meaning was probably the intended meaning by Congress, regardless of what Lincoln meant.

    163. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Omestes · · Score: 2

      Well it was really only ever truly free for people who were not of African descent.

      Tell that to my ancestors of Irish decent.

      Or many people of Japanese descent during WWII.

      Or to all the non-Blacks to languished in debtors prisons.

      Or the American Indians.

      Or...

      Yes, no nation is perfect, but that isn't an excuse to gloss over our flaws. Many do, I'm not pointing that finger at you. Americans love the tautology "We're number one. We're number one because we are America, and America is number one!" Oddly this includes my dad, who is generally against most of our Governments recent actions, I told him I was thinking of emigrating before starting a family, and he got very disappointed, telling me that America is the best country on earth, but couldn't actually say best at what. Not education. Not health. Not freedom/privacy. Not civil rights. Not freedom of the press. Not peace. Not mean happiness.

      Sorry, I'm being a bit negative. I just looked a a full page of news headlines, and got stuck with the feeling that we really are the bad guys again. I haven't felt that way since Bush II. We're the Skeletor of the international stage (or more likely Boss Hog, from Duke's of Hazard).

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    164. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by anyanka · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In terms of numbers, Stalin's atrocities are off the chart; Bush/Cheney/Obama are peanuts in comparison.

      However, saying that the other guy was 1000x worse shouldn't be valid defense when it comes to war crimes, atrocities, tyranny and oppression(*). And – saying that it was the other guy who did it, I just let him get away with it, shouldn't be a defense either.

      (*) Though, it is interesting to note that several Germans had their sentences commuted during the Nüremberg trials for crimes that had also been committed by the allies.

    165. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      We got it pretty good on the Mexicans, too. The drug war turns their country into a failed narco state where you gotta be careful who you look at if you don't want to be handed your kid's head in a box. But you can come pick our tomatoes. Just don't get uppity about those "wages" and "working conditions" or it's back to machete-land for you.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    166. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      Soldiers don't usually get charged with murder for combat operations, which they clearly thought it could be at the time, so they acted accordingly.

      How they go about deciding whether force is necessary at the time is somewhat separate.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    167. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love you. And from within this love, 2 months ago, I quit my job. I'm soo fucking tired of everyone not thinking about the full effects of what they do for a living, other than grabbing cash. You said it all well. I hope you are able to spread this message to others, outside of slashdot.

    168. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by ph1ll · · Score: 3, Informative

      No, siree, Jim Bob! The captain who gave the order to fire on a civilian aircraft was awarded a medal!

      "The president of the United States takes pleasure in presenting the Legion of Merit to Capt. Will C. Rogers III, U.S. Navy, for service as set forth in the following citation:

      "For exceptionally . . . outstanding service as commanding officer, USS Vincennes from April 1987 to May 1989"

      --
      --- "We've always been at war with Eastasia."
    169. Re: God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Flood the environment with toxins. Provide inadequate medical care to less favored groups. Extract labor and hey death from natural causes. When talking about Stalin or Mao we include famine deaths. Why sholdn't we include lack of healthcare deaths when talking about America?

    170. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Anachragnome · · Score: 1

      " You don't know you're part of the problem because you're working on just a tiny piece of it."

      I would think that anyone smart enough to work on this sort of technology would also be smart enough to realize that when they are asked to work on a project without knowing what it actually is, that they know there is a reason for that secrecy. Continuing onward without questioning that secrecy, or more specifically, the intent of it, is intentional disregard. And, as far as I am concerned, that intentional disregard amounts to culpability.

      It also sounds like a pretty lame excuse to me.

    171. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You say that as if the military contracts that you build for, are all croissants, but they're not. You make weapons to kill. You make these weapons for what you call 'good'. If you were right, then the world would be a different place. Generally when humans make the wrong decision, there's a natural effect that ends with them seeing the reasons that they were wrong. But, as long as there are "leaders" in USA that get to use your fine weapons, for whatever the fuck they want, you are serving a dream of yours, and those leaders as well. I hope things in your dream world are going better than they are in the reality that we all share.

      Also, can you please list for us all, all of the girls that get splattered with acid for going to school, or killed for dancing in the rain? I think you may fine some of that happening, in extreme situations. But here in the good ole USA, there are people that would do worse than that (go check out the fine folks at the Westboro bapist church), but they don't for fear of losing the ability to jerk off to kiddie-porn on the internet (aka freedom).

      I'm not trying to be a dick to you spacifically, but the OP has a very good point. Wars are decided by those that do not fight. Until that changes, people like you are living a false life, to yourself, and to others.

    172. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by jimicus · · Score: 1

      It's incredibly (or intentionally?) botched PR. Why is the NSA still in the spotlight (or at least light) instead of slipping back into the shadows?

      Because the rhetoric is no longer "The government's power must be kept in strict check and if a branch of government is going to far, it must be stopped". It hasn't been that for some time; today the rhetoric is "Think of the child^W terrorists!".

    173. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by PRMan · · Score: 1

      We make China look like amateur hour. Stalin? a blip.

      Now. How can anyone argue that there's no such thing as "brainwashing", or that it only works on stupid or ignorant people?

      They killed millions of people each. They weren't content to put them all in prison.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    174. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by PRMan · · Score: 1

      Stalin compared killing people to mowing the lawn... We're still a far way from that.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    175. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Life's about choices, and if you've made the kind of choices where the navy is firing at you, it's probably not a big loss to humanity if we have to kick you off the planet. Right now, there are people who will throw acid on girls for going to school or kill their sisters for dancing in the rain. These are not people who will sit down at the breakfast table and discuss their problems calmly over a croissant. They're going to kill people for what we consider no reason at all, and the only thing they can understand is force.

      Q: But they were Viet Cong, weren't they?

      A: Yes, they were Viet Cong.

      Q: And it was your job?

      A: It was my job, yes.

      Q: What were the children in the ditch doing?

      A: I don't know.

      Q: Were the babies in their mother's arms?

      A: I guess so.

      Q: And the babies moved to attack?

      A: I expected at any moment they were about to make a counterbalance

      Q: Had they made any move to attack?

      A: No.

      Q: When you left the ditch, were any of the people standing?

      A: Not that I remember.

      Q: Did you see anyone who was not shot?

      A: I can't say. I didn't get down and check them out.

      I am sure you'd have done your part in My Lai as well. Proudly.

    176. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt we really know how many people disappeared in the night, how many were actually incarcerated, how many were sent to Siberia, how many were just killed outright.

      Are you talking about Stalin, or the USA?

    177. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Right, that's the idea. Only in practice, it doesn't work that way.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    178. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's been, what, 50 years now and Kissinger has never as much been indicted for war crimes?

      He got a Nobel Peace price. That puts him on equal footing with Obama, Rabin and Arafat.

    179. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by 1s44c · · Score: 1

      That is a core belief of the US government and to a slightly lesser extent the American people. It's been obvious since, and possibly before, the war of independence.

      http://www.ushistory.org/declaration/document/

      We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

      Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin, John Adams, Roger Sherman, and John Livingston. June 28, 1776

      That quote is an idealistic daydream. 'All men' in that context was only ever taken to cover white US citizens, not blacks, and not citizens of other countries. Were slaves between 1776 and 1865 somehow granted Liberty and the pursuit of happiness? Were Native American Indians?

    180. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You also don't know how many innocent civilians the US murdered in Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, Chile, Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan etc, either directly or via US-placed 'strongmen'.

    181. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      US government, just like any other, is primarily responsible to its citizens who elected it to look after their interests. It is not a matter of whose life is more important. If you don't like it, move to a planet where there are no countries.

      What makes you think that they are unrelated? If you elect a government that causes deaths in other nations the people there are not going to care what side you personally voted for or if you voted at all. Any retaliation will be against the US population as a whole. (And have historically been.)
      When your government kill foreigners they put your life at risk, remember that next time there is a "terrorist act".

    182. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Sique · · Score: 1

      Someone violated the Omertà, and you demand that he comes back to the Family, and have the Godfather decide who has the right to kill him?

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    183. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's unlikely because it's counterproductive. Snowden 'supposedly' delivered all the material he had to the newspapers already. Papers which have been corresponding with the NSA and have already self-censored anything possibly related to their own country's spying ties to the PRISM infrastructure and/or project names that the NSA says "Ok, but seriously, don't tell everybody this"

      There aren't any winners in this game.

    184. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by haruchai · · Score: 1

      Stalin and others were much, much worse. Pol Pot and the Khmer Rouge spring to mind.
      But what disgusts me about America is the private prison industry - not a coincidence, IMO, that their staggering growth goes hand-in-hand with world record incarceration rates

      Read Henri Wedell's reply to a question about profiting off of incarceration

      http://www.vice.com/en_ca/read/whos-getting-rich-off-the-prison-industrial-complex

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    185. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No wrong. It's more likely he will have a bounty put on his head by a private rich American or beat down in some crummy country he will end up in.

    186. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by haruchai · · Score: 1

      Serving your time used to be synonymous with "paying your debt to society". That hasn't been true in some places, for a while.

        Arizona, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Oklahoma, Utah and Washington State are among the 12+ states where you can be jailed for debt - that is simple inability to pay.

      And freed prisoners are handed bills for some of the costs of incarceration as well as the fines they might have incurred which grow with interest while they're locked out.
      You have to make a lot of license plates to pay off a $1000 fine.

      So many end up back in jail shortly after being released because of the debtors laws or because they resorted to crime when the couldn't find work to pay off their fines.

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    187. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by GrahamCox · · Score: 1

      An interesting thing is happening now, and this thread is an example of it. Americans are starting to wake up to the truth about themselves.

      Twenty years ago, when I was at uni in the UK, I intervened in a very heated argument between a Middle Eastern student and an American girl. The girl was being berated simply because she was an American, and the other student, a Muslim, appeared to be holding her personally responsible for the situation in Palestine. I think if I (and others) had not intervened it could have got very ugly indeed. At the time I could not understand why the anti-American sentiment was so powerful in some people. I was, even as an outsider, baffled by that. Much like the American people themselves, until much more recently.

      In the immediate aftermath of 9/11, when I was in the US, the news coverage had a lot of baffled and ignorant pundits running around the various channels bleating about how they could not understand "why they hate us". By then it was becoming clear to some in the west exactly why they hate the US, but the penny still hadn't dropped in the US itself, and its actions in the following years were probably the exact opposite of prudent on that score.

      Now we have a situation where much of the west is openly deeply uneasy with the conduct of the USA, but there is a glimmer of hope: Americans themselves are starting, finally, to get it. If there is a shred of democracy left, this may slowly bring about a reversal of the bullying and arrogant conduct of the country towards the rest of the world. Americans are not encouraged to think very much about their foreign policy, and elections are won and lost on domestic issues. The rest of us watch powerlessly with dismay as yet another disaster unfolds.

      Even as cynical and jaded as I've become in middle age, part of me is still idealistic enough to think that one day, people might actually make an attempt to work together for a better world. What's wrong with that? I believe Snowden's actions, for example, will on balance have a small effect in that direction. Stop with the dirty tricks and ham-fisted bullying already! In the long run, if we can all get along, the world will be a much more pleasant and happy place to be. Thankfully the citizens of the biggest bully on the block (who are not in themselves to blame), seem to be waking up to the reality of the world their leaders have engendered.

      There is plenty to admire about America, but it's far from perfect. If Americans themselves can grasp this simple truth, and stop drinking their own Kool-Aid, the world we be a better place for all of us, Americans especially.

    188. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I even have an idea of what we can write on the cake:

      "NOT AS BAD AS STALIN!"
      "USA! USA! USA!"

      Stalin never got a Nobel Peace prize, like Obama, Kissinger, Arafat or Rabin.

    189. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Karl+Cocknozzle · · Score: 1

      It's unlikely because it's counterproductive. Snowden 'supposedly' delivered all the material he had to the newspapers already. Papers which have been corresponding with the NSA and have already self-censored anything possibly related to their own country's spying ties to the PRISM infrastructure and/or project names that the NSA says "Ok, but seriously, don't tell everybody this"

      There aren't any winners in this game.

      Actually, I'm not sure he has. He has delivered something that somebody may believe to be everything --or maybe has delivered it to several somebodies--but he's played it very savvy until now. It would surprise me if he doesn't have an ace up his sleeve about somebody: Some terrible secret that he can trade for passage to somewhere out of the grasp of extradition. Something he knows will be released if he has an "accident" in the transit area of a Moscow airport or if he's captured and returned to the U.S. Several articles about him have alluded to just such a dead-man-switch, running somewhere in the world.

      I certainly appreciate what he's done: He laid bare the truth beneath a thin veneer of lies about how our government works, and that is information we have the right to know.

      --
      Who did what now?
    190. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Carewolf · · Score: 2

      if I had been born in say 1805 I wouuld have lived in what may have been the freest society that human beings have ever known. It wasn't really until the early 20th century that the US really stopped being free for white people. That's when the US really started to develop a taste for tyranny.

      No, you were colonized by crazy people with really silly and stupid ideas of religion they liked to force on other people which wwas why they were thrown out of Europe.,somewhere in the last the 20th century these crazy people realized they held an effective political majority they could use to force the US away from freedom and towards craziness.

    191. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget, we've also got countries with even *more* rigorous internal surveillance and monitoring programs interested in taking our self-labeled spies and making them a part of their system. (Bolivia: Not only will we record who you called, how long, and the actual conversation; but we'll even intercept your text messages AND send messages on "behalf" of your phone. Privacy is job #27.)

    192. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you don't like it, move to a planet where there are no countries.

      Or try to erase national boundaries on this one.

    193. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by someSnarkyBastard · · Score: 1

      Forget their rights, removing a persons essential human dignity is a far worse fate then death. Keeping you alive as a horrifically broken shell of a human being can go on for years. After all, once you're dead what more can they do to you?

    194. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by 0111+1110 · · Score: 1

      Except that the same group of people wrote both. It shows that they at least claimed to believe those things. Thomas Jefferson wrote the rough draft of the declaration (I believe Ben Franlkin was responsible for the final wording of that frist sentence though) and the other four including Ben Franklin and John Adams did the rest. It represents evidence of the beliefs and intent of at least some of the Founders.

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    195. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      Oh God I am the American dream
      With a spindle up my butt till it makes me scream
      And I'll do anything to get ahead
      I lay awake nights sayin', thank you, Fred!
      Oh god, oh god, I'm so fantastic!
      Thanks to Freddie, I'm a sexual spastic
      Oh God I am the American dream
      And my name is Bobby Brown
      Watch me now, I'm goin' down

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    196. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by someSnarkyBastard · · Score: 1

      Who said power had to be centralized? (and no, I am not a Libertarian, I just believe that the absence of nation-states does not automatically imply central hegemonic control, there can be a middle ground between the two)

    197. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      Iroquois, Apache, etc. What? Don't count? That was in our formative phase - just as Mao and Stalin were doing in theirs.

      Don't get me started on the number of Africans and descendants murdered in transit and institutionalized work camps for multiple successive generations. We'll soon make Bergen Belsen look marginal by means of comparison.

      Remember, the history taught in our schools is as biased, near-sighted and self-serving as the history taught in theirs.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    198. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by melikamp · · Score: 1

      Worse or better, that is subjective and highly personal. When we talk about millions of people, though, the magnitude of evil and oppression is about the same.

    199. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying this was the reason, I don't know: Restarting the fighting war between the sunis and shia would be a completely Machiavellian thing to do. Also not something they would talk about. See also Syria.

      Not that they need our help to start fighting. A nice big regional low level mud fight could be worked to keep pumps turned up to 11 until the reserves are completely tapped. Then the middle east can return to being an ignored backwater.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    200. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by VanessaE · · Score: 1

      Er, no, you quoted the Declaration of Independence, which is not legally binding (beyond its initial use of course). As much as it really should have, the US Constitution indeed says nothing of "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness".

    201. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by arth1 · · Score: 1

      First of all, the US created the UN and other international institutions against the will of Europeans and most other nations, who, prior to Willsonian idea of collective security, did not understand or attempt any form of international relations not based on balance of power.

      Is that what they teach you in US schools? Yes, Woodrow Wilson was one of the proponents for international cooperation, and his ideas took root after WWI, when the League of Nations was created as a result of the Versailles treaty.
      However, and this is a big however, USA never ratified the treaty, and never was a member of the League of Nations.

      United Nations, which drew on experiences from the League of Nations, was a different story. But that was long after Wilson.

    202. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      I would love to visit another planet.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    203. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Karl+Cocknozzle · · Score: 1

      Just wondering when the US was supposed to be the "land of the free"?

      Even after the era of forcefully removing the previous population from their land coming to an end, and slavery ending, there has still been apartheid

      (including anti-miscegenation laws) and anti-communist drives until rather recently.

      Despite the multitude of current problems, it may well be that the US is the most free it has ever been.

      Yes, but we didn't care about those people. The government has started spying on me now.

      There's a quote about that, somewhere. First they came for...

      This times a thousand. My new favorite AC. Thanks.

      --
      Who did what now?
    204. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by dinfinity · · Score: 1

      You do realize that the UN was created due to what is probably the single most unifying cause for international cooperation? You know, an utterly nationalistic and imperialistic war-mongering country? So, thanks for strengthening my point.
      It was also, obviously, not my intention to single out the citizens of the US. Hence the inclusion of EU citizens. A lot of them have also started hating the IMF.

      Concerning your second point: (globalized) profit-seeking and cooperation are not the same. You should look into the Prisoner's dilemma and the Tragedy of the commons to understand why.

      Continuing: governments are exactly the place to look for cooperation that benefits the interest of its citizens in the long run. Which is what cooperation should lead to. If it doesn't, it is clearly irrational to 'cooperate'.
      I will agree with you that selling attractiveness has become easier than selling quality nowadays. It seems that our increased understanding of the human psyche and a free market have evolved very effective ways of exploiting that human psyche.

    205. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not the only thing keeping him alive. Assange has already insinuated that Snowden is sitting on a dead mans switch. If anything happens to him, everything he's sitting on will come out. Snowden is a smart cookie. The US government is furious, but it can only really resort to political posturing. They have some idea of what he's got, and they don't want the American populace catching wind of it. The danger from other countries anger at the leaks pales compared to the wrath of the populace if all of the details come out.

    206. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by dbIII · · Score: 1

      It's not so simple as trusting the group the weapons are made of. One reason a pile of Lebanese were angry with the USA was the "made in the USA" stencils on the bomb fragments that came through those walls. Those bombs were donated to Israel after the first gulf war so the US, let alone the manufacturer, had little or nothing to do with how they are used.
      A more convoluted situation came to light in 2000 when a top secret US targeting system used in tanks started showing up in Iranian tanks. It turns out that some were donated to Israel, stolen by some criminals there, sold to China and then on-sold to Iran. My examples are due more to Israel's press being good enough to report these things than anything else about the country - the US donates stuff to a variety of places but I'm not likely to hear much from Algeria, they kill their top reporters.

      So there you go, even if someone were to trust their government with such things that's not enough, since there may be an entire chain. Pandora's box is a good way of looking at it, once stuff has escaped it can turn up anywhere and you can't put it back in the box.

    207. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by dbIII · · Score: 1
      There's a third approach. Don't send politically well connected highly strung idiots on what is supposed to be a pleasure cruise to show the flag but has the potential to turn into a game for grown ups. See also the incident with old Tsar-era Russian mines deployed by Iran and the naval vessel hiding in the wake of an oil tanker to avoid them to show how much of an utter fuckup that operation began as.

      Or you can provide them with the best sensors and information systems

      They had plenty - it was a personality issue leading to human error. There are good reasons why they never let him go to sea again.

    208. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by dbIII · · Score: 1

      There's also the retaliation on a Pan Am flight. What's worse that killing a planeload of civilians is doing it to a country that will turn around and do it to a planeload of yours.

    209. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by jahudabudy · · Score: 1

      That's true, and I didn't mean to imply that the Declaration of Independence didn't have admiral ideals embedded in it. However, one is a legally binding document for the USA and the other is not. That is quite a large difference.

      --
      ...sometimes, in order to hurt someone very badly, you have to tell that person terrible lies. - PA
    210. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Wait, whoa, hold on there for a minute. Did you just say that incarcerated people in the USA do not get to vote?

      Is that really the case?

      Holy shitballs on a crap cracker, cannot you see the MASSIVE potential for abuse there? If you live in that... what I can only call a dictatorship, then you must do something about it.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    211. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Optic7 · · Score: 1

      There will be. Tomorrow (4th of July): http://www.restorethefourth.net/
      Join a demonstration near you if you care about this stuff.

    212. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Jade_Wayfarer · · Score: 1

      One possible (but quite improbable) answer to that is that someone is testing the overall complacency of the people. Why bother with PR, Senate hearings, even wristslapping when you can simply remove whistleblower from equation and show everyone "we're playing by our own rules, get used to it!". Basically, incompetence multiplied by power trip. They know for sure that there will be zero troubles for them ("them" in the large sense), so why bother with all that show?

      I don't think that's the case here, but sometime in the future someone in the government will surely ask "Why do we need a good PR if it works as good as a bad PR or no PR at all?".

      --
      Absence of proof != proof of absence.
    213. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Xest · · Score: 1

      Agreed, America is very different, it does it's disappearing in the night overseas instead.

      In fact, that's exactly why Karzai banned US special forces from operating in one province of Afghanistan just a few months ago, because even in Afghanistan with the shitstorm there it was deemed unacceptable to just kidnap people at night and sometimes kill them on the weakest and often incorrect suspicion they were a Taliban militant.

    214. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Xest · · Score: 1

      Europe's leakers just end up asphyxiated zipped up inside holdall bags in London.

    215. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Xest · · Score: 1

      "Soldiers don't usually get charged with murder for combat operations"

      Yes and therein lies the problem, they should.

      In many European countries at least you're not even supposed to fire until you've confirmed a target is an absolute threat - i.e. if it's fired at you and yes this puts your life at risk but you're a soldier and that's your job.

      America's throwing out the window of the concept of "do not fire until fired upon" has been disastrous for it and the reason it frankly lost the Iraq invasion and has lost in Afghanistan (in both cases, the militants are still there in massive numbers with massive influence).

      When you look at the collateral damage video for example you can see the Apache gunner's camera clearly states the range as over 1km from the targets, so there was literally no justification to pull the trigger under any circumstances - the Apache was out of RPG range, let alone effective RPG range and the people on the ground had not fired at any other US soldiers or shown any intention of doing so. The Apache pilots were given permission to fire regardless and what's the net effect? dead civilians, dead Americans and increased hatred for America and increased recruitment propaganda for the militants. The net effect? The militants get stronger and the Americans get weaker, which is why they've failed to achieve a victory in both Iraq and Afghanistan - because they put themselves above the law, above civilians and that makes them hated, and that makes them a target. The Apache video was one of many incidents of lack of punishment for clear violations of normally accepted engagement rules.

      That is also why the likes of the Boston bombings occured, because as the culprits stated, they were recruited because they were sick of seeing civilians killed by America.

      America desperately needs to start punishing it's soldiers properly when they fuck up, it needs to show occupied countries what justice means, it needs that more than anything else it will continue to be unable to win any war other than those against nation states with no post-victory occupation. That's not a military suited for modern day engagements though.

      There are a number of interesting documentaries out there about places like Afghanistan where many times villagers say they want anything other than the Americans giving them protection because the Americas are too trigger happy, kill civilians and just make things worse and this lack of punishment for it's soldiers for having a lack of RoE discipline is at the absolute core of that. Hell, even some British soldiers have officially put forward concerns about going to war with America in the past because of the disproportionate number of blue on blue incidents caused by the Americans which go without proper punishment (see the incident of A10s strafing British soldiers and journalists in Iraq for example). If even your closest military ally has problems with you on the battlefield then something has to change.

      I wont pretend it's even an entirely new problem though, it's the same reason America lost in Vietnam and went running with it's tail between it's legs from Lebanon and Somalia too - too quick to dehumanise the civilian population and treat them as vermin to which any act can be carried out without accountability leading to the civilian population doing the obvious thing - supporting their enemies instead.

    216. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by CarbonShell · · Score: 1

      I think a comparison with Stalin is faulty. I believe if you should compare, then to ancient Rome as there are a lot more parallels.
      The only real comparison you might find is that both claimed to have societies (i.e. 'communist/socialist' or 'republic'), but were nothing more then dictatorships that fed the people those carrots.

      Using comparisons are always problematic. Both Hitler and Stalin were really bad, but they were not the same in all aspects. So when we say 'like Stalin', we use the blanket statement and the trolls will counter with 'at least we did not kill that many people', as if that was the single the breaking point from achieving EvilBastard Level 11. What does it matter if you killed 1k or 1m innocent people?

      Back to 'Freedom':
      You are free because you have guns? The government has warships and tanks and strategic bombers and drones and do not really care about your puny little gun. What they care about is if that carrot will give you the illusion of freedom or not. Heck they will give you whatever you want as long as you just mind your own damn business.
      And just in case you get bored, here is a little entertainment we drench with nationalism and militarism. We used to call them gladiators, now they are called athletes.

      Absolute freedom does not exist, cannot exist, as for that to be the case, you would have to stand all alone, without anyone to support or watch or defend you. Or what do people think really makes them 'free'? You can vote? Sure, here just happen to be a number of candidates that have passed the business filter. i.e. they need support from businesses to run their campaigns, hence if they business level does not like them, they get no support, i.e. they sold out before you even see them.

      You have free speech? Again a carrot that as long as you are not a threat to the government, they do not care. You could even slaughter each other off, as long as the government sees no threat for them, they will not really care. They will get involved if they see that the problems are getting out of hand. f.i. the equal rights movement of the 60s. Then they fix the carrot and everyone is happy and moves on.

      Don't get me started on the Iraq war being a prime example of how the Government manipulates and distorts and corrupts to funnel money to the IM-Complex on the backs of taxpayers and peoples lives and property. They know exactly how to play us (the people) to get us to follow their war-carrot.

      Disclaimer: I am not an anti-government person. But a corrupt government (and they ALL become that sooner or later) is a corrupt government and should be called out as such.

    217. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by CarbonShell · · Score: 1

      I think the plan is not to stop the revelations, just to make them 'household'.
      So instead of it being just another 'conspiracy thing', let it leak, tell the sheep it is for their own good and how Snowden is such a bad person for leaking such information that could hurt them and their country and the people will by it.

      I.e. that man(Snowden) bad, government good -> government spying is good and does not really hurt, at least not as bad as the GayCommunistNaziPedophileMuslimTerrorists that want to kill us and redecorate our houses.

      Thank you for buying our illegal wiretapping system. Please check your freedom at the door on your way out. (as if you ever had any *snicker*)

    218. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by CarbonShell · · Score: 1

      Yep, one of the reason many in Europe, though they fully support the asylum, would recommend not coming here.
      If the governments do not directly forward his arse to the US, they will be 'preoccupied' while the CIA picks him up and flies him out.
      Heck they won't even do it for their OWN citizens that are kidnapped by the CIA.

      Hey, the Euros are soooo busy chastizing Syria or Iran or China for their human rights records, we just cannot stop something illegal from happing in our own countries for someone we have sworn to protect.

    219. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So consider this. When and where the US Navy deploys is up to politicians. There are *way* too many hawks in the US government right now, but that's not the Navy's fault.

      I believe that in this particular case the problem was the hawk on board. That was the fault of the Navy. Now, I know that most people who want to have a military career and accept the risks involved are more hawkish than the average Joe but it also means that as part of training, it is important to teach people not to just see what they want to see because the solution to that is not technology. This particular captain might have been even more inclined to see a military target since he was retiring soon and had never seen any real action.

    220. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by oreaq · · Score: 1

      Right now, there are people who will throw acid on girls for going to school or kill their sisters for dancing in the rain

      Right now, there are people who will rain hellfire missiles on girls for standing to close to somebody that Obama doesn't like.

    221. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by oreaq · · Score: 1

      Building bombs and putting them in public places is pro-terrorist

      Are you talking about drone strikes?

    222. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      Voting laws vary from state to state. Generally, felons cannot vote.

      In many states, the right is permanently revoked for felons, even after release and end of probation.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    223. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a useless fucking post.

      Your country's dick is not that big anymore: no one takes the place seriously since the Dark Doofus came to power. .

    224. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

      I'm not American. It's not the only country in the world with a Navy.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    225. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

      Yeah, probably.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    226. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stalin wasn't as bad as the Czar, Homeini wasn't as bad as the Shah, and Castro wasn't as bad as Batista.

      Yes, there is a progress, but looking back, history will not be bening to any of them.

    227. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stalin compared killing people to mowing the lawn... We're still a far way from that.

      Exactly! We call it collateral damage and friendly fire. Sematics my friend.

    228. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Trogre · · Score: 1

      *blinks*

      And you're... okay with this?

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    229. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      No.

      It's how the minority vote is suppressed with an obfuscated (ab)use of power.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    230. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Meski · · Score: 1

      If I had points today, I'd mod it insightful just to be ironic.

    231. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      Well it was really only ever truly free for people who were not of African descent. If your ancestors were from Africa (in the recent past) then the US had no freedom at all.

      That is false. Maybe you heard that the US used to be split into states with slavery and states without slavery? It led to a big deal called the Civil War? And slaves could certainly be freed, even in slave states. And there were white slaves as well.

      Six inconvenient truths about the U.S. and slavery

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    232. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wikipedia has stalin killing between 3 - 60 million people... most places put around 45 million... or 20 million more than hitler

      while the government of the us is killing people that have done no harm to the american people.. it is no where near stalin or hitler and diminishes the magnitude of those events...

      the problem is that the constitution stops at the border... the american government can not do what it wants to because of the bill of rights... so it does it to other nations because it can... that should be fixed...

    233. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      Guantanamo is a prisoner of war camp that has held well under 1,000 people in total, ever.

      Killing people in war, even with drones, is permitted. Killing citizens of your nation that have taken up arms against it during war is permitted.

      Here is a representation of Americans being shot down en mass lawfully by the US federal government without arrest, charges, trial, or conviction. American citizens allied with or fighting with Al Qaida are in the same position as the people in that representation. It is a serious thing to take up arms against your country, and the consequences may be fatal.

      It looks like a couple hundred people world-wide were subjected to rendition. It appears none were from within the US. The stated policy was that the US asked the nation receiving the prisoner that torture should not be used. For some of those nations it would have been a hard habit to break.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    234. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      At the rate the United States Government is going, I expect people that speak out to start disappearing...

      For ordinary political speech? Rubbish. Nonsense. There is no indication that anything like that is happening, or will happen.

      If you have some evidence, I would love to see it.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    235. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      you eliminate the threat of a progressive force in the electorate, which appeared on the threshold of revolution, 35 years ago.

      You think the United States was on the edge of a race based revolution 1978?

      Absolute rubbish. Is the only source of information you have Canadian loony left socialist publications?

      You should really consider reading from a wider range of material.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    236. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      The medal is obviously for his service as commander of the ship for the two year period, not for shooting down the plane.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    237. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      Team America to police the World but who will police America?

      Your key insight on the world comes from a puppet show?

      There are about 200 sovereign nations on the planet, the US is one of them.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    238. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      Non-Americans complain bitterly when they think they are being subjected to American law, and also when they don't have its protection.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    239. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      I don't believe statements of fact should be taken as statements of endorsement.

      I was pretty pissed recently when my state (recently) ammended its constitution for the first time in several decades to remove voting rights from felons.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    240. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      1968.

      It didn't have to be actually possible.

      Just enough to threaten the seats of power, and scare their tits off. The entire campus at UC Irvine was designed and built for rapid deployment of troops, to any point, in the wake of that era.

      Were you even alive then?

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    241. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by RevDisk · · Score: 1

      You started off with sense. Then went down the crazy lane. Let's start with the People's Republic of China. Its creation directly and indirectly killed maybe 10 million. But still, it wasn't technically China until they had defeated the nationalists. - Mao's original counterrevolutionary campaign. At least 712,000 people were executed, 1,290,000 were imprisoned in labor camps and 1,200,000 were arrest, harassment, etc. - Great Leap Forward, up to 45 million killed. Maybe up to 2.5 executed or tortured to death. - Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution, about a million, give or take several hundred thousand. Stalin? Red Revolution was in the hundreds of thousands. Decossackization was about 300,000. Yezhovshchina had 1,710,000 people were arrested and 724,000 people executed, with 100,000 priests, monks and nuns specifically targeted for execution. NKVD did counterrevolutionary cleansing in the 1930's with 350,000 were arrested and 247,157 were executed. Mongolian Terror was only 20,000-30,000 but largely focused on Buddhist priests. Holodomor killed maybe 4 million via systematic starvation. Mass deportations often had very high death rates, the Crimean Tatars had roughly a third death rate. And the Red Army generally acted like savages. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_war_crimes Not saying America is a picnic, but you sir are WAY off base. Sure, our incarceration rate is through the roof. But we're not starving our prisoners in Alaska, launching numerous massive rape and loot campaigns or forcing entire states to resort to cannibalism from enforced starvation. We wiped out a very large percent of the Native Americans, but mostly through disease. The worst massecre was Trail of Tears, which killed 60,000 of the 130,000 Cherokee, intermarried and accompanying European-Americans, and African-American free blacks and slaves owned by the Cherokee (yes, Native Americans owned slaves). It was not exactly a one way war. Settlers were massacred by Native Americans as well as Native Americans by settlers.

    242. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by InsectOverlord · · Score: 1
    243. Re: God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Extract labor and hey death from natural causes

      What the fuck is "hey death"? And how does one extract it from natural causes?

    244. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by djlowe · · Score: 1

      Stalin? a blip.

      That's probably because Stalin preferred to kill people instead of incarcerating them. It's estimated that between 3 million and 60 million people died during Stalin's regime: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Stalin.

      I don't have any hard facts concerning China, and so can't rebut your assertion, except to note that you don't offer any numbers of your own for comparison purposes.

      And, hey, let's not count the dead in any case, right? After all, they're dead, so who cares?

      Now. How can anyone argue that there's no such thing as "brainwashing", or that it only works on stupid or ignorant people?

      Well, there's brainwashing, there's stupidity, ignorance and then there's just outright dishonesty, which is what you appear to be engaged in with your hyperbole. Sad that you got modded up, though I certainly understand it. That 3-digit UID pretty much makes all the youngins here swoon, I imagine.

      Regards,

      dj

    245. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by hellop2 · · Score: 1

      damn... that's fucked up

      --
      How many more years will slashdot have an off-by-one error on your Score in your profile?
  2. Reasonable punishment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    A harsh, but reasonable punishment would be to re-route Airforce One to Austria every time Obama wants to visit some country in Europe.

    1. Re:Reasonable punishment by anagama · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's time to go beyond petty shit like that.

      Patriotic Americans should descend on DC with pitchforks, tar and feathers, and enhanced voting techniques.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    2. Re:Reasonable punishment by DougOtto · · Score: 3, Funny

      Why not try a holiday in Sweden this year?

      See the lovely lakes, the wonderful telephone system, and many interesting furry animals, including the majestic moose.

      --
      Solving Unix problems since 1989...
    3. Re:Reasonable punishment by i+kan+reed · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Oh, I see, you want to go to Guantanamo for vacation too? I hear they offer free unlimited stays. And some kind of surf boarding class called "water boarding". Should be fun.

    4. Re:Reasonable punishment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, I see, you want to go to Guantanamo for vacation too? I hear they offer free unlimited stays. And some kind of surf boarding class called "water boarding". Should be fun.

      The fact that this is your reaction to someone advocating protesting against government action shows that the US is no longer a free country.

    5. Re:Reasonable punishment by arth1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      True. He might be hiding people like Luis Posada Carriles, which is wanted by multiple countries for terrorism, or Victor Bout, a convicted russian arms trafficker.

      The double standards, where USA wants special treatment because it is USA, and refuses reciprocity, is becoming quite tiresome. How can anyone take us seriously?

    6. Re:Reasonable punishment by i+kan+reed · · Score: 2

      Christ, sarcasm dude. I... what? How do you honestly think that anyone is in favor of arresting dissenters?

    7. Re:Reasonable punishment by morcego · · Score: 4, Funny

      including the majestic moose.

      A møøse bit my sister once....

      --
      morcego
    8. Re:Reasonable punishment by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 2

      you don't think the guard, army (etc) won't shoot on fellow american citizens?

      think again.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    9. Re:Reasonable punishment by CanHasDIY · · Score: 2

      Oh, I see, you want to go to Guantanamo for vacation too? I hear they offer free unlimited stays. And some kind of surf boarding class called "water boarding". Should be fun.

      Reminds me of the wisest thing I ever heard a hippie say:

      "Hey, man, they can't, like, arrest us all, right?"

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    10. Re:Reasonable punishment by Stargoat · · Score: 5, Funny

      We apologise for the fault in the comments. Those responsible have been sent to Gitmo.

      --
      Hoist Number One and Number Six.
    11. Re:Reasonable punishment by Somebody+Is+Using+My · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Sadly, in America there does seem to be a growing number of people who have no issue with arresting protesters, dissenters and other people who speak against the status quo. You only have to look at major recent protests over the past ten years (OWS, G8, anti-Iraq War, etc) to see how often people are detained under the most frivolous of charges. Dare to step outside the designated "free speech zones" they outline for you, be they literal or figurative and thereby attract the attention of the Powers That Be and you are ever more likely to rue your actions. I had a colleague who went to one OWS protest, was arrested but never charged and /still/ he had to go to court three times. He wasn't imprisoned but just the inconvenience of having all these court dates has made him reconsider participating in future protests.

      The grandparent poster wasn't suggesting that /you/ believe in arresting dissenters, or even that most Americans do. But increasingly there is an awareness that if you /do/ go to one of these protests, you are likely to face detainment despite the fact you are doing nothing more than expressing your right to free speech and assembly. Are they arresting everybody? Of course not, but it is far more likely to happen than it was even fifteen years ago. It is a legitimate fear.

      And America is less free because of it.

    12. Re:Reasonable punishment by i+kan+reed · · Score: 2

      Seeing as they're doing exactly that at my state capital quite regularly: yeah, they can.

    13. Re:Reasonable punishment by cellocgw · · Score: 3, Insightful

      you don't think the guard, army (etc) won't shoot on fellow american citizens?

      think again.

      They have before, many times, including the 1970 Viet Nam and Equal Rights incidents, and several union/strike - breaking attempts.

      Try as I have over the last 45 years to believe the military and paramilitary (police, etc) has become more enlightened, I see absolutely no evidence of that -- and rather a lot of evidence to the contrary.

      --
      https://app.box.com/WitthoftResume Code: https://github.com/cellocgw
    14. Re:Reasonable punishment by i+kan+reed · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What they don't seem to realize is that if becomes the norm, there won't be any reason to limit one's protest to the ostensibly legal kind.

    15. Re:Reasonable punishment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are currently about 200,000 (+/-3%) troops with guns.

      There are currently about 299,800,000 (+/-3%) non-troops, also possibly armed.

      Go ahead and fight that war. I dare you.

    16. Re:Reasonable punishment by the_B0fh · · Score: 0

      Look. Another mucking foron. Sometimes, I think having drones just to get rid of these idiots might be worth it. But only in my nightmares...

    17. Re:Reasonable punishment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't realize state police were acting on behalf of government agencies to quash those dissenters.

      I must have missed that article or evidence somewhere...

    18. Re:Reasonable punishment by fazey · · Score: 1

      So military is sworn to the uphold the constitution... but what if you are given a direct order which contradicts the constitution. Do you take the court marshal for disobeying a direct order? or kill the civilian?

    19. Re:Reasonable punishment by cellocgw · · Score: 2

      You relieve your officer of his command because he has violated his sworn oath.
      At least that's the way the Pentagon claims it's supposed to work.

      --
      https://app.box.com/WitthoftResume Code: https://github.com/cellocgw
    20. Re:Reasonable punishment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yeah, drones leveling city blocks with missiles is totally going to sustain public complacency.

    21. Re:Reasonable punishment by isorox · · Score: 1

      Why not try a holiday in Sweden this year?

      See the lovely lakes, the wonderful telephone system, and many interesting furry animals, including the majestic moose.

      Was it driving?

    22. Re:Reasonable punishment by PRMan · · Score: 1

      Isn't it a little dangerous to visit the ladies in Sweden lately? A "Mr. Assange" warned me...

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    23. Re:Reasonable punishment by PRMan · · Score: 1

      Oh, you said, "lakes"... :)

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    24. Re:Reasonable punishment by someSnarkyBastard · · Score: 1

      Then said commanding officer can order for you executed on the spot for treason and/or mutiny against a superior. He's in charge; you're breaking rank, who do you think the rest of your squad is gonna side with? Remember to factor in events like Bradley Manning, examples have been made, they know what happens when you rock the boat...

    25. Re:Reasonable punishment by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      not so fast! if your canoe breaks on a lake in sweden, you'll get accused of lake rape

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    26. Re:Reasonable punishment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, I see, you want to go to Guantanamo for vacation too? I hear they offer free unlimited stays. And some kind of surf boarding class called "water boarding". Should be fun.

      Aggressive armchair apathy much? Fight'n for the right to do noth' ain't fighting for the other side. Join us in the nationalist pool - (the water's kind of yellow and smells like piss though).

    27. Re:Reasonable punishment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is a legitimate fear.

      You really don't get it do you? Stockholm much?

    28. Re:Reasonable punishment by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      Sadly, in America there does seem to be a growing number of people who have no issue with arresting protesters, dissenters and other people who speak against the status quo.

      It isn't the speech that gets them into trouble, it is the rioting, destruction of property, trespassing, vandalism, random acts of violence, and other nonsense.

      Who are the people arrested for writing opinion pieces for the newspapers? Who are the people arrested for writing an ordinary protest letter to their congressman? Who was imprisoned for writing anti-Bush books? Anti-Obama books?

      Americans remain free to protest, not free to riot.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    29. Re:Reasonable punishment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There have been a lot of arrests made in recent protests where there was no reasonable excuse for detaining the protesters. Sure, the police will make some claims as to "rioting, destruction of property, trespassing, vandalism, random acts of violence, and other nonsense" but when these cases are actually challenged, they more often than not fail to pass muster.

      For example (and this is just the first one I found) the city of Chicago had to pay $11 million for wrongful arrests in a 2003 protest. "It was clear from the get-go they did not have a right to arrest people for marching," the plaintiffs' lawyer said of the police. " I'm sure other examples could be found without much difficulty.

      Is everyone who may have been arrested at a protest innocent? Of course not. But are the authorities increasingly abusing the law to make arrests of people who are just expressing their Constitutionally-protected right of free speech and assembly? Definitely. That there are such things as "free speech zones" or "demonstrator permits" are just the tip of the iceberg. Police will take any excuse they can to wade in wearing their combat armor and throw potential disruptors into a cell.

      People are less likely to protest nowadays because they know the system is being rigged against them. Out of fear, their voices are being silenced. How is this not less free?

  3. Complete asshat move by the White House by haruchai · · Score: 5, Informative

    No matter what you think of Snowden, at this point he's just a whistleblower or spy.

    If the US wants to search plane, they can fucking do it themselves - they still have an Air Force, after all.

    --
    Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    1. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by dyingtolive · · Score: 5, Insightful

      He must be something much more dangerous to somebody. I don't understand how everything he revealed can be so trivialized, and yet he be this sought after.

      --
      Support the EFF and Creative Commons. The war is coming, and they're supporting you...
    2. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by Jawnn · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No matter what you think of Snowden, at this point he's just a whistleblower or spy.

      Just a whistle blower? He's God damn American hero, even if most American's can't understand that. Where are the yellow ribbons reading "Support Our Whistle Blowers"?

    3. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He must be something much more dangerous to somebody. I don't understand how everything he revealed can be so trivialized, and yet he be this sought after.

      I completely agree. I think he may have some information about what the government is doing he hasn't yet released which would blow our minds to bits.

    4. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Simple. The hunt for him is a threat against any other would be whistleblower.

    5. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by Dunbal · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yeah "I'm not going to scramble fighter jets for this guy", he'll just get other countries to do that for him... Hey but what is one more tiny human rights violation when you've already done so many.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    6. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I don't understand how everything he revealed can be so trivialized, and yet he be this sought after.

      U.S. citizens care a lot less about what the government does than the government does.

    7. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      He certainly knows much more about classified materials than what he has released. Considering that he didn't accept Russia's terms to stay, it is likely he plans to release more information. If you're being mugged you don't calm down until the threat is dealt with -- you don't relax because they promise they only want your wallet.

    8. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Truth is dangerous and less proftable for the sociopaths.

    9. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by realityimpaired · · Score: 2

      There's laws (in theory at least) in the US to protect whistle blowers, even those who release information the way he did. While we can argue back and forth over whether he'll get a fair trial, he is entitled to his day in court. From what I've read of it, the information gathering being done is against the US constitution, and he should be exonerated.

      So why, then, did he choose to go into exile rather than accept the consequences and justify his actions in court? And what did he think he had to gain by going to Julian Assange? These are the questions people need to be asking about this situation...

      BTW, you don't have to be a spook (or former spook) to guess that the US was spying on everybody they could. You'd have to be pretty naive to think they weren't, given the political climate over the last 12 years.

    10. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by Hatta · · Score: 5, Insightful

      He's a man with principles. There's nothing more dangerous to illegitimate authority. They are sending a message to every individual who cares about liberty and the rule of law: "If you stick your neck out, we will stomp on your face".

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    11. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many yellow ribbons have you put up?

    12. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by Hatta · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So why, then, did he choose to go into exile rather than accept the consequences and justify his actions in court?

      Because he knows there's no chance of a fair trial. Those whose crimes he exposed won't see a courtroom, why should he?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    13. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 5, Insightful

      the highest rule one can follow is to Do The Right Thing. we each should have some idea as to what that is.

      this is higher than any loyalty to a government or country. higher than loyalty to a religion. higher than what your employer wants you to do.

      I include manning and snowden as true heros and patriots. when a country or government goes bad (ours has, in case there was any doubt) then its your DUTY to Do The Right Thing and inform on them.

      the notion of checks and balances is near and dear to my heart. those who keep the people informed of wrongdoings are at the highest level of hero.

      its sad that our modern heros are being treated like criminals. isn't that a laugh, the criminals are punishing the good guys. I'm not sure when things got so backwards, but they clearly are, now.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    14. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by fazey · · Score: 1

      no it's not. It's the CIAs job.

    15. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by morcego · · Score: 4, Insightful

      illegitimate authority

      Ha! You wish it was illegitimate authority. Unfortunately, those are your elected representatives. Totally legitimate.
      Oh, right, that is sad, not funny :(

      --
      morcego
    16. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by jcr · · Score: 1

      he went from hero to traitor.

      You are so full of shit, the whites of your eyes have turned brown. Snowden took great personal risk to let us know about billions of instances of crimes committed by our government. The fourth amendment is not ambiguous.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    17. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by morcego · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There's laws (in theory at least) in the US to protect whistle blowers, even those who release information the way he did. While we can argue back and forth over whether he'll get a fair trial, he is entitled to his day in court. From what I've read of it, the information gathering being done is against the US constitution, and he should be exonerated.

      So why, then, did he choose to go into exile rather than accept the consequences and justify his actions in court? And what did he think he had to gain by going to Julian Assange? These are the questions people need to be asking about this situation...

      I'm sorry, but your arguments sounds a lot like the ones we hear against anonymity, and in favor or letting the government spy on its people.

      The reason he went into exile is simple: he doesn't trust the government. And rightly so.
      Maybe he doesn't want to be a martyr?

      --
      morcego
    18. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by jcr · · Score: 1

      the highest rule one can follow is to Do The Right Thing.

      Hear, hear!

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    19. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by Hatta · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If it's not specifically authorized in the Constitution, it's not legitimate authority. Generalized surveillance is prohibited by the 4th amendment, no matter how many representatives or judges have oversight. Congressional oversight of an unconstitutional law does not make that law legitimate, it makes those congress people traitors to their oath to defend the Constitution. The only way to make this legal is to amend the Constitution.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    20. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by CanHasDIY · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Simple. The hunt for him is a threat against any other would be whistleblower.

      Were that the case, one would think the persecution of Bradley Manning would have sufficed.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    21. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by 0111+1110 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      There's laws (in theory at least) in the US to protect whistle blowers, even those who release information the way he did.

      Citation? Examples?

      So why, then, did he choose to go into exile rather than accept the consequences and justify his actions in court?

      Because, as someone who only just turned 30 he is not prepared for his life to end either through execution (USC 18, section 2381; http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2381) or just life in prison. It is true that no good deed goes unpunished, but I think Snowden would still like his choice of punishments. Like most people he prefers exile over death.

      When he released classified documents he did in fact break US law. He publicly admitted to doing it. Short of a sympathetic jury who believes in jury nullification he has zero chance of being found not guilty of leaking classified documents. So, like everyone else, he has no illusions about living free ever again in the country of his birth.

      It always annoys me when people claim that by not choosing to spend the rest of his life in prison he is not facing the consequences of his actions. The dramatic events we are all watching unfold are the consequences. Exile is simply the only option he has that is preferable to suicide. I highly doubt you or any of the others claiming he is avoiding the consequences of his actions would act any differently. Remember that he and many other people all over the world do not believe he did anything wrong. On the contrary, many believe he is a hero.

      And what did he think he had to gain by going to Julian Assange?

      I'm not sure if you are following the news, but at no point has he been to London. He is still in the Moscow airport. So I'm not sure what you mean by "going" to Assange. He accepted help from one of Assange's associates, which is precisely what you would have done in his situation. Any other questions?

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    22. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by morcego · · Score: 1

      If it's not specifically authorized in the Constitution, it's not legitimate authority.

      No. That is ILLEGAL, not illegitimate. Those are two completely different things.

      --
      morcego
    23. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think Flo Rida already made a song for the whistleblowers. No need to use that crappy Tony Orlando song.

      Now it all makes sense! Tony Orlando and Flo Rida! This continent's dick is huge!

      And the captcha is "dickens". Fitting.

    24. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Not really. US government authority is granted by the Constitution. Outside those bounds there is no authority at all. Therefore any claims of authority are illegitimate.

      What a stupid nitpick.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    25. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by Somebody+Is+Using+My · · Score: 1

      I'm tempted to go to CafePress and create something exactly like that.

    26. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by morcego · · Score: 1

      Not really. US government authority is granted by the Constitution. Outside those bounds there is no authority at all. Therefore any claims of authority are illegitimate.

      What a stupid nitpick.

      You obviously doesn't know what legitimacy means, since you keep making arguments about legality.

      Legality is given by the constitution. The constitution is the base and source of the legal system.
      Legitimacy is given by the people (thus = elected representative) in a democratic republic (like the USA).

      Maybe it is time you all take responsibility by the people you elected. Oh, you didn't vote on him? Damn, democracy is a bitch when people don't agree with you, isn't it?

      --
      morcego
    27. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by Hatta · · Score: 2

      Legitimacy is given by the people

      Right, and you know who ratified the Constitution? The People. If the authority isn't specifically listed in the Constitution, the people have not consented, and the authority is not legitimate.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    28. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by eth1 · · Score: 1

      Jury selection for his trial might be interesting though. There's enough people that think he's a hero that it would be virtually guaranteed some of them would be called. Some of them might actually be inspired to stick their own neck out and say whatever's necessary to get on the jury and vote not guilty.

      That's assuming he's not just shuffled off to Gitmo and never heard from again, of course.

    29. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      he criminals are punishing the good guys

      It must be pointed out, who do these criminals work for? They work on behalf of the elite, bringing about fascism which is the modern version of feudalism. And we're in the final phase of their plan.

    30. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      > There's laws (in theory at least) in the US to protect whistle blowers, even those who release information the way he did

      There are processes for whistleblowers within the government that would have given Snowden protection.

      He didn't use these processes.

    31. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      Legitimacy is given by the people

      Right, and you know who ratified the Constitution? The People. If the authority isn't specifically listed in the Constitution, the people have not consented, and the authority is not legitimate.

      I see an eerie resemblance between this argument and that of morality/ethics with Fundamentalist Evangelical Christians....

      s/People/God/g
      s/Consitution/Bible/g
      s/Elect/Inspire/g

      We're beginning to have a schism between fundamentalist constitutionalists and catholic (lower-"c") traditionalists in the US....

    32. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by Karl+Cocknozzle · · Score: 2

      He must be something much more dangerous to somebody. I don't understand how everything he revealed can be so trivialized, and yet he be this sought after.

      I understand it perfectly: The government's every word on this topic is a pack of lies.

      --
      Who did what now?
    33. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by morcego · · Score: 1

      Legitimacy is given by the people

      Right, and you know who ratified the Constitution? The People. If the authority isn't specifically listed in the Constitution, the people have not consented, and the authority is not legitimate.

      No, you have your facts backwards. The people gave the constitution legitimacy. And only the people can give legitimacy. Only the original source of the constituent power can give legitimacy. Not the product of that constituent power. The constitution gives legality.

      If an elected president appoints a congress representative, is that representative legitimate? No. Legitimacy is not inherited.
      If the elected president makes a decision that is within his constitutional powers, it is a legitimate decision. Pay attention here: I'm talking about making the decision, not the decision itself. The ability to make the decision is what defined if it is legitimate. If the decision itself (the case here) is against the constitution, the decision is legitimate and ILLEGAL. (And overall an asshat decision, but that is besides the point).

      Be careful with this chain of causality you are trying to establish there. Because, otherwise, you might end up with something like this:
      People ratified the constitution; constitution establishes the election of president; president was elected; president disbanded the congress and replaced all representatives with appointees. And since it is all in the chain, it is all legitimate. So no, the making of a decision that is within his legitimate powers to make is legitimate. If that decision contradicts the constitution, it is ILLEGAL.

      Remember Nixon? What he did was illegal, not illegitimate.

      --
      morcego
    34. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by clarkkent09 · · Score: 0

      Most people don't support what he has done. Most people understand the difference between whistleblowing about NSA domestic spying activities and sharing classified information about foreign spying operation with foreign powers. He has lost all credibility when he went to China and he made it worse when he went to Putin and tried to get asylum in countries like Cuba, Venezuela, Russia etc, It is depressing how stupid and out of touch with reality people on this site are.

      --
      Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
    35. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      Jury selection for his trial might be interesting though. There's enough people that think he's a hero that it would be virtually guaranteed some of them would be called. Some of them might actually be inspired to stick their own neck out and say whatever's necessary to get on the jury and vote not guilty.

      That's assuming he's not just shuffled off to Gitmo and never heard from again, of course.

      Actually, the truth would be trickier than that... the government would just delay his trial until they were confident that the majority of people who fit the "jury duty" demographic in the area where he'd be tried would consider him a traitor. One thing that politicians have learned over the past few decades is how to take advantage of demographic manipulation. Without an equal opposing force (the defense being allowed to delay/accelerate jury selection until a favorable time), the government really does hold the power in this situation.

      See, when there's a crime against The People, the government usually does a good job of representing The People. However, when there's a crime against The Government (whose outcome could end up implicating people in said government), they make a really bad prosecutor, despite the separation of governing bodies that's supposed to prevent this sort of situation.

    36. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      if us wants to start a war over "espionage".

      they should do it themselves and not make other countries do it for them.
      closing airspace? what the fuck do they fear that Snowden has - really?

      I mean, fuck, we're talking about a country that refuses searches of it's planes when they're transferring prisoners(well, not technically prisoners but detainees for eternity) but demand that random diplomatic planes get searched on a whim? WHAT THE FUCK?

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    37. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, so he publicly told other countries We are doing the same things They do. Now we are the bad guys while They beat us over the heads for doing the same things They do. Snowden obviously has emotional issues and is an egomaniac.

    38. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not in Alexandria, where the trial will take place.
      He's fucked if they get his hands on them, he will be crushed in the gears of the system and the government employees they select will sign off on it.

    39. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      yeah well, obama has been doing a fun hide in the africa all week to hide from it all...

      I had forgotten that he said he wouldn't scramble the jets. because technically this is pretty much exactly that.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    40. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      Do you understand that you don't get to make up definitions of words?

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    41. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by morcego · · Score: 1

      Do you understand that you don't get to make up definitions of words?

      Yup. Which is why I'm questioning his use of the word "legitimacy".
      I welcome anyone who doesn't agree to read books on "Theory of State" and "General Theory of State".

      --
      morcego
    42. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by Sloppy · · Score: 1

      Where are the yellow ribbons reading "Support Our Whistle Blowers"?

      I always thought yellow ribbons were very stupid, but then I read that. You may have just converted me to "ribbonism." I love the idea.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    43. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That is the problem they are facing. It wasn't, and now they have to double down against Snowden. Killing him isn't enough. They can and have done similar before. They are trying to make an example of him, make him suffer publicly for years using harsher tactics than what they are doing with Bradley Manning. Things will get ugly.

    44. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by morcego · · Score: 1

      Legitimacy is given by the people

      Right, and you know who ratified the Constitution? The People. If the authority isn't specifically listed in the Constitution, the people have not consented, and the authority is not legitimate.

      I see an eerie resemblance between this argument and that of morality/ethics with Fundamentalist Evangelical Christians....

      s/People/God/g
      s/Consitution/Bible/g
      s/Elect/Inspire/g

      We're beginning to have a schism between fundamentalist constitutionalists and catholic (lower-"c") traditionalists in the US....

      Thank you. That is exactly the question of legitimacy.
      In pre-modern times, be it monarchy or theocracy, the source of legitimacy was god. Directly. The kind if the appointed representative of god.
      In modern times, we have republics, where the people are the legitimate source of the constituent power (the power that CREATES the constitution). But we also have theocratic and quasi-theocratic states, where there is a power behind that, so the bible is the source of the constituent power.
      And here is the interesting part of a quasi-theocratic state (which some are trying to turn the USA into): the true constituent power has no limits or bounds except international treaties regarding human rights. That it. If the constituent power is bound by the bible or religion, it is not a true source of legitimacy, that moves back in the chain and is now no longer the people, but the bible/god/whatever.

      When that happens, you pretty much destroyed the whole idea of a republic, and turns back into a quasi-theocracy, or a theocracy disguised as if it were a republic. Really, really bad idea.

      --
      morcego
    45. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by dkleinsc · · Score: 2

      So why, then, did he choose to go into exile rather than accept the consequences and justify his actions in court?

      Because he knows that the consequences involve being tortured (by the standards of the UN and Amnesty International) for years before his first day in court? If you're wondering how he knows this, it's because that's what the US did when it got its hands on Bradley Manning.

      And what did he think he had to gain by going to Julian Assange?

      A possible ally? An organization that's dedicated to spreading leaked information to the world, and has an infrastructure for doing so?

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    46. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by jkflying · · Score: 1

      But then he demonstrated that his intent was to harm the nation.

      Really? Can you give an example of exactly how he did this? I'd say that running to a country that has the balls to stand up to the US, unlike Spain and France, demonstrated that he knew exactly what the government's reaction would be.

      --
      Help I am stuck in a signature factory!
    47. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by jkflying · · Score: 2

      So why, then, did he choose to go into exile rather than accept the consequences and justify his actions in court?

      You mean like Bradley Manning did?

      Does that answer your question?

      --
      Help I am stuck in a signature factory!
    48. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by RJFerret · · Score: 1

      He was aware the government had laws in place spying on everyone. He was aware the US Constitution has been rendered moot by the very people who are supposed to maintain it. Why would he choose to subject himself to such a regime? Exile would be less risky. I used to have faith in our government, until we began arbitrarily labeling people "terrorists" and detaining them without trial. Only a fool would subject themselves to such a circumstance willingly. It's simple logic.

      The problem is, where else on the planet can you find a country with as many benefits (all things considered) as here? We have very few rights remaining, but other countries have even fewer, with even fewer pretend protections of them.

    49. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the highest rule one can follow is to Do The Right Thing. we each should have some idea as to what that is.

      this is higher than any loyalty to a government or country. higher than loyalty to a religion. higher than what your employer wants you to do.

      I include manning and snowden as true heros and patriots. when a country or government goes bad (ours has, in case there was any doubt) then its your DUTY to Do The Right Thing and inform on them.

      the notion of checks and balances is near and dear to my heart. those who keep the people informed of wrongdoings are at the highest level of hero.

      its sad that our modern heros are being treated like criminals. isn't that a laugh, the criminals are punishing the good guys. I'm not sure when things got so backwards, but they clearly are, now.

      I'm not sure I'd include Manning in there as "hero". Sure he released some incriminating evidence, but just dumping hundreds of thousands of documents? Whether or not the Frontline piece last night was gov influenced or not, he didn't come off looking in the best of light. He had a lot of personal issues as well that led to his actions.

    50. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by melikamp · · Score: 2

      Their attempts at plugging leaks are as earnest as they are pitiful, IMHO. People like Manning, Drake, and Snowden came forward because they grew up believing in the right to freedom of expression. If the administration keeps reacting this violently, though, then the next stream of leaks will be by anons. And it will be wider, bigger, deeper stream, if only because there's more to leak as the time passes, and the copying friction keeps approaching zero. I'd bet 1:1 the next big leak will be anonymous, thanks in large to Snowden's widely publicized treatment.

      In the age of the Net, the only way to stop leaks is by reducing organization size. Systematic lawbreakers will have to become very small (may be hundreds of people, more likely dozens), just so that they can be kept secret. Which is great for all of us.

    51. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I include manning and snowden as true heros and patriots.

      Please don't group those two together like that.

      Snowden released a limited set of documents to reveal what he believed that the public needed to know. In doing so, he likely broke the law, but many believe he has a valid defense in revealing crimes commited by the US government against its own people.

      Manning indiscriminately released over 600,000 documents, presumably because he was pissed off at the military. He is being tried by a military tribunal because at the time of his alleged crime, he was in the military, doing work in his capacity in the military, with a military clearance.

      I have sympathy for Snowden, but none for Manning.

    52. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah "I'm not going to scramble fighter jets for this guy", he'll just get other countries to do that for him... Hey but what is one more tiny human rights violation when you've already done so many.

      Wait, asserting control over your airspace is a human rights violation now?

    53. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps you should protest to your credit card companies, utility companies, and network communications companies as well.

      They're obviously violating your human rights every day with all that logging of personal info/purchases/usages.

    54. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If only it were so simple. Ask 100 people what "The Right Thing" is and you're going to get 100 different answers. Granted many will contain similar elements, but what one constitutes as the right thing is highly subjective. Someone who believes that the bible is the absolute truth would say the right thing would be to love your neighbor as yourself. A humanist would say that life is all about experiences and you the right thing is to have as much fun as possible. A bhudist would say that it doesn't matter as long as you learn and reach a higher state of enlightenment. Now add to that the fact that most people who think we should "do the right thing" don't even have all of the information required to know what the right thing is. What if making that information available allows terrorists to now be successful and they kill 100s if not 1000s of innocent people? Are those guys still heros? Not in my mind they're not. I'm not advocating the government spying on its citizens, I'm a big fan of checks and balances, but sometimes who the good guys and bad guys are isn't so black and white.

    55. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by dyingtolive · · Score: 1

      Then it sounds like we have a rather distressing problem.

      --
      Support the EFF and Creative Commons. The war is coming, and they're supporting you...
    56. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 1

      He must be something much more dangerous to somebody. I don't understand how everything he revealed can be so trivialized, and yet he be this sought after.

      Since we do not fully know what he took and what he revealed and how much the frenemy states of China and Russia know right now or will eventually learn if they have to brute force decrypt it, it's hard for us in the public to judge what he took and shared. When he complained about the actions of the US government against its own citizens, that was one thing. But when he told Hong Kong and thus China that actions were being taken against them, I promise you that he violated the terms of his employment and in this case US law. None of us currently have the knowledge necessary to judge his actions. It could be that it's no more serious than China and Russia now know for sure we are watching them and how and can block it. Worse may be that he may actually have done something to endanger the life of people in the field or made sure that the really bad guys nobody likes (ie. Al Queda) can now avoid detection.

      In my opinion, the US government has yet to drive the point home to anybody that you may be executed if you commit treason. There has been an absolutely endless parade of people like Robert Hanson who escape the death penalty by successfully holding out the carrot of "I'll tell you all that I did if you don't kill me". The fact that nobody has been executed for treason in my lifetime means that nobody really fears getting caught. Snowden knows that no matter what, he won't die. In fact, I suspect that he may have a 50% chance of living as a free man for the rest of his in some foreign country. So I think some of this is based on the point that the US government needs to drive home the point that people who tell our secrets to other countries are going to answer for this, at least with something like Supermax. But don't worry, tin foil hat brigade. Despite the general paranoid fears, he's not going to be at the wrong end of a gun "eating a lead sandwich" or find a cruise missle knocking at his door in Bolivia (assuming he goes there).

      Snowden is unfortunately very typical of his generation in that everything is so much bigger because it happens to them. This what happens when an entire generation is told that they never make mistakes and they are the greatest kids ever born. When is the last time any of you saw somebody cry at work because they were being trained how to do their job? My best friend is an attorney and he and his wife run a small practice. They hired a mid-20s paralegal. This girl has been exposed in school to the field. He told me that he was showing her how to do some of the work required from her and she started bawling like a baby. She quit that day. This is his generation to a tee. Everything is just bigger because it happens to them. They feel more pain than anyone else does. They are smarter than anyone else ever born. Snowden is the biggest hero in US history. Blah blah blah.

    57. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by Nyder · · Score: 1

      No matter what you think of Snowden, at this point he's just a whistleblower or spy.

      Just a whistle blower? He's God damn American hero, even if most American's can't understand that. Where are the yellow ribbons reading "Support Our Whistle Blowers"?

      I want a Snowden for President t-shirt. Who's going to make them so I can buy one?

      --
      Be seeing you...
    58. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      ..anything but a dictionary, right?

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    59. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      Agreed.

      Also, my .sig is relevant.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    60. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by Budgreen · · Score: 1

      most likely because he saw what happened to the last 3 that used those processes... how many felonies? how much time lost in court and jail? what really came to light from them? nothing... right.. .

      --
      The greatest right given is the right to be wrong...
    61. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or to obstruct practically all judicial consideration over whether or not the program is constitutional by asserting "state secrets" whenever a case has gone to court. Then you'll never be able to officially confirm it is illegal.

      It's a fine thing to say something is "unconstitutional", but if the public can't actually get standing or the evidence necessary to pursue a case "all the way up", then you've pretty much made the constitution unenforceable by the courts. Just stand in the way of judicial consideration forever and you can do what you like in a constitutional democracy, apparently.

      The smart voter will find politicians willing to commit to repeal the laws like the Patriot Act and FISA amendments that enabled this nonsense in the first place. Then state secrets or the constitution won't matter. It will just be illegal again, like it was back when it was "warrantless wiretapping".

    62. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by Karl+Cocknozzle · · Score: 1

      Then it sounds like we have a rather distressing problem.

      Oh, yes, very much so. We're teetering at the verge of totally-fucked... I really got worried when I started seeing private citizens defend the spying on American citizens.

      --
      Who did what now?
    63. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      This needs to be a bumper sticker or something. Maybe with a picture of a whistle next to it.

    64. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jury selection for his trial might be interesting though. There's enough people that think he's a hero that it would be virtually guaranteed some of them would be called. Some of them might actually be inspired to stick their own neck out and say whatever's necessary to get on the jury and vote not guilty.

      That's assuming he's not just shuffled off to Gitmo and never heard from again, of course.

      Not a problem. That would just result in a hung jury, not him being found innocent. That just means they get to try him again, and again, and again, until they get a verdict. I'm sure they'll come up with a unanimous guilty long before a unanimous not-guilty.

    65. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by dyingtolive · · Score: 1

      Since we do not fully know what he took and what he revealed and how much the frenemy states of China and Russia know right now or will eventually learn if they have to brute force decrypt it, it's hard for us in the public to judge what he took and shared. When he complained about the actions of the US government against its own citizens, that was one thing. But when he told Hong Kong and thus China that actions were being taken against them, I promise you that he violated the terms of his employment and in this case US law. None of us currently have the knowledge necessary to judge his actions. It could be that it's no more serious than China and Russia now know for sure we are watching them and how and can block it. Worse may be that he may actually have done something to endanger the life of people in the field or made sure that the really bad guys nobody likes (ie. Al Queda) can now avoid detection.

      That is absolutely a possibility. Of course, we have nothing to confirm any of that happened either, but it's like you said, it's hard to judge for ourselves.

      In my opinion, the US government has yet to drive the point home to anybody that you may be executed if you commit treason. There has been an absolutely endless parade of people like Robert Hanson who escape the death penalty by successfully holding out the carrot of "I'll tell you all that I did if you don't kill me". The fact that nobody has been executed for treason in my lifetime means that nobody really fears getting caught. Snowden knows that no matter what, he won't die. In fact, I suspect that he may have a 50% chance of living as a free man for the rest of his in some foreign country. So I think some of this is based on the point that the US government needs to drive home the point that people who tell our secrets to other countries are going to answer for this, at least with something like Supermax. But don't worry, tin foil hat brigade. Despite the general paranoid fears, he's not going to be at the wrong end of a gun "eating a lead sandwich" or find a cruise missle knocking at his door in Bolivia (assuming he goes there).

      Well, would you actually know if anything DID happen to him? I mean, ultimately, when WAS the last time anyone heard from Hanssen?

      Snowden is unfortunately very typical of his generation in that everything is so much bigger because it happens to them. This what happens when an entire generation is told that they never make mistakes and they are the greatest kids ever born. When is the last time any of you saw somebody cry at work because they were being trained how to do their job? My best friend is an attorney and he and his wife run a small practice. They hired a mid-20s paralegal. This girl has been exposed in school to the field. He told me that he was showing her how to do some of the work required from her and she started bawling like a baby. She quit that day. This is his generation to a tee. Everything is just bigger because it happens to them. They feel more pain than anyone else does. They are smarter than anyone else ever born. Snowden is the biggest hero in US history. Blah blah blah.

      There's a woman at work who has burst into tears, like a baby. She's in her late 30s. Turns out, she has some sort of thyroid imbalance that completely plays hot potato with her emotional state. I feel really sorry for her. Point is, there's a reason for everything. Maybe your anecdote actually WAS coddled too much. Maybe there was something else going on.

      Snowden's 30 years old. I'm 29, so my opinion apparently might not count, but Snowden's not my hero. All my heroes are dead. I made mistakes constantly, and still do. Hell, the first 2/3 of my life was spent being a worldclass fuckup, for the most part. I think you do yourself a vast disservice when you paint such a large subsection of people with such a wide brush. People have been trotting that same line since Socrates. I m

      --
      Support the EFF and Creative Commons. The war is coming, and they're supporting you...
    66. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      I have a choice not to do business with two of those, and the third is heavily regulated by the state public utility commission. (Fairly effectively, too).

      That's a far cry from a government, which is effectively inescapable, other than feet first.

    67. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I highly doubt you or any of the others claiming he is avoiding the consequences of his actions would act any differently.

      Of course they would act differently; they would continue to obey their masters and never leak to begin with. This is exactly what detractors expect everyone in Snowden's situation to do, and will offer no sane alternative between serving Big Brother and exile. They still think the system works, so why not simply go through the approved secret whistle-blowing process, right?

    68. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by morcego · · Score: 1

      ..anything but a dictionary, right?

      You mean I should not using something that gives the definition for the specific context we are using the word in, but instead use something that gives several different possible meanings, for several different possible contexts, that might not even include the specific one ?

      *shocked*

      --
      morcego
    69. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ALL such behavior must be dealt with swiftly and brutally. Any that get away with less than years of solitary without trial will only encourage others.

      God I wish I was joking.

    70. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      Oh sure. Obviously. Because getting his name dragged through the mud, getting exiled from his home country, and having some large fraction of his country call for his head is what every egomaniac wants. Right. I think you have Snowden confused with a Kardashian. Go revolve somewhere else, spinbot. You're boring.

    71. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Definitely. This guy has something like footage of George W sniffing blow while Obama fucks Hillary while bBll watches and shouts orders through a Blow-horn while Eric Holder films the whole ordeal, as Dick Cheney's pacemaker explodes from excitement.

    72. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by XcepticZP · · Score: 1

      Open dictators have learned a long time ago how to deal with those sorts of people. There are many people out there willing to die for the causes they believe in. However, very few are willing to do anything that will cause their loved ones pain, no matter the cause or reward involved. Luckily, the majority of western and/or civilized countries haven't had the need yet to resort to such open cruelty.

    73. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by lightknight · · Score: 1

      Bob, former NSA types have come out and said that using 'the right channels' doesn't work.

      Snowden's choices for asylum are obvious -> they are places where a SEAL team cannot be inserted without a major war erupting. As we've seen previously, the US will override the individual sovereignty of any lesser nation, to extract what it wants.

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    74. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was my thought. If the US had just gone, 'Meh.' I wouldn't have really paid much attention. But this seemingly extreme response has made me pay a lot more attention. It's amazing how many people don't seem to understand the Streisand effect.

    75. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by 0111+1110 · · Score: 1

      What benefits are you referring to? In reality most other countries have about the same rights that we do. On paper we may have a few more in some cases, but overall the experience of living here isn't better. It's just different. Try living abroad for a year and you will see.

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    76. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by 0111+1110 · · Score: 1

      What if making that information available allows terrorists to now be successful and they kill 100s if not 1000s of innocent people? Are those guys still heros?

      Absolutely. Although the premise doesn't really apply here. He hasn't released anything that could help terrorists. Well, unless you consider everyone to be terrorists.

      sometimes who the good guys and bad guys are isn't so black and white.

      Yes. sometimes, but not in this case. This is about as black and white as it gets in the real world.

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    77. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by 0111+1110 · · Score: 1

      Most people don't support what he has done.

      Citation?

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    78. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by isorox · · Score: 1

      If it's not specifically authorized in the Constitution, it's not legitimate authority. Generalized surveillance is prohibited by the 4th amendment, no matter how many representatives or judges have oversight. Congressional oversight of an unconstitutional law does not make that law legitimate, it makes those congress people traitors to their oath to defend the Constitution. The only way to make this legal is to amend the Constitution.

      Your vaunted piece of paper hasn't been relevant for years..Apart from the 3rd amendment, you don't have to give up your spare room to home a squaddie. However the way that Americans fawn over people in uniform makes me think the social pressure would be too much to resist anyway.

    79. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "So why, then, did he choose to go into exile rather than accept the consequences and justify his actions in court? And what did he think he had to gain by going to Julian Assange? These are the questions people need to be asking about this situation..."

      That first one is a GREAT question. But it's one that can be answered by every person involved with court cases related to "warrantless wiretapping" since ~2001 or earlier that has tried to push that question through the courts: the government asserts "state secrets" and/or claims that the plaintiff doesn't have standing (because they couldn't prove they were actually subject to the surveillance), and without standing or evidence the trial gets dismissed. Basically, the court system is blocked to try to resolve this question. It shouldn't be, but that's the practical effect for the last 10 years or more of people trying to get answers. Why should Snowdon think it would be any different if he was put on trial BEFORE the information was already out there? If he does get caught, maybe there's some hope we'll get the answers people have been looking for in the courts for a decade.

    80. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Shall we continue with bad analogies? The answer is yes, in much the same way as putting a bullet in your head violates your human rights. It sort of depends, doesn't it? However the right of free travel across borders is in the declaration of human rights.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    81. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by jimicus · · Score: 1

      If it's not specifically authorized in the Constitution, it's not legitimate authority. Generalized surveillance is prohibited by the 4th amendment, no matter how many representatives or judges have oversight. Congressional oversight of an unconstitutional law does not make that law legitimate, it makes those congress people traitors to their oath to defend the Constitution. The only way to make this legal is to amend the Constitution.

      Most other first world countries have similar legal guarantees. The important point is those guarantees only apply to their own citizens.

      It appears that they've been working around this in a very simple manner: GCHQ (in the UK) spy on US citizens and pass this information back to the US. All of a sudden, it's not the US doing the spying so that's all right.

      The same thing is done in reverse by the NSA.

      If this isn't a fairly transparent cynical ploy to work around legal protection in such a fashion as to guarantee that it would take years to sort out in court, I don't know what is.

    82. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      No, we can rest assured the 3rd amendment is safe. If soldiers were quartered in our homes, Halliburton would get pretty pissed off they weren't getting paid to build more barracks.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    83. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are procedures in place for whistle blowing and all employees of government contractors are informed through the usual standardized posters required to be on display. If you follow those procedures you will qualify for "protected" status that is meant to shield people from abuse from higher ups.

      The catch is that to redress his concerns, a whistle blower has to expend time and resources to sue the government to get the whistle blower protection. With a judiciary composed of secret courts that do their master's bidding, that system isn't workable when those responsible for the transgressions are at the top levels of government. In the case of national security issues, all court documents will be sealed and 25 year gag orders put in place to keep anything from coming to public light within a time frame that would be helpful to the general public.

    84. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So why, then, did he choose to go into exile rather than accept the consequences and justify his actions in court?

      You are aware of what they did to Manning even before getting him into court? And you know even Ellsberg (Pentagon Papers) was never acquitted? The judge just threw the whole case out of court because prosecution and the state and Nixon's plumbers were so mixed up (they broke into Ellsberg's psychiatrist's office in order to find some dirt for the case and wiretapped him, for example) that he considered it impossible to deliver justice in the heap of bullshit the administration considered themselves entitled to.

      Nowadays we have different standards: everything Nixon did in the name of "national security" would have been considered perfectly reasonable and legitimate. And nobody is interested in delivering "justice". Just take a look at how they killed Aaron Swartz. The justice system has turned into a religion. Everybody has original sin, enough to cream him for life, and you better believe in the prosecutor and accept the penalties he offers you, because if he won't nail you for one offense, he'll nail you for another.

      Snowden does not have enough money to buy his way through America's justice system. He is no banker.

    85. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face — forever.

      Fuck my ass, Orwell was a genius...

    86. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by Sique · · Score: 1

      Oh, that's why most countries have asylum laws.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    87. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by Sique · · Score: 1

      Most people support what he was doing. In fact at least 6.8 billion people (e.g. all people outside the U.S.) support him. Only a small but vocal minority (the one caught in the cookie jar) complains.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    88. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hasn't the Patriot Act or supreme court dismissed the constitution yet?

    89. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by SJHiIlman · · Score: 1

      Yeah, yeah, yeah. The government can do no wrong and kids these days are out of control (haven't heard that last one before).

    90. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      You're fooling yourself. We're living in a dictatorship. ..... A self-perpetuating autocracy in which the working classes--

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    91. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by morcego · · Score: 1

      You're fooling yourself. We're living in a dictatorship. ..... A self-perpetuating autocracy in which the working classes--

      Your statement is not far from the truth. Notice that the USA is not a true democracy. There is no direct voting, and the votes of all citizens do not carry the same weight. Although I wouldn't go as far as calling it an autocracy, it is not so different than an aristocracy, since a part of the population has more political power than others. It is odd that a country that gave the world presidentialism, and whose constitution was one of the landmark of the modern state and the democratic state, could have one of the least democratic, democratic election processes...

      But this is a totally different discussion.

      --
      morcego
    92. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Bloody peasants.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    93. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by thoth · · Score: 1

      Technially, the Supreme Court is the body with the authority to interpret laws and render a decision on Constitutionality or not.
      Everyone else is of course free to read, decide for themselves, bloviate online; but that's all meaningless.
      If you ACTUALLY wanted to change things, and follow the Constitution, file suit against the gov't and get it escalated.

    94. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by TheSeatOfMyPants · · Score: 1

      the highest rule one can follow is to Do The Right Thing. we each should have some idea as to what that is.

      this is higher than any loyalty to a government or country. higher than loyalty to a religion. higher than what your employer wants you to do.

      I include manning and snowden as true heros and patriots.

      I agree, particularly regarding Snowden, as he already knew what he would face based on how Manning was openly treated. I don't think I've felt admiring awe for somebody's actions since I was a kid, and even back then, it would've been for a fictional character (or at best the highly fictionalized Robin Hood) as "real people" seemingly didn't put themselves on the line for any principles beyond "look out for number one."

      IMHO between our government turning against us, the crappy economy, etc. most Americans have needed a few real heroes to believe in for a while now... It's sad that (seemingly) most people won't realize that's what they're looking at until-or-unless Hollywood turns it into an action movie in a decade or two.

      --
      Now mostly at Usenet:comp.misc & SoylentNews.org (it's made of people!)
    95. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      You mean Russ Tice, William Binney, Thomas Andrews Drake, Mark Klein and Thomas Tamm?

      Not one of them served a day in jail. That's a far better fate than Snowden is likely to experience.

    96. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I concur, the US media we get in Australia just seems to trivialize the leaks that Snowden made and refers to him as a "kid" or "traitor". The Australian media is reporting the facts of the leaks and the worldwide reaction to them. If you are an American reading this you need to know that it's a worldwide shitstorm.

  4. So what was it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Was it Spain and France? Or Spain, Portugal and France? Or Portugal on behalf of Spain? Seems like the summary should say it was the three. What a mess of a confusing summary.

    1. Re:So what was it? by TWiTfan · · Score: 1

      Doesn't matter. It's ALL *OUR* TURF!!!

      --
      The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
    2. Re:So what was it? by gmuslera · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Don't matter. Seems that all of them bend over gracefully and at once to the one that they know spy on all of them. Maybe the place that matter is Stockolm, they all have the syndrome.

    3. Re:So what was it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      It was Spain, France, Italy, and Portugal. The submitter also neglected to mention that these countries deny the accusations.

    4. Re:So what was it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They can deny it all they like. President Obama says the Spanish, French, Italians, and Portuguese give the best head in the EU! They even clean up for you after you're done.

    5. Re:So what was it? by 0111+1110 · · Score: 3, Informative

      It was Spain, France, Italy, and Portugal. The submitter also neglected to mention that these countries deny the accusations.

      Citation? I'm not sure that Spain and Italy were accused, but I know that at least so far Portugal and France have not denied the accusations. They refuse to comment on the matter. Are you gullible enough to believe that the Bolivian president just made up the whole thing and chose to have his plane diverted to Austria and then searched?

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    6. Re:So what was it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhm? Sure, here's some citations:
      http://www.theatlanticwire.com/global/2013/07/tale-re-routed-bolivian-presidents-plane-falling-apart/66838/
      http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jul/03/edward-snowden-asylum-live#block-51d38d7be4b0300b24e64d84
      http://news.yahoo.com/snowden-case-france-didnt-block-bolivia-plane-101339698.html
      http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/world/france-denies-blocking-bolivian-plane-amid-rumours-nsa-leaker-snowden-was-aboard/article12944918/
      http://www.businessinsider.com/french-officials-deny-blocking-bolivian-plane-that-was-suspected-of-carrying-snowden-2013-7
      http://www.mercurynews.com/breaking-news/ci_23590259/snowden-france-denies-blocking-bolivian-plane
      http://audioboo.fm/boos/1482009-bolivia-air-force-fuerza-aerea-boliviana-fab001-flight-precaution-landing-vienna-austria

      Yes, I believe the Bolivian president just made the whole thing up. Of course, you could just google it instead of insisting you know whats going on because the opaque WL told you so.

    7. Re:So what was it? by 0111+1110 · · Score: 1

      Yes, I believe the Bolivian president just made the whole thing up.

      http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jul/03/edward-snowden-bolivia-plane-vienna

      Officials at Portugal's foreign ministry and National Civil Aviation Authority could not be reached for comment. French government officials reached overnight said they could not confirm whether Morales' plane was denied permission to fly over France.

      The Austrian president, Heinz Fischer, visited Morales at the airport in the early hours of Wednesday and later said that the plane had been cleared to leave. "The flight route is normal, as far as I am informed. Spain's airspace is also open for him. [Morales] will resume his trip shortly," he said.

      When I read the news stories on the subject France had not yet denied the accusation. They are certainly denying it now. Although the wording of the denial seems a bit suspicious. It makes it ambiguous as to whether they did in fact deny the flight flyover permission initially and then allow it later.

      Portugal seems to claim that they denied landing permission but that they did not deny permission to fly through their airspace.

      Here's an interesting link:
      http://www.mercurynews.com/breaking-news/ci_23590259/snowden-france-denies-blocking-bolivian-plane

      Portugal said it had granted permission for the plane to fly through its air space but declined Bolivia's request for a refueling stop in Lisbon due to unspecified technical reasons.

      It seems unlikely that President Morales just decided out of the blue to humiliate himself and his country and spend an extra 14 hours in Vienna in order to, what? Just to make Latin Americans angry? If that is all they wanted they could have invented a much better story that did not also delay and humilate the president.

      I've now also read some reports of responses from Washington. They are unwilling to explicitly deny that they contacted Portugal, France, Spain, or Italy about the Morales flight. That seems odd. That would be an easy thing to deny.

      So, to me, the events are still unclear. A misunderstanding brought about by Portugal's refusal to allow a refueling and heightened by miscommunications with France is possible, but until/unless further evidence is revealed I find Bolivia's story more convincing than the alternative. It would definitely be in France's interest to deny the accusations. Portugal's answer sounds more like the truth. That they didn't deny a flyover. Just a refuelling stop.

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    8. Re:So what was it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was Spain, France, Italy, and Portugal. The submitter also neglected to mention that these countries deny the accusations.

      Citation? I'm not sure that Spain and Italy were accused, but I know that at least so far Portugal and France have not denied the accusations. They refuse to comment on the matter. Are you gullible enough to believe that the Bolivian president just made up the whole thing and chose to have his plane diverted to Austria and then searched?

      It was Spain, France, Italy, and Portugal. The submitter also neglected to mention that these countries deny the accusations.

      Citation? I'm not sure that Spain and Italy were accused, but I know that at least so far Portugal and France have not denied the accusations. They refuse to comment on the matter. Are you gullible enough to believe that the Bolivian president just made up the whole thing and chose to have his plane diverted to Austria and then searched?

      They didn't deny the accusations, in fact the Portuguese government confirmed the accusations but is blaming the Bolivian government for some "technical detail" that "forced the Portuguese government" to revoke temporarily the authorization for flying over its territory.

    9. Re:So what was it? by trawg · · Score: 1

      Citation? I'm not sure that Spain and Italy were accused, but I know that at least so far Portugal and France have not denied the accusations. They refuse to comment on the matter.

      The BBC are reporting that "Bolivia accused France, Italy, Spain and Portugal", and that the French foreign ministry has now issued a statement.

  5. If Snowden was a Chinese gangster or by future+assassin · · Score: 1, Insightful

    had a criminal past we in Canada would let me stay and give him refugee status.

    --
    by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
    1. Re:If Snowden was a Chinese gangster or by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      I think he was in Hong Kong to get his Chinese gangster credentials, but he realized the hard way that in China, pimpin' ain't easy.

    2. Re:If Snowden was a Chinese gangster or by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Snowden was a Chinese gangster or had a criminal past we in Canada would let me stay and give him refugee status.

      So if Snowden was a Chinese gangster, Canada would let you stay?

      Bye future assassin! Bye!

    3. Re:If Snowden was a Chinese gangster or by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Harper Government would hand Snowden over faster than they could spell Ed - Canadian people are still sane - but their current government is by far the worst of any developed nation right now.

  6. Bolivia has a big fraction of the world's lithium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    and I'll bet France and Portugal have business interests associated with Bolivia's lithium deposits. Morales could spank both of them by levying an access fee amounting to a few hundred million Euros. Gotta make it more expensive to be a USA poodle if we want this bad behavior to stop.

  7. Bullies and thugs ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If this was done to Air Force One, there would be outrage and calls for war.

    It's not supposed to be legal to interfere with the travel of diplomats or search them.

    If this was done at the request of the Americans, they've well overestimated their own importance. If this was done by someone trying to keep the Americans happy, they crossed well over the line.

    But America seems to believe the rest of the world should be subservient to their wishes -- and the rest of the world is waking up to a big "Fuck You".

    Keep braying about how you're the defenders of Truth and Freedom, while lying your faces off and becoming an authoritarian state. What Snowden has done is demonstrate that the US only gives a shit about themselves, and will break any law that stands in their way.

    1. Re:Bullies and thugs ... by mcvos · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If this was done to Air Force One, there would be outrage and calls for war.

      Of course. But it wasn't Air Force One, it was merely the plane of the president of some unimportant country that's not the US. So who cares, right? Only the US really matters. Only the people in charge of the US really matter, I mean. If there's one thing abundantly clear now, it's that.

    2. Re:Bullies and thugs ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If this was done to Air Force One, there would be outrage and calls for war.

      Americans talk about hating France, but yu wouldn't get many people supporting an invasion of France. That's just nonsense. In fact, if France was invaded by someone else, most Americans would be furious and we'd be there in a heartbeat.

      The rest of your post is just anti-American garbage. Snowden is from the U.S. So you're including him when you say "America" and "Americans". His supporters within the U.S. are also Americans. But I digress...

      Right now all we have are the accusations of one man who, by the way, has his own agenda. He's riled up sentiment among the Latin American countries against the U.S. I can think of a thousand reasons he might want to do that. Maybe what he is saying is true, but the countries involved deny it. But you've already found America guilty when there is no indication that: 1. it happened. 2. the U.S. was involved.

    3. Re:Bullies and thugs ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The difference is that you can call for war from a business jet carrying the Bolivian president. You can wage war from Air Force One.

    4. Re:Bullies and thugs ... by zlives · · Score: 5, Insightful

      i assume some blame must also reside with the ball-less wonders of Europe?

    5. Re:Bullies and thugs ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'll tell the joke and leave it to the reader to decide it's relevance:

      Q: What do you call 7ft man with a machette?

      A: Sir.

    6. Re:Bullies and thugs ... by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If this was done at the request of the Americans, they've well overestimated their own importance

      I take great offense at that statement. the corrupticians in power run bartertown. the american people have no say in things anymore.

      please do not assume that We The People have any control over our lawless government officials. that boat sailed a long time ago and it isn't coming back any time soon.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    7. Re:Bullies and thugs ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What Snowden has done is demonstrate that the US only gives a shit about themselves, and will break any law that stands in their way.

      Please explain to me how this is a surprise? Maybe I'm just really cynical, but this seemed obvious as long as I can remember.

    8. Re:Bullies and thugs ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      America can either realize her own problems and fix them, or continue to act like arrogant douchebags.

      Ignore this at your own peril, because the rest of the world is getting tired of putting up with the shit your leaders do.

      But you've already found America guilty when there is no indication that: 1. it happened. 2. the U.S. was involved.

      Really? A presidential plane was diverted to search for a person of pressing interest to the US and you are going to claim there was no US involvement? These countries just decided on a whim to violate international law, redirect this plane and demand to search it?

      Are you going to pretend that 'rendition' never happened either?

    9. Re:Bullies and thugs ... by jcr · · Score: 2

      But America seems to believe

      Please be a bit more precise. We're talking about the American government, not the country. Most ordinary Americans would be appalled if they fully understood the extent of their government's crimes.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    10. Re:Bullies and thugs ... by jcr · · Score: 2

      Right now all we have are the accusations of one man who, by the way, has his own agenda.

      Nice try, spinbot, but we don't just have his accusations, we have a vast amount of DATA that he delivered to news organizations.

      Now fuck off and polish that bullshit off your jackboots.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    11. Re:Bullies and thugs ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please be a bit more precise. We're talking about the American government, not the country.

      They do these things in your name. So like it or not, this reflects on you,.

      Most ordinary Americans would be appalled if they fully understood the extent of their government's crimes.

      Most ordinary Americans are either completely unaware of the issue, or would wrap themselves up in the flag and say "if it protects 'Murica from the terrorists, go ahead".

      Everyone else gets dismissed as hippies and loons.

    12. Re:Bullies and thugs ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If this was done at the request of the Americans, they've well overestimated their own importance."

      If it was requested and not done they would have overestimated their own importance. The fact that it was done indicates the opposite.

    13. Re:Bullies and thugs ... by msauve · · Score: 1

      You forgot the Indiana Jones exception.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    14. Re:Bullies and thugs ... by Yahma · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The american people are complicit in the thuggish behavior of their own government in the same way the German populace was complicit with the thuggery of the Nazi government of the 1930's and 40's.

    15. Re:Bullies and thugs ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why insult the guy? He's got a machete!

    16. Re:Bullies and thugs ... by swb · · Score: 1

      This would be impossible to do to Air Force One over European air spaces. Dozens of US fighters are capable of being scrambled from all over Europe to protect Air Force One, and this assumes there isn't a fighter escort all the time.

      Even if for some weird reason AF1 would land, the secret service would never allow the plane to be searched or probably even approached by anything less than an armored company-size force.

    17. Re:Bullies and thugs ... by 0111+1110 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Right now all we have are the accusations of one man who, by the way, has his own agenda.

      President Morales was not the only one on that plane. It is the accusations of everyone on that plane. And his agenda was just to fly home.

      He's riled up sentiment among the Latin American countries against the U.S.

      No. We and our French and Portuguese lapdogs (who cannot seem to get enough of our cum down their throats) have riled up sentiment. And rightfully so. If we are willing to essentially ground the plane of a foreign president for just the slightest of rumors can you imagine what we would do if there were some real evidence that Snowden were on the plane. Would we simply shoot the plane down? Maybe. I've never heard of anything like this before. It sounds like the US government wants Snowden more than they have ever wanted anyone. I shudder to think what the government has done that makes them so afraid of this guy.

      Maybe what he is saying is true, but the countries involved deny it.

      Have you got any evidence for that? They haven't denied it. Even if France and Portugal do deny it no one with any sense is going to believe them because it is by far the most likely sequence of events that could lead to President Morales' plane changing course and landing in Austria.

      I'm beginning to suspect that Snowden is dead no matter what he does. If the US governemnt feels he is so dangerous that they have to ground a president's plane like this over the most insubstantial of rumors then he is well and truly fucked. They will simply assasinate him and try to make it look like an accident or extraordinary rendition him to gitmo and torture and murder him there. It is sad because he truly is a brave hero. Obama's protest that this issue is not worthy of his attention is starting to sound more and more like the opposite of the truth. It is becoming clear that they are terrified of what he might reveal. It's sickening to speculate about, but maybe it is something that makes Abu Ghraib seem tame in comparison.

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    18. Re:Bullies and thugs ... by 0111+1110 · · Score: 1

      Fair enough. I think a lot of us are complicit. Maybe not a majority but a lot of people. All of this is going to (or should) ratchet up anti-Americanism around the world and in this case I have to admit that it is justified. I'm planning to leave the US more or less permanently in the near future and I'm a bit worried that I may have some problems due to all of this. But I don't blame Snowden. He clearly did the right thing, although I think his sense of self-preservation may be a bit weak. The real responsibility lies with those in the US government who made the relevant decisions and to a lesser extent with the US citizens who support their actions and who are now enthusiastically in favor of killing the messenger.

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    19. Re:Bullies and thugs ... by pkphilip · · Score: 1

      I feel sad for my many American friends, many of whom will be completely ashamed of what is happening and who feel helpless that they can't stop this.

    20. Re:Bullies and thugs ... by einar2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sorry, I take offense on this. It is always you the people! There is nobody else you can hand over the responsibility to. This is your government, this is your country. And you profit from its actions. You are in for it.

    21. Re:Bullies and thugs ... by Cederic · · Score: 1

      If you think the USAF could prevent European military forces from shooting down a boeing passenger jet over European air space then you're frankly stupid.

      Maybe - and even then, only maybe - if the US had eight months to plan and a few weeks of prior attacks against infrastructure and established armed units.

    22. Re: Bullies and thugs ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't see you on the street.

    23. Re:Bullies and thugs ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If this was done to Air Force One, there would be outrage and calls for war.

      It's not supposed to be legal to interfere with the travel of diplomats or search them.

      If this was done at the request of the Americans, they've well overestimated their own importance. If this was done by someone trying to keep the Americans happy, they crossed well over the line.

      But America seems to believe the rest of the world should be subservient to their wishes -- and the rest of the world is waking up to a big "Fuck You".

      Keep braying about how you're the defenders of Truth and Freedom, while lying your faces off and becoming an authoritarian state. What Snowden has done is demonstrate that the US only gives a shit about themselves, and will break any law that stands in their way.

      If ...
      If ...
      If ...

    24. Re:Bullies and thugs ... by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 2

      I don't know that he really has any further evidence that's more damning than he's already released. I don't think they're afraid of what else he has. I think the sheer arrogance of the US has just gotten THAT out of control. He scuffed their shoe, therefore he must die. I've seen enough of that behavior in very very little people who don't control nuclear weapons that I don't find it difficult to believe that people who get followed around by a military officer carrying a nuclear "football" will have that same reaction.

      But you're right, if he sticks his head up just a little too far, they'll kill him. Snowden's choice of where to run makes a great deal of sense, really. Black helicopters fly across Pakistan on a regular basis, and with impunity. Black helicopters do NOT fly across Russia, unless they're Russian. Russia controls its airspace. It doesn't just watch it. It backs up its radars with fighters and SAMs and assorted other pieces of unfriendly hardware, and Moscow more than anywhere else. Nobody is going to fly a black helicopter full of Navy Seals into Moscow. Not if they want to avoid being turned into a fireball, at least.

    25. Re:Bullies and thugs ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      we have a vast amount of DATA that he delivered to news organizations.

      what data would that be? you mean his speech? there was data in it? ...

      How about this data, the radio communications requesting to land in Austria due to mechanical failures? http://audioboo.fm/boos/1482009-bolivia-air-force-fuerza-aerea-boliviana-fab001-flight-precaution-landing-vienna-austria

      Or that everyone who has said anything about the matter denied they blocked air-space..
      http://www.theatlanticwire.com/global/2013/07/tale-re-routed-bolivian-presidents-plane-falling-apart/66838/
      http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jul/03/edward-snowden-asylum-live#block-51d38d7be4b0300b24e64d84
      http://news.yahoo.com/snowden-case-france-didnt-block-bolivia-plane-101339698.html
      http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/world/france-denies-blocking-bolivian-plane-amid-rumours-nsa-leaker-snowden-was-aboard/article12944918/
      http://www.businessinsider.com/french-officials-deny-blocking-bolivian-plane-that-was-suspected-of-carrying-snowden-2013-7
      http://www.mercurynews.com/breaking-news/ci_23590259/snowden-france-denies-blocking-bolivian-plane

      Sorry you got duped by a coca farmer look-alike.

    26. Re:Bullies and thugs ... by PRMan · · Score: 1

      Thanks, man. We appreciate your sentiments...

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    27. Re:Bullies and thugs ... by PRMan · · Score: 2

      Most Americans live very cushy, comfortable lives. Until they start to lose their way of life personally, they most likely won't lift a finger.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    28. Re:Bullies and thugs ... by jcr · · Score: 1

      coca farmer look-alike.

      I wouldn't know what coca farmers look like, since I've never been in CIA covert ops.

      Keep trying, spinbot. You're just making yourself and your masters look more stupid by the minute.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    29. Re:Bullies and thugs ... by jcr · · Score: 1

      They do these things in your name.

      Since I do all I can to oppose them, I am not responsible for their claims of acting on my behalf.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    30. Re:Bullies and thugs ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      like, potentially, that the fed. govt was perhaps behind 9/11?

      just speculation of course.

      what i find interesting, is that there has been this attitude - for a number of years - that if you subscribe to these beliefs you are a 'conspiracy theorist'. well, pancake theory has been disproven. we have evidence of thermite in the 'dust'.

      how many conspiracies need to be proven before we stop using that term as derogatory?

    31. Re:Bullies and thugs ... by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 1

      To be honest, the rest of the world was bending over to kiss Obama's ass when he was elected, as if he was their savior as well. I still remember that quite well.

      --
      Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
    32. Re:Bullies and thugs ... by Xarvh · · Score: 1

      You voted them in.
      You tolerate their behavior against your interest.

      Don't get me wrong, things are the same in EU.
      But the responsibility lies with We The People.

    33. Re:Bullies and thugs ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't it your duty as a citizen then to try and correct this problem?

    34. Re:Bullies and thugs ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember... "the gloves came off", after 911. The rules of war no longer apply, human rights or civil liberties no longer apply. WE GOT THE BOMB! I'm an asshole, I'm an asshole, I'm as asshole, yo de oh!

    35. Re:Bullies and thugs ... by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      If you think the USAF could prevent European military forces from shooting down a boeing passenger jet over European air space then you're frankly stupid.

      If you think European military forces either would or should shoot down US Air Force 1, you are well into the territory of political cranks.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
  8. Dear leaders: by pla · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Snowden didn't make you look bad by revealing your little games both at home and abroad. You made us look bad by pulling this shit in the first place.

    Cut it out and give Snowden the hero's welcome home he deserves.

    1. Re:Dear leaders: by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      "Dear Leaders" is actually a great term for these guys, seeing as how it was until recently reserved for rulers of North Korea.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
  9. They still can get out of Europe with some risk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A president of a large enough nuclear equipped country probably could fly him out. If they shot him down, they would effectively be at war.

    If Ecuador really want Assange all they have to do is pull the embassy out of London. There are international agreements that require that they let embassy staff leave the country unharmed. If the British stop them from leaving, arrest everyone at the British embassy in Ecuador in retaliation until they return their people. I'm guessing the Ecuadorian prisons are harsher than the British ones.

    1. Re:They still can get out of Europe with some risk by Trepidity · · Score: 4, Informative

      Afaict Morales was flying in a business jet that didn't have enough fuel to go Russia-Bolivia nonstop, so the original plan was to refuel in Western Europe before continuing on. So that complicates the possibility of just overflying without permission and daring them to shoot him down, because he'd actually have to land and refuel at their airports, not just overfly.

    2. Re:They still can get out of Europe with some risk by amck · · Score: 1

      If Ecuador really want Assange all they have to do is pull the embassy out of London. There are international agreements that require that they let embassy staff leave the country unharmed. If the British stop them from leaving, arrest everyone at the British embassy in Ecuador in retaliation until they return their people. I'm guessing the Ecuadorian prisons are harsher than the British ones.

      This only applies to accredited diplomats, which Assange isn't.

      --
      Anyone who believes exponential growth can go on forever in a finite world is either a madman or an economist
    3. Re:They still can get out of Europe with some risk by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      So put him in the car with the "accredited diplomats."

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    4. Re:They still can get out of Europe with some risk by Issarlk · · Score: 1

      You'd have to somehow get the car in front of the embassy door: inside the building, in a corridor, you'd need a tiny, tiny car that car climb stairs or fit in elevators.

    5. Re:They still can get out of Europe with some risk by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      You'd have to somehow get the car in front of the embassy door: inside the building, in a corridor, you'd need a tiny, tiny car that car climb stairs or fit in elevators.

      Problem solved!

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    6. Re:They still can get out of Europe with some risk by White+Flame · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a job for the Peel P-50!

    7. Re:They still can get out of Europe with some risk by MozeeToby · · Score: 1

      So put him in a diplomatic "pouch" of sufficient size for him to be safe and comfortable until he is on friendly territory.

    8. Re:They still can get out of Europe with some risk by isorox · · Score: 1

      You'd have to somehow get the car in front of the embassy door: inside the building, in a corridor, you'd need a tiny, tiny car that car climb stairs or fit in elevators.

      Something like a Peel P50?

    9. Re:They still can get out of Europe with some risk by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      The fun thing is I remember back during the Cold War people finding refuge in embassies to defect all the time. Yet I do not remember the defectors not being able to be flown back. At best the embassy was closed for an indefinite amount of time afterwards.

    10. Re:They still can get out of Europe with some risk by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      The only solution I can think of now would be to smuggle him on to a scheduled flight as cargo. Keep it really quiet and cross fingers that nobody accidently shoots it down.

  10. Common UE!!! by MZM · · Score: 1

    The UE needs a new par of pants after this, maybe a par with some stars and bars on it

    1. Re:Common UE!!! by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

      There is no UE. I don't understand why UE pretends to exist or matter. It doesn't. This event itslef was the decision of individual countries acting on their own accord. If the UE does anything important at all its just a proxy for Germany and France. Kind of like the US using NATO.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    2. Re:Common UE!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      EU. Not UE.

      And no, the EU is just a way to coordinate cooperation between countries. It obviously has no authority over them.

    3. Re:Common UE!!! by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

      Well, in english its EU, in french UE. I was just keeping the same abbreviation as the parent.

      While the UEEU has no power, the EUUE government pretends that it has power. Which is kind of absurd. Its like when a small town major with a giant ego visits a foreign country on a "trade mission".

      The fact that we might be spying on the EUUE, makes me think our spies really have too much time on their hands.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
  11. What hasn't he revealed? by asmkm22 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What concerns me the most is just how aggressively the entire world seems to be against him, when all he's basically revealed is the existence of a high-level domestic spy program. Yeah, that's horrible and shit, but that alone wouldn't have the US government moving political mounts pressuring other countries not to harbor him.

    What did he potentially have access to that's so damning to the government that it's strong-arming the entire world over the possibility that he could release it?

    1. Re:What hasn't he revealed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What concerns me the most is just how aggressively the entire world seems to be against him

      That's because the entire world knows that when the U.S. unzips its fly, you don't ask why. You just open your mouth and do what you're told.

    2. Re:What hasn't he revealed? by xstonedogx · · Score: 4, Funny

      Isn't it obvious?!

      He has evidence:

      1. The moon landing was faked.
      2. The U.S. is complicit in the alien abduction of its citizens.
      3. The U.S. is reverse engineering alien technology at area 51.
      4. Bigfoot is real and a consultant for the DEA.
      5. JFK was killed by Jimmy Hoffa and Elvis.
      6. The U.S. is run by lizard people of which George W. Bush is one. (Also Morena Baccarin.)
      7. Jimi Hendrix, Buddy Holly, and other supposedly dead musicians are alive, well, and immortal prisoners in an underwater city in the Atlantic for the rich and powerful.
      8. (The truth about eight is too awful to print.)
      9. Tater Tots are PEOPLE.

    3. Re:What hasn't he revealed? by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      bush had his war when 'saddam tried to kill mah daddy!'.

      obama now has his war on the american people (and the world, if you consider the core routers to be part of the world's infrastructure).

      I used to support obama. but not anymore. not after this.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    4. Re:What hasn't he revealed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I could tell you, but I'd have to kill you?

    5. Re:What hasn't he revealed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ya, I just hope he's distributed it to enough people that it'll be out in the open no matter what happens to him. Doesn't seem unthinkable that as we speak the recipients of whatever else he has are being quietly found and made silent.

    6. Re:What hasn't he revealed? by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 4, Insightful

      > What concerns me the most is just how aggressively the entire world seems to be against him

      Nope. The world is not against him. The world is against the possible [economic] retaliation from the US. That's kind of funny: during the cold war, a time people were worrying about possible armed conflicts, Snowden would have been granted asylum from many countries, including USSR. Nowadays, it seems the economic threat has more impact than nukes.

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    7. Re:What hasn't he revealed? by NicBenjamin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      His problem is he's a geek and doesn't understand how social relations work between people, much less countries. For example everyone spies on everyone-else's diplomatic missions, but everyone also pretends that no such thing ever happens. In a lot of ways these spy-missions-between-allies are actually in everyone's best interest because if French spies tell the the French government the UK really is serious about issue #47, the French know that pressing the Brits too hard on Issue #47 is likely to lead to big problems in other areas. But it's considered rude to talk about this stuff openly because the voters don't understand this, and the Brits will have to do something if anyone ever points out to those voters that the French spies got all Britain's documents on Issue #47.

      Snowden and co. just did that to the US. Instead of doing whatever they were actually planning on doing today, the Foreign ministers of multiple countries have to be self-righteous hypocrites for the next three months. They know they are being hypocrites, they do not like it, and they blame Snowden/Wikileaks for forcing their hands. Therefore they are sending a message to Evo Morales. Helping Snowden is going to have repercussions with his relationships with them. I'm not sure whether Morales cares one way or the other about that, but now he knows.

      If Snowden had stayed in Hong Kong, and avoided Assange religiously he'd be a lot better off. Since he's with Wikileaks he's burned his entire stock of moral authority with all people who have legal authority, he's also guaranteed that his information is worthless to those people because Wikileaks always tells everyone everything eventually. But he fled to Russia with Wikileaks help, now the Russians don't know what to do with him, and the Latin American countries that might shield him as a FU to the US are finding out that they'd be telling a lot of other countries FU2.

    8. Re:What hasn't he revealed? by Yahma · · Score: 1

      I used to support obama. but not anymore. not after this.

      Fortunately for him, he no longer needs your support to finish his job.

    9. Re:What hasn't he revealed? by jovius · · Score: 2

      The releases can't be contained. The freedom seeking individuals are the problem. It's impossible to have a total control anybody, so the measures taken can only go to the infinity, unless the facades themselves are deconstructed. That's not going to happen, because so many are dependent on the illusionary constructions.

      What Snowden possesses is what's inside all of us - the desire to be free. It's being chained by semantic structures like nationalism, top-down hierarchy, late primordial version of the democracy and the glorified and commercialized needs and desires.

      The admission that absolute control is impossible is not going to be heard, and to avoid the uneasy feelings snowdens need to be removed from the stage.

    10. Re:What hasn't he revealed? by Hatta · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What did he potentially have access to that's so damning to the government that it's strong-arming the entire world over the possibility that he could release it?

      A conscience.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    11. Re:What hasn't he revealed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need something at the end that rhymes with 'ai'. How about: If the U.S. unzips its fly you don't ask why. You just open your mouth and suck it dry.

    12. Re:What hasn't he revealed? by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1

      bush had his war when 'saddam tried to kill mah daddy!'.

      obama now has his war on the american people (and the world, if you consider the core routers to be part of the world's infrastructure).

      I used to support obama. but not anymore. not after this.

      I bet you are still going to blindly vote for the democratic candidate come next election right? They could kill your own parents and you would still vote from them. Blind partisans like you are getting the government that you deserve. You voted Obama in twice.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    13. Re:What hasn't he revealed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's really too bad that you folks couldn't have figured that out before he ruined our country. I could have told you he was full of crap about a year before he was elected. Anyone continually repeating the same phrases over and over again (hope and change) without articulating how he intends to bring about hope and change clearly has no intention of bringing either one. Then right after he got elected he pushed through a $3T bailout that largely went to unions and political supporters, went around the world bowing to rutheless dictators that have expressed an interested in wiping our allies from the face of the earth, and pushed Obamacare through which in the long run benefits health care conglomerates and ensures mediocre care for all who don't want to face off with the IRS. HE STILL GOT A SECOND TERM!!!! Seriously, W T F???

    14. Re:What hasn't he revealed? by WoOS · · Score: 1

      The question is more: Why did the four alleged countries follow the US request. Let's check:

      • France: Not known for its love of America. Currently leftist government.
      • Italy: Mixed government with leftist leader. Tried to arrest CIA agents.
      • Spain & Portugal: Strong ties to South America from colonial times. At least the current Spain government party should have learned from being wiped out of office over its US support during Bush times.

      Why would such governments close the airspace on US request causing a diplomatic incident? Snowden did a service to them revealing that the US does large scale surveillance of EU citizens (and probably companies).

      Unless, of course, these goervernment weren't as clueless as they claim and used the NSA as a nice, hidden backdoor for domestic surveillance far beyond the laws. And now fear Snowden could prove that, too.

    15. Re:What hasn't he revealed? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      His problem is he's a geek and doesn't understand how social relations work between people, much less countries.

      That's a matter of perspective. Perhaps he rather doesn't understand how social relations fail to work between people. (Reality considered, I think that this is a more accurate statement. :-))

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    16. Re:What hasn't he revealed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      His problem is he's a geek and doesn't understand how social relations work between people, much less countries. For example everyone spies on everyone-else's diplomatic missions, but everyone also pretends that no such thing ever happens. In a lot of ways these spy-missions-between-allies are actually in everyone's best interest because if French spies tell the the French government the UK really is serious about issue #47, the French know that pressing the Brits too hard on Issue #47 is likely to lead to big problems in other areas. But it's considered rude to talk about this stuff openly because the voters don't understand this, and the Brits will have to do something if anyone ever points out to those voters that the French spies got all Britain's documents on Issue #47.

      Snowden and co. just did that to the US. Instead of doing whatever they were actually planning on doing today, the Foreign ministers of multiple countries have to be self-righteous hypocrites for the next three months. They know they are being hypocrites, they do not like it, and they blame Snowden/Wikileaks for forcing their hands. Therefore they are sending a message to Evo Morales. Helping Snowden is going to have repercussions with his relationships with them. I'm not sure whether Morales cares one way or the other about that, but now he knows.

      If Snowden had stayed in Hong Kong, and avoided Assange religiously he'd be a lot better off. Since he's with Wikileaks he's burned his entire stock of moral authority with all people who have legal authority, he's also guaranteed that his information is worthless to those people because Wikileaks always tells everyone everything eventually. But he fled to Russia with Wikileaks help, now the Russians don't know what to do with him, and the Latin American countries that might shield him as a FU to the US are finding out that they'd be telling a lot of other countries FU2.

      The role of sharing information and negotiating is what diplomats are for, not spies. Spies are there to get an advantage over whoever you're spying on without their consent. It's not justified in any way if you're trying to keep good relations with those you are spying on.

      Would the US government accept spying on its embassies ? The answer is a big fucking no.
      You seem an apologist at best.

    17. Re:What hasn't he revealed? by melikamp · · Score: 1

      Sheremetyevo, Russia, is far safer for him than most places on Earth, especially Hong Kong. Putin (or any Russian leader) will NEVER extradite a US whistle-blower charged as a spy, because this is such a face-slap to US, with all their speeches on freedom of expression. US, OTOH, will NEVER even dream of sending marines or drones there, and will be forced to act through diplomatic channels.

    18. Re:What hasn't he revealed? by melikamp · · Score: 1

      For example everyone spies on everyone-else's diplomatic missions, but everyone also pretends that no such thing ever happens.

      Snowden's "crime" wasn't revealing the secrets to the whatever government (you are right, they knew already). It is the American public that was supposed to stay in the dark.

    19. Re:What hasn't he revealed? by NicBenjamin · · Score: 1

      Nobody gives a shit about the American public knowing this one because the American public doesn't give a shit about spying on the French government. What they're pissed about is that various other country's public's know about it now, therefore they demand their governments do something to stop it. Nobody actually has the power to stop everyone from spying on everyone else, so basically these idiots have brought the entire international system to a halt for a few months while everyone pitches a really convincing-looking hissy-fit, and then everything goes back to normal.

      If you don't believe me about how fucked the international reaction to this is just look at the French. The day of the revelation they throw a press conference condemning it (extremely convincing-looking hissy-fit). The next day they stop President Morales from using their territory to get home because he might have Snowden aboard. Not only did nothing actually change, the French actually punished the guy who spilled the beans. The day after that they apologized profusely, re-starting the hissy-fit.

      As for being in Russia, all I have to say is that privacy advocates are so cute. Russia's official paper-laws are great, and Russia does not currently like the US, therefore Russia is a very safe place for somebody who is hated by the US. And yes, on paper that makes sense. Just like on paper South Carolina was a great place to be black in 1930.

      OTOH Russia has a lot of interests in countries that are not the US, no particular interest in not shooting Snowden for the hell of it, and just re-elected Putin mostly because future generations will refer to him as "Vladimir the Terrifying." What do you think will happen if the Saudis threaten to re-start the Caucasian Jihad if Snowden doesn't disappear? Or any of another 40 countries, who are all pretty pissed at Snowden, threatens to do any of 100 other things that Putin wouldn't like? Make no mistake about it, Snowden is not in Russia today because Vladimir Putin's soul yearns to give Snowden hugs and puppies. He's there because he's a useful chip on the board of international politics, and Putin will gladly trade that chip.

      If Snowden wanted safe he should have gone to Venezuala as planned. I suspect the reason he didn't is that the venezualans can't trade anything to Putin that's more valuable then having physical control of Snowden. If he wanted free he should have gone to Iceland instead of Hong Kong in the first place. He definitely should not have said anything about anything involving diplomacy because (as Assange found out) the guy who reveals diplomatic secrets is despised by everyone.

    20. Re:What hasn't he revealed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You conveniently side-step the issue of NSA's domestic spying. In any case, how would you feel if you found out that Canada had bugged every single conversation of all US politicians ever? What if they had used all that information to help Canadian companies out-compete American ones? That level of access puts the Canadians in a position where they can release embarrassing information about any American politician at any time they want. Thus the Canadian government would in effect have a large say in who gets to be elected president. Any negotiation with Canada would be happening at a huge disadvantage to America. Not to mention, you have no way to know who else this information was passed on to. Would your response in the matter then simply be to commend the Canadians on their effective spying? You clearly have a very easy time excusing misbehavior of your own government and of finding fault in anyone who exposes its faults.

    21. Re:What hasn't he revealed? by sjames · · Score: 1

      What's really too bad is that the other choice was even worse.

    22. Re:What hasn't he revealed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't make me laugh. The USA is OWNED by the chinee and japs: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Composition_of_U.S._Long-Term_Treasury_Debt_2005-2010.PNG

      The big bully after the lunch money. USA.

    23. Re:What hasn't he revealed? by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      What did he potentially have access to that's so damning to the government that it's strong-arming the entire world over the possibility that he could release it?

      A conscience.

      His conscience didn't enter into it. He took the NSA job with the intent to steal their secrets. So the real answer is:

      Misguided values, four laptops of top secret data from the NSA, reportedly including lists of US agents and many other highly sensitive items.

      His revelations might very well end up crippling US intelligence gathering.

      How do we hold Snowden responsible if it ends up killings thousands of people, or tens of thousands?

      The Germans didn't know that the Enigma code machine had been broken, and if it didn't cost them the war, it significantly shortened it.

      John Walker gave the Soviets the ability to read US Navy classified communications. That might have very well resulted in the defeat and destruction of the US fleet in a war with the Soviet Union.

      What will Snowden cost the US, Europe, and the world?

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
  12. Grow a pair, Europe by PPH · · Score: 3, Interesting

    On the heels of revelations about US spying on its European Allies, why are you people putting up with this crap?

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:Grow a pair, Europe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      when they have been sucking at the dick of US for long enough... its hard to say no when US tells them to bend over

    2. Re:Grow a pair, Europe by arth1 · · Score: 2

      People don't just put up with it, they revel in it. It's panem et circenses for today's plebs.

      As long as something does not appear to affect an American's ability to buy cheap cheeseburgers and petrol, it's only entertainment.

    3. Re:Grow a pair, Europe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was my first reaction. Did they not read what Snowden revealed? Seriously, wtf is USA providing them for these countries to do this for USA? Does the CIA have some secrets on these world leaders on something? It does not make sense. Yesterday all these leaders were complaining about US surveillance.

    4. Re:Grow a pair, Europe by NicBenjamin · · Score: 2

      Probably because they don't give a shit about their diplomatic missions being spied on by the US. They're our allies. They need to know what we think is important, not just what we say we think is important when the cameras are rolling, therefore they almost certainly spy on us at every opportunity. Which means they can't really blame us for doing the same damn thing to them.

      Look at it this way: if you were Estonia would you rather know the US Ambassador to Estonia's official instructions were "defend Estonian sovereignty from the Russians by any means necessary," because your spies read those instructions, or would you prefer to trust him when he told you that?

      But voters don't understand that because voters think like you, so now instead of spending the next few months negotiating a free trade agreement, or pressuring Netanyahu/Abbas to fucking talk to each-other, Europe's diplomats will be forced to spend them in self-righteous hypocritic outrage.

    5. Re:Grow a pair, Europe by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      Riiiight, because the notion the US would be spying on other countries was big news and a major scandal.

      Do you really think MI6 and GCHQ aren't monitoring the US?

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    6. Re:Grow a pair, Europe by NicBenjamin · · Score: 1

      That was my first reaction. Did they not read what Snowden revealed? Seriously, wtf is USA providing them for these countries to do this for USA?
      Does the CIA have some secrets on these world leaders on something? It does not make sense. Yesterday all these leaders were complaining about US surveillance.

      What Snowden revealed is probably the reason they are pissed at Snowden.

      Every US Ally has to know what the US actually thinks. Not what the US says in it's press releases, or what Dubya/Obama say during the State of the Union, they have to know what we actually think. That means spies. Otherwise they have no way of knowing we aren't about to sign a Molotov-Kerry Treaty divvying up their country with the Russians. Which in turn means they can't actually take any serious actions against us when they discover we're spying on them. After all they do the same damn thing.

      But voters don't understand that, so the French will be lucky if they can get away with a symbolic 15-day-pause in the big free trade negotiations that everyone's been prepping for for literally years, so Snowden/wikileaks/etc. just seriously fucked up the entire foreign policies of all Europe, and they did mostly so that Assange could bitch about the US on TV some more.

    7. Re:Grow a pair, Europe by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      Procedures for requesting such plane stops were put into place on the assumption that America(or other countries) wouldn't abuse them.

      So, there was a way to ask the plane to be searched for "terorrists"(or whatever) - and getting such request through didn't actually have any delays on it like asking from political masters of each country if it should be done, partly because it was not supposed to be abused and only be used for "serious stuff".

      Now what USA has done is put such delays on the action in future, because they cried wolf.. well, not even wolf, because they cried shoplifter. It is interesting because had USA done nothing over Snowden, nobody would give a fuck, yet now it's smacking on multiple levels right on USA's face - right when biggest trade talks ever are about to go underway. Maybe it's all an EU trap to fuck with USA, to get USA to fuck their image and posture up.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    8. Re:Grow a pair, Europe by 0111+1110 · · Score: 1

      I think voters would prefer their government to behave in a way that they can be proud of, not ashamed of. That means not spying on your friends. Only on your enemies. In fact if you are spying on someone it is a good bet that they are your enemy whether you realize it or not. It is beginning to look as though the US is everyone's enemy. I'm beginning to think that the US is a bigger threat to world peace than North Korea. Not to say that the UK gets a free pass. It sounds like they are complicit and an important part of this conspiracy to make the entire world into a surveillance state.

      As far as the purpose of spying, it is obviously to have the ability to manipulate the internal affairs of a foreign government. If you don't like the opinions of an important government minister. No problem. He will soon be in a fatal car accident. That sort of thing. Intelligence is useless if you are never willing to make use of it.

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    9. Re:Grow a pair, Europe by 0111+1110 · · Score: 2

      The news is not that we were caught spying on our enemies, but that we were caught spying on countries we like to claim are our friends. Friends don't spy on friends. Hence the problem. And then there's the whole part about the US and UK treating 1984 as if it were an instruction manual. People of the world are not too happy about that either.

      If it's not news that there's no reason to be grounding planes to try to catch the guy who released the non-news that no one cares about. If it's not news then it is pretty hard to claim that Snowden has caused any harm to US interests.

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    10. Re:Grow a pair, Europe by WoOS · · Score: 1

      Except we are not talking about spying on embassies here. We talk about large scale surveillance of internet activity of the populace by NSA and GCHQ listening to major internet hubs.
      Now the U.S. citizens might not care about that. After all where is the uproar about the NSA's surveillance of US citizens? But the EU and its individual countries have laws and constitutional provisions against that which have been upheld again and again by our supreme courts.

    11. Re:Grow a pair, Europe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because we are militarily subpar.

    12. Re:Grow a pair, Europe by Hentes · · Score: 1

      Because the US is the master of divide and conquer diplomacy. I wonder what the eurosceptics have to say about this, the individual European nations don't look very free and independent now sucking on America's cock.

    13. Re:Grow a pair, Europe by NicBenjamin · · Score: 1

      I'm having trouble figuring out how spying on an Embassy, where zero government ministers work, would allow you to find out which government minister hates your country. If some Cabinet Secretary is arguing for an anti-You-stance he will do in Cabinet meetings, memos to the PM, and private meetings in the capital. The only way you could figure that out from the Embassy would be if Cabinet Secretaries routinely ask for information directly from embassies in your country, and you've got phenomenal psychic powers to deduce that the Secretary of Agriculture's interest in your Automotive engine technology has to do with his belief that the Chinese have superior tanks, and not his desire to figure out where he should be buying tractors. What spying on an embassy lets you find out is whether the Ambassador is deceiving you. If the Embassy in question is smart it won't even give you info on what the government really thinks, because the government is lying to the Ambassador. And that's pretty much it.

      Spying on negotiating missions might get you some of the internal dynamics you're talking about, but those missions are even more limited then Embassy missions. Just because the Secretary of Agriculture opposes letting US Wheat onto the national market without concessions a, b, and c that does not mean he'd buy wheat from China with no concessions. The Canadian PM in 2001, for example, absolutely hated our position on Softwood Lumber tariffs but sent troops to Afghanistan. The opposition was even more pissed at our lumber tariffs (they represented the rural lumberjacks who were hurt by those tariffs) but were so pro-US in terms of foreign policy they actually wanted to help us invade Iraq.

      Skullduggery of the type you mention is quite rare because that kind of thinking is incredibly common. Since the Cold War is over even pro-US pols on some issues will decry the US on others. The times they oppose the US will generally be related to their own country's economic interests. If you shoot an Agriculture Secretary for being thew anti-American guy his replacement will generally be as bad (or worse) because the economic interests stay the same, and if you get caught everything blows up in your face. For example, if Bush hadn't tried that coup in Venezuala Chavcez would have been a lot easier to deal with.

    14. Re:Grow a pair, Europe by NicBenjamin · · Score: 1

      Read the link in the OP. The allegation he was referring to was that the US spies on embassies, not PRISM. PRISM does piss those countries off, it should piss them off, and it will definitely be an issue going forward, but it's not what the OP was talking about.

      Unfortunately for privacy advocates instead of getting to the bottom of PRISM Wikileaks has completely changed the subject. All governments are forced into fake outrage mode (because all governments pretend to think that their embassies aren't constantly spied on), which means the people who actually run those governments are extremely unhappy that Assange and Snowden stopped them from getting actual work done, such as the actual work of fixing PRISM...

      Basically at this point I have a very strong suspicion that Julian Assange is an agent provocateur paid by Obama to render the privacy-rights-movement totally ineffective. I just can't believe anyone would be this inept and still remember to breathe. OTOH, stupid is as stupid does.

    15. Re:Grow a pair, Europe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's cute that you think everyone doesn't spy on everyone else.

    16. Re:Grow a pair, Europe by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      I never understood how wikileaks immediately replaced cryptome in the collective internet mind.

      Aside from a self promoting assclown what did wikileaks have?

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    17. Re:Grow a pair, Europe by Cederic · · Score: 1

      I'd be incredibly pissed off if they weren't.

      It was obvious that the US were spying on European countries, that the US and the UK spied on each others' citizens and swapped the data, that the US engaged in cyber attacks and that the NSA have access to data from Google and Facebook.

      I'm kind of bemused that everyone's acting so outraged about it when they weren't before.

    18. Re:Grow a pair, Europe by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Probably because they have known this is happening at least ever since word of ECHELON came out. After that a lot has happened.

  13. Discovered the Embasy was bugged????? by 3seas · · Score: 2

    ... isn't that supposed to be a given in todays spy vs. spy MAD comic?

    1. Re:Discovered the Embasy was bugged????? by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Bugs were invented for the purpose of spying on embassies, which were from time immemorial used as a good place to headquarter your espionage operations in foreign countries.

      I remember a story from the '80s where a new US embassy in Moscow was so infested with bugs that it had to be abandoned. The very concrete rebar served as antennae for the bugs.

      http://articles.latimes.com/1991-07-29/news/mn-177_1_embassy-building

      So it should be no surprise at all that any embassy is buggier than an ant hill.

      My favorite story was the the bugged version of the Great Seal Seal given to the US Ambassador, which hung in his residence. Dr Theremin got an order Stalin award for that one.

      It's one thing to be bugging private citizens, and another altogether to be bugging embassies.

    2. Re:Discovered the Embasy was bugged????? by 0111+1110 · · Score: 1

      I also remember that story about the Moscow embassy. That was fine. The US and USSR were clearly enemies and it was understood that we would be spying on each other all the time. To me that is not the same as being caught spying on, say, Canada. To me spying on enemies is one thing. Spying on close friends is another one entirely. That is what I find shocking. That we are spying on so many countries that are friendly to us and our interests. I mean forget about morality. What is the point? Are we planning to invade any of these countries in the near future? If nothing else it is an immense waste of resources.

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    3. Re:Discovered the Embasy was bugged????? by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      Bolivia and the US are not exactly bosom buddies.

    4. Re:Discovered the Embasy was bugged????? by sans17 · · Score: 1
  14. Conflicting stances...double standards? by Bearhouse · · Score: 4, Insightful

    From the BBC article...

    Meanwhile, France has urged EU-US trade talks be delayed amid the fallout from secrets leaked by Mr Snowden.

    The talks are due to begin on Monday but claims that the US bugged EU diplomatic offices in the US, and spied on internal computer networks, have upset transatlantic relations.

    French government spokeswoman Najat Vallaud-Berkacem said the talks should be suspended for 15 days to enable mutual trust to be restored.

    Yet at the same time it is claimed that the French potentially violated the diplomatic priviledges of the President of an interntionally-recognised, non "axis-of-evil", democratic nation-state in order to please the USA?

    Looks like genuine 'realpolitik' at its cynical best; we're pissed that you're spying on us, but we'll still help you collect your "bad guy" in case we need you to return the favour in the future. Just like what happened when NZ gave back the Rainbow Warrior killers so fast...

    Bottom line: Why is this spying stuff so persistent and pervasive? Because everybody in power wants it...

    1. Re:Conflicting stances...double standards? by NicBenjamin · · Score: 1

      If you're surprised that the French are hypocrites you don't pay much attention to France's actions. The Rainbow Warrior incident is downright civilized compared to their treatment of Africans. In particular you should research Operation Torquoise, which allowed genocidaires to flee Rwanda and set up bases in what was then Zaire. Much of the current DRCongo's problems are due to France's involvement in that little operation.

      You also don't understand international law very well. No country is required under international law to let anyone enter it's territory. Diplomatic immunity applies to people who have been already allowed to enter, and granted formal accreditation by the hosting state. It allows diplomats to leave the country, but it does not mean they can go anywhere they want in it or over-fly it. Morales is actual Head of State, so he's not accredited by anybody, which means he actually has fewer rights to travel then either his embassy staff or ordinary citizens. Generally that doesn't matter, because generally pissing off a head of state by refusing him transit rights is a lot of trouble for very little gain, but that doesn't mean he's got an inalienable right to cross foreign territory.

      This actually doesn't feel like a favor to me. It's too petty. There's no gain in being one of three countries owed a tiny favor by Obama, but there's plenty of gain in the opinion polls if you're the guy who stood up to Obama after the spying leak from Snowden. It feels like the French/Spanish/Portuguese/etc. know everyone spies on everyone else, and they greatly resent that Snowden has forced them to stop talking to the US for a few months while the situation cools down, so they're letting Morales know they're pissed.

    2. Re:Conflicting stances...double standards? by gl4ss · · Score: 2

      it is unlikely the flight stop request went through the political leaders in France.. thus the announcements later that the airspace is open, once they heard about it. You can request a plane to be grounded on terrorist suspicions etc nowadays. Well, you used to be anyways, until today(because the system got abused).

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    3. Re:Conflicting stances...double standards? by 0111+1110 · · Score: 1

      No country is required under international law to let anyone enter it's territory. Diplomatic immunity applies to people who have been already allowed to enter, and granted formal accreditation by the hosting state. It allows diplomats to leave the country, but it does not mean they can go anywhere they want in it or over-fly it. Morales is actual Head of State, so he's not accredited by anybody, which means he actually has fewer rights to travel then either his embassy staff or ordinary citizens.

      Somehow I'm guessing that this won't be your response when Air Force One has to change course because half the countries in Europe or South America decide at the last minute not to allow the plane in their air space.

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    4. Re:Conflicting stances...double standards? by NicBenjamin · · Score: 1

      For one thing Air Force One won't ever have this problem because it's a 747. It does not need to stop in Portugal to refuel to make it all the way to DC. "Closed air-space" is what the Bolivians say happened, everyone else says they refused Morales permission to land and refuel. Given Morales doesn't have a 747 there isn't much practical difference here, but unless you're claiming UN membership = a right to free jet fuel I think you've conceded the legal argument.

      For another I don't think you understand Americans very well if you think we give a shit whether inconveniencing the President was illegal or not. Sovereignty means you (by definition) have the right to be completely unreasonable. That is the entire point of being sovereign. For something this petty we probably wouldn't bother taking any explicit action against the transgressors, or rather we would take action but it would not be directly related to the closing of airspace. Trade deals would not be made, military sales would be unapproved, the state department has dozens of lists of bad boys the transgressors would subtly move up on. There'd be a snippy press release, but nobody in any official position with the US Government would ever admit any of this had anything to do with airspace.

    5. Re:Conflicting stances...double standards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NZ was forced to hand over the Rainbow Warrior killers because the french were using their political leverage to shut NZ out of every possible european market at time when it relied on that part of the world for a substantial proportion of its foreign export trade. (ie, illegal trade sanctions, but the french have a long history of breaking EU laws and getting away with it)

      It stank, people knew it, the govt knew it and said as much, but it had to be done. Kiwis have very long memories and love to remind the french about this affair and a lot of people still won't do business with them.

      Kiwis were also on the receiving end of vindictive USA trading behaviour when the country declared itself nuclear weapons-free and declined to allow visits of nuclear-armed vessels to their waters. The US intelligence agencies were rather surprised that their actions simply reinforced the prevailing view in NZ that the USA was (and is) a neighbourhood bully.

      Equador and any other small country harbouring whistleblowers will probably find itself on the receiving end of similar treatment. The question will become whether the citizenry will stand up to it, or give up and hand people over.

  15. Whats the threat we are issuing to these people? by Marrow · · Score: 2

    Do what we say or we'll declare bankruptcy and trash the world economy?

  16. spy novel by noh8rz9 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I love all this Snowden stuff... it's like a real life John LeCarre novel! Let me go get the popcorn...

    --
    let's have a conversation! let me know what you think.
    1. Re: spy novel by Mabhatter · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Realistically, show of hands who thought the USA ever shut down spying on other countries from during the Cold War? These Europeans are so silly and naive they thought the USA closed up spy shop just cause the Comminist countries fell? I mean that's so naive as to be dangerous for politics and military. These guys are too content coasting on NATO treaties for security arrangements in the area that the USA does the lion's share of the operations on.

      But to think for a minute the USA isn't spying on you is just silly.

      That said, back in the 1970's if the USA thought you were openly harboring a spy, we'd have just "accidented" you mr from Bolivia. I'm sure Ecuador is starting to feel the "coup de Tate" pressure from tge CIA right about now too.

    2. Re: spy novel by Seumas · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't understand ANY of this. We have known, since the 90s, that Echelon existed and monitored everything everywhere for keywords. The only new information is "now we can do it in real time and we also archive everything". We even knew this went for the NSA and CIA spying (illegally, by obligation of the agencies) on our own people. We have also known that we still spy on other nations. And other nations spy on us. And we all spy on each other. It is actually astonishing to me that the general consensus seems to be that it's horrible that we are spying on other countries, because I thought everyone knew we were doing this the whole time. Spying is just something every nation does and, frankly, it seems to be almost an obligation for their own protection. How does the Central Intelligence Agency gather Intelligence without spies and spying?

      And, of course, when it comes to spying on our own citizens, we have known about this for the last couple of decades and we've tried making a big deal about it and nobody has given two shits. It wasn't even until a few years ago that the general media started to even reference Echelon and most people who had any concern about the government spying on its own citizens were dismissed as being paranoid.

      Now, it is suddenly trendy, and people who didn't give two shits six months ago or two decades ago are all getting major boners over on Reddit as they all pretend to be revolutionaries fighting for freedom and against surveillance etc etc and now that all these little kids give two fucks, the rest of us are supposed to tag along and act like they're the first to acknowledge this and want to do something about it. Sort of like when you keep posing an idea to your boss and he keeps ignoring you, until he finally brings the idea up and claims it was his.

      Fortunately, I think most of us on Slashdot are halfway through our life (or more -- some of you guys are real old bastards), so I think we can pragmatically say "have fun with things, kids - we're going to be dead soon". And so, I can't be assed to give much of a fuck anymore. I exhausted all my giving a fucks over the last two decades. I say, bring on the surveillance state. Bring on the dystopian future. Bring on Mother America and government involvement in everything. Big monolithic buildings being erectic. Futuristic all encompassing surveillance systems. The whole boat load. It'll be fun to watch. And by the time it really crushes the absolute spirit of man, we old timers will be ashes in the dirt.

    3. Re: spy novel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be naive, of course they knew. But if they didn't make a fuss, it would seem like they didn't care. I'm waiting for proof that the US was spying on Canada to see Harper bumble about, trying to justify it.

    4. Re: spy novel by anagama · · Score: 5, Informative

      What is different, is that we have direct information (not statements, not conjecture, not foil hattery) about the surveillance. It is the difference between suspecting (or even having a well grounded belief), and KNOWING. It is the difference between knowing that AT&T set up splitters, and wondering what happens after that, and knowing what happens after that.

      More to the point though, if we do nothing after these revelations, the DC pukes will take it as a mandate to do more and worse.

      So instead of wasting your time and everyone else's lamenting how long it has taken to get to the point where real pushback can occur, get on board and start pushing the fuck back. Hard.

      Demand prosecutions, impeachment proceedings. Start with the obvious, like Clapper's felonious perjury, and then keep plowing the bastards. Don't sit back and whine about people not acting in the past -- that is a useless waste of time and just plays into the enemy's hands. So stand up and fight, or if you won't do that, go back to your cotton row and shut the fuck up.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    5. Re: spy novel by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      I don't think that many people are upset over us spying on OTHER countries, what has the majority pissed off, is the US intelligence spying on US citizens, especially within our borders.

      THAT is something different...even with Echelon, it was thought the our intelligence folks still at least had to get warrants to use it on citizens within the country...

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    6. Re: spy novel by baegucb · · Score: 1

      Don't be stupid. Impeachment is a political decision, not a criminal matter. And the GOP doesn't have the ability.

    7. Re: spy novel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But to think for a minute the USA isn't spying on you is just silly.

      Spying is generally considered an act of war rather than business as usual.

      Is USA currently at war with Germany?

    8. Re: spy novel by xQx · · Score: 2

      Seumas: I couldn't agree more with your position. In fact I have stated the same position a number of times previously. To clarify your point on "spying on our own citizens" it's an open secret that one of the benefits of having bilateral spying alliances, is when the NSA wants to know something about a US citizen, ASIO or MI5 do the spying then share the information (and vice versa). That way none of the agencies have to break their legal obligations but neatly avoid this getting in the way of them spying on whomever they like.

      I wish I could find the quote, but recently a USA military leader said that Obama wouldn't pressure china too much about their cyber-espionage programse, because 'we wouldn't ask them to do something that we would never agree to ourselves'. It's also old news that this surveillance is used to advance US commercial interests. There have been previous statements that this is clearly inside the NSA's published goals "to gain a decision advantage for the Nation and our allies under all circumstances."

      Basically, everybody is spying on everybody these days, and have been for some time. Nobody who is spying wants to stop spying, and we have about as much chance of de-armament as we do with nuclear weaponry - we may as well get the f*ck over it, and get on with our lives.

      The recent issue is that it's becoming apparent that this information is no longer confined to the spy agencies, for two reasons: 1. It's only a matter of time (and a very short time at that) before other law enforcement agencies get access to that information because if we all agree someone has broken the law, and the law is just, why should they NOT have access to all the evidence to convict criminals? and 2. Unsurprisingly, when you have spy agencies that employ thousands of people, you get leaks. It's only a matter of time before these massive databases of information get compromised, and the public gets access to information about their neighbors.

      So it's public now, and to take a quote from a crappy 1995 Steven Segal film:

      " We know this. The Chinese know that we know. But we make-believe that we don't know and the Chinese make-believe that they believe that we don't know, but know that we know. Everybody knows. "

      So, what do we do about it?

    9. Re: spy novel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In other words: "I was opposed to warrantless surveillance back when it was underground."

    10. Re: spy novel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell it.

    11. Re: spy novel by dbIII · · Score: 1

      You've got the wrong end of it - this Snowden thing has been about Americans waking up to what the rest of the world has been watching for a long time. It's not about Europeans, Chinese or whoever being naive.

    12. Re: spy novel by vikingpower · · Score: 2

      There once were times ( under the Athenian democracy and the Roman Republic, but I grant that is a bit far away from your armchair ) when people actually cared about leaving the world as a place palatable to the next generation, and about uncovering wrongdoings. We are speaking about such moral giants as Demosthenes, Cleisthenes, Thucydides, Cincinnatus, Cato, Scipio.

      It is exactly because I am statistically a bit more than halfway through my life, and because of such examples, that I actually care. I happen to have a grandfather who was in the resistance against the Nazis, in WWII. Having such examples and such ancestors may protect one from becoming a cynic.

      --
      Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
    13. Re: spy novel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol. No. How many wars do you know of that we're started when a spy was caught? Countries spy on each other. Always have, always will. Doesn't even matter that they are allies. Britain and the US are always spying on each other.

    14. Re: spy novel by palion · · Score: 1

      Well I DO think that many people are upset over you spying on other countries such as ours. The sun does not revolve around the US, as strange as it may seem.

      --
      Well, well
    15. Re: spy novel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I disagree with you, in that we have _ALWAYS_ had direct information. was carnivore simply tomfoolery?

  17. War by gmuslera · · Score: 2

    By now US is at war against the world, by their own definition, the ones that act as allies in things like this are targets too, even if they keep covering they ears and eyes to not see the evidence. Even if international law and rights used to have some meaning, is not anymore.

    Ok, maybe they have to act like this even if they don't want to. The biggest benefit of massive, worldwide snooping on everything digital is not stopping terrorist, is just have a really big database for blackmailing, to force anyone to do what they want, from the top governors to the last shoeshiner.

  18. Call responsible ministers to parlement ASAP by photonic · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Dear opposition parties of all involved countries (France, Spain, Austria, ...), please drag the responsible ministers to parliament and have them explain every detail of the closure of the airspace as soon as possible. I don't know how it is organized exactly in those countries, but in the political system I know (Netherlands), all ministers are forced to respond to any question posed by members of parliament. The sillier questions can be answered by mail within a few weeks deadline, but I guess that for more important issues like this one, they can have any minister get his ass in parliament with a few days notice. Willfully giving wrong answers is political suicide via a 'motion of no confidence'. In the more likely case that the relevant ministers are supported by the leading majority, they can still be forced to make some embarrassing statements (yes, Obama did call us to close the airspace ...), which could lead to ridicule in the press and losses in the polls.

    --
    karma police: arrest this man, he talks in maths; he buzzes like a fridge, he's like a detuned radio. [radiohead]
    1. Re:Call responsible ministers to parlement ASAP by Arkh89 · · Score: 2

      Hahahaha, forget that for France...
      It's not a free country anymore, and there is no political "opposition" party right now : we have a "Nazi" party (Front National), we have a zombie-party (UMP), rulling while the country was involved in selling weapons and DPI technologies to previous Arab dictatorships (just before their revolutions) and also receiving money for their campaigns from these same countries. And a Flanby-party, rulling right now (the name comes from a jelly-like desert, I think that you get the image).
      As for the citizens : French are morons, they're angry at the government for the same-sex mariage but you won't see them for these (irony)high level things(/irony) such as privacy concerns or human rights.
      In the 60s, General De Gaulle, got the country out of Otan to emphasize its sovereignty (vs US-UK and USSR). Now all of this has been wiped out as it re-integrated the organization and we are back following US desires... ("yeah, let's buy some more M$ licenses!")

    2. Re:Call responsible ministers to parlement ASAP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The opposing parties are even more collaborating (I mean the Vichy France type of collaboration, here). The current governement in France was supposed to break from this puddle attitude, not quite so, it seems.

      Very displeased with my country today.

    3. Re:Call responsible ministers to parlement ASAP by NicBenjamin · · Score: 1

      What makes you think any of the opposition parties would have acted differently? The French are governed by the left wing, the others the right, so they didn't do it to satisfy some ideology. To a large extent the Portuguese and Spanish are dependent on French and German goodwill, but none of the three actually needs the US for anything.

      I suspect what's going on is that everybody in NATO spies on everybody else. The only way for Estonia to really know the US isn't selling them to Putin en exchange a free hand in Syria is for Estonia to steal secrets from us. Spying on us in DC would be really hard, so what they've probably done is bug our embassy in Talinn. That way they at least know if our Ambassador is lying to them. Everybody understands this except the voters, which means that what Wikileaks and Snowden accomplished is basically to put a freeze on everyone's relationship with the US for the immediate future. And they did this a couple days before major free trade talks formally started.

      Somebody (I'd guess the Germans or French, nobody else can close Portuguese airspace) is clearly not happy that this happened, and is sending a message to Latin America that they had better cut down on the pro-Wikileaks crap or many non-American states will be kinda pissed at them.

  19. Yeah, you'd be there TWO/THREE frigging years late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    as usual.
    The USA cares ONLY about the USA. Everyone else can go to hell. The US is very isolationist until someone attacked them.
    Then the US stomps over everyone else caring absolutely Zilch about who they stomp on.

  20. Re:Bolivia has a big fraction of the world's lithi by jcr · · Score: 1

    Not a bad idea, but a hundred million euro wouldn't come close to the amount of financial pressure the USA could dish out.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  21. Snakes on a Plane 2? by jasper160 · · Score: 2

    "Enough is enough! I have had it with this motherfucking Snowden on this motherfucking plane!"

    --
    No good deed goes unpunished.
  22. Re:Bolivia has a big fraction of the world's lithi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Yes, this. Hell France, Portugal, Spain and Germany slap sanctions on any country that even looks at them wrong, huff and puff about international law, human rights etc. Now it is they who are violating every principle they proclaim to stand for... Time someone have them some of their own.

  23. Ah, the high-clearance code monkeys by oneiros27 · · Score: 1

    One of my former co-workers managed to make it 6 months back in the mid-1990s ... he said they'd give you a function to write, tell you what the inputs and outputs were, and what language it was to be written in ... and that was it ... no clue if it could be written better because you weren't allowed to know what interacted with it. He quit.

    Another person I knew went to work for one of the three letter agencies, and said that after 2001 he realized they were just out to get all brown people, and being a brown person himself, he didn't feel comfortable working there anymore.

    Unfortunately, for most of the code monkeys doing this sort of stuff, you can't just reprogram the guidance system to make the world's largest jiffy-pop.

    --
    Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
  24. France did authorize use of air space TODAY by Culture20 · · Score: 1

    Well, that's nice. So the Bolivian Pres. was supposed to circle French airspace for a whole day? I know, it was probably a different flight entirely, but still...

  25. Snowden's self-exile actually makes sense by jdev · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So why, then, did he choose to go into exile rather than accept the consequences and justify his actions in court?

    Have you seen what due process has been for Bradley Manning? During his nine-month stay in Fort Quantico, he was reportedly held in solitary confinement for 23 hours a day, forced to sleep naked without pillows and sheets on his bed, and restricted from physical recreation or access to television. A military judge ruled that his treatment was excessive and credited him with some time served against any future punishment.

    The government has demonstrated that it will crush whistleblowers who try to defy it. Who in their right mind would allow this to happen to them? Extreme measures for Snowden to protect himself just mirror the extreme measures our government has taken to punish those who oppose it.

    1. Re:Snowden's self-exile actually makes sense by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      While I do not share the opinions of the poster you replied to, Bradley Manning and Edward Snowden are completely different cases. Bradley Manning was a member of the U.S. Armed Forces and thus falls under a different due process system than Edward Snowden, who is a civilian (and thus subject to the civilian court system, not the military court system).
      This does not mean that he would be better treated, but it does mean that Bradley Manning's experience is different from what Edward Snowden would experience.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    2. Re:Snowden's self-exile actually makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So why, then, did he choose to go into exile rather than accept the consequences and justify his actions in court?

      Have you seen what due process has been for Bradley Manning? During his nine-month stay in Fort Quantico, he was reportedly held in solitary confinement for 23 hours a day, forced to sleep naked without pillows and sheets on his bed, and restricted from physical recreation or access to television. A military judge ruled that his treatment was excessive and credited him with some time served against any future punishment.

      The government has demonstrated that it will crush whistleblowers who try to defy it. Who in their right mind would allow this to happen to them? Extreme measures for Snowden to protect himself just mirror the extreme measures our government has taken to punish those who oppose it.

      That's MCB Quantico, it's not an Army post. Psshhhh, "Fort"... part of HQMC is there, MCCDC, OCS, good lord, now I wonder if you did that on purpose.

      Suicide watch isn't a special treatment relegated to the brig or MPs, we do it in regular barracks for regular, err, depressed individuals. It sucks for all involved.
      Solitary - hey numbnuts, it's a Marine Corps brig - and he's a young Army brat that betrayed the trust of everyone he served with, that is a no-brainer. I'm assuming they chose it because of closeness to FBI offices (@Quantico) and the nature of the crime. Or maybe Quantico is just special for other reasons I don't know, but I wanted to point out that it IS special, and is NOT a Fort.

      If you want to find out more fun facts about the United States military, join one of our fun loving branches (the Marine Corps is the best). It's really not that bad, but it is a different culture. When you look in from the outside, it won't make sense, but it is what it is, and works.

  26. Lay Odds by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    happy fourth of july, fellow americans ;( can't say I'm very proud to be american right now. in fact, I'm ashamed of what my country is looking like, to the rest of the world.

    Even money that on Thursday, July 4th there will be a large, showy domestic incident that will be nothing but a False Flag operation to again distract the American sheeple with fear and unthinking Jingoism.

    1. Re:Lay Odds by Seumas · · Score: 2

      It seems one of these happens every six to eight weeks. Have to keep the population frightened, after all.

      Of course, this won't do for very long. We're already at the point that people who are of voting age don't remember anything about 9/11 and certainly don't have any concept of a pre-war/pre-terrorism America. To just about anyone who is wasting away on Reddit, 9/11 is just this thing their parents and the government talk about. This means that something big will have to really happen (not just supposedly be about to happen and then stopped by the FBI at the last second). Something to rattle them and keep them subservient at least as much as most of society has been the last dozen years.

    2. Re:Lay Odds by fazey · · Score: 1

      srsly? im 28, and i was in hs in NYC when 9/11 happened. So I kind of disagree.

    3. Re:Lay Odds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have to remember that Slashdot has a lot anti-Americans posting here. Many are Europeans, many are Americans with fringe politics of one sort or another (mainly leftists, both some others as well), and some from other parts of the world, such as South American, Turkey, China, and other places. If you read here long enough you will see way too much froth at the mouth crazy anti-American opinion voted up to the max.

      Don't get discouraged if you post and get moderated down for simply speaking the truth. It is best when you don't use inflammatory language but state the facts, maybe with a link.

      Have fun.

  27. Oh they will by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Complete with the honorary waterboarding and month long solitary confinement.

    1. Re:Oh they will by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be ridiculous. He'll probably be basking under the Maui sun, just like last season's winners Whitman, Price and Haddad.

  28. Shame on you. by Fuzzums · · Score: 2

    Shame on you France.
    Shame on you Spain.
    Shame on you Portugal.
    Shame on you Italy.

    Now bend over and have Uncle Ben have it's way with you some more.

    --
    Privacy is terrorism.
    1. Re:Shame on you. by vikingpower · · Score: 2

      Some political commentator today vocally despised the attitude of Spain, Portugal, France and Italy, qualifying such an attitude as "crouching self-humiliatingly low while even running ahead of obeying the American bully once more". Well said. Nuff said.

      --
      Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
    2. Re:Shame on you. by vikingpower · · Score: 1

      By pure coincidence, I had some business with my bank's branch office, which happens to be on Vienna airport ( I once opened an account there while working on the airport's IT system, and stuck to that office ever since ). The lady in charge of my account told me what kind of pandemonium she had been an indirect witness to, this morning ( the airport is relatively small, news gets around quickly, and from the bank's office you can actually see part of the runway ). The Spanish, French, Italian and Portuguese ambassadors rushing toward the airport, with the Spanish ambassador even requesting to search the Bolivian plane by himself; yes, you read that correctly: the Spanish ambassador wanted to search the plane with his own hands..

      --
      Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
    3. Re:Shame on you. by Fuzzums · · Score: 1

      That.

      --
      Privacy is terrorism.
    4. Re:Shame on you. by bfandreas · · Score: 1

      Yeah, well, the thing that confuses me is the inclusion of France on that list. I just visualized the default French reaction to a call from the US. Traditionally it would be lifted right out of a Monty Python movie.

      It might be that maybe...just maybe...somebody...maybe...just maybe...might not have had his forms filled out properly and in triplicate and entrance into their airspace was denied by some administrative drones of the lower echelons. Because, frankly, no European country wants him(even if we all call for granting him sanctuary) and the US doesn't really want them either. The US don't need further embarrassment on top of Manning. Nobody in the US administration really thinks he could do any further damage. Russia already has had their fun with him. As did China. Snowden in Bolivia drinking Pina Colada and dying of old age seems to be a very good political solution for all parties involved.

      "'ello? Yes, M. Obama. Champs-Élysées ici. Yes. What? Non! Who? Is it racist to tell you your mother was a hamster and your father smelled of elderberries? We are socialist and you are of coloured background and you are currently scouting for resources in your ancestral homelands having just noticed the Chinese got there 20 years before. Snow what? In July? We have some around Mont Blanc. A plane? Bolivia? Didn't they kill Robert Redford and Paul Newman? What? Why? Non. Go boil your bottom, you son of a silly person."
      The Spanish again got the neo-falangistas that spawned the Aznar administration wo still are wiping W's cream pie from their mustaches. The current PP goon must have provided a much more pleasant experience with a happy end to that particular phone call. No surprise there. But the French. Cooperating with the US? That doesn't strike you as odd? M. Hollande's socialists cooperating with the US? Cooperating? US?
      My bet is there was a clerical error on the Bolivian side of things. But the Bolivian story is much more satisfying so I will declare that to be the truth since it is much more interesting.

      Has anybody found out if the POTUS smells of elderberries? The public deserves to know!

      --
      20 minutes into the future
    5. Re:Shame on you. by Fuzzums · · Score: 1

      You're kidding, aren't you?

      --
      Privacy is terrorism.
    6. Re:Shame on you. by bfandreas · · Score: 1

      Well, the Spanish ambassador propably being appointed by the neo-falangistas currently in office propably preferred searching a Bolivian plane to digging up a Franco-era grave with his bare hands. Which might actually some brownie points in his effort to rejoin the human race. There is NO reason to respect a Partido Popular official in any way, shape or form. But I still find it unlikely that a French closure of air space due to a US request would have been authorised by anybody coming from the top echelons.

      And yes, I was part of an effort to dig up a mass grave in Spain and yes, I have encountered PP officials. Saying a PP official misbehaves is like saying a pedophile likes ploughing small boys.

      --
      20 minutes into the future
    7. Re:Shame on you. by vikingpower · · Score: 1

      No, I kid you not, sir. Alas, I am not. This is what our world has become: not so much of a joke as a bad joke.

      --
      Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
    8. Re:Shame on you. by vikingpower · · Score: 1

      It can take a long time, for any country, to come to terms with a brown or fascist past. You have my sympathies.

      --
      Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
    9. Re:Shame on you. by Fuzzums · · Score: 1

      Ok. If anybody is looking for me, I am sitting in a dark corner weep softly.

      --
      Privacy is terrorism.
    10. Re:Shame on you. by bfandreas · · Score: 1

      It can take a long time, for any country, to come to terms with a brown or fascist past. You have my sympathies.

      Wot? I'm German. No troubles there...
      Hang on.

      Seriously. If you think the PP is a legitimate democratic party, just visualize Berlusconi's hairline. THAT is much more reasonable.

      --
      20 minutes into the future
    11. Re:Shame on you. by vikingpower · · Score: 1

      You are right about Germany. Great job. I was, however, implicitly referring to Spain ( hardly any Aufarbeitung there ) and to Austria ( only a bit more than half of the work done ). And don't even get me started on Portugal, Greece, Serbia and Russia. That's all.

      --
      Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
    12. Re:Shame on you. by vikingpower · · Score: 1

      Other countries have behaved worse. Do not feel ashamed or sad because of what is written in your passport. You are a world citizen, aren't you ? At least your posting here on /. proves you to be one :-)

      --
      Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
  29. hacker archive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OFFLINE since 2002
    we still exist we dont share to your govt..

  30. I am proud by vikingpower · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...to live in Austria, where Mrs. Miki-Leitner, the Minister of Interior Affairs, said ( after the dust had settled somewhat, this afternoon ):

    "This was a missed chance for Mr. Snowden. Austria has shown not to let itself be intimidated by the US. If Mr. Snowden had come here, he would have gotten a serious examination of his request for political asylum, as well as an investigation into recognizing him as a political refugee."

    I would say: Edward, life in Vienna is more than bearable. Plenty of high-tech firms in case you ever need a job again ( which I doubt ), and the border to Switzerland is only a few train hours away, in case you need to run. Come over here, man !!!

    --
    Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
    1. Re:I am proud by cpghost · · Score: 1

      Plenty of high-tech firms in case you ever need a job again (...)

      Do you seriously think that a sysadmin who ratted out his employer (notwithstanding his motives who may or may not have been good-natured) would ever get a similar job anywhere else in the industry? Sysadmin position is one of trust, and this is precisely what Snowden betrayed. Sorry to sound so conservative, but as a many decades long sysadmin myself, I take the ethics of this profession very seriously and quite a dim view on what Snowden has done.

      --
      cpghost at Cordula's Web.
    2. Re:I am proud by vikingpower · · Score: 1

      Yes, I do. A highly-trusted company like this Dutch one, recognized as an European market-leader in IT security would immediately employ him, I happen to know. So would my former employer here in Vienna, I am nearly certain. I understand your misgivings, and your point about "ethics of this profession" is partly made. Yet we have entered a new era where "ethics of a profession" are subordinate to "the interest of the general public".

      --
      Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
    3. Re:I am proud by thoth · · Score: 1

      Why would a highly trusted company employ a foreign national (let's assume he stays in Austria and gets some kind of work permit) that has shown to abuse sysadmin powers and grab data? I could understand if he has world class skills, basically if he were the Linus Torvalds of sysadmins, but I don't see that in this case.

      How does interest to the general public translate to profits for a corporation? They going to market they hired him but then hastily assure companies he won't be working on their info? I think most companies would look over his resume and throw it away unless they literally can't find anybody better among local job seekers. I dont' see what he's done as setting himself apart from his peers, at least in a way that a IT security companies would want to use.

    4. Re:I am proud by Sabriel · · Score: 1

      That depends. Is the industry seeking ethical sysadmins, or sysadmins who will knowingly conceal company malfeasance from the stockholders?

    5. Re:I am proud by SwedishPenguin · · Score: 1

      What nation would search a diplomatic aircraft, with a friendly foreign president to boot, simply in order to grant asylum to a dissident who may or may not be on that plane, on his way to a nation where would have been granted asylum already? Seems disingenuous to say the least..

    6. Re:I am proud by vikingpower · · Score: 1

      The Austrians did not want to search the aircraft. They didn't give a damn about the whole thing. But as the aircraft was sitting on and on on the Viennese airport, the Bolivian president invited the Austrian border police to search the aircraft. so he would have his peace and could fly on. That's all there is to it.

      --
      Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
  31. What a bunch of crooks ... by boorack · · Score: 2

    It seems US govt propaganda department aparatchiks never stop. They'll repeat their shit over and over again, conveniently hiding behind AC. I'm sick seeing taxpayer money thrown into this. Fuck you.

    1. Re:What a bunch of crooks ... by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      I'm sure some of them are paid. I'm equally sure some of them are not. They're volunteers. That's how effective the propaganda is. And yes, fuck them.

  32. Re:Bolivia has a big fraction of the world's lithi by ImprovOmega · · Score: 1

    All well and good, but how are you going to get exports out of the country in the first place when the U.S. Navy decides to blockade your ports?

  33. Re:Bolivia has a big fraction of the world's lithi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Make the access fee monthly or per unit then. Or ban them access all together.

  34. How long? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    war - check
    fear - check
    torture - check
    surveillance society - check
    newspeech - check
    Seems Obamas term will last till 1984

  35. Crypto Kids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remember that the NSA wants your kids: http://www.nsa.gov/kids

  36. and The Onion's the new Cassandra by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    oh great.
    That makes Anonymous Coward the new Goodwin.

  37. Embassy bugged? Boo hoo. by Quila · · Score: 1

    Everybody who can do it, does it. Back in the 80s the US had to abandon an embassy we were building in the USSR because it was full of bugs even before it was built, so many and so deep in the infrastructure that there was no way to clean it.

    Every country has spies to spy on every other country it considers worth spying on. The intelligence world even has a term for spies attached to a country's official diplomatic mission.

    1. Re:Embassy bugged? Boo hoo. by Nyder · · Score: 1

      Everybody who can do it, does it. Back in the 80s the US had to abandon an embassy we were building in the USSR because it was full of bugs even before it was built, so many and so deep in the infrastructure that there was no way to clean it.

      Every country has spies to spy on every other country it considers worth spying on. The intelligence world even has a term for spies attached to a country's official diplomatic mission.

      You don't understand or are a Government shill.

      Everyone does it has NEVER been an excuse to let something go. I used to say that shit when I was a kid. "But Mom, cousin Aaron did it!" You know what she said to me? "If Aaron ate some dog shit, would you also?" Of course the answer is no.

      So dog shit = spying. Every country might do it, but right now, the whole world has documented proof that the United States likes to eat dogshit from every country.

      In typical grammar school fashion, the USA is now trying to beat up the person who provided the proof, instead of learning from it, and fixing their mistakes. And guess what? The United States Government is scum. History isn't going to be kind to it, unless the USA writes the textbooks, but seeing as we outsource to other countries, that probably isn't happening.

      Anyways, you are a shill, so what i say doesn't matter.

      --
      Be seeing you...
    2. Re:Embassy bugged? Boo hoo. by Quila · · Score: 1

      Everyone does it has NEVER been an excuse to let something go.

      It's not an excuse. This is how the world works, because we are all different countries that in the end are going to be looking out for their own interests, their own people. To do that we need to know what the other countries are doing that may not be in our best interests. Or in the case of Israel's extensive spying on the US, they mainly wanted to know what our intelligence on their enemies was. Currently, China holds the crown for spying on pretty much everybody for political, military and economic reasons.

      Congratulations, you just walked in on your parents having sex. Now your education on the reality of how the adult world works has begun.

    3. Re:Embassy bugged? Boo hoo. by SJHiIlman · · Score: 1

      This is how the world works

      Yeah, so let's just give up on trying to better ourselves.

    4. Re:Embassy bugged? Boo hoo. by Quila · · Score: 1

      Yeah, so let's just give up on trying to better ourselves.

      So you think they spy just for the fun of it? They are spying to better their countries.

    5. Re:Embassy bugged? Boo hoo. by SJHiIlman · · Score: 1

      So you think they spy just for the fun of it?

      Where did I say that?

      They are spying to better their countries.

      That's like saying TSA agents grope people who try to get on US planes to better their country; it's nonsense. In very rare circumstances, I would tolerate the act of spying on countries we know to be hostile (and by that I'm not referring to random citizens who live in said countries), but that's all. I take freedom and privacy seriously, unlike some people.

    6. Re:Embassy bugged? Boo hoo. by Quila · · Score: 1

      Any government that doesn't gather all information from all other countries that it thinks is pertinent to the safety and well-being of its people is doing a great disservice to its people.

    7. Re:Embassy bugged? Boo hoo. by SJHiIlman · · Score: 1

      And I just said that it may gather information if a country has shown itself to actually be a threat. Anything else is just paranoid warmongering, and we need less of that, not more. As a citizen of the US, paranoid governments have done more a disservice to me; not only are they wasting my tax dollars on nonsense, but they're claiming to be spying in my name.

      Not spying on random countries isn't anymore of a disservice than not groping people at airports is.

    8. Re:Embassy bugged? Boo hoo. by Quila · · Score: 1

      And I just said that it may gather information if a country has shown itself to actually be a threat.

      So take Iran. They weren't a threat until they had a revolution. Using your logic, we'd suddenly have an extremely hostile country to us about wich we have absolutely no information. Allegiances change, better to always be informed.

      In addition, in the modern day, our main enemy does not have a country. Instead, they operate within other countries, including those that may be friendly with us. So we are to remain blind in this case too? Or do we naively hope they are keeping track of our enemies for us, and will share that information? The Israelis knew our Beirut Marine barracks was going to be attacked but didn't tell us because it would have compromised their sources. We can't rely on "friendly" nations.

      Welcome to the real world. It's not paranoia when they actually are out to get you.

  38. Where's the global campaign to say "This is wrong" by Shemmie · · Score: 1

    Threaten to make piracy more difficult in the USA, and watch as the biggest websites in the world make a big deal of it.

    The Government of most western countries piss over our liberty, while the global super power spies on all of us and chases a whistle-blower all around the globe with the intent of destroying his life, and the best we can manage is a few angry geeks muttering online.

    Seriously?

  39. good for the goose, good for the chief of staff by Thud457 · · Score: 2

    Capricious application of the law is a prime sign of corruption.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  40. carrot or stick US MILGOV is issuing by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 1

    Carrot: a billion dollar bounty
    Stick: threat of military force

    --
    You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
  41. Re:Bolivia has a big fraction of the world's lithi by Issarlk · · Score: 3, Insightful

    France also had Morales' visit earlier this year, he planed to buy helicopters and Airbus planes... Good job president Hollande !

  42. France and Spain deny this by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

    France and Spain both claim that they gave permission for the plane carrying Evo Morales to cross their air space. At this point I have not seen any evidence corroborating the Bolivian claims. The government of Evo Morales has made somewhat dubious claims in the past so that I am not willing to condemn other governments purely on their say-so. However, I am also not willing to reject their claims outright. I merely believe that we should withhold judgment on this case until more information is forthcoming.

    --
    The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    1. Re:France and Spain deny this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you Attila

  43. Maybe we should spread the rumor by Karl+Cocknozzle · · Score: 1

    Maybe the Wiki folks and anonymous should start phoning in anonymous tips that Eric Snowden is on every flight leaving Moscow from now until European air space is again free.

    --
    Who did what now?
  44. Re:Where's the global campaign to say "This is wro by White+Flame · · Score: 1

    The "biggest websites in the world" are already complicit in the activities that the US is in trouble for, so don't expect any impetus from them this time around.

  45. Where we are going as a nation... by White+Flame · · Score: 1

    ...is in a handbasket.

  46. Ehm.... where is the NRA when you need them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't you guys got guns precisely for this kinda shit?

    Where are the gun nuts when you need them?

    Oh wait, the gun nuts are all in favor of this kinda thing? The whole "owning guns to protect freedom" was just a ruse and it was all about compensating for tiny penises after all. Just as I expected.

  47. Sounds like Bolivia made it up.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Spain, France and Portugal have all said that no such no-fly order existed, with no official response from Italy. (http://www.mercurynews.com/breaking-news/ci_23590259/snowden-france-denies-blocking-bolivian-plane), covered, then ignored here http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jul/03/edward-snowden-asylum-live#block-51d38d7be4b0300b24e64d84 etc.

    Moreover, when they landed in Austria, they stated they were having mechanical problems with their fuel gauge: http://audioboo.fm/boos/1482009-bolivia-air-force-fuerza-aerea-boliviana-fab001-flight-precaution-landing-vienna-austria

    Finally, the entire story doesn't even make sense, they left Moscow heading towards Bolivia, which is west-ward for those who don't know. Then they landed somewhere in the Canaries to refuel, despite Spain supposedly saying they couldn't and their airspace was off-limits, then they flew to Austria and said they had the plane searched wherein this supposedly allowed them to fly over Spain.. despite having already done so.

    The amusing part is I bet most of you run around calling everyone else sheep.

  48. Standards by istartedi · · Score: 1

    I'm sooooo thrilled that we're using Stalin as our standard of comparison. How about Churchill? I'd like us to be equal or better than Great Britain under him. Now there's a decent standard.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  49. Why not Russia and why 4 laptops? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Two things about this story still are incomprehensible to me:

    Why did Snowden carry 4 laptops with him? It doesn't make sense to carry more than one laptop just because you have so much information to transport. He could have used at most one laptop with a light-weight external hard drive. Or probably he also has some encrypted safe storage online somewhere, so it's not necessary to use physical devices anyway. And I don't know at what point in time Wikileaks got the data (if they have it completely at all).

    Then, once WIkileaks has all the data, why didn't Snowden accept (or at least not yet reject) the offer of asylum from Russia? He could've said he won't release anymore that he has, and what Wikileaks does (=release more, little by little, of his leaks) is beyond his control. Then he wouldn't have done anything anti-American (or political) at all after his entering Russian soil and everyone would be happy.

    1. Re:Why not Russia and why 4 laptops? by 0111+1110 · · Score: 1

      Russia never actually offered him asylum. They merely said they would consider it and promised that they would not extradite him back to the US. But I do agree that withdrawing his application for asylum was a risky thing to do. He may need that and the insult of withdrawing the request might make it less likely that they would approve if Snowden has no other choice. Staying in Russia would have been safer in some ways too. US planes or helicopters will not be invading Russian airspace. So he doesn't have to worry about extraordinary rendition or having his plane shot down or grounded in a US friendly country where he could be extradited.

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
  50. Nobel Peace Prize by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_Nobel_Peace_Prize

    Obama said he was "surprised" and "deeply humbled" by the award.

    Was he really "Surprised"?

  51. Re:Bolivia has a big fraction of the world's lithi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Morales would find the idea of the US Navy blockading Bolivian ports absolutely hilarious if he wasn't so worked out about the outcome of the War of the Pacific.

  52. There goes his asylum by dreddsc · · Score: 1

    There's no way Snowden is getting out of Russia to any of those countries that he applied for asylum, except maybe to China. US and its allies are doing everything to capture him. So, Mr. Snowden, send that asylum application back to Russia as this will probably be your only best option outside of living in an airport or what awaits you in the US. Just leak everything right now or work carefully through someone else. That way you won't break Putin's terms.

  53. Funny ? by vikingpower · · Score: 1

    Apologies in advance for replying to myself. But this is getting a strange aftertaste: I had not meant my OP, in any possible way, to be funny, sarcastic or ironic. Yet it got modded up to "+4 / +5, funny" in less than no time. How strange.

    --
    Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
    1. Re:Funny ? by 0111+1110 · · Score: 1

      Yeah. I was wondering about that. Whether you were serious or not. I read that he applied to Austria but that they told him he had to apply in Austrian territory.

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    2. Re:Funny ? by vikingpower · · Score: 1

      In and by itself, you are right: he should still need to apply in Austrian territory. What I admired, however, was the firm stance taken by Mrs. Miki-Leitner, as well as the attitude of a rather tiny country ( population-wise and, especially, military-wise) vs. the USA. I was totally serious. And still am: we shall not be bullied anymore. Not now. Not tomorrow. Mindful of Winston Churchill: Never give in. Never. Never. Never.

      --
      Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
  54. Re:Bolivia has a big fraction of the world's lithi by stymy · · Score: 1

    Those lithium deposits are essentially lying unused, as there isn't enough infrastructure yet to allow full-scale exploitation of them to occur. However, the rest of Latin America might just strike back, at least subtly. UNASUR has already called an emergency meeting, and even OAS has issued a statement strongly criticizing the US (for those that don't know, OAS has traditionally been dominated by the US and lackeys -- that's why UNASUR was created in the first place). Latin America now has a total population of almost 400 million, is a massive food exporter, as well as of various metals, and even has some countries with highly-educated populations (Chile, Argentina, and parts of Brazil) so the region is going to be a key global player in the future, as it's experiencing massive growth.

  55. Re:Bolivia has a big fraction of the world's lithi by alantus · · Score: 1

    All well and good, but how are you going to get exports out of the country in the first place when the U.S. Navy decides to blockade your ports?

    Since Bolivia is a landlocked country, that shouldn't be an issue ;)

  56. "The Future of American Power" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not meaning to digress, but I felt that Noam Chomsky's "The Future of American Power" link below is highly relevant to this thread and Snowden topic. The video is from earlier last month. It's an update on current political culture. After watching the full hour of his talk- I will admit to not completely understanding the complexities of our country (US) and why things continue to function the way they presently do, his monologue was extremely helpful to at least try and understand things better - i.e., what the hell is happening and why. Getting some background for specific well-known events from the '40s, '50s, '60s, '80s explains better how they relate - today. Chomsky puts US behavior in an interesting perspective, most of it not positive.

    Watch the video and then re-read this thread. A lot is just knowing our own history (US), how and why the US is doing what it is doing and how we continue to do the same things and follow the same doctrine. This relates completely to the current topic. Chomsky, in his usual manner of complexity and well thought out/researched knowledge, explains why things are the way they are these days. While there will always be those who disagree, at least his perspective is out there. I wish Snowden the best, he's in a super tough spot; I hope he prevails one way or another; he's got balls of steel. The video is long, but good. http://youtu.be/x-BuiH4btOw

  57. Re:Bolivia has a big fraction of the world's lithi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Parent AC here. Bolivia has no ports.

  58. Andy Warhol quote on some caffeinated soda by fonske · · Score: 1

    From "the philosophy of Andy Warhol":
    "What's great about this country is that America started the tradition where the richest consumers buy essentially the same things as the poorest. You can be watching TV and see Coca-Cola, and you know that the President drinks Coke, Liz Taylor drinks Coke, and just think, you can drink Coke, too. A Coke is a Coke and no amount of money can get you a better Coke than the one the bum on the corner is drinking. All the Cokes are the same and all the Cokes are good. Liz Taylor knows it, the President knows it, the bum knows it, and you know it."

  59. Portugal not Spain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Spanish? Really?
    It says Portugal right there in the paragraph you quoted.

  60. Supply some figures. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Otherwise all you're doing is asserting that Stalin was worse, you have no idea whether this is factual, it is only your opinion that it is so.

  61. Obama's team berate their supporters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obama officials have publicly berated the progressives who supported him for complaining about Obama's failures and warn that doing so will cause the Republicans to win, so they must shut up and only talk about the successes made, never the failures.

    Seriously, watch some progressives being shat on by the officials in the Democratic party. You're watching the mainstream (non progressive) media. Watch The Young Turks instead. See what happens to the supporters of Obama who do not support his failures and complain about them.

    Then realise that your complaint is predicated on you being the only one who is complaining about the horrors of both presidents and that this assumption is completely wrong and self-serving.

  62. You don't refuel to go into someone's airspace. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Flying over the country and not stopping still requires clearance to pass into sovereign airspace.

  63. Not looking good by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

    This event suggests that Snowden will not make it out of Russia without taking evasive action. By that I mean he would need to be on an aircraft using falsified flight data, and with transponders switched off. All of which is illegal and likely to get you accidently shot down.

  64. The tree of liberty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    please do not assume that We The People have any control over our lawless government officials. that boat sailed a long time ago and it isn't coming back any time soon.

    That is not quite true. We the People definitely still have some control over our government: the Jeffersonian form of control. "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time...."

  65. Imagine rerouting Airforce 1 by overmoderated · · Score: 1

    Not gonna happen.

  66. U.S. Constitutionality by stevenddeacon · · Score: 1

    The National Security and Patriot Acts have suspended all individual freedoms guaranteed under the Constitution of the United States of America. No more due process, no Habeas Corpus, no right to legal council. You have no protections under the Patriot Act. Let's face it ... you live in a police state. The NSA is spying on you right now. It is an agency of the Department of Defense ... the Pentagon. When United States Military is policing private citizens the Constitution has become absolutely meaningless. Congressional oversight committees have allowed these unconstitutional acts to continue unchecked.

  67. Re:Bolivia has a big fraction of the world's lithi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Our (Portugal's) foreign minister is too busy pretending to demit to pay any attention to what its ministry is doing. But hell: our prime minister (now european comission president Barroso) was the boy servant of Bush and Blair during the reunion in Lages Air Force Base before the war, so yes we always expect our coward politicians to do whatever the USA or EU told them to, unless, of course, it can hurt re-election (most of my fellow citizens are too ignorant to even know who Snowden is, since he does not play soccer).

  68. whistle blower != anti-national by NewYork · · Score: 1

    A whistle blower is a freedom fighter who isn't on govt (!= nation) side.

  69. The US style of government has many clones by aNonnyMouseCowered · · Score: 1

    "The only other country I know of that had a similar experiment in freedom is France, but their experiment died a lot faster."

    Actually there are lots of country that had a similar experiment in nation building, many of them in the same New World hemisphere. Haiti was a republic founded by former African slaves, so that might count as the black African analog, on a smaller scale, of the white European USA.

    Practically all of South America is made up of countries that tried their hand at republican democracy after cutting their ties to the motherland, Spain (Portugal in the case of Brazil). It's probably not coincidental the New World is where you'll find the most number of countries that have adopted the presidential form of government with its famous separation of executive, legislative and judicial powers. The rest of the nominally democratic world are run by parliaments where the de facto leader and head of government is a prime minister with the power to both make and implement laws, along with the official mascot, a queen, emperor or ceremonial president.

  70. All this "spy" talk. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As you try to close this barn door, think about this......
    The horse ran away forty years ago !

  71. President Morales plane "rerouting". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We should all feel some shame.