Slashdot Mirror


User: thewils

thewils's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
673
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 673

  1. Re:Contact? - Talking of SETI on Weta Digital Grows Cluster · · Score: 1

    It would be cool to participate in a SETI-like rendering client for movie effects.

    "Yes, well ya know I helped render that scene..."

  2. Re:What has Microsoft ever done for us? on Microsoft's Unique Innovation · · Score: 2, Funny

    The aquaduct, don't forget the aquaduct!

  3. Do I spot a potential Google-bomb here? on Microsoft's Unique Innovation · · Score: 1

    On "Microsoft Invention"???

  4. Could be worse... on U.S. Announces Global Intellectual Property Plan · · Score: 1

    It could be the Interplanetary Intellectual Property Plan

  5. Pay Increase? on Microsoft's Nightmare Scenario · · Score: 1

    1.5%? Lucky barsteward.

  6. Pirates dammit on Global Warming Past The Point of No Return · · Score: 1

    We need more pirates...

  7. Quote from Roy "Chubby" Brown on NASA Plan to Return to the Moon · · Score: 1

    We can put a man on the moon, but we can't fucking get one on Martina Navratilova.

  8. Re:Canon on Searching for a Decent Scanner? · · Score: 1

    I am a Canon user (last 2 scanners + camera) but if you are running 64-bit windows XP be warned that Canon don't have 64 bit drivers for scanners at the moment, and are unlikely to provide them for some time, maybe not at all.

  9. Let me guess... on Company to Settle and Mine Mars · · Score: 1

    4Frontiers is really the Union Aerospace Corporation (UAC).

  10. Re:The point of Flooz? on A Look Back At Ten Dot-Com Flops · · Score: 1

    As I remember, Flooz was vulnerable to the ::$data IIS hole. It's probably a good thing that they never got very far. Who knows what other holes some poor sod's cash could have vanished into.

  11. Wow... on Original Lightsaber Goes For 3x Expectations · · Score: 1

    Useless lump of plastic sold for $200K. What a twit. Someone, somewhere, someone has their priorities all wrong.

  12. In Soviet Russia... on A $100 Million Trip to the Moon · · Score: 2, Funny

    They charge you $200 Million to bring you back.

  13. Re:Um, and so they should. The automobile is obsol on Bob Metcalfe on Open Source, IPv6, IETF · · Score: 1

    I'd hate to get into one of those cars after some bozo has barfed up his curry along with 6 pints of Scruttock's Old Dirigible. Let's face it, half the human race are slobs, and the other half don't want to get near them.

  14. Christ on a bike... on Bob Metcalfe on Open Source, IPv6, IETF · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I can't even get drivers for my 64-bit Clunker. Do you think manufacturers would want to start supporting a raft of other OSes?

  15. This will only spawn another opportunity... on Longhorn to Require Monitor-Based DRM · · Score: 1

    ...for someone to manufacture a gizmo that sits between your computer and non-DRM monitor and fixes the problem. Or even some software that emulates one.

    Just like DVD viewing, can't watch this DVD? - no problem, load this progam and away you go.

    When will they ever learn.

  16. Re:Well, here's my take on Asa Dotzler on Why Linux Isn't Ready for the Desktop · · Score: 1

    I'm surprised the parent isn't -1 Troll, because there's no information in it. One person's viewpoint - Linux sucks. No argument as to why. Forget the fact that it's about $1000 (CDN) cheaper than Windows, Office and Photoshop - it's just really bad. Dammit, I guess I should fork out for Windows + apps then 'cos I've been using Linux (Gnome) as my primary desktop since Fedora Core 2 came out, and I feel like I have regained control over my computer. It does what _I_ want it to do, not what Bill wants it to do, or some anonymous hacker or virus writer. I use Windows (XP) on a Thinkpad for development at work so I have pretty good experience of both Oses.

    Linux is already on _my_ computer, and it's free. and you know what? it does everything that I want in a desktop (and more) I'm gonna use it.

  17. Re:say what you want... on Microsoft's Most Successful Failure · · Score: 1

    Ta for that, I'll give it a whirl. It's not feasible to lug a couple of monitors around with my laptop.

  18. Re:say what you want... on Microsoft's Most Successful Failure · · Score: 0

    I wuz doing a couple of fairly common tasks on a Fedora Core 3 machine the other day.

    The first one was to rip a CD and burn a backup copy. I tried on Windows first, I have Nero installed, so I thought it would be no problem. I couldn't figure out how to do it though - Nero wouldn't let me. After several attempts I gave up.
    I Googled for the linux method dd if=/dev/cdrom of=filename.iso - done in 5 minutes. Burning was a breeze with K3b.

    The second task was to upload a file to a website. Using Firefox/Gnome I selected the folder in which the file was located and saw that I wanted to give the file a different name. I opened another window and renamed the file (hmm, maybe I could have renamed it there and then) but the point being that when I returned to the file selection screen which had been open all the time, the filename had changed there to the new one and I didn't have to close the window and re-navigate to select it.

    Just a couple of instances where Linux kicked Windows' ass. I could go on - like when you're listening to music with XMMS you can move the mp3 file around even while it's being played. Not so with Windows. And how about the concept of multiple virtual desktops that hasn't even made it over to Windows yet - I really miss that.

    There's a lot of small things like that in Linux/Gnome where a lot of thought has gone into a feature and it works so sweet.

    I run Windows at work and FC3 at home, gimme FC3/Gnome desktop's capabilities any day.

  19. Give me Filthy's reviews anyday on Roger Ebert Answers Star Wars Questions · · Score: 1

    They're always spot on.

  20. Re:What I'd really like to be able to do... on Beyond Relational Databases · · Score: 1

    Yep, sure have, used them too. But they still act like a table, right? You still need to join them into your query using (sometimes) extremely convoluted SQL.

  21. What I'd really like to be able to do... on Beyond Relational Databases · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If any smart DBMS developers are listening, is to define a set of queries within the database (like for a _simple_ example "male" and "over 60" and "salary x") and then be able to refer to these criteria by name only, having the database build the query based on these rules as I choose to combine them (select xxx from yyy where 'male' or where 'male' and 'over 60').

    Sort of like stored procedures in implementation - they could be called stored query definitions.

    Because these query definitions would already be parsed, they don't require overhead to re-parse each time the stored query definition is executed.

    Please have this feature ready in about 6 months :)

  22. Re:Length contraction? on Excursions at the Speed of Light · · Score: 1

    My understanding (IANAP) also is that length tends to zero as velocity approaches c. Does this not mean that _at_ velocity c length is equal to zero? Wouldn't this mean that as far as a photon is concerned, crossing vast interstellar distances would take _no_ time at all. In fact, time is not a concept that a photon would be "aware" of. Emission from one atom and absorption into another take place simultaneously no matter what the distance is. This is my "ask a physicist" question for today.

  23. There's an easier way to get an Xbox on Hack IIS6 Contest · · Score: 1

    If you're prepared to wait a bit. Simply register the domain hackiis7.com and trade it for a shiny Xbox, plus a Redmond tour after M$'s initial attempts to sue the ass off you fail and adverse publicity forces them to relent and trade you for the domain which has become too much trouble for you to own.

  24. Jeez, that's easy on U.S. Military's Hackers · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Just sell them Windows.

  25. What's the point... on Optimizations - Programmer vs. Compiler? · · Score: 1

    ..in optimising something like a manual data input routine to save a couple of nano-seconds. If there's a core function repeated several million times and _must_ run quickly then write the damn thing in assembler in the first place.

    No, write for clarity assuming an idiot is going to maintain your code - that idiot could likely be you...or me :)