Slashdot Mirror


Original Lightsaber Goes For 3x Expectations

Brad1138 writes "Los Angeles - The lightsaber used by intergalactic hero Luke Skywalker in Star Wars sold for $200 000 (about R1.3m) at an auction of Hollywood props that fetched far more than expected, officials said on Saturday. news24 link here. I guess Star Wars is truly done. Kind of reminds me of 'The Last Voyage of the Enterprise' when they start parting out the set."

258 comments

  1. Link to original /. article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't know why the OP didn't include this link, but here it is: http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/07/06/123423 4&tid=101&tid=186

    Posting as AC, not karma-whoring, blah blah.

  2. Wow! by American+AC+in+Paris · · Score: 4, Funny
    (about R1.3m)

    1.3 million Rand? That's nearly 390,000 Pa'anga!

    --

    Obliteracy: Words with explosions

    1. Re:Wow! by Datamonstar · · Score: 1

      Vader's will fetch more.

      --
      The eternal struggle of good vs. evil begins within one's self.
    2. Re:Wow! by LSD-OBS · · Score: 1

      Or 3.54 billion Zimbabwe Dollars!

      --
      Today's weirdness is tomorrow's reason why. -- Hunter S. Thompson
    3. Re:Wow! by beacher · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm surprised that there isn't a USD Imperial Credits conversion function... Then again, Imperial credits are no good in this system.......

    4. Re:Wow! by zerobeat · · Score: 1

      HOw much is that in Payola?

      --
      What other people think of me is none of my business
    5. Re:Wow! by Valdrax · · Score: 2, Funny

      Some country uses the Rand as its unit of currency?
      What is it backed by, "enlightened self-interest?"

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    6. Re:Wow! by BrettJB · · Score: 1

      I don't have anything else, but credits will do fine.

      --
      Smell that? You smell that? Burning karma, son. Nothing in the world smells like that...
    7. Re:Wow! by fungai · · Score: 1

      Yes, South Africa does use the rand, thanks for asking. And unlike the USA it is still backed by gold.

    8. Re:Wow! by Luigi30 · · Score: 1

      Neither are Imperial dataries, you insensitive clod!

      --
      503 Sig Unavailable

      The Signature could not be accessed. Please try again later or contact the administrator
    9. Re:Wow! by RasputinAXP · · Score: 1

      And what the hell does this have to do with the price of power converters in Toschi Station?

    10. Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? A South Africa-based news site, using the currency of its hosting country?!! The USA owns the Internet, so how can this be allowed??? It must be the terrorists! LET'S GO BOMB IRAQ!

    11. Re:Wow! by Mercano · · Score: 1

      And don't you try any mind tricks on me to try to get me to take them!

      --
      #include <signature.h>
    12. Re:Wow! by 2names · · Score: 1

      No, they won't. What, you think you some kinda Jedi waving your hand like that?

      --
      "I'm just here to regulate funkiness."
    13. Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Russia, Iraq bombs you!

    14. Re:Wow! by autodidact · · Score: 1

      Too bad you all don't live in South Africa. We get automatic Firefox supported currency conversion to Rands on /. ;)

      But seriously, in a ubiquitously networked world we should come to expect our browser to recognise a metatag. Surely?

      Initially I thought that /. had some really neat code that was converting to my home currency. So I looked around and noticed that (firstly) it was just copy/pasted from news24 and (secondly) there isn't really anything out there (that I can find easily at any rate) that will automatically convert currency on a simple mouseover.

      Or is there?

    15. Re:Wow! by autodidact · · Score: 1

      Hehe :) That's funny. And going in my fortune file. I wish they'd mod that up +5 But I guess they just didn't get it. Objectively I mean. *sigh*

    16. Re:Wow! by kryten_nl · · Score: 1

      They would have payed more, but they were still in that freaking line.

      --
      For the perfect anti-Unix, write an OS that thinks it knows what you're doing better than you do and let it be wrong.
    17. Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like a job for a Greasemonkey script. Do a find-and-replace to insert your Javascript mouseover in there every time.

      They're not too hard to write; you can probably make one yourself. Hell, there might even be one already.

    18. Re:Wow! by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      And unlike the USA it is still backed by gold

      I suggest you revevaluate your investment strategy. The Rand floats. It is not convertible into gold

    19. Re:Wow! by macdaddy357 · · Score: 1

      The buyer will probably try to return it when it doesn't work. He probably doesn't "get it" that it's just a movie prop.

      --
      How ya like dat?
    20. Re:Wow! by Fishstick · · Score: 1

      Don't you mean Republic Credits?

      Republic Credits are-a no good-a out-a here. I need something more real!

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    21. Re:Wow! by typical · · Score: 1

      That is a damn useful idea for a script. I've seen a lot of silly-and-not-that-useful ideas, but a up-to-the-minute currency conversion on pages (I never really know how much a pound or a euro is in dollars) would be awfully handy.

      Maybe just a rollover popup...

      --
      Any program relying on (nontrivial) preemptive multithreading will be buggy.
    22. Re:Wow! by YomikoReadman · · Score: 1

      Some country uses the Rand as its unit of currency?
      What is it backed by, "enlightened self-interest?"


      No, no no. It's obviously backed by The Dragon Reborn with his Asha'man.

      /rimshot

      --
      I have no regrets, this is the only path.
      My whole life has been "UNLIMITED BLADE WORKS"
  3. Wow! by geomon · · Score: 2, Funny

    A lightsaber prop from the original series? I thought it would have gone for more than a $200K US.

    I guess the fans are broke after having to pay for the high ticket prices and the assorted other crap that came with the last three movies.

    The law of diminishing returns works after all.

    --
    "Rocky Rococo, at your cervix!"
  4. Let's get real by bigwavejas · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That saber belongs to none other than the Star Wars Kid http://www.screamingpickle.com/members/StarWarsKid /

    --
    "Simplify, simplify, simplify!" Thoreau
    1. Re:Let's get real by ShyGuy91284 · · Score: 1

      I do think whoever bought it should give it to the Star Wars kid. He seems deserving.... although he might break it if he hasn't worked on his balance and "force".... Guess he could have done worse and used fluorescent light bulbs....

      --
      In undeveloped countries, the consumer controls the market. In capitalist America, the market controls you.
    2. Re:Let's get real by Xarius · · Score: 0, Troll

      Oh please... Just because some fat kid prances around the place pretending he's someone he's not, and then gets all pissy about it, doesn't mean he deserves anything than to be laughed at.

      Go on, mod me down but you're all thinking it.

      --
      C17H21NO4
    3. Re:Let's get real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      here here

    4. Re:Let's get real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I here you buddy.

    5. Re:Let's get real by Craig_P92669 · · Score: 0

      Guess he could have done worse and used fluorescent light bulbs....

      I think worse would be if he'd used a katana sword.

      --
      http://xs4.xs.to/pics/04481/p556222.gif
  5. Of course by papasui · · Score: 4, Funny

    George needs the warehouse room so he can sell the original extra special platinum edition lightsabre.

    1. Re:Of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Comeon moderators the Starwars kid right above this one is insigtful and this one isn't?

      Maybe this comment is too subtle to get it. Let me explain. The joke is that there are 4 or 5 SW releases and you have to buy a new version of the movie for each media. Say you want SW III on DVD, well I hope you like the extra platinum special edition because that is all your going to get. Now on VHS you get the true(?) movie edition. Yeah Han shoots first.

  6. Missing Items by spaztech · · Score: 5, Funny

    How much did they get for Mark Hamill? He's obviously part of this collection that no one has seen for years..

    --
    /. spaztech ./
    1. Re:Missing Items by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because you don't see him doesn't mean he's not out there. He's had a hell of a career doing voice acting work, for example.

    2. Re:Missing Items by I8TheWorm · · Score: 4, Informative

      I realize you were just being funny, but anyone with kids has seen (and heard) quite a bit of Mark Hammill since Return of the Jedi. See here.

      --
      Saying Android is a family of phones is akin to saying Linux is a family of PCs.
    3. Re:Missing Items by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's kickass. I never knew he did an English voice for the Nausicaä of the Valley of the Winds movie.

    4. Re:Missing Items by IPFreely · · Score: 1

      He also did an English voice for "Castle in the Sky", another great movie from the creator of Nausica.

      --
      There is nothing so silly as other peoples traditions, and nothing so sacred as our own.
    5. Re:Missing Items by QMO · · Score: 1

      He was in one of the Wing Commander games.
      I can't remember which one, because my roommate had it, and I never played it.

      --
      Exam 4/C again. Maybe I'll do better this time.
    6. Re:Missing Items by Cat_Byte · · Score: 1

      He was in one of the Wing Commander games but that was over 10 yrs ago.

      --
      Two roads diverged in a wood, and I - I took the one the bus load of girls just went down.
    7. Re:Missing Items by kaellinn18 · · Score: 1

      Wing Commander III: Heart of the Tiger

      --

      --------
      This isn't the sig you're looking for. Move along.
    8. Re:Missing Items by Cat_Byte · · Score: 1
      Oh wow I looked it up on imdb. He has been busy. link here

      Robotech: The Shadow Chronicles (2005) (post-production) (voice) .... Commander Taylor Thru the Moebius Strip (2005) (post-production) (voice) .... Simon Weir "Super Robot Monkey Team Hyperforce Go!" (2004) TV Series (voice) .... The Skeleton King "The Wrong Coast" (2004) (mini) TV Series (voice) .... Jameson Burkright Comic Book: The Movie (2004) (V) .... Donald Swan Wolf Tracer's Dinosaur Island (2004) .... Blake Burl's (2003) (uncredited) .... Narrator X2 - Wolverine's Revenge (2003) (VG) (voice) .... Wolverine ... aka X-Men 2: Wolverine's Revenge (UK) Reeseville (2003) .... Zeek Oakman Aero-Troopers: The Nemeclous Crusade (2003) (V) (voice) .... Older Joshua Dark Chronicle (2002) (VG) (voice) .... Emperor Griffon ... aka Dark Cloud 2 (USA) Baxter and Bananas (2002) .... Bananas Balto II: Wolf Quest (2002) (V) (voice) .... Niju the Evil Wolf Grandia Xtreme (2002) (VG) (voice) .... Col. Kroitz "Teamo Supremo" (2002) TV Series (voice) .... Birthday Bandit ... aka Disney's Teamo Supremo (USA: complete title) Rapsittie Street Kids: Believe In Santa (2002) (TV) (voice) .... Eric The Scorpion King: Rise of the Akkadian (2002) (VG) (voice) .... Apep, Additional Voices ... aka The Scorpion King (USA: short title) Soldier of Fortune II: Double Helix (2002) (VG) (voice) .... Assistant Director Wilson Night of the Living Doo (2001) (TV) (voice) .... Mr. Shifty, Himself ... aka Scooby Doo's Night of the Living Doo (USA: complete title) Batman: Vengeance (2001) (VG) (voice) .... Jack Napier/The Joker, Dr. Isaac Evers Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back (2001) .... Cocknocker

      --
      Two roads diverged in a wood, and I - I took the one the bus load of girls just went down.
    9. Re:Missing Items by Peldor · · Score: 1

      More importantly he was in one of the Wing Commander games WITH A PORN STAR! Use the Force, Luke.

    10. Re:Missing Items by VeganBob · · Score: 1

      Yeah, for real. Sheesh.

      --
      Being funny is my sig nature.
    11. Re:Missing Items by endoplasmicMessenger · · Score: 1
      My kids just rented a DVD for the animated Batman TV series. Mark Hamill plays the Joker. He actually did quite a good voice over. I would never have guessed it was him.

      He also did voice for a character in 'Castle in the Sky'. I originally guessed wrong which character he was voicing. His vocal range seems to have grown substantially since his "this R2 unit has a bad motivator!" days.

      --
      Evolution is a fact. Darwinism is a joke.
    12. Re:Missing Items by Craig_P92669 · · Score: 0

      He must be kicking himself for losing out on that sweet "Eight is Enough" gig.



      Cocknocker fkn rules!!!

      --
      http://xs4.xs.to/pics/04481/p556222.gif
    13. Re:Missing Items by MouseR · · Score: 2, Funny

      Most importantly:

      some horror flic

    14. Re:Missing Items by superstick58 · · Score: 1

      Wing commander Prophecy. I just broke that game out of the closet about a month ago and played it through. Still somewhat enjoyable.

    15. Re:Missing Items by JahToasted · · Score: 1

      You ever see Mark Hammill's appearance on SNL years ago? There was a skit where some geeks had taken him prisoner and were auctioning him off as a Star Wars collectible. Harrison Ford called up (sounding like he was drunk) and bought him.

    16. Re:Missing Items by I8TheWorm · · Score: 1

      I missed that one :( Now I have to track down a copy of that and the Christmas Special mentioned in another reply.

      --
      Saying Android is a family of phones is akin to saying Linux is a family of PCs.
    17. Re:Missing Items by caca+de+toro · · Score: 1

      LMAO!

    18. Re:Missing Items by adashiel · · Score: 1

      I recall one of his many voice rolls was the, er, flamboyant, vaguely golden-hued robot on Cartoon Network's "Time Squad".

      --
      Sanity is relative. For some of us it's just a distant cousin.
    19. Re:Missing Items by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah. I'll have to try it when it comes out for my phone in a few months...

    20. Re:Missing Items by MayorDefacto · · Score: 1

      Two words: Robot Chicken

    21. Re:Missing Items by Feztaa · · Score: 1

      Dear Lord, nooooooo! I've seen the christmas special, and it's really truly awful. Lots of wookie talk that isn't subtitled or translated or anything, and a bunch of other nonsense... it's just ... bad. There is nothing else that can be said about it.

    22. Re:Missing Items by I8TheWorm · · Score: 1

      Isn't it like a traffic accident though, where you shouldn't look, but curiosity gets the better of you?

      --
      Saying Android is a family of phones is akin to saying Linux is a family of PCs.
  7. In Other News.. by joepeg · · Score: 2, Funny

    .. the infamous "Star Wars Kid" puts golf ball retriever up for sale on eBay...

    --

    ZEN is a prime number in base-36

    1. Re:In Other News.. by Inominate · · Score: 1

      I'd bid on it.

  8. I thought that was spam by rob_squared · · Score: 3, Funny

    Make you light saber 3x! Or something like that.

    --
    I don't get it.
  9. I'd rather by ericdano · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'd rather have the little outfit that Princess Leia wore while being a slave for Jabba the Hut ;-)

    --
    It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
    I moderate therefore I rule!
    --
    1. Re:I'd rather by winkydink · · Score: 5, Funny

      I don't think it would fit you.

      --

      "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    2. Re:I'd rather by zardo · · Score: 1

      I wonder if the discharge stains make it more or less valuable.

    3. Re:I'd rather by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      Let's get the obligatory Family Guy quote out of the way:

      Auctioneer: Our first item, the golden bikini that Carrie Fischer wore in Return of the Jedi
      Quagmire: $50!
      Auctioneer: She had 9 STD`s
      Quagmire: $45
      Auctioneer: And when we found her she wet herself.
      Quagmire: $50!!!

    4. Re:I'd rather by ericdano · · Score: 1

      Oh my, that was toooooo good there!

      --
      It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
      I moderate therefore I rule!
      --
    5. Re:I'd rather by JonnyCalcutta · · Score: 1

      Is that you Tronguy?

    6. Re:I'd rather by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.leiasmetalbikini.com/ has pointers of how to make-it-yourself http://www.leiasmetalbikini.com/make.html, just in case you missed this item .

    7. Re:I'd rather by IPFreely · · Score: 1

      What? so you can look like This?

      --
      There is nothing so silly as other peoples traditions, and nothing so sacred as our own.
    8. Re:I'd rather by jurt1235 · · Score: 1

      Why, do you look good in it?

      --

      My wife's sketchblog Blob[p]: Gastrono-me
    9. Re:I'd rather by davidc · · Score: 1

      This item would only be of any use if the Princess came with it :-)

    10. Re:I'd rather by merlin_jim · · Score: 1

      I'd rather have the little outfit that Princess Leia wore while being a slave for Jabba the Hut ;-)

      I'd much rather that my girlfriend have it.

      Of course good luck getting her to put it on. Maybe if I just didn't tell her it was from starwars ;)

      --
      I am disrespectful to dirt! Can you see that I am serious?!
    11. Re:I'd rather by ericdano · · Score: 1

      Well, that was the idea. Get it, and have her wear it.

      --
      It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
      I moderate therefore I rule!
      --
    12. Re:I'd rather by ericdano · · Score: 1

      Indeed. The princess of OLD though. Her young version. Her current version looks like Jabba...

      --
      It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
      I moderate therefore I rule!
      --
    13. Re:I'd rather by merlin_jim · · Score: 1

      Well, that was the idea. Get it, and have her wear it.

      Well maybe you should be a little more specific next time. Slashdotters are known for their propensity to take everything literally and with specificity...

      unless it helps us to troll a little bit hehehe

      Seriously though replica leia outfits can be had for a couple hundred. Or build your own... there are guides out there...

      http://www.leiasmetalbikini.com/make.html

      --
      I am disrespectful to dirt! Can you see that I am serious?!
    14. Re:I'd rather by not-enough-info · · Score: 1

      That is obviously beside the point. Gross.

      --
      ---k--
      </stupid>
    15. Re:I'd rather by malelder · · Score: 1

      Holy God...do not click on link in parent, its almost as bad as goatse :/

      Damn you JonnyCalcutta, damn you to hell! I will never be able to watch Tron again :/

      --


      Yuma, AZ...You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious.
    16. Re:I'd rather by sjsoko · · Score: 1

      neah, it's probably been washed.

    17. Re:I'd rather by failure-man · · Score: 1

      I'm sure medical science can fix that for less than the cost of a lightsaber.

  10. But does it work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The guy who bought it knows IT DOESN'T WORK, right? I mean sure, I'd pay $200,000 for a working prototype, but a non-functional one isn't worth more than $125,000 at best.

    1. Re:But does it work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You oldskool jackass!

      All the kids know it's all about Natalie Portman, naked and petrified, covered in hot grits!

      Now with 67% more cowbell.

  11. Hey by zardo · · Score: 5, Funny

    $200,000 is a small price to pay, I'd pay that much for the nuclear power cell alone.

    1. Re:Hey by hackwrench · · Score: 1

      Nuclear Power Cell? Don't you know those things are Jedi-powered?

    2. Re:Hey by ghukov · · Score: 1

      (not) actually... they do have power cells.

      --
      ...because Plutonians are teh suck
  12. Profit! by magicchex · · Score: 0

    1. Make revolutionary movie.
    2. Follow it up 20-30 years later with horrible prequels.
    3. ???
    4. Profit!!!

    --
    How many fulltime jobs can one man have?
    1. Re:Profit! by Evil+Adrian · · Score: 1

      that joke has got to be, what, 5 years old? enoughhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

      --
      evil adrian
  13. Wow by eno2001 · · Score: 1

    I rememeber as a kid, seeing a special on Star Wars. They talked about how they made the light saber sound. Looks like it was just waving a transducer around a transformer that picked up the hum. That made the "whoosh" hum sound. They also mentioned something about a special paint that reflected light at 100 times it's original intensity or something like that. All this Star Wars stuff is unearthing deep-seated memories...

    --
    -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
    1. Re:Wow by Coventry · · Score: 1

      "They also mentioned something about a special paint that reflected light at 100 times it's original intensity or something like that."

      Yeah... how about a 'something like that' that doesn't violate the laws of physics.

      Perhaps you meant a paint that reflected light 100 times better than regular paint.

      --
      man is machine
    2. Re:Wow by RandoX · · Score: 1

      Dick.

    3. Re:Wow by iocat · · Score: 1
      That was a great special... showed them making the laser sounds by hitting high tension wires (the were supporting telephone poles IIRC) with metal mallets. Of course, now that would be some kind of Patriot Act / DMCA violation...

      PacBell owns the sounds its wires make when struck by mallets by long-haired terrorist types, etc.

      --

      Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

    4. Re:Wow by Matey-O · · Score: 1

      No, the Grandparent is remembering correctly. There was something on tha back of a trading card (man, THAT'S a deep memory) that said it reflected at that level.

      Course, an impressionable 7 year old in 1980 will take it at face value and not question it like a slasdot poster in 2005 will.

      --
      "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
    5. Re:Wow by Rosonowski · · Score: 1

      I seem to remember the same card, although they also said they shone lasers at it, so I don't know.

      --
      01101001 01100001 01101101 01101110 01101111 01110100 01100001 01101100 01100001 01110111 01111001 01100101 01110010
    6. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Geez, what a twit.

    7. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was reflective tape (like on running shoes, etc.), spiraled around a spinning rod. They gave a shimmer to the actors for in-camera effects. You can actually see the rods in the original movie during a few scenes where the light sabers are pointed directly at the viewer.

      I made one of these as a kid with my erector-set motor. It didn't spin very fast and wobbled a bit, but it was pretty cool in '77...

    8. Re:Wow by blincoln · · Score: 1

      It's not paint, it's the material they make movie screens out of. The same effect was used for the clothes the Kryptonians wear in the first Superman film.

      And while it obviously doesn't literally "increase the intensity of the light," it does reflect it much more effectively than pretty much anything else you can capture on film. I wouldn't be surprised if it was partially flourescent, in which case you could increase the intensity of the visual-spectrum part of the light at the expense of the UV.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    9. Re:Wow by typical · · Score: 1

      Yeah... how about a 'something like that' that doesn't violate the laws of physics.

      Hmm...what if, say, UV caused a reaction (which could only continue for so long) that caused the thing to give off visible light?

      I mean, yes, it's stretching and I'm sure it's not actually what they did, but I'm not sure that it's impossible to do something like that. I guess it wouldn't really be "reflection" then...

      --
      Any program relying on (nontrivial) preemptive multithreading will be buggy.
    10. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the OP is right. The paint emits 100 times as much light as it receives.

      I painted my whole room in the stuff. I'd show it to you, but unfortunately my mom turned on the overhead light one day, and now we live on the second sun in the Tatooine system.

    11. Re:Wow by andersa · · Score: 1

      The lights saber props are basically wooden sticks with reflective coating. Originally the idea was that the reflectivity would hopefully look futuristic enough not to need having any FX done on them. In post production they realised that really what they looked most like was.. reflective wooden sticks..

      However, it turned out that the reflective coat was an excellent base for painting the finished light sabers over. They were painted on by hand frame by frame.

      More info at wikipedia

  14. not that suprising by everphilski · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There were so many duplicates of each they were hardly unique, that's why they went for so cheap. That's also why they were being auctioned, that their profits might preserve the more rare items (and the other lightsabres).

    -everphilski-

    1. Re:not that suprising by Pollardito · · Score: 1

      also, it doesn't appear to work [anymore]

      a lightsaber without the saber is just a handle, and a $200K handle is only interesting when it's a line item on a defense budget

  15. For this price.... by ID000001 · · Score: 1

    .... I would have just bought a Ferrari and runs down those people I need to kill instead of waving around not-really-threatening-in-real-life weapon

    On the other hand... well, luke might not have an extra hand to shift the gear. I guess going for a light saber over a Ferrari is reasonable.

  16. Sign of the Times? by ajiva · · Score: 1

    Is it sign of the times that prices are now paranthesed in Rupees??? It's just a matter of time before we start seeing R1.3M ($200K).

    1. Re:Sign of the Times? by Rolan · · Score: 1

      Is it sign of the times that prices are now paranthesed in Rupees???

      Must not be, since it's in South African Rand's, not Rupees. It would be about 8.68 million Rupees.

      --
      - AMW
    2. Re:Sign of the Times? by VoidWraith · · Score: 1

      But is it Rupees, Rand, Rubles, Ringgit, Rufiyaa?

      Editors: when specifying a currency... use the three letter abbreviation! R is WAY too vague.

      It turns out its South African Rand... the abbreviation for which is ZAR. Use it.

    3. Re:Sign of the Times? by geoffspear · · Score: 1
      Editors? You must be new here.

      Although the submitter could certainly find a better source for a story that took place in Los Angeles than a South African website.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    4. Re:Sign of the Times? by fungai · · Score: 1

      What makes a South African website inherently worse than a US site? You high opinion of US media quality is, I daresay, a bit misplaced.

    5. Re:Sign of the Times? by Pollardito · · Score: 1

      i think his point is that the US media might actually be getting that story first-hand, whereas the South African one is probably getting it from some other source. things rarely get more accurate in the retelling

    6. Re:Sign of the Times? by fungai · · Score: 1

      Good point, in general, but in this case specifically, anyone can get the "first hand information" right there on ebay's site.

    7. Re:Sign of the Times? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The abbreviation for Rupees is "Rs."

    8. Re:Sign of the Times? by LackaDaisy · · Score: 1

      is that indian rupees or hyrule rupees? it's kinda like the u.s. and australian dollar.

      --
      and did the little girls who lacked daisies seem very morose...
    9. Re:Sign of the Times? by medep · · Score: 1

      Did you notice that the article didn't specify what kind of dollars the figure was given in? The Rand is a very specific currency used in south africa.

      This is the definition of a dollar:

          A basic unit of currency in Australia, Bahamas, Barbados, Belize, Brunei, Canada, Cayman Islands, Dominica, Fiji, Grenada, Guyana, Hong Kong, Jamaica, Kiribai, Liberia, Nauru, New Zealand, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Singapore, Solomon Islands, Trinidad and Tobago, Tuvalu, United States, and Zimbabwe.

      reference: http://www.answers.com/topic/dollar

    10. Re:Sign of the Times? by Durinthal · · Score: 1

      I didn't think Link could hold that many at once.

  17. Why is this not in the SMITHSONIAN?!? by voss · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A cultural icon like that not in the smithsonian?!?
    It surely belongs in the smithsonian as much as Archie Bunkers chair.

    1. Re:Why is this not in the SMITHSONIAN?!? by gid · · Score: 1

      Not a bad idea, but if you feel this strongly, why didn't you bid on it and then donate it? And the other question, would the Smithsonian even display it anywhere? They have warehouses full of junk that never even gets seen.

    2. Re:Why is this not in the SMITHSONIAN?!? by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      The new owner plans on donating it to the Sithsonian Institute for Dark Side Artifacts.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    3. Re:Why is this not in the SMITHSONIAN?!? by iainl · · Score: 1

      It belongs in a MUSEUM!!!

      Sorry, wrong Lucas-authored trilogy. Personally, I prefer that one, mind you.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
  18. You spent *how* much? by Iambic+Pentametor · · Score: 4, Funny

    But... but... but, Honey!

    The kids won't need to go to college!
    With this, they can go to the Jedi Acadamy!

    --
    So, rather than appear foolish afterward, I renounce seeming clever now.
    1. Re:You spent *how* much? by Norfair · · Score: 1

      'And I can go to the English acad[e]my!'

  19. Shitty ass grammar. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The lightsaber used by intergalactic hero Luke Skywalker in Star Wars sold for $200 000 (about R1.3m) at an auction of Hollywood props that fetched far more than expected, officials said on Saturday"

    Wow, how did they manage to look into the future like that?!

    1. Re:Shitty ass grammar. by Conanymous+Award · · Score: 1

      They probably consulted Emperor Palpatine. But as we can see, they still didn't get it quite right. Always in movement the future is!

  20. south african rand (R)? by hyperstation · · Score: 1

    is that really necessary? we're mostly only concerned with relevant currencies (like US dollars). so you could have edited that part out.

    1. Re:south african rand (R)? by rooijan · · Score: 1

      If a South African poster gets a story from a South African source, I think he's quite justified in leaving the Rand value in there. The story had a dollar value as well, after all.

      There are some of us who don't live in the US and to whom other currencies are relevant (although, I'll admit that few of us know what the Rand is, let alone what it's currently worth)

      --
      Daar is nie 'n lepel nie
  21. Wow... by thewils · · Score: 1

    Useless lump of plastic sold for $200K. What a twit. Someone, somewhere, someone has their priorities all wrong.

    --
    Once I was a four stone apology. Now I am two separate gorillas.
    1. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone, somewhere, someone needs to work on proofreading their posts...

      And it was chrome numbnut, not plastic.

    2. Re:Wow... by petabyte · · Score: 1

      Useless lump of plastic sold for $200K

      I tried a similar line with the girlfriend in a jewlery store when we were buying useless lumps of rock. It didn't take then either.

    3. Re:Wow... by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

      Maybe. Or just maybe he expects to be able to resell it for $250K (whatever that is in Rubles) in a few years, and realize a large profit.

    4. Re:Wow... by typical · · Score: 1

      Useless lump of plastic sold for $200K. What a twit. Someone, somewhere, someone has their priorities all wrong.

      Maybe that person has useless heaps of money in a bank account somewhere and said plastic produced more happiness than the $200K could otherwise.

      --
      Any program relying on (nontrivial) preemptive multithreading will be buggy.
  22. UNSURPRISINGLY... by somethingwicked · · Score: 3, Funny

    Due to the heat of walking around in a desert in a metal suit, the codpiece from C3PO's costume went for FAR LESS than expected...

    --

    ---"What did I say that sounded like 'Tell me about your day?'"---

    1. Re:UNSURPRISINGLY... by Albino+Wolfman · · Score: 1

      When asked for comment, Anthony Daniels responded "IT'S A TRAP!".

      That's the 9,454,343,234th time that joke has been used, but we can give out a prize when we hit 10,000,000,000.

  23. Holy Jar-Jar, Jedi! by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    I can get one cheaper at Barnes & Noble.

  24. Cult? by AAeyers · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...George Lucas's cult Star Wars series...

    Christianity used to be a cult too, but I don't hear it being called that anymore. I think Star Wars has grown out of 'cult' status.

    --
    "For Great Justice."
    1. Re:Cult? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Christianity is a cult.

    2. Re:Cult? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Christianity was only called a cult by the Roman Empire when they were murdering them and trying to wipe them out - The usual purpose of intentional slander.

    3. Re:Cult? by CFTM · · Score: 0, Troll

      I'm going to have to disagree on that whole slander thing, at least those Evangelical mother fuckers seem pretty cultish to me.

      PS: I'm a recovering catholic.

    4. Re:Cult? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm, I thought Evangelicals were the ones whoe were supposed to be ignorant bigots. How sad and ironic.

    5. Re:Cult? by CFTM · · Score: 1

      At least I'm not hiding behind AC to talk about the problem that is the current manifestation of the Evangelical Christians. These people think that there is a difference between "their" God and God in other various sects...I guess the evangelical's didn't get the memo that they're all just imaginary friends in the first place.

      Believing in God is a choice, it is not something that need be mandated.

    6. Re:Cult? by calculadoru · · Score: 1

      (I think I saw this on /., actually, so apologies to the original poster for using it) :

      Cult: (n) A small, unpopular religion.
      Religion: (n) A large, popular cult.

      Take your pick.

      --
      The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those who have not got it. -- G.B. Shaw
  25. Re:I just farted. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really? Mine smell like roses.

  26. Edit for truthfulness by Red+Flayer · · Score: 4, Funny

    From the Article:

    Some 85 items used in producer George Lucas's cult Star Wars series went on the block after one of the film's original producers Gary Kurtz put them up for sale to help maintain and restore his historic collection. (emphasis mine)

    I think the author mispelled "cash out while his collection still had some value."

    --
    "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  27. Hamill's Salary? by airship · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Anyone know how much Mark Hamill was paid to play Luke Skywalker? Would he have been better off to have worked for free and just kept the lightsabre? I suspect that may be the case. If so, that's kind of warped.

    --
    Serving your airship needs since 1995.
    1. Re:Hamill's Salary? by winkydink · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think if you factor in the time value of money, he probably got a better deal with his then-salary.

      --

      "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    2. Re:Hamill's Salary? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I seem to remember he got 1% of the ticket sales for Return of the Jedi on top of his salary. That's way more than the sale price for this saber, and doesn't even count the first two films.

    3. Re:Hamill's Salary? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to IMDB he was paid $650,000. I always heard it was considerably less and given the budget and time, mid 1970s, that sound very high. Known A list actors were making that not unknown kids. I always heard $8,000. That may have been a week but if true and it was say a three month shoot that would put him more like 100 grand. I have to believe the IMDB quote was way off. I know Hamill, Ford and Fisher were paid about the same and they always say it was very low. If all were paid 650K It would have added up to nearly a quarter of the budget. That doesn't include several name actors, Alec Guiness, Peter Cushing and James Earl Jones.

    4. Re:Hamill's Salary? by FidelCatsro · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah , he should of asked to keep the Millennium falcon . he could of made a good living doing the kessel run

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    5. Re:Hamill's Salary? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, Cushing was a hot commodity at the time. Remember all those Tiger Beat covers he was on?

    6. Re:Hamill's Salary? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Should have, you illiterate baboon!

    7. Re:Hamill's Salary? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah such bravery from a shadow .
      A cowardly rat as such.
      Its a common mistake and many people even though they know it is wrong still use it. Not intentionally but as a force of habit .

      It is a mistake but an acceptable mistake , "of "will very soon take on a new meaning as a form of have .
      Language is such a dynamic thing.
      Also why do you use a statement mark at the end of that sentence?

    8. Re:Hamill's Salary? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Its a common mistake and many people even though they know it is wrong still use it. Not intentionally but as a force of habit .

      I occasionally use of instead of have as a deliberate colloquialism. As William Blake said:

      To generalize is to be an idiot.
    9. Re:Hamill's Salary? by swb · · Score: 1

      If it was $8k total, it'd be the most repeated story ever.

      It may well have been $8k up front with some small percentage of first-run box office after, which might have led to the $650k total. There had to have been product and appearance money he got above and beyond the acting paycheck, so it seems unlikely that even $650k was all he ever made from Star Wars.

    10. Re:Hamill's Salary? by CodeBuster · · Score: 1

      It is known that James Earl Jones was paid a mere $2,500 for his voice over services in "Star Wars" and only $8,000 on "Return of the Jedi". The $650,000 that Mark Hamill is said to have received sounds very high considering what the other actors are known to have received for their appearances in these films.

    11. Re:Hamill's Salary? by guardian-ct · · Score: 1

      If you want to make claims like that, it'd be much easier to believe if you had some references to back it up with.

      For example, in a People article quoted here:
      http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Shadowlands/7880/h amill3.html

      Hamill seems to have gotten $1000/week during filming, and 1/4 of 1% of the film's profits. It would make sense that characters with similar screen time would get similar deals.

  28. it actually went for $170,000.... by filledwithloathing · · Score: 3, Informative

    it actually went for $170,000 but there was an 18% buyers premium for the acution I guess they're sort of adding that in (although the math's still wrong). Here's the auction: http://cgi.liveauctions.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll? ViewItem&item=6545186641

    --
    Are you a VF grad? Check out the VFMA Alumni Forums VFMA Alumni Forum
    1. Re:it actually went for $170,000.... by filledwithloathing · · Score: 1

      whoops, math is only off $600 so no mistake. I guess that's what I get for rushing to FP something with a link in it.

      --
      Are you a VF grad? Check out the VFMA Alumni Forums VFMA Alumni Forum
    2. Re:it actually went for $170,000.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your math is still off - you were nowhere even remotely close to first post.

  29. RTFA by AAeyers · · Score: 2, Informative

    Also performing far better than expected was the lightsaber used by Skywalker's dark nemesis Darth Vader in 1980's The Empire Strikes Back, which fetched $118 000 dollars instead of the estimated $40 000 - $60 000.

    $200,000 > $118,000.

    --
    "For Great Justice."
    1. Re:RTFA by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      You forgot to add units.

      $200,000 in (2005 US Curency) $118,000 (1980 currency)

      so with an average of 3% inflation over 25 years...

      $118,000*1.03^25 = $247,065.80 (of 2005 US curency)

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    2. Re:RTFA by generic-man · · Score: 1

      They sold both sabers this year. The '1980' reference was to when the movie was released, not when the prop was sold.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    3. Re:RTFA by Andy+Gardner · · Score: 1
      Also performing far better than expected was the lightsaber used by Skywalker's dark nemesis Darth Vader in 1980's The Empire Strikes Back, which fetched $118 000 dollars instead of the estimated $40 000 - $60 000.

      Better than expected != more than

    4. Re:RTFA by AAeyers · · Score: 1

      Yes, better than expected. They thought they would get $40,000-$60,000, but they got $118,000. Luke's lightsaber still brought in more money than Vader's. I can see not reading the article, but not reading the post you are replying to? That's just sloppy.

      --
      "For Great Justice."
  30. Even as an agnostic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I pray to whatever gods may or may not be listening that you are a woman.

  31. darn by asscroft · · Score: 1

    "looks like starwars is truly done"

    Damn. I was hoping for the final three movies.

    ah well.

    --
    because I have been enjoined by this Holy Office to abandon the false opinion which maintains that the Sun is the centre
    1. Re:darn by JudgeFurious · · Score: 1

      Keep hoping because I think you're going to get them. I figure that nobody wants anything from George Lucas that isn't Star Wars related and that's not going to change.

        He'll take some time off and raise his kids.

        Then he'll make a couple of films that suck even more than the prequels.

        Finally he'll get to working on some kind of new version of the first 6 episodes and "discover" some new cool technology that he wants to play with and then just like that you'll get the headline.

        "Lucas Announces Long Rumored Final Three Episodes"

        I figure I'll be about 51 when it happens. I just turned 40 about two weeks ago.

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
  32. It's was "done" 3 episodes ago by Morpeth · · Score: 1
    "I guess Star Wars is truly done"

    Honestly, I won't miss it. The Star Wars of 1977 I remember, (but hell -- it isn't even available for viewing anymore), was worthy of fond memories. Empire rocks, and Jedi well... the ewoks foreshadowed the horrors to come, can you say Jar-Jar?

    But imo, Lucas' greed killed it and for me turned it into a joke. He has to be the biggest marketing whore of the past few decades.

    How many frickin re-releases and rebrandings can make, repackage and resell. And it was clear he was more and more writing soley so he can market more pointless, useless crap off on kids, and adults apparently.

    I think it could have been a a true classic 6-pack if he didn't cheapen it down so much -- like the last movie, the Burger King dude and Darth Vader, Vader selling M&Ms, ad naseum, I mean c'mon.

    I didn't even see the last film. Sure, I heard the effects were great etc etc -- but between the franchise become a joke, the marketing, and his horrific writing that I could no longer overlook, I really didn't have the heart to see it sadly. Sigh...

    --

    'The unexamined life is not worth living' - Socrates
    1. Re:It's was "done" 3 episodes ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FWIW, you can still find the laserdisc releases of Star Wars on eBay. Also, if you don't mind trading in grey market items, superhappyfun.com has the laserdisc versions and will sell you DVD-R copies pretty cheaply. Use the code "trilogy" in the special offers section.

    2. Re:It's was "done" 3 episodes ago by Cheeze · · Score: 1

      good response.

      I saw episode 1, and I was almost embarassed. I didn't see all of episode 2, but what I did see of it made me want to gorge my eyes out. The acting was horrible, and the plot was very weak. The 3rd one will be on TV in a few months probably and I might sleep through it.

      --
      Why read the article when I can just make up a snap judgement?
    3. Re:It's was "done" 3 episodes ago by idontgno · · Score: 1
      made me want to gorge [sic] my eyes out

      I don't mean to be an Insensitive Grammar Clod, but did this mean that ep 2 made you want to eat until your eyeballs popped out of their sockets?

      What an eye-popping mental image.

      <pedant>Perchance you meant "gouge"?</pedant>

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    4. Re:It's was "done" 3 episodes ago by NidStyles · · Score: 0

      No one ever forced you to watch those maeketing commercials. No one made you look into all of the gimmicks that caused you to shun it. You did all of that to yourself, if you didn't like all of that, you could have simply turned the TV off. Better yet, sell your TV, and quit complaining about useless crap. BTW I saw the movie, and I liked it.

      --
      Yes, I said it.
    5. Re:It's was "done" 3 episodes ago by ICA · · Score: 1

      Wow, thanks for that unique and new insight!!!

      I haven't heard comments along those lines from anyone since the newer movies were released. Also, thanks for mentioning that you never saw the third movie -- that shows that you have a very solid foundation of knowledge to base these rants.

      Can you explain why the original movies were better? What was missing in the newer ones? So far, I only see you complaining about the marketing. Turn off the TV and quit watching ads, then go see the movie.

      Yawn. Pointless ramblings about the good old days should be reserved for old men before they die.

    6. Re:It's was "done" 3 episodes ago by rAiNsT0rm · · Score: 1

      Personally, I hate Star Wars. I always have. I've taken so much heat over the years being a techie and not liking Star Wars... it's nice to see others finally come to grips with the fact that it sucks.

      The only one I ever mildly enjoyed was the one with the Ewoks and the speeder race, etc. That was pretty damn cool back in the day... but that is also the one most people put down. I guess it just isn't my cup of tea, but I've never been ashamed to say I hate Star Wars.

      --
      http://teasphere.wordpress.com - A little spot of tea
    7. Re:It's was "done" 3 episodes ago by blincoln · · Score: 1

      I think it could have been a a true classic 6-pack if he didn't cheapen it down so much -- like the last movie, the Burger King dude and Darth Vader, Vader selling M&Ms, ad naseum, I mean c'mon.

      Please don't delude yourself into thinking that the original trilogy was any different. Have you never seen the Energizer ad where the bunny duels with Vader in the carbon freezing chamber? Or the Holiday Special?

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    8. Re:It's was "done" 3 episodes ago by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      What do you want? A prize?

  33. Stick a fork in it, already! by Albino+Wolfman · · Score: 1

    I guess Star Wars is truly done.

    I was saying the same thing when Phantom Menace was released.

  34. ...or go to space! by Ultronator · · Score: 1

    I'd rather go to space for that price.

  35. Sorry Mark by spaztech · · Score: 1

    Sorry Mark, I didn't know you were an AC on /. I apologize. You did a helluva voice job on.. wait, I have no FN idea.

    --
    /. spaztech ./
    1. Re:Sorry Mark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was the voice of the Joker on Batman the Animated Series. He's also done numerous other villains, but the Joker is his best work.

  36. Edit for truth by Red+Flayer · · Score: 0, Redundant

    "Some 85 items used in producer George Lucas's cult Star Wars series went on the block after one of the film's original producers Gary Kurtz put them up for sale to help maintain and restore his historic collection." (emphasis mine)

    I think the author misspelled "cash out before his collection becomes worthless."

    --
    "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    1. Re:Edit for truth by ICA · · Score: 1

      Amazing! Your comment and that of this person's are strikingly similar.

      Be honest, you guys are evil twins working for Gary Kurtz's enemies to spread hurtful lies about him aren't you?

    2. Re:Edit for truth by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      Accidental dupe post, doh!

      Shouldn't be a problem here on /.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  37. The sad part is by TheSneak · · Score: 1

    A lot of people probably envy whoever bought that peice of chrome and rubber for $200k.

    Thankfully i fall into the group that will just laugh at him behind his back. Unless of course it came with a guy who follows you around making lightsaber sound effects...

    --
    Nasa spent billions making a pen capable of writing in space. The Russians just use a pencil.
  38. WOW!! by spaztech · · Score: 1

    You weren't kidding.. that's insane. He has been a very busy man. That's a helluva list. Kudos for the info.

    --
    /. spaztech ./
    1. Re:WOW!! by I8TheWorm · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Hehe, I was amazed by it about a week or two ago, when I checked out of curiosity. I can't believe he's had time to have kids.

      Of note, one of his sons was an extra in the crowd during the pod racing scene. Ironically, that son was watching Luke's father win the race. It all sounds like part of a Douglas Adams story to me :)

      --
      Saying Android is a family of phones is akin to saying Linux is a family of PCs.
    2. Re:WOW!! by mrchaotica · · Score: 1
      It all sounds like part of a Douglas Adams story to me :)
      Either that, or a Ray Stevens song.
      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    3. Re:WOW!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having kids is only like a 5 minute process to get started if you're lucky/unlucky depending on what you're looking for. However, the longer the better i always say.

    4. Re:WOW!! by jayhawk88 · · Score: 1

      Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back (2001) .... Cocknocker

      Best. Credit. Evar.

  39. And don't forget... by BitwizeGHC · · Score: 1
    --
    N4st0r, trixx0r h0bb1tz0rz! Th3y st0l3 0ur pr3c10uzz!
  40. Re:I just farted. by __aamcgs2220 · · Score: 1

    Dad, is that you? Let me guess, the dog did it, right?

  41. R1.3m by Ziggurat+Dan · · Score: 0

    R1.3m? How much is that in Quatloos?

    --
    I'm pro-accordion and I vote
  42. I'm glad I didn't break my lightsaber... by B11 · · Score: 1
    when I did "Guys And Dolls," because George Lucas makes us pay for those you know.

    And from the looks of it, they aren't cheap.

    --
    insert inflammatory anti-microsoft comment here
    1. Re:I'm glad I didn't break my lightsaber... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neither is your mom, but that doesn't stop me.

    2. Re:I'm glad I didn't break my lightsaber... by mink · · Score: 1

      No toy company wants a product that costs a million dollars to manufacture. - Doctor Thaddeus Venture

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  43. Charity? by ytsejam-ppc · · Score: 1

    Somebody tell me this went to charity and not to George. I'm a starwars geek like the rest, but for the love of pete, this money could be used so much better elsewhere.

    1. Re:Charity? by iainl · · Score: 1

      RTFMing (at least the original story about the auction; I've not read it myself on this one) showed that it was Gary Kurtz who was auctioning off his 'Sabre, not Lucas. Kurtz has a massive collection of film memorabilia, which needs a couple of million dollars' worth of work to restore, clean up and generally make presentable to go on public view. So he picked some pieces that were both worth a fortune and could do without (he had two of them, I believe; a whole bunch had to be made up for various different shots, things getting broken during use etc.) and sold them to pay for the rest to be saved.

      I don't know about the official charitable status of the organisation he runs for preserving these things, but it definitely qualifies as a 'good cause' in my book.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
  44. US dollars? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is that really necessary? we're mostly only concerned with relevant currencies (like euros). so you could have edited that part out.

  45. Rupee conversion rate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The converted rate is not in Indian rupees. There are 43 rupees to the dollar which would make it closer to 8.6 million rupees. Any idea what the R1.3 million is?

  46. Because that would be so much clearer... by cr0sh · · Score: 1
    It turns out its South African Rand... the abbreviation for which is ZAR. Use it.

    Everyone knows that "ZAR" means "South African Rand"!!!

    Seriously, when I saw the headline, I was thinking "rupees", too - so I had to go to the website and see "Ah, South Africa" - and so I knew it wasn't a rupee - but what it was I still didn't know, other than thinking "it must begin with an 'R' - meh". It wasn't until your post and others like it that I learned that SA's unit of currency was called a "Rand". Ok, I can deal with that...

    However, I have to seriously wonder about the writer of the piece. The writer is obviously local for the story, reporting on international events. So, why didn't he instead write the line as:

    ...sold for R1 300 000 (about $200 000 US) at an auction...

    If he had wanted to be a little more "worldly", he could have pegged it with the Euro, the British Pound, or the Yen, or something similar. Of the four, I would have personally picked the Euro - and I am an American (I just think the Euro is something *everyone* in major countries can convert, to an approximate number, in their head quickly to their own currency) - the writer could have just left it in Euros and been done with it...

    I suppose, now, a lot more people know what a "Rand" is, though...

    --
    Reason is the Path to God - Anon
  47. What do you mean 'intergalactic'? by brainburger · · Score: 1

    Still, I recall seeing the back of a VHS copy of Alien describing the beast as 'galactic', which was worse, or something.

  48. Not Rupees... by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1

    South African Rand. But more importantly, about 13 million Bangladesh Taka.

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
  49. Technically, there should be two by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Toward the end of Episode V ("The Empire Strikes Back") Luke loses his hand and lightsaber. So, in Episode VI he should be wielding a replacement.

  50. Wrong department. by solomonrex · · Score: 3, Funny

    "from the dum-dum-dum-dum-da-dum-dum-dum dept."

    I believe that's
    dum-dum-dum-dum-da-dum-dum-da-dum

  51. 3x expectations? by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

    At $200k it sold for 3x expectations, eh?

    so they expected to get $66,666.66~ for it?

    --
    Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    1. Re:3x expectations? by knowsomething · · Score: 1

      actually, they expected to get $66,666.67 ^_^

    2. Re:3x expectations? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was thinking perhaps the reason the 'R' price is listed is maybe they bid in rupiah or something silly. Of course, that would also explain the twit that bought it, from a place silly enough to rip off hollywood and called it bollywood... only to make their movies similar b grade immitations of b grade films.. with more singing-for-no-reason in the middle of a fight scene and less sex.

  52. How many Flooz? by Sagarian · · Score: 1

    That's got to be several trillion Flooz!

    1. Re:How many Flooz? by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

      Damn--almost enough to take Whoopie out on a date!

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    2. Re:How many Flooz? by carninja · · Score: 1

      Tickets to see The Who and a van.

  53. Not a problem by sRev · · Score: 1

    The checkbook was strong with this one...

  54. Special Edition? by Ixalon · · Score: 1

    Your last chance to own the original Star Wars props? I've heard that one before. How long until they release original Star Wars props, Special Edition?

  55. $200 000?!?!? by Pseudo98 · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...we could almost get our own ship for that!

    1. Re:$200 000?!?!? by joelsanda · · Score: 1

      LOL

      --
      The Luddites were ahead of their time.
    2. Re:$200 000?!?!? by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

      And who's going to fly it - you?

    3. Re:$200 000?!?!? by redheaded_stepchild · · Score: 1

      Hey, I'm not such a bad pilot. Cmon! We don't have to sit here and put up with this!

      --
      Don't use the Troll mod just because you disagree with me.
    4. Re:$200 000?!?!? by Lispy · · Score: 1

      BEN: We haven't that much with us. But we could pay you two thousand
      now, plus fifteen when we reach Alderaan.

      Let's continue this thread until the end of the saga. :)

    5. Re:$200 000?!?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Han: Seventeen thousand? Eh? Ok guys, you just got yourself a ship. Meet me in the south area docking bay 63.

    6. Re:$200 000?!?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who'd invest it, you? Probably dump the whole thing into lottery tickets and baseball cards, and that'd end your party real quick.

    7. Re:$200 000?!?!? by footnmouth · · Score: 0

      Mornington Crescent?

      --
      -- For evil to triumph it is enough that good men do nothing.
    8. Re:$200 000?!?!? by SamSim · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but who's gonna fly it, kid?

    9. Re:$200 000?!?!? by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

      Looks like somebody's beginning to take an interest in your handiwork.

  56. OT:Re:Cult? by The+Good+Reverend · · Score: 1

    Christianity is a cult.

    The only difference between a religion and a cult is the number of members.

    Sometimes, bumper stickers are true.

  57. Don't forget- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was Darth Vader's lightsabre before it was given to Luke, and Anakin's before he transformed into Darth.

  58. WTF? by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    a prototype boba fett action figure goes for 13 grand, and Luke Skywalkers lightsaber goes for a measly $200,000! I say again, WTF?

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:WTF? by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      The light sabers are nothing more than press camera flash handles. Any photographer would recognize Luke's light saber as a Graflex. If I remember right, it was a Speed Graphic flash handle, with the bubble magnifier from a 1970's Rockwell calculator, and later Luke added windscreen wiper blades from an MG.

      Graflex cameras may appear quaint, antique, and unsophisticated, but there are photographers who use them every day. They had *really* good lenses available, and the 4x5 negative format is still higher quality than even the 12 megapixel pro-digital cameras today. For detailed close-up work, a Graflex would be a fine choice, especially for macrophotography (you simply mount the lensboard backwards.)

      There is a community of large-format photographers who are quite upset that so many Graflex flashes are being destroyed to turn into Star Wars props. Thanks, George.

      Laugh if you want to, but the guide number of a GE#5 flashbulb is about 200 at 1/100sec ISO100, which is significantly better than your average handheld strobe flash today.

      Fortunately, HAL's Fairchild-Curtis lens still sells for over $150,000...

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  59. Alternate article title: by Dirtside · · Score: 1

    "Someone With Too Much Money Spends $200,000 On Nostalgia Addiction"

    --
    "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  60. I LOVE YOU Dr Zaius! by Thud457 · · Score: 1
    Don't forget "Guys and Dolls" at the Springfield Dinner Theater!

    "Mark Hamill
    IS
    Nathan Detroit"

    "Pepper steak
    IS
    the entree"

    Hamill: Luke, be a Jedi tonight!
    Just be a Jedi tonight!
    Hamill & Chorus: Do it for Yoda, while we serve our guests a soda.
    Hamill: Uh, and do it for Chewie and the Ewoks, and all the other puppets ...
    Hamill & Chorus: Luke, be a Jedi tonight!

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:I LOVE YOU Dr Zaius! by NorbMan · · Score: 1

      Aw c'mon, someone's gotta mod the parent funny. I can't be the only one on here who laughed at that.

    2. Re:I LOVE YOU Dr Zaius! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It wasn't funny on the simpsons, and it's not funny now. Though the Planet of the Apes show with the breakdancing was great.

  61. Still the best Joker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hamill is still the best Joker, animated or not. It still amazes how many people, including die-hard comic book geeks, have never seen his work in Batman: TAS.

    Also amazes me how many people, including die-hard Star Wars geeks, have never seen the Clone Wars shorts, but that's another topic.

    Wait, no, it's not. :)

    1. Re:Still the best Joker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Also amazes me how many people, including die-hard Star Wars geeks, have never seen the Clone Wars shorts, but that's another topic.

      Maybe because they remember the Droids cartoon.

  62. Not exactly done... by OneFix+at+Work · · Score: 1

    I was actually surprised that LucasFilm wasn't keeping this, but I guess they have a bunch of famous lightsaber props to choose from...

    But this doesn't really mean the series is done for...I'm sure they haven't actually used the thing for any of the new (prequel) movies...

    Not to mention the new live action series that's in the works...

  63. Requisite de-violencing reference by gearmonger · · Score: 1

    They sold the lightsaber because in the next version of Star Wars, all the lightsabers will be replaced with flashlights.

  64. The Heck you say! by ianscot · · Score: 1
    This from the people who camped in front of Grauman's Chinese Theater a month-plus before the latest film's release -- and who continued to stand there after they learned the movie wouldn't even be playing inside, saying they were doing so as an act of protest?

    That they show a lack of perspective and proportion should not surprise us overmuch. You think?

    After 30-odd years, the Trekkies have figured out what a piece of Klingon head makeup is worth, relative to the blue makeup the alien wore in a middling episode of TOS. Apparently the Star Wars set hasn't quite worked out how to figure that economy. Yet. (Maybe it's because Lucas pimped the market so severely?)

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
  65. Not the only props silly. by Agarax · · Score: 1

    The props from the orig movies weren't the only ones ever made, silly.

    The first ones were sort of makeshift and made from some old flash tubes (or something like that)

    The ones from the last three were custom made from scratch for the purpose.

    I actually think its good that these things won't spend the rest of eternity locked up in some dusty warehouse.

    Something tangable for one of the greatest movies in the 20th century.

    --
    Remember folks, slashdot doesn't have a -1 "disagree" moderation!
  66. Mark Hamil's best role to date... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I still laugh every time I see Jay and Silent Bob Strike back and MH shows up on screen as "Cocknocker"! LOLOLOL There's a big comic book graphic that comes on screen and says "Look kids, it's Mark Hamil!" :-D

  67. intergalactic hero? by tomcode · · Score: 1

    Technically, isn't Luke an intra-galactic hero?

    --
    f u cn rd ths u cn gt a gd jb n cmptr prgmng
    1. Re:intergalactic hero? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not if we've heard of him a long time afterward in a galaxy far, far away.

  68. If i had $200,000 dollars Re: SMITHSONIAN?!? by voss · · Score: 1

    I would not be buying a lightsaber...but then again
    The people who created "All in the family" DONATED Archies chair to the smithsonian.

    Maybe I expected more out of billionaire George Lucas than a rummage sale on cultural icons...then again considering what he did with the Special editions of Episodes IV-VI and what he did with Episodes I-III I shouldnt be surprised.

    In contrast the original LARGE USS Enterprise model from the tv series is in the smithsonian.
    In case you are curious

    http://www.si.edu/resource/faq/where/phaser.htm

    1. Re:If i had $200,000 dollars Re: SMITHSONIAN?!? by dpilot · · Score: 1

      Years ago the Smithsonian had a touring show. I saw the phaser (and tricorder?) in Providence, RI. They didn't tour the Enterprise. It was really slick that they had a Tucker (car) there, too.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    2. Re:If i had $200,000 dollars Re: SMITHSONIAN?!? by ediron2 · · Score: 1

      If you're gonna trash-talk someone, at least do a few minutes of
      fact checking:

      Gary Kurtz, producer of the first 2 star wars movies, put the items up for auction from HIS private collection, to raise money to open a public film archive.

      No Lucas, no billionaire, no massive ego-trip. Just $2.6 million to someone's pet project (that even has the words 'public archive' in it!!!) The auction ended up netting $2.6 million. As for the lightsaber, after spending $200k on it, I'm betting the new owner isn't going to mistreat the prop.

    3. Re:If i had $200,000 dollars Re: SMITHSONIAN?!? by SlippyToad · · Score: 1

      Actually, I was told that the 3-foot model was there as well, for awhile. My wife and I had this huge argument that we finally settled by going to see the thing -- during the early 1980's I had seen the 13-foot (or whatever) model hanging in some corner. During some later period, she had seen the 3-foot version, and when we went in 1991 it was not on display, and one of the security people said it was a small model that was being prepared for re-display. But now they've got the big mamma jamma back up. I've seen it myself just two years ago.

      --
      One day I feel I'm ahead of the wheel / the next it's rolling over me / I can get back on / I can get back on
  69. No hints this was in the movie by Misagon · · Score: 2, Informative

    There is no evidence that this "lightsaber" was used in the production of any Star Wars movie. We can only tell that is was owned by Gary Kurtz.

    It is a Graflex camera flash with a linhof mount at the end of it. The black grips (or "cooling fins") are of a type not seen anywhere else but in Kurtz collection. No lightsaber in any production photo or publicity photos or any of the lightsabers that Lucasfilm regularly puts on display has any grips like it.
    For all we know, it could be something that Gary Kurtz built himself ...

    (ps. An authentic Graflex 3-cell flash in good condition is worth no more than $200 USD)

    --
    "We mustn't be caught by surprise by our own advancing technology" -- Aldous Huxley
  70. R1.3?-Indian Ruppes, Russian Rubles, S.A. Rands? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is R?-Rubles, Rupees, Rands?. I thought that in the US the only valid currency is the US$

  71. for the amount the person paid by Savatte · · Score: 1

    it should have been
    dumb-dumb-dumb-dumb-da-dumb-dumb-da-dumb

  72. Death of Star Wars, Not -- KotOR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Knights of the Old Republic (RPG), both one and two are absolutely fantastic (though I had to play through part two five times to really appreciate it).

    I was around for the first movie in 77 but interest has a habit of going away after 25 years. The games rekindled that interest unlike anything else could and now I find them actually better then the movies. Both games do very well in revisiting and recreating the original experience (and modestly better).

    If you enjoyed even one of the movies you'll enjoy both games (play the first one first-it's rather important---and get a decent computer, 2 gig + 512 + Geforce 6 or Radeon X600).

  73. Then you haven't seen his man-boobs... by brodin · · Score: 1

    They're Jabbalicious...

  74. Lucass is a Racist!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I couldn't believe it myself, but the other day an internet friend of mine pointed out, by way of IM, how Lucass is a racist. First he pointed me to this page. He said that this guy is like the king of Palestine or Arabia or some place like that. Then he pointed me to this web page and told me to note the striking similarities. It is quite apparent that Lucass mounted Fahd as the Jabba the Hutt character, proving racism!! Study the positions of their hands and the appearance of the face and opening of the mouthal area. This is all the proffs to make the case that George Lucass is a racist! It's true! I didn't want to accept it because I so loved the Star Wars saga, but Lucass has forever ruined this for me with his hidden racism. Due to this reasons, I am studying with more clarity the possibility of even more festering racism in the Star Wars movies. I think, if we get to the bottom of this, we'll be on the road to getting Lucass behind bars for illegal racism. A lot of people might think I am joking but I am not. This is a truly serious matter that deserves the attention of the entire movie going world public. Please make sure to pass this along to everyone you know on IM chat rooms and in RL too!!!

  75. How much for Mace Windu's lightsaber by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    must ... have ... purple ...

    it's the only way to play Lego Star Wars, well, besides silly moustaches ...

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  76. Ob. Joke by nickptar · · Score: 1

    I wonder if the buyer intends to fill it with gasoline...

  77. yes, and it probably cost more than that, really by artifex2004 · · Score: 1

    When I got a few Battlestar Galactica props from the same auction house in an earlier auction, they did the same thing, adding the premium plus an extra percentage for using a credit card. As you can imagine, I wasn't thrilled about it, but I had read the rules beforehand and planned accordingly. Lesson learned: try to have enough funds on hand to wire :)

  78. THE lightsaber? by phriedom · · Score: 1

    It is not accurate to call it THE lightsaber. It is ONE OF the prop lightsabers used in the movie. The certificate of authenticity is very clear. I'm sure Lucas has at least one also. No telling exactly how many there are. I hope the person who bid $200,000 realized that.

    --
    Don't moderate flamebait as Troll. Know the difference or you will be Meta-moderated.
    1. Re:THE lightsaber? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I agree. Posting anonymously for obvious reasons. I own what is certified as a "Darth Vader backup light saber" from episode 4. It was certified by Ellis Props. When shooting of the first Star Wars movie was completed, most of the props went back to the prop house. I picked up the light saber personally from Ellis Props and had a good wander around the place on one of the viewing days. It was amazing. They had the machine gun from The Outlaw Josey Wales, the stuffed bear from The Munsters (or maybe The Addams Family) and so on.

      There appears to be a certain amount of revisionism surrounding how many light sabers there were, and where they went. I've no illusion that I basically bought a flashgun handle, but at least I'm reasonably sure it's been on set.

  79. 3x Expectations by jooon · · Score: 1

    Why am I not surprised?

  80. Intergalactic hero? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I always thought Star Wars was set in a single Galaxy far, far away.

  81. Intergalactic? by Schemat1c · · Score: 1

    The lightsaber used by intergalactic hero Luke Skywalker in Star Wars...

    Would he actually be a galactic hero? From what I remember of the movie it took place in a single galaxy, of course one that was far, far away.

    --

    "Nobody knows the age of the human race, but everybody agrees that it is old enough to know better." - Unknown
  82. Re:Euros? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is that really necessary? we're mostly only concerned with relevant currencies (like yuan). so you could have edited that part out.

  83. That's funny.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...considering Fahd is WHITE!!!! So what are you saying, Lucas is anti-Caucasian?

    1. Re:That's funny.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FAHD is NOT WHITE!!! He is a sandperson. They are not white, they are semites. This would make Lucass an anti-semite!!!

  84. currency exchange by golden+robot · · Score: 1

    i wonder what the lightsaber would be worth in republic currency?