Slashdot Mirror


Nice Browsing From Undead & Unknown Software Projects

metalhed77 writes: "A new version of the Nautilus file manager (1.0.4) has made its way out to the gnome ftps. here's the article on linuxtoday. It includes various improvements which are described on linux today, these primarily consisted of bug fixes and speed ups." Good to see that the effort that went into making Nautilus friendly wasn't wasted. But if you want to browse more than your hard drive, HeUnique points out another interesting project which is not distributed with the official KDE package. It's called: KDENOX ("KDE No X" -- you can use it with X or with framebuffer and QT Embedded: here's a screenshot). The gain? You get Konqueror without KDE, with SSL, cookies, proxy, bookmarks, fonts, and without KDE itself. The executable is small (4MB), doesn't take much RAM, and it works very nicely on low end machines ... (grab it from KDE CVS). Update: 07/08 01:17 AM by T : Here's a screenshot elsewhere; first person to mirror gets a lollipop.

126 comments

  1. So.. did nautilus get better? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Eazel blows millions, gives up Nautilus... is it better now that it's totally run by the free community? If it is, no Linux company should ever get money again.

  2. Re:/. editors merely clever KDE trolls in disguise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    For all they talk about it, you'd think it has features like buttons for "Give head" [...]

    Well, it has been said that Konqueror is the best pr0n browser. Get a load of these features:

    • Checkbox to disable Javascript window.open() method to nip those annoying popups in the bud. In CVS there is a toolbar button, even!
    • Fine-grained cookie control - Let your favorite sites store their settings while blocking privacy-invading tracking services
    • Toolbar button to stop animated .gifs (woohoo!)
    • new Web Archiver feature packages up any website into a .war file for offline viewing

    I guess it's sort of the next best thing to a "Give Head" button.

  3. Good thing they mentioned konq by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5

    Hey look more news about gnome, we better spend most of the writeup talking about kde and konq

  4. Re:It's not KDE, it's GNOME! by HeUnique · · Score: 3

    Hi,

    I made the screenshot, and yes, a bit of Irony won't hurt anyone ;)

    --
    Hetz (Heunique)
  5. Re:konqueror does rule by Micah · · Score: 3

    Netscape is unstable, I think everyone will agree, it's difficult to run it for more than a half hour or so without a segfault or other error.

    Sorry, that's complete BS. Even if you're talking about NS 4.77. Ever since 4.6 or so, I've had pretty good luck with NS's stability. The only times it ever hung were when I was getting to Java apps, with maybe a couple exceptions.

    Now, some people might have had worse luck than I, but you state that "everyone would agree". No, that's just not the case.

    But Mozilla is much better, and I've pretty much quit using NS4.7. Do try 0.9.2 -- it rocks.

    ---

  6. What the hell do you use for a computer? by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 2
    Good God, it's 2001. Buy something with a hard drive in it, for God's sake.

    - A.P.

    --

    --
    "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
    1. Re:What the hell do you use for a computer? by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 2
      Find me a program that _requires_ 4M of code to do what its intended to do and I'm sure you'll find many people able to do it in a lot less code.

      7729636 Mar 26 18:50 /opt/netscape/netscape
      1067312 May 1 2000 /usr/bin/lynx

      And with a lot fewer features...

      - A.P.

      --

      --
      "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
    2. Re:What the hell do you use for a computer? by MikeBabcock · · Score: 2

      You _do_ realise that the complaint is not that the executable won't fit on the drive, but that 4M of code is _too much_ code for almost any purpose needing coding.

      Find me a program that _requires_ 4M of code to do what its intended to do and I'm sure you'll find many people able to do it in a lot less code.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    3. Re:What the hell do you use for a computer? by MikeBabcock · · Score: 2

      w3m (lynx replacement with better layout) is only 279684 bytes. Netscape shouldn't be 4M either -- but its statically linked against all its libraries. /usr/bin/nslookup: 263k /usr/sbin/named: 509k (vs) /usr/bin/dnsqr: 27k /usr/bin/tinydns: 24k /usr/bin/dnscache: 49k

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    4. Re:What the hell do you use for a computer? by MikeBabcock · · Score: 2

      w3m (lynx replacement with better layout) is only 279684 bytes.

      Netscape shouldn't be 4M either -- but its statically linked against all its libraries.

      /usr/bin/nslookup: 263k
      /usr/sbin/named: 509k

      (vs)

      /usr/bin/dnsqr: 27k
      /usr/bin/tinydns: 24k
      /usr/bin/dnscache: 49k

      My point was simply that 4M is a _lot_ of code space (especially of 32 bit CISC code).

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
  7. Re:all playing for the same side by volkris · · Score: 2

    His point was that the article would be about Mozilla or something and it would provide news about the project. At the end the poster would mention something that is completely not news just for no real reason.

    It's not a matter of what's good, it's simply kind of an odd thing that has been happening.

  8. Galeon roolz! by pedro · · Score: 2

    Damn!
    I just upgraded to slack 8.0, so I thought.. "hmm. I'll try galeon! If it's lighter than Mozilla, and it incorporates the gecko engine.. well.."
    This is such a BRILLIANT browser! I *love* the zoom feature (I'm 46, and need it occasionally). The standards conformance (IMHO) and ability to *actually view* almost every page I encounter makes this thing a real godsend. It's been only two days, and I'm using it almost to the total exclusion of 'scape 4.77, which was a HUGE improvement over 4.73, which is what I was using before.
    Yes, it pauses, and lags occasionally, but overall, on my feeble 200(!)mhz system, it's fairly snappy!
    It's still buggy, though. Just try to enter a reply to a /. post like I'm doing right now, and you'll encounter several of them.

    --
    Brak: What's THAT?
    Thundercleese: A light switch.. of TOTAL DEVASTATION!
  9. Re:It's not KDE, it's GNOME! by dylan_- · · Score: 1

    Probably an early adopter...some of us used to read slashdot before it had user ids....I waited a while to register. :)


    --

    --
    Igor Presnyakov stole my hat
  10. Re:What I want in a browser. by MoOsEb0y · · Score: 2

    another browser you might want to try that supports the linux framebuffer is arachne. http://www.arachne.cz. It is made for both dos and linux and supports HTML 3.2 as far as I can tell. (i.e. everything but javascript/shockwave/pop-under x10.com ads. I've used it before and it worked great on a 486 laptop I tossed it on.

  11. What about kfm? by Moritz+Moeller+-+Her · · Score: 1

    KDE-1.1.2 comes with a nice HTML-3.2 browser that should be light enough. Actually gtkhtml contains the same code.
    --

    --
    Moritz
  12. You are a liar. I run Kde-2.2b1 on my PIII-350 with 196 MB ram just fine. No tweaks, standard SuSE-7.2 system, AtiRagePro graphics card.

    If you experience slowness it must be something in front of your screen that slows everything down.


    --

    --
    Moritz
  13. Re:/. editors merely clever KDE trolls in disguise by CTib · · Score: 1

    Well open your eyes wide and read the topic of the posting once more. You will finally understand that it was *intended* to refer to multiple browsers. Just a nice feature to keep you informed with what happens. Get it?

  14. Re:that and RENDERING HTML by Rob+Kaper · · Score: 1
    uhh.. hello, you're surfing the web with a help browser.

    Konqueror/khtml != kfm, please upgrade your KDE 1.x installation.

    By the way, nice website you've got, renders real slick. Thanks for being one of those 4 sites. :-)

  15. Re:Another screenshot posted HERE by Rob+Kaper · · Score: 2
    don't ask me, but the projects seem somewhat similar. Galeon being a lightweight Mozilla and this one being a light konqueror...?

    Not lightweight, embedded. There are plenty of embedded Gecko solutions (check out OST, www.ostdev.net) but I do not think Galeon qualifies as such.

    Konqueror on the iPaq is very cute though.

  16. Re:konqueror does rule by garcia · · Score: 2

    I have never used Konq. I was told by a couple of friends that I should try it out. Perhaps Konq is going to do for the Linux crowd what IE did for Windows browsing.

    Netscape has been falling behind. Mozilla is great and all (it still crashes for me) but it seems like Konq is moving fast.

    I guess NS lost another browser war. :(

  17. Re:konqueror does rule by Julz · · Score: 1

    You know most of the time it so hard to know where something is crashing and what caused it that it's not worth ranting and raving about whose is best, most stable or whatever. The most important thing is that it works when you need it too. Like when your showing something to a client or demoing in front of a large audience.
    Murphys Law: If it can go wrong it will go wrong!
    If life was a box of chocolates, I'd be all finished in 5 seconds flat. ;-)

    --
    When shit hits the fan get some of these https://youtu.be/pY-GncsZ-UE
  18. Another mirror... by brianc · · Score: 1
    --


    SIGLOST && SIGUNUSED && SIGQUIT
  19. bzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzt by JamesKPolk · · Score: 1

    User Agent configurability exists in KDE 2.1 as well.

    Thank you for playing.

    1. Re:bzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzt by loopkin · · Score: 1

      Right, but it's not very easy to use, buried in the conf menu...
      In kde 2.2, u'll have a quick and simple User Agent changer (i didn't see it, but i assume it's more or less like Opera's one).

  20. Great work... by Skeezix · · Score: 2

    Thanks, nautilus hackers, for your continued hard work. 1.0.4 is substantially faster than 1.0.3!

  21. It's not KDE, it's GNOME! by jelle · · Score: 1

    How come it's KDENOX when on the screenshot it says "Galeon is a GNOME web browser based on gecko" ... "It requires Gnome and Mozilla"

    Am I missing something? I don't see KDE mentioned.

    --
    --- Hindsight is 20/20, but walking backwards is not the answer.
    1. Re:It's not KDE, it's GNOME! by jelle · · Score: 1

      Wow, fast reply! Thanks, so that's what I missed.

      Why do KDE people show screenshots of Gnome web sites? Is that sarcasm or have they become friends?

      --
      --- Hindsight is 20/20, but walking backwards is not the answer.
    2. Re:It's not KDE, it's GNOME! by justrob · · Score: 1

      They are looking at the Galeon website with Konqueror.

  22. 4Mb = Small? by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 3

    Call me old fashioned, but I don't consider a 4 megabyte executable to be small... In fact, I don't have a single executable on this system that's 4Mb.

    1. Re:4Mb = Small? by chrysalis · · Score: 2

      Yup, 4 Mb is 100% of the RAM my Atari Mega STE has. And 4 Mb is the maximum amount of RAM I can plug into it.

      -- Pure FTP server - Upgrade your FTP server to something simple and secure.

      --
      {{.sig}}
    2. Re:4Mb = Small? by be-fan · · Score: 2

      Quite true. Other's may scoff and tell you to buy a hard drive, but I look at my BeOS directory, and failing to see any executables over 2.5MB, sigh and agree with you that the whole OS world is heading into the toilet.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
  23. Qt/Embedded by JabberWokky · · Score: 2
    This has been around for awhile - the core Konqueror dev has been influenced a bit by it, adding kiosk and security lockdown features into the main code tree.

    On another note, Konqueror has been ported all over the place - it's a good starting testbed for the kdelibs and the assorted io slaves. It remains to be seen if Konqueror appearing on a platform indicates that a KDE port is being considered (possibly by someone unconnected with the Konqueror port), or if it's just a test probe into that platform (PDAs, various system's framebuffers, etc).

    --
    Evan

    --
    "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
  24. Hmm.... by JoeLinux · · Score: 2

    Looks like a step backwards...like when you had a VGA game in DOS that need to take up an entire screen and had to re-write the drivers for every game. But that's just my take.

    JoeLinux

    1. Re:Hmm.... by jmauro · · Score: 1

      Except the frame buffer is a standard driver with a defined and known interface. And QT Embedded is a standard library with a defined and known interface. No-one is re-inventing the wheel. The drivers back in the DOS day's sucked. It really didn't change until first VESA, then Windows came a long and gave nice standard drivers. Linux isn't going back, just giving more options.

    2. Re:Hmm.... by NNKK · · Score: 1

      How is removing X from the equation a step backwards? all you need is FB support and QT embedded, it's designed for embedded systems, not a standard-issue desktop PC

  25. Nautilus is looking very tasty. by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 3

    I've spent the weekend upgrading my PC to the latest and greatest stuff (Xfree, kernel, nvidia drivers) and thought I'd give Nautilus a go, having not tried it since it's initial release.

    In short, I'm impressed. It seems thoroughly usable and I think it'll have a permanent place on my desktop now. Now to have a go at compiling it with Mozilla support....

    --
    Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
  26. Re:hilarious by thrig · · Score: 1

    Apple stole originally? Yes, that would be another story (wrong, too):

    http://www.mackido.com/Interface/ui_history.html

    My problems with Windows include the look of Windows. (But hey, I'm biased that way...)

  27. Re:konqueror does rule by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
    I will give you that IE doesn't crash much, but I won't give you that it's stable-- since I cannot count the times that 5 or 5.5 have completely misdrawn pages. I think my favorite is when I've gotten moderator points on Slashdot and I go to scroll down, instead of the form elements moving with the text the text scrolls and the form elements are sticky.

    FWIW, getting mod points on /. is the only time IE has spazzed out on me...and that seems to only happen under Win98. I've gotten mod points a couple of times since switching to Win2K, and the problem you describe has never happened.

    The only current-version browser I've run across that consistently has rendering problems is Nutscrape 4.x. Its CSS implementation is effed up pretty badly; sites that render just fine in IE, Opera, Mozilla, Konqueror, etc. sometimes come up as a total jumble in Nutscrape. Even Lynx does a better job with some of these sites. (Want an example? Try http://www.thejewelers.com/store01.html, a page on a site I redesigned a while back. It validates properly for HTML 4.01 Strict and CSS 2. It renders fine in every browser I've thrown at it...except Nutscrape. For their broke-ass browser, there's http://www.thejewelers.com/nsstore01.html. It renders OK on Nutscrape and other graphical browsers (looks nasty under Lynx), but pays no heed to standards or principles of good design.)

    --
    20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  28. that and RENDERING HTML by QuantumG · · Score: 1

    uhh.. hello, you're surfing the web with a help browser. Maybe if you didn't go to just the 4 sites in the world that are designed to look good in Konqueror you would know this (or try to view a web diff with it).

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
    1. Re:that and RENDERING HTML by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      I have zero day kde pup, go to google, type in random phrase, watch Konquer break.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    2. Re:that and RENDERING HTML by NNKK · · Score: 1

      *goes to google*
      *types in random phrase*
      *watches konq display results*

      what?
      Konq is unstable, but not THAT unstable.

  29. Speed by }InFuZeD{ · · Score: 2

    This will definitely help those out there with little ram to run some of the cooler KDE apps. Great job.

    1. Re:Speed by juju2112 · · Score: 2

      It's low-RAM prejudice is what it is!!! :)

    2. Re:Speed by BlowCat · · Score: 2
      Why is this flamebait? Please explain me - I don't get it.

      Many people in many countries simply cannot pay many hundreds dollars for a computer (including the software). Either they get a computer with decent browser for $100 of they don't.

  30. Re:Lolly lolly lolly get yer screenshot here by 1010011010 · · Score: 2

    Anyone care to explain why a Konq screenshot would be of the Galeon home page?

    - - - - -

    --
    Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
  31. Lolly lolly lolly get yer screenshot here by 1010011010 · · Score: 5
    --
    Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
    1. Re:Lolly lolly lolly get yer screenshot here by be-fan · · Score: 1

      I was mostly joking. Writing without extra 'u's is one or two % more efficient than writing with them. Besides, nobody likes the British anyway ;)

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    2. Re:Lolly lolly lolly get yer screenshot here by askwar · · Score: 1

      Don't they rather call it humor?

      --
      Alexander Skwar -- Homepage: http://www.digitalprojects.com | http://www.iso-top.de iso-top.de - Die
    3. Re:Lolly lolly lolly get yer screenshot here by AirLace · · Score: 1

      They call it humour.

    4. Re:Lolly lolly lolly get yer screenshot here by naasking · · Score: 1

      Don't they rather call it humor?

      If by "they" you mean americans, then yes. If you mean everybody else, then "humour" is the correct spelling.

      -----
      "Goose... Geese... Moose... MOOSE!?!?!"

    5. Re:Lolly lolly lolly get yer screenshot here by naasking · · Score: 1

      Besides, nobody likes the British anyway ;)

      But everybody loves us Canadians. Couldn't you do it for us? ;-)

      -----
      "Goose... Geese... Moose... MOOSE!?!?!"

  32. Actually, a giant leap forward... by clump · · Score: 1
    Looks like a step backwards...
    Not at all. Where this type of work really shines is in the embedded market. Hence, 'QT Embedded'. If you can get your applications working without the overhead of things like window mangers, windowing systems/servers, and abstraction layers, you gain speed and a much smaller footprint. For little PDAs and toasters, I don't really want to run an XFree86(*), Enlightenment(*), and Xlib(*) in addition to the applications I wanted to run in the first place.

    (*) substitute with your preferred method. ;)
  33. Really great! by be-fan · · Score: 2

    If anybody hasn't noticed, KDE isn't exactly the most slim computing environment around. (To be equitable, neither is GNOME!) For those of us with low end hardware (300MHz PII, 256MB RAM...) KDE-2 is absolutely unusable (even on a super-tweeked Gentoo RC5 system running XFS!) For such people, lightweight web-browsers like this and Galeon are absolutely essential. The way things are going with KDE and GNOME, freedom is being increasingly restricted. To have a usable web experience, you seem to need to run one of these two (bloated and slow) environments. Thankfully, these project provide a way out. I'd prefer it if it were based on GTK+ (since there aren't many Qt apps outside of KDE) but hey, you take what you can get, no?

    --
    A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
  34. Re:konqueror does rule by be-fan · · Score: 2

    seems like Konq is moving fast.
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    And unlike Mozilla, it actuall MOVES fast. (At least when you get past the 3-4 second startup time!) The thing that bothers me is that the developers don't really bother to code for speed. I'm upgrading to a 1.4 GHz Athlon soon, but I shouldn't have to, not to just run my desktop or webrowser at a decent speed. I can understand a 3D renderer chewing up your CPU. For something like KDE or Konq, its just plain unjustifiable. I really think developers should be forced to code on slow machines, just so the end result uses a sane amount of computing power.

    --
    A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
  35. Re:CLI browser: w3m by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

    w3m would qualify, I believe.

    --
    - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
  36. Re:/. editors merely clever KDE trolls in disguise by MikeBabcock · · Score: 2

    Oh goodness -- get a grip. The person asked a valid question, if a little trollish, and you didn't answer it.

    Yes, the Slashdot authors seem biased toward KDE. That's their opinion, and as editors on a site that claims to pronounce "News", they ought to be open with any such predispositions.

    --
    - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
  37. Re:CLI browser: w3m by MikeBabcock · · Score: 2

    The funny thing is, I typed "w3m" but meant to say wget ...

    oh well.

    PS, why the 20 second delay for those of us who type at >100wpm ???

    --
    - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
  38. Re:/. editors merely clever KDE trolls in disguise by MikeBabcock · · Score: 2

    I'm glad your semantics are so exacting.

    That said, having wit or making sarcastic remarks does not make one a troll, nor does it negate one's arguments, statements or other remarks. The shallowness of the human reading them may allow that reader to ignore the truth value of the statements made in, around or near such "trolling" comments, but it is still present to be assessed.

    --
    - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
  39. Re:What's the best filemanger? by Emil+Brink · · Score: 1

    Heh. Since you asked for it, I guess a little bit of plugging is alright: check out gentoo (quick screenshot link). Some people like it.

    --
    main(O){10<putchar(4^--O?77-(15&5128 >>4*O):10)&&main(2+O);}
  40. because ... by taniwha · · Score: 1

    it's an article about "software projects" not just nautilus ... your question is about as silly as "why is nautilus mentioned first in an article about konqi?"

  41. Re:What's the best filemanger? by Arker · · Score: 1

    Xterm is the best filemanager. :)

    If, however, you were wanting something graphical, the most promising one IMOP is in GWorkspace - although it definately still needs some work. KDE and Gnome both have been horribly disappointing to me, although obviously some people like them. Personally, if I wanted MS Windows on my computer I'd just pull out my CD and reinstall it *shrug*.


    "That old saw about the early bird just goes to show that the worm should have stayed in bed."
    --
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
  42. Konqi on Windows? by jeti · · Score: 1

    A Konqi that runs without KDE?
    One that even runs on QTembedded?

    Since QT is also implemented for
    Windows, and now this version is
    free for noncommercial use - can
    we hope to see a port to Windows?

    I would sure like it.

  43. Fast mirror also by zerocool^ · · Score: 1
    --
    sig?
  44. Re:konqueror does rule by Nimey · · Score: 1
    (this'll probably get me modded down by the anti-microsoft zealots that refuse to accept that a microsoft product is superior to something else, I don't like Microsoft any more than you do, I'm simply informing the public that IE is not as unstable as people belive.)
    Ah, method #3 of karma-whoring - claiming that saying X will get you modded down, especially in reference to MS. Glad to see it worked.
    --
    --
    Hail Eris, full of mischief...

    E pluribus sanguinem
  45. Watching pr0n on a term by yerricde · · Score: 1

    Can't watch mpgs and avis from the command line.

    Unless you have an avi viewer that supports AA-lib.

    --
    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  46. Re:Yeah, check it out by Karma+Sucks · · Score: 1

    My apologies, if this is true. I had just discovered the website.

    --
    (Please browse at -1 to read this comment.)
  47. konqueror does rule by Karma+Sucks · · Score: 2

    Konqueror is one of those projects that is really making a difference for Linux. It is now much easier to refute complaints of outdated browsers and technology on Linux by the Windows sheep.

    I am really intrigued by the KDENOX option and I'm just dying to see the screenshot that was supposed to be linked to in this article. The geocities side is linkdead as usual, does someone have a mirror or any other screenshots?

    --
    (Please browse at -1 to read this comment.)
    1. Re:konqueror does rule by ichimunki · · Score: 2

      You are so full of it! :)

      My idea of a stable browser is one that works as intended, as well as not crashing. (And frankly, I'd rather risk a crashed application on Linux than Windows any day). I will give you that IE doesn't crash much, but I won't give you that it's stable-- since I cannot count the times that 5 or 5.5 have completely misdrawn pages. I think my favorite is when I've gotten moderator points on Slashdot and I go to scroll down, instead of the form elements moving with the text the text scrolls and the form elements are sticky. Before long I have a window full of form elements. That's so unusable stability is irrelevant. I also find it frequently mislocates images or has the same or similar problem with scrolling as images. I use Netscape a lot on that same machine and while it never has a rendering issue, it does frequently lose track of itself and/or crash.

      --
      I do not have a signature
    2. Re:konqueror does rule by BlowCat · · Score: 1
      The problem with IE is not that it's unstable. The problem is that it's closed-source (and possibly less secure because of that) and available only for few platforms (yes, I know about IE for UNIX).

      Instead of guessing what Mozilla 0.9.2 could be just try it and then post.

      I'm using it a lot. It crashed for me only once - after I tried really hard. I haven't tried IE - it doesn't run on my OS. (please don't accuse me of hypocrisy - installing an OS requires more efforts that installing Mozilla).

    3. Re:konqueror does rule by NNKK · · Score: 1

      I'm talking about 4.*, they're all unstable, I can be scrolling down a webpage and it'll just die, or of course, not really die, in which case a killall -9 netscape is neccisary
      I don't even bother talking about 6.x, as it's too slow to get to anything that would cause a stability problem.

    4. Re:konqueror does rule by NNKK · · Score: 1

      I'm aware that I.E. is closed-source, but that's not what most people focus on, most people tend to focus on its stability, without really knowing anything about its stability.

    5. Re:konqueror does rule by NNKK · · Score: 1

      I hold it against both of them, sorry sir, I'll be absilutely sure to bash IE when I mention Opera is closed source.

    6. Re:konqueror does rule by NNKK · · Score: 1

      I've had that and similar things happen on rare occasion, however it's not an IE problem specificaly, it's a Windows problem.
      Whenever that happens, other apps are having the same problem (open up a text file in notepad, scroll down, watch the fun)
      FWIW, I've had the same problem in Linux, FreeBSD, etc. a few times, I think it's actually a video card malfunction more than an OS problem.

    7. Re:konqueror does rule by NNKK · · Score: 1

      that takes you a month? IF netscape stays up for 24 hours, the process size is usualy pretty near that for me

    8. Re:konqueror does rule by NNKK · · Score: 4

      Personaly my complaint with linux browsers has always been, belive it or not, stability, not features.
      This will of course improve with time, but as far as I can tell, IE5.5 is more stable than most or all web browsers avalible for linux
      Netscape is unstable, I think everyone will agree, it's difficult to run it for more than a half hour or so without a segfault or other error.
      Mozilla hasn't achived 1.0 yet, and Konq, though officialy 2.1, simply hasn't matured yet as far ast stability goes, though it is more stable than Netscape.
      Opera I've generaly found to be very stable and very fast, though it's not under a GPL, GPL-compatible, or even Open Source compatible license (well, strictly speaking, neither is Netscape)

      I haven't tried mozilla 0.9.2 yet, I've been hearing good things about stability, but I haven't gotten around to grabbing it yet, prehaps I should, but I doubt I'll be suprised, it'll probably be a lot more stable than earlier versions, but I doubt they've made it as stable as IE5.5 yet.

      By now I can hear people yelling "Are you crazy?! IE crashes constantly!", well I'm here to tell you that contrary to popular opinion, it doesn't.
      I've had it exhibit instability maybe a dozen times since version 5, which has been out for some time. It's outright crashed, *shrug*, maybe 6 or 7 times. This is in win98 and win2k, can't speak for win95, haven't used it since 98 was in beta.
      IE simply is not the unstable peice of crap it was in 3.x and 4.x, it is a mature, stable product. Yes it's from Microsoft, and yes, it's responsible for a deluge of non-compliancy with standards, but it is STABLE.

      (this'll probably get me modded down by the anti-microsoft zealots that refuse to accept that a microsoft product is superior to something else, I don't like Microsoft any more than you do, I'm simply informing the public that IE is not as unstable as people belive.)

    9. Re:konqueror does rule by The+Mgt · · Score: 1

      I haven't tried mozilla 0.9.2 yet, I've been hearing good things about stability, but I haven't gotten around to grabbing it yet, prehaps I should, but I doubt I'll be suprised, it'll probably be a lot more stable than earlier versions, but I doubt they've made it as stable as IE5.5 yet.

      0.9.2 is way more stable IMHO than 4.7. Unfortunately it's still REALLY SLOW, so I find myself only using it for pages that don't work with 4.7.
    10. Re:konqueror does rule by CheechBG · · Score: 1
      I guess NS lost another browser war. :(

      hehe, 0 for 2 is not good, especially when you had AOL backing you for a while ;)

    11. Re:konqueror does rule by XMyth · · Score: 1

      I'm aware that I.E. is closed-source, but that's not what most people focus on, most people tend to focus on its stability, without really knowing anything about its stability

      Then how can you hold that against Opera but not IE?

  48. NetRaider looks cool too by Karma+Sucks · · Score: 2

    check it out -- apparently it's based on Konqueror too.

    --
    (Please browse at -1 to read this comment.)
  49. all playing for the same side by Karma+Sucks · · Score: 3

    Just what do you have against Konqueror and Nautilus and Mozilla mentionned in the same article? It's all free software and it all works on Linux. The desktop wars are dead.

    --
    (Please browse at -1 to read this comment.)
    1. Re:all playing for the same side by tempest303 · · Score: 1

      indeed. Like Volkris said, I'm not *slamming* Konq in my post - I try it out occaisionally, and I think it's a great project. Furthermore, I am an absolute believer that when one Free Software project wins, *everyone* wins.

      My issue, rather, was that the /. editors seem unable to talk about Mozilla or Gnome progress without talking about how much better Konq is. <troll>(even though Mozilla 0.9.2 has yet to crash on me since I installed it on its release date, but I've already crashed the latest Konq on plenty of Javascript pages...)</troll>

  50. But don't I need KDE? by Angron · · Score: 1
    From the original post:
    "You get Konqueror without KDE, with SSL, cookies, proxy, bookmarks, fonts, and without KDE itself."
    Was it just me or are they really trying to emphasize that you can get Konqueror without KDE? : )

    -Angron

  51. Re:What I want in a browser. by Faux_Pseudo · · Score: 1

    First off Mozilla wont work unless it can from the banks point of view look like Netscape or IE.
    I go for command line only for 2 main reasons.

    1. One can learn a lot more living on the command line. X tends to be a little sheltering.

    2. System bloat. My main system is a p100 with 32mg ram and a 1.2 gig harddrive. Running an emacs server, pine, slrn, BitchX, links, micq, and 9 instances of bash at any given moment tends to work the system a bit, and running X would slow it down to a crawl, especialy when 04:00 rolls around.

    Also by being full command line you can move to any other n*x system pull out a floopy and have $HOME sweet $HOME in under 50 seconds.

    On the bright side you get more codeing done because you don't spend all day in alt.binaries.*. Can't watch mpgs and avis from the command line.

  52. Re:What I want in a browser. ***Offtopic***. by Faux_Pseudo · · Score: 2

    You dont have a email addy listed so I am posting here. I wish my bank where as (cool|brain dead) as yours. fb on my current system dose not work worth a damn. I have set up framebuffering on many boxes without problem in the past and even after changing my graphics card (was a unsuported/ported #9). I still get errors and Tux is in reversed colors. I have had no luck even finding out what _might_ be wrong. So far I have just been living without it. seejpeg works so that takes care of 99% of my graphics needs.

  53. What I want in a browser. by Faux_Pseudo · · Score: 5
    Konq without X is cool but how about Netscape without X? You may ask yourself why. In order to access my bank online I have to use Netscape or IE. I am command line only at home and would love to have a framebufferd browser that is usable for this so I don't have to wait till I get to work and use one of their browsers. zen is a browser that will compile for gtk, qt or work from the framebuffer but its totaly useless for anything other than viewing a static page.

    I want to see more development on command line only browsers to take advantage of older hardware or for people like myself who are GUI-impaired. One of the nice bennies of more development would be one could do $ getbankballence.sh | netscape --prompt4password. Now wouldn't that be cool in cron.

    Some of the command line browsers out there, sorted by usefulness:

    links

    w3m

    w3/emacs

    lynx

    zen

    1. Re:What I want in a browser. by Moses+Lawn · · Score: 1
      One of the nice bennies of more development would be one could do $ getbankballence.sh | netscape --prompt4password. Now wouldn't that be cool in cron.

      Hmm, not if you're gonna be prompting for a password it wouldn't...

      --

      What if life is just a side effect of some other process and God has no idea we exist?

    2. Re:What I want in a browser. by juju2112 · · Score: 1


      Maybe you could just change your user-agent to fool the bank's website into thinking you're running Netscape?

      -- juju

    3. Re:What I want in a browser. by loopkin · · Score: 1

      well.. actually, changing the UserAgent is a feature for Konqueror in KDE 2.2, already available in Beta 1 (if this is the problem of course... but it usually is).

    4. Re:What I want in a browser. by __aaahtg7394 · · Score: 1

      does the fb x server not work for you? i know it's kind of cheating, but it would serve your purpose.

      and the only way i look at my bank info from work is over an encrypted ssh tunnel, from _my_ laptop to _my_ workstation at home (my company doesn't own any of my hardware, i just borrow a port on their switch when i'm in the office). my bank is (cool|brain-dead) enough to allow use of lynx-ssl for account checking, once you discern the actual URL it redirects you to via js.

      -jbm, just trying to help, please don't mod up (i suppose -1, Offtopic is in order though =)

    5. Re:What I want in a browser. by Spy+Hunter · · Score: 3
      In order to access my bank online I have to use Netscape or IE

      There's no reason for that to remain true. Just drop bugs.kde.org a line and they'll get right on it. They've got a great bug reporting system over there, and all improvements that get committed to the big KDE Konqueror are automatically available in KDENOX (Konqueror/Embedded is its real name, actually).

      --
      main(c,r){for(r=32;r;) printf(++c>31?c=!r--,"\n":c<r?" ":~c&r?" `":" #");}
    6. Re:What I want in a browser. by reflective+recursion · · Score: 1

      Just curious.. why only command line? (if you have hardware which can run X) I used to love command line (standard text-mode EGA style), but then I discovered rxvt and how to make it look exactly like the console (correct colors, font and all). I still use a console text editor, pine, and standard gdb, but with the benefit of Netscape, Q3 and The GIMP (xv too).

      Also, AFAIK, there has been a Mozilla build which runs without X (uses GTK I believe.. Gzilla or something?).. if you must go without.

      --
      Dijkstra Considered Dead
    7. Re:What I want in a browser. by Static+Analysis · · Score: 2
      You list several ``command line'' browsers, but none of them actually is a ``command line'' program.

      It's a common misconception that many people have; they refer to programs which run in a console as command line, but in fact this is very far from the truth. A command line program is one which is non-interactive. As such, lynx -dump could be referred to as a command line program, but I'm not aware that any of the others could be.

      To simplify, a command line browser - in fact, a command line anything - is one that can be invoked from a script without any manual intervention.

      It would be good to check my bank balance periodically, although it might be a bit depressing!

    8. Re:What I want in a browser. by zvezdan · · Score: 1

      In Konqueror you can go to Settings->Configure Konqueror. Choose "User Agent" and fill in the information how do you want your Konqueror to impersonate itself to a particular server. (Netscape 4, Mozilla 5, etc.). Your bank server will be happy.

      I believe they have the same in the embedded version.

  54. How to get it via CVS by SealBeater · · Score: 1

    On the main page, they have instructions for using cvsup. If you would rather use cvs, here are the instructions.
    export CVSROOT=:pserver:anonymous@anoncvs.kde.org:/home/k de
    cvs login
    cvs co kdenox

    I only put this here cause I had to do some digging to find it. If anyone wants the current source tree, its mirrored here

    SealBeater

    --
    -- Its survival of the fittest...and we got the fucking guns!!!
  55. Lynx 2.8.4.pre3 is released by fredlwm · · Score: 1

    Speaking of browsers, download the better.

    --
    How to contact me - http://www.pervalidus.net/contact.html
  56. Re:What's the best filemanger? by fredlwm · · Score: 1

    IMO GNU Midnight Commander. mc, not gmc.

    --
    How to contact me - http://www.pervalidus.net/contact.html
  57. Re:What's the best filemanger? by fredlwm · · Score: 1

    I forgot to say that gentoo is (again IMO) the best graphical file manager. And some people still use GMC. What a waste.

    --
    How to contact me - http://www.pervalidus.net/contact.html
  58. Konq/E On a server... by JoshuaDFranklin · · Score: 1
    Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't Konqeror/Embedded sound perfect for configuring all those 3rd-party apps on servers? You know, the ones that provide a "easy-to-use web interface" for configuration but won't work in lynx/links/w3m (because of frames, tables, graphics, etc)? I usually slog through the raw HTML rather than fire up X on a server, but a small graphical browser might not be any problem.

    Not to mention my tech computer, where I have to start X just to read slashdot...

  59. MODERATE THIS UP by Kahlua · · Score: 2

    Dumbass, you know it's a nice thing
    to help the freenet project by generating that proverbial slashdot effect on a new CHK entry.

    Do it.

  60. Re:/. editors merely clever KDE trolls in disguise by TampaTim · · Score: 1

    Why, oh why, did this comment get modded up to a 5? Is it not a legit news item that there is a way to run an advanced gui web browser without X? Dare I say it's even bigger news than a point release of Nautilus?(albiet I LOVE Nautilus)

  61. Re:/. editors merely clever KDE trolls in disguise by juju2112 · · Score: 1


    I see what you're saying. But that's what I really like about Slashdot. The editors just say what they think. Have you read the newspaper lately? The writing style they use is CRAP! To me, 'unbiased journalistic integrity' only gets you a really really stale writing style.

    -- juju

  62. KDENOX is indeed mentioned on the KDE site... by NNKK · · Score: 1

    such as it is anyway, taken from the README in the KDENOX CVS tree, also if you look at the main konq website, there's a KDE/embedded link at the top of the menu on the left

    http://www.konqueror.org/embedded.html

    1. Re:KDENOX is indeed mentioned on the KDE site... by NNKK · · Score: 1

      oops that should be Konqueror/Embedded, not KDE/Embedded

      It should also be noted that this is designed for EMBEDDED systems, not simply a 486.
      We're talking about a low-resources system that either CAN'T run X, or it would be ABSURDLY slow.

  63. Re:Interesting stuff on KDENOX by NNKK · · Score: 1

    I think he's saying that he first thought it'd be good for his low-end systems and for setting up thin clients, but then realized that it's not neccisarily that useful, since you could run Netscape or Konq or Mozilla or whatever else just as easily on those systems, because they could be handling just the display part, while a heavy-duty server could take care of the RAM and processor intensive work.

  64. Re:/. editors merely clever KDE trolls in disguise by NNKK · · Score: 1

    There's a reason for that, Konqueror is one of the best browsers to pop up for Linux/Un*x in a long time, it just needs to work out some stability problems.

  65. Re:/. editors merely clever KDE trolls in disguise by infiniti99 · · Score: 2

    The only real stability problems come from Javascript. Try turning it off and you should probably never encounter a problem. Don't worry though, the Javacript code is continually being improved, and I've heard good things about it in the new KDE2.2 Beta1.

  66. Re:hilarious by infiniti99 · · Score: 2

    Linux / Open source has always been about taking the best of all worlds. While Apple users may still bicker about Microsoft stealing their UI (which Apple stole originally, but that's another story), the Linux/KDE/GNOME,etc folks don't give a rat's. They just take what's good. Who cares if something was on another system first? In a recent KDE mailing list comment, someone thought it would be cool if Konqueror had a sidebar like Mozilla and IE. So guess what? Now Konq has an optional sidebar. It all boils down to: "Why the hell not?"

    Btw, the problems people have with Microsoft are not related to the look of Windows. Rather, it's about their proprietary code, licensing issues, etc.

  67. Why we need a lightweight browser by hysterion · · Score: 3

    I say : As a maintenance tool for low end boxes.

    (Such as, say, the old PPC I use as a gateway to the net. 3 years old, 180 MHz, 32 meg RAM.)

    On such a machine, you need something to

    1. Browse local help pages;* **
    2. Search the web for code and rpms;
    3. Download these onto the machine.
    * Bonus if it can read man and info pages, (like gnome-help-browser).
    ** Double bonus if it supports find string on page (unlike g-h-b).

    Skipstone is nice (uses gecko and fewer gnome libs than galeon), but I found it still memory hungry and a quite bit slower than g-h-b, or legacy Netscape for Mac on the same hardware.

    (The one I tried compiled against Mozilla 0.9. Although there may be good progress since, I wonder if gecko may just not be lean enough... Moz 0.9.2 is still a big memory hog on my other machine -- like 50 meg after a little browsing, where legacy Netscape would stay around 30.)

    Encompass uses gtkhtml instead. Can anyone comment on it? Will it do (1), (2) and (3) above? I still need to figure out exactly what dependencies it needs to compile. Anyway, it seems promising -- see this review and some more recent news.

  68. Re:Interesting stuff on KDENOX by einhverfr · · Score: 2

    Actually, it is more of an issue running KOffice, or GIMP ;) than netscape. Actually, for internet kiosks, this would be very useful.

    Sig: Warning The following may be illegal under the DMCA (rot-13 decoder):
    ABCDEFGH I JK LM

    --

    LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
  69. Interesting stuff on KDENOX by einhverfr · · Score: 4
    My first thought was, "This would be great for those old 80486's I have laying around." However, then I realized an important shorcoming... On low end machines you can get advanced functionality by running X because the X server really serves out your display to various clients (usually programs on the same computer) and this can be used to set up thin clients with almost no hard drive, RAM, etc.

    So it is not as useful as I first thought. However, it would be useful for setting up internet kiosks on low end machines. This could be useful where the machine's primary function is to access web pages and perform various console type applications. Particularly useful for libraries and schools, I would think...

    Sig: Warning The following may be illegal under the DMCA (rot-13 decoder):
    ABCDEFGH I JK LM

    --

    LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
  70. Re:/. editors merely clever KDE trolls in disguise by iomud · · Score: 2

    When you get a website you can write whatever opinion you want. If you're not happy with what slashdot's content is like simply stop visiting. It's not like you're forced to come here and read it. I don't remember ever seeing slashdot boast about their journalistic or unbiased standards. Excuse me while I shed a tear for you because you saw something you didnt like on slashdot.

  71. Re:/. editors merely clever KDE trolls in disguise by iomud · · Score: 2

    I dont remember a prerequisite of slashdot readers to answer anyone's questions especially in when all you're doing is complaining. The author didnt ask a question he made a retorical statement in the form of a troll, statements like For all they talk about it, you'd think it has features like buttons for "Give head" and "Win Lottery." (Maybe those are in CVS?) basically negate any point the author was attempting to make by throwing in the oh-so-intelligent-sounding bathroom humor. Others have already commented on slashdot's often biased writings, I don't blame slash editors a bit for writing that why should anyone else get to? Even worse assuming that maybe his comment might sway or change the editorial style of slash editors in the future, hah! Making a huge deal about it is silly, all I'm doing is making a huge deal about someone else making a huge deal out of something which is certainly not huge deal material in my opinion.

  72. Re:/. editors merely clever KDE trolls in disguise by tempest303 · · Score: 1
    Part of the whole IDEA of /. is for people to comment and give feedback! I was giving my feedback, which happened to be that the /. editors seem Konq biased, simple as that. (well, that, and that Konq is a little overrated, by the way people talk about it...) If I didn't like Slashdot, I wouldn't read it. But that doesn't mean I think it's perfect - so I gave my criticism.

    I don't need your tears, sympathy, or cynicism, I was just making a point. And besides, I was funnier than you, so nyah-nyah-nyah! ;)

  73. Re:/. editors merely clever KDE trolls in disguise by tempest303 · · Score: 1
    I got modded up to 5 'cause I had a point. ;)

    But seriously... Note that it *wasn't* the posters who combined the Nautilus and Konq articles - Timothy, the editor did, which demonstrates that it was the editor's choice, not the posters' intents.

    And as an aside, why are people always so eager to ditch X? It's a *good system* - it's not nearly the bloated pig everyone accuses it of being - people just don't know how to interpret top results correctly.

  74. Re:/. editors merely clever KDE trolls in disguise by tempest303 · · Score: 1
    Well, like I said in response to another post, note that it *wasn't* the posters who combined the Nautilus and Konq articles - Timothy, the editor did, which demonstrates that it was the editor's choice, not the posters' intents.

    My point was that there seems to be a pattern of /. editors raving about Konq at *any* given opportunity, especially when juxtaposed to another *Free* project. (ie: they're contributing in part to in-fighting between Free projects instead of promoting Free projects like Konq or Mozilla in place of a closed, non-Free product, like IE) Konq is a very cool thing, but why must the editors always say "Well, Galeon is kinda cool, but Konq can pay your bills, walk your dog, and plan your retirement!" ?

  75. /. editors merely clever KDE trolls in disguise? by tempest303 · · Score: 5
    Ok, I know this is a little petty, but is it just me, or does it seem like every time the Gnome or Mozilla projects do something cool, the /. editors posting the story just HAVE to mention Konqueror or KDE, especially in a context of "well, Mozilla is neat, but Konq can cure cancer, AIDS, and make your kid 25 IQ points smarter."

    For all they talk about it, you'd think it has features like buttons for "Give head" and "Win Lottery." (Maybe those are in CVS?)

  76. Re:What's the best filemanger? by blkros · · Score: 1
    Ask any hacker,
    you happen to see;
    "What's the best file manager?"
    "Q--T--Eee!"

    --
    Damnit, Jim, I'm an anarchist, not a F@#$!^& doctor!
  77. Re:What I want in a browser. ***Offtopic***. by __aaahtg7394 · · Score: 1

    my name is josh and my domain is "joshisanerd.com". i'll let you figure out the address from there ;^)

    i'd just try the plain-jane VGA fb. 16 colors at 640x480 and slow, but if it works, it works.

    as far as the reversed colors thing, i don't remember what causes that. fb is something i tinkered with for a bit, but i really didn't care about (voodoo3 runs fairly well in X).

    anyway, best of luck. bother some people about it, someone is bound to have figured it out!

  78. 4Mb *can be* Small? by Bob+The+Cowboy · · Score: 1
    Call me old fashioned, but I don't consider a 4 megabyte executable to be small... In fact, I don't have a single executable on this system that's 4Mb.
    You obviously don't code in Visual Basic
  79. What's the best filemanger? by Quizme2000 · · Score: 1

    Ye olde discussions with older programmer types have always included bidding their favorite FileManger vs. some other FileManger that never really made it. I just seems like once the GUI browsers came out that file mangers became slower and more wasteful of system resources. The worst offenders are obivous in M$, but who is out there doing it right? I kinda like MidnightCommander that comes with RedHat.

    --
    "Get them before they get....
  80. Mirror of galeon.png KSK@galeon.png by justrob · · Score: 3
    I've put the screenshot in Freenet.

    Retrieve with:

    http://localhost:8081/KSK@galeon.png
    or
    freenet_request KSK@galeon.png galeon.png

    Freenet: http://freenet.sf.net

    The CHK for this key, for the paranoid, is:

    CHK@iE7SmyIIP8rYKqT77jhdJjDcgB8OAwE,OHOBWuZQ703Mw9 YpjUxFpA

    "The Slashdot Effect is good for Freenet" - Gill Bates

  81. file manager? by Prolixium · · Score: 1

    Come to think of it...I'm not sure if I actually use a file manager in Linux. Easier for me to do everything through the shell. Never tried Nautilus though, maybe I should?

    http://www.prolixium.com/galeon.png
    watermelon please? ;-)

  82. Re:CLI browser: w3m by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

    w3m is not a command-line application, it is an interactive application.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  83. I like DOpus by roxytheman · · Score: 1

    I am an Amiga slave and I have always loved Directory Opus. After using it for some years, I can't go back to sloppy windoze-functionality-cloned managers like Gmc, kfm and nautilus. I always have loads of files lying around in my dirs and love to move around huge amounts of data. Huge fancy icons just doesn't do it for me. Though I have found two nice file managers that I like - worker and gentoo. After configging the buttons on them, everything is lightning fast.
    If I can't use one of those, I stick to bash :-)

    --

    Find nice cocktail recipes @ www.spitzy.net
  84. Another screenshot posted HERE by roxytheman · · Score: 1

    http://www.spitzy.net/galeon.jpg ... And why it is the Galeon homepage? don't ask me, but the projects seem somewhat similar. Galeon being a lightweight Mozilla and this one being a light konqueror...?

    --

    Find nice cocktail recipes @ www.spitzy.net
  85. so... by prepp · · Score: 2

    by my thoughts, that does really look like galeon, oh well.. It has some areas that it can be applicable in, picoBSD anyone?

    --
    "There is hopeful symbolism in the fact that flags do NOT wave in a Vacuum " --Arthur C Clarke