um. you are saying the "bluest of the blue" (which I read as "liberal") would be more likely to agree that PRISM (or whatever surveillance program is de' jour) is acceptable? Really? Why? Because that 'liberal' Obama (PRISM, ) is for it? Or maybe that 'liberal' Bush (TIA, Patriot Act, TSA)? which one?
This is not a conservative vs. liberal problem. This is a all government becomes corrupt problem.
I am repeating myself here, but Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759
better, bill each and every advertiser in the phonebook for the cost of disposal, as a community. (need to make the dollar signs add up to something big.)
Rape, Dangerous Pregnancy. Sometimes the woman doesn't have a choice or has her life in mortal danger. So I throw it back at you; who's life do you choose to protect? who's innocence gets to be protected?
It is simply not fair to tell a women that she MUST continue to be pregnant, or for that matter must have an abortion.
As a loose analogy, would be okay for someone to tell you that you MUST provide blood or organs to prevent another from dying? That by refusing to do so you condemn that person to death, because there is no other person that can provide the required material, and then are made criminally responsible for it?
Yes, as a father and husband, I am part of the trio involved. But in the end my opinions about abortion mean NOTHING. I am not the pregnant party. I would like to think that I will be listened to and my arguments for or against an abortion carefully considered, but finally it is not my choice. I do feel that after a certain point an abortion should be highly restricted (notice that I did NOT say disallowed), but I don't know that I CAN know when that would be, so any law about it will be flawed.
In the end women are not property. They are sentient, thinking beings with the right to make decisions about their actions, person, and possessions.
As long as there isn't positive identification of voters at the voting booth, there will always be rampant fraud in some areas. Eliminate the hacker prone, but require state ID to vote.
unless that State ID is free... you have a voter tax. and that is already been declared illegal. (Jim Crow laws and all)
Re:Android just won't catch up with iPhone
on
Unlocking Android
·
· Score: 1
Um, AD2P has been supported since the release of 1.5. It has been out for 2-3 weeks.
So, the court says "take the thing you sold to the customer from the customer and break it" ? Okay, then who gets to pay for the customers loss of property by a third party? The company? The court (read TaxPayer)?
Such an order would be equivalent to stealing and would be unlikely.
fine. but those developers, etc. can be used for other things after win95/98... A large manufacturing plant cannot be easily nor cheaply re-purposed. Oh, and such a plant might cost tens or hundreds of BILLIONS of $$. (with a B)
Repeat after me: STATE/FEDERAL business MAY NOT use NON-STATE/NON-FEDERAL Email servers.
It is not legal, it violates records retention acts and it is unethical as well as it keeps the business of OUR government from OUR scrutiny. To head off the quips, yes the business of government is not normally availible to the public, however it MUST BE MADE PUBLIC upon lawful order. If the exchanges are not on STATE/FEDERAL servers, then the public release of it may not be possible.
say you are taken to court and the decision is that in fact you ARE only licensed to view. At that point you file a motion charging the *AA with literally MILLIONS of cases of false advertising. NICE!
BEEEEEEEP wrong. earning a profit is fine. but the oil companies are 'only earning a profit' someting like 10,000% even as prices for the raw materials sky rocket.
the cables are laid, and equipment is in place... and I am sure the cost for those is already paid.
How can they get away with blocking port 80? I can see this happening a few thousands times "Hello, Customer Abuse? Yes, I don't seem to be able to get to ANY website... Yes I get mail in my outlook express/thunderbird, yes ping works..."
this behavior and _quality_ of vista (and the DRM) will push a large number of people to mac or linux. MS will need to consider the world where either: they get laws passed making other os's illegal; or they no longer control an 80% market share.
Does anyone remember the comm devices that were in Babylon 5? a little rhomboid that stuck to the back of the hand. Solve the 'stick to the back of hand' problem... I think that would be great
not to mention the confession of EB to being in possesion of the stolen goods, selling (trafficing) in the stolen goods.... aren't there FEDERAL laws about being in possesion of stolen goods? Even if you don't know it?
And by offering to SELL her back the goods, isn't that extortion? wow that is ANOTHER federal law too... DAMN what good are laws unenforced?
Yes, soon to be two... Comcast is going to buy AT&T Internet Broadband. Sound like even MORE of a monopoly.
Let's count:
mainline connections:
dialup
isdn (a phone service)
DSL on copper (a phone service, or on their wires)
Cable
Dialup sucks, isdn is EXPENSIVE and not always on, DSL is starting to price like ISDN (unless you buy the consumer 'dialup' version which IS well priced but is not always on, and only slightly faster (2-3x best dialup) than dialup) and is also becoming only availible from the phone companies, and cable is going monopolistic.
other options
phone services/HIGH cap (t1,t3, oc3 etc)
satelite
direct lines (HA:>)
t1s COST,satelite is FAST, high latency and expensive BUT FAST, Beoing and Microsoft can buy direct lines
upcoming / limited
local wireless
Others?
SO... Everything that the government has done about wiring the US has forced the growth of monopolistic bohemoth providing entities. What ever they may have tried to achive, this is what we HAVE.
okay. so try this one: A company (A Company,LLP) offers a service: Send your tape to us, we will edit out the parts that you don't want and send it back....for a service price. is this okay.
Here is the spec page for the device.
Shock
Operating 1,960m/s2 (200G), 2ms half sine wave
Non-Operating 9,800m/s2 (1000G), 1ms half sine wave
pretty good though.
Slashdot Mirror
how about this: if you float and live, you are a witch and we will burn you at the stake, but, if you sink and drown and die you are not a witch.
is a can't win.....
um. you are saying the "bluest of the blue" (which I read as "liberal") would be more likely to agree that PRISM (or whatever surveillance program is de' jour) is acceptable? Really?
Why? Because that 'liberal' Obama (PRISM, ) is for it? Or maybe that 'liberal' Bush (TIA, Patriot Act, TSA)? which one?
This is not a conservative vs. liberal problem. This is a all government becomes corrupt problem.
I am repeating myself here, but
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759
Q.E.D.
Fuck You.
better, bill each and every advertiser in the phonebook for the cost of disposal, as a community. (need to make the dollar signs add up to something big.)
Rape, Dangerous Pregnancy.
Sometimes the woman doesn't have a choice or has her life in mortal danger. So I throw it back at you; who's life do you choose to protect? who's innocence gets to be protected?
It is simply not fair to tell a women that she MUST continue to be pregnant, or for that matter must have an abortion.
As a loose analogy, would be okay for someone to tell you that you MUST provide blood or organs to prevent another from dying? That by refusing to do so you condemn that person to death, because there is no other person that can provide the required material, and then are made criminally responsible for it?
Yes, as a father and husband, I am part of the trio involved. But in the end my opinions about abortion mean NOTHING. I am not the pregnant party. I would like to think that I will be listened to and my arguments for or against an abortion carefully considered, but finally it is not my choice.
I do feel that after a certain point an abortion should be highly restricted (notice that I did NOT say disallowed), but I don't know that I CAN know when that would be, so any law about it will be flawed.
In the end women are not property. They are sentient, thinking beings with the right to make decisions about their actions, person, and possessions.
As long as there isn't positive identification of voters at the voting booth, there will always be rampant fraud in some areas. Eliminate the hacker prone, but require state ID to vote.
unless that State ID is free... you have a voter tax. and that is already been declared illegal. (Jim Crow laws and all)
Um, AD2P has been supported since the release of 1.5. It has been out for 2-3 weeks.
So, the court says "take the thing you sold to the customer from the customer and break it" ?
Okay, then who gets to pay for the customers loss of property by a third party? The company? The court (read TaxPayer)?
Such an order would be equivalent to stealing and would be unlikely.
fine. but those developers, etc. can be used for other things after win95/98...
A large manufacturing plant cannot be easily nor cheaply re-purposed. Oh, and such a plant might cost tens or hundreds of BILLIONS of $$. (with a B)
it would full under the law covering "obtaining access to a network/computer to which you don't have permission"
Repeat after me: STATE/FEDERAL business MAY NOT use NON-STATE/NON-FEDERAL Email servers.
It is not legal, it violates records retention acts and it is unethical as well as it
keeps the business of OUR government from OUR scrutiny.
To head off the quips, yes the business of government is not normally availible to the public,
however it MUST BE MADE PUBLIC upon lawful order. If the exchanges are not on STATE/FEDERAL
servers, then the public release of it may not be possible.
on that advertising bit...
say you are taken to court and the decision is that in fact you ARE only licensed to view. At that point you file a motion charging the *AA with literally MILLIONS of cases of false advertising. NICE!
"Separately, they set up DoS attacks ..."
the 'set up DoS attacks' part is where THEY ARE BREAKING THE LAW!.
BEEEEEEEP wrong.
earning a profit is fine. but the oil companies are 'only earning a profit' someting like 10,000% even as prices for the raw materials sky rocket.
the cables are laid, and equipment is in place... and I am sure the cost for those is already paid.
How can they get away with blocking port 80? I can see this happening a few thousands times ..."
"Hello, Customer Abuse? Yes, I don't seem to be able to get to ANY website... Yes I get mail in my outlook express/thunderbird, yes ping works
Unbelievible
THERE IS LAW: HIPAA http://aspe.hhs.gov/admnsimp/pl104191.htm#1177
Someone need to mail them to the wall for disclosure of medical documents.
this behavior and _quality_ of vista (and the DRM) will push a large number of people to mac or linux. MS will need to consider the world where either: they get laws passed making other os's illegal; or they no longer control an 80% market share.
Does anyone remember the comm devices that were in Babylon 5? a little rhomboid that stuck to the back of the hand. Solve the 'stick to the back of hand' problem... I think that would be great
not to mention the confession of EB to being in possesion of the stolen goods, selling (trafficing) in the stolen goods.... aren't there FEDERAL laws about being in possesion of stolen goods? Even if you don't know it?
And by offering to SELL her back the goods, isn't that extortion? wow that is ANOTHER federal law too...
DAMN what good are laws unenforced?
to fail to report a crime get get you in to S_E_R_I_O_U_S trouble. I say f*ck the company and report the felony (in the case of child porn)
Yes, soon to be two ... Comcast is going to buy AT&T Internet Broadband. Sound like even MORE of a monopoly.
Let's count:
mainline connections:
- dialup
- isdn (a phone service)
- DSL on copper (a phone service, or on their wires)
- Cable
Dialup sucks, isdn is EXPENSIVE and not always on, DSL is starting to price like ISDN (unless you buy the consumer 'dialup' version which IS well priced but is not always on, and only slightly faster (2-3x best dialup) than dialup) and is also becoming only availible from the phone companies, and cable is going monopolistic.other options
- phone services/HIGH cap (t1,t3, oc3 etc)
- satelite
- direct lines (HA
:>)
t1s COST,satelite is FAST, high latency and expensive BUT FAST, Beoing and Microsoft can buy direct linesupcoming / limited
SO ... Everything that the government has done about wiring the US has forced the growth of monopolistic bohemoth providing entities. What ever they may have tried to achive, this is what we HAVE.
SkessekS
okay. so try this one: .for a service price.
A company (A Company,LLP) offers a service:
Send your tape to us, we will edit out the parts that you don't want and send it back...
is this okay.
Here is the spec page for the device. Shock Operating 1,960m/s2 (200G), 2ms half sine wave Non-Operating 9,800m/s2 (1000G), 1ms half sine wave pretty good though.