Slashdot Mirror


Toshiba's Wristwatch PDA

pdawerks says "Toshiba has previewed what it calls a Wristwatch PDA, which it considers to be very popular in future. According to MobileMag and BBC News, the device will provide the functionality of a high-end PDA in a comparatively small and handy form factor. It features a wide hi-definition display, integrated Wi-Fi and Bluetooth wireless networking and is perfectly suited for videophone conferences. The concept also sports voice recognition, which allows you to simply talk to your Wristwatch PDA."

140 comments

  1. My question is this by revolvement · · Score: 5, Interesting

    When is enough, enough?(When it comes to size factor) With PDAs, how small can you have them until they're no longer functionable?

    1. Re:My question is this by lanswitch · · Score: 3, Insightful

      as long as you can read the screen, i guess.

    2. Re:My question is this by colinramsay · · Score: 1

      We were talking about this the other day, and it really seems like some kind of alternative interface is necessary.

      Consider a device which can project images onto your retina and also track the movements of your hands. Something like that would have no trouble taking input from a "virtual" projected keyboard...

      To be honest, my phone is pretty much as small as it can get, and I wouldn't want to do any serious data entry on it. There needs to be some kind of interface revolution before we can do anything really cool.

    3. Re:My question is this by ggvaidya · · Score: 2, Interesting

      . --- this big

      and even then, they could store files, which you retrieve by bluetooth. think about the espionage value!

    4. Re:My question is this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The big limiting factor is interface.

      But, as we're seeing nanoscale lenses these days, give it 20 or 30 years... I'm sure "PDAs", or their relative equals by then, will be nearly invisible, taking information from gestures/subvocals/whatever, and delivering it to a contact lens or something...

    5. Re:My question is this by timeOday · · Score: 1
      In this case they've addresssed the issue by combining a large (for a "wristwatch") form factor, with nonexistant technologies: working voice recognition and a screen with the resolution of paper (in fact the "screen" appears to be a cutout of an AtoZ map).

      If and when speech recognition and speech production do work, I don't see why you couldn't have a pda the size of a normal wristwatch. After all you can interface with a real, human assistant effectively using only speech.

    6. Re:My question is this by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 3, Funny
      My question is:

      Could you wear this thing, and still get a date?

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    7. Re:My question is this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the answer is smaller than that one.. didja see it.. it's huge.. I ain't wearing that on my wrist

    8. Re:My question is this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When is enough, enough?(When it comes to size factor) With PDAs, how small can you have them until they're no longer functionable?

      As, good old Slashdot mods, always speaking the truth. I mean, someone who thinks "functionable" (sic) is a word is somewhat of an Interesting specimen.

    9. Re:My question is this by LiSrt · · Score: 1

      I'm waiting for the first ribosome based turing machine...

    10. Re:My question is this by cygnus · · Score: 2, Funny
      Could you wear this thing, and still get a date?
      yes, but only with Leela, from Futurama.

      if cyclops chicks with purple hair aren't your thing, you're SOL.

      --
      Just raise the taxes on crack.
    11. Re:My question is this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Could you wear this thing, and still get a date?
      yes, but only with Leela, from Futurama.

      Am I the only one who read the first half of that sentence, and thought "Leela" from Dr. Who?

      Of course, that was filmed back in the 70s. So ya gotta figure that today, she'd be older than my mom...

    12. Re:My question is this by Brian+Dennehy · · Score: 3, Funny

      Could you wear this thing, and still get a date?

      Well, yes. It'll tell you the time and the date!

  2. Nice by HappyCitizen · · Score: 0

    That sounds awsome. A PDA on your wrist, with all that. I can't imagine that not being a big hit if people can afford it. I hope I can....

    --
    http://www.beyourowneviloverlord.tk
    http://www.frozenchickenthrowing.tk
    http://www.killercamel.tk
  3. Contradiction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Anyobody else thinks "small and handy form factor." and "a wide hi-definition display" contradict each other? What use is a high resolution display if it's so small?

    1. Re:Contradiction? by Depili · · Score: 1

      well, they are probably talking about high dpi displays, so you can cram enough pixels into it, for it to pose as a usable display

    2. Re:Contradiction? by jonjohnson · · Score: 1

      Not really a contradiction. It's similar to running your 21" monitor at 640x480 as compared to 1600x1200. The size of the monitor didn't change, but the images it puts out are higher resolution.

    3. Re:Contradiction? by PhotoBoy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It does look a bit bulky, then again I still wear my "bulky" Casio Databank watch, I'd be lost without it. Although in comparison it's a tiny watch. If everyone is wearing something that big I might be persuaded but it looks delicate too, one clumsy swing of the arm could result in a broken screen...

      I've looked for possible replacesments to my Casio Databank lots of times, but things like the (now cancelled) Fossil PDA watch and this can't seem to match the battery life of my trusty Casio (currently 5 years compared to the Fossil's 4 days).

      It's true these newer "watches" have CPU's and screens that provide flexibility for other applications, but I can't see them being that much better at reminding me when Eastenders is on, what time it is in France or even retrieving a phone number. Which is all I really want from a watch to be honest. And the Casio is decidedly smaller and more resistent to the odd bang too.

      That said this old watch isn't going to last forever, and I don't like the current Databank watches- it seems the new ones only allow a stingy 8 characters to be entered per reminder or contact; compared to the "huge" 16 of my current watch. You'd think they'd add more space not less! :)

      To paraphrase the immortal Douglas Adams, I still think digital watches are a pretty neat idea.

    4. Re:Contradiction? by o0zi · · Score: 1

      Imagine all those people hunched over their wrists and getting eye strain... could be kind of like the iPod's effect on hearing :)

    5. Re:Contradiction? by torpor · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I saw the Motorola Linux phone at CeBIT, and I thought the same thing until I saw video's and TV shows being played on it ... I'd quite happily carry around a high-definition capable player in my pocket, if it doubles as a cell phone, media player, and PDA.

      Seems thats the direction its going ... and btw, the Mot phone ws -superb- ... soon as its available in my market, I'll get one.

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    6. Re:Contradiction? by ceeam · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's not _too_ small (you clicked the link, did you?).
      FYI: the screen size on 7650/3650/3660 Nokias is 43x37mm (IIRC). Looks ok to be used in watches (bar other problems, like power consumption and stuff). And those smartphones are considered pretty useful by many.

    7. Re:Contradiction? by WC+as+Kato · · Score: 1

      Timex had a line of watches called the DataLink. I think they only have one model now. They used to have a whole line of them. You can download data from a PC to the watch. It was like a mini-PDA. I switched from a Casio Databank to Timex DataLink a few years ago. I still wear the both my DataBank and DataLink but I don't load them data anymore because I now carry around a real PDA.

      --
      --- I'm Green Hornet's sidekick not Inspector Clouseau's!
  4. Point of diminishing returns? by Zathras26 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Smaller and lighter is usually a good thing with mobile devices, but doesn't there come a point when you've gone too far? In particular, with a wristwatch PDA, I'd be concerned that the screen is too small to be useful -- even on a regular-size PDA, I sometimes feel "cramped".

    1. Re:Point of diminishing returns? by Sheridan · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I totally agree. I'm a PocketPC user, and that is just about the right form factor for me (it makes an excellent chess companion ;-)...

      For basic contact/appointment stuff, I usually rely on my mobile phone.

      If anything I'd probably prefer something slightly larger than the PocketPC form factor for the roles I use it for - a 640x480 screen (as on the new Zaurus) would be nice for digital photo browsing - and a built-in ethernet port would be great (I already have a foldable keyboard). It would make the ideal quick ssh terminal in that case. (I know you can get ethernet CF cards, but those things are too expensive... even the 802.11b wireless CF that I use in it at home is half the price of the cheapest wired ethernet CF I've seen!). Likewise, a serial connection would make it into an extremely useful mobile console in the datacentre server rooms.

      (The more I read the above, the more it looks like a miniature laptop is what I'm after... or the venerable Psion 5).

    2. Re:Point of diminishing returns? by rjelks · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure how small it really is. If the picture is any indication of how it would fit on an arm....it looks way too bulky. I don't even like wearing a wristwatch because it bugs me while typing. I'm a bit clumsy too and this thing would last about a week on my arm before it was slammed gently into a doorjam/desk/coffee table. I like the idea, but maybe we should wait for virtual displays on glasses or better audio interfaces. On the flip side, it does look like a chick magnet......if you happen to be at a Star Trek convention. :)

      -

    3. Re:Point of diminishing returns? by G-funk · · Score: 1

      On the flip side, it does look like a chick magnet......if you happen to be at a Star Trek convention

      Which is about as useful as a regular old magnet in a plastic room filled with sawdust.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
  5. But, but, but... by Blahbbs · · Score: 5, Insightful

    But, It's HUGE! No one wants a monstrosity like that on their wrist.

    1. Re:But, but, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think this product would sell more if they marketed it as a form of reliable birth control.

    2. Re:But, but, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My wife will hate it, ergo I love it.

    3. Re:But, but, but... by nartz · · Score: 1

      They should just have a needle on the side so that diabetics can test their blood sugar levels anytime.

    4. Re:But, but, but... by JaiWing · · Score: 1

      Does anyone remember the comm devices that were in Babylon 5? a little rhomboid that stuck to the back of the hand. Solve the 'stick to the back of hand' problem... I think that would be great

  6. ironic by tobes · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't wear my watch anymore since I find it more discrete to just keep a cell phone/pda in my pocket and whip it out when I need to know what time it is.

    I think the watch form factor was just fine when time was the only portable function. Once you start adding other features it really pays to have more interface options.

    1. Re:ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      When I reach in my pocket and whip it out you know what time it is...

    2. Re:ironic by slash_fossils · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Same here. There was a time when I was in a gadget war of sorts with my buddies, to see whose watch could do more things (early 80's). But once it reached the full blown scientific calculator stage, we just stopped. I did try the TV remote thing but ended up bringing the thing back.

      Now I don't even wear a watch. My phone/pda can tell me the time or I just look at the computer screen in front of me.

      The plastic wristband of my watch would get me all uncomfortably sweaty. By the looks of that chunk of plastic Toshiba wants me to wear, I'm just about getting a rash thinking about wearing it!

    3. Re:ironic by Ugmo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I don't wear my watch anymore since I find it more discrete to just keep a cell phone/pda in my pocket and whip it out when I need to know what time it is.

      I really think that a good form factor for a PDA or some kind of electronic device is the old Pocket Watch on a chain.

      Make the case out of some light weight metal or gold at the high end and have a mall screen in one end of the clamshell and a key pad at the other. With bluetooth you could also have a headset seperate from the PDA/phone. The pcoket chain could double as an antenna and the phob (the hunk of metal at the end of the chain that stays in your pocket) could be the battery/power supply.

      I wish some jewerly designer/watch company would team up with a PDA/Cell Phone company and make one.

    4. Re:ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like this idea. Patent it and make one! You'd make a mint.

    5. Re:ironic by nartz · · Score: 1

      Why do they always have to make it so geeky looking? Honestly, if ANYONE were to wear it they would immediately be branded as geek and rendered invisible to women's eyes. Why not sacrifice a few features for a better size, and have it in a nice stainless steel?

    6. Re:ironic by justdigi · · Score: 1
      You mean like these mobile phones:


      They are approaching what you described. Unfortunately I don't think they work worldwide, as they are Asian models..
    7. Re:ironic by smaug195 · · Score: 1

      Time to scream and run away?

      Or is that time to laugh? I can never remember which one.

    8. Re:ironic by Anonymous+Slacker · · Score: 1

      I can't see myself using some monstrosity pda thing on my wrist.
      I switched from wearing ugly-looking wristwatches to pocketwatches in college, but after graduation and being given a pager at work, I stopped wearing a watch altogether whenever I had my pager on me.
      A couple months ago I found a decent looking slender wristwatch buried in my closet, and now wear that when I go somewhere that appearance matters. Nothing too expensive, just simple, elegant and functional.
      Throughout high school and college, I was notoriously hard on my watches -- very few non-digital ones would last even a full year before dieing permanently for no obvious reason. And digital ones just aren't as stylish in my opinion. (I still have an older digital watch from 8-9 years ago that works quite well that I wear when working out, but that's about the only time I'll wear it -- I don't like the extra weight on my wrist when I do a lot of typing all day long)

      --
      "If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice!" -Rush
  7. And the expected lifespan is... by heironymouscoward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    About two days, before you smash your wrist into desk or corner as you're walking, and little pieces of LCD dribble down your arm.

    "No, the screen is not warrantied against accidental damage."

    And the device is not suit-compatible. Great for t-shirts, lousy with long sleeves.

    Needs more work.

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une signature
    1. Re:And the expected lifespan is... by levell · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'd say it is suit compatible but not t-shirt compatible. It looks pretty ugly; I think most people would prefer to have it hidden and just pull up their sleeve to use it.

      --
      Struggling to find a day everyone can make? WhenShallWe.com
    2. Re:And the expected lifespan is... by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      you are also missing one other important point.. if it is not WATERPROOF then it is an absolute piece of crud.

      The human body is a very hostile place to be for electronics, if it lives on your arm, it had better be waterproof, almost bulletproof, scratchproof (why do you think that a good watch crystal is made out of a super hard scratch resistan material?) and breathe easily where it touches the human. I wont grab my cellphone in the middle of a downpour, but I wont think of covering my arm.. also what about when I wash my hands? get drunk and puke all over myself? etc....

      EVERY single device that resides on your wrist or finger has to bee shockproof and waterproof, and these designers are obviousally not smart enough to realize that.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    3. Re:And the expected lifespan is... by metamatic · · Score: 1

      Yeah, my requirements for a watch were very simple:

      1. Shockproof enough to withstand everyday abuse like catching my wrist on doors.

      2. Waterproof to any depth I might reasonably swim to without special equipment.

      3. Accurate to a few seconds a month or better.

      4. Doesn't need batteries changing or other regular maintenance.

      5. Time, date.

      It's surprisingly hard to fulfil those basic requirements.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  8. Doubles as a wrist brace by chia_monkey · · Score: 4, Funny

    Did you see how big that thing was? I don't expect it to be tiny, but it doesn't look like you'd be able to move your wrist at all with that thing. It stretches from your wrist to your elbow! Soon we'll see all the skaters wearing it as wrist protection.

    --

    "He uses statistics as a drunken man uses lampposts...for support rather than illumination." - Andrew Lang
  9. Torpedo by compbrain · · Score: 2, Funny

    All those in favor of wearing a grey and blue torpedo on their wrists and calling it a PDA, say I. In other news you can buy a nice pocket sized device that wont make you look so odd when you check the time....

    --
    print 'Hello world!';
    http://compbrain.net
  10. Screen definition by DRUNK_BEAR · · Score: 1
    The article has a picture of the "watch" displaying a map in such a small screen. They don't mention about any real specs... I sure hope the resolution is high in fact for this to be useful at all.

    On the other hand, I would certainly have a PDA/Calculator/Cell Phone/Digital camera all in one and in a PDA size (with a decent screen size and definition) and a regular watch. When such a device will come out AND be quite reliable for ALL the functions, I will consider the investment.

    --
    DrkBr
    1. Re:Screen definition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When such a device will come out AND be quite reliable for ALL the functions, I will consider the investment.
      Umm.. It is out. I have one. :)

      http://www.my-xda.com

      Not bad for a 2nd gen device, even if you hate Windows (but using Snes emulators to play FF3 makes it all worth while!) It's also a lot smaller than my original Casio E105. Oh yeah, and records video direct to MPEG4.

  11. strappinga PDA to your wrist does not a Watch make by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting


    is a "watch" now defined by strapping anything to your wrist that can tell the time ?

    this sure doesnt look like in the same category as Rolex,Cartier or even a Casio i would argue this is a wrist mount for a PDA not a Watch

  12. Hmmzz.. night rider? by Core-Dump · · Score: 3, Funny

    Kit!!

    Yes Michael?

    Come and get me...

    --
    What would you do without a monitor? Sit and look stupid behind a keyboard and a mouse
    1. Re:Hmmzz.. night rider? by mobby_6kl · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry Micheal, I'm afraid I can't do that.

  13. Yeah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe this will be a worthy replacement for the calculator-watch I've been wearing since 1983.

    1. Re:Yeah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Either they had waterproof calculator watches in 1983, or you need a serious bath.

  14. Re:Watches suck by atam · · Score: 2, Funny

    A clock in the desert? In the middle of Amazon jungle?

  15. Pics by amembleton · · Score: 2, Informative

    The BBC have some nice pics of this device.

    One big problem I can see is that it will affect your wrist movements making it uncomfortable to wear in every day use. A mobile phone (they're becoming more and more like PDAs) is a discreet device that you can hide in your pocket and doesn't look so 'weird'. I don't think this will take off. I don't think there will be a market for such a thing because people want to look good. Also this thing will be prone to getting scratched and damaged with everyday wear.

    1. Re:Pics by OneIsNotPrime · · Score: 1
      Here are some more pics I was able to dig up:

      In Action

      Design schematics

      Early Mock-up of Version 2

      --

      ---

      WARNING:Slashdot karma not redeemable in the afterlife.

    2. Re:Pics by JR · · Score: 1

      Excellent reference and this should be modded up.

      Looking at the referenced pics, it appears Toshiba let their industrial designers show their fantasy creations as though they were actual upcoming products. Short of the released .85 hard drive, nothing looks like it is more than a mockup (and let's not talk about the "specs").

      What really pushed it to that level were the headphones with integrated display which used what you were looking at to control the cursor. This is such an old staple of science fiction, that every tech company has some design for it sitting on a shelf.

  16. Battery life.. by toesate · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Battery life is the important question, imho.

    You don't want a waist PDA spec-ed out so good to be true that you have to carry the spare power source in your other pocket.

    --
    Hey, that's my password you are typing
    1. Re:Battery life.. by way2trivial · · Score: 1

      they make watches that generate motive power from the walking/swing motion of being a human.. you could incorporate that....

      --
      every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  17. Progressing to wearable by stecoop · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A few have written about diminishing returns in terms of size, but these are the future.

    Soon as Bluetooth can stream video and sunglasses have video monitor then theses devices will show a logical step towards the future. PDA will become wrist computers; later fully wearable computers with sunglasses to rival plasma screens. After that, who knows (only progress will tell)?

    By the way; I put on a 3d simulation helmet the other day - not quite fashionable but a step in the direction of wearable.

    1. Re:Progressing to wearable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not so sure about wearable displays. Have you used one?

      The problem is that the display moves with your head. This will make anyone vomit after about 10 minutes.

    2. Re:Progressing to wearable by stecoop · · Score: 2, Informative

      I first read about eyeglasses displays on a web page at MIT http://www.media.mit.edu/wearables/

      A commercial company you can buy a wearable display http://www.microoptical.net/Products/HomePage.html

      I didn't think about the sickness - but on a arcade game or a PDA it would be great.

  18. God, No! by dnaboy · · Score: 4, Informative
    I, personally have had a love hate affair with PDAs for years. The thing that finally broke me was a BlackBerry. I lived and died by that thing, but what made me realize I had problems was when I couldn't use it, such as in airplanes and, still to this day, often hospitals (where I spend a decent amount of time for work). I would find myself, perhaps not so covertly huddled up in a window seat trying to time when we'd be above chicago to try to get signal (which I'm absolutely serious does work, if only long enough to get a message in or out between dropping connections).

    I was an addict.

    Anyway, long story short, went cold turkey. Cancelled my service, gave the blackberry to a friend, and have gone au natural for the last couple years. I'm finally happy and unbound from the tethers of wireless email (ironic, eh...).

    The thought of something hanging on my wrist to give me email, web, and IM anywhere anytime scares the crap out of me.

    Never in a million years!

    OK- I'm done...

    1. Re:God, No! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cancelled my service, gave the blackberry to a friend, and have gone au natural for the last couple years.

      Look man. If you want to give technology up, that's great. But for goodness sake, put on some pants!

  19. Leela.... by leon.gandalf · · Score: 0

    Doesn't Leela have one of those?

  20. Re:Watches suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    A man is traveling through the desert when he comes upon an an Indian lying on the ground stark naked with a hard-on sticking straight up in the air. He asks the Indian what he is doing, to which the Indian replies, "I`m telling the time." The man tells the Indian that he doesn`t believe it, so the Indian tells him that it is 1:00. The man looks at his watch and is amazed to find that it is exactly 1:00. He travels a bit longer until he comes upon another naked Indian lying on the ground with a hard-on sticking straight up. He asks this Indian what he is doing and he too replies that he is telling the time. He tells the Indian to prove it and the Indian tells him that it is 2:00. The man looks at his watch and once again is amazed that the time is correct. He continues his trek through the desert until he comes across an Indian lying naked in the sand, masturbating. He asks this Indian, "And what the hell are you doing?" To which the Indian replies, "I`m winding my watch."

  21. All is revealed... by Stopmotioncleaverman · · Score: 5, Funny

    So THAT'S what Leela had on her wrist all the way through Futurama...:)

  22. Considers? by jeorgen · · Score: 1
    The article says:

    Toshiba has previewed what it calls a Wristwatch PDA, which it considers to be very popular in future

    Considers? Maybe it's my lack of understanding of English, but wouldn't "forecasts" or "guesses" be a better word? The only way you can consider something to be popular in the future is if you believe in multiple futures so that there will always be a future in which Toshiba can consider its wristwatch to be very popular. Like every company has the right to its own Future Reality (tm).

    "Apple considers its Ipod IV to be the most popular player in 2008, however Microsoft says that it considers its player to be the most popular in 2008 but qualifies that statement saying that 'this may happen in the same universe as Apple's or in one parallell to it'"

    /jeorgen

    1. Re:Considers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considers? Maybe it's my lack of understanding of English, but wouldn't "forecasts" or "guesses" be a better word? The only way you can consider something to be popular in the future is if you believe in multiple futures

      Isn't its obvious? Toshiba is one of the world's largest companies specializing in high tech watches. The only reasonable explanation is that they have discovered time-travel and know perfectly well how it will sell in the future.

    2. Re:Considers? by saihung · · Score: 1

      Please tell me that you're not using Slashdot as a model of standard English usage and grammar.

  23. Re:strappinga PDA to your wrist does not a Watch m by jonjohnson · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually, yes it is. Definition

    Watch n. (...) 8. A small portable timepiece, especially one worn on the wrist or carried in the pocket.

  24. too big by Infernon · · Score: 1

    it's too darned big. what sort of professional is going to be taken seriously walking around with a tv sitting on his or her wrist?
    it's damned cool, don't get me wrong, but i don't think that items like these are going to take off until they're able to project a holographic image and allow the user to interact with that.

  25. A good first step, but not for me... by iiioxx · · Score: 1

    That wrist PDA is a nice idea, but it's not quite there as far as I'm concerned. First, like a lot of people, I don't wear a wristwatch anymore. I have a cellphone most of the time, and it has a nice external LCD display with a clock. When I'm not carrying my phone, I prefer a pocket watch to a wrist watch. Basically, I just don't like bulky shit on my wrists, as it gets unfortable when you are typing on a keyboard (something I do a lot of).

    So if someone wants to introduce a wrist PDA that I would buy, they need to make it thin, light, and unobtrusive enough to get around my dislike of wrist-based devices. This model from Toshiba definitely doesn't fit the bill (and it looks like more concept than reality at this point, anyway).

    Personally, I could see buying a wrist-based cellphone/pda with a bluetooth headset, but only if they could get the entire unit under 5mm in thickness and keep the weight under 100 grams. Basically, I want it to fit under a shirtsleeve, and be light enough that I can forget it's there. Of course, it should also have an integrated videophone. And it would have to have some sort of clamshell design with an armored lid to protect the screen.

    So I guess I'll be buying mine around 2012 or so.

  26. More questions.. or design flaws?? by toesate · · Score: 1

    Videophone conferences? But do you see the video camera anywhere convenient placed? Can it really get so tiny?

    Only 4 buttons shown - a little too few, imho. A simple digital watch have 4 buttons. Compromised usability?

    The screen texture looks too curvy and silk-ed, which will prove irritating for pen based input. Maybe voice input all around? Have fun!

    As a conceptual device, it looks good, but I'll bet its unpopularity if this device is ever actually put on store shelf.

    Somehow, I feel that Dick Tracy will not look as smart if he was to wear this gadget.

    --
    Hey, that's my password you are typing
    1. Re:More questions.. or design flaws?? by smeenz · · Score: 1

      not to mention that with the buttons placed as they are, it will only be usable on your left wrist.

  27. But how long wil the battery last... by SmackCrackandPot · · Score: 1

    It really looks impressive, but how long will this PDA run before the batteries go flat?
    Having to remove the watch in order to recharge the battery is going to rapidly lose the coolness factor.

  28. Pluses and minuses by Mycroft_514 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I looked at the device, and like and computer, what will make or break is "killer" aps.

    For the PDA I have now, the killer ap is the blood meter add-on module. Combine this sucker with the sweat based blood meter device I read about a year ago or so, and you might have a rela interesting device.

    Make the casing waterproof to 300 feet, and add a sensor and it might replace several radio dive computers (Like the Aladin Air Z O2 that I already have). (www.uwatec.com)

    At the very least, it would almost surely need a screen protector, to protect it from getting clobbered.

    I think I'll reserve judgement until I get more data on it.

  29. And this is why device convergence is bad... by hacker · · Score: 2, Insightful
    And this, my dear friends, is why device convergence is, and has always been, a bad idea.

    Not only do you get coupled to one device, vendor, or service (think Treo600 + Sprint cell service), but you can't decouple parts of the hardware to improve it as technology advances.

    • Built-in 802.11b WiFi. Oops, now 802.11g is the standard, and your device is no longer current.
    • USB 1.1 capable. Oops, now USB 2.0 and later is the standard, and your device is no longer current.
    • Want to get another Bluetooth headset to use with your PDA? Sorry, this one is built-in, and you can't connect any others. You can buy a new device though...

    Device convergence is a bad, bad bad idea. The technology (Bluetooth for example) was originally proposed to "connect devices together". It does nothing of the sort, when your devices are converged.

    I'd love to see a PDA, with a Bluetooth attachment, talking to a cellphone (bluetooth enabled, either internally or via attachment), talking to a bluetooth-enabled laptop/desktop, and so on. If you decide to upgrade your phone, the rest of the devices still keep working perfectly. It is the Unix philosophy. Replace one small part, and the process keeps working. You don't have to rip everything out and replace it all, because one small part merits an upgrade.

    What do you do when you want to upgrade a portion of this watch's capabilities? Throw it out and get a new one? Unacceptable.

    This goes for PDAs with phones, or phones with PDAs built into them. Either you get:

    • A "big" phone, capable of holding a useful PDA screen and keyboard, which can no longer be comforatably worn on a belt or in a pocket, or..
    • A "tiny" PDA, with an equally "tiny" keyboard to tap on to type in messages, with a screen you have to squint at to read.

    Building a PDA into a wristwatch, while at first seems "cool", in the real world of practical devices and people who use this technology, is an incredibly bad idea.. especially at this size.

    ...and I hope most of the technology in it is buit around some sort of updatable firmware, so you can update the OS, apps, and other software bits to help it remain compatible with other technology.

    I want my existing, bought-this-year devices to work with current technology. I don't want to have to throw them all away and replace every part, just to get a new connectivity option.

    Hrmph!

    1. Re:And this is why device convergence is bad... by pauljlucas · · Score: 1
      This goes for PDAs with phones, or phones with PDAs built into them. Either you get:
      • A "big" phone, capable of holding a useful PDA screen and keyboard, which can no longer be comforatably worn on a belt or in a pocket, or..
      • A "tiny" PDA, with an equally "tiny" keyboard to tap on to type in messages, with a screen you have to squint at to read.
      I have neither of those problems with the Kyocera 7135. I compared it to the smallest color, clamshell phone Verizon (for example) offers: the Audiovox CDM-8600 that has dimensions 3.27" x 1.65" x 0.80". The 7135 has dimensions: 3.97" x 2.43" x 1.17". The width is the biggest difference (necessary because of the typically square screen on PalmOS devices). As for height and depth, the 7135 is only 0.7" and 0.37" bigger, respectively, i.e., not much.

      The 7135 fits comfortably on my belt. While the screen is slightly smaller than "normal" PalmOS devices, it's still quite readable (even in sunlight) and actually sharper because the pixels are denser (still 160x160, but more pixels per square inch).

      Now if you were carrying both a seperate cellphone and a PDA, their sum would be much larger than the 7135.

      --
      If you reply, do so only to what I explicitly wrote. If I didn't write it, don't assume or infer it.
    2. Re:And this is why device convergence is bad... by hacker · · Score: 1
      "Now if you were carrying both a seperate cellphone and a PDA, their sum would be much larger than the 7135."

      Now show me how you can use the PDA, say to type some notes into a document or memo, while you're actively talking on the phone, or checking your voice mail at the same time.

    3. Re:And this is why device convergence is bad... by pauljlucas · · Score: 1
      Now show me how you can use the PDA, say to type some notes into a document or memo, while you're actively talking on the phone, or checking your voice mail at the same time.
      One of two ways: (1) speakerphone, or (2) headset. The "PDA part" is fully usable while using the "phone part."
      --
      If you reply, do so only to what I explicitly wrote. If I didn't write it, don't assume or infer it.
    4. Re:And this is why device convergence is bad... by DickBreath · · Score: 1

      Device convergence is only a bad idea when the devices are expensive. And for all the good reasons you point out.

      Now, let's imagine that the "universal gadget" costs $49.95.

      Ooops, technical standards improve next year? What! Just buy a new gadget every year or so.

      Once upon a time, ball point pens, cigarette lighters, and even hair combs were not considered disposable due to cost. High cost drives design and construction to NOT be disposable. Low cost drives design and construction towards disposable.

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    5. Re:And this is why device convergence is bad... by hacker · · Score: 2, Insightful
      "Ooops, technical standards improve next year? What! Just buy a new gadget every year or so."

      Don't fall into this trap. This is exactly what these vendors want you to do.

      Remember when CDs used to last 50-100 years? Do you know why they don't last that long now? Because vendors decided to reduce their production costs by not adding the additional layer of plastic on the CD, preventing oxidation. Now CDs last 5-10 years, and cost 1/2 as much. Hence, you just go out and buy a new CD, rip your old one to the new one, and throw away the old one. You're caught in the "leasing" model of technology, which is exactly where the vendors want you to be. If they made products that lasted, they'd put themselves out of business. It happens with CDs, DVDs, players, cars, and lots of other technology.

      What about all of the other technology which is engineered to "degrade" in a very specific timeframe? You simply go out and repurchase a replacement, and move on. People don't seem to have a problem with this. But I do. Technology shouldn't "expire". It is happening all over the place.

      Just because it is cheaper, doesn't mean you should have to go out and buy a new one every 2 years. After 10 replacements at 49.95, you've purchased the equivalent of that $499.95 device that should have lasted just that long in the first place.

    6. Re:And this is why device convergence is bad... by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      Now show me how you can use the PDA, say to type some notes into a document or memo, while you're actively talking on the phone, or checking your voice mail at the same time.

      Like he said... use a headset or temporarily flip the phone into speakerphone mode (even the old 6035 was able to do this).

      I'm trying to picture someone juggling a modern-day cell phone on their shoulder while using both hands to enter something on a PDA. Maybe if you're agile enough it would work, but I'd bet you'd flip your cell phone to speaker mode or hook up a headset anyway.

      If all you use your PDA for is addresses and a few notes, a PDA-based phone isn't going to be your bag. However, once you start using additional apps like expense trackers, diet/exercise logs, financial entry, etc., it's much easier to carry a single combo device then two devices.

      And the Kyocera's do a good job on the size vs function trade-off.

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    7. Re:And this is why device convergence is bad... by hacker · · Score: 1
      "I'm trying to picture someone juggling a modern-day cell phone on their shoulder while using both hands to enter something on a PDA. Maybe if you're agile enough it would work, but I'd bet you'd flip your cell phone to speaker mode or hook up a headset anyway."

      That's exactly what I'm trying to avoid by staying away from converged devices.

      I'd rather have my cellphone (ANY cellphone, or multiple cellphones) on my hip, wireless bluetooth headset, and my PDA, linked to the phone(s) over Bluetooth, so I can initiate calls from the PDA (I do this now, with my Tungsten T2 and my Nokia 3600), talk on the headset, and continue typing into the PDA from a bluetooth keyboard, wirelessly.

      Converge any of those, and I am severely reduced in functionality, and you cripple all of the devices, and you end up restricting it to one device, which is going to be sub-par in ALL areas that it tries to converge.

      Speakerphone is not an option, especially for confidential things like voice mail, company-specific conversations (think, on a train or in a public area), nor is having to juggle between phone functionality and PDA functionality, specificlly for my time/project tracking, logging, browsing, and so on.

    8. Re:And this is why device convergence is bad... by wed128 · · Score: 1
      First off, I completely agree with your "convergance is bad" philosophy...and the unix philosophy yada yada yada...

      but one nitpick with your examples, as well as a counterpoint:

      Backwards compatability is absolutely nessesary in a converged environment...

      "Built-in 802.11b WiFi. Oops, now 802.11g is the standard, and your device is no longer current."

      sure, but 802.11g APs are 802.11b compatable, and your device still has the same capability as when you bought it.

      "USB 1.1 capable. Oops, now USB 2.0 and later is the standard, and your device is no longer current."

      USB2 is USB1.1 compatable...see above

      so you see, by keeping backward compatablility, you don't lose standard compliance, you are just no longer bleeding edge in speed/range etc. the real issue here is it is impossible to make something so small modular, so obselete components could be replaced.
    9. Re:And this is why device convergence is bad... by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

      Now CDs last 5-10 years, and cost 1/2 as much.

      Have you been to a record store lately?

      (Actually, I haven't either.)

  30. This thing is JUST like the Nokia Communicator by Phekko · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Think about it. It's WAY too big to be a wristwatch (Comminicator is too big to be a phone, IMHO) and it probably costs quite a pretty penny, too. Probably in a similar fashion there'll be that small group of people who will want one and who think they just couldn't live without one.... and then they smash it against a sharp corner or something ;)

    Seriously, PDA screens are fragile things and wrists constantly bumb into stuff. I don't think there would be any way for someone to convince me to buy one of these, not after I've had a look at the Palm graveyard (Here's a link)

    --

    Sigs for Nerds. Sigs that Matter.
  31. Time Travelers by banzai75 · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...which it considers to be very popular in future.

    This is what happens when a marketer gets hold of a time machine. They don't travel to the future to find the cure for cancer or aids, they travel to the future to see if their latest line of watches are popular. Bastards.

  32. Re:Doubles as a wrist brace...until by OceanBarb · · Score: 2, Funny


    Turns ordinary falls into fractures....

    Exacerbates carpal tunnel syndrome....

    Gets caught on stair rails and pulls your arm out of socket.....

    yes, this is the fashion accessory I need!

  33. Can be smaller | Interface| Always on hand matters by jago25_98 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They could be smaller.

    Using an audio interface you could nearly have no limit on how small it is. Especially if you off processing power to a remote location.

    Some people can be terminally forgetful you know, such as me. I'd sacrifice my pride for help remembering things.

    Key things:

    - INTERFACE is still the problem. Really you need something that interfaces directly with the brain conciousness - a proper memory expansion. HUD glasses and handwriting recignition as good as M$ Windows would be a jump forward methinks. In fact even if this watch thing has good handwriting recognition that works in sentances I'd consider it.

    - ALWAYS AVAILABLE. This is why mobiles tend to get used. No point having a PDA if you don't take it everywhere with you. Question: other than a watch what else do you keep with you at all times, such in the gym?

  34. "KITT! I need you, buddy!" by payndz · · Score: 0
    Five seconds later, the Knight Industries 2000 turbo-boosts through a wall...

    (Hmm. Wonder if any of the designers at Toshiba ever owned a Nintendo Power Glove?)

    --
    You must think in Russian.
  35. too bulky by oohp · · Score: 1

    It's too bulky, I wouldn't use something like that. My Palm V PDA is okay for size and has everything I need in a PDA, although the dafult calculator sucks. Handspring's is better. Yes I know Palm bought Handspring.

  36. No, Battlestar Galactica... by gmuslera · · Score: 2, Interesting

    the part of the serie when they were in Earth they had communicators/arm computers that covered half of the arm. Not remember now the details, but wonder how much they look or like this model.

  37. Conisders in the future? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    "considers popular in the future" What?.. they have a time machine now?

    These things remind me a bit of the old show from the 70's: 'ark 2'...

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  38. I like my watch by mwyner · · Score: 1

    My watch is small, and tells time, and has a light - that's all I want it to do. My cell phone is small and let's me make phone calls. My PDA is small, and let's me use it as a PDA. All these combining of technology is getting out of hand. The form factor is too big on many of them and honestly many people (myself included) don't really want their cell phones/watches to do a million things at once.

  39. I do, I want it... I can't begin to tell you how by way2trivial · · Score: 1
    much I'd buy this, me? early adopter? hell yes

    the appropriate name is 'data cuff' and yes, I'd buy one, and utilize it, in public...
    some of the stuff (crap) I've purchased and mostly still have include
    Sony Glasstrons
    Logitech cyberman 1 and 2
    Archos 340
    nintendo game glove
    Kyocera 6035 and now 7135
    TRS-80 mdl 100 (2) and 102(1)
    stuntmaster hmd
    at least 4 different lcd shutterglasses

    some people don't care about appearance, but enhanced ability/capabilities .. this potentially would allow--- a whole lotta nerding...

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  40. Does it all have to be one piece? by Wellspring · · Score: 1

    That thing looks real big and clunky.

    I've worked in the wireless / PDA space for a while. And the same issues keep coming up: power and antenna. Army guys say that on pound on your feet equals five pounds on your back. I'd say that goes double for your arms.

    Why not have a huge battery integrated into a belt, designed to be flat and unobtrusive, along with the antenna. Then have your cell phone, screen/keyboard, digital camera, earpiece, etc mount on the belt, with capacitors charged by induction.

    This way, you have an easy, light form factor that holds maybe .5-1 hr of charge, but is easily and quickly charged by its holster. The real weight is on the belt, and since it isn't designed to be regularly pulled out and used, it can be designed solely for comfortable wear.

    As a side benefit, you only have one thing to remember to plug in at night, and all your devices share power, so the power is used by whatever device requires it (nothing is wasted). Plus, you have one GOOD wireless transceiver instead of six-odd mediocre ones.

    At work, everyone said it was a good idea, but that you'd never get the companies to agree on an open standard for the recharger. Ahh, well...

    1. Re:Does it all have to be one piece? by artg · · Score: 1

      > At work, everyone said it was a good idea, but that you'd never get the companies to agree on an open standard for the recharger. Ahh, well...

      You might, if the standard was marketed as a feature in it's own right, like this one - www.splashpower.com

    2. Re:Does it all have to be one piece? by Wellspring · · Score: 1

      Awesome, thanks!

      Excellent company.... I'm rooting for them at least. :)

  41. Total vaporware by Shoten · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This doesn't even show a picture of a solid object,instead just giving an artist's rendition...based on that we could just as easily say that Toshiba is coming out with an X-Wing fighter. There wasn't any indication that there's any software written yet either; the original article note that they used a screenshot from PalmOS. I'd me a lot more impressed if they had ANYTHING besides a "gee, wouldn't it be nice if..." concept.

    --

    For your security, this post has been encrypted with ROT-13, twice.
    1. Re:Total vaporware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A fool and his money are soon venture capital

      A fool and his company are soon venture capitalized.

    2. Re:Total vaporware by smeenz · · Score: 1

      Maybe they just wanted to see what the geek reaction on slashdot would be, and use that to improve the desgin.

  42. Vaporware and not vaporware by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

    The Toshiba stuff is obviously vaporware that will never be released. Microsoft has watches that are available now though:

    http://www.microsoft.com/resources/spot/product. ms px

  43. Pocket watch PDA maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When all it does is tell time, a wristwatch makes sense. When you need a larger interface, it's time to go back to the good ol' pocket watch form factor. Pocket watches are cooler anyways.

  44. It doesn't matter anymore by michaelmalak · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The world of high-tech wristwatches is mostly vapor, vapor, vapor. It took 16 years after the 1983 Casio CFX-200 Scientific Watch (that could do trig and parentheses) until a more advanced watch became actually available, the 1999 On-Hand PC, which runs a variant of DOS.

    Will the Toshiba actually reach the wrist of Slashdot user? It doesn't matter anymore, because of the invention of a little piece of plastic: the cell-phone belt clip. While wearing a PalmPilot makes one a first-class geek, even women now wear cell phones on their belts. The cell phone is the new standard for socially acceptable portable computing, not the Dick Tracy wristwatch.

    All thanks to a little piece of plastic.

  45. Talk to your wrist? by Cloud+K · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Down and Safe, Liberator. I expect one of the villains to conveniently steal my bracelet in around 15 minutes."

    Seriously though, would this ever take off? I think it'd fail due to looking goofy, somewhat like VR headsets did.

    However, it's feasible through other input methods like say... a finger. I remember looking a little daft in the 80s operating a calculator watch, but at least it's not as bad as talking to it... :)

  46. Here's my 1977 version by Henry+Melton · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm still waiting for the one I used in a 1977 science fiction story. Don't laugh too loudly at my version of the internet. http://www.io.com/~hmelton/stories/opus18.html

  47. magic 8-ball says... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Not likely"

  48. it will hit doors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    with that size, you'll be hiting doors. you'll need a little helmet to protect it.

  49. Unfortunately, by dos4who · · Score: 1
    wearing it causes your skin to turn blue, with a mottling of random binary code...

    ~m

    --
    "Yes, I have a Disaster Recovery Plan. It's called my Resume"
  50. Leela from Futurama has it! by Lispy · · Score: 1

    I was just wondering if this is finally the device Leela is wearing in Futurama? I knew this series was prophetic. Can't wait until they start installing these tubes in my city...

  51. Damn! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It has bluetooth? Now I can't read the endless posts whining about how it doesn't support bluetooth!

  52. Newsdate June 21, 2012 by SmegTheLight · · Score: 1

    "integrated Wi-Fi and Bluetooth wireless networking"

    .. and in other news, wrist cancer rates are on the rise, but scientists are not sure of the cause.

    --
    Time travel is possible. We are quickly heading for 1984.
  53. Doesn't need mass consumer appeal by wornst · · Score: 1

    Personally, I think the device looks pretty cool. I think many posters are concentrating too much on the mass consumer market when they say the thing is too big and clunky or that you'll look like a dork wearing one.

    This could be a very useful device for people who do need some access to information constantly. I could see a UPS or FedEx driver with one of these things instead of the huge tablet they carry around now. I could also maybe see a taxi driver (maybe) have the address of his next few pickups on the display. A lawyer maybe, so that he could have prepared questions right on his wrist of bullet points for his opening and closing (the device would have to look more presentable - less cheesy tech - get John Ives to design it. Everyone'l be scratching their heads wondering why they didn't think of that).
    Anyway, there are some professions that could really use a device like this one. It's just not for everyone in the consumer world. That's ok. A product doesn't need mass appeal to be successful. A niche works.

  54. look, do you want to be a geek or not? by victorvodka · · Score: 1

    remember when pocket protectors, mended thick-frame glasses and slide rules were uncool and people got swirlies for having them? i personally have seen the inside of a few too many toilet bowls. we geeks had to OWN those things before they became cool. the same goes for having home entertainment systems strapped awkwardly to our wrists. objectively speaking, they aren't any more absurd than a necktie, but provide much more utility. once Arnold Schwartzennegger unloads his klutzy Hummer and gets one of these, society will come around. people will stop taking you seriously if you DON'T have one.

    --

    The flag just makes more sense than the constitution. - Judas Gutenberg

  55. Comes with two screen savers by droleary · · Score: 1

    Your choice between a flashing "Loser!" and a scrolling "Even I don't want to have sex with me."

  56. PDA phone by tetro · · Score: 1

    PDA phones make a lot more sense. Now when they can only improve battery life and include a more efficient input method (don't forget price), then I'm getting one.

    --
    .smell my feet.
  57. "Turn Your Wristwatch into a Defensive Weapon" by Mad+Man · · Score: 1
    Now we just need to combine the watch/PDA with this:

    The Ultimate Defense Band: Turn Your Wristwatch into a Defensive Weapon
    Posted on Friday, March 19 @ 13:59:58 PST
    by David Crane

    It's pretty much common knowledge that we're primarily gun guys here at DefRev. However, this one's a nifty little item. It was just brought to our attention by Chuck Habermehl. Chuck runs Close Quarters Battle (CQB), Inc. (the name is self explanatory), and he is an expert in both armed and unarmed (hand-to-hand/hand-to-weapon) combat.

    "The Ultimate Defense Band", made by Attitude Athletic Apparel, "is based on the (now ubiquitous) Sleeve Choke", a popular Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu submission technique. According to the company, the Ultimate Defense Band "will allow you to secure your attacker in no time without using excessive or lethal force".

    By the way, Mr. Habermehl pretty much raved about this item. He believes that every street cop, SWAT operator, and military Special Operator should have one of these on their wrist, once they are trained in the appropriate submission choking techniques.

    Price on The Ultimate Defense Band is $19.95 US + shipping.

    If you're interested in acquiring The Ultimate Defense Band, you can order one by calling 866-667-6923 (toll free) or 310-325-6333. You can also reach Attitude Athletic Apparel via email at sales@attitudeapparel.com.
  58. Typos! by antdude · · Score: 1

    Knight Rider and KITT.

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  59. Look At The Picture by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1


    Now imagine trying to bend your wrist.

    OTOH, if you take it off and hold it in your first, looks like it would make a nice set of "brass knuckles".

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  60. New Age Watches by nartz · · Score: 1

    I see this watch as an intermediate step in the evolution/'decrease in size' of technology. It is inbetween a watch and a pda screen. In the future, I see tiny watches, but instead of having a large screen, they instead project the image onto a wall, the ground, or any surface, which would in turn eliminate the highly nerdy and conspicuous watch.

  61. Ironies by Ilan+Volow · · Score: 1

    You show up late to work because you were too busy playing with your watch to notice the time.

    --
    Ergonomica Auctorita Illico!
  62. Great idea, crappy implementation. by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

    (1) Obviously, the electronics/display portion needs to be rigid, this is unavoidable (at least until OLED/OLEP tech comes down in price enough to make a wraparound screen).

    (2) Flexible circuitry and flexible rubber or silicone keyboards have been available for years. Why not make it part of the wristband?

    (3) Logically, what they should do is have as small as possible a "CPU", a hinged screen that can flip up and/or be plugged in, so you could flip the screen up when typing on the bottom of your wrist, and/or just pop the screen out when you're done doing geek stuff, stowing the screen in your pocket.

    It is impressive, however, that they have an almost full sized PDA screen on the doohickey, pity the original designers of a programmable computer watch haven't considered releasing a modernized version of the wrist computer back in the mid 80s (I forget the brand).

    --
    Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
  63. Nope. Wrong Answer! by d474 · · Score: 1

    Is it long sleeve compatible? Imagine the tan line! Can you imagine how sweaty it would get under there?! How do I hook it up to my portable keyboard? How do I see what I'm typing while using my portable keyboard (sore neck!). Will Casio make a G-Shock version? I'm always breaking my watches. Why stop there, let's design a friggin' laptop around my entire left arm!

    Did Toshiba design this at the request of DARPA?

    --
    Authority questions you. Return the favor.
  64. Re:My question is this, battery life! by iamhassi · · Score: 1
    I held my Ipaq 1945 up to my wrist and it looks a lot like the photos of that Toshiba "Wristwatch" (when are they going to stop calling them watches? that's more like a arm band) except the 1945 has a longer display.

    I'm not really concerned with input, PDA users have used styluses with great success for years now. My concern: battery life. How long would it last with that huge display? 3 hours tops? My 1945 would die in 3 hours if I left it on, and being a watch I'm guessing that Toshiba display would have to be on 24/7. Even my "old" Palm m515 wouldn't last 5 hours if kept on, so how is this going to be powered?

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  65. They should ask FOSSIL how their 'wrist PDA' sells by snic · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It was discontinued before it reached market I believe.

  66. How big is the keyboard on this thing? by MMHere · · Score: 1

    Seriously... click'n'tap PDAs are very hard to use for entering data, even if you use the onscreen chiclet keyboard "simulations." I don't see a PDA as a _primary_ data entry device, mind you. I just find it so annoying to use the stylus for entering even small amounts of data like the description for an appointment.

    My old HP 200LX "palmtop" is eminently typable, either in two-thumbs mode, or six-finger mode (while device is resting on a flat surface). The device continues to run flawlessly five years after it was discontinued.

    Newer devices, such as the Sharp Zaurus clamshell-configurations with integrated keyboard (avail. only in Japan 8-( ), look appealing and typable. The U.S. Zaurii with keyboards have keys the size of a pinhed; I tried it; the keyboard is pretty much unusable.

    I prefer the keyboard to be integrated; I don't want to carry a separate device on a dongle/cable.

  67. 2 thoughts: 1 for, 1 against by fikx · · Score: 1

    One thought is that I can see uses for this shape/size of device. I can see it as useful for the video display function for different stuff and as just a good shape for getting a device on your wrist (better than the other tries anyway). And, if you want it more descrete, wear it screen-down like some wear watches anyway...

    The other is a gripe. If someone wants a display, why not make it a remote one for something with more power and keep it the size of a watch? make the watch a time-piece AND be able to use it for messages, alarms, etc. from a PDA or something else via bluetooth or maybe even PAN?

    --
    AB HOC POSSUM VIDERE DOMUM TUUM
  68. stupid. by senatorpjt · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Maybe it's just me, but I feel incredibly stupid trying to use voice-recognition in public.

    The need for all this stuff would vanish if it somehow became socially acceptable for men to carry purses...

  69. Re:My question is this, battery life! by Crudely_Indecent · · Score: 1

    The battery in your palm m515 is probably 1/2 the size of the entire toshiba pda-watch.

    Assuming that the unit is 1/2 battery and is more energy efficient than your m515. Also assuming that the backlight is not always on (as is not required with moderate light for a reflective display). Perhaps battery life could be boosted to 7 hours.

    If the unit has an instant-on-time-only button/feature (press a button to see the time for 15 seconds), perhaps the battery life might be as much as 12 hours.

    My Clie n610c will last for several days if I only turn it on once in a while to jot a note or get a phone number. I imagine that if I had this toy....I'd be doing a lot more with it than just notes/numbers/time.

    Bottom line......I'd buy one. I don't date much anyway.

    --


    "Lame" - Galaxar
  70. Re:My question is this, battery life! by iamhassi · · Score: 1
    "The battery in your palm m515 is probably 1/2 the size of the entire toshiba pda-watch."

    how do u figure, considering the picture of the toshiba looks far smaller than the m515?

    If anything the Toshiba is half the size.

    "If the unit has an instant-on-time-only button/feature (press a button to see the time for 15 seconds), perhaps the battery life might be as much as 12 hours."

    that'd annoy the heck out of me, I'd have to press a button to see the time? Two hands to check the time, whatever happen to "glacing"? Maybe they can shove a small clock in the corner.

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  71. Re:My question is this, battery life! by Crudely_Indecent · · Score: 1

    If anything the Toshiba is half the size.

    Didn't I say that the battery in the m515 is probably half the size of the entire toshiba pda-watch......hmmm....

    These pda's eat a lot of juice while running, but seem to last a long time while powered down and only maintaining memory state. We're talking about a device that has a touchscreen....perhaps a tap of the screen can activate the clock.

    --


    "Lame" - Galaxar