Everybody knows that Israel was occupied and now occupies, it is not "informative".
The word "so" is usually used to mean implication, I don't think you are using it right in the second sentence.
Against popular believe, and contradiction your knowledge about ancient gods, there never were child sacrifices in the keltic, germanic, greek/roman pantheons and most likely not in the Egypt, Sumerians either.
This is too definite a statement. More correct would be "We do not know about..." and even then you cannot state this with certainty unless you are a historian specialized in this field and maybe no even then. However as human sacrifice in general was practised in these cultures, it is natural to think that at least somewhere it was extended to kids. Then there were Spartan children, that purportedly were sacrificed and we cannot definitely exclude at least some religious influence.
The only child sacrifice we know about is the one mentioned on the bible...
And then again we have those south americans...
Religion is vile and disgusting, and those who advocate it are a scourge on mankind.
So your religion is to be anti religious?
Seems not to help, as a good deal of mankind has a "special brain region" that makes them emphatic for religions. Do you want to euthanize all of them?
I would think he wants to educate them, so at least they can decide for themselves whether what they believe is nonsense or not.
This is strange, how did this post get so big score? Yet it suggests that getting efficient means loss for the economy. I am in no way libertarian nor neoconservative, but it looks to me like Smith's candlemakers again.
Have they resolved the incompatibility of Hyper-V with other virtualization engines yet? I would love to try it, but enabling Hyper-V has always meant disabling my other VMs, which makes it virtually useless for me.
Sorry, are the questions (rhetorical, I suppose) meant to be answered positively or negatively? Because I really do not know how, AFAIK Google did not renew its US military contract and went out of China a long time ago. Then again, it did not pull out of the contract immediately and now allegedly develops censored search engine...
I agree that anything big in China is under control or at least silent consent of the communist party. But I am not sure how patriotic - you probably mean nationalist - employees could help.
Thank you for the comment. I absolutely feel this way, but strangely I mostly read positive or at least neutral things about that piece of software. I rather think about it as piece of excrement.
Yes, the bold text clearly shows which side you are on. The other side are things not directly quantifiable by the God of Greed: The Environment, Public Health, and Government Corruption that makes legitimacy of some Private Property dubious.
Something strange is going on in the US. The info given here and the linked site is probably distorted as well, because I cannot imagine police killing an unarmed man and then blaming some pranksters for that. (Maybe they can be blamed in this case, something like one percent blame)
Furthermore, why build a display for blind people? If they can't see anyway, what difference does it make?
Your tax dollars at work.
x=Beau=x
A Braille display is a tactile device with cells representing characters by raising and lowering Braille dots (typically eight Braille dots in several tens of cells on one line). Some blind users I know use them heavily and some not at all. Open standard is a good thing since controls like buttons and their layout vary quite a bit across devices.
Kids, do not fight. As a compromise, they will both be put in a box together. Then they will fight to the death. To make things even, Hillary will get a screwdriver.
This is what Lenin called "useful idiots". People who believe propaganda and do dirty work for its creators.
Were it the other way round, it would be considered hostile and criminal attack. If people just realized that there is no substantial difference from what they are doing, there would be much less warfare (probably).
Bitcoin is so complicated to use as an actual currency.
It is not, there are such things as client software...
The whole concept of it was that it would be easier and cheaper to send money around to people.
I do not think so, AFAIK the main goal was to create decentralized digital means of exchange
I can send an international transfer these days for 12 USD and a 3 day wait period and that sucks. Bitcoin on the other hand is fucking ridiculous, you have to pay 26 USD, understand the concepts of how many megabytes of currency you want to transfer (fucking wat?!) and then even after all that it might take a week just to get your money anyway.
You can send international transfers to banks that accept them. Fees and time will vary across sending and receiving banks. In developed countries it will likely indeed be cheaper. You can send bitcoin anywhere and adjust the fee according to your preferred speed. I suspect the number 26 is a bit off, but do not know current situation enough to be able to argue about it. You are right that it make take a week, but if you attach a reasonable transaction fee, it is highly unlikely.
The worse part about it is it isn't any better than having money in the bank because you're money is held hostage to the whims of the developers that write the bitcoin code. So unlike Banks that have to abide by government regulations the developers of all the different bitcoin programs can get together and legally fuck you over in all sorts of ways.
That is not correct, the developers (hundreds or thousands of them, if you count everyone who contributed code to the bitcoin project) are able only to make relatively minor changes without making it incompatible with the current version. And if such big change ("fork") happens, a consensus of developers, miners and users is needed for it to be universally accepted. Bitcoin Cash and Bitcoin Gold are examples of such forks.
Slashdot Mirror
Everybody knows that Israel was occupied and now occupies, it is not "informative". The word "so" is usually used to mean implication, I don't think you are using it right in the second sentence.
Because it is free?
The second paragraph is in fact not a quote, sorry
Against popular believe, and contradiction your knowledge about ancient gods, there never were child sacrifices in the keltic, germanic, greek/roman pantheons and most likely not in the Egypt, Sumerians either.
This is too definite a statement. More correct would be "We do not know about..." and even then you cannot state this with certainty unless you are a historian specialized in this field and maybe no even then. However as human sacrifice in general was practised in these cultures, it is natural to think that at least somewhere it was extended to kids. Then there were Spartan children, that purportedly were sacrificed and we cannot definitely exclude at least some religious influence.
The only child sacrifice we know about is the one mentioned on the bible ...
And then again we have those south americans ...
Religion is vile and disgusting, and those who advocate it are a scourge on mankind. So your religion is to be anti religious?
Seems not to help, as a good deal of mankind has a "special brain region" that makes them emphatic for religions. Do you want to euthanize all of them?
I would think he wants to educate them, so at least they can decide for themselves whether what they believe is nonsense or not.
This is strange, how did this post get so big score? Yet it suggests that getting efficient means loss for the economy. I am in no way libertarian nor neoconservative, but it looks to me like Smith's candlemakers again.
Have they resolved the incompatibility of Hyper-V with other virtualization engines yet? I would love to try it, but enabling Hyper-V has always meant disabling my other VMs, which makes it virtually useless for me.
Sorry, are the questions (rhetorical, I suppose) meant to be answered positively or negatively? Because I really do not know how, AFAIK Google did not renew its US military contract and went out of China a long time ago. Then again, it did not pull out of the contract immediately and now allegedly develops censored search engine... I agree that anything big in China is under control or at least silent consent of the communist party. But I am not sure how patriotic - you probably mean nationalist - employees could help.
Thank you for the comment. I absolutely feel this way, but strangely I mostly read positive or at least neutral things about that piece of software. I rather think about it as piece of excrement.
Yes, the bold text clearly shows which side you are on. The other side are things not directly quantifiable by the God of Greed: The Environment, Public Health, and Government Corruption that makes legitimacy of some Private Property dubious.
And the benefit from the fall of USSR was...?
Something strange is going on in the US. The info given here and the linked site is probably distorted as well, because I cannot imagine police killing an unarmed man and then blaming some pranksters for that. (Maybe they can be blamed in this case, something like one percent blame)
Furthermore, why build a display for blind people? If they can't see anyway, what difference does it make? Your tax dollars at work. x=Beau=x
A Braille display is a tactile device with cells representing characters by raising and lowering Braille dots (typically eight Braille dots in several tens of cells on one line). Some blind users I know use them heavily and some not at all. Open standard is a good thing since controls like buttons and their layout vary quite a bit across devices.
Kids, do not fight. As a compromise, they will both be put in a box together. Then they will fight to the death. To make things even, Hillary will get a screwdriver.
This is what Lenin called "useful idiots". People who believe propaganda and do dirty work for its creators. Were it the other way round, it would be considered hostile and criminal attack. If people just realized that there is no substantial difference from what they are doing, there would be much less warfare (probably).
Is it that ad ridden social network full of crackpots, some of them threatening with nuclear war? Does anybody sane still use it?
This is more serious than just fascism. China is already fascist, if you mean state violence and corporativism. This is another step to 1984.
What is this whole thread about? If it is in the database, it is correct and we can concentrate on the password, or am I missing something?
Bitcoin is so complicated to use as an actual currency.
It is not, there are such things as client software...
The whole concept of it was that it would be easier and cheaper to send money around to people.
I do not think so, AFAIK the main goal was to create decentralized digital means of exchange
I can send an international transfer these days for 12 USD and a 3 day wait period and that sucks. Bitcoin on the other hand is fucking ridiculous, you have to pay 26 USD, understand the concepts of how many megabytes of currency you want to transfer (fucking wat?!) and then even after all that it might take a week just to get your money anyway.
You can send international transfers to banks that accept them. Fees and time will vary across sending and receiving banks. In developed countries it will likely indeed be cheaper. You can send bitcoin anywhere and adjust the fee according to your preferred speed. I suspect the number 26 is a bit off, but do not know current situation enough to be able to argue about it. You are right that it make take a week, but if you attach a reasonable transaction fee, it is highly unlikely.
The worse part about it is it isn't any better than having money in the bank because you're money is held hostage to the whims of the developers that write the bitcoin code. So unlike Banks that have to abide by government regulations the developers of all the different bitcoin programs can get together and legally fuck you over in all sorts of ways.
That is not correct, the developers (hundreds or thousands of them, if you count everyone who contributed code to the bitcoin project) are able only to make relatively minor changes without making it incompatible with the current version. And if such big change ("fork") happens, a consensus of developers, miners and users is needed for it to be universally accepted. Bitcoin Cash and Bitcoin Gold are examples of such forks.