Women don't work as well. It's good that they aren't being placed into these jobs, driving the industry and the economy to hell so CERTAIN PEOPLE can grab power
Why is it a crime? Because the story of the holocaust is a flat lie and the entire structure of this society depends on that lie being believed by the majority.
Satisfied? Or will you keep doublethinking your beliefs in freedom of speech with the call to conformism?
The problem with censorship is in general is that the people supporting it fall back on infantile, irrational definitions of the people they want to see censored, using names like "asshole" to justify their own reaction to opposing points of view regardless of reasoning and objective analysis, two fundamental human traits. Simply put these people think selectively and usually choose not to think at all let alone do, and instead appeal to authority for all of their needs even when they could make an effort and supply themselves. At a certain point, anyone who takes enough joy in censorship becomes a brainless, soulless subhuman being used as a tool for evil men to silence freedom forever. They conform to the image of self they receive from the media due to peer pressure. They become nonthinking machines.
Are you kidding right now? You are copying a very common mode of bullshit verbatim. You say the incantation as quoted above and then you just plop whatever idiotic opinion you have in the mix and call it an argument.
God save us from these brainless idiots using evolution to justify their half-thoughts.
Humans are irrational
That explains how empires were engineered Actually it's ANIMALS that are irrational.
If I was in charge, there would be a whole lot of people being marched out the door
Probably why you're not in charge of anything. You don't understand human dynamics or what it takes to run a business.
The simple truth that you justice warriors don't understand about life: your ideals amount to nothing in terms of creativity. Your sanitized model of existence does not support innovation.
You need colorful people with spirit to innovate and maneuver. You need to accept these people and negotiate with them, not deliver them ultimatums.
You can run in circles weeping about all the injustice, but you're just being disruptive and you will find your place on the sidelines as soon as the media fervor about "justice" actually starts tanking the economy.
It's not about the person you incredibly thick fool. It's about sabotaging Uber. It's about the media being able to use you ninnyhammers as a weapon because you will believe ANYTHING you hear as long as you feel like it. It's dangerous. You lack critical thought.
The only ones forbidding discussion are the people believing this is real with absolutely no proof when the woman said she had no intention of bringing a lawsuit. They are modding down anyone asking for proof insisting that it has been given when all there really is are this womans claims...no screenshots...no witnesses. You're literally insane.
Because she's trying to get a reaction from society at large and people shouldn't react to hearsay like a crime was committed. But hey I'm crazy, rationality is clearly an out fad here.
>plenty of documentation about these interactions You have serious problem with qualifying your perception. Where is this documentation? NOWHERE. She just says she has it.
>As such, all we have is our personal judgement as to whether the woman was telling the truth in her blog or not. There's no real possibility of ever getting any proof. So then why are you getting so invested in believing it?
It's true because you "get the feeling" that it is?
>my personal judgement carries no weight beyond whether or not I'd do business with Uber NO. You don't live in a bubble. What you say and do effects people around you. You have a duty to do right by them and adhere to the truth.
Look at my interaction with you for example. I've explained why you're wrong and i've judged you to be fucking retarded. I hope that you have enough sense to see that you are factually wrong and that the verbal lashing piggypacks on this realization and drives it deeper into your thick skull
Yes, if you were smart, and you had any reason for judging the person, you would need to understand his history and motivation and thought in order to guide him and others that may be similar to a better path.
but as it stands the only reason you have for judging is to add ballast to the ideology you blindly subscribe to. which is detrimental to humanity, whose foundations are rationality and objectivity.
The issue here is the obvious vulnerability in people's minds that causes them to believe and advocate for anything they feel like believing without any objectivity or rationality
It's not absurd. What right do you have to assume you understand his motivation without any investigation? That's an aside. How is it logically sound to assume you understand his motivation without any investigation?
For you, the area in which you can make judgements is delineated by your skin
It not about this forum. It's about the greater forum of public discussion. If it's not a criminal court of law, then why is it being made to be? Why is a universal judgement being attempted to be made then?
There's almost no possible way to do that
Recording the transcripts of conversations. Recording the conversations as they happened. So impossible.
That raises the bar so high that no reports like these could ever see the light of day
EXACTLY. We only want the truth to see the light of day.
But anyway, you're literally saying there is no way to know if this is real or not. And yet you believe that it is without considering any of the interests in play here. You are insane at best.
From the publisher's other article about this event:
Last month, after reports surfaced that Uber had allegedly broken a taxi driver strike at JFK Airport amid protests against President Trumpâ(TM)s immigration ban, the hashtag #DeleteUber caught fire on social media, leading hundreds of thousands of users to cancel their accounts with the ride-sharing giant. But just when the grassroots backlash against Uber seemed to be dying down, a former engineer went public with her tale of rampant sexism and bureaucratic incompetence within the company. And like flipping a switch, #DeleteUber is back blazing up the social networks.
Gee I wonder what this is really about. Couldn't have been about "flipping that switch back on", could it?
Note well the insane knee-jerk responses posted here. Note well the effort to suppress anyone talking about proof and rationale.
Slashdot is totally corrupt. The editors are complicit in these kinds of farces which are becoming ever more frequent. The moderation system is manipulated (astroturfing)
Women don't work as well. It's good that they aren't being placed into these jobs, driving the industry and the economy to hell so CERTAIN PEOPLE can grab power
Why is it a crime? Because the story of the holocaust is a flat lie and the entire structure of this society depends on that lie being believed by the majority.
Satisfied? Or will you keep doublethinking your beliefs in freedom of speech with the call to conformism?
Remember Scotland? Lakes at high elevation? Every stream in the damned country blocked with a dam?
Great Britain has many dams that only generate power for a few hours a day or even skip days.
They have at least 100x the potential electricity output they will need for this century.
The holocaust is not real.
Anyone with basic reasoning skills can see the story is very inconsistent.
The problem with denying the truth is that the truth is still true and cannot be destroyed simply by mass denial.
The problem with censorship is in general is that the people supporting it fall back on infantile, irrational definitions of the people they want to see censored, using names like "asshole" to justify their own reaction to opposing points of view regardless of reasoning and objective analysis, two fundamental human traits.
Simply put these people think selectively and usually choose not to think at all let alone do, and instead appeal to authority for all of their needs even when they could make an effort and supply themselves.
At a certain point, anyone who takes enough joy in censorship becomes a brainless, soulless subhuman being used as a tool for evil men to silence freedom forever. They conform to the image of self they receive from the media due to peer pressure. They become nonthinking machines.
I only use social media every single day, it's not making ME insane
hard-wired
hunter-gatherers
fast forward x years
Are you kidding right now? You are copying a very common mode of bullshit verbatim. You say the incantation as quoted above and then you just plop whatever idiotic opinion you have in the mix and call it an argument.
God save us from these brainless idiots using evolution to justify their half-thoughts.
Humans are irrational
That explains how empires were engineered
Actually it's ANIMALS that are irrational.
Your world view is garbage.
So let me get this straight
You are blaming everything on Trump?
"a little touched"
go back to the bayou or stop staying that
and workers refuse to band together because... reasons
Because they were selected for employment based on their temperament
I believe the kids these days call this kind of personality a 'cuck'
If I was in charge, there would be a whole lot of people being marched out the door
Probably why you're not in charge of anything. You don't understand human dynamics or what it takes to run a business.
The simple truth that you justice warriors don't understand about life: your ideals amount to nothing in terms of creativity. Your sanitized model of existence does not support innovation.
You need colorful people with spirit to innovate and maneuver. You need to accept these people and negotiate with them, not deliver them ultimatums.
You can run in circles weeping about all the injustice, but you're just being disruptive and you will find your place on the sidelines as soon as the media fervor about "justice" actually starts tanking the economy.
only checking Facebook once or twice a day
once or twice a day
friends who are posting fallacious memes
posting memes
This is not normal behavior. Your social sphere and apparently much of what is being said in it is being decided by a computer interface.
Less insane than most is still insane. Objectivity and purpose are the only measures of sanity.
It's not about the person you incredibly thick fool. It's about sabotaging Uber. It's about the media being able to use you ninnyhammers as a weapon because you will believe ANYTHING you hear as long as you feel like it.
It's dangerous. You lack critical thought.
The only ones forbidding discussion are the people believing this is real with absolutely no proof when the woman said she had no intention of bringing a lawsuit. They are modding down anyone asking for proof insisting that it has been given when all there really is are this womans claims...no screenshots...no witnesses. You're literally insane.
This story proves you wrong
How can a story that contains no evidence prove anything?
Time to bail from Slashdot, seems like almost all the sane rational people have left.
Probably because of the incredibly low threshold of their confirmation bias and general cognitive deficiencies
Why would you expect that it appear in her post?
Are you totally insane?
Because she's trying to get a reaction from society at large and people shouldn't react to hearsay like a crime was committed. But hey I'm crazy, rationality is clearly an out fad here.
There is no proof.
There will be no lawsuit.
Her account is a lie.
Meanwhile you see the total insanity of people believing her word as truth. Everywhere.
We need a culling.
When you're as retarded as you are, I guess reality is no object, just pick the part you want to respond to.
You'll be in a camp soon
You are suffering from severe thought dissonance.
>plenty of documentation about these interactions
You have serious problem with qualifying your perception. Where is this documentation? NOWHERE. She just says she has it.
>As such, all we have is our personal judgement as to whether the woman was telling the truth in her blog or not. There's no real possibility of ever getting any proof.
So then why are you getting so invested in believing it?
It's true because you "get the feeling" that it is?
>my personal judgement carries no weight beyond whether or not I'd do business with Uber
NO. You don't live in a bubble. What you say and do effects people around you. You have a duty to do right by them and adhere to the truth.
sheltered spoiled brat overgrown is what you are
Look at my interaction with you for example. I've explained why you're wrong and i've judged you to be fucking retarded. I hope that you have enough sense to see that you are factually wrong and that the verbal lashing piggypacks on this realization and drives it deeper into your thick skull
No I'm telling you're (selectively?) illiterate.
You're fucking retarded in any case.
Yes, if you were smart, and you had any reason for judging the person, you would need to understand his history and motivation and thought in order to guide him and others that may be similar to a better path.
but as it stands the only reason you have for judging is to add ballast to the ideology you blindly subscribe to. which is detrimental to humanity, whose foundations are rationality and objectivity.
Saying you have evidence IS NOT EVIDENCE
The issue here is the obvious vulnerability in people's minds that causes them to believe and advocate for anything they feel like believing without any objectivity or rationality
It's not absurd. What right do you have to assume you understand his motivation without any investigation? That's an aside. How is it logically sound to assume you understand his motivation without any investigation?
For you, the area in which you can make judgements is delineated by your skin
evidence
hard evidence
am I losing my fucking mind here? some one is.
WHAT EVIDENCE?
This forum is not a criminal court of law
It not about this forum. It's about the greater forum of public discussion.
If it's not a criminal court of law, then why is it being made to be? Why is a universal judgement being attempted to be made then?
There's almost no possible way to do that
Recording the transcripts of conversations. Recording the conversations as they happened. So impossible.
That raises the bar so high that no reports like these could ever see the light of day
EXACTLY. We only want the truth to see the light of day.
But anyway, you're literally saying there is no way to know if this is real or not. And yet you believe that it is without considering any of the interests in play here. You are insane at best.
From the publisher's other article about this event:
Last month, after reports surfaced that Uber had allegedly broken a taxi driver strike at JFK Airport amid protests against President Trumpâ(TM)s immigration ban, the hashtag #DeleteUber caught fire on social media, leading hundreds of thousands of users to cancel their accounts with the ride-sharing giant. But just when the grassroots backlash against Uber seemed to be dying down, a former engineer went public with her tale of rampant sexism and bureaucratic incompetence within the company. And like flipping a switch, #DeleteUber is back blazing up the social networks.
Gee I wonder what this is really about. Couldn't have been about "flipping that switch back on", could it?
Note well the insane knee-jerk responses posted here. Note well the effort to suppress anyone talking about proof and rationale.
Slashdot is totally corrupt. The editors are complicit in these kinds of farces which are becoming ever more frequent. The moderation system is manipulated (astroturfing)