There's no way TCP/IP is on the level of those other ones.
You don't need much code to write a TCP/IP implementation that will meet all standard use cases.
To deal with all the corner cases is harder (especially if you're a middlebox like a firewall), but you're talking 100-1000 of times less code in TCP/IP as a whole than most of the other items on this list - and in fact most of those items would include a TCP/IP implementation themselves anyway.
Consent is an ongoing process, it can be withdrawn at any time. The app can therefore only record an initial consent, and nothing more. Anyone thinking it protects them from anything is seriously deluded (pretty easy to imagine a case of a woman using the app under duress, too).
You don't jail the engineers or architects who design a building that fails in an earthquake.
Well actually. In the 2010 Christchurch earthquake, we had a building called the CTV Building that fell over and killed 115 people: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
The engineer has not been held responsible, because he quit from the professional engineering society before they laid charges against him, and the police (apparently incorrectly) decided that he could not be held culpable for their deaths.
It's a fairly minor scandal here and the families of the victims have appealed to the attorney general to re-review the case
> The second point related to a legal technicality only flagged in the final months of the police investigation. The law says that any death resulting from negligent conduct must occur no more than one year and one day after that conduct ended.
This part of the law is being repealed by the government.
If you're asking for practical applications of this effect, I'm not aware of any. But I'm hardly an expert - my knowledge is for youtube videos from physicists explaining this stuff.
I was just giving an off-the-cuff answer based on YouTube videos I've watched on the subject (coincidentally just watching one now about Bell's theorem), in response to the frequently-seen misunderstanding that entanglement could be used to transmit information.
Saying "Both A and B were spinning clockwise from the time they were entangled" was my (poor) explanatory way of showing how measuring the spin of A cannot 'change' the spin of B - we've discovered some information about A and through entanglement also know that same information about B, but we didn't actually change A's state (except insofar as the waveform was collapsed, as you state).
Entanglement is poorly understood. You don't "change one and the other changes".
Entangled particles vibrate/spin/whatever the same way. You don't know what that way of movement is until you measure it. When you measure A and discover it to be spinning clockwise (or whatever), then you also know that B is spinning clockwise. Both A and B were spinning clockwise from the time they were entangled, there is no "change" involved, just the fact that measuring the spin of A lets you also know the spin of B.
The bottom line is you CAN'T use this to transmit information instantly across distances: if it were the case that you could cause B to spin the same way as A by changing A's spin, then you could transmit information. That's not how entanglement works.
Four flashlights which need batteries to hold charge at maximum for years (they're in emergency packs, hopefully never to be used).
You should be checking and replenishing your emergency kits every 12 months. Take whatever food you have and put it into normal circulation, and replace with new food. Replace batteries. Replace water. Check medical supplies haven't passed their expiration dates (if applicable).
You seem to be very unfamiliar with the point of a remaster of a game.
1. A remaster of a game updates the controls and graphics to modern standards. 2. People want to play the original game, with the original gameplay and story, with modern graphics and controls. Bugs and rough edges can be fixed and smoothed out.
If you don't want #2, then there are PLENTY of other games out there for you. If you want #2, then this is the ONLY way you can get it.
The Earth's climate has changed far more radically and far quicker to more extreme states many times in the past and yet here we and all other life are going about living, the silly humans
This XKCD comic makes it quite clear why "silly humans" are right to be concerned about the current warming trend, even if it has "changed far more radically... many times in the past".
You've just, in this forum response, revealed enough information for anyone reading it to have a good idea of just how well your marriage is likely to work.
You seem to be operating under this weird idea that the nutrient level in soil is fixed.
There are these things called fertilisers.
Also, it's not unreasonable to assume that it could be possible to make the plants more efficient at extracting nutrients, ie less wasteful, as well as reducing nutrients that plants themselves require to grow but are less importent for humans, or making plants that can generate their own nutrients (eg nitrogen fixing).
I doubt that selective breeding programmes for wheat have randomly produced deadly or harmful wheat, though, since the base plant is already such a highly tuned freak that the number of mutations required to make it harmful simply won't happen in a single generation.
Slashdot Mirror
Why the 3 laws of robotics are not serious and for entertainment only and would never work: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
A possible way to design AI to help humans: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
There's no way TCP/IP is on the level of those other ones.
You don't need much code to write a TCP/IP implementation that will meet all standard use cases.
To deal with all the corner cases is harder (especially if you're a middlebox like a firewall), but you're talking 100-1000 of times less code in TCP/IP as a whole than most of the other items on this list - and in fact most of those items would include a TCP/IP implementation themselves anyway.
Er, why would the onus be on google to hang up?
If you don't agree to your conversation being recorded, you hang up.
If the editors don't get any feedback, they won't be able to improve.
Nor is this stuff that matters.
Embarrassing and silly, but upon reading the summary, understandable how it happened. Not worth wasting screen space for.
But if it's cheap, then it doesn't matter so much that it's fragile.
The problem is that these phones are getting more and more expensive.
That app is bogus anyway.
Consent is an ongoing process, it can be withdrawn at any time. The app can therefore only record an initial consent, and nothing more. Anyone thinking it protects them from anything is seriously deluded (pretty easy to imagine a case of a woman using the app under duress, too).
They already can do that. If they aren't already, it's because they've chosen not to.
You don't jail the engineers or architects who design a building that fails in an earthquake.
Well actually. In the 2010 Christchurch earthquake, we had a building called the CTV Building that fell over and killed 115 people: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
The engineer has not been held responsible, because he quit from the professional engineering society before they laid charges against him, and the police (apparently incorrectly) decided that he could not be held culpable for their deaths.
It's a fairly minor scandal here and the families of the victims have appealed to the attorney general to re-review the case
https://www.stuff.co.nz/nation...
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/...
> The second point related to a legal technicality only flagged in the final months of the police investigation. The law says that any death resulting from negligent conduct must occur no more than one year and one day after that conduct ended.
This part of the law is being repealed by the government.
Load them all up on a spaceship, along with the telephone sanitisers, and blast them into space.
It's weeks to interview multiple different candidates before deciding on 1 or 2 of them. Not weeks per person.
Nature doesn't have "a point", it just is.
If you're asking for practical applications of this effect, I'm not aware of any. But I'm hardly an expert - my knowledge is for youtube videos from physicists explaining this stuff.
Yeah, you're right.
I was just giving an off-the-cuff answer based on YouTube videos I've watched on the subject (coincidentally just watching one now about Bell's theorem), in response to the frequently-seen misunderstanding that entanglement could be used to transmit information.
Saying "Both A and B were spinning clockwise from the time they were entangled" was my (poor) explanatory way of showing how measuring the spin of A cannot 'change' the spin of B - we've discovered some information about A and through entanglement also know that same information about B, but we didn't actually change A's state (except insofar as the waveform was collapsed, as you state).
Changing the spin of A breaks its entanglement with B.
Based on current knowledge, you cannot transmit information using entanglement.
Entanglement is poorly understood. You don't "change one and the other changes".
Entangled particles vibrate/spin/whatever the same way. You don't know what that way of movement is until you measure it. When you measure A and discover it to be spinning clockwise (or whatever), then you also know that B is spinning clockwise. Both A and B were spinning clockwise from the time they were entangled, there is no "change" involved, just the fact that measuring the spin of A lets you also know the spin of B.
The bottom line is you CAN'T use this to transmit information instantly across distances: if it were the case that you could cause B to spin the same way as A by changing A's spin, then you could transmit information. That's not how entanglement works.
Four flashlights which need batteries to hold charge at maximum for years (they're in emergency packs, hopefully never to be used).
You should be checking and replenishing your emergency kits every 12 months. Take whatever food you have and put it into normal circulation, and replace with new food. Replace batteries. Replace water. Check medical supplies haven't passed their expiration dates (if applicable).
I mean seriously, designing circuits that can only use one brand of battery? Or circuits that can't use rechargables?
Yeah, I don't believe you either.
You know that the blue states overwhelmingly are bankrolling and paying tax money to the red states, right?
You seem to be very unfamiliar with the point of a remaster of a game.
1. A remaster of a game updates the controls and graphics to modern standards.
2. People want to play the original game, with the original gameplay and story, with modern graphics and controls. Bugs and rough edges can be fixed and smoothed out.
If you don't want #2, then there are PLENTY of other games out there for you. If you want #2, then this is the ONLY way you can get it.
This is what I was referring to: "She'll barely tell me when breakfast is ready."
The Earth's climate has changed far more radically and far quicker to more extreme states many times in the past and yet here we and all other life are going about living, the silly humans
This XKCD comic makes it quite clear why "silly humans" are right to be concerned about the current warming trend, even if it has "changed far more radically... many times in the past".
https://xkcd.com/1732/
You've just, in this forum response, revealed enough information for anyone reading it to have a good idea of just how well your marriage is likely to work.
You seem to be operating under this weird idea that the nutrient level in soil is fixed.
There are these things called fertilisers.
Also, it's not unreasonable to assume that it could be possible to make the plants more efficient at extracting nutrients, ie less wasteful, as well as reducing nutrients that plants themselves require to grow but are less importent for humans, or making plants that can generate their own nutrients (eg nitrogen fixing).
I doubt that selective breeding programmes for wheat have randomly produced deadly or harmful wheat, though, since the base plant is already such a highly tuned freak that the number of mutations required to make it harmful simply won't happen in a single generation.
The same cannot be said for CRISPR.
Obviously you didn't read the actual thread. We're talking about foreigners coming to the US and studying, racking up debt and leaving.
They aren't going to be US citizens, and I suspect that if they attempt to become citizens, their outstanding debt will be a big red flag.