I keep hearing this -- "Smartphones & tablets killed the console", but I just don't see how the very simple sorts of games without physical controls that you find on them in any way compete with even DS games let alone Wii/PS3/Xbox360 games. Maybe in the future when consoles are dead those games will move to tablets and phones, but not today.
Of course it's real. Why, I remember a case where clearly the interviewer needed some insights into animal transportation. As if I am going to help them figure out how to keep their cabbage from being eaten by a goat while crossing a river for free!
That's funny because usually the argument goes the other way -- "Electronic books are fine for reference, but for relaxing with fiction a real book is better". Personally, I prefer electronic books for both, and was even into them in the 1990s on my Palm Pilot before it became mainstream...
USL vs. BSDi had absolutely nothing to do with Linux. That was a battle between USL (former Bell Labs people) and Berkeley over who owned UNIX. Linux wasn't based on any of that code (despite what SCO would later claim), so it wasn't involved. Yes, Linux wouldn't have existed if BSD was open and available at the time. Hell, it wouldn't have existed if Tannenbaum had been more open about MINIX. But that's like arguing that the USA wouldn't exist if (like Ben Franklin wanted), the British would have just allowed the colonies to have their own MPs.
You also pay $0 to Apple if you don't distribute your apps. You can download Xcode for free and install apps you write on your own phone for free. I've done that myself. You pay the $99 for the ability to distribute your app in the App Store. Yes, I know there are advantages to Android's openness, but for this particular example it isn't any different.
You do realize that people can find apps by searching, right? Yes, I wish there were better search tools as part of the app store, but other than popular games in the top 50, pretty much everything I purchased I discovered through searching -- I realized I wanted an app to do X, and then searched for some keywords to find it. There are plenty of very niche apps (dictionaries of ancient Greek and Latin, for example) in the app store. These may not be getting anyone rich, but I'm sure they break even and give the developers (probably hobbyists) some pocket money.
It's pretty much the same reason Alternate History is considered part of SF, even ones that don't depend on time travel or something like that to cause the difference. Traditionally, AH was written by SF authors, so it's part of SF.
I was thinking of using Coherent at the time too, but I was an undergrad and even it was too expensive for me:-)
My favorite moment in early Linux history was asking if X11 was going to be ported, and getting a personal message from Linus saying "maybe, but don't count on it". I still ended up installing Linux in fall of 1991 despite the lack of X.
If dozens of Japanese started coming up with alternative physical currencies that looked just like Yen, they certainly *would* confuse people. Similarly, if people start coming up with ByteCoin, BitBuck, CoinBit, etc, they certainly *would* cause confusion with BitCoin. The difference is while the Japanese government would take a dim view of the former and intervene, nobody can prevent the latter.
While I prefer git, it's worth remembering that just a couple of years ago, svn was the young rebel upstart (hence the name "subversion") -- most commercial shops were using cvs until recently. It's a hard sell to get IT departments to shift again ("why, just a few years ago you nerds made us switch to svn when cvs was working just fine. Now you want to shift again?")
I know -- it's so frighteningly like Palm -- even down to making a crippled version of whatever was hot at the time (a netbook for Palm; a tablet for RIM) that only work if tied to a phone of theirs.
Circa 2000, you may have had a point. Big bookstores like Barnes & Noble and Borders were popping up all over, and generally had lots of comfortable seating. As a rather fast reader, I often spent a free afternoon or evening reading a book cover to cover in those stores back then. Guess too many people did just that. Now, you can hardly find a chair in most big box bookstores and they are closing up many locations anyway. I guess the free market can't support these big bookstores, which is too bad in a way.
The idea that educated people aren't selected for a jury just isn't true. I've served, and I have a doctorate in microbiology -- and there was another professor on the jury as well. Obviously both the defense and the prosecution want to eliminate people who would be biased against their side (and take turns doing this from the initial pool), but there is no reason why the educated can't be unbiased.
I created a Hackintosh and I think it taught me a lot about how OS X works "under the hood". If you don't see that as valuable, then no it isn't worth it.
Published papers in open access journals. Why read the interpretation of a third-rate academic (the type who actually have the time to write textbooks because they don't have grants funding research that needs to be done) when you can you can read the real cutting-edge stuff th
You can't claim that a group is both a neocon propaganda group *and* funded by George Soros. Soros gave millions of dollars to the Democratic party during the 2004 election and stated that removing Bush from office was his central focus in life.
It is entirely possible and fair for a class to get all A's if they all meet the criterion (>90% on exams and so on). Yes, you might then argue that the tests were too easy, but if the tests covered the material you want the students to learn, what's the problem? Maybe the students were all very smart. Maybe the teacher is excellent.
Pretty much *all* of the classic Mac software was written in Pascal -- it was Apple's premier development system. C didn't really catch on outside the UNIX world until the mid to late 1980s.
For "The Art of Computer Programming", according to the article. What was he planning on doing? Converting it to his pseudo-assembly language MIX? As far as I know, Knuth has never used a high level language in his AoCP, although obviously he knows how to program in them (early versions of TeX were in Pascal, and now they are in C)
'Lost' requires the viewers to *infer* what is a flashback, flashforward, or alternative universe. Typically, these things are labeled in other movies or fiction. For example, they'll say "Twenty Years ago..." or in a movie, making the screen go all wavy or something similar. 'Lost' just jumps in and hopes the fans figure it out. About the only earlier example that I can think of is Vonnegut's "Slaughterhouse Five" , which obviously the scriptwriters of 'Lost' have read
Nobody is denying that during the 1990s Bill Gates and Microsoft were seen as evil monopolists. The point was this wasn't the case in the early 1980s. Microsoft was a successful company, but not a very large or high profile one -- Gates was just another successful tech guy like Jobs and Wozniak -- probably less famous, actually, as Gates was known as just the guy who wrote BASIC interpreters, rather than the more sexy design of computer systems. Again, read the book -- it gives a good feeling for the time.
The point isn't whether Gates is a nice guy or not; the point is how he was *perceived* at different points in time. In _Hackers_, as was common at the time, he was portrayed in a positive light. If you were around back then, it was IBM that was the "big evil" back then. Microsoft just wasn't seen that way. This isn't "whitewashing" his reputation, it is just reminding us that corporate image changes over time.
We are seeing this today with Apple and Jobs. While Apple was (at least during the last 20 years) seen as the plucky underdog fighting against Microsoft, now that the iPhone is so popular they are beginning to throw their weight around, rejecting apps for seemingly arbitrary reasons and banning cross-platform tools for iPhone development to hinder the growth of competitors like Android, Apple will be seen as the new devil -- and I say that as a Mac and iPhone user.
What was interesting about the book was that it was written at a time when microcomputers were just beginning to be big business and not just geek toys. Bill Gates was seen as a geek who made it big -- sort of like Sergey Brin today -- not the "villain" that he was seen as being in the 1990s. And RMS was seen as a hopeless romantic, trying to recapture the spirit of 1970s MIT -- while Levy respected RMS, it was clear that he thought that the idea of Free Software and the GNU project were just hippie fantasies that were going nowhere.
Nobody ever made me use a Scientology product for work though. Maybe the FSF doesn't use Microsoft products, but everybody else does. Try to send a non-geek a LaTeX or Open Office document and they'll just complain "I can't open this". On the other hand it is easy to avoid Scientology.
Slashdot Mirror
I keep hearing this -- "Smartphones & tablets killed the console", but I just don't see how the very simple sorts of games without physical controls that you find on them in any way compete with even DS games let alone Wii/PS3/Xbox360 games. Maybe in the future when consoles are dead those games will move to tablets and phones, but not today.
Of course it's real. Why, I remember a case where clearly the interviewer needed some insights into animal transportation. As if I am going to help them figure out how to keep their cabbage from being eaten by a goat while crossing a river for free!
That's funny because usually the argument goes the other way -- "Electronic books are fine for reference, but for relaxing with fiction a real book is better". Personally, I prefer electronic books for both, and was even into them in the 1990s on my Palm Pilot before it became mainstream...
USL vs. BSDi had absolutely nothing to do with Linux. That was a battle between USL (former Bell Labs people) and Berkeley over who owned UNIX. Linux wasn't based on any of that code (despite what SCO would later claim), so it wasn't involved. Yes, Linux wouldn't have existed if BSD was open and available at the time. Hell, it wouldn't have existed if Tannenbaum had been more open about MINIX. But that's like arguing that the USA wouldn't exist if (like Ben Franklin wanted), the British would have just allowed the colonies to have their own MPs.
You also pay $0 to Apple if you don't distribute your apps. You can download Xcode for free and install apps you write on your own phone for free. I've done that myself. You pay the $99 for the ability to distribute your app in the App Store. Yes, I know there are advantages to Android's openness, but for this particular example it isn't any different.
You do realize that people can find apps by searching, right? Yes, I wish there were better search tools as part of the app store, but other than popular games in the top 50, pretty much everything I purchased I discovered through searching -- I realized I wanted an app to do X, and then searched for some keywords to find it. There are plenty of very niche apps (dictionaries of ancient Greek and Latin, for example) in the app store. These may not be getting anyone rich, but I'm sure they break even and give the developers (probably hobbyists) some pocket money.
It's pretty much the same reason Alternate History is considered part of SF, even ones that don't depend on time travel or something like that to cause the difference. Traditionally, AH was written by SF authors, so it's part of SF.
I was thinking of using Coherent at the time too, but I was an undergrad and even it was too expensive for me :-)
My favorite moment in early Linux history was asking if X11 was going to be ported, and getting a personal message from Linus saying "maybe, but don't count on it". I still ended up installing Linux in fall of 1991 despite the lack of X.
If dozens of Japanese started coming up with alternative physical currencies that looked just like Yen, they certainly *would* confuse people. Similarly, if people start coming up with ByteCoin, BitBuck, CoinBit, etc, they certainly *would* cause confusion with BitCoin. The difference is while the Japanese government would take a dim view of the former and intervene, nobody can prevent the latter.
While I prefer git, it's worth remembering that just a couple of years ago, svn was the young rebel upstart (hence the name "subversion") -- most commercial shops were using cvs until recently. It's a hard sell to get IT departments to shift again ("why, just a few years ago you nerds made us switch to svn when cvs was working just fine. Now you want to shift again?")
I know -- it's so frighteningly like Palm -- even down to making a crippled version of whatever was hot at the time (a netbook for Palm; a tablet for RIM) that only work if tied to a phone of theirs.
Circa 2000, you may have had a point. Big bookstores like Barnes & Noble and Borders were popping up all over, and generally had lots of comfortable seating. As a rather fast reader, I often spent a free afternoon or evening reading a book cover to cover in those stores back then. Guess too many people did just that. Now, you can hardly find a chair in most big box bookstores and they are closing up many locations anyway. I guess the free market can't support these big bookstores, which is too bad in a way.
The idea that educated people aren't selected for a jury just isn't true. I've served, and I have a doctorate in microbiology -- and there was another professor on the jury as well. Obviously both the defense and the prosecution want to eliminate people who would be biased against their side (and take turns doing this from the initial pool), but there is no reason why the educated can't be unbiased.
I created a Hackintosh and I think it taught me a lot about how OS X works "under the hood". If you don't see that as valuable, then no it isn't worth it.
Here's the snarky comment by another four-digit user, but lower than the previous four-digit user.
Published papers in open access journals. Why read the interpretation of a third-rate academic (the type who actually have the time to write textbooks because they don't have grants funding research that needs to be done) when you can you can read the real cutting-edge stuff th
You can't claim that a group is both a neocon propaganda group *and* funded by George Soros. Soros gave millions of dollars to the Democratic party during the 2004 election and stated that removing Bush from office was his central focus in life.
It is entirely possible and fair for a class to get all A's if they all meet the criterion (>90% on exams and so on). Yes, you might then argue that the tests were too easy, but if the tests covered the material you want the students to learn, what's the problem? Maybe the students were all very smart. Maybe the teacher is excellent.
Pretty much *all* of the classic Mac software was written in Pascal -- it was Apple's premier development system. C didn't really catch on outside the UNIX world until the mid to late 1980s.
For "The Art of Computer Programming", according to the article. What was he planning on doing? Converting it to his pseudo-assembly language MIX? As far as I know, Knuth has never used a high level language in his AoCP, although obviously he knows how to program in them (early versions of TeX were in Pascal, and now they are in C)
'Lost' requires the viewers to *infer* what is a flashback, flashforward, or alternative universe. Typically, these things are labeled in other movies or fiction. For example, they'll say "Twenty Years ago..." or in a movie, making the screen go all wavy or something similar. 'Lost' just jumps in and hopes the fans figure it out. About the only earlier example that I can think of is Vonnegut's "Slaughterhouse Five" , which obviously the scriptwriters of 'Lost' have read
Nobody is denying that during the 1990s Bill Gates and Microsoft were seen as evil monopolists. The point was this wasn't the case in the early 1980s. Microsoft was a successful company, but not a very large or high profile one -- Gates was just another successful tech guy like Jobs and Wozniak -- probably less famous, actually, as Gates was known as just the guy who wrote BASIC interpreters, rather than the more sexy design of computer systems. Again, read the book -- it gives a good feeling for the time.
The point isn't whether Gates is a nice guy or not; the point is how he was *perceived* at different points in time. In _Hackers_, as was common at the time, he was portrayed in a positive light. If you were around back then, it was IBM that was the "big evil" back then. Microsoft just wasn't seen that way. This isn't "whitewashing" his reputation, it is just reminding us that corporate image changes over time.
We are seeing this today with Apple and Jobs. While Apple was (at least during the last 20 years) seen as the plucky underdog fighting against Microsoft, now that the iPhone is so popular they are beginning to throw their weight around, rejecting apps for seemingly arbitrary reasons and banning cross-platform tools for iPhone development to hinder the growth of competitors like Android, Apple will be seen as the new devil -- and I say that as a Mac and iPhone user.
What was interesting about the book was that it was written at a time when microcomputers were just beginning to be big business and not just geek toys. Bill Gates was seen as a geek who made it big -- sort of like Sergey Brin today -- not the "villain" that he was seen as being in the 1990s. And RMS was seen as a hopeless romantic, trying to recapture the spirit of 1970s MIT -- while Levy respected RMS, it was clear that he thought that the idea of Free Software and the GNU project were just hippie fantasies that were going nowhere.
Nobody ever made me use a Scientology product for work though. Maybe the FSF doesn't use Microsoft products, but everybody else does. Try to send a non-geek a LaTeX or Open Office document and they'll just complain "I can't open this". On the other hand it is easy to avoid Scientology.