Why would he have the right to refuse to hire union works? Does he have the right to refuse to hire Catholics or Jews? Personally I really don't care if he has hiring biases, but when we start talking about freedom it gets a little tricky. He certainly has a right to refuse to negotiate.
Are you on a jet with your ass on the line next to these people helping them? What about Hindu compassion that holds the cow to be so sacred that people allow them to eat plastic in the filthy streets? Do you think they will care if I have A/C or an SUV when they get one?
"one in which the world comes close to meeting its goal of curbing emissions to limit Earth's average temperature rise to 2 degrees C (3.6 degrees F) above pre-industrial levels"
The goal is to revert to a time we have little connections with because it was obviously the "golden age".
From what I have seen via Docker and other container technologies, what you have with mobile apps is basically a small O/S image that can be easily tested and pushed to many devices. The 247MB probably contains entire libraries that are never even touched since they are just wholesale pulled in from a dependency list that "works". The core install of Perl, for example, is 77MB before you start messing with CPAN. If you have even one part of your app that uses Perl, you just installed 77MB worth of data and code to your machine image.
Meanwhile, behind the facade of an innocent looking bookstore...
Russia builds the SATAN-2 missile which can obliterate France or Texas. Priorities... Mobile reactors sure are popular even if we haven't gotten the landings just right.
Companies issuing more stock is usually backed by capital infusion. Governments issuing more currency happens but then you trade on the same currency. This is more like a single country split into two but both are retaining the factories and producing goods for two markets. If it does happen in the financial world, it's certainly rare.
Where did I say diabetes? Fructose is bad for the pancreas, period. No human cell can metabolize it directly and it is processed in the liver in a manner similar to alcohol. My understanding is that this process produces by-products which are harmful to the pancreas over the long-term. Severe alcoholics are also known to have pancreatic issues with little or no sign of diabetes.
Not really like a split. More like a clone. This doesn't happen in the stock or currency world. Basically you now have two chains that operate on the same history but are now divergent.
I have no idea how the value of this will play out because it will depend on how strong the support is for each. If each gains equal support, I imagine a decline in valuation for both back to "normal". Otherwise you'll have one absorb the transaction space of the other and essentially just eliminate the loser's value overnight, probably. Depending on how long that plays out people are going to be trading on both which means potential volatility.
I keep hearing The Government is us so I'm not sure who you expect to fix anything when you say The Government. For one thing, even if you consider "The Government" (or "The State") as being separate from normal human beings, it is still run by and consists of human beings to function. Judges, police officers, legislators, executive administrative assistants to the vice chair of the majority sub-committee on hiring more executive assistants... all human.
When you say "fix" stuff... can you describe a precise process on how this is supposed to be done? I've always gotten hand-wavy answers like "voting" and "democracy". None of which actually physically implement anything you've ever asked for. Not roads. Not health care. Not internet access. It was human beings that did all those things as instructed by other human beings who were given "authority" to use force, if necessary, to enact these projects. In today's world it's almost exclusively bid to private contractors. The same people you could just go straight up to and ask to do it. For some reason putting another layer in the middle is better for everyone even though middle-men are evil in insurance and other "life-essential" areas.
How about this... you want stuff? You propose a business plan. Get local investment from the community to pay for a contractor to put in fiber. Negotiate the working rate with neighbors and future service users. Work with internet service providers to provide inter-connect access and use your community as leverage to get suitable rates and access speeds. Set up and maintain a locally-funded community POP with co-locateable racks and other services.
I mean, this is what all the human beings working for The Government will do (inefficiently). I don't understand why you can't cut out the middle man. Oh wait... I forgot... It's ILLEGAL to do any of that.
You take up physical space and time on this planet. Yes, if anyone saw you in your car and could correlate that with your activity (hint: NSA) then you are not anonymous. This can be done. It has been done (hint: NSA). Even through Tor.
If I had to guess, I'd say it was the fruit that killed him. Fructose is bad for the pancreas and from what I read he ate a lot of fruit. Once your pancreas goes, there is nothing that can be done. It doesn't regenerate, you only have one, and it provides some life-critical chemicals.
They won't be able to block it. Look at how much effort China has to put into their great firewall. It's a huge energy and time cost and newer protocols can make that process even harder. We don't need a new physical internet. That's not what this is about.
You can't be anonymous. Even as you posted here there was a chain of information that links back to your computer. The time you posted it links it to you. Virtually everything you do in this world can be correlated either directly to you or via people you know. This "anonymity" you speak of is really just keeping all of that data hidden. Which was my point.
Privacy doesn't mean anonymity. With encrypted protocols it's possible to share pieces of data or perform collective actions without revealing personal information. There is still a worry of data accumulation (logging) but ideally you can identify bad actors and remove them from the system with minimal damage rather than the wild west of identity we have today.
That's how it is sold. A real internship is called an apprenticeship, is paid, and directly leads to a career path. Internships are just social avenues for networking and the people that succeed take full advantage of that, not the "experience" gained.
This is the history of voting. What I don't get is why people hold Democracy to be so sacrosanct when it's clear that it doesn't give you the outcomes you want. Voting is great when you win. When you lose you have to deal with whatever punishment the winner ascribed. Instead of blaming Trump or The People... perhaps you should be asking why we are begging permissions from Oompa Loompas? Democracy is two wolves and a sheep deciding what's for dinner. And I'm hungry.
Slashdot Mirror
Why would he have the right to refuse to hire union works? Does he have the right to refuse to hire Catholics or Jews? Personally I really don't care if he has hiring biases, but when we start talking about freedom it gets a little tricky. He certainly has a right to refuse to negotiate.
Are you on a jet with your ass on the line next to these people helping them? What about Hindu compassion that holds the cow to be so sacred that people allow them to eat plastic in the filthy streets? Do you think they will care if I have A/C or an SUV when they get one?
No... that's not quite right:
"one in which the world comes close to meeting its goal of curbing emissions to limit Earth's average temperature rise to 2 degrees C (3.6 degrees F) above pre-industrial levels"
The goal is to revert to a time we have little connections with because it was obviously the "golden age".
I play blindfolded. And die a lot.
edit text.
From what I have seen via Docker and other container technologies, what you have with mobile apps is basically a small O/S image that can be easily tested and pushed to many devices. The 247MB probably contains entire libraries that are never even touched since they are just wholesale pulled in from a dependency list that "works". The core install of Perl, for example, is 77MB before you start messing with CPAN. If you have even one part of your app that uses Perl, you just installed 77MB worth of data and code to your machine image.
Meanwhile, behind the facade of an innocent looking bookstore...
Russia builds the SATAN-2 missile which can obliterate France or Texas. Priorities... Mobile reactors sure are popular even if we haven't gotten the landings just right.
Companies issuing more stock is usually backed by capital infusion. Governments issuing more currency happens but then you trade on the same currency. This is more like a single country split into two but both are retaining the factories and producing goods for two markets. If it does happen in the financial world, it's certainly rare.
What gives anything value? Even life-essentials life food change value based on your immediate situation.
Where did I say diabetes? Fructose is bad for the pancreas, period. No human cell can metabolize it directly and it is processed in the liver in a manner similar to alcohol. My understanding is that this process produces by-products which are harmful to the pancreas over the long-term. Severe alcoholics are also known to have pancreatic issues with little or no sign of diabetes.
Not really like a split. More like a clone. This doesn't happen in the stock or currency world. Basically you now have two chains that operate on the same history but are now divergent.
I have no idea how the value of this will play out because it will depend on how strong the support is for each. If each gains equal support, I imagine a decline in valuation for both back to "normal". Otherwise you'll have one absorb the transaction space of the other and essentially just eliminate the loser's value overnight, probably. Depending on how long that plays out people are going to be trading on both which means potential volatility.
Popcorn-worthy from my seat.
I keep hearing The Government is us so I'm not sure who you expect to fix anything when you say The Government. For one thing, even if you consider "The Government" (or "The State") as being separate from normal human beings, it is still run by and consists of human beings to function. Judges, police officers, legislators, executive administrative assistants to the vice chair of the majority sub-committee on hiring more executive assistants... all human.
When you say "fix" stuff... can you describe a precise process on how this is supposed to be done? I've always gotten hand-wavy answers like "voting" and "democracy". None of which actually physically implement anything you've ever asked for. Not roads. Not health care. Not internet access. It was human beings that did all those things as instructed by other human beings who were given "authority" to use force, if necessary, to enact these projects. In today's world it's almost exclusively bid to private contractors. The same people you could just go straight up to and ask to do it. For some reason putting another layer in the middle is better for everyone even though middle-men are evil in insurance and other "life-essential" areas.
How about this... you want stuff? You propose a business plan. Get local investment from the community to pay for a contractor to put in fiber. Negotiate the working rate with neighbors and future service users. Work with internet service providers to provide inter-connect access and use your community as leverage to get suitable rates and access speeds. Set up and maintain a locally-funded community POP with co-locateable racks and other services.
I mean, this is what all the human beings working for The Government will do (inefficiently). I don't understand why you can't cut out the middle man. Oh wait... I forgot... It's ILLEGAL to do any of that.
Well... good luck.
You take up physical space and time on this planet. Yes, if anyone saw you in your car and could correlate that with your activity (hint: NSA) then you are not anonymous. This can be done. It has been done (hint: NSA). Even through Tor.
Not to mention all the open source projects that rely on GitHub for distribution. I wonder how much Node.js development gets done when GitHub is down.
If I had to guess, I'd say it was the fruit that killed him. Fructose is bad for the pancreas and from what I read he ate a lot of fruit. Once your pancreas goes, there is nothing that can be done. It doesn't regenerate, you only have one, and it provides some life-critical chemicals.
They won't be able to block it. Look at how much effort China has to put into their great firewall. It's a huge energy and time cost and newer protocols can make that process even harder. We don't need a new physical internet. That's not what this is about.
This. You vote with your time, your actions, your energy. Facebook won because cockroaches don't give a damn about your opinions.
You can't be anonymous. Even as you posted here there was a chain of information that links back to your computer. The time you posted it links it to you. Virtually everything you do in this world can be correlated either directly to you or via people you know. This "anonymity" you speak of is really just keeping all of that data hidden. Which was my point.
Look in the mirror as you press F5.
Privacy doesn't mean anonymity. With encrypted protocols it's possible to share pieces of data or perform collective actions without revealing personal information. There is still a worry of data accumulation (logging) but ideally you can identify bad actors and remove them from the system with minimal damage rather than the wild west of identity we have today.
That's how it is sold. A real internship is called an apprenticeship, is paid, and directly leads to a career path. Internships are just social avenues for networking and the people that succeed take full advantage of that, not the "experience" gained.
After a week the sensors will be "owned" by various multinationals in the Eastern Bloc.
Or we could try to do something about it. Technology can be broken and bent. We aren't slaves to it because we made it.
This is the history of voting. What I don't get is why people hold Democracy to be so sacrosanct when it's clear that it doesn't give you the outcomes you want. Voting is great when you win. When you lose you have to deal with whatever punishment the winner ascribed. Instead of blaming Trump or The People... perhaps you should be asking why we are begging permissions from Oompa Loompas? Democracy is two wolves and a sheep deciding what's for dinner. And I'm hungry.
Quit waiting for Congress. Congress will never do anything for you. Why would you even think they are on your side?