If there's an answer, it's not with the education system. It's with the law.
Given that tests do not control for admission criteria (US having tierless secondary/tertiary, Russia/China having highly rigid tiering), there can be no comparison on educational systems.
They could try again when they factor that and population size out, but it will favor the US a bit too much for them.
A more likely case is that Russia & China have lax enforcement - especially on foreign targets. Another factor is the law of large numbers, something also not in the US's favor.
If there's an answer, it's not with the education system.
Given that tests do not control for admission criteria (US having tierless secondary/tertiary, Russia/China having highly rigid tiering), there can be no comparison on educational systems.
They could try again when they factor that and population size out, but it will favor the US a bit too much for them.
A more likely case is that Russia & China have lax enforcement - especially on foreign targets. Another factor is the law of large numbers, something also not in the US's favor.
When there's a policy that will favor citizens instead of guest workers, nerves should be a bit frazzled.
That's how we know Trump has chosen the right policy. Besides, it's time that globalists like Cook show a little heart for citizens - by respecting the law and enforcing it consistently.
The US complied with Kyoto, much to the detriment of its own citizenry (read: the majority not living in the coasts or in environmentalist Colorado).
As for Paris, someone wanted an uninterruptible gravy train from the US to some BFE country, even at the cost of entire US regions. Americans got their choice through representation, and the US exited it, despite the claims from the MSM to the contrary.
Fine and dandy to believe the Sierra Club and some highly-politicized "scientists", but AGW (unlike the natural change in climate over geologic timespans) largely DNE. But that's science that/. won't accept.
It might be more believable if environmentalists weren't trying to force people (by lack of meaningfully different choice) to adopt lower-tier solutions, while the policy-making nomenklatura is spared any pain.
Slashdot Mirror
Given the amount of conservatives being attacked, this doesn't look like to be the practice.
If there's an answer, it's not with the education system. It's with the law.
Given that tests do not control for admission criteria (US having tierless secondary/tertiary, Russia/China having highly rigid tiering), there can be no comparison on educational systems.
They could try again when they factor that and population size out, but it will favor the US a bit too much for them.
A more likely case is that Russia & China have lax enforcement - especially on foreign targets. Another factor is the law of large numbers, something also not in the US's favor.
Countries with such systems have less educated people - as they consign people to drudgery if they dont test well or had a bad day.
In contrast, the US educates about everybody and does well once you factor out admission systems.
If there's an answer, it's not with the education system.
Given that tests do not control for admission criteria (US having tierless secondary/tertiary, Russia/China having highly rigid tiering), there can be no comparison on educational systems.
They could try again when they factor that and population size out, but it will favor the US a bit too much for them.
A more likely case is that Russia & China have lax enforcement - especially on foreign targets. Another factor is the law of large numbers, something also not in the US's favor.
The deal-killer with the r.pi is the still-unfixed USB bandwidth bug that has plagued the platform since the first generation.
Merkel only seeks to silence opposition under the banner of political correctness.
Easier to mop up any "accidents". If he's not a US citizen, we don't have to protect him.
The only thing that has happened is the outflow of work, not the inflow or increase of citizens hired.
Besides, Apple can be replaced by a more faithful company.
Unlike Wipro, Trump actually has acted in favor of regular, non-billionaire US citizens.
When there's a policy that will favor citizens instead of guest workers, nerves should be a bit frazzled.
That's how we know Trump has chosen the right policy. Besides, it's time that globalists like Cook show a little heart for citizens - by respecting the law and enforcing it consistently.
Apple didn't do so bad when they weren't an intelligence service with a technology company attached to it.
I'll happily embrace AI when it has been neutralized.
Not so sure that is the case.
Take Two/R* first co-opted modders through GTAForums with some success.
Unfortunately, they went for too much by trying to kill off modding entirely. Hopefully they reverse course, as they've removed any goodwill.
N/T
Scratch a leftist, find a totalitarian wanting to come out - Vox's readership and staff included.
All it wants to do is create an echo chamber and easy out - "the AI did it!".
The NYT is all about the narrative, whether it is the article or the comments.
It's one thing to be in a top list for jobs, but how many of them are friendly towards those that don't already have work?
The US complied with Kyoto, much to the detriment of its own citizenry (read: the majority not living in the coasts or in environmentalist Colorado).
As for Paris, someone wanted an uninterruptible gravy train from the US to some BFE country, even at the cost of entire US regions. Americans got their choice through representation, and the US exited it, despite the claims from the MSM to the contrary.
Fine and dandy to believe the Sierra Club and some highly-politicized "scientists", but AGW (unlike the natural change in climate over geologic timespans) largely DNE. But that's science that /. won't accept.
It might be more believable if environmentalists weren't trying to force people (by lack of meaningfully different choice) to adopt lower-tier solutions, while the policy-making nomenklatura is spared any pain.
These are models that try to extrapolate geologic spans from relatively small datasets. Of course they don't know.
Then would Aspen, Colorado be their holy city, with Al Gore's various homes being their version of seminaries?
If AI's supposed to be able to create opportunity, why not use it to help connect the displaced and long-term jobless?