How do you stream reliably over N? I'm trying now with a shared directory and I keep getting stutter. I'm connected at 150 to 250 mb/s, so bandwidth shouldn't be a problem.
It is NEVER helpful to talk to the police when you are a suspect, even if you are innocent.
How do you know when you're a suspect? Do they have to tell you right off? If everyone acted this way, then how would the police ever get anywhere?
If, for example, there have been break-ins in your apartment building, but all the external entrances were not damaged. When the police come knocking at your door to ask if you've heard/seen anything are you going to call a lawyer or are you going to help them out? Is everyone in the building going to call a lawyer? That could get really expensive and really time consuming.
Not that I don't think you shouldn't have the right to clam up if you don't think you can talk without saying something that might incriminate you. And I also don't think we should waive rights just to make the job of the police easier. Any insights that you or anyone else might have on this would be nice.
because if there were indeed massive numbers of non-thug, thug-disliking throngs at such protests, then they'd go to enormous lengths to not have their events become hosts to such BS.
Do you want to tell the half-cut, masked, local breaking shit with a baseball bat to cut it out? Or maybe if you ask his similarly inclined friends, they might stop him? Good luck with that.
and NAFTA clearly shouldn't apply when you are destroying the environment to undercut your competitors.
Do you really think that the US was imposing duties for environmental reasons? Seriously?
Can't argue with you about the government's action re: the preservation of the spotted owl though. I'm not a big fan of North America's lack of respect for the environment as a whole. Then again, I could be doing a hell of a lot more personally.
From my perspective it was one of the fastest paradigm shifts ever. Shockingly fast, even.
I'm with you there. Though there was a bit of a lag between a select few users having them and regular consumers buying them, there was definitely very little time between some consumers buying them and "everyone" having one.
It ranks just behind DVD players in my (flawed?) memory as far as mass adoption goes. It only takes one government year end paired with a holiday season with new devices at "reasonable prices".
I find it intriging that the newer tech seems to have fewer licensing issues and barriers to market entry in this case. Normally, doesn't it go the other way? The older tech is accessable to all and the newer stuff is patented all to hell (eg: Anyone can make ground coffee, but if you make something too similar to my Coffee Pouch (TM) I have a case for patent infringement).
Why is there no (obvious) such problems with flash memory? Why is it an open market? Is this a resurgence of an older idea?
You mean the comment I quoted in the post you just replied to? I'm honestly wondering what I missed.
Regardless, the argument boils down to "Old art is better than new art." and is an old argument and is bunk. People have been saying that new art is profane and without value for ages (Rock and Roll anyone)?
Slashdot Mirror
I'm reading what I want to as well, looks like.
That's because it actually says "notebook hard drive".
How do you stream reliably over N? I'm trying now with a shared directory and I keep getting stutter. I'm connected at 150 to 250 mb/s, so bandwidth shouldn't be a problem.
It is NEVER helpful to talk to the police when you are a suspect, even if you are innocent.
How do you know when you're a suspect? Do they have to tell you right off? If everyone acted this way, then how would the police ever get anywhere?
If, for example, there have been break-ins in your apartment building, but all the external entrances were not damaged. When the police come knocking at your door to ask if you've heard/seen anything are you going to call a lawyer or are you going to help them out? Is everyone in the building going to call a lawyer? That could get really expensive and really time consuming.
Not that I don't think you shouldn't have the right to clam up if you don't think you can talk without saying something that might incriminate you. And I also don't think we should waive rights just to make the job of the police easier. Any insights that you or anyone else might have on this would be nice.
because if there were indeed massive numbers of non-thug, thug-disliking throngs at such protests, then they'd go to enormous lengths to not have their events become hosts to such BS.
Do you want to tell the half-cut, masked, local breaking shit with a baseball bat to cut it out? Or maybe if you ask his similarly inclined friends, they might stop him? Good luck with that.
"It's based on an old Persian religion, Zoroastrianism, and the battle between light and darkness."
Let's hope it leaves out the ritualistic testicle shaving referenced in Austin Powers.
You're going to be disappointed when you find out what the "battle between light and darkness" really refers to.
So when you were doing it it was pure and harmless fun, but now "the scene" is "dirty".
Nostalgia sure isn't what it used to be.
MADD condones drive-bys as long as you're sober?
75 years?
Shakespeare's Hamlet is a retelling of an old legend.
This has been going on as long as we've been telling stories.
The dispute is over hardwood,
The dispute is about softwood. This can be confirmed in about two minutes on Google.
and NAFTA clearly shouldn't apply when you are destroying the environment to undercut your competitors.
Do you really think that the US was imposing duties for environmental reasons? Seriously?
Can't argue with you about the government's action re: the preservation of the spotted owl though. I'm not a big fan of North America's lack of respect for the environment as a whole. Then again, I could be doing a hell of a lot more personally.
It's not like the US doesn't already ignore NAFTA when it doesn't work to their advantage (see Canadian softwood lumber).
From my perspective it was one of the fastest paradigm shifts ever. Shockingly fast, even.
I'm with you there. Though there was a bit of a lag between a select few users having them and regular consumers buying them, there was definitely very little time between some consumers buying them and "everyone" having one.
It ranks just behind DVD players in my (flawed?) memory as far as mass adoption goes. It only takes one government year end paired with a holiday season with new devices at "reasonable prices".
That's very interesting, thanks for your comment.
:)
I find it intriging that the newer tech seems to have fewer licensing issues and barriers to market entry in this case. Normally, doesn't it go the other way? The older tech is accessable to all and the newer stuff is patented all to hell (eg: Anyone can make ground coffee, but if you make something too similar to my Coffee Pouch (TM) I have a case for patent infringement).
Why is there no (obvious) such problems with flash memory? Why is it an open market? Is this a resurgence of an older idea?
I know what I'm researching after work.
Could you make the same choice?
News to me.
It's not necessarily hypocritical. "Use whatever methods I can to get my way and fuck everyone else." is a perfectly consistent modus operandi.
Here in France someone is not guilty until it has been proven.
That doesn't make any sense. Surely someone's actual guilt doesn't change once it's proven or disproven.
Mixing legal definitions into normal conversation isn't a good idea.
Dues at my squash club are about $80 a month even though I've already bought a racquet, protective glasses and shoes.
I play the game because I enjoy it. I will never be a professional (or even a competetive amateur). I don't get any phat loot.
Am I a sucker?
It's American.
Please drive through.
Suck on THAT Jack Thompson.
Which Jack Tompson?
no text
You're expelled.
You can make metal roses out of the platters.
Having a hard time finding a howto though.
You dropped 65lbs and you say "even then I wasn't really fat before"? 65lbs overweight is definitely fat.
That's almost an Olsen twin.
...?
You mean the comment I quoted in the post you just replied to? I'm honestly wondering what I missed.
Regardless, the argument boils down to "Old art is better than new art." and is an old argument and is bunk. People have been saying that new art is profane and without value for ages (Rock and Roll anyone)?