Slashdot Mirror


McDonald's UK CEO Blames Video Games for Childhood Obesity

BoingBoing is reporting that Steve Eaterbrook, McDonald's UK CEO, says that video games are leading the charge in obesity. He does have the decency to at least admit fatty foods are a part of the problem, but points the finger at interactive games for keeping kids indoors and not out burning off energy. "According to The Times, McDonalds UK is 'on the brink of its best year for two decades'. The firm has enjoyed six per cent like-for-like sales growth in the last year. More than 88 million visits were made to McDonald's restaurants last month, up 10 million on the previous year." Don't forget, we have known for ages that video games make us fat and mean.

321 comments

  1. The Layer Cake of Disappointment by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We have a problem with obesity--increasingly with children.

    Disappointment Level One: Someone, somewhere decided that it is one single factor contributing to this, not a combination. Blame is absolute and illogically must be placed on one thing.

    Disappointment Level Two: The media reinforces Lvl 1 idea and is on a witch hunt.

    Disappointment Level Three: Each alleged witch further exacerbates by shifting blame to another witch, none of them ever admitting to being part of the problem. Once a new target is acquired, they escape the public eye.

    Disappointment Level Four: Lvls 1-3 act as a free pass to parents. There are so many witches to point at, surely nothing they have done resulted in this. Again, no responsibility is taken.

    And all the while, we're setting ourselves up for a diabetes explosion. Although many have claimed it's been on the horizon for a long time, the numbers are starting to creep. Enjoy eating through all four layers of that cake!

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:The Layer Cake of Disappointment by TeknoDragon · · Score: 4, Informative
      It's almost like Easterbrook said in the original article:

      "I don't know who is to blame," Mr Easterbrook says. "The issue of obesity is complex and is absolutely one our society is facing, there's no denial about that, but if you break it down I think there's an education piece: how can we better communicate to individuals the importance of a balanced diet and taking care of themselves? Then there's a lifestyle element: there's fewer green spaces and kids are sat home playing computer games on the TV when in the past they'd have been burning off energy outside.

      "The Government has a part to play, individuals have a responsibility and so does the food and drink industry. These are the three pillars that need to work together and demonstrate that they have a commitment to solving the issue. We're front and centre of the diet piece of the debate and, as a large business with a big influence, it is a responsibility that we accept as a leader in our sector."

      Government responsibility, individual responsibility, industry responsibility have to be in sync to solve the issue.
    2. Re:The Layer Cake of Disappointment by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 2, Informative

      CORN! Corn? Yes. Corn.

      Destroy ADM and Cargill, today!

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    3. Re:The Layer Cake of Disappointment by pembo13 · · Score: 1

      And thus is the apparent flow of civilization. You never see fat children in post-apocalyptic stories do you.

      --
      "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
    4. Re:The Layer Cake of Disappointment by snarfies · · Score: 1, Funny

      The cake is a lie.

    5. Re:The Layer Cake of Disappointment by Applekid · · Score: 3, Funny

      I read your entire post and it's well thought out and interesting.

      But, I have to admit, I sort of wanted some cake to go with it. And maybe a tall glass of whole milk. Duh, of course there should be chocolate syrup in the milk.

      --
      More Twoson than Cupertino
    6. Re:The Layer Cake of Disappointment by JeepFanatic · · Score: 4, Informative

      In the case of children, you also have to include PARENTAL responsibility.

    7. Re:The Layer Cake of Disappointment by mh1997 · · Score: 1

      Disappointment Level Four: Lvls 1-3 act as a free pass to parents. There are so many witches to point at, surely nothing they have done resulted in this. Again, no responsibility is taken.
      Well, as the parent of a future obese child, as long as I am not held responsible for poor parenting my child, I'm OK with passing the blame to video games.
    8. Re:The Layer Cake of Disappointment by CastrTroy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Reminds me of a George Carlin act I was listening to. When the kids turn out good, they take all the credit. When the kids turn out bad, they put the blame on something else, like rock music, video games, fast food, or whatever the evil-du-jour is. I'm a parent, and I know how hard it is to raise kids, but I believe that how my kid turns out has a lot to do with how good I am at being a parent. I had video games, rock music, and fast food when I was a kid, but that doesn't mean I didn't turn out well.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    9. Re:The Layer Cake of Disappointment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We regret to inform you that it is not necessary to read this post. We are sorry for the inconvenience.
      -
      The cake is a lie!

    10. Re:The Layer Cake of Disappointment by MBraynard · · Score: 0, Troll

      Nice attempt at trying to make a hip, John Katz-like post, while ignoring or trying to obfuscate the issue that PS3/360/Wii and parent's tolerance of these console babysitters is contributing obesity in the US and elsewhere. .

    11. Re:The Layer Cake of Disappointment by FSWKU · · Score: 1

      Sadly enough, in this case, the cake ISN'T a lie... =(

      --
      "So after all this, you make my case for me. To end this stalemate, you must die..."
    12. Re:The Layer Cake of Disappointment by mmalove · · Score: 2

      Ehhhhhh, kinda. On the one hand, companies could certainly always be more forthcoming about what they are selling to kids, the action packed in your face commercialism that surrounds ever more creative ways to sell a wad of corn syrup needs to be reigned in. But that's not the real issue, the one driving that kind of commercialism.

      The real issue is a underdeveloped sense of pro active thinking in young minds. Less and less are kids encouraged to think critically, more and more are they spoon fed. I trust that marketing minds are doing whatever it is that generates them the most profits and sales, and their weapon of choice is the action packed, emotionally charged, factless message (works for politics too). It's an issue of education, but I don't think it's because kids don't know sugar without exercise makes you fat. It's because they don't care. They don't really think about life when they're 40. They don't build the habits that reward not through instant gratification, but long term success and health. And we say, well they're just kids, they'll learn that later. But look around, and tell me they learned it later.

      If the world went on a heatlh kick, and people consistently acted in their own best interest in terms of diet, McDonalds would go out of business, or undergo a very significant menu change. Oh yes, they've introduced the premier "salad" to their menu, sure. Is there a salad happy meal? Batter coated fried chicken paste wins the taste buds of the youngest generation, not the health conscious choice.

      --
      You can get 15 minutes of fame, but you can go down in history for infamy.
    13. Re:The Layer Cake of Disappointment by eln · · Score: 1

      a hip, John Katz-like post Don't be foolish. I did a text search on the OP, and I didn't see "post-Columbine" mentioned even ONCE.
    14. Re:The Layer Cake of Disappointment by Dirtside · · Score: 1

      how can we better communicate to individuals the importance of a balanced diet and taking care of themselves?
      I think part of the problem is that we try to communicate the idea that "it's healthy to do XYZ", rather than giving people the basic information and letting them make their own decisions about how they want to manage their health. Telling everyone that X is bad and Y is good and you should avoid X and do Y instead just makes people resentful, because they like doing X and then feel guilty when they do it.

      Instead, if we teach people what X and Y actually are, then they can decide on their own that they'll maybe limit their intake of X because they know what's in it and they know what that stuff does to your liver, for example. It's aiming for the same goal, but from a standpoint of encouraging personal responsibility, rather than believing that information handed down from an authority will have the desired effect. Sorry to abuse the cliché, but people have to want to change.
      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    15. Re:The Layer Cake of Disappointment by Chabil+Ha' · · Score: 1

      I must not be one of George's typical children. I'm a Generation Xer (Y depending on who defines the range). Everything that I've done in life I attribute to good parents who gave me opportunities. I opine that without those opportunities, I would not have had as much success as I enjoy. What's interesting is I have a brother who not quite two years younger than I, had the same exact (if not greater opportunities than I) and blames my parents for all his personal problems and misfortunes. Generation gap, perhaps?

      --
      We're all hypocrites. We all have hidden parts, it's the contrast between them that make us more a hypocrite than others
    16. Re:The Layer Cake of Disappointment by kannibal_klown · · Score: 2, Insightful
      To play devil's advocate, it's possible (and likely) that two siblings get treated differently, especially if they're not twins.
      • He's your younger brother, you played a role in his development while there's a chance you didn't have an older brother to play a role in yours. Parents do not make up the raising environment alone, and a 2nd/3rd/4th child may easily experience different raising styles because of the older siblings.
      • Parents can have completely different raising styles between children, I've seen it first-hand. One example (though not the only)
        • The first is raised strictly
        • The second is more lax, since they feel they didn't need to be "as" strict on the first
        • The third is the most strict of all because the family realized they were too leniant on the second
        • etc
      • Maybe one brother has one personality while the other has a completely different
      • etc
    17. Re:The Layer Cake of Disappointment by poticlin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Fully Agree with you there! Actually, I would say it is mostly Parental responsibility as children are brought to Fatty Restaurant where the food is bought by mom and dad. Video Games are bought and "supervised" by the parents. Balance Diet : Have you ever seen kids cook?
      What is Fatty restaurant's responsibility involved here? or Video game industry? It's all about education...

    18. Re:The Layer Cake of Disappointment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It ain't the fat, it's the carbs. Keep the meat and cheese, just ditch the soft drink, fries and the bun.

      http://webcast.berkeley.edu/event_details.php?webcastid=21216

    19. Re:The Layer Cake of Disappointment by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Telling everyone that X is bad and Y is good and you should avoid X and do Y instead just makes people resentful, because they like doing X and then feel guilty when they do it.

      Actually it is a lot worse than that. Part of the problem is that the media jump all over new results and publicize them before they have been scientifically confirmed (although the huge number of conflicting reports which the medical profession apparently produces does give one pause to consider the level of scientific rigour). As a result the message tends to be: X is good and Y is bad. Oops sorry, actually X is bad too, oh now Y is good, err...sorry actually neither are particularly great, have you tried Z? ...and so on. So is it any wonder than most people just ignore it and do what they want?

    20. Re:The Layer Cake of Disappointment by spun · · Score: 2, Insightful

      We gave the Native Americans smallpox and booze, they gave us tobacco and corn. It only looks like we came out ahead in that deal...

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    21. Re:The Layer Cake of Disappointment by dada21 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You're right about sugar being a big cause of obesity (not fat), but McDonald's isn't really to blame. When I met my (now) wife, I had never been a big carb eater. I was always a meat & cheese kinda guy. She introduced me to pasta, sugary snacks, potato chips, and other stuff. I went from my "anorexic" 140lbs to 190lbs in less than a year. When I realized I was fat, I thought it was because I was eating too many fatty foods, so I cut my fats out entirely. I gained even more weight. Thanks to Dr. Atkins and about 12 months of diet research, I then proceeded to reduce my sugars, increase fiber and healthy fats, and I lost my weight back to 140-150lbs. Some of my meals were at McDonalds, too. At one point, I ate McD's almost every day, and continued to lose weight while getting my blood pressure and bad cholesterol levels lower.

      Americans are sickeningly fat, but it isn't video games or McDonalds -- its their love of sugar and sugar-like products (HFCS). I can't believe how many unbelievably fat people I know, and I know I'll have to pay for their early retirement because they won't stop shoving candy into their mouths. Cola soda is candy. "Healthy" Granola is candy. Most of the products on Weight Watchers are candy. Don't these fat people see that they're not only killing themselves, but they're putting the cost on me and others who decide to live healthy?

      Here's a reason why I detest single-payer healthcare: because people will have LESS reason to live a healthy lifestyle. I haven't been to the doctor in years except for my annual checkup. I haven't been sick in years, either. And yet I know my health costs go up because of the people who refuse to look into what ails them in terms of weight problems.

    22. Re:The Layer Cake of Disappointment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't believe that a guy named Steve Eaterbrook is McDonald's UK CEO. Eaterbrook? I hardly knew her!

    23. Re:The Layer Cake of Disappointment by Simon+Brooke · · Score: 5, Insightful

      When I was six, I used to walk a mile to school - and a mile back - every day. In the summer all through my chidhood, I'd make myself a sandwich before anyone else was up, and be out in the woods until evening - or else, later on, drop down river in my boat on the outgoing tide and come back in on the next. When I was twelve, I used to cycle twenty miles up into the hills with a friend - and, at the end of the day, twenty miles back. Kids these days aren't allowed to do that sort of thing. They're driven everywhere. They get no time to be out by themselves. The sea - the roads - the woods - are all suddenly 'too dangerous' for kids.

      It isn't video games - at least, not mostly. It's over-protection. Of course, the over-protected, housebound kids then have to be entertained, so they get given video games. Diet doesn't help, this much is true. But the real problem is over-protection.

      --
      I'm old enough to remember when discussions on Slashdot were well informed.
    24. Re:The Layer Cake of Disappointment by sharkey · · Score: 1

      But, I have to admit, I sort of wanted some cake to go with it.

      After the Big Mac and Super Size fries, of course.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    25. Re:The Layer Cake of Disappointment by nih · · Score: 1

      Enjoy eating through all four layers of that cake!
      fs i was going to mod you insightful until then...there goes my diet!
      --
      I'm a rabbit startled by the headlights of life :(
    26. Re:The Layer Cake of Disappointment by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      Disappointment Level Three: Each alleged witch further exacerbates by shifting blame to another witch, none of them ever admitting to being part of the problem. Once a new target is acquired, they escape the public eye.

      OK, kids have been sitting in front of the boob tube since I was a kid, and I was a beta tester for dirt (we never did get all the bugs out).

      Could these McClowns explain to me how playing video games would tend to make you more fat than watching Popeye? And how playing video games will make you more fat than ingesting 3 times your needed amount of calories in a McMeal?

      Just McWondering.

      -McGrew

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    27. Re:The Layer Cake of Disappointment by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      Have you ever seen kids cook?

      Dude, that's just sick!

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    28. Re:The Layer Cake of Disappointment by Dan667 · · Score: 1

      Fatty restaurant responsibility - McDonald's directly markets to children. Most others do not. I would give them a free pass if they would end that single practice.

    29. Re:The Layer Cake of Disappointment by bluie- · · Score: 1

      I always think of all this as a form of natural selection. As people become more lazy, they will develop major health problems and die. Parents passing this lifestyle on, as described in your disappointment level four, are only ensuring that these health problems persist.

      Maybe this will be what prevents the world from getting massively over-populated. Too bad it also has the effect of costing insane money in healthcare, and destroying people you care about.

      In conclusion, fuck little debbie, and walk 30 minutes every day. It's as easy as delicious pie.

      --
      life is a tragedy to those who feel, and a comedy to those who think
    30. Re:The Layer Cake of Disappointment by Tikkun · · Score: 1

      This cake is not a lie.

    31. Re:The Layer Cake of Disappointment by Kazrath · · Score: 1

      "Hit the nail on the head"

      Kids are fat because they don't get anywhere near the level of physical activity needed to keep the weight off. They go to school and sit. They come home and sit. I have recently started to maintain the exact same lifestyle as today's children and I also am starting to put the pounds on.

      Parents are WAY to overprotective of their children. This is largely caused by the news media and goverment propaganda causing everyone to be afraid of everything. There have ALWAYS been child molestors. Most of them are blood related. The amount of kidnappings in the US of pre-teen children that are not done by a parent is pretty small number. Most missing children run away from home and get into a very unfriendly environment and are not directly abducted. Out of 4 children my mother had two of us ran away between the ages of 12-14 (Puberty go figure).

      I cannot remember the last time I even heard/read of a kidnapping in the news.

    32. Re:The Layer Cake of Disappointment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course not! no parent ever wants to hear that, god forbid, they might be part of the wrong..

    33. Re:The Layer Cake of Disappointment by nschubach · · Score: 1

      Personally, I've always wondered if High Fructose Corn Syrup was actually better for us then Sugar. (I'm sure it was mainly about money as stated in the article.) Both my parents are diabetic (my dad is mild, mother is severe, and I think I'm very mild) I usually tend to steer clear of corn as much as I can, though I don't evaluate food labels and such so I know I consume it. I don't eat raw corn because I don't like the flavor and I avoid popcorn as I usually don't like the flavor of that either (with or without butter.) Consider me interested in the theory though. They always say: "Too much of anything is bad for you."

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    34. Re:The Layer Cake of Disappointment by cheeseboy001 · · Score: 1

      How did you manage to say all of that without once using the phrase "in my day"?

    35. Re:The Layer Cake of Disappointment by BewireNomali · · Score: 1

      my nephew is sort of an interesting case study. He's 11 - the son of my older cousin, and my nephew's dad is on extended "vacation" courtesy of a few white collar crimes on wall street. consequently, he's a boy raised by women in new york city. my cousin worries (inordinately and unreasonably) for his safety and actually prefers him to play video games at home rather than engage in activities that might have him riding the bus or subway to get to - given that she might not have the wherewithal to get him there herself due to her career (nurse).

      I travel a lot for business, so I don't see him as much as I'd like, but we're pretty close. So I come home from business trips last summer and he's packed on a few pounds - he has a little belly which I poke fun at a bit. I work out religiously using body weight exercise regimens (they travel well) and one day he sees that I'm working on a bit of a six pack - to which he implies that he'd like to have one as well. So I get my cousin to let him stay with me for a while - and we work out together. We'd go jogging in the park - or rollerblading: we learned how to rollerblade, skateboard, rockclimb, paintball (hey - it's outdoorsy), ice skate. He took about two weeks of kickboxing lessons before dropping out - got him swimming, etc. He very quickly leaned out and was in general a more energetic kid. This happened say between august and october - at which time I had to travel to LA to deal with some urgent business.

      I get back home for Christmas, and he's packed on all the weight back on. And it's not necessarily that he's eating bad food - because my cousin is not really into fast food and such - it's that SHE'S NOT ACTIVE and she refuses to cut the umbilical cord so therefore NEITHER IS HE. I've tried to get back to spending more time with him but I think she resents the bond we've developed and is thus playing foil a bit.

      The lesson I learned - as relates to boys in particular - BOYS NEED THEIR FATHERS. Not growing up with one myself, it was cathartic for me to get to do those things for him because the kid in me got to enjoy it the way I would have then. But I can't stress it enough - boys need their fathers.

      As I hit high school, I wanted to play sports - which required parental signatures. My mother declined - saying that since I'd up to that point been pretty much a nerd, I was only setting myself up to get hurt. I forged her signatures and tried out for every team (football, basketball, baseball, track and field) that interested me EVERY YEAR OF HIGH SCHOOL. My freshman year the basketball coach told me I was the worst player he'd ever seen pick up a basketball. He was right as I'd just started playing about two weeks prior. I wasn't even sure what a travel was. I got cut all four years for basketball (but did score 19 points against the varsity team in a charity game my senior year), but got fast enough to play safety my junior and senior years on the football team and to run a bit on the track and field team. I even did some relief pitching on the baseball team; I think I hold a record for most players walked in an inning (9). I did throw an 82 mile an hour fastball once though (I think there was something wrong with the gun) - and had a .250 lifetime batting average (1hr). That bit of rebellion was the best thing I'd ever done in my life - because it showed me that the artificial striations between social groups like nerds and jocks are largely that - you as an individual can choose who you are - you can design yourself. It's that same thought process that allowed me to later make the potentially dangerous choice to leave a well defined career track at (multinat pharm) to become a consultant in a completely different field using accrued relationships, some saved up cash, and a bit of luck. Best decision I ever made. I hope my nephew will make that choice for himself to cut that umbilical cord - single mothers in my experience use their children as replacement companions (to compensate for not having a mate or strong peer group)

      --
      un burrito me trampeó.
    36. Re:The Layer Cake of Disappointment by xtracto · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It is all about parental responsability. The problem is that first, it is the parents who are not educated to eat healtly, they are the first ones to take their kids to McDonalds and the like; second, because they do not like responsability, they blame whatever is to blame right now. McDonalds is just a food provider, just like any other (take the healthier choices like subway or 100% natural), however while they get a lot of demand of junk food, they will continue to produce it.

      The issue here is that the government should educate the parents but in the USA you are talking about people that think "wtf I dont like the government telling me what to do". Or at least, try to educate the kids.

      I've got two examples of that. One is here in the UK, I read some time ago that some schools in Scotlands where implementing a "points" program for kids lunch. They provide certain healthy menu, but the problem they had is that kids went to buy crap food, so they made each food had some points in value and kids could then change the points for videogames and the like.

      Such thing would not work in the USA because of the mentality of the parents (wtf you [the government] are inciting my kids to eat something!!).

      The second example is related to "teaching kids". Campeche, Mexico used to be a very very dirty city (I lived there for 15 years). However, something like 7 years ago, the government established a program that thaught in government schools (where the majority of kids go) about polluting and thrash issues. It was amazing that you could see that the kids *told* to their parents to pick up the thrash when they threw it by the street. It was the kids who where educating the parents! If you go to the city now, there is an outstanding difference.

      But hey, let everybody blame everybody else. Of course McDonalds won't say that the parents are to blame because they would be shooting themselves in the foot by attacking their customers.

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    37. Re:The Layer Cake of Disappointment by rtb61 · · Score: 1
      Perhaps adding neuro stimulants into junk food might also not be that good a idea, unless you want to create a whole lot of junk food addicts. It isn't just sugar or fats or carbohydrates, the reality is, it is the junk additives and saturation mass media marketing that does the most harm.

      Perhaps that McDonald's ass hat corporate executive should go out and get himself a Wii.

      They know the harm they have caused they are even trying to get legislation passed to absent them from the legal liabilities of knowingly targeting addictive chemicals at children. The more junk food in the market the greater the problem, the greater the list of undecipherable or misleading ingredients on the label, the greater the problem, the more often lying slimly corporate executives stand up and blatantly lie about the real causes the greater the problem.

      The solution, run a series of publicly funded, publicly open investigations into the junk additive industry, and hold the junk additive and junk food executives criminally liable for their murderous and destructive actions.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    38. Re:The Layer Cake of Disappointment by smurgy · · Score: 1

      He was afraid of being modded -1:Python

    39. Re:The Layer Cake of Disappointment by freeweed · · Score: 1

      Here's a reason why I detest single-payer healthcare: because people will have LESS reason to live a healthy lifestyle.

      Contrary country-wide anecdote: Canada has far fewer obese people than the USA.

      There's a lot more going on in people's lifestyle choices than just "who pays my medical bills".

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    40. Re:The Layer Cake of Disappointment by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure videogames are really a contributor for obesity tho, people who play loads of videogames (i.e. geeks) tend to be pretty skinny. I'd expect if games are such a big factor most videogame geeks would be much fatter. This may be a perception error on my part but I still find it strange.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    41. Re:The Layer Cake of Disappointment by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Should've gone for the +1, Perl vote.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    42. Re:The Layer Cake of Disappointment by cluckshot · · Score: 5, Informative

      I own chickens. It might seem unrelated but in owning chickens I wanted to learn how best to feed them. (I learned much about their nutrition and the epidemic of obesity in the industrialized world by this.) So I went to the local feed suppliers and tried to determine the best diet for feeding the birds. The answer to the question of how best to feed the birds was always another question that made no sense. "How much Antibiotics do you want?" was the answer! After getting this illogical response about 6 times, and eliminating disease as a reason for this, I finally got it out of the feed suppliers what is going on. Chickens gain 1.3 times as much weight per pound of food consumed when fed antibiotics as when they are not fed them. Typically Chickens convert about 3kg of feed into 1kg of chicken meat but when fed antibiotics it only takes 2.3kg of feed to produce 1kg of chicken meat.

      Shortly there after I learned that this was a fairly typical gain associated with feeding animals. I learned that chickens being such high efficiency converters of food into meat and eggs also didn't alter the feed that much in its content. The Future Farmers of America (FFA) typically has an experiment that shows this very well. It involves feeding a laying hen purple dyed food. The egg yolks from that hen become purple!

      I learned a lot more about the breeding of birds in the years that passed and about their raising. A typical farm raised bird is sold with about a 4% margin to the farm. This leaves the farm about 25% "under water" financially if the do not feed antibiotics. This is also typical in most meat production. Unless the meat is specifically raised without antibiotics it has them in it. These antibiotics pass through to the one eating the meat and they affect that person exactly as the feed animal. How this works is pretty simple and leads right into our epidemic of fat people. Antibiotics screw of the Glucose metabolism causing Hyperglycemia. Bluntly they cause a temporary diabetic episode. This triggers insulin release and begins damage towards type II diabetes. This causes almost instant weight gain in the individual. But this is hardly all of it regards our feed animals.

      McDonald's Corporation, KFC and several other major US food delivery companies have done tremendous research now covering something close to 70 years to optimize user demand and to breed foods that stimulate demand. Chickens for example are highly genetically altered through breeding and other processes so that they produce meat of this profile. Similarly most meat animals have been modified this way. In addition our vegetable crops have been altered this way as well. This modification has come to dominate the production of most food crops in the USA. Potatoes and many other crops have become altered to achieve the goals of McDonald's et al. The essential demand increase is to produce a food that demands more food by screwing up blood sugar. As a result a person gets a very high blood sugar followed by a very low one. This is very nearly a profile for diabetes and weight gain. If you are a farmer, it is very nearly impossible to get farm loans and such to raise crops outside this genetic and marketing chain. As a result it is beyond doubt that McDonald's and other similar institutions have caused our epidemic of obesity. Their success in genetic and farming control is about 20 years old now and it corresponds directly to the time when this obesity started developing dramatically. It is so deep and so profound in the food chain in North America, that it is quite possible to point out that even a vegan who never ate at McDonald's could be proved to have problems directly traced to McDonalds et al.

      The point here isn't to divorce any personal responsibility from the system. Rather to point out that it is a far lessor factor than we might like to think. Frankly it has fallen to a trivial level of consideration. The real issue here is when will be realize that our foods have been screwed up to the point wher

      --
      Never Politically Correct ~ I prefer the facts If you don't like what I say, get a life, or comment yourself.
    43. Re:The Layer Cake of Disappointment by pimpimpim · · Score: 1
      Hey, I'm not sure if so many more kids are grown up in broken marriages or not, but having had not much of a father myself, without getting overly fat. I (and my siblings) have been grown up way overprotected, though, and this is not good for getting a relationship. When you have taken over your mother's concern "what if this person won't be the right for me?", you will never ever get the chance to mess up and learn for yourself. I haven't messed up enough until now, and it really is a problem for me at the moment I mess up something in my relationship, I just don't know a natural way to solve it. Overall I came out fine, but in general, not being able to get a relationship, be it a good or bad one, is bad for the self-image and will contribute to getting fat. All these things contribute, but I think the main line is:

      It's all about raising your kid based on fear. Fear that "something might happen". It can't be the "terrorists": can someone explain me while even in the 80's, when there was still the cold war threat (I remember a pop song about the A-bomb being a top hit in my youth), I could still go out and do my thing, without my parents being worried shit?

      I might be on the other side of this at some point. Take the example of bicycle helmets: I know and understand that statistically, a bicycle helmet will immensely lower the risk of damage after a biking accident. I know it is very smart to wear one, and could save you from having to spend the rest of your life in a wheelchair. But you know what, you couldn't even get decent bicycle helmets in the early eighties, and still I would bike without anyone being worried about not having a bicycle helmet! When I will have kids, could I let them drive around without them? If something would happen, would I be guilty all my life because "it could have been prevented"? I can't predict, then again, this all depends on my willingness to wear a helmet. Try convincing your kid to wear a helmet that makes you look like an idiot without wearing one yourself. We'll see what happens.

      Let's be honest with ourselves, you can read no parenting books or hundred, but in the end nobody knows a f**k about parenting, it just comes naturally (or not). But the wrongest way to parent is being afraid of making mistakes. Make mistakes yourself, let your kid make his own mistakes, so the kid has to figure out how to clean up the mess afterwards. It's the most important part of learning and life.

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
  2. By that logic.... by Rooked_One · · Score: 4, Insightful

    does fast food cause violence?

    1. Re:By that logic.... by AbsoluteXyro · · Score: 5, Funny

      Violent diarrhea maybe...

    2. Re:By that logic.... by CFBMoo1 · · Score: 1

      does fast food cause violence?

      Only to the guy sitting next to them in the Quake match as they try to reach over for the his fries and accidentally roll over him out of their chair.

      --
      ~~ Behold the flying cow with a rail gun! ~~
    3. Re:By that logic.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Violent diarrhea maybe... But in my experience, it doesn't stop at violent diarrhea, there are several more types caused by fast food:
      • Explosive
      • Projectile
      • Neverending
      • Reverse
      • Liquid
      • Instant
      • Presidential
      • Quad Core
    4. Re:By that logic.... by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Funny

      It does when it's 1 minute past breakfast and I'm trying to get an egg McMuffin.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    5. Re:By that logic.... by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      # Presidential

      Hey now.... turd sandwich is clearly the most qualified candidate to lead our country. You take that back right now!

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    6. Re:By that logic.... by Seumas · · Score: 1

      A BigMac has, what, 1,200 calories?
      A videogame has 0 calories.

      Case closed. McDonald's might as well blame reading and studying and writing for obesity.

    7. Re:By that logic.... by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 1

      Let's get out and vote!
      Let's make our voices heard!
      We've been given the right to choose
      Between a douche and a turd
      It's democracy in action,
      Put your freedom to the test,
      A big fat turd or a stupid douche,
      Which do you like best?

      --
      "I only speak the truth"
      Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
    8. Re:By that logic.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For a minimum of 1/80 people it causes great gastrointestional distress. McDonalds was the only company where a lawyer answered when I was asking for ingreedient information. Lets take a look at the published ingreedient list today. I'm sure you can find a few things that will cause you much violence within your gut.

    9. Re:By that logic.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called junk food not fast food

    10. Re:By that logic.... by rrohbeck · · Score: 1

      >Violent diarrhea maybe...
      Or violent retrograde peristalsis. Just ask Morgan Spurlock.

    11. Re:By that logic.... by VanillaBabies · · Score: 1

      540 Calories. Not that makes it ok, nor negates your point any. Now add French Fries 570(LG Fry), and a large Coke , 310, and then you're well over 1000. Throw in a deluxe breakfast(1200) and you're at your calories for the day (2000-2500). Source: http://www.mcdonalds.com/app_controller.nutrition.index1.html

    12. Re:By that logic.... by Grandiloquence · · Score: 1

      Quad Core diarrhea? Oh man, that gives new meaning to the term "race condition".

    13. Re:By that logic.... by Chosen+Reject · · Score: 2, Funny

      Are you crazy? That's utter poppycock hogwash. Everyone knows you always get the Diet Coke with your large order of fries.

      --
      Stop Global Warming!
      Just say no to irreversible processes!
    14. Re:By that logic.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you Michael Douglas!

    15. Re:By that logic.... by nschubach · · Score: 1

      You just need to apply more "threads", that's all. Tie it up so much, that you cannot "process" the "job" and if you do, it will take so long to get out of the many "threads" that you'll have time to take care of it when you reach the "join."

      (I know, that was a little vague, obscure, and reaching. Maybe someone will get a chuckle out of it...)

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    16. Re:By that logic.... by jd_esguerra · · Score: 1

      Don't forget "crippling diarrhea." It's the diarrhea that is so bad (and loud) that you don't know whether to laugh or cry. It's the diarrhea that trumps embarrassment, and will lead strangers to ask you if you are OK. If you have ever walked out of a bathroom, knowing that everyone within 25-m heard you, and not one of them is laughing or grinning, you have suffered crippling diarrhea.

    17. Re:By that logic.... by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      A videogame has 0 calories.

      I'd like to contest that claim. We should capture some McDonald's execs and feed them shredded DVDs to see how many calories they can extract.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    18. Re:By that logic.... by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Him too. Not an uncommon response.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  3. Helmet Society by Aeonite · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As I said on this site:

    There's a lot to be said for this, but I think the finger should be pointed past the video games and towards an overprotective and overly litigious society.

    When I was growing up we had our Nintendos and Segas and Ataris and Intellivisions and Apple IIe computers, but we only played around with those for a few hours, and then we'd go outside and play baseball or football or street hockey, or merely ride our bikes around the neighborhood for a few more hours.

    But nowadays it seems like everyone is scared to get up out of their chair. Are you going to ride a bike? Better wear a helmet, get some reflectors, ride with a friend, attach a siren, etc. Going to play street hockey? Better wear a helmet and a bunch of pads and secure the services of a lawyer so you can sue the first person who body checks you into a parked car. Going for a walk? Better rethink that - you might get abducted by a stranger. Gym class? Recess? Are you mad? You might fall and skin a knee.

    We didn't take precautions when we played when I was growing up. And you know what? We survived. We did amazing crazy things. We played tackle football in the street. We threw rocks at each other. And no matter what we did we didn't wear helmets. And the worst that came from all of it is one of my friends got a broken arm once.

    I think we need more Nietzsche and less nurture. "That which does not kill me makes me stronger." Because that which does not make me stronger is killing me.

    1. Re:Helmet Society by moderatorrater · · Score: 4, Interesting

      According to this study, activity levels for children stay the same no matter what they're forced to do, ie if they're not active at home they'll be active at school and vice versa. A child will be active no matter what they do for play. My little brother and his friends start to get overly energetic when they play video games for too long, and then they quit and run around for a while. It should also be mentioned that this same brother plays video games more than anyone I know, and he's also skinnier than average.

    2. Re:Helmet Society by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      We live in a society that enjoys violence vicariously through our entertainments (and yes, that includes the nightly news with its stories of sex and gore), but are in many ways a cowardly society. We've scared ourselves and our kids inside our houses because our media has given us a distorted view of the dangers. You'd think there were child predators on every street corner, that every park was populated by rapists and murderers. People have no sense of proportion any more.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    3. Re:Helmet Society by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 1

      Well said. It's become such a pain for kids to go outside and do any exercises now, most figure why bother. We did some really crazy stuff as kids and, looking back, I'm surprised no one drowned. But somehow we all managed to survive. I think my childhood was a bit extreme (we were doing todays 'extreme' sports when they weren't even consider sports...) though and the normal bike riding, football/baseball/basketball playing kids should be able to play outside without being armored up.

      I've mentioned this before and then all the 'wearing helmets when riding a bicycle 2 blocks saves xxx number of kids per year.' Well a lot of people fall in the shower, hit their head, and die every year too. Should we just wear helmets all the time?

    4. Re:Helmet Society by Amouth · · Score: 2, Funny

      luckly i had a metal plate installed in my skull as a child due to a birth defect (still sets off good metal detectors). i consider my self quite hard headed.. there for screw helmets for me..

      p.s. if i crack my skull open take some pictures and show them to me later - i want to see what the plate looks like..

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    5. Re:Helmet Society by garcia · · Score: 3, Insightful

      We didn't take precautions when we played when I was growing up. And you know what? We survived. We did amazing crazy things. We played tackle football in the street. We threw rocks at each other. And no matter what we did we didn't wear helmets. And the worst that came from all of it is one of my friends got a broken arm once.

      I have a friend that just recently had his fourth child (they are all 5 and under) and he said to me, "I need to buy a farm. I can't allow my children to do what I was able to do -- like ride my bike all over town." I asked, "why not?" Now, I want to mention that I wasn't allowed out of sight of my house on a bike until I was probably 12 and even then I had to be within earshot and 5 minutes of my father's whistle (which had quite a range). His reply, "They can't be trusted."

      So it has nothing to do with litigious society, etc, it has to do with parents realizing what they got away with as kids (surviving, yes) and attempting to stop it for their children. What these people don't realize is that kids are still going to get hurt, get abducted, steal shit, fuck, drink and do drugs. All that's going to happen is that they are going to find ways that we didn't think of to get it done.

      Back on topic:

      While what McDonald's UK douche says is true, it's also very true that the "Fast Food Nation" (sponsored heartily by communities like the one I live in where the little guy is ignored while the big box and chain restaurants are encouraged to thrive by the Council) is also killing us. I've read several books like Plenty: One Man, One Woman, and a Raucous Year of Eating Locally and similarly Animal, Vegetable, Miracle: A Year of Food Life which mention the advantages of local eating, home cooking, and healthy lifestyles. I'm really going to attempt to get into Community Supported Agriculture, get out to our local farmers' market more than 1x a month, and stop eating out nearly as much as I was.

      We've traded dangers from biking without a helmet, pads and an orange flag with blinking LEDs to eating foods with 50% of your daily need of fat, 75% of your calories and loaded with high fructose corn syrup. One might take 15 to 20 years to kill you rather than 15 to 20 seconds but we need to decide which is better.

      Happy Meals need to be replaced with Happy Medium.

    6. Re:Helmet Society by Rinikusu · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I've been noticing for years the trend of "wussifying" our youth. You're right, when we were kids (I'm in my mid-30s), I played in ditches, played soccer, got beat-up by the neighborhood bully, rode bikes on the trails and make "jumps", played lots of hide and go seek or kick the can, we ran home from school, ran down the street, just being kids.

      You know what ruined it for me?

      Air Conditioning. Cheap electricity, Central A/C, and summers just got too hot to bother going out in. Heating in the winter made going out in it too cold, nevermind our forebears survived quite handily. A couple years ago, I started an experiment. I quit using the A/C except for when I was expecting company. I opened up my windows, turned on a fan to circulate the air, and wouldn't you know it? I was hot, but after a couple weeks, I got used to it. Walking into an office building felt like I was walking into a meat freezer. My electricity bill halved, if not more. I was amazed. I went out for walks more. I lost 30 pounds that summer, because it was no longer "too hot" to go outside.

      SO, I don't think it's video games, for sure. Video games are just what you do when it's too hot to go outside, and it becomes a habit. Turn off your a/c, let your athlon crank your room to 120 degrees, and you'll *want* to go do something else for awhile. :)

      --
      If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
    7. Re:Helmet Society by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      You have some good points, but to be fair when I(and probably you) was a kid the "SUV" with its huge bulky mass, very poor handling/braking distance, and gigantic blind spots that drivers pretend don't exist, were incredibly rare. Not to mention that the drivers of those smaller cars were not distracted by yapping on a cell phone while driving. Hell, even as an adult and an avid(and helmet wearing) cyclist, SUVs scare the shit out of me. The sooner they are banned the sooner kids can go play out on the street more safely.

    8. Re:Helmet Society by techpawn · · Score: 1

      I know I think of the crap we pulled as kids behind our parents backs (and even with our parents watching). And all I can think now is "Damn, someone's going to call social services on my ass and get me arrested and my children taken away" It's not that the toys/games are getting more advanced and more engaging... It's that that rusty piece of metal in the dirt is now seen as something that will kill you instead of the sword that slays the dragon (read: younger sibling). In our quest to "think of the children" we're shot ourselves in the foot because you can't run around too much in a plastic bubble.

      --
      Ask not what you can do for your country. Ask what your country did to you
    9. Re:Helmet Society by localman · · Score: 0, Redundant

      But nowadays it seems like everyone is scared to get up out of their chair.

      This is so apparent to me too... I don't have kids yet, so what do I know, but the level of fear I see in others is amazing. Everyone child-proofs their house and runs around protecting their kid. My terrible mother (note sarcasm) had no child-proofing to speak of and let me pretty much monitor myself for periods of time even before the age of four. Generally I played with blocks and toy cars. But once I remember I played with a electrical plug, got zapped, bawled, and respected electricity henceforth.

      I distinctly remembered being allowed, before age four, to go outside on my own (we lived on a fairly quiet city street) to friends houses. We'd play on the porch. Or at their place. Adults seemed to assume we were fine unless we notified them otherwise.

      At four we moved to a quieter town where I learned to ride a bike and my friends and I would be off for hours by ourselves. We used to intentionally crash our bikes into each other to try and knock each other off: sort of like jousting without lances. Sometimes we'd get cut up and bruised. And it just wasn't a big deal. I don't recall my parents ever trying to prevent me from minor injuries by limiting what I could do.

      Compared to what I see and hear today, it would appear my parents, and my friends parents were absolutely insane. Is the world actually that much more dangerous today? I tend to doubt it. I hope I can maintain a level of freedom for my kids to experience life. I hope that when they inevitably hurt themselves and get stitches (like I did) that I don't subsequently deny them freedom.

      Cheers.

    10. Re:Helmet Society by Bearpaw · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Well said. It's become such a pain for kids to go outside and do any exercises now, most figure why bother. We did some really crazy stuff as kids and, looking back, I'm surprised no one drowned. But somehow we all managed to survive.

      Millions of people a day drive without seatbelts and live to tell about it. Therefore, seatbelts are totally unnecessary. QEH.

      (QEB = "quod erat handwavandum")
    11. Re:Helmet Society by avandesande · · Score: 1

      ...and with good reason. If your child is hurt you run the risk of losing them to the state or being thrown in jail.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    12. Re:Helmet Society by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1, Interesting

      When I was a kid, we didn't have the creeps we have today roaming around preying upon children. Don't get me wrong, there were creeps back then, but they were held in check by society.

      Case in point, if creepy dude back then made unseemly remarks or advances upon a kid, 9 times out of 10, the dad would march over creepy dudes house and punch the guy in the nose until he was a bloody pulp. Police and courts weren't involved and the creepy dude was held in check.

      Today, if that happened, creepy dude would walk away knowing that 1/2 the time there is no dad, and even if there was a dad, the dad wouldn't and couldn't punch him in the nose, and if the dad did that, dad would end up arrested, in front of a judge and then in jail, while the creepy dude remains free to molest more kids.

      Okay, so there is a tad over simplification here.

      I'm of the opinion that creepy dudes are also more prevalent today because of access to creepy dude material is much easier to come by.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    13. Re:Helmet Society by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 1

      Of course this is anecdotal, but my grandfather is only alive today b/c he WASN'T wearing a seatbelt when he got in a wreck. A dump truck ran a stop sign and plowed into the driver side of his car. If he hadn't been thrown out, he would've been killed. Of course this sort of thing is a statistical anomaly until it's someone you know.

    14. Re:Helmet Society by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 1

      Similarly, I remember going to school by myself since first grade (~7 years old); had to use public transportation. I dunno what changed, but I hardly know of anyone sending their kids by themselves at that age---what's with this "school bus" business? That's just silly!

      Either the society got screwed up, kids got dumber, or something is very wrong with the current generation of kids.

      --

      "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

    15. Re:Helmet Society by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      We didn't take precautions when we played when I was growing up. And you know what? We survived.

      Well, the ones that survived did, at least.

      We don't talk much about the boy who became a vegetable because he wasn't wearing a helmet and cracked his head open, or the girl who disappeared walking home from a friend's house and whose body was found in the woods a week later...

    16. Re:Helmet Society by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but I also know TONS of people who claim anecdotally that it's better they weren't wearing a seatbeat. In my backwards ass locale (rural SC) they're largely seen as negative. I had a cousin and a friend (who was another cousin's husband) get into a wreck responding to a small fire (they were first responders with the fire department). Both were thrown out of the vehicle. My cousin got pretty beat up but was out of the hospital less than a day later. Other guy had the truck roll over him. Had to be air lifted out. He flat lined 3 times in the ER, being revived each time. Was in the hospital for a very long time but he eventually made a full recovery.

      Most everyone's response at this? "If they'd have been wearing those seatbelts they'd be dead for sure.". The reality, looking at the wreck, is that if they'd have been wearing their seatbelts I doubt either would have been seriously injured. Having seen this same story play out NUMEROUS times, I can't say that I'm too trusting when ANYBODY says they know someone who was saved only because they were not wearing a seatbelt. It's just reached urban legend status for me.

      On the other hand, despite my fervent belief that they are a wonderful thing and that everyone should wear them (I never drive without one on), it's still my belief that it's a personal choice and should not be a LAW. If a person wants to do something dangerous then that's their business. A whole hell of a lot more things are dangerous and not illegal.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    17. Re:Helmet Society by cbart387 · · Score: 1

      Same deal with a guy I knew in high school on a bike. He got hit by a car while crossing the road on it and the doctor told him that he probably would have been hurt more. Though this summer I flipped my bicycle and ending up breaking my elbow. I had scrapes on my helmet that would have been scrapes on my head...

      There's always going to be exceptions to the rule.

      --
      Lack of planning on your part does not constitute an emergency on mine.
    18. Re:Helmet Society by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "creepy dude" "creepy dude material" What are you fucking 4? Way to miss the entire point jack ass.

    19. Re:Helmet Society by timeOday · · Score: 1

      I agree with you and the GP that physical activity is important, but you still cannot discount diet! With my own weight, I've found exercise alone does not cause weight loss (especially since it makes you hungry). You can burn some calories, but it's almost irrelevant if you're still replacing them 1500 KCal/s at a time! That's the number of calories in a supersized Big Mac Meal - fries + burget + soda. For most people (perhaps less so for kids) the amount of exercise you have to get to eat whatever you want and stay slim would be insane; I understand riders on the Tour de France have trouble keeping their weight up, but that's simply not relevant to the general population.

    20. Re:Helmet Society by CannonballHead · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Skinny doesn't necessarily mean healthy, though.

      I'm still in college, and there are still students in college that literally go to class, get food to-go from the cafeteria, and sit and play video games until 2am. Some of them are still "good students," others definitely let their grades slide because of computer games.

      Do computer games help obesity/health? No, they don't, I hope we can ALL agree on that. Do they hinder it? I think they do hinder it a little bit. How many people spend hours upon hours, each day, often late into the night (loss of sleep? not healthy!) playing WoW? Of course, you could argue that this is because they weren't taught that they need to go to bed, or perhaps that their parents told them to and they don't, or whatever... but, at the very least, WoW is the way they choose to lose their sleep. And it's not out of boredom all the time. I don't have TIME to play games while I'm in school... there's plenty more to do, but some people HAVE decided that WoW is the single most important thing in their life.

      Back to being skinny, by the way, I know a lot of gamers that look very unhealthy, look like they don't sleep, are always eating fast food, and are very skinny, hehe. Actually, I know some gamers, too, that are quite healthy, drink tons of water, don't eat fast food, work out, etc... but they still spend a ton of time playing games, and a ton of money buying 8800GTS video cards for their computers to play a virtual reality.

      Maybe part of the problem is we have taught our kids to ignore reality and to try to seek a virtual reality, instead of trying to make the REAL reality better? Hm.

    21. Re:Helmet Society by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      You know, I'd punch you in the nose if I could. Thank you for proving my point.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    22. Re:Helmet Society by sammy+baby · · Score: 1

      I'm really going to attempt to get into Community Supported Agriculture...


      My wife and I did that for the first time this last year, and didn't regret it once. I'd recommend it to anyone.

      (Well - okay. A couple times I found myself saying, "seriously, who eats that much bok choi?" But other than that it was great.)
    23. Re:Helmet Society by budcub · · Score: 1
      You raise a good point. I can't take the heat like I used to as a kid, and my theory has been:

      • As a kid I'd run around in shorts, t-shirt and sneakers or sandals all day. Didn't have to wear dress shirt, pants, shoes, etc.
      • As an adult, I'm in air-conditioned offices all day, and I can't get aclimated to the heat.


      Anyways, I still prefer cold weather to hot weather.
    24. Re:Helmet Society by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm of the opinion that creepy dudes are also more prevalent today because of access to creepy dude material is much easier to come by.

      And...How exactly do you know this? Sorry dude, that's just a little... creepy...

    25. Re:Helmet Society by Monkey · · Score: 1

      I find it interesting that, of all vehicles, school buses do not have seat belts for their passengers either. I suppose the hassle of dealing with seatbelts on a bunch of little kids (particularly in an emergency) outweighs the safety benefit.
        On a related note, did anyone else see the recent episode of Mythbusters where they rolled the school bus in the jet wash of a 747? The roof of the bus completely collapsed pretty much to the seat level. I was shocked at how poorly a vehicle millions of people entrust the safety of their kids to everyday held up.

    26. Re:Helmet Society by Knara · · Score: 1

      Oh please. In the 60's and 70's cars were larger and more dangerous than any SUV today. No anti-lock brakes, death trap seatbelts, huge blind spots, giant engines, etc.

      The solution is to have kids be aware of cars when they're in the streets, not be scared that SUVs have somehow made playing in the street more dangerous.

    27. Re:Helmet Society by Knara · · Score: 1

      I'm of the opinion that creepy dudes are also more prevalent today because of access to creepy dude material is much easier to come by.

      "creepy dudes" aren't more prevalent, but media coverage of the "creepy dudes" (see: To Catch a Predator, formerly known as "Dateline") is a HUGE revenue generator, so it ends up getting talked about more, worming its way into your subconscious, and then it gradually becomes tacitly accepted that there's a serial child rapist around every street corner

    28. Re:Helmet Society by irm · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What you describe is more problematic than you think. The introduction of both air conditioning and electric lighting allowed architects to abandon or ignore fundamental issues of light and air in their work. In all likelihood, the house you live in was design with the assumption that you would use air conditioning during the summer months. Have you ever looked at vernacular building practices in hot climates? Ceilings are often over-height, there is frequently a large thermal mass component, there are usually few openings on the west elevation, and so on.

      Air conditioning fosters laziness in architects; had your home been designed knowing air condition would not be used, the result would be radically different. Indeed, it would be more comfortable. Cars are effectively the same: cheap energy results in lazy designers.

      I should add that none of this is meant to imply a regressive approach to building and city making, as the new urbanists frequently advocate to our peril. Indeed, the very best modern and contemporary architecture endeavour s to incorporate such issues.

    29. Re:Helmet Society by TimothyJones · · Score: 1

      That is very true indeed. But then this is true of every situation in life and for every child that got hurt there are 1000's that did/do not. Loosing a child or it getting seriously hurt is tragic and I would not wish it upon any parent but let's face it, kids still get abducted, they still get hurt, they still actually do stupid shit. Our overbearing society fixed none of that with our protectionism. All the what ifs, holy shits and oh my gods. I tell you, stop ever watching news at 11 and your life will suddenly become a lot safer.

      To be completely honest, I'm not a parent and I am seriously petrified of becoming one. On one hand I would like my child to have the kind of childhood I did with all it wonderful - now seen as forbidden - activities. But I would most likely be the same stupid, overprotective drone the rest of the society is.

      I walked ~1 mile to and from school every day since I was 7. No there were no big bad SUV's and cell phones to blame for all that's bad with the world today, but the street outside was a dangerous and deadly place no less. The first thing my mom taught me of the world outside our yard was how to cross it safely and what to do if this or that happens. Would I do the same for my child? I'd like to think so but most likely what I'd teach him or her would be to never, ever, under any circumstances cross the street without the parent because they will surely die. I'd probably stretch it to "an adult" but that's as far as I'd go.

      Not to mention the state and everyone else sticking their fucking fingers into every aspect of parenting. Yea, if I was a kid today and pulled the same "stunts" my folks would be in jail and I would be finally enjoying my life going from one screwed up foster family to another. Oh joy!

      The parents should really get most of the blame for their kids, be it obesity or anything else but really, personally I think that as much as it is harder for kids to be kids these days, the same goes for parenting. Kids may not benefit from abuse but they do need good authority and unfortunately it seems the parents have less and less of it each day. State and neighbors like to point things out and stick their fingers where they don't belong because they always know better but our collective solution to the problem is really the root of the problem itself.

      JMHO of course.

    30. Re:Helmet Society by PlusFiveTroll · · Score: 1

      You're thinking about this all wrong. By law stupid people should be forced not to wear seat belts. Maybe impact explosives should be installed in their cars too.

    31. Re:Helmet Society by xaxa · · Score: 1

      Most kids in London get a bus/train to school if they're too far away to walk (it's free). They all stick together. On the first couple of days of the new school year (back in September) there were a fair few men in suits attached to the smallest kids -- presumably ones without older siblings being shown the way by dad. (I expect there were men/women not in suits too, but the suits stood out more.)

      (Different issue, but this might be one case where the school uniforms are useful. The kids know that the people on the train could ring the school and report any really bad behaviour. The other kids can easily see someone to follow if they're unsure.)

      In places where kids travelling without adults isn't the norm -- often smaller towns/villages -- I expect parents are more worried. Some schools have organised "foot-buses" (or something like that) which gets nearby kids to walk past each others' houses and pick everyone up on the way.

    32. Re:Helmet Society by acherusia · · Score: 1

      I'd argue with this on the basis it depends on what climate you're in. I live in Los Angeles with my father, and he refuses to turn on the air conditioning on in the summer, except maybe on the hottest nights. Going outside when it's 100 degrees outside still doesn't appeal to me because the heat just drains me of any energy whatsoever.

      For the most part though, I think you made an interesting argument there. If nothing else, when your home's air-conditioned, you don't always dress for the weather, making going outside infinitely worse.

    33. Re:Helmet Society by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "I know I think of the crap we pulled as kids behind our parents backs (and even with our parents watching). And all I can think now is "Damn, someone's going to call social services on my ass and get me arrested and my children taken away"

      I hear ya. I imagine in today's era....if they saw a bunch of kids playing "Kill the man with the ball", they whole neighborhood would have their kids confsicated by Human Services...

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    34. Re:Helmet Society by localman · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry? I've never heard of that happening. Care to give an example?

    35. Re:Helmet Society by randyest · · Score: 1

      Haha, are you seriously trying to suggest that modern cars/SUVs are larger, more massive, have poorer handling and breaking, and more blind spots than those 30 years ago? You really couldn't be more wrong.

      --
      everything in moderation
    36. Re:Helmet Society by grumbel · · Score: 1

      ### But nowadays it seems like everyone is scared to get up out of their chair.

      You know what happened to the places where I played back when I was young? They build apartment buildings and shopping centers on that ground. If I would grew up today I would have a much harder time to find a place to play. Things are simply getting pretty crowded these days and playgrounds for kids are often the first thing that will go. I can't really blame kids when they don't want to go outside to play, when the next place where they actually can play is a few miles away. And I can't really blame parents for getting overprotective either, when the most likely place where their kids will play is the street instead of the forest or another much less dangerous place.

    37. Re:Helmet Society by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "it's a personal choice and should not be a LAW. If a person wants to do something dangerous then that's their business."

      Well yes and no.

      Personal choice is fine. But when those people's personal choice gets them killed it leads to the wowsers in 'authoritah' lowering speed limits, increasing points for traffic offenses, increasing fines, etc.

      That is a negative impact on me due to someone else's 'personal choice'. If they go and jump off a cliff for fun and splatter themselves then fine, I couldn't care less. When the results of their choice adversely affects me for no good reason then what should we do?

    38. Re:Helmet Society by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And no matter what we did we didn't wear helmets. And the worst that came from all of it is one of my friends got a broken arm once. No, that's not the worst of it. See "Making A Good Brain Great" by Daniel G. Amen M.D., or "Carved In Sand: When Attention Fails and Memory Fades in Midlife" by Cathryn Jakobson Ramin. The braincase has some fairly jagged edges, and mild traumatic brain injury in youth has consequences later on. Big ones.
    39. Re:Helmet Society by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, despite my fervent belief that they are a wonderful thing and that everyone should wear them (I never drive without one on), it's still my belief that it's a personal choice and should not be a LAW. If a person wants to do something dangerous then that's their business. A whole hell of a lot more things are dangerous and not illegal.

      The problem is that when they get in an accident that wasn't their fault the other party pays their medical expenses and without seatbelts those expenses might be a lot higher than they would be otherwise. Of course you could say using no seatbelt means you have to pay your own expenses but then everyone will claim they were using the seatbelt. Also they'll take up medical attention that would have been better spent on people who didn't get injured by their own stupidity.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    40. Re:Helmet Society by audacity242 · · Score: 1

      You've got a good point. I went from living in a house with central air to an apartment with no A/C, and wouldn't you know it, this summer I was a lot more likely to be out and about.

    41. Re:Helmet Society by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Er... are you sure about that? I've been watching my caloric intake for a few months now, and I make sure I know how much energy most foods tend to have. Perhaps McD's is different over there (I'm in Australia), but here, no meal of any size would come anywhere close to that. Calorie/kilojoule ratings are even printed on the wrappers and boxes that everything comes in, so it's pretty easy to work it out. Big Mac, around 450. Fries, 350. Coke, 120 (less than a can, but that's because it's watered down post-mix at McD's). Sure, a large meal could easily work out to almost half of your daily requirements*, but it certainly won't approach three-quarters. So long as your other meals that day are very light, and you don't snack much between them, you'll still lose weight with that super-sized meal per day. Granted, it wouldn't meet a lot of other nutrition requirements, and you'd be pretty sick after a while, but I'm talking solely in terms of calories here.

      * For most people, around 2000 per day is average.

    42. Re:Helmet Society by operagost · · Score: 1

      I'd be pretty surprised if the jet wash of a 747 was included in the safety testing for any motor vehicles. It doesn't seem to reflect a likely scenario.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    43. Re:Helmet Society by Monkey · · Score: 1

      I should clarify that the roof of the bus didn't collapse directly from the jet wash. The 747 merely caused the bus to roll over. Upon rolling onto it's roof, the entire thing collapsed on itself. Admittedly it was a pretty violent and abrupt rollover, but not out of line of what the vehicle would experience in a high speed roll.

      To the previous poster, after a 30 second Google I discovered that in the U.S. many states have seat belts mandated on their school buses as you say. I apologize as I was speaking from a Canadian perspective and we have never had seat belts on school buses (Transport Canada Regs). It is true though, that I have not been on a school bus in quite some time :-).

  4. Hm... by Smordnys+s'regrepsA · · Score: 4, Funny

    He must not have heard of the Wii ;)

    --
    Just -1, Troll talking to another.
    1. Re:Hm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Oh yeah, balls out boys! It's Wii strokin' time!

  5. In other news... by volpone · · Score: 5, Funny

    The tobacco industry claimed that great sex causes lung cancer.

    1. Re:In other news... by laejoh · · Score: 0

      ???

      How would we, slashdotters, know?

    2. Re:In other news... by BForrester · · Score: 1

      I fail to see how that's relevant to this audience. Oh... right. We could have smokers here.

    3. Re:In other news... by Sergeant+Pepper · · Score: 2, Funny

      The tobacco industry claimed that great sex causes lung cancer. At least I'll get to live a long and healthy life.
  6. A bit hypocritical? by Joe+Random · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So McDonald's emphasizes personal responsibility when it involves what people eat, but not when it involves their recreational activities?

  7. What's in a name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this guy really called 'Eaterbrook'?

  8. In related news by Sciros · · Score: 5, Funny

    1) Philip Morris say video games are promoting smoking among children.

    2) KKK Grand Wizard says video games are making children racist.

    3) Exxon-Mobil says video games make children averse to renewable energy.

    4) McDonald's CEO is a peen.

    --
    I like basketball!!1!
    1. Re:In related news by eclectro · · Score: 2, Funny

      Laugh as you might, but fat kids are contributing to global warming with all the extra methane they are releasing.
      When people finally realize this, something will finally be done about it.

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    2. Re:In related news by Plutonite · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What I find very funny, and utterly confusing, is that fear-mongering, war-waging politicians who are perfectly OK with us going to war with non-threatening nations half way around the world and killing (or indirectly causing the death of) hundreds of thousands of innocent people, are making all kinds of accusations against video games being encouraging of violence. Holy shit, ya know? I am perfectly willing to accept some sort of objective psychological study that manages to make a good case for that sort of thing (although I doubt it will ever happen). But politicians? American politicians? Gimme a break.

    3. Re:In related news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the devil blames god for evil as he gave children free will

  9. Video Game makers blame McDonalds for bad games by neo · · Score: 4, Funny

    In a statement made by the United Video Game Designers of the UK, stated ...

    "Clearly our reliance on fast food, particularly McDonald's, has caused us to become unimaginative and lackluster in our new game designs. By buying initially from the value menu and then going to super sized items we have replicated this trained up-sell response in our own games. We haven't made an original game since Doom. We even tried watching Super Size Me 10 times, but that only made one designer go completely mad and make a copy of Burger Time. We can only hope that McDonald's changes the way they sell food items so that we can again create new and innovative games that people around the world will become lethargic blobs of goo playing. Thank you."

    1. Re:Video Game makers blame McDonalds for bad games by drseuk · · Score: 1

      but that only made one designer go completely mad and make a copy of Burger Time. Can you PLEASE get around to adding some ketchupy sound to it? http://perso.b2b2c.ca/sarrazip/dev/burgerspace.html
  10. I blame McDonald's commercials by davidwr · · Score: 1

    What do you blame?

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  11. First soda, now burgers by hansamurai · · Score: 3, Informative

    Soda companies blamed video games a bit back, and then back peddled on their statement.

    http://kotaku.com/335546/soda-companies-blame-videogames-for-fat-kids

  12. Yes but... by MikeDirnt69 · · Score: 1

    Yes, you can get fat if you stay home just playing and eating. But this don't make McDonald's less guilty.

    --
    Am I eval()? - http://www.monst3r.com.br
    1. Re:Yes but... by OldeTimeGeek · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Guilty of what? If McDonalds sold nothing but "healthy" foods starting tomorrow, they would be out of business within a couple of months - if that long. Restaurants that sell what people aren't interested in eating don't stay around long. If people were truly interested in eating better, restaurants would notice this and change their menus. Society as a whole will have to change first.

    2. Re:Yes but... by MikeDirnt69 · · Score: 1

      I totally agree with you. But when I say 'McDonald's' I mean the fast food habit. Putting another "no healthy habit" on the spot lights is good for them.

      --
      Am I eval()? - http://www.monst3r.com.br
  13. Not only that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is also a well documented and scientifically proven fact that video games also cause AIDS. But seriously, when was the last time a CEO knew anything about anything (besides, of course, the fine art of scapegoating)? I can just see this guy with his thumbs up his ass and one day saying, 'Its not fatty foods that make people fat, its video games.' Yeah, the nutritional label on the back of GTA says that 1 serving has 1500 calories. Eat McDonalds, not GTA!

    1. Re:Not only that by Drooling+Iguana · · Score: 4, Funny

      Actually, seeing as AIDS (or rather HIV) is a sexually transmitted disease I'd say videogames are doing a great deal to fight AIDS.

      Slashdot, of course, does far more.

      --
      ... I'm addicted to placebos
    2. Re:Not only that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  14. What does he blame for other kinds of obesity? by davidwr · · Score: 1

    We recently heard about a very obese black hole. Who gets the blame for that?

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:What does he blame for other kinds of obesity? by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      I'm sure it got that way from sucking up a lot of video games.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    2. Re:What does he blame for other kinds of obesity? by Drooling+Iguana · · Score: 1

      Too much Katamari Damacy.

      --
      ... I'm addicted to placebos
  15. I make it a point to by tieTYT · · Score: 1

    never take diet advice from a fast food CEO

  16. That's as stupid as Blaming McDonalds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Subject pretty much says it all.

  17. Pirates! by Womens+Shoes · · Score: 1

    My god -- I think childhood obesity is directly linked to the decline in pirates!

    Or perhaps it is the video game playing that eliminates pirates?

    Hmm... is that a good or bad thing?

    I suppose it depends on whether you're a ninja or not.

    --
    Does your significant other love shoes? ;)
    1. Re:Pirates! by Drooling+Iguana · · Score: 1

      Copy protection causes obesity! Yet another reason to ban DRM.

      --
      ... I'm addicted to placebos
  18. Except that he is right in part. by LWATCDR · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There are lots of things causing the problem.
    Blaming McDonald's is kind of silly. Don't raise your kids on a diet of McDonald's. It is supposed to be a treat and not a diet.
    You feed your kids the big breakfast at IHOP the same thing will happen. Again it is supposed to be a treat and not a diet.
    Letting your kids play video games for hours on end. Also not a good plan.
    Letting them sit in front of the TV is also not a good plan.
    Frankly I am amazed at the amount of passive entertainment we have available to all of us. With NetFlix, PVP, PVRs, Cable, Video Games, and the Internet there is always something worth while to watch or read or play.
    A kid today doesn't need to find something to entertain themselves with.
    Combine that with traffic today and all the fears over safety, and both parents working kids are often raised on a diet of video and fast food. It isn't bread and circuses it is Burgers and Playstations.
    I have noticed that McDonald's is offering some better choices on the menu as well.
    So don't dismiss video games just because you like them.

    BTW if you don't think the techie life style contributes to the problem take a look around your office.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    1. Re:Except that he is right in part. by dvice_null · · Score: 3, Insightful

      > Blaming McDonald's is kind of silly. Don't raise your kids on a diet of McDonald's. It is supposed to be a treat and not a diet.

      Actually you can blame them for marketing. It is a known fact that marketing affects people and they market a lot. Their marketing is directly connected to the amount of fast food people buy. If it wouldn't be, they wouldn't do the marketing as that wouldn't be worth of it.

    2. Re:Except that he is right in part. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't know which "better choices" you are referring to, but if you saw Super Size Me, you will have seen how their "healthy" salads were hardly healthy at all.

    3. Re:Except that he is right in part. by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      "Actually you can blame them for marketing. It is a known fact that marketing affects people and they market a lot."
      And that doesn't apply to video games?????

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    4. Re:Except that he is right in part. by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      They offer apple slices instead of fries and milk instead of soda for happy meals now.
      Is it great for you? No.
      But then they are not twisting your arm to buy it.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    5. Re:Except that he is right in part. by Bryansix · · Score: 1

      Blaming McDonald's is kind of silly. Don't raise your kids on a diet of McDonald's. It is supposed to be a treat and not a diet.
      McDonald's actually says this when questioned about it. However that is NOT how they market themselves. In fact they even market themselves as health food now. You may even believe it by how they market but their Chicken Selects Premium Breasts Strips just made the list of the 10 WORST FOODS: Foods You Should Never Eat. The point is the more McDonald's panders to the healthy food advocates, the more they stay the same. They manufacture their foods to develop pshycological dependancy. The combination of artificial flavors and bucketloads of sodium in the chicken strips is just one example. The craploads of Trans Fat in their Fries is another example.
    6. Re:Except that he is right in part. by rrohbeck · · Score: 1

      >It is supposed to be a treat and not a diet.

      A treat? You must be kidding. That only reinforces the "Fast food is good" reflex that is programmed into so many brains. Just like Ronald, the playgrounds and the little plastic toys.

      Show them "Supersize Me" as a treat. Threaten to have them eat at McD to punish them. I'm not kidding. These are all just learned behaviors. It took me a couple of years to detrain myself and these days the smell of cooking fat at the place causes me nausea rather than "yummy!".

    7. Re:Except that he is right in part. by Knara · · Score: 1

      > Blaming McDonald's is kind of silly. Don't raise your kids on a diet of McDonald's. It is supposed to be a treat and not a diet.

      Actually you can blame them for marketing. It is a known fact that marketing affects people and they market a lot. Their marketing is directly connected to the amount of fast food people buy. If it wouldn't be, they wouldn't do the marketing as that wouldn't be worth of it.

      Wouldn't it make more sense to educate people about how advertising/marketing works? I know a lot of colleges these days have classes on how advertising works that get put into intro psych classes, maybe it needs to be put into some sort of high-school class regiment, too. Home-ec or something.

      It's pretty unAmerican to suggest that people can't advertise their (perfectly legal) products at all.

    8. Re:Except that he is right in part. by tcoop25 · · Score: 1

      I just took a look around the office and all I see is a bunch of fat people checking their AOL email. Your theory has failed. I sit in a cube all day, then drive home to play hours of video games. I am 5'8" and weigh 140 lbs. I don't eat fast food, and don't buy anything in a box at the supermarket. My theory is that fast food and cheap calories are making you all fat. Leave my video games out of this.

    9. Re:Except that he is right in part. by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      "I just took a look around the office and all I see is a bunch of fat people checking their AOL email. Your theory has failed. I sit in a cube all day, then drive home to play hours of video games. I am 5'8" and weigh 140 lbs."
      Yea and I bet your uncle smoked a pack of cigarettes a day and lived to 95. Some people survived trench warfare but that is no reason to throw a mustard gas party.
      You need to stop playing video games and read some science books.
      Notice I said that there where many causes. Good for you that you have a great diet and a good metabolism. There is a guy at work that lives off McDonald's and Duncan Donuts and is as skinny as a rail also. Guess what? Studies have shown that active overweight people are more healthy than thin inactive people... So you have half of it licked I suggest you get out and get some exercise as well. Maybe pickup DDR.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    10. Re:Except that he is right in part. by funkatron · · Score: 1

      It is supposed to be a treat and not a diet.

      I know a treat when I have one and a treat does not contain burger sauce that smells the same coming out as it did when it went in.

      --
      "Welcome to our world. We are the wasted youth. And we are the future too." Yes, I know these are stupid lyrics.
    11. Re:Except that he is right in part. by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      While I am not a big fan of McDonald's some people do like it.
      Then again I would rather go hungry than eat fish or lobster. I think they just are gross. I have a friend that would go hungry rather than eat the best steak on the planet.
      I guess it depends on what you like.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    12. Re:Except that he is right in part. by funkatron · · Score: 1

      I wasn't criticising Maccy D's just thought the world would like to know about my bowels not functioning as they should.

      --
      "Welcome to our world. We are the wasted youth. And we are the future too." Yes, I know these are stupid lyrics.
    13. Re:Except that he is right in part. by spgass · · Score: 1

      Right on. The occasional meal at McDonalds will not cause an active child to become obese.

    14. Re:Except that he is right in part. by dangitman · · Score: 1

      It is supposed to be a treat and not a diet.

      A treat? Don't you mean punishment?

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    15. Re:Except that he is right in part. by toddestan · · Score: 1

      It's pretty unAmerican to suggest that people can't advertise their (perfectly legal) products at all.

      You mean like what happened to the cigarette companies?

    16. Re:Except that he is right in part. by Knara · · Score: 1

      I would argue that your statement is correct. I fully support a person's right to engage in unhealthy behaviors.

  19. Rolling Up Obesity by dprust · · Score: 1

    This explains a lot! I roll up burgers and frieds a lot in Katamari Damacy games. I had no idea it was going straight to my waist!!!

  20. Korea and Japan by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ooops. Forgot the fact that the two most videogame obsessed countries don't have obesity problems.

    Doh!

    1. Re:Korea and Japan by Ogive17 · · Score: 1, Redundant

      And both of those countries have McDonalds and other fast food chains. What is your point?

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    2. Re:Korea and Japan by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 4, Informative

      The point is that videogame use is not correlated to obesity. Duh.

    3. Re:Korea and Japan by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 1


      Rice + Fish = healthy

      Factory Beef + Processed Cheese = unhealthy

      --
      "I only speak the truth"
      Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
    4. Re:Korea and Japan by timeOday · · Score: 1
      Don't speak too soon, we're converting them.

      Other examples of the global rise in childhood obesity include Malaysia, Japan, and China. In Malaysia, where obesity was once relatively rare, a 1998 survey shows that nearly 17 percent of Malaysian boys and 8 percent of Malaysian girls are obese. In the National Survey of Primary and Middle Schools in Japan, between 1970 and 1997, obesity in 9 year-old children increased three-fold. Further, in Shanghai, China, 7 percent of children are obese, a six-fold increase in 10 years.
      The fact is, ease + excess = fat. Videogames fall solidly in the "ease" category.
    5. Re:Korea and Japan by SiO2 · · Score: 1

      You conveniently overlooked Japanese sumo wrestlers! Without McDonald's the sport of sumo wrestling would probably wither and die.

      SiO2

    6. Re:Korea and Japan by Knara · · Score: 1

      The point being that they've had those chains for decades, along with videogames as a significant social pastime, and don't have the same sort of rapid increase in obesity (there's some, but there's also been a huge increase in nutrition for both countries in the last 40 years).

    7. Re:Korea and Japan by HonIsCool · · Score: 1

      A study in Sweden actually showed the opposite: those who played lots of video/computer games were actually tending to be more physically active also!

      --
      "Give me six lines of C++ code written by the most competent programmer, and I will find enough in there to hang him."
    8. Re:Korea and Japan by Ogive17 · · Score: 1

      But it can be related to other health issues.. like dying suddenly after playing WoW for 48 hours in a row...

      I wasn't trying to be confrontational in my original post. I guess what I wanted to do was make a point that it's really a mix of factors. Just because S.Korea and Japan don't have an obesity issue like UK and US doesn't mean video games don't play part of it. Sure I had an atari and C64 when I was growing up.. and I spent a lot of time on both systems.. but I also spent many hours with GI Joes and Legos during bad weather and riding bikes when it was nice out. My mom would buy us McDonalds on payday, which was every other Friday.

      Almost everything in moderation is not going to have harmful effects. But 6 hours a day of video games or fast food 3+ times a week will take it's toll. In the end it comes back to the parent(s). Set some rules instead of letting the PS3 be the babysitter.

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    9. Re:Korea and Japan by dbIII · · Score: 1

      The country that invented high fructose corn syrup is not stupid enough to use it in such large quantities as the USA. This is only part of the problem - countries that use a lot of cane sugar instead are rapidly catching up. A Californian Oncologist that I cannot recall the name of or easily google has been working on this: in short glucose is processed by most of the body while fructose has to be processed in the liver making frequent large doses a problem. Sucrose breaks down to 50% fructose so frequent large doses have a similar effect. Fruit is not a problem because there is a lot of fibre in even the sweetest fruit - you don't get the sudden arrival of a lot of fructose at once as you do with a drink full of high fructose corn syrup.

    10. Re:Korea and Japan by Welshalian · · Score: 1

      And both of those countries have McDonalds and other fast food chains. What is your point? I think the point is that diet is more important than games in this respect. I visit Japan often, and the food there is amazing - loads of vegetables, little meat, plenty of fish, rice, and most of it is steamed or boiled, as opposed to smothered in cheese and fried. Plus, it's hard to find candy bar machines on the streets. Everytime I visit (on business) I do very little physical activity and yet I manage to lose some weight by just eating the food everyone else is eating...
  21. Being a larger guy... by Manip · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Being a larger guy myself I'd put it down to a number of factors including:
    - Eating too fast
    - Forgeting to enjoy food (fat people enjoy their food less than thin people while eating it)
    - Very concentrated sugar / fat foods (e.g. Soft Drinks, Burgers)
    - Society encourages us to stay home (Safer, Entertainment, and for Computer Geeks even work-useful activities like coding)
    - Very little "good" help available (Doctors throwing pills, diets selling useless books, but nobody wants to give good advice except perhaps Paul Mckenna and a couple of others)

    I wouldn't pin it down to Games or any other single form of entertainment. Well except perhaps World of Warcraft but that is a different kind of crack within its self. ;-)

    1. Re:Being a larger guy... by JakiChan · · Score: 1

      Very little "good" help available (Doctors throwing pills, diets selling useless books, but nobody wants to give good advice except perhaps Paul Mckenna and a couple of others) Amen, brother. All the doctors and/or insurance companies want to do is point you at a surgeon to cut up your intestines. Very very few people in the medical profession want to help the obese.
      --
      "Where quality is like a dead stinking rat - you just can't miss it."
    2. Re:Being a larger guy... by Reziac · · Score: 3, Informative

      I always eat like a starving wolf (always have, ever since I was a little kid -- that's how I best enjoy my food!), and at 52 I'm still as skinny as I was in college. People are always asking me how I stay so thin. Well, this is it:

      Lack of balanced protein and/or lack of fat makes you FEEL HUNGRY, and sugars early in the day make the liver "lazy" ("gimme easy food, not food I have to work to process!") and gives you the munchies. -- My diet is based around red meat (chicken, fish, and vegetable proteins do NOT have the right balance of amino acids to control your appetite), with normal amounts of fat (no particular effort made to trim it down). I don't eat carbs before noon, unless liberally lathered with grease. (Incidentally my cholesterol is way *down* there.) This serves to keep my appetite under control over the long haul, and prevents having the munchies during the day. -- I don't limit sweets otherwise, since I hit a natural limit of how much "tastes good" fairly quick. I suspect as a side effect, I do not get "sugar highs" even if I eat a lot of sugar at once.

      Just because your stomach is empty does NOT necessarily mean you need to ingest more calories. Learn to feel when you need energy, don't just assume your stomach knows anything about it. -- My stomach does NOT control when I eat. It can growl all it likes, but if the rest of my body doesn't say it needs food TOO, the stomach will be ignored (or at best placated with a couple crackers or a piece of jerky); it has learned to produce a couple token growls, then shuts up and stops bothering me. If you don't give in every time you feel the slightest hunger, your stomach too can learn this self-control.

      Don't stuff yourself. I feel no need to "clean my plate". That's what the fridge is for -- storing leftovers. One extra bite at every meal adds up. And if you eat out a lot, remember that both fast-food joints and 5-star restaurants have doggie-bags. Take it home, get another meal out of it, instead of shoveling down food you don't really want.

      Listen to your body when it is "bored" and wants to move around, or needs to sleep. The "twitchies" you get after a marathon coding session are a major symptom of this physical boredom and sleep deprivation (the two tend to go hand in hand). -- Find something physical to DO for an hour or so every day, even if it's just walking around the block. And try to sleep at *night* (preferably by 10pm) -- that helps keep the rest of the system in sync, so your appetite is easier to control.

      Take note of the metabolic slowdown that happens around age 30. If you keep eating as much as you did when you were 20, you WILL get fat.

      If your lifestyle *becomes more sedentary* thanks to computer games or ANY "sit in one place" behaviour, you WILL get fat. I know a lot of formerly-active, formerly-thin people (mostly middle-aged guys) who got addicted to some computer game, or to the internet, or who got a desk job after being a field rep, and promptly put on weight, simply because now they sit there and snack instead of moving around, and they eat just because their body is bored. -- I can tell when a certain friend's computer is broken, because he loses weight. -- TV never had quite as much of an effect, probably because what interests most people is limited to certain hours and certain days, so sitting in front of the TV tends to be self-limiting. Conversely, you can play WoW 24 hours a day if you wish. -- I still play a lot of DOOM, and muck about online a lot, but I DON'T snack while I'm on the computer. And I do stuff besides just sit here all day.

      So... that's it. Nothing special about my lifestyle, no particular diets, no deprivation, no exercise regimen (tho I do a couple hours of physical work every day, it's nothing strenuous, mainly just a lot of walking). Do likewise, and chances are you'll return to your teenage weight, too. It worked for generations of your forefathers, who never heard of all this low-fat, low-protein "healthy eating" that's been packing weight on Americans for the past two decades.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    3. Re:Being a larger guy... by pyite · · Score: 1

      Amen, brother. All the doctors and/or insurance companies want to do is point you at a surgeon to cut up your intestines. Very very few people in the medical profession want to help the obese.

      I'm not in the "medical profession," but I am an engineer, so that qualifies me to give the following advice. Eat Less. Exercise More. You definitely won't gain weight, and most likely you'll lose weight. No one needs more than thermodynamics to lose weight. Beyond that, it's just a question of will power.

      --

      "Nature doesn't care how smart you are. You can still be wrong." - Richard Feynman

    4. Re:Being a larger guy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You were on the right track there until you made your last point, "Very little "good" help available."

      Here is the secret you can't seem to find. Exercise when you can and eat whole foods. That'll get you 90% of the way there.

    5. Re:Being a larger guy... by garcia · · Score: 1

      - Very little "good" help available (Doctors throwing pills, diets selling useless books, but nobody wants to give good advice except perhaps Paul Mckenna and a couple of others)

      What "good" help do you need? I can guarantee you that you already know every single last bit of information about how to lose weight successfully as it's only two words: diet, exercise.

      If you mean that you need someone to motivate you to change your diet substantially or if that means finding someone to do the shopping, cooking, and cleaning for you instead of going to Rotten Ronnie's three times a day then you're insane. Or do you mean that you need someone to put you outside and on the pavement for 45 minutes a day?

      I think you just need to help yourself, seriously.

    6. Re:Being a larger guy... by JakiChan · · Score: 1

      I'm not in the "medical profession," but I am an engineer, so that qualifies me to give the following advice. Eat Less. Exercise More. You definitely won't gain weight, and most likely you'll lose weight. No one needs more than thermodynamics to lose weight. Beyond that, it's just a question of will power. And I'm sure you'd also walk up to that homeless guy you passed on the way to work and say "Get a job."

      It's not that simple and condescending "advice" like that is more harmful than useful. But it's a good example of what a unhelpful and arrogant doctor would say.
      --
      "Where quality is like a dead stinking rat - you just can't miss it."
    7. Re:Being a larger guy... by funkatron · · Score: 1

      Good advice. Can I just add the one thing that works for me, might be a good place for other people to start.
      Cook your own food. If nothing else this will make sure that you know what's in it. I found that after cooking for a while certain combinations of ingredients tasted healthy (even if I still cannot understand salad). I've also found that I stock up on ingredients rather than actual ready to eat food so I haven't been able to snack, after I week or so I stopped missing it and fell into having food at regular times only. Of course, I still keep some decent chocolate and some nice beer around the place.
      Just a thought, not sure if it works for other people.

      --
      "Welcome to our world. We are the wasted youth. And we are the future too." Yes, I know these are stupid lyrics.
    8. Re:Being a larger guy... by Morpeth · · Score: 1
      'Very little "good" help available (Doctors throwing pills, diets selling useless books'

      I must disagree. My fiancee is a physician (in the US), and she's constantly dealing with patients wanting quick fixes for everything -- usually in the form of pills. They don't want to be told, stop smoking, eat less/better, get exercise. Instead of taking on the responsibility themselves and making changes, they want magic in a bottle -- and of course, with no side effects either.

      I think the good help and advice is out there, the problem is, no one wants to hear it. They don't want to told you're overweight because of your own lifestyle/eating choices and you sit around too much. Though information and knowledge has grown with time, I don't think anyone can say with a straight face that they don't know the key to weight management is exercise and reducing your caloric intake.

      --

      'The unexamined life is not worth living' - Socrates
    9. Re:Being a larger guy... by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 1

      Very little "good" help available (Doctors throwing pills, diets selling useless books, but nobody wants to give good advice except perhaps Paul Mckenna and a couple of others)

      Huh? What kind of good help are you looking for? Unless you're one of the near death obese, it's not rocket science on how to lose weight. 1) Fill out www.fitday.com for a week so you can see your real caloric intake. Most people lie to themselves. 2) Get a quick physical and get cleared by a doc that it's okay to exercise 3) Fix your diet and start exercising. I know it's hard to do some activity for an hour each day and skipping those cookies right before bed, but don't complain about there being no good help available.

    10. Re:Being a larger guy... by dbIII · · Score: 1
      To add to this very high protein diets don't usually make people fat. Very high carbohydrate diets (eg. mostly rice) don't usually make people fat. When you mix the two fairly evenly and add a lot of sugar that's where you have the old McDonalds menu and trouble.

      How your body handles cholesterol depends a lot on your genetics. A friend with a girlfreind that worked in a pizza shop was living off leftover pizza (pizza twice a day for eight months before the test) and had a very good cholesterol result in a blood test - mine would be higher on a more normal diet. He did get reasonable levels of daily exercise which most likely had an effect.

    11. Re:Being a larger guy... by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 1

      And I'm sure you'd also walk up to that homeless guy you passed on the way to work and say "Get a job."

      If the person is able bodied and able minded yes. Anyone can be broke for a time, but poor is a state of mind.


      It's not that simple and condescending "advice" like that is more harmful than useful. But it's a good example of what a unhelpful and arrogant doctor would say.


      So what other advice do you want? Do you need a doctor to come to your house and throw out all your cookies? Do you need a doctor to shop with you and buy veggies instead of ice cream? Do you need a doctor to pick you up and take you to the gym? Losing weight is a simple formula. Eat less and exercise. The problem is that most people can't handle the mental challenge of eating less or the discipline of exercising daily.

    12. Re:Being a larger guy... by JakiChan · · Score: 1

      So what other advice do you want? Do you need a doctor to come to your house and throw out all your cookies? Do you need a doctor to shop with you and buy veggies instead of ice cream? Do you need a doctor to pick you up and take you to the gym? Losing weight is a simple formula. Eat less and exercise. The problem is that most people can't handle the mental challenge of eating less or the discipline of exercising daily. Your compassion is staggering. I hope you never need help from anyone because you clearly don't deserve any...
      --
      "Where quality is like a dead stinking rat - you just can't miss it."
    13. Re:Being a larger guy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's not being uncompassionate ,he's being straightforward. Perhaps he could have said it more nicely but his point stands. I don't see how eating less and exercising more requires anything other than willpower for the average person.

    14. Re:Being a larger guy... by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 1

      What sort of compassion do you want? Short of serious medical problems, losing weight is mostly a solved problem. Being overweight is a choice, and you have to chose to not be overweight. I'm in great shape and people ask me all the time how to get in shape. I tell them it's simple, eat better and exercise. The first thing I hear back, 'well I can't eat better' or 'I don't want to exercise' or 'don't have the time' (which is a crock b/c they seem to be able to watch every reality TV show known to man). Reminds me of a quote, "His mother had often said, when you choose an action, you choose the consequences of that action. She had emphasized the corollary of this axiom even more vehemently: when you desired a consequence you had damned well better take the action that would create it." -- Lois McMaster Bujold

      We know what actions are required to lose weight. Do them!

    15. Re:Being a larger guy... by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 1

      Not sure if you're full? Save it. If you still feel hungry in a few hours, you can eat it then.

    16. Re:Being a larger guy... by JakiChan · · Score: 1

      Short of serious medical problems, losing weight is mostly a solved problem. Curing alcoholism: stop drinking
      Curing drug addiction (not counting detox): stop using

      Uhm, yeah, it's that simple. Many people, my self included, often eat based on emotion - and it's not a simple thing to control. Even LMB knows it, as one of her characters has the same problem. If you don't recall you might want reread Mirror DanceA Civil Campaign.

      Pointing at behaviors rooted in defense mechanisms and emotional coping schemes, or any other mental health issue for that matter, and just saying "Do this!" or "Don't do that!" is more destructive than helpful. It sounds just as stupid as "Just Say No!" You may think you're so smart and tough by pointing out what you think is obvious but it's actually hurtful. It helps to enforce a negative feedback loop. So unless, in addition to being an engineer, you also have either and MD or PhD in psych then please STFU.
      --
      "Where quality is like a dead stinking rat - you just can't miss it."
    17. Re:Being a larger guy... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      And contrary to popular belief, I've noticed that if you eat slowly, you will tend to eat more. But if you gulp your food, you'll also gulp more air, so the stomach feels full sooner.

      Oh, and drink lots of water. Often when you think you're hungry, you're not -- you're actually *thirsty*, and mildly dehydrated.

      Tea and coffee are all right too, but sodas are not (with OR without sugar -- and in my observation the sugar substitutes tend to INCREASE appetite).

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    18. Re:Being a larger guy... by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 1

      Then go talk to someone! You're trying to blame being overweight on poor medical care which is a crock. You have all the tools to change your situation. Will it require personal work? Yes! The question you have to ask yourself is do you really want to lose weight? If you don't, fine. But don't go blaming doctors or anyone else but yourself. And hurtful? How is pointing out the truth hurtful? The truth is something you need to hear, since it sounds like you want to blame everyone else but yourself for your weight problem.

    19. Re:Being a larger guy... by JakiChan · · Score: 1

      Then go talk to someone! You're trying to blame being overweight on poor medical care which is a crock. You have all the tools to change your situation. Will it require personal work? Yes! The question you have to ask yourself is do you really want to lose weight? If you don't, fine. But don't go blaming doctors or anyone else but yourself. And hurtful? How is pointing out the truth hurtful? The truth is something you need to hear, since it sounds like you want to blame everyone else but yourself for your weight problem. First of all, you have NFI what my situation is, how my weight I've lost (hint: it's in 3 digits). You're just sitting there, judgemental as fuck, getting off on looking down on fatties. And that's fine - it makes you no different that a lot of people. As for telling the truth, let me ask you this: if you're diagnosed with a terminal illness do you want your doctor to come in and tell you "Fuck, you screwed. Get out of here - I only help those that might make it"? He's being truthful, yes. Helpful? No. Plus, I doubt you'd have the balls to talk that way to my face.

      So back to your suggestion - which makes my original point for me. An insurance company will be happy to pay over $200,000 to rework the plumbing on a fat person. Will they lose weight? Probably. Will they keep it off? Maybe. Will they be happier? Unlikely. A lot of people I know who have had the procedure and have lost weight but if they were not just simply overeating then they still have the same old problems. They're healthier, but not happier. I suppose that's an improvement, but if mental health was any sort of priority in this country I bet they could have lost the weight without the surgery.

      I've gotta hit the shower since I just got back from the gym (*gasp* - yes, I work out 5x a week? OMGWTFBBQ!!1!) but meanwhile, why don't you go find a teenage girl with anorexia and tell her to stop being a whiny bitch and eat a sandwich already? Let me know how that "truth" works for you.
      --
      "Where quality is like a dead stinking rat - you just can't miss it."
    20. Re:Being a larger guy... by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 1

      First of all, you have NFI what my situation is, how my weight I've lost (hint: it's in 3 digits). You're just sitting there, judgemental as fuck, getting off on looking down on fatties. And that's fine - it makes you no different that a lot of people. As for telling the truth, let me ask you this: if you're diagnosed with a terminal illness do you want your doctor to come in and tell you "Fuck, you screwed. Get out of here - I only help those that might make it"? He's being truthful, yes. Helpful? No. Plus, I doubt you'd have the balls to talk that way to my face.

      First off, I've helped a lot of people make the changes needed to lose weight. The first thing is a mental change - one that people must realize that they are in control and that the situation they are in is within their control. Your first post blaming the medical profession shows you didn't, at least originally, feel it was in your control. Second, nowhere did I say I didn't want to help those who are overweight. Quite the opposite actually. I want people to know that they can change, but they are the ones who have to make the decision and do the change. I don't really see this as related, but if was diagnosed with anything I want the doc to tell me how bad it is. Don't sugarcoat it, tell me what I need to do to fix it and I will. I had ACL surgery 11 weeks ago today. I'm am months ahead in my recovery because I took control of my situation and go to the gym on my off days from PT and do my own PT workout again. Am I more motivated or driven than the average person? Maybe, but if I can be motivated then anyone can. Also, I would say anything I've said here to your face because I haven't said anything that shouldn't be said.

      So back to your suggestion - which makes my original point for me. An insurance company will be happy to pay over $200,000 to rework the plumbing on a fat person. Will they lose weight? Probably. Will they keep it off? Maybe. Will they be happier? Unlikely. A lot of people I know who have had the procedure and have lost weight but if they were not just simply overeating then they still have the same old problems. They're healthier, but not happier. I suppose that's an improvement, but if mental health was any sort of priority in this country I bet they could have lost the weight without the surgery.

      I'm against any sort of surgical procedure to lose weight. It doesn't address the problems the people have and the lifestyle changes that they need to make. You're original assumption is that the medical field wasn't helping people lose weight. At the end of the day change and motivation must come from within. Even a motivational psychologist can only take someone so far. Like the alcoholic or the drug abuser, they are the ones that must first decide to change and go from there.

      I've gotta hit the shower since I just got back from the gym (*gasp* - yes, I work out 5x a week? OMGWTFBBQ!!1!) but meanwhile, why don't you go find a teenage girl with anorexia and tell her to stop being a whiny bitch and eat a sandwich already? Let me know how that "truth" works for you.

      Yes, some people have severe eating disorders. Are you trying to say that every person who is overweight has a severe eating disorder? I would argue that's simply not true.

    21. Re:Being a larger guy... by JakiChan · · Score: 1

      The first thing is a mental change - one that people must realize that they are in control and that the situation they are in is within their control. There are many that would disagree with you. The first thing you're supposed to realize in a "12-step program" is that you're powerless over whatever your problem is. Personally I hate 12-step programs but there ya go. At least they try and address the true cause of of the issue for which the substance abuse (even if it's food) is just a symptom.

      I'm against any sort of surgical procedure to lose weight. It doesn't address the problems the people have and the lifestyle changes that they need to make. You're original assumption is that the medical field wasn't helping people lose weight. At the end of the day change and motivation must come from within. Even a motivational psychologist can only take someone so far. Like the alcoholic or the drug abuser, they are the ones that must first decide to change and go from there. And there is where the lack of help comes in. It's not a motivation issue for a lot of people, myself included. If someone truly has an eating disorder then they often eat as a way to self-medicate and avoid dealing with feelings. It usually has been going on for a long time - most people will start this behavior very young, well before they have other options (like alcohol or other drugs). So assistance in learning to cope without food is what is needed and what can't be found. They were willing to rip my intestines apart - hell, I had a surgeon say it was the only way I'd ever lose weight - and when I asked how that was going to change my emotional outlook on life they just didn't understand the question.

      So while I'm fighting tooth and nail to deal with my issues I'm finding very little help from either the medical community and especially from the health providers/insurance companies. I found very few specialists in eating disorders and all of them said they had no experience dealing with men. Even if I found one I doubt I could afford it. Insurance is happy to cut my intestines open but jeebus forbid you have a mental health issue.

      Yes, some people have severe eating disorders. Are you trying to say that every person who is overweight has a severe eating disorder? I would argue that's simply not true. Not every one, but many. I know I do. Which is why your initial suggestions were so completely less than helpful.
      --
      "Where quality is like a dead stinking rat - you just can't miss it."
    22. Re:Being a larger guy... by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 1

      Let me say congratulations on losing the weight! I think we might be saying the same thing - that weight issues have a large psychological component to them.

      I think you might be looking to the wrong place for help. A surgeon only knows how to do an operation. He's not supposed to know anything more. My knee surgeon grafted my a tendon in the right spot for me, but my PT knows a ton more about how to bring me back to pre-op strength my surgeon ever will. Maybe you should be looking for a personal trainer who focuses on people who need to lose a lot of weight. I know there are ones out there who understand the mental aspect and challenges with losing lots of weight. Try these forums forums.jpfitness.com a lot of helpful people on hang out there.

      It's also not easy, I understand that. For example, one girl I help now had to find all new friends after she dropped 80+lbs. All her old friends were mostly overweight and they only wanted to do things that involved eating and gave her a hard time about changing. It took time, but now she has a new set of friends who run marathons with her, workout with her, etc...

      At the end of the day though it is a personal decision to do what it takes. Either by finding help by exploring all avenues or figuring out things on your own. For most weight issues there doesn't need to be a medical solution. The solution is what I listed out of the gate - eat healthier and exercise.

    23. Re:Being a larger guy... by ElleyKitten · · Score: 1

      I don't think there's one way for everyone. You say that red meat is what makes you full, but for me I'd feel like I was starving without carbs. We also have different metabolisms, the slowdown you say happens at 30 hit me at 20. I also think it's very unlikely for most people to return to their teenage weight, and it would be impossible for me. Today I eat healthier (mostly veggies and whole grains) than I ever did as a teenager (I actually ate cheese and *sugar* sandwiches, and my cookie and donut cravings had no bounds) and I do try to exercise when I can, but I'm never going to get to my teenage weight, and if my metabolism slows down again at 30 I'll likely be obese. But that's ok, because it's eating badly and being sedentary that are the health risk factors, not obesity (though they usually correlate) and as long as I try to be healthy I won't worry about my weight. Not all of us have the genes to be skinny, and that's ok.

      --
      "What is Internet Explorer 7? Are you saying we can't access the normal internet?" - I love tech support. Really.
    24. Re:Being a larger guy... by JakiChan · · Score: 1

      weight issues have a large psychological component to them Yes, issues that should be addressed by a licensed therapist (working with your PCP) or a psychiatrist. However such care is expensive and often not covered. So while insurance will be happy to spend over $100,000 on surgery to treat a symptom they won't help me treat the actual disease.

      It blows my mind. Let's say that you do the following things: meet with a trainer once a week (obviously working out more than that, but just with the trainer 1x), and meet with a pshrink. The trainer is probably $60/session (when bought in groups), and pshrink - I dunno, lets call him $150. Say you meet with them once a week, 50 weeks a year, for 2 years. That's $21,000. That's less than the surgeon's fee for doing gastric bypass. It would be more cost effective and you'd end up healthier. But no, the insurance company would rather cut me up.

      And the fact that it is usually a mental disease is why just brusquely saying it's about thermodynamics doesn't help. It just causes more negative emotions which feed in to the loop. I mean do you really think attacking the self-esteem of someone who already has self-esteem issues is going to help the problem? No.
      --
      "Where quality is like a dead stinking rat - you just can't miss it."
    25. Re:Being a larger guy... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I didn't say red meat makes you FULL. I said that the protein balance found in red meat (and not adequately substitutable with anything else) keeps your *long-term* appetite under control -- and the effect there is that you need *fewer* carbs to achieve that final feeling of satsifaction. One potato will do instead of two, and so on. (BTW being low on B-complex vitamins will make you crave wheat products.)

      And yes, the age of metabolic slowdown varies; I know other people who had it at age 20, and a few who never really had it. But 30 is the most typical age.

      And you are right, it's perfectly possible to be pretty chunky and still be healthy; lots of farmers and eskimos will agree with you. But if your weight is affecting your lifestyle (including negative impacts on health, such as joint problems or diabetes), ie. preventing you from activities you could do when you were thinner, you are carrying too much, and that threshold can be 5 pounds or 100 pounds (which is about the max before it WILL negatively impact your life).

      Veggies are very poor weight-control food, as you need to eat a lot more calories worth of veggies to get the same net level of nutrients that you do from a more-concentrated food. Lack or imbalance of nutrients creates cravings (which is why in general you should listen to your cravings, not fight them).

      BTW I am not a skinny-bigot; in fact I love the "big beautiful woman" look (tho most guys can't pull it off). I also have a background in biochem and animal nutrition, so I'm not just pulling this out of my ass. :)

      Small rant: the people who most like to dispute my methods are also most likely to be those with a lifelong weight battle. But which of us still wears the same clothes we did in college??

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    26. Re:Being a larger guy... by ElleyKitten · · Score: 1

      I didn't say red meat makes you FULL. I said that the protein balance found in red meat (and not adequately substitutable with anything else) keeps your *long-term* appetite under control -- and the effect there is that you need *fewer* carbs to achieve that final feeling of satsifaction.

      In general, vegetarians tend to be thinner than the rest of the population. I've never noticed anyone who ate red meat being any thinner than the people I know who don't.

      One potato will do instead of two, and so on.

      Never could eat two potatoes in one sitting anyways, and can usually only finish one if it's small. As I said before, people are different.

      (BTW being low on B-complex vitamins will make you crave wheat products.)

      I'm not low on B vitamins. And I don't eat wheat products obsessively, I have them as part of normal-sized meals. It's just that if I have a meal without any wheat products then I'm usually hungry afterwards.

      And you are right, it's perfectly possible to be pretty chunky and still be healthy; lots of farmers and eskimos will agree with you. But if your weight is affecting your lifestyle (including negative impacts on health, such as joint problems or diabetes), ie. preventing you from activities you could do when you were thinner, you are carrying too much, and that threshold can be 5 pounds or 100 pounds (which is about the max before it WILL negatively impact your life).

      Diabetes (type II) isn't caused by obesity, it correlates with obesity. Only a tiny percentage of obese people have diabetes. Type II diabetes is genetic, so if you have a lot of family members with it then you will likely get it, whether you're fat or thin. And if you want to bring up fat children with Type II, remember that it was only recently that anyone even tested children for Type II (and you can go for years with diabetes without knowing, ask anyone with it). So we haven't gone from 0 to whatever the number is now, we've gone from unknown to known. 5 extra pounds is not going to impact your health. 5 pounds is nothing. As for the high end, some people are just built chunky and can't get skinny in any healthy way. I have a friend who has always been fat (about 300lds now), and the only time she wasn't was when she was bulimic. She's tried a lot of different diets and changes (besides bulimia), at one point she was vegetarian, and now she's trying high protein, low carb. Her weight doesn't go down with reasonably healthy diets (from whatever philosophy), it only goes down with starvation, and that's not healthy. People should focus more on being healthy instead of what they weigh. Sure, many people who eat healthy and exercise will be at a good weight, but some won't, and we shouldn't push them to starve themselves because their bodies don't react like other people's.

      Veggies are very poor weight-control food, as you need to eat a lot more calories worth of veggies to get the same net level of nutrients that you do from a more-concentrated food. Lack or imbalance of nutrients creates cravings (which is why in general you should listen to your cravings, not fight them).

      You've got that confused. Veggies are very low in calories (by volume, compared to other foods) and have more nutrients than just about anything. Here's the nutrition facts for spinach. It only has 7 calories per serving, less than a gram of fat, 0 cholesterol (of course), and a whole list of nutrients, from calcium and potassium to things that I don't even know what they are. Now look at the nutrition facts of beef (according to the meat man, chosen because he's not likely to be biased against meat). The cut with the lowest amount of calories is still at 150, has 7 grams of fat, 70 micrograms of cholesterol, and... meatman doesn't list any nutrients besides iron and

      --
      "What is Internet Explorer 7? Are you saying we can't access the normal internet?" - I love tech support. Really.
    27. Re:Being a larger guy... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      People are different, true, but biochemistry (which I have most of a degree in -- short 3 classes) is *basically* the same for everyone. And you can argue micronutrients all you like, but it doesn't change the fact that protein and fat are the defining nutrients for long-term appetite control.

      And I know a lot of vegetarians; MOST of them are overweight to obese.

      I also know a lot of people who DON'T struggle with their weight... and guess what, MOST of them eat pretty much like I do. Funny thing, this was the norm before the "obesity epidemic". And obese children were *extremely* rare before all this "healthy eating" -- perhaps one child in a thousand. Now, fat kids are everywhere... and so is adult-onset diabetes, also formerly rare. Draw your own conclusions.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  22. Who's To Blame? by MrCrassic · · Score: 2, Insightful

    While McDonald's blames video games on the obesity trend, let's not forget the millions of Americans who work in physically inactive jobs for many hours per week, come home to eat a full dinner (while skimping on more important meals, like Breakfast) and then finish it off by watching a good amount of TV. Never mind the lack of (or committment to) exercise, eating healthier (which isn't as important as exercise) or even trying to be active.

    When one sees public service announcements telling people to play at least ONE HOUR a day, then I think we know where a lot of the blame can be shifted. Ironically enough, in my mind it wouldn't be fast food...

  23. Experiment by Kamokazi · · Score: 1

    Okay, I'm going home, and I will play video games nonstop for a month. Someone else about 5'10" and 200lbs needs to go to McDonalds and eat Big Macs nonstop for a month. Someone else needs to get us federal grants for obesity research so I can get paid to play video games all month, and to cover that other poor fat bastard's Big Macs. Then at the end of the month, we'll see who gained more weight.

    --
    As our way of thanking you for your positive contributions to Slashdot, you are eligible to disable Slashdot 2.0.
    1. Re:Experiment by moderatorrater · · Score: 1

      How much are you willing to bet that I can find more people who play video games at least 3 hours a day than eat at mcdonald's once a day?

  24. Advertise to those gamers! by Demon10000 · · Score: 1

    A few months ago I downloaded Prince of Persia: Sands of Time from some game site. It was some trial that Ubisoft was doing where they were putting advertisements into games. Interestingly enough, the only advertisement I ever saw was for McDonalds.

  25. There are many causes by gilesjuk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    1. Fructose and corn syrup

    2. Paranoid and over protective parents not letting their kids play outside

    3. Lazy parents buying ready meals and junk food

    4. Lack of room in the school timetable for PE (physical exercise)

    5. Computer games (parents should limit this)

    6. Film and TV programme tie-ins with McDonalds and sugary foods such as cereals

    7. Kids being driven to school

    1. Re:There are many causes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well... you can extrapolate this:

      1. Fructose and corn syrup are cheaper additives than pure cane sugar. If you're on a strict budget, you may not have a choice but to buy something containing them. Hell, you can't find many things that DON'T contain HFCS.

      2. Paranoid and overprotective parents possibly overcompensating by keeping kids indoors because they're too busy to keep an eye on them.

      3. Busy parents buying ready made meals and junk food for their kids because it's cheaper, quicker, and easier to eat on the way to daycare/school in the morning while they're rushing to work.

      4. Lack of funding in the school budget for P.E. programs, especially when there's a push to keep standardized test scores from dropping for fear of losing even more funding from the school district (thanks, No Child Left Behind)

      5. Computer games keeping kids busy while parents finish the work they have to bring home with them, or keep them busy while one parent is gone working to earn a second income (possibly while working a second job)

      6. There is no excuse for this one, seriously. You hit the nail on the head. These tactics are used to breed brand loyalty at a young age.

      7. Kids being driven to school? That shouldn't make more of a difference than kids riding buses to school. Especially when that kid's in a magnet program because he's gifted. But, I get your point.

    2. Re:There are many causes by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      5. Computer games (parents should limit this)
      God no, you don't get it (or you aren't a parent). World of Warcraft keeps my pain in the ass children occupied for days on end!
    3. Re:There are many causes by jimicus · · Score: 1

      I see from the email address you publish you're presumably UK based. I'd like to add a few more comments which might help explain things to our US cousins:

      1. Fructose/corn syrup. I'd never even heard of corn syrup before I used /.. Corn syrup is used a lot less in the UK and fructose is something health food freaks eat (because it comes from fruit so it's "healthier", y'know) which costs 30% more than sugar.

      I'd add, to point 4:

      4. Land in the UK is rather less of a commodity than it is in the US - put simply, we've got much less space relative to the size of the population and local governments are under pressure to avoid growing towns outwards into neighbouring farmland. Combine that with most state-run schools being fairly desperate for cash - a lot of them have sold off some or all of their fields for development. Time or not, there's nowhere to run PE.

  26. For the Win! by trongey · · Score: 3, Funny
    ScuttleMonkey wins the prize for Freudian Typo of the Day:

    ...Steve Eaterbrook, McDonald's UK CEO...
    --
    You never really know how close to the edge you can go until you fall off.
  27. Fair's fair by FlyByPC · · Score: 1

    I'll accept that video games are the sole reason we're getting fatter -- if McDonalds accepts that fast food is making us violent. It seems just as logical to me.

    Personally, I know why I'm fat (although I'm currently working on that problem). Soft drinks, pure and simple. I used to consume at least 1,000kcal/day of the stuff. At 3500kcal/lb, that adds up fast!

    At least I don't smoke -- but as a soda addict, I do sympathize with smokers. It's hard to give up (or even cut back on) something you really enjoy.

    --
    Paleotechnologist and connoisseur of pretty shiny things.
    1. Re:Fair's fair by ninjagin · · Score: 1

      -= love your logic! =-

      Myself, I found that beer was giving me all those calories. I used to wash down the day with 1-2 litres of beer (~2 cases a week). Cutting back to .5 litres, and sometimes not having beer at all (~.5 cases a week), has really cut the calories for me. To put this in perspective, I quit smoking a month ago, and even though I'm eating more, I've only gained a pound or two.

      I know I'll never be able to give up beer (it's proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy, after all), but I don't miss the calories.

      --
      .. pa-ra-bo-la, pa-ra-bo-la, 2 pi R, 2 pi R, where's your latus rectum, where's your latus rectum, 2 pi R
  28. Hmmmmm by edwardpickman · · Score: 1

    So eating a pair of syrup soaked muffin shaped pancakes with a wedge of sausage crammed between doesn't make you fat but consumer electronics will?

    1. Re:Hmmmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know how they can call that runny brown abomination they cover the biscuit cakes with, "syrup," except in the sense that it's marginally thicker than water.

      Go with the real stuff. It's sweeter, more flavorful, and thick. You'll use less and enjoy it more and it won't get all over everything in a gunky, sticky, mess.

    2. Re:Hmmmmm by Isaac-Lew · · Score: 1
      The last time I checked, there were no laws mandating that you eat at McDonald's, Burger King, or any other fast food place.

      How about showing some personal and/or parental responsibility?

  29. If only... by poetmatt · · Score: 1

    If only there were some sort of activity that is possibly known to combat obesity? Obviously not a diet or anything...

    1. Re:If only... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I personally am getting quite sick of this mentality. You somehow believe that when you go to work each day and work on programs that have millions of lines of code and can't find one bug in that mess that the human body is somehow simpler. Let's take our understanding of diabetes over the years. First we couldn't figure out why these people were wasting away. Then we found insulin and started blending up pig pancreases in order to harvest the insulin. Then we found out that we weren't filtering it well enough and other proteins were ending up in it (remember you inject this DIRECTLY into your bloodstream). Then we come across medications that will somewhat fix the problem for type 2 diabetes (cells won't absorb the insulin). Then we find out that we are burning out the pancreas. So after this we figure we have the problem licked. Except that people who adamantly control their blood sugar still end up with complications. How can that be if insulin is the only part of the problem. Now we are finding more research that shows the bones and brain are directly involved in the system. This is one small system in the entire energy system of our bodies and you people who believe that diet will fix all obesity problems and also believe that we completely understand the system)

    2. Re:If only... by poetmatt · · Score: 1

      Do you have any idea how easy it is to lose weight if you control overeating either by surgery or by willpower, and additionally cut out the extreme amounts of sugar in foods? Forget exercise, you can do it just by smart eating and definitely without starving yourself nor starving yourself of the foods you like to cheat with. If you did so, you could cheat every single day on whatever is your cheat-food.

      Instead, go ahead, blame it on some magic inevitability, biological or otherwise, as if you neglected to realize that almost every product has 2 or 3 types of added sugar and salt, in addition to extra salt. So yeah, pour on that extra salt too, and don't forget that these small quantities that are in EVERY SINGLE THING YOU EAT tend to add up quickly. Now, if you start looking at labels, you might realize there is more to it than "oh! this serving is only 2-3 grams of sugar" because, it might be 2-3 grams. But so is every other thing you eat in a day. So if you eat 20-40 grams of sugar a day that way (which is easily passed in natural sugar, let alone the additives in foods), you can imagine where that will end up. You'll be a diabetic in 20 years. Oh wait, we already have that situation don't we, with the 6 fold increase in diabetes. That's because these additives started in the 60s right around when the diabetes increase started going crazy.

      Here is what General Mills says about doing that, Verbose of their rationale of why they add sugar and salt to their foods: "Sodium is an essential ingredient and occurs naturally in many foods. It enhances flavor, improves texture and helps keep food fresh. We regularly test different sodium levels among several thousand families across the United States. Our products reflect consumer testing and contain the necessary ingredients to produce a tasty and convenient product."

      So they know that you will make yourself fatter by eating multiple types of sugar, and it sells more because your body eventually gets addicted to it. Sound common? Okay maybe not fatty. How about I add some more information. Lets take a GM cereal. How about Wheaties? ingredients: wheat, salt, sugar (corn syrup), soybean oil (oil = fat), brown sugar syrup (sugar), natural flavor (can be anything from animal byproduct to more sugar), trisodium phosphate (artificial salt). Does that sound healthy to you? See the real reason why people who spend more on food at higher quality places are healthier, is the foods don't all have extra sugar added to them.

      Try shopping at a Trader Joes, or a Whole Foods, and almost nothing will have added sugar, or salt. You'll notice a distinctly lower amount of sodium and salt in everything they eat, because the only salt and sugar in their products is natural. Or you can keep eating the cheap stuff, like ramen noodles, which have like double the RDA of salt.

      Sound too expensive? Think again. How about buy less of the healthier stuff, since you won't be as hungry. Your body will crave less sugar, and you will eat less.

      That or keep telling yourself that fat is a lifestyle decision, and I'll be the one putting the flower on your grave.

  30. BOOKS! by emeri1md · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's the books! The books are making us fat. Damn those kids and their eight hour reading marathons! They need to go outside and get in trouble like normal kids! That'll get rid of the problem.

  31. I know how to correct this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We must...like...eat less food or something...

    I play videogames all the time and my figure is utterly ganglian, QED

  32. Not one cause, but by fermion · · Score: 1
    This makes some sense as those who are now teenager are the first generation that have raised totally in front of the video games, and whose parent probably were raised in from of video games. This means that they probably were likely to sit in front of a video game with the parent rather than work or play outside. The fact that some of these teenagers may be heavier may be in part due to the fact that sitting in front of the computer is much more sendentary than previous generations.

    OTOH, everyone over 40 was pretty much raised in front of the TV, and though it is probably easier to kick a kid out the house to go and play in the garden when the kid is watching TV, the fact is that many kids spent 40 hours a week in front of the TV, doing nothing buy drinking cokes and eating chips.

    But here is something that has changed in the past 15 years. foodstuff, be it frozen dinners, McDonald's or whatever, is considered acceptable food, and more importantly it the only cheap sustenance that some families know how to eat. How many families will make pancakes, or casseroles, or a bunch or rice and beans. Sure one may say that there is no time to cook, or that such food is more expensive, but that just is a matter of priorities. If one does not know who to make dinner in a hour, or does not put down the video, then dinner will not get made and bad cheap food will be eaten instead.

    Which is why I believe the problem is fast food. When I was a kid fast food was expensive. One did not see kids spending $2 for a snack at McDonalds, because $2 was hard to get. Now it seems that almost all kids, no matter how poor the family appears to be, has money to go to McDonalds, where the get calories but no nutrition. And then a school, where they are supposed to get the nutrition, the fast food concerns have bribed government officials so the kids again can get calories, but no nutrition. So hopefully at home they will be forced to eat some decent food. But in the process they have eaten 4000 calories, but only gotten 50% of the nutrition they need. Honestly if the fast food would supply 100% of the calories and 100% of the nutrition, that would be great. But it seems they supply 200% of the calories and a small fraction of the nutrition. Now that fast pseudo food is considered food, that is a unsustainable condition.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
  33. Video Games != Obesity by Daveznet · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't know how he can say that video games leads to obesity. South Koreans probably play the most video games out of any nationality. A big portion of their economy is based on it. They have pro-gamers that practice 10+ hours a day and the last time I saw none of them were obese.

    --
    GL HF!
    1. Re:Video Games != Obesity by AArmadillo · · Score: 1

      Most of these professional gamers have a rigorous physical training schedule as well, in order to keep reflexes sharp and endurance high. They also tend to have planned diets for similar reasons.

  34. Honest by Smordnys+s'regrepsA · · Score: 1

    I blame my fat for being fat.

    Seriously - it puts out a chemical that stimulates my appetite, and makes extended exercise very difficult.

    --
    Just -1, Troll talking to another.
  35. World of Warcraft by dunezone · · Score: 1

    My friend asked me how he could lose weight. Hes over 300 pounds an hes only 21, I told him he needs to make some lifestyle changes. For one I told him to play less WoW and start being more active, of course he didn't want to give up his precious WoW over his health. Now whenever I go over to his house, hes sitting there playing WoW with a bag of potato chips.

    Its not completely video games fault but its definitely a key contributor and it doesn't help that its contributing to the problem at an early age. And to those that say they grew up playing video games and their still healthy, that can happen, if you watch Super Size Me theres a man in that film that ate over 10,000 big macs in his life time and looks completely fine. Some people can get away with it, but the majority cant.

    When it comes down to it. Theres two key factors, lifestyle and respect. You cant expect the problem to go away with changing your lifestyle and learning to respect your body.

  36. Keys lipid hypothesis is dead... by waterford0069 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...long live the carbohydrates theory.

    Keys lipid hypothesis is dead... scientist are fleeing it like rats from a sinking ship. The media just hasn't caught up yet.

    The truly frightening thing is that the diet that US and Canadian governments have been recommending over that last 30 years is pretty much the same thing that we use to fatten cattle up for slaughter.

    1. Re:Keys lipid hypothesis is dead... by Knara · · Score: 1

      The diet made a lot more sense when the majority of our population didn't live in city centers and did physical work on farms (or other that required large amounts of physical labor). That huge breakfast with eggs and sausage and pancakes went a long way to keeping you moving.

      I'm not as big a fan of the carbofad as you apparently are, but when you work in an office, you just don't need as much caloric intake as you did when you were out fixing fences. Makes sense that the FDAs recommended daily intake would change.

    2. Re:Keys lipid hypothesis is dead... by waterford0069 · · Score: 1

      There's the perception out there that your body is a black box: if (caloriesIn > caloriesOut) then getFat(); else getSkinny(); but its more complicated than that. Weight Watchers/LA Weight Loss/Herbal Magic/etc. all try to help you get to a better weight by reducing your caloric intake to ~1500 calories per day (average a normal adult male needs without heavy exertion is ~2000).

      Yes, eggs, sausage and pancakes will go a long way to keep you moving. But the difference is, your body will absorb what it needs from the eggs and the sausage, but it will take in all the pancakes. When the carbs from the pancakes aren't use right away, it raises your blood sugar, which raises your insulin levels, which causes your fat cells to absorb the carbs (and turn them into fat). And of course, when your body needs energy to do work, the last thing that it goes after are your fat reserves. What you eat has a big effect on whether you get fat or skinny. It's not fat that makes you fat, its sugar/carbs.

      Every type one diabetic teen girl knows that if she wants to fit into that dress for the big dance, all she has to do is stop taking her insulin, all the low carb thing is doing is taking advantage of that phenomena.

      Anecdotally - I'm a big guy, and I've done the low fat thing, the 1500 calorie thing, and the low carb. I gained a frack load of weight eating low fat (try eating nothing but spaghetti for a week and see what happens), I've struggled with the 1500 calorie thing and gone nowhere, and I've had great success with the low carb thing.

  37. NOT potkettleblack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Both are white. Both are wrong.

    Barring certain metabolic syndromes, it is the choices that people make that are responsible for obesity.

    I play video games. I eat at toadburgers. I have a decent BMI. I exercise. I practice moderation.

    The "fast food nation" folks are hardly any better than Jack Thomspon's lot.

  38. Different Viewpoint by kellyb9 · · Score: 1

    I'm not totally disagreeing with what he said. I think there are elements here that may actually lead to obesity. I know personally when I'm sitting there playing a video gaming I'm usually eating some kind of snack or whatnot. Whatever the case, I would think for one second this guy might actually realize his firms role in the problem and not pass the buck off.

  39. IDIOTS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not the fat, it's the CARBS !!

  40. Play at a friend's house once in a while. by mathletics · · Score: 1

    I'm 22 and have good genes, but I ride my bike to a friend's house to play co-op Guitar Hero. That's two 20-minute aerobic sessions per day, and I spend several hours playing video games. When I was a kid, we'd ride to the house of whoever's mom would let them have Mortal Kombat. Point being, there's no reason that kids can't play a seemingly unhealthy amount of video games while still getting some exercise.

  41. Carrot or stick? by Shuntros · · Score: 1

    How about putting Xenical (drug which prevents the body from absorbing fat) in fatty foods? Once the burger-loving youngsters have soiled themselves in the presence of their peers once or twice they'll be screaming for fruit and veg! I tried one once as an experiment, went out for a curry, woke up the next day and tried to slip a discreet fart out - bad idea.

  42. It really comes down to the parenting and parents by Colin+E.+McDonald · · Score: 1

    Kids are going to do what their parents do. If they are over-consuming then more than likely their parents are as well.
    IMO, a major problem with the overweight issue in society is that food is used to fill missing holes, mostly those of a
    spiritual and pyschological nature. It is also about the time that is spent in actually eating the food. I got in the bad
    habit of wolfing down every meal after I went through Army Infantry basic back in 90 and over the years the calorie burning
    fell off but the eating habits didn't. It takes a lot of work to break that kind of habit. A lot of people basically eat too fast
    and don't give their systems time enough to deactivate the hunger signals.

    It is up to parents to monitor the kid's habits and to guide them in healthy and positive ways (as well as leading by example, which is the most important)
    which include all aspects of their existence. Sticking kid's in front of television to keep them busy while they are toddlers usually
    ends up developing a kid that has a need to watch tv all the time and I think without moderation of virtual environments you develop kids
    that can't function well in non-vr or projected environments. I think that this is the reason for so many kids being prescribed Adderal and Ritalin
    in order to keep them "calm". I think the most important way to handle these issues (too much immersion in video based play or watching, overeating and
    the inability to function in group environments) is through guidance and moderation. It will take a holistic approach that I believe should include
    meditation and quiet time for introspection without the constant onslaught of our media saturated world. I also think that kids have to be shown how important
    exercise and outdoor/nature play is to a healthy mind and body.

  43. But who Cares? by unlametheweak · · Score: 1

    McDonald's UK CEO Blames Video Games for Childhood Obesity I have no indication that the CEO of McDonald's is an obesity scientist.
    I suppose he's thinking that since he has the title of CEO that there is some credibility to anything he says. I suppose there is for quite a lot of people.
    It's sad.

    I'm running out of tinfoil.
  44. Next: Tobacco companies will use the same logic by trolltalk.com · · Score: 1

    By the same logic, tobacco companies will argue that people who play video games are more likely to stay indoors, where second-hand smoke is concentrated, rather than spending their time outdoors.

    Fucktards.

  45. In his defense... by Myrcutio · · Score: 1

    I have noticed that compter techs have an average higher rate of beer belly's than for example, the rest of the world. I know my ass gets more than its fair share of sitting in one day, but that doesn't keep me from going to the gym every once in a while so i don't look like Cartman from the WoW episode.

    I think the oompa loompas said it best, "who do you think's to blame? the mother and the father."

  46. It's McDonald's Fault Kids Are Fat by TrollMaster+9000 · · Score: 0

    Ever since the evil Chimpy McBushitler declared all children under the age of 16 eat Double Quarter Pounders with Cheese twice a day the children of this nation have had NO chance!

    When are we going to stop allowing evil fascist corporations to stuff foods high in fat, sugars, and salt down our children's throats?

    Can't the U.N. do something?

  47. It's not rocket science by ddrichardson · · Score: 1

    If the calories eaten outweigh the calories burned then weight is gained. Steve Easterbrook is stating the blisteringly obvious, and in doing so completely misses the point.

    Increasing obesity levels are not as straight forward as blaming fast food or video games though, there are several other factors:

    • Sport at school: Sport is not a priority in the majority of state schools now. It isn't funded and the teachers don't seem to be as willing to dedicate the time to run afterschool sessions. I'm not blaming teachers here, I'm sure there are reasons. When I was at school there was sport at least three afternoons a week.
    • Quality of food: I don't know if this is the case in the US but I haven't noticed it in other European countries so much - supermarkets sell a lot of really nutritionally crap food at low, low prices. Food shopping is bloody expensive as every parent knows.
    • People don't seem to have a clue how to cook or are too lazy - I mean you can make passatta for a fraction of the price of a prepackaged carton.
    • Fitness facilities are minimal. Although there are council funded gyms, they vary wildly in cost and quality throughtout the UK and perhaps more importantly don't seem to have as many trained staff there to help.
    • Education. If we spent half as much time teaching school kids how to look after their health as we do teaching them the ins and outs of half a dozen different religions that they'll probably never have an epihany for then we could make up for some of the knowledge gaps that many parents seem to have.
    --
    A thistle is a fat salad for an ass's mouth...
    1. Re:It's not rocket science by thethibs · · Score: 1

      If the calories eaten outweigh the calories burned then weight is gained

      Not even wrong. The body is not a thermodynamically closed system—something you should be aware of every time you sit on the toilet.

      --
      I'm a Programmer. That's one level above Software Engineer and one level below Engineer.
    2. Re:It's not rocket science by ddrichardson · · Score: 1

      What does "not even wrong" mean?

      --
      A thistle is a fat salad for an ass's mouth...
  48. When I was a kid by SCHecklerX · · Score: 1

    I worked at McDonald's. So would eat a quarter pounder or two every day. I also played a lot of video games, and played with computers. But I wasn't fat. Am now, however.

    Being captain of the cross country team and also in the marching band probably helped. I think 'social networks' (to include networked video games) are more to blame than just games themselves. It is much harder to pull yourself away from interaction with other people online. It's just so much easier than doing it in real life. It's that need to belong, and being in your element thing. We didn't have those electronics networks when we were younger, so getting away from the computer or game was a lot easier.

    Really, communicating online is the addiction here, I think.

  49. Ba da dup dup dah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm lovin' it.

  50. It's a combination, sure, but... by brkello · · Score: 1

    So, we know, or at least should, that to decrease our weight and increase our fitness we need to change the way we eat and exercise more. The more calories we burn in exercise, the more high calorie foods we can eat. But, if we didn't want to work out, we could very easily (if you have will power when it comes to food) maintain our weight by just eating the proper amount and avoiding fast food like McDonalds. So what I am saying is, I can play video games all I want and not become obese as long as I alter what I eat. I won't win any body building contests, but I can stay thin. On the other hand, if I eat only McDonalds food, I will become obese. You don't need large quantities of that stuff to get fat.

    The problem is fast food is quick to get and very cheap. It is interesting how in the past, a more plump person was viewed as wealthy since they could afford lots of food with little physical effort. Now we are attracted to people who are thin and our poor population continues to get fatter and fatter.

    Can video games be blamed for some people being fat? Possibly, but they could replace that activity with television, the Internet, knitting, playing cards, etc etc with the same result.

    Ultimately, there is only really one person to blame in this: the individual. There is no mystery on how people are getting fat. Get out and exercise and stop eating crap. It angers me to see this guy point the finger at gaming though. It is just the popular punching bag of our time. The guy serves some of the least healthy food on the planet and he thinks that if there just wasn't gaming, we'd all be perfect.

    --
    Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com
    1. Re:It's a combination, sure, but... by RobDude · · Score: 1

      That's not true - people have lost weight on all McDonald's diets...

  51. M.C. Kids says hello by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  52. To Serve Man by bonkeydcow · · Score: 1

    They are fattening us up for the aliens.

  53. The Only Way to Lose Weight by aquatone282 · · Score: 1

    Eat less and exercise more.

    That's it - no gimmicks, no pills needed.

    And it WORKS.

    --
    What?
  54. It's not just games, food, or even parenting by Dirtside · · Score: 3, Insightful

    All of these things are contributing factors. But it's not just as simple as "kids eat too much junk food" or "kids don't get enough exercise", as if the solution is to simply STOP these things, like flipping a switch.

    Let's look at one. Why do kids eat too much bad food? Because:
    1. processed crap is cheaper per calorie (and gram) than healthier foods
    2. freshly made food takes more time and energy to prepare than crappy food
    3. people typically have a poor understanding of what exactly is in their food

    Why are these things true? Partly because we didn't evolve to eat what we eat, and our bodies sometimes have trouble coping; partly because our diet isn't varied enough, and there's been a fair amount of research showing that more varied diets improve health; allergies/reactions to foods are higher in populations that eat a lot of those foods; and, among other things, decades of giant agribusinesses lobbying the government for laws and subsidies that support their business model of mass-producing cheap junk, and (sometimes) trying to suppress research that shows that cheap junk is unhealthy. Take "enriched flour". This is wheat flour that has had the husk removed (the husk contains almost all the fiber and other good nutrients; the germ contains basically nothing but carbohydrates), and then had artificially-produced versions of the nutrients in the husk added back in. What the hell? How about we just eat the whole grain instead (or flour therefrom) and cut out the middleman?

    #3 really vexes me. My son has reactions to milk protein (irritability, rash around his butt), wheat (skin rash), canola (screaming hyperactivity), and artificial food coloring (more irritability and hypersensitivity to things going wrong); since my wife is still nursing him, she has to avoid those things too. And she's discovered that she reacts to milk protein (rashiness) and soy (body temperature drops by 1-2 degrees, cold sores develop on lip every couple of weeks, versus virtually never when she's off soy).

    We still like to go out to eat, but it's a chore because we have to grill our waiters about what exactly they use to prepare the food. The question "What kind of cooking oil do you use to prepare X?" is usually met with either a blank stare (why should we expect someone who works in a restaurant to be informed about what's in the food? madness!), or the answer "Vegetable oil." Uh, yeah, pretty much ALL cooking oil is vegetable oil (animal fats are solid at room temperature, and are not "oil", culinarily speaking). WHICH VEGETABLE DID IT COME FROM? It matters! We eventually started saying "What kind of vegetable oil do you use," which frequently gets the answer "Regular vegetable oil", which lead to much headdesking frustration. Now we actually cue them by saying, "What kind of vegetable oil do you use, like, canola, corn, safflower, olive oil?" and most of the time that seems to get them to provide us with an actual answer (but sometimes they still say "regular").

    Hell, one time we went to a very nice restaurant, and my wife expained that she couldn't have dairy or wheat. The waiter dutifully returned later and told us that he'd checked on the desserts and found one that wasn't made with dairy or wheat flour, "just white flour." We stared at him for a second and asked what plant white flour comes from. It was priceless watching the expression on his face as it dawned on him that white flour is also made from wheat. And this guy was a waiter at a well-known upscale restaurant in Los Angeles. And we've had this experience repeated numerous times, at restaurants all along the scale.

    Anyway, rant over, but if you don't already, do yourself a favor -- find out what the hell you're eating. Learn about food. Read ingredient labels. (Did you know that "rapeseed" is another name for "canola"? Did you know that "casein" is milk protein? Did you know that virtually all soy sauce contains wheat, which is a pain in the ass for us because we love sushi?) Avoid proc

    --
    "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    1. Re:It's not just games, food, or even parenting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Hell, one time we went to a very nice restaurant, and my wife expained that she couldn't have dairy or wheat.

      Yup, I've got non-life-threatening wheat and dairy allergies also. Just avoiding those two things, plus being vegetarian, puts you into this 'underworld' of food -- the parent poster knows exactly what I mean when I say this, when he started really looking at the ingredients in everything he's surrounded with in America. Add vegetable oil and I can understand how screwed you are. As far as sushi goes, I had to pick up some wheat-free soy sauce from Wild Oats or possibly Whole Foods and bring it with me to the restaurant.

      Considering how many people have food sensitivities in the US -- what is it, like half? -- you'd think there would be some organization selling a service to meet with the restaurant and come up with subsets of the menus for people with various sensitivities.

    2. Re:It's not just games, food, or even parenting by Dirtside · · Score: 1

      I had to pick up some wheat-free soy sauce from Wild Oats or possibly Whole Foods and bring it with me to the restaurant.
      Yep, that's exactly what we do. Nothing will stop our pursuit of sushi! :)
      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    3. Re:It's not just games, food, or even parenting by Punko · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Number 1 son has no allergies. Likewise my wife and I. Number 2 son is anaphalactic to penicillin. He also is allergic to beef (not dairy, though) and egg whites. The downside is now that he has had 2 anaphalactic reactions that required hospitalization (and epipens) that we have no idea what caused. We now read every label, home cook from scratch every night, and do not eat in restaurants. If it wasn't for lunch, I would never have a restaurant meal again. We are restricted in sauces, need to contact manufactuers to grill them (pun intended) about not only the unlisted contents of their foods, but also the nature of their production facilities. Many food companies are excellent and knowledgable, but many insist that the label tells all. We've learned to bake almost anything without eggs, learned how to cook with everthing fresh, and learned how little we can trust pre-made or pre-cooked foods.

      On the upside, I'm sure its doing me a lot of good, although my caloric intake is too high, and my amount of excercise is too low. Home-made bread is just too good!

      --
      If only we could fall into a woman's arms without falling into her hands
    4. Re:It's not just games, food, or even parenting by Dirtside · · Score: 1

      "Aren't fucking possible"? Perhaps you've conducted a scientific study which proves this, and can provide us with info? Otherwise, I'm not going to trust the words of an anonymous cocksucker like yourself.

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    5. Re:It's not just games, food, or even parenting by randyest · · Score: 0, Troll

      What a horror story. No offense, but perhaps you and your allergic-to-everything (and herpes-infected) wife should reconsider your decision to reproduce?

      --
      everything in moderation
  55. Increase amount of information available by pinkocommie · · Score: 1
    Legislation mandating calorie counts and fat counts on menu's and displays should solve the problem to a great degree. I think they were trying to get this passed in NYC but was shot down by the restaurants association.

    A tad draconian / big brother but perhaps making a rule of no single order can exceed 500 calories and a certain fat percentage, if you want more, buy 2 / 3 etc. That way people will at least be aware of much they're eating.

  56. I play World of Warcraft at McDonalds by MaximvsG · · Score: 0

    I should be getting fatter twice as fast.

  57. The excercise myth by Joce640k · · Score: 1

    Forcing kids to run around just makes them eat more when they get home. School bullies are hyper-active all day but most of them are fat because of all the lunches they steal.

    Half an hour of running is only a couple of Oreos so it isn't hard for kids to make it up by snacking. If you don't want your kids to get fat then don't give them free access to a refrigerator/pantry full of instant foods. ...but as others have noted, that would take some parenting.

    --
    No sig today...
    1. Re:The excercise myth by xaxa · · Score: 1

      My parents managed fine. They simply didn't buy loads of snack food. Crisps (potato chips), chocolate bars etc were bought sometimes -- at most once a month, but my mum would always say "once they're gone, they're gone!" and we'd rarely eat more than one a day. More often than buying chocolate etc my mum would bake a cake, which is healthier.

      Forcing kids to run round makes them healthier. It doesn't make them eat more if the meal is good -- if they come home and eat chocolate then that's a problem, if they come home and eat a decent meal with lots of fibre they won't care for the chocolate.

  58. Article picture Freudian? by StringBlade · · Score: 1

    Not that anyone actually reads TFA, but did anyone else think the baby and the bun looked like a baby trying to suck on a sesame-seeded hamburger-bun breast?

    We'll ignore for the moment that McDonald's basic burgers don't have seeded buns.

    --
    ...and that's the way the cookie crumbles.
    1. Re:Article picture Freudian? by TomorrowPlusX · · Score: 1

      That was intentional. IIRC it's from a cheeky ad.

      --

      lorem ipsum, dolor sit amet
  59. Bah. by B3ryllium · · Score: 1

    I wish people would get off their soap boxes and realize that video games aren't all bad.

  60. Gaming powered by BigMacs by micromuncher · · Score: 1

    Ok, so video games makes kids fat, but if parents didn't throw McBurgers at them infront of their TVs/computers to keep them "occupied", where would we be? "Give 'em what they want to shut them up" is the best way to avoid active parenting, lack of child care, or any other excuse not to be involved with your own kids. (And its hard - I have two young kids - and its exhausting trying to keep them occupied.)

    --
    /\/\icro/\/\uncher
  61. A stronger correlation... by Joce640k · · Score: 1

    You'll find a stronger correlation with obesity if you look at how many kids are allowed free access to a kitchen full of high calorie, zero-preparation foods - cookies, chips, yoghurts, peanut butter, cereals, etc.

    Uncontrolled snacking = fat kid.

    --
    No sig today...
  62. irony by davFr · · Score: 1

    You did not understand! McDonald's CEO was referring to this specific obesity-enhancing video game :

    http://www.mcvideogame.com/

    --
    RIP Slashdot. I used to love you. dead account - but slashdot wont let me delete it.
  63. that's rich coming from them... by advocate_one · · Score: 1

    McDonalds use in-game advertisements

    --
    Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
  64. Calories in video games? by HalAtWork · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wonder how many calories video games have? Oh right, it's the McDonald's that people while playing the video games. Personally I play a lot of video games, watch a lot of TV, and go to work. I don't go out of my way to do physical activity but I don't inhibit it either, I just do what feels natural. I eat well though. Ever since I cut out McDonald's and drinking soda, I dropped 65 lbs over like 4 months. Now I'm not overweight in the least, and even then I wasn't really fat before, but bending over made me sweat, and I didn't like that. I still eat about a bag of cookies a day (a habit which I am cutting out now, I just can't quit all my bad habits all at once you know) and it's nowhere near as aweful as McDonald's, and I don't feel like vomiting after I eat either.

    1. Re:Calories in video games? by ODiV · · Score: 1

      You dropped 65lbs and you say "even then I wasn't really fat before"? 65lbs overweight is definitely fat.

      That's almost an Olsen twin.

    2. Re:Calories in video games? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe, but it didn't really show. I didn't know I gained the weight 'til I weighed myself, and I never do that. Maybe it was just well distributed?

  65. The real problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only real problem with obesity is that people consider obesity a problem.

    I'm fat. I don't care. I don't blame anyone for it. I have no problem with being fat.

    1. Re:The real problem by TomorrowPlusX · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's a health problem. Seriously.

      Now, people who think fat people are *bad* or *amoral*, those people are assholes. But the fact remains that being fat will kill you early, and will impact the quality of your life for a long time before you die.

      I'm not judging you or other fat people. I'm just speaking the truth. It's bad for you. I used to be fat, and thanks to the laws of thermodynamics I'm not any more. I can ride my bike 50 miles and feel great the rest of the day. I can run, do pushups, etc. I couldn't do that way back when I was in high school spending my time in a basement playing Wolfenstein and watching horror movies, all the while stuffing my face and lamenting my lack of a girlfriend.

      --

      lorem ipsum, dolor sit amet
    2. Re:The real problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I can't eat what I want and do what I want, living a long life is pointless. I'd rather live a short life that I can enjoy than a long life living like a monk.

    3. Re:The real problem by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "But the fact remains that being fat will kill you early,"
      No, it's not. In fact a recent study showed that fat people lived longer;which is counter intuitive to the fact that they do have issues.
      It is very interesting, but in the last 4 year some really good studies have been done that have lead to some seriously counter intuitive results.

      here is a nice summary of the study I mentioned:

      http://junkfoodscience.blogspot.com/2007/11/fat-and-long-life-obesity-crisis-is.html

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:The real problem by TomorrowPlusX · · Score: 1

      I've read some of those studies -- it's quite interesting. The ones I've read ( admittedly in NewScientist ) referred to *overweight* people and not obese people. And that being said, I think I was a bit harsh in my original post. There's no real health problem with being merely overweight. It's obesity that shortens life, or at the very least the quality of life.

      I'll read the summary you linked.

      --

      lorem ipsum, dolor sit amet
    5. Re:The real problem by uanimosity · · Score: 1

      Health is one of the reasons I've been turning things around. I've lost roughly 200 lbs in 3 years with another 80 (220lbs overall weight) to go. And the changes weren't all that dramatic, but just made sense. Drank way less pop, had an apple or grapes instead of a bag of chips, and i started working out. Now I'm at the point where i can do Martial arts, but I'm still the biggest guy in my class. Trying to find a single cause for the rise in obesity is like trying to say there is 1 solution for it. There isn't. If there was, over 60% of north America wouldn't be considered overweight, and 1/2 of them extreme cases. For me, it's relatively simple; Do your homework, ask questions and try it to see what works for you. I've known people who have lost 8 pounds in a month not lifting a finger physically, but eating very healthy and controlling their portions. But for me, physical activity helps immensely. Another problem i think is people refer to it as "Weight Loss", whereas what you want to lose is the "Fat/Water" weight. Not all weight is bad; if you gain 20 lbs of lean muscle, your metabolism rises and you're more fit then you were. However some people were concerned when they "Put on 20 lbs" even if it is muscle, because of the mislabel. It's euphemistic language because no one wants to say "i got a little fatter" vs "i put on a little bit of weight". My father had severe medical problems surrounding his death. he was a diabetic since his early twenties, and died of Cirrhosis of the liver, and multiple organ failure. Seeing that happen when you're 20 gets you thinking, let me tell you.

  66. Freudian slip by GottMitUns · · Score: 0

    EATERbrook - , eh?

  67. "Parental responsibility" by Dirtside · · Score: 1

    So one of the replies I always see on discussions like this is that it's about "parental responsibility". The parents aren't taking responsibility, so we don't need to do anything as a society -- let's just blame bad parents.

    Well, blaming bad parents and exhorting them in Slashdot posts to do better isn't going to make a damn bit of difference, except maybe to the small percentage of the overall population who are 1) parents and 2) read Slashdot. But having parents take better care of their kids probably is the result we want, rather than relying on laws or litigation to do the parts of the job that parents should be doing themselves.

    So how do we get our parents to be better parents? That's the real question.

    --
    "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  68. 1960s = no such thing as diet for kids by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

    I was born in 1959. When I was a kid, I ate all the junk food I could, and I was skinny as a rail. All kids my age did the same, but there no child obesity crises. Diet coke? Are you kidding, that sort of thing was strictly for old people. But, we didn't have video games.

    This report is obviously biased, but he may be partially right.

  69. It's the chips, not the WoW by Joce640k · · Score: 1

    "hes sitting there playing WoW with a bag of potato chips."

    I suspect the chip-cramming causes his weight problem, not the WoW or lack of exercise.

    "if you watch Super Size Me theres a man in that film that ate over 10,000 big macs in his life time and looks completely fine"

    IIRC the guy ate Big Macs but didn't eat any fries or drink soda. Big difference.

    --
    No sig today...
  70. Yea..that's why I am fat by Cpt_Jean_Luc+_Picard · · Score: 1

    I am 6'3 and weigh in at a whopping 140 pounds.I play loads of video games...I hardly touch McDonalds. Eating McDonalds and playing video games all day is NOT good. Try getting outside sometime...fucking hate people who put allllllll the blame on ONE thing and one thing only. TV, vid games, fast food, hell if you eat McDonalds and other crap and read books all day you will get fat from NOT MOVING. Unless you're blessed with a high metabolism then FUCKING MOVE PEOPLE.

  71. Fat and mean... by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

    why am I suddenly reminded of a certain german kid caught on youtube recently?

  72. Cultural as well. by Shivetya · · Score: 1

    I do believe he is right in a sense. You cannot compare the US to those countries so simply as it leaves out too many variables.

    One thing I do note that makes a big difference is that parents of the current and maybe even previous generation are far more concerned with themselves than their children. We have more disposable income than generations raised in the seventies which in turn has resulted in many more things for adults to have to occupy their time. We then have the cycle where some people get stuck in wanting more and more and thereby reducing the time they allot to their children.

    As such the children are left idle more here than in other countries so the higher fat and calorie intakes affect children here more. Combine with the abundance of food and junk food and its a double whammy. I can compare different parents easily just in my sister's own neighborhood. You can tell those who focus on their children and those who don't simply by observing the kids. From how outgoing they are to even their weight. Sorry, there just isn't an excuse for a 200lb 8th grader. Yet I can see the same in the parents. But wait you say, its genetic. Yeah, until I look at their wedding pictures and wonder where the dashing young man went and his hard body wife went...

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
  73. Simple forumla by Tozog · · Score: 1

    (Calories In) - (Calories Burned) = (Net Calories)

    If (Net Calories) > 0, Weight++
    If (Net Calories) 0, Weight--

    McDonald's could negatively contribute to the (Calories In) part of the equation.
    Video games could negatively contribute to the (Calories Burned) part of the equation, if video games edge out enough physical activity.

    1. Re:Simple forumla by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Great programming there, slick.
      If net calories are zero, there is no weight loss. if it is negative then weight--

      There are other factors as well. For example stress can cause you to metabolize the food differently. This means if your diet doesn't change, but your stress level increase, you end up with more fat.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  74. I know I'm replying to a "troll" message, but .... by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    Do you *really* think today's society has more "creeps" in it than previous generations??

    I'd argue that the numbers haven't changed a bit. The only thing that HAS changed, really, is our communications abilities. Just as before the advent of motorized transportation, most people had very little idea about social differences in communities other than their own, we're learning a LOT more about all the "fetishes", "variants of normal", and "alternate lifestyles" of people with the advent of "Internet access for all".

    Right now, if I really wanted to, I could probably search around IRC and other chat rooms on the net for 30 or 45 minutes, and eventually find some little group of individuals exchanging child porn, or a group devoted to teens hooking up with older men, or you name it. This doesn't prove that society has more creeps in it today than in the past. It just means that now, they have a visibility that wasn't present before, because of the new methods of communications they employ.

    By the same token, law enforcement has leveraged the Internet as a means to warn people of those convicted of such crimes. 20 or 30 years ago, if a child molester lived on your block, chances are you never knew (or it was just some unsubstantiated rumor floating around). Now, you can do a lookup on a web page and get a map showing their exact location.

  75. Sin tax by Rebycman · · Score: 1

    Well if the major media companies can get the public to listen to this FUD then they can increase your monthly cable bill as a quasi sin tax. "You have to pay more to offset the cost of health care for the fat children affected by the violent video games." Oh crap I forgot, don't give them any ideas!

  76. honestly... by ImTheDarkcyde · · Score: 1

    Why are gamers so defensive? How can you even deny games have hurt the american physiquie? Just because you might consider yourself fit doesn't mean you A) Are, or B) are representitive of every gamer

    No, of course McDonalds doesn't help. But it doesn't hurt either, what hurts is people who eat there full well knowing how unhealthy it is. People who eat there and then decide to go home and play Tekken for 6 hours, or WoW, or any game, and then doing it again tomorrow.

  77. Wrong - it's not fatty foods by c0d3g33k · · Score: 1

    I just read through most of "Good Calories, Bad Calories" by Gary Taubes (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gary_Taubes), and he makes a convincing case for the notion that fat is not the evil we've been taught to believe by the medical community and the popular press. I'll be reviewing the original literature source Taubes himself used (one of the benefits of access to Medline etc) to make my own conclusions, but the facts point to excess carbohydrates, not fat and inactivity as the cause for the current obesity epidemic.

    One should of course take this with a grain of salt (watch the blood pressure) - nutrition science is terribly complex. But I prefer rigorous analysis of the facts over "buy my diet book because I need to pay the rent and get on Oprah". The fact that the book is a painstaking slog through the research data is almost enough by itself to convince me to take it seriously - the target audience is definitely not the "just tell me what to eat" crowd.

  78. Keeping kids indoors? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    We always get this same argument over and over again. Video games are bad because they are apparently keeping kids indoors and making them socially inept and fat.

    But my question is, why doesn't anyone ever have the same problem with books?

    Books, like video games:
    1. Keep you indoors (the glare from trying to read outside stops me reading outdoors anyway)
    2. Are a sit-down sit-still activity (discounting the Wii, and overzealous gamers)
    3. Allow people to escape into sometimes inappropriate fantasy worlds

  79. I hate to be the one to break it to you by spun · · Score: 3, Funny

    I read your entire post and it's well thought out and interesting.

    But, I have to admit, I sort of wanted some cake to go with it. The cake is a lie.
    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    1. Re:I hate to be the one to break it to you by VGPowerlord · · Score: 1

      I'm making a note here: HUGE SUCCESS

      --
      GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
  80. Burger King & Gaming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Given that McDonalds are blasting video games for contributing to obesity, it's funny to note that their main competitor, Burger King, put out three video games for kids to play.

    It might even be ironic, but the proper usage of that term probably doesn't apply (If it did, then this comment would be ironic).

  81. Peanut butter should not be in your list. by DigitalReverend · · Score: 1

    While some brands of peanut butter have a small amount of trans fats (very small to make it negligible), it is one of the healthiest things you can eat. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peanut_butter

    --
    I read Slashdot for the headlines, because the headlines, unlike the articles, are usually original and never duplicated
  82. Two words... by Ang31us · · Score: 1

    Wii Fit

    Two more words...Wii Boxing

    Where does this greedy atery-clogging, "Super-Size Me" executive get off blaming video games for something that the fast-food industry's focus on cheap and un-healthy food is largely responsible for?

  83. Gamers should boycott McDonald's by Ang31us · · Score: 1

    With this ridiculous statement from McDonald's as our reason for it. I think I feel my blood boiling as my "nerd rage" overflows.

  84. It ain't the games or the fat by thethibs · · Score: 1

    Don't forget, we have known for ages that video games make us fat and mean.

    In actuality there are a lot of well-controlled studies showing that kids on high-carb diets get fat whether they exercise or not (which explains why Americans on the whole are getting more obese at the same time that they are exercising more and eating less fat). The poison at McDonalds is not the fat but the sugar—an addictive drug.

    "Fat makes you fat" is attractive because it's easy to understand. But it's dead wrong. The truth is more complicated than that—complicated enough to be beyond the ken of most journalists, politicians and health bureaucrats. So they keep telling us that fat is bad for us, not because it's true, but because it's simple, and they have to tell us something.

    To put it into a familiar context, they're telling us to cure buffer overflows by eliminating buffers.

    To learn more, search on insulin, adenosine, lipolysis, read the journal papers, follow the trail. You may want dictionary.com in another window—I did. The good news for most of us is that caffeine counteracts adenosine—not only keeping us alert but helping to keep us skinny.

    --
    I'm a Programmer. That's one level above Software Engineer and one level below Engineer.
    1. Re:It ain't the games or the fat by gujo-odori · · Score: 1

      Spot-on. Too much fat can have negative effects on cholesterol levels and heart health, but eating fat doesn't make you fat. A calorie from fat is not more fattening than, say, a calorie from fish. However, fat does have a lot of calories in it; because fast-food tends to be high in fat, it packs a lot calories, and eating a lot more calories than needed will cause weight gain. The sugar only makes it worse, or course. Comedians tell jokes about people getting a double quarter-pounder with cheese and a super-sized fries, then ordering a Diet Coke with it, but the Diet Coke is actually a pretty smart thing to do.

      As for gaming making people fat, all I can say is "What's he on?" Insofar as I remember when the original Pong came out, I wasn't a gamer as a child for the simple reason that there weren't any game consoles until I was in my teens already. However, I was an avid reader and spent at least as much time reading as avid gamers spend playing video games, and reading is definitely far more sedentary than gaming. I know a lot of gamers and participate occasionally myself. Gamers move around a lot more than readers do, and good games can definitely get your heart rate up. Using a Wii is practically exercise :p Despite the sedentary hobby, I was never overweight as a child, not even a little bit.

      So, I spent at least as much time at a sedentary activity when I was a kid as today's gamers do, but I wasn't fat. In fact, fat kids were just plain rare when I was in grade school. Now, they're pretty thick on the ground, so to speak. What was different back then? A couple things that I can think of: I (and most kids) ate way less fast good, junk food, and other prepared food than kids today, and even junk food wasn't as bad. Drinks and other junk foods that used sugar in those days no use high-fructose corn syrup, which is worse than sugar.

      I know that a CEO has to promote his company, it's part of his job, but a statement like "Gaming is what makes kids fat" is just embarrassing.

  85. Monteczuma's by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

    Real revenge!

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  86. What's wrong with a little hunger? by pyrr · · Score: 1

    It's foolish, as many have pointed out, to take advice from a fast-food company's CEO.

    There's also a large component of lifestyle in addition to food intake that contributes to obesity. Lifestyle includes the level of daily activity, and certainly flailing around a WII or getting worked-up at a game is still pretty low on the activity scale, while still a bit above, say, sleeping or reading. Lifestyle also includes dietary choices, such as what to eat and how much.

    The latter is what I'm getting at in my subject line. For some reason, hunger is somehow "evil" and must be waged war upon! I can confidently say that starving is a bad thing. This notion that, if a child anywhere in the USA (and apparently the UK too per this article) is experiencing a pang of hunger from missing a meal or an afternoon snack, the society will collapse into a bloody revolution or something, is almost as silly as my hyperbole in this sentence. I think if more kids were brought-up to eat when they became hungry, and only eat enough to "not be hungry for a few hours", obesity wouldn't be such a problem. Choices on what to eat also factor in, but McDonald's isn't the sole culprit. When I'm hungry, I eat at the first reasonable opportunity, and eat only enough to keep me from being hungry until slightly before my next opportunity to eat. If I get too hungry between opportunities, I'll graze on snacks. If I'm not hungry at a given opportunity to eat (such as lunch), I pass up the opportunity. I'm on the lean side, that's probably one of the factors.

    I also think a lot of the bad eating habits have to do with that crap kids' parents insist on, such as "cleaning your plate" and "thinking of the starving waifs in Ethiopia who have no food". You know what? I came to the realization when I was rather young that eating all my food, when I KNEW it would make me uncomfortably full, simply wasn't going to vicariously help ANY of the suffering, starving children in Ethiopia. I was happy I wasn't starving, but being uncomfortable by eating too much wasn't going to make me any more grateful for having food.

    Moreover, I think anytime a parent has to tell a kid to clean a plate on a regular basis, they're not paying enough attention and are basically force-feeding the poor thing. I have four animals in my household (cat, dog, horses), and they usually aren't hitting weight extremes. All it takes is paying attention to whether they're looking a bit too much on the fleshy or thin side, and adjusting the amount or richness of their diets accordingly. I don't worry too much if they *want* more, I do make note of if they're leaving a lot behind (except in the case of the cat, who regulates her intake on free-choice well enough), and go by the old rule of thumb, "ribs shouldn't be seen, but should be easily felt with minimal pressure". Parents and caretakers who fail to pay attention to these things with an objective eye and make decisions accordingly are responsible for their fat-ass kids, not video games, not McDonald's, not society, Iran, or anyone else. The buck stops with the parents. You just can't generally trust children or animals to make appropriate dietary decisions for themselves.

  87. Actually, it's often the opposite. by WebCowboy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    does fast food cause violence?

    Though sugar- and caffeine-laden drinks can perhaps wind a person up, most of a typical fast-food menu would probably leave you feeling lethargic and feeling a bit calmer, due to the high-fat content and other chemicals such as the enzymes in the cheese on your burger. That's what's a bit perverse about a lot of restaurant meals--not only will they make you feel fat, they'll put you in a lazy mood so you are less motivated to be active. When those effects wear off you'll feel tired and grumpy, then you'll want to eat more bad food to get that mild euphoria again.

    Anyways, this McDonalds bigwig is actually talking out of hid butt. Video games don't make people fat--the lack of physical activity is what partly contributes to weight gain. Some video games are GOOD for your health...how many morbidly obese people have YOU seen playing the advanced levels on DDR for example? And many Nintendo Wii titles certainly encourage people to get up and move. In any case, sedentary video-game playing is only partly the cause of weight gain. The other much bigger contributer to weight gain is excessive caloric intake. Kids who don't snack and skip meals because they are compulsively playing video games are SKINNY kids (still unhealthy, but skinny). Kids who snack on junk food and eat Big Macs between levels are FAT kids.

    Research has now widely shown that thoguh exercise is essential to good health, by far the largest single contributer to obesity is DIET. It only takes moments longer to eat a supersized value meal than it does to eat a regular value meal, but it takes a half-hour of moderate activity to burn off the extra calories...worse yet, you can eat a fast food meal faster than you can eat a home-cooked meal, but it would take an extra hour of moderate activity to burn off the calories. As far as fixing obesity goes, priority one should be fixing people's over-processed, carb-loaded, calorie-dense diet.

    That said, though, McDonald's is not the most evil of offenders in providing us with easy access to a nasty diet and it really does get far more flak than it deserves (perhaps because it is a big corporation that markets toward children which amplifies the focus on McDo). The baddest, most evil food-mongers are most of the "casual dining" restaurant franchises, primarily because of their insanely huge portions (especially in the United States). Appetiser platters at these eateries are actually large enough for 2 to 4 complete meals. "Meal sized" salads can approach 1500 Calories. Surveys have been done that show that "healthy choice" or "lighter fare" meals even have excessive portions...too much of even a good thing will make you fat.

    1. Re:Actually, it's often the opposite. by nschubach · · Score: 1

      That's what's a bit perverse about a lot of restaurant meals--not only will they make you feel fat, they'll put you in a lazy mood so you are less motivated to be active. When those effects wear off you'll feel tired and grumpy, then you'll want to eat more bad food to get that mild euphoria again.
      So that's why I've been reading Slashdot more often after lunch... I don't feel like doing actual work.
      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
  88. Gamer that does not eat McDonalds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am a gamer. I play like 15hrs a week plus I am a developer. That is 60 -80 hrs a week on a chair.

    The funny part is that I am not fat!!!!

    The only reason that I have for my non fatness is that

    I DON'T EAT AT MCDONALDS!!!

  89. Conspiaacy? by Doug52392 · · Score: 0

    Could McDonald's be being paid by a politician (or Jack Thompson), to say that??? And what about the Wii. All though the Will can't compare to actual excersize, but it's a start. Hey McDonalds, you want the truth: your to blame. See, I did what the McDonald's CEO did. I decide I believe a right-wing conspiracy theory, then, using inductive reasoning, decided to blame an entire industry for one problem, that doesn't even make seanse. What McDonald's just said is the equivalent to saying: Microsoft Windows powers many computers Lots of kids are spending too much time online Microsoft is to blame for childhood obesity! Now he'll go find a politician or well-respected figure, tell him this, and force him to say it to the world, or just say it himself.

  90. Humans are horrible at assessing risk by PIPBoy3000 · · Score: 1

    My kids love hearing tales of horrible injuries for some reason. I started to rattle off the bike and car accidents that hit our family over the years. In one, my dad had part of his scalp peeled back (no helmet) when hit by a car on his bike. In another, my 3 year-old sister was in the back seat without a seat belt during a car accident. Then there was the time I was hit by a motorcycle while on my bike - neither one was wearing a helmet and the motorcycle rider got some serious hospital bills.

    I think there's some risks, such as abduction, which are completely overblown. My wife was admitting she sometimes worries about it last night. I told her she should worry about heart disease instead. I tell my kids they shouldn't worry about monsters, they should worry about dogs off their leashes or walking in the street.

    Personally I'm quite happy with the level of parenting I give my kids, which includes managing their screen time and amount of exercise. Plus they're not doing the crazy things I used to do, like ride the bus downtown at age five or climb cliffs in the rain without ropes when I was twelve. Insanity . . .

  91. Too bad studies have shown that NOT to be true by geekoid · · Score: 1

    Kids who have TV or Video games taken away do not lose the weight. They just do another activity that is Just as sedentary.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  92. School buses have seatbelts by georgeha · · Score: 1

    at least the one I was one in the fall did. When was the last time you were on a school bus?

  93. No - parenting is very important by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1
    One of the best things you can do to live a long and healthy life is to pick parents who live long and healthy lives!

    Thanks mom & dad!

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  94. I'm so sorry... by hxftw · · Score: 1

    that you were abused by being let outside to play and exercise so often, are you still able to live a normal life?

    --
    Just because an idea is popular doesn't make it right.
  95. The Science of Obesity by cbarcus · · Score: 2, Informative

    Just a short time ago, Slashdot ran an article that talked about Gary Taubes latest book Good Calories Bad Calories: Challenging the Convention Wisdom on Diet, Weight Control, and Disease. How many Slashdot'ers actually examined what this article was all about? It appears that many posters have not given this topic the consideration it needs.

    In short, Taubes argues very thoroughly and persuasively that there is much known about the cause of fat accumulation, and it goes very much against what the medical establishment claims. Anyone who has not closely looked at this matter is very likely in the dark about what is going on in our bodies, regardless of what they've heard or believe. Carbohydrates, specifically refined carbohydrates like white flour and sugar are the main culprits. Obesity is a disease that occurs because of poor nutrition, not because of poor willpower, gluttony, and sloth.

    Here are the relevant links:

    New York Times Magazine article from 2002: http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9F04E2D61F3EF934A35754C0A9649C8B63
    MIT interview about the above article: http://web.mit.edu/knight-science/fellows/interviews/taubes.html
    Taubes' recent article about the role of exercise: http://nymag.com/news/sports/38001/


    Happy reading! And good luck staying healthy!

    1. Re:The Science of Obesity by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
      Sorry. I used up my last mod point before getting to you.

      "Insightful!"


      -FL

    2. Re:The Science of Obesity by nido · · Score: 1

      The original /. story on Taubes' book also included a link to an mp3 of an interview. Which I thought was quite interesting.

      I've got one person applying the low-carb philosophy, and she's doing quite well - the extra pounds are just melting off. We've got her fight-or-flight response pretty much under control now, and that's probably most important overall.

      --
      Learn the rules so you know how to break them properly.
      www.teslabox.com
  96. Halo 3 Tastes Like Chicken by CandlJack · · Score: 0

    If video games cause people to get fat then why don't just they start putting the nutrition facts on the labels? This way we can better work them into our diets.

  97. I Blame too much Food by okmijnuhb · · Score: 1

    Video games have no calories, therefore are not fattening.
    Food intake is the soul source of body fat.

  98. Tell Ronald to stay the frack away from my kids by jeko · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'll make you a deal.

    Tell Ronald to pull his creepy pedophile advertising from all the children's shows. Tell him to quit bribing my school board for access to the classroom for his "special presentations." Tell him to keep his Richard-Simmons fat ass away from whispering in my children's ears 24/7 "McDonald's is cool and magical and if your Mommy and Daddy will take you there Grimace has a special present for you."

    Pull his multi-billion dollar marketing machine away from my children's playground. Stop cramming preternatural amounts of fat, sugar and salt into their food so that my children's hindbrains don't scream "My God, we found the mother lode, we'll never need to eat again!" at the first whiff. Tell Ronald to quit fucking around with the peace in my home, and I'll lay off trying to shove him in jail with all the other fat, middle-aged men who wanna wear makeup and play with little kids.

    Yes, I keep my kids away from that crap, but I'm sick of Ronald spending billions of dollars worming his way into my kids' dreams telling them that Mommy and Daddy are keeping them from something special.

    Parental Responsibility?! How would you react if I followed your kid around all day telling them "I'll take you to McMagicFairyLand if your Mommy and Daddy will let me..."

    --
    He put his boots up on the table and made a face. "The sig," he smirked. "You can waste your life in search of the sig."
    1. Re:Tell Ronald to stay the frack away from my kids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I made my kids watch the bit from Fast Food Nation about the kill floor and as if by magic...Ronald is no longer someone they look up to...

    2. Re:Tell Ronald to stay the frack away from my kids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      him to keep his Richard-Simmons fat ass away from whispering in my children's ears 24/7 "McDonald's is cool and magical and if your Mommy and Daddy will take you there Grimace has a special present for you."


      Really? He's actually following your children around?!?! Amazing!

      And this advertising is actually forcing you to head to McDonalds often enough to be concerned about obesity? Wow.

      Two of my children are 6 & 4 years old...both prime target market for McDonald's advertising. Do we eat at McDonalds? yes. About 2 - 4 times a month. Would they have it more often if they thought it was an option? Probably.

      But at our house, they KNOW it is not their choice. There is no point in begging, whining, crying, etc about it...doing so results in punishment. Consistently.

      As a result, they never ask anymore. They know food choices are not up to them at their age...that's a Mom & Dad decision. They also know WHY Mom & Dad make the choices we do. The know McDonald's is not a healthy choice, but is a treat food that should be treated as such.

      Other than the US phenomenon of crap food at the schools, I believe all of this obesity responsibility lies squarely on the shoulders of the parents. Nobody is forcing crap food down your children's throats other than you.

      Teach your children what to eat & why. Don't let them make nutrition decisions until they are responsible enough to do so. Encourage regular, fun exercise.

      Don't blame corporations for catering to their market. The market made McDonald's, not the other way around.

  99. Gym class. . ? by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 2, Informative

    When I was a kid, video games were in their toddlership; the Apple ][ and the C64 were big when I was 'Stand By Me' age. --And I played a LOT of them. And I read tons of books. And watched too much TV, and was engaged in a bunch of other quiet desk-y activities which included things like dice and soldering irons. But I also liked to climb trees and ride my bike all over creation, and play the odd sports and even cross a suicidal train bridge with by friends now and again. --And in gym class, we had to run around the school yard perimeter three times every school day. That's about a mile! Every day. Running. What the heck? We were all in pretty great shape!

    Life hasn't changed that much for kids except that the TV and video game quotient has crept up, (but not by so much), and McFries along with much of our food supply now uses GM vegetable oil. (McFries used to be cooked with animal fat back in the good old days when the oils wouldn't break down under heating into toxins; but that's another story. . ).

    And yet there has been a distinct change, and I don't think it is linked to any one thing; not to video games or TV or our diets. I think it's a collective build-up of unhealthy and limiting forces, no one of which is going to tip the scales on its own. But it's there. People today are in general, less interesting. I'm sorry, you youngsters our there, but it's true. There's a curve of sorts going on. Want to test it? Do the following. . .

    Sit down with a sampling of regular burger-eating, TV-watching twenty-year-olds, (I should note that this does not apply to people who have disengaged from all the normal culprit lifestyles), and ask about their lives and their childhoods. Listen to their stories. Then do the same thing with a bunch of people in their late thirties and early forties. Move through the decades. --You'll begin to really notice the trend with people who were born in the fifties and sixties.

    I did that for a while without particularly planning to measure anything; I was just in a phase where I was meeting lots of people, and was stunned by just how much more alive people seemed who had been born in the earlier decades. --I knew this one girl who must be in her late forties by now, who when she was a kid burned down a garage in the middle of one of her adventures. She and her gang also used to hike through the city ravine system which back then could take you from one end of the city to the other without needing to abandon the tree line, and they knew when all their various abusive parents would be away so that they could raid their separate kitchens en masse for lunch without being spotted. They'd take in fifty-cent films down at the Kingsway with the gang sitting along the entire front row passing roaches made from wild marijuana they'd picked in the forest and rolled into joints the size of 12 gage cigars. --One time they went to their favorite baseball field only to find that the Toronto chapter of the Hell's Angels had settled in for the day. --So they challenged them to a baseball game, and everybody ended up having one of the most exciting days of their lives.

    Shit. I was born in the early Seventies, and my stories weren't nearly so bloody or amazing. --I did a few cool things; I burned down a fence one time trying to reverse-engineer fireworks, and I stole a shipment of wonderbread from a grocery store with my friends one night on a whim.

    But I know a guy who was born in the fifties who has stories like Indiana Jones. And a thirteen year-old today whose big adventure was that she lost her cell phone and had to go looking for it in the woods.

    --Now, I know this is not the norm. There are placid people in all times. --And adventurous ones, too. But it's the style and depth of adventure which I notice seems to have diminished over the decades. George Lucas used to be into street racing and hot rods; American Graffiti was drawn from his own teen years. Most of the young wannabe directors I meet today just watch movies. And

  100. Hmmmmm..... by IHC+Navistar · · Score: 1

    I played BurgerTime on my old NES when I was a kid, yet I didn't get fat.

    --
    Knowing Google's lust for data collection, the Soviet Union is still alive and well inside the psyche of Sergey Brin....
  101. Pot. Kettle. Black. by Satan's+Crowbar · · Score: 1

    Oh Steve. You are a blueberry muffin of creamy, creamy fun. Jibber on about your salads and your apples (Apples! At McDonalds!) until the cows come home, but in the end you'll have to admit that next to no-one buys those and that those dumpling-shaped kids your company has raised still love the taste of your Lard Burger and that parents still buy them.

  102. "calories", not "health" by Joce640k · · Score: 1

    Peanut butter is healthy, sure, but one of the most calorie-laden foods in the house.

    --
    No sig today...
  103. At MacDonalds... by Z00L00K · · Score: 1
    • You know what you get. (for good and bad... - but usually no surprises regardless of where in the world you are.)
    • You get what you deserve. (or why did you enter that outfit?)
    --
    If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  104. Blame obesity for video games? :o) by MessyBlob · · Score: 1

    You could argue that the other way around (blaming obesity for video games), but I wouldn't want to try...

  105. erm... by Tom · · Score: 1

    Yeah, that is probably why people like me (lots of games, nearly no fast-food) are slim and so many of the "typical american fuckups" (lots of TV, very little games, lots of fast-food) are fat like hell.

    Sorry, dude, if you live on a diet of McShit food, there is no way you can move enough to burn that amount of fat and calories unless you are hyperactive and a pro in at least three different sports.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  106. This is so lame by them... by jskline · · Score: 1

    Facts are now that I stopped patronizing them because I really got tired of ordering food that came swimming (literally) in the box full of cooking oil!!

    They just don't want a federal law being passed that requires them to change the product they push. Many people here have gotten tired of going to Micky-D's and having to talk to someone on a lousy speaker that barely understands English, then getting a sandwich that usually is completely wrong, and that swims in a half-inch of oil in the box, along with it leaking out and soaking the bag, which then soaks your car seats.... you get the picture.

    Stop buying the stuff and the obesity issue should begin to alleviate.
    Cheers!

    --
    All content in this message is copyright (c) 2008. All rights reserved. RIAA is prohibited here.
  107. Video burgers? by Philippe+McIntyre · · Score: 1

    Fastfood chains are KNOWN for promoting action movies and video games spin out as a result or vise versa. So merit equals zero to what they said here.

  108. Hypocrisy by DeanCubed · · Score: 1

    Maybe that CEO should be aware that McDonald's has a deal with Nintendo to put N64s and GameCubes in their PlayPlace areas, and that they've also made it completely kid-friendly to play their DS systems online with McDonalds' WiFi connection.

    --
    Born to Play