We ought to string up the owners of this company by the nearest tree. And others who runs similar companies. This is clear betrayal against their fellow Americans for financial interest. Everyone e who lives in the USA knows we're in a cold war with our own government. Just a matter of time before it heats up
Not allowing the owners of the chips
to load custom firmware onto the chips is an atrocious practice.
That would be the equivalent of maintaining hidden root access on a system that doesn't belong to you and relegating the legitimate owner to a shadow fake root. If you're going to require signed firmware images on a piece of kit then you need to include the private key to sign new firmware to anyone with with your chip in their equipment.
If you plan on your information being compromised in the first place then you don't have to bother with security. If your business depends on hiding information, and your business should not receive protection by society. It is not in the interests of the people to allow information hoarding by large business
Life vs humans. Humans are destruction to all life including themselves, limitations of scale, may make it seem otherwise, but that's just because we are still in play. Mid destruction. We won't quit overstepping until everything's dead including us. That's humans for you. Destructive intelligence.
Desperation creates and motivates radicals. Society manufactures desperation in one or more demographics in order to create a safe harbor for other demographics. You you can spread it around until it's a lesser degree of strife and annoyance spread out across demographics, aka small tribess and nomads. Or you can build Society, which requires our culture that demonizes end justifies the exploitation of the masses, I'm demonizing of certain key behaviors, to shift the labor and efforts to those manufactured criminals and low classes
People on the Spectrum tend to be more intelligent the normal people and most of the problems autistic and those with Asperger's , are result of our culture demanding that they fail. Because the rest of us can't keep up with them if they are allowed to thrive. If you'd suck a bunch of people with autism and Asperger's and gave them their own City they would quickly outpaced the rest of society and no one none of the normies would be able to predict or curtail them because normies can't relate. This leads to a resentment on a primal level. and people with Autism or allowed to thrive Without Shame then the rest of us will never catch up and the future will be controlled by something different then what is now.
Nobody is entitled to anything silly. I'm from pragmatic Viewpoint doesn't really matter if I'm entitled and not all that matters is if I willing and able to do something
If you're trying to assess for threats you're going to observe a whole lot more if you're not busy blather on about nothing. Small talk is what enables threats to disguise themselves. 90% of communication is nonverbal and subconscious. Small talk allows us to distract people from honest observation and replace it with posturing and prepared deceptions
Is not for safety this is for better interference and destruction of freedoms.
And the light there is no safety because everyone can see you the target you. While in the dark nobody can see you to Target you in the first place.
The darkness provides important refuge and safety from assailants and unsavory characters
Come now, as a fellow American, I have to call you out. Our culture is is immature, nieve, rough, stobborn unnecessarily pigheaded, and ultimately hypocritical. Because we are a child nation with guns and a thirst for blood, compared to the rest of the world. It's hardly fair to scapegoat all of Humanity for the limitations of Americans
Murder is a legal definition. Outside if law there is no murder. Just animals killing animals. Also it's kinder to kill someone then to twist who they are through forced condition until they are but a Shadow of themselves. Is more ethical to let someone die as themselves then to twist them into your own privately acceptable monster
It's always more than one way to approach the problem. It Is more ethical to prevent a life then it is to allow an existing life to suffer. So adjust our environment to to make a successful pregnancy more difficult to achieve.
Because it's the tiny obscura sites these days that tend to hold unique or useful information. Ever since the internet went mainstream you've had to dig deeper and deeper to get uncensored data doesn't wrongfully imply that there isn't a way to do what you're trying to do. Civil disobedience is the last recourse against malignant rules and Order. is important the people free access to information so that they may make a law irrelevant, it is the last defense of freedom.the ability to disobey At will. If we lose that then we lose any chance at a life worth living.
What is the US Military has not stayed within the bounds and scope of our national borders four years US military is out of control. We have no claim to influence on events in the rest of the world. Every Act of military force by the usa, outside our borders is an act of undue aggression upon territories which we do not and should not have any legitimate opinion or interference with. U. S. Military is a bully because when it comes time to back the fuck off cuz it's not US Territory they continually trespass and murder natives within their own countries
One rule though means that you only have one rule that challenge in order to resume abuse of the network. Every state having their own provides additional redundancy and safety to prevent loss of net neutrality.
That sounds all high-and-mighty until we examine what standards are. when examined standards are nothing more than he said she said built up and piled over each other over time. He said this is wrong she said this is right. and because nobody came along and set them straight saying hey dude that's just your opinion that doesn't apply to other people then it's stuck around and got mistaken as fact. Standards aren'tmore than opinions mislabeled. It deceptive concept , the falsely pushes The View that there is a right way to do things rather than simply different ways to do things.and need to get the hell out of our laws
After all the telecoms success of today was made possible by grants from the from the public, by all honest accounting the public own these isps that claimed to be private because it's our money that built them.
So what if California seizes Network infrastructure through eminent domain, makes a Statewide Intranet. Returning legal domain and regulation to the state instead of the federal government. Then they can simply refused to do business with any of the isps until the isps cater to them. There's too much business done over the internet in California. And those who hold stock in is peace also tend to hold stock in business is supported by the internet. The companies will cave because profit drives you just need to starve them for profits it's long enough to make it in their financial interest to behave ethically. Please us or lose billions. Give the customers what they want or go out of business.that's fair
Evolution is highly misunderstood. Evolution is not a never-ending progression to Excellence. If evolution is just means whatever is good enough not to die before it reproduces. Good enough not to die, is a pretty low standard. But it's all thar evolution deals in
Well if Google being allowed to accumulate power and wealth does not benefit the world populace in the end then what rational benefit is there to upholding values provide opportunities for Google to hold on to that wealth. The only reason for the poor to allow the rich to accumulate their wealth is if the rich act as custodians to the poor. Because it is only by the contributed efforts of the poor the values are maintained. in return for maintaining values that allow you to be successful we expect a return
What's the model for different people interacting in the world in general anytime a singular culture becomes dominant it becomes detrimental to the majority over time. Once a culture run out of other cultures to demonize, it turns on itself, splintering off segments of itself and creates new villains from its own numbers, to maintain artificial distinction and conflict and collective ego. Is only mutually assured destruction that keeps the peace with humans. It is only prevention of any dominant pattern the law allows people to choose peace instead of War.
The hackers and threats from other countries are not the biggest danger.the biggest danger is our own military overstepping its own bounds. concern is the our soldiers may fail to disobey their commanding officers when appropriate and through orders betray the interest of the Common Man.
Once they can get assault bots mainstreamed, then they can hack their wayaround,oversight,accountability. now that they can always just say that they got hacked they can do anything they want and make up any excuse and scapegoat anybody for it and then continue to do it. The hackability to the military is a feature they can use to distort the public View
Slashdot Mirror
We ought to string up the owners of this company by the nearest tree. And others who runs similar companies. This is clear betrayal against their fellow Americans for financial interest. Everyone e who lives in the USA knows we're in a cold war with our own government. Just a matter of time before it heats up
Not allowing the owners of the chips to load custom firmware onto the chips is an atrocious practice. That would be the equivalent of maintaining hidden root access on a system that doesn't belong to you and relegating the legitimate owner to a shadow fake root. If you're going to require signed firmware images on a piece of kit then you need to include the private key to sign new firmware to anyone with with your chip in their equipment.
If you plan on your information being compromised in the first place then you don't have to bother with security. If your business depends on hiding information, and your business should not receive protection by society. It is not in the interests of the people to allow information hoarding by large business
Life vs humans. Humans are destruction to all life including themselves, limitations of scale, may make it seem otherwise, but that's just because we are still in play. Mid destruction. We won't quit overstepping until everything's dead including us. That's humans for you. Destructive intelligence.
Desperation creates and motivates radicals. Society manufactures desperation in one or more demographics in order to create a safe harbor for other demographics. You you can spread it around until it's a lesser degree of strife and annoyance spread out across demographics, aka small tribess and nomads. Or you can build Society, which requires our culture that demonizes end justifies the exploitation of the masses, I'm demonizing of certain key behaviors, to shift the labor and efforts to those manufactured criminals and low classes
People on the Spectrum tend to be more intelligent the normal people and most of the problems autistic and those with Asperger's , are result of our culture demanding that they fail. Because the rest of us can't keep up with them if they are allowed to thrive. If you'd suck a bunch of people with autism and Asperger's and gave them their own City they would quickly outpaced the rest of society and no one none of the normies would be able to predict or curtail them because normies can't relate. This leads to a resentment on a primal level. and people with Autism or allowed to thrive Without Shame then the rest of us will never catch up and the future will be controlled by something different then what is now.
Nobody is entitled to anything silly. I'm from pragmatic Viewpoint doesn't really matter if I'm entitled and not all that matters is if I willing and able to do something
If you're trying to assess for threats you're going to observe a whole lot more if you're not busy blather on about nothing. Small talk is what enables threats to disguise themselves. 90% of communication is nonverbal and subconscious. Small talk allows us to distract people from honest observation and replace it with posturing and prepared deceptions
Therefore "progress" is malignant because it detracts from self adaptation
Is not for safety this is for better interference and destruction of freedoms. And the light there is no safety because everyone can see you the target you. While in the dark nobody can see you to Target you in the first place. The darkness provides important refuge and safety from assailants and unsavory characters
Come now, as a fellow American, I have to call you out. Our culture is is immature, nieve, rough, stobborn unnecessarily pigheaded, and ultimately hypocritical. Because we are a child nation with guns and a thirst for blood, compared to the rest of the world. It's hardly fair to scapegoat all of Humanity for the limitations of Americans
Profit is the undue gain , profit represent s how much more then fair you charged them. If in Equitable trade you break even..
Murder is a legal definition. Outside if law there is no murder. Just animals killing animals. Also it's kinder to kill someone then to twist who they are through forced condition until they are but a Shadow of themselves. Is more ethical to let someone die as themselves then to twist them into your own privately acceptable monster
It's always more than one way to approach the problem. It Is more ethical to prevent a life then it is to allow an existing life to suffer. So adjust our environment to to make a successful pregnancy more difficult to achieve.
Because it's the tiny obscura sites these days that tend to hold unique or useful information. Ever since the internet went mainstream you've had to dig deeper and deeper to get uncensored data doesn't wrongfully imply that there isn't a way to do what you're trying to do. Civil disobedience is the last recourse against malignant rules and Order. is important the people free access to information so that they may make a law irrelevant, it is the last defense of freedom .the ability to disobey At will. If we lose that then we lose any chance at a life worth living.
What is the US Military has not stayed within the bounds and scope of our national borders four years US military is out of control. We have no claim to influence on events in the rest of the world. Every Act of military force by the usa, outside our borders is an act of undue aggression upon territories which we do not and should not have any legitimate opinion or interference with. U. S. Military is a bully because when it comes time to back the fuck off cuz it's not US Territory they continually trespass and murder natives within their own countries
One rule though means that you only have one rule that challenge in order to resume abuse of the network. Every state having their own provides additional redundancy and safety to prevent loss of net neutrality.
That sounds all high-and-mighty until we examine what standards are. when examined standards are nothing more than he said she said built up and piled over each other over time. He said this is wrong she said this is right. and because nobody came along and set them straight saying hey dude that's just your opinion that doesn't apply to other people then it's stuck around and got mistaken as fact. Standards aren'tmore than opinions mislabeled. It deceptive concept , the falsely pushes The View that there is a right way to do things rather than simply different ways to do things.and need to get the hell out of our laws
After all the telecoms success of today was made possible by grants from the from the public, by all honest accounting the public own these isps that claimed to be private because it's our money that built them.
So what if California seizes Network infrastructure through eminent domain, makes a Statewide Intranet. Returning legal domain and regulation to the state instead of the federal government. Then they can simply refused to do business with any of the isps until the isps cater to them. There's too much business done over the internet in California. And those who hold stock in is peace also tend to hold stock in business is supported by the internet. The companies will cave because profit drives you just need to starve them for profits it's long enough to make it in their financial interest to behave ethically. Please us or lose billions. Give the customers what they want or go out of business .that's fair
Evolution is highly misunderstood. Evolution is not a never-ending progression to Excellence. If evolution is just means whatever is good enough not to die before it reproduces. Good enough not to die, is a pretty low standard. But it's all thar evolution deals in
Well if Google being allowed to accumulate power and wealth does not benefit the world populace in the end then what rational benefit is there to upholding values provide opportunities for Google to hold on to that wealth. The only reason for the poor to allow the rich to accumulate their wealth is if the rich act as custodians to the poor. Because it is only by the contributed efforts of the poor the values are maintained. in return for maintaining values that allow you to be successful we expect a return
What's the model for different people interacting in the world in general anytime a singular culture becomes dominant it becomes detrimental to the majority over time. Once a culture run out of other cultures to demonize, it turns on itself, splintering off segments of itself and creates new villains from its own numbers, to maintain artificial distinction and conflict and collective ego. Is only mutually assured destruction that keeps the peace with humans. It is only prevention of any dominant pattern the law allows people to choose peace instead of War.
The hackers and threats from other countries are not the biggest danger.the biggest danger is our own military overstepping its own bounds. concern is the our soldiers may fail to disobey their commanding officers when appropriate and through orders betray the interest of the Common Man.
Once they can get assault bots mainstreamed, then they can hack their wayaround ,oversight ,accountability. now that they can always just say that they got hacked they can do anything they want and make up any excuse and scapegoat anybody for it and then continue to do it. The hackability to the military is a feature they can use to distort the public View