The person who failed to put down his gun rather then storm the house and pull the trigger on a hearsay, is a the one who escalated the situation from unknown to definite physical harm the officer is directly responsible for the murder. Until officers are personally accountable without protection that a private citizen wouldn't have, the police will continue to shoot people to cover their own asses.
You know both his parents are Mormon? He was raised Mormons Trump's parents. And his grandparents. Mormons believe that women cannot make it to the highest level of Glory in the afterlife unless attached to a man. I also believe that every male has the potential to come the god of his own Universe one day. Now if you look into Financials. Mormon church owns and operates many llc's which Avast are forbidden from revealing who their Master is. Well we know businesses you hide information for up to no good. And businesses that conduct business ethically don't give a damn who knows what because it doesn't affect their bottom line. He learned everything from Mormonism. I grew up Mormon. Study unit in detail is what actually got me to give it up. I said I want to be a balanced person not a person who can only find security in inappropriate control of other people's money and actions.
Yeah but new works are generally created by people with a passion for their crap they get creative and find a way to do it regardless of financial status. All copyright law does is a enable people who are good at exploiting other people to lay claim to these inappropriately . Creative people will always feel compelled to create by their nature. Although a few artists May benefit financially through copyright the greatness of their work tends to sub suffer and more importantly Bad actors become empowered with the ability to influence and affect the rest of us. Without giving us a way to ignore those we disagree with we are forced waist beads diculous around some resources nationally on arguments over basically is the notion that whoever throws the biggest fit should get their way. And currently that notion is winning. If you give and Tantrums whether they be two year olds or adults you merely encourage more and empower the worst of humanity
Yeah but in this day and age if you have anything in your own name you are sorely naive and lacking in doing your due diligence to cover your own liability. If you layer your shit right then legality should be irrelevant
Yeah but everybody is responsible for tending to the snowball effects of their actions on others, and mitigating then that's just part of being a person who's not an enemy to those they do business with
As far as Dynamics almost nothing because it is a form of gambling. I said the major difference is that stocks our form of gambling that is protected from the normal cultural to stayed for gambling buy artificial legal contracts designed to legitimize it's deviancies.
Depends on what you want for your return if you just want stupid money which you already have them whatever you're just fucking around playing games make yourself feel important. Now they're after something we're having like the mainstreaming of new technology now that's something worth more than money. Any amount of moneyMoney is a small investment compared to a return of real world progress that can't be undone or reversed
It's no wonder , there is such a problem getting our economic system to actually distribute funds fairly. It's gambling with our country's well-being, find people I have no need for additional money for power simply an unhealthy desire for it, worst case they still be able to afford a a home to live in and food to eat, just not the luxurious shit that the prefer. Billions of dollars being gambled. Making it legal to allow people to stack the deck? The economy is the casino then this is the equivalent of people cheating. This is gambling addiction at its worst. The entire country is paying to cover the losses of the Shameless gambling addicts
Well yeah, that is outrageous. Can't just Live and Let Live, the government always has to pick a fight with people not even trying to interact with it in the first place.
Well yes, to provide a proper counter or check to prevent companies from gaining influence over individuals, at some point failure to respond to the needs of the many should result in a loss of controlling over what they have failed to manage properly
Geez. It's not like breaking the law is bad, it is simply disorderly. You got a lot hate and predjudice In you to be assuming just because they are a criminal they are bad. Or not entitled to try a carve out their own way of life. Crimes are bothing personal usually. It just happens to be out of protocol.
You couldn't hack it on the streets and resent any who have attained both freedom of methodology and comfort of living, and so resent those who have. You just don't understand that these people work, it just doesn't involve money or the rules you ate bound to. They work for themselves and answer to no one. There is honor in that. they made the personal sacrifice you couldn't and have earned the chance to pursue happiness without being bound by the rule of others.who you to stand in the way and attempt to convince others to treat them as less deserving of compassion and sharing than any other person. You can learn a thing or two from the homeless. they are better at surviving on their own then most . Everyone should have to go homeless for a while just to learn self-confidence and self-reliance. How to create your own rules. How to look at fear in the face and say too bad I'm not going to quit, and I'm going to have a good time while I'm at it. Anything doesn't kill me is merely an inconvenience.
Does he now? You sir have quite a bit to learn about what people claim to own vs what they actually in practice have direct control of. Which is what true ownership is, simply a measure of control is a situation. Not a measure of intention or registration or legal definition. He could be made irrelevant or complacent through any number of effective means, some of them technically legal, some not, but all effective. And thus it is only through the self restaibt if others can he continue to entertain the illusion of ownership.
Why? Do you need external validation to simply try on the idea as a perspective for a while and see if it functions? Are you not in the habit of experienting?
But the individual has the right to cast off imperatives of society and choose a different path. As they did not create Society they are not responsible for it. They have right to change their priorities and make a life of their own choosing. People themselves are more important then the the coceptualtools they create, like society, are
That's what cousiousness is. The merging of the layers, but the definite, the cousious is made of assumptions unchalenged, a response to a inherently insecure environment, in a species that becomes mentally crippled due to emotion. The ability to lie and believe it. The is nothing more to it, move on. Counsious definition. An ability to convienient lie to one self for the sake of expedience and survival. It is the counter to workaround empathy.
Because it does exist as a disproven theory. Just not as a fact if exhistence. People can discuss wishes all day. Wishes aren't real, but the theory is talked and thought about.
But are you factoring in the how humans autoreject anything that takes a honest look at our species, we always skew the data or exchange metrics or make exceptions to maintain the view that we are right. Especially when it comes to admitting our animal nature and limitations
Hawaii is right to protect to coral. We aren't in any danger of running out of humans, we have plenty to spare and making more doesn't take very long, Coral takes a very long time to make, and more importantly we can't make it to the same quality as nature can. Coral is innocent. Let humans take the fall fir once. We do the most fuckups. We should take our licks.
Well whatever entity is claiming authoritative control is responsible and liable for all outcomes in their declared territory. Such as a trade-off for controlling all is now your fault. However you're right everything has gone political lately that's probably because from people noticing the all the tech is pointless and politics and business interests sabotage implementing it properly in basic infrastructure.
People aren't here to help the economy. The economy is supposed to be here people. People are the value, the economy is just one tool of money that people attempt to use in the order to help themselves. But under no means some people be sacrificed to maintain the economy the economy can die but people can can adapt and live other ways and still have a reasonable chance at happiness in life. In the end that's the whole point is to have the highest percentage of happy people in our population possible and to genuinely look for more ways to eliminate to satisfaction in conflict. The economy is not a deity to be worshipped and it's causing a problem there's not a damn thing wrong with with doing things a different way and trying other things until we get a better result. That's how things get better. Every human system eventually becomes obsolete as the world changes, even economic systems
But that has cost the employee to lose potential influence over their pay, pushing more control into the hands of the employer, which has caused additional errosion of respect for employees, the employee has list a voice on the matter. Now everyone loses equally. This race to the most miserable common state is dangerous to fair and humane treatment of workers in business culture. So yeah now they're both treated the same but nobody gets to have a voice. Keep this up nobody will be allowed to have anything just to keep things Fair.
Slashdot Mirror
The person who failed to put down his gun rather then storm the house and pull the trigger on a hearsay, is a the one who escalated the situation from unknown to definite physical harm the officer is directly responsible for the murder. Until officers are personally accountable without protection that a private citizen wouldn't have, the police will continue to shoot people to cover their own asses.
You know both his parents are Mormon? He was raised Mormons Trump's parents. And his grandparents. Mormons believe that women cannot make it to the highest level of Glory in the afterlife unless attached to a man. I also believe that every male has the potential to come the god of his own Universe one day. Now if you look into Financials. Mormon church owns and operates many llc's which Avast are forbidden from revealing who their Master is. Well we know businesses you hide information for up to no good. And businesses that conduct business ethically don't give a damn who knows what because it doesn't affect their bottom line. He learned everything from Mormonism. I grew up Mormon. Study unit in detail is what actually got me to give it up. I said I want to be a balanced person not a person who can only find security in inappropriate control of other people's money and actions.
Yeah but new works are generally created by people with a passion for their crap they get creative and find a way to do it regardless of financial status. All copyright law does is a enable people who are good at exploiting other people to lay claim to these inappropriately . Creative people will always feel compelled to create by their nature. Although a few artists May benefit financially through copyright the greatness of their work tends to sub suffer and more importantly Bad actors become empowered with the ability to influence and affect the rest of us. Without giving us a way to ignore those we disagree with we are forced waist beads diculous around some resources nationally on arguments over basically is the notion that whoever throws the biggest fit should get their way. And currently that notion is winning. If you give and Tantrums whether they be two year olds or adults you merely encourage more and empower the worst of humanity
Yeah but in this day and age if you have anything in your own name you are sorely naive and lacking in doing your due diligence to cover your own liability. If you layer your shit right then legality should be irrelevant
Yeah but everybody is responsible for tending to the snowball effects of their actions on others, and mitigating then that's just part of being a person who's not an enemy to those they do business with
As far as Dynamics almost nothing because it is a form of gambling. I said the major difference is that stocks our form of gambling that is protected from the normal cultural to stayed for gambling buy artificial legal contracts designed to legitimize it's deviancies.
Depends on what you want for your return if you just want stupid money which you already have them whatever you're just fucking around playing games make yourself feel important. Now they're after something we're having like the mainstreaming of new technology now that's something worth more than money. Any amount of moneyMoney is a small investment compared to a return of real world progress that can't be undone or reversed
It's no wonder , there is such a problem getting our economic system to actually distribute funds fairly. It's gambling with our country's well-being, find people I have no need for additional money for power simply an unhealthy desire for it, worst case they still be able to afford a a home to live in and food to eat, just not the luxurious shit that the prefer. Billions of dollars being gambled. Making it legal to allow people to stack the deck? The economy is the casino then this is the equivalent of people cheating. This is gambling addiction at its worst. The entire country is paying to cover the losses of the Shameless gambling addicts
Well yeah, that is outrageous. Can't just Live and Let Live, the government always has to pick a fight with people not even trying to interact with it in the first place.
Well yes, to provide a proper counter or check to prevent companies from gaining influence over individuals, at some point failure to respond to the needs of the many should result in a loss of controlling over what they have failed to manage properly
Geez. It's not like breaking the law is bad, it is simply disorderly. You got a lot hate and predjudice In you to be assuming just because they are a criminal they are bad. Or not entitled to try a carve out their own way of life. Crimes are bothing personal usually. It just happens to be out of protocol.
You couldn't hack it on the streets and resent any who have attained both freedom of methodology and comfort of living, and so resent those who have. You just don't understand that these people work, it just doesn't involve money or the rules you ate bound to. They work for themselves and answer to no one. There is honor in that. they made the personal sacrifice you couldn't and have earned the chance to pursue happiness without being bound by the rule of others .who you to stand in the way and attempt to convince others to treat them as less deserving of compassion and sharing than any other person. You can learn a thing or two from the homeless. they are better at surviving on their own then most . Everyone should have to go homeless for a while just to learn self-confidence and self-reliance. How to create your own rules. How to look at fear in the face and say too bad I'm not going to quit, and I'm going to have a good time while I'm at it. Anything doesn't kill me is merely an inconvenience.
Does he now? You sir have quite a bit to learn about what people claim to own vs what they actually in practice have direct control of. Which is what true ownership is, simply a measure of control is a situation. Not a measure of intention or registration or legal definition. He could be made irrelevant or complacent through any number of effective means, some of them technically legal, some not, but all effective. And thus it is only through the self restaibt if others can he continue to entertain the illusion of ownership.
Why? Do you need external validation to simply try on the idea as a perspective for a while and see if it functions? Are you not in the habit of experienting?
But the individual has the right to cast off imperatives of society and choose a different path. As they did not create Society they are not responsible for it. They have right to change their priorities and make a life of their own choosing. People themselves are more important then the the coceptualtools they create, like society, are
That's what cousiousness is. The merging of the layers, but the definite, the cousious is made of assumptions unchalenged, a response to a inherently insecure environment, in a species that becomes mentally crippled due to emotion. The ability to lie and believe it. The is nothing more to it, move on. Counsious definition. An ability to convienient lie to one self for the sake of expedience and survival. It is the counter to workaround empathy.
Ai is run on artificial neurons that are modeled after biological neurons, at this point ai and neuroscience have merged
Because it does exist as a disproven theory. Just not as a fact if exhistence. People can discuss wishes all day. Wishes aren't real, but the theory is talked and thought about.
But are you factoring in the how humans autoreject anything that takes a honest look at our species, we always skew the data or exchange metrics or make exceptions to maintain the view that we are right. Especially when it comes to admitting our animal nature and limitations
Hawaii is right to protect to coral. We aren't in any danger of running out of humans, we have plenty to spare and making more doesn't take very long, Coral takes a very long time to make, and more importantly we can't make it to the same quality as nature can. Coral is innocent. Let humans take the fall fir once. We do the most fuckups. We should take our licks.
Metal hydride storage. That has been solved for over a decade.
Well whatever entity is claiming authoritative control is responsible and liable for all outcomes in their declared territory. Such as a trade-off for controlling all is now your fault. However you're right everything has gone political lately that's probably because from people noticing the all the tech is pointless and politics and business interests sabotage implementing it properly in basic infrastructure.
People aren't here to help the economy. The economy is supposed to be here people. People are the value, the economy is just one tool of money that people attempt to use in the order to help themselves. But under no means some people be sacrificed to maintain the economy the economy can die but people can can adapt and live other ways and still have a reasonable chance at happiness in life. In the end that's the whole point is to have the highest percentage of happy people in our population possible and to genuinely look for more ways to eliminate to satisfaction in conflict. The economy is not a deity to be worshipped and it's causing a problem there's not a damn thing wrong with with doing things a different way and trying other things until we get a better result. That's how things get better. Every human system eventually becomes obsolete as the world changes, even economic systems
And since information is further restricted, ensuring that none may benefit except those who would abuse it's exclusivity
But that has cost the employee to lose potential influence over their pay, pushing more control into the hands of the employer, which has caused additional errosion of respect for employees, the employee has list a voice on the matter. Now everyone loses equally. This race to the most miserable common state is dangerous to fair and humane treatment of workers in business culture. So yeah now they're both treated the same but nobody gets to have a voice. Keep this up nobody will be allowed to have anything just to keep things Fair.