There was a comment that went by on Reddit(?), from a flash game dev that basically lamented that the sound and gfx capabilities (or perhaps the dev tools?) of html5 were not up to par yet. I was hoping someone would provide some more insight.
Its funny you mention spreadsheet. This whole commentary from this guy very much feels like what it means to poorly grasp a field/ technology.
Back to my analog, people see spreadsheets with data on them, and think "this is how i should interact with data", being (intentionally) ignorant on how data come together for it to be presented to them. And yet they will pass the spreadsheet around via email, oblivious to all the bad info anyone can put in, and when it comes back to them they have giant "?" over there head as to why all the info is now hopelessly broken and unusable.
I forsee this as a problem. As part of policy we have to encrypt mobile devices, and we store the recovery key in case the users get locked out. We cannot have someone calling apple (for which we don't setup account for our devices) to unlock these units. Apple cannot be the arbiter of access.
Well if they are honest reviews, and the contractor is claiming they are fake, in addition to being dropped form the suit they can coutersue for libel. Once you gotta get a lawyer for thing like this, and you gotta pay them, you don't typically go half measures.
My understanding (as very limited as it is), is that you'd need to ablate enough material off the object to knock it out of orbit and to fall to earth.
However do you even need to hit it that hard? Can you just put enough laser energy on to it to perturb it out of orbit without ablating/vaporizing material? More massive objects would of course require more power applied.
1) you aren't camapgning against Tim Cook 2) Complaining about someone who complains about a place that is a against gay rights makes you sound like you are against day rights 3) Which countries did HP do business with when she was in charge that don't have a good record on women's rights?
Yeah none of those will come and bite you in the ass.
Considering that in the instances of 'high profile' individuals, for whom their treats actually got police attention, and when then deemed 'non credible'; there is going to be a vanishingly small percentage of times in which any action is taken by law enforcement for which the reporter will be satisfied.
What is actually a problem condition is that there is a low SNR and something actually happens to someone, and then police hyper react.
We can only hope that well-trained (larger?) law enforcement agencies know how to sift thru all the chaff, but some small town PD? No way to know what you are going to get there.
Also, what is considered a 'core user'? Is the point of using Zelda Williams as an example mean she was a core user? --
I have seen commentary from 'advocates' for better block tools. It consisted of feeding a program in which you fed precreated blacklist you got from a 3rd party.
If you are going to choose to let others decide who you communicate with on social media, you need to re-evaluate why you are using social media.
You have just argued that 'inattentive parents' is the reason that actual incidents should have no evaluation. Or perhaps in a rephrasing, to pay no attention to the details, in a way being inattentive, at the administrative level.
Why bother checking any facts. Accusation is enough to go on. And if you can't get authorities to go after someone, just post it up, someone is always lookign for fresh meat.
Lets ignore that, its a TOS violation, which is if you believe the TOS laywers a contract violation, and teh school would also be in violation of illegal computer system trespass. But ya know anything extra legal means to avoid having to make a legal justification.
Slashdot Mirror
There was a comment that went by on Reddit(?), from a flash game dev that basically lamented that the sound and gfx capabilities (or perhaps the dev tools?) of html5 were not up to par yet. I was hoping someone would provide some more insight.
Its funny you mention spreadsheet. This whole commentary from this guy very much feels like what it means to poorly grasp a field/ technology.
Back to my analog, people see spreadsheets with data on them, and think "this is how i should interact with data", being (intentionally) ignorant on how data come together for it to be presented to them. And yet they will pass the spreadsheet around via email, oblivious to all the bad info anyone can put in, and when it comes back to them they have giant "?" over there head as to why all the info is now hopelessly broken and unusable.
These days the common thought seems to be that you can't get anyone to read anything without currying 'outrage'
You mean men are expected to wear certain set up gender topic clothing types....
I forsee this as a problem. As part of policy we have to encrypt mobile devices, and we store the recovery key in case the users get locked out. We cannot have someone calling apple (for which we don't setup account for our devices) to unlock these units. Apple cannot be the arbiter of access.
"threaten to go to the press over it."
Done and done.
So says "anonymous coward".
Did you not hear that if we force everyone to use their real identity online that will fix all the problems?
Well if they are honest reviews, and the contractor is claiming they are fake, in addition to being dropped form the suit they can coutersue for libel. Once you gotta get a lawyer for thing like this, and you gotta pay them, you don't typically go half measures.
Well perhaps the IGDA will put their money where their mouth is and advocate for some form of unionization for these exploited workers?
http://www.flashnetworks.com/E...
Targeting proof of concept?
My understanding (as very limited as it is), is that you'd need to ablate enough material off the object to knock it out of orbit and to fall to earth.
However do you even need to hit it that hard? Can you just put enough laser energy on to it to perturb it out of orbit without ablating/vaporizing material? More massive objects would of course require more power applied.
So separate is no longer inherently unequal.
Got it.
1) you aren't camapgning against Tim Cook
2) Complaining about someone who complains about a place that is a against gay rights makes you sound like you are against day rights
3) Which countries did HP do business with when she was in charge that don't have a good record on women's rights?
Yeah none of those will come and bite you in the ass.
The functions written in software is not a 'society facing' item. I would really like to see this misogyny is everywhere groupthink to stop.
Considering that in the instances of 'high profile' individuals, for whom their treats actually got police attention, and when then deemed 'non credible'; there is going to be a vanishingly small percentage of times in which any action is taken by law enforcement for which the reporter will be satisfied.
What is actually a problem condition is that there is a low SNR and something actually happens to someone, and then police hyper react.
We can only hope that well-trained (larger?) law enforcement agencies know how to sift thru all the chaff, but some small town PD? No way to know what you are going to get there.
This sounds like a perfect question for an xkcd 'what if'
First crowd sourced funding, now crowd sourced logistics...
I mean how could a trip to another planet possibly go wrong with this kind of strategy?
I'm going to need $50 million dollars to build the landing pad on mars... I plan on deploying a bunch of down pillows... that'll work right?
Yep I saw that. I use as a gauge how well those in authority apply their own rules to themselves.
This has nothing to do with ethics in games journalism. You need to get your echochamer re-aligned.
Odd however for someone who "left twitter", Looks like Zelda came back
https://twitter.com/zeldawilli...
Also, what is considered a 'core user'? Is the point of using Zelda Williams as an example mean she was a core user?
--
I have seen commentary from 'advocates' for better block tools. It consisted of feeding a program in which you fed precreated blacklist you got from a 3rd party.
If you are going to choose to let others decide who you communicate with on social media, you need to re-evaluate why you are using social media.
You have just argued that 'inattentive parents' is the reason that actual incidents should have no evaluation. Or perhaps in a rephrasing, to pay no attention to the details, in a way being inattentive, at the administrative level.
Why bother checking any facts. Accusation is enough to go on. And if you can't get authorities to go after someone, just post it up, someone is always lookign for fresh meat.
Lets ignore that, its a TOS violation, which is if you believe the TOS laywers a contract violation, and teh school would also be in violation of illegal computer system trespass. But ya know anything extra legal means to avoid having to make a legal justification.
Its like institutional internet vigilantism.
I applaud your dedication to the faith.