Instead of running VNC why not run X over ssh; a megabit would be fine to run applications (wouldn't exactly run my WM over 1mbit)...
VNC wastes a lot of bandwidth transferring stuff that could be done by the local workstation (colors, shapes etc.)...
Re:Who didn't see this coming?
on
SCO DOS'ed
·
· Score: 1
150 megabits per second is nothing...
EFnet didn't crawl to its knees if you hit it with 20 mbps; but if you hit all the efnet servers (and yes there's a lot of them these days). You'll probably be able to get parts of the efnet to crawl... Remember this is a chat-network hosted for fun and not for profit...
SCO on the otherhand surprises by not having more than 150 mbit, consider this is a huge organisation and not having more than 150 mbit kinda surprises me... Remember The Gathering (the worldst largest computerparty) was DDoSed at over 900 mbit/s (they also had a 1 gbit link, not uncommon these days).
150 mbit... that's just 100-150 high-end xDSL home-computers, or put in a few 10/100mbit college-computers and you could scratch 30-50 xDSL-customers...
Or even better, you can simply fix the problem in the source (download a patch or do it yourself) and compile the software all over again...
How many IIS-users has swatted their bugs that fast?
Have you taken a look at 3ware ?
They make RAID controllers with RAID5 support, all based on ATA-IDE drives, the biggest controller supporting up to 12 drives. They also support hotswap and all the other goodies you'd expect of a SCSI-RAID-system, but at the price of IDE;-). (NO I do NOT work for them, nor do I resell them, just another happy customer).
There's hardware support for win/linux/freebsd (Not sure about Mac, but I've tried it under the 3 mentioned and it worked like a charm).
Especially considering all the pr0n is being pushed as jpegs not as html...
I bet asciiprawn doesn't make up many percent of the total bandwidth consumed at any ISP...
If your company does commercials for the local tv-station not only would shake be expensive, but also overkill... and expensive/difficult to learn... Just speaking out of experience...
I wonder if you know what After Effects does sir, as there are different uses for Final Cut *, Shake and After Effects.
After Effects is actually what the name implies a program to add Effects after it's been edited (or even while). Final Cut is a linear editor, while After Effects is a visual effects program. The do wastly different things.
Shake on the other hand is not unsimilar to AE, but the price tag on it ($5,000) just prices it out of the competition. That's also why they marked it as a digital composition tool, aimed at filmproducers rather than the average joe just wanting to put some flashy-text in his average home-video.
Because I doubt apple would do any better than Microsoft of keeping up with all the various hardware you can get for i386 compared to the rather sparse selection that is available for PPC... especially HW that is "apple-approved".
how is it proven to be more insecure ?
Not trying to be flaimbait or anything here, but I'd like to see some evidence. Every where I turn I see somebody up on their soapbox shouting about this insecure Windows...
I myself use non-microsoft operatingsystem not because of security, but another reason to add to my list would be great (with proof of course)...
It doesn't run on Linux, but as it runs on Mac OS X (or basterdizedBSD if you like) and it's (hopefully) pretty portable c++ (comeon if it runs on Windows *and* Mac...) it can't be too hard to get it to compile under Linux...
The ISO means that you're potentially gonna make more money as an ISO standard is more likely to be adopted than some unknown method some boffin has pondered up...
I guess the US patentoffice would be kind of hesitant to give out patents to people whose dayjob includes being a dictator with atleast 3 clones/lookalikes...
Boycotting and expressing your views (booing etc.) shouldn't be forbidden, but I guess there were several people at the Oscars that wanted to *censor* Michael Moores speach... That's scary!
There are several embedded systems that use SMP, namely a lot of mobilephones do so... One for software and one for GSM-handling, that's the kludge phonemakers used to get around the timing problems with GSM. Dual CPU-phones don't put as high demands upon RealTime handling and stability on the softwareside of things as the GSM-CPU would still be available to handle GSM-requests...
I'm already using qmail, works like sendmail in the sense it delivers email and differs in the sense that it's not broken, borked or configfiles that look like/dev/urandom
Slashdot Mirror
Instead of running VNC why not run X over ssh; a megabit would be fine to run applications (wouldn't exactly run my WM over 1mbit)...
VNC wastes a lot of bandwidth transferring stuff that could be done by the local workstation (colors, shapes etc.)...
150 megabits per second is nothing...
EFnet didn't crawl to its knees if you hit it with 20 mbps; but if you hit all the efnet servers (and yes there's a lot of them these days). You'll probably be able to get parts of the efnet to crawl... Remember this is a chat-network hosted for fun and not for profit...
SCO on the otherhand surprises by not having more than 150 mbit, consider this is a huge organisation and not having more than 150 mbit kinda surprises me... Remember The Gathering (the worldst largest computerparty) was DDoSed at over 900 mbit/s (they also had a 1 gbit link, not uncommon these days).
150 mbit... that's just 100-150 high-end xDSL home-computers, or put in a few 10/100mbit college-computers and you could scratch 30-50 xDSL-customers...
That's only on thursdays... We've gotta have something to do the other 6 days of the week...
Or even better, you can simply fix the problem in the source (download a patch or do it yourself) and compile the software all over again...
How many IIS-users has swatted their bugs that fast?
Have you taken a look at 3ware ? ;-). (NO I do NOT work for them, nor do I resell them, just another happy customer).
They make RAID controllers with RAID5 support, all based on ATA-IDE drives, the biggest controller supporting up to 12 drives.
They also support hotswap and all the other goodies you'd expect of a SCSI-RAID-system, but at the price of IDE
There's hardware support for win/linux/freebsd (Not sure about Mac, but I've tried it under the 3 mentioned and it worked like a charm).
Especially considering all the pr0n is being pushed as jpegs not as html...
I bet asciiprawn doesn't make up many percent of the total bandwidth consumed at any ISP...
Doesn't really matter as most things that are transfered are compressed in the first place... mp3s doesn't compress more ;-)
Strike open-source add a couple of $$$s and you've got Lotus Notes...
If your company does commercials for the local tv-station not only would shake be expensive, but also overkill... and expensive/difficult to learn...
Just speaking out of experience...
you know how it is when posting before lunch... ;-)
You mean it too will be defaced by vanilla IIS-exploits....
After Effects is actually what the name implies a program to add Effects after it's been edited (or even while). Final Cut is a linear editor, while After Effects is a visual effects program. The do wastly different things.
Shake on the other hand is not unsimilar to AE, but the price tag on it ($5,000) just prices it out of the competition. That's also why they marked it as a digital composition tool, aimed at filmproducers rather than the average joe just wanting to put some flashy-text in his average home-video.
I want to be able to put a window down. ;-)
Consider xkill or psdoom
Because I doubt apple would do any better than Microsoft of keeping up with all the various hardware you can get for i386 compared to the rather sparse selection that is available for PPC... especially HW that is "apple-approved".
how is it proven to be more insecure ?
Not trying to be flaimbait or anything here, but I'd like to see some evidence. Every where I turn I see somebody up on their soapbox shouting about this insecure Windows...
I myself use non-microsoft operatingsystem not because of security, but another reason to add to my list would be great (with proof of course)...
It doesn't run on Linux, but as it runs on Mac OS X (or basterdizedBSD if you like) and it's (hopefully) pretty portable c++ (comeon if it runs on Windows *and* Mac...) it can't be too hard to get it to compile under Linux...
They seem to have fixed the 3.11 - 3.10 = 0 bug in calc.exe now... You mean there are other longrunning bugs in Windows?
you mean you got a boy up to level 5 with apraxia!
Man y0 must be l33t!
Hopefully he changed some hardware in those 9 years, It'd be painful to run WinXP on a Pentium 75MHz...
The ISO means that you're potentially gonna make more money as an ISO standard is more likely to be adopted than some unknown method some boffin has pondered up...
I guess the US patentoffice would be kind of hesitant to give out patents to people whose dayjob includes being a dictator with atleast 3 clones/lookalikes...
Boycotting and expressing your views (booing etc.) shouldn't be forbidden, but I guess there were several people at the Oscars that wanted to *censor* Michael Moores speach...
That's scary!
There are several embedded systems that use SMP, namely a lot of mobilephones do so... One for software and one for GSM-handling, that's the kludge phonemakers used to get around the timing problems with GSM. Dual CPU-phones don't put as high demands upon RealTime handling and stability on the softwareside of things as the GSM-CPU would still be available to handle GSM-requests...
GIANT still doesn't make it a good SMP design. Even Linux has a better design when it comes to SMP ;-).
I'm already using qmail, works like sendmail in the sense it delivers email and differs in the sense that it's not broken, borked or configfiles that look like /dev/urandom