Or better, have your GPS tracker, already available at a much lower cost, hidden on the vehicle, in a not so easily removed location. And tied into the ignition system so rather than just blank the license plate, and hope a police officer sees it, you just trigger a lockdown. Kill the ignition as soon as the vehicle is reported missing and lock the door(s) into the cargo compartment. Far simpler, far quicker for recovery, much cheaper, less prone to breakage or theft.
Just because Uber messed it up does not disprove their safety. Uber tries to do everything on the cheap to boost their profits. Meanwhile Google's cars would have spotted that pedestrian with the tech they were using four years ago.
Self driving cars can are safe, just not the el-cheapo versions Uber is trying to use.
We've had aircraft have to veer out of their intended retardant drops because a Drone crossed their flight path. Other Drones have been hovering beside flare-ups (to get the good video) again getting in the way of the firefighters. These drones are not 20 miles away. They are right over the burn zones interfering with firefighting.
Small threat? When a drone is seen near an active fire, all aircraft are grounded until it is removed from the scene. The removal of those aircraft can allow a fire to escape fire lines, to surround and entrap ground crews and many more issues. Not just increasing risk to humans but also substantially increasing the cost of fighting a fire.
Note also that the wording is up to a year. That gives them the option of going first with a misdemeanor and fine for most cases, but should a drone cause the crash of a firefighting aircraft or loss of life due to aircraft not being able to drop retardant at a critical point then they have the option of going for the felony charge. They can also go that way for repeat offenses.
Drones flying near fires is a serious problem and it needs to be stomped hard to get people to wake up and not interfere just to get some cool video for Facebook.
When it causes aircraft trying to fight a fire to crash yes. Or when those same aircraft have to waive off of drop runs because of a drone, letting a fire break free of lines, possibly entrapping fire crews or citizens on the ground?
A potential Felony is proper. I would hope they would start off with a heavy fine but repeat violations or causing one of the above results should pull the felony charge and year penalty.
Drones near fires has become a serious problem and needs to be stomped hard and fast before people do start dying.
So you rather the kids just be abandoned there on the spot when the parents are arrested? The kids can't go to jail with the courts, not even specially designed and designated family detention centers. The courts blocked that. so what do you propose we do with the kids? Abandon them? Or are you just calling for us to abandon any hope of controlling our borders from an uncontrolled flood of immigrants?
Who is the Ghoul? someone who wants the children cared for while the parents are handled by the justice system for the crime they committed, or who are processed for their claims of asylum (which takes longer to process than a simple illegal entry prosecution and deportation order). Or you who evidently wants either the kids to be abandoned. Or wants them to go to jail, or just wants to destroy this county by ignoring the borders. That would be you.
Yes for misdemeanors. If you are arrested. You go to jail and for at least a few hours you are separated from your children. If over a weekend and they can't get ahold of a family member then DCFS (or what ever they are called in your state) will place them in short term foster care.
In the US as a citizen the court system should have you at least eligible for bail and back out on the street with a court date within a few hours to days tops. But for a time you are in jail and your children are not in there with you.
For illegal entry it's the same, except that the courts are overwhelmed by the never-ending flood. And if the detainee claims asylum that kicks in an entirely new process with a series of interviews and investigations to validate the claim. That takes time, and while it is going on the children will be separated.
They tried to keep families together using special detention centers years ago and your beloved liberal courts blocked them. The kids can't go to jail, so they have to be taken care of and this is how it happens. It's how it happened under every president since 1997 when the courts forced the separation. Obama had four times as many children separated in 2013 and 2014 until he initiated his foolish catch and release program that is a total failure. Over 80% of those caught and released with a court date never showed up.
So yes a misdemeanor will result in your separation.
A traffic infraction gets you a written citation as you darn well know.
They both have broken the Law. Even someone who is innocent but is accused of and arrested for breaking a law will be separated from their children for at least a short time while their case is being processed.
The difference is that in the normal operation of the criminal justice system, the system isn't overwhelmed on a daily basis with a never ending flood and criminal cases process quicker, The arrestee is booked, sits a few hours (maybe a weekend) and then is arraigned and usually a bail amount is set and they can be bailed out to a future court date.
If the border crosser has just crossed illegally it should be nearly that quick assuming we have enough judges to handle all the cases. But when the crosser claims asylum that throws a big wrench into the situation. Now there are a series of interviews and investigations of their claims that have to be processed and this takes time. Meanwhile thousands more enter the system every day.
It's a matter of logistics and scale. Not even our biggest cities have to handle this size of load every single day, seven days a week.
So what do we now do with the children. the 9th circuit ruled years ago they couldn't go to jail with their parents. Not even special family detention centers that were designed to be as non-jail like as possible and still do the job. So the parents are separated from their children. The parents go to jail for either criminal processing and deportation or asylum claim review. Meanwhile the children are handed over to HHS by the thousands, they have 20 days to find and place the children with relatives or other trusted responsible adults known to the parents or into foster care.
No it's not pleasant, no it's not ideal. But the courts have prevented keeping the families together. The Obama Catch and release program is a failure with over 80% of those caught and released failing to show up for their court dates. (Catch and release was they were caught, briefly processed and released into the US with a court date). It's a viable system to deal with the logistics of such large scale detention and arrests.
And ICE is required by law to separate the children from their parents, the courts blocked an attempt to do otherwise.
Nope, there is still a process of declassification, including documentation and publication of the information being declassified. I do speak from knowledge, and not just of the Army, Joint operations get you working with all the intelligence agencies and having to know how they function and how intelligence is classified and declassified has standards across the board that all agencies must follow, even up to the Dept. Secretaries.
Over 100 email conversations contained classified information. At least 8 contained information classified TOP SECRET or higher. Much of the info belonged to other Agencies meaning she had no authority to declare it unclassified. Nor did she ever document declassifying any of the information to be sent via the emails.
As an OCA yes she did have the authority to declassify Information classified by the State Dept., but there is a process and it must be documented and published that the information has been downgraded or declassified. There has been no evidence of any such documentation for any of the State Dept. Info, and she did not have authority to declassify information from other agencies.
The classified is actually a big deal. People do get charged and prosecuted and even convicted of it. A one time incident no, but multiple instances including TOP SECRET (at least eight instances according to Comey's briefing in July 2016) does get prosecuted. A one time event is a slap on the wrist a second or even a third time the same, 100+ instances is a pattern of willful criminal negligence that does get prosecuted.
Almost correct. There were a few conversations regarding her schedule that were later classified. But at the time of being sent they had not been classified. Prior Secretaries of state had similar accusations about similar emails send over unclassified networks where the schedule was later deemed to be worthy of classification but at the time they were transmitted were not classified yet.
You have it exactly backwards. the 110 email conversations were all classified before the fact, they omitted conversations that were classified after the fact.
So, when saluted you return the salute. It's common courtesy regardless of who salutes you. As an NCO in the Army I occasionally had a nervous young soldier salute me, I'd return the salute then correct him/her as to my rank and that I was enlisted not an officer and thus not worthy of a sniper check.
It would have been a problem if he hadn't returned the salute as it would have been an insult to ignore the salute.
Even Comey stated in his July 2016 briefing that at least 8 of the email conversations contained information that was Classified as Top Secret, Top Secret is not Higher or lower than classified. Classified means one of the three main levels Confidential, Secret or Top Secret as well as any of the higher Caveat designated SCI classification groups.
No she did not have any such authority to declare her server secure. The requirements for handling classified information are set in law, She had the authority to review and alter the classification of State Dept materials. But not how such classified information is handled and stored. And Comey again stated that several items of classified information involved belonged to other agencies than the State Dept. thus she didn't even have declassification authority over the information.
Please don't speak about what you have so little real knowledge of. I spent 20 years in US Army Counterintelligence. Her server was illegal for avoiding the government networks and the mandatory storage of all official communications (classified and otherwise). And She violated the Espionage act by placing the classified information onto the unclassified server connected to the unclassified civilian internet. Classified information is processed and transmitted over separate networks for security reasons.
Ya got me there, Add those rumored prequels, and the rumored Matrix Sequels to the rumored Movie adaptation of Starship Troopers as movies that don't exist.
(But Boba still had appearances in the Clone Wars series).
Actually we do have lower violent crime rates to show for it, as the rise in incarceration was due to increased prosecution in order to stem rapidly rising crime rates that started climbing in the 60's until peaking in the 90's Since then crime rates have dropped by over 50%, and in recent years the incarceration rate has dropped.
The vast majority of legitimate ticket purchases are made online, via phone or through licensed ticket resellers. None of those are set up to capture facial data. So how does this stop scalpers? Also there is a legitimate secondary market, of people who get tickets and then realize they are not able to attend. They aren't going to be collecting facial data either.
geekmux nailed the real purpose of this advance of Big Brother.
So we need to stop excelling and become the more oppressed gender. But wait, if we surrender and let women dominate every field to the point that we then excel at being oppressed and persecuted. Would that not be oppression in some way?
Slashdot Mirror
Or better, have your GPS tracker, already available at a much lower cost, hidden on the vehicle, in a not so easily removed location. And tied into the ignition system so rather than just blank the license plate, and hope a police officer sees it, you just trigger a lockdown. Kill the ignition as soon as the vehicle is reported missing and lock the door(s) into the cargo compartment. Far simpler, far quicker for recovery, much cheaper, less prone to breakage or theft.
Just because Uber messed it up does not disprove their safety. Uber tries to do everything on the cheap to boost their profits. Meanwhile Google's cars would have spotted that pedestrian with the tech they were using four years ago.
Self driving cars can are safe, just not the el-cheapo versions Uber is trying to use.
Birds tend to fly away from wildfires. Not hover over them trying to get good video to upload to YouTube.
Mod parent up please!
We've had aircraft have to veer out of their intended retardant drops because a Drone crossed their flight path. Other Drones have been hovering beside flare-ups (to get the good video) again getting in the way of the firefighters. These drones are not 20 miles away. They are right over the burn zones interfering with firefighting.
Small threat? When a drone is seen near an active fire, all aircraft are grounded until it is removed from the scene. The removal of those aircraft can allow a fire to escape fire lines, to surround and entrap ground crews and many more issues. Not just increasing risk to humans but also substantially increasing the cost of fighting a fire.
Note also that the wording is up to a year. That gives them the option of going first with a misdemeanor and fine for most cases, but should a drone cause the crash of a firefighting aircraft or loss of life due to aircraft not being able to drop retardant at a critical point then they have the option of going for the felony charge. They can also go that way for repeat offenses.
Drones flying near fires is a serious problem and it needs to be stomped hard to get people to wake up and not interfere just to get some cool video for Facebook.
When it causes aircraft trying to fight a fire to crash yes. Or when those same aircraft have to waive off of drop runs because of a drone, letting a fire break free of lines, possibly entrapping fire crews or citizens on the ground?
A potential Felony is proper. I would hope they would start off with a heavy fine but repeat violations or causing one of the above results should pull the felony charge and year penalty.
Drones near fires has become a serious problem and needs to be stomped hard and fast before people do start dying.
So you rather the kids just be abandoned there on the spot when the parents are arrested? The kids can't go to jail with the courts, not even specially designed and designated family detention centers. The courts blocked that. so what do you propose we do with the kids? Abandon them? Or are you just calling for us to abandon any hope of controlling our borders from an uncontrolled flood of immigrants?
Who is the Ghoul? someone who wants the children cared for while the parents are handled by the justice system for the crime they committed, or who are processed for their claims of asylum (which takes longer to process than a simple illegal entry prosecution and deportation order). Or you who evidently wants either the kids to be abandoned. Or wants them to go to jail, or just wants to destroy this county by ignoring the borders. That would be you.
Yes for misdemeanors. If you are arrested. You go to jail and for at least a few hours you are separated from your children. If over a weekend and they can't get ahold of a family member then DCFS (or what ever they are called in your state) will place them in short term foster care.
In the US as a citizen the court system should have you at least eligible for bail and back out on the street with a court date within a few hours to days tops. But for a time you are in jail and your children are not in there with you.
For illegal entry it's the same, except that the courts are overwhelmed by the never-ending flood. And if the detainee claims asylum that kicks in an entirely new process with a series of interviews and investigations to validate the claim. That takes time, and while it is going on the children will be separated.
They tried to keep families together using special detention centers years ago and your beloved liberal courts blocked them. The kids can't go to jail, so they have to be taken care of and this is how it happens. It's how it happened under every president since 1997 when the courts forced the separation. Obama had four times as many children separated in 2013 and 2014 until he initiated his foolish catch and release program that is a total failure. Over 80% of those caught and released with a court date never showed up.
So yes a misdemeanor will result in your separation.
A traffic infraction gets you a written citation as you darn well know.
They both have broken the Law. Even someone who is innocent but is accused of and arrested for breaking a law will be separated from their children for at least a short time while their case is being processed.
The difference is that in the normal operation of the criminal justice system, the system isn't overwhelmed on a daily basis with a never ending flood and criminal cases process quicker, The arrestee is booked, sits a few hours (maybe a weekend) and then is arraigned and usually a bail amount is set and they can be bailed out to a future court date.
If the border crosser has just crossed illegally it should be nearly that quick assuming we have enough judges to handle all the cases. But when the crosser claims asylum that throws a big wrench into the situation. Now there are a series of interviews and investigations of their claims that have to be processed and this takes time. Meanwhile thousands more enter the system every day.
It's a matter of logistics and scale. Not even our biggest cities have to handle this size of load every single day, seven days a week.
So what do we now do with the children. the 9th circuit ruled years ago they couldn't go to jail with their parents. Not even special family detention centers that were designed to be as non-jail like as possible and still do the job. So the parents are separated from their children. The parents go to jail for either criminal processing and deportation or asylum claim review. Meanwhile the children are handed over to HHS by the thousands, they have 20 days to find and place the children with relatives or other trusted responsible adults known to the parents or into foster care.
No it's not pleasant, no it's not ideal. But the courts have prevented keeping the families together. The Obama Catch and release program is a failure with over 80% of those caught and released failing to show up for their court dates. (Catch and release was they were caught, briefly processed and released into the US with a court date). It's a viable system to deal with the logistics of such large scale detention and arrests.
And ICE is required by law to separate the children from their parents, the courts blocked an attempt to do otherwise.
Nope, there is still a process of declassification, including documentation and publication of the information being declassified.
I do speak from knowledge, and not just of the Army, Joint operations get you working with all the intelligence agencies and having to know how they function and how intelligence is classified and declassified has standards across the board that all agencies must follow, even up to the Dept. Secretaries.
I spent 20 years as Army Counterintelligence. I speak from experience not fantasy.
Try again.
Yes She Did!
Over 100 email conversations contained classified information. At least 8 contained information classified TOP SECRET or higher. Much of the info belonged to other Agencies meaning she had no authority to declare it unclassified. Nor did she ever document declassifying any of the information to be sent via the emails.
As an OCA yes she did have the authority to declassify Information classified by the State Dept., but there is a process and it must be documented and published that the information has been downgraded or declassified. There has been no evidence of any such documentation for any of the State Dept. Info, and she did not have authority to declassify information from other agencies.
The classified is actually a big deal. People do get charged and prosecuted and even convicted of it. A one time incident no, but multiple instances including TOP SECRET (at least eight instances according to Comey's briefing in July 2016) does get prosecuted. A one time event is a slap on the wrist a second or even a third time the same, 100+ instances is a pattern of willful criminal negligence that does get prosecuted.
Yes she did, and yes it does.
Almost correct. There were a few conversations regarding her schedule that were later classified. But at the time of being sent they had not been classified. Prior Secretaries of state had similar accusations about similar emails send over unclassified networks where the schedule was later deemed to be worthy of classification but at the time they were transmitted were not classified yet.
But for the most part you are correct.
You have it exactly backwards. the 110 email conversations were all classified before the fact, they omitted conversations that were classified after the fact.
So, when saluted you return the salute. It's common courtesy regardless of who salutes you. As an NCO in the Army I occasionally had a nervous young soldier salute me, I'd return the salute then correct him/her as to my rank and that I was enlisted not an officer and thus not worthy of a sniper check.
It would have been a problem if he hadn't returned the salute as it would have been an insult to ignore the salute.
Even Comey stated in his July 2016 briefing that at least 8 of the email conversations contained information that was Classified as Top Secret, Top Secret is not Higher or lower than classified. Classified means one of the three main levels Confidential, Secret or Top Secret as well as any of the higher Caveat designated SCI classification groups.
No she did not have any such authority to declare her server secure. The requirements for handling classified information are set in law, She had the authority to review and alter the classification of State Dept materials. But not how such classified information is handled and stored. And Comey again stated that several items of classified information involved belonged to other agencies than the State Dept. thus she didn't even have declassification authority over the information.
Please don't speak about what you have so little real knowledge of. I spent 20 years in US Army Counterintelligence. Her server was illegal for avoiding the government networks and the mandatory storage of all official communications (classified and otherwise). And She violated the Espionage act by placing the classified information onto the unclassified server connected to the unclassified civilian internet. Classified information is processed and transmitted over separate networks for security reasons.
Yes as recent videos of government troops walking down the streets shooting people (including the person with the camera) have shown.
Venezuela is a cess-pitt, anyone with the means to has fled the county. People are starving.
Anyone citing Venezuela as an example of anything but a prime example of the failure of communism is an idiot.
Ya got me there, Add those rumored prequels, and the rumored Matrix Sequels to the rumored Movie adaptation of Starship Troopers as movies that don't exist.
(But Boba still had appearances in the Clone Wars series).
So we just ignore the Prequels and Clone Wars? Those weren't tossed as cannon.
Actually we do have lower violent crime rates to show for it, as the rise in incarceration was due to increased prosecution in order to stem rapidly rising crime rates that started climbing in the 60's until peaking in the 90's Since then crime rates have dropped by over 50%, and in recent years the incarceration rate has dropped.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-myth-of-mass-incarceration-1456184736
The vast majority of legitimate ticket purchases are made online, via phone or through licensed ticket resellers. None of those are set up to capture facial data. So how does this stop scalpers? Also there is a legitimate secondary market, of people who get tickets and then realize they are not able to attend. They aren't going to be collecting facial data either.
geekmux nailed the real purpose of this advance of Big Brother.
So we need to stop excelling and become the more oppressed gender. But wait, if we surrender and let women dominate every field to the point that we then excel at being oppressed and persecuted. Would that not be oppression in some way?