His point is, based on the most common reasoning of each the time periods, every revolutionary weapon technology is horrible, and shouldn't be produced or used.
And even today, 59 years after its first use, people still fear and hate nuclear weapons, though hat doesn't mean they didn't have legitimate use at some point. (Regardless of whether or not the nukes dropped on Japan saved millions of lives, the threat of nuclear warfare kept relations between NATO and the Soviet Union fairly peaceful, even if they were still hostile.)
So what is mob opinion telling us today about nanotechnology? It's telling us that nanotechnology is horrible, and shouldn't be produced or used. Not that I agree.
Moonbase and Moonwar by Ben Bova. They do an excellent job highlighting the likely results of fear and FUD against nanotechnology.
I live in Michigan, where we have two seasons: Winter and "Under Construction"
And traffix slows way down going through construction zones.
Re:This should just be the start
on
Robocones
·
· Score: 1
That'll require automated navigation on the car's part. I certainly wouldn't be able to navigate it manually...
Proximty Alarms
on
Robocones
·
· Score: 2, Interesting
Once cars have proximity alarms, worker garments could be configured to set them off...
Re:Self Healing Minefield
on
Robocones
·
· Score: 1
Ideally, cones should be very massive, so as to reduce the kinetic energy of a car voilating the lane limits. Resulting damage to the car would a significant deterrant.
Re:Practical or somebody's thesis?
on
Robocones
·
· Score: 1
In Michigan, we recently had more laws passed which are intended to protect road workers. Things like double fines for violations in construction zones. And penalties for injuring or killing a road worker.
It's a going public concern, so statistics are irrelevant.
Only if the robot wasn't designed for reasonably quick movement. Remember that the robot still has inertia, even in zero-grav situations. If the robot was designed for such movement, they'd have needed to take into account the stresses of, for example, the arm moving relative to the torso.
Personally, I'd like to see an exhibit that makes use of a black rubber sheet and heavy colored balls. The balls represent masses, and the rubber sheet represents spacetime.
I saw something like it briefly in the background on a video in high-school AP Physics class, but I've never seen it in a museum or even as the focus for a scene in a video.
Slashdot Mirror
Uh, your project page has no useful description. What's it about? "Doom for Columbine" doesn't immediately strike me as an appropriate name.
OK, what language is your sig in? I can tell it's a "Hello World" app.
More likely, nanobots that target specific DNA sequences. They may have to burst the nucleus to read the DNA, though.
Nah, you're better off engineering a virus that will have little impact on any host other than one with the target DNA sequence.
The suicide switch is probably easy. Just expose the machines to flourine gas, the most chemically corrosive substance in existance.
Or high concentrations of radiation. Transmute the component atoms so that the structure is disrupted.
But the flourine is probably cheaper, both environmentally and politically.
His point is, based on the most common reasoning of each the time periods, every revolutionary weapon technology is horrible, and shouldn't be produced or used.
And even today, 59 years after its first use, people still fear and hate nuclear weapons, though hat doesn't mean they didn't have legitimate use at some point. (Regardless of whether or not the nukes dropped on Japan saved millions of lives, the threat of nuclear warfare kept relations between NATO and the Soviet Union fairly peaceful, even if they were still hostile.)
So what is mob opinion telling us today about nanotechnology? It's telling us that nanotechnology is horrible, and shouldn't be produced or used. Not that I agree.
Moonbase and Moonwar by Ben Bova. They do an excellent job highlighting the likely results of fear and FUD against nanotechnology.
My computer rests on the floor...I guess that'd work. ;)
I live in Michigan, where we have two seasons: Winter and "Under Construction"
And traffix slows way down going through construction zones.
That'll require automated navigation on the car's part. I certainly wouldn't be able to navigate it manually...
Once cars have proximity alarms, worker garments could be configured to set them off...
Ideally, cones should be very massive, so as to reduce the kinetic energy of a car voilating the lane limits. Resulting damage to the car would a significant deterrant.
In Michigan, we recently had more laws passed which are intended to protect road workers. Things like double fines for violations in construction zones. And penalties for injuring or killing a road worker.
It's a going public concern, so statistics are irrelevant.
I don't think you don't have to be the original compromiser in order for it to be considered illegal access.
Just because someone else busted down the door doesn't mean it's not tresspassing to explore the house.
I'm going to quote you on that one...
too weak to support the full weight.
Only if the robot wasn't designed for reasonably quick movement. Remember that the robot still has inertia, even in zero-grav situations. If the robot was designed for such movement, they'd have needed to take into account the stresses of, for example, the arm moving relative to the torso.
It wouldn't have made a different. Astronauts have already needed to make repairs that the Hubble wasn't designed for in the first place.
For instance:
Sounds like it's a fairly widespread thing. Seems to me like applying it to a new field is a "logical next step", which isn't patentable.
Personally, I'd like to see an exhibit that makes use of a black rubber sheet and heavy colored balls. The balls represent masses, and the rubber sheet represents spacetime.
I saw something like it briefly in the background on a video in high-school AP Physics class, but I've never seen it in a museum or even as the focus for a scene in a video.
Some would say there's already a psychological aspect to it.
Just threaten to bring out that oscilloscope.
And, uh, who has first-hand experience?
The people in charge of clinical trials of exposing children to Aibos?
...from an Analog issue where all international conflicts of the future took place on the Moon, using no-holds-barred automated technologies.
It was a good story.
Apple Lossless Encoding
;)
So let's bring out the ALE and get drunk celebrating.
Why would you want to install from a binary? Won't your biggest speed gains come from optimizing libc and other widely-used libraries?
would anyone invest Pixars IT budget to steal a few credit card numbers?
It depends on the credit limits of the cards, and whether or not the holder knows the data's been accessed..
it's more like a competitor renting the billboard next to the one that AXA rented.
Yah...I realized that after reading more of the comments. I thought AXA's competitor had purchased an ad for when people searched for AXA.
That would only include trademarks held in the US, not France.