Slashdot Mirror


Gentoo Linux Announces Gentoo Linux 2004.1

Keppy writes "The departure of Daniel Robbins hasn't dented the progress of Gentoo Linux with version 2004.1 being released. ... please support Gentoo by purchasing something from the online store. The Gentoo homepage also has a short message about the future of Gentoo Linux now that Daniel has left. ' Robbat2 writes with an excerpt from the linked announcement: "Please consult our mirror index for download locations and the Gentoo Linux Installation Handbook for detailed installation instructions. Support for Gentoo Linux 2004.1 can be found through our user community by way of the Gentoo Forums, IRC, and various community mailing-lists. Release notes for each architecture can be found linked from the Gentoo Linux Release Engineering project page."

377 comments

  1. Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and here by Novanix · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Gentoo really is a great operating system, and maybe even for beginners. One of Gentoo's many strengths is the portage system. The portage system is a easy to use system that allows you to build just about any application from source automatically (and often with Gentoo optimizations). It can automatically build all the dependencies for the program too, saving you much time and effort. The portage system also supports binaries (must mention to avoid stoning) however that is often only used in replication systems. Since you can easily setup your own portage mirrors you can create your own custom packages (either that compile from source or are binaries) and easily deploy across your own servers. This would allow you to configure packages on one machine and then just distribute the binaries across duplicate machines if you wished (as I have heard of being done). I also have found Gentoo emerges rarely fail when compared to some of the problems you can run into with RPM. Another large benefit of gentoo is it doesn't install anything that isn't needed to clutter your system up. It will install the bare bones, (ssh, etc) and then you can emerge anything you want. This is much nicer than most OS's which will load it with crap from the start. It is one of the most configurable distributions I have seen, and every Gentoo install is truly unique. Again, while it may give you the barebones to start it takes little work (minus the cpu time to compile) to get it to where you want it. As I said earlier, I think Gentoo may even be a bit beginner friendly. While setup is a bit long and not nearly as easy as something like Redhat, they have a very easy to follow tutorial which walks you through it step by step that I think most beginners could follow. In addition, they have 3 different ways to install Gentoo. A live cd version that is basically bootable and then you have 3 different stages you can choose from. Stage One is a bit insane, for those who really need total control over what is installed. For most people Stage Two is fine as it still compiles virtually everything from scratch, giving you a ton of control, just saves some time over Stage One. Stage Three is for those who just need something fast or are a bit new, and can install binaries of various things to save you compile time and easy of install. This makes Gentoo truly amazing.

  2. Am already there! by the_thunderbird · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I am already ugrading, this is by far the best distro I have used :) together with debian :-D

    1. Re:Am already there! by Some+Bitch · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why not upgrade every week like most of us do?

      emerge -uvD system
      emerge -uvD world
      etc-update

    2. Re:Am already there! by the_thunderbird · · Score: 1

      Thats what I am doing!

    3. Re:Am already there! by Too+Much+Noise · · Score: 1

      ... assuming you have emerge sync as a cron job ^_^

    4. Re:Am already there! by ttrafford · · Score: 0

      Isn't "system" a subset of "world"?

    5. Re:Am already there! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      Yes. You do not need to do system if you are doing world. World is a list of all packages installed on the system.

      Further: Not using the -p switch to see what will be installed during your updates is probably a bad idea, though blindly doing an update is better than not doing updates at all... Certainly the official documentation suggests that you use the pretend flag to check dependencies. This will also tell you if somehow something you need for upgrading has been masked and cannot be updated.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:Am already there! by eugene+ts+wong · · Score: 1

      I read through http://packages.gentoo.org/ 6 days a week. I'm pretty sure that there is nothing there that requires updating every week. Many of the changes are on hardware that you may not have. For example, if you have x86 then you won't need the Sparc upgrades. I think that you're wasting bandwidth, because the changes that are on your system tend to be very minor. If I understand correctly, the changes tend to be install-related, which means that if you installed already, then you won't see any benefits. It would only benefit people who haven't been able to install.

      Could someone verify or correct me on this?

    7. Re:Am already there! by eugene+ts+wong · · Score: 1

      I recommend using -a instead of -p so that the user can quickly verify the changes, & then type Enter or Yes, or whatever, to continue. It saves having to recalculate the dependencies.

    8. Re:Am already there! by Some+Bitch · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm on 56k dialup, if I update weekly then the update remains doable (I actually use -fuvD with emerge then re-emerge without -f). If I leave it a month then it turns into several days of downloading packages before starting the compile.

      Gentoo on dialup means regular updates unless you want to end up in download hell.

    9. Re:Am already there! by eugene+ts+wong · · Score: 1

      That's a good point. I never even considered that. Thanks!

    10. Re:Am already there! by junky · · Score: 1

      5 1 * * * /usr/bin/emerge -uf --deep world

    11. Re:Am already there! by justMichael · · Score: 1
      Weekly cron job:
      emerge --no-spinner sync
      emerge -uUp world
      have a look at the output and see what needs to be done.
  3. News or Commercial? by deutschemonte · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This sounds more like a commercial than news to me.

    --
    The preceding message was based on actual events. Only the names, locations and events have been changed.
    1. Re:News or Commercial? by datastalker · · Score: 1

      As it will happen every quarter, you'd best get used to it. ;)

    2. Re:News or Commercial? by g0at · · Score: 1

      "Commercial" is an adjective meaning "of or having to do with commerce".

      Verbing nouns... nouning adjectives... eeeuuughhaaa!

      (I guess you could argue that "news" are plural, but anyway...)

      -b

    3. Re:News or Commercial? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haven't been speaking english for that long, huh? Or are you just a pedantic trolling retard with nothing better to do than point out minor faults in others? I know that's my problem. Maybe we can be slashdot buddies!

    4. Re:News or Commercial? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Commercial" is also a noun meaning "A paid advertisement on television or radio". Not too far off if you ask me.

    5. Re:News or Commercial? by g0at · · Score: 1

      Sure. People also talk about "accessing" files. Doesn't mean I have to suppress my urge to cringe. :)

      -b

    6. Re:News or Commercial? by m.mascherpa · · Score: 1

      This sounds more like a commercial than news to me.

      Actually i don't think asking for donations could
      ever be considered as a commercial.

      Besides I don't think anything covered by an Open
      Source license will ever need commercials.

  4. Things of note... by bc90021 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    1) For posts like this, it's good to be a subscriber. ;)

    2) It's good to see that the DR announcement has not changed anything in terms of release schedule, and the job they did setting up the hierarchy seems to be working very well.

    3) At least one mirror has a file claiming to be 2005.1. While Gentoo is great, I don't think that it's being delivered from the future. (At least not yet. ;) )

    4) The minimal CD is still only 82MB!

    5) Slashdot, could Gentoo get its own icon? It's here. Thanks!

    1. Re:Things of note... by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1
      3) At least one mirror has a file claiming to be 2005.1. While Gentoo is great, I don't think that it's being delivered from the future. (At least not yet. ;) )


      You never know with Gentoo. IIRC, Gentoo advertised a 2.4.19 kernel when the latest stable was 2.4.18.
      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  5. In related news, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Debian has announced their expected release of Sarge to coincide with the next ice age.

    1. Re:In related news, by deutschemonte · · Score: 4, Funny

      In other news, environmental scientists claim they have proof that Microsoft is to blame for global warming.

      --
      The preceding message was based on actual events. Only the names, locations and events have been changed.
    2. Re:In related news, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Debian has announced their expected release of Sarge to coincide with the next ice age.

      Or, right around the time I finish compiling 2004.1.

    3. Re:In related news, by Stile+65 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Which is still before Longhorn will come out. :)

      --
      I claim first use of "Error No. 0B" - or "No. 0B error." It'll be the new ID 10T!
    4. Re:In related news, by Ctrl-Z · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Which is before the weapons of mass destruction will be found.

      --
      www.timcoleman.com is a total waste of your time. Never go there.
    5. Re:In related news, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It figures this would get modded up without any flamebait or overrated mods (unlike the grandparent comment). You slashbots just can't take a simple linux-related joke without coming back with some trite anti-MS reply.

    6. Re:In related news, by beforewisdom · · Score: 3, Funny

      So competition with Gentoo has forced them to speed up?

      ( no offense, use debian, love debian )

      Steve

    7. Re:In related news, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just right before GNU Hurd hits the street.

    8. Re:In related news, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BZZZT! You took the joke too far, you lose! Thanks for playing though!

    9. Re:In related news, by tacarat · · Score: 1

      Forced who to speed up? Microsoft or Debian?

      --
      "Common sense will be the death of us all"
  6. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    That, folks, is karma whoring at it's best!

  7. Hooray for Gentoo by PuffCammy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've used Gentoo since last October. Before that, I had essentially never seen a Linux machine. It is my first distro and I haven't really looked back. I've tried others just to see what they were like, mainly Fedora and Debian, but they just don't shape up to the standards I've put and Gentoo has given me. It took a while in the beginning to learn all the ins and outs, but now I can navigate through it with so much ease. Hoorah to Gentoo and its bleeding-edge innovation.

    --
    And the day came when the risk to remain closed in a bud, became more painful than the risk it took to blossom.
    1. Re:Hooray for Gentoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whats that, a Gentoy user who hadn't even seen a computer running Linux not six months ago? Well there's a total fucking surprise. I bet you feel really 'leet, too.

    2. Re:Hooray for Gentoo by no-arg+constructor · · Score: 1

      it is my first in a while (i used mandrake about 3 years ago and gave up since i couldn't get quake 3 running without pulling teeth), and i couldn't be happier (although my sound is like a second behind). i actually think too that is good for beginners (like me) since it forces you to learn about the os that you either never knew or was too afraid to fool with. i know that when i decided to try from stage 1 i was worried about editing tons of config files wrong and fucking up any and all types of programs, but i found that the files are documented (for the most part) fairly well and usually if something fucks up its because i either mistyped or didn't spell correctly.

    3. Re:Hooray for Gentoo by IncohereD · · Score: 1

      Are you using KDE?? Is it running aRTsd?? That caused a fair amount of latency for me in Mandrake.

  8. Give it a go. by caluml · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you have never tried Gentoo, you should give it a try. Contrary to popular belief, you can have the base installed and running in 15 minutes, and from then you just emerge the packages you want. gentoo-dev-sources, openssh, sysklogd, vixie-cron, at, ntp, whatever.
    The documentation is brilliant, and all the defaults for the packages are sensible, and well thought out.
    When I install a box, I do it at about 4pm. Give it 30 mins to configure, and install a new kernel, reboot, and leave it to emerge -u world ; emerge kde mozilla overnight.
    Couple of things though - emerge ufed, and gentoolkit - ufed is a gui for editting USE flags, and gentoolkit contains qpkg.

    A very brief doc I knocked up is here. It's probably slightly out of date by now, but you get the idea.

    1. Re:Give it a go. by Otter · · Score: 2, Informative

      Tip: Make sure to save copies of your XF86config, fstab, grub and kernel config files. They'll make life much, much easier than having to generate all those things from scratch.

      If you don't have a previous installation of Mandrake, Red Hat or something like that, you should consider doing one before the Gentoo install. Their partitioning tools are easier than raw fdisk, especially if you want to resize a Linux partition. (Reformat them, though, for the Gentoo install.) Again, save those config files!

    2. Re:Give it a go. by rarn · · Score: 1

      I've used gentoo before. The compile from source, while fun, was a real time waster for me. I see now there are binary packages. How often do they get updated? How are they compiled? Can I install and use binary packages all the time?

    3. Re:Give it a go. by tangent3 · · Score: 1

      A better option actually would be to use the install from Knoppix method. Not only does the Knoppix CD comes with good partitioning tools, you can copy the XF86Config from the one it generates at startup.

    4. Re:Give it a go. by omicronish · · Score: 1

      If you have never tried Gentoo, you should give it a try. Contrary to popular belief, you can have the base installed and running in 15 minutes, and from then you just emerge the packages you want. gentoo-dev-sources, openssh, sysklogd, vixie-cron, at, ntp, whatever

      I'd especially recommend it to Windows users like me who know a lot about computers in general but are unfamiliar with Linux. The installation process is a great learning experience since it explains all steps in detail and generally discusses what and why things happen. You also have complete control so you're not overwhelmed by installations with lots of cruft. I'm sure you can disable installing things in other distros, but with Gentoo, you know exactly what gets installed. No overwhelming feeling -> easier learning.

      Sure, it may take slightly more effort to install than say Red Hat or Mandrake, but it's an interesting experience at least. Plus at the end you get a great sense of accomplishment and can pretend to be a Linux geek on Slashdot because you know how to edit config files ;) Oh and config file editing isn't bad either, they'll tell you what you need to modify.

    5. Re:Give it a go. by mattyrobinson69 · · Score: 1

      i like to use cfdisk for simple partitioning - is that just a slackware tool, i cant remember having it in mandrake. if its not - use it.

    6. Re:Give it a go. by CmdrTHAC0 · · Score: 1

      "I see now there are binary packages. ... Can I install and use binary packages all the time?"

      Binaries are solely for speeding up installation; you install Stage 3 + GRP (that is, the binaries) and then it acts like a normal source-installed Gentoo system. You can either leave it for a while doing emerge -e world after you finish the install to put your own USE/CFLAGS settings into effect, or just let things get replaced naturally when you update things.

      rac argues for this to continue here; I'm not aware of any other information.

      --
      __CmdrTHAC0__
      In Soviet Russia, Spanish Inquisition doesn't expect YOU!!
    7. Re:Give it a go. by Politas · · Score: 1

      So does this "emerge" step require a stable internet connection? I only have dial-up internet, unfortunately.

      --

      Politas

  9. The Gentoo "geek-factor" by lacrymology.com · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I am relatively new to the Linux game, so perhaps I am just ignorant -- so please forgive me if that is the case. However, it seemed to me as an outsider that true geeks used Linux, while mortals used Windows and Mac. However, having joined the fray it seems that within the Linux community is highly fragmented. Now it seems that the true geeks use Debian and Gentoo, while the mortals use Mandrake and Redhat. Weird.
    -m

    --

    #
    # Modus Ponens
    #
    1. Re:The Gentoo "geek-factor" by krumms · · Score: 1

      I'm sitting in front of two monitors:

      To the left is Gentoo (running 2004.1) on an Athlon XP 3200+ w/ 1Gb of RAM (my main workstation), to the right, Debian unstable on an Athlon XP 2800+ w/ 512Mb of RAM (currently in the middle of an apt-get dist-upgrade, and downloading what seems to be lots of KDE packages).

      Meanwhile, I'm downloading FreeBSD 5.2.1 for my little router. So what does that make me? :)

    2. Re:The Gentoo "geek-factor" by IncarnadineConor · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Once you move to Gentoo you'll realize that true geeks use BSD. When you get there you'll realize they use Plan 9. And you'll never actually use Plan 9, because no one uses Plan 9, so the cycle ends there.

    3. Re:The Gentoo "geek-factor" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In a word: Busy.

    4. Re:The Gentoo "geek-factor" by dijjnn · · Score: 1

      ctually, it's much more complicated than that. "True geeks" prefer different distributions for different purposes.

      I myself use debian on my laptop and gentoo on my desktop. I've used Slackware, Redhat, Knoppix (a livecd), Mandrake, SuSE, LinuxPPC, Yellow Dog , and probably others i can't recall, and in addition NetBSD, FreeBSD, and OpenBSD. Most have their strengths, all have their weaknesses.

      --
      ~dijjnn
    5. Re:The Gentoo "geek-factor" by Paul+d'Aoust · · Score: 1

      a very interesting take on the Linux community! I suppose some would say it's fragmented, and curse the fragmentation; while others would say it's diverse, and laud the diversity. It's all in what you like, I suppose. I'm kind of in between. I hate the inconsistency, but I like being able to choose one distro over another. (Mine is Gentoo, by the way, although I don't imagine that matters.)

      I've noticed a lot of 'true geeks' using Fedora (née Red Hat) lately... I guess they're the RH-loyal geeks, as well as those who like to live on the edge of the cliff.

      --
      Standing at the very edge of my imagination, I peered into the inky void and realised -- I couldn't think up a new sig.
    6. Re:The Gentoo "geek-factor" by dijjnn · · Score: 1

      I wish i used Plan 9. Such a cool name, such a cool set of ideas, and their mascot is so cuddly despite it's odly alien appearance.

      Plus, i'd be cool then. But instead, i'm just a run of the mill GNU/Linux user. <sigh>

      --
      ~dijjnn
    7. Re:The Gentoo "geek-factor" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One question: What are you doing that needs such systems, other than compiling the programs you use?

      I'm still ticking away on a 400 MHz Pentium II, and even if Mozilla takes around ten seconds to start up, that's perfectly okay since I leave it running for days on end.

    8. Re:The Gentoo "geek-factor" by Dan+Ost · · Score: 4, Funny

      I know a couple of folks who use Plan 9. In fact, one of them is planning on
      moving to Inferno because Plan 9 is getting too mainstream.

      --

      *sigh* back to work...
    9. Re:The Gentoo "geek-factor" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a geek! Congratulations, see you at the meeting.

    10. Re:The Gentoo "geek-factor" by Some+Dumbass... · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Somebody mod this guy "Insightful". There seems to be a huge "I'm a bigger geek than you" factor involved in OS choice, at least on SlashDot. Despite what the BSD guys seem to think, I use Linux because I like it and because I'm familiar with it, not "because I hate MS". Despite what most Linux users seem to think, I use Mandrake because it gives me a powerful, easy to use desktop, not because I'm a "Linux noob" (exactly the opposite: I'd like to leave my Linux admin workload at work, thank you!)

      For a more topical example, note how many posts have already suggested Gentoo as "great for newbies". Now I tried Gentoo a few months ago (before the LiveCDs), got it running with a little work, and it was okay. But I went back to Mandrake pretty quickly. Some advanced desktop features were missing, such as an equivalent to Mandrake's combination supermount/hotplug support. I had to specifically emerge almost all of the programs I wanted to use because the base install was so stripped down. And I sure hope the install is now easier than the old "partition by hand using fdisk" install that I had to do (it wasn't so hard for me, but for a newbie...)

      Who would recommend a distro like that to a newbie? I think it's mostly people who want to say "my distro is bigger/badder/geekier than yours". If you're willing to put some work into setting up Gentoo it would probably be a fine desktop, and I'm sure that a stripped down, highly optimized Linux would be a great server OS, but that's not what newbies need.

    11. Re:The Gentoo "geek-factor" by amightywind · · Score: 1

      Very insightful. The holy wars within the GNU/Linux world are as isometric as they are endless. Use a soulless federation like Debian, a commercial sellout like SuSE or RedHat, or a lovingly crafted, wisely designed, endlessly upgradable, feel at home source distribution like Gentoo. I leave it up to you!

      --
      an ill wind that blows no good
    12. Re:The Gentoo "geek-factor" by kfg · · Score: 1

      You left out the rainbow suspendered, grey ponytailed, sandal/Hush Puppie wearing, ex-big iron, Unix geeks who use Slack.

      Or build from source.

      Although I prefer belts myself. And I've switched to lace up Rockports. I guess it's my IBM background peeking through. No blue suits in my closet though, thank you very much.

      Actually, I use a number of different distros for different things. For instance, my standard business desktop is KDE on Mandrake. My "It's just got to be rock solid and run vim/mutt without eating a ridiculous amount of resources" console distro is Red Hat 5.2. I run the single floppy Mu Linux on my 486 laptop, which spends 99% of its time in vi, either as a text processor or ebook reader.

      Linux being "fragmented" confers certain benefits upon the user. Stick around a while. You might just find you like it that way.

      Not that it's really all that different over on the MS side really. Lot's of people still run Win98 (or even 95, and I've still got 3.11 on that laptop), the cutting edge home user has upgraded to XP Home (whether he really needed to or not) and the "power user" goes with XP Pro (whether he needs its features or not, more often than not).

      Hell, I've got two Macs in my house and their OSs are both rather different.

      The homogeny of the propriatary OSs is largely illusory, as is the "fragmentation" of Linux. It's all just in the way you squint at them.

      KFG

    13. Re:The Gentoo "geek-factor" by bonch · · Score: 1

      True geeks use BSD.

      I'd be using FreeBSD 5.x were it not for the fact that exiting XFree86 froze my entire machine. I'll wait for it to go stable. :)

    14. Re:The Gentoo "geek-factor" by Carlos+Silva · · Score: 1

      A frequent masturbator?

    15. Re:The Gentoo "geek-factor" by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 2, Informative

      Common misconception. Actually there is no "true geek" distro - at CodeWeavers which is staffed almost entirely by geeks, you'll see everything from Debian Testing (the CTO), to Slack to bleeding edge Fedora/SuSE releases. They are all Linux, after all.

    16. Re:The Gentoo "geek-factor" by milkman_matt · · Score: 1

      Who would recommend a distro like that to a newbie?

      I would. As for the 'partition by hand using fdisk' thing, the install guide clearly holds your hand through this entire process, explaining why you're doing what you're doing, and suggesting partition sizes and things like that to you. Also, it's very easy for a new user to keep their system patched and totally up to date (which is a VERY good thing as we all know). I think it's a great learning experience for any new linux user because from the start, they'll have a handle on their system, and they will be more able to fix a problem that they run into because of that. If they're not able to solve something themselves, their forums are -very- helpful, I haven't run into a problem I couldn't solve in there, including a very nice dual head display setup that I was having one hell of a time taking care of, until I found a very good step by step on how to get it working in the gentoo forums. Yeah, gentoo is complicated, but it's a good learning experience, and it's backed by a very patient and happy to help community who act like there's nothing they'd rather be doing than getting your system working.

      -matt

    17. Re:The Gentoo "geek-factor" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "true geeks used Linux, while mortals used Windows and Mac. However [...] the true geeks use Debian and Gentoo, while the mortals use Mandrake and Redhat. Weird."

      Well... even the most miserable super-hero will beat any mere mortal.

      Still, everybody knows Spiderman is no enemy for Superman.

      Err... your point exactly was?

    18. Re:The Gentoo "geek-factor" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AH! Sinner, Gotcha!!!

      Recuerdos al mini-BOFH!

    19. Re:The Gentoo "geek-factor" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yesssss, that's another "geek-factor".

      "Ahem! I know everything about all Linux and *BSD distributions over there, and then half a dozen that won't appear till next year".

    20. Re:The Gentoo "geek-factor" by ThisNukes4u · · Score: 1

      True geeks build a Linux From Scratch system.

      --
      thisnukes4u.net
  10. Upgrade by ChaserPnk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What's the easiest way to upgrade for current users?

    --

    "A diplomat is a man who always remembers a woman's birthday but never remembers her age." -Robert Frost
    1. Re:Upgrade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      emerge -u world

    2. Re:Upgrade by omega9 · · Score: 1

      # emerge -u world

      And you're done.

      --
      I'm against picketing, but I don't know how to show it.
    3. Re:Upgrade by fox8118 · · Score: 1
      What's the easiest way to upgrade for current users?

      Just emerge sync and then emerge -UupD world
      That should get everything.
    4. Re:Upgrade by the_bard17 · · Score: 1

      'emerge sync && emerge -u world'

    5. Re:Upgrade by nuclear305 · · Score: 1

      emerge sync && emerge -uvD world

      Although, there are about a few dozen different ways to do the same thing..

      man emerge (very informational)

    6. Re:Upgrade by fox8118 · · Score: 1
      Just emerge sync and then emerge -UupD world

      Woops. Its 'emerge -UuD world'. 'emerge -UupD world' is if you want to view all of the packages that the system will upgrade.
    7. Re:Upgrade by 42forty-two42 · · Score: 1

      emerge -au world :)

    8. Re:Upgrade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't need the second 'u' flag. -u is --upgrade, -U is --upgradeonly(won't downgrade packages if, for example, you chose to emerge development packages), -U implies -u. Just FYI :) Oh, and by the way, I've never used the -D flag, not sure the use (I'd check but I'm not at home). I've always just done emerge -U world. You can also update only system packages if you want.

    9. Re:Upgrade by Aneurysm9 · · Score: 1

      The -D flag will upgrade packages that were merged as dependencies of packages you specified and, as such, aren't necessarily in the world file. It can be a pain though if you have a number of ~arch packages installed because of dependency issues unless you change your ACCEPT_KEYWORDS to ~arch, but that would update everything to unstable which probably isn't what you want.

      --
      There was Cowboy Neal at the wheel of a bus to never-ever land.
    10. Re:Upgrade by gandalf013 · · Score: 3, Informative
      First of all, it is a pretty bad idea to use -U (--upgradeonly), because if the latest version of a package has some bug (either in the software itself, or in the ebuild), then you may well need to downgrade it (and portage will downgrade it [if needed] if you use the -u option). emerge -u is the Right Way.

      For the OP, emerge -upv world to see what will be upgraded, and then do an emerge -uv world to actually upgrade it (or you can upgrade only the packages you want to upgrade from the list).

      emerge -upv tells you which packages will be upgraded, and with what options (USE flags in Gentoo speak). -p is for pretend, while -v means verbose. Always a good idea before going ahead and doing the actual upgrade.

      Of course, with Gentoo, you never need to download the new distribution to make sure you stay current. Just do emerge -u world (after an emerge sync), and you have the latest version.

    11. Re:Upgrade by barcodez · · Score: 1

      -D is a deep upgrade, it updates all packages installed not just those explicitly installed.

      I always use "Uu" as is supresses the warning that U implies u.

      --

      ----
    12. Re:Upgrade by BenjiPenguin · · Score: 1

      Putting the '-u' flag in is repetitive if you already have '-U'. Well not exactly, but it's unneeded, as '-U'(--upgradeonly, does not downgrade anything) implies '-u'.. Just FYI :)

    13. Re:Upgrade by gandalf013 · · Score: 1

      Couple of points:

      -D: implies deep. This upgrades the packages that you didn't directly install (but which were installed as a dependency of the packages you installed). While this may seem to be a good idea, it may break things. For example: if you installed xine, which depends on libdv, portage will install libdv. Now, if you do an emerge -D world, and a new version of libdv is available, it will install that. xine still depends upon the old version though, so running it will give you an error as the old library is not found. Solution? Install gentoolkit and then use revdep-rebuild to make sure all broken dependencies are rebuilt. Or don't use -D at all.

      -U: as I said before, you probably don't want this, as it will not "downgrade" some packages when it may be necessary to do so (bugs, security issues, broken ebuilds, etc.).

      Other than that, you are right. So, just do:

      emerge sync && emerge -uv world
    14. Re:Upgrade by St.+Arbirix · · Score: 1

      I'd probably use "emerge -uDav world" just to see whether or not you really want to upgrade so soon, you probably don't though.

      XFree86, glibc, gcc, gnome, kde, xfce, portage, and all the kernels look like they might have been bumped a version. You'll need to pick the wisest update order for what you need.

      One of the updates is from kernel 2.6.5-r1 to 2.6.6_rc1. The way gentoo has handled it on my system, it'll just download the source code for you and you'll be able to compile it at your leisure. I'd upgrade gcc and glibc before compiling a new kernel.

      --
      Direct away from face when opening.
    15. Re:Upgrade by cornice · · Score: 1

      I think it's just:

      emerge -UD world

      and you can and should do this whenever you want. The releases really are just for the install CDs. Gentoo is constantly evolving and updating. An emerge -UD will always bring you up to date. I would suggest doing this first though:

      emerge -UDpv

      This will display the ebuilds that will be updated and their use flags whether on or off. For critical packages I would emerge them seperately. I would also always follow with a run through etc-update to be sure your config files are up to date. Also note that you can do:

      USE="-mysql" emerge cyrus-sasl

      This will merge cyrus-sasl without mysql support. I do this in paticular because I don't use mysql for sasl authentication but I want everything else to compile with mysql support (so mysql is in my USE flags in /etc/make.conf).

      Also note that you can do:

      ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86" emerge -UD k3b

      This will update k3b to the "unstable" version of the k3b ebuild. Note that this isn't the unstable k3b but just an untested k3b ebuild. Then using the -D flag will update without downgrading k3b. Note that using -d will likely downgrade unstable packges to the stable version. I had to do this with Win4Lin. I emerged the unstable ebuild, had some problems, ran out of time and simply did: emerge Win4Lin to return to a working version.

    16. Re:Upgrade by NetCow · · Score: 1

      You'd also have to get the /etc/make.profile symlink point to the new 2004.1 directory under /usr/portage/profiles to get full equivalence to the new "release".

    17. Re:Upgrade by trickycamel · · Score: 1

      emerge -upv world. Check what it says, if you're happy, emerge -uv world

      --
      Sig? What sig?
    18. Re:Upgrade by mrjackson2000 · · Score: 1
      and don't forget that -U is bad, dangerous and nolonger needed. use /etc/portage/package.keywords to unmask packages (the only reason to use -U in the first place)
      gnome-base/gnome ~x86
    19. Re:Upgrade by mrjackson2000 · · Score: 1
      -U is bad, dangerous and nolonger needed. use /etc/portage/package.keywords to unmask packages for example, to unmask gnome 2.6
      gnome-base/gnome ~x86
    20. Re:Upgrade by Our+Man+In+Redmond · · Score: 1

      As someone says further down the chain, you should also do an "etc-update" after you finish emerging the new version so you have all of your configuration files up-to-date.

      Assuming you're using a 2.4 kernel, you might also want to consider whether you want to keep your existing kernel, upgrade within the 2.4 kernel series (gentoo-sources), move to the new 2.6 kernel (gentoo-dev-sources), or one of the other kernel choices (hardened-sources, gaming-sources, etc). Assuming, that is, that you're on an x86 processor and not emerging onto a Mac or something.

      --
      Someone you trust is one of us.
    21. Re:Upgrade by Zagar · · Score: 1

      # emerge -Du world is a better thing to do since the -D flag ensures every depedency is installed.

      --
      YAFIRL (Yet another Free iPods referral link)
  11. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by Entropy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I just switched about three weeks ago from Debian to Gentoo, and so far I love it!

    emerge is as easy for me as apt-get was, and the only difference is I have to be patient with long builds. For me, thats a "so what" ?

    I'd personally rather wait during the install, than wait while the machine is supposed to be running.

    And while I am not a linux newbie, I certainly am no guru (yet :^), but I find Gentoo as easy as Debian. BOTH are MUCH better than RedHat, IMHO.

    Anyhow, whatever *nix one chooses, it handily beats Windoze over the head except for gaming. *sigh*

    Linux on THE desktop? Linux is on MY desktop.

    --
    The sea changes color, but the sea does not change.
  12. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by andy666 · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Yeah, but why do people put so much energy into these different distributions when it would profit the linux community and the rest of the world much more if linux was able to easily do things like download pictures from my digital camera ?

  13. Re:Awww crap! by rayde · · Score: 1

    don't worry... i'm also already running gentoo, and a emerge -p world doesn't list anything outdated on my system... I think this release is only going to provide updates to the install process and to the base system. once you're up and running, emerging new package will keep you just as up to date as the new releases will (since all they install is the very base system anyway).

  14. about that departure by __aahlyu4518 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "The departure of Daniel Robbins hasn't dented the progress of Gentoo Linux with version 2004.1 being released. ... "

    Robbins anounced his departure.. what.. last monday ?? Ofcourse his departure didn't affect the release... it was already finished !

    And Robbins hopes to continue working on the release engineering aspect of Gentoo...

    1. Re:about that departure by Dalcius · · Score: 1

      There was a little heat back a few months ago with what drobbins was doing with Gentoo Games. Apparently he and another Gentoo Dev had agreed to do a for-profit venture and didn't tell anyone straight away. There was also concern that drobbins wasn't pushing Gentoo Inc. to non-profit status, concerns about the growing management overhead, etc.

      I don't know how I feel about Daniel leaving. Reading some of the dissenters' stories (especially from the fork a few months back) and speaking with a Gentoo developer I know personally, I'm curious as to his real motives. But, in the end, this whole "Gentoo thing" was a brilliant idea and I owe him a lot for my last two years of computing. I'm happy to see the project take a more community oriented turn, but I am sad to see Daniel step down.

      Cheers

      --
      ~Dalcius
      Rome wasn't burnt in a day.
  15. Awww crap! by pointzero · · Score: 1

    If you're going to install it on your 486, do us a favor:

    1) Stop complaining about long installs, it's your fault. 2) Read the instructions because it should take nearly that long. 3) Install from binary... that should shorten your install time 100000x fold.

    ----
    This message has been written on a Gentoo Linux System.

  16. Drobbins' store by redog · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The gentoo store's funds go directly to Daniel Robbins. This is planned to change as soon as drobbins has the not for profit org in place. Untill then your purchaces fund him directly not the gentoo project.

    -Not that he hasn't done alot to deserve the money. But If your trying to support the community that supports gentoo you may want to wait untill the NFP community is actually created instead of funding the departing founder.

    1. Re:Drobbins' store by ViceClown · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Daniel has also accumulated on the order of about $20,000 in dept keeping Gentoo going so... helping the guy who gave us all Gentoo feed his kids isn't such a bad thing, IMHO :-)

      --
      Have a Happy.
    2. Re:Drobbins' store by cornice · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It seems that Drobbins could maintain ownership of the trademark and thus profit from the store indefinitely. That said, you obviously have not followed the effort and money that Drobbins has put into Gentoo. From a Gentoo Newsletter:

      In addition, Daniel will retain royalty-free rights to use of the "Gentoo" trademark and the "G" logo, allowing him to continue him to run the Gentoo Store if he wants, in order to support his family and attempt to pay some of the $20,000 in debt he accumulated during his tenure as Chief Architect.

      I think Drobbins deserves every penny that can be squeezed from the Gentoo store and then some. Thanks Daniel.

    3. Re:Drobbins' store by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here is the thread on the Gentoo forums tracking donations to the store (and thus to Daniel):

      http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=166143&po stdays=0&postorder=asc&start=0

      Pretty good showing of support so far. If you use Gentoo and are able, please contribute.

    4. Re:Drobbins' store by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Robbins' doesn't deserve a penny...he's a cold-blooded killer.

    5. Re:Drobbins' store by motown · · Score: 1

      Man, I've been reading about his debt on the Gentoo Forum. I didn't know he sacrificed so much to get Gentoo where it is today!

      And then to think how many people have happily been using this superb distro without having to pay a cent.

      I've never made a Paypal-donation before, but I'm simply compelled to make a donation this time. Since I've been enjoying Gentoo as my main OS for so many months (only rarely booting into Windows XP anymore), I simply owe him. Until I tried Gentoo, I had never encountered a distro that was so flexible that I could keep it up-to-date without having to cleanly reinstall every new major release.

      Fortunately, I'm not alone in this: I am particularly impressed by the level of appreciation and solidarity expressed by so many people on the forum so far. :)

      Daniel, hang in there! Help is on the way :D

      And if enough people contribute, I hope you'll reconsider your departure from Gentoo. Although we absolutely respect the fact that your familie will always remain your number one priority, as it should be! :)

      --
      "Oooh, does that mean we get to kick some puffy white mad zionist butt?"
  17. autoupdate by Tobias+Luetke · · Score: 1, Informative

    updating: emerge -D world

    1. Re:autoupdate by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Updating: Done with the -u flag. -D is "deep". RTFM, por favor, preferably before spreading misinformation.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  18. Upgrading is not needed by BuddieFox · · Score: 3, Informative

    Actually, with the Gentoo portage, current Gentoo users should be the ones least interested in new Gentoo distributions, since Gentoos portage allows updating of components to "the latest version" regardless of what cd-version you used to install it.

    To me the greatest benefit of Gentoo is this: I do not need to blow a machine clean and install a new version or risk a lot with an uncertain install of large packages, I just gradually update my system as new versions become available!

    And contrary to popular belief, Gentoo is pretty "user friendly" since it allows "on the fly updating". But this is of course once you actually have your system working flawlessly to begin with.. :)

    1. Re:Upgrading is not needed by ch3 · · Score: 1

      That's actually my biggest complain with Gentoo. Every time they release a new version I've got nothing more to do than "emerge rsync && emerge -u world" :(

      I've got a server installed with "1.1 something" and another with "1.4" and they never saw the install CD again...

      Maybe it's time to get a new computer so I can see the improvements in Gentoo's installation CD ;)

    2. Re:Upgrading is not needed by Dot.Com.CEO · · Score: 1
      And contrary to popular belief, Gentoo is pretty "user friendly" since it allows "on the fly updating"

      How is that different to every other distribution under the sun?

      --
      Mother is the best bet and don't let Satan draw you too fast.
    3. Re:Upgrading is not needed by Frohboy · · Score: 1

      An interesting bit that can be added to the parent is the fact that the actual bootstrapping process for a fresh install of Gentoo doesn't actually need an installation CD.

      I set up my home PC using a 1.4rc CD, but at work, I tried the "Knoppix install". You use a Knoppix CD (which is handy to have around anyway) to boot up, and set up your partitions. Then, you download the Stage 1 tarball from Gentoo, get the portage tools set up, and emerge the rest of your system. An advantage is that you can play games on the running Knoppix system while Gentoo is building itself. :)

    4. Re:Upgrading is not needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only difference is that new versions of the packages usually require new versions of the libraries. Correct me if I am wrong but in Gentoo I can mask glibc in 2.2 and then update KDE or something like that to the latest version knowing that it will not update the base libraries unless I tell it to.

      Of course, it will come a time when something needs a more updated version of your libraries and that requires you to upgrade lots of things...

      That said, I don't use Gentoo. I tried it but, at the time, they had a rc version of the kernel (2.4.19) which had an ide bug and hosed my girlfriends home directory (I mean completely hosed), so I decided to use something a bit more conservative.

    5. Re:Upgrading is not needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Correct me if I am wrong but in Gentoo I can mask glibc in 2.2 and then update KDE or something like that to the latest version knowing that it will not update the base libraries unless I tell it to."

      I don't know if you really can do that. I hope not, since you would end up with a trashed box.

      You just can't stick this to this version and upgrade that. Even when you can, if *features* (I mean features, not bugs) change, your environment changes too, even in unforeseen ways.

      That's why Debian Stable just accepts bugfixing backports, because is the Proper Thing To Be Done (TM) on a production environment.

    6. Re:Upgrading is not needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You just can't stick this to this version and upgrade that. Even when you can, if *features* (I mean features, not bugs) change, your environment changes too, even in unforeseen ways.

      Hrm, actually...

      Yeah, you can stick to your fav version of foo.bar and upgrade independant packages. Check the newbie installation guide.

      "features" are basically USE flags if I'm reading this right. You don't *have* to use them. That way there can be no unforseen consequences if some other application that states it supports "option" actually doesn't and just cores... Which is no fault of the upgraded package imho.

  19. Upgrade by barcodez · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm assuming one can upgrade by doing the following:

    #emerge sync
    #emerge -DUu world

    (oh and upgrading to the latest kernel that will be in /usr/src/ after the emerge)

    Could someone confirm or deny?

    --

    ----
  20. Re:Awww crap! by SQLz · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    How is this funny? Someone should mod it down for being redundant and over played.

  21. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmmm, funny, but I just plug in my USB Fuji Camera and Linux automatically mounts it as a removable drive and I can then drag and drop the pictures anywhere on my other drives, no problems at all.
    Maybe your problem lies somewhere between the keyboard and chair....

  22. How to upgrade... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    No need to download this CD to upgrade.
    1. "emerge sync"
    2. "emerge -pv world"
    3. Look at the list of packages and see if you need to upgrade them, or if the upgrade will break something.
    4. "emerge [packagename]"

    Some people say to just "emerge world", which will upgrade everything on the system. Problem is that you don't really want to be doing blind upgrades like that. A new version that just came out could have some security hole in it that you don't know about. Also, you should only upgrade if the newer version is a security fix or has a feature you need. UPgrading for shits and giggles is not a good idea. Also, don't forget to run "etc-update". (but READ THE MANPAGE FIRST, it can severely bork your system if you don't do it right. Consult the Gentoo forums for more infol.)

    1. Re:How to upgrade... by mahdi13 · · Score: 1

      Also, if you've been installing certain packages with the ALLOW_KEYWORDS="~x86" to get the 'bleeding edge' versions, an "emerge -u world" will 'downgrade' those packages to the 'stable' version.
      And using a global keywords upgrade won't work since there are many packages that won't even compile without certain tweaks

      --
      "Some things have to be believed to be seen." - Ralph Hodgson
    2. Re:How to upgrade... by xsbellx · · Score: 1

      You Sir/Madam are truly brilliant. If I had mod points, they ALL be used on this one post!

      --
      If VISTA is the answer, you didn't understand the question
  23. Re:Awww crap! by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

    Why would you want to install from a binary? Won't your biggest speed gains come from optimizing libc and other widely-used libraries?

  24. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by 42forty-two42 · · Score: 5, Funny
    root@gentoo ~# emerge newlines
    HTH.
  25. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by andy666 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well a year ago I had a system administrator try to get Mandrake to talk to an Olympus C3030 and it never happened!

  26. Not a good idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    You shouldn't just blindly update everything on the system. (which is what emerge world does) Do "emerge -pv world" to see what would be upgraded; then check and update each package individually.

    1. Re:Not a good idea... by BenjiPenguin · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, but this is time-consuming if you have 100 or more packages that need updating. I always go through the list, then mask out everything I don't want updated(in package.mask). Alot quicker. Of course, I'm the same person that emerges complete development packages, soo...

    2. Re:Not a good idea... by N1KO · · Score: 1

      Using -a asks if you want to continue (most of the time you will) avoiding the need to recalculate dependencies.

      I'm lazy so I have:
      alias up="esync && emerge -uDa world"
      esync comes with esearch (emerge esearch) It syncs, updates its little database to make searching faster and displays the list of changes after the sync.

      This takes a bit longer than a normal rsync/emerge -u world but it's usually going on when i'm having breakfast.

  27. Best Gentoo Utility! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    By far is esearch. "emerge esearch" will get you a suite of utilities that will index the portage tree and make it easier and faster to search the package descriptions. It will also sync and show you any new or updated packages since the last time you synced. A great addition to any Gentoo machine.

    1. Re:Best Gentoo Utility! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I do something like this
      alias es='esync && eupdatedb'

      Throw that in a cronjob and then use esearch to search the portage tree. Much faster and I recommend it over the original way ;)

      Cheers,

      ~ zx 'at' gentoo.org

    2. Re:Best Gentoo Utility! by RealityThreek · · Score: 1

      Wow, thanks for the tip. esearch is very cool, makes searching instantaneous.

      --
      :wq
    3. Re:Best Gentoo Utility! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use this to sync, while looking at the output.

      #!/bin/sh
      esync_pid=
      tail_pid=

      signal() {
      [ "x${esync_pid}" != "x" ] && \
      kill -0 "${esync_pid}" 2>/dev/null && \
      kill "${esync_pid}"
      [ "x${tail_pid}" != "x" ] && \
      kill -0 "${tail_pid}" 2>/dev/null && \
      kill "${tail_pid}"
      exit
      }
      trap signal EXIT ERR TERM INT HUP KILL

      /usr/sbin/esync &
      esync_pid="$!"

      /usr/bin/tail -F -n 0 /var/log/emerge-sync.log &
      tail_pid="$!"

      wait "${esync_pid}"
      kill "${tail_pid}"

      (Btw, esync calls emerge sync and eupdatedb.)

  28. PAY ATTENTION MODERATORS by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Flamebait
    (Said in a gollum voice of course)

    This is not a troll. Here, let me explain this joke so the humor impaired can figure it out. Debian released in the next ice age, Microsoft postponing the ice age.

    Is this a deliberate abuse of the moderation system, or just the result of the moderation work by an idiot who never should have had mod points?

    The scary part is that this is the kind of thing which tends to just get clicked off affirmatively during metamoderation. "Looks like the usual anti-M$ diatribe to me! (click)"

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  29. Re:Awww crap! by blkwolf · · Score: 1

    You can get binary stage3/grp install cd's or .iso's for your particular cpu and architecture.
    This lets you take advantage of both the speed of a binary install and a base system that's been optimized for your cpu class.

  30. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by andy666 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I should add, that your response is too typical of the linux community - "To get it to work is easy..just do such and such...oh it didn't work ? You must be ignorant" or some such insult. This is exactly the sort of nonsense that keeps linux from being widespead.

  31. Re:Does it still have the same installer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Dude, who needs an installer? You bootstrap Gentoo and off you go. Other distro are so archaic. Geez, I installed Gentoo two years ago and have completely forgotten what "installing" means. Just upgrade, that's it.

  32. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by westi · · Score: 1

    Have you tried gphoto for all you digital camera access needs?

  33. Removing packages? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Last time I was looking at Gentoo (about a year ago), one could not safely remove a package from Gentoo. Has that changed?

    1. Re:Removing packages? by mahdi13 · · Score: 1

      What? You mean "emerge unmerge packagename" is not safe?!?
      Oh crap...

      --
      "Some things have to be believed to be seen." - Ralph Hodgson
    2. Re:Removing packages? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? You mean "emerge unmerge packagename" is not safe?!?

      IIRC, it does not check if other packages depend on the package being removed. It simply removes it and other packages are left broken.

    3. Re:Removing packages? by mahdi13 · · Score: 1
      If you remove any core packages your system may cease to function and the removal of various libraries may cause software to fail.
      There's the key, in anything you do. You sure as HELL better know what your are doing if you are removing core packages!
      emerge unmerge gcc
      Might not be the best idea on a Gentoo system...
      --
      "Some things have to be believed to be seen." - Ralph Hodgson
    4. Re:Removing packages? by theTerribleRobbo · · Score: 1

      I think he was more focusing on the words

      Portage does not warn you if you are removing core packages or dependencies for other packages.

      What sensible package manager isn't going to check for dependencies when removing packages? It makes it a damn sight more hazardous if it doesn't.

    5. Re:Removing packages? by Zoolander · · Score: 1
      After you remove a package, you can do
      revdep --rebuild
      to re-install packages that are missing. Not the best solution, but until we get reverse dependency checking, it works..
      --
      Meep.
    6. Re:Removing packages? by dcstimm · · Score: 1

      if you remove a package you should know what kind of impact it has on your apps, and if for some reason something stops working after you unmerge it, then just reemerge the broken applications, or the one dependency that you just removed. But its easy to see what packages depend on each other by using gentoo-toolkit..

    7. Re:Removing packages? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "if you remove a package you should know what kind of impact it has on your apps"

      No, you shouldn't. I have thousands of packages installed on my system. Most of them are deep within its heart. How is it suppoused I am going to know about all of them? What I should know is a way to find it.

      And a safe net is not out of place (well... so after all kmail depends on sleepycat's db3, who would say?)

  34. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by irix · · Score: 4, Funny

    On topic when replying to this guy and still funny after all this time ... I've got the Karma to burn on the troll mods :)

    Official Gentoo-Linux-Zealot translator-o-matic

    Gentoo Linux is an interesting new distribution with some great features. Unfortunately, it has attracted a large number of clueless wannabes and leprotards who absolutely MUST advocate Gentoo at every opportunity. Let's look at the language of these zealots, and find out what it really means...

    "Gentoo makes me so much more productive."
    "Although I can't use the box at the moment because it's compiling something, as it will be for the next five days, it gives me more time to check out the latest USE flags and potentially unstable optimisation settings."

    "Gentoo is more in the spirit of open source!"
    "Apart from Hello World in Pascal at school, I've never written a single program in my life or contributed to an open source project, yet staring at endless streams of GCC output whizzing by somehow helps me contribute to international freedom."

    "I use Gentoo because it's more like the BSDs."
    "Last month I tried to install FreeBSD on a well-supported machine, but the text-based installer scared me off. I've never used a BSD, but the guys on Slashdot say that it's l33t though, so surely I must be for using Gentoo."

    "Heh, my system is soooo much faster after installing Gentoo."
    "I've spent hours recompiling Fetchmail, X-Chat, gEdit and thousands of other programs which spend 99% of their time waiting for user input. Even though only the kernel and glibc make a significant difference with optimisations, and RPMs and .debs can be rebuilt with a handful of commands (AND Red Hat supplies i686 kernel and glibc packages), my box MUST be faster. It's nothing to do with the fact that I've disabled all startup services and I'm running BlackBox instead of GNOME or KDE."

    "...my Gentoo Linux workstation..."
    "...my overclocked AMD eMachines box from PC World, and apart from the third-grade made-to-break components and dodgy fan..."

    "You Red Hat guys must get sick of dependency hell..."
    "I'm too stupid to understand that circular dependencies can be resolved by specifying BOTH .rpms together on the command line, and that problems hardly ever occur if one uses proper Red Hat packages instead of mixing SuSE, Mandrake and Joe's Linux packages together (which the system wasn't designed for)."

    "All the other distros are soooo out of date."
    "Constantly upgrading to the latest bleeding-edge untested software makes me more productive. Never mind the extensive testing and patching that Debian and Red Hat perform on their packages; I've just emerged the latest GNOME beta snapshot and compiled with -O9 -fomit-instructions, and it only crashes once every few hours."

    "Let's face it, Gentoo is the future."
    "OK, so no serious business is going to even consider Gentoo in the near future, and even with proper support and QA in place, it'll still eat up far too much of a company's valuable time. But this guy I met on #animepr0n is now using it, so it must be growing!"

    --

    Do you even know anything about perl? -- AC Replying to Tom Christiansen post.
  35. Portage-NG by SavedLinuXgeeK · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Supposedly Gentoo is switching Portage over to a new system (moving away from python, and to another language), and I thought it was happening soon(like 2004.0), but possibly not. Does anyone else have any idea on when this is happening, because apparently its a big step for Gentoo?

    --
    je suis parce que j'aime
    1. Re:Portage-NG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I saw this question asked before (before the 2004.0 release), the answer was along the lines of "Heh! more like 2005.0..."

  36. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by Paul+d'Aoust · · Score: 1

    hmmmmmmmmmm... I am one of those 'ignorant' people, and I got my Minolta E223 camera mounted no problem. (by the way, never buy an E223; it's not a great camera. Go for an Olympus.) It simply mounted as a USB bulk storage device.

    Maybe, though, Olympus cameras are different -- I know my Olympus USB multi-flash-card reader doesn't play nice with Linux -- or Windows, for that matter. I wonder what they're using for controller chips.

    --
    Standing at the very edge of my imagination, I peered into the inky void and realised -- I couldn't think up a new sig.
  37. Torrent Link by TimCrider · · Score: 1

    Does anyone have a torrent up for this release?

  38. Re:Does it still have the same installer? by Aneurysm9 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Gentoo has an installer? That's news to me! Seriously, though, Gentoo doesn't really need an installer because part of the point is to build your system from a minimalist base. Sure, some scripts could be hacked out to automate most things like HDD setup and extracting the stage tarballs, but I think that providing an excellent install document (as Gentoo does) that forces users to understand a bit more about what is really going on under the hood saves many times the effort on the backend when something goes wrong because more users will have some clue where to start troubleshooting.

    --
    There was Cowboy Neal at the wheel of a bus to never-ever land.
  39. Stages are more flexible than that! by MarcQuadra · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Stages are more flexible than that. If you use a tool like stager or catalyst you can compile fully-optimized stage3 tarballs for your next install from the system you're working on already, so you can still use 'today's' machine while building 'tomorrow's'.

    I have a stager script that I've hacked the bejeezus out of and configured to generate 2.6-headered NPTL systems that are fully optimized, even though the installs start at stage3. I've got flowcharts and stuff to keep track of the 'stage evolution'

    here's my process, IIRC:

    1. have working gentoo system with stager and a stage1 snapshot.
    2. emerge sync
    3. unmask or modify certain .ebuilds for desired result (gcc-3.3.3 and linux-headers-2.6.5 come to mind). Also modify stager for optimizations and stager/files/make.conf.$ARCH for USE flags.
    3. stager snap $DATE-custom
    4. stager athlon-xp 2 stage1 $DATE-custom
    5. stager athlon-xp 1 $DATE-custom $DATE-custom
    6. clean out temp files in /var/stager for good luck
    7. stager athlon-xp 2 $DATE-custom $DATE-custom
    8. stager athlon-xp 3 $DATE-custom $DATE-custom

    so now you've got a fully-native NPTL stage1 to build other stages from and a fully-native stage3 ready to install.

    My actual system is a lot more complex, as I build a 'generic i686' stage1 and then fork off to Pentium3 ad Athlon-XP builds for my different machines. I've also got a totally seperate stage geneology for the PPC build, but they all share the portage snapshots and configs for consistency.

    --
    "Sometimes, I think Trent just needs a cup of hot chocolate and a blankie." -Tori Amos on Nine Inch Nails
  40. for my money - overrated by chegosaurus · · Score: 1

    I tried Gentoo a while back, all the hype round here made it sound quite exciting. I installed the binary base, set all the build variables and let it do its thing.

    The system it built for me wasn't noticably faster than my old Slackware install. It certainly wasn't worth the pain of the build process.

    Gentoo worked just fine, but in the end I decided I preferred my old "home grown" Slackware setup because I already knew where everything was and how it all fitted together, so I dug out the tape and went back to that.

    I've tried lots of distributions over the years and I really can't see any one with any clear benefits. It's all the same kernel, the same desktop and the same tools. (Pretty much.)

    I know a lot of people like gentoo's packaging, but I don't really like any packaging beyond the .tar.gz source. ./configure --prefix - how hard can it be?

    1. Re:for my money - overrated by n()_cHIEFz · · Score: 1

      If you have the bandwith (which does cost a little) then how can it be overrated for the money, last time I checked it's free.

      I agree that unless you use prelinking the system won't be noticably faster than any other distro. And prelinking won't help all packages at that.

      I can't argue against using something that's firmilar but if you know what you're doing, if you've used one distro you've used them all. If you think that compiling everything from tarballs and solving dependancy problems on your own isn't that hard, why is it so hard to switch to another distro?

      The portage system is way better than downloading tarballs and trying to resolve dependecy problems yourself (downloading more tarballs and ./configure, etc., etc.) I doubt you could install any program faster with tarballs versus a simple emerge install [program], as emerge finds all the dependancies, downloads and compiles them for you, and you don't have to worry about configuration.

      Gentoo is the first distro that I've used (although Debian comes close) that really makes it easy to install and use almost ANY program out there for Linux. Even if the source you need to compile is not in the portage tree, it's really easy to emerge all the dependancies that you need to make the source work. I'm speaking from experience here, I've used Slack (since almost 8 years ago), Debian, Mandrake, RedHat/Fedora, and even with tools like apt and yum I can't make every piece of software work without a lot of hassle. So portage really does make Gentoo shine, IMO.

      --
      -- Is it a right to remain ignorant? -- Calvin
    2. Re:for my money - overrated by IdleTime · · Score: 1

      I guess since Gentoo uses tar.bz2, that is the cause you don't like Gentoo?

      And 'emerge program' is easier than your world. It will:
      a) Check and install all dependencies of 'program'
      b) Unpack the source, run configure, make and install the 'program' for you.
      c) Portage allows you to have several versions of a program installed due to it's use of slots.

      Not beeing a Gentoo zealot, but I don't see how your argument is valid.

      --
      If you mod me down, I *will* introduce you to my sister!
    3. Re:for my money - overrated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is my thinking too. I mean, at the end of the day, what do you really need on your Linux box?

      bash/csh, vi/emacs, gcc/g++/gdb, grep, tail, and a boatload of other tools...

      You'll get the same tools, with (mostly) the same behaviour regardless of what distribution you use. Who really cares how the tools get onto your harddrive?

      Heck, in that regard, I find WinXP with cygwin to be sufficient for most things I need to do.

  41. etc-update by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Don't forget to run etc-update after you upgrade; that way you can merge any changes to the config files in /etc. (hence the name "etc-update")

    IMPORTANT!!!!: make damn sure you know what you are doing before running etc-update!!!! It is very easy to bork your system if you're not paying attention. Read the manpage and check with the forums before using it.

  42. For current Gentoo users, no need to "upgrade" by ScottGant · · Score: 1

    If you use, as I do:

    "emerge sync && emerge -UDvp world"

    once a day, or once every other day or so (not more than this, once daily should be enough, if you do it more it could slow down the rsync servers...don't be greedy).

    You do this a few times a week and you've GOT the up-to-date Gentoo already. The "Gentoo Linux 2004.1" is mainly a new version for the install CD's.

    And I've also been using Gentoo since about last October and haven't looked back. It's kinda cool since I built this system from scratch (bought the components and case etc etc and slapped it all together) and then built the OS from scratch that goes on it. This machine has never run any other OS...hehe, it hasn't been "tainted".

    And as far as compiles go, people saying that it takes forever are full of it. I let mine emerge sync at night and it's ready to roll in the morning. The only time I ever reboot my machine is when I have major Kernel upgrades (for instance going from 2.6.4 to 2.6.5 etc). And even then that only takes about 10 minutes...tops.

    Gentoo is a great distro. And personally, it was the easiest to get up and running. And I know EXACTLY what is loaded and what isn't. Not a lot of un-needed crap that other distros tend to throw in for no good reason.

    --

    "Music is everybody's possession. It's only publishers who think that people own it." - John Lennon.
    1. Re:For current Gentoo users, no need to "upgrade" by mrjackson2000 · · Score: 1

      the -U option is bad, and nolonger needed. use the /etc/portage/packages.keywords file for unmasking purposes, and if your not unmasking anything the -U isn't needed anyway, -u works fine

    2. Re:For current Gentoo users, no need to "upgrade" by ScottGant · · Score: 1

      Thanks! Something that slipped through the cracks for me.

      --

      "Music is everybody's possession. It's only publishers who think that people own it." - John Lennon.
    3. Re:For current Gentoo users, no need to "upgrade" by justMichael · · Score: 1

      OK, so your post got me digging on /etc/portage/packages.keywords, apparently this is now the way to do it, but the docs are wrong?

      Just another classic example of the problems with Gentoo (don't get me wrong, I use it and like it, but you gotta watch your ass) if -U is so wrong, a hack and deprecated, why is there no message stating so when it's used?

      My initial concern with using /etc/portage/packages.keywords for masking is that I may only want an unstable version to get a feature that I need now, when that version becomes stable, I don't want the bleeding edge. I only unmask packages that I need features in.

    4. Re:For current Gentoo users, no need to "upgrade" by mrjackson2000 · · Score: 1

      it's a recent addition, and i'm looking into finding/writing docs if you just want to unmask a certian version of a package, i belive if you put in the version number that it will work like you want

    5. Re:For current Gentoo users, no need to "upgrade" by mrjackson2000 · · Score: 1

      ohh, and looking back at my original post i realized that it's suposta be /etc/portage/package.keywords not packages

    6. Re:For current Gentoo users, no need to "upgrade" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "And as far as compiles go, people saying that it takes forever are full of it"

      Then, please, come home and compile it from scratch (stage1) on my K6II-350 and then repeat that.

      In this case it goes literally forever: you just can't go from stage 1 to KDE in any sensible time span (I calcute about 5 to 6 days if all the box would do is compile. But then it won't end anyway... too old to be at 100% CPU usage day after day)... But please don't tell me it's because faulty hardware: it works just OK for my day to day needs with it's current installed Linux distribution.

    7. Re:For current Gentoo users, no need to "upgrade" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      either get a real computer out of the dark ages, or use the binary packages.

      You MUST realize that it would take a while to compile everything if your computer is an old one. I mean, you do know that right?

      And the ones with 486's will have a rough time too. But since that computer hardware is so cheap today, I put together a system for less than 400 dollars that compiled everything, including X and Gnome in a day...so it's not asking much. Also, don't cry to me "but 400 is too much". 400 is nothing. If you can't afford a 400 dollar computer, then you can't afford internet access, you can't afford rent, you can't afford anything.

      I deliver newspapers for a living...that's it...and even I can afford to build a new computer.

      Give me a fucking break.

    8. Re:For current Gentoo users, no need to "upgrade" by justMichael · · Score: 1

      So I finally got around to mucking around with packages.keywords and it seems to be working OK, with the exception of bind 9.2.3, using both .keywords and .unmask. I can't get it to believe that I actually want 9.2.3 installed.

      Thanks for the tip. now to figure out the bind issue.

  43. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by Dan+Ost · · Score: 1

    Could you please discribe your difficulties in this area?

    If you do this, perhaps people will be able to give helpful advice.

    --

    *sigh* back to work...
  44. Re:Does it still have the same installer? by Neil+Watson · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The original poster has valid point. If you are installing Gentoo on the underwear covered machine at foot of your bed than the current install procedure is fine. You have the time to spare. For production, one does not have the time to duplicate the tedious steps of the Gentoo install procedure for every machine.

  45. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by eugene+ts+wong · · Score: 1
    It can automatically build all the dependencies for the program too, saving you much time and effort.
    I agree with this. Much of the user friendliness is in taking care of the dependencies. Users @ all skill levels don't want to search around for dependencies.

    I also agree that the installation process is user friendly. User friendly isn't necessarily the same as automated. Sometimes you need to have certain options, but if the installer automatically installs without the option, then it could be considered user unfriendly. I consider the install documentation user friendly, because it tries to explain what you need to do, as well as give reasonable defaults.
    Another large benefit of gentoo is it doesn?t install anything that isn?t needed to clutter your system up. It will install the bare bones, (ssh, etc) and then you can emerge anything you want. This is much nicer than most OS?s which will load it with crap from the start.
    This is not true. It installs some things that I definitely don't need. I don't use my CD drive, so it shouldn't be installing things like "eject". There were a couple of other programs that I definitely didn't want, also. These programs weren't huge so it didn't really matter, but still.

    Another complaint that I have is the modprobing every time you boot up. I turn my workstation off each night to save electricity, & wear 'n tear. To have to go through the modprobe each time is wasteful. Modprobbing is supposed to be done during kernel install.

    It's still a wonderful OS, though.
  46. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by andy666 · · Score: 1

    This is another variation of the problem. Yes right,

    "it worked for me and so it will work on every possible distribution with any device. I can't possibly imagine that with a COMPUTER things might be more complicated in different scenarios."

    Things are so fragmented this just isn't the case. It is the one advantage Apple has over Linux. So many times have I had responses like this about "sure no problem in Linux!" and in the end it is either impossible or a total pain in the ass. I really am starting to think that their is a serious psycological issue - too much of the community would prefer to be cogniscenti, and stay "the smart computer guys" rather than let the rest of the world be a part of linux.

  47. Gentoo vs. Slackware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Good day,

    I literally just moved my home computer from Slackware 9.1 to Gentoo 2004.0 last week (ok, over the course of the last week!) and I have to say that it is indeed the slickest Linux distribution I have ever used!

    I still run Slackware 9.1 on my laptop, which has 5/3 the memory and a CPU twice as fast as my home computer - but my new Gentoo box actually runs about TWICE as fast!! It's amazing how compiling everything w/ -O3 and -march=XXX really makes a huge difference. Last night I was simultaneously compiling OpenOffice, Evolution and Gimp, with no slowdown at all in my web browzing, development, etc!

    Also, nvidia, sound, FB, kernel 2.6.5 worked the first time, plus it has thousands of packages to download (everything I need), and boots faster than Windows did on my faster machine (by ~8-15 seconds, depending on my readings).

    One more thing - Portage is even more user-friendly than downloading *.tgz from linuxpackages.net and running installpkg. It searches for the right version from various mirrors, then downloads, does MD5 checking, and compiles automatically, and maintains a nifty little log, and checks for all dependencies. Also - it provides the most freedom I've seen in a distribution - nothing I don't need or want is installed. Getting evolution to be optimized to my machine is just a matter of typing "# emerge evolution"

    Gentoo is indeed fan-freaking-tastic (if you have the patience to compile everything from scratch).

    A. Coward

    1. Re:Gentoo vs. Slackware by tangent3 · · Score: 1

      I would not actually recommend -O3. -O2 is sufficient and can often be faster than -O3 simply because you can fit more code into the cache with the smaller compile.

    2. Re:Gentoo vs. Slackware by dpilot · · Score: 1

      I've even heard some recommendations for -Os, (optimize for size) because cache limitations may be more significant than other factors.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    3. Re:Gentoo vs. Slackware by milkman_matt · · Score: 1

      You know what, your mentioning of the -03 and -march flags n' stuff, this reminds me of something... Something that, IMO would make gentoo absolutely perfect (aside from an intuitive installer option, that'd be nice). This missing link for me, is the ability to merge $package --prefix=/usr/local/$package. I asked them about it and they said it's not possible at the moment.. :( But dammit the day they get that working I will be absolutely stoked.

      -matt

    4. Re:Gentoo vs. Slackware by Sweetshark · · Score: 1

      but my new Gentoo box actually runs about TWICE as fast!!
      You b0rked something with you Slackware install ...
      -O3 and -march=XXX really makes a huge difference.
      No, not a huge one. However, -fomit-frame-pointer makes a difference on archs where it isnt included in -O2/3 by default (x86 for example)
      You have a point on gentoos maintainablity and user-friendliness tough ...
      Björn, a longtime gentoo user - because it just works.

  48. Removing even MORE by MarcQuadra · · Score: 2, Informative

    BTW, you can disable or add packages to the 'base' system by editing /usr/portage/profiles/.

    I disable a few packages from the 'recommended set' before I snapshot the tree and start building.

    --
    "Sometimes, I think Trent just needs a cup of hot chocolate and a blankie." -Tori Amos on Nine Inch Nails
  49. Go OSDN by Mr.+Arbusto · · Score: 0, Redundant

    As relfected in previous posts, it looks like slashdot is becoming more Freshmeat.net with each passing day. Then again, it is news for nerds.

    Just my two cents

  50. Gentoo store clarification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    The Gentoo store doesn't support Gentoo, it supports Daniel Robbins' family and his debt incurred in administering Gentoo.

    Just wanted to clear that up. ;)

    If you really wanted to support Gentoo itself, make a direct contribution.

  51. about his return by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i hope Daniel Robbins will rejoin gentoo when he gets out.

  52. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by Polkyb · · Score: 3, Flamebait

    It would be funnier if it wasn't so true...

    I do find that emerge is a wonderful tool for installing with, however, I think they still need to do some work on the installation guide... I managed to get my gentoo box up running KDE and SAMBA (+some other stuff I require) but, the lack of a decent troubleshooting guide, and my relative inexperience with how Linux actually DOES what it does, means that I'm buggered if I can get the sound to work in an X session.

    Still, my philosophy is 'This is how we learn'

    --
    I've never shoed a horse, but I once told a donkey to piss off!
  53. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by D-Cypell · · Score: 4, Informative

    Anyhow, whatever *nix one chooses, it handily beats Windoze over the head except for gaming

    And hardware support... The only reason my laptop is still running XP is that my wireless card refuses to run.

    After a bit of hunting it seems that the problem is an IRQ conflict between the inbuilt LAN card (which cant be disabled in the BIOS) and the IRQ that the PCMCIA tries to grab when initializing the card.

    The card works in windows without a hitch.

    I dare say that someone with skills beyond mine in Linux could probably get it working, but for now im stuck in windows, as are most of the computer using population.

  54. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by SoTuA · · Score: 1
    Another complaint that I have is the modprobing every time you boot up.

    Ever hear of loading modules on boot, like in, say, /etc/modules.conf or /etc/modprobe.conf (for 2.6 kernels)?

    One word: RTFM!

  55. Re:Does it still have the same installer? by Dan+Ost · · Score: 1

    Gentoo doesn't really have an installer. The LiveCD gives you an environment
    where you can do the installation yourself, but any environment that supports
    the network and chroot should work just fine (any live-cd or installed
    linux partition should work just fine).

    I have, in the past, installed an old minimal version of RedHat just to get an
    environment to install Gentoo from when I couldn't boot off of a CD. Does anyone
    know of a boot floppy that supports chrooting (Tom's didn't when I tried)?

    --

    *sigh* back to work...
  56. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Are you actually interested in getting help with your camera, or just in providing a running commentary on the state of Linux and its users?

  57. No security policy for gentoo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does it have it? If so, where is it?

  58. Re:Does it still have the same installer? by mehaiku · · Score: 1

    "Does anyone know of a boot floppy that supports chrooting (Tom's didn't when I tried)?

    Boot Knoppix. Enter virtual terminal. Proceed with well documented installation instructions. Done.
  59. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sir.!!
    I guess you are typing in the wrong window.! Your gentoo irc chat window is on the 3rd desktop please cntrl-tab cntrl-tab cntrl-tab.
    thank you.

  60. One more thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    One more thing:

    Gentoo emerge -UD world FUCKS UP configuration files.

    I have a server in a closet and after emerge fucked up its network I had to drag the damn thing out, bring out a monitor and a keyboard to deal with the mess. Talk about how easy Unix makes remote administration...

    1. Re:One more thing by ScottGant · · Score: 4, Informative

      Gentoo emerge -UD world FUCKS UP configuration files.

      um..if you knew anything about Gentoo then you would know that it doesn't touch configuration files, if there is a new config file it will rename the NEW file as something like /etc/._cfg0000_gentoo-release while keeping the original /etc/gentoo-release untouched.

      After the emerge it will tell you that some files config files need to be looked at, a simple:

      find /etc -iname '._cfg????_*'

      will give you a list of the config files that need updating. Yes. Gentoo even informs you how to find these files. and nice big fat: "use 'emerge --help config' message is staring you right in the face if any new config files need updating.

      This isn't something you can just bypass. Nice try. But please, give us a little credit if you're going to make something up!

      --

      "Music is everybody's possession. It's only publishers who think that people own it." - John Lennon.
    2. Re:One more thing by B1 · · Score: 5, Informative

      After the emerge it will tell you that some files config files need to be looked at, a simple:

      find /etc -iname '._cfg????_*'


      Actually, you can also do:

      'etc-update'

      This will walk you through the config files that need to be updated, and let you decide whether you want to accept the changes wholesale, discard the changes, or manually merge them in (it will even show you the differences between old and new).

  61. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by andy666 · · Score: 1

    Thanks for you offer - that is nice of you. But the problem is moot now.

  62. Help is an IRC channel away. by ScottGant · · Score: 4, Interesting

    irc.freenode.net /join #gentoo

    Very helpfull people there. Base install of Gentoo comes with "irssi" IRC client that you can hook up to right from the install CD. Ask your question (no need to ask "can I ask a question") and try to be as specific as you can.

    Now, this IS an IRC channel so you might run into a few knuckleheads there, but be patient and you WILL be helped. The people there are very well versed and many of the OPs are themselves Gentoo developers and they know the system. They will help.

    I go there to help also. It's my small way of giving something back to the community as I'm not a developer, but I can try to help others.

    Most people are very patient there, but if you're asking a question that's plainly right in the install guide, they'll direct you to that usually.

    Don't be a jerk there and you'll do fine. Others I've seen log into the channel and go "this sucks, I can't get this and this working...Gentoo sucks...I can't do anything". Then when no one responds in about 20 seconds they shout "how come no one wants to help me...this sucks". And on and on. Some people are beyond help it seems...and not for just and OS install either, hehe.

    --

    "Music is everybody's possession. It's only publishers who think that people own it." - John Lennon.
    1. Re:Help is an IRC channel away. by Li0n · · Score: 2, Interesting

      honestly #gentoo is one of the least helpful channels I've ever been in. I hung out there for a while, asked very specific questions about non-esoteric stuff, politely and everything, and just got ignored. In the end I figured out things myself, which is fine. The reason I installed gentoo is because it's more "manual" than other distros, however some help would have been nice...

      --

      ~
      ~
      :wq
    2. Re:Help is an IRC channel away. by ScottGant · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, it does take time, it also depends on what time of day.

      But then again, some people don't feel they're ever helped it seems. I'm not saying you're one of them of course, but some don't have the patience.

      It is free by the way. I've found #gentoo an enormous help when I was first installing my system. They helped me get everything up and running and pointed out certain areas I would need to look more into etc etc. I was amazed at how helpfull.

      But I understand you can't please everyone all the time. All I can say is if you're ignored at first, or they were busy helping others, just try back later.

      Should IRC and #gentoo be used in place of a tech support service, of course not. But you may find that it's a very nice place to get help.

      --

      "Music is everybody's possession. It's only publishers who think that people own it." - John Lennon.
    3. Re:Help is an IRC channel away. by Agile+Monkey · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Don't be a jerk there and you'll do fine. Others I've seen log into the channel and go "this sucks, I can't get this and this working...Gentoo sucks...I can't do anything". Then when no one responds in about 20 seconds they shout "how come no one wants to help me...this sucks". And on and on. Some people are beyond help it seems...and not for just and OS install either, hehe.
      Actually, sometimes that can help, as weird as that may sound. I read this one time on /. and I absolutely agree. If you're nice and say hello I don't know how to use X in linux, please help me, then you might get an answer within the next hour after being told to look through all sorts of documentation. On the other hand, if you say "linux is a stupid piece of crap and can't do X, windows can do that EASILY", then you get about ten people yelling at you each telling you exactly what command to type and it works flawlessly :)
      --
      It puts the lotion on its skin or else it gets the hose again.
    4. Re:Help is an IRC channel away. by ravloony · · Score: 1

      Do you know why that is? I worked it out after a couple of deceptions. It's because they all talk to each other by nick, and so tend to ignore the other messages. I myself have my irc app set to highlight messages with my nick in them....

      Anyway, good luck with gentoo, i find it's cool

  63. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let me guess for you encore you are going to do a joke about how long gentoo compiles take? /. really needs some new material.

  64. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by michrech · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I feel I should add that it is NOT typical of the entire linux community. In the years I have been hanging out in the #gentoo channel on freenode, I don't recall ever once having seen someone say "You couldn't get it working? You must be ignorant."

    --
    bork bork bork!
  65. my poor modem by uberjoe · · Score: 1
    I thought gentoo sounded great until I tried to install it. The manual was telling me to cp a directory that did not exist, and the disc only seemed to contain one kernel. (I wanted the gaming kernel)

    And all this emerge sync all stuff would be great if I had broadband and could utilize all those new packages. The gentoo faqs made sure to point out that a netless install was possible, which it seemed to be but just barely.

    I guess I'll stick with suse until I can convince my wife to give in and get cable or dsl, but with a new baby on the way I doubt that will happen.

    This gripe session has ended.

    --

    The days of the digital watch are numbered.

  66. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by eugene+ts+wong · · Score: 1

    Yeah, but who says that I'm loading any modules? If I'm not, then there should be a way to specify that.

    I haven't seen any manuals that tell us how to disable the modprobing each time. I haven't really seen any documentation that explains it either.

  67. Enough by MasTRE · · Score: 1


    I keep seeing the #1 complaint being that Gentoo is always compiling stuff. Aside from the original install, this is a non-issue. You do know that Linux is a multi-tasking(tm) OS, don'tcha? Stop your whining. I'm not doing this to defend Gentoo in particular (although I like it mucho), it's just pissing me off to see the crybabies always repeating the same crap all the time. Look, you don't like it, don't use the damn thing! Compiling ain't your thing? No prob! Forget Gentoo, go to distrowatch.com, pick something else. Just stop your damn bitching already, you big babies!
    </rant>

    --
    Must-not-watch TV!
    1. Re:Enough by thryllkill · · Score: 1
      I'll second this. I used Gentoo for about two months, and in truth I was annoyed at the compiling all the time thing, plus due to over-optimizations (at least that is reason most problems with Gentoo are blamed on) I had some weird stuff going on sometimes. Like when I was just browsing the web and doing little non-intensive things like that my CPU usage would suddenly spike and drag ths system to a halt for a few moments. The really strange drawback of that was it would through my system clock off by however long it was stuck.

      Anyways, dreading a gentoo rebuild I started looking for other 686 optimized distos, and gave Arch Linux a try. So far I love it. Pacman is a great package manager. If your suffering from gentoo compile burnout, give it a shot.

      --

      Note to self: No more arguing with the faithful.

    2. Re:Enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People who are complaining about the compile times should switch to the standard Gentoo kernel, which is made for tasking during compiles. The 'gaming' kernels etc. are pitiful in comparison.

    3. Re:Enough by Sweetshark · · Score: 1

      Stop your whining. [...] to see the crybabies always repeating the same crap [...] stop your damn bitching already, you big babies!
      You must be new here ...

    4. Re:Enough by MasTRE · · Score: 1

      LOOOOL
      good one ;)

      --
      Must-not-watch TV!
  68. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by mattyrobinson69 · · Score: 1

    if you have a different pcmci slot, try moving your wireless network card there - that might sort out the IRQ conflict

  69. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is the one advantage Apple has over Linux.

    Really? So if you plug a device which uses a propriatory communications protocol into an Apple which doesn't have drivers to communicate with the device, the Apple will still magically work with the device?

    Those Apple guys must be putting pixie dust in every box!

  70. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by mattyrobinson69 · · Score: 1

    "Gentoo makes me so much more productive." "Although I can't use the box at the moment because it's compiling something, as it will be for the next five days, it gives me more time to check out the latest USE flags and potentially unstable optimisation setting have you never heard of multitasking?

  71. Not mentioned yet, or often around here by lambent · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What is not often mentioned is the stable vs. unstable settings in portage. Ie, in /etc/make.conf is the setting 'ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86"', which means unstable/testing packages, as opposed to "x86", which is just regular old stable pacakages.

    There have been lots of issues over the past few months regarding improper (too hasty and with too little testing) moving of pacakges from ~x86 to x86. This often results in pacakges that will not compile cleanly in the stable branch for all users.

    There was a hideous bug a few months back introduced into ~x86 that basically screwed up the build environment for all packages. I was one of the lucky ones that it hit. Weird permission conflicts that could not be resolved that forced a complete system reinstall. And, while one might correctly point out I'm running unstable, this was an error in portage itself, and should not have been introduced into the system at all.

    Also, two weeks ago, there was an issue with xine, where the only way to get it compiled was to start the emerge, pause it, then change directory into the sandbox, remove an erroneous file, then unpause the build.

    Then there was the problem with OOo not compiling correctly in the sandbox. Solution? Don't use the sandbox (red flags should be going up, here).

    Then there was the problem where I somehow caught half the latest KDE upgrade in portage, but not ALL of it. So, portage upgraded some packages, then downgraded those same packages to reinstall lower numbered KDE pacakges, which then forced me to recompile everything again on the next complete sync.

    Now, one may point out that all these problems will eventually be fixed with correct and updated ebuilds. And they were and will continue to be. However, these problems are not infrequent to begin with.

    The moral of the story is, gentoo is great, "May she live forever", etc etc. However, updating is NOT always as simple as "emerge sync && emerge -uD world". If you put off updating for a few weeks, you will get dozens of packages that will be updated next time you sync. Sometimes you can let it happily hum for a few days autonomously recompiling stuff. Othertimes, compiling will exit for no good reason, and you'd best get your thinking cap on.

    It's NOT idiot simple.

    (incidentally, I started off using the stable tree only, but had enough problems with it that I decided i might as well use unstable to get on the bleeding edge.)

    1. Re:Not mentioned yet, or often around here by reasonant · · Score: 1

      When dealing with stable (x86) and unstable(~x86) one of the best features which I have only discovered recently (I think it is only recent) is the /etc/portage/package.keywords file.

      I run a x86 base system but there are always packages that I want that are currently marked ~x86 - so I just populate the package.keywords file with these packages and everything else works fine - it is much better than temporarily changing ACCEPT_KEYWORDS to ~x86 because it make sure that you don't install unstable depenency packages if you don't want too.

      Incidently, I would recommend gentoo as a brilliant distribution for linux newbies - sure sometimes things go really wrong and you have to start again but I learnt much more in much less time than I ever did with redhat - of course I happen to think the important reasons for using linux is to learn stuff...

    2. Re:Not mentioned yet, or often around here by rlangis · · Score: 1

      I think I saw the same bug with portage. I was updating the wife's laptop to the latest versions of whatever overnight, and when I went to check the system the next morning it was hosed. Emerge just wouldn't work. For *anything*.

      Since that system was the only system on the network running anything other than Debian (or Windows) I decided that for kicks I'd just boot via Knoppix and run the HD installer off of that. I've not had a Debian installation - even with everything running unstable - totally render the system unusable, like whatever issue with portage did to my laptop.

      Gentoo is a good idea, but I don't think I was running unstable on the laptop, and it completely threw me that it would just up and die for no apparent reason. I'm sure if I'd played with it I could have gotten everything fixed, but I wasn't really in the mood. Plus in order for Gentoo to really shine you should have a fairly beefy system (or perhaps distributed compilers, a la ditscc?), and none of my linux boxes are over the 1Ghz mark.

      Ah well, to each his own.

      --
      GIR: I'm going to sing the Doom song now. Doom doom doom doom doom doom de-doom doom doom doom doom doom doom...
  72. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hilarious. I did notice your last statement about no serious business considering Gentoo was not funny because it is not true. I do happen to know 2 high level network administrators who are very seriously considering Gentoo for their server farms. They had invested much time and effort building these systems and now Red Hat is dropping support and forcing an upgrade. They decided they would like to avoid a forced upgrade in the future . Since their time is valuable they are very seriously considering Gentoo and are evaluting it as we speak. As far as it being serious business I have to say it is so serious I cannot give out the name. Have to say though that is a hilarious post *chuckles*

  73. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by Lussarn · · Score: 4, Informative

    uncomplicated upgrades.
    This is the only reason I switched all servers where I work over to gentoo. We need some special builds and such. I don't have time to download/compile by hand. Of all distros I have used Gentoo is the easiest to maintain and keep up to date.

    It would be nice with a more enterprise geared gentoo though. It is very fast with upgrades to new packages, might break something. Doesn't happen often but if it does it's often easy to fix.

    For the desktop there is no competition. Gentoo is the easiest "bleeding edge distro" to maintain. Alot of unstable packages to test out. And no need to go fully unstable if you only need a few packages.

    Now I have about 10 different gentoo boxes at work to take care of. Every friday it takes about an hour of work to upgrade them. Could probably handle 20-30 with not much more time spent.

  74. MOD THIS DOWN by DroopyStonx · · Score: 1

    This looks like a copy & paste of a horrible term paper... why mod this up?

    --
    We have secretly replaced these Slashdot mods' sense of humor with a rusty nail. Let's see if they notice!!
  75. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by andy666 · · Score: 1

    Well then what about the above response to my original post ?

  76. Karma Whoring by DroopyStonx · · Score: 2, Funny

    Since everyone is getting away with posting obvious shit like:

    "Update your system with 'emerge sync' and then 'emerge -DUu world'"

    and

    "Don't forget to run etc-update after you upgrade; that way you can merge any changes to the config files in /etc. (hence the name "etc-update")"

    I figured I'd take part in some karma whoring of my own: GENTOO IS A LINUX DISTRO!!! omg!!!!!! I bet you DIDN'T KNOW THAT!!!

    Now give me my fucking karma.

    --
    We have secretly replaced these Slashdot mods' sense of humor with a rusty nail. Let's see if they notice!!
    1. Re:Karma Whoring by secondsun · · Score: 1

      Now give me my fucking karma.

      How about a +1 Funny Instead?

      --
      There is nothing wrong with being gay. It's getting caught where the trouble lies.
  77. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by jiminim · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Wait!

    root@gentoo ~# emerge newlines
    Calculating dependencies
    emerge: there are no masked or unmasked ebuilds to satisfy "newlines".

    !!! Error calculating dependencies. Please correct.

  78. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That crap your parents told you about "people who pick on you really just feel bad about themselves" - it's not true. Seriously, that was a LIE to make YOU feel better. YOU'RE the one with the self esteem problem because YOU'RE the one everyone kicks around.

    Projection is ugly, you should stop doing that.

  79. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by 74nova · · Score: 3, Insightful

    speaking of karma whoring, thats not the first time ive seen that exact post somewhere else. am i missing out on an inside joke or are you trolling?

    --
    use your turn signal! you people act like it's divulging information to the enemy
  80. Ready for production? by ryanvm · · Score: 1

    I've used Gentoo briefly as a workstation OS, but one thing I've wondered is how stable is it?

    Is anyone using Gentoo in a server farm in a production environment? That's always been one of the strengths of Debian's stable release. You can run your servers for years at a time and never have an update break ANYTHING. Has Gentoo reached this level of stability yet or is it more of a bleeding edge kind of distro?

    1. Re:Ready for production? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Has Gentoo reached this level of stability yet or is it more of a bleeding edge kind of distro?"

      Gentoo has not even the concept of a Stable release (that is, one "profile" that is well tested, then feature frozen and then only accepts security backports), so I think it is completely out of question for datacenters and the like.

  81. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have used Suse since version 5.3 and RedHat since 5 and have tried many distros. I also run FreeBSD and OpenBSD. Not once after three tries have I ever gotten Gentoo to work on a server class machine from Compaq/HP or Dell. After all the wasted time I spent I went back to one of the real distros and had it all running in minutes and ready for production. Just my two cents. If you have time to mess around for hours just to get your machine set up then thats cool but a lot of people have work to do...

  82. Gentoo is not for everyone... by g_adams27 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    There's a lot of Gentoo lovin' going on here, and while I am a satisfied Gentoo customer more-or-less, people should realize that Gentoo is a very young and bleeding-edge distro. The good thing about Gentoo is that it'll teach you a huge amount about the inner workings of Linux. The bad news is that you'll be doing that learning as you're pounding your head against a wall trying to fix something that an "emerge -u" broke.

    Some Gentoo developers just seem to release stuff without thoroughly testing it out. Here's some examples just from my own experiences over the last 2 months:

    • "emerge -u openldap" fails. The root cause (at listed in the bug report) is "libiodbc package appears to be badly broken, reported to it's maintainer. problem should go away when it's fixed."
    • "emerge -u alsa-driver" breaks my ALSA setup (no sound). Updated ALSA library package had a severe bug.
    • New "hotplug" libraries created a race condition with gentoo's dependency caching program. Result: the /var/lib/init.d/depcache file is written to simultaneously by multiple processes. Result: corrupted file. Result: unpredictable booting, ranging from certain programs not starting to completely unusable bootable state.
    • tcng program requires certain kernels to be installed (don't know why, but it does). New kernel is released, breaking tcng which does not recognize the new kernel. (new tcng released 2-3 weeks later)

    Gentoo can be a very cool distro if you're willing to put up with the annoyances of (IMHO) a somewhat muddled and slipshod update-release process.

    1. Re:Gentoo is not for everyone... by glasswalkerny · · Score: 1

      this is not a function of gentoo... i recently ran into another similar problem (PyKDE is not supported on KDE 3.2) but this is a general problem of the open source community.. the different programs, drivers and kernel maintainers would never release anything if they all had to worry about breaking each other's code!

      And i have a lot less incidents of this than i used to have using Red Hat's RPM system which completely hosed my system on a regular basis just by installing common packages (samba and evolution come to mind as big culperates in this).

      --
      Welcome to the world of the techno-werewolves! Michael Dragos welcomes you to the Steeleguard Security office.
    2. Re:Gentoo is not for everyone... by reallocate · · Score: 1

      That mirrors my experiences with it. I've twice built desktops from the minimal install package, which eats up a bit more than 24 hours. The machines were fast, looked nice, and behaved quite well. But, sooner or later, I'd intall a new update and something would go belly up. So, I don't use Gentoo anymore. I've got better things to do than learn the innards of yet another one-off packaging scheme.

      That said, the Gentoo site and community are superb.

      --
      -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
    3. Re:Gentoo is not for everyone... by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

      I've also had to mask mplayer >=1.0pre3. Additionally, install support for HPQ servers (cciss) is pretty bad, enough for me to abandon gentoo and use redhat. Pick a device tree and run with it.

      However, I appreciate the ease-of-use when it comes to nvidia stuff, and 'opengl-update' is a handy hack.

      OTOH, using nvidia opengl libs breaks building opengl packages, which is annoying.

      In general, I still prefer gentoo, but I wouldn't recommend it for the faint-of-heart.

    4. Re:Gentoo is not for everyone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "emerge unmerge foobar"

  83. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by debian4life · · Score: 1

    I tried the Linksys and D-Link cards and both were a pain and I could not get them to work. All the modulating and rigging etc did not make them work. So as a helpful tip, go get yourself a Cisco Aironet 350 off Ebay. Support is built right into the kernel. It worked first try. Do that and leave your XP days behind.

  84. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by bonch · · Score: 1

    Informative, but it sounds like you copy and pasted a press release.

  85. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by Ctrl-Z · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Hmmm... I have no problem with my digital camera. Plug it in, run gtkam, copy pictures. In fact, I can only get the pictures on my Linux box since Kodak refuses to release drivers for Microsoft Windows Server 2003.

    --
    www.timcoleman.com is a total waste of your time. Never go there.
  86. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by ImpTech · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The only thing I miss about Debian now that I'm on Gentoo is the easy ability to clean out the install. With Debian I could always go into dselect and walk through all the crap I had installed and remove it selectively, with full dependancy checking. It was tedious, but I was glad to be able to do it every now and then. As far as I can tell, Gentoo has no comparable functionality.

  87. Enterprise Systems require a modicum of competence by FreeUser · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The original poster has valid point. If you are installing Gentoo on the underwear covered machine at foot of your bed than the current install procedure is fine. You have the time to spare. For production, one does not have the time to duplicate the tedious steps of the Gentoo install procedure for every machine.

    Perhaps not, but if one is a competent admin, one can quickly put together a python (or [insert your favorite scripting language here]) script to automate these tedius steps in response to a few quick questions posed at the start of the script.

    That is what I did when we deployed Gentoo enterprise-wide for my employer. (Maintaining your own sync server, frozen to your enterprise's tested and vetted state, is also a wise thing to do. Still vastly more managable, flexible, and easy to keep up to date than any other distro I've come across, and over the years since my first pre-distro use of Linux back in '93 that is more than I care to count).

    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
  88. Re:Does it still have the same installer? by Dan+Ost · · Score: 1

    Does Knoppix make a boot floppy? I'm only aware of Knoppix CDs.
    I'm looking for a boot floppy specifically because I have several
    machines that have floppy drives, but either don't have a CD drive or
    can't boot off of it.

    --

    *sigh* back to work...
  89. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by Dalcius · · Score: 4, Informative
    I want to avoid scaring people away from Gentoo, but I do want to make it clear to Slashdotters that this isn't just like falling off of a log.

    In short, here are some negative things to keep in mind:
    • Gentoo is built from source code. This means it can take an entire weekend (Friday night included) to get a system built, or longer depending on your CPU/RAM/HDD. This also means your Mozilla install isn't a trivial event. ;)
    • If you have problems, you're in a 'brave new world' so to speak. If you don't have a handle on the situation, it might require outside help and research to solve the problem.
    • Problems come up on their own. Since programs are compiled and linked against each other and many libraries, when versions change, problems can arise in certain setups, especially new ones. Sometimes an install will fail simply because someone @ Gentoo didn't dot their i. Normal solution: report it and/or just wait a few days and the problem is almost always resolved on their end.
    • This is not a click-n-install, auto-magic-detection distro. You will be using the command line for most administration. Don't confuse me here, your desktop is very graphical (and quite nice!) and you've got all the good applications for email, browsing, etc. But administration is a command line task. This distro is not for you if you would rather drink curdled milk than use a command line.

    In turn, here are some more (and some repeated from the parent post) good points from my view:

    • You can compile any program under the sun on your box, but for those that are offered by Gentoo you have some handy features available. All the information for available applications but the source code is stored on your computer. This means it's searchable. "emerge -s xmms" will give you a long list of plugins and other xmms (think WinAMP) related items.
    • Installing programs is one command. Want gaim? "emerge gaim" and come back in 5-10 minutes. Everything is downloaded, md5sum checked, and installed. No hunting for the latest versions of RPMs for your distro or grabbing a tarball yourself. Easy peasy.
    • Updating your system to the also a breeze. Update your local copy of all of the package installation files mentioned above (known as the Portage tree) with "emerge sync". In about 5 minutes, come back and run "emerge world -UD" and every package on your system will be upgraded to the latest available.
    • Community is there. Almost any problem can be found in the Gentoo Forums, and most all of them have solutions. I solve most of my problems with a quick search. Second to that, I check the bugzilla repository. Very rarely do I have a problem which isn't at least mentioned in either location, and most have a solution. But if you need interactive help, the IRC channel can be very helpful! I haven't spent much time in there, but when I do drop by there are generally at least two people getting help.
    • Gentoo's install guide is very detailed and geared towards novices. If you don't run into problems, for the most part you can just cut and paste commands to install. ;)
    • Because of the way you install Gentoo, you become much more familiar with the way Linux works under the hood (GUI) and can, from there, be better able to solve any problems you run into. You also step into the realm of being able to install and maintain your own servers (www, ssh, ftp, mail, etc.) with your newfound systems knowledge. And it makes a good resume item. :)
    • Gentoo is bare bones, as mentioned in the parent. Nothing on the system you don't want there. This makes for a great feeling of 'having a handle on things.' :)

    Gentoo is for the computer user who likes to customize his environment and have control and know what is what. If you just want to 'use' your computer, go get Mandrake or Fedora or Windows. If you like

    --
    ~Dalcius
    Rome wasn't burnt in a day.
  90. Yeah, library versioning could be better by Theatetus · · Score: 1

    Agreed. Portage should handle clean, depclean and unmerge better, particularly for libraries. A good start would be a version of etcat that shows me what version of libfoo appbar is linked against and what versions of libfoo are installed and available on the portage tree... hmmm... come to think of it, sounds like a project for me....

    --
    All's true that is mistrusted
    1. Re:Yeah, library versioning could be better by loginx · · Score: 4, Informative

      qpkg -q libfoo sounds like what you are looking for.

    2. Re:Yeah, library versioning could be better by opello · · Score: 2, Informative

      you can also prune (emerge -P) to remove all but the latest versions of packages

    3. Re:Yeah, library versioning could be better by thre5her · · Score: 1
      Hehe.

      emerge -Pp world

    4. Re:Yeah, library versioning could be better by ImpTech · · Score: 1

      Yeah... I actually discovered that moments after posting. Its not quite the same though. You *could* do what I describe using that, but it requires a lot of typing, scrolling output, and general tedium. Suffice to say I could do it a lot faster and be more confident that I got everything in Debian.

      Now if somebody were to write a dselect/synaptic-ish interface around qpkg, we might have something

  91. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by milkman_matt · · Score: 4, Interesting

    And while I am not a linux newbie, I certainly am no guru (yet :^)

    And this is one thing I really love about gentoo. Especially if you're a newbie to linux (I wasn't, but I like you, was certainly no master). Following the installation guide that gentoo provides was a very educational experience for me. Not only does it tell you step by step what to do to get your system up and running, it tells you WHY you're doing it. I was very impressed with the instructions. Oh, and when I ran into any problems at all, their forums had the answer, and when they didn't have the answer, someone responded to my post within a matter of a couple hours, and had the solution to my question.

    -matt

  92. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by B1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "You Red Hat guys must get sick of dependency hell..."
    "I'm too stupid to understand that circular dependencies can be resolved by specifying BOTH .rpms together on the command line, and that problems hardly ever occur if one uses proper Red Hat packages instead of mixing SuSE, Mandrake and Joe's Linux packages together (which the system wasn't designed for)."


    Obviously, it's bad RPM Juju to mix and match RPMs from different distributions. As long as you stick with RPMs built for your specific release of RedHat, everything fits together fine. But sometimes you don't have that option.

    The difference is that sooner or later, RedHat releases become obsolete, and much harder to find good RPMs for. I imagine it's pretty hard to find the latest KDE RPMs for an old Redhat 4.2 box :) I might find them on rpmfind.net, but then I also will have to manually track down a zillion dependencies, and make sure that the RPMs are all built for RH 4.2.

    And it's not just old versions of RedHat. Newer versions can have the same problems. We recently installed RH ES on a 24/7 database cluster, but needed to use Postgres 7.3.x. The Redhat-supplied Postgresql was an older release, where the periodic VACUUM process would basically lock an entire table for up to an hour--in our application, that's unacceptable. We strayed from RedHat's official packages because we basically had to. We went with the PGDG RPMs compiled for our version of Enterprise Server, and they work great, but I'm dreading the day that we need the official RedHat Postgresql RPM to satisfy a dependency. RPM --nodeps --force usually works, but it's also bad RPM Juju.

    With Gentoo (and Debian), you also have the best results if you stay with the packaging system. However, this much easier to do so, especially over time, because your base install never becomes obsolete. You never need to search for a package that's built for your specific release of Gentoo / Debian--if it's in the packaging system, you'll be able to install it on your machine, regardless of how long ago you did the base install.

    My machine at home was originally running Gentoo 1.2, and it's been painless to keep it up to date as new packages become available.

    If RedHat and the other RPM distributions were to standardize on their RPM package naming and layout, and provide an easy and reliable upgrade path between releases, that would go a long way towards getting rid of the RPM Dependency Hell problem.

  93. The genius of Gentoo... by bonch · · Score: 1

    ...is that I don't have to reformat and reinstall with each new release. You pretty much have to with other distros if you want a sane system, which, amusingly, is completely insane. I don't want to reformat every year.

    There actually isn't a new release of Gentoo, just a new release of the installation CDs. You're always up to date with Gentoo, and there's no way to determine a "version number" since you upgrade what you want.

    1. Re:The genius of Gentoo... by 74nova · · Score: 1

      see, that way of doing things makes more sense to me. just keeping everything up to date. i dont want to reformat every year, either.

      --
      use your turn signal! you people act like it's divulging information to the enemy
  94. Re:Does it still have the same installer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's news to me! Seriously, though, Gentoo doesn't really need an installer because part of the point is to build your system from a minimalist base.

    Still, quite a few of us would appreciate being spared the pain of setting up XF86Config

  95. Portage by bonch · · Score: 1

    Funny, I thought Portage DID do 99% of the work for you. In my mind, it's an automated LFS. That's what initially drew me to Gentoo.

  96. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

    Linux systems play games better than windows, there just aren't as many of them. Try playing America's Army, Unreal 2k4, or WolfET on both windows and linux (on the same hardware) and you will see that performance under the 2.6 kernel kicks the shit out of the Win2k kernel. Graphics and gameplay is so much smoother... I have no reason to reboot into windows now.

    --
    A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
  97. Gentoo unrealistic for production environments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting
    While there is a lot of praise here for Gentoo, the problems with it must be pointed out. I have run Gentoo on my laptop, my desktop, and my dev server for some time now and I am planning my move away from this system. The reasons?
    • Incredibly short release cycle obsoletes software too quickly
    • Currently no way to only get security updates
    • Poor package maintenance and broken builds are increasingly common
    • Compilation is stressful on hardware but performance benefits have not been proven
    • Quality assurance leaves much to be desired, especially compared to that of Debian or the commercial offerings
    • USE flags have limited flexibility and are more of an annoyance than a benefit
    At work, I run Debian stable. I will soon be running Debian stable on my dev server and Suse or Debian testing on my other systems. I appreciate having the choice of using Gentoo, but its advantages are primarily cosmetic and have little benefit for a system that is being used to get real work done. If I do have a need for a ports-based system, I will be running FreeBSD which has more trustworthy quality assurance as well as more refinement and experience. Thanks for your time!
    1. Re:Gentoo unrealistic for production environments by temojen · · Score: 3, Informative
      Incredibly short release cycle obsoletes software too quickly

      So only update when there is a security or stability fix that effects you.

      Poor package maintenance and broken builds are increasingly common

      You should have very few packages on a server. (For me it's (Apache, SSHD, mod_php) or (SSHD, postgres) or (SSHD, OpenLDAP, Courier))

      Compilation is stressful on hardware but performance benefits have not been proven

      So maintain a local portage tree and build binary packages for distribution across your server farm. You only need to build each package once. You could even set up distcc if you expect to have spare cycles on some of your servers

      USE flags have limited flexibility and are more of an annoyance than a benefit

      Is there a way in Debian or commercial distros to tell Qt to compile with support for Postgres or MySQL so you can install Rekall on your desktops (without recompiling it manually)? Is there a way to tell Courier whether or not to include support for OpenLDAP, MySQL, or Postgres?

    2. Re:Gentoo unrealistic for production environments by Gamma · · Score: 1

      They are working on developing an emerge "group" (like 'system' and 'world') that will only bring in security updates.

    3. Re:Gentoo unrealistic for production environments by 74nova · · Score: 1
      At work, I run Debian stable
      well, that will definitely fix this problem:
      Incredibly short release cycle obsoletes software too quickly
      its a joke, laugh
      --
      use your turn signal! you people act like it's divulging information to the enemy
  98. Gentoo is pretty damned good by hattig · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Gentoo is the distro that has made me most happy with Linux.

    Well that, or deciding to install OpenBox as the Window Manager, and then having pure simplicity itself on my desktop as opposed to KDE or Gnome.

    It has brought new life to my old HP Omnibook laptop, now 6 years old at least. Of course it was hell installing it, even with a Stage 3 install. The laptop was previously running Mandrake with Blackbox, and would run out of memory all the time (160MB installed) even without running much. Gentoo, by being custom all the way, means that I have memory spare, enough to run Apache and Postgresql and have a little portable web development machine.

    The only thing that is scaring me is that I have just emerge -DUu world, and something has downloaded the kernel 2.4.21 headers when I have kernel 2.6.5 on my machine. I did emerge -pv world first as well, and this was not indicated, grrr.

    1. Re:Gentoo is pretty damned good by Fallingcow · · Score: 1

      The 2.4 headers will work with the 2.6 kernel sources. In fact, the 2.6 headers can cause a LOT of problems, which is why 2.4 headers are still the default.

      Check the Gentoo Forums for more info.

    2. Re:Gentoo is pretty damned good by hattig · · Score: 1

      Thanks. It didn't seem to affect operations at all, I presume that I have an up to date system that matches or exceeds 2004.1 now then? Is there a way to verify this or anything?

    3. Re:Gentoo is pretty damned good by Fallingcow · · Score: 1

      Not really. A new Gentoo release mostly just means a new install disk. You could completely ignore new releases, just run:
      #emerge sync
      emerge -uD world
      every now and then, and have no idea what version the distro as a whole is at, yet be totally up to date.

      I, for one, like it that way. :)

  99. Still no online-accessible binary packages? by RLiegh · · Score: 1

    I only tried gentoo briefly before going back to NetBSD and Debian with a bad taste in my mouth. I know that they had a plan to "eventually" offer binary packages of the various programs (presumably a mirror of their cds or something) for downloading online (similar to apt-get or pkg_add $URL)...

    So my question is: did they ever get around to implementing that, or do I need to stick to more serious distributions and operating systems in order to have that functionality?

    1. Re:Still no online-accessible binary packages? by talornin · · Score: 1

      Stick to Debian and NetBSD. It has been pointed out over and over again that if you dont want to compile your pacakages from source, then Gentoo is not for you. There is no need to bash Gentoo and call it an unserious distribution just because it doesnt suit your taste.


      Yes, it takes a long time to install (compared to Mandrake and Fedora), yes "emerge kde" is slow as hell, but nobody is forcing you to use Gentoo.

      --
      When in danger, whewn in doubt! Run in circles, scream and shout!
    2. Re:Still no online-accessible binary packages? by RLiegh · · Score: 1
      talornin, on Wednesday April 28 2004 said the following:
      It has been pointed out over and over again that if you dont want to compile your pacakages from source, then Gentoo is not for you. There is no need to bash Gentoo and call it an unserious distribution just because it doesnt suit your taste.


      If I were to bash gentoo at all, it would not be for not suiting my tastes, but -frankly- for not following up on its' own stated promises (despite having the infrastructure in place to do so).

      Please read the following directly taken from gentoo's own social contract page:

      To summarize the heart of Gentoo, imagine a user sitting in front of a Linux system. What does he or she want do to? The Gentoo philosophy is to allow this user to do what he or she wants to do, without getting in the way.

      At around the time Gentoo was born, the thing that got in the way was the lack of an easy way to build packages from source, to a user's specifications. Currently, we've done that very well, but what we haven't done very well is support pre-built packages, even though Portage has supported building binary packages almost since its inception. So we are doing that now.

      It's important that our tools support binary packages, because binary packages are widely used and widely in demand in the Linux community. If our tools don't support binary packages, then we can't claim that our tools are designed to allow a user to do anything he or she might want to do. If we purposely choose to exclude binary support, then we are attempting to interfere with how users might choose to approach particular problems, by instead imposing our own will or view of how they should approach a problem. And if we do not build binary packages, then we are not taking any steps to ensure that our tools actually work well with binary packages, nor are we taking steps to ensure that others can build binary packages, nor are we able to *demonstrate* that our tools work well with binary packages. Besides these philosophical reasons, there are many practical reasons to create binary packages.
  100. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by sweede · · Score: 2, Informative
    Gentoo is built from source code. This means it can take an entire weekend .... This also means your Mozilla install isn't a trivial event. ;)

    Problems come up on their own. Since programs are compiled and linked against each other and many libraries, when versions change, problems can arise in certain setups, especially new ones.

    ...You will be using the command line for most administration....

    For the first one, Gentoo also offers pre-build Mozilla binaries for you to use. dont know what compile flags it uses but you can just emerge the binary mozilla, then emerge -B mozilla and when thats done you'll have your own mozilla package in /usr/portage/packages/All

    For library changes in programs, use revdep-update (im 85% sure that is the name). it does back tracking in package dependencies to see what needs to be updated.

    kportage is pretty nice :) there is also a gnome version i hear.

    --
    I follow the SDK and GDN principles.. Spelling Dont Kount, Grammer Dont Neither
  101. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    May have something to do with your tone?

  102. I use Arch Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    It's very new, not popular like Gentoo, and it's based around binary packages, not source, but it has many strengths:

    -everything comes i686 compiled for speed
    -pacman package manager makes installs quick and auto-resolves deps, like Debian apt-get except using a different repository(admittedly a much smaller one, but it stays near the cutting edge, unlike Debian).
    -Initial install is very light and gives you the opportunity to learn how to build up your system "from scratch," so you'll never be wholly dependent on any distro-specific tools.

    The main disadvantage, that scared me away for a few days, is that you'll have to be willing to edit a lot of configuration files, which is tricky for a beginner; but I managed and I only have a few weeks experience with Linux. There is a port of the Knoppix autoconfigure, but it will only tell you what your hardware is, and it's up to you to use the information. But the documentation, while sparse, hits on most of the necessary points, and the forums were extremely helpful to me.

    I have not tried Gentoo, but neither do I see a compelling reason to switch. I don't want to bother with compiling everything(compiling is a "dirty" process in my opinion; too much can go wrong), and I'm comfortable with what's offered using pacman.

  103. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by SoTuA · · Score: 1
    Now I'm confused, maybe you mean the hardware (and its driver module) detection?

    (If you indeed mean that, I think it is a startup service that can be disabled as any other. Anyway, did you try asking in the gentoo forums? One thing I loved while using gentoo was the forums and community, there isn't a better one)

  104. Re:Does it still have the same installer? by bonch · · Score: 1

    So use Catalyst to build a stage3 for your other machines.

  105. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by Cobron · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Hehe :)

    Our optimizationism (tm) also has some constructive consequences: http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=108718 (gets more interesting towards the end) is a nice example.
    Since we all want to have the latest and "greatest" these fine developers (I am sure other distros have em too...) are squishing every bug they see on their way to get a full GCC 3.4 - compiled system.
    I'm sure some of these fixes will find their way to all distros.

  106. Re:Does it still have the same installer? by Corporate+Gadfly · · Score: 1
    Aneurysm9 said:
    Gentoo has an installer?
    There is an installer in the works here.
    --
    Corporate Gadfly
    Jonathan Archer: the most beaten up Enterprise captain in Star Trek history
  107. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by Cobron · · Score: 1

    revdep-update (im 85% sure that is the name)
    Make that 50% sure and you're right: revdep-rebuild :)

  108. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by Prior+Restraint · · Score: 2, Informative

    have you never heard of multitasking?

    I'm beginning to suspect that the author of this particular troll is a Windows user. Microsoft, WISE, InstallShield, etc., have cultivated in Windows users the notion that installation prohibits multitasking. Most every Windows installation program I've seen since the 3.1 days runs in either a maximized window or--in the case of a lot of games--fullscreen mode. Also, they pretty much all include a message on the first screen to the effect of, "Please shut down all other programs while Setup is running."

  109. It's all about trusting your distro... by SaDan · · Score: 1

    And I don't trust many people to manage packages for me, at home or at work.

    Portage is great, I am working on getting Gentoo running (again) on my Sun SparcStation 20 at home for kicks. It's fun to play with new stuff, like Gentoo.

    However, all of my other Linux machines are Slackware. I trust Patrick V., and I prefer to work with software packages myself. Slackware is proven, stable, and doesn't have the fluff most other distros have (Gentoo is good about this too. Another reason I'm looking into Gentoo).

    When I am satisfied with where Gentoo developers are taking the distro, I'll add it to my list of "trusted" operating systems. Right now that list has one entry: Slackware. I'd love to make a second entry, though.

  110. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    By the time these guys compile there base system Sarge will be out for debian. Stupid Gentoo weenies

  111. Sure it has supermount/hotplug support. by RealityThreek · · Score: 1

    Err? Compile your kernel with supermounting, set up your /etc/fstab to mount any drives you want supermounted. Then 'emerge hotplug'. Am I missing something?

    Second point, having a stripped down system after installing is one of the focuses of Gentoo. You have the ability to customize what you want. This would have been very helpful to me when I was a Linux newbie as half my problem was that there were 3-4 programs installed that all did the same thing. (I was confused)

    I agree about the "partitioning with fdisk" thing. I have no problems doing it, in fact I prefer it over the more graphical disk partitioners, but it's not newbie friendly.

    I'm not going to say that Gentoo is right for a Linux newbie. Just that it's right for me. Clean, easy to install, and easy to maintain. :)

    --
    :wq
    1. Re:Sure it has supermount/hotplug support. by Some+Dumbass... · · Score: 1

      Err? Compile your kernel with supermounting, set up your /etc/fstab to mount any drives you want supermounted. Then 'emerge hotplug'. Am I missing something?

      Yes. Mandrake also has some scripts which interact with hotplug to help out.

      Basically, Gentoo did not auto-detect my digital camera. Mandrake detects it and put an icon on the desktop (which runs gtkam, I believe).

      Also, "compile your kernel" is not something which you should say to a newbie! Having said that, there are some supermount-supporting Gentoo kernels out there. Then again, "pick a kernel" is also not something which you should say to a newbie...

      Second point, having a stripped down system after installing is one of the focuses of Gentoo. You have the ability to customize what you want. This would have been very helpful to me when I was a Linux newbie as half my problem was that there were 3-4 programs installed that all did the same thing. (I was confused)

      Yes, but the flip side of that is the "What program do you use to do that?" problem, e.g. "What's this 'hotplug' thing? Why doesn't my computer just detect my camera like Windows/Mandrake does?" :)

      Personally, I think a Linux newbie, and certainly a computer newbie, would be better off having all the programs they need available to start. Even for a more experienced user it can be annoying. I remember trying to think of the name of my preferred Instant Messaging program and thinking "Why isn't it just installed?" After going through this same sort of thing several dozen times, I got tired of it.

      I'm not going to say that Gentoo is right for a Linux newbie.

      Then we're in agreement.

      Hand-holding is a good thing for newbies, and Gentoo just isn't made for that.

  112. Gentoo is good for you by chamilto0516 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Like most, I started with the Slackware floppies (N1, N2, N3...) and then found the RedHat CD around version 4 or something like that. I am now in the process of switching from Win to Linux on my Thinkpad as my primary desktop O/S. Redhat dropping (I don't call phone support but will miss my auto-update account) it's non-AS line prompted me to try another dist for the first time. I picked Gentoo. My findings are thus:
    • Learn (relearn) from Gentoo: Start with the lowest stage you can tolerate. You will learn a lot. The install process took me a week because I am not careful and choose to start over several times and make new decisions. Plan for a few days to a week before you are ready to pack it up and take it out and about.
    • Learn to read before you type: Very important that you undestand the install process and USE variables and such or you will end up with a system with very little of what you expect on it. But that is ok because emerge is there
    • Learn patience: Gentoo takes time to get where RedHat/Suse/Fedora might start you. Expect during the first few weeks that you will often type a command and it not work because you don't have it. An 'emerge' and some d/l and compile time later and you are back in business but you have to be patient.
    • Learn to interpolate: I used to start all trouble shooting adventures with a google query that started with "RedHat ~some problem~" I found with troubleshooting my Gentoo problems that stuff that was written to solve other dist (really HW) issues are pretty easy to apply to Gentoo. make sense as it is all really Linux
    • Learn to appreciate: I'll admit that RedHat's init system we something I never learned for various reasons (complicated, I never manually modified it with much success so I stopped trying). Gentoo's makes more sense and is a bit more kid friendly. Emerge/Portage is really pretty neat.
    • Learn to borrow: No need to rebuild an XF86Config file from scratch with the standard tools. The RedHat generated one the other hard drive was perfect. Just copy it over.

    The bottom line is that it is still Linux. You are closer to the core/spritit of Unix (distributed with source code). Does compiling it for YOUR machine make a big performance difference? Maybe it was a little snappier...hard to tell. Does the "if you do not need it, it will not install" make a big difference? Nope, it is just disk space in many cases that you are wasting? You are no longer dependent on .rpm files to get new stuff but you are now dependent on the portage tree. Is there anything that I couldn't get working on Gentoo? Nah, not really. Am I going to go forward with my migration with Gentoo? Not sure, I have a HW problem to resolve on my T30 and after that, I may go to Fedora Core 1 because there are more resources out there and the company I work for software is being ported to support RedHat AS line so I will have better luck getting my Demo's working on a RH O/S. Picking a dist these days is really just a bunch of littler minor subjective decisions and feelings. I'll probably keep Gentoo around on a harddrive and punch it in every now and then. It has been fun and good for me.

    --
    Magic Eight Ball: Outlook not so good., Hmmm, how about Excel and Word?
  113. switching to Gentoo by dpilot · · Score: 2, Informative

    I recently switched some of my boxes to Gentoo.

    Up until then, I'd had some control over 7 boxen running RedHat, mostly RH8. I never moved to RH9 because I didn't like the emerging direction. Starting to cast about for a new distribution, I began to realize that I was thinking of support for family, etc, and not *fun*.

    My dual-boot work laptop now runs Gentoo, as does my second (up and coming) server. Other systems are waiting for me to get more comfortable, and for the various nForce2 patches to stabilize and hopefully get into the mainline kernel.

    Gentoo has been a mixed bag. Package install is a breeze, far better than RedHat, as long as you don't mind a minor wait. Configuration is 'a learning experience.' (not all bad, but slow)

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    1. Re:switching to Gentoo by Dalcius · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what nforce2 patches you're looking for, but if it helps, I've been using Gentoo (2.4.2x gaming sources) on my A7N8X board (which is an nforce2 board) for over a year with no problems.

      On board networking is fine (though I'm only using one eth port), UDMA, AGP, etc. all work. I'm not using my onboard sound, so that might be what you're having problems with?

      Cheers

      --
      ~Dalcius
      Rome wasn't burnt in a day.
    2. Re:switching to Gentoo by dpilot · · Score: 1

      I'm actually not having problems, either. (I began using AGP when it was a standalone patch, just prior to going into 2.4.20-ac2.) But then, I'm careful to not use APIC or ACPI, which seem to be part of the formula for trouble. It actually has something to do with timer IRQ routing in the nForce2, address prefetching built into the nForce2, and a thing called the 'C1-disconnect state' in the Athlon.

      Stick with the XT-PIC and you're fine, which is what I've been doing. But I'm not getting the full benefit of the chipset, and don't believe I can fully flex the onboard peripherals (SATA support is just getting there, too.) without the APIC.

      The boards run fine with RH8 and a newer 2.4 kernel, so I'm not inclined to take the pain to switch to Gentoo until I can get full-function with a 2.6 kernel, too.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
  114. the new distribution by dpilot · · Score: 1

    Perhaps the best part of Gentoo.

    It's bad enough that RedHat, Mandrake, SuSe, and the various other RPM-based distributions have diverged enough that their packages are largely incompatible. But then you get into RH7.x vs RH8 vs RH9 vs Fedora, and the same with the others.

    With Gentoo, update really means update.

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
  115. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by Entropy · · Score: 1

    That may be true, I don't have any games on my system except kasteroids and the like ...

    But my overall point is that the gaming environment on linux still lags way, way behind Windoze.

    On the related point of hardware compatibility, thats never a problem I have personally had with linux, but I've never owned esoteric hardware either.

    Maybe someday I'll try out some of those games you mention, but I'll have to upgrade my POS videocard.

    --
    The sea changes color, but the sea does not change.
  116. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by pantherace · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Speaking as a Gentoo user, I can be emerging a package and play quake3, admittedly I usually don't because it can get slow and laggy.

    Certain things don't allow you to do that (ut2004-demo being the worst) because they are writing to the disk a whole lot, or something else. However, the things like that are rather few and far between.

  117. Am I wrong or it's a pain to install? by spectro · · Score: 1
    After reading all the hype about Gentoo I decided to try it for an old P2 I was setting for my home asterisk PBX and after 6 hours I was still half-way on the install process (stage 3). I don't have time for that so I rebooted the computer with the Mandrake 9.2 CD and my asterisk was up and running less than an hour later.

    I don't know if I did something wrong but do they have an automatic install?

    --
    HTML is obsolete. It's time for a new, simpler and richer markup language.
    1. Re:Am I wrong or it's a pain to install? by Galaxie · · Score: 1

      If you want easy then mandrake was the right way to go. If you looked up the whole purpose of Gentoo maybe you'd realise why the install took as long as it did. You might have also noticed the excellent handbook documentation regarding the install process.

      Although, if your short on time, don't go this route, a precompiled package based distro would be more to your liking.

      --
      <end/>
  118. RE: karma whoring...what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You call that karma whoring? Gosh I thought it was a tootin' good "Junior Achievement" sales pitch.

    I have found out for myself that the "strengths" of Gentoo have been exagerated. Its portage system is NOT more stable than RPM, at best it is no worse.

    Now for my own karma points:

    During Feb/2004 I tested the latest version (then) of Gentoo against Slackware 9.0.
    Slackware won hands-down AND easily in every category of interest to me:
    1 - speed of NFS transfers
    2 - overall network transfer rate
    3 - launching openoffice+mozilla+gimp at the same
    time (stuff I use all the time)
    4 - ripping+encoding a CD to mp3 (using RipperX
    which does both in parallel).
    5 - recompiling a kernel to include XFS
    filesystem

    Both were on the same machine and hardrive (using lilo as bootloader).

    Seriously folks...try it youselves. Get a copy of Slackware and one of Gentoo. Be fair and use the same hardware and everything....then report back.
    One thing you'll find out is just how easy Slackware is to install... you'll also find out that Slackware is NOT for gurus only.
    Slackware has been the target of a lot of false propaganda coming from the "junior" or is it the "under" achievers club.

    When I started using Linux all I knew was how to use windows. I had zero unix background. For no good reason really I picked Slackware to start with. I've had no problems at all using it for 5 years.

    You learn what you have to when you want to with
    Slackware, and it really is stable, secure, and speedy.

    Oh, and buy(!) the way, please buy something from the Slackware store while you are there...

  119. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by Spicerun · · Score: 1
    If RedHat and the other RPM distributions were to standardize on their RPM package naming and layout, and provide an easy and reliable upgrade path between releases, that would go a long way towards getting rid of the RPM Dependency Hell problem.

    It would really help if the RPM packages tracked with what you get in a regular tarball. I've had too many cases where I installed an RPM, tried to configure it, and still not have it work...only to find that I got a lobotomized RPM package that didn't have everything, and I had to search for a second or third RPM that had the addon to the original RPM to let me do what I wanted. No thanks, I just download and compile the tarball and get everything I want first pass (including on where I want to put files).

    Thankfully I have no such problems with Gentoo and their portage system.

  120. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by michrech · · Score: 1

    I agree with the guy who already responded to you that is currently marked at Score: 0. It may very well have had to do with your tone. For proof that I am correct and you are not, just read further down the thread. Particularly the part where someone asked how to upgrade his system and about 20 or more people responded with how to update. I didn't see one RTFM (there could have been some that had been moderated down, I didn't look). But it still proves that your idea is not typical of the linux community -- at least not when speaking of the Gentoo community. That's the MAJOR reason I use Gentoo myself (and have installed several servers in schools/libraries/businesses that use Gentoo).

    =-]

    --
    bork bork bork!
  121. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by Punk+Walrus · · Score: 2, Informative
    Having just had my first real taste of Gentoo, I'd like to comment on your post:

    Gentoo is built from source code. This means it can take an entire weekend (Friday night included) to get a system built... Yeah, no kidding. I was a bit suspicious about build times because often when someone jokes "this days days to compile" they mean "it took a long time" which could mean anything. Here's a real stat for newbies: I had a P2/450/384mb RAM, took a little over 8 hours (including reading manual, fixing mistakes, and so on) for a base install. Okay, it took me several days on two machines. The last (5th attempt) only took 5 hours to compile because I went from Stage 1 to Stage 3 to save lots of time. The stage 1 attempts I ran at work, went home, came back the next day, and it was done compiling in about 22 hours on a P2/Dual450/512mb RAM. KDE 3.2.1 took 44 hours to install, not including xfree86. Mozilla took 5 hours.

    If you don't have a handle on the situation, it might require outside help and research to solve the problem. Which I used. Luckily, Gentoo-loving people seemingly are both educated and friendly. I had a "Gentoo buddy," and he was very helpful with good cheer once he heard I was having problems. "Oh, I know what the problem is! Nano sucks! Do this, emerge vim..."

    Problems come up on their own. Since programs are compiled and linked against each other and many libraries, when versions change, problems can arise in certain setups, especially new ones. This also includes just installing the base system. I had a problem when a package was labeled missing from the ftp mirrors (due to a misspelling. But again, Gentoo forums came to the rescue

    You will be using the command line for most administration.The first thing I launch in a GUI is an xterm or something, so this wasn't a problem. What was a problem was nano saved my files only half the time, and it took an emerge vim to get an editor that worked and got my fstab fixed (actually, I used vim from a Slack-LiveCD first to get Gentoo bootable). For a hard core distro like Gentoo, I was a bit surprised vi was not part of the LiveCD, but nano was. I don't mind nano, I was used to pico because I use pine, but the random "not saving" part was irrirtating.

    Community is there. Almost any problem can be found in the Gentoo Forums, and most all of them have solutions. A-men! Thank god for those comprehensive, flame-resistant forums. I got my Stage 1 attempt fixed in less than an hour.

    Gentoo's install guide is very detailed and geared towards novices. I'd change that to "step-by-step commands for people who know what 90% of these commands mean." So when they go wrong, you can go, "Ah... all I have to do is repeat step 15a."

    Because of the way you install Gentoo, you become much more familiar with the way Linux works under the hood. Ater my hassle, I may not use Gentoo. I just don't have the time for all those compiles. But you are so right on your point, and that's why I considered my install process with Gentoo, hassles and all, to be well worth my time simply because even though I knew a lot of this stuff already, I still learned a whole lot. Very educational, very forward, and support's there when you need it.

    Some points I'd like to add from a newbie's POV:

    • Once all the fixing was done, my 2.6.5-r1 kernel on this box ran very fast. KDE was as fast as Windows 98 was on this box. Not to rag on Linux, but the GUIs are awfully slow and overhead-intensive. I am not sure if it was Gentoo or the 2.6, but KDE "feels" faster on this old box than my P4/3.0ghz with 1GB RAM does on Fedora Core 1.
    • As step-by step as this install was, it left out some things, l
  122. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by opello · · Score: 4, Interesting

    yes! i started in gentoo linux because a friend recommended it

    the more or less manual install, coupled with the very good documentation and guides, helped me grow acustomed to linux more than I had by just using it through shell accounts or on friend's boxes

    the full immersion that comes with its install is a learning experience that can't be beat, and when help is needed there are docs, forums, and irc -- and let me say the irc (imo) is one of the best ways to learn ... although a moment ago #gentoo had 1013 people, channels like #gentoo-laptop (since I have a laptop) are excellent resources

  123. Odd Timing... by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 2, Informative
    I was in the middle of building a new Gentoo box when this thread got started...

    "New" as in a reformat and repurposing of a venerable rack-mount. My email server moved to a new box and this one is becoming a firewall. All of my production machines are running Gentoo.

    Yes it's crazy. But I k#0\/\/ w#@t 1m d01#% +0 C##p fr0# 831n% 0wnd.

    --
    "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
    --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
  124. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by eugene+ts+wong · · Score: 1

    I don't know what I mean. I'm confused too. I honestly thought that a module is a module, & that if the hardware doesn't change, then the driver itself shouldn't need to be probed. Since I never add new hardware, I thought that relevant information could be kept in a safe place. I honestly don't know what I'm talking about. Even though I searched pretty hard for any clues, I couldn't find anything. That's why I never asked anybody about it.

    That is, until I suggested this idea of mounting root as read-only on that ROX file manager mailing list. I also mentioned the problem of waiting for modprobe, & a fellow said that we don't need to modprobe each time. This seems to be verified by the fact that I managed to comment out the part of the boot up scripts that run modprobe. I've been booting up without it for some time.

    On an unrelated note, I mentioned this to that mailing list, because Gentoo doesn't seem too open to the idea of a read-only root system. I based that opinion of the results of searches for read-only root.

    Like I said, I honestly don't know what I'm talking about. I just know that my system has been running quite well without modprobe, & I did do a search on modprobing. I don't recall any manual explaining in layman's terms whether or not it was needed for every reboot, whether or not you have new hardware. From what little I understand, kudzu, udev & hotplug are supposed to take care of new stuff in their respective contexts.

    I never tried asking about modprobe in the forums because it never occurred to me. I haven't the foggiest idea why it never occurred to me. As for start up scripts, I disabled as many as I could. I even modified some of them. There is 1 script [I can't remember which], which appears to run modprobe no matter what. Even if you don't have any modules, you'll still run it.

  125. Re:Awww crap! by apachetoolbox · · Score: 1

    redundant and over played

    hehe...

  126. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "you will see that performance under the 2.6 kernel kicks the shit out of the Win2k kernel"

    Are you sure?

    Even when your graphics card has 3D accel support in Win2k but not in Linux?

    Surely you are joking, aren't you?

  127. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Yeah, but why do people..."

    Because that's open source, my friend. Anyone program what cares *him* (as in *not you*) the most.

    You always have the three choices anyway, you know:
    1/ Program it yourself
    2/ Pay others to program it for you
    3/ Shut up!

    You just have to choose one.

  128. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by faccenda · · Score: 1
    what is newlines?
    # emerge -s newlines
    Searching...
    [ Results for search key : newlines ]
    [ Applications found : 0 ]

    # emerge -p newlines

    These are the packages that I would merge, in order:

    Calculating dependencies
    emerge: there are no masked or unmasked ebuilds to satisfy "newlines".

    !!! Error calculating dependencies. Please correct.
    Danmit! I think I didn't understand the joke, or maybe my portage tree isn't updated.

  129. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Sorry, but as a non zealot Gentoo user I have to use the inverse spin-o-matic logic to establish some of the truth that lies inside the goofy lines you extrapolate from:

    >>"Gentoo makes me so much more productive."

    >"Although I can't use the box at the moment because it's compiling something

    My "gentoo-stable" machine runs a nightly cron task. I've never found it still emerging in the morning.

    >>"Gentoo is more in the spirit of open source!"
    >"Apart from Hello World in Pascal at school,

    This really is a disservice to what Gentoo is trying to do. I find it much more likely that those *capable of doing so* will track down a source bug when the source is there and integral to their installation of the package. I know I have, personally, and submitted those bug reports to either Gentoo or the authors as appropriate. For those that can't do it in the first place, there is little difference between Gentoo and any other distro, they don't do anything.

    >>"I use Gentoo because it's more like the BSDs."
    >"Last month I tried to install FreeBSD on a well-supported machine (etc etc)

    I use Gentoo because it does what I need. I have an OpenBSD install I use on my firewall machine...because it does what I need. So?

    >>"Heh, my system is soooo much faster after installing Gentoo."
    >"I've spent hours recompiling Fetchmail, X-Chat, gEdit and thousands of other programs which spend 99% of their time waiting for user input. Even though only the kernel and glibc make a significant difference with optimisations...

    And yet for the clueful user there are gains. Flac compiled with ICC and specifically optimized for P4 saved me huge (>20% general speed) and when ripping 400 CDs, you know, that added up. There are more examples, but you'd probably dismiss me as a servile fan boi. shrug.

    >>"...my Gentoo Linux workstation..."
    >"...my overclocked AMD eMachines box from PC World,

    My main server at home is a dual Xeon. It has a 1.5TB LVM2 that is backed up regularly via rsync (scripts I wrote) to a couple of raid machines elsewhere (the main machine is a media server - all of my music, and recent video stuff, avialable from anywhere in the house). It runs my web server, mail config, etc etc. Not a huge deal by big iron standards but a capable server machine. Happens to be running Gentoo quite capably. Just because it's popular to think script kiddies are using Gentoo, doesn't mean all Gentoo users are script kiddies.

    >>"You Red Hat guys must get sick of dependency hell..."
    >"I'm too stupid to understand that circular dependencies can be resolved by specifying BOTH .rpms...

    No, I understood RPM management just fine. It was still more cumbersome than Portage, and still didn't meet my needs in other ways (yes, being up to date was one of them).

    >>"All the other distros are soooo out of date."
    >"Constantly upgrading to the latest bleeding-edge untested software makes me more productive.

    Gentoo provides you with three levels of edges to bleed on or not, as per your choice. You can use stable, unstable, or completely unverified (emerging a specific package and it's dependents). But why confuse the issue with the facts, it's so much more fun to cut and paste rhetoric.

    >"Let's face it, Gentoo is the future."

    Don't know if it is or is not. What I do know it is fits *my* needs better than any other distro I've tried, and I've tried an even dozen if I have one. And from a geeky personal standpoint, it put a little bit of the fun back in *nix that I lost 15 years ago or so.

    Ah well, probably be modded to nothing, but I felt like replying.

  130. The sad tale of Debian GNU/Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Debian is Slow, Worse, Expensive

    Open source may be good, but there is one example that sticks out like a sore thumb as a problem with open source. Debian gnu/Linux. It is offically the Worst Linux Distribution ever made.

    First of all, Debian has the most out of date software packages of any major mainstream distros. Even in the unstable version, is KDE 2.2 and Gnome 2.0, with Xfree86 4.1 (A version that really sucks). There are literally years that pass between each update of Debian.

    Secondly, its a pain in the goatse to set up, first of all, you are forced to use Kernel 2.2, which is horribly hacked with "backports" to get any use on any modern machine (Read, made after 1999). Good luck memorizing all the *.ko files in /lib/modules, as you are going to need it.

    Configuring XFree86 is hell! If you don't have a Thick X11 orilley book, and a list of your horizontal sync values from your monitor's intruction manual (if you even have one), BOOM! There goes your monitor.

    Even then, good luck getting anything over 640x480@16 colours.

    The most common response to help questions on the Debian mailing list is "n00b, READ THE FUCKING MANUAL, you idiot, go back to WINDOWS XP if you can't learn to use dselect", true too, search the archives if you think I'm lying. Other distros give you comprehensive PRINTED MANUALS, PHONE SUPPPORT and/or freindly forums where repling RTFM gets you banned!

    Debians support for any decent hardware, including USB mice, scanners, Sound cards, heck even Serial devices struggle. If you can even get 80x25 text mode with PS/2 input devices you are really lucky.

    Apt-get has many flaws. First of all it uses a non standard package format (the rest of the world uses RPM, deprecate the DEB format!), has broken respetories, and out of date software to install. All this combined with the kludgey dselect user interface make package management a nightmare.

    And if you think I'm joking about this, find out why THOUSANDS of Debian users are switching to REAL distributions Debian is falling to pieces, if it is to survive any market share it will be through its superior forks (Xandros, Lindows, K/G-noppix) and unoffical package respetories.

    Of course, while all this is going on, the only thing the Debian maintainers do is argue about politics on the mailing lists. The distribution decays while its creators argue over inane details like software licensing and the virtues of Marxism. Please! Spare me the political rhetoric and just give me a working distro!

    Don't get me wrong, I love Linux, and I'm happily using distros such as Mandrake, SuSE, Gentoo and Fedora. But I'm sick to death of zealots that push obsolete Distros on me EVERY FREAKING TIME linux is mentioned. I'm speaking from real world experiance here.

    1. Re:The sad tale of Debian GNU/Linux by HiThere · · Score: 1

      It sounds like you are using the stable branch. Try testing. For that matter, if you like the cutting edge so much, and unstable is to conservative for you, you could try "experimental".

      OTOH, Debian doesn't have *ANY* market share. Debian doesn't SELL. If you want to buy it, you need to buy Libranet or one of the other repackaged varieties. But this doesn't mean that nobody is running it, or using it. (And using OSNews as a "source"...well, they're probably a bit better than "Weekly World News", though not as funny.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    2. Re:The sad tale of Debian GNU/Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would think that with such a low UID, you would know better than to respond to trolls.

  131. Need hardware in store by mdfst13 · · Score: 1

    The biggest problem I have with projects like Gentoo or MythTV is that there is no list of hardware (particularly motherboard) that definitely works without tweaking. I would seriously consider buying from the Gentoo store (supporting Daniel directly or the Gentoo brand in general) if it offered a preinstalled system that was known to work, particularly a PVR system.

    I tried installing Gentoo on my regular system back before the second hard drive died, but I never got the X settings right so no desktop. Kind of took the fun out of it. On the bright side, it only took my machine about a day to compile. I suspect that the three to five day estimates are with older hardware.

  132. Another advantage: No installs after the first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Something I haven't seen mentioned here is that after you have a running Gentoo system, you don't ever have to do another install, but you can still have as up to date packages as you want.

    I have been running Gentoo on my laptop (stable) and a desktop (unstable) for over a year with no problems worth mentioning. Testing distros and doing installs may be fun sometimes, but other times you just need to get things done!

    The other REALLY nice place for Gentoo is a remote server. Need a security update? "emerge sync"; "emerge -v new_package". I supported a schools web/email server with SuSE 7.0 on it for years without fixing glaring Sendmail and other security bugs, because I was too lazy. I recently upgraded the hardware and put Gentoo on it. Now I just ssh in, and update with a level of effort that matches my lazy-ness.

  133. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I do happen to know 2 high level network administrators who are very seriously considering Gentoo for their server farms."

    They are either not so high level administrators or you are a liar, you choose.

    Gentoo, at its current state, is an impossible choice for datacenters due at least to its complete lack of backport support.

    "now Red Hat is dropping support and forcing an upgrade. They decided they would like to avoid a forced upgrade in the future ."

    If that's the problem, since they seem not to be dependant on software certifications (like Oracle and RedHat/SuSE) they will be best served -by far, by Debian.

    This is not a rant nor a Debian zealotry, but a clear fact.

    Oh, yes! I'm a proffesional *systems* administrator myself (why the heck would I want those networking guys, no matter how brilliant, to touch my boxes is something I just can't imagine).

  134. I agree by ylikone · · Score: 0
    I use Mandrake as my main desktop workstation also. I run debian and redhat on servers. Using mandrake doesn't make you a newbie, it makes you someone that needs to get work done without endless time for tweaking!

    I don't understand why you were modded down as a troll!!!

    --
    Meh.
  135. Still looking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe there would be a torrent for Gentoo if they included shitty japanese cartoons in the distribution.

  136. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by Frizzle+Fry · · Score: 1
    Life is a sexually transmitted disease!

    Doesn't this quote have a second half, something about it being "invariably fatal", or something similar? I think it works better that way.
    --
    I'd rather be lucky than good.
  137. OK, but I have a question by Pausanias · · Score: 1

    I have been using Linux for scientific computing since 1994, when I wrote my college thesis using LaTeX. That was within a Slackware installation. I am currently running Redhat 9. While I do compile my own C programs every week, I am no OS expert---I have always used the "out-of-the-box" installation without doing much system administration.

    I would like to try Gentoo, but this is what I am afraid of: I don't know anything about vixie-cron, at, or ntp (besides maybe seeing their names on the redhat bootup screen for 5 seconds). I am afraid that I will have to spend a lot of time figuring out which of these very basic, system-level packages to download.

    So here is my question: given that I know how to compile things, but don't know very much about system administration at all, will I be able to have a fully functioning system (and I mean fully---I want to use my CD-RW and X11) just by following the instructions on the Gentoo site?

    In other words, how will I know which packages I need to emerge to get my system fully functioning?

    1. Re:OK, but I have a question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everything in the installation documentation has a default. If you don't know what to pick, just pick the default and it will work fine. The documentation is really very good, and is aimed at people less experienced than yourself.

  138. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by Brando_Calrisean · · Score: 0

    I have a Linksys WMP11 v2.7 that does not work under Linux. However, I don't blame Linux for that incompatibility, I blame Broadcom for not releasing the farking chip's specs so that someone ELSE can write a free driver for it.

    Anyway, supposedly I can use DriverLoader to get it working (use win32 drivers in Linux) but I haven't had the time to play around with this yet.

    --
    Don't call me a cowboy, and don't tell me to slow down!
  139. Re:Does it still have the same installer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes gentoo have an graphical installer based on anaconda from Redhat the URL is http://gentoo.vidalinux.com :) i probe it and works very good.

  140. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by GreyWolf3000 · · Score: 1
    No, I understood RPM management just fine. It was still more cumbersome than Portage, and still didn't meet my needs in other ways (yes, being up to date was one of them).

    rpm just isn't comparable to portage; they almost do two different things, except portage is a front-end and a back-end.

    portage is great software, it just bothers me when I see {portage,apt,ports,etc} compared to rpm. Who would compare apt to dpkg?

    --
    Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
  141. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by aenters · · Score: 1

    As long as you use a NVIDIA card, you get performance in the games mentioned under Linux then Windows. Not sure about ATI cards, but I'd imagine its the same.

    --
    where flamebait is +5 funny and funny stuff is -1 flamebait
  142. pcmcia during install by undertoad · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know if pcmcia works during the install for 2004.1? I tried using both the universal and unversal-minimal images for 2004.0, and had no luck. (Don't happen to have the hardware to test with in front of me, or I'd answer my own question.)

  143. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by El+Pollo+Loco · · Score: 1

    Modprove is simply a driver loader. Say you have a sound card. The kernal needs to be able to talk to the sound card. It does that using a driver. Modprobe loads that driver. It runs everytime you start up your computer, and anytime you run it manually. If you don't need the driver, then you can disable that, and run modules-update. I can explain better, if you let me know what you commented out that was modprobe related.

  144. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by flatface · · Score: 1

    Ok, a little offtopic, but can't driver problems like this be fixed by using a wrapper with the dlls like Captive? I know that you have to have the original DLL files (download/copy them yourself), and it won't be in the "true spirit" of open source software, but like me, most people just want their stuff to work. And if it's preventing you from something like getting your computer onto a network, why the Hell not?

  145. Re:Does it still have the same installer? by Sweetshark · · Score: 1
  146. I have two words for you by bigredradio · · Score: 1

    emerge KDE Then go away for the weekend. Come back and "maybe" if will be finished.

  147. etc-update - cool, but deadly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Users should tread carefully when updating config files. etc-update is a great assistant to this process, but if you hang out on #gentoo for a little while, you'll eventually hear from someone who's accidentally blown away their working config by using etc-update. Be careful with it!

    In conclusion, with great power comes great responsibility. Learn to use `find` and `diff`, you'll be glad later. HAND.

    1. Re:etc-update - cool, but deadly by 00420 · · Score: 1

      Users should tread carefully when updating config files. etc-update is a great assistant to this process, but if you hang out on #gentoo for a little while, you'll eventually hear from someone who's accidentally blown away their working config by using etc-update. Be careful with it!

      If you accidentally blow away your config files by using etc-update, then you seriously fkced up (which I'll admit, I've done myself, once). It tells you which config files need updating, and then gives you the option to update all of them, update one at a time (with an option to skip each one), or not update them at all. So, if you blindly overwrites a file it is your fault not etc-update's.

      Also, if you don't have a backup of your config files then you are even more at fault.

  148. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by raodin · · Score: 1

    Nope, ATI's linux drivers are utter trash compared to NV's, imho.

  149. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by macdaddy · · Score: 1

    I just wanted to toss something out here because I see it happen a lot. Many folks talk about how long is takes Gentoo to compile things. It's a common discussion around the 'Net. However I'd say close to 90, maybe 95% of the time when people refer to "days" or numerous hours for an install they are using far inferior machines. It's not meant as an insult. I see it an awful lot though. People complain about the compile times and yet they are using a PII 350 with 128MB of RAM. That machine is what, 6 years old? Compile times with a version of Gentoo using 6 year old versions of software packages would be admirably quick. People are trying to use compile new versions of software with very dated machines. Anyhow, I see folks make that duration claims and thought I'd throw that tidbit out there. I haven't yet had time to install Gentoo (bought the CDs and even downloaded all 24GB of distfiles). I suspect it will compile quite quickly on either my dual 2400MP or my dual 2.8 Xeon boxes. I don't expect it'll take too terribly long.

  150. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Life is a sexually transmitted disease and the mortality rate is one hundred percent.

  151. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by Xabraxas · · Score: 1
    It would really help if the RPM packages tracked with what you get in a regular tarball. I've had too many cases where I installed an RPM, tried to configure it, and still not have it work...only to find that I got a lobotomized RPM package that didn't have everything, and I had to search for a second or third RPM that had the addon to the original RPM to let me do what I wanted. No thanks, I just download and compile the tarball and get everything I want first pass (including on where I want to put files).

    I had similar problems with SUSE. All their multimedia packages were stripped out and broken. The only option I could find was to build from source but that broke a ton of shit.

    Thankfully I have no such problems with Gentoo and their portage system.

    Amen

    --
    Time makes more converts than reason
  152. Upgrade? by RoadkillBunny · · Score: 1

    Is ther eany real reason for me to upgraade from 1.4? As far I see it, no matter the gentoo version you always have the newest stuff. So what's the difference?

    --
    Cheers,
    RoadkillBunny
    1. Re:Upgrade? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      The difference is that they "need" to bump the version number every once in a while so that people won't say "Gentoo sucks; it's only at 1.4, while Mandrake is at 10.0!"

      So, no, it doesn't matter in the slightest - just "emerge -u world"

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  153. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by Xabraxas · · Score: 1
    kportage is pretty nice :) there is also a gnome version i hear.

    There is a gtk version called porthole. There is also a java version called portagemaster.

    --
    Time makes more converts than reason
  154. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by eniu!uine · · Score: 1

    "Gentoo really is a great operating system, and maybe even for beginners."

    Not for beginners. It took me a long time to install gentoo and it still didn't work. I don't think I've ever been so pissed at a distro. I wasn't pissed because it didn't work, because I didn't pay for it, but because so many people said it was easy. Bullshit. It might be easy if you're used to things like compiling your kernel and editing your fstab file, but for those of us who are used to Redhat, Suse, Mandrake etc it is an incredible pain in the ass. Beginners: don't let this guy fool you, anyone who is not intimately familiar with Linux should stay the hell away from gentoo unless they like headaches and swearing at their computer.

  155. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by Darby · · Score: 1

    use your turn signal! you people act like it's divulging information to the enemy

    The way some bastards react when you do turn on the signal, it is divulging info to the enemy ;-)

  156. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by 74nova · · Score: 1

    i feel your pain on that one. the trick, however, is to drive a burly enough machine like mine to be able to handle just such an occasion :-) on the bright side, sometimes this behavior can be used to your advantage. have you ever had somebody just driving in your blind spot? just turn on your signal to that side and they will pass you in no time. stupid drivers are usually at least somewhat predictable.

    --
    use your turn signal! you people act like it's divulging information to the enemy
  157. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by Curtman · · Score: 1

    it seems that the problem is an IRQ conflict between the inbuilt LAN card (which cant be disabled in the BIOS)

    I've got that problem with my Toshiba laptop. My solution was to just not load the driver for the lan card. Everything works fine now.

  158. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Joke:

    Parent post had an aversion to formatting their text with whitespace / newlines (aka carriage returns)

  159. Mod Up. by theTerribleRobbo · · Score: 1


    This man deserves an informative, or at least a (+1, Helpful).

  160. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by 00420 · · Score: 1

    Well, other people already debunked the majority of the BS in this post, but I'll point out something that they seemed to miss.

    "I use Gentoo because it's more like the BSDs."
    "Last month I tried to install FreeBSD on a well-supported machine, but the text-based installer scared me off. I've never used a BSD, but the guys on Slashdot say that it's l33t though, so surely I must be for using Gentoo."


    Gentoo's installation is all done from the command prompt. I really doubt anybody who has done it would be scared off by a text-based installer.

  161. Re:I prefer Ninnle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    UNLEASH the people who won't STFU about gentoo zealots. You morons think gentoo zealots are bad? I am hearing people BITCH about gentoo zealots before gentoo zealots even show up. ARG. JUST STFU YOU SFMs.

    (my new thing to make annoying is the sheer amount of people who won't stfu about people who won't stfu about gentoo zealots)

  162. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you are, my best advice is to read the install guide. You might not understand it depending on your level of knowledge, but it should at least read like English.

    Or Danish, German, Dutch, French, Indonesian, Italian, Spanish, or Traditional Chinese ;-)

  163. emerge depclean by zmedico · · Score: 1

    I have found the command "emerge depclean" is also very handy. First tune the USE flags in /etc/make.conf and the packages in /var/cache/edb/world. The man page for emerge has some good documentation.

  164. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by Dalcius · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the great reply! I just want to say a few things:

    1)
    > > Gentoo's install guide is very detailed and geared towards novices.
    I'd change that to "step-by-step commands for people who know what 90% of these commands mean." So when they go wrong, you can go, "Ah... all I have to do is repeat step 15a."

    Correct -- I should have been more explicit. The instructions are, IMO, enough that the user will know what is going on (we're partitioning now -- this is what partitioning is for... etc) when he copies the commands and runs them.

    If you run into problems, I am not trying to imply that a novice will know what to do (e.g. repeat step 15a) but will at least know where he stands. Then comes asking for help.

    2) the fact the directions don't have /boot mounted by default,
    Maybe I'm not understanding you, but I found this in the install guide when describing /boot setup in fstab:
    "[/boot] shouldn't be mounted automatically (noauto) but ..."

    3) As someone else mentioned, it isn't surprising that it took so long for you to build KDE as you were only on a dual P2 450 (I'm thinking maybe about a P3 700 if multiple processors were used properly?). More 'modern' processors like a 2000+ or higher will generally achieve a full system in a weekend (from stage1, no binary builds).

    4) Everything else you said I agree with 100%. Your observations on help you got, problems you ran into, etc. are all pretty fitting with my own.

    Cheers :)

    --
    ~Dalcius
    Rome wasn't burnt in a day.
  165. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by Crazy+Eight · · Score: 1
    I don't think it would kill you to note that some people here -- in a thread that was supposed to be about Gentoo Linux -- have offered unsolicited assistance with your camera. You've received one negative response from an anonymous smart ass who never got modded out of oblivion. Like others, I immediately wanted to pitch in with pointers as I just learned how to link my new camera with my computer but saw that gphoto2 has already been mentioned.

    Incidentally, there is no fragmentation in this case. libgphoto2 is the defacto resource for connecting *nix to PTP cameras.

  166. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by Crazy+Eight · · Score: 1

    It's kind of a classic that keeps coming up on gentoo stories. The poster isn't trying to pass it off as his own.

  167. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "And yet for the clueful user there are gains. Flac compiled with ICC and specifically optimized for P4 saved me huge (>20% general speed) and when ripping 400 CDs, you know, that added up. There are more examples, but you'd probably dismiss me as a servile fan boi. shrug."

    Gee. And here I was thinking that physically inserting and ejecting the CDs from the drive, and ripping them, took a considerably longer time than any encoding process.

    The original post's point stays valid: aggressive compiler optimisation does make sense in some cases, but they are the vast minority.

  168. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by Crazy+Eight · · Score: 1
    I don't know what I mean. I'm confused too... I honestly don't know what I'm talking about... Like I said, I honestly don't know what I'm talking about... I haven't the foggiest idea why it never occurred to me.

    WOW!

    I can't believe I just read that on Slashdot!

  169. nForce2 kernel support by Crazy+Eight · · Score: 1

    For the record I don't think there's any ground left to cover.

    1. Re:nForce2 kernel support by dpilot · · Score: 1

      From what I've read, Ross Dickson has done a tremendous job of figuring out the hangs and stabilizing things. But I don't think he would say he's done, at least as of yesterday on lkml he wasn't saying that.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
  170. This pisses me off.. by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1

    I JUST printed the 2004.0 docs on my color laserjet needlessly, just hours before the release. Now I have to burn MORE paper and MORE color toner.

    I wish they would pre-announce their announcements...

  171. what kind of card do you have? by lorcha · · Score: 1

    My orinoco and d-link cards both work fine under debian. For fun, try putting a knoppix cd in and see if it detects your card. you might be pleasantly surprised.

    --
    "Avoid employing unlucky people - throw half of the pile of CVs in the bin without reading them." -- David Brent
  172. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow.
    Here you go friend.
    Copy and paste these starter snippets of html as much as you need in your next post. Preferably at the beginning and end of a paragraph respectively. My eyes and brain thank you in advance.

    <p> </p>
  173. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by Al+Al+Cool+J · · Score: 1
    Anyhow, whatever *nix one chooses, it handily beats Windoze over the head except for gaming

    And hardware support

    Ironically, 30 minutes ago my brother returned an old computer I had given him because WinXP wouldn't install on the hardware. It was an older PII system, with no USB or PS/2 mouse adaptor and WinXP could not detect the serial mouse. Before I gave it to him, the same computer had been running Gentoo with no problems.
  174. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by eugene+ts+wong · · Score: 1

    :^)

    Hey, I'm just being honest. I'm tired of reading source code, man pages, etc., & still having my system break on me.

  175. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by aztracker1 · · Score: 1

    have you tried using an xp pro/home cd? will those drivers load? I've had to use win98 drivers from the cd in a winme before, because they didn't include it in a newer version, was an obscure onboard audio chipset.. was a while ago though.. drivers are a pain, but if xp came with them, try loading from that, or sometimes, using windows update will actually find them..

    --
    Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
  176. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by Dasher42 · · Score: 1

    You know, when a rating system becomes so self-referential, it's time to hide it or ditch it. I see nothing wrong with the parent, and all the noise people make about points on a website is really tiresome.

  177. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by Merusdraconis · · Score: 1

    Dude, don't you know the best way to get help with Linux? You just say that Linux sucks because you can't do x, and everyone will rush to 'help' by correcting you. Otherwise they'll just say to read the manual, and we all know tech guys can't write manuals that are actually helpful.

  178. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i've actually had a hard time finding time to tweak various distro's to get my wlan card/sound/sony weirdness working, as i never seem to have enough time between work related activities...

    but i've found suse 9.0 to support prism2 cards (i have a ambit lan-express, vaio) and many others very easily. it comes with acpi in the kernel too.

    only downside is i hate YasT, but apt-get for suse takes care of stuff nicely and i've always got conf files! (albeit in weird places)

  179. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by Crazy+Eight · · Score: 1

    Well, I hope that smiley means you took my post as humorously as I meant it. The stuff I highlighted has a pretty different tone from the usual, "I know blah, blah, blah..." we like to throw about around here.

  180. get a clue by chegosaurus · · Score: 1

    > "...my Gentoo Linux workstation..."

    it's "Gentoo Athlon boxen" ffs!

  181. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    oh yes, very "proffesional". So "proffesional", in fact, that you don't know how to spell....

  182. Choose your stimilus for insanity by beforewisdom · · Score: 1

    Well, I guess if you want a FULL, quality distro with good portage/package managers it looks like you get to choose what will eventually drive you crazy:

    1. long waits in between releases ( Debian )

    or

    2. long waits during compilation ( Gentoo )

    Love both, got both installed.

    Steve

  183. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by eugene+ts+wong · · Score: 1
    Well, I didn't take it seriously. I didn't know if you meant it humourously or not, but I didn't think that you were offensive.

    You are right in that there is that usual tone. It's almost rather amusing to watch 2 people, who probably actually agree on something, argue because they didn't bother to hear what the other person was saying. It'd be like you saying that you like oranges & me saying that I like apples. We could argue & argue, but did we bother to ask questions:
    • do we both like the other fruit as well as the other fruit or do we just like 1 of the fruits?
    • are we arguing about which is best or what we like or what?
    These are pretty stupid questions & the list could go on, but they need to be asked if we are to engage in a discussion about Linux vs. BSD or whatever the topic may be.
  184. Bad timing strikes again. by Tukla · · Score: 1

    I just got my 2004.0 CDs in today's mail. Damn!

  185. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by eugene+ts+wong · · Score: 1

    I went & took a look, hoping to take you up on your offer, but I couldn't find it. Maybe I deleted it instead of commenting. That's not my normal tendency for things like system scripts.

    Maybe it was actually something else. I just remember a message about modules & calculating something like module dependencies

    I appreciate your comments & explanations. Thanks for your time.

  186. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by Ctrl-Z · · Score: 1

    I have tried and no, it does not work.

    --
    www.timcoleman.com is a total waste of your time. Never go there.
  187. Re:Gentoo is one of the best linux distribs, and h by schon · · Score: 1

    it would profit the linux community [...] if linux was able to [...] download pictures from my digital camera

    Why? Do you have some pictures there that are vitally important to everybody else? Maybe pictures of Bill Gates giving a cheque to SCO to destroy Linux?

    If you want to use your digital camera under Linux, you should have bought one from a manufacturer that supports Linux. There are quite a few of them, and they're very well documented. My HP720 (for example) works extremely well under Linux.