This masterpiece was written by the Slashdot Troll Community. The only funny hoax of the entire day, and now that it makes the front page, the authors of the hoax are pounded into -1 by the Moderation system. I guess the message is "it's funny if it's posted somewhere else".
This is a question of taste and as such can be debated endlessly.
I , for example, find Mac very annoying and much prefer Windows style KDE desktop etc...
CORRECTION! Taste has nothing to do with the purely objective factors by which desktop systems are ranked. In every objective survey, Enlightenment has come out on top in terms of functionality. For instance, in Enlightenment, you can make a dragged window semi-transparent.
The people at Microsoft can't even comprehend that level of functionality, let alone implement it.
I have no idea what you mean by "Windows style KDE desktop", but rest assured that KDE and Microsoft are authored by different companies! You idiot!
The DMCA can contain 100 Titles if need be, it still does not address the original posters' topic of the enforcability of End User License Agreements. Your comment is illogical, which makes you A RETARDED SHITSTREAK COCKSUCKER! GO FUCK A DOG!
A German court has ruled that you can even sell your OEM versions, and Microsoft can't do anything against it (even though they tried). But in the US this is probably different, thanks to the DMCA...
Your facts are legitimate, but your conclusion is illegitimate and downright wrong. The DMCA is a revision to copyright law that prohibits trafficking in circumvention devices. It has nothing to do with the enforcability of End User License Agreements. There is a law which is being supported at the state level called UCITA which deals with this topic.
Obfuscating the purpose of the DMCA lessens the logicical correctness of our argument against it and in so doing weakens our cause. In the future, please be more vigilant.
Slashdot Mirror
This masterpiece was written by the Slashdot Troll Community. The only funny hoax of the entire day, and now that it makes the front page, the authors of the hoax are pounded into -1 by the Moderation system. I guess the message is "it's funny if it's posted somewhere else".
Fucking stupid hypocrites.
No it is not an April 1st post! It was posted on April the second, a Tuesday! Can you not see the date? You are quite ILLOGICAL!
yes, anonymity is disabled! it is only LOGICAL!
it should be obvious to everyone that the RIAA is just trying to protect it's property against theft. it's only LOGICAL.
This is a question of taste and as such can be debated endlessly. ...
I , for example, find Mac very annoying and much prefer Windows style KDE desktop etc
CORRECTION! Taste has nothing to do with the purely objective factors by which desktop systems are ranked. In every objective survey, Enlightenment has come out on top in terms of functionality. For instance, in Enlightenment, you can make a dragged window semi-transparent.
The people at Microsoft can't even comprehend that level of functionality, let alone implement it.
I have no idea what you mean by "Windows style KDE desktop", but rest assured that KDE and Microsoft are authored by different companies! You idiot!
Your comment is illogical and NOT FUNNY you cocksucker!!
Your comment is illogical and NOT FUNNY you cocksucker!
Your comment is illogical and NOT FUNNY you cocksucker!!
Your comment is ILLOGICAL and NOT FUNNY you cocksucker!!!!
You sig is illogical and NOT FUNNY you cocksucker!!!!
Your comment is illogical and NOT FUNNY you cocksucker!!
Your comment is illogical and NOT FUNNY you cocksucker!!!!
Your comment is illogical and NOT FUNNY you cocksucker!!
Your comment is illogical and NOT FUNNY you cocksucker!!!
shakes from fear realizing that probably a large number of people out there are eating this garbage up as if it were as natural as poop
Your statment is illogical! Humans do not, in my experience, naturally eat poop! Only monkeys do that!
Humans and monkeys both masturbate however, though monkeys prefer public masturbation and humans are less efficient masturbators than Vulcans.
Please obey logic and be more vigilant.
Heck no.
This is illogical. You are contractually bound by all license agreements you agree to. If you do not review them, the consequences could be dire.
Please be more vigilant.
The DMCA can contain 100 Titles if need be, it still does not address the original posters' topic of the enforcability of End User License Agreements. Your comment is illogical, which makes you A RETARDED SHITSTREAK COCKSUCKER! GO FUCK A DOG!
Please be more vigilant.
But the thing is -- you find later on what you say isn't allowed.
You are illogical. Your comment is illogical. The road to purification lies in examination of logic.
I believe the comment you were grasping for was You get something for a little, with regard to stealing music using a cd copier device.
Please be more vigilant.
The poster is incorrect and therefore his argument is vacuously true. You can link directly to articles.
Please to the logical thing and remove this story immediately.
A German court has ruled that you can even sell your OEM versions, and Microsoft can't do anything against it (even though they tried). But in the US this is probably different, thanks to the DMCA...
Your facts are legitimate, but your conclusion is illegitimate and downright wrong. The DMCA is a revision to copyright law that prohibits trafficking in circumvention devices. It has nothing to do with the enforcability of End User License Agreements. There is a law which is being supported at the state level called UCITA which deals with this topic.
Obfuscating the purpose of the DMCA lessens the logicical correctness of our argument against it and in so doing weakens our cause. In the future, please be more vigilant.