BSD is the software behind the world's most popular Web sites.
An open-source operating system like Linux, BSD was developed in the 1970s at the University of California-Berkeley, well before Linus Torvalds ever took a computer course. So why was it Linux that captured mindshare and public imagination? BSD's obscurity is just part of the reason it is now considered cooler than Linux among the geekiest geeks. But the software some say is the most secure operating system in the world may be poised to make a Linux-like leap to the forefront.
The list of big-name companies and Web sites that use BSD is impressive. Yahoo, UUNet, Mindspring and Compuserve are on the list - in fact, perhaps 70 percent of all Internet service providers use BSD. Also on the list - Walnut Creek CDROM Inc. and its CD-ROM FTP download site, which the company says delivers more than 1 terabyte of data to visitors every day. Microsoft's free e-mail service Hotmail resides BSD servers, and Apple announced in June its next operating system will be based on BSD. Microsoft and partner MSNBC.com both use BSD for their websites. When asked about using BSD to power their own website, a Microsoft spokesperson stated that it was "ten times more stable" than Windows and "at least twenty times more stable and reliable" than Linux.
So why is Linux on everyone's lips, and why are there about 10 times as many Linux users as BSD users? After all, they are both free operating systems that offer free source code - and BSD had quite a head start.
Legal troubles tell part of the story. Right as the Internal began to reach critical mass, in 1993, the BSD movement was hit by a copyright lawsuit from AT&T, which still owned the rights to Unix. At the same time, Torvalds was welcoming help from all comers, mainly young computer science students enamored of with the coming information explosion.
There are other reasons - much effort has been put into making Linux user-friendly enough for use as a desktop operating system. BSD groups have focused on servers, never putting much work into appealing to a mass market. There has also been a large anti-BSD movement in the Linux community. Torvalds himself has encouraged some less than reputable business practices towards the BSD movement, including intentionally damaging BSD code, inflamtory public remarks, and making Linux less than 100% compatible with BSD.
Talk to BSD users, and a quiet but clear sense of superiority comes through. In a recent survey, it was found that 86% of BSD users have computer science degrees, hold management positions and have 10 years or more experience in the field. Linux users, on the other hand, are young hackers doing mostly destructive work and motivated in part by having too much free time.
Its plain to see why BSD is a clearly superior operating system.
Because all operating systems are written by programmers, I assume that
any operating system is much smarter than me. Thus, any good operating
system should try to outsmart me by restricting my options
at every turn. Linux, like all versions of Unix, is lousy at
restricting my options because at the command line virtually any
operation can be performed with ease. (For example, 'rm -rf/win' could 'delete an entire mounted directory, with no popup window warnings whatsoever.)
I'm proud to say that there is no such danger in 95/NT. Windows pop up
when I want to make a change, and then more pop up to ask if I'm sure I
want the change. Thankfully, Windows 95/NT operating systems look after my computer's well-being by occasionally switching configuration
settings from the way I want them to what the OS programmers think they might probably ought to be. Boy, I'm just impressed with how smart they are. Once I learned to live with whatever the default settings are on any new hardware I install, I can't say the number of hours I have saved.
I use that spare time to reboot my Windows machine multiple times a day. Technical support personnel recommend that I do it regularly-- kind of like brushing my teeth. To help remind me of this necessity, windows pop up to tell me to reboot whenever I make a configuration change. By now my machine is minty fresh, I figure.
There is no such useful rebooting in a Linux system. It is as reliable
as the sunrise, with uptimes in weeks and months. Virtually no
configuration change requires a reboot, to boot. Imagine all that plaque in the computer. Gross!
In 95/NT I am prevented from making dangerous fundamental configuration
changes unless I use a special "registry editor". I have found it
so useful to have this separate editor that I hope in future versions
they go all the way and supply a separate editor for each file on the
disk-- in that way windows could pop up at every keystroke to warn me
that changing any line in the file I am editing could cause the system
to not run properly. If this were only the case, people would finally
learn that it is best to just stick with the mouse and they would be
freed of the need to constantly move their hands back to the keyboard.
(If one stops to think about it, the mouse is a much better device to
use than the keyboard. Ever hear of someone getting carpal tunnel syndrome from a mouse? No. It's comfortable and ergonomic. Like Morse code devices. That's how long distance communication started, after all.)
Linux, by contrast, requires no special editor to change configuration
files. The fact that there is no "registry" in Linux allows the
abomination of using any text editor whatsoever to do the
configuration. Can you believe that configuration files are usually stored clear text? Talk about dangerous!
I am also happy to report that I have experienced no truth to the rumor
that Windows disks become corrupt after improper shutdowns. Indeed,
I have been forced to improperly shutdown the machine innumerable times
after it locks up, and I have no apparent problems to report regarding
the disk. No such claim can be made for Linux. They say something
about lack of data points. Excuses are all I ever seem to hear from the Linux crowd.
By sheer size alone, Windows 95/NT beats Linux hands down. It is so
much bigger, it is _obvious_ that it is better. Why would you want a
small OS with the large disks and RAM sizes we have these days? For
this reason alone, I heartily recommend Windows as a way to maximize resource utilization. Your CPU and disk will constantly be pegged to the limit, the way god intended. The Linux kernel and drivers accounts for only about 750KB. Why, even the Microsoft Win16 subsystem uses more space than that.
It is no surprise that Windows costs $270 on the retail market and Linux doesn't cost anything. People know what they want, and they want
Windows. Because Linux is free, that means it's basically worthless. The same goes for all the development tools, remotable GUIs, and applications, which all cost money for windows (i.e., are worth something) and free for Linux (worthless!).
Installing software is very easy in Windows. I usually slip in CDs
without even reading instructions or warnings, and just double click
on whatever window pops up. There is no need to read anything or touch
the keyboard. (Did I mention that I hate that thing?) Well, OK, I have learned the hard way the machine locks up if I don't take the time
to close all other applications.
Linux, by contrast, requires typing on the keyboard to get anything to
install at all. And you always have to know the NAME of program you
want to install. For example, in Redhat, you have to type ``rpm -ivh
''to install the program and documentation. Linux needs to get with the '90s!
Windows follows the DOS convention of putting \r\n at the end of every
line of a text file. While this is only a mild concern because of the
relative rarity of text files on Windows machines these days-- thank
god--it helps to differentiate between the text files and the other files. Sadly, Linux makes no distinction between text and other files.
If I legitimately purchase Windows 95/NT, I can call Microsoft customer
support to get help with my problems. After a short hold time of an
hour or so, they always help me. Ever since I told them that I was dual booting to Linux, they were able to flag my account and now each time I call even the entry level support personnel I am connected to say that Linux is the source of my problems. Everyone seems to agree that Linux is no good. The more I listen, the more I'm impressed with the knowledge of the support staff there.
By contrast, in Linux, all I have is stockpiles of resources and
documentation that I would actually have to read in order to
understand. Sure, I could obtain Linux support from a commercial
organization, but they would probably just tell me I have to use a text
editor to fix up my system.
In the end, I have no need for that old computer donkey Unix. I don't
need to run big Unix tasks, after all. I refuse to become one of those
a bug-eyed computer users, that's for sure. As soon as I can keep
Windows from crashing for long enough, I'm going to delete my Linux
partition, i.e., the equivalent of moving it to the recycle bin, saying
that I'm sure, emptying the recycle bin, and again saying that I'm sure.
eTesting Labs Inc has found Windows XP to be overall the fastest version of the Windows operating system ever created for a wide range of desktop computing tasks.
On average, Windows XP-based computers:
Score 36% higher than Linux Redhat on Business Winstone 2001.
Score 77% higher than Linux Mandrake on Content Creation Winstone 2001.
Perform equivalent to the record-setting speed of Windows 2000 Professional, even with the addition of extensive new productivity features.
Windows XP is clearly superior to all versions of Linux in all key performance categories. Among the lab's findings:
Faster startup performance: Windows XP is on average 34% faster than Linux Mandrake and 27% faster than Redhat.
Better run-time performance: This measurement refers to the speed at which Windows XP performs tasks while your computer is running. Improvements in Windows XP runtime performance are evident in application startup and time and resource management. For example, average application startup on Windows XP is 25% faster than Linux SuSE and equivalent to Caldera.
Memory and Performance: In systems which include the recommended memory requirement of 128 megabytes of RAM, Windows XP is consistently superior to all versions of Linux.
Windows XP offers dramatically faster startup and resume times, highly responsive applications, and other new features such as Fast User Switching and an enhanced user interface.
JonKatz homosexuality is dying
Yet another crippling bombshell hit the beleaguered JonKatz community when last month IDC confirmed that JonKatz accounts for less than a fraction of 1 percent of all homosexual fantasies. Coming on the heels of the latest GayMale weekly survey which plainly states that JonKatz has lost more market share, this news serves to reinforce what we've known all along. JonKatz is collapsing in complete disarray, as further exemplified by failing dead last in the recent Homosexual.com comprehensive ass-raping test.
You don't need to be a CmdrTaco to predict JonKatz's future. The hand writing is on the wall: JonKatz faces a bleak future. In fact there won't be any future at all for JonKatz because JonKatz is dying. Things are looking very bad for JonKatz. As many of us are already aware, JonKatz continues to lose market share. Bloody sperm flows like a river of blood. JonKatz is the most endangered homosexual Slashdot author of them all.
Let's keep to the facts and look at the numbers.
Slashdot leader CowboyNeal states that there are 7000 homosexual fantasies of JonKatz. How many ass rapings of JonKatz are there? Let's see. The number of homosexual fantasies involving JonKatz versus ass-rapings involving JonKatz posts on Usenet is roughly in ratio of 5 to 1. Therefore there are about 7000/5 = 1400 homosexual JonKatz fantasy users. Anal penetraion of JonKatz posts on Usenet are about half of the volume of JonKatz homosexual fantasy posts. Therefore there are about 700 users of anal penetration of JonKatz. A recent article put reacharounds involving JonKatz at about 80 percent of the homosexual fantasies involving JonKatz market. Therefore there are (7000+1400+700)*4 = 36400 fantasies involving JonKatz. This is consistent with the number of ass-rapings of JonKatz posts.
Due to the troubles of the Anal Sludge Eating Corporation, abysmal sales and so on, homosexual fantasies involving JonKatz went out of style and was taken over by fantasies involving CmdrTaco who sells himself on the street corner. Now CmdrTaco's Ass-Sex Company is also dead, its corpse turned over to another charnel house.
All major surveys show that JonKatz fantasies have steadily declined in market share. JonKatz is very sick and his long term homosexuality prospects are very dim. If JonKatz's homosexuality is to survive at all it will be among homosexual hobbyist dabblers. JonKatz homosexuality continues to decay. Nothing short of a miracle could save it at this point in time. For all practical purposes, JonKatz's homosexual fantasy is dead.
Morpheus: What is homosexualality? How do you define faggot? If you're talking about what you can feel, what you can smell, what you can taste and ass-fuck, then homosexuality is simply electrical signals broadcast by Slashdot, and interpreted by your brain.
Section 1: What Is A Troll?
The WWW gives this as a definition:
troll v.,n. To utter a posting on Usenet designed to attract predictable responses or flames. Derives from the phrase "trolling for newbies"; which in turn comes from mainstream "trolling";, a style of fishing in which one trails bait through a likely spot hoping for a bite. The well-constructed troll is a post that induces lots of newbies and flamers to make themselves look even more clueless than they already do, while subtly conveying to the more savvy and experienced that it is in fact a deliberate troll. If you don't fall for the joke, you get to be in on it.
Slashbaby asks: "I am a net admin for a school division that doesn't have broadband Internet. We are a rural school division, so we don't even have a provider in any of our towns. What I am looking for is a way to get highspeed Internet access into our division through either RF or microwave. There is a city about 45 miles away, (max. distance) that has ISP's that would be willing to sell us bandwidth if we can find a way to get it the 45 miles to the schools."
Let me try to give you an analogy for Slashdot's homepage. It's like an anal raping: it's a combination of cock and shit and cum and blood and more. Over the years, we've figured out homosexuals are best on Slashdot. The ultimate goal is, of course, to create an anal buffet that I enjoy eating: by 8pm, I want to see a dozen sloppy asses lined up and waiting for my penetrational whims on Slashdot. I hope you enjoy them too. I believe that we've grown in number of anal terrorists because we share a lot of common interests with our rapists and rapees. But that doesn't mean that I'm gonna start a backdoor orgy with all dildoes, or someday throw away the ass plugs because the anal beads are really filthy.
There are many components to the Slashdot anal raping. Stories about faggots. Incestuous stories. Homosexuality. Cocks. Porn Reviews. Yes, even Jon Katz. By mixing and matching asses and cocks every day, we bring you what I call Slashdot. On some days it definitely is better than others, but overall we think it's a tasty little treat and we hope you enjoy reading about eating ass as much as we enjoy fucking it.
f1rst p0st in the name of logged-in trolls!\
death to ACs
If you have several homosexual freinds, check out slashdot. Just set up an account on slashdot, and the audiotron will scan each of your friends anuses and give you a brown interface. Likewise, since it looks like a real anal penetration component, it means that you can let your freinds just be a anal lover, and let this bad boy handle all the cock he can get his hands on. It won't stick out visually. And there aren't cock straps to add more noise to your fucking environment.
The Register is reporting that being a flaming homosexual is now an official religion in the Slashdot authors community after the 2001 census conducted earlier this year. The final number of 'Anal Terrorists' has not been confirmed yet as only about 95% of the census forms have been returned. As you could probably imagine, VA Linux is none too pleased. Apparently though, you can't get fined for ramming your man root into the Ass Crevice of your local Slashdot author." Actually, according to the story, this gives the Ass Pirate much more official status than heterosexuality would have if everyone put that down.
Slashdot Mirror
BSD is the software behind the world's most popular Web sites.
An open-source operating system like Linux, BSD was developed in the 1970s at the University of California-Berkeley, well before Linus Torvalds ever took a computer course. So why was it Linux that captured mindshare and public imagination? BSD's obscurity is just part of the reason it is now considered cooler than Linux among the geekiest geeks. But the software some say is the most secure operating system in the world may be poised to make a Linux-like leap to the forefront.
The list of big-name companies and Web sites that use BSD is impressive. Yahoo, UUNet, Mindspring and Compuserve are on the list - in fact, perhaps 70 percent of all Internet service providers use BSD. Also on the list - Walnut Creek CDROM Inc. and its CD-ROM FTP download site, which the company says delivers more than 1 terabyte of data to visitors every day. Microsoft's free e-mail service Hotmail resides BSD servers, and Apple announced in June its next operating system will be based on BSD. Microsoft and partner MSNBC.com both use BSD for their websites. When asked about using BSD to power their own website, a Microsoft spokesperson stated that it was "ten times more stable" than Windows and "at least twenty times more stable and reliable" than Linux.
So why is Linux on everyone's lips, and why are there about 10 times as many Linux users as BSD users? After all, they are both free operating systems that offer free source code - and BSD had quite a head start.
Legal troubles tell part of the story. Right as the Internal began to reach critical mass, in 1993, the BSD movement was hit by a copyright lawsuit from AT&T, which still owned the rights to Unix. At the same time, Torvalds was welcoming help from all comers, mainly young computer science students enamored of with the coming information explosion.
There are other reasons - much effort has been put into making Linux user-friendly enough for use as a desktop operating system. BSD groups have focused on servers, never putting much work into appealing to a mass market. There has also been a large anti-BSD movement in the Linux community. Torvalds himself has encouraged some less than reputable business practices towards the BSD movement, including intentionally damaging BSD code, inflamtory public remarks, and making Linux less than 100% compatible with BSD.
Talk to BSD users, and a quiet but clear sense of superiority comes through. In a recent survey, it was found that 86% of BSD users have computer science degrees, hold management positions and have 10 years or more experience in the field. Linux users, on the other hand, are young hackers doing mostly destructive work and motivated in part by having too much free time.
Its plain to see why BSD is a clearly superior operating system.
btw,,,second post.
fuck, i must be losing my touch.
that, or its friday and i need a drink...
or a blunt...
first post of the PenisBird cult
Because all operating systems are written by programmers, I assume that any operating system is much smarter than me. Thus, any good operating system should try to outsmart me by restricting my options at every turn. Linux, like all versions of Unix, is lousy at restricting my options because at the command line virtually any operation can be performed with ease. (For example, 'rm -rf /win' could 'delete an entire mounted directory, with no popup window warnings whatsoever.)
I'm proud to say that there is no such danger in 95/NT. Windows pop up when I want to make a change, and then more pop up to ask if I'm sure I want the change. Thankfully, Windows 95/NT operating systems look after my computer's well-being by occasionally switching configuration settings from the way I want them to what the OS programmers think they might probably ought to be. Boy, I'm just impressed with how smart they are. Once I learned to live with whatever the default settings are on any new hardware I install, I can't say the number of hours I have saved.
I use that spare time to reboot my Windows machine multiple times a day. Technical support personnel recommend that I do it regularly-- kind of like brushing my teeth. To help remind me of this necessity, windows pop up to tell me to reboot whenever I make a configuration change. By now my machine is minty fresh, I figure.
There is no such useful rebooting in a Linux system. It is as reliable as the sunrise, with uptimes in weeks and months. Virtually no configuration change requires a reboot, to boot. Imagine all that plaque in the computer. Gross!
In 95/NT I am prevented from making dangerous fundamental configuration changes unless I use a special "registry editor". I have found it so useful to have this separate editor that I hope in future versions they go all the way and supply a separate editor for each file on the disk-- in that way windows could pop up at every keystroke to warn me that changing any line in the file I am editing could cause the system to not run properly. If this were only the case, people would finally learn that it is best to just stick with the mouse and they would be freed of the need to constantly move their hands back to the keyboard. (If one stops to think about it, the mouse is a much better device to use than the keyboard. Ever hear of someone getting carpal tunnel syndrome from a mouse? No. It's comfortable and ergonomic. Like Morse code devices. That's how long distance communication started, after all.)
Linux, by contrast, requires no special editor to change configuration files. The fact that there is no "registry" in Linux allows the abomination of using any text editor whatsoever to do the configuration. Can you believe that configuration files are usually stored clear text? Talk about dangerous!
I am also happy to report that I have experienced no truth to the rumor that Windows disks become corrupt after improper shutdowns. Indeed, I have been forced to improperly shutdown the machine innumerable times after it locks up, and I have no apparent problems to report regarding the disk. No such claim can be made for Linux. They say something about lack of data points. Excuses are all I ever seem to hear from the Linux crowd.
By sheer size alone, Windows 95/NT beats Linux hands down. It is so much bigger, it is _obvious_ that it is better. Why would you want a small OS with the large disks and RAM sizes we have these days? For this reason alone, I heartily recommend Windows as a way to maximize resource utilization. Your CPU and disk will constantly be pegged to the limit, the way god intended. The Linux kernel and drivers accounts for only about 750KB. Why, even the Microsoft Win16 subsystem uses more space than that.
It is no surprise that Windows costs $270 on the retail market and Linux doesn't cost anything. People know what they want, and they want Windows. Because Linux is free, that means it's basically worthless. The same goes for all the development tools, remotable GUIs, and applications, which all cost money for windows (i.e., are worth something) and free for Linux (worthless!).
Installing software is very easy in Windows. I usually slip in CDs without even reading instructions or warnings, and just double click on whatever window pops up. There is no need to read anything or touch the keyboard. (Did I mention that I hate that thing?) Well, OK, I have learned the hard way the machine locks up if I don't take the time to close all other applications.
Linux, by contrast, requires typing on the keyboard to get anything to install at all. And you always have to know the NAME of program you want to install. For example, in Redhat, you have to type ``rpm -ivh ''to install the program and documentation. Linux needs to get with the '90s!
Windows follows the DOS convention of putting \r\n at the end of every line of a text file. While this is only a mild concern because of the relative rarity of text files on Windows machines these days-- thank god--it helps to differentiate between the text files and the other files. Sadly, Linux makes no distinction between text and other files.
If I legitimately purchase Windows 95/NT, I can call Microsoft customer support to get help with my problems. After a short hold time of an hour or so, they always help me. Ever since I told them that I was dual booting to Linux, they were able to flag my account and now each time I call even the entry level support personnel I am connected to say that Linux is the source of my problems. Everyone seems to agree that Linux is no good. The more I listen, the more I'm impressed with the knowledge of the support staff there.
By contrast, in Linux, all I have is stockpiles of resources and documentation that I would actually have to read in order to understand. Sure, I could obtain Linux support from a commercial organization, but they would probably just tell me I have to use a text editor to fix up my system.
In the end, I have no need for that old computer donkey Unix. I don't need to run big Unix tasks, after all. I refuse to become one of those a bug-eyed computer users, that's for sure. As soon as I can keep Windows from crashing for long enough, I'm going to delete my Linux partition, i.e., the equivalent of moving it to the recycle bin, saying that I'm sure, emptying the recycle bin, and again saying that I'm sure.
eTesting Labs Inc has found Windows XP to be overall the fastest version of the Windows operating system ever created for a wide range of desktop computing tasks.
On average, Windows XP-based computers:
Score 36% higher than Linux Redhat on Business Winstone 2001. Score 77% higher than Linux Mandrake on Content Creation Winstone 2001. Perform equivalent to the record-setting speed of Windows 2000 Professional, even with the addition of extensive new productivity features.
Windows XP is clearly superior to all versions of Linux in all key performance categories. Among the lab's findings:
Faster startup performance: Windows XP is on average 34% faster than Linux Mandrake and 27% faster than Redhat.
Better run-time performance: This measurement refers to the speed at which Windows XP performs tasks while your computer is running. Improvements in Windows XP runtime performance are evident in application startup and time and resource management. For example, average application startup on Windows XP is 25% faster than Linux SuSE and equivalent to Caldera.
Memory and Performance: In systems which include the recommended memory requirement of 128 megabytes of RAM, Windows XP is consistently superior to all versions of Linux.
Windows XP offers dramatically faster startup and resume times, highly responsive applications, and other new features such as Fast User Switching and an enhanced user interface.
where have all the trolls gone? sunken kursk, strom thurmond, trollman5000...?
JonKatz homosexuality is dying
Yet another crippling bombshell hit the beleaguered JonKatz community when last month IDC confirmed that JonKatz accounts for less than a fraction of 1 percent of all homosexual fantasies. Coming on the heels of the latest GayMale weekly survey which plainly states that JonKatz has lost more market share, this news serves to reinforce what we've known all along. JonKatz is collapsing in complete disarray, as further exemplified by failing dead last in the recent Homosexual.com comprehensive ass-raping test.
You don't need to be a CmdrTaco to predict JonKatz's future. The hand writing is on the wall: JonKatz faces a bleak future. In fact there won't be any future at all for JonKatz because JonKatz is dying. Things are looking very bad for JonKatz. As many of us are already aware, JonKatz continues to lose market share. Bloody sperm flows like a river of blood. JonKatz is the most endangered homosexual Slashdot author of them all.
Let's keep to the facts and look at the numbers.
Slashdot leader CowboyNeal states that there are 7000 homosexual fantasies of JonKatz. How many ass rapings of JonKatz are there? Let's see. The number of homosexual fantasies involving JonKatz versus ass-rapings involving JonKatz posts on Usenet is roughly in ratio of 5 to 1. Therefore there are about 7000/5 = 1400 homosexual JonKatz fantasy users. Anal penetraion of JonKatz posts on Usenet are about half of the volume of JonKatz homosexual fantasy posts. Therefore there are about 700 users of anal penetration of JonKatz. A recent article put reacharounds involving JonKatz at about 80 percent of the homosexual fantasies involving JonKatz market. Therefore there are (7000+1400+700)*4 = 36400 fantasies involving JonKatz. This is consistent with the number of ass-rapings of JonKatz posts.
Due to the troubles of the Anal Sludge Eating Corporation, abysmal sales and so on, homosexual fantasies involving JonKatz went out of style and was taken over by fantasies involving CmdrTaco who sells himself on the street corner. Now CmdrTaco's Ass-Sex Company is also dead, its corpse turned over to another charnel house.
All major surveys show that JonKatz fantasies have steadily declined in market share. JonKatz is very sick and his long term homosexuality prospects are very dim. If JonKatz's homosexuality is to survive at all it will be among homosexual hobbyist dabblers. JonKatz homosexuality continues to decay. Nothing short of a miracle could save it at this point in time. For all practical purposes, JonKatz's homosexual fantasy is dead.
JonKatz's homosexuality is dying
i am a troll, but i dont know about the penisbird loving part.
you are the gayest homosexual, goodbye!
Morpheus: What is homosexualality? How do you define faggot? If you're talking about what you can feel, what you can smell, what you can taste and ass-fuck, then homosexuality is simply electrical signals broadcast by Slashdot, and interpreted by your brain.
Trollman 5000...
my sincerest apologies for leaving you out. i was afraid to do shout outs, for fear of leaving some brother trolls out.
now my fear is realized. again, i'm sorry.
by the way, that is what we call a hat trick- three fps in a row, bitches!
i dedicate this fp to the memory of Dead Fart Warrior. May you rejoin us soon.
mad propz to sunken kursk, cyborg monkey, strom thurmond, fecal troll matter, and to any one else who i forgot to mention...eat it!
COL. SANDURZ: He's an Asshole, sir.
DARK HELMET: I know that. What's his name?
COL. SANDURZ: That is his name, sir. Asshole. CmdrTaco Asshole.
DARK HELMET: And his cousin?
COL. SANDURZ: He's an Asshole too, sir. Gunners mate first class JonKatz Asshole.
DARK HELMET: How many assholes we got on this ship anyhow?
ALL CREW: Yo!!
DARK HELMET: I knew it. I'm surrounded by Assholes!
DARK HELMET: Wait 2 minutes before posting? FUCK! Even on slashdot, nothing works
i got some good experience as an ac, but i dont remember ever getting fp...
hope that doesnt jinx it
sorry to steal the fp from you...you gave it a good anti-slashdot try
nice * is dying modification, by the way
Section 1: What Is A Troll?
The WWW gives this as a definition:
troll v.,n. To utter a posting on Usenet designed to attract predictable responses or flames. Derives from the phrase "trolling for newbies"; which in turn comes from mainstream "trolling";, a style of fishing in which one trails bait through a likely spot hoping for a bite. The well-constructed troll is a post that induces lots of newbies and flamers to make themselves look even more clueless than they already do, while subtly conveying to the more savvy and experienced that it is in fact a deliberate troll. If you don't fall for the joke, you get to be in on it.
if only sunken kursk or strom thurmond were here to see it...*sigh*
f1rst p0st!
way to go on the actual fp.
what am i doing, you may ask?
just seeing if the dreaded 72-hour ban has been imposed yet
fscking horse shit! another 72 hour ban?!?
slashdot may eat my anus!
f1rst p0st in preparation for Trolling Tuesday!
yes, both the parent and your reply are rather e*tarded
Slashbaby asks: "I am a net admin for a school division that doesn't have broadband Internet. We are a rural school division, so we don't even have a provider in any of our towns. What I am looking for is a way to get highspeed Internet access into our division through either RF or microwave. There is a city about 45 miles away, (max. distance) that has ISP's that would be willing to sell us bandwidth if we can find a way to get it the 45 miles to the schools."
Let me try to give you an analogy for Slashdot's homepage. It's like an anal raping: it's a combination of cock and shit and cum and blood and more. Over the years, we've figured out homosexuals are best on Slashdot. The ultimate goal is, of course, to create an anal buffet that I enjoy eating: by 8pm, I want to see a dozen sloppy asses lined up and waiting for my penetrational whims on Slashdot. I hope you enjoy them too. I believe that we've grown in number of anal terrorists because we share a lot of common interests with our rapists and rapees. But that doesn't mean that I'm gonna start a backdoor orgy with all dildoes, or someday throw away the ass plugs because the anal beads are really filthy. There are many components to the Slashdot anal raping. Stories about faggots. Incestuous stories. Homosexuality. Cocks. Porn Reviews. Yes, even Jon Katz. By mixing and matching asses and cocks every day, we bring you what I call Slashdot. On some days it definitely is better than others, but overall we think it's a tasty little treat and we hope you enjoy reading about eating ass as much as we enjoy fucking it.
f1rst p0st in the name of logged-in trolls!\ death to ACs
If you have several homosexual freinds, check out slashdot. Just set up an account on slashdot, and the audiotron will scan each of your friends anuses and give you a brown interface. Likewise, since it looks like a real anal penetration component, it means that you can let your freinds just be a anal lover, and let this bad boy handle all the cock he can get his hands on. It won't stick out visually. And there aren't cock straps to add more noise to your fucking environment.
The Register is reporting that being a flaming homosexual is now an official religion in the Slashdot authors community after the 2001 census conducted earlier this year. The final number of 'Anal Terrorists' has not been confirmed yet as only about 95% of the census forms have been returned. As you could probably imagine, VA Linux is none too pleased. Apparently though, you can't get fined for ramming your man root into the Ass Crevice of your local Slashdot author." Actually, according to the story, this gives the Ass Pirate much more official status than heterosexuality would have if everyone put that down.