What is logical and clear to us, may not be to the court.
Plus they can just refuse to hear any cases related to it, and let any new law stand without making any ruling. Much as they did with the 2nd for so many decades.
its not an attempt to shut down a blog i agree, its a direct attack on ones ability to speak in a public forum unless its 'approved' by the government.
If you think its just an 'innocent clarification' you are sadly mistaken and naive.
Why nothing, you give up all rights and incoming from your videos, even to the extent you cant resell them later on your own since they no longer belong to you.
They want us to pay for dubious quality, with unknown content videos created by complete amateurs? What are they smoking? Thats a good way to kill it off, even better then the 'IP cops' that now monitor it.
If they cant pay for it via the offensive "commercials" that have been added, then they need to get out of the way to make room for someone else who can.
If the answer is no, then you understand. if you don't mind being tied to a vendor and at their mercy, then i guess the answer for you is that there is no benefit.
Open hardware has the same value as open software.
LIke the ix432 ( check my nick.. you will understand ), AMD 29xx. Video chip sets too, like the ET4000 which brought 'accelerated vga' to the masses. Eproms.. .
Slashdot Mirror
How about a version for the rest of us, something that is more like 200 ( or less ).
No fancy 3G, no keyboard ( who uses that anyway? ). Just the basics ( with PDF being a basic )
7. its still damned expensive.
OS loaded on a floppy instead of via front panel bus attached switches.
Hmph... kids these days..
Such a loss. Has mankind totally lost its mind and cant appreciate the past?
Or are we just doomed to repeat it, again.
One of most brilliant men *ever* to exist. At least Davinchi gets credit for his work.
Guess you better ban national geographic then, and the discovery channel.
Oh, and your mother too as I'm sure you have seen breasts at least once when you were hungry...
Nanny state in a corporate form.
Nope, IP is the problem. No network, no sharing across them.
All kidding aside, "ethics" ( and morals ) are relative.
This is a joke, right? We don't need yet another association.
What is logical and clear to us, may not be to the court.
Plus they can just refuse to hear any cases related to it, and let any new law stand without making any ruling. Much as they did with the 2nd for so many decades.
I have a right to hate anyone i want, and tell you about it. ( you don't have to listen of course )
Is this 'change'?
its not an attempt to shut down a blog i agree, its a direct attack on ones ability to speak in a public forum unless its 'approved' by the government.
If you think its just an 'innocent clarification' you are sadly mistaken and naive.
It only protects you while its in place. They can remove those 2 amendments.
That is what they are trying to do in effect with this.
Im sure they are now cataloged as such.
But the whole point was to be like a standard paperback book. If it gets much bigger, might as well get a tablet PC and call it a day.
What if they planned this for several years and infected all the backups with someting so they wont restore?
Not saying they did, but anything is possible.
Are against DRM.
Are you sure you don't want to rephrase your statement, comrade?
Yup, but they made it a *priority* to get there. I don't get the same feeling of commitment with 4.x, especially with stories like this.
You have to ask?
Why nothing, you give up all rights and incoming from your videos, even to the extent you cant resell them later on your own since they no longer belong to you.
They want us to pay for dubious quality, with unknown content videos created by complete amateurs? What are they smoking? Thats a good way to kill it off, even better then the 'IP cops' that now monitor it.
If they cant pay for it via the offensive "commercials" that have been added, then they need to get out of the way to make room for someone else who can.
How about get 4.x as stable as 3.5x before we start moving forward?
While you may be right, its time to take all this back underground.
What you cant see you cant sue/stop/fight.
With the WTO they have some power to reach out of their countries borders.
Extradition has happened in other cases too.
its BS if you ask me, but im not running the show.
But if you have the HDL code you can choose anyone you want to produce it, or use FPGAs
Do you want to be tied to a vendor?
If the answer is no, then you understand. if you don't mind being tied to a vendor and at their mercy, then i guess the answer for you is that there is no benefit.
Open hardware has the same value as open software.
LIke the ix432 ( check my nick.. you will understand ), AMD 29xx. Video chip sets too, like the ET4000 which brought 'accelerated vga' to the masses. Eproms.. .
That is the problem with any list, its YOUR list.
But i agree with most of it.
*snip* It's CONNECTED TO THE INTERNET fer chrissakes. So I guess I should be in jail *snip*
Yes, you should be.