Today. Give the IP conglomerates a few more years of buying votes/laws and that may change. And just think, your tax dollars will be used to fund the raids on what should be a civil issue.
And forget the password due to the 'stress of being investigated for something i haven't done', unless they have something that resembles our 5th amendment here in the states.
Actually, i dont belive in IP rights at all. Nor do i adhere to them.
But if you want/need to be bound by a license, i think the BSD license is more free then the GPL anyway, so if i dont 'deserve' the GPL, thats ok with me.
I really hope the poster wasn't advocating more governmental control.
Part of the reason 99.9 is acceptable, is because it is.. Most services don't really *need* 99.9% uptime anyway. Another reason, is people are used to downtime now in all aspects of their life, so the extra % really doesn't matter to people for the most part.
If this stuff is as strong as aluminum, why aren't we using it to actually build things like cars and buildings?
Has anyone leaked the details of how their process works beyond the little 'teaser' in the article? Could it be scaled down to personal size? Im thinking it would be great to add their process to a home 3D printer.
Slashdot Mirror
Today. Give the IP conglomerates a few more years of buying votes/laws and that may change. And just think, your tax dollars will be used to fund the raids on what should be a civil issue.
Do you have it in your contract? If not, they don't care.
"up to xxx mps doesn't count )
No, id be protecting myself instead, or going somewhere else.
To do *real* break-ins. Yours might get lost in the noise of the 'test'.
The point is to track ( and in turn control ) the populace.
"terrorism prevention" is just the excuse to get the sheep to accept it, or if they did a real good job marketing, want it.
Man, i wish i was wrong sometimes.
No, everyone will feel so much safer and welcome the cameras...
Or something like that.
So, slippery slopes don't exist and only tinfoil hatters believe in them? Right?
Morons. Giving your rights and freedoms away like it was candy.
It doesn't mean we *cant* make more, just that its cheaper to buy already processed from Russia so we are taking advantage of the pricing situation.
It also means one less warhead that someone can point at us in the future as a bonus.
You Do?
I happen to remember a Tyrell, but not a Terrill...
So you can just vote in someone just like them?
I cant find a real difference in any of the politicians. Sure, they talk differently to appeal to different groups but the end result is the same.
Why not just ban IP communications altogether?
Or write-able drives? Or photocopiers? Or word of mouth... Or books.. Hell, lets ban knowledge.
Time to encrypt.
What ever happened to that case that was to claim that the 5th amendment also covers your digital data?
But if they have "blueprints", they could just work around the 'lock'.
But using 2008 tech.
And forget the password due to the 'stress of being investigated for something i haven't done', unless they have something that resembles our 5th amendment here in the states.
No.
Actually, i dont belive in IP rights at all. Nor do i adhere to them.
But if you want/need to be bound by a license, i think the BSD license is more free then the GPL anyway, so if i dont 'deserve' the GPL, thats ok with me.
How do i get one to my house?
With out it, many of us would be screwed for drivers.
Who really cares if its bla bla bla compliant?
Sure, they will be something different then we have today due to changing times/tech, but i don't see libraries ever going away.
I really hope the poster wasn't advocating more governmental control.
Part of the reason 99.9 is acceptable, is because it is.. Most services don't really *need* 99.9% uptime anyway. Another reason, is people are used to downtime now in all aspects of their life, so the extra % really doesn't matter to people for the most part.
Sounds like you were using the wrong hardware and OS back then.
Get off my lawn ya whippersnapper.
if it has to be explained why the 'older day's of computing was better then today, you are too young and would never understand.
If this stuff is as strong as aluminum, why aren't we using it to actually build things like cars and buildings?
Has anyone leaked the details of how their process works beyond the little 'teaser' in the article? Could it be scaled down to personal size? Im thinking it would be great to add their process to a home 3D printer.