Slashdot Mirror


The Cuban Memory Stick Underground

circletimessquare writes "The NyTimes has an aticle describing how students and others in Cuba have taken to passing around media on memory sticks, as this is the only way they can get around state-controlled media. Also driving this phenomenon is the fact that there are so few places to get on the Internet. In Old Havana there is only one Internet cafe; getting online there for an hour costs 1/3 of the average Cuban's monthly wages. Local entrepreneurs get the memory sticks from European friends, since they are scarce to find in Cuba through normal channels, and expensive."

427 comments

  1. Handing off thumb drives - The new Cuban Internet by gnick · · Score: 5, Funny

    Not bad bandwidth, but the lag time can be a bitch.

    --
    He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
  2. I see... by Aegis+Runestone · · Score: 5, Funny

    I see that your memory stick is as big as mine.

    --
    -Aegis Runestone-
    1. Re:I see... by ILuvRamen · · Score: 1

      lol speaking of size, that reminds me somehow of my totally bitchin ninja flash drive I got :P I don't remember what it's actually called but it's about 2cm x 1cm x 1mm. Barely bigger than a micro SD card really. It doesn't fit around the USB port, it just has bare terminals and you stick it between the "clamp" so it contacts. It's so cool! When I first saw it I was like "wow, I could totally hide this in my shoe or something" so yeah you reminded me of that. Those would be great in cuba. It held 2 GB too!

      --
      Google's Super Secret Search Algorithm: SELECT @search_results FROM internet WHERE @search_results = 'good'
    2. Re:I see... by compro01 · · Score: 1

      is this it? i have one myself. got it on sale on $15. it's my smallest and my largest drive (used to be. got a 4GB sandisk on sale).

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    3. Re:I see... by ILuvRamen · · Score: 1

      yeah, that's the one

      --
      Google's Super Secret Search Algorithm: SELECT @search_results FROM internet WHERE @search_results = 'good'
  3. sneakernet by graveyhead · · Score: 3, Informative

    Great example of the sneakernet in action. Quick RIAA, ban shoes! :-)

    This is really smart. Maybe the college kids here in the US could learn a thing or two from this. Why provoke the beast when nobody has to know about your trading?

    (I'm not advocating copyright infringement, just pointing out how silly attacks on internet users are)

    --
    std::disclaimer<std::legalese> sig=new std::disclaimer; sig->dump(); delete sig;
    1. Re:sneakernet by Hatta · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sounds like an opportunity for propagandizing. Take a few thousand cheap USB keys, fill them with american media, put them in a water tight enclosure and drop them off outside cuban waters.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    2. Re:sneakernet by ISurfTooMuch · · Score: 2, Funny

      American media? With the garbage we produce here, this would likely end up backfiring.

    3. Re:sneakernet by lhaeh · · Score: 1

      Personally, I've always been a fan of mesh networking to distribute files anonymously. It's nice and fast, capacity is as big as the drives on the network, and all you need is a spare wi-fi card with the right software. The problem with it these days is that people simply don't have them set up. It looks as if they will become popular in portable devices first, with some limited functionality already here. If I could get new songs, which I had previously picked out, automatically added to my PMP just by going for a ride in the subway, then that would be pretty cool.

    4. Re:sneakernet by IBBoard · · Score: 1

      I'm only in my early 20s and we had people doing that at University anyway, but with HDDs. They'd give a HDD to one guy, who'd give it to another, who'd give it to another, who'd give it back and then each of the guys in the group could share their music/movies without the hassle of downloading them (which was ridiculously fast on the Uni network anyway).

      (I'm also not advocating copyright infringement, just pointing out a method that friends of mine were using a whole half decade ago for mass transfer)

    5. Re:sneakernet by SleptThroughClass · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sounds like an opportunity for propagandizing. Take a few thousand cheap USB keys, fill them with american media, put them in a water tight enclosure and drop them off outside cuban waters.
      Actually, toss them in the Windward Passage off the northwest tip of Haiti. Current there tends to loop clockwise around Cuba. Cylindrical containers might be more likely to be urged to the inside of the loop.
    6. Re:sneakernet by mlts · · Score: 1

      This would work or backfire depending on the type of American media. For example, if its some songs made by current pop stars, it could be considered a violation of the Geneva Convention by doing that.

      AOL could always do this, just hand out USB flash drives instead of CDs.

      In any case, the majority of the Cubans would just cheer, format them, and have new media for trading.

    7. Re:sneakernet by powerlord · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Why not just package an offline Wikipedia Reader onto some memory sticks, and let them loose. :)

      (sorry for the cached link, but the original seems to have disappeared)

      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
    8. Re:sneakernet by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      Just set it up like those damned U3 drives where it maps in a phantom CD-Rom that autoruns. Except instead of helpful software it's a copy of relatively recent global news and maybe a friendly "sponsorship" message. Just no pop-up so inserting the drive doesn't automatically make someone vulnerable to "He's using American media, shoot him" or whatever.

      If I wasn't in the US and honestly more scared of the Cuban Embargo than the RIAA I would buy 200 or so 512Meg drives, do this, and ship them over with maybe 450-500Meg usable space.

      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    9. Re:sneakernet by edbob · · Score: 1

      Great example of the sneakernet in action. Quick RIAA, ban shoes! :-)
      Of course, banning shoes just gives rise to barefeetnet. Next thing you know, you will need a license to walk around on the street.
    10. Re:sneakernet by pipatron · · Score: 1

      I'm also not advocating copyright infringement

      I am advocating copyright infringement and I think this is a great idea. I hope more University students starts doing this if the lesser Universities gets threatened too much by the RIAA.

      --
      c++; /* this makes c bigger but returns the old value */
    11. Re:sneakernet by whitehatlurker · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Okay, I'm tired of waiting for someone else to post this. The steps taken to get around the censorship gives rise to the new slogan: "Cuba, putting the sneak back into sneakernet."

      --
      .. paranoid crackpot leftover from the days of Amiga.
    12. Re:sneakernet by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 1

      I've occasionally considered doing a similar thing for media under DRM, such as audiobooks from Audible. My friends and I all have old iPods, and even new iPod shuffles are cheap. So, why not just have a floating pool of old iPods or Shuffles that we pass among us, whenever we want to loan a friend an audiobook?

    13. Re:sneakernet by grcumb · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sounds like an opportunity for propagandizing. Take a few thousand cheap USB keys, fill them with american media, put them in a water tight enclosure and drop them off outside cuban waters.

      Or just hand them to a citizen of any other country in the world, who can put them in a suitcase and bring them over on the plane.... 8^)

      --
      Crumb's Corollary: Never bring a knife to a bun fight.
    14. Re:sneakernet by ACMENEWSLLC · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a good place to start up a mesh network with a back haul through long range WIFI to a Florida ISP. Use a VLAN and make the first page each day one that reads "Welcome to the USA."

    15. Re:sneakernet by glwtta · · Score: 1

      Take a few thousand cheap USB keys, fill them with american media

      Yeah, American media always solves everything.

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    16. Re:sneakernet by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "This is really smart. Maybe the college kids here in the US could learn a thing or two from this. Why provoke the beast when nobody has to know about your trading?" /me flashes back to 1981:

      Rip vinyl records to reel-to-reel "server".
      Record selections to cassette.
      Copy cassette for swappage with others.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    17. Re:sneakernet by n3tcat · · Score: 1

      Well, they do tend to go around on foot, so I'd imagine it would be more like "putting the sneaker back into sneakernet."

    18. Re:sneakernet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      put them in a water tight enclosure and drop them off outside cuban waters.
      Too easy to fail (just lost, got into hands loyal to authorities, finder tries to earn fortune by selling them one at a time and gets caught shortly...).

      Better just fly over Cuban cities and pepper them with USB keys. They are light, so they won't get smashed by the fall from high altitude. For this particular application I recommend PQI's Intelligent Stick(TM), for their small mass and compactness (very easy to keep them hidden, too). Now, when I think about it, comparing this one I've got with micro SD card footprint, I'd say they could be made even smaller and lighter and Uncle Sam could certainly order a bunch of them to be designed and manufactured.
    19. Re:sneakernet by operagost · · Score: 1

      ... and be caught by the authorities, and be arrested, and sit in a Cuban pound-me-in-the-ass prison for an indefinite period before diplomacy gets you released.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    20. Re:sneakernet by operagost · · Score: 1

      I guess you weren't too worried about generation loss. I recorded straight to cassette back then. Even if your r2r did 7.5ips, it would add a lot of hiss.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    21. Re:sneakernet by default+luser · · Score: 1

      That's an interesting idea, but it has some complications.

      Two things:

      I don't think we could stretch a Wifi network nintety miles without violating FCC rules. Twenty miles with a high-gain antenna is pushing it. You could, of course, solve this by getting an FCC exception (call it "Project Free Cuba," they'll eat it up).

      Nintey miles means you have line-of-sight issues, and high frequencies like Wifi don't tend to duct/refract as much as low frequencies. You'll need a tower to solve this problem.

      A nice alternative would be a boat anchored off the shore of Cuba in international waters, which lets you get around the whole FCC thing and use a much shorter tower. All you need is a satellite uplink to make the prefect relay. Unfortunately, the running cost of a ship relay is a lot more than the cost of a land-based relay, plus you'd be a nice fat target for Cuba's airforce :)

      --

      Man is the animal that laughs.
      And occasionally whores for Karma.

  4. Image in my head by Kev647 · · Score: 1

    I have an image in my head of the stereotypical people who pass around guitars and sell them with cocaine hidden within the instruments. I wonder if the gov will start cracking down on them like they do with drug dealers...

    1. Re:Image in my head by swb311 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Who cares, I'm going to go home and look inside all of my old guitars.

    2. Re:Image in my head by 74nova · · Score: 1

      bit-sniffing dogs?

      --
      use your turn signal! you people act like it's divulging information to the enemy
    3. Re:Image in my head by fireman+sam · · Score: 4, Funny

      Dude, those bits are medicinal.

      --
      it is only after a long journey that you know the strength of the horse.
  5. Re:Handing off thumb drives - The new Cuban Intern by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IP_over_Avian_Carriers I think this is better and more subtle if they really want the Internet.

  6. Interesting by Slashdot+Suxxors · · Score: 1

    I had read about stuff like this before, but never really seen anything in the mainstream about it.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sneakernet

    1. Re:Interesting by kellyb9 · · Score: 1

      I had read about stuff like this before, but never really seen anything in the mainstream about it. Isn't that the point?
    2. Re:Interesting by g4b · · Score: 1

      Well, it was very common some years ago to run around with floppy disks instead of networking. was kinda scary. we also used gloomy beepy sounds to get into the internet.

      Seriously: What we now find like a living fossil, was also pretty common in the east-block of europe until the very late 80's, they were carrying disks around between C64 computers - since access to newer hardware was hard, and expensive for most companies.
      so basically "ethernet" was a guy in the basement.

      it all changed with the fall of communism. well not in cuba.
      i dont think it's because of communism itself, it could have been different, if there would have been computer development in the russian influenced countries, too. in a way "internet" is also a very good tool for propaganda...

      gladly, we are free of this. okay, but now i have to go, my deathclock is running, my date of death coming nearer and nearer, and i haven't found all my classmates yet...

    3. Re:Interesting by DeadChobi · · Score: 2, Funny

      Don't copy that floppy.

      --
      SRSLY.
  7. Bandwidth by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 5, Funny

    Never underestimate the bandwidth of a pre-revolutionary automobile loaded with thumb drives!

    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  8. Is that a cigar in your pocket by Timesprout · · Score: 5, Funny

    or did you just get a new batch of porn?

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
    1. Re:Is that a cigar in your pocket by Francisco_Scaramanga · · Score: 1

      I'd trade my USB memory stick for a Cuban cigar in a second.

  9. think about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a/s/l kind of chat over this network. so romantic..

  10. Want to bring down the Cuban government? by Gordonjcp · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Then the US should drop their trade sanctions, and station ships off the Cuban coast, or possibly blimps flying over Cuba, with *huge* wireless network systems on. Basically, turn a ship into one giant floating wireless AP, with a satellite connection to the Internet. Then give all the people USB wireless adaptors.

    1. Re:Want to bring down the Cuban government? by LMacG · · Score: 1

      > blimps flying over Cuba

      A new life awaits you in the off-shore colonies. A chance to begin again in a golden land of opportunity and adventure!

      --
      Slightly disreputable, albeit gregarious
    2. Re:Want to bring down the Cuban government? by megaditto · · Score: 1

      What good is free Internet if you don't have a computer? I heard somewhere that it would take an average Cuban about 5 months' worth of salary to afford a $100 OLPC

      --
      Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
    3. Re:Want to bring down the Cuban government? by KillerCow · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Riiight... because Cuba can't defend its own sovereignty. If it was that easy, don't you think that the Americans would have invaded by now?

    4. Re:Want to bring down the Cuban government? by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Nice idea except that the US has been transmitting news and entertainment to Cuba for the last 40 years. The Cuban jam it. If the US tried to put blimps or ships with wifi anywhere near Cuba the Cubans would shoot them down. Hey if the brave Cuban air force will attack a Cessna Skymaster in international waters with just two Mig 29s what makes you think they wouldn't attack a blimp.
      Also what makes you think that those people have there own PCs?

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    5. Re:Want to bring down the Cuban government? by The+Only+Druid · · Score: 1

      I love that movie...just watched the Final Cut version last night.

      --
      "Stumble before you crawl"
    6. Re:Want to bring down the Cuban government? by MightyYar · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Riiight... because Cuba can't defend its own sovereignty. I don't think you are suggesting that Cuba's defenses are capable of defending the island against invasion by the US... if you are, that would be silly. The Bay of Pigs was not a US invasion, though it did have financial support from the US. Had there been some kind of active military support, they might have stood a chance.

      In any event, they haven't even tried to kick the Americans out of Gitmo.

      If it was that easy, don't you think that the Americans would have invaded by now? No, because part of the deal ending the Cuban Missile Crisis was a promise to the Soviets not to invade.
      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    7. Re:Want to bring down the Cuban government? by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      What good is free Internet if you don't have a computer? I heard somewhere that it would take an average Cuban about 5 months' worth of salary to afford a $100 OLPC

      Or even a little more. TFA says that "the state-owned cafe charges a third of the average Cuban's monthly salary -- about $5 -- to use a computer for an hour", so that puts you at over 6 months salary to have $100.

      The average Cuban is very poor. I doubt that there are a lot of computers in individual households, and that's not gonna change soon. They need basics like food and shoes long before they're going to start wanting computers. When you drive around, you can see a lot of evidence of poverty and inability to maintain buildings and the like.

      But, despite their living conditions, many Cubans are happy with their country and don't want to embrace American style capitalism either. They'd like some enhanced personal freedoms and a better standard of living, but they're not clamoring to remake their country in the image of the USA.

      Of course, that's what I was told by Cubans, so they may have self-censored a little for us. But, they were also honest about some of the rougher edges around their society and the pitfalls of the current system. I think most of them still largely believe in the ideals of Casto and Guevara.

      Cheers
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    8. Re:Want to bring down the Cuban government? by rasman1978 · · Score: 1

      Ha! Sounds like my solution to Iraq.

      --
      MHNATY.
    9. Re:Want to bring down the Cuban government? by gnick · · Score: 1

      I heard somewhere that it would take an average Cuban about 5 months' worth of salary to afford a $100 OLPC FTA, 1-hour of internet access costs $5 - About 1/3 of the average Cuban's monthly salary. I'm starting to think that Cuba may not be the paradise that Michael Moore made it out to be...
      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    10. Re:Want to bring down the Cuban government? by everphilski · · Score: 1

      Also what makes you think that those people have there own PCs?

      Where do you think they use their memory sticks?

    11. Re:Want to bring down the Cuban government? by Notquitecajun · · Score: 1, Troll

      Had they not been screwed over by JFK and actually had a decent landing area, operational security, good intelligence, air cover, and everything else needed for a good invasion, it would have worked. NOTHING was done right on the Bay of Pigs invasion. NOTHING.

    12. Re:Want to bring down the Cuban government? by ozbird · · Score: 1

      Um, stationing ships off of a country's coast without their permission is generally considered a hostile act.

      And placing a trade embargo on a country for nearly 50 years means they want to be friends?

    13. Re:Want to bring down the Cuban government? by Anonymous+Cowpat · · Score: 1

      *shrug* they did it during the cuban missile crisis and nothing happened - there was the means for Cuba to take retaliatory action then as well.

      --
      FGD 135
    14. Re:Want to bring down the Cuban government? by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      School, Office, Libraries.... Since a half an hour at an Internet Cafe costs two weeks wages I would bet that a PC is probably a bit more.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    15. Re:Want to bring down the Cuban government? by jcr · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But, despite their living conditions, many Cubans are happy with their country and don't want to embrace American style capitalism either.

      Sure, there's a lot of apparatchiks in Cuba, just like there are in any totalitarian regime.

      I think most of them still largely believe in the ideals of Casto and Guevara.

      It's amazing what propaganda can accomplish when any dissenters can be tossed in Jail. Lots of north koreans worship that repugnant little elvis impersonator who rules their country.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    16. Re:Want to bring down the Cuban government? by Woundweavr · · Score: 1

      Of course, that's what I was told by Cubans

      One in Cuba or one outside of Cuba? The whole fleeing-Cuba-in-a-bath-tub thing suggests differently (along with the huge Cuban population in So Florida). I'm not trying to act like a foam at the mouth anti-Commie type (the embargo makes no sense considering how much we trade with China) but lets be real about living conditions. Take the celebrities (and elderly New Yorkers) out of Miami and don't you essentially have Cuba plus "enhanced personal freedoms and a better standard of living"?
    17. Re:Want to bring down the Cuban government? by C_L_Lk · · Score: 1

      The wonderful thing is we don't even need to have ships off the coast to do this - or have we all forgotten where Guantanamo Bay is? A couple of good high-power directional antennae on the roof of the gitmo base pointed at the population centres of Cuba, and have all the tourists from Canada hand out thumb drives as gratuities to their Cuban service people while there on holidays. You've got a country full of people using Internet - and of course since it's through Gitmo - they could add in all the "pro-US" content they want while they are at it!

    18. Re:Want to bring down the Cuban government? by websitebroke · · Score: 1

      A friend of mine is from rural Kashmir (Pakistan side), where all the houses got trashed by the Earthquake in 2005. She's now studying in Cuba, and one of her first remarks about the place was that the economic is really dire. Coming from her, that's really saying something.

      Anyway, this article is describing basically what we've done to exchange larger files. I had a friend who was visiting Canada send a book and a few CDs (not sure about DVD compatibility on Cuban computers) for a mere $12 Canadian. Took about 2 months to get there, but hey, it works.

    19. Re:Want to bring down the Cuban government? by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      You said it better ;-)

    20. Re:Want to bring down the Cuban government? by Wandering+Wombat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As much as I defend Cuba, I do have to agree that the state-control of media outlets continues to piss me right the hell off. However, the article does make a very interesting omission:

      Yes, the internet cafe does cost a lot in Cuban dollars. However, it is in downtown Havana, which means it's in tourist central, so it's likely that the people who go there are part of the tourist economy, which means they can make thirty or forty Canadian dollars in a day, and spend every last second of spare time in the internet cafe. The dual economy does make for some very wierd commercial enterprises. A man can sell a cake to a couple tourists, and make more money off that cake than he does in his regular day job as a... whatever. Electrician, maybe.

      Right now, the socialist ideals of Cuba are facing the harsh realities of the global mass media, and hopefully they will begin to embrace it. As more and more tourists head for Cuba, the government, and state-run outlets, has to know that people are going to start figuring out that there's some freedoms they still aren't enjoying to the fullest extent.

      --
      I like to place meaningful quotes in my sig, so people will know that I know what meaningful quotes are.
    21. Re:Want to bring down the Cuban government? by billcopc · · Score: 1

      have all the tourists from Canada hand out thumb drives as gratuities to their Cuban service people while there on holidays

      We already do this, it's better than cash! You could literally trade a porn- or music-filled thumb drive for just about anything down there.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    22. Re:Want to bring down the Cuban government? by Blitz22 · · Score: 1
      What good is free Internet if you don't have a computer? I heard somewhere that it would take an average Cuban about 5 months' worth of salary to afford a $100 OLPC

      How many PII 350-800 or better pc's are sitting in Amurincan basements collecting dust? Sure, these won't get you 60fps playing CRYSIS, but could probably handle most things on teh internets.... (add a PCI USB2 card and this could also be used enhance sneakernets) The Marines could change their annual drive from "Toys for Tots" to "Packard Bells against Fidel"(or something) for one year and give 'em away at the Guantanamo gate.

      --
      If I went around claiming I was an emperor...they'd put me away!
    23. Re:Want to bring down the Cuban government? by R2.0 · · Score: 1

      "Fomer mayor Frank Rizzo once claimed that the Philadelphia police department could invade Cuba and win."

      Considering the Phila PD had their own Luftwaffe ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Move_bombing#MOVE_organization ), I tend to agree.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    24. Re:Want to bring down the Cuban government? by modecx · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sounds a lot like my idea. But with my idea, we also air-drop a few entire Wal-Mart stores, about a hundred thousand gallons of Pabst Blue Ribbon, 10 tons of pre-soiled wife beaters, and a few thousand mobile homes out of a some C-5 Galaxy transports. (each trailer complete with 100 square feet of artificial turf, one plastic flamingo, one garden gnome, and one non-functional Pontiac Trans-Am, and four concrete blocks). Once they were all setup, Wal-Mart would implement a "guns-for-stuff" policy, where they would trade in AK-47s and RPGs for cheap Chinese made crap. I'd give them two, maybe three weeks before the insurgents realize the superior cost savings afforded to them by Wal-Mart, and the American way. The mobile homes, shirts and cheap beer is ancillary to the effort.

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    25. Re:Want to bring down the Cuban government? by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      NOTHING was done right on the Bay of Pigs invasion. NOTHING.

      Not true! The anti-aircraft guns the American advisers (really commanders) personally had added to their otherwise unarmed ships worked very well in fending off Cuba's air force for quite some time, and despite the terrible landing location their plan to stymie the Cuban army by turning a narrow road in the swamp into a killing field worked perfectly.

      Oh yeah, that was all pretty much in spite of the higher-level mission planners and politicos... Everything they did was a clusterfuck.

      Decision for Disaster is a great book on the Bay of Pigs invasion, written by one of the two American advisers who went on the mission. Highly recommended.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    26. Re:Want to bring down the Cuban government? by FatSean · · Score: 1

      Well, if I were earning $15 a month, I'd rather live in Cuba than in the USA. Healthcare-wise anyway. Plus, the weather is great.

      --
      Blar.
    27. Re:Want to bring down the Cuban government? by rwyoder · · Score: 1

      Then the US should drop their trade sanctions, and station ships off the Cuban coast, or possibly blimps flying over Cuba, with *huge* wireless network systems on. Basically, turn a ship into one giant floating wireless AP, with a satellite connection to the Internet. Then give all the people USB wireless adaptors.
      What makes you think you would need a ship, or a blimp flying over Cuba? Hint: Google for "cudjoe key" and "fat albert".
    28. Re:Want to bring down the Cuban government? by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      Right now, the socialist ideals of Cuba are facing the harsh realities of the global mass media, and hopefully they will begin to embrace it. As more and more tourists head for Cuba, the government, and state-run outlets, has to know that people are going to start figuring out that there's some freedoms they still aren't enjoying to the fullest extent.

      Which, incidentally, is why the embargo is the stupidest fucking thing ever.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    29. Re:Want to bring down the Cuban government? by everphilski · · Score: 1

      So they can now get internet at their previously disconnected school/office/library, the beauty of USB wireless cards.

    30. Re:Want to bring down the Cuban government? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Which, incidentally, is why the embargo is the stupidest fucking thing ever."

      Until you posted.

    31. Re:Want to bring down the Cuban government? by Zedekiah · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, propaganda can be very effective; it's got you thinking cuba is teh evils, after all.

      To be frank, compared with the US, cuba's crimes seem rather minor. In fact, if it weren't for a few political prisonors, and the blockade put there by a certain country, it'd be quite a place indeed.

      --
      What I wouldn't do for the ability to mod "-1, Plain Wrong"
    32. Re:Want to bring down the Cuban government? by canUbeleiveIT · · Score: 1

      How many PII 350-800 or better pc's are sitting in Amurincan basements collecting dust?

      Never mind that. How many are in my garage?

    33. Re:Want to bring down the Cuban government? by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      And shot.
      Of course it doesn't solve the problem of no wifi provider to start with. The blimp idea will not work. Or keep them from jamming wifi which really isn't hard.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    34. Re:Want to bring down the Cuban government? by w000t · · Score: 1

      Haven't you heard? The whole fucking world is waiting for the US to come set it free!
      Sigh... some people will never get out from their bubbles.

    35. Re:Want to bring down the Cuban government? by blofeld42 · · Score: 1

      Who says they're happy? Most of them seem to be building boats so they can get the hell out.

    36. Re:Want to bring down the Cuban government? by Repossessed · · Score: 1

      Cuba's crimes against humanity were so bad that even China and the USSR thought it was unacceptable. So US propaganda is hardly the be all end all of thinking of Cuba as evil.

      --
      Liberte, Egalite, Fraternite (TM)
    37. Re:Want to bring down the Cuban government? by Scruffy+Dan · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have been to Cuba, and to a few other totalitarian states, and there was a noticeable difference between in peoples attitudes towards the government. The people in Cuba mostly genuinely support Fidel Castro (it remains to be seen what kind of support Raul will get). In Myanmar it was obvious that the people were genuinely unhappy about their government. Of course non of this should be used as an excuse for denying Cubans proper elections.

      --
      Just another crappy blog
    38. Re:Want to bring down the Cuban government? by teratux · · Score: 1

      "Cuba's crime's against the humanity??" Oh you're reffering to the thousands of innocent women and children that are being killed in Iraq as we speak, or perhaps the 3 million vietnamese killed during the VietNam war, or perhaps the support to tens of dictators around LatinAmerica like Somosa or Pinochet?? I know, I know, you're reffering to the lives being saved right now in Pakistan by Cuban doctors due to the earthquake in 2005, or the doctors in Guatemala, or El Salvador, or Haiti perhaps, or the support Cuba gave to the United States citizens of New Orleans when the Katrina disaster and the total restriction of Cuban doctors to access that area by the North American Government ... I don't think you clearly understand the concept of "crimes against humanity", try looking it up, and see who the real perpetrarors are !!!

    39. Re:Want to bring down the Cuban government? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you insinuate that only apparatchiks are able to enjoy living in Cuba and support the Cuban government, throw a blind, far reaching accusation of "tossing dissenters into jails" and then you have the nerve to claim that the others are the ones being brainwashed by propaganda? You must be kidding, right? Well, unless instead of Cuban jails you were mentioning the gulag in Guantanamo.

    40. Re:Want to bring down the Cuban government? by Jens+Egon · · Score: 1

      If this is caused by Castro, then Castro rules Latin America in its entirety.

      And we can hardly handle Afghanistan and Iraq as it is.

    41. Re:Want to bring down the Cuban government? by jcr · · Score: 1

      Yes, propaganda can be very effective; it's got you thinking cuba is teh evils, after all.

      Who said Cuba is evil? It's country ruled by a thug, but that's the fault of the thug, not his victims.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    42. Re:Want to bring down the Cuban government? by Moe1975 · · Score: 1

      Well, the insurgents in Iraq, armed and equipped with VERY little and without much training under their belt, are definitely holding their own against US troops . . . I think that the highly motivated, Soviet trained (as in the people who train Cuban troops were in turn trained by the Soviets, thus Cuban training consists of Soviet military doctrine) and comparatively (better than those who are holding their own against US troops right this second) well armed and equipped Cuban troops would - particularly on their own terrain - be able to effectively defend their island, because the number of casualties they would inflict are not the type of losses modern US commanders or the US public are willing to accept - and the Government knows this, so after the first couple of weeks, once US casualties reach 10,000+, it would be over.
      This is not the 1940's, when 12,000 US troops at a time could be lost in an action against the Japanese without many repercussions at all. And that is not counting the casualties that the weather and terrain would inflict.

      I read Military history.

      --
      SARAVA!
    43. Re:Want to bring down the Cuban government? by Notquitecajun · · Score: 1

      The problem with the swamp was...it was a swamp. Both sides had to deal with it and it didn't work out so well particularly for the invaders. I agree completely with you that the weight lies on the JFK administration for the failure of the invasion. It wasn't the invaders' fault that it went to pot.

      And I want to know WHY I was modded troll, btw.

    44. Re:Want to bring down the Cuban government? by GreatBunzinni · · Score: 1

      No one in their right mind claims that Cuba's hold on the national media is a good thing. Nonetheless, it should be noted that the Cuban state's grip on the national media wasn't exactly implemented due to some sadistic motivation to screw all Cubans. In fact, the reasoning behind that grip was national security, as it was known by then that the US's reaction to losing their grip on any latin america country's governance was to attack the newly implemented government. Those attacks always involved manipulating the country's public opinion through the US's control of the country's media networks, with the intent of shaping the people's minds with nasty propaganda campaign. So, when Castro dethroned the US's private dictator he cut down, he was already expecting that type of retaliation, which forced him to regain control of the nation's media outlets and never let go.

      But hey, don't take my word on it. You can simply look into Venezuela's 2002 coup, the involvement of the Venezuela's "independent" media and the US's influence on the attempt to overthrow a democratically elected, popular president.

      --
      Slashdot, fix your code or at least hire someone who is competent at it to do it for you.
    45. Re:Want to bring down the Cuban government? by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      I agree that it would be foolish for the US to "hold" Cuba. But it could certainly walk in their and depose the government if it needed to. Also, I'm pretty sure the Cuban exiles in Florida would be more than willing to "occupy" their own country if properly equipped and supported...

      10,000 troops? How would it ever reach that? There wouldn't need to be an amphibious assault - the US already has a base there.

      The comparison with Iraq is a bit silly. Cuba is an island, and all of the neighbors are friendly with the US. It would be much harder to smuggle in men and material. It is also a much smaller country than Iraq, and much closer to the mainland US - so even the costs would be lower. Most importantly, there's no conflict between ethnic groups such that the US would have to worry about preventing genocide like they must in Iraq. It's very hard to win the "hearts and minds" of several groups of people who all viciously hate one another. The friend of my enemy is my enemy, in other words.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    46. Re:Want to bring down the Cuban government? by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      The problem with the swamp was...it was a swamp. Both sides had to deal with it and it didn't work out so well particularly for the invaders.

      Yeah, the "defend the beachhead from the army" part of the plan worked, but the "leave the beachhead so as to continue the invasion" not so much. I was just trying to pick out what positive successes I could. ;)

      And I want to know WHY I was modded troll, btw.

      Seriously, who cares what an idiot with mod points thinks? Karma means dick.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    47. Re:Want to bring down the Cuban government? by Wandering+Wombat · · Score: 1

      I already knew about that.... And it keeps getting funnier, every single time I see it!

      --
      I like to place meaningful quotes in my sig, so people will know that I know what meaningful quotes are.
    48. Re:Want to bring down the Cuban government? by Moe1975 · · Score: 1

      The comparison with Iraq is a purely tactical one.

      If a comparative handful of malnourished, under equipped, underarmed, under trained, and under led insurgents can hold their own against US troops, I would bet my computer that Cuban troops, defending their own territory, could indeed inflict 10k+ casualties in the first month. As I stated in my previous post, I read military history, and have read firsthand accounts of the Spanish-American War including accounts of combat operations in Cuba, and I have spoken at lenght to a few American WWII Pacific, Korea, and Vietnam combat Veterans (and I also watch the news) so that conclusion is not based on speculation . . . 10k+ would happen the same way that tens of thousands of casualties happened in Vietnam, the same way they happen in any other theater.

      Would you have ever thought that 3,201 (and counting) US troops would fall to hostile fire in Iraq? Ever? How did that EVER happen?

      --
      SARAVA!
    49. Re:Want to bring down the Cuban government? by MightyYar · · Score: 1
      If you are counting ALL troops taken out of action as "casualties" (which is reasonable) I will agree with you. However, the only number that ever gets any real press is deaths.

      I am not surprised that thousands have died in a hostile occupation. Frankly, I think that number is amazingly low and is only possible due to advances in medicine. I would have been shocked if more than a few hundred died during the invasion, however.

      And, in any event, the US went into Iraq despite it being a more difficult target than Cuba - so I still contend that the main thing preventing an invasion of Cuba was the Cuban Missile Crisis agreement. The apparent willingness of the Soviets to run a US blockade demonstrated during the Crisis would have been another big factor.

      I have spoken at lenght to a few American WWII Pacific, Korea, and Vietnam combat Veterans (and I also watch the news) so that conclusion is not based on speculation . . . WWII Pacific involved a lot of bloody beach landings... we already have a base in Cuba. The established beachhead is a huge difference.

      North Korea was essentially defeated until China rushed in, which is very unlikely in Cuba. First, there are no nearby "friendly" countries. Second, a US naval blockade would be very hard to run for anyone to supply Cuban resistance.

      Similarly, Vietnam was a proxy war with the Soviets. North Vietnam was very well supplied during the entire conflict.

      Without the support of the Soviets and with an established beachhead, Cuba would not be a very hard target for the US military.

      It's not like the US never invaded or occupied Cuba in the past.
      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    50. Re:Want to bring down the Cuban government? by Moe1975 · · Score: 1

      You are looking at it from a strategic point of view, and your take on it falls in line with conventional military thought, which is exactly the type of thinking that leads to defeat in an irregular warfare scenario - which is what would happen in Cuba. The Cubans would not attempt a conventional defense to an American invasion, because they know that they would lose, the don't have the resources for that. They would defend in an irregular manner, and would have every advantage in that scenario: defending their own territory (moral advantage) on terrain they know well, a territory that happens to be HOT, HUMID, JUNGLE (which they are used to, as opposed to US troops) where most US armored vehicles cannot travel (and with enough natural cover that air power cannot be as effective as it otherwise would be, enough cover to where no matter how much you bomb an area, there are still places for defenders to hide after the bombing stops) with the added advantages that their troops are motivated, well-trained, disciplined, and well led - and they do have PLENTY of small arms (and even heavy weapons) and ammunition, which is all they would really need . . .

      I am not inclined to delve deeply into the factors that would be to their advantage in this post, as what I have made reference to is pretty clear to someone who has read up on what I am talking about. I do, however, see your logic and find this exchange agreeable to a certain extent.

      You bring up the Soviets, yet any agreements reached with the old Soviet government are no longer in place, if I am not mistaken, owing to the fact that the Soviet government no longer exists.

      You bring up logistics. Well, in Vietnam the US forces had all the logistic support any Armed Force could ever hope for, and that did not make much difference. They had control of the sea and air, and could concentrate more offensive power in any one place than their opponents. Total material superiority. Did that make a difference in the end?

      You bring up Cuban resistance having a supply problem. I would agree, in a protracted scenario, yet the thing is, that would not be a major factor in the first few weeks, which is all the time they would need for US casualties to skyrocket, the UN to be brought in as a "peacekeeping" force to basically hold the cities, and for US forces to be withdrawn.

      And yes, the US did invade Cuba before, and sustained many casualties, fighting an enemy that was not determined to fight to the last man, the way the Cubans would in this hypothetical scenario.

      I would suggest (and this is in a friendly tone) reading some of the WWII Pacific combat accounts. The parallels that can be drawn between both scenarios are plentiful and awful direct.

      --
      SARAVA!
  11. But.. but.. I thought Cuba is a utopian society w/ by nedburns · · Score: 4, Insightful

    But.. but.. I thought Cuba is a utopian society with perfect free healthcare that the rest of the world should aspire to emulate!? ( see movies by fat slobs who don't know what they're talking about )

  12. High Tech by Russell2566 · · Score: 1
  13. Re:Handing off thumb drives - The new Cuban Intern by sm62704 · · Score: 1

    Wow, and I thought back when I was playing Quake MY lag was bad!

    At least in cuba you don't get slashdotted...

    --
    mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
  14. European friends by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1, Troll

    I suppose European friends are the way to go, but in general non-USA friends. I am not sure which would be worse for a USA citizen, being discovered that you are subverting state censorship or being discovered by your government that you have been to Cuba.

    --
    Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    1. Re:European friends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is this a troll? It is a valid question. If you are caught helping information in Cuba then you would thrown in jail or worse The states won't protect you, since you aren't even meant to be there, even if your intent was in helping democracy. This is a case of being between a rock and a hard place.

  15. I can hear it already... by Xaroth · · Score: 1

    I can hear it already:

        Yo está apesadumbrado, podría usted descargar el Internet sobre esto?

    And for once, it'll actually make sense!

    (If the translation sucks, blame babelfish. ;) )

    1. Re:I can hear it already... by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's real, REAL bad. I don't even think "podría" is a properly conjugated verb. What the hell did you type into it?

  16. Re:Handing off thumb drives - The new Cuban Intern by gnick · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wow, and I thought back when I was playing Quake MY lag was bad! Actually, I believe that there was an attempt to port Quake so that it's playable via Sneakernet.
    --
    He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
  17. Re:But.. but.. I thought Cuba is a utopian society by arthurpaliden · · Score: 5, Interesting

    They have first rate low tech preventative and pre/post natal health care. Which gives them a lower infant mortality rate than the US and a life expectancy just a bit lower that the US.

  18. RIAA just goes after lowest common demoninator by adam · · Score: 1

    Maybe the college kids here in the US could learn a thing or two from this. Why provoke the beast when nobody has to know about your trading? Who says this isn't already widely taking place? Private DC hubs come to mind. Additionally, I can assure you there are many private FTP servers, sitting on fat pipes, maintained and expanded (content-wise) by groups of like-minded individuals. I am speaking from past experience in this case, and knowing human nature.. if some of my nerd friends did this in college, then many others are doing the same currently. The RIAA just goes after the lowest common demoninator, which in many cases means people sitting on common P2P apps, sharing the latest crappy music/films.

    It's sort of like any other enforcement.. the coke dealer on the corner is easy to bust, but the guy who is moving kilos of product to the hedgefund managers in the downtown highrise? Well, he's a lot more under the radar.
    --
    I am Jack's complete lack of surprise.
    1. Re:RIAA just goes after lowest common demoninator by Eccles · · Score: 1

      But why not just copy hard drives? With 500 GB for $100, that's a heck of a lot of music. Even movies if you're willing to go MP4. And the transfer speed once going is pretty darned fast.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    2. Re:RIAA just goes after lowest common demoninator by gnick · · Score: 1

      But why not just copy hard drives? With 500 GB for $100, that's a heck of a lot of music. That's what we did back in college. 5 or 6 of us that were all active in collecting large sets of large files would each bring a couple of drives to one of our houses, set up a couple of boxes for copying, and share 100's of GB of data in a matter of hours. Of course, that was before DVD-burners and thumb drives were accessible to college students so who knows what the popular methods are these days...

      Hey wait - Anyone know what the popular methods are these days? I've been out of the loop for a while.
      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    3. Re:RIAA just goes after lowest common demoninator by perlchild · · Score: 2, Insightful

      1) they are harder to hide(bigger)
      2) that's 100$ in the US, not how much it is in Cuba

    4. Re:RIAA just goes after lowest common demoninator by Smackheid · · Score: 1

      But why not just copy hard drives

      Most of the big private trading groups do it this way, although burned DVDs are cheaper and easier to mail. Mind you, this was an mp3 trading group I was part of. For movies, HDs might make more sense.

      --
      Je me fous du passé
    5. Re:RIAA just goes after lowest common demoninator by Eccles · · Score: 1

      I should have clarified that I was talking about college students. Given all the RIAA/MPAA issues with trying to sue college students, it seems like it would be trivially easy to go "underground" with hard drives. Back in the stone age when I went to college, we'd certainly copy records onto tape for friends, and that took a lot more effort.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
  19. The consumer way of looking at the world by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1
    If you can get 15 different types of ketchup in the store then clearly you have a great society.

    All societies have pros and cons. Personally, even though I'm a geek, I'd say having a reasonable healthcare for all should be prioority ofver bandwidth for all.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:The consumer way of looking at the world by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      There is a fatal flaw in the "healthcare for all" idea. Because most people who are for this universal healthcare thinks they will be able to get universally great healthcare for free. It's not free and we likely will not be able to afford to give everyone some "platinum plan" healthcare. Instead of a robotic arm with realistic flesh you'd get a plastic one with a choice of 3 different skin tones. Instead of braces for your kid's teeth they might have to wear headgear. Instead of designer glasses frames you might get a choice of 3 styles.

      Either the universal healthcare will have limits or it will be a bankrupt institution. Personally I prefer the healthcare that I pay for, I don't even like the plans my employer offers. Obviously I wish medical costs weren't rising due to litigation and pharmaceutical patents, then maybe my insurance would be a bit cheaper.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    2. Re:The consumer way of looking at the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously I wish medical costs weren't rising due to litigation and pharmaceutical patents, then maybe my insurance would be a bit cheaper.

      Costs don't go down because the insurance companies don't want them to go down. As costs go up, they can scare you into paying more and more for their insurance (otherwise, you might GO BANKRUPT oooOOOOooo), and then exclude you from coverage or hike the rates when you actually want to use it.

      Personally, I think "the answer" is to get rid of insurance for everything except major medical issues (cancer, etc).

    3. Re:The consumer way of looking at the world by misleb · · Score: 1

      How much do you actually use your health insurance? Healthcare in the US is fine if you a) happen to have a full time job with benefits or can afford it on your own (not likely if you don't have the full time job) and b) don't spend a lot of time in and out of doctors offices. Once you start using doctors on a semi-regular basis, the bills add up quick between the copays, deductibles, and things your insurance just won't cover.

      I currently owe thousands of dollars to doctors offices and hospitals. My household also spends over a hundred dollars a month in prescriptions. It sucks big time. And I make a decent living. I can't imagine how horrible it must be to not have insurance and know that you can really only see a doctor if it is a life and death situation... and then you'll probably just have to cut and run on the bill.

      The idea of healthcare as a "business" and health plans as "insurance" is fundamentally broken. I don't know if sociallized medicine is any better, but I do know that the system we have in the US is broken in so many ways it just isn't funny.

      --
      "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
    4. Re:The consumer way of looking at the world by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      actually I have some of my premiums drop before for both medical and car insurance. I'm assuming because it's a free market and my insurance company wished to stay competitive.

      And I agree about not using insurance for everything. Your medical insurance should not be like a membership to a discount club. If my doctor's visit is $80 instead of $10. I think I can manage, since I don't get sick often and I don't have kids. If an emergency room visit is $1000 instead of $100, I can also manage because I don't go to the emergency room constantly. If a person has to go to the doctor's office or emergency room constantly maybe they should get a plan with high premiums.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    5. Re:The consumer way of looking at the world by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      Most people spend more than $100/month on cable TV. Start crying when you spend over a thousand a month on prescriptions.

      I've taken friends to the hospital who had no insurance in a life or death situation. They're still alive. I wonder how that happened. I guess the county and state paid to treat them like they have for like 80 years now.

      Would you be willing to file for bankruptcy if you needed a heart or liver transplant? Given the choice of dying or having to move out of your house and have your family live in an apartment. What would be your choice?

      Luckily it is (currently) illegal for a hospital to do a credit check before performing a procedure. Else people would probably be dying in the hospital lobby like doom and gloom universal healthcare proponents say.

      Now I will readily agree that a hospital should not be a "business" (despite my libertarian background). I have seen too many non-profit hospitals get bought out and turned into for-profit. Once that is done they provide far less service to the community. I believe that it only makes sense to turn for-profit when the non-profit route is unsustainable. And in the cases I have seen, the hospitals were doing just fine. they still charged people for treatment, just not as much and wouldn't ship you off somewhere else if you couldn't afford treatment for non-life threatening issues.

      As for insurance, I think it makes sense. insurance is supposed to protect you against losing all your money if the odds go against you. And this could be quite affordable and practical if it was mainly used for catastrophic cases rather than minor cases or chronic illness.

      Rather than universal healthcare I would only be willing to compromise and offer coverage for people who have a chronic disease and are unable to work. This system is already in place right now, but it doesn't work. Let's fix the stuff we have before creating new empires of bureaucracy.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    6. Re:The consumer way of looking at the world by misleb · · Score: 1

      I've taken friends to the hospital who had no insurance in a life or death situation. They're still alive. I wonder how that happened. I guess the county and state paid to treat them like they have for like 80 years now.


      The point is that it often doesn't have to become a life and death situation. People should feel they can see a doctor before a seemingly minor pain or other symptom turns into something serious.

      Would you be willing to file for bankruptcy if you needed a heart or liver transplant? Given the choice of dying or having to move out of your house and have your family live in an apartment. What would be your choice?


      Why should this have to be a choice?

      Luckily it is (currently) illegal for a hospital to do a credit check before performing a procedure. Else people would probably be dying in the hospital lobby like doom and gloom universal healthcare proponents say.


      Ok, it could be worse. Is that your point? My point is that it could be better.

      As for insurance, I think it makes sense. insurance is supposed to protect you against losing all your money if the odds go against you. And this could be quite affordable and practical if it was mainly used for catastrophic cases rather than minor cases or chronic illness.


      So how do people pay for all those doctors visits that aren't catastrophic cases? How do people get preventative medicine that can help avoid the catastrophes?

      -matthew
      --
      "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
  20. Re:Must be evil capitalist counterrevolutionaries by damburger · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Because there are no capitalist counter-revolutionaries in Cuba of course.

    What always amuses me is that people decry the reactionary left-wing government of Cuba without seeing it in the wider context of the history of Latin America and the Caribbean in the 20th century, during which the US made a point of launching vicious attacks on every progressive left-wing government in the hemisphere by organising strikes, spreading propaganda, sponsoring coups and terrorists, and occasionally direct military force. The repression of the Cuban regime is a result of a Darwinian process that has weeded out every left-wing government in the region that didn't shoot or imprison anyone and everyone who even might be on the CIA payroll.

    Yeah, the Castro brothers aren't exactly nice to those who disagree with them - but thanks to the actions of America there is literally no way their social programmes could've been implemented if they were not prepared to run the country as a dictatorship. Western democracies such as Britain have reacted in a similar way when faced with extreme outside threats.

    --
    If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
  21. Well at least by niceone · · Score: 1

    Sony's proprietary format is popular some place!

    1. Re:Well at least by Constantine+XVI · · Score: 2, Informative

      Memory stick: generic term for portable flash media, usually USB drives
      Memory Stick: name for Sony's flash media format

      The capitalization is important

      --
      "I think an etch-a-sketch with an ethernet port would beat IE7 in web standards compliance."
    2. Re:Well at least by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      Just ask your Uncle Jack!

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    3. Re:Well at least by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Erm... no. Memory stick = trademarked, no matter how you capitalize it. The only reference to "memory sticks" in the article came from the rather technology-illerated author of the article, not the people actually using them - who call them "flash drives", just like you and I do.

  22. Donate old memory sticks by andyfrommk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We should donate our old memory sticks to them, I've got a 128mb mp3 player which is worthless to westerners but could be of use to people in the third world to dissemenate information.

    1. Re:Donate old memory sticks by irishdaze · · Score: 1

      Items such as old thumb drives and file-boat MP3 players need to be "recycled". In fact, I'd be willing to send any that I can get my hands on to someone in Europe for such "recycling". I wonder -- How many other people would be willing to send such items to a US PO box set aside for such "recycling"?

      --
      -- Dedicated Cthulhu cultist since 1982 A.C.E.
    2. Re:Donate old memory sticks by Kamineko · · Score: 1

      I know at least 50 people who would have thousands of uses for such a device (granted most of these involve 'transferring data'). I'll have it if you don't want it.

    3. Re:Donate old memory sticks by Dominic · · Score: 1

      ..or we could just convince the US to end their ridiculous trade sanctions so that the price of the sticks in Cuba comes down?

  23. Re:Handing off thumb drives - The new Cuban Intern by kesuki · · Score: 5, Funny

    are you kidding, with 55% packet loss, and 6165731.1 ms lag over 3 miles... i think the little thumb drive method is way easier. not to mention getting carrier pigeons to cross a couple hundred miles of ocean doesn't work very well either. plus carrier pigeons are really bandwidth restricted, they can at most carry .5 ounces of microfilm which then requires a microfilm reader... thumb drives just work in any usb enabled pc, even ones running linux, and you can get a whole month of blog sites, interesting news etc all in one package with a thumb drive. if they're relatives have the cash they can even send feature length films on thumb drives (i've seen 8 GB modules, in divx/xvid format that's a lot of movie)

  24. Re:But.. but.. I thought Cuba is a utopian society by doshell · · Score: 0

    But.. but.. I thought Cuba is a utopian society with perfect free healthcare that the rest of the world should aspire to emulate!?

    And healthcare has exactly what to do with memory sticks and Internet access?

    Who modded this insightful?

    --
    Score: i, Imaginary
  25. Re:But.. but.. I thought Cuba is a utopian society by The+End+Of+Days · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And a choice of presidential candidates just one behind the US as well.

  26. Re:But.. but.. I thought Cuba is a utopian society by thesolo · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Nowhere in "Sicko" did Moore imply that Cuba was a utopian society. If anything, the exterior shots in Cuba should show how their clinging to communism (not to mention the US embargoes) have caused extreme poverty among most Cubans.

    With that said, it's hard to deny that Cuba is doing some things right in regards to their healthcare system. For example, according to both the UN & the CIA world factbook, Cuba has a lower infant mortality rate than the United States does. (See list of countries by infant mortality rate on Wikipedia for a full list.) That, despite the extreme discrepancies in GDP, per capita income, etc., between the two countries.

  27. Re:But.. but.. I thought Cuba is a utopian society by fondacio · · Score: 1

    Is it that inconceivable that a country can have excellent healthcare but at the same time severely limit its people's political freedoms?

  28. Working so well by Bombula · · Score: 2, Funny

    Jeez, I finally get it! And here I thought the whole strategy of destroying a country through decades of economic sanctions based on political ideology two generations out of date was one of the great disasters of US foreign policy. But it's actually a clever strategy to turn a whole nation into a think tank and foster innovation the old fashioned way: by creating necessity! It's so simple!

    --
    A-Bomb
  29. "Life will always find a way..." --Jurassic Park by mnslinky · · Score: 1

    This sort of reminds me of the line in Jurassic Park, 'Life will always find a way,' in reference to the scientists creating only female clones so they can't breed. How well did that work out for them?

    Passing laws banning something only makes it more difficult for law-abiding citizens. Prohibition didn't work. How's the war on drugs going here in the US? Not only do you fail at your original goal in something like this, your shoot the value of whatever you're trying to stop through the roof!

  30. Re:But.. but.. I thought Cuba is a utopian society by Scareduck · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The real problem I had with Moore's citing of Cuba is that we have no idea how good their official statistics are. Also, if anyone is getting shafted by their medical system, was there any real chance of Moore -- or any outsider, for that matter -- finding out about it?

    --

    Dog is my co-pilot.

  31. For potential visitors by fondacio · · Score: 1

    Now here's a thought for people who want to visit Cuba, but still feel a bit guilty because of its repression. Take a bunch of USB sticks with you - they can be empty if you don't want to take any risks. Or maybe some flash memory, so you can claim it's for your camera, and a card reader. Hand them out to people there. And maybe you've made a small contribution to improving the human rights situation there...

  32. Re:But.. but.. I thought Cuba is a utopian society by STrinity · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Do those life expectancy figures include people dying from acute lead poisoning?

    --
    Les Miserables Volume 1 now up with my reading of
  33. Re:Must be evil capitalist counterrevolutionaries by Scrameustache · · Score: 4, Informative

    Yeah, the Castro brothers aren't exactly nice to those who disagree with them But they are still an improvement over the dictator they replaced.
    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  34. Not new. I used to do that. by GreatBunzinni · · Score: 5, Insightful

    About 16 years ago, in a time of floppy disks, 486s and joysticks, I also was a part of such a network. Media such as the anarchist cookbook and all kinds of software were passed around by hand through packs of floppy disks from one person to another, spreading through everyone.

    Mind you, that took place in a western european country, a free country with freedom of expression as best as the world could muster. Yet, that network, which TFA tries to label as a sign of subversive actions against a government went ahead anyway. How could that be?

    The thing is, that has absolutely nothing to do with dissent or trying to overthrow any government. People form data sharing networks because they want to share data. With the internet we belong to multiple P2P networks. Before that we had FTPs. Before that we had BBS. If there is no electronic network available then that doesn't stop anyone. Instead of a computer network, people networks are formed. Nowadays, instead of floppy disks or even CD-RWs we have USB mass storage devices such as flash drives.

    So quite simply the article is nothing more than yet another piece of anti-Cuba propaganda. Just because there are people in Cuba sharing media around does that mean that they do it with subversive intentions in mind? If you fire up your FTP client does it mean that you are also trying to overthrow your country's government? What about your USB drive? And what about SD cards? What a rebellion.

    --
    Slashdot, fix your code or at least hire someone who is competent at it to do it for you.
    1. Re:Not new. I used to do that. by Spazntwich · · Score: 1

      Nothing stated in the article is an erroneous conclusion. I failed to see any sort of logic like, "Because the kids are passing around memory sticks, they are subverting the government." They are forming their network to subvert government controls.

      Note that the article also never made any blanket statements like, "All networks are created with subversive intent."

      What the author left unsaid, and what you might have realized if you were not a complete simpleton, is that all sorts of people create all sorts of networks for all sorts of reasons, and these kids have created one to subvert their political leaders. Next time try to keep your knee from knocking you so hard in the face you lose what rational parts exist in your brain.

    2. Re:Not new. I used to do that. by GreatBunzinni · · Score: 1

      That is all find and dandy. Nonetheless, if you paid a bit of attention to what is being posted to this discussion before unleashing your dim wit through your post, you would've noticed that a fair share of posters were already clamoring the subversive nature of these networks. Things like dropping freedom wireless cards, running wifi access point freedom blimps and dumping loads of freedom USB flash drives filled with US propaganda on Cuba's beaches were already being seriously suggested as a means to help these courageous file sharing freedom fighters. And yet you try to label someone stating the obvious (which you've clearly weren't able to get it through your little mind) as being "a complete simpleton". How quaint.

      --
      Slashdot, fix your code or at least hire someone who is competent at it to do it for you.
    3. Re:Not new. I used to do that. by Doppler00 · · Score: 1

      yeah because passing around USB keys is so much more advanced then... oh I don't know. Actually having internet access? Why don't you question why the Cuban government hasn't allowed internet access into their country? Don't blame the U.S., there are plenty of other countries in the world that would offer to help. A fiber or microwave link to Mexico is definitely doable.

      And you're saying that the people are not "doing it with subversive intentions in mind". Well, then why doesn't Cuba open up their countries internet access to everyone? You know... like the perfect democracy they claim they have? What is Cuba afraid of then?

    4. Re:Not new. I used to do that. by GreatBunzinni · · Score: 1

      Sorry but you are letting your ignorance get ahead of your judgement. If you had simply read the article, you would know that the Cuban government does indeed allow internet access in Cuba. The problem is that internet access isn't cheap and, as Cuba's economy is in shambles thanks to the US' blockade, there isn't all that money floating around to spend on luxuries.

      But hey, why let facts get ahead of your pretty rant against those evil Cuban socialists?

      --
      Slashdot, fix your code or at least hire someone who is competent at it to do it for you.
    5. Re:Not new. I used to do that. by Doppler00 · · Score: 1

      Hey, maybe you should I don't know... read up on your history before making stupid comments? I did read the article. It specifically said there was one internet cafe in the entire country. You'd find more even in poorer African countries.

      There is no U.S. blockade of Cuba, that happened only during the Cuban missile crisis. Any other country is still free to trade with Cuba without intervention from the U.S.. The Soviet Union continued to do so during the cold war.

      And they aren't socialists, it's communism. The U.S. spent billions if not trillions fighting the soviet union in the 80's and we basically won. But you're probably not from the U.S. so you'll go on making up history to make us look like the bad guy while the people of Cuba continue to live under a dictator with restricted freedom.

    6. Re:Not new. I used to do that. by GreatBunzinni · · Score: 1

      Hey, maybe you should I don't know... read up on your history before making stupid comments? I did read the article. It specifically said there was one internet cafe in the entire country. You'd find more even in poorer African countries.

      That's an amusing remark as a) it's clear that you don't have a clue about what you are talking about and b) once you realize what you said was bullshit, you promptly contradict yourself. After all, in the previous message you claimed that "the Cuban government hasn't allowed internet access into their country" but now you state that yes, the Cuban government does in fact allow internet access but somehow other countries have more "internets". Very amusing indeed.

      There is no U.S. blockade of Cuba, that happened only during the Cuban missile crisis. Any other country is still free to trade with Cuba without intervention from the U.S.. The Soviet Union continued to do so during the cold war.

      You are really funny. After all, what you are claiming goes directly against the US's government policy regarding Cuba for the last... four decades. Why not learn a thing or two about the US's embargo against Cuba, specially the hardening of the restrictions done in the past 10 years through the Helms-Burton Act, before spewing your ignorance all around your posts? Maybe next you will try to claim that the US hadn't anything to do with the bay of pigs fiasco, I bet.

      And they aren't socialists, it's communism.

      Funny stuff! I see that ignorance can produce really funny things. I mean, you spew your nonsense about Cuba and you don't even know that Cuba is in fact a socialist republic that has adopted a socialist constitution. Heck, you may even believe that the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (URSS) couldn't possibly be tied to socialism. Impossible!

      The U.S. spent billions if not trillions fighting the soviet union in the 80's and we basically won. But you're probably not from the U.S. so you'll go on making up history to make us look like the bad guy while the people of Cuba continue to live under a dictator with restricted freedom.

      And as the soviet union crumbled, Cuba stopped being a socialist state. Right... And of course, all the propaganda that keeps being fed to you will, along with the profound ignorance and total lack of understand of the issue being discussed that you displayed, makes you an authority on Cuba's history and governance. Right...

      It is said that ignorance is bliss and, based on the nonsense that you keep on posting, I do believe that you are an extremely happy idiot.

      --
      Slashdot, fix your code or at least hire someone who is competent at it to do it for you.
  35. Re:But.. but.. I thought Cuba is a utopian society by Serge_Tomiko · · Score: 2, Informative

    Totally false. They don't count a child as "born" in Cuba until it has lived for a week. Since a significant portion of infants die during that time, it should not be a surprise their statistics indicate a lower infant mortality rate.

  36. Re:But.. but.. I thought Cuba is a utopian society by InvisblePinkUnicorn · · Score: 2, Informative

    And all they've given up is their inalienable rights as human beings. Yay!

  37. Re:But.. but.. I thought Cuba is a utopian society by Mongoose+Disciple · · Score: 1

    Do those life expectancy figures include people dying from acute lead poisoning?

    Wait, are those the Cubans, or American kids with toys made in China? I'm confused.

  38. Re:Must be evil capitalist counterrevolutionaries by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

    Because the ends justifies the means.

    People like you are the scariest of all.

    Okay, perhaps you're not one of "those" people (Michael Moore, you are!). However, from your apology for the regime in Cuba, and the socialist policies (programs) you seem to embrace, I'll make that assumption.

    What you don't realize is that the greatest force of all, which you seem to embrace, is the force of the herd mentality (Tyranny of the Majority). The moment you force someone into your viewpoint, you've become a tyrant.

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  39. this is an attitude i can't fathom by circletimessquare · · Score: 2, Insightful

    the cuban government is clearly more authoritarian than the us government, on most every measure, according to most any observer (try the great neocon fortresses of human rights watch and amnesty international), by a large order of magnitude

    but then you have some people such as yourself, due to hating the usa's tactics in fighting cuba, or in thinking the idea to defeat cuba is not to fight it, or with a laundry list of cold war and colonial era grievances... that it all somehow means that the point here is to prosecute the usa, rather than the clearly worse government: cuba

    how does this convoluted kind of thinking present itself? on the subject matter of the evils cuba does, we should... drum roll please... prosecute the usa. the clear enemy of cuba!

    (smacks forehead)

    how does this work in some people's minds? that the usa gets prosecuted for what its bitter enemies do?

    various internet ideologues: fine. you win. the usa sucks. fuck the usa. rah rah rah! the usa is evil! blah blah blah. whatever! i don't care: be my guest, hate the usa, you go on with your bad selves

    but in your effort to hate and prosecute the usa, how do you get anywhere in that passion of yours by forgiving regimes which, right now, in the PRESENT TIME, are doing clearly worse than the usa, ON THE SUBJECT MATTER YOU SAY IS IMPORTANT, such as freedom of expression?

    i can never understand this kind of thinking

    again, someone please explain to me: how on the subject matter of the bad things the usa's bitter enemies do, does the usa gets all the hate?

    it just blows my mind how that is possible in someone's mind. you present them with evidence of usa's enemies doing truly vile things, and their reply is to hate the usa

    it blows my mind how this kind of thinking works

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:this is an attitude i can't fathom by DeadChobi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't hate the ideals that the USA originally aspired to, especially the idea that we can govern ourselves as a group and still maintain a cohesive society. What I hate is what we've done as a country, consistently, to other countries. We interfere with their development, we ignore their soverignty, and we have even stolen land from them. Yes, it's been a while since we've invaded a country and taken land from them, but it's happened.

      I love the ideals that we aspire to, but as a country there is a pattern of antisocial behavior which I find to be disturbing.

      --
      SRSLY.
    2. Re:this is an attitude i can't fathom by bendodge · · Score: 1

      Mod parent UP!

      --
      The government can't save you.
    3. Re:this is an attitude i can't fathom by damburger · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I put it to you that the Cuban government is no worse than the United States government, under similar circumstances. The Cuban government is subject to monthly threats of annihilation from its northern neighbour, who possess the most powerful military the world has ever seen. Faced with a far less potent threat from Imperial Japan, the United States started rounding up people based on their ethnicity and putting them into camps. Faced with a far less potent threat from the Soviet Union, the United States started investigating its own intellectuals, artists, dissidents and union leaders accusing them of treason.

      This is not to condone the Cuban dictatorship (and I am calling it such directly seeing as you seem to have missed me calling it so indirectly in my original post...) - it is merely to explain its actions and its nature. Everyone, repeat EVERYONE, who has formed a government that works for the poor in Latin America has come under attack from the United States. In the same way that sharing an environment with dangerous predators has made Hippos extremely aggressive animals, sharing the Western Hemisphere with the U.S. made revolutionary movements there extremely aggressive.

      I suppose you are going to continue to maintain that I'm an apologist for the regime. But hey, you are clearly a libertarian, so I don't expect you to grasp nuance.

      --
      If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
    4. Re:this is an attitude i can't fathom by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      someone please explain to me: how on the subject matter of the bad things the usa's bitter enemies do, does the usa gets all the hate? Because the USAs' dear friends do worse things, but the hate is not applied appropriately.

      Look at Pakistan, look at Saudi Arabia. Why all the hate for Cuba when the USAs' friends are also doing truly vile things?
      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    5. Re:this is an attitude i can't fathom by j1m+5n0w · · Score: 1

      but in your effort to hate and prosecute the usa, how do you get anywhere in that passion of yours by forgiving regimes which, right now, in the PRESENT TIME, are doing clearly worse than the usa, ON THE SUBJECT MATTER YOU SAY IS IMPORTANT, such as freedom of expression?

      The United States obviously treats its citizens much better than Cuba treats its citizens in terms of freedom of expression, press, etc.. However, that isn't the only measure of the "goodness" or "evilness" of a nation, one must also look at how that nation treats other nations; we don't have such a good track record in that area. (We have good intentions, perhaps, but bad foreign policy is always based on (or justified by) good intentions.)

      In the case of Cuba, we are embargoing the country because we think their leadership is evil and threatening, under the notion that maybe economic pressure will encourage the poor to rise up against their evil regime and inspire a new era of freedom and democracy. This has been tried many times in many contexts, and I'm not aware of a case in which it has actually worked. The poor are not deceived; they know that we're the ones actively trying to starve them, and that just makes their authoritarian government more popular. Authoritarian governments thrive on outside threats; it gives them something to point to, to frighten the population into supporting their "benevolent protector".

      Simply comparing the United States to Cuba and saying "we're better than them because we have more freedom" is a little simplistic. One must also consider the role the United States has played in making Cuba what it is.

    6. Re:this is an attitude i can't fathom by Just+Another+Poster · · Score: 1

      The Cuban government is subject to monthly threats of annihilation from its northern neighbour

      Bullshit.

    7. Re:this is an attitude i can't fathom by xhrit · · Score: 0

      What ov the evidence of usa doing truly vile things?

      What ov all the bad things the usa's bitter enemies do, that the USA also does. Often justifying it's truly vile actions by stating the enemy does worse.

      As a thought experiment, lets try something. First, count the number ov innocent people the government ov cuba has killed in the last 5 years.

      Then count the number ov innocent people the US government has killed in the last 5 years.

      If killing innocent people is evil then tell me, what country is more evil?

      Since 2001 Cuba has had 3 executions. The usa has had 63 executions in 2006 alone, not including the military executions ov terrorist suspects. Not including collateral damage caused by the invasion and occupation ov 2 sovereign nations.

      What country is more evil, Communist Cuba or Communist China? What is the fundamental difference that allows the USA to be most favored trading partners with the Communist government ov China, but mortal enemies with the Communist government ov Cuba?

      What country has worse human rights violations, Cuba or China? So, have you REALLY given thought as to exactly why is it that China is our ally, but Cuba is our enemy?

      Where is the disconnect?

      I'll give you a hint - Cuba is not willing to enslave its population for the economic benefit ov the USA, but China is. Cuba is not willing to let US corporations take advantage ov its people, but China is.

      The reason that the communist dictatorship ov China is an ally and the communist dictatorship ov Cuba is an enemy is that the gp is correct in stating that the US wants democracy, only if the people elect people who will do as we say. If not, a dictator will do nicely.

      Everything else is a lie.

  40. Re:But.. but.. I thought Cuba is a utopian society by arthurpaliden · · Score: 1

    Citation Please....

  41. Re:But.. but.. I thought Cuba is a utopian society by rucs_hack · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Micheal Moore only spoke about their health care system, not the other social problems.

    Mind you, with decent free health care, they have something fundamentally good that Americans don't, and the way things are going, never will have.

    How many people in the US can't change jobs because of losing health insurance if they do?

    I have known a few myself, doesn't seem either fair or pleasant.

  42. Re:Handing off thumb drives - The new Cuban Intern by Notquitecajun · · Score: 2, Funny

    Insert Monty Python and the Holy Grail coconut-laden swallow jokes HERE.

  43. Re:But.. but.. I thought Cuba is a utopian society by Serge_Tomiko · · Score: 1

    How about this, why don't you find me infant mortality statistics in Cuba that were NOT reported by the repressive, communist government that rules over that land?

    Oh, you can't. Why? Because anyone else who tries to survey doctors will be arrested and imprisoned.

    The UN does not do any research on the matter, it merely reports what the dictator tells them.

  44. Communism by mathimus1863 · · Score: 1

    Why does the summary mention the average Cuban wages? Sounds like an extraneous calculation.

  45. Re:Handing off thumb drives - The new Cuban Intern by jeffstar · · Score: 3, Funny

    in soviet cuba they slashdot YOU!

    no?

  46. In red China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People use DVDs.

  47. Re:Handing off thumb drives - The new Cuban Intern by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Actually, I believe that there was an attempt to port Quake so that it's playable via Sneakernet. Maybe for a short-range, medium-latency sneakernet. For the networking stats of this sneakernet, you might need a different variant.

    Still, this brings up an interesting idea for a project: construct a network where multiple packets are carried in bursts on physically delivered storage media (such as a USB drive) where you can only retrieve those packets addressed to you when it arrives and not monitor the others. Obviously encryption would be required, but design it for reasonable packaging and retrieval from the thumb drive. Anyone could add packets to the media after retrieving their own. Basically, formalize a community sneakernet. Best if it can be made compatible with a private LAN of, say, an apartment building that has no direct connection to the Internet.

    You have 26 days left to get the RFC in by April 1.

    Not to say that I think it is entirely a joke. This could be useful when we discover we cannot trust the common carriers any more.
    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  48. nonsense by Quadraginta · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This bullshit urban legend about the "low" infant mortality rate in the US has got to stop.

    The reason the infant "mortality" rate in the US is low is because the US is one of the very few countries that tries to save the life of severely premature babies and babies with severe birth defects. Not surprisingly, quite a lot of these sad cases die, up to 80% in the case of severely premature babies. By contrast, most other countries don't even try to save those infants, and simply record them as late miscarriages or stillbirths. Since they're never "born" they can't "die," so they don't count in infant mortality statistics. Hey presto! A lower infant mortality rate than the US! Congratulatory headlines in any random self-hating US media outlet...

    Here's a related fun fact: university hospitals often have higher death rates than community hospitals for grave disease, e.g. heart attacks, strokes. Is this because they're less competent? Some strange corruption where the richer and more prestigious hospital is screwing up because of its callous disregard for humanity, i.e. the kind of "logic" used to criticize the US infant mortality rate? Nope. It's just because the most serious cases prefer to go to university hospitals, or get transferred there from community hospitals, and because university hospitals often admit people for experimental therapies that usually don't work, whereas less sophisticated hospitals just send folks to hospice or home to die.

    Whenever you compare statistics, it really needs to be apples to apples, and when the statistic is so politically-charged as a quality of life versus type of government measurement, you really need to ask some hard and detailed questions about the methodology. It's amazingly easy to lie with statistics.

    1. Re:nonsense by Laglorden · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Do you really beleieve that?? I live i Sweden (2.76 deaths/1,000 live births according to some statistics) and I absolutely promise you we DO try to save our infants at every cost and not just record them as "miscarriages" and "stillbirths". The trend continues even after the first year. 8 children of 1000 in the US won't live to their 5th birhday, 3 in Sweden, this is one area where our obsessive "security above everything", "no visits from anyone else but the immediate family", then "always wear a helmet", "don't swim until 1 hour after eating", "use seatbelts" etc etc attitude actually has some effects. (Don't know if it's worth it, sometimes you want to live dangerously and cross the street without looking three times, but we do live longer lifes)

      So which "most countries" are you referring to? In which countries don't the parents and doctors want to save the infants?

      20 years ago Sweden had a child mortality rate of 6.9 but we have managed to get it down significantly since then. Advanced medical care actually actually have very little effect on child mortality, instead it's the _basic_ healtcare (for all, cause if you leave out 5% of the popuplation, the infant mortality may become 50/1000 there screwing up your statistics) which is most effective. That's why Cuba manage to compete with US on this statistic.

      In summation: you're wrong, it's not an "urban legend" and it boggles the mind how you can beleive your country is the only one trying to keep your newborn alive.

      (and low infant mortality = good. low means less dead since it's measured as dead/not dead 6 dead out of 1000 which Cuba and US have is actually quite "ok" compared with Angola (192) but maybe they're just trying to hard over there)

    2. Re:nonsense by PingXao · · Score: 1

      Of course the nationalist jingoists won't even bother to reply. Just as decades ago, when the US was a leader in low infant mortality, they never bothered to point out that nations with higher rates might actually offer better care.

      Today all you have to do is point out that America is not perfect and all of a sudden you "hate" America. Right.

    3. Re:nonsense by arpad1 · · Score: 1

      Not quite. Infant mortality is whatever it's defined to be. If death before the age of one year isn't defined as being part of the infant mortality count then it isn't part of the infant mortality count.

      And of course, all counts are subject to assumptions about honesty.

      I'm willing to credit Swedish honesty in the infant mortality count but I wouldn't give a second thought to the likelihood of the Cuban figures being anything other then what some government official's decided they ought to be.

      --
      Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
    4. Re:nonsense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You say "low" when you really mean "high."

    5. Re:nonsense by emj · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't give a second thought to the likelihood of the Cuban figures being anything other then what some government official's decided they ought to be.


      There are a lot of doctors in Cuba... So we now they spend lots of money on the problem, these doctors are well educated and often in my experience very anti Castro.
    6. Re:nonsense by ZorbaTHut · · Score: 1

      I seem to remember that shortly after the US army introduced new metal helmets for soldiers, the number of head injuries requiring hospitalization jumped dramatically.

      The reason, of course, being that there were lots of people being hospitalized for injuries that previously would have been instantly fatal.

      --
      Breaking Into the Industry - A development log about starting a game studio.
  49. Re:Handing off thumb drives - The new Cuban Intern by Duncan+Blackthorne · · Score: 5, Funny

    ..so would a hawk or eagle in the mix qualify as a BITM (Bird In The Middle) attack, or DoP (Denial of Pigeon) attack?

  50. Re:But.. but.. I thought Cuba is a utopian society by arthurpaliden · · Score: 1

    CIA Factbook - Govenment of the United States Infant mortality rate Cuba 6.04 United States 6.37 figures from 2007 Will this do?

  51. I wish China or some nation would just send to by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    Cuba a few tons of clones Cisco gear, some slew of Linux servers, a fat pipe into the Internet, and pay off the Cuban government to open up.

    But, do it in some diplomatic Asian way that might gain inroads into Cuba. Apparently, the US/Western ways must suck pretty bad. SOME government SOMEwhere needs to overtly defy the US. Externally oppressing Cuban citizens and denying US citizens visitation of Cuba is plain evil and heinous. It's just a matter of time before Cuba opens up. i just think their elite don't want history to show that the *USA* forced them to open.

    China, are you LISTENING? Maybe Medvedev (and Putin) might take lead on this. Surely, the rest of the world has balls to stand up against this. Would be ironic, though, to see some combination of China and Russia convincing Cuba (through aid packages) to just knock off the current situation and in a few years be where they ought to be as if no embargoes ever happened.

    i mean, REALLY, what threat has Cuba herSELF been to the US? None. She's been an active symbol of rejection of the US (to a great extent), survived coup plans orchestrated by the US, and other than refugees, has yet to launch some military attack upon the US. Drugs and other things might be issues, but it's not as if Cuba has a physical border to the US.

    i'd like to see some world or NGO body once and for all defy the US and just SETTLE this matter without coups, assassinations, economic oppression or destabilization...

    This is just insulting political BULLSHIT, and it's embarrassing and it just one more reason to make 'merkuns question whether travel with a US passport it the wisest or safest thing to do. After all, i've met in Japan people from various countries who had US passports AND multiple others, apparently valid, because they were from countries that permitted dual/multiple citizenship. Their countries aren't so arrogant or stupid as to assume that forcing someone to swear allegiance to ONE country makes them less likely to turn on their "new" country. Some of these people were from Australia, Canada, Hong Kong, and places in Europe. This was in 2004. i don't know what has happened between then and now. Of course, i'd be remiss to suggest that these people use their passports solely to not be fingered AS american citizens. Some do it to skirt around visa time frames.

    Why? Well, as a non-US citizen or by entering Japan with a NON-US passport (and not being on a list of terrorist nations, unfriendly nations, or nations that might swamp Japan with foreigners looking to squat there), a visitor from the "right nations" can enter Japan on a Visitor Visa for not 90 days (as from the US) but for 180 days. Not only THAT, such visitors can WORK part time to subsidize their tourism/stay. From the US? Forget it. You can visit for 90 days, but are NOT legally permitted to work in Japan unless some company or individual puts up a bond or sponsorship and prepares the entry paperwork for obtaining a visa stamp.

    Anyway, criminalizing a US citizen visit to Cuba is just obsequious, stupid, asinine, and vindictive. Someone should try again to fast-track (non-violently) Cuba's state status and maybe embargo the US for embargoing Cuba -- unless Cuba and the US are technically in a state of war. The US normalized with Vietnam, has trade status with China (a nation vastly superior to Cuba and a nation which the US is constantly measuring defense budgets against, but not against Cuba -- not on THAT scale...), and other nations from which the US incurred civilian and military deaths vastly greater than anything Cuba could have done to the US. Besides, is CUBA conducting technology-based infrastructure warfare upon the US? USA, grow up.

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
    1. Re:I wish China or some nation would just send to by davidsyes · · Score: 1

      http://www.cfr.org/publication/11113/

      "Cuba has the "same effect on U.S. administrations that the full moon has on a werewolf.""

      "What is the likelihood that the United States and Cuba will resume diplomatic relations?

      Given the range of issues dividing the two countries, experts say the possibility of normalization remains distant. "We don't use that language [normalization] anymore because the relationship is so toxic," Sweig says. Wayne Smith, director of the Cuba program at the Center for International Policy, says Cuba has the "same effect on U.S. administrations that the full moon has on a werewolf.""

      i guess Cuba is the (wolfs) bane of the US' political existence... and i see the current regime is a source of angst for many Cubans outside the country. However, i will again assert that oppressing or internationally rebuking a nation's government (and spilling this over to its people) is not the way to advance a nation out of poverty and domestic oppression.

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  52. Re:Handing off thumb drives - The new Cuban Intern by jcr · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm impressed. I would expect them to be handing off 8" floppies.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  53. Re:Cuba now, US tomorrow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The US Govt and their corporate friends seem to be doing a really good job of "banning" that book. Their mind control rays make it REALLY hard for me to find the big blue BUY IT NOW button.

  54. More appropriate? by KublaiKhan · · Score: 1

    "The internet interprets censorship as damage and routes around it."

    Just because it's not using TCP/IP doesn't mean it's not still internet.

    --
    In Xanadu did Kubla Khan
    A stately pleasure dome decree
  55. Re:Must be evil capitalist counterrevolutionaries by damburger · · Score: 1

    If you think that was an apology for the Cuban regime, you have pathetic reading comprehension skills. Also, the fact you accuse people who disagree with you of having 'herd' mentality and your sig says people are panicky animals, suggests you are a frightful elitist.

    --
    If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
  56. Consider, if you will by sjvn · · Score: 1

    all those of you who find good things to say about the current Cuban government that the same government makes sure that the Cubans can't read your words.

    Interesting eh?

    Steven

  57. A very long pedal by Tired+and+Emotional · · Score: 2, Interesting
    You need to transfer a 4Gbyte file. Your Internet connect speed is 256Kb/s. How far must you be transferring the data for it to be faster to transfer it via your connection rather than via a man on a bicycle carrying a thumb drive?

    This used to be a standard exam question when I taught CS, only back then he was only armed with a floppy. As floppys got larger faster tha bandwidth increased (back then it was proabbly 2400bps dialup) the poor guy kept having to ride further and further.

    Lets see - the file will take 8*4x10^9/256x10^3 (back in asynch dialup days that multiplier was 10, not 8) = 0.125x10^6 seconds. Lets suppose the bicyclist average 10 miles per 3600 seconds. So break even is 10*1.25x10^5 /3.6x10^2 ~ 4x10^3 (4000) miles.

    For extra marks: How large a thumbdisk would a swimmer need to carry from Florida to Cuba so that the transfer rate would be faster than the entire bandwidth of the island? There are no extra marks for speculating where the swimmer would carry it.

    --
    Squirrel!
    1. Re:A very long pedal by Shuntros · · Score: 1

      I trust sir chose a proper filesystem on which to save his 4Gb file, otherwise he'll spend 8*4x10^9/256x10^3 (/2) getting all excited, just to have it disappear up its own anus when it reaches 2Gb.

  58. There's a problem with how they got that low by keineobachtubersie · · Score: 1

    "Which gives them a lower infant mortality rate"

    No, what gives them a lower infant mortality rate is, at least partially, their extremely high abortion rate.

    Cubas per capita abortion rates are nearly 3 times those of the US. In fact, once you examine the figures you realize the number of countries that perform fewer abortions than Cuba is vanishingly small.

    http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/policy/abortion/ab-unitedstates.html

    United States= 19.7 abortions per 1000 (2004)

    http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/policy/abortion/ab-cuba.html

    Cuba = 57.0 per thousand. (2004)

    I imagine the US numbers would come down too if we started aborting that many fetuses.

    Here's another (slightly less current) list. It says the same thing.

    http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/journals/2504499.html

    Regardless of your stance on abortion, crowing about low infant mortality while you're aborting that many fetuses seems a little ridiculous.

    1. Re:There's a problem with how they got that low by arthurpaliden · · Score: 1

      That reasoning is bogus..Why are you asuming that the infinte mortality rate of the aborted group would be greater that the population that is allowed to go to term. Remember that they do not have the technology to determine abnormalities to the same extnt as they do in the US.

    2. Re:There's a problem with how they got that low by keineobachtubersie · · Score: 1

      "Why are you asuming that the infinte mortality rate of the aborted group would be greater that the population that is allowed to go to term."

      Do you have any idea at all what you're discussing? Do you even realize why that question is silly?

      "Remember that they do not have the technology to determine abnormalities to the same extnt as they do in the US."

      Thanks you for proving my point so nicely without realizing it. Ask yourself, what do they do with fetuses that they CAN determine are abnormal?

      They abort them. Meanwhile, in the US, we bring them to term and treat them, resulting in a higher mortality rate.

      It's not hard to understand, I don't know why you're having such a problem.

  59. Modern method by Molochi · · Score: 1

    I think they're called iPods. Seems like everyone has one, though it's mostly music and crappy resolution videos.

    --
    "The Adobe Updater must update itself before it can check for updates. Would you like to update the Adobe Updater now?"
  60. As A Good Western "Progressive" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    . . . it is my duty to report these reactionaries to the Cuban authorities so the Revolution can succeed!

  61. Re:But.. but.. I thought Cuba is a utopian society by BLAG-blast · · Score: 1

    Can you explain why you are unable to provide any references to back up your original statement?

    Or was it just made up?

    On the other hand, looking at US figures on unnecessary surgeries and deaths caused by unnecessary surgery, I could well believe Cuba can cover up few 10,000s of infant deaths, if the US can hide 100,000s of adult deaths each year (some project the figure to be over 1M deaths per year).

    --
    M0571y H@rml355.
  62. " Yes, it's been a while " by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    exactly, it's been awhile

    make a list of the usa's cold war and colonial era crimes, and you have a list which is pretty much no better or worse than any other major country that has ever existed

    such that you aren't really commenting intelligently on the reality you find yourself in today, right now

    if you wish to grouse about history, go in a corner and do that

    but if you wish to make comments that are relevant to what is happening in the world right now, look at who is doing bad things in the world right now

    not that this gets the usa off the hook. you can give me another nice list of current american crimes

    but that's ok, do that. and also give me a list of what other players are doing that is criminal

    then you can begin to be relevant, intelligent, and you can begin to actually matter on the subject matter you are commenting on

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:" Yes, it's been a while " by DeadChobi · · Score: 1

      Howzabout us invading Iraq, a soverign nation with its own government, abolishing that government, hanging its leader, and then opening up the country for a civil war?

      Oh, I get it. This is one of those posts that you make in order to inflame me against you! Wow, how clever.

      --
      SRSLY.
    2. Re:" Yes, it's been a while " by Just+Another+Poster · · Score: 1

      Howzabout us invading Iraq, a soverign nation with its own government, abolishing that government, hanging its leader, and then opening up the country for a civil war?

      If only that was the extent of US involvement in Iraq, as it damn well should have been.

      We had to take down at least one Arab nation after 9/11. Iraq was as good as any.

  63. I explained why their number is lower, keep it by keineobachtubersie · · Score: 1

    They abort more fetuses than virtually any other country on earth.

    If that's what it takes to get the number in the US marginally lower I'm not sure it's worth it.

    http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/policy/abortion/index.html#ST

    1. Re:I explained why their number is lower, keep it by tantrum · · Score: 1

      you complain about the lack of democracy in cuba, and still you think it wrong of them to abort however many fetuses they want to?

  64. wait by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    american japanese internment camps excuses cuba's present day limits on freedom of expression?

    this is where you lose: "the usa did something bad once, so we can't criticize what cuba is doing bad now"

    this is an incredibly useless way of thinking about the world you live in

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:wait by damburger · · Score: 1

      Read what I said, not whatever easier-to-refute argument you cooked up in your head. I never excused the Cuban regime for anything. Please try to actually appreciate an opinion on a country that is more sophisticated that rating it out of 10. You might broaden your horizons a bit.

      --
      If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
  65. The Embargo is retarded. by phoenix.bam! · · Score: 1

    The embargo against Cuban travel by the united states is a terribly counter-productive policy. If Americans were hopping over to cuba for the weekend, dropping off laptops, satellite dishes and money, the citizens of that nation would be free by now. Instead Cuba has remaned the communist boogyman on our doorstep for 50 years. Sick.

  66. Re:But.. but.. I thought Cuba is a utopian society by Serge_Tomiko · · Score: 1

    No, the CIA factbook uses UN statistics. Sorry.

  67. Re:Cuba now, US tomorrow by The+End+Of+Days · · Score: 1

    I don't think it's censorship so much as people knowing enough to ignore crazy.

    Which implies when people ignore you, then aren't censoring you either.

  68. A very very very small number by keineobachtubersie · · Score: 1
    "How many people in the US can't change jobs because of losing health insurance if they do?"

    Virtually none.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consolidated_Omnibus_Budget_Reconciliation_Act_of_1985

    The Act allows employees of a qualifying employer and the employee's immediate family members who had been covered by a health care plan to maintain their coverage if a "qualifying event" causes them to lose coverage. A qualifying employer is generally an employer with 20 or more full time equivalent employees (ERISA cites"(more) than 20 employees on a typical business day during the preceding calendar year"). Among the "qualifying events" listed in the statute are loss of benefits coverage due to (1) the death of the covered employee, (2) termination or a reduction in hours (which can be the result of resignation, discharge, layoff, strike or lockout, medical leave or simply a slowdown in business operations) that causes the worker to lose eligibility for coverage


    "I have known a few myself"

    I'd like to hear specifics because that's pretty unusual.
    1. Re:A very very very small number by rucs_hack · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      come up with something more recent than 1985 and I might be interested in arguing.

    2. Re:A very very very small number by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      COBRA only last 18 months, fucktard.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    3. Re:A very very very small number by keineobachtubersie · · Score: 1

      No, actually it sometimes lasts 36 months.

      And unless I miss my guess, 18 months is plenty of time to find NEW insurance, or a job that has some.

      Did you bother to think before you posted?

      "fucktard"

      At least you were man enough to sign your post.

    4. Re:A very very very small number by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      Did you actually read what you responded to?

      The question was: How many people in the US can't change jobs because of losing health insurance if they do?

      If they'd lose health insurance if they change jobs, it's because their new job wouldn't have health insurance. Um, duh. Most people do not change jobs and then immediately look for a new job. And CORBA lasts 18 months when changing jobs.

      And incidentally many people in the US cannot get insurance without a job, so cannot 'look for' insurance independent of looking for a job.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  69. criticize saudi arabia for saudi crimes by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    criticize pakistan for pakistani crimes

    criticize the usa for american crimes

    criticize cuba for cuban crimes

    DON'T criticize the usa for cuban crimes

    DON'T criticize the usa for saudi crimes

    DON'T criticize the usa for pakistani crimes

    that's the kind of weirdo i am

    i'm sorry if this kind of thinking is so strange and exotic to people!

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:criticize saudi arabia for saudi crimes by damburger · · Score: 1

      The USA (and others, lets not just dump on America for this) financially and militarily support the Saudis and the Pakistanis. Your presidential family has a creepily close relationship with the Saudi royal family. So, yes, the US bears a measure of responsibility for what happens in Saudi Arabia, although of course not as much as it's leadership.

      The problem with having such enormous military, economic and political power is that people are going to judge you by what you do with it. With such widespread influence, it isn't surprising that many situations in the world have reached their present state with US intervention, and you have to take responsibility for your part in that.

      You should either develop a more complex understanding of our modern, interconnected world, or keep quiet on issues that are out of your depth.

      --
      If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
    2. Re:criticize saudi arabia for saudi crimes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's because you american faggots meddle in other people's business, which makes it your fault. fuck off and let us do our thing.

  70. Re:Handing off thumb drives - The new Cuban Intern by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1, Funny

    Actually, I believe that there was an attempt to port Quake so that it's playable via Sneakernet.

    Lame. It doesn't even support rocket jumping!

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  71. Called UUCP by Colin+Smith · · Score: 4, Informative

    With store and forward for email and Usenet.

    Though we used to feed a couple of sites with 10Mb tapes...

    If all you have is analog phones, or even tapes, you can still run email and get usenet.

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:Called UUCP by houghi · · Score: 1

      Email only if you have upstream spamfilters. Usenet should not be a problem.

      Also if the internet is out to your location, most likely your landline will be as well. Cellphones could still work and should be able to get Usenet and (filterd) email.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    2. Re:Called UUCP by hairykrishna · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I worked at a site that, for security reasons, had to be air gapped from the 'net. All the email was handled via tape. Worked fine as long as you didn't mind only getting new email twice a day.

      --
      "Physics is to math as sex is to masturbation." -R. Feynman
  72. Re:Must be evil capitalist counterrevolutionaries by Coryoth · · Score: 1

    Moral of the story... oppressive censorship, iron-handed dictatorship, and state sanctioned murder/torture are okay as long as the United States disagrees with your ideology. I'm pretty sure that's not at all what he said. An explanation of why something is the way it is is not codoning nor excusing the state of things. I'm constantly surprised by the number of people who can't seem to read or hear an explanation regarding why something terrible has happened without assuming it is an attempt to excuse the atrocity. Is a little bit of nuance and slightly more than pure black and white that hard to come by? It is possible to look at more complex explanations and motivations than just "the people who did it are evil" without saying that nothing evil happened, nor that the people who did it don't still bear responsibility.
  73. Citations for above by Solandri · · Score: 5, Informative
    I was curious enough to do some quick googling on the above claim.

    Wikipedia entry on disparities between way infant mortality is measured.
    US News & World Report article on same (doesn't cite sources, though news magazines almost never do).
    Slate article on impact of premature births on infant mortality rate.
    Boston Globe article on rate of premature births in U.S.

    It would appear there is something to the claim that better medical care can skew infant mortality rate upwards.

    1. Re:Citations for above by Grail · · Score: 1

      It's not the better medical care that makes the difference - it's the differentiation between, "this baby was recorded as being born, but died shortly after birth" versus "this baby died before we recorded its birth."

    2. Re:Citations for above by Antisuji · · Score: 1

      Same thing happened when they introduced steel helmets in WWI -- the incidence of head injuries actually went up. (Or so I've heard... too lazy to look up the reference.)

  74. Wikipedia? by Aereus · · Score: 1

    How much space do the off-line versions of Wikipedia take up in text-only format? That would seem like a good thing to put on a USB drive.

    1. Re:Wikipedia? by compro01 · · Score: 1

      we've got the wikipedia on disc here at 421MB or the direct download from wikimedia here, though i'm not sure how big those are.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
  75. Re:Handing off thumb drives - The new Cuban Intern by idontgno · · Score: 3, Funny

    Think of it as an avian spoofed RESET packet.

    I'm sure Comcast is evaluating it even as we speak...

    --
    Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
  76. RFC 1149A by The+Redster! · · Score: 1

    I'm considering implementing this standard using hogs instead of pigeons. My first planned transmission will be a copy of Duke Nukem Forever.

  77. Re:Handing off thumb drives - The new Cuban Intern by xappax · · Score: 1

    I like this idea a lot. What would be really neat would be to write a virtual server for the sneakernet software - so basically you operate your computer as though it's connected to the internet, only all requests to the internet are recieved by the local server software and "queued" for delivery via the sneakernet.

    The server component could be designed to accept connections and handshakes for popular protocols like HTTP, SMTP, POP3, etc, but when sent data, it would queue it instead of sending directly. And when data was requested, it could just check the existing cache and supply the content when requested (for example new emails or earlier requested web pages).

    The advantage of doing it this way is it would be compatible with existing software, you could use most common internet apps with no modification, only a new service written for the virtual server.

  78. Re:But.. but.. I thought Cuba is a utopian society by j.+andrew+rogers · · Score: 1

    They have first rate low tech preventative and pre/post natal health care. Which gives them a lower infant mortality rate than the US and a life expectancy just a bit lower that the US.

    In the industrialized world infant mortality rates are primarily a function of genetics, not healthcare. Some ethnic groups have integer factor higher rates of miscarriage even after controlling for the environmental and medical factors. If you control for ethnic and racial demographics, infant mortality rates are more or less the same in the industrialized world. In the non-industrialized world, infant mortality rates are primarily a function of infectious disease (a pretty low bar to cross before genetics take over).

    A similar story exists with life expectancy, which largely measures environmental factors (e.g. car accidents and homicide in the case of the US). The statistics you are using do not measure what you think they are measuring. For example, if you look at survival rates for cancer -- a leading cause of death in the industrialized world -- the US leads the world by a significant margin (e.g. per the recent Lancet Oncology study), yet this is not obvious in the aggregate life expectancy statistics.

  79. Re:But.. but.. I thought Cuba is a utopian society by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can you fucking read?

    "How about this, why don't you find me infant mortality statistics in Cuba that were NOT reported by the repressive, communist government that rules over that land?"

    THAT'S WHY you god damned moron, Cuba fudges their numbers and has for years, stop being a fucking douche.

  80. Re:Must be evil capitalist counterrevolutionaries by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

    "during which the US made a point of launching vicious attacks on every progressive left-wing government"

    Well, lets start with THIS statement above, shall we. Every one of the "progressive left-wing government" you speak of was communist thuggery dictatorships. We're still dealing with such these even today.

    "organising strikes, spreading propaganda, sponsoring coups and terrorists, and occasionally direct military force."

    Same could be said of France's support with respect to the US Revolution against Britain. History has a way of sorting these things out, and remembering only the things it wants. While it would be nice to live in a peaceful world, I'm not ignorant enough to think that we live in such a place or that the world could become such a place anytime soon. But as long as some people want what others have, and use force to take what they want, then this world will be screwed up. Oh and this applies to all socialist, communist and "progressive left wing governments" .

    "accuse people who disagree with you of having 'herd' mentality"

    I didn't accuse anyone of anything. I said Tyranny of the Majority is still tyranny. In fact I even stated that you MIGHT NOT be (perhaps you're not one of "those" people), but since you replied, I can now show that you are in fact, "one of those people". In fact, I purposely couched my sentences and gave escape clauses in case I miss read your intent (eg "which you seem to embrace").

    So, you see, my reading and comprehension skills are quite evident, while yours seem to be lacking.

    "but thanks to the actions of America there is literally no way their social programmes could've been implemented if they were not prepared to run the country as a dictatorship."

    This statement here, completely suggests you support forced government "programmes" even under a dictatorship, suggesting you indeed believe that the ends do justify the means. Phrases such as "literally no way" suggest that dictatorships are acceptable for instituting ill conceived, unsupportable "programmes" that force people into a system which is based upon herd (group, majority) wishes, under penalty of government retribution for non-compliance.

    My original post stands as posted.

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  81. blame where blame is due by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

    DON'T criticize the usa for saudi crimes

    DON'T criticize the usa for pakistani crimes

    that's the kind of weirdo i am The USA endorses and defends these criminals.
    The accomplice of a crime deserves blame just as much as the perpetrator.
    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  82. i understand what you are saying by circletimessquare · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "I put it to you that the Cuban government is no worse than the United States government, under similar circumstances."

    "This is not to condone the Cuban dictatorship (and I am calling it such directly seeing as you seem to have missed me calling it so indirectly in my original post...) - it is merely to explain its actions and its nature."

    "In the same way that sharing an environment with dangerous predators has made Hippos extremely aggressive animals, sharing the Western Hemisphere with the U.S. made revolutionary movements there extremely aggressive."

    tell me where i am wrong in my understanding of your words: you are saying that the cuban government behaves the way it does because of the usa

    W.T.F!?

    this utterly blows my mind!

    here is my bizarre, neocon, libertarian (is that what you called me?! how did you base that weird judgment!?), imperialist, neocolonial, mercenary capitalist, zionist, orphan children raping opinion:

    1. criticize cuba for cuba doing bad things

    2. don't criticize the usa for cuba doing bad things

    that's it. that's the beginning of my thought. that's the end of my thought. that's my strange, exotic way of thinking

    please forgive me if this such an alien concept to you!

    (smacks forehead)

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:i understand what you are saying by damburger · · Score: 1

      Here is a simple concept for you to mull over:

      The United States does things in Latin America.

      Mull it over for a while. Ask a friend for help.

      --
      If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
    2. Re:i understand what you are saying by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      tell me where i am wrong in my understanding of your words: you are saying that the cuban government behaves the way it does because of the usa

      W.T.F!? Cuba had a democracy. A dictator overthrew that democracy and that tyrant was supported by the USA.
      He was then deposed by revolutionaries, and the USA condemned that turn of event ans has been imposing hardships on the population of Cuba ever since.

      Maybe if you didn't slap your forehead so much you could understand that a nations' actions towards another has consequences that should not be ignored.
      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

  83. Re:But.. but.. I thought Cuba is a utopian society by Serge_Tomiko · · Score: 2, Insightful

    NO ONE can provide any references. You don't understand. The government will imprison/execute anyone trying to establish legitimate statistics regarding the health care system in Cuba. Not only that, the culture of repression will insure that no doctor will give you the honest truth unless you have a boat ready to take him to the US.

    I have known many who have fled that land of oppression, and have known a few doctors. It is from them I receive my information. Absent any transparency of the Cuba government, anecdotal evidence is to me far more reliable than propaganda. If you want to believe the shit shoveled to you by the Castro Monarchy, feel free.

    Also, if you honestly believe that 0.3% of the population dies every year because of unnecessary surgery - nothing I could possibly quote would be acceptable for you. That is nearly 1/3 of all deaths every year. Total insanity.

  84. Re:But.. but.. I thought Cuba is a utopian society by keineobachtubersie · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Like all the US citizens! Yay!"

    Bush is a fucking idiot and a traitor. Rise up and overthrow that madman.

    That would get me found and shot in Cuba, yet strangely, not here in the US.

    Funny how the reality of the situation escapes people like you in your rush to spew snide remarks all over the place.

  85. Re:Handing off thumb drives - The new Cuban Intern by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "...with 55% packet loss, and 6165731.1 ms lag over 3 miles... i think the little thumb drive method is way easier."

    Yes, USB sticks over a sneaker net can be more reliable. But for small, UDP packets over medium distance, a pigeon net can more convenient assuming, of course, you are aware that their is no guarantee your packets will arrive at its destination and in order sent.

  86. Re:Must be evil capitalist counterrevolutionaries by damburger · · Score: 1

    Pure Randroid gold. Basically, your fevered ranting tells me you consider anybody who favours universal 'socialised' healthcare to be an unthinking zombie, a member of the 'herd'. You are so deeply embedded in your ideology that you assume anyone who disagrees with your principles can't possibly have a mind of their own. They've all been brainwashed by Noam Chomsky and Hugo Chavez.

    You see everything in black and white. You vs. the 'herd'. Freedom-loving objectivists on one side and lazy, stupid 'statists' on the other side. I imagine in real life you make a point of avoiding those who might challenge your belief system.

    By the way, I'd love to hear your opinions on the fluoridation of water, you paranoid right-wing nutjob :)

    --
    If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
  87. based on that way of thinking by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    why aren't you excoriating moscow for selling arms to war torn africa?

    why aren't you lambasting beijing for endorsing myanmar?

    based on your understanding of how accountability and responsibility works, no one in this world is responsible for anything except washington dc

    don't you find that your lines of "logic" for finding blame and responsibility gee, i dunno, just a little creative and unreasonable?

    this way of thinking is entirely in line with your way of thinking: "saddam hussein talked on the phone to osama bin laden once. therefore the usa is entirely right to invade iraq in 2003 after 9/11"

    what i just wrote above is 100% pure horseshit

    but it is EXACTLY the kind of horseshit you are trying to sell me when you want to blame the usa for what pakistan and saudi arabia does

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:based on that way of thinking by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      why aren't you excoriating moscow for selling arms to war torn africa?

      why aren't you lambasting beijing for endorsing myanmar? Because this thread is neither about Africa nor Myanmar.
      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

  88. Says... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...you?

  89. Sneaker-Net by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    But using 2008 tech.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  90. i have a more complex understanding by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    this is the essence of accountability:

    you are responsible for what you decide to do

    for example: if i sell you a gun, i am not responsible for how you use that gun

    meanwhile, the "complex understanding of our modern, interconnected world" that you are defending is this: "all the bad things that happen in the world is fault of washington dc, somehow"

    yeah, i see your vast intellectual and moral complexities in that persepctive

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:i have a more complex understanding by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      for example: if i sell you a gun, i am not responsible for how you use that gun
      If you go round knowingly selling guns to street gangs who it is reasonable to suspect are using them for criminal purposes imo you deserve a share of the blame for what is done with those guns.

      Similarlly if you go arround selling big military weapons to dictatorships who it is reasonable to suspect will use them for agressive purposes then imo you deserve a share of the blame for what is done with them.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  91. Re:But.. but.. I thought Cuba is a utopian society by InvisblePinkUnicorn · · Score: 1

    "Is it that inconceivable that a country can have excellent healthcare but at the same time severely limit its people's political freedoms?"

    It depends on what you mean by "excellent healthcare" and how it is impacting the economy as a whole. Care to clarify?

  92. Don't bother you need reading work first by keineobachtubersie · · Score: 1

    "come up with something more recent than 1985"

    That's when IT WAS PASSED INTO LAW genius.

    It's still in effect.

    I might be interested in arguing once you get your foot out of your mouth...

  93. Re:Must be evil capitalist counterrevolutionaries by istartedi · · Score: 1

    You hit the nail right on the head there. We abused the CIA the way some doctors abuse anti-biotics. We killed off the weak leftists, leaving only the strong ones. Curiously enough though, we had Western Europe under our influence after WWII, and allowed socialism to develop within a framework of democracy there. This has resulted in a Western Europe that stands to our left and pokes us verbally, but doesn't stand too far to our left and threaten us militarily. It's a pity we can't treat our near neighbors the way we do the countries across the pond. Even if we started *right now*, there is a built-up lack of trust.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  94. here's some wacky ideas for you to mull over by circletimessquare · · Score: 3, Insightful

    russia tinkers in british affairs. china tinkers in american affairs. cuba tinkers in angolan affairs

    etc., etc., etc., ad nauseum

    most every country that exists and has ever existed and will ever exist has tinkered in the affairs of other countries

    and you want to do two things:

    1. conveniently forget all tinkering by any country except american tinkering
    2. leverage that american tinkering into direct accountability by the usa for whatever bullshit someone else does

    example: britian, france, russia, china, and the usa all had arms deals with iraq. but we'll forget all of that and just think about the usa. next, saddam hussein gassed kurds. so obviously, the usa is responsible for that

    this is your superior understanding of the world?

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:here's some wacky ideas for you to mull over by damburger · · Score: 1

      America 'tinkers' a hell of a lot more, especially in Latin America, so rightfully America gets blamed more. It is the cost of an empire, live with it.

      --
      If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
    2. Re:here's some wacky ideas for you to mull over by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      conveniently forget all tinkering by any country except american tinkering Prove it, or stop building your straw man.
      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    3. Re:here's some wacky ideas for you to mull over by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So the US sells biological and chemical weapons to Iraq and when Iraq uses them they should just be shocked? The US puts the weapons right in their hands and then somehow acts surprised and appalled when learning that they pulled the trigger? That's hypocrisy. Hypocrisy in a global level.

  95. Uhm... by OpenSourced · · Score: 1

    What's the bandwidth of a station wagon filled with memory sticks?

    Cuba might have the highest bandwidth in the _world_

    --
    Rome taught me patience and assiduous application to detail. Virtues which temper the boldness of great, general views.
  96. Re:Handing off thumb drives - The new Cuban Intern by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This could be useful when we discover we cannot trust the common carriers any more.
    When?

    When those "common carriers" are begging for retroactive immunity from handing our communications to bad actors like the Bush Administration, I'd say that "when" is "now".
    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  97. Re:But.. but.. I thought Cuba is a utopian society by Fredge · · Score: 1

    What criteria does Cuba count infant mortality by? Some countries do not count every life birth against their infant mortality standings. The U.S. does. Because of this the U.S. often appears to have worse infant mortality than other countries when that is not necessarily the case. Details here: http://www.ocregister.com/ocr/sections/commentary/orange_grove/article_443950.php

  98. i understand and accept all of that by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    then i want you to think about a few things:

    1. more people than the usa are involved in what happens in cuba
    2. some of those people are from other countries, but even more importantly, MOST OF THOSE DECIDING WHAT CUBA DOES ARE CUBAN

    so, in my strange weird exotic universe, when cuba does something bad, i blame cubans

    what a crackpot i am. what a neocon propangadist i am

    i'm clearly an imperialist neocolonial warmongerer for saying that: cubans are responsible for what cubans do. what a weird strange little man i am: blame cuba for what cubans do? what a crazy person! we all know that the usa did something bad in cuba 50 years ago, so the usa should get the blame for every single thing that cuba does bad now. obviously!

    now you'll excuse me, i'll be slapping my forehead

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  99. Overheard on the Cuban streets: by OMNIpotusCOM · · Score: 1

    Psst, hey, buddy. You seen this video yet? Some real femmy guy is crying on his webcam and says stuff like "Leave Britney alone!" No, no, this one is free. See me next week, I got this great vid of a 15 year old boy the Americans call "Paris" goin down on a guy.

    -------------

    I'm so happy we can share. *crying* ...and the rockets red glare

  100. oh i see by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    america tinkers a lot. nevermind any other tinkering by any other country. never mind how long ago the tinkering took place. nevermind tinkering by latin americans in their own damn countries

    so we can never ever find actual latin americans responsible for anything bad that happens in latin america. we must always creatively extend and embrace the idea that the usa is repsonsible for all the bad in the world, forever

    you know, the concept of accountability and responsibility: it only falls on the usa. it never falls on latin americans. latin americans can never be held accountable and repsonsible for what happens in their own damn countries, right?

    don't you find that patronizing and condescending to latin americans?

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  101. Re:Must be evil capitalist counterrevolutionaries by damburger · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wouldn't go so far as to say the US allowed social democrats to gain power in Western Europe - it is more a case that Western European democracies were older, stronger, and lest corrupt than the generally fledgling ones that the US crushed in Latin America. It would take a lot more to institute a coup d'etat in France than in Venezuela, and IMHO that is purely the reason the US has never tried it.

    That said, the US has tried to use a lot of soft power over the years to drag Europe to the right. The Murdoch media in Britain, for example, was instrumental in keeping the Labour party out of power in the 1980s and also played a major roll in convincing the British public it was necessary to invade Iraq. 45 minutes my fucking arse.

    --
    If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
  102. So the Cubans have discovered by kilodelta · · Score: 1

    Sneakernet. Remember the days when a floppy got passed from person to person, before reliable broadband came to the U.S.? I do.

    But the Cuban government is doomed. They have to know that they're in a very bad position because once a view outside Cuba gets in, their days in office become numbered.

  103. Re:But.. but.. I thought Cuba is a utopian society by fropenn · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why do individuals who disagree with Michael Moore's movies always resort to calling him "fat"? I don't see how his being overweight has any relevance for his views on guns, corporate crime, or health care.
    How about you address the issue he points out: that too many people in the U.S. have too little access to health care.

  104. Re:Must be evil capitalist counterrevolutionaries by powerlord · · Score: 1

    Because there are no capitalist counter-revolutionaries in Cuba of course.


    Well, yes and no.

    There WEREN'T any Capitalist Counter-Revolutionaries in Cuba, (for all the reasons that you mentioned), but it seems like they are creating their own (the people running the black market are certainly Capitalist, and some would argue that those using their services are counter-revolutionaries).

    The more interesting thing to me is the perceived path for Information Freedom. That its coming from the Universities (similar to how Email and the WWW found their way to people's homes).

    From TFA:

    Pedro, a midlevel official with a government agency, said he often surfed Web sites like the BBC and The Miami Herald at work, searching for another view of the news besides the ones presented in the state-controlled media. He predicted that the 10,000 students studying the Internet and programming at the University of Information Sciences would transform the country over time, opening up more and more avenues of information.

    "We are training an army of information specialists," he said.


    The world is out there, and it looks like the next generation is not only aware of it, but actively [thinking about/seeking/working] to become a part of it.
    --
    This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
  105. that's very nice sounding by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    here's an alternative view: the notion of the usa being responsible for everything that happens in the western hemisphere is something that died last century. in today's world, latin americans are responsible what happens in their own countries. but rather than waking up and realizing the world is changing, some people's minds are locked in the past, and therefore their way of thinking actually stands in the way of progress

    say the usa deserves blame for something bad that happens in latin america. ok, fine. now: at what point in time do you say "ok, blame is up, now latin americans are responsible". and what if you had a bunch of minds who never get to that point. who stay stuck on blaming the usa, with no sell by date or expiration date on that mode of thinking? then aren't such people part of the problem rather than the solution?

    in other words: yes, learn from history. but don't stay trapped it in. history should inform progress. not stand in the way of progress

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  106. Re:But.. but.. I thought Cuba is a utopian society by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1
    The government will imprison/execute anyone trying to establish legitimate statistics regarding the health care system in Cuba.

    My anecdotal experience while travelling in Cuba was that, overall, the local Cubans 'looked' healthier than the Mexican, Belizean etc. counterparts.

  107. Re:But.. but.. I thought Cuba is a utopian society by hyfe · · Score: 1
    The difference between 'Same shit, different wrapping' and 'Same shit, same wrapping' is neglible.

    I'm not trolling though, it's a serious argument:
    The important difference between the US and Cuba is the independent judiciary. Look at Hong Kong, Singapore and various other well-function south-asian countries and the numerous failed democrasies in the world and you'll find one important trend. Parlamentarism, checks'n'balances and sharing of power leads to succesfull societies.

    Being able to pick the president doesn't.

    --
    "" How about taking the safety labels off everything, and let the stupidity-problem solve itself? """
  108. Re:Must be evil capitalist counterrevolutionaries by damburger · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't associate freedom of information with capitalism. Plenty of capitalist countries have censored and imprisoned dissenters more than Cuba has. I consider it unlikely that people passing around memory sticks in universities are saying they want the right to start a business and not have it taxed and regulated much. They are probably more concerned with being able to protest and communicate with the outside world freely.

    --
    If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
  109. Re:Handing off thumb drives - The new Cuban Intern by yo_tuco · · Score: 1

    "5oz of microfilm? That seems far lighter than a coconut."

    African or European coconut?

  110. Re:But.. but.. I thought Cuba is a utopian society by BLAG-blast · · Score: 1

    Ok, so let me get this right, you cannot provide any references because you information is based on hearsay. That fine, it's just nice if you say so, it in no way invalidates what you are saying - although getting defensive/abusive would definitely draw your validity into question.

    I've also encountered doctors who have worked in Cuba, they do not share your views on infant deaths.

    I don't believe or disbelieve anything. Do you know what is the 3rd leading cause of death in US is?

    http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Third+Leading+Cause+of+Death+in+the+U.S.

    Do you think every doctor who kills somebody by accident reports it as death they caused?

    Yeah, total insanity.

    --
    M0571y H@rml355.
  111. 2 things by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    1. you don't attack the intent, you attack the poor policies. which is 100% correct of you. which also means you are not someone i am attacking, nor are you effectively understanding what i am really attacking. what my enemy is: those who actually believe the usa just does evil things. that's not what you are saying, so i have no argument with you on that point

    2. the bad usa policy towards cuba does not make cuba. cuba makes the bad usa policy. castro did not turn his country into an authoritarian dictatorship because the usa doesn't want to trade with it, the usa doesn't want to trade with it because cuba is an authoritarian dictatorship

    for the life of me, i can't fathom in a million years how otherwise intelligent people like yourself can get this cause and effect reversed!

    now you are correct that authoritarian governments use aggression towards them as the rationale to tighten their authoritarian controls. but that doesn't matter: if the usa was extremely hostile towards the cuba, cuba is still 100% responsible for their authoritarian policies. if the usa relaxed its hostility, cuba would probably relax their authoritarianism as well. i completelty and utterly understand this connection

    but that still doesn't mean the usa is RESPONSIBLE for what cuba does, merely that it has influence on cuba like every country in the world has influence on each other. if russia masses troops towards its border with china, and china in response jails all of its dissidents, russia's actions might have influenced china's actions, but russia is in no way responsible for china jailing its dissidents. china is, 100%!

    my problem is with the kind of thinking, utterly beyond my grasp, of saying because the usa is hostile towards castro, or iran, and iran or cuba tightens their grip, THAT THEREFORE THE USA IS REPONSIBLE FOR WHAT THOSE GOVERNMENTS DO

    this is the bill of goods you are trying to sell me. and i absolutely reject it, as completely out of touch with an intellectually honest definition of how accountability and responsibilty works in this world

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:2 things by rtechie · · Score: 1

      the bad usa policy towards cuba does not make cuba. cuba makes the bad usa policy. castro did not turn his country into an authoritarian dictatorship because the usa doesn't want to trade with it, the usa doesn't want to trade with it because cuba is an authoritarian dictatorship I've been reading this thread and you simply refuse to acknowledge history: Castro replaced Batista, a US-backed authoritarian dictator. There is not one iota of doubt that Batista was an authoritarian dictator and the US specifically put him in power. The difference between Castro and Batista is that Castro threw out American business and organized crime because he had the evil idea that the land of Cuba actually belonged to Cubans.

      because the usa is hostile towards castro, or iran, and iran or cuba tightens their grip, THAT THEREFORE THE USA IS REPONSIBLE FOR WHAT THOSE GOVERNMENTS DO You've reasoned in earlier posts that merely funding, training, and arming someone does not amount to "responsibility" for them. I believe this view is simply wrong.

      For example, based on your reasoning the Vietnam War was pure mindless aggression by the US because the Vietnamese were acting independently to spread popular political ideas in Vietnam.

      I, on the other hand, believe that the Soviet Union bears some responsibility for the Vietnam War because they supported North Vietnam and the Vietcong.

    2. Re:2 things by j1m+5n0w · · Score: 2, Insightful

      what my enemy is: those who actually believe the usa just does evil things. that's not what you are saying, so i have no argument with you on that point

      I'm not defending the United States when I say they have good intentions. There have been many atrocities committed with good intentions. I think our foreign policy towards Cuba is guided by, perhaps, one part good intentions (we want them to be a democracy, as long as they make all the "right" decisions), two parts pride (we'd like to forget the whole humiliating bay of pigs thing), two parts revenge (for nationalizing the property of US corporations), and three parts stubbornness (if we stop our embargo, it's an admission that we were wrong all along).

      the bad usa policy towards cuba does not make cuba. cuba makes the bad usa policy. castro did not turn his country into an authoritarian dictatorship because the usa doesn't want to trade with it, the usa doesn't want to trade with it because cuba is an authoritarian dictatorship

      for the life of me, i can't fathom in a million years how otherwise intelligent people like yourself can get this cause and effect reversed!

      Cuba, of course, is at least as responsible for their own government as the United States is for perpetuating things. But, we in the United States can't change Cuba directly (nor can we change the past), we can only change our own foreign policy towards Cuba. As for the causality, my understanding of Cuban history isn't very good, so I'll defer to the other reply to your post, which is written by someone with (perhaps) more understanding than I.

      my problem is with the kind of thinking, utterly beyond my grasp, of saying because the usa is hostile towards castro, or iran, and iran or cuba tightens their grip, THAT THEREFORE THE USA IS REPONSIBLE FOR WHAT THOSE GOVERNMENTS DO
      I don't think it's a coincidence that many of the countries we don't currently get along with (and generally label "evil", perhaps not incorrectly), are countries that we've interfered with in self-serving ways in the past. (It's funny you mention Iran...) I think we ought to accept our share of the blame for that. Not more than our share, but not less either.
  112. Re:Handing off thumb drives - The new Cuban Intern by Bender+Unit+22 · · Score: 1

    It does, but it is a one time deal.

  113. Re:But.. but.. I thought Cuba is a utopian society by epilido · · Score: 1

    In the U.S. there is a great deal of money spent keeping preterm babies alive. Some even as small as 500g. "The primary reason Cuba has a lower infant mortality rate than the United States is that the United States is a world leader in an odd category -- the percentage of infants who die on their birthday. In any given year in the United States anywhere from 30-40 percent of infants die before they are even a day old." http://www.overpopulation.com/articles/2002/cuba-vs-the-united-states-on-infant-mortality/ Just one data point sometimes doesnt make a point at all.......Cuba's health care may look better from this point but it doesn't tell the whole story......

  114. Re:But.. but.. I thought Cuba is a utopian society by BLAG-blast · · Score: 1

    that were NOT reported

    Then how could anybody know that they are eating babies if it's not reported? ESP?

    --
    M0571y H@rml355.
  115. Re:Must be evil capitalist counterrevolutionaries by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

    "your fevered ranting tells me you consider anybody who favours universal 'socialised' healthcare to be an unthinking zombie,"

    No, more like a tyrant who wants to take something belonging to someone else, by force or coercion if necessary. This is nothing short theft or robbery. What makes you think that it is okay to take what is not yours to take? Because you're giving it to someone else?

    I'm personally against forcing anyone into any system which requires forced regular payments. Just because YOU think its okay to take my money doesn't mean it is. This idea of universal health care is nothing more than tyranny of the greatest threat. I can make my own damn health care decisions, I don't need you or anyone else's opinion.

    I also don't want to pay for someone elses poor decisions either. You want to eat McDonalds Burgers and Fries twice a day, I don't want to have to pay ANY portion of your Coronary By-Pass. You want to jump off buildings with parachutes and you end up breaking twenty bones doing so, I don't want to pay for a nickel of your million dollar hospital bill.

    And I certainly don't want to pay for the illegal alien's Cancer Treatment, just because s/he ended up on the door step of some hospital.

    "By the way, I'd love to hear your opinions on the fluoridation of water, you paranoid right-wing nutjob :)"

    From Wikipedia ... Studies have also indicated exposure to fluoride can lower IQ ... http://www.fluoride-journal.com/00-33-2/332-74.pdf

    Also

    The EPA scientists recently concluded, after reviewing all the evidence, that the public water supply should not be used "as a vehicle for disseminating this toxic and prophylactically useless ... substance." They called for "an immediate halt to the use of the nation's drinking water reservoirs as disposal sites for the toxic waste of the phosphate fertilizer industry." The management of the EPA sides not with their own scientists, but with industry on this issue. (See 1-6: "Why EPA's Headquarters Union of Scientists Opposes Fluoridation", Chapter 280 Vice-President, J. William Hirzy, May 1, 1999).

    Which side of the argument you fall on? I suspect that will make sense of a bunch of things. ;)

    See http://www.fluoridedebate.com/ for more of the debate, including plenty of study materials. I don't blindly accept fluoridation of our water supply is a good thing, do you? Perhaps the good out weighs the bad, perhaps not. I suppose not blindly accepting what the government tells me is cause for me being a nut job.

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  116. We do this by Faux_Pseudo · · Score: 1

    My friends and I do this in the USA. We call them library cards. Sure we all have internet access and could email stuff but that would take all the fun out of it. Beer recipes, pod casts, project info etc. It all fits on the cards and in your pocket. Instead of an email that might not get read it is a tangible item that is looked forward to.

    My father is a truck driver with spoty internet. We exchange sd cards via the mail. Load them up and ship them off. Works great and gives you something to expect other than another bill in the mail.

  117. Re:But.. but.. I thought Cuba is a utopian society by arpad1 · · Score: 1

    And we know about these low infant mortality rates and life expectancy figures because the Cuban government collects the data and offers it up, right? Well hey, that's the gold standard, right?

    --
    Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
  118. Re:But.. but.. I thought Cuba is a utopian society by 0111+1110 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They have first rate low tech preventative and pre/post natal health care.

    Well, I agree with the 'low tech' part. As for the rest, getting the nurses there to stop reusing hypodermic needles would be a good start. I was waiting at a clinic in Havana with my (Cuban) ex-girlfriend for a blood test and was amazed at the Cubans waiting their turn to get an injection from the same needle. At least they washed it in a tray of water between shots. Yeah, Cuba is the high tech health care capital of the world. I demanded that they do *not* use a shared needle for my girlfriend and they were willing to comply for the rich foreigner. It just costs a bit extra and most Cubans don't have the extra money to pay for the new needle. Also, I hope you aren't expecting a large selection of drugs or say, bandaids (only available at the biggest hospitals in Havana) or antibiotic ointment (haha, that's a good one). Also, outside of Havana there are rolling blackouts on a regular basis. Just hope you aren't getting some medical procedure when that happens. They do have basic antibiotics at least, but not much else. Vitamins are often prescribed by doctors there for all kinds of ailments. And even the largest hospitals seem to lack those machines that go "bing".

    --
    Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
  119. Re:Handing off thumb drives - The new Cuban Intern by gnick · · Score: 1

    Lame. It doesn't even support rocket jumping! Maybe not the way you play, rookie.
    --
    He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
  120. Re:But.. but.. I thought Cuba is a utopian society by faloi · · Score: 1

    This is a pretty interesting take on it. I haven't done a lot of checking to see if the numbers in the article are accurate, but it does make logical sense. The long and the short of it is that children in the US are more likely to receive medical care when they're in dire circumstances compared to some other countries. Since those children have a very low long term survival rate, it skews our numbers because doctors try and fail. In other countries, they wouldn't bother trying and the children wouldn't live long enough to be counted toward infant mortality.

    --
    "It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education." -Albert Einstein
  121. Re:But.. but.. I thought Cuba is a utopian society by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's exactly the point moron, no one can verify the numbers in Cuba, but you can everywhere else. And even though they can't be verified, they get accepted by mental midgets like you.

    Holy shit you're a fucking idiot.

  122. Re:Handing off thumb drives - The new Cuban Intern by The+End+Of+Days · · Score: 1

    Then I have a stupid and possibly obvious question for you: what are you doing on Slashdot?

  123. Re:But.. but.. I thought Cuba is a utopian society by OeLeWaPpErKe · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Look ... we understand that you can only have a democratic "lunatic left" ideology if you believe cuba is perfect. Cubans risk their lives to get out of the country ... lots and lots of them do.

    What more do you really need to know ?

  124. Re:But.. but.. I thought Cuba is a utopian society by 0111+1110 · · Score: 1

    Is it that inconceivable that a country can have excellent healthcare but at the same time severely limit its people's political freedoms? Not in the least bit inconceivable. It just happens to not be the truth in this case. Go travel to Cuba and visit some clinics there and the major hospitals (I have been to all of them). Then you will see how 'advanced' their health care is. And very quickly. The Cubans I have met there laugh at this idea that foreigners have of Cuba as being some kind of model for health care. It may not be any worse than lots of other 3rd world countries (although I can vouch for Mexico, Colombia, and Thailand as being approximately 1 zillion times better), but it sure as hell isn't any better. I think you would really have to go to Africa to compete with Cuba's level of health care. I have been to a lot of 3rd world countries and can't think of any that are worse than Cuba. Maybe Laos has about the same level overall, although prescription drugs seem to be more widely available than in Cuba. Sometimes it is the Cuban doctor's outdated ideas and lack of knowledge about newer theories and techniques that scare me the most. I have met doctors there who seem to believe that a cold can be caused by too many rainy days or getting wet, for instance. And they are simply ignorant of things that are easy for me to find out about with one medline search. Almost no one has an internet connection there. Not even doctors. For reference all they have are old medical textbooks, if they are lucky. Cuba is just too cut off from the rest of the world.
    --
    Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
  125. Re:Handing off thumb drives - The new Cuban Intern by houghi · · Score: 1

    they can at most carry .5 ounces of microfilm which then requires a microfilm reader
    MicroSD can get up to 8GB and there are small enough. Also there are pretty small: http://www.ixbt.com/short/images/Trifecta_microsd_sd_usb.jpg

    Much smaller then a thumbdrive yet you will be able to use the pigeon. Best of both worlds.
    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  126. Re:But.. but.. I thought Cuba is a utopian society by BLAG-blast · · Score: 1

    no one can verify the numbers

    Ah, now you get to my point. Since nobody knows either way, all claims are made up.

    --
    M0571y H@rml355.
  127. Re:Handing off thumb drives - The new Cuban Intern by Amouth · · Score: 2, Funny

    basicly what you are saying is build a token ring network where some poor guy walks around carring the token.. might want to watch out.. i wouldn't be supprised if IBM has a patent for that

    --
    '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
  128. Re:But.. but.. I thought Cuba is a utopian society by DavidTC · · Score: 1

    Exactly. Cuba is just the last punchline, and not actually that important considering their medical technology somewhat sucks. Free 1960 medical care is not exactly something to get worked up over. The actual countries to pay attention to in Sicko are England, France, and Canada.

    Just the other day I was talking to an English friend online who'd taken issue to some American saying that new mothers should stay in the hospital for longer periods of time. We talked past each other for a bit until I realized she was saying that hospitals make new mothers stay too long, which in her book was 'two weeks', and that they should let them go after a day or three and just send people out to check on new mothers and babies, whereas in my experience hospitals were throwing mothers out four hours after giving birth because that was all insurance allowed.

    It was truly a surreal moment for me. Hospitals...having people stay too long? Nurses...making house calls?

    And then it really hit me this was all for free and I almost punched a hole in the wall.

    And while some of Moore's other documentaries play loose with some of the facts, Sicko doesn't. The only outright lie in it is that prisoners at Gitmo get nice medical care, when in fact they don't, but that's a government lie (Remember when they swore up and down they weren't hurting people there?), not Moore's.

    --
    If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  129. Re:But.. but.. I thought Cuba is a utopian society by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And another set of mental midgets like you accepted a whole bunch of other "facts" which can't be verified either.

  130. Re:Must be evil capitalist counterrevolutionaries by Just+Another+Poster · · Score: 0, Troll

    But they are still an improvement over the dictator they replaced.

    Communist dictators generally murder between 10 and 1000 times as many people as non-communist dictators. Castro is no exception to the rule.

  131. Re:But.. but.. I thought Cuba is a utopian society by 0111+1110 · · Score: 1

    Mind you, with decent free health care, they have something fundamentally good that Americans don't, and the way things are going, never will have. I am getting tired of battling all of this misinformation about Cuba every time there is a story about it here. Look, just go there and see for yourself. I guarantee that you will find it very enlightening. I lived there for more than a year. I have experienced this supposedly miraculous health care phenomenon for myself. I have to admit that, before I arrived there, I too assumed that what I had heard about Cuban health care was true. That it would be at least marginally better than other third world countries. How many times do I have to break this to all of you? IT IS NOT TRUE. IT IS A MYTH. There. Was that loud enough? Apparently it is something that people really want to believe. Well, I can't stop you. Believe what you want. But if you ever need the services of a doctor or hospital on that island you will realize how wrong you are. I'm not sure if you are an American yourself, but we *do* have free health care in this country. You just have to have a low enough income to qualify for it. My friend does and he gets all of his care for free. To compare the level of health care in the US or really any first world country to Cuba is worse than laughable. It is so far beyond ludicrous that it leaves me speechless. Have you ever traveled to a country with very primitive health care and needed the care of a doctor? Well, unless you have been to Central Africa, it is very likely that Cuban health care is far more primitive than what you experienced there.
    --
    Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
  132. Re:But.. but.. I thought Cuba is a utopian society by keineobachtubersie · · Score: 1

    "And then it really hit me this was all for free and I almost punched a hole in the wall."

    And THEN it was explained to you that it wasn't in any way free, and that they had paid for it.

    You people always fail on that one, like you did there, and that kind of disregard for reality says much about your ability to accurately assess subject.

  133. Re:But.. but.. I thought Cuba is a utopian society by Omestes · · Score: 2, Insightful


    And all they've given up is their inalienable rights as human beings. Yay!


    Er... where do I find these "inalienable rights" for all human beings? Last I checked, the common interpretation was that these only apply to US citizens, if we had to extend them to everyone else our current international (and increasingly domestic) policies would dissolve.

    To all of our leaders, since FDR (perhaps before), the only "inalienable right" that the US has stood for is opening your markets to our corporations, and do what we say. Or at least this is the right that we've fought every modern war over.

    That said, Cuba has some problems, and should have free elections. I do think, sans the embargo, that they are better off than under the US shill Batista, though. If the people freely decided to be communist, then fine, no business of ours. Appearently communism isn't enough, since we are now trading with Vietnam and China, leaving only two "verboten" states, Cuba and North Korea. Cuba doesn't compare to N. Korea in any way besides economic systems.

    --
    A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
  134. Kick Raul out! by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 1

    I got a better idea than passing stuff around on memory sticks. Now that Fidel ain't in charge no more, the people of Cuba need to kick Raul's butt out of power, get rid of this Communism rubbish, install a democratic government, and watch how everyone's wages soar, the quality of life goes from fourth-world to first-class, and this nonsense about the state controlling everyone through fear becomes a thing of the past.

  135. Re:Handing off thumb drives - The new Cuban Intern by suckmysav · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually, it is more like a high tech version of the old Russian Samizdat during the Soviet era.

    --
    "You can't fight in here, this is the war room!"
  136. Re:Must be evil capitalist counterrevolutionaries by DavidTC · · Score: 1

    It would take a lot more to institute a coup d'etat in France than in Venezuela, and IMHO that is purely the reason the US has never tried it.

    One word: Gladio

    It was a secret network operated by the CIA in, basically, all of Europe. Its many parts:

    Lochoi Oreinn Katadromn - Helped overthrow Greece government in 1967 in miltary coup
    Aginter Press - assassinated many leftist Portugal politicans
    Counter-Guerrilla - Killed about 5000 Turks via domestic terror.
    Gladio - Blew up, shot, and killed half of Italy. Way too much to list. Also linked to the very odd 'Propaganda Due' conspiracy.

    --
    If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  137. The secret are in the sticks by BobSixtyFour · · Score: 1

    I wonder if some of those "suppliers" of thumb drives would have happened to "accidentally" pick up a few sticks at US army bases...

    Last I checked, those sticks were hot items in Iraq... I'd hate to think about whats on them.

  138. Re:your sig by Mad+Merlin · · Score: 1

    std::disclaimer<std::legalese> sig=new std::disclaimer; sig->dump(); delete sig;

    C++ isn't Java, try this instead:

    std::disclaimer<std::legalese> sig; sig.dump();

  139. Learn to read mod by keineobachtubersie · · Score: 1

    Read the post again, you're obviously not smart enough to understand what I wrote.

    1. Re:Learn to read mod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read the post again, you're obviously not smart enough to understand what I wrote. So now you are trolling the moderators!! You dumsonfabitch!
    2. Re:Learn to read mod by keineobachtubersie · · Score: 1

      "You dumsonfabitch!"

      Why post AC if you're going to sign your post?

  140. Re:KDAWSON! Did you make it through second grade? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damn dude, if you're going to grammar Nazi troll, at least do it right. The first comma is correct - it's a separate idea (if you were speaking, you would PAUSE there).

  141. No actually you're wrong again by keineobachtubersie · · Score: 1

    Sorry, perhaps you need a lesson, you're wrong when you say

    "It was a secret network operated by the CIA"

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Gladio

    "Gladio (Italian, from Latin gladius, meaning sword) is a code name denoting the clandestine NATO "stay-behind" operation in Italy after World War II"

    1. Re:No actually you're wrong again by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 1
      From the same article

      The role of the CIA in sponsoring Gladio and the extent of its activities during the Cold War era, and its relationship to attacks perpetrated in Italy during the years of lead and other similar clandestine operations is the subject of ongoing debate and investigation. Italy, Switzerland and Belgium have had parliamentary inquiries into the matter. [emphasis mine]

      If you're sponsoring something, you're pretty much running it ; he who has the gold, makes the rules.
    2. Re:No actually you're wrong again by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      Try actually reading what you link to.

      'This military structure provided for significant US leverage over the secret stay-behind networks in Western Europe as the SACEUR, throughout NATO's history, has traditionally been a US General who reports to the Pentagon in Washington and is based in NATO's Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe (SHAPE) in Mons, Belgium. The ACC's duties included elaborating on the directives of the network, developing its clandestine capability, and organizing bases in Britain and the United States.'

      Yeah, it was nominally a NATO network. A NATO network that almost none of the other people in NATO appeared to know about. (Except France and England.) One operated by a 'Allied Clandestine Committee' that does not actually exist in NATO's structure. One reporting to the SACEUR, which is a four-star Pentagon general.

      This is because, and if you've been asleep 50 years you might not know this, NATO is operated almost entirely by the US. Decisions are made by the member countries, but the actual operation and funding is entirely controlled by the US, so it was rather trivial for the US to stick a secret organization inside it, one that, in essence, 'stole' existing secret intelligence services after the war (During which they had been working with NATO) from their own countries' leadership.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  142. Re:Must be evil capitalist counterrevolutionaries by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

    This idea of universal health care is nothing more than tyranny of the greatest threat. As demonstrated by the hellish nation of Canada.
    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  143. Re:Must be evil capitalist counterrevolutionaries by rtechie · · Score: 1

    Communist dictators generally murder between 10 and 1000 times as many people as non-communist dictators. Castro is no exception to the rule. Any evidence of this? Can you prove that in any given 23 year period (the period of time Batista ruled Cuba) Castro killed more people? Can you prove that during his entire reign Castro killed more people than Batista?

    Your rule simply isn't true. Hitler and Pol Pot killed an awful lot of people and they weren't communist. The bloodiest conflict in the world, Congo, has nothing to do with communism.

  144. Why? by DingerX · · Score: 1

    The official reason for the embargo is the seizure of US assets 50 years ago. If we send 'em 'American Media', I'm betting we'll see the RIAA making ex parte filings against the John Does on every refugee boat that makes shore, alleging that flirtatious speech while packing a USB key in the pants constitutes 'making available' which itself is equivalent to mass duplication. You thought the revolution was bad for busiess - you won't believe the kind of damages these guys willl assert.

  145. Re:Must be evil capitalist counterrevolutionaries by rtechie · · Score: 1

    I'm personally against forcing anyone into any system which requires forced regular payments. Apparently you have a problem with government in general. I suggest you buy a boat and try to stay in international waters. It "worked" for L. Ron Hubbard.

    I don't blindly accept fluoridation of our water supply is a good thing, do you? So how *IS* the John Birch Society doing? And do you have a RaHoWa or a Fourteen Words tattoo? I'm really curious.

  146. Re:Handing off thumb drives - The new Cuban Intern by jcuervo · · Score: 1

    UUCP.

    --
    Assume I was drunk when I posted this.
  147. yes you are a crackpot by DerangedAlchemist · · Score: 1

    i'm clearly an imperialist neocolonial warmongerer for saying that: cubans are responsible for what cubans do.

    You are a crackpot for saying Cubans are responsible for Americans aiding the overthrow of their democracy and supporting a dictator. And then claiming Americans do not effect Cuban politics. While maintaining trade sanctions and a gigantic army.

    1. Re:yes you are a crackpot by Just+Another+Poster · · Score: 1

      You are a crackpot for saying Cubans are responsible for Americans aiding the overthrow of their democracy and supporting a dictator.

      And your evidence that Americans "aided" the overthrow of a democratically elected Cuban government is...?

  148. Gives me an idea... by Matt+Apple · · Score: 1

    When I upgraded my cell phone recently the clerk gave me the option of donating my old phone to a charity that passes the phones along to battered women so they can dial 911 in an emergency. Seems like something similar could be done with memory sticks. I have a couple of memory sticks I don't use anymore because I've gotten a new one with more capacity. I imagine that a lot of people have older, smaller capacity memory sticks sitting in a drawer somewhere. Wouldn't it be great if there was a trusted third party that we could give our old memory sticks to which could then smuggle them into countries living under repressive regimes? Thus encouraging a robust sneakernet that is below the state's radar.

  149. We need to bomb them with memory! by Tsu+Dho+Nimh · · Score: 1

    Imagine sending hundreds of helium-filled balloons, with a payload of memory sticks full of games, pron, and Linux source code!

  150. Re:Handing off thumb drives - The new Cuban Intern by rtechie · · Score: 1

    I've done networking over tin cans and string, but sneakernet sounds like a new low.

  151. But Michael by slapout · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Moore said Cuba was paradise.

    --
    Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
    1. Re:But Michael by adminstring · · Score: 1

      Do you have a hyperlink for that?

      Or did you mean to say that some right-wing commentator erroneously stated that Michael Moore said that Cuba was paradise?

      --
      My truck is like a series of tubes.
  152. Re:Handing off thumb drives - The new Cuban Intern by klapaucjusz · · Score: 1

    formalize a community sneakernet.

    You're late. RFC 4838 does just that.

  153. We need to do this in the USA!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank you Bush.

  154. well let us go with your assertions by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    for the sake of rhetoric

    let us take your assertion at face value: batista was 100% the puppet of the usa

    ok

    based on that, when castro overthrew him, castro reasserted cuban independence, and has in fact been acting in opposition to the usa the best he could ever since

    therefore, according to the implications of your own assertion, whatever the hell cuba does today, is cuba's responsibility and cuba responsibility's alone

    right?

    or is it that because the usa gave support to some dictator 50 years ago, that was overthrown, therefore the usa still bears responsibility for what cuba does?!

    (smacks forehead)

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:well let us go with your assertions by rtechie · · Score: 1

      let us take your assertion at face value: batista was 100% the puppet of the usa I'll concede this premise.

      based on that, when castro overthrew him, castro reasserted cuban independence, and has in fact been acting in opposition to the usa the best he could ever since Here's the flawed premise: Explain how "[Castro] has in fact been acting in opposition to the usa the best he could". What did Castro do to justify the Bay of Pigs invasion? Has there been in any time in the last 50 years that the US was NOT trying to assassinate or overthrow Castro?

      I'm sure you're going to argue that Castro accepted Soviet support and that's "in opposition to the usa", but he had no choice. It was that or death, the US was trying to kill him and destroy his government and he didn't have the resources to fight alone.

      And if the goal is to stop Cuba from acting "in opposition to the usa", why not try to reconcile?

      therefore, according to the implications of your own assertion, whatever the hell cuba does today, is cuba's responsibility and cuba responsibility's alone What does the embargo have to do with "what cuba does today"? How does the embargo help the Cuban people?

      The embargo has absolutely nothing to do with human rights, that's a red herring. If you wish to argue this point there is no reason to engage in further discussion. The US does not embargo dictatorships with FAR worse human rights records.

  155. Re:Handing off thumb drives - The new Cuban Intern by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

    I was going to say, I just saw a 2GB microSD card for $30. A bird could easily carry that, it's smaller than folded paper they usually carry. They couldn't cover to Cuba, but for dozens of miles they would probably work well.

    I find the suggestion a great example of hi-fi, lo-tech. You could even read one of these on an OLPC network spaced 1km apart.

  156. Re:Handing off thumb drives - The new Cuban Intern by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

    for a history of pigeon post look here:
    http://www.mediahistory.umn.edu/archive/PigeonPost.html

    it's got more history than I thought!

  157. awesome by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    he's not 100% pure absolute hitler evil so he's acceptable

    pffffffffft

    castro and castro bro are not batista. but they still suck, no matter how they compare to batista, so we criticize them on that basis. not on the basis of "well, there's worse"

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:awesome by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      castro and castro bro are not batista. but they still suck, no matter how they compare to batista, so we criticize them on that basis. No. You don't. That's my point. Batista was a dictator who overthrew an elected government: He got US support. Castro overthrew him, he gets the US trying to assassinate him and claiming that what they want is democracy in Cuba, when clearly democracy was not an issue with the last, worse dictator.

      Flagrant hypocrisy. Unacceptable.
      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

  158. Are you American?! by trawg · · Score: 1

    I'm just assuming so because your first thought is to use this information to try and figure out a way to overthrown a foreign government :)

  159. Re:Must be evil capitalist counterrevolutionaries by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

    And evidenced by people coming from Canada to the US to get the best Health Care Money can buy, but isn't available there. All the socialized health care in the world has this backup plan, called the US of A.

    Part of the problem is most of the newer and innovative treatments are created, right here in the US of A, and all of that R&D comes with a price, the skyrocketing insurance premiums people like me pay (yes, I pay for my insurance). But we pay them with the expectation that when the need arises, we'll get the latest and greatest treatment, often without much cost to ourselves.

    Yeah, it sucks for those that can't afford the most expensive treatments, but on the other hand, I don't see people getting turned away at the emergency rooms because they can't pay either. Not that I'd ever want to go into a normal ER, because it is clogged with people who don't go to regular doctors for the sniffles.

    But I don't want second class medical care because you think I don't deserve it, because it isn't fair to those that can't afford it. That is the whole point of Socialized Medical Care, isn't it? You don't think I deserve the best, right? You want to take from me, what isn't yours to take, and give it to someone else because of some weird sense of "fairness".

    Life isn't fair, get over it. I have to spend extra money on clothes and food because I'm 6'5" and can't buy off the rack and require more nutrition. I don't see anyone crying for "universal food care" because someone is starving. Or Universal Housing because someone is homeless.

    No thanks, I don't want Univerally bad Health Care.

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  160. Re:Handing off thumb drives - The new Cuban Intern by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a 16GB *well, more like 15GB* stick myself, and can fit quite a few hours of porn... *eh-hem* I mean movies... on it.

  161. Re:But.. but.. I thought Cuba is a utopian society by rohan972 · · Score: 1

    Funny how the reality of the situation escapes people like you in your rush to spew snide remarks all over the place.

    Yes, the open complaining about oppression, without repercussion, is one of the reasons my wife and I want to emigrate to the US.

  162. Re:But.. but.. I thought Cuba is a utopian society by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Posting anonymously for obvious reasons (don't want my dictator torturing and killing me.) I have the actual number on baby deaths. There are none. We have amazing technology that has actually completely eliminated death. The only deaths we have are murders.

  163. Re:Must be evil capitalist counterrevolutionaries by Just+Another+Poster · · Score: 1

    Any evidence of this? Can you prove that in any given 23 year period (the period of time Batista ruled Cuba) Castro killed more people? Can you prove that during his entire reign Castro killed more people than Batista?

    This gives democide estimates for both Batista and Castro. Between 1952 and 1959, about 1,000 people are thought to have been outright murdered by the Batista regime. Between 1959 and 1987, between 35,000 and 73,000 people are thought to have been victims of democide by Castro's regime.

    Your rule simply isn't true. Hitler and Pol Pot killed an awful lot of people and they weren't communist.

    Hitler wasn't communist, but rather an adherent of fascism, a form of guild socialism. Pol Pot was a communist, who imposed the purest implementation of Marxism ever seen, and was the most murderous as a result, in terms of percentage of population killed.

    The bloodiest conflict in the world, Congo, has nothing to do with communism.

    Conflict in wartime, where both sides are armed, is different from democide, where the victims have been disarmed.

  164. Re:But.. but.. I thought Cuba is a utopian society by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

    This documentary is far better, if you want to learn about Cuban medical/humanitarian aid.

    - RG>

    --
    Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
  165. For the uninitiated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  166. Re:But.. but.. I thought Cuba is a utopian society by rohan972 · · Score: 1

    ...with decent free health care

    The is no such thing as free health care. Someone has to pay. This is not a comment on whether government health systems are desirable or not.

    So long as large amounts of people don't take reasonable measures to protect their own health (good diet, exercise, etc) no health care system will be adequate to cope, public or private. Too many resources are taken up by preventable illness. The cost is unsustainable.

  167. Re:Must be evil capitalist counterrevolutionaries by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

    And evidenced by people coming from Canada to the US to get the best Health Care Money can buy, but isn't available there. All the socialized health care in the world has this backup plan, called the US of A. And the people of the US going to Canada to get the medication they need, or going to Mexico or India for surgery they just can't afford at home.
    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  168. from a Cuban ... by teratux · · Score: 1

    Up to the year 2005 Cuba's bandwith and internet connections were supplied by a US fiber cable. In 2006 they cut that connection leading to the more expensive ( about 3 times more ) and slower satellite link for our country. Google up a map of the Caribbean with the layouts of all neighboring fiber cable connections, and see if Cuba is crossed by any one of those. Did you know about the embargo the US government has on the Cuban people ??( they think the pressure relies on the Cuban government, but it's our people who are suffering those consecuences ). Did you know about the Helms Burton Law?? or the Torricelli Law?? or how they prohibit us from acquiring us equipment or any type of products in foreign countries thus leading to more expensive transport arrengements?? I don't recall the "famous" New York Times talking about it, or eveng refering to the cause of the problems. It's pretty easy to speak without any knowledge, firstly if you don't know the problem in it's roots, it's causes, and secondly if you haven't lived any of those problems. How many of the people speaking here have ever been to Cuba?? I didn't see many posts saying "I've been to Cuba and ..... " But despite of all those publicitary, and media commentaries that I've seen expressed throughout a group of replies to the article, despite the enormous pressure brought upon us by many governments throughout the world ( that in many cases don't represent the opinion of their people ) we have survived almost half a century. And to those wondering what will happen in Cuba if there's an invasion, to you I want to say : "Remember VietNam?? " Worse .... In Cuba it is a national duty to defend the country and there are actually 6 million soldiers ready to defend it, having Cuba 11 million people. Our army is composed by proffesionals and the whole people ready and trained. Try to compare it to the army of any country vs it's population and see the rate. Never doubt it, the US government isn't stupid, and have tried for over 50 years to get someone to do the "dirty work". See if they have succeeded. Take Bush for example, 8 years in office, promising year after year the surrender of Cuba to their followers in Miami, well we're still here, our words: "Bye Bye" .....

    1. Re:from a Cuban ... by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      How many of the people speaking here have ever been to Cuba?

      Citizens of the Land of the Free are forbidden by their government to visit Cuba.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    2. Re:from a Cuban ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lot of times embargos are intended to force the people of a nation to change their government. Have you changed your government yet? No, well when you do, let us know and we'll lift the embargos.

  169. Re:Buttload of bandwidth. by I+confirm+I'm+not+a · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Possibly replying to a troll (the mod-gods think so anyway), but here goes...

    I last visited Cuba about 6 years ago, and took a laptop and a couple of large - for 2002 - thumbdrives. The Cuban customs official noticed them, casually asked how much capacity they had, then carried on about her business. Maybe customs would pay more attention now, but 6 years ago they didn't seem to care about laptops, USB drives, CD-ROMs (blank or full of data), cameras, books (including a critical biography of Karl Marx by a conservative biographer), or pretty much anything else I was bringing in.

    ...And before the oh-so-obvious remark that I was a tourist and wouldn't be able to pass my potentially subversive material to real Cubans - Cuban tourist resorts aren't golden prisons. I wandered around the town I was staying in (sorry, forgotten the name, somewhere on the North East), I wandered around Havana, I spoke to random people about random nonsense. I had ample opportunity to pass someone a USB drive. In hindsight, I should have done... though the 64MB I had back then would probably be ridiculed by even a Cuban these days...

    --
    This is where the serious fun begins.
  170. Re:Handing off thumb drives - The new Cuban Intern by msromike · · Score: 1

    Perfect place to implement FidoNet. Tailor made for bursty transmission with high bandwidth needs.

  171. Re:Handing off thumb drives - The new Cuban Intern by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if they're relatives have the cash

    "their".

    And Jesus Christ, have you not heard of fucking capitalization?
    (The word "fucking" in the previous sentence is meant as an adjective, not a verb; I do not mean to imply in any way that you should be engaging in sexual intercourse with capitalization. In fact, I have absolutely no idea how such activity would be accomplished, or, indeed, whether it's even possible.)

  172. Re:Handing off thumb drives - The new Cuban Intern by wwwgregcom · · Score: 1

    Funniest comment I've read on /. in years.

    --
    What signature defines me as a person?
  173. Did you see the pictures they took? Shafting! by patio11 · · Score: 1

    When you've got roaches on the floor of your hospital, you just might not have world class medical care:

    http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/004070.php

    Take a look at the photos of the hospital El Presidente calls "one of the most modern and best ones in the capital". The evidence is plain to anyone who cares to look that Cuba is just lying outright, like the USSR before it, and their official statistics (and the UN and NGO reports which are based, ultimately, on the Cuban government statistics) are just a fiction, buttressed by non-representative sampling of a few good clinics they make available to health tourists who can pay in hard currency.

  174. Re:But.. but.. I thought Cuba is a utopian society by will_die · · Score: 1

    The infant mortality rate as it is currently counted is worthless for comparisons.
    The problem is that the US considers any child removed from the womb that shows a sign a life or self movement as being born, so thier death counts against infant mortality. Most other countries require additional things such being above a certain height or weight(common in Europe) to being seperated from the mum for a min of 24 hours to multiple days in some countries.
    The other problem are premature births, current the ratio is something like 1 in 8 births is premature. In the US and other first/second class countries were the medical technology is ample those kids are being born, the reason why some countries have the height/weight requirement. So because of the technology you know have doctors birthing a premature kid and taking that chance that it will live, where in the past it would of died in the womb(like what happens in Cuba), so with an increase of technology you get a spike in infant deaths.

    Abortions do not count against the mortality rate since the child is considered to not have left the womb.

  175. "1/3 of the average Cuban's monthly wages" by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    In Old Havana there is only one Internet cafe; getting online there for an hour costs 1/3 of the average Cuban's monthly wages.

    I see they have Comcast also.

  176. Re:Handing off thumb drives - The new Cuban Intern by big+ben+bullet · · Score: 1

    in south korea only old people use thumb drives

  177. Re:But.. but.. I thought Cuba is a utopian society by GreatBunzinni · · Score: 1

    Not to mention, it doesn't make any sense applying the per capita income calculation to Cuba. It's true that the average Cuban "salary" is low but, unlike profoundly capitalist nations such as the US, all basic human needs are provided by the state. Things such as healthcare, education, housing, public transportation and even food are freely provided by the state. That means that, unlike what happens in capitalist nations like the US, Cubans don't spend their salary on basic human needs. We are talking about expenses that, in the US, would cover more than the average person's paycheck. How many americans find themselves bankrupt due to not having enough cash to pay their medical bills or education?

    --
    Slashdot, fix your code or at least hire someone who is competent at it to do it for you.
  178. Strange circular reference by aepervius · · Score: 1

    The wiki link to the article which says the count is different and thus the mortality in the US is higher, but it does not :
    1) cite peer reviewed study, it only cite a media article
    2) it does not cite a comparison on identical basis. For example take 1000 infant death, then cut off those less than 1 pound. Do you get the same number as the germany , worst or better ? Count only birth after 6 month and a half (26 weeks) do you get identical number as France ? I see none of this. Just a "they don't count like us".
    3) as another poster said, even if you discount infant mortality outright as being counted differently and thus not being comparable, death in the 0-5 year period is still apparently higher in the US than in the same previously discounted countries. That should certainly indicate a trend.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
  179. Re:Handing off thumb drives - The new Cuban Intern by V!NCENT · · Score: 1

    Sneakernet /. effect: Steal every USB stick and never read THFA's

    --
    Here be signatures
  180. Re:Handing off thumb drives - The new Cuban Intern by Ed+Avis · · Score: 1

    They obviously need to use UUCP! http://www.wizzy.org.za/

    I predict that Cuba will become the centre of a new world-wide anti-imperialist UUCP network reaching all the way to Venezuela.

    --
    -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
  181. Re:Handing off thumb drives - The new Cuban Intern by laejoh · · Score: 0

    Shouldn't you insert the usb stick in the unladen swallow?

  182. the cold war? defeating communism? not a reason in your mind for dealing with dictators?

    no, in your mind dealing with dictators to defeat communism gets warped to become "we say we want democracy but we really want dictatorship because we're flagrant hypocrites like that"

    and even better, DEALING with a dictator becomes "the usa purposely destroyed a democracy and put in a dictator, all by itself"

    amazing the idiocy

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:gee by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      the cold war? defeating communism? not a reason in your mind for dealing with dictators?

      no, in your mind dealing with dictators to defeat communism gets warped to become "we say we want democracy but we really want dictatorship because we're flagrant hypocrites like that" "We want democracy, only if the people elect people who will do as we say", if not, a dictator will do nicely.

      No, defeating communism is no reason to ignore democracy when convenient.
      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

  183. prove what? by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    that other countries besides the usa tinker in the affairs of other countries?

    do you want me to prove to you the sky is blue too?

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:prove what? by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      prove that the people you rail against ONLY disapprove of the USs' meddling and never blame Russia for Chechnya and etc.

      Or stop claiming that.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

  184. how does your brain decide these things? by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    so, inalienable human rights end at the rio grande?

    above that line, huamn beings have equal value, below that line, human beings are lesser? is this what you are trying to say? are you trying as hard as you can to be an outright ethnocentric racist?

    "If the people freely decided to be communist, then fine, no business of ours."

    right, people FREELY decided (they did?) to give up their FREEDOM. got it. that's how you read cuban history. wtf!

    what kind of mental gymnastics and purposeful avoiding of the plainly obvious does it take to think like you?

    the usa is the great devil. the usa is a godly saint. it doesn't matter what you think of the usa and what the usa does to realize this about your thinking: when you begin to assert that cubans have freely chosen to have less freedoms than americans, you have completely and utterly swallowed some really stupid propaganda

    but don't take my word for it. go tell a cuban in havana they deserve less freedoms than americans do. go ahead. let's see how they react to your way of thinking, shall we?

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:how does your brain decide these things? by Omestes · · Score: 1

      First off I didn't claim I agreed with the statement, it was an ironical, or satirical statement based on the US's current policies, and an attempt to show how absurd the situation is. I personally think that all people have rights, and that these rights should be respected beyond any political goal (or even security). America disagrees, in polls even a majority of people support torture, which in my opinion is a rather grievous denial of rights.

      right, people FREELY decided (they did?) to give up their FREEDOM. got it. that's how you read cuban history. wtf!

      Never said they did. Go back and reparse that sentence. I state "they should have free elections", and "if they chose communism we would have to accept that". No where did I state that they originally chose it, the closest I got was saying that Fidel is better than Batista.

      the usa is the great devil. the usa is a godly saint. it doesn't matter what you think of the usa and what the usa does to realize this about your thinking: when you begin to assert that cubans have freely chosen to have less freedoms than americans, you have completely and utterly swallowed some really stupid propaganda

      Never claimed it, therefore your ad hominem rolls off my back.

      I also never claimed that they deserve less freedom. I stated that they should have the freedom to decide what form of government they want to live under. I'm careful in stating that, since if Cuba ever becomes a democracy, and doesn't turn into a micro-US, we'll bomb the shit out of them, or put another US-friendly bloodthirsty tyrant like Batista in. In America, also, we take free market economics as a sister of democracy and freedom, and I don't see this as necessarily true. People should be free to choose their economic system AND their political system.

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
  185. Re:Handing off thumb drives - The new Cuban Intern by cryptoguy · · Score: 1

    Long live sneakernet!

  186. Article is a bit wrong... by Kirgin · · Score: 1

    Couple things: Schools, university all have access to network and internet resources (although with the deny everything allow specific mentality). The internet that costs 1/3 of a monthly wage is the tourist internet. EVERYTHING sold to a tourist costs 10-20 times what a cuban pays. The reality is, for Cubans there really isn't any access point outside of the schools. It used to be a lot more lax, until the Cuban government got paranoid because US interests caught trying to stir up things for billionth time. What used to happened is the person working the internet cafe would sell (blackmarket) the leftover time a tourist paid for if he left early. Cubans would hang out outside the tourist cafe waiting for the "nod". Government got wiser to that. Now you are a seeing the latest version of that...People make "requests" to the internet operators and they get what you want. Its mostly music, movies...emails..etc. In fact they have 2 currencies. They have their tourist dollar(CUC) which trades for USD and they have the cuban peso (CUP) which Cubans use. 1 bottle of 12 year old rum costs Cubans the equivalent of .50 CUC. Cubans are not really allowed to use USD and CUC, so they would never pay the full CUC price a tourist does.

  187. Re:But.. but.. I thought Cuba is a utopian society by DavidTC · · Score: 1

    And then I learned exactly how much they had paid, which was a good deal less than any US health insurance, and I almost punched a hole in you.

    --
    If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  188. Re:Must be evil capitalist counterrevolutionaries by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

    I'm not saying that there aren't problems. Take a look at obstetricians in the US, and why many are fleeing that field. I blame people like John Edwards who made a fortune off the misery and sadness of genetic defects, suing doctors for problems that had nothing to do with the doctor.

    You want to fix part of the high cost of Medical Care in the US, get the lawyers out of the mix, and the stupid juries who award billions in the latest get rich quick scheme. And illegal Aliens seem to get free medical care here, so I'm not sure why people are leaving to go to Canada.

    That, and doctors think that they are entitled to seven or eight figure incomes. And why can't we license more nurse practitioners to take the more "normal" cases, like colds, flus, sprains and abrasions. Why does it take a full MD to treat relatively minor problems?

    There are ways to fix many of the problems in the system today. The problem is, that people suggesting these things are often called radical and dangerous. Yeah, I am radical and dangerous, as I can think for myself and can see the problems in the system that nobody wants to touch.

    The problems in the system aren't huge, its just that nobody wants to touch them because the AMA and the Lawyers have huge lobby's in Washington, creating artifically restricted markets, increasing cost every step of the way.

    And I haven't even begun to talk about the problem from the Insurance side, which is another huge part of the problem.

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  189. imagine interstellar coms without ftl radio by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

    In scifi, it's typically assumed that you have ftl radio if you have ftl drives. Of course, a few settings play with that assumption, Battletech being the most notable. Ships can make jumps of up to 30 lightyears with a roughly two week recharge time between hops. ftl communication technology exists but is the secret property of a cult-like technology company that isn't Apple. Naturally, any messages that pass through that company, comstar, cannot be absolutely trusted as secure. So this means that starships are now the new pony express for secret communications.

    Starships would be part of the physical network in the OSI model. A starship enters the system and starts beaming message traffic to the nearest relay. Having announced its presence and intended destination, packets are beamed back to the starship for relay to the next hop.

    One of the interesting quirks of the setting is that the fabulously rich can setup jumpship chains for rapid transit. The jump itself is instantaneous with all the time consumed with charging the fusion batteries. With a properly positioned chain of relay ships with freshly-charged batteries, a trip that would normally take months could be done in days, just like relay riders on the pony express.

    The setting replicates the pre-telegraph days of human history when wars could end up going on for months after a peace treaty is agreed to since it takes time to relay the terms across oceans.

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  190. Re:Must be evil capitalist counterrevolutionaries by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

    The problems in the system aren't huge, its just that nobody wants to touch them Same goes for implementations of universal healthcare.
    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  191. WiFi by evilviper · · Score: 1

    Get some wifi cards to a few of those Cubans! No infrastructure needed, completely free (except for the cost of electricity) high-speed data transfers (faster than I get with DSL), and ad-hoc routing across the country. With a few wifi cards and some decentralized P2P app (like Gnutella), pretty soon everyone in the country has access to EVERYTHING, from home.

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  192. Is reading that hard for you by keineobachtubersie · · Score: 1

    Nowhere in there does it say the CIA sponsored it, it says they are being investigated. As to "If you're sponsoring something, you're pretty much running it" that's just stupid.

    "he who has the gold, makes the rules."

    NATO has more gold, so by your logic THEY make the rules.

    Just like I said. Stop trying so hard, it just makes it look that much worse when you're wrong like you are now.

  193. Re:But.. but.. I thought Cuba is a utopian society by keineobachtubersie · · Score: 1

    "And then I learned exactly how much they had paid, which was a good deal less than any US health insurance, and I almost punched a hole in you."

    Is that really the best you can come up with? You're stupid enough to think it's free, then when proven wrong, you try the "well it's cheaper" crap?

    Let's see your figures guy, I say you're full of it, and in light of your total failure to support your spew with citations, I'm right.

    "I almost punched a hole in you."

    THEN you realized you're a pasty ass loser who is safe behind his keyboard, but knows full well if you HAD punched me in the face it's be YOU who needed "free" insurance.

  194. You're not very good at reading are you by keineobachtubersie · · Score: 1

    "Did you actually read what you responded to?"

    Clearly, you on the other hand have failed to understand it twice now.

    "The question was: How many people in the US can't change jobs because of losing health insurance if they do?"

    Right, and I was right. Very few.

    "If they'd lose health insurance if they change jobs, it's because their new job wouldn't have health insurance. "

    That's idiotic, the state of insurance at their new job has no influence on their old insurance. You're wrong

    "Most people do not change jobs and then immediately look for a new job."

    What kind of retard are you? They look for a new job then change to it. Stop grasping at straws you look even more idiotic now.

    "And CORBA lasts 18 months when changing jobs."

    No moron, that's wrong too.

    "And incidentally many people in the US cannot get insurance without a job"

    Another lie.

    So you've lied, and made up facts, just because I proved you were wrong.

    How fucking pathetic are you?

    1. Re:You're not very good at reading are you by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      Okay, I'm going to have to explain to people who might be confused by your stupidity.

      The original question was 'How many people in the US can't change jobs because of losing health insurance if they do?'.

      You don't seem to grasp what is immediately obvious to everyone one, that the original poster was talking about wanting to change to a job without health insurance, as obviously people wouldn't 'lose' health insurance if they had it at their new job.

      In other words, many people are unable to switch from jobs with insurance to jobs without insurance, as they'd then, DUH, lose their insurance. This is insanely obvious to every single person except you, who apparently think it makes sense to talk about people 'losing their insurance' when changing between two jobs with insurance.

      COBRA, is indeed slightly relevant here, in that CORBA is designed to cover people through transitions. If they switch jobs and their new insurance doesn't cover preexisting conditions, they can use COBRA and keep their old insurance for, indeed, 18 months, not any longer, which is hopefully long enough for it to kick in. So it's slightly useful in job changing if you're going to one insured position to another.

      However, that still wouldn't help if they were 'changing to a job where they would lose health insurance'. If they change to a job without health insurance, CORBA will 'help' in that they will remain covered longer, but ultimately they will be uninsured. (Except in your crazy world, where people who need health insurance can purchase it on the street.)

      Proposing CORBA as insurance is akin to proposing unemployment as a job. It's just stupid. CORBA is just 'If you find yourself without a job, you can continue your job's insurance for a set amount of time'.

      And incidentally many people in the US cannot get insurance without a job

      Another lie.

      I can't get insurance without a job, you idiot.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  195. No I don't by keineobachtubersie · · Score: 1

    "you complain about the lack of democracy "

    You're a liar, I've never done that.

    "and still you think it wrong of them to abort however many fetuses they want to?"

    No, actually, improve your reading skills. I never said anything about "wrong" in any of my discussion of the subject.

    You really need to get a reading tutor.

  196. i can prove that by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    ratio of anti-usa rants to anti-china rants or anti-russia rants: 99 to 1

    if you spend 200 paragraphs ranting against the usa and then go "oh yeah, china and russia are bad to" then you are revealing your intellectual dishonesty

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:i can prove that by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      ratio of anti-usa rants to anti-china rants or anti-russia rants: 99 to 1 [citation needed]
      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

  197. there's no such thing as democratic communism by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    so if in a country a military coup ousts a communist government, exactly what democracy is being destroyed?

    certainly, a country can vote for communism. this is akin to suicide: you're freely giving up your right to be free. which is whole other philosphical argument: do you have the freedom to destroy your own freedom? my answer would be no, as it imperils the freedom of others, but i digress

    back on point, if a country winds up in a fight between communists and military forces, how is the usa solely responsible for this? oh certainly, the usa got involved in these fights in the cold war. as did the ussr. as did anyone vying for influence. but mostly, it was the internal forces of the country at work. the usa wasn't a deciding factor

    and furthermore, if the usa then interacts with the military dictator, or theocrat, or royal monarch, or whomever, that world despises, how does "interaction" turn into "support" in your mind exactly?

    i suppose you could say that you expect the usa to act virtuously. for example, i woudl suppose you would want the democratic usa to have no interaction whatsoever with an unelected authoritarian in a display of clean idealistic allegiance to democratic principles

    ok

    BUT THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT THE BUSH POLICY IS TOWARDS CUBA WHICH EVERYONE HERE SAYS IS EVIL!

    so you can't win. because the argument isn't really about what is the right thing for the usa to do, the argument is really "whatever the usa does is wrong and i'll stand against the usa in kneejerk fashion no matter what it does"

    so ther eis no intelligence to anti-americanism

    there is only intelligence to aligning yourself with a principle. and if you align your thinking with a principle, you will find, astonishingly, that the usa does things which helps your principle

    really

    imagine that crazy concept huh?

    pfffffffft

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:there's no such thing as democratic communism by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      i woudl suppose you would want the democratic usa to have no interaction whatsoever with an unelected authoritarian in a display of clean idealistic allegiance to democratic principles

      ok

      BUT THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT THE BUSH POLICY IS TOWARDS CUBA Last year in Miami, I offered Cuba's government a way forward [...] Clearly, the Castro regime will not change by its own choice. But Cuba must change. So today I'm announcing several new initiatives intended to hasten the arrival of a new, free, democratic Cuba. (Applause.)
      October 10, 2003
      President Bush Discusses Cuba Policy in Rose Garden Speech


      FUCK, you're stupid! That explains why you don't understand anything, can't spell, and keep flaming strawmen!
      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

  198. how does that work? by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    you just provided the factual representation of what i asserted: that the bush govt doesn't deal with cuba as a matter of policy, and will deal with it when it becomes more democratic

    so thanks for the support, but i don't know why you providing links that support my assertions makes me look stupid

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:how does that work? by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      what i asserted: that the bush govt doesn't deal with cuba as a matter of policy What you really asserted: "no interaction whatsoever"

      Move that goalpost up your ass.
      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

  199. citation needed by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    ok, start here:

    http://google.com/

    (snicker)

    you've got a great rhetorical approach: prove the obvious with copious links or what you say is wrong

    darling, i don't need to cite the obvious

    it isn't obvious to you that more america bashing than china or russia bashing goes on in the world?

    okkkayyyy

    darling: it's not beholden on to me to hold your delicate hand with copious links just because you are sheltered from obvious observations of the world we live in

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:citation needed by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      darling, i don't need to cite the obvious You are a violent pedophile predator.
      I don't need proof, since it's obvious.

      darling: it's not beholden on to me to hold your delicate hand with copious links just because you are sheltered from obvious observations of the world we live in Listen, perv, your obvious observation of a biased sample don't mean squat, coming from a pedophile.
      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

  200. Re:Must be evil capitalist counterrevolutionaries by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

    The problems for universal health care is a non-starter for me. It requires (demands under penalty of law) that I participate, and in the process get lower quality care than I can provide for myself now, or makes me pay MORE for the coverage I already am paying for. No thanks.

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  201. Re:Must be evil capitalist counterrevolutionaries by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

    universal health care is a non-starter for me. [...] I can provide for myself now Think about it.
    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  202. Re:Must be evil capitalist counterrevolutionaries by rtechie · · Score: 1

    This gives democide estimates for both Batista and Castro. Between 1952 and 1959, about 1,000 people are thought to have been outright murdered by the Batista regime. Between 1959 and 1987, between 35,000 and 73,000 people are thought to have been victims of democide by Castro's regime. You're misrepresenting these statistics. The "low" estimate for Batista 52-59 was 1,000, the "high" was 20,000. The "low" of Castro 59-87 was 15,000 and the "high" was 33,000. So assuming the "high" numbers it took Batista 7 years to kill 20,000 and it took Castro 28 years to kill 33,000, so Batista killed at about 2.5x the rate. Of course, it really all depends on whose numbers you want to believe.

    Conflict in wartime, where both sides are armed, is different from democide, where the victims have been disarmed. There is plenty of slaughter of unarmed civilians in Congo. Look into it.

    Pol Pot was a communist I was thinking of Suharto.

  203. Re:But.. but.. I thought Cuba is a utopian society by DavidTC · · Score: 1

    If you don't know the relative amounts different countries spend on health care per capita, perhaps you really should exit this conversation before you look like even more of an idiot.

    The US, to get you started, spends approximately twice as much on health care as every other country in the world.

    --
    If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  204. Re:Must be evil capitalist counterrevolutionaries by Just+Another+Poster · · Score: 1

    You're misrepresenting these statistics. The "low" estimate for Batista 52-59 was 1,000, the "high" was 20,000.

    From line 739, the low estimate is 500, mid-range is 1,000, and the high estimate is 20,000, a figure provided by Castro.

    The "low" of Castro 59-87 was 15,000 and the "high" was 33,000. So assuming the "high" numbers it took Batista 7 years to kill 20,000 and it took Castro 28 years to kill 33,000, so Batista killed at about 2.5x the rate. Of course, it really all depends on whose numbers you want to believe.

    From line 848, the low estimate for Castro's democide is 35,000, mid-range is 73,000, and the high estimate is 141,000.

    I was thinking of Suharto.

    Suharto is nowhere in the same league as Hitler or Pol Pot.

  205. Re:Must be evil capitalist counterrevolutionaries by rtechie · · Score: 1

    From line 739, the low estimate is 500, mid-range is 1,000, and the high estimate is 20,000, a figure provided by Castro. Yup.

    From line 848, the low estimate for Castro's democide is 35,000, mid-range is 73,000, and the high estimate is 141,000. Wrong line. The correct comparable line is 788, and even then I don't know if it's comparable. The statistics for Batista's regime are very sparse. Was nobody in prison? Was nobody executed?

    Suharto is nowhere in the same league as Hitler or Pol Pot. I disagree. Pol Pot and Suharto are about even for killing by my count. Tells you how much debate there really is here.

    Anyway, I stand by my statement. You can't actually prove that the Castro regime is worse than that one it replaced. Nor can you prove that left-wing dictators (like Castro) always mass slaughter their people unlike right-wing dictators (like Hitler) who don't.

  206. Exactly what I thought, no figures from the liar by keineobachtubersie · · Score: 1

    "Let's see your figures guy"

    Why am I not surprised that you didn't provide any.

  207. "I can't get insurance without a job, you idiot."

    Liar.

    1. Re:No by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      I'd like everyone to do an experiment who believes this idiot. Call up a health insurance company, one that advertises. Don't give them your name, but tell them immediately that you have a pacemaker, and ask if you can get insurance.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  208. Awsome! by Melllvar · · Score: 1

    So the fact that the African-American infant mortality rate in this country is two-and-a-half times higher than it is for white babies must mean that we've got one helluva health care system set up for our inner-city minorities. Somebody ought to contact the NAACP; they seem to have the impression that there's something wrong with this state of affairs.

    And what is going on with this country when even the frackin' Puerto Ricans and Native Americans are doing better than white people? Dammit, what is their secret, that they can get infant mortality rates approaching 1.5 times to twice that of the white kids?

    So yeah, a big problem with big numbers is that most folks reach false impressions based only on the surface data. And then there are the people who only drill down far enough to get the answers that they wanted all along.

  209. Re:Handing off thumb drives - The new Cuban Intern by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    what are you doing on Slashdot?
    Making friends.

    Isn't it obvious?
    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  210. Re:Exactly what I thought, no figures from the lia by DavidTC · · Score: 1

    perhaps you really should exit this conversation before you look like even more of an idiot.

    And now it's too late for you to not look like an idiot, but I trust I've made my point.

    And here. You'll notice that except for Luxumberg (Which it is populated almost entirely by rich transients and the 'health care' there is half facelifts.), the next most expensive places, Norway and Switzerland are at 2/3 our per capita cost, and there's Austria at slightly above half, and then all the others are at or below half.

    Considering that this is one of the most repeated facts when discussing health care in this country, you are either a) a troll pretending not to know it, or b) a fucking moron who shouldn't be allowed anywhere near a discussion of health care.

    --
    If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  211. oblig? serenity by fan+of+lem · · Score: 1

    Can't stop the signal!

  212. Oops, I got some, looks like you're wrong again by keineobachtubersie · · Score: 1

    I'd like you to stop lying. We can't always get what we want (unless it's insurance).

    By the way, I did, and I did. Easily.

    So, I caught you lying again liar.

    1. Re:Oops, I got some, looks like you're wrong again by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      This guy sent me this email four days ago:

      I thought I'd share since you're a pathetic hit and run fuck, I corrected your reply to me because you said something incorrect, as well as being a douchebag.

      The incorrect part you can fix, the douchebag part, well...

      At any rate, I thought I'd let you know because it's fun to tell cunts like you off and then spam filter their loser asses.

      I win.

      I was just ignoring him until he replied to me again, but now I decided to make a record of it. The address he used was: keineobachtubersie@gmail.com

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  213. Two things, I mean apart from you being a liar by keineobachtubersie · · Score: 1

    First, thanks for the link, it proves you're too fucking stupid to read, because it doesn't say what you think it does. Holy shit you're stupid.

    Second

    "a fucking moron who shouldn't be allowed anywhere near a discussion of health care."

    Like someone who thinks that government provided health care will be "free" as you stated? Or is that a different kind of fucking moron?

    And isn't it funny how you STILL refuse to admit you were lying about that, and are trying so hard to insult and flame me into forgetting your lie.

    You lied, I caught you, and now you're just looking more pathetic. The best part is your 3rd grade understanding of the subject causes you to link to studies which demonstrate your ignorance even more effectively, as they don't say what you claim and you're too stupid to realize it.

    1. Re:Two things, I mean apart from you being a liar by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      This guy sent me an email four days ago. Just to show you the quality of thought we're dealing with.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  214. How fucking pathetic are you? by keineobachtubersie · · Score: 1

    If you expcet people to believe that nonsense after I proved you're a liar repeatedly, then you're as dumb as you act.

    1. Re:How fucking pathetic are you? by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      Ah, yes, everyone's lying to and about poor little keineobachtubersie. Here only two week and already the subject of a giant slashdot-spanning conspiracy to, apparently, lie about random shit. Or at least use figures of speech that he or she can't understand. (Remember, folks, I'm 'lying' because I said government provided services were free. Quibbling about the definition of 'free' is one thing, standing there and saying 'You're a proven liar' is another, quite delusional, thing.)

      Anyway, keineobachtubersie, you are aware that people can see that I'm a subscriber, have been here eight years, have posted over 6000 comments, have a displayed email address, and get to post with a karma bonus, right? And that you're a freeloader, have posted under 200, no email address, and probably don't have a karma bonus? And let me guess...you had to get a new account because your last one ended up with no karma, right? Because posting that many in your first two weeks really sorta looks like you've been here a while and are just using disposable accounts, when one get karma-crippled you switch to another.

      And also people can read your past comments, at least the ones you've posted on your current account, where you're an ass.

      You apparently think that because we're both apparently pseudonymous (Although my real name is actually David T. C., as you can see if you follow my homepage URL and as I've mentioned before.) that our reputations are valued equally.

      Well, I'm not particularly know for just making things up. Someone did, indeed, send an email to my spamgourmet account, the one displaying here on slashdot, from the account keineobachtubersie@gmail.com. (Ironically, my spamgourmet account forwards back to a gmail account.)

      Relevant headers:

      Received: (from jqh1@localhost) by gourmet.spamgourmet.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id m271HZd2031174 for REDACTED@gmail.com; Fri, 7 Mar 2008 01:17:35 GMT
      Received: from rn-out-0910.google.com (rn-out-0910.google.com [64.233.170.184]) by gourmet.spamgourmet.com (8.13.8/8.13.7) with ESMTP id m271HYbX031132 for <slforri.vadiv.vadiv@neverbox.com>; Fri, 7 Mar 2008 01:17:34 GMT
      Received: by rn-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id a43so335533rne.10 for <slforri.vadiv.vadiv@neverbox.com>; Thu, 06 Mar 2008 17:17:31 -0800 (PST)
      Received: by 10.141.43.5 with SMTP id v5mr277825rvj.49.1204846858399; Thu, 06 Mar 2008 15:40:58 -0800 (PST)
      Received: by 10.140.188.11 with HTTP; Thu, 6 Mar 2008 15:40:58 -0800 (PST)
      Message-ID: <e763485f0803061540y468cf3bdiebee3cb37f2355a7@mail.gmail.com>

      Of course, there's no hope at all for you to admit you sent that, but, hey, I'm not posting this for you, I'm posting it so other people know what's going on.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    2. Re:How fucking pathetic are you? by keineobachtubersie · · Score: 1

      "Ah, yes, everyone's lying to and about poor little keineobachtubersie."

      No guy, just you.

      I proved you were a liar here in public, you have no credibility.

      "Well, I'm not particularly know for just making things up."

      Except that I proved you did just that repeatedly.

      "Relevant headers:"

      Sad, just sad that you resort to that kind of nonsense just because I proved you were lying.

  215. Still a liar by keineobachtubersie · · Score: 1

    Dude, you're a proven liar, no one cares what you think.

  216. Re:Must be evil capitalist counterrevolutionaries by Just+Another+Poster · · Score: 1

    Wrong line. The correct comparable line is 788, and even then I don't know if it's comparable.

    Line 788 does not include refugees who die while fleeing, or political prisoners who die in prison.

    The statistics for Batista's regime are very sparse. Was nobody in prison? Was nobody executed?

    Cuba was a much more open society under Batista. If larger numbers of people were imprisoned or executed, it's likely that someone would have heard about it.