Intel makes all kinds of "chips"--not just CPUs. I think it's a little early to jump to conclusions. If it ends up that Apple switches to Intel CPUs, MacOS X will be all that much closer to running on your x86 PCs. In that case, Dvorak would actually be right about something (shudder).
I, for one Mac user, welcome our new dark corporate overlords.
There are two things to remember when watching any of these films:
1) They are not Science Fiction 2) They are not the uber-cerebral life-changing movies you thought they were when you were a kid (and they never were).
Ok, those said, I think a pinch or two of salt should be added to your cinematic experience. Sure the dialog is wooden and contrived--if not corny. So is the acting & dialogue on anything found on the Sci-Fi channel, Bab5, Star Trek, Battle Star Galactica. Every one of those shows are cheesy but all the geeks seem to like them anyway. Why should SWEP3 be any different?
Lucas calls them "Space Operas" --and if you're familiar with that genre, you know that opera's stories and motivations require an extended suspension of disbelief. You just go with it.
Because all of the technology and theory in Star Wars isn't really explained, it just happens to take place in a galaxy far, far away, it gets lumped into SciFi genre. SciFi is a bit more satisfying to the "geek" types. But, Star Wars really doesn't quite fit into that category despite it's cover.
Hayden Christianson definitely comes off as a poor actor--or he isn't given very good direction to bring more dimension to his character. How was he in "Shattered Glass"? I think dialog and direction can make or break a good performance. Maybe if Lucas let someone else direct, it might have worked better.
I was blown away by the eye candy and I think it sets up the next film fine. I'm going to overlook some of the incontinuity others are finding just because I have more important things in life to bitch about. Afterall, it's just a movie, isn't it?
If you're a detail-oriented person, you'll probably be very frustrated. If you just like an entertaining, mind-blowing ride through Lucas's world, you'll probably enjoy it.
Well, really...any company's future depends upon the management factor. They just have to not do what MS does--get complacent about their products and focus on being the biggest (which Gates thinks is being the best).
The biggest revenue cash cow for software companies are other companies, schools, and government. Almost all of them generally follow the rules for fear of a BSA audit. Most individuals buy over-priced boxed sets.
The people that make illegal copies are people who wouldn't buy their products anyway--how is that considered to be revenue loss? I don't know anyone who has ever copied software and resold it or bought copied software. These are people who are CHEAP and don't spend money anyway.
What they mean to say is, "We would have made $33 billion more if we actually sold to the people who use it illegally."
I think, in reality, the actually piracy costs are minimal. They're really just eye-balling an untapped market.
As long as prices stay over-inflated for Photoshop, Office, etc., I think the piracy problem will, indeed, not abate.
Any you g33kz |<n0w wh3r3 I c4n F1nD s0m3 g00d W4R3Z?
Deep from an obscure unlisted URL somewhere in the slashdot FAQ:
Q: Many of my article submissions on slashdot seem to go unnoticed. How can I generate more interest and responses--even if they're a bunch of flaming retorts?
A: While the interests and levels of expertise on slashdot cover their entire respective spectrums, one sure-fire way to get guaranteed attention on slashdot is to post anything with the words "Microsoft" and "Linux" in the same subject line. You're likely to receive more attention if the submission implies any of the following:
1. Microsoft does anything superior to Linux
2. Microsoft wants to buy/cheat/steal anything from the Linux community.
3. Microsoft makes any business move to check Open Source/FSF initiatives.
Submissions that point out the obvious will be appended only with posts of the "Me too" nature. Be sure to punch it up with a new spin or a repeat of a post that is at least 30 days old.
It should also be noted that any submissions or posts that are PRO-Microsoft will be rejected or modded down respectively. Be sure to bash MS thoughtfully and thoroughly with disputable data, imaginative spelling, and ambiguous grammar.
SEE ALSO: Flaming, Linux Bigotry, Open Source Zealotry, and Mac Fanboy posts.
I suppose if there's an experimental drug out there that needs testing and it's aimed at my particular affliction/malady, I'm game for it if the docs can't do much for it with exhisting medicine or techniques. [And the side effects aren't worst than the disease--such as 'anal leakage'].
But, then again, there ain't no cure for the summertime blues.
The worst messes on KBs/Mice are made by 3 things:
1) The filling from jelly-filled doughnuts 2) That sebaceous tar generated from your own filth after days behind the keyboard without bathing. 3) The worst is both. (they don't taste good together either).
I have large facility with many good computers and access to evil western sites. Please, if so kinds, forward names and addresses of dissidents to me so I may contact them for their helps.
Salesman: Mr. Smith, here's your new car. Mr. Smith: Thanks, Bill. Say, where's the seat belts? Salesman: Oh, that'll be extra. Mr. Smith: There's no windows or doorlocks either? Salesman: Oh, that's extra, too. Mr. Smith: I'm confused, Bill. Isn't my car supposed to be fully functional and include safety features? Salesman: Well, Mr. Smith, we can include them on a trial bases for 30 days, but you'll have to return them or pay the subscription price. Mr. Smith: What the f*ck, Bill? You mean I have to PAY repeadetly for something that should come with my car? Salesman: Yes, Mr. Smith. Did you not read the EULA? Mr. Smith: I think I want my money back. Salesman: I'm afraid I can't let you do that, Mr. Smith. Mr. Smith: Why the f*ck not? Salesman: Because by opening the car door, you agreed to the EULA and you are bound to its terms and conditions. Mr. Smith: You're a bastard, Bill. Salesman: Actually, I'm the spawn of Satan.
right on, dude. that's a huge problem with the uberwidgets out there--battery life (or lack thereof).
Gate's thinks this is a penis measurement with Jobs or something so he's going after a market in which he doesn't have ANY products that compete--it's on now that he shot off his mouth.
I do understand your points but, I'd rather be untethered from my from laptop and its bulky bag and accoutrements. I like my little Treo 600 because I can monitor my e-mail, have cell phone/text pager, and simple browser when I have to make my rounds--and it's all in my pocket not on my shoulder or back. It keeps me light. I also have a calendar to remind me when I need to be somewhere and I can make appts on the fly--it's like a little info pod not a computer.
I am surprised how many people have these fancy phones but don't use any of the features (i.e, they bought them because of the hype).
At some point in time, the iPod will fade into obscurity but I doubt it will be caused by anything Microsoft makes. They've got one point of domination--Windows and they have severe quality issues.
Any emerging technologies out there for cell phones are going to have to consider several factors if they want to compete and beat the iPod as a music player (or if Apple wants to morph the iPod into a cell-phone):
1) Battery life. With all the stuff these uberwidgets are doing, they are going to have to find a good, stable, non-explosive power source. The iPod or other music players have a dedicated purpose--if you multiply the purposes, multiply the power consumption (probably by an exponent). I'd rather have a separate music player than to chance losing all my juice in my phone.
2) Portability--by that, I mean music can be moved from/to an iPod or computer to/from my new music phone easily. The interface has to be easy to use and it will have to be compatible the dominant music sources. Otherwise it's going to have hell catching up because re-inventing that wheel has not proven to be a match for iTMS. People won't switch products if it's not easy or they feel to heavily invested in or loyal to another product/service.
3) Availability & Pricing. If you can't get one from or working with your provider, it doesn't matter how good the product works or doesn't. [Look how long it took the Treo to get ubiquitous support]. The price dictates availability, too. The market demographic for people who want music and cell phones may not have the disposable income to afford it if it's not priced right. (i.e., cheaper than a nice cell phone + an iPod).
4) Fashion. MS's devices aren't ever as slick looking as Apple's--that will definitely be a factor in its appeal to both vendors and consumers. The "cool" factor enjoyed by the iPod is something Microsoft's money just can't buy. They'll have to compete in quality and design--two areas they don't do well in.
Slashdot Mirror
I suppose this makes it more like the "improbability" drive now, doesn't it?
You wouldn't have to be in a wormhole very long to travel somewhere (sometime) else--as long as you're not counting on the return trip.
uh...it's just a movie, dude. Besides, the lightspeed drives are probably more worthy of such scrutiny.
Intel makes all kinds of "chips"--not just CPUs. I think it's a little early to jump to conclusions. If it ends up that Apple switches to Intel CPUs, MacOS X will be all that much closer to running on your x86 PCs. In that case, Dvorak would actually be right about something (shudder).
I, for one Mac user, welcome our new dark corporate overlords.
Ok. I saw it. I really liked it--it's Star Wars.
There are two things to remember when watching any of these films:
1) They are not Science Fiction
2) They are not the uber-cerebral life-changing movies you thought they were when you were a kid (and they never were).
Ok, those said, I think a pinch or two of salt should be added to your cinematic experience. Sure the dialog is wooden and contrived--if not corny. So is the acting & dialogue on anything found on the Sci-Fi channel, Bab5, Star Trek, Battle Star Galactica. Every one of those shows are cheesy but all the geeks seem to like them anyway. Why should SWEP3 be any different?
Lucas calls them "Space Operas" --and if you're familiar with that genre, you know that opera's stories and motivations require an extended suspension of disbelief. You just go with it.
Because all of the technology and theory in Star Wars isn't really explained, it just happens to take place in a galaxy far, far away, it gets lumped into SciFi genre. SciFi is a bit more satisfying to the "geek" types. But, Star Wars really doesn't quite fit into that category despite it's cover.
Hayden Christianson definitely comes off as a poor actor--or he isn't given very good direction to bring more dimension to his character. How was he in "Shattered Glass"? I think dialog and direction can make or break a good performance. Maybe if Lucas let someone else direct, it might have worked better.
I was blown away by the eye candy and I think it sets up the next film fine. I'm going to overlook some of the incontinuity others are finding just because I have more important things in life to bitch about. Afterall, it's just a movie, isn't it?
If you're a detail-oriented person, you'll probably be very frustrated. If you just like an entertaining, mind-blowing ride through Lucas's world, you'll probably enjoy it.
For whatever my $.02 is worth.
I was doing something rather unusual on slashdot: reading the article instead of trolling for people to pick on to make my sad life feel better.
...debug that one?
:)
I welcome our new insect overlords.
Hey! Don't mod me down. I mean, how can my comment be any worse than an article about roach-operated robotics?
As long as that ****ing moron Jar jar doesn't make any appearances, I'm all for new episodes.
I found that f**king Kudzu utility on my Red Hat box made me want to drink more heavily! I hate that piece of crap. ...wait...oh, nevermind.
Well, really...any company's future depends upon the management factor. They just have to not do what MS does--get complacent about their products and focus on being the biggest (which Gates thinks is being the best).
The biggest revenue cash cow for software companies are other companies, schools, and government. Almost all of them generally follow the rules for fear of a BSA audit. Most individuals buy over-priced boxed sets.
The people that make illegal copies are people who wouldn't buy their products anyway--how is that considered to be revenue loss? I don't know anyone who has ever copied software and resold it or bought copied software. These are people who are CHEAP and don't spend money anyway.
What they mean to say is, "We would have made $33 billion more if we actually sold to the people who use it illegally."
I think, in reality, the actually piracy costs are minimal. They're really just eye-balling an untapped market.
As long as prices stay over-inflated for Photoshop, Office, etc., I think the piracy problem will, indeed, not abate.
Honeymonkey, eh? Now I know what to call our network of self-administrating faculty and staff.
2 Words: Job security.
Why not!? Windows already runs on blood, sweat, and tears!
Same difference.
Also, this was pretty much a joke poking fun at the culture.
Honorable mention for catdevnull's funny post of the day :)
If they only dared give me mod points...
Deep from an obscure unlisted URL somewhere in the slashdot FAQ:
:-)
Q: Many of my article submissions on slashdot seem to go unnoticed. How can I generate more interest and responses--even if they're a bunch of flaming retorts?
A: While the interests and levels of expertise on slashdot cover their entire respective spectrums, one sure-fire way to get guaranteed attention on slashdot is to post anything with the words "Microsoft" and "Linux" in the same subject line. You're likely to receive more attention if the submission implies any of the following:
1. Microsoft does anything superior to Linux
2. Microsoft wants to buy/cheat/steal anything from the Linux community.
3. Microsoft makes any business move to check Open Source/FSF initiatives.
Submissions that point out the obvious will be appended only with posts of the "Me too" nature. Be sure to punch it up with a new spin or a repeat of a post that is at least 30 days old.
It should also be noted that any submissions or posts that are PRO-Microsoft will be rejected or modded down respectively. Be sure to bash MS thoughtfully and thoroughly with disputable data, imaginative spelling, and ambiguous grammar.
SEE ALSO: Flaming, Linux Bigotry, Open Source Zealotry, and Mac Fanboy posts.
[big, cheesy "I-just-bonked-your-daughter" grin]
One man's unfortunate side-effect is another man's fetish treasure.
c'est la vie.
I suppose if there's an experimental drug out there that needs testing and it's aimed at my particular affliction/malady, I'm game for it if the docs can't do much for it with exhisting medicine or techniques. [And the side effects aren't worst than the disease--such as 'anal leakage'].
But, then again, there ain't no cure for the summertime blues.
The worst messes on KBs/Mice are made by 3 things:
1) The filling from jelly-filled doughnuts
2) That sebaceous tar generated from your own filth after days behind the keyboard without bathing.
3) The worst is both. (they don't taste good together either).
Dude. You get catdevnull's unoffical "Funny" mod + 5 of the day.
I have large facility with many good computers and access to evil western sites. Please, if so kinds, forward names and addresses of dissidents to me so I may contact them for their helps.
Here's a little allegorical play scene by Me:
Salesman: Mr. Smith, here's your new car.
Mr. Smith: Thanks, Bill. Say, where's the seat belts?
Salesman: Oh, that'll be extra.
Mr. Smith: There's no windows or doorlocks either?
Salesman: Oh, that's extra, too.
Mr. Smith: I'm confused, Bill. Isn't my car supposed to be fully functional and include safety features?
Salesman: Well, Mr. Smith, we can include them on a trial bases for 30 days, but you'll have to return them or pay the subscription price.
Mr. Smith: What the f*ck, Bill? You mean I have to PAY repeadetly for something that should come with my car?
Salesman: Yes, Mr. Smith. Did you not read the EULA?
Mr. Smith: I think I want my money back.
Salesman: I'm afraid I can't let you do that, Mr. Smith.
Mr. Smith: Why the f*ck not?
Salesman: Because by opening the car door, you agreed to the EULA and you are bound to its terms and conditions.
Mr. Smith: You're a bastard, Bill.
Salesman: Actually, I'm the spawn of Satan.
right on, dude. that's a huge problem with the uberwidgets out there--battery life (or lack thereof). Gate's thinks this is a penis measurement with Jobs or something so he's going after a market in which he doesn't have ANY products that compete--it's on now that he shot off his mouth.
Dang, Mr. Grumpypants!
I do understand your points but, I'd rather be untethered from my from laptop and its bulky bag and accoutrements. I like my little Treo 600 because I can monitor my e-mail, have cell phone/text pager, and simple browser when I have to make my rounds--and it's all in my pocket not on my shoulder or back. It keeps me light. I also have a calendar to remind me when I need to be somewhere and I can make appts on the fly--it's like a little info pod not a computer.
I am surprised how many people have these fancy phones but don't use any of the features (i.e, they bought them because of the hype).
Dammit, Ballmer! Quit trolling Slashdot!!
At some point in time, the iPod will fade into obscurity but I doubt it will be caused by anything Microsoft makes. They've got one point of domination--Windows and they have severe quality issues.
Any emerging technologies out there for cell phones are going to have to consider several factors if they want to compete and beat the iPod as a music player (or if Apple wants to morph the iPod into a cell-phone):
1) Battery life. With all the stuff these uberwidgets are doing, they are going to have to find a good, stable, non-explosive power source. The iPod or other music players have a dedicated purpose--if you multiply the purposes, multiply the power consumption (probably by an exponent). I'd rather have a separate music player than to chance losing all my juice in my phone.
2) Portability--by that, I mean music can be moved from/to an iPod or computer to/from my new music phone easily. The interface has to be easy to use and it will have to be compatible the dominant music sources. Otherwise it's going to have hell catching up because re-inventing that wheel has not proven to be a match for iTMS. People won't switch products if it's not easy or they feel to heavily invested in or loyal to another product/service.
3) Availability & Pricing. If you can't get one from or working with your provider, it doesn't matter how good the product works or doesn't. [Look how long it took the Treo to get ubiquitous support]. The price dictates availability, too. The market demographic for people who want music and cell phones may not have the disposable income to afford it if it's not priced right. (i.e., cheaper than a nice cell phone + an iPod).
4) Fashion. MS's devices aren't ever as slick looking as Apple's--that will definitely be a factor in its appeal to both vendors and consumers. The "cool" factor enjoyed by the iPod is something Microsoft's money just can't buy. They'll have to compete in quality and design--two areas they don't do well in.