How can he be overusing it, since they explicitely said you can pay for your own usage, being considered that in excess of 25000 characters? If it all had to be work usage, then they should pay the whole thing regardless, and do some checks if it seems excessive.
I think your main two options are to hit everyone up with heavy duty lawyers, or else bombard Google with so much other information about yourself, that this drops down to page #100. Maybe a third option is to fabricate an identity of someone else with the same name as you, and pretend you were a different person.
I reckon I probably can't tell the difference through ear buds, even good quality in-ear ones. But give me a nice quality stereo, good quality speakers and sub-woofer, and I'm damn sure I can tell an MP3 from a SACD.
"I don't think *any* organization, association, or person should ever have tax-free status period."
Ok, when you bring money into your organisation that you call a "family" let's tax it one more time. When you give your kids pocket money, lets tax it again. Exactly the same principle you are asking for. Money that goes into clubs and organisations has already been taxed. A tax free organisation is a group of people communally spending their post-tax dollars.
Hillsong and and "the church down the road" are probably exactly the same. The members throw money in the hat, and it pays the wages and rent and activities of the group. Hillsong have a lot more people on the payroll and rent, but no real difference. Anyway, since all the money goes on wages, more or less, at the end of the day, there is no "profit" because there are no shareholders. Sooner or later all money is dispersed. If it is on wages, then the person getting the money is taxed.
And what is a profit? If you and I and our friends throw $50 each in the hat to hold a party, have we just made a "profit"? That's what a non-profit organisation is.
Huh? This is not ignorance of the law, this is ignorance of the facts. Facts and Law and completely different animals. I'm sure you are fully aware that driving without a license is against the law, and that you have to pay your fines etc. What you were ignorant of was the fact that your license was suspended and you had tickets outstanding.
It's not irrelevant because all those alt-fuel schemes are a lot more expensive (if they are feasible at all on a global scale), so at best the economy will take a big hit, at worst it will take a body blow.
Yeah, because Berkeley DB is a piece of shit. I was talking about something UP the scale of sophistication, not way DOWN. Something like an advanced object database as an example.
"But I'd much rather see effort put into solving the lack of horizontal scalability associated with relational DBs"
I think I'd rather see the opposite: That non-relation DBs become the mainstream, and they have SQL added for the odd occasion it is useful. Relational has some nice properties for ad-hoc querying, but for everything else they are a nuisance.
I actually listened to some of the senate committees this week on censorship. Boy does this government LOVE censorship. You should hear the self-righteous prattle they were going on with. The ridiculous thing of course is they are trying to stick their fingers in the dyke while the whole thing is coming down around them.
True, but if Oracle kept Sun's US assets, including all the IP and manufacturing, and simply sold a European sales company because of EU regulators, what would the regulators have actually achieved in terms of competition? Possibly, not a lot.
Even if it did not have interpreted code, mere use of an SQL database ALLOWS you to insert triggers and various stored procedures that could influence the election. It doesn't seem useful to merely ban interpreted code. You need to ban INTERPRETERS.
Slashdot Mirror
You've got to wait for the carrier to get your update? There's a fundamental problem right there.
How can he be overusing it, since they explicitely said you can pay for your own usage, being considered that in excess of 25000 characters? If it all had to be work usage, then they should pay the whole thing regardless, and do some checks if it seems excessive.
I think your main two options are to hit everyone up with heavy duty lawyers, or else bombard Google with so much other information about yourself, that this drops down to page #100. Maybe a third option is to fabricate an identity of someone else with the same name as you, and pretend you were a different person.
So you've missed the entire trend towards power saving in the data center?
A web server, no they shouldn't be allowed. But basic user level apps, why shouldn't they be allowed, at least as a default policy for a shipping OS?
I reckon I probably can't tell the difference through ear buds, even good quality in-ear ones. But give me a nice quality stereo, good quality speakers and sub-woofer, and I'm damn sure I can tell an MP3 from a SACD.
"I don't think *any* organization, association, or person should ever have tax-free status period."
Ok, when you bring money into your organisation that you call a "family" let's tax it one more time. When you give your kids pocket money, lets tax it again. Exactly the same principle you are asking for. Money that goes into clubs and organisations has already been taxed. A tax free organisation is a group of people communally spending their post-tax dollars.
Hillsong and and "the church down the road" are probably exactly the same. The members throw money in the hat, and it pays the wages and rent and activities of the group. Hillsong have a lot more people on the payroll and rent, but no real difference. Anyway, since all the money goes on wages, more or less, at the end of the day, there is no "profit" because there are no shareholders. Sooner or later all money is dispersed. If it is on wages, then the person getting the money is taxed.
And what is a profit? If you and I and our friends throw $50 each in the hat to hold a party, have we just made a "profit"? That's what a non-profit organisation is.
Huh? This is not ignorance of the law, this is ignorance of the facts. Facts and Law and completely different animals. I'm sure you are fully aware that driving without a license is against the law, and that you have to pay your fines etc. What you were ignorant of was the fact that your license was suspended and you had tickets outstanding.
It's not irrelevant because all those alt-fuel schemes are a lot more expensive (if they are feasible at all on a global scale), so at best the economy will take a big hit, at worst it will take a body blow.
I for one welcome our new botnet masters.
Yeah, because Berkeley DB is a piece of shit. I was talking about something UP the scale of sophistication, not way DOWN. Something like an advanced object database as an example.
Is that necessarily so? I don't think anyone has seriously attempted a democratic communist state.
"But I'd much rather see effort put into solving the lack of horizontal scalability associated with relational DBs"
I think I'd rather see the opposite: That non-relation DBs become the mainstream, and they have SQL added for the odd occasion it is useful. Relational has some nice properties for ad-hoc querying, but for everything else they are a nuisance.
The nice thing about Firewire is you can chain devices without a hub. That's why most machines have one firewire port, and any number of USB ports.
There are no unibody macbooks anymore. They were superseded by the Macbook Pro 13", and they do have Firewire.
I actually listened to some of the senate committees this week on censorship. Boy does this government LOVE censorship. You should hear the self-righteous prattle they were going on with. The ridiculous thing of course is they are trying to stick their fingers in the dyke while the whole thing is coming down around them.
True, but if Oracle kept Sun's US assets, including all the IP and manufacturing, and simply sold a European sales company because of EU regulators, what would the regulators have actually achieved in terms of competition? Possibly, not a lot.
That doesn't change anything unless they somehow disabled triggers and stored procedures in the database.
Even if it did not have interpreted code, mere use of an SQL database ALLOWS you to insert triggers and various stored procedures that could influence the election. It doesn't seem useful to merely ban interpreted code. You need to ban INTERPRETERS.
Yeah, but they required a BBC employee underneath to move it along.
Wouldn't the appeal be to play the old games and software that runs on the original architecture?
It's not unlikely that $random_slashdotter actually contributed a few lines to the Linux kernel and thus is legally positioned to ask HTC to cough up.
You can have it. There is an app for that on the app store. Takes about a gig or 2 or storage and costs about 10 bucks.