The un produced a lot of worthwhile stuff, mostly on the side of science(particularly medicine and standardisation), children protection. Just dig up and go past US news outfit whim ham on the un andcresearch a bit and you will find lot if sucess. They just dont advertise it like american do each time they habe a little duccess (better said american smear theur success on you and belittle anybody else success).
Cheney and Mumbai to be exact. I went through the slums with heavy protection and poor quarter, and that's not even counting rural india with lot of place lacking internet. There is no sensor tech to watch over those people. None. They have no CC, nobody has fingerprint or iris reader, they use cash only. At best you are speaking of the middle class which is still a minority in India (depending on who you ask middle class is 30 million to 300 million folk out of 1.3 billion folk). face it, yes india has made bound and leap, but they have done it very unequally. And biometric sensor tech spread is as far as it can be. At msot it is in the main city maybe spreading to the rural area, and only to make sure identity are correct. But for surveillance you need to be able to watch over people and that mean sensor and a way to read them. At the moment impossible in India Far more possible in the US.
From 0 to 18000 kronor you have 0 tax. Sure 18000 kronor is not much (2000 dollar yearly!) but then up to 460K kronor, that is 50K dollar yearly the tax rate is only about 30%. So far off your 76%. In fact only the top marginal tax have 76% and ONLY if you count the VAT (the top tax is 57% not 76% and if you count 25% from VAT then only then you come near 70% at most and that is assuming you think all tax goes to the same entity the state, which is untrue as about 20% of that is municipality). So I would qualify your claim as not only untrue, but if the people having less than 70K$ per year have any brain they will vote to continue the system.
if it does not hook you up in 2 episodes then they are doing their job wrong. A serial is not supposed to hook you up by end of season 3 episode 14, it is supposed to hook you up at the start. If it does not , then the show failed at its job. Life is short, I want to know from the start if it is going to suck 2 hours from my life and have nothing for me.
But India not. Let me clarify why I say that : those biometric stuff in the India ID card ? There are nigh a reader in India, and for all practical intent and purpose you cannot "observe" what somebody is doing without sensor. What you can is associated identity.
Now the US has 1) cellphone and cellphone ship every where perfect for position surveillance 2) CC usage every where perfect again to watch over somebody 3) internet/wifi/cellular usage watching over yeah they are supposed to only do it on foreigner but hey it is in place.
The US has a far better possibility to do state surveillance than India with its biometrics.
Sad puppies , sjw, dragon, happy puppies whatever. I am an avid reader of sf, as in at my peak I was reading 8 books a week, now less due to work/friends. I only care whether the story is good. *some* of the Hugo from 2017 or 2018 I find so bad as to wonder why they were nominated. That bot story for example I rolled my eye.
Nomination should never be based on race,skin, gender but on SF quality of writing skills and on story content quality mostly. If that means no white man or no non white women win, so be it. It isn't about gender/race author equality but all about SF quality. And while some Hugo were in the last year of high quality, many were so poor like that bot story that I wondered WHY the fuck they were nominated.
No it could be a misguided attempt at equality outcome as some pretend, or it could be there were no author worth nominating, or simply that the Hugo are being mismanaged. Whichever , Hugo are simply not a good indicator of SF in the last years.
An alternative explanation by the way is that "us" of the older generation expect some type of content, and the hugo is geared toward a newer generation expecting other type of content. If that's the case, in a few year/a decade SF is going to suck and blow ass.
But only when the show is *actually* funny. Look there are many shows where they make funs of geek in a certain way, see some episode of ti crowds, heck I would dare say futurama or many episode of the simpson, and I pass many many other. But TBBT is really poor in joke, it is a sitcom like people like them, but not geeky. Look, take some of the geek stuff, remove the laugh band and often you see there is nothing there. I can remember one with sheldon reciting names of games "mario kart etc..." if you remove the laugh band you realize there is ntohing tehre. TBBT is filled of those.
You see there is a difference also between laughing AT geek, and laughing WITH geek. TBBT the the sort of "AT" point at geek like ape and laugh. Look at their studio antics ! Other shows present funny geek situation but laugh WITH geek on those situation.
IMO TBBT was a show about geek charicature as viewed by non geek put into situation the non-geek view as funny. It was not funny. Want to show something utterly funny making fun WITH geek (and not AT) ? Watch the gamers. Watch brad Vader. You will immediately see what I mean with the difference between AT/WITH. And PS: sheldon is not funny. He look like somebody with a terrible mental problem which is not helped by its entourage. And that's unfunny unless you like laughing AT people with mental problems. I can nearly hear the producer whispering "why are you hitting yourself" while using your own punch to hit you in the face.
TL;DR TBBT is not a geek show. And yes we can laugh at ourselves but only when it is REALLY funny.
When people speaks of marijuana death they usually do not speak about secondary death (accident, inattention) because that criteria tells nothing about the LD50 of drugs. In fact most if not all propaganda I ever had shoved by throat was always about frying your brain, and getting OD, etc... Nearly never about driving with drug, which falls under the "don't drive impaired , or drunk" ads.
As such the LD50 of pot is about so high you would have to inject pure THC to reach it. Smoker/ingester cannot be affected. The number of death caused by pot itself as a substance is indeed zero. Even alcohol *directly* kills as a substance and has a reachable LD50 not counting organs destroyed by abuse long term like liver. Pot does not have that in a really reachable way (yes it increase throat cancer risk,but the risk is negligible - you are better off moving from city to countryside to lower the risk).
You just need to have distributed counting like many other countries do. The one I was born to, slice the voting places by about a few thousand electors. Then during election days they ask for volunteer. Usually they get around 20 from many political affiliation. I was one for many election. Then each is separated in a small group, then we get each a part of the ballot to count, then we note the number, then the ballots get shifted to another table then it get recounted, and finally the results which only officials can see until recount are finished, are compared (to avoid bias and people simply telling the same number). At that point maybe 1 hour has passed after the election, number are put on a board then summed, and result toldf loudly. Then the results are sent/cascaded/tabulated by region so everybody in the voting county can check the number they found is correct. Within 1 or 2 hours the results are in for 95% of all places, with recount already going on if there are problems. Then the paper ballot are kept under key for some times, with the name of the county. And yes the number of potential elector while not being 200 million , is around 1/5 of that so it ain't a micro island where that happens. You get the results without expansive optical readers, AND you get transparency to the voters.
Firefighter traffic is prioritizing tcp ip of a protocol, say for emergency service, over some dumb torrent download. *traffic type prioritization* has NEVER been about net neutrality. Why that crop up again and again I am beginning to suspect either people are dumb do not do research or are paid off. Look net neutrality is about not having traffic from amazon prime video throttled because verizon has a concurring service or they want amatzon to pay more, while they don't throttle say netflix *for the SAME protocol*. That is neutrality : neutrality toward the sending and receiving entity. Protocol can still be prioritized. To take your firefight example again, net neutrality is about not having BMW prioritized of a private person given priority over a volvo of another person. It has NEVER been about "not" prioritizing firefighter over private car. In fact from the start it was recognized that prioritizing protocol in a neutral manner (so ignoring who send/who receive) is fine.
... I am also doubtful on those cost from Uber are on development or AWS cost. No, far more likely they are spending the crushing majority 90%+ of that on 1) marketing and 2) subsiding the price of share down to try to crush competition and 3) as a minor cost comapred from the previous 2 the self driving research.
Not only has millions of tonnes of greenhouses gases been produced due to mining
it. According to you the atmosphere is 100% CO2 at this point.
Hardly, carbon cycle is natural 750 gigaton per year, as for human it is around 30 gigaton (or that order of magnitude). A million tons CO2 is not even a sizzling drop on a hot stone in the sahara.
Arrest someone your government dislikes, take phone, demand pin, change pin, tell detainee their pin doesn't work so you must have lied, put in jail for 10 years.
a country that far gone through the rabbit hole of fascism, does not need that. Just go to the culprit home and drop a bundle of child porn in mag form, photo of what "could" look like the suspect having sex with a child, et voila, and contrary to a phone that does not leave potential electronic evidence like changing the pin (which may have been logged). Or heck as xkcd said, just take a crowbar and hit them, or make them disappear in an early grave (pun intended). Frankly you are thinking of complicated solution when there is far more easier.
Not many people are willing to possibly lose their earning, their home, and possibly worse just for a few philosophical question (note that this would be different if they were threatened themselves, but let us be clear this is about half a word away so not the same attachment ideology or not).
The answer is obvious that does not make THEIR position more hypocrite. They are just realist but still trying to do something. What have you done agaisnt censorship except calling other hypocrites about working at google while having ethical issues ?
""NDEs tend to share many common elements, such as feelings of inner peace, the experience of traveling through a tunnel, out of body experiences, and encounters with sentient beings,""
While the first studies reported those elements, by now it is pretty much clear that 1) NDE depends on cultural backgrounds and 2) there are also negative one which go under reported because most religious folk don't like to report they saw vision of hell on where they think they are going after death. Just sayin'.
Plenty of study shows that coal kills prematurely 100K to 1M people worldwide. e.g. for EU https://phys.org/news/2016-07-... . And that's with today standard you can imagine what it was with 1930 standard. Capitalism killed far far many more people than communism by simply offloading externalities.
Yeah like those hellhole of danemark , sweden, etc...
You can mark everything as a failure if you ignore the success the only gather the failure. The truth is, socialism and capitalism together , the one to build a social net to avoid people falling down, the other to enhance society as a whole is MUCH better than either one pushed to 11. At the moment the US is doing capitalism pushed to 11, and the younger generation can recognize they are getting fucked in the ass without vaseline. You know people are young, not dumb.
See there is a difference to say in a cynic ton pretending to do sarcasm "This would never happen to elections. There is absolutely no need to burden the voters with having to prove their identity and eligibility, and anyone telling you otherwise is a hateful racist." and the ACTUALITY of it happening.
When checked the occurrence of true voter willful fraud is incredibly minimal, a few voters out of millions *at most* (most story you hear about people registered at two places are people having moved on but forgot to de-register at the old place , and there is no fraud, they only vote once) . But some people pretend it happens very often and want to impose verification which are very difficult to pass for poor (as in no money) voters. See such assholes long saw the correlation between those mostly poor demographic and a certain political arty, so what is the great thing about pretend-voter-fraud laws for them is that it kicks out those voters and so enable to skew to vote toward THEIR party. e.g. exclude homeless or people working 2*40 jobs the one because they have no address, the other because they have no time left to pass through hoops. Disenfranchise enough people and you can skew election.
here is the thing though : voter fraud is incredibly rare and negligible. You want to pretend otherwise ? Then advance evidence, like peer review or verifiable study. Go ahead. All those which exists out there all shows voter fraud to be extremely negligible.
i mean normally those chip takes years to engineer, so if they were already pre-producing when spectre/metldown came up... There was probably no chance to change them ?
Quite a few site I land on just plain tell" go away we cannot offer you any page view due to GPDR" (paraphrased the real message is : "We recognize you are attempting to access this website from a country belonging to the European Economic Area (EEA) including the EU which enforces the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and therefore access cannot be granted at this time. For any issues, contact content@richmond.com or call 804-649-6000. )", you got to ask yourself what the heck of a shaddy thing they are doing that they cannot offer you a page view. I am betting on tracker getting a lot of info off you. Because there is no real reason otherwise to forbid due to "legal" reason GPDR area.
Say you are the US and want to kill Putin/Castro/insert boogey man of your choice. There is a risk of nuclear war if detected. Do you : 1) do make a plain sniper murder or do you 2) hack the re-programmer for the pace maker so that if it detects a specific patient it change the therapy to be deadly,e.g. fail to deliver shock or do it at an irregular rate, but report to forensic the correct rate ? Same thing for any group XYZ wanting to murder somebody ABC but wanting to avoid the consequence IJK associated with plain murder.
While it is true that EU emission rose and US emission are slightly more down, per capita the US emission per capita ~16t are slightly more than double the one per capita in EU ~7t (2014 numbers sorry, difficult to come back to all country 2017/2018 nubmers https://data.worldbank.org/ind...). That is the ONE measure which is far more telling than absolute change from years to years. 2% up to 7t*500 million is still vastly less than16*300 million even if that country emit slightly less CO2 due to change from coal to natural gas. Both really should be massively going toward renewable or nuclear. Unfortunately this does not happen to go that way, so our grand children and their children gen screwed. But yes saying that emission is down for the US and up for the other hide the very inconvenient fact that per capita the US is still vastly ahead.
it is off by default. https://wiki.mozilla.org/Trust... "TRR is preffed OFF by default and you need to set a URI for an available DOH server to be able to use it."" Set `network.trr.mode` to 2 to make DNS Over HTTPS the browser's first choice but use regular DNS as a fallback (0 is "off by default", 1 lets Firefox pick whichever is faster, 3 for TRR only mode, 5 to explicitly turn it off)."
I am sorry, AGAIN, what is the problem ? People are simply throwing mud and getting angry because they want to.
The un produced a lot of worthwhile stuff, mostly on the side of science(particularly medicine and standardisation), children protection. Just dig up and go past US news outfit whim ham on the un andcresearch a bit and you will find lot if sucess. They just dont advertise it like american do each time they habe a little duccess (better said american smear theur success on you and belittle anybody else success).
Cheney and Mumbai to be exact. I went through the slums with heavy protection and poor quarter, and that's not even counting rural india with lot of place lacking internet. There is no sensor tech to watch over those people. None. They have no CC, nobody has fingerprint or iris reader, they use cash only. At best you are speaking of the middle class which is still a minority in India (depending on who you ask middle class is 30 million to 300 million folk out of 1.3 billion folk). face it, yes india has made bound and leap, but they have done it very unequally. And biometric sensor tech spread is as far as it can be. At msot it is in the main city maybe spreading to the rural area, and only to make sure identity are correct. But for surveillance you need to be able to watch over people and that mean sensor and a way to read them. At the moment impossible in India Far more possible in the US.
From 0 to 18000 kronor you have 0 tax. Sure 18000 kronor is not much (2000 dollar yearly!) but then up to 460K kronor, that is 50K dollar yearly the tax rate is only about 30%. So far off your 76%. In fact only the top marginal tax have 76% and ONLY if you count the VAT (the top tax is 57% not 76% and if you count 25% from VAT then only then you come near 70% at most and that is assuming you think all tax goes to the same entity the state, which is untrue as about 20% of that is municipality). So I would qualify your claim as not only untrue, but if the people having less than 70K$ per year have any brain they will vote to continue the system.
if it does not hook you up in 2 episodes then they are doing their job wrong. A serial is not supposed to hook you up by end of season 3 episode 14, it is supposed to hook you up at the start. If it does not , then the show failed at its job. Life is short, I want to know from the start if it is going to suck 2 hours from my life and have nothing for me.
But India not. Let me clarify why I say that : those biometric stuff in the India ID card ? There are nigh a reader in India, and for all practical intent and purpose you cannot "observe" what somebody is doing without sensor. What you can is associated identity.
Now the US has 1) cellphone and cellphone ship every where perfect for position surveillance 2) CC usage every where perfect again to watch over somebody 3) internet/wifi/cellular usage watching over yeah they are supposed to only do it on foreigner but hey it is in place.
The US has a far better possibility to do state surveillance than India with its biometrics.
Sad puppies , sjw, dragon, happy puppies whatever. I am an avid reader of sf, as in at my peak I was reading 8 books a week, now less due to work/friends. I only care whether the story is good. *some* of the Hugo from 2017 or 2018 I find so bad as to wonder why they were nominated. That bot story for example I rolled my eye.
Nomination should never be based on race,skin, gender but on SF quality of writing skills and on story content quality mostly. If that means no white man or no non white women win, so be it. It isn't about gender/race author equality but all about SF quality. And while some Hugo were in the last year of high quality, many were so poor like that bot story that I wondered WHY the fuck they were nominated.
No it could be a misguided attempt at equality outcome as some pretend, or it could be there were no author worth nominating, or simply that the Hugo are being mismanaged. Whichever , Hugo are simply not a good indicator of SF in the last years.
An alternative explanation by the way is that "us" of the older generation expect some type of content, and the hugo is geared toward a newer generation expecting other type of content. If that's the case, in a few year/a decade SF is going to suck and blow ass.
But only when the show is *actually* funny. Look there are many shows where they make funs of geek in a certain way, see some episode of ti crowds, heck I would dare say futurama or many episode of the simpson, and I pass many many other. But TBBT is really poor in joke, it is a sitcom like people like them, but not geeky. Look, take some of the geek stuff, remove the laugh band and often you see there is nothing there. I can remember one with sheldon reciting names of games "mario kart etc..." if you remove the laugh band you realize there is ntohing tehre. TBBT is filled of those.
You see there is a difference also between laughing AT geek, and laughing WITH geek. TBBT the the sort of "AT" point at geek like ape and laugh. Look at their studio antics ! Other shows present funny geek situation but laugh WITH geek on those situation.
IMO TBBT was a show about geek charicature as viewed by non geek put into situation the non-geek view as funny. It was not funny. Want to show something utterly funny making fun WITH geek (and not AT) ? Watch the gamers. Watch brad Vader. You will immediately see what I mean with the difference between AT/WITH. And PS: sheldon is not funny. He look like somebody with a terrible mental problem which is not helped by its entourage. And that's unfunny unless you like laughing AT people with mental problems. I can nearly hear the producer whispering "why are you hitting yourself" while using your own punch to hit you in the face.
TL;DR TBBT is not a geek show. And yes we can laugh at ourselves but only when it is REALLY funny.
When people speaks of marijuana death they usually do not speak about secondary death (accident, inattention) because that criteria tells nothing about the LD50 of drugs. In fact most if not all propaganda I ever had shoved by throat was always about frying your brain, and getting OD, etc... Nearly never about driving with drug, which falls under the "don't drive impaired , or drunk" ads.
As such the LD50 of pot is about so high you would have to inject pure THC to reach it. Smoker/ingester cannot be affected. The number of death caused by pot itself as a substance is indeed zero. Even alcohol *directly* kills as a substance and has a reachable LD50 not counting organs destroyed by abuse long term like liver. Pot does not have that in a really reachable way (yes it increase throat cancer risk,but the risk is negligible - you are better off moving from city to countryside to lower the risk).
It was not disclosing it during the campaign. There are certain thing you have to disclose as campaign finance. That was the illegal thing.
You just need to have distributed counting like many other countries do. The one I was born to, slice the voting places by about a few thousand electors. Then during election days they ask for volunteer. Usually they get around 20 from many political affiliation. I was one for many election. Then each is separated in a small group, then we get each a part of the ballot to count, then we note the number, then the ballots get shifted to another table then it get recounted, and finally the results which only officials can see until recount are finished, are compared (to avoid bias and people simply telling the same number). At that point maybe 1 hour has passed after the election, number are put on a board then summed, and result toldf loudly. Then the results are sent/cascaded/tabulated by region so everybody in the voting county can check the number they found is correct. Within 1 or 2 hours the results are in for 95% of all places, with recount already going on if there are problems. Then the paper ballot are kept under key for some times, with the name of the county. And yes the number of potential elector while not being 200 million , is around 1/5 of that so it ain't a micro island where that happens. You get the results without expansive optical readers, AND you get transparency to the voters.
Firefighter traffic is prioritizing tcp ip of a protocol, say for emergency service, over some dumb torrent download. *traffic type prioritization* has NEVER been about net neutrality. Why that crop up again and again I am beginning to suspect either people are dumb do not do research or are paid off. Look net neutrality is about not having traffic from amazon prime video throttled because verizon has a concurring service or they want amatzon to pay more, while they don't throttle say netflix *for the SAME protocol*. That is neutrality : neutrality toward the sending and receiving entity. Protocol can still be prioritized. To take your firefight example again, net neutrality is about not having BMW prioritized of a private person given priority over a volvo of another person. It has NEVER been about "not" prioritizing firefighter over private car. In fact from the start it was recognized that prioritizing protocol in a neutral manner (so ignoring who send/who receive) is fine.
... I am also doubtful on those cost from Uber are on development or AWS cost. No, far more likely they are spending the crushing majority 90%+ of that on 1) marketing and 2) subsiding the price of share down to try to crush competition and 3) as a minor cost comapred from the previous 2 the self driving research.
Hardly, carbon cycle is natural 750 gigaton per year, as for human it is around 30 gigaton (or that order of magnitude). A million tons CO2 is not even a sizzling drop on a hot stone in the sahara.
a country that far gone through the rabbit hole of fascism, does not need that. Just go to the culprit home and drop a bundle of child porn in mag form, photo of what "could" look like the suspect having sex with a child, et voila, and contrary to a phone that does not leave potential electronic evidence like changing the pin (which may have been logged). Or heck as xkcd said, just take a crowbar and hit them, or make them disappear in an early grave (pun intended). Frankly you are thinking of complicated solution when there is far more easier.
Not many people are willing to possibly lose their earning, their home, and possibly worse just for a few philosophical question (note that this would be different if they were threatened themselves, but let us be clear this is about half a word away so not the same attachment ideology or not).
The answer is obvious that does not make THEIR position more hypocrite. They are just realist but still trying to do something. What have you done agaisnt censorship except calling other hypocrites about working at google while having ethical issues ?
""NDEs tend to share many common elements, such as feelings of inner peace, the experience of traveling through a tunnel, out of body experiences, and encounters with sentient beings,""
While the first studies reported those elements, by now it is pretty much clear that 1) NDE depends on cultural backgrounds and 2) there are also negative one which go under reported because most religious folk don't like to report they saw vision of hell on where they think they are going after death. Just sayin'.
Plenty of study shows that coal kills prematurely 100K to 1M people worldwide. e.g. for EU https://phys.org/news/2016-07-... . And that's with today standard you can imagine what it was with 1930 standard. Capitalism killed far far many more people than communism by simply offloading externalities.
Yeah like those hellhole of danemark , sweden, etc... You can mark everything as a failure if you ignore the success the only gather the failure. The truth is, socialism and capitalism together , the one to build a social net to avoid people falling down, the other to enhance society as a whole is MUCH better than either one pushed to 11. At the moment the US is doing capitalism pushed to 11, and the younger generation can recognize they are getting fucked in the ass without vaseline. You know people are young, not dumb.
See there is a difference to say in a cynic ton pretending to do sarcasm "This would never happen to elections. There is absolutely no need to burden the voters with having to prove their identity and eligibility, and anyone telling you otherwise is a hateful racist." and the ACTUALITY of it happening.
When checked the occurrence of true voter willful fraud is incredibly minimal, a few voters out of millions *at most* (most story you hear about people registered at two places are people having moved on but forgot to de-register at the old place , and there is no fraud, they only vote once) . But some people pretend it happens very often and want to impose verification which are very difficult to pass for poor (as in no money) voters. See such assholes long saw the correlation between those mostly poor demographic and a certain political arty, so what is the great thing about pretend-voter-fraud laws for them is that it kicks out those voters and so enable to skew to vote toward THEIR party. e.g. exclude homeless or people working 2*40 jobs the one because they have no address, the other because they have no time left to pass through hoops. Disenfranchise enough people and you can skew election.
here is the thing though : voter fraud is incredibly rare and negligible. You want to pretend otherwise ? Then advance evidence, like peer review or verifiable study. Go ahead. All those which exists out there all shows voter fraud to be extremely negligible.
i mean normally those chip takes years to engineer, so if they were already pre-producing when spectre/metldown came up... There was probably no chance to change them ?
Quite a few site I land on just plain tell" go away we cannot offer you any page view due to GPDR" (paraphrased the real message is : "We recognize you are attempting to access this website from a country belonging to the European Economic Area (EEA) including the EU which enforces the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and therefore access cannot be granted at this time. For any issues, contact content@richmond.com or call 804-649-6000. )", you got to ask yourself what the heck of a shaddy thing they are doing that they cannot offer you a page view. I am betting on tracker getting a lot of info off you. Because there is no real reason otherwise to forbid due to "legal" reason GPDR area.
Say you are the US and want to kill Putin/Castro/insert boogey man of your choice. There is a risk of nuclear war if detected. Do you : 1) do make a plain sniper murder or do you 2) hack the re-programmer for the pace maker so that if it detects a specific patient it change the therapy to be deadly ,e.g. fail to deliver shock or do it at an irregular rate, but report to forensic the correct rate ? Same thing for any group XYZ wanting to murder somebody ABC but wanting to avoid the consequence IJK associated with plain murder.
While it is true that EU emission rose and US emission are slightly more down, per capita the US emission per capita ~16t are slightly more than double the one per capita in EU ~7t (2014 numbers sorry, difficult to come back to all country 2017/2018 nubmers https://data.worldbank.org/ind...). That is the ONE measure which is far more telling than absolute change from years to years. 2% up to 7t*500 million is still vastly less than16*300 million even if that country emit slightly less CO2 due to change from coal to natural gas. Both really should be massively going toward renewable or nuclear. Unfortunately this does not happen to go that way, so our grand children and their children gen screwed. But yes saying that emission is down for the US and up for the other hide the very inconvenient fact that per capita the US is still vastly ahead.
it is off by default. https://wiki.mozilla.org/Trust... "TRR is preffed OFF by default and you need to set a URI for an available DOH server to be able to use it."" Set `network.trr.mode` to 2 to make DNS Over HTTPS the browser's first choice but use regular DNS as a fallback (0 is "off by default", 1 lets Firefox pick whichever is faster, 3 for TRR only mode, 5 to explicitly turn it off)."
I am sorry, AGAIN, what is the problem ? People are simply throwing mud and getting angry because they want to.
And if this is disabled by default why is everybody so pissed off ?