As I use my bicycle to go to work, I have the same problem as you : pedestrian being idiot (and i would note , car thinking they have a priority over cyclist , no respecting right of passage but that's for another slashdot story). But those damn hybrid are really quiet too. While with a colleague which was getting her car out of parking he only noise I could hear was the strident "touting" noise the constructor added to the car. While going *forward* there was no noise at all. As pedestrian (and cyclist) are USED to be warned by noise, it doesn't come off as surprising that they get caught pant down. Constructor should simply add a noise to the vehicules, something akin to an ICE motor runing noise.
The problem is, thoser "pothead" have a good points. Cyrose, Alcoholic coma, and various other illness (korsakof), not even counting those which at the end of the road try other type of alcohol (rubbing alcohol forn example). Alcohol is more adictive and more destructive for the body than marijuanna. So it stands to reason that you should not ban something which is less addictive and less dangerous than alcohol while selling legally alcohol. The problem in this case is *cultural* and not a health one. Those who smoke weed eevryday are about as rare as those which drink alcohol everyday, but they are certainly much., much more fucntional. You never hear of those which don't smoke everyday, because unless you make a blood sampling, you would not be able to distinguish them from the rest of the population, just like your moderate drinker. The bottom line is, there is no reason whatsoever to forbid marijuanna a quite a lot of good reason to ban alcohol (and I did not even mention road accident).
And before you start to call me a pot head, I despise UTTERLY all chemicals which robs me of my mental potential. That include Pot, alcohol BOTH. But I am not a fucktard wanting to ban either , as they are personal choice. The only things I would impose is that having a road accident with any alcohol in the blood, I don't care which amount, or any drug, should automatically lead to heavy prison, while possessing and consuming either in privacy should not be a problem. Driving is something which can kill uninvolved people therefore it should be heavily punished. The rest is voter rethoric which has no scientific basis.
Whereas people using internet explorer as a rule won't probably care that much , I suspect firefox user in percentage (if not majorly) will care about noscript, adblock. I don't know many people without noscript and/or adblock. No granted , that could be a selection bias here, as I work in IT.
We aren't too excited, because the USA had this tech (destroying satellite) for some time. If anything it re-establish the BOP which is good thing for peace.
The code would be under copyright, but patent free. Not the same things. That mean you would not be able to COPY the code snippet, but you would be free to make your own implementation.
This is because of the lost baggage tracking system used by most airlines (world tracer / Sita). Most lost baggage from big company are entered in it, including bag tag, telephon, address of stay of the person, or original address, and once a "masterless" baggage is found it is checked against that list, and either forwarded on the next flight (the most usual choice) or shipped to an address of choice with two weeks. The airline don't lose intentionally baggage, that cost them a lot of money to track them down. The problem is that most if not all baggage handling is in the hand of the airport, which may or may not have the same incentive to properly track baggage.
Check in agent are supposed to look at the baggae you have, and at least their volume. Under a certain volume (basically a small luggage)you should be fine , but above that volume you normally are forced to register the baggage. Furthermore you can only have one big carry on AFAIK. Anything above is airline's tolerane.
By using very simple convention, you can put the entire equation program from graduation physic. Naturally the equation are useless without knowing how to use them, but still. In QM (my graduation) they allowed all books, calculator, whatever you wanted. It did not help *a bit* as long as you did not udnerstood what this was about and how to reason your way out of a paper back.
I dunno where you all live, but even while biking in the countryside in europe I *never* had call dropped, never heard of people getting call dropped that much either, except for battery power drain. And seeing how some people cite a 1.4% drop rate, I would like to know if it is the europe drop rate, or the US one. My experience (albeit much much more limited than in europe) is that in comparison the US coverage simply sucks rapidely when you got out of cities, and sometimes even within cities (NY).
Now what would be interesting is that somebody plug those number into a calculator, and assuming a perfect spherical repartition of the X ray photon, calculate the energy / intensity of the total photon emitted at the moment of the event, in 1 AU radius...
1.2.3 How far away could we detect radio transmissions?
By Al Aburto and David Woolley
Representative results are presented in Tables 1 and 2. The
short answer is
(1) Detection of broadband signals from Earth such as AM radio,
FM radio, and television picture and sound would be
extremely difficult even at a fraction of a light-year
distant from the Sun. For example, a TV picture having 5
MHz of bandwidth and 5 MWatts of power could not be detected
beyond the solar system even with a radio telescope with 100
times the sensitivity of the 305 meter diameter Arecibo
telescope.
(SnIpped but basically only narrow band transmission would be detectable beyond 1 LY).
stupid junk filter
Source ; Frequency ; Bandwidth ; Tsys ; EIRP ; Detection
; Range ; (Br) ; (Kelvin) ; ; Range (R)
AM Radio ; 530-1605 kHz ; 10 kHz ; 68E6 ; 100 KW ; 0.007 AU ;
FM Radio ; 88-108 MHz ; 150 kHz ; 430 ; 5 MW ; 5.4 AU
UHF TV ; 470-806 MHz ; 6 MHz ; 50 ? ; 5 MW ; 2.5 AU
Picture
Note : basically with 1 LY I was even generous as it seems TV and radio won't even go past *pluto*.
Therefore my point is that the JPG with all range is misleading as those signal will go nowhere below noise signal. The only signal going outside and which might be recognizable is the arecibo one.
What they care for is finding other civilisation that way. Already knowing *somebody* is existing would be an incredible knowledge and confirmation to our theory that "we are not alone". You might not find that great, but to some of us , this would be an incredible finding. That said, I don#t think SETI will ever come to anything valid.
Most ofn the signal we sent out will have gone below noise floor after 1 light year, so by our nearest neighbor sun would be already not recognizable. That nicve picture *DO NOT* take into account the reverse square law. The only one we can pretend is MAYBE recognize a few light year away is the arecibo signal. And that was a *3 MINUTES* signal. Hint : it was not a "ping" to show us, it was only a technical demonstration that it can be done. Face it, using our own waste of signal into space from start of broadcasting to today, we would not be able to detect ourselves from alpha centasuri ! No, the only stuff we could detect is a constant willful strong signal from ET civilisation saying "we are here". And that is it.
Ten grand per paper? And this compares to the government funding of warmist science by what, a factor of 1 to 1000? 1 to 100,000?
We don't get paid by paper. We get funding to research a specific things. And a whole lab might get a funding of a few million for a subject, over a few years, but nobody PERSONALLY get that much money as a scientist. That's not even counting the TIME spent on doing that paper. So take your 1 to 1000 factor and stuff it. 10 grand per paper is an ENORMOUS sum of money for the average scientist.
I started programming because it was fun to do stuff which did not exists on the computer and letmy imagination run wild. Heck the first computer game I had *literally* required imagination to be enjoyed: Yeah that square stick figure is the avatar, and that stick figure with stick out of it is the spider you are attacking. Reading book was not overrated either. But then again i was a geek, and a few of the jocks were literally laughing at me for playing with computer. But if I was born today, I would NEVER be as creative, or I would not even learn to program a computer. General PC is too complicated, even ASM is too complicated in comparison. Console is closed. I praise my luck that I was born at a time of change and shifting rather than before , when computing was for elite, or after, when computing was a closed commodity.
It won#t start suddenly morphing. What will happen, is that the strain which DO morph will be selected for, as they will more easily spread, than the one stopped by this antibody. But I would not put my hope too high. "In laboratory" means in-vitro. A lot of stuff works in vitro, but never pan out.
Around in Paris and the suburb (wonderful Banlieue...) all manhole cover can be removed with a metal crowbar. there is no bolting. And this is the first time I *ever* hear of manhole cover blowing up (stolen , oh yes, as a dangerous prank). I got the feeling it is not the wide spread problem in major city you think it is.
Logic at his purest form is not dependent on *ANY* material. Philosophy involve more than logic is dependent on logic, the same way physic involve more than math but is dependent on math. So philosophy is applied logic to idea and existence etc... Logic is not a subset of philosophy, philosophy is USING logic. Otherwise you could declare math a subset of physic. So at the core of EVERYTHING, logic, is there present and the most purest of all material.
Love is the behavior which is the result of chemical reaction in the brain and the body (neurotransmitter, hormone, neuron state etc...). Love *IS* based on chemistry , and therefore fully based on electromagnetic force, QM. All our emotion are based on chemistry. A complicated system, surely, one for which we have only superficial model definitively, but in absence of evidence to the contrary, those are definitively system where only biochemistry is at play.
All of those people which buy wooden knob and oxygenated golden cable fall into the same trap : they don't even do the modicum research themselves (like, I dunno check on wiki or around) to see if there is anything to the claim. They just hear from the vendor "it is better" see the 4 digits cable price and just swallow it hook and sinker. You don't need to be educated into physic, you just need to be educated enough to google.
A body covered by protection make a much better weapon than a bare body. You can pick up greater speed and have a greater shock. Otherwise, when bare, you get the pain yourself inflict without protection. I would wager that the energy involved in helmet+protection is allowed to be much greater, and when that protection fail the danger of greaver wound is probably higher. Maybe somebody with statistic on grevious wound in rugdby vs US football (more like handball) can chime in.
The fact is that once the apps/book was on YOUR device, it was *deleted* without your approval. Whether $ were shelled or not, this is exactly the kind of things what we around here call draconian control.
Slashdot Mirror
As I use my bicycle to go to work, I have the same problem as you : pedestrian being idiot (and i would note , car thinking they have a priority over cyclist , no respecting right of passage but that's for another slashdot story). But those damn hybrid are really quiet too. While with a colleague which was getting her car out of parking he only noise I could hear was the strident "touting" noise the constructor added to the car. While going *forward* there was no noise at all. As pedestrian (and cyclist) are USED to be warned by noise, it doesn't come off as surprising that they get caught pant down. Constructor should simply add a noise to the vehicules, something akin to an ICE motor runing noise.
"our OS are so bug ridden, that it is more easy to search the OS bit between the bugs, we would be ruined quickly if we paid for bugs found".
The problem is, thoser "pothead" have a good points. Cyrose, Alcoholic coma, and various other illness (korsakof), not even counting those which at the end of the road try other type of alcohol (rubbing alcohol forn example). Alcohol is more adictive and more destructive for the body than marijuanna. So it stands to reason that you should not ban something which is less addictive and less dangerous than alcohol while selling legally alcohol. The problem in this case is *cultural* and not a health one. Those who smoke weed eevryday are about as rare as those which drink alcohol everyday, but they are certainly much., much more fucntional. You never hear of those which don't smoke everyday, because unless you make a blood sampling, you would not be able to distinguish them from the rest of the population, just like your moderate drinker. The bottom line is, there is no reason whatsoever to forbid marijuanna a quite a lot of good reason to ban alcohol (and I did not even mention road accident).
And before you start to call me a pot head, I despise UTTERLY all chemicals which robs me of my mental potential. That include Pot, alcohol BOTH. But I am not a fucktard wanting to ban either , as they are personal choice. The only things I would impose is that having a road accident with any alcohol in the blood, I don't care which amount, or any drug, should automatically lead to heavy prison, while possessing and consuming either in privacy should not be a problem. Driving is something which can kill uninvolved people therefore it should be heavily punished. The rest is voter rethoric which has no scientific basis.
Whereas people using internet explorer as a rule won't probably care that much , I suspect firefox user in percentage (if not majorly) will care about noscript, adblock. I don't know many people without noscript and/or adblock. No granted , that could be a selection bias here, as I work in IT.
We aren't too excited, because the USA had this tech (destroying satellite) for some time. If anything it re-establish the BOP which is good thing for peace.
The code would be under copyright, but patent free. Not the same things. That mean you would not be able to COPY the code snippet, but you would be free to make your own implementation.
This is because of the lost baggage tracking system used by most airlines (world tracer / Sita). Most lost baggage from big company are entered in it, including bag tag, telephon, address of stay of the person, or original address, and once a "masterless" baggage is found it is checked against that list, and either forwarded on the next flight (the most usual choice) or shipped to an address of choice with two weeks. The airline don't lose intentionally baggage, that cost them a lot of money to track them down. The problem is that most if not all baggage handling is in the hand of the airport, which may or may not have the same incentive to properly track baggage.
Check in agent are supposed to look at the baggae you have, and at least their volume. Under a certain volume (basically a small luggage)you should be fine , but above that volume you normally are forced to register the baggage. Furthermore you can only have one big carry on AFAIK. Anything above is airline's tolerane.
I germany there are starcraft advertising at prime time. That can't be cheap. And that is only one country.
By using very simple convention, you can put the entire equation program from graduation physic. Naturally the equation are useless without knowing how to use them, but still. In QM (my graduation) they allowed all books, calculator, whatever you wanted. It did not help *a bit* as long as you did not udnerstood what this was about and how to reason your way out of a paper back.
I dunno where you all live, but even while biking in the countryside in europe I *never* had call dropped, never heard of people getting call dropped that much either, except for battery power drain. And seeing how some people cite a 1.4% drop rate, I would like to know if it is the europe drop rate, or the US one. My experience (albeit much much more limited than in europe) is that in comparison the US coverage simply sucks rapidely when you got out of cities, and sometimes even within cities (NY).
Now what would be interesting is that somebody plug those number into a calculator, and assuming a perfect spherical repartition of the X ray photon, calculate the energy / intensity of the total photon emitted at the moment of the event, in 1 AU radius...
SETI themselves.
FAQ distance detection
1.2.3 How far away could we detect radio transmissions? By Al Aburto and David Woolley Representative results are presented in Tables 1 and 2. The short answer is (1) Detection of broadband signals from Earth such as AM radio, FM radio, and television picture and sound would be extremely difficult even at a fraction of a light-year distant from the Sun. For example, a TV picture having 5 MHz of bandwidth and 5 MWatts of power could not be detected beyond the solar system even with a radio telescope with 100 times the sensitivity of the 305 meter diameter Arecibo telescope.
(SnIpped but basically only narrow band transmission would be detectable beyond 1 LY).
stupid junk filter
Source ; Frequency ; Bandwidth ; Tsys ; EIRP ; Detection
; Range ; (Br) ; (Kelvin) ; ; Range (R)
AM Radio ; 530-1605 kHz ; 10 kHz ; 68E6 ; 100 KW ; 0.007 AU ;
FM Radio ; 88-108 MHz ; 150 kHz ; 430 ; 5 MW ; 5.4 AU
UHF TV ; 470-806 MHz ; 6 MHz ; 50 ? ; 5 MW ; 2.5 AU
Picture
UHF TV ; 470-806 MHz ; 0.1 Hz ; 50 ? ; 5 MW ; 0.3 LY
Carrier
WSR-88D ; 2.8 GHz ; 0.63 MHz ; 40 ; 32 GW ; 0.01 LY
Weather Radar
Arecibo ; 2.380 GHz ; 0.1 Hz ; 40 ; 22 TW ; 720 LY|
S-Band (CW)
(SNIP)
Note : basically with 1 LY I was even generous as it seems TV and radio won't even go past *pluto*. Therefore my point is that the JPG with all range is misleading as those signal will go nowhere below noise signal. The only signal going outside and which might be recognizable is the arecibo one.
What they care for is finding other civilisation that way. Already knowing *somebody* is existing would be an incredible knowledge and confirmation to our theory that "we are not alone". You might not find that great, but to some of us , this would be an incredible finding. That said, I don#t think SETI will ever come to anything valid.
Most ofn the signal we sent out will have gone below noise floor after 1 light year, so by our nearest neighbor sun would be already not recognizable. That nicve picture *DO NOT* take into account the reverse square law. The only one we can pretend is MAYBE recognize a few light year away is the arecibo signal. And that was a *3 MINUTES* signal. Hint : it was not a "ping" to show us, it was only a technical demonstration that it can be done. Face it, using our own waste of signal into space from start of broadcasting to today, we would not be able to detect ourselves from alpha centasuri ! No, the only stuff we could detect is a constant willful strong signal from ET civilisation saying "we are here". And that is it.
Ten grand per paper? And this compares to the government funding of warmist science by what, a factor of 1 to 1000? 1 to 100,000?
We don't get paid by paper. We get funding to research a specific things. And a whole lab might get a funding of a few million for a subject, over a few years, but nobody PERSONALLY get that much money as a scientist. That's not even counting the TIME spent on doing that paper. So take your 1 to 1000 factor and stuff it. 10 grand per paper is an ENORMOUS sum of money for the average scientist.
I started programming because it was fun to do stuff which did not exists on the computer and letmy imagination run wild. Heck the first computer game I had *literally* required imagination to be enjoyed: Yeah that square stick figure is the avatar, and that stick figure with stick out of it is the spider you are attacking. Reading book was not overrated either. But then again i was a geek, and a few of the jocks were literally laughing at me for playing with computer. But if I was born today, I would NEVER be as creative, or I would not even learn to program a computer. General PC is too complicated, even ASM is too complicated in comparison. Console is closed. I praise my luck that I was born at a time of change and shifting rather than before , when computing was for elite, or after, when computing was a closed commodity.
It won#t start suddenly morphing. What will happen, is that the strain which DO morph will be selected for, as they will more easily spread, than the one stopped by this antibody. But I would not put my hope too high. "In laboratory" means in-vitro. A lot of stuff works in vitro, but never pan out.
Around in Paris and the suburb (wonderful Banlieue...) all manhole cover can be removed with a metal crowbar. there is no bolting. And this is the first time I *ever* hear of manhole cover blowing up (stolen , oh yes, as a dangerous prank). I got the feeling it is not the wide spread problem in major city you think it is.
If they continue breaking privacy law, the fine will continue, and increase.
Logic at his purest form is not dependent on *ANY* material. Philosophy involve more than logic is dependent on logic, the same way physic involve more than math but is dependent on math. So philosophy is applied logic to idea and existence etc... Logic is not a subset of philosophy, philosophy is USING logic. Otherwise you could declare math a subset of physic. So at the core of EVERYTHING, logic, is there present and the most purest of all material.
Love is the behavior which is the result of chemical reaction in the brain and the body (neurotransmitter, hormone, neuron state etc...). Love *IS* based on chemistry , and therefore fully based on electromagnetic force, QM. All our emotion are based on chemistry. A complicated system, surely, one for which we have only superficial model definitively, but in absence of evidence to the contrary, those are definitively system where only biochemistry is at play.
All of those people which buy wooden knob and oxygenated golden cable fall into the same trap : they don't even do the modicum research themselves (like, I dunno check on wiki or around) to see if there is anything to the claim. They just hear from the vendor "it is better" see the 4 digits cable price and just swallow it hook and sinker. You don't need to be educated into physic, you just need to be educated enough to google.
A body covered by protection make a much better weapon than a bare body. You can pick up greater speed and have a greater shock. Otherwise, when bare, you get the pain yourself inflict without protection. I would wager that the energy involved in helmet+protection is allowed to be much greater, and when that protection fail the danger of greaver wound is probably higher. Maybe somebody with statistic on grevious wound in rugdby vs US football (more like handball) can chime in.
The fact is that once the apps/book was on YOUR device, it was *deleted* without your approval. Whether $ were shelled or not, this is exactly the kind of things what we around here call draconian control.