Is that all they do is complain, but provide no answers to human rights violators.
What alternative is there to putting people in jail just because they're Chechen? Or torturing people?
"You could also put them in jail for half a jear without a lawyer!"? They already do that.
They could try to foster more mutual understanding instead of getting people to write letters to the politicians in charge. But who says those people don't include alternatives?
They are against Nixonian engagement (trade with China), against embargos/sanctions (Cuba), and against military intervention to overthrow murderous dictators (Iraq).
Last i read, Cuba was doing fine without US products. They grow their own. Maybe that was from a different magazine though.
As for Iraq: The official reason to invade was to find the Weapons of Mass Destruction. Which was a false presumption.
Too bad Amnesty just likes to whine and doesn't have any solutions.
I thought so too, but after reading their entries at dictionary.com, i think a nerd is more of a single minded person and a geek more of an eccentric one.
And if the astronauts were protected by their space suits, why didn't rescue workers use such protective gear at the Chernobyl meltdown, which released only a fraction of the dose astronauts would encounter?
An apple also releases only a fraction of the dose astronauts would encounter. Yet i'm fine without a space suit.
Slashdot Mirror
If he didn't do it, why is he sending threatening tapes about the attacks to the media? Is it part of his CIA training?
Genocide like using chemical WMD on the Kurds during operation Anfal in 1988.
If your government "cannot wait for one of these terrible weapons to turn up in our cities.", then it shouldn't have supplied
them in the first case.
Ah, so some paperwork is a better reason to invade a country than genocide?
You haven't specified the weapons you spoke of.
What weapons?
I don't give a shit about Saddam. You should've caught him in the first Gulf War.
Is that all they do is complain, but provide no answers to human rights violators.
What alternative is there to putting people in jail just because they're Chechen? Or torturing people?
"You could also put them in jail for half a jear without a lawyer!"? They already do that.
They could try to foster more mutual understanding instead of getting people to write letters to the politicians in charge. But who says those people don't include alternatives?
They are against Nixonian engagement (trade with China), against embargos/sanctions (Cuba), and against military intervention to overthrow murderous dictators (Iraq).
Last i read, Cuba was doing fine without US products. They grow their own. Maybe that was from a different magazine though.
As for Iraq: The official reason to invade was to find the Weapons of Mass Destruction. Which was a false presumption.
Too bad Amnesty just likes to whine and doesn't have any solutions.
Fair trials. Peace.
Watcha gonna do? Sell caddle prods to corrupt Russians?
I was making clear that it's not implausible that they may take revenge. Not aimed at you personally.
I just think it's stupid to hate the rich just because they are rich.
So you are afraid of different people becoming self sufficient? Are you by any chance using violence against them for personal gain?
I thought so too, but after reading their entries at dictionary.com, i think a nerd is more of a single minded person and a geek more of an eccentric one.
Could it be dew? How much did the temperature of those airbags change?
But how do you dispose of all those poisoned mussels?
ROX is the most instinctive filer i know of.
Nice idea, but it doesn't seem to work for me. Do you have a non-crosseyed version?
And if the astronauts were protected by their space suits, why didn't rescue workers use such protective gear at the Chernobyl meltdown, which released only a fraction of the dose astronauts would encounter?
An apple also releases only a fraction of the dose astronauts would encounter. Yet i'm fine without a space suit.
Er, skipping. D'oh.
That doesn't exclude skidding though.
There's no shortage of food. Just a distribution problem.
That was a decade ago. Besides, they can send you to Cuba now on suspicion of terrorism.
Whoa. I've been playing 4D shoot'emups all along.
We know that it takes more energy to build them than they will ever produce in their lifetime.
:)
Then how come they are still being made, bought, and can pay for themselves in 3 years?
In addition to having centralized pollution, solar cells are becoming more attractive all the time.
Because killing people is wrong.
You're right. "Gefeliciteerd met jullie overwinning in Australie." = "Congratulations with your victory in Australia."
Mozilla Toynbee tiles...
RemLine should help.
Have places to safely store radioactive waste run out? No matter, there are plenty of decomposing organic things that give off gas.