Slashdot Mirror


Dutch Win World Solar Car Challenge

Sick Boy writes "The Dutch solar car Nuna II, using ESA space technology, finished first in the World Solar Challenge, a 3010 km race right across Australia for cars powered by solar energy. Having set off from Darwin on Sunday 19 October, Nuna II crossed the finish line in Adelaide in a new record-breaking time of 30 hours 54 minutes, beating the previous record of 32 hours 39 minutes set by its Dutch precursor Nuna in 2001."

215 comments

  1. bravo, jongens! by Potor · · Score: 2

    ik wens u met uw overwinning in Australie geluk.

    1. Re:bravo, jongens! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I accidently moderated this off-topic, so this comment should undo the moderation.

    2. Re:bravo, jongens! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Inderdaad, proficiat keesbollen!

      Een nederig belgje groet u.

    3. Re:bravo, jongens! by mirko · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, he may at least have translated...
      According to wordlingo, the above meant: "I wish with your victory in Australie luck you."

      (yes, I know : online translation is still a concept)

      --
      Trolling using another account since 2005.
    4. Re:bravo, jongens! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i think the parent was aimed at the team, not you

    5. Re:bravo, jongens! by Monk[Deviant+Form] · · Score: 1

      wooooot my first chance at being a spelling/grammar nazi in a obscure language so to hell with karma!
      this sentance might look dutch to the casual observer but its structure is wrong and "u" is used to adress ones elders, "je" or "jullie" (plural) would have been more usual here.
      my guess its a poor online translation from english

      now if only i could remember how to translate solar powered overlords to dutch :P

    6. Re:bravo, jongens! by MooCows · · Score: 1

      No, the sentence is correct :) But I guess the poster is belgian though, as they use "u" for everybody. We Dutch are not so polite and say "je" mostly

      --
      The path I walk alone is endlessly long.
      30 minutes by bike, 15 by bus.
    7. Re:bravo, jongens! by EasyTarget · · Score: 1

      as they use "u" for everybody

      Or simply not a native Dutch speaker.
      I'm learning Dutch at the moment and I have repeatedly been told that 'U' is formal, 'Je' is informal and -only- to be used with people you know. If in doubt use 'U' is the advice I have had several times..

      Bedankt! en tot ziens ;-)

      --
      "Oops, I always forget the purpose of competition is to divide people into winners and losers." - Hobbes
    8. Re:bravo, jongens! by Da+Fokka · · Score: 1

      'Heersers op Zonne-energie' would be a good translation.
      'Persoonlijk verwelkom ik onze nieuwe Heersers op Zonne-energie' probably is the complete sentence you're looking for :)

    9. Re:bravo, jongens! by BorgDrone · · Score: 1

      "u" is used to adress ones elders, "je" or "jullie" (plural) would have been more usual here.
      'u' is used as a politeness form (e.g. when talking to your boss), afaik there is no similar construct in the english language.
      'je','jij','jullie', etc. is more informal. (e.g. when talking to friends, collegues, parents)

      Using 'u' to adress ones elders is not commonly used anymore.

    10. Re:bravo, jongens! by Potor · · Score: 1

      re: belgium, good guess! also, it is not my mother tongue, so its correctness is actually a random occurance

    11. Re:bravo, jongens! by mrjb · · Score: 2, Informative

      "indeed, congratulations cheeseballs! a humble little Belgian greets you."

      --
      Visit http://ringbreak.dnd.utwente.nl/~mrjb/growingbettersoftware to download your free copy of the book
    12. Re:bravo, jongens! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The correct sentence would be,

      Ik wens u geluk met uw overwinning in Australie.
      I wish you luck with your victory in Australia.

      The buildup of the sentence is exactly the same in dutch as in english in this case.

      Gefeliciteerd met jullie overwinning in Australie.

      The above would be the normal sentence because wishing someone luck is mostly used before an event has taken place. To congratulate someone is used when the event has already taken place.

      I almost flunked dutch in school though so i could be all wrong ;)

    13. Re:bravo, jongens! by Zan+Zu+from+Eridu · · Score: 1
      It's technically correct, but it's not good style.

      Ik wens u geluk met uw overwinning in Australie. (formal, as if you had won the Nobel prize).
      Ik wens jullie geluk met jullie overwinning in Australie. (informal)

    14. Re:bravo, jongens! by Zan+Zu+from+Eridu · · Score: 1

      You should use the informal construct if you address them as "jongens", meaning "boys" or "lads".

    15. Re:bravo, jongens! by geschild · · Score: 1

      In Dutch, as in most other European languages, there is a formal form ('u') and an informal form ('je'/'jullie') of addressing people. In english, the same was true in the past with 'thee' and 'thou' as the formal variant.

      As you say, if in doubt, use 'u'. However, here in the Netherlands, young people are often amazed if one uses 'u' instead of 'je' to address them. Most people feel, that if addressed with u, they're suddenly old... ;-). If you want to be polite, use 'u', but don't when the person you address is young (apparantly younger than 25) and it doestn't concern a formal contact or situation.

      [dutch mode]Ik vind het knap dat je de moeite neemt om Nederlands te leren en ik hoop dat je het niet al te moeilijk vindt.[/dutch mode]

      --
      Karma? What's that again?
    16. Re:bravo, jongens! by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 2, Informative


      In english, the same was true in the past with 'thee' and 'thou' as the formal variant.


      Erm, not correct. "thee" and "thou" are the informal variants. "you" is the formal one, and today only the formal one is used .... and in common sense it transformed by that into the informal one. So you are half right anyway :-)

      Ah ... now I wait for that guy who will mod this as flaimbait ... as usually all my posts where I correct someone get modded down as flaimbait ... likely because there isa /.er who really hates me.

      angel'o'sphere

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    17. Re:bravo, jongens! by NonSequor · · Score: 1

      There used to be formal and informal forms of the second person pronoun in English but now the informal one, "thou," is considered archaic.

      It's still useful to know that "thou" is informal and "you" is formal when reading Shakespeare. For example, Cassius addresses Brutus as "you" when he's talking to him, but after he leaves he uses "thou" to refer to him.

      --
      My only political goal is to see to it that no political party achieves its goals.
    18. Re:bravo, jongens! by geschild · · Score: 1

      If it helps any, I think it is an enlightening post that goes to show how little one knows. Oh well. I'm just happy people outside of the Netherlands / Belgium make the effort to learn Dutch. Not one of the easiest languages out there.

      What I find most interesting is that it then must be that english migrated to the courteous form, whereas Dutch seems to be converging on the informal form.

      Language can be a lot of fun, whichever language it is.

      --
      Karma? What's that again?
    19. Re:bravo, jongens! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am amazed to see non-dutch go through the effort of learning what i think sounds like a throat desease.

    20. Re:bravo, jongens! by uradu · · Score: 1

      In German it's similar, with "Sie" being the formal and "du" the informal version of "you". But since living in the English-speaking world I've started to get quite impatient with and intolerant of these silly formalisms, which seem a throwback to times past. Besides, they just add a layer of awkwardness having to transition from "Sie" to "du" and finally "pass the cigarette" when romancing the other sex.

    21. Re:bravo, jongens! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gefeliciteerd met jullie overwinning, te gek!!

      When I wishes someone luck , I say :
      "succes!"

      Dutch changes also , influenced by the internet , media,music etc.

      20 years ago, the youth said instead of "hoe gaat het?"
      "Alles kits?"
      Now , this is a not.
      You have to say :
      "Alles Flex?"

    22. Re:bravo, jongens! by g_braad · · Score: 1

      SUPER! Dit hebben ze zeker wel verdient. Een prestatie die zelfs overtreft wat men had verwacht!

      --
      F/OSS & IT Consultant
    23. Re:bravo, jongens! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gast, wat zijn keesbollen nou weer???
      Belgen zijn echt raar. En dom.

    24. Re:bravo, jongens! by MonoSynth · · Score: 1

      'Verdiend' ((they have) deserved) in this context is with a 'D' and not with a 'T' at the end.

      It should be with a 'T' if it was 'Hij verdient' ((he) deserves). The pronunctation is exactly the same and there are many exceptions to this rule, so (i guess) >40% of the Dutch people don't master this. (even higher educated people!)

    25. Re:bravo, jongens! by Cybrr · · Score: 1

      You're right. "Gefeliciteerd met jullie overwinning in Australie." = "Congratulations with your victory in Australia."

      --
      Why did GEAR crush RDP?
    26. Re:bravo, jongens! by MonoSynth · · Score: 1

      I wonder how much Dutch *is* a 'throat disease'. It should be calculatable by counting the percentage of people who stutter, people who don't master the language (from common spelling mistakes to dyslexia), and so on. Personally, I think Dutch could get a bad score on most of the items.

      I'm Dutch, I stutter (but I master the grammar and spelling), and I often wonder how it was when I grew up with a more fluently spoken language.

    27. Re:bravo, jongens! by mazur · · Score: 1
      Which is astonishing, beccause only the word order is wrong, not the actual translation:
      "I wish you luck with your victory in Australia." is a more correct translation.

      Stefan.

      --
      The truth shall make you fret. (Ankh-Morpork tImes motto)
    28. Re:bravo, jongens! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey, it's cheeseHEADS for you !

  2. Are solar panels really all that great? by Dancin_Santa · · Score: 2, Insightful

    While it's nice that we can get power out in the middle of nowhere (and face it, most of Australia is "the middle of nowhere"), doesn't the environmental damage posed by the building and throwing away of these solar panels negate much of the benefits of having a non-fossil fueled car?

    That said, you'd think that a country with more cloudy weather would do better at squeezing the last little bit of energy out of a solar panel than somewhere sunny like Holland.

    1. Re:Are solar panels really all that great? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      The thing is nobody said that the solar panels were developed in Holland. Cloudy weather has nothing to do with it. Solar panels came linea-recta from ESA (ESTEC). They are Ga-As solar cells used on space sattelites.

    2. Re:Are solar panels really all that great? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First of all most of the Australian outback is way more in "the middle of nowhere" than most people can comprehend.

      Face it, we have farms that are larger than most countries in Europe.

      Second, The Netherlands is not very sunny compared to outback Australia. Is it cloudy or does it rain more than once or twice every two years or so in The Netherlands? Though so. Not a very sunny country at all.

    3. Re:Are solar panels really all that great? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Netherlands is not very sunny compared to outback Australia.

      Which, I think, is the point. Seattle is rainier than the Netherlands (do you capitalize the 'the'?). So is England. Further north you get to the Scandanavian countries which have less light throughout the year than the lower countries.

      So what is the Netherlands doing right that they can repeat this win every year?

    4. Re:Are solar panels really all that great? by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 5, Funny
      Well Australia was of course called "New Holland" before the pommies got there.

      In Australia they have signs on the road every 50km or so saying "Drowsy Drivers Die". In other countries they have an alternative to keep them awake, called "scenery".

    5. Re:Are solar panels really all that great? by milosoftware · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In Holland, we have signs that say 50 because that is how fast you're allowed to go. We have fully automated "cash machines" on 'strategic' places (read: wide straight road) that will take a picture of the license plate of every car that is caught driving 51 or more, and to complement, we have aggressive BMW drivers honking and flashing headlights behind anyone driving less than 50.0

      By the way, the Dutch weather is more like UK than like Aussi.

      --
      Musicians don't die. They just decompose.
    6. Re:Are solar panels really all that great? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My superiour open source businessmodel!

      1: Make free software.
      2: ?
      3: Post redundant stuff.
      4: Profit!

    7. Re:Are solar panels really all that great? by CvD · · Score: 1

      Sunny weather? Sunny weather??? WTF? For at least 3/4 of the year it's cloudy/overcast here. Not that that helped, in this case. As someone else mentioned, the solar panels used are triple junction Ga-As solar panels also used in space, by the ESA. So, the panels were made for space, not for bad weather in Holland. :-)

      Cheers,

      CvD.

    8. Re:Are solar panels really all that great? by CvD · · Score: 5, Informative

      They have software managing all the energy uses. There's lots of sensors picking up lighting conditions, road conditions, load on the engines, incline, wind, etc. They all feed into some computer which is in one of the follow cars. This then recommends the driver at what speed he should be going.

      They were actually hoping for overcast skies, as this is where the car can really gain on the competition, with the battery/panel management software. In sunny weather every car can drive top speed, but when its cloudy you have to start being clever with your solar panels input vs. battery usage vs. speed (energy usage).

      Also, they have pretty efficient solar panels: 3000 Gallium-Arsenide Triple Junction solar cells, 24,5+% efficiency (total 9 square meters).

      They also got specially designed tires. Very low roll resistance. The electric engines are mounted in the wheels, so there's no power loss in transmission or gearing.

      And of course the frame is a monocoque structure (it doesn't need an internal frame/chassis), of lightweight composites.

      These are just some of the things they did. I'm getting this from their website, which is unfortunately in Dutch.

      And no, we don't capitalize the 'the', only at the beginning of a sentence. :-)

      Cheers,

      Costyn.

    9. Re:Are solar panels really all that great? by Da+Fokka · · Score: 1

      Well thankfully climate change is slowly changing our foggy little country into something with a near-medditeranean climate. Last summer was record-breaking (although it's pretty fucking chilly right now).

    10. Re:Are solar panels really all that great? by The_DoubleU · · Score: 1

      >> somewhere sunny like Holland. HAHAHHAHAHAHHAHHAA That is funny, do you know where holland is located? This year sofar Holland had 1843 hours of sun. But it was an extreme sunny year. The Dutch average is 1523 a year. Hahahhaha, sunny Holland, hahahhaha

      --
      What power has law where only money rules.
    11. Re:Are solar panels really all that great? by hatchet · · Score: 1

      It is not true that scandinavians have less light through the year. Yes light is not as intense as in southern countries.. and yes they do have even dark days in winter in north of scandinavia (2-4 weeks iirc) but in summer they also have light through the whole day.. so the amount of time when the sun shines through the year is about the same.

    12. Re:Are solar panels really all that great? by Red+Rocket · · Score: 1


      The best thing about solar power is that you don't have to invade sovereign countries and kill thousands of innocent people to secure sources of solar panels.
      You also don't have to blast away entire mountain ranges and snuff out the valleys and streams below with the leftover rock and dirt from mining solar panels.
      So, relatively speaking, yeah, solar panels are pretty good.

      --
      - Hail to our fearless misleader! Fool speed ahead!
    13. Re:Are solar panels really all that great? by Viceroy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, the solar cells were developed and manufactured in the US by companies like Spectrolab and Emcore. They are then assembled and encapsulated by Hans Gochermann in Germany. ESA only purchased the cells and sponsored them to the Dutch team. But they are GaAs cells that were to be used on space satelites.

    14. Re:Are solar panels really all that great? by bombadillo · · Score: 1

      In Australia they have signs on the road every 50km or so saying "Drowsy Drivers Die". In other countries they have an alternative to keep them awake, called "scenery".

      I have seen similar signs about drowsy drivers on the English motorways. Maybe these signs were imported by pommies :)

    15. Re:Are solar panels really all that great? by kabocox · · Score: 1

      O.k. Here is an idea. Why can't they take all the neato keen ideas they've already demonstrated, and find out how the MPG could be improved solely by driving patterns. I have no idea how my driving patterns effect my MPG except in general terms. If there were some lights on the dashboard that allowed me know know how to "best" drive my vechile, I would like it.

    16. Re:Are solar panels really all that great? by CvD · · Score: 2, Informative

      Some newer cars, and luxury cars have had this for a while. Its basically a MPG indicator. It'll show you how many MPG you're currently driving at. When you accellerate, it goes up... when you're coasting, you barely use anything. Quite useful yeah, but in general traffic, you basically have to go with the flow and usually don't have the choice.

      Otherwise there are ways of driving economically. Accellerate slowly, don't press the gas pedal more than you need to accellerate (there's a point when you press the accellerator but the engine doesn't develop any more power, but it uses more fuel - you should avoid that). And basically don't drive to fast either... higher speed = higher wind resistance.

      But these guys took it to the extreme. They probably also considered changes in elevation... used regenerative braking and stuff like that.

      Cheers,

      Costyn.

    17. Re:Are solar panels really all that great? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, bloody hell, you really believe this? Oh, and I guess they grow on trees too? Well, actually they do, but not in any matter of solar panels we are talking about. You do realize that when the total lifetime energy generation of a solar panel is figured out, when used on earth, the number is always negative compared to what it takes to make right? That includes mining the stuff to make the solar panels (blowing up mountains and valleys), the energy needed to make them (occupying foriegn countries for oil to run generation plants, or flooding valleys for decades, after occupying foreign countries for the energy needed to make damns, or making vast tracts of plains unviable for much else but wind generators), and then there is always the highly toxic by-products of solar cell production (poisoning streams and oceans, not to mention the air since you've got to burn something sometime). Yeah, real good. You're better off burning crude oil, when you figure out the total pollution/energy debt.

      But, lets not confuse the issue with reality huh?

    18. Re:Are solar panels really all that great? by kabocox · · Score: 1

      I have a piece of crap old vechile with over 160K miles on it. It is "paid off" though. I'm still working on the payments on my wife's car. Maybe one day I'll be able to get a "new" car. I can always dream. Sigh.

    19. Re:Are solar panels really all that great? by rsmith · · Score: 1

      You could fit a so-called econometer in your car. They work by measuring the fuel flow and/or inlet underpressure.

      --
      Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence.
    20. Re:Are solar panels really all that great? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To compare the environmental costs of solar panel production to petroleum production is totally without factual basis, particularly when you factor in the human costs which we have just seen in Iraq and Afghanistan (the Turkmenistan->Pakistan pipeline in the latter case). The scales of production cost and resource appropriation are different by huge factors.

      If a tiny proportion of the money spent on fossil-fuel research was spent on solar research, you would see much more dramatic efficiency gains in photovoltaic panels.

      Like all industries, the costs of production start high and production is inefficient. This can be refined over time, particularly if there is government environmental oversight regulating photovoltaic cell manufacturers to reflect the total costs to the environment.

      As an electronics based industry, there is far more scope for photovoltaic cells to improve their processes than the petroleum industry, independent of the fact that the petroleum industry actively works to limit regulation of itself in many countries.

    21. Re:Are solar panels really all that great? by karnal · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't think that they just take the cars that ran in the race off to the junkyard just yet...

      And if they do, let me know. I'd like to get some solar panels for cheap (meaning free!)

      --
      Karnal
    22. Re:Are solar panels really all that great? by skyemoor · · Score: 1

      Most commercial solar panels are straight silicon. I have 50 on my roof (BP thin film), and they take little energy to make and recycle at 99%. This topic comes up sometimes from people trying to put out disinformation, which gets picked up by people who have been hoodwinked.

    23. Re:Are solar panels really all that great? by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1

      In England they have embankments to keep drivers from seeing the scenery :-( (it's slightly better going by train). NZ highways are flat on the ground, so have great views. I guess since US highways tend to raised rather than lowered they probably have good views (e.g. along the west coast).

  3. Smoke and a pancake? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    No? I zee zat zere ees no pleesing you. Zee dutch won! Iznt zat veird?

    1. Re:Smoke and a pancake? by Crash42 · · Score: 5, Funny

      No? I zee zat zere ees no pleesing you. Zee dutch won! Iznt zat veird?
      No! No! No! that is German.
      In Dutch it's more like : I see dat der is no pliesing joe. Issent det wierd ?

      Congrats to the Dutch Team !!

      --


      ....Excuse me, but ... ah, forget it...
    2. Re:Smoke and a pancake? by EasyTarget · · Score: 1

      I prefer Harry Enfields Dutch quote.
      "Hallo dere! It's me Captain Stefan Van Der Haast Graacht of the Amsterdam Police, and this is my partner jens, who is also my lover."
      Mind you his 'herman the German' character went further and was funnier..

      --
      "Oops, I always forget the purpose of competition is to divide people into winners and losers." - Hobbes
    3. Re:Smoke and a pancake? by Pflipp · · Score: 1

      You got a copy of that show?

      I really thought is was marvellous how well they spoke their Double Dutch; they really had all nuances perfectly!

      (that's stefanrieken apestaartje softhome punt net, dankjewel ;-)

      --
      "We can confirm that Debian does *not* ship the version with the trojan horse. Our version predates it." [CA-2002-28]
  4. Doesn't sound that incredible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Nearly 31 hours to cross a country the size of Australia doesn't sound a fantastic effort. From memory a Florida team went from canada to mexico in a little over 50 hours, and australia is at a guess a third the size of here. Are there more solid restrictions in the australian race?

    1. Re:Doesn't sound that incredible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go back to school.

      Australia is approximately the same size as the US (minus Alaska)

    2. Re:Doesn't sound that incredible by questamor · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The area of the contiguous 48 states (which is what's relevant here) is almost identical to the area of Australia. perhaps 3-5% bigger.

      If you include Alaska (which is about 1/5th the size of the 48) in the total that's quite a bit bigger again, but still doesn't bring the US near 3 times the size.

    3. Re:Doesn't sound that incredible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      australia is at a guess a third the size of here
      No, you've got it all wrong. Australia is about the same size as the States, they just have less than a third of the prison population that the US has. Ironic, considering Australia's history and all... [Insert 'use of the word ironic' troll as a reply to this post]

      --
      Rate Naked People! at FuckMeter (not work-safe)
    4. Re:Doesn't sound that incredible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You learned geography in a US school didn't you?

    5. Re:Doesn't sound that incredible by Craigj0 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Firstly as others have pointed out AUstralia is about as big as the US. But additionally since this road race is not really a race but a rally no cars can break any road rules so no speeding where speedlimits exist and there is other traffic besides the contestants.

      I can see it now:
      The dutch car stuck behind some slow family on a vacation in a caravan taking up the middle of the road.

    6. Re:Doesn't sound that incredible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of the race goes through the Northern Territory.
      In NT there are no speedlimits outside populated areas (==nowhere)

    7. Re:Doesn't sound that incredible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Darwin to Adelaide is 3000km or roughly 1875 miles. That's a little more than the distance from Detroit to Florida.

      This is why so many people here think "Ignorant American" is a tautology. I've got five bucks that says you've mistaken Australia for Austria.

    8. Re:Doesn't sound that incredible by pubjames · · Score: 5, Informative

      australia is at a guess a third the size of here.

      I just love the sense of geography you have in the USA!

      It's like every time a discussion of how behind the USA is with broadband or mobile phone technology, a load of you pipe up with "but the USA is so big! That's why we're behind!"

      Get yourself a globe (not a flat map - they distort the sizes of countries.) Cut out a shape approximately the same size as the USA, then position it over other places in the world. You will find that the USA isn't as big as you thought it was.

    9. Re:Doesn't sound that incredible by MoobY · · Score: 1

      Let's enter the numbers

      USA: 9,629,091 sq km (ranked 3rd largest after russia and canada)

      Australia: 7,686,850 sq km (ranked 6th largest after china and brazil)

      --
      --- Sigmentation Fault - Comments Dumped
    10. Re:Doesn't sound that incredible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but that 9,629,091 includes Alaska, which wasn't anywhere in between Canada and Mexico if my admittedly non-American schooled Geography serves me correctly.

      Alaska is about 1,500,000 sq km or thereabouts, so you get to a difference of about 500,000 sq km at the end of the day.

    11. Re:Doesn't sound that incredible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      That's including Alaska. If you can include Alaska as part of the USA then we can include Russia as part of Europe. Which makes us much bigger than you. Na nana na na.

    12. Re:Doesn't sound that incredible by mev · · Score: 2, Informative

      ...they have less than a third of the prison population that the US has...

      According to web sites such as
      this and this, the prison population in Australia was approximately two orders of magnitude less than that in the US. The total population is also an order of magnitude less.

    13. Re:Doesn't sound that incredible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't really have to explain population density to you, do I?

    14. Re:Doesn't sound that incredible by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 1

      Actually, they're ALL prisoners. We transported them there in the 19th century and they bred ;-)

      --
      When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
    15. Re:Doesn't sound that incredible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't really have to explain population density to you, do I?

      Er. No.

    16. Re:Doesn't sound that incredible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, i'm not an expert when it comes to judging the level of education of people, but I think it's safe to say that you are a fine example of US education put into practice. Yes of course, feel free to read the previous line twice, although I'm sure you think you understand it right away the first time. After all, you know facts when you see them.

    17. Re:Doesn't sound that incredible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Australia is a lot less dense. perhaps a tenth as densely populated as the USA

      The US is more dense.

    18. Re:Doesn't sound that incredible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually when it comes to mobile phone services and internet access, the US comes across a lot of problems nobody in the rest of the world could understand, simply due to the fact it is FAR less densly populated than anywhere. The second largest nation with a population barely tipping near 300 million humans. That's alot of space and not alot of people.

    19. Re:Doesn't sound that incredible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Way more, especially when you take into account
      the fact that the average American is far denser
      than the typical guy from Oz.

    20. Re:Doesn't sound that incredible by DaneelGiskard · · Score: 1

      Really? So a team member could drive in front of me with this really big car and I could just drive in his lee? Problem solved, no solar necessary =)

      Or better yet, mount some really big ass halogen lamps on the car in front of you and point them to the solar cells of my vehicle ;-)

    21. Re:Doesn't sound that incredible by idamaybrown · · Score: 1

      But, Alaska is part of the USA. On the other hand, is Russian Siberia part of Europe?

    22. Re:Doesn't sound that incredible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Wait. tell me, really, what gave you the impression that the US is three times the size of Australia? Was it a wild guess based on absolutely nothing but your own presumptions on the size of the US? did you see that the US gets stretched out of proportion on a mercator projection but not realise a sphere can't lay flat on paper and mistake it as a true representation of proportional reality? Did you (heaven forbid) LEARN in school that the US is a lot larger than it is?

      I'm intrigued, as I come across dozens of USA residents who are shocked that a country like Australia could be nearly the same size.

    23. Re:Doesn't sound that incredible by spindizzy · · Score: 1

      But then so are the Yanks - the Brits had a habit of making convicts out of anyone who showed initiative and sending them to the colonies. Australia was founded as a penal colony because they lost the US and needed a new place to send the convicts. Sad that they sent the ones with all the cricket talent ;)

      --
      Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur
    24. Re:Doesn't sound that incredible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I really want to stab you in the head.

    25. Re:Doesn't sound that incredible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, Ural mountains are the border between Europe and Asia.

    26. Re:Doesn't sound that incredible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But all those people are huddled together in population centers (big cities + suburbs). The problem with mobile phone tech in the US is not that it doesn't exist in the countryside, but that it uses outdated and conflicting/competing standards. Competition is good, but not for basic infrastructure (imagine if there were 5 different kinds of train tracks, with trains unable to ride on the tracks of a competing transport copmpany).

    27. Re:Doesn't sound that incredible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Erm, United States 29 people/km^2, Australia 2.5 people/km^2 there are quite a few other first world nations that also have population densities lower than the USA but I didn't include them as they are no where near as big as Oz.

    28. Re:Doesn't sound that incredible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well even so I still think it's more of a problem here in the US. We have to deal with rolling out services to a highly technically literate population, and I don't think Australia or many other countries approximate that same level of literacy.

    29. Re:Doesn't sound that incredible by linoleo · · Score: 1


      is Russian Siberia part of Europe?

      "new" Europe or "old" Europe? :-)

      - nic

      --
      Be faithful to your obsessions. Identify them and be faithful to them, let them guide you like a sleepwalker. JG Ballard
    30. Re:Doesn't sound that incredible by bluGill · · Score: 1

      Where do you get the idea that there is a problem in the cities? Mobile works in the big cities no matter which standard you use. Sure it took slightly longer to get there, but there is enough population density that all standards have representation. There are exceptions, but the areas where you can't get service on one system the others don't have service (or very weak service). Seems a lot of people don't like cell towers and try to prevent them. Not a problem from diversity of standards.

      In the vast countryside it is different. There multipul standards hurt. There isn't enough money in a lot of areas to make ANY tower profitable, except if you can get the bragging rights that you ahve service everywhere. When the entire population served by a cell is 30 people how do you pay for a tower? Here a universial standard would help because everyone could agree on roaming, and coordinate towers so there is always exactly one in range (except for the moment where you switch cells)

    31. Re:Doesn't sound that incredible by zoefff · · Score: 1

      Because US is as big as Australia (as pointed out by others), one starts wondering why it took the florida team 50 hours to get to Mexico? maybe the 55mph speedlimit?

    32. Re:Doesn't sound that incredible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Car and Driver (the automotive magazine staff) did something like that when they participated in a mileage-a-thon through California. They built a big windbreaker behind an SUV, then followed that monstrosity very closely in the test vehicle. They absolutely annihilated the competition.

    33. Re:Doesn't sound that incredible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty good, but those large words like "approximate" and "technically" really hurt your believability. Try using words at a more American level to maximize the bait factor.

    34. Re:Doesn't sound that incredible by kabocox · · Score: 1

      Yes, but is that a Personal Perspective Globe? If it is than I'm sorry, but my home town takes up most of mine, then what little is left is for 2 1/2 hour drive to where I went to college, and another for a 5 hour drive to my father-in-law. Oops I almost forgot the 5 & 7 hours drives to 2 different Aunts.

      But other than that much of the rest of the Globle exists only in an abstract sense. I know it exists any things happen out there that effect me, but usually i hardly ever leave my town any so my Personal Sphere would be that. I could care less what is happening on the other side of the state, much less the other side of the globle.

      Gosh, that sounds so "American." Our secert mind controlling media masters must be thrilled with me. I have the idealized American view point.

    35. Re:Doesn't sound that incredible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      lol! try again.
      Australian Literacy : 100%
      American Literacy : 97%

      source : CIA world factbook.

    36. Re:Doesn't sound that incredible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nope...usually the other way around

    37. Re:Doesn't sound that incredible by DonGar · · Score: 1

      Being a US citizen, I think I can comment.

      Our sense of self-importance is pumped up in lots of subtle ways. The selection of news items for broadcast is one of them. Another is that globes are not often used when teaching geography. More importantly, they are never used on TV.

      The projections used often make the US bigger than anything else on the planet. Additional blowups are often used to draw the users attention to whatever is considered important. Obviously, the US is usually the most important.

      I've even (once) run across a globe that had the size of the US distorted to be larger. I found that to be really bizzare.

      PS: I don't think this is a conspiracy. Just the way things tend to work out in US culture.

      --
      plus-good, double-plus-good
    38. Re:Doesn't sound that incredible by Ogive17 · · Score: 1

      The US is behind in broadband/mobile phone tech because of how much we are spread out.

      In Europe, most towns/cities are quite old and the population density is much higher on average. This gives your companies a better chance at turning a huge profit from upgrading their systems. Plus you have to factor in who the large players are in the mobile techonology market: nokia, motorola... It should be quite obvious why Northern Europe is leading the mobile tech craze.

      My town in Ohio is about 24,000 people and is flanked by corn and soybean fields. Yes, lots of people have cell phones, but the reception is iffy sometimes because of the lack of towers. Cable came to our area about 3 years ago, and dsl is still unavailable. Companies are unwilling to invest the millions of dollars in upgrades if they cannot recover the costs.

      In terms of size, the US is still in the top 5 in land mass I believe. But I do admit that believeing the US is 3x larger than Australia is being naive.

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    39. Re:Doesn't sound that incredible by graystar · · Score: 1

      Did you I have met some Americans who didnt believe me when I told them the US used to get convicts. They literally could not accept it.

      The Brits are just annoyed. They thought they were send the worst people to the worst place. Looking at it now, they realise they sent them to the best place - only to come back and kick their arse at everything.

      --
      -- Cheer, Cheer, The Red and the White.
    40. Re:Doesn't sound that incredible by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 1

      Especially at cricket.

      --
      When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
  5. FlashMOB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Find the blue fwibble before midnight!

    1. Re:FlashMOB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh wait, it was under my book

    2. Re:FlashMOB by bigbudz · · Score: 1

      Oh wait, it was under my nutsack

  6. Solid restrictions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Are there more solid restrictions in the australian race?
    Yes, you can't excrete any solids for the duration of the World Solar Car Challenge, or else you're disqualified. That's why 31 hours across Australia is far more impressive than 50 hours from Canada to Mexico... In North America, they were allowed to make pit stops!

    --
    Rate Naked People! at FuckMeter (not work-safe)
  7. Solar energy propulsion... by aaribaud · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...now we've got a fRying dutchman.
    --
    Someone had to do it.

    1. Re:Solar energy propulsion... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that an open source businessmodel?

      1: Make free software.
      2: ?
      3: Watch a frying dutchman.
      4: Profit!

    2. Re:Solar energy propulsion... by CvD · · Score: 1

      Yep, definitely. With temperatures up to 50 C (122 F) in the cockpit these drivers were certainly frying, at times. :-)

    3. Re:Solar energy propulsion... by MooCows · · Score: 1

      Well, they had 4 drivers, constantly swapping.
      And the driver in the car was wearing a suit with a layer of cooling liquid to keep him from overheating :)

      --
      The path I walk alone is endlessly long.
      30 minutes by bike, 15 by bus.
  8. Simpsons quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    "I prefer a vehicle that doesn't hurt Mother Earth. It's a go-cart, powered by my own sense of self-satisfaction."

  9. Point of origin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
    Having set off from Darwin
    OK, you can stop there. That pretty much explains everything...

    --
    Rate Naked People! at FuckMeter (not work-safe)
    1. Re:Point of origin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't leave Darwin, Not while they have a Darwin Toddy left.

      Goed gedaan Jongens, a Cheer:

      Goed Zo, Goed Zo Goed Zo Zo.

  10. Search! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Find the fluffy fwibble before midnight

  11. Techonology transfer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The only problem with these cars is that it is hard to transfer the technology to real cars. These solar cars are covered with panels and are streamlined to go as fast as possible. They also have to be as light as possible for the same reason. Which makes the transfer that bit harder. That is not to say the race isn't a good idea. It's a great idea which enables peaple to have fun while investigating the power of the sun.
    Michael Harris.

    1. Re:Techonology transfer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So are the Formula-1 cars...

  12. Hooray! Electric cars for all please! by adeyadey · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So the big question - are we getting close to practical electric cars? Ok the vehicles in this competition are a "tour-de-force" of solar technology, but perhaps one day we could really have cars with advanced light-weight cheap batterys (thanks to advances in laptop/mobile batteries), and solar panels to charge when you leave your car parked in daylight. Also add regenerative braking, a fairly rapid recharge cycle, and for longer journeys give the garages something to sell - they can "hot-swap" batteries for a fully charged one, for a price. Is that the future, or is it Hydrogen fuel cells? Or some combination of both?

    Again, I just cannot figure why we still persist with nuclear, oil, coal, with all the attendant problems (pollution, wars over oil, etc), when we could cover a small proportiion of the deserts of the world with solar cells, and the roofs of our buildings, and the coasts with huge offsiore wind farms (British Wind Enrgy Association page) & tidal turbines, and have all the power we need?

    --
    "You lied to me! There is a Swansea!"
    1. Re:Hooray! Electric cars for all please! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not so sure that covering deserts wouldn't have a climate change, but in any case, sounds good to me. The first one with enough billions to do this, between the two of us, wins!

    2. Re:Hooray! Electric cars for all please! by Spruitje · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, on the other hand...
      We have a large desert called the Sahara in Africa.
      Space enough, sunshine enough and enough sand to make solarpanels.
      I've read somewhere that if you put enough solarpanels in the Sahara it could produce enough electrical power to power the whole world.

    3. Re:Hooray! Electric cars for all please! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bad ideal, the desert storm will destory those panels

    4. Re:Hooray! Electric cars for all please! by tanveer1979 · · Score: 1
      Again, I just cannot figure why we still persist with nuclear, oil, coal, with all the attendant problems (pollution, wars over oil, etc), when we could cover a small proportiion of the deserts of the world with solar cells, and the roofs of our buildings, and the coasts with huge offsiore wind farms (British Wind Enrgy Association page) & tidal turbines, and have all the power we need?

      Because its already there, coal, oil and nuclear are established. Non-Conventional is intruding, and oil corporations do not want to be sidelined. Have you ever seen a big corporation push for alternative technologies in the senate? Even Honda etc., dont really launch campaigns.

      And then there is practicality and political will. It does not exist. Your avg politician is not bothered. Unless its like there is no oil and no coal, nobodys gonna wake up. Look at Brazil only when Oil bills turned hefty and people started complaining, they shifted to ethanol(from sugar). So when some sunny country decides(people decide) they are not going to starve for oil, they will force the govt to act and in a few decades time we will have them using the Sun.
      Cant Resist this
      Maybe Sun actually has a Future ;-)
      --
      My Aurora : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o91ZsGwJYyg
      FB : https://www.facebook.com/TanveersPhotography
    5. Re:Hooray! Electric cars for all please! by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      How are you gonna stop the sandstorms destroying your panels? (or covering them up?)

      Quite apart from the fact that there's LOADS of oil under the Sahara...

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    6. Re:Hooray! Electric cars for all please! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Desert storm was in 1992 so that shouldn't be a problem and operation Iraqi freedom is half a continent away.
      Where are the solar panels?

    7. Re:Hooray! Electric cars for all please! by adeyadey · · Score: 1

      You employ a bloke with a big broom..

      Or find a desert location without so much sand (fact - only a small proportion of the Sahara is sand dunes. Trust me Ive been there.)

      Oil in the sahara? Maybe, but that defies the point..

      --
      "You lied to me! There is a Swansea!"
    8. Re:Hooray! Electric cars for all please! by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      "Oil in the sahara? Maybe, but that defies the point.."

      Let me introduce you to the bigger picture...

      "the point" of EVERYTHING is money. If it cost 0.01% more to build a panel than drill for oil we all know what would happen.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    9. Re:Hooray! Electric cars for all please! by wayward_son · · Score: 1

      Who holds back the electric car?
      Who makes Steve Gutenberg a star?

      We do! We do! /obligatory Simpsons reference

    10. Re:Hooray! Electric cars for all please! by 4of12 · · Score: 1

      put enough solarpanels in the Sahara

      That's one option.

      Another might be to put the solar panels in orbit and to beam down the power to whereever you needed it.

      Yes, it's fraught with danger, radiating concentrated power out of the skies.

      The upside is that you could justify funding the whole thing for military purposes, but it could end up being practical, too.

      It would make sense for stationary receiving stations; reliably hitting a vehicle undergoing unusual accelerations from LEO would be challenge.

      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
    11. Re:Hooray! Electric cars for all please! by adeyadey · · Score: 1

      Ok, we could use solar panels to collect sunlight and beam the energy to earth. But we already have such a device up there - its called the "sun". We could just use its energy directly.. radical though that may seem..

      --
      "You lied to me! There is a Swansea!"
    12. Re:Hooray! Electric cars for all please! by shrubsky · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Again, I just cannot figure why we still persist with nuclear, oil, coal, with all the attendant problems (pollution, wars over oil, etc), when we could cover a small proportiion of the deserts of the world with solar cells, and the roofs of our buildings, and the coasts with huge offsiore wind farms (British Wind Enrgy Association page) & tidal turbines, and have all the power we need?"

      There's a very good reason why, and it isn't politicians and evil oil companies. It's money. When alternative power sources become cheaper than fossil fuels people will use them more. Go visit http://www.bpsolar.com/homesolutions/ and see how long it would take for your solar panels to pay for themselves. If you don't live in a state like California who subsidizes the heck out of them (and coincidentally has a budget disaster in progress) then it takes 30 years. And that doesn't count the investment earnings you lose by ponying up $$$ for the equipment and installation.

      --
      I have suffered from being misunderstood, but I would have suffered a hell of a lot more if I had been understood.
    13. Re:Hooray! Electric cars for all please! by Viceroy · · Score: 1

      I've participated in solar-car racing events now for over 8 years, yet I still think there is little chance of seeing a practical solar car on the road any time soon. Consider that on a perfectly sunny day, with a solar array of 8m^2, with solar cells that are 100% efficient in converting solar energy to electricity (we're at a max of a little more than 30% now), you still could only generate 11hp of continuous power. We are as close to 100% efficient solar cells as we are to cars that only need 11hp. These cars drive as fast as they do because they are purpose built race cars, with aerodynamics, control systems, lack of creature comforts, and weight control to match.

    14. Re:Hooray! Electric cars for all please! by adeyadey · · Score: 1

      I would agree, we will probably not see "purely" solar power cars in large scale use in the forseeable future, but a hybrid solar/electric might makesense, particularly if the costs of efficient solar cells comes down..

      --
      "You lied to me! There is a Swansea!"
    15. Re:Hooray! Electric cars for all please! by adeyadey · · Score: 1

      Would that be in the same way governments have "subsidised the heck" out of Nuclear power then? And how much is Nuclear going to cost in the future - decommission, clean-up, waste disposal? How much does it cost to look after plutonium waste for centuries to be sure terorists dont get hold of it? And what are the real costs of continued use of Fossil fuels?

      I would admit that solar is still quite expensive, although I have seen better figures for Solar than that, particularly if used to heat water too. New technologies like Amorphouse Siliconc ells promise much cheaper cells, all be it less efficient. Wind power gives much better cost payback figures, and is a rapidly increasing cheap power source.

      --
      "You lied to me! There is a Swansea!"
    16. Re:Hooray! Electric cars for all please! by harkabeeparolyn · · Score: 1
      Unless its like there is no oil and no coal, nobodys gonna wake up.

      Hey, now there's an idea. Oil-eating bacteria already exist, so why don't we pump some of those little fuckers down the oil wells to speed things along? Exponential growth and an abundant food supply ought to take care of the rest.

      Anyone have an idea how to get rid of the coal?

    17. Re:Hooray! Electric cars for all please! by shrubsky · · Score: 1

      It is similar to the subsidizing of the nuclear industry, yes. You read my post and assumed that I don't want alternative power to ever succeed. You assume too much. I just stated my opinion that alternative power will not take off until it's cheaper than what we already have, and I gave an example of an alternative power source that's still too expensive. Way to go straight for the throat.

      --
      I have suffered from being misunderstood, but I would have suffered a hell of a lot more if I had been understood.
    18. Re:Hooray! Electric cars for all please! by adeyadey · · Score: 1

      Ok, but it is an important point, because if you take Nuclear out of the equation, you have a choice between the "green" alternatives, and fossil fuels. Fossil fuels also have "hidden" costs we are not really paying yet, and of course we can only go on using them for a short time, in the historic scale of things..

      There is actually nothing wrong with "subsidising" an emergent energy technology, if in the end it can deliver cheap, renewable, relatively non-polluting power. Wind power is getting to the stage where it can stand alone, here in the UK the next generation of stations can generate power at $0.03/kw/hr,and that is set to come down. Solar still needs a nudge to achieve its full potential..

      --
      "You lied to me! There is a Swansea!"
    19. Re:Hooray! Electric cars for all please! by nathanh · · Score: 1
      Again, I just cannot figure why we still persist with nuclear, oil, coal, with all the attendant problems (pollution, wars over oil, etc), when we could cover a small proportiion of the deserts of the world [electrosolar.co.uk] with solar cells

      Solar cells are not a cost effective way to build a large-scale solar power plant. You're better off using mirrors to superheat water pipes, generating steam, driving a turbine/generator.

      You're even better off building a tall chimney (100m or more) and using heat differentials to cause airflow across a turbine/generator. Cleaning mirrors is expensive.

    20. Re:Hooray! Electric cars for all please! by adeyadey · · Score: 1

      I would suppose it depends on the cost/efficiency of the cells. I would agree that todays cells, although improving, make it a fairly pricey proposition. Amorphous silicon cells are a promising development, much cheaper to make than traditional cells, but currently not so efficient. It strikes me that the sort of plants you propose involve a lot more structure, pressurised pipes, moving parts, etc - and how do the efficiency/cost figures work out? Wouldit be better to use 30%+ efficient solar cells rather than water pipes at the focus of the mirrors? Or is it just better to use banks of cells, with no moving parts, if they are at the right price?

      --
      "You lied to me! There is a Swansea!"
    21. Re:Hooray! Electric cars for all please! by nathanh · · Score: 1
      It strikes me that the sort of plants you propose involve a lot more structure, pressurised pipes, moving parts, etc - and how do the efficiency/cost figures work out? Wouldit be better to use 30%+ efficient solar cells rather than water pipes at the focus of the mirrors? Or is it just better to use banks of cells, with no moving parts, if they are at the right price?

      Photovoltaic cells are typically mounted on motors so they can track the sun.

      Yes, the two designs I described require a large upfront investment. I don't know enough about the details to explain why they choose thermal designs instead of photovoltaic designs, but if the engineers made that decision then I'm confident they had good reasons. Remember that we're talking megawatt plants with lifetimes of 20-30 years. The designers are solving problems that we probably aren't even aware of.

  13. nice to see a tech prize go to holland by stiller · · Score: 1

    Here in Holland, we develop and produce quite a bit of hightech aerospace equipment. (Think of Stork, former Fokker, think of Estec, a Holland based ESA tech facility) Although, this usually ends up in some other country's high profile project. So it is good to see the Dutch own engineering get some appreciation once in a while. Even if we didn't develop all of the parts ourselves this time.

  14. Two Points by L-s-L69 · · Score: 0

    1. This was done in the Ozzie desert, when they can get a car that does this under cloud in the US/UK I'll be a bit more impressed.
    2. I read about this over 24 hours ago, so the 'news' is more 'olds for nerds'

    1. Re:Two Points by Cronan · · Score: 2, Funny

      Perhaps for the UK a car running on rainwater would be a better idea?

    2. Re:Two Points by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      This edition is for us morning people. :)

    3. Re:Two Points by Hieronymus+Howard · · Score: 1

      No good, it's hardly rained here (London) for months now.

      HH

    4. Re:Two Points by NonSequor · · Score: 1

      I doubt anyone thinks that solar power will ever be viable in the UK.

      --
      My only political goal is to see to it that no political party achieves its goals.
    5. Re:Two Points by CavyDriver · · Score: 1
      1. This was done in the Ozzie desert, when they can get a car that does this under cloud in the US/UK I'll be a bit more impressed.

      You mean this: American Solar Challenge.

      Two of the teams in WSC were competitors in ASC!

    6. Re:Two Points by L-s-L69 · · Score: 1

      It is still very sunny. "under clowd in the US/UK" so when they can do it in *insert cloudy US location here, maybe maine or somewhere i duno* that will be impressive.

    7. Re:Two Points by CavyDriver · · Score: 1

      Oh, then you mean this:

      Sunrayce 99

      It doesn't say it outright on that page, but that rayce had solid clouds and rain 8 out of 9 days.

  15. No a/c by hughk · · Score: 1
    In Oz, an a/c is regarded as mandatory, alternately, you use the breeze to cool yourself. However, these cars are incredibly well streamlined, so the driver can't exactly open the window.

    Definitely a frying Dutchman!!!!

    --
    See my journal, I write things there
  16. Well done boys! by sopuli · · Score: 1

    I wish you luck with your victory in Australia.

  17. asyouwere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Find the last teeny weeny fwibble before midnight!

    1. Re:asyouwere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh wait, it was under my keyboard over here :-)

  18. Re:Search! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's under my book!

  19. We forgot to mention... by Warshadow · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    that the Dutch were also the only ones to enter the race. ;)

    1. Re:We forgot to mention... by MooCows · · Score: 4, Informative

      Not really, 30 teams total, from 12 countries.
      Here's a list

      --
      The path I walk alone is endlessly long.
      30 minutes by bike, 15 by bus.
    2. Re:We forgot to mention... by sijajno · · Score: 2, Informative

      Winner's site (Dutch): www.nuonsolarteam.nl

    3. Re:We forgot to mention... by Warshadow · · Score: 1

      Please see this:

      http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=joke

    4. Re:We forgot to mention... by RobinH · · Score: 1

      Please see this:
      http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=jo ke

      Please see this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_troll

      --
      "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." - Mark Twain
  20. Re:Search! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh wait, it was on fire and now its all burnt :(

  21. Speed limit! by valentyn · · Score: 4, Informative

    the report (in Dutch) says: "gemiddelde snelheid van 97.02 km/h" and also "de gehele dag gemiddeld zo'n 110 km/h gereden, de snelheidslimiet in South Australia.". In English: "average speed of 97.02 km/h" (60.29 mph) and "the whole day an average of 110 km/h, the speed limit in South Australia". The race takes place on public roads, remember?

    --
    my other sig is a 500 page novel
    1. Re:Speed limit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, public roads. However, most of the race goes down the Stuart Highway (think Peter Falconio, for the Brits), and there is no speed limit in NT outside Darwin.

  22. Find the spotted fwibble before midnight! by bigbudz · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Find the spotted fwibble before midnight!

    1. Re:Find the spotted fwibble before midnight! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh wait, it was under my chair.

    2. Re:Find the spotted fwibble before midnight! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh wait, it was under my TROUSERS!

  23. Space technology? by worst_name_ever · · Score: 1
    The Dutch solar car Nuna II, using ESA space technology

    Curse those wily Dutchmen and their Nutricia Chocomel-flavored Tang!

    --

    In Soviet Rush, today's Tom Sawyer gets high on you.
    1. Re:Space technology? by Pflipp · · Score: 1

      You mean you know Chocomel?

      I live about 20 kilometres from the Nutricia factories, so I'm used to getting my daily Chocomel -- in the French-language parts of Belgium known as Cecemel. However, once in France, there was no waiter that understood my order of either Chocomel OR Cecemel (or lait chocolate chaude). They all knew "Gouda" cheese and "Heineken" beer, however, so I was afraid that Chocomel was a little behind on being a solid Dutch export product.

      Please tell me that it's different!

      --
      "We can confirm that Debian does *not* ship the version with the trojan horse. Our version predates it." [CA-2002-28]
  24. Fwibble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    find the Hairy Fwibble before midnight!

  25. Re:What a crock of shit. by illuminata · · Score: 0

    Offtopic? It's a joke relating to the story.

    --


    Until Slashdot fixes the funny modifier, use insightful or interesting. The poster knows your intentions.
  26. Solar Panels bah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Just wait till the Dutch team arrives at the Annual Windmill-powered-car Challenge next year!

  27. Day five results by caffeine_monkey · · Score: 2, Informative

    are available here, in PDF format unfortunately. Rounding out the top five behind the Dutch are Aurora Vehicle Assn, MIT Solar Electric Team, Queens University, and FH Bochum/SBU.

  28. A lot of cars weren't there.. by westcourt_monk · · Score: 1
    Not really a world challenge.. U of Waterloo's car wasn't there due to lack on funding. Same goes for other top cars. Too bad really.

    --
    I am going to hell and I am going to take all of you with me.
    1. Re:A lot of cars weren't there.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, their bad. But they had the opportunity to be there and compete - and they blew it. Fine, just don't complain about it... Sheesh.

    2. Re:A lot of cars weren't there.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really a world challenge..
      Mate, I'm sure it's open to the world. Unlike baseballs "World Series" and the US tendency to proclaim it's champions "World Champions"? I'll see you there in a couple of years. Bring a hat (cap).

    3. Re:A lot of cars weren't there.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and who's fault is that?

      Just because your team memebers had their noses buried in textooks and couldn't make it to the competition doesn't diminish the rest of competition in any way...

      fucking waterlooser. the world does not revolve around you and your shitty university

  29. Ultimate proof: cannabis works! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You cee, it is quit known that EVERY Dutchie lives in a wind mill, eats sheese, and uses cannabis all day long. Well, as you also have notised, those Dutchies in the car were smard enouf too construct the car and win with it.

    Conclusion: cannabis and brain damag have no thing to do with each otter!

  30. Neat Stuff by shplorb · · Score: 1

    I work about 50m away from the finish line and I think it was nice and sunny today. Well, it was when I looked out the window in the morning. I should have gone down to the tents in Victoria Square at lunch to have a look. I gather they'll still be going for a few days yet so I'll make a point to go have a look tomorrow.

  31. Looks like moderator abuse by Red+Rocket · · Score: 0, Offtopic


    Is there some reason this was modded down twice? It might not be a magnum opus but, hell, it wasn't that bad.

    --
    - Hail to our fearless misleader! Fool speed ahead!
  32. Drifting OT here, but by DoraLives · · Score: 1
    you've not quite got it right. The SPS (Solar Power Satellite) will be dangling from the end of a naontube tether and the power will be sent down the wire/waveguide/whatever so that no messy microwaves need be sprayed around indiscriminatly.

    These things will be the FIRST use of "space elevator" technology, mark my words. No moving parts (that "elevator" cab will prove to be a knotty technical nightmare when it comes to actually getting the sonofabitch to work in the real world, and designs that mererely suspend things from the end of the tether will come first) makes for a much simpler deal all the way around.

    When it's a done deal, tell 'em you heard it here first, way back in '03.

    --
    Is it fascism yet?
    1. Re:Drifting OT here, but by mugnyte · · Score: 1

      I thought Omni Magazine went out of business....

      There are going to be meny other possibilities looked at before nanotube tethers are attempted. What prevents us from wiring all this energy from the desert to elsewhere, taking the whole system horizontal? Money!

      SO, in conclusion, you owe me. Payup. Thank you, ladies and gentlemen.
      mug

  33. I'd love to have a solar panel on my car... by One+More+Troll · · Score: 0

    ...but not to power it. I'd like to have it power the AC or heater (or engine block heater for those in Minnesota) while the car is parked.

    That way, when I get into my car that has been sitting out baking in the sun all day, I don't have to wait until I'm halfway home before it cools down.

    While solar cars certainly are cool to look at, unless there's a major breakthrough in solar tech, I don't see a solar car ever going into production.

    1. Re:I'd love to have a solar panel on my car... by gregarican · · Score: 1

      There are fans that attach on the top of your car window and are solar powered. You barely crack the window and away you go. Not exactly what you were talking about, but a step in the right direction.

  34. I commute in a solar powered car everyday... by Ricdude · · Score: 1

    ...and I only have to recharge the "battery" every 700 miles or so.

    My propulsion system stores solar energy in the form of soybeans, from which oil is extracted, and converted to biodiesel. I pump it into my car (thus recharging my "battery") and drive off. Ok, it's not strictly solar power, but it's a pretty efficient use of surplus soy oil, of which the US has a fair amount. And my car drives fine even with cloudy skies...

    --
    How's my programming? Call 1-800-DEV-NULL
    1. Re:I commute in a solar powered car everyday... by fluffy666 · · Score: 1

      Technically, since the amount of fossil based energy used in the Fertilizer, Tractors, transport, pesticides, conversion, etc, etc. exceed the amount of energy actually in the end result biodiesel, you're not using solar energy (or you are using multimillion-year-old solar energy, anyway). In fact, you're probably using more that if you ran your car on normal diesel.

    2. Re:I commute in a solar powered car everyday... by clustercrasher · · Score: 1

      That argument may not hold if you use biodiesel to run the tractors and transport the fuel. I would like to see your numbers. Can you post them?

    3. Re:I commute in a solar powered car everyday... by Ricdude · · Score: 1

      Actually, the energy balance of soy biodiesel is just over 3:1. That means for every unit of energy you put into fertilizers, tractors, pesticides, oil extraction, etc., you get over 3 times the available energy in the biodiesel produced. Other oils are even more efficient, but we have millions of gallons of excess soy oil in the US, so it's a nice way to put it to good use.

      --
      How's my programming? Call 1-800-DEV-NULL
  35. "Cheeseballs" by gwappo · · Score: 2, Funny
    For the casual slashdot reader; the Dutch and the Belgians appear to have a "thing" with eachother, whereby the Belgians are quite convinced the Dutch are cheap and eat only cheese. The Dutch, on the other hand, are convinced the Belgians are stupid & dumb.

    From this, the casual Slashdot reader can immediately conclude two points, 1) The Dutch are not cheap, nor do they only eat cheese since, if this were true, the profound intelligence required to reach such a conclusion would mean Belgians are not stupid. 2) Given -1-, the writer of this post must obviously be Dutch.

    :-P

    Klasse lui!

  36. Well DUH by cosmol · · Score: 1

    So is the space progam, so is all of science.

  37. Fully Operational... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dang, for some reason I read the title as "Dutch Win World Death Star Challenge."

    Hmm...

    1. Re:Fully Operational... by Nihynjahs · · Score: 0

      The US already has a death ray...
      www.haarp.alaska.edu/

  38. They had an advantage: by angst_ridden_hipster · · Score: 1

    The Dutch Advantage: bad weather in their homeland.

    If you get more clouds, you have to learn to be more efficient.

    The Aussies had the disadvantage that they've got 358 sunny days each year, so they didn't bother with efficiency.

    For evolutionary progress, there must be oppositional conditions. It's just another example of the theory of Darwin.

    (Disclaimer: satire. Get it? Darwin? Y'know? Ah ... nevermind. I either need to up the dosage or quit already.)

    --
    Eloi, Eloi, lema sabachtani?
    www.fogbound.net
  39. Urgh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those are square kilometers, you moron. The actual figure that matters is the North-South distance...

    *sigh* Stupid Americans...

  40. Re:Hooray! Carfree areas for all! by skyemoor · · Score: 1

    Leave it to the Dutch to win this, when they have a large number of cities with carfree cores (close to 50!). They walk and bike much more than citizens of North American and are at the top compared to their European counterparts. http://www.carfree.com/carfree_places.html

  41. Top? by ishmaelflood · · Score: 1

    "Same goes for other top cars"

    In some bizarro world definition of 'top'.

    Let's face it North American University teams don't win the World Solar Challenge, and part of the reason for that is that it is not their main objective (to be charitable).

  42. Energy Payback Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You clearly have no idea what you're talking about. I work in the solar cell industry, and I've studied the technologies in depth. A typical panel will pay off it's energy dept in a year or two, and they last more than 20 years. (When compared to diesel fuel which requires more energy to create than it ever gives back, is pretty good).

    Take a look at http://www.nrel.gov/ncpv/pdfs/24596.pdf

    But I'm glad to see you're quoting factual information, not just ideas you dreamed up one day when you decided to be a pesimist.

    1. Re:Energy Payback Time by Ken+Erfourth · · Score: 1
      Ummmm, Look, I really like Solar, and I'm not into bashing it at all, but this statement struck me as pretty, well, bizarre.
      When compared to diesel fuel which requires more energy to create than it ever gives back.
      Diesel fuel is just thicker gasoline really (more carbon atoms). It's refined from the same crude oil. I think it's actually easier to refine than gasoline and since it's more dense, it's more efficient to transport.

      So unless the whole petroleum industry is running itself on hydropower or wind or something, if diesel fuel takes more energy to create than it delivers, we'd be in a net energy deficit regarding petroleum based power. I find it difficult to believe that is true. I also find it hard to believe that diesel fuel (and by inference, fuel oil, which is the same thing) would be so cheap to buy and widely used if they were sucking up all that energy.

      You sure you didn't make a typo?
      --
      Fundamentalism is a crime against humanity
  43. Dutch cheaters? by iamhassi · · Score: 1
    I thought this was a college-based event?

    According to the article the car "uses advanced space technology, provided to the team via ESA's European Space Agency) Technology Transfer Programme" and the "ESA not only provided them with engineering support via its Technology Transfer Programme but also with general support via the Education Office, previously headed by former ESA astronaut Wubbo Ockels, who is also adviser to the team."

    The article also points out that the "Nuna II also carries Maximum Power Point Trackers... many satellites carry these devices, for instance ESA's Rosetta mission to comet Churyumov-Gerasimenko, due for launch in February 2004."

    So while everyone else was racing cars built by students with relatively small budgets, the Dutch were racing the latest and greatest technology that the space industry can provide. So which is it, a competition between colleges, or various countries flexing their technological might? US went with the former, obviously the Dutch chose the latter.

    Why does this sound a lot like the 1st grader who turns in a working nuclear reactor as a science fair project? Hmm...

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  44. Winner based on "best bang for buck"? by iamhassi · · Score: 1
    After reading the article and seeing the words "space technology" used far too many times (which reads $$$$$$ to me) I think they should determine future winners based on the price of the materials used in the car compared to the time to completion.

    For example, if the 5 million dollar car finishes only 5% quicker than the half million dollar car than I think the half million dollar car should be declared the winner. Cost won't include design, only the price of the physical materials used to build the car.

    Why? Because it's more useful. If this is ever going to become a pratical solution for the public (and that's the point, right? To prove solar power is practical?) than they're going to have to stop building 5 million dollar vehicles that get 60mph and start creating $100,000 vehicles that get 50mph. Sure it's slower, but at least the price is dropping, and technology that's $100,000 now might be $30,000 in 10 years.

    Otherwise in 5 years they'll be making 15 million dollar cars that get 90mph and all they'll prove is how expensive solar power is.

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone