Google will do that 95% of the time. Even if it was 100% wrong consistently you would be able to work around it, but it's random. And really quite bad. If you didn't already know what number to expect you wouldn't even know it was wrong.
Chinese have a concept of 10,000 being a standard division for counting, so things will be measured in 10k's but Google changes them to either just thousands or millions instead depending on how it feels that particular time.
Not quite the same as Windy just making up numbers, but the effect is similar. Completely unreliable results and not trustworthy without alternate sources.
And that's not even your biggest lie of claiming everyone else is a liar.
CHina has 1.2TW of coal plants running at 60% load factor, while BOTH America and Europe are at.25 TW running ~90-95% load. Note that this means that Europe and America can NOT increase their emissions from coal without building new plants.
Look it's the same lie as before, when will you use it again? since you didn't learn from last few times you were called on it.
China's gov choosing to build new coals plants and continue using more than 85%coal for electricity.
Another repeated lie. This one you use a lot.
China's emissions AND COAL use continue to set RECORDS,
Nope, peaked in 2013 and you know it did.
Hmm. Ok. Why did china's coal production, consumption, and CO2 increase over 5% in 2017,
No it was less than 1% closer to 1/2
You even tried to claim America's GDP growth was the highest (it was the lowest)
Finally, you speak of GDP growth.
Here is America [tradingeconomics.com]
Here is China [tradingeconomics.com]
Here is EU [tradingeconomics.com]
Out of all 3, America is doing the best. Should we be allowed to grow our CO2 just because our GDP is going up faster?
You even had to work your Musky fanboism into your lies.
Starting next year, the new tesla trucks will actually drop our CO2 by 2-5% EACH YEAR. That is how much of an impact that truck will make. Yes, 5000 new Tesla trucks EACH YEAR will reduce CO2 FURTHER than 500,000 new model 3s EACH YEAR.
The saddest part is that about 44% of people didn't even care enough that a nazi might win to even bother voting.
Only 1/4 of eligible voters actually wanted Trump, but now he's President.
If you had compulsory voting and the option for 'neither they both suck'. 'Neither they both suck' would have won.
If Obama hadn't let little Kimmy get Nukes, he would never have had the confidence to meet Trump as an equal.
So all credit obviously goes to Obama for doing all the legwork in setting up the deal for Trump to just swoop in and take the credit.
Oil has much heavier use than the rest so of course it is at top.
So Oil has more use does it and that's why its total is bigger. Where have I heard that argument before?
I know, China has more people, that's why it's total is bigger.
You do know what an asset is don't you?
You obviously have to not be a moron. Buy the assets that everyone else is buying, houses, stocks, etc, tulips if that's what the rest are into. The demand will keep them rising by itself. You need to also understand the difference between massive and crippling.
Smart people will be ready for the problem and the first to dust themselves off. Now they get a headstart for the next ride too.
Now is your chance Windy to show you aren't a liar. Where did you get those numbers from? Your ass like all the other times?
Half of the numbers are obvious lies, or you are getting them from very unreliable sources, show us so we can avoid them in the future.
If you are unable this time as well, it just shows again that the very unreliable source is you.
Capacity factor for both countries coal plants are basically the same if you had bothered to look. Although why you think it's relevant to anything is also strange.
The sensible thing to do is to go into massive debt like everyone else, but only if everyone else is.
The assets you buy with the debt, say housing, will rise along with everyone else and you will happy. If you didn't go into debt, you would just end up unhappy and jealous of all those who did.
If there is a problem, daddy government will save everyone anyway, interest rates to zero, stimulus packages, that kind of thing. Everyone just dusts themselves off and climbs back on for the next ride.
If you're within stumbling distance of a bar at 2am chances are good that you are drunk. Tripley so if you are a regular user and they see your history.
Maybe you didn't understand the BBC link. (It does go against your core beliefs.) He is basically saying that yes, you can pick and choose small timescales where the data will match, but it's meaningless to consider such things. They are no more than coincidences. You could sift through stock market chats and find similar patterns too it you like, equally as meaningless. Except to the true believers that it.
Slashdot Mirror
They already track everyone's phone and have cameras everywhere taking video and pictures of just about every street in the country.
All were in southern Africa – Zimbabwe, Namibia, South Africa, Botswana, and Zambia
Did you misspell global warming?
Google will do that 95% of the time. Even if it was 100% wrong consistently you would be able to work around it, but it's random. And really quite bad. If you didn't already know what number to expect you wouldn't even know it was wrong.
Chinese have a concept of 10,000 being a standard division for counting, so things will be measured in 10k's but Google changes them to either just thousands or millions instead depending on how it feels that particular time.
Not quite the same as Windy just making up numbers, but the effect is similar. Completely unreliable results and not trustworthy without alternate sources.
Totally believable, 2038 the whole world uses insta-pay, but Americans still write cheques and can't spell it.
Since you are admitting to your lies, how about these few as well?
And that's not even your biggest lie of claiming everyone else is a liar.
CHina has 1.2TW of coal plants running at 60% load factor, while BOTH America and Europe are at .25 TW running ~90-95% load. Note that this means that Europe and America can NOT increase their emissions from coal without building new plants.
Look it's the same lie as before, when will you use it again? since you didn't learn from last few times you were called on it.
China's gov choosing to build new coals plants and continue using more than 85%coal for electricity.
Another repeated lie. This one you use a lot.
China's emissions AND COAL use continue to set RECORDS,
Nope, peaked in 2013 and you know it did.
Hmm. Ok. Why did china's coal production, consumption, and CO2 increase over 5% in 2017,
No it was less than 1% closer to 1/2
You even tried to claim America's GDP growth was the highest (it was the lowest)
Finally, you speak of GDP growth.
Here is America [tradingeconomics.com]
Here is China [tradingeconomics.com]
Here is EU [tradingeconomics.com]
Out of all 3, America is doing the best. Should we be allowed to grow our CO2 just because our GDP is going up faster?
You even had to work your Musky fanboism into your lies.
Starting next year, the new tesla trucks will actually drop our CO2 by 2-5% EACH YEAR. That is how much of an impact that truck will make. Yes, 5000 new Tesla trucks EACH YEAR will reduce CO2 FURTHER than 500,000 new model 3s EACH YEAR.
Clearly absurd.
The saddest part is that about 44% of people didn't even care enough that a nazi might win to even bother voting.
Only 1/4 of eligible voters actually wanted Trump, but now he's President.
If you had compulsory voting and the option for 'neither they both suck'. 'Neither they both suck' would have won.
You know people like you falling for clickbait is the reason there's clickbait right?
Do us all a favour and read and understand the summary at least before jumping in next time.
Even better WindBourne. Once you are flagged compulsive liar even your anon posts will be flagged, perfect.
That would be a great idea. Then all the compulsive liars like you could be tagged
More people decided that they didn't care enough to even vote for either candidate.
If Obama hadn't let little Kimmy get Nukes, he would never have had the confidence to meet Trump as an equal.
So all credit obviously goes to Obama for doing all the legwork in setting up the deal for Trump to just swoop in and take the credit.
Some countries now have more debt than they have economic production.
So, the debt doesn't have to all be paid in one year.
Oil has much heavier use than the rest so of course it is at top.
So Oil has more use does it and that's why its total is bigger. Where have I heard that argument before?
I know, China has more people, that's why it's total is bigger.
If you are 'predicting' the past for investment advice, I suggest lottery numbers as a faster easier way to wealth. How about predicting the future?
You do know what an asset is don't you?
You obviously have to not be a moron. Buy the assets that everyone else is buying, houses, stocks, etc, tulips if that's what the rest are into. The demand will keep them rising by itself. You need to also understand the difference between massive and crippling.
Smart people will be ready for the problem and the first to dust themselves off. Now they get a headstart for the next ride too.
Now is your chance Windy to show you aren't a liar. Where did you get those numbers from? Your ass like all the other times?
Half of the numbers are obvious lies, or you are getting them from very unreliable sources, show us so we can avoid them in the future.
If you are unable this time as well, it just shows again that the very unreliable source is you.
Capacity factor for both countries coal plants are basically the same if you had bothered to look. Although why you think it's relevant to anything is also strange.
The sensible thing to do is to go into massive debt like everyone else, but only if everyone else is.
The assets you buy with the debt, say housing, will rise along with everyone else and you will happy. If you didn't go into debt, you would just end up unhappy and jealous of all those who did.
If there is a problem, daddy government will save everyone anyway, interest rates to zero, stimulus packages, that kind of thing. Everyone just dusts themselves off and climbs back on for the next ride.
I thought you said it would cost $10?
If you're within stumbling distance of a bar at 2am chances are good that you are drunk. Tripley so if you are a regular user and they see your history.
So why didn't you just pay $10 and take one of the alternatives?
It's not a surge price, it's the normal price. The other times are just off peak discounts.
Science logic math, is there nothing you can't completely fail at?
Maybe you didn't understand the BBC link. (It does go against your core beliefs.) He is basically saying that yes, you can pick and choose small timescales where the data will match, but it's meaningless to consider such things. They are no more than coincidences. You could sift through stock market chats and find similar patterns too it you like, equally as meaningless. Except to the true believers that it.
You missed the per person bit. It's a common mistake don't feel too bad about it.
You're