Slashdot Mirror


Tesla's Autopilot To Get 'Full Self-Driving Feature' In August (reuters.com)

Earlier today, Tesla CEO Elon Musk tweeted that its Autopilot driver assistance system will get full self-driving features following a software upgrade in August. Reuters reports: Autopilot, a form of advanced cruise control, handles some driving tasks and warns those behind the wheel they are always responsible for the vehicle's safe operation. But a spate of recent crashes has brought the system under regulatory scrutiny. "To date, Autopilot resources have rightly focused entirely on safety. With V9, we will begin to enable full self-driving features," Musk tweeted here on Sunday, replying to a Twitter user.

Musk said the autopilot issue during lane-merging is better in the current software and will be fully fixed in the August update. However, it was not clear what self-driving features would be included in the August update. Tesla's documentation on its website about the "full self-driving capabilities" package says that it is not possible to know exactly when each element of the functionality will be available, as this is highly dependent on local regulatory approval.

180 comments

  1. Fake News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Can we get a better law passed to make deceptive quoting and deceptive titles illegal? "begin to enable full self-driving features" is not nearly the same as "get 'full self-driving features'". No wonder the news industry is dying. It's all just bullshit, same as gossip.

    1. Re:Fake News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they are enabled that means someone would be receiving them. Get and receieve are synonyms. So there is nothing deceptive, Trumpkin.

    2. Re:Fake News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's dishonest reporting at best. The most likely interpretation for the phrase "get 'full self-driving features'" is that the car will suddenly become fully self-driving. That is clearly not what the original tweet meant. The deception is not in the word get (or receive), the deception is in omitting the words "begin to enable".

      The reporter of course KNOWS THIS. They know that the way they rephrased the original wording changes the intended meaning, with the goal of increasing number of clicks / pageviews.

    3. Re:Fake News by Desler · · Score: 1

      It's dishonest reporting at best. The most likely interpretation for the phrase "get 'full self-driving features'" is that the car will suddenly become fully self-driving.

      Only if you don’t actually bother reading the story.

    4. Re:Fake News by dgatwood · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The headline is grossly misleading because "feature" is singular. If it had said "features", it would have been less misleading, because people would have immediately realized that there must be multiple parts to full self-driving capabilities, and they're just getting some of them. By using the singular form, the headline is saying that the car will be fully self-driving in August, which is almost certainly far from the truth.

      The fact that you can figure out that the headline is pure B.S. by reading the article doesn't change the fact that the headline is clickbait.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    5. Re:Fake News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I kind of agree with you. Except Musk clearly has a habit of using this type of language on purpose to hype his companies.

    6. Re: Fake News by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      Only if you donâ(TM)t actually bother reading the story.

      That's rather the point; the headline is intentionally designed to mislead in order to get you to read the story. Which makes the "reporter" a douchebag and his editor a cunt.

    7. Re: Fake News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TDS

    8. Re:Fake News by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      This could be as little as adding the ability to read road signs, something that the old AP1 hardware could do but which the newer AP2 hardware has lacked for years.

      It's probably just Tesla finally enabling all the cameras that they have installed in the car. At the moment only half of them are actually in use.

      To get to fully autonomy they need to add the ability to read road signs, the ability to differentiate different kinds of vehicles (cars/bikes), and some kind of 3D vision (probably comparing consecutive video frames since they don't have stereo cameras), heavy redundancy so the car can act safely when cameras get splashed with rain or mud. They they need to take that data and build a 3D model of the world, and figure out how to navigate around it.

      Keep in mind that they have been selling full self driving for a couple of years now, and promised that it would drive you to work and then go off and park itself, more than Google's system can do and using a vastly inferior sensor suite.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    9. Re:Fake News by Pinky's+Brain · · Score: 1

      Do airplane pilots have a different definition of "full" we are supposed to follow now too?

    10. Re:Fake News by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      I just hope no one reads this and tries to take a nap the next time they turn on their Tesla autopilot.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    11. Re:Fake News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      As if Musk's tweet was, on the other hand, straight, clear and honest.

      "begin to enable full self driving features"... So... Partial full self driving, then? What does that even mean?

    12. Re:Fake News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No wonder the news industry is dying. It's all just bullshit, same as gossip.

      An industry is an economic sector in which things are fabricated. That makes the term "news industry" somewhat amusing :)

    13. Re:Fake News by Malc · · Score: 1

      They know that the way they rephrased the original wording changes the intended meaning, with the goal of increasing number of clicks / pageviews.

      They must be new around here: /.'s don't read the story!

    14. Re:Fake News by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

      If it had said "features", it would have been less misleading, because people would have immediately realized that there must be multiple parts to full self-driving capabilities, and they're just getting some of them.

      Yes. Missing, for example, are the "full" and "self" parts ...

    15. Re:Fake News by JourneymanMereel · · Score: 2

      It's dishonest reporting at best. The most likely interpretation for the phrase "get 'full self-driving features'" is that the car will suddenly become fully self-driving.

      Only if you don’t actually bother reading the story.

      Which is kinda the point the OP is making. The only way to read the story is to click on the misleading headline and give the author the pageview they are gunning for by crafting a misleading headline.

      --
      Life has many choices. Eternity has two. What's yours?
    16. Re:Fake News by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      "Full self driving", in this context, means an optional package that you can buy when you buy the car, but for which the software is not yet available. Part of the cost is additional hardware, so it is more expensive to add it later.

      What "begin to enable full self-driving features" means is that they will begin delivering features that are only available to people who bought that optional package (which is not the same thing as actually delivering full self driving). This update could add traffic light detection, or even something as minor as speed limit sign detection (though the latter is probably planned for the lesser "enhanced autopilot" package). Or it might finally enable the smart summon feature (basically full self driving, but at 5 MPH or less).

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  2. Suggestion for first feature: by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 4, Funny

    When approaching stopped car at high velocity, do not hit car. Hopefully they can expand that feature to cover other stationary objects as well, but I can see how that might be a "2.0” kind of thing.

    1. Re:Suggestion for first feature: by fluffernutter · · Score: 2

      "Oh yes we missed large concrete objects, we'll fix it OTA tomorrow."
      "Oh yes we missed large red firetrucks, we'll fix it OTA tomorrow."
      "Oh yes we missed police cars, we'll fix it OTA tomorrow."

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    2. Re:Suggestion for first feature: by viperidaenz · · Score: 0

      When autonomously changing lanes to obtain preset cruising speed (set by driver in excess of posted limit), do not pull out where there is no lane, accelerate and crash into barrier to kill the driver as punishment for asking the car to do 75 in a 65 zone.

      https://www.popularmechanics.c...

    3. Re:Suggestion for first feature: by slashdice · · Score: 1

      do you even move fast and break stuff bro?

      --
      Copyright (c) 1990 - 2014 Dice. All rights reserved. Use of this comment is subject to certain Terms and Conditions.
    4. Re: Suggestion for first feature: by c6gunner · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As opposed to human drivers?

      "Oh we missed 5,000 stop signs today alone. We'll fix it never."

    5. Re:Suggestion for first feature: by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      That safeguard code is easy to write:

      CASE WHEN IS Car THEN NOT KILL
      CASE WHEN IS Truck THEN NOT KILL
      CASE WHEN IS Bicycle THEN NOT KILL
      CASE WHEN IS Human THEN NOT KILL
      ELSE KILL;

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    6. Re:Suggestion for first feature: by mjwx · · Score: 1

      When approaching stopped car at high velocity, do not hit car. Hopefully they can expand that feature to cover other stationary objects as well, but I can see how that might be a "2.0” kind of thing.

      The logic of "do not hit parked car" is not the issue.

      The issue is "is that a parked car or a leaf" and by the time computers have figured it out, they've hit it. OK if it was a leaf, shit if it was a parked car. In the rush to make self driving cars serious corners are being cut. The fact is that computers are not good at determining what objects are if given a long time to process the input data... They're even worse when they have to process it in less than a second. If an unidentified object in the road cant determine if what it's detected is a parked car or a leaf, it has two real options, stop or drive into it. If they choose stop, people will get annoyed and stop using the system, currently they're choosing to drive into it which means people are less annoyed, but sometimes killed when the system is wrong.

      I've worked with image recognition from remote sensing, we're a long way off from real time object recognition. Right now if you want fast object recognition you need to limit it to specific criteria that must have quite tight tolerances and even then, false positive and negatives are right through the roof.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    7. Re: Suggestion for first feature: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but you KNOW what to do there and are just ignoring it...the vehicle on its own may not, but those updates will surely fix it and never cause any sort of problem.

    8. Re: Suggestion for first feature: by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Human drivers drive 169,000 miles without an accident, in all conditions, everywhere.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    9. Re:Suggestion for first feature: by edtice1559 · · Score: 1

      For things that are not safety critical, yes. For things that have health and safety consequences, no.

    10. Re:Suggestion for first feature: by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 2

      Which is why you also have ultrasonic and radar sensor input to "vote" on an issue. You also have sufficient cameras and angles that the vision logic can vote as well among the different perspectives... and you have a lot more time as a computer than as a human, as your processing loop should take nowhere near a second to converge.

      If you can't do this, it isn't autonomous, and never will be.

    11. Re: Suggestion for first feature: by houghi · · Score: 1

      Tell that to my dead mother, you incensitive clod.
      (No, she was not killed due to traffic. It was cancer. But she had several minor car accidents during her lifetime.)

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    12. Re:Suggestion for first feature: by lhunath · · Score: 1

      It does already do some automatic emergency breaking and they are working on improving the performance of this; but it's not a trivial problem to solve.

      See https://youtu.be/kFF1AHeIf14?t...

      --
      ``OK, so ten out of ten for style, but minus several million for good thinking, yeah?''
    13. Re: Suggestion for first feature: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't anthropomorphise Tesla vehicles, or any vehicle/automaton in fact. Automation is supposed to reduce the risk of driving to zero much better than any human driver. That goal is still a long way off, unfortunately, but first to market wins. Even if this means there are gross mistakes along the way.
      What I don't really like with this technology not being ready, is the attitude that it will fix itself in the end after many deaths in-between of live testing. These vehicles are BETA at best, and ALPHA in many situations.
      Introducing current software practices into life critical machines needs to be done with NASA levels of criticism. I just don't think these car manufacturers, as a whole, are taking this approach seriously. Because profit.

    14. Re: Suggestion for first feature: by Thelasko · · Score: 1

      As opposed to human drivers?

      This is a good opportunity to remind everyone that a human driver crashed at the exact same spot as the Tesla in Mountain View eleven days before.

      Yes, the Tesla Autopilot needs a lot of work. But humans aren't perfect either.

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
  3. Re:Tesla? LOL! by SeaFox · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Tesla has a high rate of recalls compared to other car manufacturers.

    Just because a car maker has fewer recalls than Tesla doesn't mean their cars have fewer issues. It just means they don't have as many recalls. They could simply be not taking responsibility for their problems compared to Tesla.

  4. Big spend coming from Tesla by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 0

    Liability insurance payments will skyrocket starting in August, as they will now be on the hook for any accidents that happen whilst running Autopilot. No more excuses of "it's just an aid, you still need to hold the wheel". Musk is explicitly claiming self-driving capabilities.

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    1. Re:Big spend coming from Tesla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Liability insurance payments will skyrocket starting in August, as they will now be on the hook for any accidents that happen whilst running Autopilot. No more excuses of "it's just an aid, you still need to hold the wheel". Musk is explicitly claiming self-driving capabilities.

      yes very curious. Although tesla already has a reputation for going fully autonomous.

    2. Re:Big spend coming from Tesla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keep the faith bro. Your opinions are just as valid as everyone who can actually read's facts.

    3. Re:Big spend coming from Tesla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bahaha, why would Tesla be the first tech company in history to agree to take financial responsibility for the havoc caused by flaws in their products?

      Buying a self-driving car is like buying a Windows laptop, except that every time Windows crashes you have to pay $20,000 in repairs and medical costs.

      Captcha: Idealism

    4. Re:Big spend coming from Tesla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bahaha, why would Tesla be the first tech company in history to agree to take financial responsibility for the havoc caused by flaws in their products?

      They are an automotive company and certainly would not be the first to take financial responsibility for the havoc caused by flaws in their products.

  5. Re:Tesla? LOL! by Elfich47 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Recalls normally have some sort of government intervention that forces the recall.

    --
    Architectural plans are like computer source code with a couple of differences: You only compile once.
  6. Re:Canada has retaliated by slashdice · · Score: 2

    Canadians don't mess aboot.

    --
    Copyright (c) 1990 - 2014 Dice. All rights reserved. Use of this comment is subject to certain Terms and Conditions.
  7. Does anyone care anymore? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anyone honestly care outside of tech bubbles or greedy car companies? If anybody is stupid enough to utilize this, Musk will have more deaths on his hands and through that verbiage he would find it a lot more difficult to weasel his way out of liability. Full automation for this particular task is a pipe dream, and one that no one asked for. He's a fossil of the disuption-equals-hostile-takeover startup culture, he's not half as bright as he gets credit for, and he's just trying to keep himself relevant. I could honestly care less about this. Yawn.

    1. Re:Does anyone care anymore? by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      Resist! get out and walk.

  8. Let me tell you a story by slashdice · · Score: 2

    I knew a guy. He drove his car into an interstate overpass at 80+ mph. It was a failed suicide attempt (i.e., he lived).

    Point is, Tesla's autopilot is indistinguishable from a depressed, suicidal middle aged man that was just fired.

    --
    Copyright (c) 1990 - 2014 Dice. All rights reserved. Use of this comment is subject to certain Terms and Conditions.
    1. Re:Let me tell you a story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://schizophrenia.com/earlysigns.htm

      > Early Signs of Schizophrenia
      > --Frequent loose association of thoughts or speech- when one thought does not logically relate to the next. For example, "I need to go to the store to buy some band-aids. I read an article about how expensive AIDS drugs are. People take too many street drugs. The streets should be clean from the rain today, etc" The need to go to the store to buy band-aids is forgotten.

    2. Re:Let me tell you a story by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      You should seek help.

    3. Re: Let me tell you a story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Says the asshole making fun of another's suicide attempt. Youre shameful.

    4. Re:Let me tell you a story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly, why would I want to be drive around by a depressed suicidal middle aged man that was just fired?

    5. Re:Let me tell you a story by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      Exactly, why would I want to be drive around by a depressed suicidal middle aged man that was just fired?

      Pretty sure that's Uber's entire business model.

    6. Re: Let me tell you a story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would rather he drove for trump.

    7. Re: Let me tell you a story by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      Utterly

  9. have you ever driven in a Tesla? by slashdice · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's a nice car. It's a luxury car, nice interior. Kind of makes you feel like royalty, like a king. Or queen. More specifically, a princess. In particular, Princess Diana.

    --
    Copyright (c) 1990 - 2014 Dice. All rights reserved. Use of this comment is subject to certain Terms and Conditions.
    1. Re: have you ever driven in a Tesla? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Jokes aside, the tesla interior is much closer in quality and style to a civic than a Mercedes.

    2. Re: have you ever driven in a Tesla? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I rode in a tesla once, clearly youâ(TM)re not driving the same kind of civic I am. Thereâ(TM)s no comparision.

    3. Re:have you ever driven in a Tesla? by LifesABeach · · Score: 0

      Just a suggestion princess, buckle your seat belt.

    4. Re: have you ever driven in a Tesla? by froggyjojodaddy · · Score: 2

      This is very true. If you discount the flashy LED displays (which are extremely impressive), the materials and patterns of the interior are very underwhelming considering the price of the car. Step into an equivalently priced Mercedes, BMW, Audi, Jaguar etc. and you'll instantly feel, smell, and see much better quality interiors. The plain door panel on a Tesla, for example, is a plan swath of leather (maybe vinyl?) but in an equivalent German car, the leather is either quilted, patterned, or otherwise broken up with other design elements. Same goes for the rest of the interior.

      The rest of the engineering may match, maybe exceed that of it's similarly priced rivals but the interior quality/design has a long way to go still.

    5. Re:have you ever driven in a Tesla? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever driven a real luxury car? Because a Tesla isn't one.

    6. Re: have you ever driven in a Tesla? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It depends on the Mercedes. When in Europe last month, I sat in more than one E-class taxi that had an interior that would have been expected from a Corolla.

      Can Tesla step their game up on the interior? Sure. But remember that Mercedes-Benz USA only imports the expensive shit to North America because they managed to curate their brand into being luxury-only, and they make all kinds and varieties of vehicle elsewhere.

    7. Re: have you ever driven in a Tesla? by eth1 · · Score: 2

      This is very true. If you discount the flashy LED displays (which are extremely impressive), the materials and patterns of the interior are very underwhelming considering the price of the car. Step into an equivalently priced Mercedes, BMW, Audi, Jaguar etc. and you'll instantly feel, smell, and see much better quality interiors.

      I own an Audi (2015) and a Porsche (2008), and I've been in a Model S (2016). The S is about equivalent to the Audi (a little better, maybe), and much better than the Porsche as far as interior quality goes.

      Mercedes, though, (the upper tiers, anyway) generally seem to have better interiors in general, not just compared to Tesla.

    8. Re: have you ever driven in a Tesla? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Putting an "R-Type" sticker on the back of your Civic does not make it faster.

    9. Re: have you ever driven in a Tesla? by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      yup. The interior is actually made out of decent material, but, it is not fancy. However, they hired 2 ppl away from Volvo who did the XC-90's top end to re-do the interiors on tesla. So far, minor changes have been made. I think that Musk goals is to first get M3's production line solid, along with the hand portion, then re-do the M[SX].

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    10. Re: have you ever driven in a Tesla? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Benz owners love it when you call their cars 'Eurotaxis'.

      Especially the ones that paid way too much for AMGs (as always factory tuner price = price of base model + 5x(price of tuner parts + install)).

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    11. Re: have you ever driven in a Tesla? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know Volvo is Chinese? They will probably just smear the interior with coal.

  10. I care... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    And I own a Tesla model 3 and find the autopilot to be a significant improvement over the standard cruise control found in a lesser cars.

    I'm also an engineer and have a graduate degree in machine learning, so I don't share your pessimism. Fortunately, you Luddites are in the minority or we'd instead be arguing the merits of mules vs horses vs donkeys.

    1. Re:I care... by crimson+tsunami · · Score: 1

      Mules are clearly the best. Being infertile they can't go all Planet of the Apes and take over, like AI cars inevitably will.

    2. Re: I care... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Standard cruise control has never driven some dumb bastard into a concrete barrier. Cc is not called and never advertised as auto pilot.

      You may have a masters degree from a third rate school but iâ(TM)d never hire your arrogant and equally stupid dumb ass who has yet to maste (get it?) the basics of the English language.

      I hope you only work on video games and not anything important like medical devices or car auto pilot.

    3. Re: I care... by triffid_98 · · Score: 1

      It's a fine cruise control system if you're holding the wheel and paying attention but the more it improves the less likely that is to be the case. People will (once again) assume they can zone out and watch Harry Potter DVDs because "autopilot" and vehicular carnage will then ensue.

    4. Re: I care... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank God that you are a mule. The last thing we need is more jackasses breeding.

    5. Re: I care... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depending what sort of nanny state you live in, this isn't really the manufacturer's problem, any more than drinking while driving is Jack Daniel's problem. People need to step up and take responsibility for themselves once in a while.

  11. Misinterpreting Tweet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Musk tweeted: "we will begin to enable full self-driving features" doesn't mean Teslas will be capable of "full self driving", his claim is that his company would "begin" to deploy some of the features for the people that paid extra money for the "Full Self Driving Feature" in addition to the Auto Pilot feature, but not anyone else.

    This could simply mean that it's just better at dealing with merging vehicles that the tweet that Musk was responding mentioned that the existing Auto Pilot software had problems with.

    1. Re: Misinterpreting Tweet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In other news, Musk tweets some more bull shit about his fake autopilot to boost sales and increase his murder rate.

    2. Re:Misinterpreting Tweet by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      My prediction: It will (sometimes) detect traffic lights and chime at you to remind you to push the brake pedal. :-D

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    3. Re:Misinterpreting Tweet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    4. Re: Misinterpreting Tweet by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      The mortality rate for A/C's would plummet if A/C's would just stop looking up when it rained.

    5. Re: Misinterpreting Tweet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Newsflash! Anonymous moron using fake handle on internet insults other anonymous person not using fake internet handle for being anonymous while ignoring point! Ad hominem lives!

      Body of news article: today an anonymous moron for the first time ever used the clever rhetorical tactic of ad hominem attack based on anonymity rather than address a point! As this has never happened before, anonymous handle using moron mom said, oh that Jonny I always knew if I never let him out of the basement he would one day make me proud of his mad internet warrior skills!

      In other news, the elan Musk tesla has only murdered 16 innocent pedestrians this week down from 18 last week after the new update.

    6. Re: Misinterpreting Tweet by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      This is the best you can imagine?

  12. Re:Tesla? LOL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    As a motorcyclist, this terrifies me. Teslas already have an issue with running us over to begin with, now they're going to open it up for full auto without addressing the problem.

  13. Re: Tesla? LOL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok, so which recall was Tesla forced to do by the Government?

    Also, recalls can be anything from a sun shade that doesn't latch quite right, to a fuel line problem that makes the vehicle explode without warning.

  14. Re: Clutch Nixon has retaliated by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

    FYI, this thread is about Tesla's autopilot.

  15. Re:Tesla? LOL! by LifesABeach · · Score: 2

    Just a thought, buy one and prove Tesla wrong. And one can finance through the First Bank of Parents; clean up the basement first.

  16. Re:Tesla? LOL! by LifesABeach · · Score: 0

    Stay in your basement?

  17. self driving assist? by kiviQr · · Score: 1

    does "self driving" mean what it means or is it a "self driving assist"?

    1. Re:self driving assist? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It’s self driving when selling you the car or in this case to manipulate the companies stock price. It’s driver assist after it crashes.

    2. Re:self driving assist? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1 Insightful

  18. Some partial feature, not full self driving by misnohmer · · Score: 3, Informative

    Since 2016, anyone who paid Tesla for FSD got absolutely nothing over those who didn't. What feature will get rolled out in August is not publicly known, could be some trick the car can do that it couldn't before (e.g. warn you if it sees a stop sign or a red light, not guaranteed it will see one of course). Then again, given that Elon said the exact same thing in the past, "features rolling out starting December 2016", then "FSD coast-to-coast demo by end of 2017", and none of them came remotely true, I would not be holding my breath. Could be just a way to distract the media from NHTSA investigation results, or other news Elon wasn't thrilled to see.

    1. Re:Some partial feature, not full self driving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then again, given that Elon said the exact same thing in the past, "features rolling out starting December 2016", then "FSD coast-to-coast demo by end of 2017", and none of them came remotely true, I would not be holding my breath.

      Pointing out how Elon fails to fulfill promises might as well be a summoning spell for Rei's specious (Score:5, Informative) damage control.

    2. Re:Some partial feature, not full self driving by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      The problem with all these little incremental improvements is that they just make the driver more and more reliant on features that are not reliable.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:Some partial feature, not full self driving by misnohmer · · Score: 4, Informative

      That actually is is a much bigger problem, and Google/Waymo and other researcher have concluded there is no safe way to implement a self driving car if humans have to supervise it and be able to take over in a split second (as per Tesla's fine print) when it does something wrong, such as try to kill you by driving into a concrete median:
      Robot Cars Can’t Count on Us in an Emergency https://www.nytimes.com/2017/0...

      Elon got it wrong, self driving is a separate problem and you can't get there incrementally by increasing the level of autonomy (think wanting to go to the moon - going farther and farther by car will never get you there):
      People who paid Tesla $3,000 for full self-driving might be out of luck https://arstechnica.com/cars/2...

    4. Re:Some partial feature, not full self driving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually, you can. But you need to start from the other end.

      Start with automatic breaking to avoid hitting obstacles, including pedestrians and bicycles. Get that perfect. Then automatic stopping when the driver falls asleep. Then add automatic take over and stopping if the car starts swerving out of its lane. Add automatic stopping for red light...

      I.e. let the human drive, and the computer monitor ready to take over at a millisecond notice.

      Once all the safety features are working, all you need is to add the GPS subsystem that tells the car where to go.

    5. Re:Some partial feature, not full self driving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google is right, but that doesn't mean Elon is wrong. "There is no safe way" does not mean that there could not be "a safer way". Individuals are good, but humans in general are so bad that Elon could easily end up saving many people, even if the cars would kill some people.

    6. Re: Some partial feature, not full self driving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tesla's fine print is legal CYA, not meant to express technical reality. Conflating the shared vocabulary makes for both-sides-are-right unending arguments on forums and in the media, but the self driving software is technically supposed to be better than humans, and improvements to its domain of competence will eventually result in software better than human performance across every measurable metric.

    7. Re:Some partial feature, not full self driving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Human driving is not risk free. Human drivers makes mistakes all the time, resulting in over a million traffic fatalities per year globally. Typical human mistakes are driving tired or intoxicated, fiddle on smartphone, failing to pay attention, etc.

      Robotic driving in not risk free, yet. Typical autonomous driving system failures are driving into stationary object and having trouble following the road.

      Tesla have choosen to accept robotic driving risks in exchange for customer convenience and reduced human driving risks, which so far have resulted in 40% reduced crash risk, many miles of very relaxed driving, a fast development of autonomous driving and and a few fatalities. This is a fully moral approach. Robotic driving can virtually eliminate traffic deaths, the sooner we can get there, the better. Human-caused traffic deaths are thousands per day.

    8. Re:Some partial feature, not full self driving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Elon got it wrong, self driving is a separate problem and you can't get there incrementally by increasing the level of autonomy"

      Sure you can. It will just kill a few people while you do it. Note this is not obviously a bad idea. The speed of technological deployment and safety is a tradeoff. However, while you may hurt more people by deploying the tech fast you may also save more people by deploying the tech fast because of this particular technologies impact.

    9. Re:Some partial feature, not full self driving by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

      Elon got it wrong, self driving is a separate problem and you can't get there incrementally by increasing the level of autonomy

      And Elon claims he has statistics that incremental autonomy improves safety in spite of the failures. The fact is that we don't know. We just have anecdotes.

  19. Stop falling for click-bait by CaffeinatedBacon · · Score: 1

    You know people like you falling for clickbait is the reason there's clickbait right?

    Do us all a favour and read and understand the summary at least before jumping in next time.

    1. Re: Stop falling for click-bait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spoken by a well-known lying troll. Figures.

    2. Re:Stop falling for click-bait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, wipe your face. My load is dripping all over because you did not swallow it all. You are just too use to small Chinese loads.

  20. Elon Musk will not last 1 day in a prison by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    Elon Musk will not last 1 day in a prison and after an full self-driving Tesla runs someone down and kills someone.

  21. Hey Apple, over here.... by seoras · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This, this is courage.

    1. Re:Hey Apple, over here.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      idiot. Elon is nothing more than a fool who is running a cult and you are a cult member.

    2. Re:Hey Apple, over here.... by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2

      Jobs made beautiful technology but Cook has a beautiful balance sheet.

      It turns out coasting on the past is more profitable than taking risks. For now (this scenario is why interruptors can emerge).

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    3. Re:Hey Apple, over here.... by lhunath · · Score: 1

      I'm assuming that you're not an idiot and therefore have a well-structured logical argument that you've used to convince yourself of this claim?

      --
      ``OK, so ten out of ten for style, but minus several million for good thinking, yeah?''
    4. Re:Hey Apple, over here.... by seoras · · Score: 1

      I think he's a short seller who's going to have to moonlight as a rent boy for the next 100 years.

    5. Re:Hey Apple, over here.... by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      I wish it were so.
      The fact is, that most of those shorters are going to be large companies or institutions that have a dog in this fight. The fact is, that most of these idiots running around screaming against Tesla are probably WAY to scared to back up their own words. Kind of like Trump vs China/Russia. He spoke a lot about it, but really he has been best friend to both.

      OTOH, these ppl, and the shorters could very likely be from Russia/China. Neither really wants Tesla to do well here.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    6. Re:Hey Apple, over here.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We know you have a hate on for China, but why would Russia care about Tesla at all?

  22. Tesla... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stop shooting that foot already what is wrong with you!

    More autopilot crashes comming. "oh it's not autoppilot!"

    How stupid are you people?

  23. Re: Tesla? LOL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Must be an interesting beta release program. We can plot the death charts on the programmer wallboard to monitor progress.

  24. Quick! by nightfire-unique · · Score: 1

    Everyone, short TSLA! Ramble on about how Tesla sucks and is overvalued! I've got a few hundred shares I'm willing to loan anyone who is interested.

    --
    A government is a body of people notably ungoverned - AC
  25. Re: Tesla? LOL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rei, where are you? People are talking bad about Tesla!

  26. Re:Canada has retaliated by Pitt64 · · Score: 1

    i heard the faggot survived, i.e. non-fatal heart attack

  27. Re:Tesla? LOL! by Pitt64 · · Score: 1

    self-driving motorcycles. -tags head-

  28. Re: Tesla? LOL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Reporting from Detroit. Software updates for cars in the field is my specialty. This is simply not true. Some recalls have a government push behind them, but many do not. Any in-field fix that is announced to customers is a recall. An in field fix that is only fixed when customers bring it up at the service desk is sometimes called a soft recall. That is nearly always voluntary, but even proper recalls are often voluntary.

  29. Re:Tesla? LOL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Stay in your lane, within the speed limit and follow the law.
    99% of motorcycle related fatalities are self inflicted.
    Get it down to half and other people might worry about you too.

  30. Brain-dead dead, well.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More brain-dead brainless motherfuckers dead in Teslas on Autopilot. They are idiots, fuck 'em, clean up the gene pool, Darwin Award, all that. I'm just waiting for the first moron on Autopilot to kill a person. An elderly person, a kid, whomever. We'll see how well it goes for the company. Pseudo-Auto-driving Uber Alles? Uber, uber, hmm.... Reminds me of something....

    1. Re:Brain-dead dead, well.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey brain-dead one. That already happened. Uber killed a pedestrian. As to Tesla, nope.

    2. Re:Brain-dead dead, well.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get a clue from my last line you moron

  31. Re:Tesla? LOL! by Rei · · Score: 2, Informative

    The premise is simply false. Tesla does not have a high rate of recalls. Go here. Punch in "2017 Tesla". Check out the recalls and investigations stats. Now punch in "2017 Mercedes". Note the difference.

    --
    I was watching this thing on TV about some guy named Hitler. Someone should stop him!
  32. Re:Tesla? LOL! by Rei · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Key word is "begin to". And just so you know, the real news is that with the last update, Tesla went in the other direction. It used to be that you could have your hands off the wheel for minutes at a time when conditions were good. After the update it's more like 15-20 seconds. A number of people are complaining.

    BTW, Musk had a comment recently concerning motorcycles.

    --
    I was watching this thing on TV about some guy named Hitler. Someone should stop him!
  33. Re:Tesla? LOL! by Joce640k · · Score: 1

    Meh. What's an extra 0.1% risk to a motorcyclist?

    Get out there and live your dream!

    --
    No sig today...
  34. Re: You sound poor. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get a job and you too can own a car!

  35. Human Sacrifice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many corpses need stacked infront of the Robot Idols before these corporations blood lust is satisfied ?

    Work with your local and state government to ban Tesla and all driverless technology.

    None of us have signed an agreement allowing us to become victims in your lab experiments.

    Go kill people somewhere else.

  36. Re:Elon Musk will not spend 1 day in a prison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Elon Musk will not spend 1 day in a prison after a full self-driving Tesla runs someone down and kills someone.

    FTFY

    Remember rich people don't go to prison, that's just for people who can't afford expensive lawyers.

  37. You mean auto crashing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just surprised Tesla with all the bad press on these deaths don't provide a better solution then to offer a more improved auto pilot. What's even more surprising is that NHTSA has not required some sort of recall of the system given their own findings say something is definitely problematic with the auto pilot system.

  38. Re: Tesla? LOL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The majority of motorcycle accidents are actually caused by a car or truck.

  39. Re:Canada has retaliated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like I said, just a warning... this time. Trump needs to watch his step.

  40. Re:Tesla? LOL! by Bearhouse · · Score: 1

    Urm, I'm aware that you're a serial Tesla defender, and I'm fine with that - plenty of people here seemingly have shorted the stock.
    But...not sure that comparing the number of recalls for the entire range of 2017 Mercedes vehicles is fair...

  41. Re:Tesla? LOL! by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

    That's the theory, at least here in the UK. Sadly, from personal experience, it doesn't always work like that and the relevant authorities are not good at fixing oversights, sometimes with very dangerous results.

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
  42. Re:Tesla? LOL! by Rei · · Score: 1, Informative

    Slashdot is complaining about the number of characters per line so I'm going to have to add a very long line here. Hipster Ipsum will do: "Lorem ipsum dolor amet whatever scenester post-ironic adaptogen humblebrag narwhal kickstarter asymmetrical tilde direct trade typewriter meggings taxidermy. DIY enamel pin direct trade pug, pour-over occupy bespoke. Kale chips air plant crucifix raclette organic. Prism chambray kickstarter, echo park glossier vexillologist tattooed disrupt air plant synth snackwave unicorn iceland. Microdosing cred next level shabby chic post-ironic snackwave four dollar toast shaman sustainable etsy. Yr selfies put a bird on it palo santo tbh vinyl taiyaki helvetica XOXO succulents, normcore thundercats mustache pinterest pabst. Bitters direct trade vaporware kickstarter, ethical tumeric jianbing waistcoat stumptown vegan post-ironic craft beer crucifix cronut flexitarian. Ugh venmo pitchfork squid, ramps microdosing roof party leggings cloud bread fanny pack 8-bit PBR&B. Salvia meggings semiotics try-hard cronut swag farm-to-table." There we go, that should do. On with our regularly scheduled post.

    You apparently didn't follow the instructions I gave. When you do so, recalls are broken down by model.

    Tesla:

    VEHICLES RECALLS INVESTIGATION COMPLAINTS MANUFACTURER COMMUNICATIONS
    2017 TESLA MODEL S 60 5 HB RWD 0 0 50 7
    2017 TESLA MODEL S 60D 5 HB AWD 0 0 50 7
    2017 TESLA MODEL S 75 5 HB RWD 0 0 50 7
    2017 TESLA MODEL S 75D 5 HB AWD 0 0 50 7
    2017 TESLA MODEL S 90D 5 HB AWD 0 0 50 7
    2017 TESLA MODEL S P100D 5 HB AWD 0 0 50 7
    2017 TESLA MODEL S P90D 5 HB AWD 0 0 50 7
    2017 TESLA MODEL X 60D SUV AWD 2 0 22 9
    2017 TESLA MODEL X 75D SUV AWD 2 0 22 9
    2017 TESLA MODEL X 90D SUV AWD 2 0 22 9
    2017 TESLA MODEL X P100D SUV AWD 2 0 22 9
    2017 TESLA MODEL X P90D SUV AWD 2 0 22 9
    2017 TESLA MODEL 3 4 DR RWD 0 0 0 0

    Mercedes:

    VEHICLES RECALLS INVESTIGATION COMPLAINTS MANUFACTURER COMMUNICATIONS
    2017 MERCEDES-BENZ C-CLASS 4 DR 4WD 7 0 31 9
    2017 MERCEDES-BENZ C-CLASS 4 DR RWD 7 0 31 9
    2017 MERCEDES-BENZ GLE-CLASS SUV RWD 7 0 12 9
    2017 MERCEDES-BENZ GLE-CLASS SUV 4WD 7 0 12 9
    2017 MERCEDES-BENZ C-CLASS 2 DR RWD 7 0 31 9
    2017 MERCEDES-BENZ E-CLASS C RWD 15 0 21 57
    2017 MERCEDES-BENZ E-CLASS C 4WD 15 0 21 57
    2017 MERCEDES-BENZ CLS-CLASS 4 DR RWD 0 0 0 0
    2017 MERCEDES-BENZ CLS-CLASS 4 DR 4WD 0 0 0 0
    2017 MERCEDES-BENZ S-CLASS 4 DR RWD 5 0 1 46
    2017 MERCEDES-BENZ S-CLASS 4 DR 4WD 5 0 4 47
    2017 MERCEDES-BENZ S-CLASS HYBRID 4 DR RWD 5 0 4 47
    2017 MERCEDES-BENZ S-CLASS HYBRID 4 DR 4WD 5 0 4 47
    2017 MERCEDES-BENZ CL-CLASS 2 DR RWD 0 0 0 0
    2017 MERCEDES-BENZ CL-CLASS 2 DR 4WD 0 0 0 0
    2017 MERCEDES-BENZ S-CLASS C RWD 5 0 4 47
    2017 MERCEDES-BENZ S-CLASS C 4WD 5 0 4 47
    2017 MERCEDES-BENZ SL-CLASS C RWD 1 0 0 20
    2017 MERCEDES-BENZ SLC-CLASS C RWD 1 0 0 1
    2017 MERCEDES-BENZ B-CLASS E-CELL 4 DR FWD 0 0 0 0
    2017 MERCEDES-BENZ CLA-CLASS 4 DR FWD 3 0 8 4
    2017 MERCEDES-BENZ CLA-CLASS 4 DR 4WD 3 0 8 4
    2017 MERCEDES-BENZ GLA-CLASS 4 DR FWD 3 0 6 13
    2017 MERCEDES-BENZ GLA-CLASS 4 DR 4WD 3 0 6 13
    2017 MERCEDES-BENZ GLC-CLASS SUV RWD 7 0 26 23
    2017 MERCEDES-BENZ GLC-CLASS SUV 4WD 7 0 26 23
    2017 MERCEDES-BENZ GLC-CLASS COUPE 4 DR RWD 7 0 26 23
    2017 MERCEDES-BENZ GLC-CLASS COUPE 4 DR 4WD 7 0 26 23
    2017 MERCEDES-BENZ GLE-CLASS HYBRID SUV 4WD 7 0 12 9
    2017 MERCEDES-BENZ GLE-CLASS HYBRID SUV RWD 7

    --
    I was watching this thing on TV about some guy named Hitler. Someone should stop him!
  43. Re:Tesla? LOL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  44. Re:Tesla? LOL! by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 2

    99% of motorcycle related fatalities are self inflicted.

    A lot of motorcycle accidents happen at road junctions where the bike is not noticed by drivers of larger vehicles crossing its path, or when vehicles change lanes without their drivers properly checking for a bike already in the other lane. You can ride defensively to mitigate some of these risks, but ultimately if a driver in a larger vehicle does something dangerous because they didn't look properly and see you, there is only so much you can do, and you're inherently in a much more vulnerable position on a motorcycle.

    I've heard that the insurance industry likes to argue that motorcyclists are the sole cause of many motorcycle crashes, but then the insurance industry is trying to avoid paying out for the drivers who forced the motorcycles off the road, so it's not exactly neutral here.

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
  45. Re: Tesla? LOL! by Rei · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    The funny thing is that you actually seem to think that such comments are... what, offensive? Hurtful? Do elaborate on how sexual innuendo is supposed to be hurting my delicate widdle feelings. ;)

    --
    I was watching this thing on TV about some guy named Hitler. Someone should stop him!
  46. Re: Tesla? LOL! by Rei · · Score: 1, Funny

    Teslahu akhbar.

    --
    I was watching this thing on TV about some guy named Hitler. Someone should stop him!
  47. Re:Tesla? LOL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Insurance companies know that motorcycles are very rarely at fault for accidents involving other vehicles.

    If you don't believe me, look what liability only insurance costs on a motorcycle. I can do liability only on my S1000RR for 75 bucks a year. It becomes expensive when you want full coverage.

  48. Re:Tesla? LOL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > They could simply be not taking responsibility for their problems compared to Tesla.

    Put up or shut up. If there's something you know, let the NHTSA know. This is the sort of thing they go after.

  49. Re: Tesla? LOL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe you should be more aware of the easy digital footprint you leave. And those out there capable of translating to IRL.

  50. Re: Clutch Nixon has retaliated by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

    FYI, this thread is about Tesla's autopilot.

    Which has killed more people than the claimed Canadian "heart attack weapon".

    --
    Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
  51. Re:Tesla? LOL! by Eloking · · Score: 0

    You apparently didn't follow the instructions I gave. When you do so, recalls are broken down by model.

    [...]

    Hi Rei,

    Interesting, but it's a little meaningless point as it is don't you think?

    First, unless I'm wrong, the NHTSA only cover North America. Your exercise tell us that 13 Tesla 2017 were recalled compared to 64 Mercedes 2017 in the USA.

    But we lack the total number of car sold in the USA by both companies. For instance, if Tesla sold 130 cars in 2017 compared to 6400 by Mercedes, then even if Tesla made 5 time less recall, the recall rate would still be 10 time higher than Mercedes.

    Also, given your partisanism with Tesla (sorry Rei but you have to agree on that one), what tell us that you didn't chose Mercedes because it was the only luxury car brand with an higher recall rate than Tesla? Personally, I believe in you objectivity, but you have to give us more than that.

    But SeaFox had a point, higher recall rate doesn't mean higher failure rate. My neighbor, who had a Model S 75D, just send back the the car to Tesla free of charge (not sure if it count for a recall or not) because the windshield jet didn't send the fluid equally on the passenger side. They even got a Model X for free to try during the repair (amazing windshield on that one).

    --
    Elok
  52. Re: Tesla? LOL! by Rei · · Score: 1

    Explain what you mean "translating to IRL"? With specifics.

    Also explain what you mean by the word "those out there"

    --
    I was watching this thing on TV about some guy named Hitler. Someone should stop him!
  53. Well, yeah by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

    It will fully self drive you into the barrier ... you won't have to lift a finger! (or be able to, afterwards)

  54. Re: Tesla? LOL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You'll find out.

  55. Re: Tesla? LOL! by triffid_98 · · Score: 2

    You are aware that Tesla only makes 3 cars right? They don't even make all that many of them. While I'm aware that AMG (the "faaancy" Mercedes) is a German word that loosely translates as "money pit", this is an unfair comparison.

  56. Re: Tesla? LOL! by triffid_98 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sorry but "squids" negate your entire argument. If you are zipping around people's blind spots in-between lanes of traffic wearing shorts, a t-shirt and a DOT approved helmet I have zero pity for you when you eventually "merge" with a car.

    Even if you are extremely vigilant about checking your corners and adjusting mirrors most modern cars have blind spots.

  57. Re:Tesla? LOL! by Ogive17 · · Score: 2

    My Hondas have had adaptive cruise control for the past few years. They require driver steering wheel input after 10-15 seconds. This is a safety feature, it ensures the driver does not get into the habit of losing focus while behind the wheel.

    I hope it doesn't change until 100% of cars on the road are self driving and the roads themselves (at least the main ones) follow industry standards for autonomous vehicles.

    --
    "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
  58. Re: Tesla? LOL! by Rei · · Score: 1

    Is this a vagueness contest? Try again.

    --
    I was watching this thing on TV about some guy named Hitler. Someone should stop him!
  59. Re:Tesla? LOL! by Rei · · Score: 1

    1) That was pre-update. Also, it's not clear whether the person was asleep or having a medical emergency.

    2) From your second link:

    Mr. Ramirez was employed by Tesla for less than four months after joining from SolarCity, and during his short time at Tesla, it was his job to identify ways to enhance our safety program, and he certainly was not terminated for doing so. That would make no sense.

    Mr. Ramirez was terminated because after an extensive investigation, it was clear that he had engaged over and over again in harassing workplace behavior and used extremely inappropriate language that violated any reasonable standard. We conducted our investigation after we received an onslaught of complaints about Mr. Ramirez’s behavior, with nearly a dozen different employees stating that he engaged in clear bullying, sought to intimidate his colleagues, and repeatedly made inappropriate comments about women. Importantly, this was not a case of he said/she said. There were literally almost a dozen people who came forward to complain about Mr. Ramirez – notably, from a wide variety of different locations and departments within the company, some of whom were Mr. Ramirez’s direct reports and others who were his peers in other departments. Among the evidence that was provided:

    One employee said that Mr. Ramirez commented on a fellow employee by saying ‘she’s got some big old [expletive].’ This obviously made the employee very uncomfortable.

    One of Mr. Ramirez’s direct reports said that he made inappropriate comments towards women, calling them names like ‘hun’, and that he regularly tried to intimidate others.

    Another employee told her manager that because of the abrasive language that Mr. Ramirez repeatedly used against her, she never wanted to interact with him again.

    One of Mr. Ramirez’s direct reports said that he regularly mistreated his team, and that she felt he bullied team members and others with abusive remarks.
    Multiple employees said that they were fearful of coming forward because they had witnessed Mr. Ramirez engage in intimidation and they were scared of being retaliated against by him.

    Bullying and harassment have no place at Tesla.

    --
    I was watching this thing on TV about some guy named Hitler. Someone should stop him!
  60. BS by rojash · · Score: 1

    I think its a load of BS. Musk is the Trump of the car industry, diverting otherwise bad news with sensational stuff which is mostly untrue.

  61. Re: Tesla? LOL! by c6gunner · · Score: 3, Interesting

    For instance, if Tesla sold 130 cars in 2017 compared to 6400 by Mercedes, then even if Tesla made 5 time less recall, the recall rate would still be 10 time higher than Mercedes.

    That's ... not at all how that works. A recall is typically for an entire model year, not individual vehicles. It doesn't matter if you sell 10 vehicles of that type, or 10 million; you're recalling all of them ergo the recall rate is the same.

  62. Re:Tesla? LOL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    5 times less would be negative 4 times as many recalls. Unless there were zero it's a nonsense amount.

  63. Re:Tesla? LOL! by jellomizer · · Score: 2

    You are aware, the current autopilot feature isn't the same as autonomous driving?

    The Autopilot feature was designed for drivers to still be vigilant however with their hands off the wheels, and in essence to keep the car on the road and in its lane, and avoid collision. It still needs a human driver, to regulate its decisions. This feature is nice when you are on a highway and in a safe easy driving condition, and you can help relax your eyes, and refocus yourself, knowing that you car will stay in the lane, and not drive off the road.
    However if you are in an area with traffic, people, construction... You need to be smart enough to drive it yourself.

    Autopilot is a safety feature much like cruse control, which realizes that we as humans have only so much attention that we can work with, and needs a way to relax our minds for a few minutes. So we are better prepared for more advanced problems in the future.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  64. Re:Tesla? LOL! by jellomizer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It would depend on the business model of the company. Luxury/Sports car makers, will be more likely to do self imposed recalls, because their brand image is based on quality and perception. If they can fix a problem before it becomes an issue, then most likely the customer will not think poorly of the product, and when they get a new one, they will more likely go with the same company again.

    If you are getting a more budget practical car, having a hinge fall of, or a wobbly sun-visor isn't a safety issue, and chances are the customer will not be loyal to that brand as much as the luxury makers. Sure my last two cars were Toyota's however there isn't anything wrong with my next car being a Honda, or some other brand. Being that I expect a particular build quality, which isn't fine tuned, but just acceptable and reliable.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  65. Re: Tesla? LOL! by penandpaper · · Score: 1

    It is folly to call on Crom!
    Only stronk call Crom Cruach.
    Not stronk enough. >:(

  66. Re:Tesla? LOL! by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

    A lot of motorcycle accidents happen at road junctions where the bike is not noticed by drivers of larger vehicles crossing its path, or when vehicles change lanes without their drivers properly checking for a bike already in the other lane. You can ride defensively to mitigate some of these risks, but ultimately if a driver in a larger vehicle does something dangerous because they didn't look properly and see you, there is only so much you can do, and you're inherently in a much more vulnerable position on a motorcycle.

    Well, yes ... in addition to being more vulnerable to damage, you are, while piloting a MUCH smaller vehicle, much harder to see in general.

    I suppose that could be construed to be everyone else's fault, but that isn't really systems thinking ...

  67. Re: Tesla? LOL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's ... not at all how that works. A recall is typically for an entire model year, not individual vehicles. It doesn't matter if you sell 10 vehicles of that type, or 10 million; you're recalling all of them ergo the recall rate is the same.

    No, that's not always how it works. It may be an entire model year, but it's typically sub-models of a particular model that are recalled based on the defect in question. Not every model made in a model year has the same parts, same vendor, etc.

  68. Re: Tesla? LOL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is accurate, but not relevant to the point of disagreement.

  69. Re: Tesla? LOL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Solid point. Adding a broadcast system to motorcycles would be a starting point. Cars could add detectors and pop up a HUD warning with the location.

    Which no one would buy. But if we also did it for cars, you could get a HUD display of all the traffic around you, and cars could relay conditions backward to prevent rear-endings.

    Would need to be mandatory, and there are privacy implications. Hopefully it wouldn't have a permanent tracking ID. But it would.

  70. Re:Tesla? LOL! by Green+Mountain+Bot · · Score: 1

    Yup. He shoulda said "one-fifth as many".

  71. Re:Tesla? LOL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tesla is lying about the harassment to attempt to discredit him. It will fail because we have lots of evidence from multiple sources that Tesla is illegally lying about their accident reporting.

  72. Re: Tesla? LOL! by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

    Maybe this is a cultural thing. I am in the UK, and in my entire life I have never seen a motorcyclist doing anything like what you described.

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
  73. Re:Tesla? LOL! by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

    I live near Cambridge, UK, where not only do we have motorcyclists on the road, we also have a lot of cycling generally, with cycles often using quite narrow lanes further to the edge of the road than the normal driving line for larger vehicles. In a couple of decades of driving here, I have never managed to not see a cycle or motorcycle while I was pulling out of a junction in my car and cause a crash. Nor, as far as I'm aware, has any other driver I know. So yes, I think if someone manages to turn right out of a junction (i.e., across the path of traffic going right-to-left on our roads) in front of a cycle or motorcycle and causes a crash as a result, under normal conditions I'm going with it being 100% their fault.

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
  74. Re:Tesla? LOL! by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

    The problem for insurance companies is often the "accidents" that involved a motorcycle and another vehicle, but no actual collision between them. Car pulls out in front of motorcycle and the rider swerves to avoid it and loses control. Car changes lanes right in front of motorcycle coming up to overtake, and the rider brakes sharply and loses control.

    The insurer for the car driver who actually caused the accident has every incentive to argue that the rider was at fault in such cases.

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
  75. Re:Tesla? LOL! by jbengt · · Score: 1

    That low liability rate doesn't mean they're rarely at fault. That means they rarely cause as much damage to other vehicles as cars, SUVs, & trucks do.

  76. Re: Tesla? LOL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even worse would trusting the many trolls on this site. None have a brain.

  77. Re: Tesla? LOL! by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    Exactly. To the best of my knowledge, Tesla has not had gov issued recalls. Otoh, regular car makers only have recalls if the gov forces it.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  78. Re: Tesla? LOL! by N1AK · · Score: 1

    Change the clothing and I see plenty of that in the UK, even more so in London.

  79. Re:Tesla? LOL! by salnikov · · Score: 1

    Liability cover damages you inflict on others, luckily for other guys you puny bike cannot do too much damage (unless you manage to accelerate to 150mph) in a collision. I guess your insurance is smarter than you are.

  80. Re: Clutch Nixon has retaliated by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

    How do you think commercial jets land? Hint, I.L.S.

  81. Re: Tesla? LOL! by triffid_98 · · Score: 1

    Thank you for admitting it. The "cafe racer" and higher power motorcycles (AFAIK) originated in the UK. While they were eventually eclipsed by "rice bikes" (Japanese performance motorcycles) they are the original authors of that segment. Early Harley-Davidson bikes (and even most modern ones) are simply cruisers, not speed machines. Indian had a few but were much less popular.

    I'm unclear on the UK laws on "lane splitting" but it's perfectly legal here in the USA (In my state anyhow) and the only requirement is head gear. While sane people wear full leathers many dumb people pass on those, or even decent full face helmets. If you're going to pull that garbage I really hope you've filled out an organ donor card since your luck will eventually run out.

  82. Re: Clutch Nixon has retaliated by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

    How do you think commercial jets land? Hint, I.L.S.

    So they don't fly into the next available stationary object like Tesla does?

    --
    Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
  83. Re: Tesla? LOL! by Thelasko · · Score: 1

    Watch for motorcycles...because they will cut you off.

    They make BMW drivers look like grannies.

    --
    One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".