I rent a locker at a local storage locker company.
The guy with the locker next to mine, fills his with drugs... and gets caught.
Police put a crime scene tape around the entire facility and block my access to my stuff.
Police want to verify that there isn't any drugs in my locker.
What happens next?
This is nice, but doesn't actually identify the problem.
The problem is, when you put an item in a safety deposit box at the bank, if the government wants to know what's in it they serve a warrant on you. Not on the bank, who may or may not defend it, and with varying degrees of vigor.
When you replace safety deposit box with server, item with data, and bank with cloud service provider, the equation has not fundamentally changed...but the answer has.
It's tragic to me that students don't learn how to do the job in school. All the tools already exist. All you need is a git server, divide the class up into teams based on interest level in different aspects of the project, and go. Force people to merge. Force them to use standard libraries. Force them to do real work.
I would've given my pinky finger in college to have this experience going into the working world...not that it slowed me down that much, but still, it was a speed bump that I paid a lot of money in college not to experience.
Yes, and this hybridized notation is responsible for the confusion around expressions like 6/2(1+2). Some people think the answer is 9, others say 1. If you bring to bear a fair amount of knowledge about precedence and associativity of the operators involved, you find the correct answer is 9. Unfortunately, some calculators don't handle operator associativity correctly and will actually give the wrong answer.
Actually, Chinese has "r" sounds in it (and "l" as well). The problem is not with the existence of the phonemes, but their placement in relation to other phonemes and the fact that the romanization of Chinese pronunciation (called "pinyin") represents different phonemes with the same "r". But Chinese people are perfectly capable of making these sounds, it's just that attention isn't given to which sound they should be making where because of the way English is taught. (Being a native born English speaker that's taken Chinese, the same is true in the other direction...why are languages taught as though spelling in the language is indicative of pronunciation when this is only approximately true?)
The best way to get kids attention is to start with something that defines intuition, and really focus the discussion on that to begin. Example: we all know that when you cool a substance, it goes from gas to liquid to solid. When you heat it up, it goes from solid to liquid to gas. Look at the noble egg—goes in the pan as a liquid, and as it heats.........wait, ok, well that's a bad example. We all know that when you something turns into a solid, it gets denser, and we know that dense things sink in less dense things, just like ice....wait, another bad example, darnit. On the ice one, some kids will get hooked just because it behaves opposite, other kids will find the consequences of this fact more interesting (that life could not have formed if lakes froze bottom-up, etc).
Each time you want to explain some new principle, the way to set it up is when this new principle is juxtaposed against some other principle the kids already know, but wins out because it's more significant. This is how many discoveries are made in science and why scientists consider the problems intriguing, why should kids be any different? Trying to explain these anomalies is where the aether theory and relativity came from, the photoelectric effect, discovery of the 4 forces (gravity pulls a feather and a hammer the same, how electricty & magnetism are manifestations of the same force, discovery of the weak and strong forces too), superfluidity, the transistor, etc. I believe it's also a good idea to introduce kids to these advanced topics early on, without delving too much at least explain the motivation behind them by telling them the problems they can answer.
Nothing bothers me as much as the incorrect usage (well, what I consider incorrect usage) of works like biweekly, bimonthly, etc, to meet twice per X. These words mean every two X, not twice per.
Unfortunately, years back the dictionary added these incorrect and ambiguous usages so that now these words can "officially" mean either twice per, or every two. Two conflicting definitions makes them useless. (For those of you who may be wondering, the proper way to say twice per X is with the prefix semi-, as in semiweekly, semimonthly, etc.)
The confusion arises from the fact that half-ness and two-ness are obviously related; does bisect mean "cut in two" or "divide in half"? If you consider other bi- words, it quickly becomes clear that the intended meaning has to do with two-ness. Bicycles exist along with unicycles and tricycles, and the comparison is clear...and I don't even want to know what you think bisexuality is if an interpretation based on half-ness makes sense to you...
Having fixed all other problems with the state public education, Utah senate fixes common misconception of students reading chapter 3 of their Civics book.
Man, this makes me mad. I proposed the same thing awhile ago, with the proceeds going to me, and for some reason none of the major news outlets picked it up. What makes this more newsworthy than my proposal?!
I don't know the law in that state.........but as far as I know felony wiretapping charges won't stick if they can't prove intent. It seems to me that might be a difficult burden for the state to meet on this one.
Not that it'll ever get that far...they'll get him to cop a plea based on the trumped up charges and the threat of getting the chair. That's how these things work.
They also need to get on the books thing...there's lots of bad words in those. Sometimes you just have to step back and smile when governments finally start recognizing their proper role in society...the people aren't going to protect themselves from the outside world!
Information security && encryption != freedom of speech. As long as the ones in power have the option to torture you, no encryption scheme in the world is a long-term solution to your problem.
I don't think preventing people from accessing Facebook will do any good. The Libyan govt needs to keep people away from Twitter, email, etc. What they really need to do is just shut off the Internet completely...that would get them where they want to be.
What? Why's everyone looking at me? Why wouldn't that work???
Suggested Alternative Headline: "Confidential, Unencrypted Data Not Safe on Solid State Disk, Conventional Disk, or Anywhere Else Now That I Think About It"
Yes, that would be ex post facto. But it also means that Assange wouldn't be able to continue doing what he's doing.
Of course, neither would journalists, so this probably violates the 1st Amendment. "Espionage" only applies to spies. Last I checked, spies don't generally publish what they know; only journalists do that.
Aren't the people that leak the information actually spies, though? Why isn't that enough?
Yes, you're absolutely right. And if the phone company decides they don't want to make a phone available unless you get a plan, they could charge $1M for the phone and give a $1M - $100 rebate on it. Total cost to you: $100 + tax*.
* taxes assessed on $1M. problem, citizen?
Obviously, the phone isn't worth $570 when you get it with the plan. It's worth $150 in that case. I'll give you one guess as to where I got that number... -sigh-
Slashdot Mirror
Here is an analogy;
I rent a locker at a local storage locker company. The guy with the locker next to mine, fills his with drugs ... and gets caught.
Police put a crime scene tape around the entire facility and block my access to my stuff.
Police want to verify that there isn't any drugs in my locker.
What happens next?
This is nice, but doesn't actually identify the problem.
The problem is, when you put an item in a safety deposit box at the bank, if the government wants to know what's in it they serve a warrant on you. Not on the bank, who may or may not defend it, and with varying degrees of vigor.
When you replace safety deposit box with server, item with data, and bank with cloud service provider, the equation has not fundamentally changed...but the answer has.
How does making information more available to some kids hurt other kids?
Is using a copyrighted image in a patent application considered infringement? Any lawyers up in hurr?
I would've given my pinky finger in college to have this experience going into the working world...not that it slowed me down that much, but still, it was a speed bump that I paid a lot of money in college not to experience.
Yes, and this hybridized notation is responsible for the confusion around expressions like 6/2(1+2). Some people think the answer is 9, others say 1. If you bring to bear a fair amount of knowledge about precedence and associativity of the operators involved, you find the correct answer is 9. Unfortunately, some calculators don't handle operator associativity correctly and will actually give the wrong answer.
This is actually a pretty great invention if you have a lot of non-critical data to store.
Actually, Chinese has "r" sounds in it (and "l" as well). The problem is not with the existence of the phonemes, but their placement in relation to other phonemes and the fact that the romanization of Chinese pronunciation (called "pinyin") represents different phonemes with the same "r". But Chinese people are perfectly capable of making these sounds, it's just that attention isn't given to which sound they should be making where because of the way English is taught. (Being a native born English speaker that's taken Chinese, the same is true in the other direction...why are languages taught as though spelling in the language is indicative of pronunciation when this is only approximately true?)
Did they adjust for the researcher population? Of course a big city with 100x the number of researchers will produce 100x the results...
The best way to get kids attention is to start with something that defines intuition, and really focus the discussion on that to begin. Example: we all know that when you cool a substance, it goes from gas to liquid to solid. When you heat it up, it goes from solid to liquid to gas. Look at the noble egg—goes in the pan as a liquid, and as it heats.........wait, ok, well that's a bad example. We all know that when you something turns into a solid, it gets denser, and we know that dense things sink in less dense things, just like ice....wait, another bad example, darnit. On the ice one, some kids will get hooked just because it behaves opposite, other kids will find the consequences of this fact more interesting (that life could not have formed if lakes froze bottom-up, etc).
Each time you want to explain some new principle, the way to set it up is when this new principle is juxtaposed against some other principle the kids already know, but wins out because it's more significant. This is how many discoveries are made in science and why scientists consider the problems intriguing, why should kids be any different? Trying to explain these anomalies is where the aether theory and relativity came from, the photoelectric effect, discovery of the 4 forces (gravity pulls a feather and a hammer the same, how electricty & magnetism are manifestations of the same force, discovery of the weak and strong forces too), superfluidity, the transistor, etc. I believe it's also a good idea to introduce kids to these advanced topics early on, without delving too much at least explain the motivation behind them by telling them the problems they can answer.
Nothing bothers me as much as the incorrect usage (well, what I consider incorrect usage) of works like biweekly, bimonthly, etc, to meet twice per X. These words mean every two X, not twice per.
Unfortunately, years back the dictionary added these incorrect and ambiguous usages so that now these words can "officially" mean either twice per, or every two. Two conflicting definitions makes them useless. (For those of you who may be wondering, the proper way to say twice per X is with the prefix semi-, as in semiweekly, semimonthly, etc.)
The confusion arises from the fact that half-ness and two-ness are obviously related; does bisect mean "cut in two" or "divide in half"? If you consider other bi- words, it quickly becomes clear that the intended meaning has to do with two-ness. Bicycles exist along with unicycles and tricycles, and the comparison is clear...and I don't even want to know what you think bisexuality is if an interpretation based on half-ness makes sense to you...
Having fixed all other problems with the state public education, Utah senate fixes common misconception of students reading chapter 3 of their Civics book.
Man, this makes me mad. I proposed the same thing awhile ago, with the proceeds going to me, and for some reason none of the major news outlets picked it up. What makes this more newsworthy than my proposal?!
Well, now that I think about it, do police in public have any expectation of privacy? Methinks not. (Mehopes not.)
I don't know the law in that state.........but as far as I know felony wiretapping charges won't stick if they can't prove intent. It seems to me that might be a difficult burden for the state to meet on this one.
Not that it'll ever get that far...they'll get him to cop a plea based on the trumped up charges and the threat of getting the chair. That's how these things work.
...on the "dreaded microgravity wet burp"?
I just hope they programmed those robots using Guice. Because...uh...Guice has a solution to the "robot legs" problem. -ba dump ching-
Btw, you have the funniest sig on slashdot. I've seen it a million times, and I laugh every time.
Who could be against banning this???
They also need to get on the books thing...there's lots of bad words in those. Sometimes you just have to step back and smile when governments finally start recognizing their proper role in society...the people aren't going to protect themselves from the outside world!
Information security && encryption != freedom of speech. As long as the ones in power have the option to torture you, no encryption scheme in the world is a long-term solution to your problem.
But if you can't get an exception and get on Facebook for even a life-changing event, when can you update your status?
Other visionary insights from Intel's CEO: the sky is blue, water is wet, and money actually can buy happiness.
I don't think preventing people from accessing Facebook will do any good. The Libyan govt needs to keep people away from Twitter, email, etc. What they really need to do is just shut off the Internet completely...that would get them where they want to be.
What? Why's everyone looking at me? Why wouldn't that work???
"80% of Browsers Found To Be At Risk of Attack. In other news, Chrome marketshare up to 20%." :-)
Suggested Alternative Headline: "Confidential, Unencrypted Data Not Safe on Solid State Disk, Conventional Disk, or Anywhere Else Now That I Think About It"
Yes, that would be ex post facto. But it also means that Assange wouldn't be able to continue doing what he's doing.
Of course, neither would journalists, so this probably violates the 1st Amendment. "Espionage" only applies to spies. Last I checked, spies don't generally publish what they know; only journalists do that.
Aren't the people that leak the information actually spies, though? Why isn't that enough?
Yes, you're absolutely right. And if the phone company decides they don't want to make a phone available unless you get a plan, they could charge $1M for the phone and give a $1M - $100 rebate on it. Total cost to you: $100 + tax*.
* taxes assessed on $1M. problem, citizen?
Obviously, the phone isn't worth $570 when you get it with the plan. It's worth $150 in that case. I'll give you one guess as to where I got that number... -sigh-