Or you can keep it as a distress flare if you are doing much back country hiking or sailing/boating. As a very expensive lighter, it fits the bill as well. Even ISIS is considering these devices for the djihad.
This and also with email voting, someone can sell his vote to anyone and it is possible for the buyer to make sure he got the vote he bought. Also, with email vote, someone can be under a third party (family or other) to vote for a given candidate. No, email voting is far to be the best system. Paper track is mandatory of course to trust elections, however I don't see anything to replace the voting polls.
My 30 years experience in IT is telling me the same. But, I must say to the discharge of management, evaluating the quality of a piece of code that is just delivered in terms of reliability and security is not an easy task, hence the indifference to the quality of code. They will never be evaluated on it because they cannot evaluate it themselves. What they can be evaluated on is time to delivery and costs.
First - it is not really an open source project if it doesn't want to publish the design files/documentation. There is nothing wrong with wanting to keep that secret, but then, please, don't use the "open source" moniker.
That's why I believe this question to/. community is not an honest one. It's like the question is asked because the OP doesn't know how to protect his design from being cloned by Chinese manufacturer when he will reach the actual sampling and production milestone in his project. In fact, everyone contracting fabrication of hardware to the Chinese or anyone else (they are not the only one to manufacture and copy hardware) is having this very same problem open or not open.
I wasn't able to reproduce on any of my systems. So, it is not as simple as stated in the summary. Maybe true on 2 years old systemd installations which haven't been upgraded since then. Hence the inflammatory statement about the bug being there for 2 years. Misleading summary AND blog article.
Well, of course you can probably spin a piece of wood on the rocket as well. After all, that's how primitive's started fire as well as well trained scouts.
You have stolen the words from my mouth. Exactly that. For the same money we could explore more and do more science than spending it to send a useless piece of meat with no embedded measurement capabilities to grab some knowledge from the worlds it explores.
We already know with enough accuracy why Mars lost most of its atmosphere. A manned mission won't provide much more details, rover missions would be enough for that purpose as well as orbiting satellites loaded with scientific instruments. That's how we acquire knowledge these days. Sad to say the direct human observation is no longer providing sufficient details and accuracy to be really useful.
Manned mission accomplish a single role, exacerbate chauvinism. That was the main motivation behind the Gemini and Apollo programs. It has nothing to do with science, science is a collateral damage.
What have you done without the mandatory military comparison? The actual question is about allocation of funds for manned flights with Mars as the ultimate destination vs doing real science (no necessarily global warming related, but you can do a lot of science with that kind of budget).
In case you haven't noticed, robot here stands for a remote controlled vehicle equipped with some remotely controlled gizmos. This isn't an autonomous robot programmed with a mission and making decisions on how to accomplish it.
You are an idiot or an ignorant. Like you can enrich uranium in your basement to military grade using your kitchen pots. Or destroy a nuclear plant containement vessel with small airplanes and so on. Seems you have an blockbusters overdose here.
How FBI was wrong? At my knowledge they never said what the summary states: 'They need a universal backdoor' in fact, in this very case, they never asked for a backdoor. A backdoor is something you put in place BEFORE, not AFTER. They asked for help from Apple to crack the iPhone.
That summary is really shitty. It seems written by someone not knowing the difference between his head and his ass. Bypassing the counter limit has nothing to do with cracking the encryption key by brute force attack. The iPhone password is not the encryption key, it is the protection to grant access to the encryption key. It is simply laughable to think the iPhone would have been encrypted with a four byte encryption key if the password would have been the key.
Slashdot Mirror
Computers don't lie!
The Galaxy Note 8 will be manufactured in North Korea and include a failing ballistic missile embedded to launch the battery.
So, someone cracked the security gate guard's iPhone. Why such an uninfomative article makes its way to /.?
My understanding is OpenCAPI is actually built on top of a glorified HyperTransport architecture.
Samsung should buy Space X. A nice synergy should emerge from these enterprises.
Or you can keep it as a distress flare if you are doing much back country hiking or sailing/boating. As a very expensive lighter, it fits the bill as well. Even ISIS is considering these devices for the djihad.
This and also with email voting, someone can sell his vote to anyone and it is possible for the buyer to make sure he got the vote he bought. Also, with email vote, someone can be under a third party (family or other) to vote for a given candidate. No, email voting is far to be the best system. Paper track is mandatory of course to trust elections, however I don't see anything to replace the voting polls.
Yes, she is already spouting so much bullshit, she is surely a politician.
- I think mauve has the most trust.
Database color
Alice Cooper for President!
Blackberry DTEK or PRIV or next one.
My 30 years experience in IT is telling me the same. But, I must say to the discharge of management, evaluating the quality of a piece of code that is just delivered in terms of reliability and security is not an easy task, hence the indifference to the quality of code. They will never be evaluated on it because they cannot evaluate it themselves. What they can be evaluated on is time to delivery and costs.
First - it is not really an open source project if it doesn't want to publish the design files/documentation. There is nothing wrong with wanting to keep that secret, but then, please, don't use the "open source" moniker.
That's why I believe this question to /. community is not an honest one. It's like the question is asked because the OP doesn't know how to protect his design from being cloned by Chinese manufacturer when he will reach the actual sampling and production milestone in his project. In fact, everyone contracting fabrication of hardware to the Chinese or anyone else (they are not the only one to manufacture and copy hardware) is having this very same problem open or not open.
I wasn't able to reproduce on any of my systems. So, it is not as simple as stated in the summary. Maybe true on 2 years old systemd installations which haven't been upgraded since then. Hence the inflammatory statement about the bug being there for 2 years. Misleading summary AND blog article.
The point is not about the blow up, it is about taking responsability for it. That fucking Musk is always blaming someone else.
Would you see a dark spot on a low resolution video capture representing a bullet flying at supersonic speed?
Well, of course you can probably spin a piece of wood on the rocket as well. After all, that's how primitive's started fire as well as well trained scouts.
Not to mention the freakin sharks with lasers on their heads who cannot be ruled out as potential saboteurs under an unknown entity's command.
You have stolen the words from my mouth. Exactly that. For the same money we could explore more and do more science than spending it to send a useless piece of meat with no embedded measurement capabilities to grab some knowledge from the worlds it explores.
Manned mission accomplish a single role, exacerbate chauvinism. That was the main motivation behind the Gemini and Apollo programs. It has nothing to do with science, science is a collateral damage.
What have you done without the mandatory military comparison? The actual question is about allocation of funds for manned flights with Mars as the ultimate destination vs doing real science (no necessarily global warming related, but you can do a lot of science with that kind of budget).
Where physics meets religion.
In case you haven't noticed, robot here stands for a remote controlled vehicle equipped with some remotely controlled gizmos. This isn't an autonomous robot programmed with a mission and making decisions on how to accomplish it.
You are an idiot or an ignorant. Like you can enrich uranium in your basement to military grade using your kitchen pots. Or destroy a nuclear plant containement vessel with small airplanes and so on. Seems you have an blockbusters overdose here.
How FBI was wrong? At my knowledge they never said what the summary states: 'They need a universal backdoor' in fact, in this very case, they never asked for a backdoor. A backdoor is something you put in place BEFORE, not AFTER. They asked for help from Apple to crack the iPhone.
That summary is really shitty. It seems written by someone not knowing the difference between his head and his ass. Bypassing the counter limit has nothing to do with cracking the encryption key by brute force attack. The iPhone password is not the encryption key, it is the protection to grant access to the encryption key. It is simply laughable to think the iPhone would have been encrypted with a four byte encryption key if the password would have been the key.