What participants can do is collect data on less sensitive subjects such as, "who does your dumpster removal; who takes care of your paper shredding," Hadnagy said.
"If you don't tell me, I'll look at the dumpster behind your building and read the name on it!"
Why completely eliminate the look and feel of the UI users have mastered since Win9x/2k (or at least leave a Classic Win2k option for the UI)
Right-click the desktop and choose "Personalize" from the context menu. Then click on "Windows Color and Appearance" and select "Windows Standard" or "Windows Classic" in the "Color scheme" box.
This part hasn't changed one bit. (Well, except for the "Vista Basic" and "Vista Aero" options.)
Let's take these nano-tubes for a moment, and "fill them" with advanced hole and wound sealant technology? Why, the moment a soldier was shot, their wound would be patched, as the breaking of the tubes themselves would release the treatment
Well, not really. The body armor would stop the bullet and there would be no puncture wound: that's the whole point. Also, most of the wounds in Iraq are from IEDs, and involve wounds to extermities not covered by body armor (arms, legs, neck, etc.)
I know a lot of you guys on Slashdot are programmers - and probably clever ones at that. Can one of you come up with a Firefox extension that somehow manages to fit a 2000-word article on a single page instead of spanning it across four pages? And then send it to Computerworld so they can offer it to their readers?
Thanks.
...We, as Americans, are behind the progress curve, in terms of broadband connectivity. There is a huge chunk of population still using 56k modems. I mean, Christ. Broadband should be a cheap commodity and a requirement in every house
Um...let's see,
Population density of South Korea -- 459 persons per SqKm
Population density of the United States -- 28 persons per SqKm
While it is a valid position to take that the US should be doing more to encourage broadband availability, you glossed over the details, don't you think?
If anyone had ever been able to show a corelation between scientific discovery and economic success, andif anyone had ever been able to show a corelation between economic success and reproductive success (in modern times), you might have a point. But this is simply not the case.
Further, you are now demonstrating profound ignorance of simple economics, despite what you might claim.
Simple natural selection now means that our populations are becoming geared towards those who consume handouts but produce no new discoveries
What is that, a joke? You are sugesting that there is evolutionary pressure slecting against the types of people who discover things?! And that this evolutionary pressure has made some sort of significant difference in humanity over a period of less than 3000 years?
You are woefully ignorant about modern evolutionary theory.
Slashdot Mirror
Wood burning trucks in North Korea. Renewable Juche!
MYA = "Million Years Ago."
"If you don't tell me, I'll look at the dumpster behind your building and read the name on it!"
"Disco Inferno."
Where do we eat?
Open the pod bay doors, Pivo-kun. ...
Open the pod bay doors, Pivo-kun.
I know a lot of you guys on Slashdot are programmers - and probably clever ones at that. Can one of you come up with a Firefox extension that somehow manages to fit a 2000-word article on a single page instead of spanning it across four pages? And then send it to Computerworld so they can offer it to their readers? Thanks.
Where's Crackton?
- Population density of South Korea -- 459 persons per SqKm
- Population density of the United States -- 28 persons per SqKm
While it is a valid position to take that the US should be doing more to encourage broadband availability, you glossed over the details, don't you think?If anyone had ever been able to show a corelation between scientific discovery and economic success, and if anyone had ever been able to show a corelation between economic success and reproductive success (in modern times), you might have a point. But this is simply not the case. Further, you are now demonstrating profound ignorance of simple economics, despite what you might claim.
You are woefully ignorant about modern evolutionary theory.