I'd like to know what sort of person that Farah was, growing up.
I wouldn't mind betting that I'm like a lot of slashdotters - was physically bullied during high school by athletes such as Farah, to the point that the thought of going to school made me physically ill and I contemplated suicide to escape the (seemingly) never-ending physical and mental abuse.
I'm disgusted by Trolls too, don't get me wrong. But I want to know if Farah is "without sin" (clearly he's not, at least in Gillard's case) before I give him an ounce of sympathy for "being bullied."
Ooh, anyone have a broker who can buy some of this for Non-US residents? I'd love to buy a couple of hundred share certificates in SCO to have on hand.
Not only is it cheap toilet paper, but think of the novelty value and gag-gift potential!
Don't need a phone for that; I've had two Navman Navigators built 8 years apart try that on me in Adelaide. And if you've ever heard of Adelaide water, you know that'd be fatal.
The complaint at the U.S. International Trade Commission claims infringement of seven Motorola Mobility patents on features including location reminders, e-mail notification and phone/video players, Motorola Mobility said today.
Reading a 1 page article isn't really that hard...
Wow... I'm actually in the boondocks of South Australia. Population is 1,500, the nearest major city is a population of 15,000.
I can see two shiny 3G towers from my bedroom window. (Telstra and OpenNetwork (Optus/Vodafone etc))
If mobile carriers there don't think that a city with 500k population doesn't warrant a tower or two, then I'm afraid there's no hope for your telco industry.
It wasn't really directed at you. It's directed at the people who think they're being wonderful people by forcing their will/intentions/beliefs on you by "praying for you" when you don't want it.
For the sake of argument, let's assume that there is such a thing as a soul/spirit/fluffy-bunny. If someone else prays to change any outcome for someone else's soul/spirit/fluffy-bunny without their permission or consent, no matter how good the intentions, they are infringing on that other person's free will to do whatever they want with their own soul/spirit/fluffy-bunny.
Exactly. Regardless of whether Koh was right to disallow Samsung's attempt to use the F700 in evidence, Apple introducing it is a textbook case of "opening the door."
Otherwise Apple is making an accusation ('See? The F700 is a copy!') and Samsung isn't allowed to mention the F700 in defending themselves. It's akin to saying "John Doe fucks pigs" and then disallowing John Doe to use the word "pig" and thus defend himself by saying he'd never seen a pig before, let alone fucked one.
I can understand Apple being upset at opening the door, but that's the incompetence of their lawyer, not Samsung's fault.
Slashdot Mirror
Touche.
Though I vaguely recall some Kiwi in the early 90s beating a shark off with a cricket bat...
Distractions... You obviously weren't watching the cricket then. ;)
Baseball bats? Surely you meant "cricket bats?"
Fortunately that one has been cancelled.
Mitt? Is that you?
There's a bit of Santorum on your top lip.
I'd like to know what sort of person that Farah was, growing up.
I wouldn't mind betting that I'm like a lot of slashdotters - was physically bullied during high school by athletes such as Farah, to the point that the thought of going to school made me physically ill and I contemplated suicide to escape the (seemingly) never-ending physical and mental abuse.
I'm disgusted by Trolls too, don't get me wrong. But I want to know if Farah is "without sin" (clearly he's not, at least in Gillard's case) before I give him an ounce of sympathy for "being bullied."
Why do we need to encrypt an 18 year old game that has had the source code released? ;-p
I had some good experiences with their lasers, especially in big government departments.
;-)
Of course, I was the contracted Lexmark service agent, so my good experiences were in being paid to work on them.
(To be fair, they were a decent workhorse. That said, they were all equipped with PostScript, so I didn't have to deal with driver issues.)
Sure fucked your grammar, however.
Wait... You fucked your gramma too?
So he's responsible for inflicting atrocities and human suffering on a grand scale AND of an act of war?!
Or 2 if you're in Australia. ;-)
Obligatory links: Australia pays $150 (13"), $200 (15") or $300 more (15" Retina) than the USA before considering the exchange rate.
Ooh, anyone have a broker who can buy some of this for Non-US residents? I'd love to buy a couple of hundred share certificates in SCO to have on hand.
Not only is it cheap toilet paper, but think of the novelty value and gag-gift potential!
Au contraire, once you're driving 150mph, the scale inverts and the cyclists start having chances of Undeath.
If these self driving cars are going to be allowed to travel at 200mph, we're going to be seeing zombie cyclists everywhere!
I thought that too, until the leaking of the cables saying that they were.
Don't need a phone for that; I've had two Navman Navigators built 8 years apart try that on me in Adelaide. And if you've ever heard of Adelaide water, you know that'd be fatal.
Indeed. I've been to Glenelg many times and was once a fan of the Glenelg Football Club.
;-)
If they're looking for proof of intelligent life, they're going to the wrong place.
(Just kidding, of course. Nothing wrong with Glenelg)
Reading a 1 page article isn't really that hard...
Wow... I'm actually in the boondocks of South Australia. Population is 1,500, the nearest major city is a population of 15,000.
I can see two shiny 3G towers from my bedroom window. (Telstra and OpenNetwork (Optus/Vodafone etc))
If mobile carriers there don't think that a city with 500k population doesn't warrant a tower or two, then I'm afraid there's no hope for your telco industry.
It wasn't really directed at you. It's directed at the people who think they're being wonderful people by forcing their will/intentions/beliefs on you by "praying for you" when you don't want it.
Sorry for the confusion.
Except in the case of "free will."
For the sake of argument, let's assume that there is such a thing as a soul/spirit/fluffy-bunny. If someone else prays to change any outcome for someone else's soul/spirit/fluffy-bunny without their permission or consent, no matter how good the intentions, they are infringing on that other person's free will to do whatever they want with their own soul/spirit/fluffy-bunny.
The summary references a law from 1987 that gives them the power to do so.
Without reading the history of the Act, I'd suspect that those laws were passed in 1987 to make up for the fact they were powerless to react in 1984.
I would've thought that the 'Mir" in your username would show where your loyalties lie. ;-)
Touchdown! All went well! \o/
Exactly. Regardless of whether Koh was right to disallow Samsung's attempt to use the F700 in evidence, Apple introducing it is a textbook case of "opening the door."
Otherwise Apple is making an accusation ('See? The F700 is a copy!') and Samsung isn't allowed to mention the F700 in defending themselves. It's akin to saying "John Doe fucks pigs" and then disallowing John Doe to use the word "pig" and thus defend himself by saying he'd never seen a pig before, let alone fucked one.
I can understand Apple being upset at opening the door, but that's the incompetence of their lawyer, not Samsung's fault.
It sure makes me take back all the things I thought when the Australian Government Banned Huawei from tendering for the National Broadband Network