Slashdot Mirror


Judge Orders Release of Ex-Marine Detained Over Facebook Posts

Penurious Penguin writes "A few days ago, news of an ex-marine detained for his Facebook posts reached far and wide throughout the interweb. It was a hotly debated affair and considered from many perspectives. Today, a judge has ordered the release of Brandon Raub, citing a lack of facts regarding the detention. It's a strange case, undoubtedly, but perhaps even stranger when taking into account a few things. For example, Raub reportedly made claims that one of the psychiatrists involved in the case threatened him with forced medication. For history polymaths, government proposals of forced medication may not be a surprise; you may remember the case of Susan Lindauer. The situation may also remind of 2009, when Fusion Centers targeted Ron Paul supporters, certain universities, and conspiracy theorists as threats to national security, even logging anti death-penalty and anti-war activists into federal terrorism databases. Personally, I find myself wondering what sorts of epic dangers someone like Noam Chomsky might seem to pose after a stressful day and a few beers, if overheard by certain departments."

333 comments

  1. Semper Fi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Whatever the hell that means

    1. Re:Semper Fi by Sparticus789 · · Score: 2

      Always Faithful.

      --
      sudo make me a sandwich
    2. Re:Semper Fi by DragonTHC · · Score: 2, Informative

      but it's not what he said that scared the government.

      It's that he's a Marine and said it.

      1,000 crazy truthers are nothing compared to one determined Marine.

      --
      They're using their grammar skills there.
  2. Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by crazyjj · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't know if this guy was ever a real threat to anyone or not, but he certainly isn't some super-patriot or free speech hero. He's mentally ill, and really does need help (even if you can't force it). The guy seriously believes that George W. Bush is living in a secret castle in Colorado where he rapes and sacrifices children. He also believes that Bush not only planned 9-11, but serves a world shadow government who also seem to spend most of their time raping and sacrificing children (when they're not planning world domination, I guess).

    Whatever you think of the free speech issues involved, please don't celebrate this dude. He's very sick and needs help.

    --
    What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
    1. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by cultiv8 · · Score: 5, Funny

      The guy seriously believes that George W. Bush is living in a secret castle in Colorado where he rapes and sacrifices children. He also believes that Bush not only planned 9-11, but serves a world shadow government who also seem to spend most of their time raping and sacrificing children (when they're not planning world domination, I guess).

      So he's probably a frequent AC on /.?

      --
      sysadmins and parents of newborns get the same amount of sleep.
    2. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1, Troll

      The most unbelievable thing in that scenario is that Bush is smart enough to pull such a thing off.

      Maybe he means it as a code or a metaphor. :-)

      But, yeah, the flying saucer men are probably really the flying saucer men.

      Free cookie to anyone getting that reference.

    3. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by arth1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      He's mentally ill

      How, exactly, do you know this? You have the qualifications to set a diagnosis and have enough data to comfortably do so?

      The guy seriously believes that George W. Bush is living in a secret castle in Colorado where he rapes and sacrifices children. He also believes that Bush not only planned 9-11, but serves a world shadow government who also seem to spend most of their time raping and sacrificing children (when they're not planning world domination, I guess).

      Again, how do you know this?

      The pope is secretly an ant-eater, and Neil Young planned the invasion of Kuwait.

      There. You now think you have enough evidence to conclude that (a) I believe that, and (b) are insane?

      Leave the diagnoses to the professionals, please.

    4. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How can you be certain he is wrong?

    5. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    6. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's mentally ill, and really does need help (even if you can't force it). The guy seriously believes that George W. Bush is living in a secret castle in Colorado where he rapes and sacrifices children.

      Posting that here will get you an instant "+5, Insightful" here.

    7. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by postbigbang · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Making observations based on superficial evidence is usually pretty dicey, but the opinions he ostensibly represents would lead one to believe that there are paranoid delusions being spouted, rather than random disinformation usually attributed to political parties.

      In your case, being obviously preposterous is much different than being delusional. While professionals are the ultimate observers, we civilians can make reasonably educated guesses ourselves.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    8. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by Hatta · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You're right the free speech issues here are minimal. The real problem is how we deal with the mentally ill in this country. He needs help, not prison.

      Unfortunately, in this puritanical country mental illness is treated like demonic posession. That is, something to punish the victim for to make ourselves feel more righteous. That's even more sick than this guy is.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    9. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2

      The cases always get a bit more interesting if the feds are involved(because institutionalizing pesky dissidents for being crazy would be a convenient thing to be able to do); but there are a lot of much more prosaic involuntary psych commitments. A suicide attempt will probably earn you one, as will psychosis or delusions sufficiently strong and unpleasant to render you likely to violence toward yourself or others.

      For obvious reasons, this corner of medicine really does bear considerable watching; but it operates largely according to protocols designed for serious but politically uninteresting psych cases. Being seriously mentally ill and cogent enough to be a credible threat to political types is relatively rare.

    10. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Here's an interview with the guy while he was still being detained: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=sX1EvM6XksM
      He may be "sick" but he doesn't sound like it. I have met people with some very weird beliefs and they haven't and wouldn't harm a fly.
      Another interesting discussion on the subject: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wMo6BrDbDQE

    11. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by j00r0m4nc3r · · Score: 1

      He's mentally ill, and really does need help

      And you're basing this diagnosis on what exactly?

    12. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      OK, you lost me at "Bush is smart enough".

    13. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by crazyjj · · Score: 4, Funny

      How, exactly, do you know this? You have the qualifications to set a diagnosis and have enough data to comfortably do so?

      Well, I suppose it's always possible that the homeless guy at the subway station who's talking to invisible people and carrying around a jar of his own urine ISN'T actually mentally ill, but is in fact a psychic who can talk to the dead--but only with the help of concentrated urine. Only a Ph.D. in Psychology can pierce through that unknown veil and reveal the truth of the matter (since part of the Psychology Ph.D. program at any major university involves learning to distinguish the real conspiracies/psychics/mediums/etc. from the fake ones, presumably). Until then, we should all probably give him the benefit of the doubt and assume that it's just as likely that he's NOT mentally ill (until we can find a board-certified Psychologist to tell us differently).

      Or, maybe the homeless guy is making a giant meta-joke on the world. Being a homeless guy talking to invisible people is secretly all part of his MFA thesis performance art piece entitled "Homeless Guy Who Appears Mentally Ill, But Isn't." Again, since there is no way to be sure, we should probably treat this as equally a possibility.

      --
      What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
    14. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by FacePlant · · Score: 4, Funny

      > Neil Young planned the invasion of Kuwait.

      Wrong Canadian. It was Supreme General Leonard Cohen.

      --
      My Heart Is A Flower
    15. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by Antarius · · Score: 3, Funny

      Neil Young planned the invasion of Kuwait.

      So he's responsible for inflicting atrocities and human suffering on a grand scale AND of an act of war?!

    16. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The guy seriously believes that George W. Bush is living in a secret castle in Colorado where he rapes and sacrifices children. He also believes that Bush not only planned 9-11, but serves a world shadow government who also seem to spend most of their time raping and sacrificing children (when they're not planning world domination, I guess).

      Wow, that is nuts. Everyone knows it's Dick Cheney.

    17. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by cpu6502 · · Score: 1, Troll

      >>>He's mentally ill, and really does need help (even if you can't force it).

      I friended him on facebook, and then start chatting with his friends. They say he's a quiet person and the kindest person they know.

      >>>The guy seriously believes that George W. Bush is living in a secret castle in Colorado where he rapes

      Provide citation or retract the libel.

      >>>He also believes that Bush not only planned 9-11, but serves a world shadow government

      Well this part is true. He does believe that there's a group called the "Bilderberg Group" that acts, not as a world government, but also to set policy. And since this group just held a meeting in northern Virginia, the guy is not crazy. It's a fact that they exist. (But I doubt they are a world government..... just the leaders getting together to set international policy. Like a conference.)

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    18. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      No! He's a 4 uid you insensitive clod!

    19. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by crazyjj · · Score: 2

      How can you be certain he is wrong?

      No more certain than I can be that unicorns aren't real, of course. I can only presume that the press would be woefully inadequate (even more so than usual) to have missed either George Bush's secret child-raping castle or all the horned, magical horses flying around shitting rainbows.

      --
      What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
    20. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by Baloroth · · Score: 4, Informative

      You're right the free speech issues here are minimal. The real problem is how we deal with the mentally ill in this country. He needs help, not prison.

      And thats why they took him to a mental hospital (John Randolph Psychiatric Hospital, to be specific) and not prison. He wasn't technically arrested or charged with any crime at all, it was a "civil commitment" (which law exists, I believe, to hold individuals who are believed to be a potential danger to themselves/others).

      --
      "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
    21. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 2

      He's very sick and needs help.

      Not the core issue causing all the fuss. Core issue is that he is being locked up for what he allegedly "said" in a facebook post. Second issue is the ongoing mistreatment of civilians by douhebag cops who think they are above the law. People are sick of it.

      Besides, there are homeless people all over the city who are just as delusional as this guy. Are you going to force medication on them "just in case" they actually do something illegal?

      Until someone actually breaks the law, or is endangering themselves or someone else, threatening to do so should not get you locked up. Hitler took that approach.

      --
      Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
    22. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's sad, but in the last 2 years or so, I've heard people who I once respected--who were once normal, rational human beings--say some of the most outlandish/ridiculous/insane shit about Barack Obama that I've ever heard come out of anyone's mouth. It's like the whole country has become a giant mental institution.

    23. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So he's probably a frequent AC on /.?

      Apart from the castle part (I can't imagine Bush Jr. doing anything like that without involving Texas), I don't see what's wrong about what he's...

      Oh, God DAMNIT, cultiv8, you're on to us! All right, quick, everyone, fall back to absurd, borderline dada nonsense, we'll have to come up with something else. Bring back the Natalie-Portman-petrified-grits meme as a placeholder until we've got it worked out.

    24. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      A probable exaggeration. I'm not willing to grant full on illness. Spend some time with conspiracy nuts. Seriously. Some real time. I made the mistake of being active in some groups for nearly a decade. It was a mistake, but one that let's me see the reason to their madness.

      Don't bullshit them. Don't screw with them. Don't be rude. Just sit and listen. Ask questions if they aren't intended to be a misguided proof by contradiction. Here's a hint: What makes a good conspiracy a good conspiracy is that you can't prove it exists.

      Like every community, they have their...messed up fools. Maybe a higher percentage. They have propagandists, glory hounds, attention whores, charismatic leaders. They certainly have a higher percentage of paranoids, but really... that's probably what draws them in the first place.

      And they have thematic stories that have...elements of truth, however blown out of proportion.

      The gov't planned 9/11? Well, it is indisputable fact that we funded Al Qaeda leaders, provided them arms and training, and largely ignored the bin laden threat. Sure, those incidents were... what, 20, 30 years ago? And with hindsight being 20/20, we can speculate wildly on people ignoring hijackers just wanting to learn to fly...

      This guy certainly sounds sick, but he's almost certainly part of a fringe conspiracy theorizing community -- that while any individual may seem outlandish by total-societal standards, functions perfectly fine by itself. These groups often have hundreds of people -- their own websites, mailing lists, newsletters, maybe even really awkward get-togethers.

      I don't celebrate that individual, but I celebrate the community, and the group that can reach such consensus, and has the freedom and liberty to draw such conclusions, however inaccurate they may be.

      Democratic process requires permitting people to make wrong decisions, and letting them vote on them.

      Remember, when you call them sick, deranged, lunatics, you externalize them -- cut them off from the societal support they need. You actively reinforce the most paranoid delusions that people are out to get them -- positively confirming the hypothesis that people are watching, paying too much attention, calling the police to check on them. They need normal friends with a bit of tolerance. If you try to medicate some of these people, you'll just create a person skilled in giving evasive answers to the shrink.

      Anyway, I gotta run now... the government's about to send a pulse down the power lines that interacts with the iron in my hemoglobin to resonate a picture of what my eyes are seeing to the satellites in the sky.

      Live free or die and meet Xenu!

      (Seriously though... support. It's critical. And it isn't psychiatric that's needed except in case of planning immediate harm to self or others -- it's social, societal, communal, familial...)

    25. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by Vinegar+Joe · · Score: 4, Funny

      > Neil Young planned the invasion of Kuwait.

      Wrong Canadian. It was Supreme General Leonard Cohen.

      But Justin Bieber was pulling the strings......

      --
      "The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old......They literally know nothing." - Ben Rhodes
    26. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by ArhcAngel · · Score: 2

      Posting that here will get you an instant "+5, Insightful" here.

      How long have you worked for the department of redundancy department?

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    27. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by cpu6502 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      (1) I wanted to comment that those who said the marine "deserved to be jailed" were wrong. The cops handed-in a blank piece of paper!!! Basically the cops arrested him without causes and this shit should not be happening in America. Thankfully we had a judge who still serves the Virginia Constitution (shall not be deprived of freedom w/o due process) and released the man ASAP.

      (2) The "version" of this Bilderberg theory I hear is that Bush is dumb as dirt. He was just a puppet that was used by Cheney and other connected men to manipulate things behind the scenes. (This same theory also claims Obama is a puppet.) Here's a photo that is frequently used. It's Bush's head but overlaid with an Obama mask..... meaning nothing has really changed except the frontman:

      http://www.dokumentarci.com.hr/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/The_Obama_Deception_by_virtuadc.jpg

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    28. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by FishOuttaWater · · Score: 1

      Ah, that's the clever part: He's only *pretending* to be that dim.

    29. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by crazyjj · · Score: 1

      And you're basing this diagnosis on what exactly?

      On the fact that I've been to George Bush's child-raping castle and can verify that there are absolutely no child sacrifices going on. It's strictly rape, no killing. To suggest otherwise is obviously crazy.

      --
      What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
    30. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, that looks like Bill Clinton's hair/head.

    31. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by cpu6502 · · Score: 0

      >>>Yawn. Put up or shut up.

      Sure. Right after you post under your registered /. ID. (Also maybe you could clarify what I'm supposed to "put up"? I'm not trying to prove anything. I'm just stating what I've heard from the marine's FB friends and about Bilderberg meeting in Virginia.)

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    32. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The guy seriously believes..."

      As long as it's just believing, why would anyone care?
      Do people who believe in angels also need help?

    33. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by crazyjj · · Score: 4, Informative

      Provide citation or retract the libel.

      July 28, 2012 Facebook post from Raub:

      “If you are my friend, you deserve to know the truth. This world is secretly run by a shadow organization of people who among other things enjoy raping children. Some of leaders were involved with the bombing of the twin towers. It was a sacrifice and a complete inside job. Also the Bush’s are very sick twisted problems. I believe they have a secret Castle in Colorado where they have been raping and sacrificing children for many years. Think I’m crazy? Think again.”

      --
      What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
    34. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

      Apparently I lost you earlier where I used the word "unbelievable". :-|

    35. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How long have you worked for the department of redundancy department?

      After five years of service, I just celebrated my fifth anniversary.

    36. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by AntiBasic · · Score: 0

      ...He also believes that Bush not only planned 9-11, but serves a world shadow government who also seem to spend most of their time raping and sacrificing children (when they're not planning world domination, I guess).

      Whatever you think of the free speech issues involved, please don't celebrate this dude. He's very sick and needs help.

      This describes 95% of the liberals in the world.

    37. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 2

      Did you reply to the right post? Personally, I think the guy needs help, not jail, but the mental health landscape in this country is abysmal.

    38. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by somersault · · Score: 1

      It's like the whole country has become a giant mental institution.

      Heh. This is the best description I've ever read of the good ol' US of A.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    39. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by gmanterry · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't know if this guy was ever a real threat to anyone or not, but he certainly isn't some super-patriot or free speech hero. He's mentally ill, and really does need help (even if you can't force it). The guy seriously believes that George W. Bush is living in a secret castle in Colorado where he rapes and sacrifices children. He also believes that Bush not only planned 9-11, but serves a world shadow government who also seem to spend most of their time raping and sacrificing children (when they're not planning world domination, I guess).

      Whatever you think of the free speech issues involved, please don't celebrate this dude. He's very sick and needs help.

      Here is a link to what is supposed to be on his FaceBook page:

      http://wtvr.com/2012/08/21/full-text-brandon-raubs-proclamation-take-our-republic-back/

      I don't see any references to Bush or children and being a former Marine myself, I agree with what he says. If he was arrested for this, it is just wrong and they need to put me away too.

      --
      Since when is "public safety" the root password to the Constitution?
    40. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Again, how do you know this? The pope is secretly an ant-eater, and Neil Young planned the invasion of Kuwait. There. You now think you have enough evidence to conclude that (a) I believe that, and (b) are insane? Leave the diagnoses to the professionals, please.

      You are indeed insane. Note because of your sentence about the pope, that is your only true statement in there. It's your stuff that makes you insane.

      And if you're not, we'll drive you there.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    41. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, someone who would believe something like that would probably believe that the government would start a war and kill tens of thousands based on little to no evidence of another country potentially acquiring weapons of mass destruction. What kind of paranoid psychotic would believe that?
      If believing in a conspiracy is grounds for commitment to a mental institution, then we need about 100 million more beds in those places.
      I don't agree with his theories, but I've heard much worse. Like believing that raped women who get pregnant chose to get pregnant instead of " shutting it down."

    42. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by gstoddart · · Score: 0

      The "version" of this Bilderberg theory I hear is that Bush is dumb as dirt

      I think there's enough video evidence from him speaking to prove that point.

      Bush said an incredible amount of Really Stupid Things. I find it hard to believe anybody still believes he's anything but a drooling chimp.

      As to whether some secret illuminati are controlling him from behind the scenes ... it doesn't even need to be some grand conspiracy, lobbyists have a lot of access and influence, and seem to get what they want. The copyright cartels are telling government to force trading partners to implement IP laws they wrote. The idiots on Wall Street who lost all the money advise on financial policy. There's Halliburton, who seem to be able to run around doing all sorts of awful things.

      Like I said, it doesn't even need to be some big secret group that sits around the table and influences such things. They do it right in the open.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    43. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by tbannist · · Score: 2

      Provide citation or retract the libel.

      He posted that it on his facebook page:

      July 28 at 11:15 am
      If you are my friend, you deserve to know the truth. This world is secretly run by a shadow organization of people who among other things enjoy raping children. some of the leaders were involved with the bombing of the twin towers. It was a sacrifice and a complete inside job. Also the Bush's are very sick twisted problems. I believe they have a secret Castle in Colorado where they have been raping and sacrificing children for many years. Think I'm crazy? Think again.

      --
      Fanatically anti-fanatical
    44. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by dontclapthrowmoney · · Score: 1

      Free cookie to anyone getting that reference.

      Is it a tracking cookie?

      PS I'm not paranoid. And I have new socks on.

    45. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Well, I suppose it's always possible that the homeless guy at the subway station who's talking to invisible people and carrying around a jar of his own urine ISN'T actually mentally ill, but is in fact a psychic who can talk to the dead--but only with the help of concentrated urine.

      It may be possible that the homeless guy does these things knowing fully well how crazy it will seem, and does them for that exact reason -- a cry for help.

      Or it may be that either medication, malnutrition or substance use trigger delusions that would go away if the cause was rectified.

      Stop jumping to conclusions, folks.

    46. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by Hatta · · Score: 0

      No kidding. I've even heard some people say that they are voting for him *again*. They say insanity is doing the same thing over and over, and expecting different results...

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    47. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by arth1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And you jump from his posting that to the conclusion that he wasn't trolling why, exactly? Are you new on the internet?

    48. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 1

      And ultimately guided by the cunning Lerxst.

      --
      We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
    49. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It definitely does not resemble Bush. I am going with Bill Clinton too on this.

    50. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by arth1 · · Score: 1

      In your case, being obviously preposterous is much different than being delusional.

      Or he might be better at trolling than I am.

      A mental leap from "A posts B" to "A means B", and then drawing further conclusions based on that, to the point that they trump the first amendment, is a dangerous thing to do.
      I think we should avoid those waters - there be krakens.

    51. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "So he's probably a frequent AC on /.?"

      Bet he has one awesome Hosts file.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    52. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    53. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by Cl1mh4224rd · · Score: 1

      He's mentally ill

      How, exactly, do you know this? You have the qualifications to set a diagnosis and have enough data to comfortably do so?

      Judge orders Chesterfield Marine's release from psychiatric facility

      However, Raub's defense attorney admitted in court that during Raub's evaluation, mental health professionals found signs of "psychosis."

      --
      People will pass up steak once a week, for crap every day.
    54. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by arth1 · · Score: 1

      You are indeed insane. Note because of your sentence about the pope, that is your only true statement in there. It's your stuff that makes you insane.

      Don't touch my stuff!

    55. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by thedonger · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The "version" of this Bilderberg theory I hear is that Bush is dumb as dirt

      I think there's enough video evidence from him speaking to prove that point.

      Bush said an incredible amount of Really Stupid Things. I find it hard to believe anybody still believes he's anything but a drooling chimp.

      Just curious, but when Obama said he had visited 57 states, did you see that as being stupid? How about the unbelievably numerous times he stammers in his non-teleprompter speeches, e.g., I-I-I-I-I-I don't- wha-wha-wha-what I mean; you see, the-the-the..., and so on? Or is he still The Great Orator? Genius, voice of a generation? And Haliburton is evil, but what about Obama's Goldman-Sachs chums in the administration?

      We spend so much time complaining, yet it is us - the people, the voters - who opted to sit around and watch television and let politicians warp the constitution to serve their need for power. The right and the left serve the same master. But it isn't the people.

      --
      Help fight poverty: Punch a poor person.
    56. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by crazyjj · · Score: 0, Troll

      I would reply to your question, as if you were serious, but it would be unfair of me to assume you're not just trolling.

      --
      What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
    57. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

      is believing in god or jesus or other profets as equally insane?

      Prove that god exists dude.

      --
      Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    58. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

      A rhino is a big fat unicorn gone wrong on steroids.

      In all respects are rhino is a unicorn.

      --
      Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    59. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This post disgusts me almost as much as this situation itself.

      Oh, so you read some post he made on the internet? Obviously he is mentally ill.... I guess I must be sick too for not having seen it with such clarity myself.

      OMG he must be sick! He said some things on the internet, which may or may not have been in jest, that don't rectify with my rainbow and unicorns world view! Quick guys lets *help* him! C'mon, its for your own good, we're from the government and we're here to help! Just let this happen!

      I saw some other post say this isn't as much about the first amendment as it is about getting help for the mentally ill... Are you f**king kidding me?! This guy was detained against his will under the guise of psychiatric evaluation for something he posted online... its ENTIRELY a first amendment issue.

      It sickens me how many of you are quick to brush this under the rug and give .gov a free pass with "its a mental health issue" rather than notice the obvious civil rights violations.

    60. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by cyborg_zx · · Score: 1

      He was made redundant you insensitive clod!

    61. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

      Then all people that believe in gods or promote mythical fairy tales (disney) are promoting insanity? What santa isnt real?

      Why does every parent lie to their children about Cokacola santa and the Nestle bunny?

      --
      Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    62. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

      I got that impression from watching Celsius 800+111

      --
      Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    63. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's like asking what happens when we die. We can guess, but we don't know for sure until it happens to us.

      We don't have the answers to everything. Yet.

    64. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you know how I can tell that you're just another ignorant conservative with a delusional worldview?

      Conservatives say the wackiest things, due to existing in an echo chamber that embraces superstition and ignorance, rejects western civilization, and excludes any ideas that conflict with their dogma.

      When your group will not tolerate reality-based people, your group will inevitably become increasingly delusional over time.

    65. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

      Well, duh, in the qantum world thats how it works. The LHC does the same thing over and over again, looking for that different result.

      Do insane people really expect anything? They wont.

      Either they hear voices or they are ultra paranoid to the max, over analyzing events/future, concluding wrong things.

      Then again, doing a get request using http to google.com/news gives different results over time.

      Looking at the sky at the same location, over time gives different results.

      Tcpdumping an ethernet port every day, gives different results, is that insane?

      --
      Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    66. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Simple.

      Let God = 0.
      Let Exists = 1.
      Also, let x and y be numbers such that x=y.

      Then we have:
      x^2 = xy
      x^2 - y^2 = xy - y^2
      x + y = y
      2 y = y
      2 = 1
      1 = 0.
      But since 0 = God, and 1 = Exists, we have
      God = Exists,
      QED.

      You are so wrong.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    67. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

      Correct this, to lots of un-elected leaders.

      Please list all the attendees, and which are elected.

      Which are leaders in what.

      How rich they are.

      How they know.

      How they are married to (ie interfamily ties with other prominent families/circles).

      --
      Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    68. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "July 28, 2012 Facebook post from Raub:
      “If you are my friend, you deserve to know the truth. ...Think I’m crazy? Think again.” "

      The really crazy thing there is that he apparently thinks people would believe him just based on his saying so. But that's not as uncommon as it should be, certainly not a cause for forced "help".

    69. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Nice try on the math, but...

      1) You can't make the leap from x^2 - y^2 = xy - y^2 to x + y = y. Simplifying line 2 would result in x^2 - y^2 = y(x - y), which doesn't lead to line 3 in any way.

      2) The correct way to solve this (from line 2 down) is:

      x^2 - xy = y^2 - y^2 = 0
      x(x - y) = 0

      Solution is that x = 0 and/or (x - y) = 0, which means that x = y, for any values of x and y.

      3) Because of that, you have no basis to try to claim QED.

      Personally, I don't care if you believe in God or not, but if you're going to try to use math to prove it (and your example is extremely arbitrary, let alone erroneous), at least know how to actually solve for x and y before trying to look like a hotshot.

    70. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by grantspassalan · · Score: 1

      Prove that He doesn't.

      --
      A sufficiently advanced simulation is indistinguishable from reality.
    71. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah? That was the most obvious problem you could find with that proof?

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    72. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by Rob+Riggs · · Score: 3, Funny

      Huh? I don't get it.

      --
      the growth in cynicism and rebellion has not been without cause
    73. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by jimbolauski · · Score: 2

      He's mentally ill

      How, exactly, do you know this? You have the qualifications to set a diagnosis and have enough data to comfortably do so?

      The guy seriously believes that George W. Bush is living in a secret castle in Colorado where he rapes and sacrifices children. He also believes that Bush not only planned 9-11, but serves a world shadow government who also seem to spend most of their time raping and sacrificing children (when they're not planning world domination, I guess).

      Again, how do you know this?

      The pope is secretly an ant-eater, and Neil Young planned the invasion of Kuwait.

      There. You now think you have enough evidence to conclude that (a) I believe that, and (b) are insane?

      Leave the diagnoses to the professionals, please.

      (a) No you don't believe that, I can tell by the context of your statement.
      (b) You seem rational enough, but if you truly did believe that the pope is secretly an ant-eater, Neil Young planned the invasion of Kuwait, and you posted violent rhetoric I would be worried about the safety of you and others around you.

      There are two kinds of people that post crazy stuff on the internet the people that truly believe it and the trolls, his posts do not seem like the work of a troll unless he was trolling people into believing that he is nuts in which case he was wildly successful. You do not need a medical degree to realize he is severely out of touch with reality. I hope that if a family member of yours started acting like he did you would try to do something instead of letting a loved one go about their business because you are not qualified to properly diagnose them so you do nothing.

      --
      Knowledge = Power
      P= W/t
      t=Money
      Money = Work/Knowledge so the less you know the more you make
    74. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by drainbramage · · Score: 1

      And this is exactly how the police are required to treat people in Seattle.

      --
      No brain, no pain.
    75. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by jimbolauski · · Score: 1

      All rhinos are not unicorns some are either bicorns or ducorns, are bicorns extra magical or evil?

      --
      Knowledge = Power
      P= W/t
      t=Money
      Money = Work/Knowledge so the less you know the more you make
    76. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      That sounded like all the democrats during the period of 2001-2008.
      Now the republicans are spweing the same nonsense.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    77. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whos to say he's really crazy...
      The goverment WAS watching him. And DID come get him for something he said on the internet. And DID put him in jail for no reason at all.

      That all sounds pretty crazy and paranoid too. Until it actually happens. And it did.

      So you really can't just dismiss anything else he says. No matter how crazy. Just because we have no proof yet.
      Because all that other shit DID happen.

    78. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Bush Sr. has been linked to international child prostitution rings and satanic ritual sacrifice. Read "The Franklin Cover-Up", it's a book written by a former Nebraska state senator.

      Truth is stranger than fiction.

    79. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I will just say: Look at the ears, man, the EARS.

      How could they NOT both be puppets for a shadow regime.

      I kid. About the shadow regime. I think anybody who takes the time to look at bush/obama photos side by side will wonder if they both have the same ancestor.

    80. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by PhrstBrn · · Score: 2

      Or he might be better at trolling than I am.

      For fucks sake, acting like an idiot on purpose isn't trolling.

    81. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by INowRegretThesePosts · · Score: 2

      in this puritanical country

      WHAT? You mean that a country with a huge pornography addiction, widespread promiscuity, high STD infection rates, is "puritanical"?

    82. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you prove him wrong?

    83. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by sgt_doom · · Score: 1

      Sure, and people actually believe Cheney had recorded videos on DVD (of all those tortures which never took place) in that humongous safe he kept in his office when he was VP. (Wonder what became of that safe .....?)

    84. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by crazyjj · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I could say a bunch of crazy shit and then threaten the President and I'm pretty sure they would come lock me up too. That wouldn't make the crazy shit any more true.

      --
      What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
    85. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by crazyjj · · Score: 1

      Can you prove to me that Fairies aren't real?

      --
      What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
    86. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2

      Just be careful where this leads you, especially when the case involves someone's political beliefs in one way or another.

      To remind, in late Soviet Union there was that practice where they declared dissidents insane. Very easy, actually: those people were claiming that Soviet regime was bad and nasty, and obviously any sane person can see just how awesome it actually is (and hey, they're lynching Negroes in America!), so clearly badmouthing it a sign of insanity. So this was used to lock undesired people out without formally pressing charges or anything like that. Then you can say with a straight face that you don't have any political prisoners whatsoever; you just have a bunch of crazies, who're getting the requisite medical help.

      I'm not saying that this case is like that - from what I know about it it certainly doesn't look that way - but there is certainly a slippery slope here if you start classifying certain political beliefs, even extreme (truthers etc) as a sign of insanity in and of itself.

    87. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      is believing in god or jesus or other profets as equally insane?

      Well, we have a great deal of historical evidence for the existence of Jesus. Believing he did not ever exist is a pretty extreme position, and a possible indicator of mental illness. Believing he still exists is also pretty far out there.

      Prove that god exists dude.

      Trivial. Scientists and philosophers do it all the time, atheists never listen. Here, I'll recap Spinoza:

      axiom: God is by definition the greatest thing there is.
      axiom: A lesser thing by definition cannot encompass or contain a greater thing.
      observation: The set of all things cannot be contained or encompassed by any other thing, and is greater than all things it contains.
      conclusion: Therefore, God is all things.
      observation: The set of all things exists.
      conclusion: God exists.

      If you're a Christian or faith-based atheist, I've just committed the worst possible heresy, but luckily I'm semi-anonymous here, and besides my Church has got my back. So don't try burning any darwin fish on my lawn, m'kay?

    88. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by Hatta · · Score: 1

      We spend so much time complaining, yet it is us - the people, the voters - who opted to sit around and watch television and let politicians warp the constitution to serve their need for power

      You can't blame the people for being vulnerable to the best propaganda system in the world. You can't blame an old man for believing Fox News any more than you can blame him for falling for the typical scams that target the elderly.

      You're just blaming the victim here. The ones who really bear the blame are the ones actually comitting the fraud against the American people.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    89. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by crazyjj · · Score: 1

      Ask him if they were just meant in jest. It certainly doesn't sound like it to me.

      And the issues of whether or not he should be locked up or forced to receive treatment are separate ones. My contention is that the guy is mentally ill and this is a sad situation, not one to be celebrated as some sort of blow for intellectual freedom. This isn't some dissident advocating revolution. It's the rantings of an unhinged paranoid schizophrenic who's obviously out of touch with reality and in need of help. Regardless or whether he should be locked up or not, or whether his posts fall into the realm of free speech, it's just sad. I don't know what this guy's war experience was like, or whether it contributed to this, but I do wonder why the people around him let it come to this without someone stepping in beforehand saying "Hey man, I think you need help." Maybe someone did and he just refused.

      --
      What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
    90. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      inorite? Kids these days...

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    91. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by crazyjj · · Score: 1

      God = Exists

      Now if we could only figure out which God.

      --
      What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
    92. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      We spend so much time complaining, yet it is us - the people, the voters - who opted to sit around and watch television and let politicians warp the constitution to serve their need for power. The right and the left serve the same master. But it isn't the people.

      Read the last sentence you posted. Then read the first I quoted without rejecting the last as false. Hopefully you can see the contradiction. Blaming the voters here is like blaming the Senate for the rise of Caesar....

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    93. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like most sane people, I saw that as the kind of normal mistake anybody can make from time to time. It happens. I can make typos, but I still recognize the difference between myself and somebody who can't string together words with any great deal of accuracy. It's the difference between an incident and a pattern.

      But you know what I took from the continuous Republican/Conservative criticism on that issue, and on the subject of teleprompters? I observed a pattern, a pattern of people whose behavior I find to be disingenuous, hyperbolic and ultimately without credibility.

      I think the problem is you think there's anywhere near the same character on each side. I do not find that to be accurate.

      But yes, Goldman-Sachs is evil, and I sincerely want them dealt with appropriately. However I've not been consulted by Obama on anything.

    94. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Read the book "The Franklin Cover-Up". It's by a former Nebraska state senator.

      It presents hard evidence that links Bush St. to an international child abduction/abuse ring and ritual satanic sacrifice. It all got swept under the rug.

      Truth is stranger than fiction.

    95. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1

      How about some info from his real facebook page? Sifted second hand we don't really know. If the original is there, look at IT not newspapers. His facebook is there and takes all of about a minute and a half to find. I'll not post the link here because it is too easy to feed his delusions with tons of hits. The lazy who just read the papers won't bother.

      There is definitely some deranged ranting going on there, but most of it should fall under 'free speech'. We're all allowed to rant. (I say this even though I never do [extremely huge grin]. But there are also definitely some worrisome comments, like about sharpening the ax, and "I'm coming for you." And then one thing he says stands out in all its truthiness: "Do you know what the secret of the Marine Corps is? Tell people they are Heroes and they will act it out."

      There's probably been less said by people who have gone out and shot up a shopping mall or campus, or movie theatre, or congresswoman. So I think they are right to be concerned. I can't fault them for wanting to talk to him. Arresting him maybe was over the top and feeds his psychosis too much much, but better safe than sorry,

      Personally I think he's nuts and should be forced to get treatment. We don't give kids under a certain age the option of not getting treatment for many things including mental disease. Why? Because they don't have the reasoning power to know what's best often... it's why we evolved to have long childhoods, there is a lot to learn and it gives us that time. Why then should an adult who is obviously less able to make rational judgments than many children not also be forced to get treatment? Because they're adults? Liberals have their misguided reasons on this although I think it is crueller to let them live in their psychosis than to help them out of it. And for the conservatives who go with it, it is usually because they know it saves tax dollars using an excuse, they're adults they can make their own decisions... nice full circle there, and as a bonus saying they agree with the liberals on some things. That's my conspiracy theory of the day.

      ...
      Brandon J Raub
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KZJ-TXpBKCU
      The Revolution is here. And I will lead it.
      Big Pun - Brave In The Heart
      www.youtube.com
      Big Pun Brave In The Heart; A tribute to the artist
      Share  August 15 at 2:00am Â
      19 shares

      Brandon J Raub
      The Revolution will come for me. Men will be at my door soon to pick me up to lead it. ;)
      Share  August 14 at 6:15pm Â
      132 shares
      Brandon J Raub I'm at [read his facebook if you want his address]
      August 14 at 6:33pm  Edited

      Brandon J Raub
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SNLa93Q_rvM
      This is firefighters talking about the explosive charges placed within the twin towers.
      9/11 Eyewitnesses to Explosive WTC Demolition 1/2
      www.youtube.com
      A key facet of the 9/11 catastrophe that is often overlooked is the reports of explosions at the Twin Towers that dozens of eyewitnesses gave on 9/11 and in ...
      Share  August 14 at 8:37am Â
      415 shares

      Brandon J Raub
      This is the picture of the Pentagon, right after our leaders shot a missle into it.
      Share  August 14 at 8:28am Â
      Raymond xxxxx likes this.
      700 shares
      Raymond xxxxx no plane here
      August 14 at 11:27am  1

      Brandon J Raub
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jlACgYHtWCI

      There are some men who struggle against destiny. And there are Some who Embrace it.
      Dragon Age 2 Trailer - Destiny Extended
      www.youtube.com
      Experience the stunning directorial cut version of th

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    96. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by AlamedaStone · · Score: 1

      Neil Young planned the invasion of Kuwait.

      So he's responsible for inflicting atrocities and human suffering on a grand scale AND of an act of war?!

      I don't know. His stirring rendition of Whip My Hair moved me. Deeply.

      http://www.latenightwithjimmyfallon.com/video/neil-young-and-bruce-springsteen-whip-my-hair-111610/1260532/

      --
      "All these years believing you're the signified monkey, only to find out you're just a big hunk of nobody cares."
    97. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by AlamedaStone · · Score: 1

      God = Exists

      Now if we could only figure out which God.

      I've got a warehouse full of cheap wine riding on Bacchus.

      --
      "All these years believing you're the signified monkey, only to find out you're just a big hunk of nobody cares."
    98. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Prove that He doesn't.

      Burdens of proof do not work that way! Goodnight!

    99. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by hey! · · Score: 2

      Look, politicians are professional opinion staters. They nearly always have a positive sounding opinion on anything, but when they get to the presidential level people scrutinize their *every* word, and aren't shy about taking it out of context ("You didn't build that."). Very few people, even presidents, can make that transition without sounding like an idiot occasionally. One of the few presidents who handled this well was Dwight Eisenhower, who not coincidentally had a background in military/diplomatic politics, but not *electoral* politics. When faced with a question he didn't want to answer, he'd toss out some zen-master quote that sounded so wise everyone wanted to agree with it, while not quite understanding what it meant.

      George W. Bush wasn't stupid, at least when it comes to figuring out how to get his way with people. What he was is something that should be familiar to most of us here on /.: he was bright, but *cocksure*. He confused making snap decisions with being decisive; sticking to his plan in the face failure with being resolute; not listening to contrary opinions with leadership. Those things might make him an obstinate fool, but that's not quite the same as being "dumb".

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    100. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by arth1 · · Score: 1

      For fucks sake, acting like an idiot on purpose isn't trolling.

      When it elicits a reaction, that's precisely what it is.

    101. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If a judge ordered his release, then the Marine's hearing proved he was not danger to self, danger to others, or gravely disabled. Since the medical staff lost their side of the case, he must be discharged.

    102. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cohen was only a Field Commander.

    103. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      Whatever you think of the free speech issues involved, please don't celebrate this dude. He's very sick and needs help.

      At the risk of invoking Godwin, the former Soviet Union sent many dissidents off to hospitals because they were "mentally ill."

      I mean, one had some pretty crazy ideas. You know, that Khrushchev had betrayed the principles of the founder of the Soviet Union, Vladimir Lenin.

    104. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by hey! · · Score: 2

      Well, this is the biggest problem of any political system: every power we give the government is subject to abuse. Yes, the Soviets used mental illness as a pretense to silence dissidents, but the also used the power a state has to imprison people for similar purposes -- as China does today. Everybody (except for anarchists) think the state should *have* the power to imprison people, but it's probably the single most abused power there is.

      We give the police the privilege of bashing in somebody's door and searching the premises, but we don't expect or want that ever to be done to *us*. What makes government powers like that tolerable is that they are restricted by law, that the process is transparent, leaves a paper trail, and can be challenged.

      I think here we see another of the mechanisms that makes the government power to detain people tolerable. Even if police never made procedural errors (which of course is untrue), they'd still occasionally detain someone who shouldn't be detained. Being human, they aren't going to believe it was a mistake, even if confronted with clear evidence. That's why you need an independent judiciary (which, for example China does not have).

      It's quite possible this person should be involuntarily confined to a psychiatric hospital, but the police failed to prove he met the legal criteria for that, and they failed publicly. This kind of public failure and correction is essential to any government that is neither anarchy nor tyranny. Even if you assume the police are well-meaning, which they probably are in this case, you can't assume they are infallible.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    105. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      Ah, that's the clever part: He's only *pretending* to be that dim.

      You've gotta get your potential consituents (and look at his!) to relate to you somehow! :p

    106. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      You're saying Celine Dion wasn't involved??

    107. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      Yawn.

      Put up or shut up.

      http://www.bilderbergmeetings.org/

      There; you happy? (Didn't think so...)

    108. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Leave the diagnoses to the professionals?

      That's what was happening.

      1. he raised concern among his friends as to his mental health.
      2. The authorities contacted him and took him for a psychiatric evaluation.
      3. Based on the evaluation he was deemed to have possible mental health issues warranting a longer forced evaluation.

      He was not arrested or charged with any crimes. Nor was he being held by the police without charge as you imply. At no time were the police responsible for determining whether to hold him beyond 24 hours. Also the police are allowed to pick anyone up, arrest them and hold them for 24 hours without charge. That is the law.

      So you would have the police ignore warnings from people's friends and families that someone may have mental issues and could pose a threat to themselves or others? Seriously, even for just the mental welfare of the person involved, the authorities have an obligation to check out claims like this.

    109. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean that A + B + C + every singe thing he posted. Every post of his referenced either that the revolution was coming, he was leading the revolution, people must choose sides, the guilty will be punished or heads will roll. It was not a single post, it was the entirety of what he said.

      Some says "I will kill you" one time it could be a joke, but if they tell you every day they are going to kill you, would you not get worried and call the police? I am sure you would.

    110. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by rk · · Score: 1

      Did you just seriously refer to the Catholic/Canadian Musician/Anteater shadow cabal on a public forum? Dude, you need to get to your safe house, lock the doors, and if you even THINK you see an aardvark, run.

    111. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In that case, you got it all wrong:
      First, we take Manhattan.
      Then we take Berlin.

    112. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      There are two kinds of people that post crazy stuff on the internet the people that truly believe it and the trolls [...]

      Okay. So let's say he truly believes this stuff.

      Here in America, we don't lock up people based on their beliefs. Just because I believe there is a guy who lives up in the clouds and created the universe and is all-powerful doesn't mean I get locked up, no matter how ridiculous that might sound to you. And if I believe that he has told me that he hates women who have abortions and that I should kill any woman who considers having an abortion, I still don't get locked up.

      I don't get locked up until I actually make an attempt to kill said woman. We are not judged by our beliefs. We are judged by our actions.

      What you're engaging in is "Pre-crime." "Well, he's obviously paranoid. And he's been trained to use weapons and kill people. So he might do that. So we need to lock him up for his own safety as well as ours."

      That's right. You're locking him up because he might commit a crime.

      The sad part of all of this is that he's right--"The Government" is now officially out to get him and lock him up because of what he's saying. If he wasn't paranoid before, he definitely is now. If I were him, I'd either lock myself in my home with a lot of guns and try to fight them off (which didn't work so well in Waco and Ruby Ridge) or I'd go on the offensive and get them before they get me.

    113. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by sjames · · Score: 1

      Freedom of speech even applies to the ramblings of a lunatic. When evaluating the character of the mentally ill, you have to evaluate their actions in the light of their beliefs (however bizarre). A man who grabs a pebble away from a child believing that it emits death rays and that he could die as a result is still a hero if it turns out to be just a chunk of granite. After all, he really believed he was placing himself in mortal peril to save another and willingly did it.

      As for help, the idea that forced psychiatric drugging constitutes help is debatable. They will certainly shut him up and make him 'manageable' but that's not the same as helping him.

    114. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by AlamedaStone · · Score: 1

      Prove that He doesn't.

      "Extraordinary claims require [...] evidence."
          - Reader's Digest

      --
      "All these years believing you're the signified monkey, only to find out you're just a big hunk of nobody cares."
    115. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by sjames · · Score: 1

      And how does that prove his mental illness? There was a study done once where 3 people were admitted to psychiatric facilities based on 'symptoms' that were deliberately and obviously bogus. During their stay, only fellow patients ever suspected that they didn't belong there.

    116. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by AlamedaStone · · Score: 1

      ... there is certainly a slippery slope here if you start classifying certain political beliefs, even extreme (truthers etc) as a sign of insanity in and of itself.

      Delusion is a symptom of mental illness even if the delusion is "political". This isn't about political speech, it's about individuals who are not cognitively secured to objective reality. On the other hand, if that alone was enough to submit someone to psychological evaluation, the House floor would have to be reclassified as a mental disaster area.

      Come to think of it, is there a requirement for elected officials in the US to submit to such evaluation? It's not a terrible idea...

      --
      "All these years believing you're the signified monkey, only to find out you're just a big hunk of nobody cares."
    117. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by sjames · · Score: 2

      If you are taken away and held somewhere against your will, it is indistinguishable from arrest and imprisonment. It certainly is not 'help'.

      Otherwise, you start to see things like 'sluggishly progressive schizophrenia'. For reasons never properly understood, that particular mental illness only struck political dissidents in the old Soviet Union. The only known 'help' for the disease was confinement to a psychiatric facility in remote parts of Siberia and heavy medication. Evidently espousing the official doctrine rendered one immune to it.

    118. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by AlamedaStone · · Score: 1

      in this puritanical country

      WHAT? You mean that a country with a huge pornography addiction, widespread promiscuity, high STD infection rates, is "puritanical"?

      Pretty much exactly, yes. Those things you mention are extreme reactions against a largely puritanical society (well, the high STD [and teen pregnancy] rates are a result of poor-to-nil sex education because Sex Is Evil).

      --
      "All these years believing you're the signified monkey, only to find out you're just a big hunk of nobody cares."
    119. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by AlamedaStone · · Score: 1

      there are homeless people all over the city who are just as delusional as this guy. Are you going to force medication on them "just in case" they actually do something illegal?

      No, but if they had access to mental health treatment they might not be on the street anymore.

      --
      "All these years believing you're the signified monkey, only to find out you're just a big hunk of nobody cares."
    120. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by AlamedaStone · · Score: 1

      "The guy seriously believes..."

      As long as it's just believing, why would anyone care?
      Do people who believe in angels also need help?

      No - only the ones who threaten "angels" with axe murder the way this guy threatened military personnel (although not a specific individual).

      --
      "All these years believing you're the signified monkey, only to find out you're just a big hunk of nobody cares."
    121. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

      How the fuck does this rate troll? All I really did was agree with the OP and make an Aeon Flux (animated) reference.

    122. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by s.petry · · Score: 1

      So if a neighbor calls the police and says you are crazy, they should just come put you in to an institution? We are not discussing someone that was doing something other than talking poorly about the Government on Facebook. Great, you dislike his theory. It's not like he said he was going to harm anyone, he was simply sharing his theories.

      This case is not unique, over 20,000 cases of the same exact thing have been reported in Virginia, this is just the first that hit your ears. Ohio had a similar case today. Warrant for a persons arrest, privately owned guns confiscated under the guise of "protecting the public", and the person was attempted to be committed to a mental institution because of Facebook posts.

      So yeah, it can be abused and is quite possibly being abused already. Keep thinking "it can't happen here", it may already be happening.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    123. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by s.petry · · Score: 1

      False dichotomy! You neglect the role models people are shown on TV and told to worship. Paris Hilton received more air time than even the President of the USA did at the during the same 4 year time span. We have 5-6 hours a night of incest, murder, rape, teen pregnancy, robbery, sexual perversion, drug abuse and sales, spousal abuse, etc.. etc.. Hell even the Police, Judges, and often the Clergy sleep around, do illegal drugs, and commit crime.

      In the mornings for the last week on ABC and NBC kids get to see Niki Menaj (or what ever that tramps name is) paraded around and praised by the TV anchors. Parents are shown how their kids should be idolizing someone very obviously satanic, with 3-some in her name, and some rather extreme mental disorders (they themselves admit to having).

      I'm not ignorant enough to blame a few religious people for today's problems, and it's very sad that people like you are. A Religious idiot does not have the ability to reach millions of people simultaneously, they can only reach a handful. What we see today is on a massive scale, and brought to you by media with a reach to millions of people.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    124. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by s.petry · · Score: 1

      And if you say it one time about Obama, you end up in Jail! (See teen arrested in Florida for Facebook post in case you are unfamiliar)

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    125. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *eyes closed* and fingers in ears yelling "NO NO NO!

    126. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I hate to say this is a right-wing person (from another country), but in USA there is not left and right, only right and right.

    127. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Fun bit of trivia: geneticly it's what you get when you have a two tonne gazelle that can eat the toughest and thorniest vegetation available.

    128. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by dbIII · · Score: 1

      The bullshit over the superbowl nipple slip showed that the land of sleaze is also puritanical. Extra Taliban points for the outrage being focused on the woman and not the man who pulled her clothes off.
      Of course all that shows is it's nation of 300 million people with diverse views. We just see it through a lens of people with extreme views one way or another (and TV networks devoted to extreme depictions).

    129. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by dbIII · · Score: 1

      The do exist, they are sort of an industry group for bankers etc.

    130. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by dbIII · · Score: 1

      That's almost mainstream these days. Just change the names to Democrats and add a blackboard to get the ravings of a cocaine ravaged former DJ on Fox.

    131. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Next you'll be saying that his grandfather helped finance Hitler. Oh wait.
      BTW, in the 1930s there was a lot of trade between the US and Germany, and a lot of German companies donated to political parties so the same applies to a lot of people's grandfathers. International trade is a tangled web. Did George Bush Snr. actually know the people he was dealing with were up to such things, or was it like the tenuous link in the 1930s?

    132. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by tqk · · Score: 1

      Now if we could only figure out which God.

      Just ask the guy who's pointing a gun at you, and go with his choice. It's not like it matters which sky fairy you bow down to.

      Or, just shoot him if that's an option. Quicker.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    133. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by dbIII · · Score: 1

      I know a lawyer who was threatened with violence by different people nearly every day of the week for a couple of years. Such threats are vastly more common than actual violence.
      Being an ex-marine the person we are talking about is probably far less inclined to actually act on the impulses than somebody with less respect for authority or less exposure to physical violence.

    134. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by Jonner · · Score: 1

      He's certainly not a hero, but we all need and are entitled to free speech. My attitude toward Raub would be the same as that of Evelyn Beatrice Hall summarizing Voltaire:

      I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.

    135. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by elucido · · Score: 1

      I don't know if this guy was ever a real threat to anyone or not, but he certainly isn't some super-patriot or free speech hero. He's mentally ill, and really does need help (even if you can't force it). The guy seriously believes that George W. Bush is living in a secret castle in Colorado where he rapes and sacrifices children. He also believes that Bush not only planned 9-11, but serves a world shadow government who also seem to spend most of their time raping and sacrificing children (when they're not planning world domination, I guess).

      Whatever you think of the free speech issues involved, please don't celebrate this dude. He's very sick and needs help.

      Why does it matter what he believes? What matters is what he does not what he thinks.

    136. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here is a complete capture of his wall, including full comment threads.
      brandon j raub.png

      A few highlights:

      "I am starting a revolution. The government has gone too far."
      "Our leaders are traitors."
      "Fuck the New World Order. I'm bringing it down. ... Soon."
      "I feel like I am standing at a great crossroads. As if a storm of destiny is about to pick me up and take me to fight a great battle. A battle I could have never imagined existed. ... What I need is for someone to come pick me up so we can get the revolution started."
      "If you are my friend, you deserve to know the truth. This world is secretly run by a shadow organization of people who among other things enjoy raping children. Some of leaders were involved with the bombing of the twin towers. It was a sacrifice and a complete inside job. Also the Bush's are very sick twisted problems. I believe they have a secret Castle in Colorado where they have been raping and sacrificing children for many years. Think I'm crazy? Think again. ... Also there's about to be a revolution. Which is why I'm here. ... It's in Sedalia. Take a strap."
      "We MUST rise up and take our country back"
      "The day of reckoning is almost at hand"
      "This is the part where I tell the Federal Government to go fuck itself. This is the part where I tell Generals, training our young men to fight Americans, I am coming for you. The Veterans will be with me."
      "The Revolution is Upon Us."
      "I'm starting the Revolution. I'm done waiting."
      "Your government is evil. It is as simple as that. And the calvary is coming."
      "Do you know why the American people will win the civil war that is coming? Because we are Americans."
      "Sharpen up my axe; I'm here to sever heads."
      "The Revolution will come for me. Men will be at my door soon to pick me up to lead it. ;)"

      Considering the constant talk about starting a revolution and civil war, combined with openly encouraging people to take up weapons against their leaders ("Take a strap"), it's not terribly surprising that they came and picked him up. His words go beyond free speech. Calling for rebellion or war against the U.S. Government is sedition, and sedition is illegal. Furthermore, since he is a Marine (not an ex-Marine: once a Marine, always a Marine), he is subject to the US Code, which also makes sedition a crime - if his words incite anyone to violence or revolt against the government, he could face the death penalty:

      10 USC Sec. 894 - Art. 94. Mutiny or sedition

      (a) Any person subject to this chapter who—
      (1) with intent to usurp or override lawful military authority, refuses, in concert with any other person, to obey orders or otherwise do his duty or creates any violence or disturbance is guilty of mutiny;
      (2) with intent to cause the overthrow or destruction of lawful civil authority, creates, in concert with any other person, revolt, violence, or other disturbance against that authority is guilty of sedition;
      (3) fails to do his utmost to prevent and suppress a mutiny or sedition being committed in his presence, or fails to take all reasonable means to inform his superior commissioned officer or commanding officer of a mutiny or sedition which he knows or has reason to believe is taking place, is guilty of a failure to suppress or report a mutiny or sedition.
      (b) A person who is found guilty of attempted mutiny, mutiny, sedition, or failure to suppress or report a mutiny or sedition shall be punished by death or such other punishment as a court-martial may direct.

      All I want to know is, if (when?) he eventually goes postal and kills someone, can the judge who forced his release be held liable for releasing a dangerous lunatic?

    137. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by INowRegretThesePosts · · Score: 1

      Pretty much exactly, yes. Those things you mention are extreme reactions against a largely puritanical society (well, the high STD [and teen pregnancy] rates are a result of poor-to-nil sex education because Sex Is Evil).

      If there is promotion of chastity in America, it is not among the elites. The cultural elites are overwhelmingly pro-pornography. See what passes on TV and cinema.

      Second, I have never seen a Christian say that sex is evil. Precisely the opposite: they say that sex is sacred.

      Third: American kids do get "sex education". And it is pornographic. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j7XR9yH2ETk

    138. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by INowRegretThesePosts · · Score: 1

      Of course all that shows is it's nation of 300 million people with diverse views.

      Yes, Americans have diverse views. But those with pornographic tastes dominate TV and cinema.

    139. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by i · · Score: 1

      So he is a common US citizen ?

      --
      Mundus Vult Decipi
    140. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 2

      Argh!!

      Don't mention that damn file, he'll pop up like a little lawn-sprinkler and shower us all with strangely-formatted advice!

      --
      ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
    141. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please *don't* leave mental health diagnoses to the professionals in situations like this. There is too much pressure to err on the "safe" side.

    142. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by tqk · · Score: 1

      WHAT? You mean that a country with a huge pornography addiction, widespread promiscuity, high STD infection rates, is "puritanical"?

      On its face, yes. Behind the scenes, out of the public eye, no. This isn't an exclusively USA trait though. Otherwise devout Saudis are known to drink alcohol and party hard when they can get away with it, & etc.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    143. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by cavebison · · Score: 1

      Just curious, but when Obama said he had visited 57 states, did you see that as being stupid?

      Well, Australians know we're the 51st, so I'm sure there are at least another 6 out there somewhere.

    144. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by tragedy · · Score: 1

      Parents are shown how their kids should be idolizing someone very obviously satanic, with 3-some in her name

      "Ménage" means "housekeeping".

    145. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you know he's wrong? ;-)

    146. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know if this guy was ever a real threat to anyone or not, but he certainly isn't some super-patriot or free speech hero. He's mentally ill, and really does need help (even if you can't force it). The guy seriously believes that George W. Bush is living in a secret castle in Colorado where he rapes and sacrifices children. He also believes that Bush not only planned 9-11, but serves a world shadow government who also seem to spend most of their time raping and sacrificing children (when they're not planning world domination, I guess).

      Whatever you think of the free speech issues involved, please don't celebrate this dude. He's very sick and needs help.

      You're missing the point. The point is that the government - not his doctor, not his family, nor even his friends, but the fucking GOVERNMENT! - apparently is free to take a man who, as far as anyone knows, has committed NO CRIME OF ANY KIND against ANYONE AT ALL and is NOT EVEN ACCUSED of having done so, from INSIDE HIS OWN HOME, handcuff him, and take him away to confine him AGAINST HIS WILL!

      Now, if THEY can do that to SOME innocent person, what would prevent THEM from doing it to ANY innocent person, including me, or even YOU, if THEY feel like it?

      THAT is why "this dude" is worthy of celebration, regardless of whether "he's very sick and needs help."

      As drill-sergeants are accustomed to ask,

      "DO you underSTAND?!!!

    147. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by jimbolauski · · Score: 1

      Mentally ill people are put into observation against their will all the time even though they have not committed any violent crimes. It has nothing to do with his training and everything to do with his mental state.

      --
      Knowledge = Power
      P= W/t
      t=Money
      Money = Work/Knowledge so the less you know the more you make
    148. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by grantspassalan · · Score: 1

      Nothing is ever “proved” in any human endeavor, except perhaps mathematical proofs. Evidences no matter how much or how numerous, can only be either believed or disbelieved. There is plenty of evidence that God does indeed exist, but that does not prove he does. Either way, you either have to believe the evidence or disbelieve. There is no proof. There are people today who will refuse to believe that any human being ever stood on the moon or that the Holocaust ever happened, despite all of the evidence.

      --
      A sufficiently advanced simulation is indistinguishable from reality.
    149. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by AlamedaStone · · Score: 1

      Nothing is ever “proved” in any human endeavor, except perhaps mathematical proofs. Evidences no matter how much or how numerous, can only be either believed or disbelieved. There is plenty of evidence that God does indeed exist, but that does not prove he does. Either way, you either have to believe the evidence or disbelieve. There is no proof. There are people today who will refuse to believe that any human being ever stood on the moon or that the Holocaust ever happened, despite all of the evidence.

      I'm not aware of any evidence of the existence (or non-existence) of God, whereas evidence of the Holocaust exists in video, photographs, documents, and first-hand eyewitness accounts. Certainly one can choose to disbelieve, but denial of proof doesn't negate the proof.

      A person might say the sunrise is evidence of God, but as far as science is concerned it's only evidence of gravity and orbits and... you know, testable physical phenomenon. As far as I am aware, God is inherently untestable in this way because it's a non-corporeal phenomenon. According to my best understanding it is a phenomenon that exists outside of both time and space, in fact.

      To be clear, I'm not arguing for or against faith, but faith doesn't have any impact on evidence. They are not intersecting concepts. I would be very interested to hear some specific examples of what you mean by "evidence that God does indeed exist".

      --
      "All these years believing you're the signified monkey, only to find out you're just a big hunk of nobody cares."
    150. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just curious, but when Obama said he had visited 57 states, did you see that as being stupid?

      Well, Australians know we're the 51st, so I'm sure there are at least another 6 out there somewhere.

      Given the amount of AGW, Birther and anti-Vaccine people in the US, "denial" may as well be an official state.

    151. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by s.petry · · Score: 1

      Yeah, until you see her stage show, the bondage simulations, etc.. Keep thinking that, it's okay to be socially acceptable instead of honest.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    152. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by grantspassalan · · Score: 1

      God, the Creator of time and space, he alone possesses the ability to tell us everything that happens throughout all time. God demonstrates the authenticity of his word, the Bible, by writing history before it happens. Thousands of years ago, in the Old Testament, God predicted that the Jewish people would be scattered all over the earth, when they refuse to believe him and thus obey his commands. This scattering of the Jewish people and the desolation of their land came true in 70 A.D. when Jerusalem and Jewish temple were destroyed by the Romans. The final scattering of the Jews took place in 135 A.D. after the Jews that were left rebelled against the Roman government again. They were enjoined from returning to the land of Israel on pain of death. The land itself was renamed Palestine.

      God also predicted that in the final days of man under human governments, the Jews would return to their land and become a nation once again. This took place on May 14, 1948 when the state of Israel was born. God further prophesied that the city of Jerusalem would be a bone of contention and a rock of offense for ALL nations. All these predictions were made centuries before the time of Christ or Mohammed. What other city on earth do you know of, where a zoning change and the building of a few apartments threatens peace in the entire Middle East and perhaps the whole world?

      Damascus is one of the oldest cities on earth. It is over 5000 years old. Yet, God through his prophet Isaiah tells us that Damascus, the capital of Syria, will be destroyed and not be an inhabited city again. This is yet future to us, but given the present unrest in Syria could well happen in the very near future. Enter “Samson Option” into Google to learn how this will happen by the hand of Israel. I could go on and on with more scriptural evidence, because there are literally hundreds of prophecies made by God through his prophets. I hope this is enough evidence for you right for now.

      --
      A sufficiently advanced simulation is indistinguishable from reality.
    153. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by tragedy · · Score: 1

      No, the word "Ménage" literally does mean "housekeeping"/"household". I'm not being dishonest. The term "Ménage à trois", which you referenced when you said "with 3-some in her name" literally means 3 people living together. Nicki _Minaj_ is the stage name of Onika Maraj and is quite clearly based on her real name.

    154. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by AlamedaStone · · Score: 1

      I appreciate your sincerity, but none of this is evidence of God in the scientific sense. I wouldn't attempt to dissuade you from your faith, but the Bible is made up of words written on a page by man. God doesn't pick up a pen, it doesn't leave fingerprints. An article of faith isn't objective evidence - in fact, faith is belief without evidence. That is simply the definition. With evidence, faith is not required. They are distinct, separate, non-intersecting concepts in unrelated fields.

      Which is fine! One can be proud of one's faith, celebrate it. The unknowable is fascinating and compelling. But don't try to make it into something it isn't. Claiming articles of faith as evidence (it seems to me) is an insult to faith.

      --
      "All these years believing you're the signified monkey, only to find out you're just a big hunk of nobody cares."
    155. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by s.petry · · Score: 1

      If a person names themselves a term, and acts a certain way, it is safe to assume that there is a collision. Is it possible that there is more than one meaning to the name? Of course there is, and actually I believe that to be more common that I know. But one should not discount one meaning in favor of another. Seriously, with a name like Onika Marage why not Niki Mirage or something without the sexual innuendo? And if there is no sexual reference intended in the name, why is there so much sex in her act? Why the satanic props?

      I do appreciate the knowledge reference for the term however. Learning is good. Perhaps we are more in agreement than I know, but I don't perceive your messages that way.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    156. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by grantspassalan · · Score: 1

      I appreciate your sincerity, but none of this is evidence of God in the scientific sense. I wouldn't attempt to dissuade you from your faith, but the Bible is made up of words written on a page by man. God doesn't pick up a pen, it doesn't leave fingerprints. An article of faith isn't objective evidence - in fact, faith is belief without evidence. That is simply the definition. With evidence, faith is not required. They are distinct, separate, non-intersecting concepts in unrelated fields.

      Which is fine! One can be proud of one's faith, celebrate it. The unknowable is fascinating and compelling. But don't try to make it into something it isn't. Claiming articles of faith as evidence (it seems to me) is an insult to faith.

      Evidence, whether scientific or not has to be believed. Evidence need not be only “scientific”, but can take many other forms as well, such as historical evidence.

      If someone gave you the next 5 winning Powerball combinations for the next 5 draws, you would have to believe them and fill out the tickets each time. If you did not believe that person and did nothing about it, you would likely be kicking yourself for disbelieving the predictions, when those numbers did indeed come up on every single one of the 5 draws and you would have won the Powerball lottery 5 times in a row. Of course, you would likely be accused of cheating somehow by fellow disbelievers If that prediction actually were fulfilled exactly.

      In the Bible, God has predicted history in advance, both the past history of the world and also the future as well as your own future. Some of these predictions are far more improbable than my Powerball example. If you do not believe what Jesus Christ said about your future, you will have an eternity of regret to look forward to.

      --
      A sufficiently advanced simulation is indistinguishable from reality.
    157. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by AlamedaStone · · Score: 1

      Evidence can be believed - as long as it is scientifically verifiable. Otherwise it isn't evidence. Historical evidence is based on (among other things) documentation, photography/video and eyewitness testimony. All of these things can be tested scientifically, therefore "historical" evidence is not distinct from scientific evidence. Your dogmatic assertion that your god wrote the bible is tiresome. Men wrote that book, and the predictions of men are sometimes correct - it isn't evidence of a deity even if you refuse to accept it. In fact, there is a rich, well-documented history of the origins and numerous translations of the bible across the centuries. Unless you read Greek and Hebrew, you aren't even reading the original text (whatever your beliefs about the "original" author).

      To put it another way, in the words of the esteemed Lionel Hutz, "We've plenty of hearsay and conjecture. Those are kinds of evidence."

      I'm also not interested in your banal predictions about an afterlife, because (as with all your other arguments) it is unknowable. It is unknowable. Just in case I haven't made an impression on this point, it is unknowable. Please consult a professional theologist if the concept still remains unclear. In any case, I personally think the threat of hellfire is absurd. If a person does the "right" thing only out of fear of torture, it demonstrates nothing about their character except a fear of personal pain.

      As I said before, I'm not interested in challenging your faith (although you seem intent on hammering it into me). It surprises me a little how poorly you seem to grasp both science and faith. Jesus said to pray in private. I would personally be grateful if you'd listen to the guy.

      I won't be responding again so if you feel the desperate, prideful need to have the last word, now is the time.

      --
      "All these years believing you're the signified monkey, only to find out you're just a big hunk of nobody cares."
    158. Re:Ex-military, current paranoid schizophrenic by tragedy · · Score: 1

      I don't really know much about the performer you're talking about, beyond the hysterical response she provokes from you and the origin of her stage name, which I looked up. I was just nitpicking over a factual inaccuracy.

  3. As if the truth about all that isn't just as... by darkharlequin · · Score: 2

    ... bizarre as his fantasy world.

    --
    i am so very tired....
    1. Re:As if the truth about all that isn't just as... by lexsird · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That smacks of Illuminati conspiracy theories. The Internet is a complete cesspool of half baked conspiracy theories that the mentally stressed or ill should not be exposed to. Information overload.

      The military really needs to deprogram these guys and integrate them back into the population. I would propose a type of "Combat Engineering" program, to shift these guys into some good paying, hard working jobs back home, via prepping them for things like road construction. We need to rework the infrastructure, unless we are just going to let the country fall into a vast wasteland. I present to you the concept of a Trans Americas Highway system, to tie the entire continents of North and South America together. A big project, but very handy for developing this part of the world. It's what advanced civilizations do.

      That or something like it, to burn off a decade of war stress, by building something. Let's build it here, fuck them. They need to build something.

      --
      Take the Red Pill.
    2. Re:As if the truth about all that isn't just as... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't drug me bro!

    3. Re:As if the truth about all that isn't just as... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      And if we didn't have the internet then these nuts would be out on the street!

    4. Re:As if the truth about all that isn't just as... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The military is responsible for programming them like this in the first place. I personally know a 9/11 Truther who is an Iraq war veteran and now works as a paramedic. He's quite brilliant and can cite all klnds of sources for his belief that Bush and Cheney engineered the World Trade Center attack as an excuse to invade Iraq and steal all of their oil. He claims that his military experience gave him access to the same classified information allegedly leaked by Bradley Manning to Wikileaks and now verified. He says none of us could possibly believe some of ths shit he witnessed over there, and the horrors reported by the media and even by Wikileaks are only the tip of the iceberg. He's not mentally ill, he has just seen too much blood and misery to process it all and return to living a "normal" life. You have no idea what these guys go through when the government they pledged to serve turns them into meat robots and instructs them to kill other people like they were animals or avatars in a video game. You just can't easily "unwire" a brain that has been damaged by war. And we are still sending/programming thousands of kids over there every month to become just like these guys, so the "wounded warior" syndrome is only going to get worse.

      The lucky ones may just be those who come back in a box.

    5. Re:As if the truth about all that isn't just as... by djlowe · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The military really needs to deprogram these guys and integrate them back into the population. I would propose a type of "Combat Engineering" program, to shift these guys into some good paying, hard working jobs back home, via prepping them for things like road construction. We need to rework the infrastructure, unless we are just going to let the country fall into a vast wasteland. I present to you the concept of a Trans Americas Highway system, to tie the entire continents of North and South America together. A big project, but very handy for developing this part of the world. It's what advanced civilizations do.

      That or something like it, to burn off a decade of war stress, by building something. Let's build it here, fuck them. They need to build something.

      I present to you, a person who goes by the nickname "lexsird", who thinks that the solution to these kinds of problems is to compell members of the military, eligible to muster out honorably, to participate in forced manual labor for the "greater good", because "lexsird" wants a North/South American highway system, wants to rebuild the infrastructure in the US, and thinks that forced labor is the way to go.

      Sure, sure, we'll pay 'em well, and it's for their own good, after all - Hell, ain't no kinda mental problem can't be fixed by some good, old-fashioned manual labor! And, if'n they get outta line? Well, we gots lotsa ways to deal with that, too!

      You ARE correct in stating that the highway infrastructure in the US needs rebuilding, and since you seem so concerned about it? Rather than volunteer others for it, why not volunteer yourself? Oh, yeah, that's right - manual labor isn't for the likes of you, right?

      Let's build it here, fuck them.

      Goddamn right! Fuck the veterans!

      They need to build something.

      That's the only thing in your post with which I agree. However, that something isn't roads, it's their lives. THEIR lives, on THEIR terms. Your complete lack of empathy, your cookie-cutter approach to what is an enormously complex and difficult issue, one which you've proven by your words that you've never experienced, tells me that you're clueless, at best.

      It's what advanced civilizations do.

      Yes, that's exactly what advanced civilizations do: Public works using forced labor comprised of miltary veterans returned from the battlefield after serving their country honorably. Yup, that's exactly correct.

      So, what do you do for an encore? Forced sterilization of people with physical or mental defects?

      Sorry, but I am not interested in your ideas, nor do I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.

      Regards,

      dj

    6. Re:As if the truth about all that isn't just as... by lexsird · · Score: 1

      "Let's build it here, fuck them". I mean Afghanistan and Iraq. We build the living shit out of those countries, costing our tax payers fortunes that should have been spent here. They meaning Iraq and Afghanistan need to build something, pony up, be worthy of the sacrifices, don't just let it all fall to shit. Add to the sum of what has been done, that kind of thing.

      --
      Take the Red Pill.
    7. Re:As if the truth about all that isn't just as... by lexsird · · Score: 2

      That's not very respectful of people who went and fought a war for their country. I'm not saying get rid of the Internet either, Jesus! I'm saying people get worked up over cracked pot conspiracies. Couple that with PTSD or God knows what other kind of stress these vets have to deal with. Throw in some injuries, some pain, some medication, and you have a recipe for trouble, no?

      I don't think training people for war, putting them through a war, and when it's over, just dropping them off at the curb is a good idea. Help provide skill sets/education and jobs if they want/need them, so they aren't left with a bleak future. Homeless veterans, shouldn't that be a concept that disturbs us?

      --
      Take the Red Pill.
    8. Re:As if the truth about all that isn't just as... by djlowe · · Score: 0

      Did I mention forced labor?

      So, do you honestly think that all of those military veterans are going to say "Hey, yeah, let's build roads after spending 10 years fighting!" How else would you get them to do so? Many of them have highly advanced technical skills, after all, even though they're "only in the military", and those skills are valuable, far more valuable than building roads, no matter what you think.

      You're a hysterical fucking retard, do yourself a favor and STFU.

      Gosh, that hurts! I should probably just skulk away, now that you've pwned me! Please, don't say bad things about my Mom!

      Regards,

      dj

    9. Re:As if the truth about all that isn't just as... by lexsird · · Score: 1

      But it can be done, just because it's not easy, doesn't mean we don't try. If we can't honor our vets, what the fuck kind of assholes have we become? Honor doesn't just mean having a little parade and wave flags at them. Right? Or did I miss a memo?

      Here's a tough problem. We have a shitty economy, and we have these vets coming home to a job market that is brutal, on the ropes. Imagine being National Guard members, holy fuck! Are we going to be able to recruit for it ever again after this? Anyway, I am just spit-balling, looking for a solution to stick to the wall. Why am I offering them? I fucking suck at solutions, ask my fans. We pay people good money to be smart and work things out and all they seem to do is fight like monsters.

      To tangent back onto the meat and potatoes of the thread; I thought the big issue with this was the guy was posting to himself, like a personal log, and somehow this is showing up as reason to take this guy into custody. Meaning it would seem that "they" are farming data, key words especially, in our private stuff. Holy Orwellian Creepiness Batman! It's a "wtf?" moment and suddenly he's back out on the street. Did you see that? Was it just me? Was that a conspiracy thing?

      I think that in the obvious tail spin chasing the pretzel logic of him being back on the street if he's obviously that fucked up, has us overlooking that point? Unless I missed something....right? I'm sure I will be corrected..lol.

      --
      Take the Red Pill.
    10. Re:As if the truth about all that isn't just as... by lexsird · · Score: 1

      Just don't have a "Vietnam Flashback" on me in the supermarket, and we are golden.

      --
      Take the Red Pill.
    11. Re:As if the truth about all that isn't just as... by lexsird · · Score: 1

      I'm sure they would like to know there are jobs at home for them. I'm sure you can imagine though that combat infantry skill sets have a very hard niche to fill in the civilian market. If you don't think rebuilding infrastructure takes technical skills you are wrong. Think "smart roads", integration of our technologies into the system, innovation to marvel at. We don't just need strong backs and weak minds, but also our best and brightest minds. We could at least meet Google halfway in their efforts or something?

      Think of this, if a guy can work a job driving a tank around in a desert, then a switch over to heavy construction equipment operation and support isn't such a stretch. Do they want to do that? Who knows, but I'd like to think they have better options that just being dropped back into this shitty, job starved economy. It's not perfect, if you have better ideas, offer them up.

      --
      Take the Red Pill.
    12. Re:As if the truth about all that isn't just as... by djlowe · · Score: 1

      "Let's build it here, fuck them". I mean Afghanistan and Iraq. We build the living shit out of those countries, costing our tax payers fortunes that should have been spent here. They meaning Iraq and Afghanistan need to build something, pony up, be worthy of the sacrifices, don't just let it all fall to shit. Add to the sum of what has been done, that kind of thing.

      Nice attempt at revisionist history, but I'm not buying it, unless you're saying that you're so stupid that you didn't re-read your post to ensure that it was as you intended... I've read, re-read your original post, and it flows properly, and the overall message that results is quite clear.

      Regards,

      dj

    13. Re:As if the truth about all that isn't just as... by djlowe · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying get rid of the Internet either, Jesus! I'm saying people get worked up over cracked pot conspiracies. Couple that with PTSD or God knows what other kind of stress these vets have to deal with. Throw in some injuries, some pain, some medication, and you have a recipe for trouble, no?

      Not necessarily.

      You need to stop generalizing, stop extrapolating your opinions and beliefs upon others, and most importantly? Stop pretending that you have a clue about any of this, or that you've a right to chime in about things you don't, and cannot, ever understand.

      Basically, STFU.

      Seriously.

      Regards,

      dj

    14. Re:As if the truth about all that isn't just as... by lexsird · · Score: 1

      Meds; are you forgetting them?

      --
      Take the Red Pill.
    15. Re:As if the truth about all that isn't just as... by lexsird · · Score: 1

      I authored it, I'm the person who gets to define what the hell I mean. I was wondering why there is an orange icon by this guys name. I mouse over it and it reads "Freak". Fuck me, I should know better than to aggro this kind, right?

      --
      Take the Red Pill.
    16. Re:As if the truth about all that isn't just as... by s.petry · · Score: 2

      He claims that his military experience gave him access to the same classified information allegedly leaked by Bradley Manning to Wikileaks and now verified. He says none of us could possibly believe some of ths shit he witnessed over there, and the horrors reported by the media and even by Wikileaks are only the tip of the iceberg. He's not mentally ill, he has just seen too much blood and misery to process it all and return to living a "normal" life.

      Your last sentence is a complete contradiction. He's telling you what he saw, told you it was verified by a Wikileaks dump, and you believe it's all "his" mental problems and that there is no truth in any of the conspiracies?

      Look, I get that some are pretty far fetched.. but most of them also provide a whole lot of factual data. Example: Demand letters 1-3 factually show that Operation Fast and Furious had a primary goal of attacking the 2nd amendment and trying to get gun control laws passed.

      If people's guess at a motive is wrong, the facts being provided don't magically vanish. We should be looking to find out what the real motives are, and resolving issues that these facts do bring up. Such as why no criminal charges have been brought upon anyone involved in Fast and Furious. Perhaps these people are not as crazy as you think either.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    17. Re:As if the truth about all that isn't just as... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damned fine rebuttal, djlowe.

      Signed -- A U.S. Military Veteran (SSgt, U.S. Army, 1/7th Mechanized Infantry ~ 3ID, Bradley Fighting Vehicle ~ 1988 to 1994)

      P.S. -- To lexsird: Force me into anything, and I'll show you how the military trained me to force you into something right back. My brain is just fine, and I exited the military to start several companies and work for a venture capital firm helping many people to "build roads". For your information, our infrastructure is crumbing because of CIVILIAN government leadership caving to special interest, welfare/entitlement junkies, illegal aliens, and perhaps unions ~ i.e. ~ funds for infrastructure are grossly mismanaged and squandered. Our state and federal leadership is most of the problem. I assure you that our military can fix that problem, too.

    18. Re:As if the truth about all that isn't just as... by okcdan · · Score: 2

      And we are still sending/programming thousands of kids over there every month.

      I know you meant "they" and not "we" right? I support none of that shit. Let those fuckers put me on a watch list. They can watch me raise two middle fingers in their direction.

      --
      D.
    19. Re:As if the truth about all that isn't just as... by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1

      Another example of understanding from the master

      --
      The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
    20. Re:As if the truth about all that isn't just as... by lexsird · · Score: 1

      I know, I suck, I don't know or care, I just read the articles, comments and post something if it strikes me. I got to looking at that icon, and thought, did I mark this guy this way? I never pay attention to names. I could agree with my worse enemy or gut shoot my best friend in here and not know it. I just give a shit about the information, or the ideas presented. To me it's a realm of pure thought or lack thereof. Clicky things bring me down...lol. I hate mod points. I figured out how to deal with them. IGNORE THEM..mwaahahaha... fuck off with the moderation duty. I'm a prick about modding anyway, it's all about my whims.

      I like your sig.

      --
      Take the Red Pill.
  4. History polymath? by gazbo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A polymath in a specific subject?

    1. Re:History polymath? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thank you...

    2. Re:History polymath? by Baloroth · · Score: 2

      A person with a wide range of historical knowledge, as opposed to an expert in one field (like the American Civil War or ancient Greece). Strictly speaking, you be a polymath in a specific field if that field in turn has a large variety of largely separate sub-fields, although it is not generally used that way. The term makes sense, although it really doesn't seem relevant or required here at all.

      --
      "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
    3. Re:History polymath? by Penurious+Penguin · · Score: 1

      Maybe my writing could use some improvements, but so could some of the arguments around here. Since history covers myriad subjects, I expect it is a large enough realm of study to make room for a polymath. There are enough subjects in this world to prohibit even a polymath from being an expert in history. I have in fact, never read anything holding that all polymaths are necessarily outstanding history buffs. And I am certainly not making any claims for myself; I simply chose a less than perfect term to describe the difficulties of knowing everything that has passed.

      --
      Forward! -- Emperor Norton, 2012
    4. Re:History polymath? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1 - Proper use of the word 'myriad'

    5. Re:History polymath? by NemosomeN · · Score: 1

      I came here to say this. A history polymath is like someone who loves his wife so much that he's a polygamist to her.

      --
      I hate grammar Nazi's.
  5. polymaths are more than just smart by LulzAndOrder · · Score: 1

    polymaths are good at more than one thing. I don't think you can be a history polymath.

    1. Re:polymaths are more than just smart by NEDHead · · Score: 1

      Since history tends to be rewritten over time, one might be a 'revisions of history' polymath...?

    2. Re:polymaths are more than just smart by LulzAndOrder · · Score: 1

      that's called a historian :)

    3. Re:polymaths are more than just smart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod way up!

  6. Expect more stories like this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    More troops are coming home. A lot of them spent a lot of time overseas, and despite the intense media spin that says otherwise, we did some really messed up shit over there.

    We took bright-eyed young people raised in an age of hope and peace and dropped them in to the middle of a secratarian human rights mess and forced them to watch the destruction of countless families and lives first hand.. And often by actions of their own hands.

    Now that they're home we don't need them anymore, and we'll tell them to suck it up and deal with it. We're sorry you had to watch your buddies get blown up by a roadside bomb. We're sorry you had to watch some child bleed out and die in your arms. We just don't want to pay for the costs of treating your trauma.

    1. Re:Expect more stories like this. by Scarred+Intellect · · Score: 1

      We took bright-eyed young people raised in an age of hope and peace and dropped them in to the middle of a secratarian human rights mess and forced them to watch the destruction of countless families and lives first hand.. And often by actions of their own hands.

      No, we volunteered for it.

      And a lot of troops did spend time overseas, but most of them weren't in infantry, nor were they in combat. I'm not sure how this country fails so miserably at taking care of a few (A few in this case being a small fraction of a percentage of the entire population).

    2. Re:Expect more stories like this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Boo hoo I signed up to be GI Joe and murder brown people now I feel guilty.

      We need to teach those fuckers how to commit suicide and get their heavenly rewards.

      GOD BLESS ARE TROOPS

      I have a hard time believing we can teach all the brown people to commit suicide.

    3. Re:Expect more stories like this. by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 0

      Cry me a river, Anon Coward, the people knew what the game was when they signed up (and continue to sign up). They are volunteers and as such bare a large part of the responsibility for both their actions and the outcome / result of military service. I'm sorry if the reality isn't as glorified as you would like, but these people who have exercised their free-will, need to suck it up. Perhaps they should not reenlist when their 4 or 6 years is up? Funny, many re-up and keep going back for more.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    4. Re:Expect more stories like this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    5. Re:Expect more stories like this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go Fuck Yourself!!

    6. Re:Expect more stories like this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They "bare responsibility"?

      Heck, if people hold them responsible, I guess they might as well be naked.

    7. Re:Expect more stories like this. by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      Go Fuck Yourself!!

      Yes, indeed, my penis is just that long...

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    8. Re:Expect more stories like this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent up to 100.

  7. Forced medication by operagost · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Most Slashdotters are for mandatory vaccinations, so why would you ever be against forced medication? Clearly, these people are a danger to society.

    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    1. Re:Forced medication by DL117 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Because vaccinations that prevent deadly disease with almost no side effects are very different than psychoactive drugs.

    2. Re:Forced medication by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought the US has forced medication programs for certain depraved sexual deviants (chemical castration) and the likes?

    3. Re:Forced medication by RKThoadan · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's not remotely clear that "these people" are a danger to society. Some of them might be, and in that situation medication or incarceration are options, and if a person prefers incarceration to medication I'll respect their preference.

    4. Re:Forced medication by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly, these people are a danger to society.

      What people? What danger? Clearly, you have no idea what "clearly" means. If you mean the mentally ill, you are incorrect. The same percentage of the general population is violent, 1%.

    5. Re:Forced medication by MrLizard · · Score: 1

      Because there's no difference between protecting a child from the stupidity of their parents, when they are incapable of making the decision for themselves, and altering someone's mind because the government doesn't like what they're thinking, when they haven't committed a crime or been shown to be in the process of actively planning to commit a crime in the near future.

      (I have to wonder, though, if there's a way to contain the harm morons do to their children without forced vaccinations. I dislike forced anything, on principle, and the use of force to prevent harm to others should be the last resort. I'm thinking we start with a "No Vaccination" list, like a sex offender list. This at least informs parents, so they can keep their kids away from the children of morons. Businesses should not be forced to deny entrance to unvaccinated children, but they could be required to publicly post a policy stating if they do or do not. This would be especially applicable to restaurants, movie theaters, or any other business where large numbers of children congregate. Most non-moron parents will not patronize businesses that choose to allow unvaccinated children entrance, and the free market does the rest. Of course, this requires some kind of "proof of vaccination" card you can show, but that's relatively trivial. A final option is to require, as part of getting an exemption from vaccination, the purchase of insurance that will pay for the medical care of vaccinated children who nonetheless contract a disease they have been vaccinated against (vaccines aren't perfect, and the more unvaccinated kids are around, the better the odds of a germ slipping past the defenses). The actual mechanics of this will have to worked out based on the number of unvaccinated kids nearby, etc. I leave such matters to the bean counters.)

      Some may note this plan is harsh on the kids. Yes. There's this thing called "evolution". If a trait possessed by a parent causes their offspring to be less likely to survive to breeding age, or reduces their ability to breed even if they live, it will be slowly but surely edited from the gene pool. "Bad parenting" is one such trait. Even if the children of morons don't catch anything fatal, they will be psychologically harmed by a childhood of being shunned, and this will reduce their chances of proper socialization, mating, and reproducing. It's cruel, but the long-term effects inflict much greater cruelty on a much larger group of people. There is a right, I think, to raise your children as you see fit; there's no right to be protected from the social consequences of your decisions. It is very likely that the prospect of a child being marked and shunned will, oddly, be more likely to convince a parent to do the smart thing than any amount of scientific evidence, since it's obvious that parents who deny vaccination do not think rationally, but emotionally. Therefore, appeal to their emotions.

    6. Re:Forced medication by nickberry · · Score: 1

      Some people actually cannot take vaccinations, there is not a vaccination on this planet that does not make me ill, and my daughter ill. So guess what we're not vaccinated, we're still alive, and both of us survived chicken pox, mumps, and measles. This societal belief that a shot or a pill will fix the world is slowly going to turn around and bite everyone in the ass. And this persons Constitutional rights were not just violated, but trampled all over. Who cares if you believe in a conspiracy theory that Barney the purple dinosaur and friends were involved in the 9/11 tragedy. We have rights guaranteeing such idiocy.

    7. Re:Forced medication by roccomaglio · · Score: 1

      There is a database of adverse reactions at http://www.medalerts.org/. In 2011, there were 30591 adverse reactions reported. There were 312 deaths reported for the same time period. These reports are made by doctors only. I would not necessarily call that no side effects.

    8. Re:Forced medication by cpu6502 · · Score: 1, Interesting

      This is my body.
      That means I have the right to abort if I get pregnant.

      This is my body.
      That means I have the right to drink until I pass out.

      This is my body.
      This means I have the right to have sex with my girl or my best guy. Or even in a swingers party.

      This is my body.
      This means I have the right to choose where I work and trade my body's labor for money.

      This is my body.
      This means I have the right to be free, and not a serf (unpaid work).

      This is my body.
      This means I have the right to smoke. Or not.

      This is my body.
      This means I have the right to vaccinate. Or not.

      Democrats/liberals who can't understand this chain of statements Fail at basic rudimentary logic. They scream "My body, my vagina, my right!" over and over and then turn-round and try to dictate how I use MY body as if my body belongs to Them instead of me. (Forced purchase of hospital insurance; forced vaccinations; et cetera.) Logic fail. Inconsistent.

      This is why even though I agree with the Democrats on many issues, I refuse to join their party. I will remain libertarian since their party view is not perfect, but at least it's consistent. (Your body, your choice in ALL areas of life.)

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    9. Re:Forced medication by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      Most Slashdotters are for mandatory vaccinations, so why would you ever be against forced medication?

      I would be against forced vaccinations, if it was done on a daily basis and required forced indefinite daily detention to make it happen.

      In the case of Lindauer, the case was actually preposterous. If you really believed, as the government did, that the woman psychic was paranoid and had delusions of grandeur ever since the age of seven years old. And if you didn't know, as the government didn't seem to know, what exactly she did for Iraq -- except for getting paid by them. Then, moving the case forward was all just nonsense anyway.

      In any case, I am against forced medication, but not in all cases.

      Clearly, these people are a danger to society.

      It depends. Was Lindauer a danger to society? I don't know.

      What about this guy? I don't know either. It sounds to me like he was just mouthing off privately. If he had really taken action to prepare for their assassinations, then we would have heard something about it by now.

      Also, he was only privately threatening Generals, it's not like he was threatening to blow up school children, or go into a random movie theater and start shooting. And he may be a well-trained killer, but the Generals are well-trained killers and they're protected by well-trained killers as well, so those different scenarios are not exactly equivalent.

    10. Re:Forced medication by clarkkent09 · · Score: 1

      This is my body.
      This means I have the right to be free, and not a serf (unpaid work).

      I don't think anybody truly believes that as long as you accept things like safety net or free emergency care (which even most libertarians do), never mind all the other welfare programs that liberals can dream up. We all happily accept to work up to half of our working hours for the benefit of someone else.

      --
      Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
    11. Re:Forced medication by cpu6502 · · Score: 1

      >>> I'm thinking we start with a "No Vaccination" list, like a sex offender list.

      Yeah because the Sex Offender list has been oh-so-fair. There are people who have downloaded, for example, bestiality photos and served their 10 years in jail for the so-called "crime". Or they had sex as a teenager and served their 5 years for the "crime" of statutory rape. - Then they get out but because they are on the S.O. list they cannot rent an apartment. Or buy a house. Or even stay at a hotel.

      The sex offender list is like the old Scarlett Letter A, that makes a person "untouchable" and punishes them for the rest of their life. They never have an opportunity to become a rehabilitated functional member of society, but instead become homeless/poor and barely able to get by. It is a cruel system.

      Read more here: http://reason.com/archives/2011/08/19/a-false-remedy-for-sex-offende
       

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    12. Re:Forced medication by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then it is fortunate for DL117 that he said almost no side effects.

    13. Re:Forced medication by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm more sympathetic to libertarians than any other group, so I largely agree. But on the other hand...

      This is my body.
      This means I have the right not to be infected by communicable diseases that you carry.

      Forcing you to vaccinate is not good, to be sure. But allowing you to infect me? Definitely worse.

      And you can't really fall back on the "hold me responsible if I infect you" position common among libertarians, because there's no way of proving that it was you specifically that infected me.

      Mandatory vaccinations, at least for situations like kids going to public schools, are the least crappy solution we have yet come up with.

    14. Re:Forced medication by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's amazing to see someone who's being saved by herd immunity due to a medical condition try to erode that immunity and die due to fear of pills.

      There's no bottom to ignorance.

    15. Re:Forced medication by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A couple problems with your post.

      First, 15 or so years ago when I started high school, I was yanked out of class because they thought I was not up-to-date on my vaccinations. So unless things have changed in recent years, I'd say we already have something like a Not Vaccinated registry.

      Second, unlike the Sex Offender registry, there is a very simple method to get oneself off of a Not Vaccinated registry. Get fucking vaccinated. Within an hour of my being pulled from class that day, the school had my correct records (or at least had something good enough while they waited for the physical records to be delivered) and I was back in class.

    16. Re:Forced medication by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When your dumb ass refuses to be inoculated against communicable diseases, it unfortunately becomes MY problem.

    17. Re:Forced medication by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's this thing called nuance, and the capability of discernment and differentiation.

      I can be for mandatory vaccinations without being for all potential vaccinations. I can be concerned with some of the issues of medication in society without blindly believing that all cases of medicating somebody are wrong.

      Let's go back to a famous historical example, Mary Mallon.

      She was firmly convinced that she was being persecuted by health authorities. They had asked her to avoid cooking, to take steps to not infect others. She refused. No evidence would persuade or convince her. So in that case, I can understand her being held in isolation.

      Does that mean I couldn't possible think somebody else was being unfairly held? No, it doesn't.

      It's shocking, but I can recognize differences, even if I've not bothered to articulate them out in detail. It's like I'm not a literal robot or something.

      What to think in this case? I've not bothered to check the facts, but yes, I can believe a mentally disturbed person is a sufficient threat to others that action should be taken. I can also believe that some harmless nutter is just going around saying crazy stuff and doesn't merit any action except at their family's request.

      That's right, I can hold two notions at once and tell them apart.

    18. Re:Forced medication by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish one of you guys had replied not a/c (I know, pot meet kettle). I really, honestly, why they are a harm to us.

      If I inoculate against Germ X and he gets Germ X and goes full-blown ugly symptoms, etc, am I still not inoculated? Sure, if he goes to the ER uninsured, I will have to pay for it, but beyond that, how's it work?

      I'm not terribly medically knowledgeable, so please forgive my ignorance.

      One last thing: I am in favour of mandating some inoculations as there will always be some people that cannot (newborn infants can't right away, perhaps some people with egg allergies?), but as far as me, a typical 30-something male that is inoculated (against Germ X), what danger does he pose to me?

    19. Re:Forced medication by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herd_immunity

      Relevant passage:

      Since only a small fraction of the population (or herd) can be left unvaccinated for this method to be effective, it is considered best left for those who cannot safely receive vaccines because of a medical condition such as an immune disorder or for organ transplant recipients.

      In other words, only so many unvaccinated people can benefit from herd immunity, so everyone who can take a vaccine should.

    20. Re:Forced medication by AlamedaStone · · Score: 1

      the Generals are well-trained killers and they're protected by well-trained killers as well, so those different scenarios are not exactly equivalent.

      Is there an exception to the law that prohibits making threats as long as you're only threatening someone who has the ability to fight back? Fascinating.

      --
      "All these years believing you're the signified monkey, only to find out you're just a big hunk of nobody cares."
    21. Re:Forced medication by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Smoking in a public space and spreading a contagious disease in a public space because you haven't been vaccinated is certainly my problem if I also use that space.

    22. Re:Forced medication by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      I guess you never heard about how we successfully eradicated smallpox worldwide with vaccination. We haven't eradicated more diseases because of idiots like you.

    23. Re:Forced medication by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you can't really fall back on the "hold me responsible if I infect you" position common among libertarians, because there's no way of proving that it was you specifically that infected me.

      Sure I can! Just because it's difficult to prove doesn't mean you get to punish everyone! That's as ridiculous as saying that we should arrest random people if we can't find the real criminal.

    24. Re:Forced medication by sjames · · Score: 1

      While vaccines do seem to actually prevent disease in a significant portion of vaccinated people, so-called anti-psychotics are never curative. At best they can take the edge off of SOME of the symptoms of mental illness. 100% of users suffer at least some of the side effects and the number affected by the most severe and irreversible effects approaches 100% with prolonged use. There is even the suggestion that anti-psychotic use prolongs the duration of the illness.

      So the vaccine provides a much better benefit/risk ratio.

    25. Re:Forced medication by sjames · · Score: 1

      We accept that because we feel that there is real benefit to having that social insurance and to others also having it (and so not becoming desperate enough to resort to crime). That is not nothing to us, so the work (money) we devote to it is not unpaid.

    26. Re:Forced medication by nickberry · · Score: 1

      Wtf I'm an idiot because so called medicines have repeatedly almost killed me?and have hospitalized my child?

    27. Re:Forced medication by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Unless you explain your situation properly I will continue to think you just are misinformed and did not understand the problem at hand. While there are cases of a bad vaccine batch where the weakened specimen was too active or the vaccine was contaminated somehow they are statistically irrelevant and people are overall better off than not getting vaccinated where you would get the disease at full strength.

    28. Re:Forced medication by nickberry · · Score: 1

      Misinformed? You can think what you want, but when I was a child and they gave me the MMR vaccine I was hospitalized, and in the ICU, this was repeated three times with other vaccines because some idiot doctor in the Air Force insisted I was faking it. My child had the same reaction after her MMR vaccine, so there is no misinformed, no ignorance on my part. Not everyone can take vaccines, and to call me an idiot is ignorant and quite honestly just being a dick. I don't oppose vaccines, but I can't take them.

    29. Re:Forced medication by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Then you can't get sick either or you will end up in the ICU as well. I thought the Air Force didn't allow immunocompromised people in their ranks. A vaccine is merely a weaker form of the disease in question that is used to train your immune system to spot the genetic code of the actual disease without prior exposure to it.

    30. Re:Forced medication by operagost · · Score: 1

      Why don't you just stop beating around the bush, and propose that he and his family be terminated to eliminate the weak bloodline?

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  8. That's "Former Marine" please by SensitiveMale · · Score: 5, Informative

    not ex-Marine

    1. Re:That's "Former Marine" please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      ex means former

    2. Re:That's "Former Marine" please by j00r0m4nc3r · · Score: 1, Redundant

      once a marine, always a marine

    3. Re:That's "Former Marine" please by dywolf · · Score: 3, Informative

      Ex- means "no longer". You are only "no longer a Marine" if formally stripped of the title, and there's even debate about that.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    4. Re:That's "Former Marine" please by cultiv8 · · Score: 1

      Mod up, he was a decorated marine and was not dishonorably discharged.

      --
      sysadmins and parents of newborns get the same amount of sleep.
    5. Re:That's "Former Marine" please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ex- means "no longer". You are only "no longer a Marine" if formally stripped of the title, and there's even debate about that.

      Former is not suitable either then.

    6. Re:That's "Former Marine" please by JeffAtl · · Score: 1

      The military tends to have very specific meanings assigned to synonyms and they can vary by branch.. Terms like ship/boat, soldier/marine, engine/motor, gun/firearm, ex/former, etc all have very specific meanings in the military that may conflict with civilian usage.

    7. Re:That's "Former Marine" please by rhizome · · Score: 1

      The military establishment seeks to control the behavior of civilians by telling them what words they can use to describe different kinds of soldiers. "Ex-Marine" has a specific negative connotation to insiders, kind of like the word "hipster" does to Skrillex fans. The military subculture tells them, "once a Marine, always a Marine," so you have to have done something terrible to have your Marine-ness taken away.

      --
      When I was a kid, we only had one Darth.
    8. Re:That's "Former Marine" please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The military tends to have very specific meanings assigned to synonyms and they can vary by branch

      Okay, but at some point most of them have to assimilate back into civilian society where they'll have to cope with people speaking English. They do all sorts of stuff in the military that the rest of us aren't going to imitate.

    9. Re:That's "Former Marine" please by mcgrew · · Score: 3, Insightful

      When I worked at Disney, a fellow I worked with was a retired police officer. He referred to himself as an "ex-cop". A musician I met once named Dwayne Mahoney also referred to himself as an "ex-cop", he had resigned his police job in New York to seek fame in California (he did later).

      "Ex" simply refers to "used to be". As in "I used to be married to my ex-wife".

      A little checking finds no dictionary definition (except the urban dictionary, which isn't a real dictionar in my eyes), ask.com says "No such thing. Once a Marine, always a Marine."

      The US marine birthplace memorial web site says

      Once a Marine, Always a Marine: This truism was adopted as the official motto of the Marine Corps League. The origin of the statement is credited to a gung-ho Marine Corps Master Sergeant, Paul Woyshner. During a barroom argument he shouted, "Once a Marine, always a Marine!" MSgt. Woyshner was right. Once the title "U.S. Marine" has been earned, it is retained. There are no ex-Marines or former-Marines. There are (1) active duty Marines, (2) retired Marines, (3) reserve Marines, and (4) Marine veterans. Nonetheless, once one has earned the title, he remains a Marine for life.

      So one doesn't have to be fired from the police force to be an ex-cop, you can split peacefully from your ex-wife (it happens sometimes), but you can't be an ex-marine.

      Did the X-Men all get sex change operations?

  9. Subby summary is word salad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Subby summary is word salad.

  10. A Useful fact for you by RobertLTux · · Score: 2, Informative

    Semper Fidelis would be Latin for Always Faithful.
    As this is the Marine Corps Motto if you say this in say a tavern you will most likely hear Ho-Ah! from a number of folks (marines tend to run in groups).

    Also if you forget a marines birthday then you can always use November 10 as a "fallback" since that is the Marine Birthday (bonus note do not "crash' those parties since multiple folks WILL BE ARMED).

    --
    Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
    1. Re:A Useful fact for you by Enderandrew · · Score: 4, Informative

      Mostly correct.

      The Army says Ho-Ah. The Marine Corps says Ooh-Rah.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    2. Re:A Useful fact for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The Army says Ho-Ah. The Marine Corps says Ooh-Rah.

      With a straight face?

    3. Re:A Useful fact for you by Sparticus789 · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, with a "I come in peace. I didn’t bring artillery. But I’m pleading with you, with tears in my eyes: If you fuck with me, I’ll kill you all" face.

      -General Mattis

      --
      sudo make me a sandwich
    4. Re:A Useful fact for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      The Army says Ho-Ah. The Marine Corps says Ooh-Rah.

      With a straight face?

      No, with your war face.

    5. Re:A Useful fact for you by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      Yes.

      I'me not a Marine, but I know quite a few, many fighter pilots (that's just not fair, BTW, to be Marine AND a fighter pilot, but FTW anyways), and they would indeed shout 'Ooh-Rah' when appropriate. It is best to shout the same cry, satisfies the military requirement for order and discipline, and may ocasionally expose an imposter.

      But, if you are not a Marine, it is understandable that you would think as you do, unless you paid a little attention and asked about such things. If you're not a total dork, they wil tell you. Sometimes even if you are.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    6. Re:A Useful fact for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I always thought the Marines said, "Well... hello, Sailor!"

    7. Re:A Useful fact for you by quackPOT · · Score: 1

      And the Navy says Hoo-yah

    8. Re:A Useful fact for you by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      Or perhaps it's just plain ho.

    9. Re:A Useful fact for you by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Marines have no other type of face.

    10. Re:A Useful fact for you by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      bonus note do not "crash' those parties since multiple folks WILL BE ARMED).

      Does it matter?! Those S.o.B.'s could separate my head and limbs from my torso with both arms tied behind their backs, using nothing more than a toothbrush clenched between their teeth...

  11. You want crazy? by Vinegar+Joe · · Score: 1

    General Sara Suten Seti will give you crazy!

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OgTHureu12Q

    --
    "The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old......They literally know nothing." - Ben Rhodes
    1. Re:You want crazy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But I like SETI....

    2. Re:You want crazy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      General Sara Suten Seti will give you crazy!

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OgTHureu12Q

      Thanks a lot, Joe. I can't get that time back now. :(

  12. How many stories? by cultiv8 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The June 2010 issue of the Archives of General Psychiatry published a study of 18,300 Army soldiers screened at 3 and 12 month intervals following deployment in Iraq. The study found that using “the least stringent definition” for PTSD, rates now range between 20 and 30 percent, and depression rates are at 11.5 and 16 percent.[2] Together this accounts for almost a third of our troops now suffering serious functional mental impairment. source

    --
    sysadmins and parents of newborns get the same amount of sleep.
    1. Re:How many stories? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      The depression rate seems to be lower than the national average.

      http://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/publications/the-numbers-count-mental-disorders-in-america/index.shtml

      Mood Disorders
      Mood disorders include major depressive disorder, dysthymic disorder, and bipolar disorder.
      Approximately 20.9 million American adults, or about 9.5 percent of the U.S. population age 18 and older in a given year, have a mood disorder.1,2
      The median age of onset for mood disorders is 30 years.5
      Depressive disorders often co-occur with anxiety disorders and substance abuse.5
      Major Depressive Disorder
      Major Depressive Disorder is the leading cause of disability in the U.S. for ages 15-44.3
      Major depressive disorder affects approximately 14.8 million American adults, or about 6.7 percent of the U.S. population age 18 and older in a given year.1, 2
      While major depressive disorder can develop at any age, the median age at onset is 32.5
      Major depressive disorder is more prevalent in women than in men.6

    2. Re:How many stories? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you did argue that, you'd be lying.

  13. Kafka by arth1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    He should have an offer of the very best help possible, paid for by the same people who paid for him being a marine.

    I'm not so sure that he should be forced into treatment until and unless he causes harm, not just talk. That opens up for Kafkanesque abuse.

    1. Re:Kafka by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So if he keeps posting about rebellion and taking axes to people and we know he's mentally unbalanced we should do nothing until he actually kills or maims somebody?

    2. Re:Kafka by tqk · · Score: 1

      He should have an offer of the very best help possible, paid for by the same people who paid for him being a marine.

      Finally, the voice of reason. The amateur psychiatrists in here have been driving me crazy. BTW, where the hell is the Marine
      Corp and his Marine buddies in this?

      One account I read (BoingBoing?) said he was considering re-enlisting. Maybe that's his support group and once back in, he'd be straight and they'd keep him straight. Or, "Dude, you got PTSD bad and need to powwow with the VA ASAP. Hoo-rah!"

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
  14. High school journalism, again by Gothmolly · · Score: 1

    "Personally, I find myself wondering..."

    What the heck, Slashdot? I can understand people submitting sensational posts, but you can EDIT them if you want to.

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    1. Re:High school journalism, again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No usually they just strip off the name put theirs on it and slap a smidge of formatting on it.

    2. Re:High school journalism, again by Penurious+Penguin · · Score: 1

      If looked at through a high school mentality, I imagine you have a point. But I never went to either highschool or middle school -- although I do have a couple university years behind me and I still keep trying.

      Your comment irritates me for several reasons. I'll try to explain:
      As an examination of current government criteria befitting the terms "terrorism" and "extremism" will show (feel free to follow some of the links in the article), a growing and arguably dubious array of views are steadily being appended to them. Chomsky, who happens to be generally opposed to war -- at least the "for profit" variety presently popular -- by the the very rhetoric of the departments, bureaus and agencies redefining these terms, at best lingers on the edge. According to my readings of his work, and citing the government itself, he indeed falls into the category of "Conspiracy Theorist".
      See: [Economic section.]
      I struggle to imagine Noam getting along and agreeing with such government sponsored agencies as Haliburton, BlackWater (Academi) or Serco. I also struggle to imagine Noam going along with the military's pretense for wars like Iraq, which have brought about thousands upon thousands of civilian casualties. If I am correct, this would effectively make him "anti-war" in the eyes of an incorrigible administration.

      So when I suggest someone like Noam Chomsky when speaking too freely might be perceived as a threat, I say so only in accordance with official theory.

      Perhaps somewhere along the roads of our writing careers we might meet and you can impart more elaborate lessons in journalism. Until then, thanks for what you've given so far.

      --
      Forward! -- Emperor Norton, 2012
  15. Sounds Familiar by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1

    "...a civil war, the Revolution is coming."

    This is exactly what Texas Republican Tom Head said recently, though with the added twist of UN troops invading Lobbock. Will he be picked up as well?

    1. Re:Sounds Familiar by tbannist · · Score: 2

      No, he's too rich to be crazy, he's therefore "just" eccentric.

      --
      Fanatically anti-fanatical
  16. Semper Fidelis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most marines are a six pack of bud lite away from bum loving their fellow devil dogs.
    Fact

  17. Also targeting "black clothing, paint, sticks, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    flags, computers and cell phones, and "anti-government or anarchist literature."

    That is, if you're with the occupy movement.

    Political Convictions?
    Federal Prosecutors in Seattle Are Dragging Activists into Grand Juries, Citing Their Social Circles and Anarchist Reading Materials
    http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/political-convictions/Content?oid=14397498

  18. Soviet style shrink-ology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This certainly sounds like the Soviet's 1984 approach:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_abuse_of_psychiatry_in_the_Soviet_Union

  19. "We" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I take issue with your use of "we" to describe the actions and decisions of those in power. By the simple laws of human nature, I refuse to take responsibility for the actions of anybody but myself. At the same time, I take absolute responsibility for my own actions -- as government should as well. Don't give them the benefit of the doubt. I was coerced into funding these actions, rather than persuaded. I did NOT voluntarily choose for myself to fund government, and therefore, I bear absolutely no responsiblity for what government does with the money they take from me.

    Before you say "social contract", I will casually point out that coercion and voluntary association are polar opposites. A man cannot volunteer to be subject to coercion (as the age-old theory goes), any more than he can coerce another man into volunteering. The two modes of human interaction are mutually exclusive -- that is, in fact, what gives them meaning.

    1. Re:"We" by gtbritishskull · · Score: 1

      Nope... that is not enough. If you were out protesting the war, then you might deserve a pass on responsibility. But, the fact is that a little under 50% of the people in this country voted for Bush. As you point out, you funded the war by paying taxes. If you don't want to be responsible for the actions of our government, then you should give up citizenship and leave the country. As much as Republicans might want to believe to the contrary, you cannot blame "government" for anything. Government exists because the people support it (that whole "social contract" thing). If government does wrong, then the people are to blame for either voting for the people who did it, or for being too apathetic and letting other people vote in the people who did it.

    2. Re:"We" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Responsibility is void where coercion is present. That is the only point I am willing to debate with you.

  20. Forced medication is routine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Forced medication is, for better or (my belief) for worse, routinely used on just about everyone, not just on this person. Once you're committed - an act for which the due process is only several weeks after-the-fact - you have no right to refuse medication. Total myth that you ever did.

  21. How about "Current American"...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Does anyone care that his Facebook profile was supposedly set to "private"?
    Why is this not news while we are distracted by evaluations of his sanity?

  22. Welcoome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Welcome to Obama's America. Enjoy your stay.

  23. Forced medication happens in the armed services by snaildarter · · Score: 1

    .... more than one might think. A relative in the Army was threatened off the books with hell to pay if he didn't take Larium. He protested personally to his boss because of the psychological issues Larium can cause (I'm sorry I don't know military ranks) but found no sympathetic ears. So he decided to give in and make no formal complaint. After taking Larium regularly for a year or two, he was in the Middle East working on a vehicle and had a massive seizure. He also then discovered that the Larium had reacted with a particular genetic condition to make him permanently sterile. So now he can't have kids, although he wants them badly, and has had migraines and balance problems since. He is a very honorable person, and since he was a career guy, he never sued, even though his genetic condition was on file, and there was obvious medical malpractice. He was close to retirement when it happened, and he just wanted to get out as smoothly as possible.

    --
    Japanese scientist: Technically, sir, tomatoes are fags. Military scientist: He means fruits.
  24. WTF Summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For history polymaths, government proposals of forced medication may not be a surprise; you may remember the case of Susan Lindauer.

    I saw nothing about forced meditation in that case. The closest I saw was that the government wanted her to take anti-psychotic medication. Given that she thinks that she has psychic powers, that doesn't sound all that unreasonable.

    1. Re:WTF Summary by Penurious+Penguin · · Score: 1

      If it was not proposed, please explain why the Judge would have ruled against it? Or the document revisited maybe:
      .... that involuntary administration of such drugs is necessary to advance the government's interests because less drastic measures will not suffice, and that administration of such drugs is in defendant's best medical interest in light of her over-all medical condition.

      --
      Forward! -- Emperor Norton, 2012
    2. Re:WTF Summary by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Great she says she has psychic powers so let's give her the modern equivalent of a lobotomy. Then she turns into a walking vegetable. Much more useful for society.

  25. Think twice before calling anyone crazy. by occam · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sick or not, intellectually he's spot on. Reread his concerns about US and war and taxes.

    Then pretend you're a large scale fraudster with control over (literally) trillions of dollars, and key control points peppered throughout US government. Then consider how YOU would design and run a large scale fraud (Commons Fraud). Then consider how YOU would use your government control points to fleece unwitting tax payers out of billions and trillions of dollars per year.

    Perhaps you see Brandon Raub's concerns. If not, you're an example of when, why, and how democracy fails. In theory, every patriotic citizen should be deathly concerned that democracy has been turned on its head to use as a vehicle for overwhelming fraud.

    Brandon Raub is concerned, but you're not. Really? Who's nuts?

    Also kudos to Brandon Raub for his psychological fortitude. Soldiers, military families, and military friends are all very susceptible to the state of denial about war corruption because they are likely to have lost close ones to such crime. That's a heavy and for some insurmountable emotional and psychological burden to overcome with intellect. Since these frauds typically involve going to war unnecessarily, Brandon Raub has already transcended the typical emotional, patriotic, psychological trap of war veteran victims (and their families and friends).

    Ditto the war veteran actors and consultants on movies like "The Green Zone" [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Green_Zone_(film)].

    Casualties to fraudster wars are horribly tragic victims of terribly predatory faceless fraud run abusing overwhelming government power. So, the fact that a military veteran (Brandon) has transcended this psychological trap speaks to his intellectual stamina. Is he crazy? His friends don't think so. Even the ones who are military veterans, but you do?

    About 911, Raub points out that a building fell down all on its own. Until you (or someone) could explain that glaring incongruity definitively, don't say he's nuts for calling 911 an inside job. 911 adds up far more likely as an inside job courtesy a US intelligence agent (Osama bin Laden as anti-Russian agent repurposed as scape goat). Recall 911 launched several meaningless and misguided wars with HUGE impact on USA debt --- a basic money laundering / extortion / embezzlement scheme from American taxpayer wallets to stracketeer bank accounts. That's all Brandon Raub is pointing out... and he's not alone.

    So, next time you hear that the 911 wars were a farce, and that 911 was more than likely an inside job, think twice.
    When you recall that the Bush family is at the heart of several election rigging schemes, think twice.
    When you consider that BushLeague family and associates installed Supreme Court Justices who are central to the most ludicrous SCOTUS opinions in the nation's history (including GWBush reelection as President), think twice.
    When you consider GWBush started a war (in retrospect) on total pretense (e.g., see movie "The Green Zone" with Matt Damon for docufiction of what must have happened regarding WMD (Weapons of Mass Destruction farce) on the ground in Iraq), think twice.
    And in case you didn't know that the Bush family has been linked to the similar behavior and motive for WWII (financing Nazi Germany war machine), i.e., across multiple generations, think twice.

    Once you consider all that, it makes perfect sense that the Bush family would have an out of country (somewhere in South America) family compound for when all the proverbial shit hits the fan. Because when you put 2+2 together, some superficially crazy shit starts to make perfect sense. Which is probably why Brandon Raub says we're headed for a revolution.

    You see, when democracy (or any government) breaks down --- a growing number of citizens realize their government is a vehicle for fraud and there's NOTHING we can do about it --- it's just a matter of time until a critical mass of knowledge spreads and ignites. History repeats itself, and our "democracy

  26. Obligatory? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The USA is so enormous, and so numerous are its schools, colleges and religious seminaries, many devoted to special religious beliefs ranging from the unorthodox to the dotty, that we can hardly wonder at its yielding a more bounteous harvest of gobbledegook than the rest of the world put together. -- Sir Peter Medawar

  27. Stupidiosity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Bush said an incredible amount of Really Stupid Things. I find it hard to believe anybody still believes he's anything but a drooling chimp.

    I'm not dumb enough to start defending Bush's intelligence, but let me tell you something: there are lots of different ways to be dumb. Some people think I am some kind of raging genius (as if), not realizing how they routinely take certain skills & knowledge for granted which totally flummox me. But yeah: vice versa, too: I can do things they literally aren't able to imagine.

    That is, I'm both dumb and smart. Or to put another way...

    I am dumb enough to start defending components of Bush's intelligence. As weird as it is, that guy knew how to do whatever it is that it takes, to get elected president. And even weirder, he got re-elected .. after wasting shitloads of tax money on a totally useless war (which everyone knew in advance would be useless) .. and he was re-elected by supposedly conservative party! That's not "intelligence" as most of us here on /. define it, and yet if I ask you how to do it, I think you'd probably come up with a total blank.

    I have talked to seemingly-rational people, who it turns out practice religion.

    I have talked to people who are smart enough to perform eye surgery, and dumb enough to smoke cigarettes. And others who are smart enough to not smoke, but dumb enough to buy Apple phones.

    There is no one-dimensional continuum of stupidity; it's multi-dimensional and complex. There is almost nothing that I would just blanket assume GWB is too dumb for.

    OTOH, GWB really is too dumb for what is being discussed. So bad example but my point is .. oh, never mind.

    1. Re:Stupidiosity by sonamchauhan · · Score: 1

      True.

      Your note does apply to you, but not the way you think: defending (components of) Bush's intellect isn't dumb, it's rational (as you pointed out.) But you are smart enough to write all this but disbelieve that God created us.

      Ignoring (say), the identical size (to us) of the sun and the moon -- two sources of ligh,t for the day and the night (according to the Bible.)

  28. Lawyer of the marine on Alex Jones show. by Leafwiz · · Score: 3, Informative

    Lawyer from The Rutherford Institute talks about the case on Alex Jones Show.

    Psychiatrist Threatens & Terrorizes Marine Over 9/11 Facebook Posts
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L8XuQWsXsZo&feature=g-all-u

    Talks about that Civil liberties in the US is getting attacked, and that Veterans are getting targeted by government harassment.

    "The Rutherford Institute is a non-profit organization based in Charlottesville, Virginia dedicated to the defense of civil liberties and human rights. The organization was founded by its current president, John W. Whitehead, in 1982.[1] The Rutherford Institute offers free legal services to those who have had their rights threatened or violated. The Rutherford Institute has a network of affiliate attorneys across the United States and funds its efforts through donations. In addition to its offer of legal services, the organization offers free educational materials for those interested in the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights. "

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rutherford_Institute

  29. I dunno... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd kind of enjoy seeing Noam Chomsky forcibly medicated.

    1. Re:I dunno... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dunno. He seems to be heavy on something every time I see him talk. Perhaps it is the sedated way he talks or just the weird shit that he actually says.

  30. there's no such thing as an "Ex-Marine" by inerlogic · · Score: 1

    once a Marine always a Marine....

    that's why i went Army..... it's nice to retire...

  31. Join the Military and be all that you can be... by 3seas · · Score: 1

    Oh what a deal .... your Constitutional Rights exchanged for Post Traumatic Stress Disorder and perhaps with a bonus of dismemberment and the win of death.
    Oh what a deal... you get to go kill others who did nothing wrong and you won't even have to know their names.
    Oh what a deal.. And if you make it back you might even be able to stand at a street corner begging for food, if you can stand.
    Oh what a deal... Now they have added the benefit of removing your ability to speak... so use a sign until they remove your right to write.
    Oh what a deal... There is nothing like being a dumb pawn of those playing the war game with the courage of being out of range.

    OH what a DEAL...

  32. 9/11 and conspiracy ..... by sgt_doom · · Score: 1

    ...***On 9/11: any American who still doesn’t grasp the obvious connection between the Pentagon’s comptroller announcing the results of a DoD audit on 9/10/01, stating that $2.3 trillion was unaccounted for, and the very next morning Flight 77 crashing dead center into the Pentagon’s west wall, killing most of that auditing team and severely injuring the rest (DIA’s Financial Management staff), is a complete and total idiot! (So I'm not sure this is a valid point in favor of that unconsistutional arrest and psychiatric internment by the FBI and Secret Service, on this fellow or all the many others over the previous five decades.)

    1. Re:9/11 and conspiracy ..... by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Sorry, that doesn't fly. Lost money is business as usual dating back to at least the 1980s and the Iran/Contra mess, and the amount that vanished that was supposed to be spent on Iraq in the last decade is staggering. Also an aircraft hitting any side of the pentagon is going to hit somebody doing something that the government of the day would like to have kept secret.

    2. Re:9/11 and conspiracy ..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The public record --- especially the news reports of 9/10 and 9/11 prove you completely wrong douchey, you ever, ever consider reading the news, sonny, or one day learning how to locate your vagina?

      sgt_doom

    3. Re:9/11 and conspiracy ..... by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Oh, by public record you mean the hints a cocaine addled former DJ drops on Fox because he knows that even he cannot get away from stating such ridiculous lies that make fun of the dead outright? Also WTF is it with this locate vagina shit? Are you so insecure in your manhood and have such limited contact with women that you think that is an insult? To me it just screams "wtf is this little virgin going on about?". The "sonny" bit is even more hilarious on the net to a guy that was working as an engineer before the first web page was written, the comment about the 1980s should have been a bit of a clue to you there. Anyway, what would a real member of the military think of you "sgt_doom"? Do you think you'd measure up in any way at all, let alone get promoted that far?
      Sorry, but you're doing nothing now but painting yourself as a ridiculous clown that is out of touch with reality and hates women. I don't know if you are a virgin, a woman hating gay or just a twisted freak, but your attempts at an insult based on saying I'm acting like a woman only really indicate some pathetic weakness in yourself if you'd be insulted by that yourself.

  33. Wasn't he playing a game? by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    He's mentally ill, and really does need help (even if you can't force it). The guy seriously believes that George W. Bush is living in a secret castle in Colorado where he rapes and sacrifices children.

    Does he? Really?

    I've seen at least one report claiming the postings were taken out of context from where he was playing a(n Illuminati-themed) game on Facebook. (I'd love to see more info on this.) Is everybody who plays such a game, or had a hand in writing one, or who writes or quotes song lyrics or satirical books, now to be considered dangerously nuts?

    Of course if you put him in a loony bin and medicate him enough he'll believe it eventually. Probably very soon: It's hard NOT to believe they're after you when they ARE after you. B-b

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  34. Is he, or are you? by s.petry · · Score: 1

    Hand on a second here: You have over 20,000 Architects and Engineers that have been requesting the US re-open the 9/11 files because what they provided as answers are not possible in physics. Those people are just crazy and insane? The Government ignores them, media ignores them, and most people don't know that they are even asking. This is not to pass blame, but to find out what really happened since what the Government stated is impossible based on facts and they want to architect buildings to avoid similar failures. Other questions regarding how Building 7 crumbled makes no sense? The fact that no plane debris was found at the Pentagon crash makes no sense? Look, if the Government has a super weapon that melted the plane a split second before impact, most people would accept that answer instead of the silence given currently.

    We have a Government that has lied rather chronically for a very long time about a multitude of issues. Fast and Furious is the easiest target, but also we have the FBI that was found to be creating false terrorist plots and reporting them to be real. That's really just the tip of the iceberg (I'll preempt your citation requests and ask you to use Google, at least for now nothing is hidden.)

    We have the DHS purchasing over a billion rounds of ammo 2 weeks ago, and none of it's target ammo. When people started asking why, they pulled the orders and redacted the quantities (which is illegal).

    We have a Government that is openly funding a rebellion in Syria, and has been extremely tight lipped about the Governments roles in the various colored revolutions in the middle east, even amid numerous reports that the CIA and other Government agencies were funding and training militants responsible for starting the revolutions.

    So a guy looking at all the various information starts to come to conclusions on motives and that makes him a loony person?

    People not asking questions at this point in time in my opinion are the loony ones. People ignoring illegal acts by the Government are loony in my opinion, and people rallying for continuation of these illegal activities are the loony ones. Those not asking why the Government is asking for people to be classified as psychopaths by tweets and Facebook posts are loony. A Government asking that DNA be used to determine preemptive criminal activities should scare the piss out of you!

    If there are no answers to critical questions, it's very normal to draw parallels and conclusions from all of the various activities. And if you don't know about the various activities you are ignorant and should quickly educate yourself. If what he assigns as a motive is incorrect, does that make all of these things not exist? Sorry, that is not a logical conclusion.

    Oh, and have you seen the creepy Denver International Airport in Colorado? People are upset, have asked for who requested the bizarre and sickening art work, asked who the "New World Airport Commission" is that is credited with the design, etc.. etc.. and the government refuses to answer questions. The satanic nature of the airport is blatantly obvious. Go look at it!

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    1. Re:Is he, or are you? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      The fact that no plane debris was found at the Pentagon crash makes no sense

      Were you watching cartoons or something that day? The burning building full of aircraft debris was shown live on television.

    2. Re:Is he, or are you? by s.petry · · Score: 1

      At the Pentagon? Sorry, no.. there was a few scraps of aluminum in the yard. Hell while the fire was going they had about 50 guys in suits and ties sweeping the yard in a line looking for small objects, there was no 757 debris. There were no seats, no luggage, no engines, no massive wheels, no bodies, no clothing, nothing that resembles every other passenger plane crash in history. The Penn. crash has the same exact issues. There was a smoking crater (which showed on satellite data years prior) and some small parts, but nothing like a passenger jet liner crash. Again, look at every other passenger plane crash in history and compare.

      The 11 frames of footage finally released after people were asking questions regarding plane debris did not help either. There is no image of a 757 anywhere to be seen. It's a very small white object releasing white smoke, and has caused more people to ask questions than the released footage helps.

      Look, it's easy to let your emotions over take your logic. Check every single image of the Pentagon crash you can find. There was no plane debris. The hole in front of the Pentagon where the impact happened is about 1/2 the diameter of a 757, and there are no wing imprints. The exit hole has office debris, but again no plane debris. There is 1 image of an engine rotor, however the rotor is way to small to be that of a 757's engine. Last I checked, a 757 has 4 engines also, and not 1.

      Interestingly, I work with a guy who lived in New Jersey and had a friend that witnessed what crashed in to the Pentagon. He described it as looking like a small private jet but flying much faster than it should be flying. The guy died 2 years later from Legionnaires disease. This was about the time more people were over the emotional aspects of the events and started asking harder questions.

      As mentioned, people want to know what happened and not receive silence or bullshit answers. People like you that deny the actual evidence don't help with either side. Don't take my word for anything, go look for yourself. There are plenty of images available through Google Search. Again, compare these passenger crashes to every other passenger crash in history.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    3. Re:Is he, or are you? by dbIII · · Score: 1
      I'm really quite astonished that you remember things so differently, and no, I don't have to go back since I saw those things you imagine were not there on live TV.
      Here's something that disturbed me in your earlier post:

      because what they provided as answers are not possible in physics

      It is very much possible. With respect, I suggest you get a real architect or a real engineer to explain it to you. The IEEE spectrum website had a very good article on why the towers fell and it's probably still on the net. With faked moon landing level conspiracy crap like you've posted with your sig you are giving real engineers a very bad name.

    4. Re:Is he, or are you? by s.petry · · Score: 1

      You are in the pit of having your emotions played to. On TV, there was very little footage of the Pentagon or Penn crash. What you remember is the NYC buildings. This is why I emphasized going and looking at images. What you would remember from TV is emotionally biased, and probably not the truth. This is a normal psychological issue, it's how your brain copes. Don't take my word for it, go look at images. If you refuse, I'll assume you are just instigating propaganda and nothing more. If you don't understand how the mind deals with trauma, I'm sure a book or a friend in psychology can help you with information.

      What I stated regarding physics is exactly true. The requirements for the Government models do not match what happened given all of the information we have on the crash. Thousands of computer simulations have been run, and the results don't even come close to the Government answer. As with above, go investigate for yourself instead of simply denying information. As mentioned previously, nobody is passing blame. They want to know what really happened so that they can make buildings without catastrophic failures. You instigating "conspiracy crap" is all in your mind.

      I work with hundreds of Engineers and Architects every day, it was some of those guys that showed me the movement and requests to have the Government re-open the case.

      I stated no BS, I stated what is real. There are so many photos' available, there is no point in me giving you links. The data is free, and simply requires a search in Google images.

      You deny facts, invent statements, and attack ad hominem while admitting to go look at nothing. Are you by chance paid to spread propaganda? I do feel my question is very valid considering your responses.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    5. Re:Is he, or are you? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      What I stated regarding physics is exactly true.

      You've made it extremely clear that you are not considering even the most simple physics involved - for example:

      There is 1 image of an engine rotor, however the rotor is way to small to be that of a 757's engine

      Consider a turbine rotor spinning at several tens of thousands of revolutions per second. Now consider what happens to it when you stop it spinning by running it into a concrete wall at several hundred knots.
      Obviously you did not spend any time at all thinking about it and only thought of photos you've seen of low speed landing crash landings or something. It's that sort of lack of consideration before posting bullshit as if you are utterly certain that separates yourself from the dimmest student that has managed to complete a single semester of a course that will eventually enable them to legitimately claim the title you put on your posts. That's why your moon landing conspiracy scale bullshit pisses me off more then if it was by another MSCE that doesn't try to pretend their multi-choice test in GUI interfaces gives them some sort of qualification relating to aircraft.

    6. Re:Is he, or are you? by s.petry · · Score: 1

      You are intertwining two separate subjects, which until now you kept separate. The WTC collapse is what the Engineers are questioning and want re-opened. The physics for how the Government claims the towers collapsed is what is in question by Architects and Engineers. The physics given by the Government auditors simply do not work, and can not work.

      For the crashes, you are still falling in to the same trap I pointed out before. A rotor for an engine does not shrink by 33% (roughly) during a collision. I would agree that a lot of physics are involved that would make parts and pieces end up scattered for a hefty distance. What's important to note is that in the collision area of the Pentagon, there were no wing marks in the building. There was only a few parts found for a much smaller jet engine than a 757 has. Is it something that was perhaps a model inside the building that ended up outside? Sure, it's possible. Even considering that was true, there are 4 757 engines missing from the crash site, in addition to other debris we see in every other commercial airline crash in history being missing. It's not logical, and makes no sense. I mentioned before that you need to establish comparisons to every other crash in history. Are you insisting that every other crash in history was a low speed crash? That is not a rational assumption, facts regarding all commercial crashes are readily available.

      You claim I'm posting bullshit, yet you deny facts exist. Then you inject motives when none was provided, and your insistence that one is being presented is rather pathetic as well as illogical. People simply want the facts.

      To be rather blunt: Anyone that involved in Engineering (as you are pretending to be), understands the importance of establishing facts. You deny that facts exist, and refuse to go look. You tell me to believe what memory would serve from 11 years ago on TV as opposed to establishing facts. You are not in Engineering, you are not being Scientific, you are purely spreading propaganda. You are bullshitting people, not I.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

  35. Religion is a conspiracy theory too...right? by elucido · · Score: 1

    That smacks of Illuminati conspiracy theories. The Internet is a complete cesspool of half baked conspiracy theories that the mentally stressed or ill should not be exposed to. Information overload.

    The military really needs to deprogram these guys and integrate them back into the population. I would propose a type of "Combat Engineering" program, to shift these guys into some good paying, hard working jobs back home, via prepping them for things like road construction. We need to rework the infrastructure, unless we are just going to let the country fall into a vast wasteland. I present to you the concept of a Trans Americas Highway system, to tie the entire continents of North and South America together. A big project, but very handy for developing this part of the world. It's what advanced civilizations do.

    That or something like it, to burn off a decade of war stress, by building something. Let's build it here, fuck them. They need to build something.

    Beliefs don't translate into actions. Believing in God could be considered a conspiracy theory so why don't we treat all believers in God as mentally ill?

  36. Christians are sanctioned conspiracy theorists. by elucido · · Score: 1

    Belief in God based around conspiracy theories. Yet somehow it's okay to be Christian and a marine and not be classified as having some mental disease. Why? If you believe in anything you can't see with your 5 senses then you're no different in your schizophrenia than the guy who believes Bush is an alien or Obama is the antichrist.

    Can anyone tell me why some conspiracy theories are sanctioned and others are banned?

    1. Re:Christians are sanctioned conspiracy theorists. by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      Tribes accept memes, but when they're incredible (root word: cred), the tribe doesn't accept them. There are as many conspiracy theories as opinions, meaning a myriad of them. Some people are pathological liars and try to pass of their theories as fact, or sew enough seemingly truthful things together so as to build a case.

      As correlation != causation, facts have to emerge to disprove the meme.

      That said, you'd knock me over with a feather if you told me that Lance Armstrong would lose all seven wins, or that Apple could convince a jury of its patents' worthiness and application to the litigation with Samsung. If you then implied that Lance Armstrong was an alien, and was in cahoots with Bob Dole over ED meds, I'd start to wonder, as its when there are two people doing something, it becomes a conspiracy rather than a tuple of data regarding an individual to decide the merits of.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    2. Re:Christians are sanctioned conspiracy theorists. by elucido · · Score: 1

      Tribes accept memes, but when they're incredible (root word: cred), the tribe doesn't accept them. There are as many conspiracy theories as opinions, meaning a myriad of them. Some people are pathological liars and try to pass of their theories as fact, or sew enough seemingly truthful things together so as to build a case.

      As correlation != causation, facts have to emerge to disprove the meme.

      That said, you'd knock me over with a feather if you told me that Lance Armstrong would lose all seven wins, or that Apple could convince a jury of its patents' worthiness and application to the litigation with Samsung. If you then implied that Lance Armstrong was an alien, and was in cahoots with Bob Dole over ED meds, I'd start to wonder, as its when there are two people doing something, it becomes a conspiracy rather than a tuple of data regarding an individual to decide the merits of.

      If enough people believe in Aliens then it becomes credible just like God is credible to adults as Santa, the cookie monster or the tooth fairy was credible to children. A lot of things seem credible but credibility doesn't really mean very much because it's determined by the status quo. The tribe? You never defined what the tribe is.

  37. If you believe in God, are you mentally ill? by elucido · · Score: 1

    Can you prove God exists without a conspiracy theory?
    If you believe in God, an atheist logically could conclude you have schizophrenia.

  38. Christians calling the atheists "crazy"... by elucido · · Score: 1

    When it should be the reverse.If you're an atheist then you shouldn't believe in any conspiracy theory government sanctioned or not.

    So why haven't we detained every religious marine in America? Why that marine? A lot of marines believe in God, Allah, etc. Who decides if a belief is crazy or not? The government? The government of Christians?

  39. Psychiatry is similar to the inquisition. by elucido · · Score: 1

    They want to tell people the acceptable modes of thinking and acceptable belief systems and label the free thinkers with schizophrenia for not thinking about things in the standard way.

    How is this different than the church labeling people for not believing in the proper interpretation of the scripture?

  40. voting for people who believe in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Magic underwear and other bat shit crazy people might just be the cause of this.

  41. Where did by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You all get the idea he is an ex-Marine?

    Former Marine is the proper designation for those who have honorably served, regardless of what you may think of his current situation. And you all wonder why alot of Combat arms types distrust the geeks.

  42. He needs help. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah I know this guy.. His family isn't ANYTHING like this at all, and he wasn't raised to believe any of it. He IS mentally ill and does need help.

  43. Sorry, it's just you by dbIII · · Score: 1

    Sorry - you are a petty little computer dweeb that likes the sound of the name "engineer", has decided to take on the title without earning it, and then uses it to pretend you know things way beyond your field despite demonstrating obvious mistakes a first year student would be embarrassed about (shrink by 33%? It hit a fucking wall at cruising speed under power!).
    You've decided to start a childish penis measurement contest without understanding that you are a pygmy sitting in cold water in the middle of a vast herd of horny bull elephants.
    First understand that plane crashes involve speeds vastly faster than car crashes, and that planes are more fragile, and then take another look at your conspiracy theory. You will find it is a pile of shit inspired by magical thinking and the childish notion that the only thing that can give the US government trouble is the US government.

    1. Re:Sorry, it's just you by s.petry · · Score: 1

      Ooooh, a person claiming to work with Engineers can call names. I'm so intimidated and belittled by you. And you can read and comprehend so well.. wow, maybe I should go pee myself or something now? Oh, sorry I won't do that

      First understand that plane crashes involve speeds vastly faster than car crashes, and that planes are more fragile

      Hello Captain Obvious! I stated "Compare these crashes to ever other commercial air line crash in history" which would include of all things.. other air planes traveling at different speeds. I never mentioned a car, or a boat, or a jet fighter, or a moon lander, or anything else you wish to invent. So you are not just a propagandist, you are partially illiterate?

      , and then take another look at your conspiracy theory.

      YOU are the only one that mentioned a conspiracy theory at all in any response. I said "People want facts" very clearly. You deny facts, and invent bullshit to cover up that statement.

      It's rather sad, yet comical, that you call me names and try to belittle me.. and for what? To prevent you from looking for facts? or other people from looking for facts? If it's you, who cares? Shut up and live in your cave. If it's others, then shame on you for keeping people chained in the cave.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    2. Re:Sorry, it's just you by dbIII · · Score: 1

      YOU are the only one that mentioned a conspiracy theory at all in any response

      So a fake aircrash into the Pentagon and a huge cover up, if it was real, would not require a huge conspiracy? It seems to tick every box to me.
      Also it's rather pathetic that some MSCE who boasts about their fake title on a social media site (is your life really so empty?) is going around telling professional engineers "You are not in Engineering"? How would you even know? Your expectation of intact turbine rotors implies you haven't even applied very simple high school physics and a rough estimate to the situation and are just going in blind with your tasteless conspiracy theory.
      I belittle you because you are tarnishing my own reputation by claiming a title I have earned and you have obviously not and sticking it under a description of an utterly sickening delusion. You are leading the gullible astray because your false title is giving the impression you are not just pouring sewerage onto the internet.
      Just get off your arse and hike to an old crash site to cure yourself of the delusion that you've got from Hollywood or somewhere about aircraft hitting concrete walls at close to their maximum speed and remaining mostly intact. Even 1940s era wrecks that came down at speed are spread over a lot of landscape in little pieces.

    3. Re:Sorry, it's just you by s.petry · · Score: 1

      You, not I, tarnish the reputation of Engineers and Architects. You change the subject often, invent statements, and choose to ignore facts. As stated previously, you are doing so to either spread propaganda or protect your beliefs. Since your posts remind me of a child having a tantrum, I'm guessing it's the latter.

      I am not a MSCE contrary to you insisting such nonsense. I won't even begin to mention what my credentials are because you insist that facts do not exist, that people should not investigate facts, and that decade old TV is the only truth you want or that anyone should use. You have repeatedly stated that anyone looking at facts is just a conspiracy person, and everyone should trust their memory from TV over a decade ago to find facts. It takes a very sad person, to dismiss facts as you have. You don't deserve to know my credentials since you show that you completely lack credibility and logical thought.

      As mentioned earlier, it would not take a conspiracy that most people consider. How about a more valid way of explaining the problem, such as I earlier mentioned? There are some things that should be explained in all 4 of the major events of 9/11. Why on Earth would people start looking? This is a normal critical thinking step called correlation. If there are issues with answers given regarding WTC perhaps there are issues with more of the events. I notice that you dropped the WTC questions and just went with something that hurts your beliefs even more. A true champion for the propaganda!

      I have no idea whether you are spreading propaganda to convince others not to look, or simply as a protection of your weak belief system. Investigating facts would challenge your beliefs, and that's rather traumatic to the mind. Go talk to a friend in the psychological field, they will tell you that same exact thing.. which is another proven fact (which you will probably ignore).

      During my time in the Military I had to visit several crash sites. These were of course not civilian crashes, but military air craft. I have seen dead bodies in the wrecks, and in the case of a fighter crash just bits of bodies. I have also seen how jet engine parts stay remarkably solid even after a mid air collision between two F16's flying at over Mach 1.2. I have some real life experience to back a perspective, however I rely more on facts regarding other crashes with civilian jets since there is a massive difference between how Military and Civilian air craft are constructed. I won't rely on a propeller plane from the 1940's to determine how jet engines react in a crash however, doing so is foolish. What is interesting though, and perhaps will help you connect dots is your statement "over a lot of landscape in little pieces". Go look at images of both the Pentagon and Penn crash and look for pieces.. you won't find enough pieces to make up a Lear jet, let alone a 747. No body parts, no clothing, no luggage broken open.

      Science requires facts, not opinion and belief. I never stated that the whole jet would remain in tact so stop inventing bullshit to back your weak beliefs or to spread propaganda. Many engine components would remain in tact, or at least mostly in tact. But of course that logic is beyond your belief system, so you will invent more bullshit to counter instead of ever going to look for a single fact. You ignore the fact that the single rotor photographed was absolutely in tact, even if it was 1/3rd the diameter of a 757 engine rotor.

      In fact the only thing you have to tell you it's a civilian jet crash is someones word. Do I blindly trust the word of companies that have been caught fabricating and editing "news", and were sued up to the US Supreme court which ruled "News is Entertainment so they don't have to tell the truth, and can modify and fabricate information at will"? The answer to that is simply "Nope, not a chance in hell". I'm betting that you will deny any court cases ever existed just like you ignore other plain and open facts. That one really hurts

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    4. Re:Sorry, it's just you by dbIII · · Score: 1

      The facts do not fit your conspiracy theory. Both of us know that your " every other commercial airline crash in history" bullshit is a lie since it's obvious you've thrown that up as an appeal to authority without having a clue about even a single crash. It's a disgusting tactic to say the facts back you up when you have no idea at all what the fact are and are simply trying to bully your way past the ignorant and force those that are not ignorant to do the work you are too lazy you to do yourself.
      As for your anecdote, concrete walls are somewhat more solid and less forgiving than another fragile aircraft. Go to the school you claim you've attended and learn something or stop pretending to be an expert on stuff you have less of a clue than a high schooler about.
      This "911 is an inside job" bullshit is an insult to a lot of dead people. I'm not "spreading propaganda", just pulling you up on your "evidence" which is utter bullshit that relies on ignoring actual evidence. One thing that is annoying is you are accusing me of your own deliberate ignorance. I suggest you take your own advice above about your delusion.

    5. Re:Sorry, it's just you by s.petry · · Score: 1

      Oh, it's so easy for you to call BS but did you bother to even look at how easy facts are to find? Here you go, now go pound sand up your lazy propagandist asshole. If you are still confused, from that data you can readily find photos (where they exist)as well as details surrounding the crashes. Such as air speeds, altitudes, etc.. Such as TWA Flight 260 which has images here.

      I never claimed "911 is an inside job" as you once again inject as an appeal to emotion. Never, not one time. I stated that there are facts missing and incorrect from all 4 events on 9/11 that people are asking to have resolved. Go back and read what I wrote, and stop injecting _your_ fantasies in to what I wrote. You can go back and read them as often as you like, never did I claim what you state.

      Next you will probably claim I was somehow able to edit my posts right? Your delusion has been thus far rather obvious.

      Your whole last paragraph is a series of appeals to emotion. You learned them from TV didn't you? My guess is, that you still have not checked 1 thing for yourself. Nope, not 1. Even knowing TV tells lies you insist it can't lie. You don't see the appeal to emotion that "This "911 is an inside job" bullshit is an insult to a lot of dead people." is? If you don't, then you are absolutely blind. Come on now, it's not even a good fallacy. This is Google search easy to determine as fallacy.

      Yeah, I'm sure you were pulling me up on evidence. Now you have 2 samples. Were you really just being lazy? Will you go look now? I'm guessing you won't, you will have more reasons why anyone asking for _facts_ should not do so. "Those fact seekers are just crazy conspiracy nut jobs, the TV said so!"

      Oh, and from that sample gallery I provided you can see how much of a plane survives a crash. Wholly shit, that plane crashed in to a mountain which is at least as hard as a building. It was last seen in a high speed climb, which for that model of Air plane is roughly 300 Mph. Even prop engines are pretty damn solid, and that is proven by of all things.. science. And before you claim something stupid the answer is "NO! Another 100-150 Mhp will not magically make titanium alloy vanish. Various parts may separate, but the core parts are built to withstand explosions. You do know how jet engines work right? You do realize that the conversion of fuel to energy is a controlled explosion right? Hell, you will probably deny that too.. Or you will claim it was a tree that kept everything from the motors in tact, ignoring the fact that about 50 feet of 757 would have absorbed impact prior to the engines of a 757 hitting a wall. You will only claim knowledge of physics if it suits your fantasy world right?

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    6. Re:Sorry, it's just you by dbIII · · Score: 1

      You do realize that the conversion of fuel to energy is a controlled explosion right

      Of course I deny it because that's completely fucking wrong. You stupid comment is the same as saving a normal fire is a controlled explosion.
      Why do you think pissing on the grave of the 911 dead while wearing a big unearned T-shirt that says "engineer" is not going to upset recognised professional engineers that are getting their names dragged through mud by association?
      There's so much bullshit in your post that makes it obvious it's made up - 757 airframes made entirely out of titanium? That would be one expensive aircraft. The front of the aircraft absorbing all the impact? See my note about it not being a low speed car crash above for comparison.
      You really are highlighting the difference between an IT technician with little curiousity outside of their feild and even a first year engineering student in their first week - yet you put that title on every post you have and rub it in our faces like a diseased scrotum.


      Since you're upset that I think you are pushing the inside job line, then WTF are you pushing? If it isn't that conspiracy but a different one that involves a faked plane crash then what the hell are you trying to say?

    7. Re:Sorry, it's just you by s.petry · · Score: 1

      A jet motor is not the same as a normal fire, or people's houses would not be able to have a fireplace. I also did not say "explosion", I stated "controlled explosion". The difference to anyone with even a primitive knowledge of Physics would understand the difference.

      What I am publishing is rational thinking, which was based on a response to a post which stated very similar to you "Anyone looking at facts is mentally ill". What you both are doing is called either 1) propaganda (in an attempt to manipulate people) or 2) Expressing a personal delusion.

      There was absolutely no BS in any of my posts, contrary to your repeated instance at such. You simply deny facts, and claim that someone looking at facts is wrong to look. Why? You refute every fact I gave, from your first reply to me. If you had no interest in items 1. or 2. above, you would have A) kept quiet or B) checked facts. Instead, you went with the option not even listed, which was to display a child like tantrum, name call, and deny reality. You continue to modify facts to suit your delusional belief that nobody should look for facts, as you clearly demonstrate by modifying my statement regarding the metallurgy of Engines to be the metallurgy of the shell of an air craft. Stop and look at your irrational thinking! It's blatantly obvious, and extremely severe (To the point where I suggest perhaps it's time to visit a Psychologist and begin medication).

      You continue with the fallacy of "it offends dead people to investigate" after I pointed out that it's a fallacy. As with my previous mention, I believe that this is strictly to protect your delusion. This would be fine by itself if you just denied everything and kept quiet, but you continue to deny all facts and attack someone pointing out facts.

      Let me share an anecdote from a book called "Plato and a Platypus Walk in to a bar" by Thomas Cathcart and Daniel Klein. I'd strongly suggest that you read the book for a brief introduction to Philosophy. Page 33 (Logic).

      Two men are making breakfast. As one is buttering the toast, he says "Did you ever notice that if you drop a piece of toast, it always lands butter side down?"

      The second guy says "No, I bet it just seems that way because it's so unpleasant to clean up the mess when it lands butter side down. I bet it lands butter side up just as often."

      The first guy says "Oh, yeah? Watch this." He drops the toast to the floor, where it lands butter side up.

      The second guy says "See, I told you".

      The first guy says, "Oh, I see what happened. I buttered the wrong side!"

      That anecdote shows exactly what you are doing. You will most likely refuse to believe that just like you have repeatedly modified statements so suite your needs and refuted plain, clear, and easy to verify facts.

      Seriously consider seeking professional help. I have pointed out repeatedly that you are not thinking rationally or critically. Your repeated answer has been to attack ad hominem, deny facts exist, and claim that everyone should share your belief system over verifiable facts. This level of delusion is rather worrisome, and the ad hominem attacks demonstrate that you could easily resort to violence in order to protect your delusion.

      Considering your rather abusive tone, I think I have done very well in maintaining my composure in responses. My portion of this conversation is now concluded however, since there is no possible way to have an intelligent discussion with a person with the level of delusion you are displaying. Have a nice life, and I do hope you try and get better.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    8. Re:Sorry, it's just you by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Well, you've built a nice little strawman there cold little pygmy, but the reality is you are calling me delusional for questioning your fake plane crash fantasy.
      Let's explore some implications of your fantasy. If the crash was faked, what happened to the real plane and more importantly to the crew and passengers? Were they taken out and shot then hidden in a mass grave? Which branch of the services are you going to call traitors to all the ideals of America for doing such a thing or some other method of killing innocent citizens?
      It really is disgusting filth that you are trying to shove down our throats with the assistance of pretending to have more authority than you have earned.

  44. Where is there a fact above? by dbIII · · Score: 1

    Hang on - where is a single fact in any of the rubbish you've smeared all over this website? You only have assertions, some of which are utter bullshit pulled from tour lack of understanding (controlled explosion, titanium airframe etc). You've written something about a photo of a turbine but just expect me to take your word for it. You've called up the spirit of physics like some magical incantation but not what law of physics is supposed to demonstrate that your point of view is correct. Did you learn this tactic from talk radio or something - the ignorant claiming the facts are behind them but lying through their teeth about it.
    Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence and you've provided nothing but petty bullying designed to cow the ignorant to back up your claim of a faked plane crash at the pentagon. WTF are these turbine photos you claim are proof anyway? Do you even understand what the part is, what is does (in general terms, I don't expect specifics) and what size it should be? Do you understand that they are very strong and brittle and typically shatter almost like glass on impact? Obviously not, since you've never taken that first year general materials science subject that all engineering students in all fields everywhere have to take so they can get some background to design stuff in whatever field they end up in.

    1. Re:Where is there a fact above? by s.petry · · Score: 1

      Guess what Mister delusional? I am a Veteran, and I never laid claim to blame in any post. I stated that the events required explanations since what we were told is not correct based on observational facts (which are simple to verify). You are the person that has repeatedly injected motives and blame. Re-read every post I made, and not one time will you find that I assigned blame to anyone.

      Let me be perfectly candid: If the truth is that a pilot was ordered to shoot the plane down, I'm okay with that. We were not told they were shot down, we were told that they impacted and were destroyed. Either way, the reason "why" is secondary to noticing something called "facts" which clearly show that the given explanations do not work.

      Ever wonder why are over 20,000 Engineers and Architects asking about the 9/11 events? In reality the motive does not make as much difference as making sure there is no impact to current and future architecture and Engineering. You probably will not even consider it rational to look. Hell in your own words 'those people are just crazy and dishonoring dead people' right? Because that's what you have been brainwashed in to believing. You can go read their thoughts at ae911truth.org, but probably won't because Fox News said it's bad.

      Ever wonder why many Veterans are asking questions regarding all 9/11 events? If you have a rational thought in your head, the correlation with the logic for ae911truth would be obvious. I doubt you will get the logic any more than you would look in to a fact yourself. It's much easier to listen to TV and call anyone looking for answers names. Get help man, you are in pretty bad shape.

      No more discussion, you are a horribly delusional person. Contrary to one of your previous statements, there is no straw man argument in that statement. If you were rational you would simply re-read this discussion and recognize it for yourself. Of course you believe your delusion to the point of ignoring facts, and using blatant and repeated fallacy to argue your opinion over facts. Even when something is pointed out as fallacy, you re-use the same argument over and over. Perhaps you should read up on what a fallacy is.

      I still don't discount that you are a person paid for propaganda. If that's the case, you are poor at the job and should find a new line of work.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.